<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/items/browse?collection=2&amp;output=omeka-xml&amp;sort_field=added" accessDate="2026-06-07T23:00:20+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>100</perPage>
      <totalResults>68</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="224" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="13">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/538bdc6ba0530077be0ac863533401f5.pdf</src>
        <authentication>74bce06bc6e20def0793fd89b0e7d725</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100641">
                    <text>3mm mam mum mm nwrxrmuox
arm:

ML.

WW4;

or

A

0A3:

MA
Mb.
(ﬁrm)

g;

(\Mmc

~39:qu

QNUULJ».6§~UJ\MA1 4%

(0.2.1:? #:g

Afod.

I751:

Viz/b.

wk.

316%
3.17/‘3.

�1.

sustained by patients during hospitalisations'
in mental institutions may cause disease of the nervous systemunrelated to the original illness. The trauma may be disregarded
and the resulting complications may be interpreted as further
progression of the original mental illness, thereby thwarting
possible definitive therapy. This is most apt to occur in
patients with organic psychoses. For this reason it is felt that
a report of a case of subdural heaatcna developing during
hospitalization in a patient with organic psychosis will be of
Head trauma

interest.

‘

fiftyoeight year old white feaale a nurse was
admitted to Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital because of aental and
personality changes. Four to five years previously the patient
began to aislay objects and complained of occasional headaches.
During the next two years it was noted that she would repeat
herself in conversation, did not play bridge as often as before
and complained of a constant feeling of fatigue. One and a half
adaission
to
a marked change in her behavior occurred.
years prior
She had difficulty in asking decisions, became caliess in her
dress, nislaid objects more frequently and exhibited stereotyped
HISTGRY:

A

aoveaents (rubbing hands together, crossing legs) when excited.
During the subsequent months she became ”confused" and incontinent.
Prior to her illness the patient was a nurse doing
private duty and was described as an excellent worker. She was.
a happy individual with a pleasant and sociable disposition and
had had zany friends. She had been an excellent bridge player,
winning aany prises.

�2.

pressure was 95/60, pulse 88, temperature 98,
respirations 18. General physical examination was negative.
The patient was well nourished and alert. neurological
examination disclosed her to be aphasic and apraetio. There
were disturbances in body scheme, a left hononyuous visual field
defect was present bu t the remaining cranial nerve functions
were intact. There was no ataxia or inooordination. hotor power
was noraal. The deep tendon reflexes were active and equal
bilaterally and the plantar responses were normal. There was a
left henisensory defect to pinpriek and touch.
gegggégggz; hunter puncture disclosed clear, colorless fluid under
an initial pressure of lho an. containing 5 lymphocytes and a
total protein of 62 ng.%. The Hassernann and colloidal gold
reactions were negative. X~rays of the skull and chest were
negative. in electroencephalogram was diffusely abnormal containing
a prevalence of slow activity maximal in the temporal and
posterior parietal regions bilaterally.
GOURSIa' The differential diagnosis was that of presenile
and
cerebral neoplasm. A
degenerative disease of the brain
pneuaoeneephalograa revealed generalised dilatation of the
ventricular system without displacement or distortion. The
cortical aarkings were increased bilaterally.
The patient was kept in the hospital for further study
of her mental and sensory defects. On at least one occasion
during this period bruises were noted overthe patient's head and
fees. these were thought to be sustained tron falls or from
busping into objects on the ward. The patient remained alert
and no new neurological signs developed. Approximately three
EIAIIIAEIOK: Blood

‘

'

�months after admission the patient gradually became lethargic
and exhibited rhythmic myoclonio movements, frequent in the

corner of the mouth and the left upper extremity and
occasional in the right upper extremity. A left hemiperosia developed
end the patient became etuporoue. Lumbar puncture diacloeed
clear, oolorleee fluid under an initial preeeure or 200 mm. and
containing 3 white blood cells. Loft temporal and right
A
hugh oubdurel henntoma
were
performed.
trephinationo
perietal
was found on the right eide. It contained dark red, liquid blood.
There we: no definite aotive bleeding. The outer membrane one
very thin and the inner nenbrene wee inoonepiououe. The right
hemisphere wee nerkedly compreeeed and failed to re-expend after
evacuation of the hlnmtona. 0n the left side there were two
eubdurel membranes about 3~5 mm. apart and oontaining a small
amount or yellowish fluid between then. There wee no blood. A
cerebral biopsy wee teken.fron the left parietal lobe by introducing
a glaee euotion tube for a distance of one inch at a right angle
to the eurteoe of the cortexand eepirating a specimen.
Following operation the patient became more alert but
the apheeie and the disturbance in body scheme were more marked

left

and epeeoh was

unintelligible.

The myoolonie movements

diaeppeered and the left henipareeie improved. Seventeen days
efter operation a pneunoencephelogran showed dilated lateral
ventricle: more marked on the left side. The enterior and
poeterior horns were aeynaetrioal and slightly diapleoed to the
left. The patient died eight days later. An autopsy was not
obtained.
hieroaeopio examination of the cerebral biopsy at the

�shoved numerous

senile plaques and
time or trephinstion
Alzheimer cells, oomputible with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's
diseaoe.
signs of progreooive diocese of the cerebral
hemisphere: which this patient developed during the latter part
of hospitalization were initially interpreted as the end stage
of an organic psychoaia. In view of the head traumn sustained
exclude
done
subdurel henntonn
ward
was
the
on
trephination
to
although this diagnosis was considered improbable. That the
subdurel'hanntonntn were of recent origin.end yore not present
before hospitalization is demonstrated by the following observations:
1) s pneuloenoophnlogrsn prior to the progression or neurological
ventriculnr
showed
system without
a symmetrically dilated
signs
'diaplaoinent or distortion and increased cortical markings
nontranen
the
of the hematonats were very thin.
2)
bilsterdlly;
Patients with organic ptyohosie in nentsl hospitals
are psrtioulerly prone to head trauma which may initiate subdursl
hemntamn; Progressive usurologioal signs in such patients should
be evaluated with this oonsiderstion in mind.
The

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2234">
                <text>Subdural hematoma developing during hospitalization. Arch. Neurol Psychiatry. 1951 Aug; 66(2): 230-1</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2235">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2236">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-1-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2237">
                <text>1950</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2238">
                <text>Green, Martin; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2239">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2240">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2241">
                <text>[Preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2242">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2243">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74426">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80987">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87548">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94109">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="225" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="14">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/35b321c800690bb601799adad174ab44.pdf</src>
        <authentication>460a6759754060bc775314593ce1e71c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100642">
                    <text>I
‘

Table I

30 Discharge Ratings of Improvement:
Ratings of imw
provement at the three hOSpitals varied in format and detail» The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep~
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)o For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other

institutions,

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
1»

The

Sociopsychological Variables

distribution of the variables of social class, age,

education and California F Scale score
is presented in Table III.

Table

III

among the

three institutions

.

a) Social Class: The anticipated difference in social
class composition of the three institutions was observed, At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age distribution

in the institutional populationso

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2244">
                <text>Subdural hematoma developing during hospitalization, Am J Psychiatry. 1950;107(5):381-3.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2245">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2246">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-1a-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2247">
                <text>1950</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2248">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2249">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2250">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2251">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2252">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2253">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74427">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80988">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87549">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94110">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="226" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="15">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/348b7ac617e184efef2c6c30c847fca6.pdf</src>
        <authentication>36100719e5c813fdabfca556caa0ba68</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100643">
                    <text>Reprinted from
TRANSACTIONS OF THE
AMERICAN NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

1950

PATTERNS IN PERCEPTION ON SIMULTANEOUS TESTS OF
FACE AND HAND
MORRIS B. BENDER
MAX FINK
AND

MARTIN GREEN
NEW YORK

In previous studies we found that the method of double simultaneous
stimulation showed defects in sensation (extinction) which were not apparent on routine single stimulation. In testing two different regions of the
body and various combinations it was found that extinction was apt to
occur most often in the hand and least in the face. Conversely, “dominance”
was greatest in the face and least in the hand. In the present communication we wish to report the results obtained on simultaneous stimulation of
the face and the hand (the face-hand test) in groups of subjects with the
following conditions: 1) aphasia without hemiparesis or hemisensory syndrome; 2) aphasia with severe mental changes; 3) organic mental syn—
drome; 4) schizophrenia; 5) no disease of the brain (normal adults) and
6) normal children between the ages of four to ten years. Patients in groups
2 and 3 showed severe memory defects, confusion, poor orientation, difﬁculties in calculation and other symptoms characteristic of diffuse disease
of the brain.
Method: The subject was instructed to close his eyes. When this was
done his face (cheek) and contralateral hand (any part of the hand or
ﬁngers) were touched Simultaneously. Care was taken to make the two
stimulations of equal intensity. As soon as the stimuli were applied the
subject was asked to report what he felt, and following this, where he felt
the sensation. Identical tests were carried out with light rubbing and pin

prick stimulations.
Results: Under these conditions the subject gave either of the following
responses on the ﬁrst examination: a) a touch on the face only (face
dominance), implying no Sensation in the hand (extinction) ; b) a touch on
both sides of the face (there being “displacement” from the hand to the
ipsilateral face) ; or c) a touch on the face and contralateral hand. In the
(a) response the subject was asked whether he felt still another stimulus.
The reply was either in the negative, or there was uncertainty or vague
approximation. This question suggested to the subject that there were two
stimulations so that on subsequent tests he was expectant of more than
one stimulus.
In the (b) type of response the subject mislocalized or displaced the
sensation evoked in the hand toward the ipsilateral face. Since the mislocalization was towards the face it appeared as if the face determined the direc250

�251

Perception

in
al.——Patterns
Bender, et

of
type
a
this
was
that
therefore,
said,
be
might
It
than
tion of the displacement.
common
less
was
displacement,
or
(b),
Response
dominance.
face
the
patients
in
often
most
seen
was
(b)
Response
extinction.
or
(a)
testing.
response
repeated
despite
persisted
and
with the organic mental syndrome,
comment.
special
needs
no
and
normal
expected
the
was
face
The (c) response
ipsilateral
the
when
noted
werealso
Extinction and displacement
including
tested,
subjects
the
all
In
tested.
sides
and hand were simultaneously
left
and
right
the
between
difference
no
was
there
aphasia,
with
those
-

'

of the body.

the
in
shown
is
various
groups
the
in
obtained
results
Analysis of the

following table:

Hand

;/,’//

Group

Face Response
Extinction or
Displacement

Number of
Subjects

2

‘4

22
20

5

53

'

3

20

.

0

14

24

,

19

‘

0

6

20

'

Response

_

9
12

15
12

1

Face and Head
Response

‘

2
6
28
0

'

‘

-

0
0
0

.

j

.

l

l

of
is
dominance
there
whenever
that
obvious
is
it;
foregoing
the
From.
the
hand
in
Dominance
face.
the
in
is
it
apparent
another
over
sensation
the
in
one
"uniformly
almost
found
was
dominance
Face
once.
notedonly
did
was
patients
These
2
and
3)..
(groups
changes
mentalwithsevere
in.

_

subjects
few
a
In
repeated'testing.
after
hand
even
the
not report sensation in
were
or
stimuli,
two
were
there
told
the
were
patients
after
even
stances,
percept
one
only
reported
they
stimuli,
of
the
of
asked to watch the application
sides
both
of
stimulation
simultaneous
cases
Inthese
one.
displaced
these
that
or
objection
the
excluding
thus
correctly,
the face was reported
once.
things
at
_.
two
perceive
do
or
able
to
not
were
those
in
and
patients
with
aphasia
subjects
in
dominance
face
of
The'incidence,
in
..
patients
1 and 4) was less. In contrastto
with schizophrenia (groups
correctly
sensations
both
1
4
reported
and
in
those
groups
2» and 3,
the
hrst
groups
done
not
had
soon
if
they
trials,
fourth
third
or
second,
the
domiface
on
of.
incidence
the
5)
adults
(group
normal
of
the
In
group
the
trial.
on
found
only
it
was
though
even
signiﬁcant,
still
but
least,
dominance
nance was
face
of
incidence
the.
children
normal
of
series
In
trial.
a
dominance
ﬁrst
face
children
3.
In
2
and
young
in
groups
as
the
same
almost
was
examination.
ﬁrst
the
after
trials
several
tested
was present even
hand
were
the
than
other
body
of
the
When theface and parts
The
apparent.
still
was
dominance
face
3,
2
and
in" groups
calf,
simultaneously
thigh,
penis,
(breast),
trunk
shoulder,
face,
was
dominance
order of
hand.
and
foot, arm
.

.

_

�252

Weights
(IL—Discrimination
of
Bender, et
CONCLUSION

In a wide variety of subjects the phenomena of extinction and displace-

consistent
A
demonstrated.
stimulation
simultaneous
were
ment on double
dominant
most
face
the
which
in
was
established
of
pattern perception was
and
abnormal
the
in
both
noted
These
ﬁndings were
and the hand the least.
the normal subjects. In the abnormal subjects with severe mental changes,
be
that
consistent
they
may
extinction
were so
face dominance and hand
used as a sign of diffuse disease of the brain, but only when found to persist
after repeated examinations.
The pattern of dominance, as well as the phenomenon of extinction,
be
to
brain
diffuse
disease,
with
in
appear
patients
which are so prominent
exaggerations of the patterns found in the normal subjects, especially
children.

�um

II mama! 0'
MES 0! I‘M!

w

3mm
my-

A!

Harris 3. Bender, ILD.
Pink, IL».

m

and

lax-tin anon, LB.

of
lumbar
ﬁpi‘fﬁnﬁ
'75;
Buivenity cones. of Mieinc,
555

Sinai

City.
tort
lelpiul, In

m lupin

'

101E
law
c
ﬁy Edi-y,1 and that Haunt
3.11m.

from
the
mum;
grant
a
”starch
by
part)
(in
This work was aided
a.
by
grant
and
part)
(in
service
Public
With
of
math,
Institutes
Inc
York
.
city.
in
Cmbral
of
In
council
his:
Coordinating
the
I‘m

�1.'
Previously it was shown thst exsnihstioh of the cutaneous
uodelitiec by the method or double siuultsneous etisnlstion
elicited defects in perception which were not sppsrent on single
“extinctiont”
”obscuration,”
The
ss
defects,
desctihed
etihhlstion.
"displacement” and "eliesthesis'.were observed in groups of
or
the centrsi nervous
disesse
diffuse
with
localixed
or
patients
systen (1) (a) (3). In esch group the defects in cutaneous per»
most
were
stimulation
double
sismitsneous
obtsined
on
ception
of
the
rhe
fece.
hand
the
sud
object
in
the
lesst
in
appsrent
or
the
was
responses
determine
to
patterns
investigation
present
in nonnsi subjects, sduits and children,to simultaneous stisu1s~
Yarns
"fece~hs.nd”
observe~
head
and
teat
the
face
of
the
tion
tions in this nonnsl group were then cospsred to sole extent with
the responses of pstients with orgshic mental syndrases, sphssis
sud cchisophrenis.
IAEIR£égc

the ”non-s1“ subjects were children and sdulte.

These

there.

subjects were persons attending hcspitsl clinics, in
was no evidence or disesce or the brsin; and school children, start
of
disorder
manifest
who:
no
was
there
sud
in
students,
personnel
been
had
Hone
of
then
previously
system;
the central nervous
exslined by the nethod or double sisultsneous stimulation. the
to
according
sge:
three
into
groups
classified
were
subjects
12
“adults”
end
6
over
end
years.
7
to
3
children or to
it years,
For comparison with the noml goup we studied patients on
'There
were three
Bellevue
wards
of
Psychiatric
the
iospitsl.
the
sod
lo
attempt
sphssis.
psychoses
~
organic
schizophrenia,
group:
whom

�2.
.uno and. to separately study each or the clinionl typo: of
schisophronil. ﬂoat of tho puticntu ours or the paranoza, mixed
or iinplc vurietiel of Iohixophrenin. the patient: uith organic
montnl changes showed doreota 1n nonorw, orient¢t1on and

onloulution, a: wall In other signs and symptom: oharuoteriltio
or dxtruoo dileIIO of tho brain. Tho clinical diagnoael in loot
of,those onuou was Althoincr'n dilt&amp;§c, urtorionolcrotio onoop~
haloputhy, severe oorobrll ordain, brain tumor or toxic ano¢p~
who
with
thou
mm
uphuu.
lubjootl
mommy.
ohnrnotcriltio difficultiob in columnioation. Theta who had a
oonoolitant hmnipnroail or I huuiscnlory aorta? noticeable on
single Itilnlation war. not inorudod in thin Curios.

m

'3th

maroon:

2h: subject val instruotcd to‘olouo tho cyan. When thia
1p3111tcéll
(chock)
and
tho
oontrav
done
or
either
tho-root
it:
our.
hand
ninnltnnooully
on.
(any
hand
digit.)
at
or
part
lateral
touohcd or stroked with tho examiner‘s ringorl. the subject:
whoa
two
sonsntionn;
only one percept
one
or
either
reported
no: reported tho subject was naked 1: than. at: 3:111 unothor,
and 1: no, to indiooto its loontion and quality.
Following the initial trial, in each subject, tho opposite
chuck Ind hand aura stimulatod 1n the 1.80 nunnor. Those tout:
poquepoatod and tho result: reoordod, until tho subject: oon~
who
those
In
both
auhjootl
otinnli
correctly.
nistontly roportod
toiled to localize tho two Itinuli oorruotly otter at: or eight
word
an
touted
t1oo~ttoc,'hand~
body
the
of
0th.:
part:
triala,
room-hand
tho
with
uumung
ma, “mama, penis-hand, em,

tout.

�otinuleé
eerie! ot.stndies pin prick
tions sere used in s sinilsr fsshion.w In both series, cere use
taken to apply the stimuli at the me time and with the em
thst'snhdects
who‘nede consistentt
was
spherent
intensity. It
he
would
correct as soon es the stinuli were
errors in reporting
rsther
thsn sinnltsneoutly, even if the
spplied consecutively
tine leg betseen stinuli was that or one or two nonente. It was
slso necesssry to use neive norssl subjects, since sthects
previously tested did not show the.petterns noted below.

In e second sepsrste

8

ones;

lhe responses obtained on the tnce~hsnd test fell into four
groups: (s) s touch on the face and the hsnd, indicstins the
correct end expected perception; (h) e touch on the fees only,
in
the head; (c) I touch on both sides or
implying no eensstion
the tees: and (d) s touch on the bend only, implying none on the
race. ﬂhen only one stimulus III reported the subject use ssked
if there uss any other sensstion. the oocesionsl reply sue that
there use snother percept, and the sthsct correctly pointed to
the second locus. lhny hdhaects, however, reported thst they hsd
not perceived snother stimulus, neuslly sdding the state-cut: ”In
use not paying sttention - do it seein' or, ”I'm not sure - Isvhe
of
here"
end
somewhere
the
the
was
direction
in
over
pointing
it
side of the body or the poorly felt stimulus. In some instances,
second
while correctly locslising the
percept, they Iinnteered
the ststenent: "It use not es strong es the other one,“ or "It
doesn't seen as sharp.”
Before we proceed with the results we rust define the
connnnicstions
other
the failure or the
need.
In
special terns

�#.

luhjoet to report ohm or two ninnltnnmaunly applied stimuli ha:
of
been called “tbs phhnhnenon
gunnery extinction“ hr ”extinction“
1n
utid
wharu
stinmlu;
tho
poreeived
or
body
the
(1). the part
Ill
uxnultanuhulh
to he "danihnnt” ta the part of thh body where thn
Itinnlun nun net perceived, or parceivcd faintly. the latter
aensatieh
was terncd ”obnouration.'
or
a
the
diminution in
quality
whah tho uuhject ruparted tun nonnatiehn, hut ninloenlilod one or
thun, the "ditplhccncnt' a: a peroapt in .315 to hire oeeurrea (2).
ndsplaccnentu Ir. ununlxy 1n the direction or tht daninnnt
’ntinnxup and as: he puttinl hr eqnpxgte. rhe‘dilplaccucnts nttcd
man»
chock
the
side.
of
hand.to
th1§.ner1gp
tn.
were
:ran.the
in
Rarely did the displscahehts cedar to the hack or thauldor.
tram
the
nthhdpoint
{hm
snalyuod
result;
\Ih1t1h1‘2r1hxs
uqrt
of initial and nuhluqnont
thee¢hnnd test with touch

trilla.

en

Ithhlltion

tn. initill trial

or the

Inhjcetn, taco
deninnnec uuu appurant 1h :11 use granny. 'lhrc_thnn half or such
and
none in thc
race
the
in
the
schnation
udulta
rcported
nonntl
hand. lhrno Cubdoetn ninlaehlisod tho lentation 1n the hand to
thn £160. In thn green: of hon-n1 children 90! under the use of
hand
the
percept
hiuloealizcd
thee
the
or
hereopt
:1: reported only
tha
{teeddhinhnoe
in
a:
also
1:
seen
face.
the
Ibis
pattern
to
children tram 7~12 years of age hat.th a 10:30: extent.
hand
the
adults‘reportod
or the ham-ll suhjaotl, five
indtidl
or
example
dinplaeenont
In
thn
an
trial.
only
Ittnulus
noted.
hand
was
tram race to
by
hand
extinction
or
by
daninanee
face
or
Ill pattern
the
more
apparent
was
tune
even
th
hind
percopt
of.the
dinplncclant
1n nornnl

�in thn patients aznninad. Xt uun.noat evident in patients with
arggnic gantal chanset, 935 or when did not repert bath stimuli
corrnctly. In callinntion. or uchixqphrunio lub:ectn and patinntu
with aphnail runponneu lililnr to thnse of thc annual adult were

observed on tum intill trial.
land doninnnoe was accllionllii seen in the patient and
vital: in tn. net-:1 Iahjpat. In «use. of hand dominance the
race'
not
the
reported
the
but
percent; It was seen
manual
I

in the initial trial

on

m
five different net-11 Malta

..

In

the”

instano§3. tun nubaoct ropnrtod both.ttanu11 carrectiy oh
nubaoauunt tinting. In the patidntt with organic mental changes
hand dauinnnee III In inconntant rtupanto and rcpeated touting the
sale day or on unbloquant dawn danonntrated thy amt! usual
poruiutunt pattern or
dominanco.

""

'

rm

1

stilulttion
,Rolponso on initini
roueh

19ml Adult
lam]. «mm,
low emu.

Totalicorrcot Pace

Only luaowraae land Only

160

77

15

3

5

3-6

564

m

23

18

a

7.12

76

33

27

9

2

7:

26

n5

1

2

syndrome 120

9

9n

n

3

o

o

Schisoyhranin

(“malt-niried)

mute luau:

trill

.

i

Apmu

Submgguont

I

23

Erialla or the

12

83

11

narnti adult.

uh» nude

errata

initial trial, #3 were correct on the uecond and 12 on the
third triul. In a to! sub: '“Vfﬂiaur. five at Ii: trill! var.

the

nucOIsary berare the tun stimuli Into corructly localised.

than.

on

�6.‘
ta be annual, althuugh complete psychologiaal
(tennion
during
that
noted
VII
anxiety
It
the
with
to'ploaae)
interfered
desire
strong
callinltton,er.n
annual
:11
aubaeetl,
In
rncognition
the
of
ntiauli.v
torruct
early
aubjoets ware Inlunnd
tent. wcro.not dune.

the
IIB
correct
once
those
rosponae
with
anxiety,
including
abtn1npd (oven

all

ﬁtter

an
was
iith
elicited
error.)
it
trials
number
warn
or
if
n¢cncd
a
an
tritll
It

many

aubnequont_teut1ns.:
”aét“
axmnlnntion,
the
at
the
into
neoenuary_ror tn. anbaect'ta set
evon
cccurutoly,
trtcr
the
ha
ntinnli
riported
the
once
in
tad
set,
of
any WI;
”9,10.an
in
that
was
apparent
child
annual
wanna
th:
it
In testing
inst canon Inn: tail: war. nocolsnry.h¢£ore the correct rotpanse
was «enlistently elicited. Alta, tan child at. not tlltya
dayu.
many
over
tasting
lopeutcd
tubaugunnt
touting.
an
correct
of
Ibis
tuna
daninlncc,
in:
shin
tbs
patterns
hauever, olicittd
natod in 36 of tho 56 childrtn tottqd, ‘In a number of instances
than
and
reportcd
tho
stimuli
appz1¢nttan
can
o;
Intchcd
en. child
was
thy
But
repeated
an
test
noon
corroetly.
percept1onn
tbs
t;
stimulus.
on.
repertod
child
tho
«my
with tm «you acted.
min
or
“int”
the
tn»
in:
not
into
could
tho
get
ehild
evident
that
It
oxtninntion, even with viaunl anal.
311
In
children.
in
not
wag
apparunt
vary
thin diffieulty
t6
the
76
give
the
failed
17
at
anly
(age:
7-12)
the older group
correct renponse utter th; inititl tau trials.
1.:
at the nae-hand
on
the reports obtained
repeated.
A:
relieved
connintent
s
pattern.
test: in mgr-:1 nubjecta also
tubsocti.
on tbs initial trial, face daninnncc was trivalent in all
or
or‘
obsmatien
(a)
extinction
by
It was: unite,” uthor
"

tr:

m

�8.
or
the
autumn
te
displacement
fees, or
er
me
atmii
”.in aevertl insteneea the displacement we. in a direction tantra
(1)) by

O3

'

em taco.
In contrast to normal adults, patient; with organic mental
change: were unuhie te regert the two stimuli earreetly even
utter many triele. When_the yetient reported the pereept in ane

teet eorreetly, he frequently failed on tubuequent testing; It
was tine Ipperent that touting en subsequent‘daye etiii elicited
in
and
er
stimuli.
extinction
dieeinemt
m: u ntrang
who
made
seldom
unmet:
to
tn error
apparently
subject:
centreet
on subsequent tritiu, day: after the initial examination. the
responses obteined in this group demanetrated the pattern: at tee.
teetfﬂ
deninnnee in meet or the
niepiaeenent of the hind percept
to the tune was frequent. In tame instances dieplneement or
extinctien was preeent deepite the {get that the putiont watched
the applitutiea of the etinnii to the fete and hand. Extinetien
was very taxman en hencieterni or heterologoun teeting while
~

ﬁne
apparent
dilpieoenent

neatly

on heterolegeun

teats.

514;
the
and
nyhneie patient:
the uehisephrenie
reports
gayb
which were «1:111: te normal adulte. After the first tie trial:

the pertentnge of errer in hand sensation was slightly higher
than in the normal greup. reraietent bistrre reepoaeee were
elicited from a number or the schizophrenic Inbdeetl. lheee
reperte ineluﬁed multiple responses to mingle or daubie stimuli,
pereietent displacement: to one area from any other body area,
ineonsittent
verve
end 'mimrreveruls or localiutien.
day:
As
normal
the
to
free
with
an
day
examinetien_and
eating
consecutive
an
the
aphasia
subject
Iehixephrenie
touting
or
idnlt,

M

�days roiled to elicit extinction phenonehe once the
been eccorltely reported before.

test

hen

‘

comparison of the reeponeee or each or theoe groove to
nultiple teeting in chain in fig. 1.
A

ﬁrﬁ
54’”

Pin Phick Btiuuietioh: It in known thet the type or
etinuiue epplied influence: the result: in perception. To
denonetrete the importance or thie rector einiier groups of
subject: were tested ueing two pin prick ineteed or two touch
etilnletione. With pin prick etinnieticn ct tece end hencﬂfece
dominance wee egein uehiteet in all the groupe. however, the
incidence of error in perception of the pin prick in the head
III lower than with e touch etinnloe. Ihe reeulte are recorded
in IhhﬂcIIt
Elna! II

:1

'

aﬁzaiiﬁfmﬁ’ﬁm
lttei
tor-ll

Adult

correct Pace only Feccqrece Hind an}:

68

51

15

2

c

ﬂannel child, 3~6 yearn #5
lorlml Child,7~12 your! 39
50
Schizophrenin

16

26

2

1

25

1h

0

0

36

13

9

1

arsenic lentei syndrome #7

9

33

3

2

Repeated testing with two pine in the nccnﬁi adult subject:
elicited the correct reeponeee in the initiel three trieie. Fever

at the chiloren ﬁgiﬁcd to report the teat eccuroteiy after the
initiel trials. ~It we: poeeibie ih_e hunter or instance: to
alternate touch and pin prick etieuietiohe, end demonstrate extinction
to touch, but correct localization to pin prick. loreover, with

�m.
abre intehae pih prick atianlatieh, extinction and diaplaeeaant
were lean frequently ebaerved.
vzheae phendaena, haaely extinction and diaplaeeaent were
eveh.nbre apparent in the patiehta with erzahie mental ayadreaea.
Bdaplaeeaeht or touch ltd-311 eauld be alternated with oerreet
Idealiaatibn of pin brick atzaulatiah. A ddubihatxon or touch tb
the fade had pin prick te the hand evinced the edubinetibn at
displacement and obaenratioh, an the patient reported “a teach
an the fade, and a dull the en the other aide {or the face).'
Pin prick to the eheak and teach to the hand raaulted 1n extinction
hand
the
pareept; be, oeeaaiehally, the rephrt or a pin prick
of
both an the cheek and hand.
rhe aehizephrenie aubaeete were able to loealiae the pin
prick accurately after the initial ten trials, an had the aerial

mule: .

Blﬂaﬂbazﬂl:
mains the nethbd er dabble ainnltaneoua

atinulatibn in
teuta or the face and the hand a eenaiateht pattern bf reapeneea
baa been observed in a variety hr aubaeota. the atinnlua to the
m.’ 1: non readily perbeived than the one 1:: the me. «never,
the pareept in the race influences the due in the hand,
frequently canning the displacement of aehaatibh. 1h1a pattern a:
reapbhaee haa been repeatedly deaehatrated in bath the annual and
abnormal eubJeeta, and 1a aahireet 1h extinetibn, obaeuratibn and
diablaeeaant. Extinction 1: abet and diaplaeeaeht :- leaet
frequent. In eatinetien, the race pereept 1a correetly reperted aa
te quality and leans, but the hand attanlua 1a not perceived at all;
In all hf the rereading teat: or patient or abrnaz aubJeeta§*uhether
By

�11;

'

tha reaponaaa were aaeurate tr not, it uaa notod that tbs
stiuuius
yointad
to the face
tirat.
aubjaet almost invariably
pattoived
and
1a
ourrectly
hand
perecpt
tha
Octaaianally
iooaliaed, but anamnea a qualitative differonce, always of
diaiﬁntion. In displaeunant tha percent in the hand 1: 113*
such
an
the
or
rage,
tho
it
direttitn
the
face, or
localiscd tn
to tan ahauldor er nuak. In aunt instance: if tha taco cud tho
hand at the lama aid: are stimulated, tho lubaeet occasionally
1a
thaae
phnnancna
of
1n
lane
the
taco.
raporta tut paroapta
ah:
or
these
un1eh
one
with
the
rrtquancy
haphaaard. nail.
varia«
druga,
be
attention,
observed
affected
by
may
erraeta 1:
tion in atilnli, ate., it: pattern 1: eonaiatent.
Thea. raaponaaa to tha face-hand teat arc undifiad by nan:
(b)
attenttan.
factor]
arc
ﬂame
influnnning
of
tbs
fa)
factora.
or
atinnlna,
(a)
type
of
stimuli,
(0)
simultanaity
d:
subject,
aga
(o) atrensth a: stilnlua, (t) locua of atilnlation and (3) internal
with
tha
fragment,
Etna;
alter
fatter! lax
atate or organiaa.
aﬁpeur
do
change
net
but
and
that
displaccnaut
which Ixtinetien
tbs pattern or face dalinanso.
1a
in
factor
of
tha
teat
a.na:or
Iuardnaaa
the aubaact'a
80th
attention
extinntiun.
a:
thy
phannncnon
of
tho appearance
’)(
awarenaai€£)1n.a
and priviona axpnrionoa tun bring stimuli to
two
to
were
informed
who
Itinnli
that
unra
adulta
atria: or twanty
Baoauaa
proviaua
of
applied
abouad
extinction
parcepta.
be
non.
tan
abet-nary
rcaerd
ta
uaa
intluensa.a response it
experience
in.ha1ve
ﬂatbed
aw
this
aubjccta.
tha.f1ndinga on initial trial
At
the
Ian»
wan
aintniacd.
experience
or
previoua
en. tactar
number
the
”alert"
for
he
the
on
tine tbs aubjcct was not apt to
'

�of stimuli he an: ta reeeive. cannequently ene night nay thet
the reason the subject perceived only one Itinulul or perceived
ene and diupleeed the
the
other
at
he
atinnluu
in
that
peﬁfypt
4
was not peying ettentlen. this aritieinn may be valid but the

Iiznifieant fact

it

9

//¢w

»

%

that the error III always aide in the hand
and net in_the‘teee. I: it were mere inattention one utula expect
50! or the single response: ta dauble einultaneeue stimulation
ta be in the hand end 50% in.the flee. But this type or ehance
enter was not ebterved. it the single reepenaes ta double
lilultaneeul Iti-nluticn 95% were at the fete percent and 5% at
the hand pereept. Iain pettern of race daninnnee or hand extinction
examinetionl.
further
during
subsequent
eitublilhed
Ill
lereovee,
when dinplneenent II. seen in normal aubJeetn, it was to the
race and not ta the hand.
ihin pattern at face daninnnee to deuble tinultnneaul
stimulation was fauna to be exnggereted in nan-.1 young children,
when
83$ deuanetrated either 33nd.extinetion or displeoenent
at
er the hand pereept to the face an the initial triel. loreover,
this high percentage of face duuinnet reiponnet peruisted on
eubuequent trielE. In the elder children ulna tece delineate
we: consistently demonstrable. It It: noted that the younger the
ahild, the more distinct In: thie puttern of race daninnnee.
awn extinetion night he Ittributed to an mummy to
perceive two ltﬂluli at once. Ehiu particulir detect has been
noted in patient: with severe until change? (“Zlf'ﬁﬁevm in
patient: with severe lentel changed or in young children itinuli
epplied to both cheek: or both hands or.eny other two hanglegonn
body even: were correctly reported as tee uenentione. Ihere it:
_

�neither extinetion nor displacement. aaldstein'eKohuervatien,
therafere, cannot be used an an explnnetion for hand extinetion.
what
matter
daninanne
in
noted
apparent
flee
that
at
It is
types or etimnlltion was used. Simulteheoun pin prick stimulation:
revealed the pattern of face daninenee, elthaugh with e leaner
frequency than touch etinhiltiona. ether duteneeua utinuletion
such :1 two tuning forks, hot and cold telperature tuhel, rtpetitive
rubbing and repetitive pin prick Itianletian were Ipplied and
neniteet
regardless of the cuteneeun utilnletiun
race daninence is
ﬂied.

inphrtmee of the ainulteneity or the ”man. has nlrudy
been alluded to. In eubJeetn in when extinctidn In: persistent,
consecutive epplieetion or the stimuli invariably resulted in
the permeption or two stimuli. In actual Idultn consecutive
the
nun-L1
the
on
the
even
of
two
trial,
we
ma.
etiluletion
extihetioa.
never resulted in
-euuni
thin
thy
nerd
ntinuli
intensity.
at
these
ethdien
In
aux-aux,
the
for
in
inn-pom:
the
in
pattern
mum
eliciting
”I.
stimuli here teemingly mare readily perceived than equal etiuuli.
After the first few trials the etheet was able to perdeive the
two stimuli, even it one we: pnintul and the other not. In
and
diaextinction
mental
hhuevee,
with
chnhses,
organic
patient:
quality,
the
wide
dinorepency in
pleeenent were manifest despite a
of the stimuli. aw Altering the etrength a! the Itinhli, it ran
hand
the
at
the
tram
extinction
response
pdlaihle to alternate
th
teak)
the'
ta
diepleaenent
were
hand
the
stieuli
percept (if
.gheek (if the head stimuli were utrang). The sneeze than extinhtien
ulst
the
the
at
by
quality
elidited
altering
run
displacement
to
The

'

‘

�13.

touch
the
to
,Ievertheleac,
frna
prick.
pin
that
ia
atiunli,
a
at.
a,ua
oe'aaa
the part: of the body being aianltanecnaly atianlated are
have
patterna.
theae
I!
etudying
consideration
in
another
already alluded to the fact that extinction ie anat cannon in
the hand and leaat in the face. In teating other body areaa the
incidence of extinction and diaplaceaent ia leaa than in teating
and
ahcnlder
thigh nay
hand.
and
the
testing
the face
Ithat is,
not elicit extinction or cbacnraticn,where the faceehand teat will.
Alec, in patients with leaicnn or the brain or apinal cord,
the pattern or relationahip cf the body parts tc aiaultaneoua
atinnlaticn.nay be altered in a characteriatic haniaenaery or
”level leaicn' ayndreae. Aa fer the aignificance cf the pattern
be
can
the
leaning
before
prayer
further atndiea are neceaaary
would
be
time
purely
thin
deducticn.aade
Any
at
interpreted.
that
by
gained
atating
ia
nothing
For
inatance,
speculative.
dcainance
(7).
of
inpliea
order
aenccry
rcatral
a
daninance
face
Such hypetheaia ia ccntradicted by at leaat one tact, naaely the
‘chaervaticn that when the hand and fact are atimlated eimltanecualy
data
are
hand.
after'ncre
Perhapa
the
dcninatea
over
the fact
accumulated a aatiafactcry theory night he obtained.
,

QUIIIRI:
hand
haa
and
race
the
cf
teata
in
pattern in perception
method
cf
the
abnaraal
and
anh:ecta.hy
been elicited in actual
dcnble simultaneous atianlaticn of cutanacua uhdalitiea.
hand
the
of
percent
extinction
by
Face delinance, aaniteat
an
a
in
seen
the
hand
to
race,
the
or
percent
or dicplaceaent
the~
and
in
non-a1
the
adulte,
in
naniteatcd
normal phancaencn,
aeriea.
the
exasined
in
and
anhaaie
cchiacphrenia
with
patienta
A

�15.
with
in
m
in
menu:It 1: mcntod young «mum
and
what
,of
ditpnouont
the
«unﬁt.»
bran
in
an...”

mitten:

utter

may}. mun .

.

um.
m

1:
at
run
or
unite“
denim”
usual.”
pattern
m:
1n
the
a
only
clung.
{chucking
the autumn- nodanw team,
a!
11th
in
type
“mum.
.cxtincuoa'
at
rmugnay

am.

‘

�m,
mm W
:m.
In,”
Wtiﬂl
m
t
‘4;
“1,5151
m
m m
«some.
mm
m.“
1.!”
Id.
“.3.
mo
mm.
m, 19”.Mum-sic
3.:
(I)
cum...
mm
m
mm.
m,
at unusual
than.
”pm
ma.
a;
M
ammo
3.1.:
Aug-mu
m
m
'
Mm
m
mummy
Mmkwém Datum
81mm!“
11W.
m.
mnnmuumumumwmm
mum.
£1.
Pittm‘03.;
I.
w
m
mum
m;
m.
u-mmmuormmomm
-.-.m:

1. (I)

W
3.3.
1‘

“

‘3)

2. (a)

3.

I

‘

if...

.5

. --...

08

,

and

-

....,

610:

«.5

an

.LL.

-.

&gt;

,

'

and

813-191,

5

.

1

am.

1.1.

11.3.;and

in

11.:

@1162!!!

5.

mwﬂw

W

mm.
mmm

In ﬁt an

6.
.

W

Warm.
to mom

chum-

as

«W

1M6 61m
72: 5

nth

m to frontal am “so.
«poets of m may

W
Auwmmmm
5mm

mm
manna-mm.

cm,

R. and

m

max.
mam...
at

1956.

tn

“1.

1959.

and

501.515.

,5

-.

‘0

117.121.,
_

‘

8.3.

ILL!

(o)

50

phonon-manor

1n

5......-

1'.

9:
3.1.:
9:135:19:
wholes“
1
”“33;
of
pm1p1uuea
m

and
11014:

11.8.:

(h)

m1
mm
mum.

an

6.1.: w

by 191111101111
166-1685 19195

tuna-Mon.

�PATTERNS IN PERCEPTION

By:
‘I
0—m—

ON

SIMULTANEOUS TESTS OF FACE AND HAND

Morris B. Bender, M.D., Max Fink, M.D., and Martin Green,
In previous studies we found that the method of double

M.D.

simultaneous stimulation showed defects in sensation (extinction)
testing
In
which
routine
were not apparent on
single stimulation.
;
the
two
of
body and various combinations it was
different
regions
\,
found that extinction was apt to occur most often in the hand and
least in the face. Conversely, "dominance" was greatest in the face and
least in the hand. In the present commuhication we wish to report
simultaneous
on
obtained
the results
stimulation of the face and the
hand (the face-hand test) in groups of subjects with the following
conditions: 1) aphasia without hemiparesis or hemisensory syndrome;
2) aphasia with severe mental changes; 3) organic mental syndrome;

disease
5)
of the
no
4) schizophrenia;

,‘

brain (normal adults) and 6)
four
of
between
normal children
the ages
to ten years. 'Patients in
5
2
showed
and
severe memory defects, confusion, poor orientation,
groups
difficulties in calculation and other symptoms characteristic of
diffuse disease of the brain.
Method: The subject was instructed to close his eyes. When
this was done his face (cheek) and contralateral hand (any part of
the hand or fingers) were touched simultaneously. Care was taken to
make two stimulations of equal intensity. As soon as the stimuli
were applied the subject was asked tox°eport what he felt, and following
this, Where he felt the sensation. Identical tests were carried out
with light rubbing and pin prick stimulations.
Results: Under these conditions the subject gave either of the
following responses on the first-examination: a) a touch on the face
only (face dominance), implying no sensation in the hand (extinction);
.

$1.1mMuTﬁzA

kﬁWJqM 5.4.1:.

�2.

b) a touch on both sides of the face (there being "displacement"
from the hand to the ipsilateral face); 0r 0) a touch on the face
and contralateral hand. In the (a) response the subject was asked

whether he felt still another stimulus. The reply was either in
the negative, or there was uncertainty or vague approximation.
This question suggested to the subject that there were two

stimulations so that
than one stimulus.

on

subsequent tests he was expectant of more

In the (b) type of response the subject mislocalized or
displaced the sensation evoked in the hand toward the ipsilateral
face. Since the mislobalization was towards the face it appeared
as if the face determined the direction of the displacement. It

might be said, therefore, that this was a type of face dominance.
Response (b), or diaplacement, was less common than response (a)
or extinction. Response (b) was seen most often in the patients

with the organic mental syndrome, and persisted despite repeated
testing. The (c) responSe was the expected normal and needs no

special comment.
Extinction

and displacement were

also noted

the ipsilateral face and hand were simultaneously tested. In all the
subjects tested, including those with aphasia, there was no
difference between the right and left sides of the body.
Analysis of the results obtained in the various groups is
shown in the following table:
when

�3.
Group

of
Subjects

Number

1

15

2

12

3

Face Response

Extinction or

Face and Hand‘ Hand Response
Response

~

Displacement
9

6

O

12

O

O

22

20

2

O

4

20

14

6

O

5

55

24

28

6

20

l
l

From

-

p

.

19

o

it

is obvious that whenever there is
sensation over another it is apparent in the face.

the foregoing

dominance of one

p

Dominance in the hand was noted only once.

dominance
Face
was found

almOSt uniformly in the

subjects with.severe mental changes (groups
2 and 5.) These patients did not report sensation in the hand even
after repeated testing. In a few instances, even after the patients
were told there were two stimuli, or were asked towratch the application of the stimuli, they reported only one percept or displaced one.
In these cases simultaneous stimulation of both sides of the face
was reported correctly, thus excluding the objection that these
patients were not able to&lt;io or perceive two things at once.
The incidence of face dominance in subjects with aphasia and
those
in
with schizophrenia (groups 1 and 4) was less. In contrast
to patients in groups 2 and 5, those in groups 1 and 4 reported both
sensations correctly on the second, third or fourth trials, if they
had not done so on the first trial.‘ In the group of normal adults
(group 5) the incidence of face dominance was least, but still
'

significant,
a

even though

it

was found only on the

first trial.

series of normal children the incidence of face dominance

was

In

�In young children face
dominance was present even several trials after the first examina-

almost the same as in groups

2 and

5.

tion.
the face and parts of the body other than the hand
were tested simultaneously in groups 2 and 3, face dominance was‘
The
order of dominance was face, shoulder, grunk
apparent.
still
When

(breast), penis, thigh, calf, foot, arm and hand.
In
Conclusion:
a wide variety of subjects the phenomena of
extinction and displacement on double simultaneous stimulation were
demonstrated. A consistent pattern of perception was established
in which the face was most dominant and the hand the least. These
findings were noted in both the abnormal and the normal subjects.
-In the abnormal subjects withseVere mental changes, face dominance
and hand extinction were so consistent that they may be used as a
sign of diffuse disease of the brain, but only when found to persist
after repeated examinations.
The pattern of dominance, as well as the phenomenon of
extinction, which are so prominent in patients with diffuse brain
disease, appear to be exaggerations of the pattern found in the
normal subjects, especially children.
I

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2254">
                <text>Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1950;51:250-2. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2255">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2256">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-2a-003</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2257">
                <text>1950</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2258">
                <text>Bender, Morris B.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Green, Martin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2259">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2260">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2261">
                <text>[Two preprints] and a reprint. Reprint from Transactions of the American Neurol Assoc. 1950;51:250-2. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2262">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2263">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74428">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80989">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87550">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94111">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="227" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/abb942c109b57ff8986a7757e43563c2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>23a7bbd876571d7517224c266ad15ea2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100644">
                    <text>Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous
Tests of Face and Hand
_

N...”- —-.

MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.
MAX

FINK, MD.
AND

MARTIN GREEN, M.D.
NEW YORK

Reprinted from the Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry
Septmnber 1951, Vol. 66, pp. 355-362
COPYRIGHT, 1951, .‘BY
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
535 NORTH DEARBORN STREET
CHICAGO 10, ILL.

Printed and Published in the United States of America

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and
Psychiatry
September 1951, Vol. 66, pp. 355-362
Copyright, 1951, by American. Medical Association

PATTERNS IN PERCEPTION ON SIMULTANEOUS
TESTS OF FACE AND HAND
MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.
MAX

FINK, MD.
AND

MARTIN GREEN, M.D.
NEW YORK

it
PREVIOUSLY was shown that examination of the cutaneous modalities by
the method of double simultaneous stimulation
elicited defects in perception
which were not apparent on single stimulation.
The defects, described as “extinction,” “obscuration,” “displacement,” and “allesthesia,”
were observed in groups of
patients with localized or diffuse disease of the central
nervous system.1 In each
group the defects in cutaneous perception obtained on double simultaneous stimula—
tion were most apparent in the hand and least in
the face. The object of the present
investigation was to determine the patterns of
in normal subjects, adults
responses
and children to simultaneous stimulation of the face
and hand—the “face—hand”
test.2 The observations on this normal
were then compared to some extent
group
with the responses of patients with
organic mental syndromes, aphasia, and schizophrenia.
MATERIAL

The “normal” subjects were children and adults.
These subjects were persons attending
hospital clinics in whom there was no evidence of disease
of the brain, and school children, staff
personnel, and students, in whom there was no manifest disorder
of the central nervous system.
None of them had been examined previously
by the method of double simultaneous stimulation.
From the Department of Neurology and
Psychiatry, New York University College of
Medicine; Bellevue Hospital, and the Mount Sinai Hospital.
This work was aided (in part) by a research
grant from the National Institutes of Health,
United States Public Health Service, and (in
part) by a grant from the Coordinating Council
of Cerebral Palsy in New York City, Inc.
1. (a) Bender, M. B., and
F'urlow, L. T.: Phenomenon of Visual Extinction
in
Homonymous Fields and Psychologic Principles Involved, Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 53:29—33
(Jan) 1945. (b) Bender, M. B.: Extinction and Precipitation of Cutaneous
Sensations, ibid.
54:1—9 (July) 1945; (c) The
Phenomenon of Sensory Displacement, ibid.
65:607-621
1951.
(May)
(d) Bender, M. B.; Shapiro, M. F and Schappell, A. W.:
.,
Extinction
Phenomena
in Hemiplegia, ibid. 62:717-724 (Dec.) 1949.
(e) Bender, M. B. ; Wortis, S. B., and Cramer,
J.:
Organic Mental Syndrome with Phenomena of Extinction
and Allesthesia, ibid. 59:273-291
(March) 1948. (f) Bender, M. B.; Shapiro, M. F., and
Teuber, H. L.: Allesthesia and
Disturbance of Body Scheme, ibid. 62:222-231
(Aug) 1949. (g) Bender, M. B., and Nathanson,
M.: Patterns in Allesthesia and Their Relation
to Disorder of Body Scheme and Other
Sensory Phenomena, ibid. 64:501—515 (Oct) 1950.
2. Bender, M. B.; Fink, M., and
Green, M.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests
of the Face and Hand, Tr. Am. Neurol. A.
75:250—252, 1950.

�2
The subjects were divided into three groups according to age: children of 3 to 6, and 7 to 12
yr., and “adults” over 12 yr. of age.
For comparison with the normal group, we studied patients in the wards of the Bellevue
Psychiatric Hospital. They were divided into three groups on the basis of their disease—
schizophrenia, organic psychoses, and aphasia. No attempt was made to study separately the
clinical types of schizophrenia. Most of the patients had the paranoid, mixed, or simple variety
of schizophrenia. The patients with organic mental changes showed defects in memory,
orientation, andcalculation, as well as other signs and symptoms. characteristic of diffuse
disease of the brain. The clinical diagnoses for most of thesegpatients was Alzheimer’s’ disease,
arteriosclerotic encephalopathy, severe cerebral trauma, brain tumor, or toxic encephalopathy.
The subjects with aphasia were those who showed characteristic difﬁculties in communication.
Those who had concomitant hemiparesis or ‘a hemisensory defect noticeable on single stimulation
were not included in this series.
MET HOD

The subject was instructed to close the eyes. When this was done, the face (cheek) and
either the ipsilateral or the contralateral hand (any part of the hand or digits) were simultaneously touched or stroked with the examiner’s ﬁngers. The subjects reported either one or two
sensations. When only one percept was reported, the subject was asked if there was still
another and, if so, to indicate its location and quality.
After the initial trial, in each subject, the opposite cheek and hand were stimulated in the
same manner. These tests were repeated and the results recorded, until the subjects consistently
reported both stimuli correctly. In those subjects who failed to localize the two stimuli
correctly ‘after six or eight trials, other parts of the body were tested in such combinations as
face-face, hand-hand, face-breast, or penis-hand, these stimulations alternating with the facehand test.
In a second, separate series of studies, pinprick stimuli were used in a similar fashion. In
both series, care was taken to app-1y the stimuli at the same time and with the same intensity.
It was apparent that subjects who made consistent errors in reporting would be correct as
soon as the stimuli were applied consecutively rather than simultaneously, even if the time lag
between stimuli was that of one or two moments. It was also necessary to use naive normal
subjects, since subjects previously tested did not show the patterns noted below.
RESULTS

The responses obtained on the face-hand test fell into four groups: (a) a touch
sensation on the face and the hand, indicating the correct and expected perception;
(b) a touch sensation on the face only, implying no sensation in the hand; (6) a
touch sensation on both sides of the face, and (d) a touch sensation on the hand
only, implying none on the face. When only one stimulus was reported, the subject
was asked if: there was any other sensation. The occasional reply was that there was
another percept, and the subject correctly pointed to the second locus. Many subjects, however, reported that they had not perceived another stimulus, usually
adding the statement: “I was not paying attention; do it again,” or, “I’m not sure;
maybe it was somewhere over here,” and pointing in the direction of the side of the
body of the poorly felt stimulus. In some instances, while correctly localizing the
second percept, they volunteered the statement: “It was not as strong as the other
one,” or “It doesn’t seem as sharp.”
Before we proceed with the results, we must deﬁne the special terms used. In
other communications the failure of the subject to report one of two simultaneously
applied stimuli has been called “the phenomenon of sensory extinction,” or “extinction.” 1”“ b The part of the body where the stimulus was perceived is said to be
“dominant” to the part of the body where the simultaneous stimulus was not per—
ceived, or perceived faintly. The latter diminution in the quality of a sensation was
'

�3.

termed “obscuration.” When the subject reported two sensations, but mislocalized
one of them, the “displacement” of a percept is said to have occurred.1c Displacements are usually in the direction of the dominant stimulus and may be partial or
complete. The displacements noted in this series were from the hand to the cheek
of the same side. Rarely did the displacements occur to the neck or shoulder.
Initial Trial—The results were analyzed from the standpoint of initial and
subsequent trials. On the initial trial of the face-hand test with touch stimulation
in normal subjects, face dominance was apparent in all age groups. More than half
of such normal adults reported the sensation in the face and none in the hand. Three
subjects mislocalized the sensation in the hand to the face. In the groups of normal
children, 90% under the age of 6 yr. reported only the face percept or mislocalized
the hand percept to the face. This pattern of face dominance is also seen in the
children from 7 to 12 yr. of age, but to a less extent.
Of the normal subjects, ﬁve adults reported the hand stimulation only on the
initial trial. N 0 example of displacement from face to hand was noted.
This pattern of face dominance by hand extinction or by displacement of the
hand percept to the face was even more apparent in the patients examined. It was
most evident in patients with organic mental changes, 93% of whom did not report
TABLE

l.—Response to Touch Stimulation on Initial Trial

Normal adult ...........................
Normal child, 3-6 yr .....................
Normal child, 7-12 yr ....................
Schizophrenia (unclassiﬁed) ............
Organic mental syndrome ...............
Aphasia .................................

Total
160
56
76
74
120
23

Correct
Responses
77
10
38
26
9

12

Face Only
75
28
27
45
94
11

Face-Face Hand Only
3
18
9

5
0

1

2

14

3

O

O

2

both stimuli correctly. In examinations of schizophrenic subjects and patients with
aphasia, responses similar to those of the normal adult were observed in the initial
trial.
Hand dominance was occasionally seen in the patient and rarely in the normal
subject. In cases of hand dominance the subject reported the hand, but not the face,
percept. It was seen in the initial trial in ﬁve normal adults. These subjects
reported both stimuli correctly on subsequent testing. In the patients with organic
mental changes hand dominance was an inconstant response, and repeated testing
the same day, or on subsequent days, demonstrated the more usual persistent
pattern of face dominance.
Subsequent Thain—Of the 83 normal adults who made errors on the initial
trial, 43 made correct responses on the second trial and 12 on the third trial. In a
few subjects, four, ﬁve, or six trials were necessary before the two stimuli were
correctly localized. These subjects were assumed to be normal, although complete
psychological tests were not made. It was noted that anxiety (tension during
examination or a strong desire to please) interfered with the early correct recog—
nition of the stimuli. In all normal subjects, including those with anxiety, once the
correct response was obtained (even after many trials with errors), it was elicited
on all subsequent testing. It seemed as though a number of trials was necessary for

�4

the subject to get into the “set” of the examination, and
that, once in the set, he
reported the stimuli accurately, even after the lapse of
many days.
In testing the normal young child, it was apparent that in most
cases many trials
were necessary before the correct response was consistently elicited. Also, the child
did not always give a correct response on subsequent
testing. Repeated testing over
many days, however, elicited the same patterns of face dominance. .This was noted
in 36 of the 56 children tested. In a number of instances
the child watched the
application of the stimuli and thus reported the perceptions correctly. But
as soon
as the test was repeated with the eyes closed, the child again
reported only one
stimulus. It was evident that the child could not
get into the “set” of the examination, even with visual cues.
This difﬁculty was not very apparent in all children. In the older
(ages
group
7 to 12 yr.) only 17 of the 76 failed to give the
correct response after the initial few
trials.

A\\A

A\4*A\
‘~

90

‘___-c\‘ ~ ‘c____ .¢—————-—._—_——__———-—c

89

Responses

70

60
Dominant

Face

50

Organic Mental Syndrome

c--c Children, age 5 to 6
o——o Schizophrenic Adult
Normal Adult

40

%
50
20
10

1

2

3

4

5

6

10

Responses to face~hand test on initial and subsequent trials.

The responses obtained on repeated trials of the face-hand
tests in normal sub—
jects also followed a consistent pattern. As on the initial trial, face dominance
was
prevalent in all subjects. It was manifest either by (a) extinction
or obscuration
of hand stimuli or (b) displacement of hand stimuli
to the face, or, in several
instances, in a direction toward the face.
In contrast to normal adults, patients with organic mental
changes were unable
to report the two stimuli correctly, even after
many trials. When the patient
reported the percept in one test correctly, he frequently failed on
subsequent testing. It was also apparent that testing on subsequent days still elicited
displacement
and extinction of stimuli. This is in strong contrast to the
responses of apparently
normal subjects, who seldom made an error on subsequent
trials, days after the
initial examination. The responses obtained in this
group demonstrated the patterns of face dominance in most of the tests. Displacement of the hand
percept to

�5

the face was frequent. In some instances displacement or extinction was
present
despite the fact that the patient watched the application of the stimuli to the face
and hand. Extinction was very common on homolateral or heterologous testing,
while displacement was apparent mostly on heterologous testing.
The schizophrenic and the aphasic patients gave reports which were similar to
those of normal adults. After the ﬁrst two trials percentage of error in hand sensation
was slightly higher than in the normal group. Persistent bizarre responses were
elicited from a number of the schizophrenic subjects. These
reports included mul—
tiple responses to single or double stimuli, persistent displacements to one area from
any other body area, and mirror reversals of localization. These were inconsistent
during an examination and from day to day. As with the normal adults, testing the
schizophrenic or aphasic subject on consecutive days failed to elicit extinction
phenomena once the test had accurately been reported before.
A comparison of the responses of each of these groups to multiple testing is
shown in the accompanying chart.
Pinprick Stimulation—It is known that the type of stimulus applied inﬂuences
the results in perception. To demonstrate the importance of this factor, similar
groups of subjects were tested using two pinprick stimuli instead of two touch

M
TABLE 2,—Respoinse

to Pinprick Stimulation an Initial Trial

Normal adult
...........................
Normal child, 3-6 yr
.....................
Normal child, 7-12 yr
....................
Schizophrenia
...........................
Organic mental syndrome
...............

Correct

Total

Responses

Face Only

68
45
39
50
49

51
16
25

15
26
14

36
9

'

13
33

Face-Face Hand Only
2

0

2

1

0
0
3

0
1

2

stimuli. With pinprick stimulation of the face and hand, face dominance
was again
manifest in all the groups. However, the incidence of error in perception of
the
pinprick in the hand was lower than that with a touch stimulus. The results are
recorded in Table 2.
Repeated testing with two pins in the'normal adult subjects elicited the correct
responses in the intial three trials. Fewer of the children failed to report the test
accurately after the initial trials. It was possible in a number of instances to alternate touch and pinprick stimulations and to demonstrate extinction to touch, but
correct localization to pinprick. Moreover, with more intense pinprick stimulation,
extinction and displacement were less frequently observed.
These phenomena, namely, extinction and displacement, were even more
apparent in the patients with organic mental syndromes. Displacement of touch stimu—
lation could be alternated with correct localization of pinprick stimulation. A
combination of touch to the face and pinprick to the hand evinced the combination
of displacement and obscuration, as the patient reported “a touch
on the face, and
a dull one on the other side (of the face).” Pinprick to the cheek and touch to the
hand resulted in extinction of the hand percept. or, occasionally, the
report of a
pinprick on both the cheek and the hand.
The schizophrenic subjects were able to localize the pinprick stimulus accurately
after the initial few trials, as had the normal adults.

�6
COMMENT

By using the method of double simultaneous stimulation in tests of the face and
the hand, a consistent pattern of responses has been observed in a variety of sub—
jects. The stimulus to the face is more readily perceived than the one to the hand.
Moreover, the face percept inﬂuences the hand percept, frequently causing the displacement of sensation. This pattern of responses has been repeatedly demonstrated
in both the normal and the abnormal subjects and is manifest in extinction, obscuration, and displacement. Extinction is most, and displacement is least, frequent. In
extinction, the face percept is correctly reported as to quality and locus, but the
hand stimulus is not perceived at all. In all the foregoing tests of patient or normal
subjects, whether the responses were accurate or not, it was noted that the subject

almost invariably pointed to the faceixsti‘mulus ﬁrst. Occasionally the hand percept
was perceived and correctly localized, but assumed a qualitative difference, always
of diminution. In displacement the stimulus to the hand was mislocalized to the
face, or in the direction of the face, e. g., to the shoulder or neck. In some instances
if the face and the hand of the same side were stimulated, the subject occasionally
reported two sensations in the face. None of these phenomena was haphazard.
While the frequency with which any one of these effects was observed might be
affected by attention, drugs, or variation in stimuli, its pattern was consistent.
These responses to the face-hand test are modiﬁed by many factors. Some of the
inﬂuencing factors are (a) attention, (b) age of subject, (c) simultaneity of stimuli,
(d) type of stimulus, (e) strength of stimulus, (f) locus of stimulation, and (9)
internal state of organism. These factors may alter the frequency with which extinc—
tion and displacement appear, but they do not change the pattern of face dominance.
The subject’s awareness of the test is a major factor in the appearance of the
phenomenon of extinction. Both attention and previous experience can bring stimuli
to awareness. In a series of 20 adults who were informed that two stimuli were to
be applied, none showed extinction of percepts. Because previous experience can
inﬂuence a response, it was necessary to record the ﬁndings on initial trial in naive
subjects. By this method the factor of previous experience was minimized. At the
same time, the subject was not apt to be on the “alert” for the number of stimuli he
was to receive. Consequently, one might say that the reason the subject perceived
only one stimulus, or perceived one stimulus and displaced the percept of the other,
is that he was not paying attentio‘n.3 This criticism may be valid, but the signiﬁcant
fact is that the error was always made in the hand and not in the face. If it were
mere inattention, one would expect 50% of the single responses to double simultaneous stimulation to be in the hand and 50% in the face. But this type of chance
error was not observed. Of the single responses to double simultaneous stimulation,
95% were of the face percept and 5% of the hand percept. This pattern of face
dominance or hand extinction was further established during subsequent examinations. Moreover, when displacement was seen in normal subjects, it was to the face
and not to the hand.
This pattern of face dominance to double simultaneous stimulation was found
to be exaggerated in normal young children, of whom 83% demonstrated either
hand extinction or displacement of the hand percept to the face on the initial trial.
Critchley, M.: The Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special Reference to
Parietal Lesions, Brain 72:538—561, 1949.
3.

�7

Moreover, this high percentage of responses of face dominance persisted on sub—
sequent trials. In the older children, also, face dominance was consistently demon—
strable. It was noted that the younger the child, the more distinct was this
pattern
of face dominance.
Hand extinction might be attributed to an inability to perceive two stimuli at
once. This particular defect has been noted in patients with severe mental changes
by Goldstein.4 However, in patients with severe mental changes or in
chil—
young
dren stimuli applied to both cheeks, or both hands, or
any other two homologous
body areas were correctly reported as two sensations. There was neither extinction
nor displacement. Goldstein’s observation, therefore, cannot be used as an explana—
tion of hand extinction.
It is noted that face dominance was apparent no matter what type of stimula—
tion was used. Simultaneous pinprick stimulations revealed the
pattern of face
dominance, although with a lower frequency than touch stimulations. Other
cutaneous stimulation, such as application of two tuning forks or hot and cold tubes,
repetitive rubbing, and repetitive pinprick stimulation, was used, and face dominance
was manifest regardless of the cutaneous stimulation employed.
The importance of the simultaneity of the stimuli has already been alluded to.
In subjects in whom extinction was persistent, consecutive application of the stimuli
invariably resulted in the perception of two stimuli. In normal adults consecutive
stimulatiOn of the face and the hand, even on the initial trial,
never resulted in
extinction.
In these studies the stimuli were of equal intensity. This factor
was important
in eliciting the pattern in the normal subject, for
unequal stimuli were seemingly
more readily perceived than equal stimuli. After the ﬁrst few trials the subject was
able to perceive the two stimuli, even if one was painful and the other
not. In
patients with organic mental changes, however, extinction and displacement were
manifest despite a wide discrepancy in the quality of the stimuli. By
altering the
strength of the stimuli, it was possible to alter the response from extinction of the
hand percept (if the hand stimulus was weak) to displacement to the cheek
(if the
hand stimulus was strong). The change from extinction to displacement
was also
elicited by altering the quality of the stimuli, that is, from touch
to'pinprick. Nevertheless, the pattern of face dominance was always apparent.
The parts of the body being simultaneously stimulated is another consideration
in studying these patterns. We have already alluded to the fact that extinction is
commonest in the hand and least in the face. In testing other body areas, the incidence of extinction and displacement is less than in testing the face and the hand.
That is, testing shoulder and thigh may not elicit extinction or obscuration, whereas
the face-hand test may. Also, in patients with lesions of the brain or spinal
cord,
the pattern of relation of the body parts to simultaneous stimulation
may be altered
in a characteristic hemisensory or “level-lesion” syndrome. Further studies
are
necessary before the signiﬁcance of the pattern can be interpreted. Any deduction
made at this time would be purely speculative. For instance, nothing is gained
by
stating that face dominance implies a rostral order of sensory dominance.5 Such a
4. Goldstein, K.:: The Mental Changes Due to Frontal Lobe
Damage, J. Psychol.

17:187, 1944.
5. Cohn, R., and Raines, G. N.: On Certain Aspects of the
Sensory Organization of the
Human Brain: A Study in Rostral Dominance ‘as Determined by Ipsilateral Simultaneous
Stimulation, Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 74:162-168, 1949.

�8

hypothesis is contradicted by at least one fact, namely, the observation that when
the hand and foot are stimulated simultaneously the foot dominates over the hand.
Perhaps after more data are accumulated a satisfactory theory may be obtained.
SUMMARY
_. “awn—a,

elicited in normal and abnormal subjects by the method of double simultaneous
stimulation of cutaneous modalities.
Face dominance, manifest by extinction of the hand percept or by dlsplacement
0f the handmpercept to the face, is seen as a normal phenomenon, manifested1n the
normal adults andin the patients with schizophrenia and aphasia examined in the
series. It is exaggerated in young children and in patients with diffuse disease of
the brain, in whom extinction and displacement are persistent after multiple trials.
This pattern of face dominance is manifest regardless of the cutaneous modality
tested, there being a change only in the frequency of extinction with change in type
of stimulus.
j

Printed and Published in the United States of America

/ f

/

r:

L/nAJ/C’ .....

.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2264">
                <text>Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1951 Sep; 66(3): 355-62.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2265">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2266">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-2b-004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2267">
                <text>1951</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2268">
                <text>Bender, Morris B.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Green, Martin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2269">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2270">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2271">
                <text>Reprinted from the Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry September 1951, vol. 66, pp. 355-362.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2272">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2273">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74429">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80990">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87551">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94112">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="228" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="19">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/945d2769d3cde3d546dfd13ec8bc4c04.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7b68d01261bda3dea9d45000fea060a8</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100645">
                    <text>The F ace—Hand Test as

a Diagnostic

Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome
Max Fin/c, M.D.,
Martin Green, [M.D. and [Morris B. Bender, M.D.

In the course of sensory studies by the method of double simultaneous
stimulation, it has been observed that patients with mental changes may
show perceptual errors which are not demonstrable by routine single

stimulation.1 When stimuli are simultaneously applied to the cheek and
the hand (the face-hand testz) , patients frequently report only one of
the two stimuli, or when reporting the two stimuli mislocalize one to
another part of the body or even into space. These changes in perception
are seen on repeated trials of the face-hand test and seem to form a con—
sistent part of the syndrome usually labelled “organic mental syndrome”
or “organic psychosis.”
SUBJECTS

Four hundred patients, who manifested cerebral dysfunction in the
form of an organic mental syndrome due to a variety of causes, were
studied on the wards of the Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital.* Each patient
manifested, to some degree, the following mental changes: (1) impairment
of memory, for both recent and remote events; (2) confusion and disorien—
tation for time, space, situation and body image; (3) errors on calculation
and general information tests; (4) distractibility, poor attention span, inability to handle more than one situation at a time, concreteness and
*This number represents several series of patients in whom the method of double simultaneous
stimulation were applied. It includes all tests of the face and hand by touch, pin prick and
combinations of touch and pin prick stimuli, as well as tests of body areas other than the face
and the hand.

From the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of Medi—
cine, and the department of neurology and
psychiatry, Bellevue Hospital, New York City.
This work was aided in part by a Fellowship
from the National Foundation for Infantile

Paralysis, and by a research grant from the
United States Public Health Service, National
Institutes of Health.
Read at the second biennial meeting of the
American Academy of Neurology, Virginia
Beach, Virginia, April 11, 1951.

46

�4'7

ORGANIC MENTAL SYNDROIVIE

rigidity in thinking; (5) perseveration of speech and behavior; (6) emo—
tional liability and readily elicited “catastrophic” reaction; (7) loss of
initiative and interest in the environment and indecent exposure and soiling of the clothing. The clinical diagnoses were varied, including chronic
alcoholism, post-traumatic encephalopathy, hypertensive cerebro-vascular
disease, diffuse arteriosclerotic softening, syphilis of the central nervous
system and degenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Hunting—
ton’s chorea or senility.
Observations on the face-hand test in patients with organic brain
disease were compared with previously obtained results of similar examinations in normal adults and children and in adult patients with
schizophrenia”. The normal adults and children, including students,
associates and patients in clinics, were without manifest disorder of the
nervous system. The schizophrenic adults were patients from the wards
of the Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital. No effort was made to group the
patients into the various clinical types of schizophrenia.
JMETHOD

The face—hand test was applied to each of these subjects. During
routine physical examination the patient was asked to close his eyes.
One cheek and the contralateral hand were simultaneously touched or
stroked by the examiner’s ﬁngers. The patient was then asked what he
had felt. The usual response was, “You touched me here,” while pointing
to the cheek. After this initial application of the face-hand test, the
patient was again asked to close his eyes and the contralateral cheek
and hand were similarly stimulated. In the many instances when only
one percept was reported, the patient was asked if he had felt anything
else. Occasionally the second percept was reported after this question,
but more often it was not. Thereafter the tests were applied to the face
and hand and to other parts of the body.
RESULTS

In patients with the organic mental syndrome most responses to the
initial and subsequent face-hand tests were of four types: (1) a touch on the
cheek only, implying no sensation in the hand; (2) a touch on each cheek,
implying a mislocalization or displacement of the percept evoked in the
hand to the cheek; (3) a touch on the hand only, implying no sensation in
the cheek; and (4) correct localization of the percepts evoked in the cheek
and hand. Less frequently other responses were noted, as both percepts
in the hand, or a percept in the cheek and homolateral hand implying
a mislocalization from one hand to the opposite hand. In a few cases the

�NE UROLOGY

4-8

percept in the hand was mislocalized to a part of the body upon which the
hand was resting, out into space, or onto the examiner’s body.
The following case illustrates the various responses of patients with
an organic mental syndrome.
Case

admitted to the psychiatric hospital with a one
year history of progressive difﬁculty in concentration, inability to continue work, mood
disturbances, episodes of confusion, forgetfulness and occasional lapses into irrelevant
speech. Later, following the death of his wife, he became depressed, cried frequently,
and spent many hours talking to himself.
The neurologic examination showed minimal right facial weakness and some
gross tremors of the hands. On psychiatric examination the patient answered questions coherently and relevantly. He was euphoric and friendly. There was disorientation
for time and place, his memory for both recent and remote events was poor, and
confabulation was frequent. Calculation and general information tests were performed
poorly. Judgment was poor and there was no insight into his difﬁculties. When left
alone he carried on a conversation with himself, and when presented with a mirror
he identiﬁed the image as that of his brother and conversed with the image, listening
for replies and reporting them to the examiner. In addition, there were difﬁculties
in expression, both verbal and written, with errors in reading, calculation and reporting
numbers. He was able to carry out simple commands but made errors in imitating
mouth and hand movements. He handled objects clumsily. There was right-left dis—
orientation, and he made errors in naming body parts.
Psychometric examination revealed a severe organic impairment with defects in
memory, concentration, abstraction, and concrete verbalization. His performance on the
Kohs block test was severely deﬁcient, exhibiting ability to complete only the ﬁrst two
1:——-A

60 year old man was

ﬁgures.

,

0n sensory examination by the method of single stimulation he could identify
and localize pin prick and touch stimuli, except that stimuli applied to the left hand
TABLE
Stimulus

Right cheek, left hand
Left cheek, right hand
Right cheek, right hand
Left Cheek, left hand
Right and left hand
Right and left cheek
Right cheek, left shoulder
Left cheek, right shoulder
Left foot, right hand
Left hand, right foot
Right and left hand
Right cheek, right hand
Left cheek, left hand
Right and left cheek
Right cheek, left hand
Left cheek, right hand

1

Response

Right and left cheek
Right and left cheek
Right cheek, right shoulder (P)
Left cheek only
Correct
Correct
Right and left cheek
Left cheek, left shoulder
Left foot, left hand
Right and left foot
Out into space*
Two percepts right cheek
Left cheek only
Correct
Right and left cheek
Right and left cheek

Type of Defect
Displacement
Displacement
Displacement
Extinction
Displacement
Displacement-allesthesia
Displacement-allesthesia
Displacement
Exosomesthesia
Displacement
Extinction
Displacement
Displacement

*Patient mislocalized these percepts into space, insisting that the stimulation had not been applied

to his body.

�49

ORG/1N1C .MENTAL SYNDROME

were occasionally displaced to the shoulder or the face on the same side. There were
no signiﬁcant differences in temperature, Vibration, position sense, and two-point
discrimination tests on the two sides of the body. Stereognosis was intact. Examinations by the method of double simultaneous stimulation elicited many defects in
cutaneous perception. These were manifest by extinction and displacement of percepts.
The errors were persistent despite numerous examinations and over many weeks of
study. Table 1 is an extract from the record of the patient’s responses to touch stimula-

tion.

Similar errors in localization of percepts were found when continuous and
repetitive pin prick, tuning fork and temperature tube stimulations were used. 0n
simultaneous stimulation of the cheek and any other region of the body, the patient
correctly localized the percept in the face but seldom perceived correctly, or at all, the
other stimulus. This was particularly evident when the cheek and hand were tested,
especially a cheek and contralateral hand.
A pneumoencephalogram revealed symmetrically dilated ventricles without displacement. A biopsy of brain tissue removed from the right cerebral hemisphere disclosed a prominence of senile plaques, Alzheimer cells and fatty pigmentation of
neurons.
COMMENT

In this case there was no question as to the clinical diagnosis. The
is
of
in
defects
not surprising. It is signiﬁcant that
perception
presence
despite the severity of the mental dysfunction the alterations in perception were consistent and patterned. Even though the patient appeared
confused he never made errors in perception and localization of stimuli
on the face, whereas he frequently erred in the simultaneously stimulated
hand. Extinction and displacements from the hand were frequent during
many examinations. These perceptual errors were conspicuous by their
consistency, orderliness and predictability against a background of apparent mental confusion. These changes can be considered a prominent
sign in the organic mental syndrome.
DISCUSSION

Incidence of errors on the face-hand test: Of 156 patients with organic
mental syndrome, 91 per cent made errors on the initial trial of the
face-hand test using touch stimuli. Subsequent trials revealed a similar
high incidence of errors. These errors were in a deﬁnite pattern, in which
the face percepts were correctly localized, and the hand percepts either
not perceived or mislocalized. Displacement of percepts from the hand
to the cheek was a prominent feature during the initial few trials of the
test. Errors were noted on both sides of the body and occurred on tests
applied to cheek and hand on the same side of the body, or on opposite
sides. In 87 per cent of the patients errors were apparent through the
tenth trial of the test and persisted for many more trials. Repeated testing

�NE UROLOGY

50

I

100

~ ‘~_
60 O
RESPONSES

0*.\

Responses of normal children ages 3-6

DOMINANT

Responses of schizophrenic patients

FACE

CENT

PER

1

2

3

4
NUMBER

FIG. 1. Responses on

5

6

or successnve

'7

8

9

TRIALS

gm

multiple trials of the face—hand test to touch stimuli:.

on subsequent days elicited similar errors. It must be emphasized that
these patients were able to correctly identify and localize single stimuli
applied to the face and hands.
In signiﬁcant contrast to these observations on patients with organic
mental syndrome are the observations on normal and schizophrenic
adults.2 On the initial trial of the face- hand test to touch stimuli,
'75
of
normal
and
the
adults
cent
per cent of the schizophrenic adults
per
failed to report one of the two stimuli. As the test was reapplied, the
percentage of error rapidly declined until by the tenth trial of the facehand test less than 0.5 per cent of the normal adults and less than 3 per
cent of the schizophrenic adults still showed omissions or mislocaliza—
tions of percepts (ﬁgure 1). However, examination of children, age
three to six years, with this method again showed a very high incidence
of defects on face-hand tests. The curve of responses, as noted in ﬁgure 1,
is parallel to the curve of responses of the patients with organic mental
syndrome. The errors persisted for many trials and were observed in
testing over many days. In older children, the curve of responses ap—
proached that of the normal adult.
A number of factors were found to inﬂuence these responses. Such
elements as the type of stimulus, the conditions of the test, the part of

�51

()RGA N10 i1! ENTAL SYNDROME

the body stimulated, “set” and “attention” of the patient, the type and
severity of the mental changes, and the effect of drugs were considered.
Timing and type of stimulus: In previous studies on normal and
schizophrenic adults,2 simultaneity, similarity and equality in strength
of stimuli were emphasized as essential for eliciting these responses. In
the patients with mental changes, however, these factors were not as
prominent since stimuli of unequal intensity or of different modalities
still elicited errors in the tests. Dissimilar stimuli, as application of a
touch stimulus to the cheek and a pin prick stimulus to the hand, or
stimuli of unequal intensity, as a light touch to the cheek and forceful
rubbing in the hand, elicited extinction and displacement of percepts.
Similarly, errors in localization were elicited even if stimuli were not
simultaneous, i.e. followed one another with a lapse of a moment or
two. As previously reported, these errors on unequal, or dissimilar stimu—
lation were not seen in the normal or schizophrenic controls.
Application of the face—hand test using pin prick stimuli elicited the
same pattern of responses as with touch stimuli. Eighty per cent of the
patients made errors on the initial trial and such errors persisted in 60
of
incidence
is
This
defects
trials.
for
than
ten
lower,
cent
more
per
however, than in the series with touch stimulations (table 2). In some
of these patients it was possible to alternate touch and pin prick stimuli,
and observe extinction and displacement of the touch percepts alternating
with correct responses to pin prick stimuli. In a number of the more
severely affected patients, extinction and displacement of percepts were
also apparent on tests with temperature tubes, tuning forks and repetitive
rubbing stimulations.
TABLE

2

INITIAL TRIAL

Organic Mental
Syndrome

Normal Adult
Schizophrenic
Adult

Modality
Touch
Pin Prick
Touch
Pin Prick
Touch
Pin Prick

Hand or
Face Only Face-Face Hand-Hand

Total

Correct

156
50
160
68

15
10

122
35

7’7

75
15
45

’72

50

51

24
36

13

14

5

3
3
2

2

1

2

0

1

5

0

This factor of the type of stimulus was more prominent in the normal
and schizophrenic subjects. Less than 30 per cent of these made errors
on the initial trial with pin prick stimuli, and the number of errors declined rapidly until by the tenth trial none of the normal subjects and
only one of the schizophrenic subjects still showed errors.

�NEUROLOGY

of cutaneous stimuli between various body parts was apparent.
lation of dissimilar body areas with the face as one locus, the
the cheeks were well localized and identiﬁed, while stimuli
were either not perceived or poorly localized. Combinations

SQ

On stimu—

stimuli to
elsewhere
of stimuli
to the face and trunk, face and foot, face and hand, etc., repeatedly showed
face dominance. In contrast, in tests with the hand as one locus, the hand
percept was always poorly perceived and poorly localized. This was
observed in the initial trials in the normal and schizophrenic adults, but
was more apparent in multiple trials in patients with organic mental
changes. By repeatedly testing various combinations of other body areas,
a gradient of the sensory relationships of these areas has been established.
Because the face and hand regions represented the extremes in the
pattern of responses, these two regions were selected as the basis of
most of the tests. Therefore, this method of examination was named
the face-hand test.
The errors in these examinations were apparent in tests of both
sides of the body without any manifest preference. In patients with hemiplegia of recent onset and associated mental changes, extinction and
displacement of percepts were apparent bilaterally, but were more prominent and more persistent on the involved side of the body. In patients
with long-standing hemiplegia in whom the mental syndrome was no
longer apparent, the defects were limited to the involved half side of the
body?
The factor of mental set: The mental set or attitude often inﬂuenced
the perceptual response. Once the normal adult was examined by the
method of double simultaneous stimulation, subsequent tests failed to
elicit a repetition of the errors which occurred on the initial face—hand
test. It was as if these subjects had “learned” the set of “two-ness.”
Moreover, when normal subjects were tested with face-face stimuli, the
responses were correct, and then all subsequent face-hand tests were also
correct. When face-face tests were interposed among trials of the face—
hand test in the patients with mental changes, they continued to make
errors on tests of face and hand, even though they were correct on the
face-face trial. Such errors persisted for days. Evidently mental set and
learning did not alter the pattern of response.
The factoq' of attention: It is well known that attention can inﬂuence
4
perception.2' In a series of 30 normal adults who were told that two
stimuli were to be applied, none made errors on the initial trial of the
face-hand test. However, patients with severe mental changes, who were

�53

ORGANIC MENTAL SYNDROME

told either before the initial trial or on subsequent trials that there would
be two stimuli, still showed extinction and displacement of percepts. It
was possible to have the patient, with eyes open, observe the application
of two stimuli and report them correctly. Then, with eyes closed, and the
stimuli applied to the same or homologous areas, the patient would report
the stimuli incorrectly.
The effect of fatigue on the performance of the patient has already
been mentioned. It is possible to increase the errors of the patient by
administering the stimuli more frequently, or by making him aware
of his errors and thereby increasing his anxiety. With mounting anxiety,
errors increase until culminated by a catastrophic reaction and withdrawal from the examination. A similar effect of anxiety on performance
was manifest in the normal subjects. The adults with manifest severe
anxiety required more trials of the face—hand test to perceive the percepts
correctly than adults without manifest anxiety.
Degree of mental changes: We found a deﬁnite relationship between
the severity of the mental changes and the frequency of errors in perception in the patients with an organic mental syndrome. The patients
varied in their mental status from mild memory disturbances and alteration in intellectual ability, to severe psychomotor retardation, amnesia,
aphasia and somnolence. The responses to the face-hand test varied
from occasional extinction of percepts seen in the mild cases, to con—
sistent, bilateral displacement of percepts to other parts of the body,
the examiner’s body, or into space in the subjects more severely affected.
In a number of patients with severe head trauma or following cerebral
in
mental functioning was acthe
improvement
progressive
surgery,
companied by a change in response to repeated trials of the face-hand
test. The responses changed from bilateral displacement and allesthesia
when damage was most severe, to extinction in decreasing frequency
and ﬁnally consistently correct responses as the subject improved.
Perceptual errors were greatest in subjects in whom nervous system
dysfunction was acute in its course with rapid onset and short duration.
Patients with severe head trauma, infections of the nervous system,
vascular accidents and neoplasms were more likely to show extensive
changes on double simultaneous stimulation than patients with chronic
alcoholism or senility. It was in these last two groups that there were a
number of subjects with organic mental changes who consistently per—
ceived the two stimuli of the face—hand test correctly on the initial and on
multiple trials.
Type of mental defect: There was no obvious correlation of the freface—hand
with
of
in
of
the
the
single
test
errors
symptom
any
quency

�NEUROLOGY

54

organic mental syndrome as in patterns of thinking, spatial or body
orientation, memory or calculation. Errors in perception were most apparent when disturbances in function were most widespread.
A good correlation existed, however, between the patient’s alertness
and the responses on the face-hand test. In patients who were apathetic
or lethargic, errors on double simultaneous stimulation were most promi—
nent. This was apparent in many subjects who made errors occasionally
during the initial trials of the face-hand test, but in Whom errors became more frequent and changed from extinction to displacement responses as the examination continued. Similarly, in testing patients with
ﬂuctuating states of consciousness, there was a good correlation between
the degree of alertness and the responses on multiple trials of the face—
hand test.
Some of the patients were unable to carry out tasks which had two
different aspects. But despite this inability to do two things at once they
were able to perceive the two stimuli applied to the sides of the face.
Therefore, it could not be said that the inability to correctly perceive one
of the two stimuli applied to the face and hand was due to a defect in the
ability to perform a task with two different components.
The factor of aphasia: Aphasia is sometimes considered a defect in
mentation. Such a defect, Where severe or associated with mental changes
characteristic of the organic mental syndrome, yields a picture of the pa—
tient as confused. For instance, a patient with aphasia may also have a
loss of memory and an inability to recall or recognize situations even after
they are described to him. In order to determine whether aphasia per se
will produce errors in the, face-hand test, aphasic patients, with or
without such mental changes, were studied. Patients with aphasia but
without mental changes did not make errors on the face—hand test, while
patients with aphasia and mental changes made repeated and consistent
errors on multiple trials of the test (ﬁgure 1) .
Organic mental syndrome with normal responses on the face-hand
test: As already noted, not all patients with an organic mental syndrome
make errors in tests by the method of double simultaneous stimulation. In
a series of 271 patients in whom various combinations of these tests were
applied, there were 228 patients who made errors and 43 patients who
gave correct responses on initial trials. Of these latter, however, there were
22 who made errors after the initial trial. The remaining 21 were correct
throughout multiple trials. Of the 228 patients who made errors on the
initial trial there were 28 who were subsequently correct and yielded
responses similar to the normal as carried out in one series of tests. In
of
found
49
it
the 271 patients with mental changes
that
was
summary,

�55

ORGANIC MENTAL SYNDROME

yielded normal reactions. All of these 49 patients had an organic mental
syndrome but in general the mental changes were not severe. lVIemory
loss was spotty and the degree of orientation varied, Apathy was seldom
marked. There were fluctuations in performances. At times there were
long intervals, minutes to hours, during which the patient showed no
apparent mental changes. Examinations during those symptom—free intervals showed the face—hand test to be normal. In several instances it was
learned that the defects in memory or indifference in answering questions
pertaining to orientation were‘due to an emotional depression or to a
phlegmatic premorbid personality. Their organic mental syndrome was
only apparent and not real. There were, however, 11 patients with severe
mental changes who reported correct responses on repeated face—hand
tests.
Eﬂect of drugs: From the foregoing studies it is clear that patients with
organic mental syndrome make errors in perception in double simul—
taneous stimulation tests. Consequently it was thought that the mental
changes induced by drugs should yield similar errors. To test this theory,
normal adults were subjected to intravenous injections of 7 to 10 ml. of a
5 per cent solution of sodium Amytal administered slowly. This drug
produced the usual nystagmus, dysarthric speech and drowsiness. In addi—
tion, normal adults, who made no errors on the face—hand test prior to
the injection, now made consistent bilateral errors. Within 5 minutes
after the injection errors were apparent on many repeated trials of the
test and these persisted during the period the drug action was effective.
The more drowsy or intoxicated the subject became the greater the tend—
ency to make errors in perception. At the onset, displacements of hand
percepts were frequent, but as the drug effect diminished, displacements
diminished and extinction of hand percepts became prominent—only to
disappear as the subject became more alert. Similar effects have been
observed in the patients with a mild mental syndrome. Where only extinction of hand percepts was apparent prior to the Amytal injection, displacement of percepts became frequent and persisted for the duration of
the examination. The effect of the drug persisted for longer periods in
patients with organic mental changes than in normal adults, so that
displacement of percepts was manifest hours after the injection in the
patient group.
Similar observations on the effect of anesthetics on central nervous
system function have been made in a study of normal adults subjected
to varying periods of anesthesia.5 These subjects with no demonstrable
disease of the brain, who made no errors on double simultaneous stimulation tests prior to anesthesia, manifested extinction and displacement of

�NEUROLOGY

56

percepts in either hand on multiple trials of the face-hand test during
recovery from anesthesia. When these subjects regained consciousness
from a general anesthetic, they were disoriented and confused. There
was a manifest correlation between the duration of the perceptual errors
and the period of confusion, lethargy and apathy that followed the anes—
thetic administration.
Eﬂeet of convulsions: During post—convulsive states patients frequently show confusion and other symptoms of the organic mental syndrome.
Since persistent errors on the face—hand test were found in patients with
mental changes due to disease of the brain or due to drug intoxication, it
was thought that any one who has an organic mental syndrome, of whatever cause, should show these errors. F or this reason, groups of patients
were studied in whom convulsion were induced electrically for treatment
of depressions. Patients who were given intravenous barbiturate prelimi—
nary to electric stimulation were not included in this group.
It was found that if the post-convulsive confusional state was severe,
these patients showed a high incidence of errors on the face-hand test. As
soon as the confusional state cleared, the incidence of errors in the facehand test decreased.
Value of the face—hand test as a diagnostic sign: In order to determine
the value of the face-hand test as a diagnostic sign of severe mental
changes, a series of patients were examined in the admission ward of Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital. This examination was carried out by simultaneous stimulation of the face and hand. Each patient was given a series
of 10 tests. N 0 history was taken nor were other clues used to make a
diagnosis. Using this method it was found that in all cases in which the
face—hand test showed errors on repeated trials, subsequent psychiatric
examinations disclosed the presence of an organic mental syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS

From the foregoing observations it is apparent that subjects with the
organic mental syndrome showed persistent errors on face—hand tests. It is
signiﬁcant, however, that the same confused and disoriented patients did
not err in a haphazard fashion. An analysis of their responses based on
numerous tests showed that the errors were made in a predictable pattern.
There were consistent errors in the hand percepts, whereas there were
very few errors in response to the simultaneous stimulations applied to the
face. Another signiﬁcant point is that this pattern was found not only in
patients with cerebral dysfunction, whether it was due to structural or
chemical changes in the brain, but also in normal children. This was found
in children in whom the brain was not altered in any manner. The latter

�57

,

ORGANIC MENTAL SYNDROME

observation indicates that this pattern is not the result of disease of the
brain, and conversely, that it is inherently organized. Moreover, it indicates that this pattern is acquired early in life.
N o explanation is offered as to why these patterns are so organized,
namely, face dominance and hand “extinction.” The rostral dominance
theory proposed by Cohn6 cannot be supported by these observations, inasmuch as it was found that the foot dominates over the hand. This fact
automatically precludes the factor of rostral dominance. Moreover, the
authors do not wish to agree or disagree with the well known theories
proposed by Goldstein.7
Still another point is that reactions of the child are similar to those
of the senile individual with mental changes. One might draw an analogy
to the Babinski sign, which is considered normal in the developing infant
and abnormal in the adult. From this analogy, it might be inferred that
the presence of persistent errors on the face-hand test in the adult indicates a regression to the infantile level. However, we do not wish to convey
the idea that we concur with such a theory.
Finally, it might be concluded that what is seen in patients with dis—
ease are normal patterns of function which appear to be grossly exag—
gerated. As noted, repeated errors on face-hand tests may be found in the
normal adult under certain conditions, particularly when there is altered
brain function. Based on this hypothesis it is felt that a good deal of information about normal function can be obtained from patients with
dysfunction as a result of altered structure.
Aside from the theoretical considerations it must be concluded that
the face—hand test has clinical value. It is a diagnostic sign of the organic
mental syndrome. The persistence of errors on face-hand tests in an
adult strongly suggest an organic mental syndrome.
SUMMARY

Patients with an organic mental syndrome make persistent errors in
tests by double simultaneous stimulation of the face and hand. The errors
are usually made in the hand. These errors are made on multiple trials of
the face—hand test and on subsequent examinations on repeated days. The
normal and the schizophrenic adults, however, do not make persistent
errors. This difference in response between these groups is so striking
as to have diagnostic value.
Errors of extinction and / or displacement on multiple trials of the facehand test by touch stimulation are indicative of the organic mental
syndrome. In a series of patients examined in the admitting room of the
Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital, these tests were applied to patients as the

�NEUROLOGY

58

ﬁrst questions of the interview. The diagnosis of an organic mental syn—
drome was conﬁrmed by subsequent interview in every case. The significance of these ﬁndings is discussed.
REFERENCES
1.

(a) BENDER, M. B., and NATHANSON, M.:
Patterns in allesthesia and their relation
to disorder of body scheme and other
sensory phenomena, Arch. Neural. &amp;

Psychiat. 642501, 1950.
(b) BENDE‘R, M. B., and WORTIS, S. B.; Patterns in perceptual, motor and intellectual functions in organic brain disease, Tr. Am. Neural. A. 72:31. 1947.
(C) BENDER, M. B.; WORTIS, S. B., and
CRAMER, J,: Organic mental syndrome
with phenomena of extinction and allesthesia. Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat.
59:273. 1948.
(d) BENDER, M. B.; SHAPIRO, M. F., and
TEUBER, H. L.: Allesthesia and disorder
of the body scheme, Tr. Am. Neural. A.
73:170, 1948.
(e) SHAPIRO, M. F.; TEUBER, H. L., and
BENDER. M. B.; Disturbance of body
image and allesthesia. J. New. &amp; illent.
Dis. 108:253, 1948.
(0 BENDER, M. B.; SHAPIRO, M. F., and
TEUBER, H. L.: Allesthesia and disturbance of the body scheme, Arch. Neural.

10

.

.

&amp; Psychiat. 62:222. 1949.
BENDER. M. B.; FINK, M.,

and GREEN,
M.: Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand, Tr. Am.
Neural. A. 75:250, 1950.
(b) BENDER, M. B.; FINK, M., and GREEN,
M.: Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand, Arch.
Neural. &amp;: Psychiat, 66:35.5, 1951.
BENDER, M. B.; SHAPIRO. M. F., and SCHAPPELL, A. W.: Extinction phenomenon in hemiplegia, Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat. 62:717.
(a)

1949.

The phenomenon of tactile
inattention with special reference to parietal
lesions, Brain 72:538. 1949.
5. JAFFE. J., and BENDER, M. B.; Perceptual
patterns following general anesthesia. J.
Neurol.. Neurosurg. &amp; Psychiat.. in press.
. COHN, K.: On certain aspects of the sensory
organization of the human brain: 11. A
study of rostral dominance in children,
Neurology 1:119, 1951.
GOLDSTEIN, K.: The Organism. New York,
American Book Co., 1939.
4. CRITCHLEY, M.:

In order to conceive a clear idea of the pathology, we have only
to imagine the physiological phenomena, already noticed, assuming
a pathological character. Now, the force of these phenomena may
be augmented, diminished, or annihilated.
In regard to the cerebral functions, we have, in the sentient
nerves, pains or insensibility; in the cerebrum itself erroneous perceptions, judgments, and colitions, or delirium; or a total deﬁciency
of these faculties, or come; in the motor nerves continual voluntary
actions; or paralysis.

Hall in Lectures on the Nervous
System and Its Dis-eases, published in 1876.

-——Marshall

�The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic
Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome
31am

Fink, M .D., 111a7'tin Green», M.D., and NI 0772's B. B ender, M.D.

Reprinted from January—February 1952 (Vol. 2, N0.

1)

Issue of NEUROLOGY

�NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY

The 116th Regular Meeting oI the Society
WILL BE HELD AT THE

BELLEVUE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL
LEWIS I. SHARP. M.D.. Direcior
30”! STREET AND FIRST AVENUE

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 9th, 1950
AT 8:30 P.M.

PROGRAMME
I. TWELVE YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY ON METRAZOL
TREATED CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENT SCHIZOPHRENICS
.

LAURETTA BENDER.

MD. and

S’raff

2. THE FACE-HAND TEST IN ORGANIC MENTAL DISEASE
M. FINK, M.D..

MORRIS

B.

M. GREEN. MD.

BENDER.

and

M.D.

NOLAN D. C. LEWIS. M.D.

MORRIS HERMAN. M.D.

Prosideni

Secrefary

Staff invited

—

Dr. Herman

�4/,q/,

.

(0‘

‘Pv

mmmmnsnmucmm

Newman.
h
an m. w..-

W m. 1.9.
m I.rmm.
and

61w

ICU

47%“

V

21*...‘1977i/w’177

M;
~

M

«magnum-rm
I“
MW”.
human
mum 9mm.» mun

coir;

wa
«m
nun-u.

”W77 .2: 4L5:J' fflzﬂ.)

.

r,

Inn.

.

mu a»

III

(mag.

mIn M(
at»...
mu.
mmm

61”.

m»

um
mMum muumo of man.

��put-W0
W.
m
WW.W«WW.W
WWImmumuth-mxmmm
um mu mam-a

mu

W.Mnmmm.
“mun
MW“ mm minty.or

mumummmtumnunnmu

www.m«mmmummuu
mmmumnwmummuumt
mmmu-umm
umumWﬂ).
mumymmatumauﬁn.mm

‘

sum-.muumuumuuaum. aha-ow.

mummmmmmamummmm
mam nmmmummnmumm

mummwmumummu.
‘

mmmmpmmmuummuntmm»
01mm“. mmummmuummm
m.
mmumwomnmmunm.
unntmmummtnmnu. sun-mm
m‘yummmm.”mumm. mm
wmmnumuumnmmt.mmmmm
«muuxmmmmmmmummumm

nwmmmmuiymm
www.mmmwuumnumom.
mmmmmtmwmmmum
Ntmmumm. mmmummuuu
“mum-mm.

mmummuommotmm.

�3.

“cummumumuumemmo

wwwmmwmwmmu
mdtmwmn (C).Mﬂmwmgmmﬂ

Manama-m; (h)uMnmm.mmunm.

zuumumnmpmtumpmqwmmmm

tomm3(a)utmﬂmmm.mmuumm

umm.umammnuuuummm
umMu-mm. WMWMWMM

lm.ummuuwm.uumonnmmm
mummm-mmunnummum
mouth”. unmm‘mmtuwmmuu
awwamummmmmmmmm._

www.cmummum.
mmuunummmm.

Wu¢unmmmmmmmuhum
mmm-wmumnmmmmamn
to mm M. not
may
Wt: In emu-u.
or
«a mus-an:

ovum 0mm tan-Waumm.
um.roumummtuotm
WWWtW.
m.mmw.mumm.mmcmm

“mun-Ion.

Gamma-lo
mammmumm.
mum «may «my.
WM you.“

w
“pm-.mwmwmmmuMva-unw
ﬂu

Ind

ammonium. Mmmuuutwtm

�����W:

mu. Mummy.
ammummnwumuMnr-Wu
mmomxmmm nmnumuuumm
own”

(a) In

m1 M

w.m.mmmmmupwmtmm

«wwwwummmmnmum
mum. mmm.umnmmotum-m

«Immuammwnmmumm.wumxa

mummuuummummmmm
awn-ac. omsmmuummmamu.

Min-1:, man in “annual: an annual

m 1: am an

Momm.1.c..tmm”mwnthnmuI
mutton... upmAmuW.Mmu-nmaw

nguummtmuuoWu-Wc
mmu.'

muuuﬁawmmmmmumx
cunzm'mmutmumuuam-m. um
wwammwmmwmwmmm
mmmuwrwmmmm. m4mm
«muuw.m.mummusum.m
um(mx). nmumumummmu
.

ummummtm.ummuam
Mwummmummnuwm
“stamina-an. namummmmw
ammauumwumummw
«mmuwm.mrmumuuwm
mmumwammmwm
mama-Woman». mmmwmm

mummwumnmmmum.mmmw

�mummmxwmmummdmm

mummaummawm

mm.

mamt

M

mu» W
,.

mMat
m
nu met
'

'

Pin

ﬂat-I1

“a“

mm
91:: Wk

m

“Magnum

:55:

:3

160

E

.a

‘

m

m
35

36

W
a W
;
ma

3

3

3

t13

0l

I1

8

uM

15

at

51:

an:

.

m
mummmumnnumonmmu
21.;

:.:!..,;:

A:

4

&lt;41"

:1.

.,;;,,3

'

‘

”“1

nnmummummumamumuuum
Imp-mummy.» mummuuummwm'
,umeumxmgmmumMn-ﬁun

www.m-msoummumm
mmwmuxmm. emumuumuuwm

mm.mmm.mmm,mummwm
mm:.mmnutumumm.m
W.
mwmmpmuwmmmum.

mummmwmmummuum
www.mmmwammumaumu
dam-mum. nmmmunmmnun-ummmnmyummum
mount-«mm
ammmmm.
wmwmmmmnmamn
«mmmmummumumm.

9.

�mgnmmmummmwmt.
umummummwmmua

10.

'

mmummuumtwmtpmym

muuWMﬂ'umtm-ﬂmmmmm

”.mttmmﬂMofWI-NW
mm.htmmmﬁuﬂmmmmm
mandate-«mm. zap-umumam-nmm.
mammmm~~l~nvmmm
mummmummmwmumwm.

mmxmwnumm
momma-alumnus

Win-WW
wumWamomum-mm.
Wcmumnunatnmuuuwmmm
“ml-12m
Mummmwmt.
mmu'm'm‘mmu'mﬂ W.“
WWmmmnwtm-th.mm
.

‘

www.mmmmmmmmtummo

W.'mm~mmummmmmmuw
tut in tho unam- at: mm M. M «an»:
«mmmmuar\m'mm.mwmm
mtummum. Mmmmmws

W

'WWm'm'm'mmummpum-t
‘m till} «man an
of 30 m1 mu was
Mum mm: (2.”. In a
man mtmasmnmunmuu. noun-gamma
mmwwumwmm nmmuumnmm
;..

‘

.‘

It 1. i011

m

mu. m,mm'wuwmmmmmnmn

v"

���am.émmégmmummmm
«mummnmunomumrmm

13.

mumumeuom-yutmmwm.
mmmn.atmxummnwwmmm‘
utmmmmumn,mmmmmuum
nun-«mm. Wanna-.itnauaothmthum
_

munwucubumnMnmwmm-mmu
”mummmuamtmmmnwumtmeu

mummmamu.
Winn-am“ MQMNG,MIm.wmuum
um am.
nummmmuqum-om
new : mm m mt nun-mm.“ m- am.
umuammmomcnamwmmmmmw
“M’umummmmWL-ommu
m. umuammmu.mmmzm
mm in ”I {W mt.
«mm
puma,
muumme.
www.msw.
«thmmmammmmmmmm;
mumumwmmmmwmmm
Q/F’7”
at
am.may»
m m,
am
or

a

than. aphasia

‘

.

with or

W
mamw,mmumummmomm
an

(of. Figure I)

mummmuwmmaammm
0W.
mnmummuummmom
umﬂMMmmmMmmumu-mm

mm.mbsmmmwmm,muum.

�15a

“mmmu,mmmmnmtm.mtum

mummmuwumuumm
mums-ﬁammmmmumm
«nun-mun. mmmnmmmm
um
mummmummmm
M.W¢MMMW.utum-m
www.mwwmmmumum
mwmumuwummm
mam. mmmmmumumuuu
.uuu-umm. mmmmummum
ammmumwmuummamu

ququa-mmuwmu
mantuumwthmmmumun
mom.xm’mummmumummt

«Wuwmmmmumnm

Wmunummemm'mmu
mmmummmasswummu.
mm‘
mummumts).
“mummdmmuMmm-nu

mMmanumm.mu
W.uwumuuwmumm

m.
Wummmmmmmu.
mmmuWMWrmnnu-uazmm»
mmmummmu'mme
m.mumwmsmlmmm

���18.

mm.uumhomwwtmtmmmnm
uuMmMMQthamuu
mum-ma. um.mmmum~mm

wumummmngmmum.
Monm-

mmmuummm
Wanna-unmammwwmumnumw

Wmummnmuamumuuum:
“titanium.

Ma
m
umnmwumm ”Mormon
umm-m

“tum-mun».

nuns-mm

13"

nuance-nu.

_Mmmum‘WWmmm
'W.

m mutant mm
“WI-shim
tau-aw mmmummummmm
“mummy-ammo” Momma-um
mmmemmmnwmgm
MMMNW¢NM.W.
«mm
downs-mm Momma-mom
Manta Int

«ummm
“mun
mu!
umWWVMuWuva-am

«mummy-mu

‘

namwmumnm
WWW
thMdWWWMOMm.Mtc-um
mumummcm
wW W
Me
m:
M
mm” a am out,
of In

w

!:*

{

i
‘

a

.

�.

1...}

hilt

[,....VMLL..FED|II'

.

.

y

p.

.

‘

.

‘

I.EEERIEKV=5¥I

1

ll...

.

b
w

.

,.,.,..VHA|I,EELLELEtELVFIVIillrilill&gt;il

fit:

..

‘

.

:33:

.00

mac:

.50

mmmmw

a

.&lt;
63:08..“

.3
Jun—“Suv—

z.

.l..|||lli.,r

5::

.EE\

liKiff

,

uv..mmn

'

|

.muwooEm—zg

.L

‘

‘

L

E!!i:ll.’yw

A

/

:1

E.

E!

.m

.
A

mo&lt;5

�’W

amount

11

1‘.“ to

on

may» run. a: the moon“

ma “mu.

'

mm
in: normal 0mm
(x—é—x) at
«W
of an. 3.6 (0—0), mm m1:- (0+m0).
”mum“ uncut: (x—h—x) m magne- lulu
”mu name me mm mm (rm-I).
*

In. mama or

W

patzlcntl

sun emu.

���i/‘l/B

I
STANDARBIQATION

OF THE FACE-HAND TEST

Introduction:
In previous studies a simple perceptual test, the

test,

race-hand

test

was

introduced and the responses to the

of normal subjects and of patient with psychiatric

disorders were described in detail (1~6).

sists

The

test

con-

of applying touch or pinprick stimuli simultaneously

to the face and hand while the subject's eyes are kept
closed.

The

subject is then asked

localize the percepts.
occur.

The two

stimuli

correctly or the subject
and

Two

felt

and

to

general types of response

may be
may

what was

perceived and localized

perceive only one stimulus

either not perceive the other

(phenomena of

extinction)

or misloceliae the second stimulus (phencmens of displacement)

(7).

Most

often the mislocslisstion or displacement

occurs to another part or the subject's body but occasionally

there is displacement into extrspersonsl space or onto
the examiner (exosomesthesis) (8).

Displacement of stimuli

�2.
across the mldllno of the body (alleatheala) is another
form of displaoomont
Normal

adults

initial trials
orrots

that

may show

of the

among

occur (9).

errors in perception

teat. characteristically

of face dominance).

all subjects correctly

-

be

those

is perceivod correctly
As

correct

(phen-

additional tests are

tho errors disappear so that by the.tenth

to

on the

oonaiot of extinction of the stimulus on the hnhd

wheroao the face stimulus
-

may

done

trial noarly

porcolvo both stimuli and continue

0o subsoQuent

trials.

has been tarmod a ”negatlvo faoe~hand

This type of response

test."

lt

oocura

not only with normal gdulto but also in patients wito
nohlzophronla, depression, or oovoro anxiety{
In contrast to the preceding groups, patient

tith'

an organic mental tyhoromo show extinction‘and diaplaoef

want not only during the

initial trials

or the ‘tost but

’

after

10

total:

of testing or as long on testing is

continued. Such a rooponse is termed a ”positive taco—hand

�3f

test.”
-by

A

normal

"positite fees-hand test“ is also manifested
ohildren, normal aged persons.

fectives asvwell as
syndrmhe.

by

patients with

and mental de-

an organic mental

~

Because of the

differentiel_response or these several

groups of subjects, the face-hand

test

has become

useful

clinically in detecting the presence of organic brain
disease. During the course of our studies, however,

it

hes been noted thst patients with an organic mental syndrone vary

'

greatly in the type and frequency of peroeptuel

errors. Also, subjects without organic brain disease

‘

occasionally manifest a positive faoefhend test.

The

questions thieh arose from these observations are: 1) Is

it
.

poeeiole to classify or standardize the different types

of errons ooeuring in subjects with e positive race-hand

test?

3

2) Gen

these different types of response he corb

related with the several groups or subjects previously
mentioned?; 3) In there e type of response which can be

�llld to

ooour absolutely only

in notiente with eeyere

4

dieeeee of the brain? 'The present study ie an attempt

to enerer these questions.‘

~

“

‘

.

lethod end Resultez.
We

test

reviewed our previous records of the face-hand

done

in almost

syndrome, normal

1000

adulte,

patients with organic mental
and

schizophrenia adults, as

well an in lesser numbere~of normal children, normal aged

persons, and subjects with mental defioienoy, depression
or severe anxiety. Additional groups or some of theee

subjects

were

aleoteeted in

different types of stimuli.

e systematic manner with
The

criteria ueed‘to

form-

ulate a standardization of the race-hand test were:

1)

‘type of perceptual errorx'a) frequency or the variOue

type: or error: with different types of stimuli (touch,
rubbing, scratching, or pinprick);
quency of

errors

when

3)

effect

on

the fre~

the Subject ere-witnesses the applio'

cation of the stimuli (factor of attention). Fifteen to

thirty trials
'

or the

test

were

usually done for each

eubjeet.

�5.
Based on theoe

criteria,

it

was

possible to divide

oeticnte showing a poeitive race-hand test into four
groups.

The

oheracterietio reeponeee for each group are
V

'

in Teble I.

summarized

Qheee reeponeee with examples

are described more fully in the following peregraphe.

mm

I

Features of the Different Type: of
Positive Face-Hand Test
\

One-glue

Extinction
only with

,

a

touch stimuli,

Two-Blue

Three—glue

Extinction

Extinction

~pinprick

placement with
touch, rubbing

with touch,
rubbing, and

and deep

~

stimuli

die-

and pinprick
’stimull

Four-Rina
Same as
three-plus
with at
least one or
the following

feeturoe:
e) exosomeetheeie
b) alleetheeie

c) frequent

pereervetion

d) occurrence of

errors while

subject eye—
witnesses the
areas stim-

ulated.

One~Plue Face-ﬁend
show

These

Test:

errors only of extinction

The

subjecte in this gnoup~

and not of

displacement.

errors occur only with touch stimuli.

When

pinprick

�6.

in need, both stimuli are perceived correctly, although

errors will again uppeer

when

touch stimuli are reintro-

duoed.
A

6h

year old

because of a

1%

men

with mild diabetes was admitted

year history or difficulty in walking.

For at leeet the same period of time the patient had
been depressed,
The

elept

and

ate poorly. and

wee

impotent.

only neurological finding was a elow, heeitent,

shuffling gait. There
vascular dieeaee.
payohomotor
was

The

peripheral

patient appeared depressed.

showed

retardation, and cried readily. Senecrium

intact. Spinal fluid,

eere normal.
The

was no evidence of

The

EEG,

and

X—reya

of the spine

diagnoeie wee involutional psychosis.

gait difficultiea

were thought

to be secondary to the

depression.

this patient
hand

test.

A

shoeed a onesplue response on the raoe~

sample of

his response: rollove:

�7.

'

com

stinging
touch: right chcokolort hand' right cheek
touch loft chock—right hand
touch right check—right hand
'“touch loft chockwlcft hand
touch right check-loft chock
touch right hand-loft hand
touch right chock—loft hand
touch lelt chock-right hand
touch loft check-right hand

'

left

cheek

right cheek

left

cheek

T222

of Error

extinction
extinction
oxtinction
extinction

correct
correct

right

chock‘

extinction

correct
correct

touch right check-right hand 'right cheek
touch left chock—loft hand
left cheek

extinction
extinction

pinprick right chock—left hand correct
pinprick loft chock-right hand oorncct
pinprick right chook-right_hand correct
pinprick loft chock-left hand corrcct
touch right cheek-loft hand
correct
touch loft check~right hand
loft chock

extinction

'

adamant:

Although

this type

patients with cerebral disease,

it

Or

response occurs in

is not

alwaya charac{'5 w (M

.

[cal/ca
toriatic for this group. It is also seen in caciiihf
defrlswod’ a; MAJ (as: t/(O‘ﬁli‘d 4"/ Mo, ﬁtter (a! amt/11:5 Skits}
.(achizophrcnia, and, occasionalgy,

in normal adults.

�8.
Two-Plus Paoe~ﬁand Test: In

this

group

extinction

'

occurs with pinpriok and rubbing stimuli as well as with
These errors.may be

touch stimuli.

just as frequent

with both types of etimhli or may be more conspicuous
with touch than

sith pinpriok

is not present, but

or rubbing.

may ooour on an

A.72 year old man had a 5 weeks
and

Displacement

occasional

trial.

history of mental.

behavioral changes. This. consisted of disorientation,

confused behavior, and internittent autism.

thero

was an

examination

organic mental syndrome characterized by

partial disorientation, defects in recent
and oiroumlooutions

illnoss,

On

in answering questions, denial of

and pain asymbolia.

logical disabilities.
l-raye were normal.

memory, evasione

The
A

There were no other neuro~

spinal fluid,

and

EEG,

pneumoenoephalogram showed

skull
diffuse

,oerebral atrophy.
This patient's responses on the face-hand

characterise the two-plus type or response.

A

test
sample

�of these responses followc:
Stimulﬁs
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch

lett

cheek~right hand

right cheek-left hand
left chock-left hand
right cheek—right hand

right chookéleft

cheek

right hund~1ert hand
touch right cheek~left hand

I

.

Roseanne

ngo of Error

left

extinction
extinction
extinction
extinction

cheek

right cheek

left

cheek

right cheek
correct
correct
right cheek

pinpriok left cheek-right hand left cheek
pinpriok right cheek-left hand oorrect’
pinprick loft cheek~lort hand left.choek
pinpriok right cheek-right hand right cheek
pinprick left cheek-right hand left cheek
Gonncnt:

extinction.
extinction
extinction

,

extinction
extinction

This roaponco occurs most often in patientcv

with cerebral disease although patients with anxiety state,
I

depression or schizophrenia

may

also exhibit

it. It is

not seen in normal adults.
Three-Plus Paco—Hand Test:

This group is characterised

by the Occurrence of displacement as well as

with both touch and pinprick stimuli.

The

extinction

frequency of

�10;

extinction

and displaoomont may be aqual

or unequal and,

likewise, the number of errors with touch and pinprick
otimuli will be variable.
A

57 year old chronic alcoholic was found in the

in a stuporous condition.

Hia

Itroot.

breath had an alcoholic

odor and there oas a laceration over his right foroooad.
There here no

hospitol

focal neurological signs. During the

doy the

patient graduolly

Spooch woo rambling and
was

was

and

skull

had savoro memory defects

There were no
X~ru§a were

ﬁalluoinationsti'

nofonl.

The

diagnosis

ocuto and chronic alcoholism with deterioration;
A

hand

fluid

And

35‘

expressed taranoid ideas aod was

He

hoatilo'hnd asaﬁultivo.
ISpihal

fully oooacioualgii.

at timeo almost incoherent!

oomplotoly‘diooriontod

with confahulation.

become

first

sample of

this pationt'a

toot, indicative of

fallout:

responooa on the

race-

a throe—plgo rooponao. in go

‘

�114‘

szg

Rcaponso

Stimulus

of Error

right chcck~left hand right chock-left hand displacement
touch loft check~right hand right hand—left hand displacement
touch right cheek-right hand right cheek
extinction

Touch

touch
touch

loft
loft

cheokﬁloft hand

Correct

cheekoright hand.

left

chock

extinction

touch right chock-loft hand right check—left check diaplacomont
touch right hand-left hand .correct
pinprick right chock~1c£t hand‘ right-choek-lcft chock displccomcnt
pinprikk loft chock-right hand loft chock-right cheek displacement
‘

pinprick right chock—right hand right cheek
left check
pinprlck left chock-loft hand
FourvPlus Facc~Hand Test:

extinction
cxtincticn

This group shows the.

sovercat porcoptual errors. In addition to frequent

extinction

and displaccment ac scan

group. one or
.

all

in the threc~pluc

of the following phononcna

may be

sccn'

with touch andﬁlr pinprick stimuli: 1) oxoaomcsthesia;
2)

allcsthosic;

3)

frequent pcrservation of responses;

h) the occurrence of perceptual

errors even while the

subject keeps his apes open and eye witnesses tho arcas'
stimulated.

�12.

A

60

year old

man had a

oriéntation, torgetfulness,
examination he

ShOﬁBd a

three year history of

interest.

and loan of

On

sovare organic mantal syndrome

manifested by cemplete digorientation. marked
-d6fect3, and inability to calculate.

'oodperativo.

d18~

He was

mamary

alert

There were no other neurological

Spinal fluid and skull x-raya were normal.

EEG

and

signs.'
showed

modernta, diffuse biaynohronoua slaving with slow alpha.
A

diffuse curcbral atrophy.

pneumoogoephalograg disclosed
A

sample of the

patient's roaponsee; 1ndlogt1ng a'

fqur-plua face-hand tagt, is as fellows:
Stimulus
touch right cheek~

left hand
touch left cheek»
hand

right aheek
sonal spaco~

,

v‘

right.oheok

oxosomosthaaia

extinction

,

_

oheek—
lart
left hand

10ft hand

extinction

,

touch

touch right hand-

‘

left-hhook-oxtrlporu

,

touch right cheekhand

.

,

right

right

‘,

‘

of Errér

Tzﬁo

Haazonse

right cheek
,

oorrhot

perseveration
'

'

�13.

touch right ohook-

right chook~loft

left hand
touch left oheok¢
hand

right
pinpriok right
hand

loft

ohook-

loft

right hand
'pinpriok right cheek- right

right

hand

pinpriok loft

’lort

hand

loft

chaok—

pinpriok (eyes open)

right cheek-left
adamant:

hand

cheek—loft hand

right ohook-lott

left

pinpriok loft chaak~

ohook

ohook

allosthosia
displaoomont

extinction

_

cheek~oxtrnporaonnl
apnoo

displacement

extinction

cheek

oxoaomeathosia

right cheek—extrAporaonal oxosomosthoain
space

Throo~plua and four-plus responses invariably

indicate disoaae of the brain.
normal

chock

They are never found 1o

adult: or in patients with psychiatric disorders.

In oddition to tho difforont groups of subject: diaounsod above, the responses of normal children above

fears 0! ago, normal
hove

ngod

also been studiod.

3

persons, and montal defectives
The

distribution or the responses,

or the children and aged poraooa are related moinly to
age.

The

youngest children and the oldest adults show

threo-plus and four—plus reopensoa.

With changes in

�age away from thine extremes, one-plus and two~plus

re-

spouses become more frequent. or the subjects with mentel

deficiency, those with

ﬁho

lowest mental age have throe-

plua and four—plus responses while one-plus and two-plus
in subjects with higher mental 33035
'neoponses predominate
Table II summarizes the distribution or the four

different tfpes of responsesamong the various groups of
subjects.
ShOﬂ

Only

three-plus

may be

patients with
and

four-plus roséonses._ Such responses

considered diagnostic of an organic mental syndrbme.
TABLE

‘

an organic mental
syndrome

I;

Frequency of One-Plus to Four~P1us Positive
Pacerﬁend Test in Different Groups of Subjects

Negative

Ono~

F5H.test Pius

organio nental Syndrome 10%
7%
1%
Normal Adults (below 60’ 99%
year: or age)
“yachixophrenio Adults nearly noooae-

Two~

Plan

Patients with anxiety nearly occae~
states
all ionelly
Petients with paycho~ neerly
genie depression

all‘

Four~

Plus

Plue_

25%

335-

o

o

'

25%

o

_

'

'

all ionally

Three»

rare neVer never
more

never never

�15;-

Discussion:
In answer to the questions raised in the intreduetlon,
our results indicate that four general types of positibe

Itsce-hsnd test occur and that these different types can
be

correlated with different groups of subjests (Table

Our

attentien

there

was a

was

ii).

focused mainly on the question of whether

type sf response which occurred only in pamienss

with severe disease of the brain. All cases with a threeplus or foursplus response have organic brain disease.
Suoh'responses are never seen in nermel adults or patients-

Iith

psychoaenic disorders, even theugh these groups

occasionally

show one~plus

may

or two-plus responses.

Patients with oerehral disease manifesting s four~
plus response invsrihbly

show

vsneed foam or mental changes.

the severest or most adOtherwise there is no

correlations between the type.n! positive faoeahand
test and the severity of she senserisl defense. Same

good

istients

with severe mental changes may have only a twenplus

�»

response; In addition,

10%

of patieoie with an ofganio

mental syndrome hove a negative face~hand

ereelized that the use of
‘fov the groups

16.

teet.’ It is

to four ~plus nomenclature

a one

implies an increasing degree of cerebral
‘.

-dyafunntion. This nomenclature

‘

was used

because of con(1

lenience and much an implication is not intended;

.

We?

This classification of a positiieﬁface-haod should
‘

be

useful clinically.

In feeting neurological patients,

the exect type of positive face-hand
-corded,
was

will

test

should be re-

rather than the deeignetion "the taceuhend test

positive" as has been
make

it

easier to

of politiﬁe faoe«hand

done

until

now;

Judge whether the

Such a prooeedure

particular type

test manifested; indieatee definite

cerebral disease or whethef‘it

may

not be a mnnifestatioh

of anxiety or depression.‘ The use or such a classification

will also

make

it

easier to

compare the response of

patients

at different times during their illnees. In addition.
.

,

it

should be valuable in clinical experimental work,'euoh an
the reopen-e or patients to drugs. eleetroehock trentmont; ate.

�17o

Ema

1“,? :

.A

stanﬁardization of the
dittorgnt

face-hand responses is prgsented.

A

ﬁypea of

positive

one-pins face—hand

that consists of gxﬁinotion only with'touoh stimuli.
Itwo~plus

reapgnsg 1a charactﬁgixéd by

A

extinction with

pinprick and rubbing gtimﬁix,‘gs.wéll as with touéh stim-

uli?

A

three~plu3xfesponés consists cf extinction plus

diapﬁacaﬁont with touch, rubbing, #nd pinprick stimuli.
A

four—plus rggpénso has

all

tha charactériatics of a
‘

é

three-plus rgaponsa

and

in addition at least one of tbs

following features: a) exo§bmeathesia; b)_allesthesia;.
c) pérseveration of respongea;'d) occurrenoa of
evbn while the

errors

subject aypeyitneéaas tha Aﬁﬁlication of

fha stimuli. ‘Three—plﬁs éﬁdttour«plua responses invaritbly
M-rindictte_¢1aeaaé of Fhé braig.

One-plus and two~plua

rdaponaea ocgur in patient; with brain disease but are

alab maniteated by a hmélllﬁumber of normal alulta and
.

patients with psychogenic disorders. Pationts with

a;

r

�183

four-plus response

the Invarest mental changes but

show

otherwise there is no correlation betwoon-tho aovopgyy'
of the montql changes and the
.

7-

test manifested.

-

.

face-handV.‘
typo-of'politivo
(J
’

"

.

,

'w

L

�19.

REFERENCES

1.

BENDER,

u.a.,

PINK;

3. and

GREEN,

n. - Puttarnn 1n

paﬁcegtiun on simultawawus ﬁesta a: face and hand.
Arch.Neurol.&amp;Pq1chiat., ﬁg: 355—362, September, 1951.

2.

M.B., and PINK, M. ~ Tactile perceptual tests
in the differential diagnosis or psychiatric
disorders.
J.Hillaido 3032., A: 21-31, Jlnunry, 1952.

3.

FINK, M., GREEN, M., and BENDER, M.B.

BENDER,

tastNo.an dia'noatlo
1,

‘g:

h'ar8,

- The raoa4hand

Sign or disease or the
Jan~Feb., 1952.

brain. Nburolo

.

FINE, H. and

BENDER, M.B. - Dovelopmunt of perception
9f simultaneous tnctile'stimull in normal children.
2 27-3L, January,
Neurolo
1953.

JAFFE, J. and BENDER, M.B. ~ Barceptual patterns fol—
lowing general anesthesia. J.Nouro.Neurosurg.&amp;Psychiat.,
gg: 316-321, Hovombor, 1951.

and

BENDER, M.B. ~ Cutaneous perception
in the aged. Aroh.Neurol.&amp;ngphint. ﬁg: 577. 1953.
g. BENDER, ﬂ.B. - The phenomenon of sensory displacement.
GREEN, M.A.

,Armh.Neurol.&amp;Pq;oh1at., 95: 607-621 May. 1951.

8. SHAPIRO,.M.F., PINK, m. and BENDER, v.3. ~ Exosomesthesia
or displacement of cutaneous sensation into extruporsonnl
space. Aroh.Rouvol.8:Psgchi-.at.,

9.

gag: 1.81-1.93,

Oct. 1952.

Patterns in allasthosia
body scheme 3:: other
g4: 501~515,
Arch.Neurol.&amp;Pa;chiat.,
aensorysphohamena.
Oct. 19 2.
BENDER,

and

M.B. and NATHANSON, H.

—

their relaticu ta disorder or

3

�3?}!DAMIM’1'IM

63‘

m FAW $33!?

a,

mu: 1. Green, 3.
'

n.

end

m ﬂak, “e at

«mu (m. unit m m hum hun«tion at Melanie hardy“: (m. omen;
are. the he
at at hmlag at the umt 81nd nupitd
mad the 31

statue

m1“ heath

1“ Megan}...

�human:
m wim cm» owl. 9;".le tut. m tam»W «at, In: untamed and 8h mum» a: mi ijﬂiuj
.

.

an

m6 6: pinata“ with

«m1 (hm... m

I

”yum-mu gamma

m :3an
at pup-1a:

an amt“: or mum mu

”m: swim» to aim m. and mm um. um mhjuuu

an nu «Elma. m mm 1! mg: and £o¢uu1hu and

.

i

1m

Imus. an ”my“. ad mm”). km; of Hum-M mm;
m We «mu my by manna and 1:00.11.an a‘amauy. or.
a» mild.“ any pun-«in only can “mm: and um:- mh para«1» m an)” (Warn, of mutation) a:- 11:10am" it»
or “wanna” (7). lo“ mm
«com! “1mm!
W “almanaum or
«am ﬁn “who: M at
m “mun: m. but «gutmmy m» u “mums auto
utmycnml and. ar on» tho 0mm” {unmsmltﬂ (‘8).
of «mu gums. tho gumm- o!’ m had: my.»
anlmt
than) my the cum (9).»
new mom show um 11: ”reunion an tho mun:
trim a: m rue-hum an. mutant-visually than cm“

(mm

«ng:

,

‘

in?

‘

'

m1» a: titanium at m. «Mm:

to:

an hm! worth an

(Wm

at an ammno. «mm: 5.: pandwd dame-1:1:
muh M that mu m npch’w 0mm many-w no that
by m mm ﬁrm. marl: All munch alarm“: ”was." both
“mm and than 00mm m but own“ on tum-«mm man.
m. in. of mm. m but: hand a “no-nun
int.“
«am not only with 2mm). adult: but an a: punch“
1%.

1'in

�3.

‘riih

I¢b1iayhm¢n1ug dnpmunl1un.-ov 11'111 1nx1tty.

m

«mtmt to

m panama magnum, pathnu mu m

i-orsun1o 3.11:1 aynérhln aha! 1:11101111 and d1splaaolnn1

1:11:

ton 111.1: or 11¢11n¢_av at long a; 1.31115 13 uon11nuod. 3111
a ruspumno 1u‘1gauud 1 "911111 1 tuaouhand 1111.” A "91111111
rnut~huui 10.1” 1: alun‘nnn1rbaeod by annual «h1ldrun, nay-a1

laid

W. «a 1mm.

10100111“.

31151:. 1: 1h; d1££buon1111 9.19011. 1! 1ha1o sewirnll
~grouya at 31111113. 1h. flatuhmud‘1nut has bacon. 111911 111nm
11.117 1n 6010011ng 1h» pwaacnac a: orgnn1a 11111 111.11..
naming 1h. «aura. at our 1111101. hawthr. 11 ha: haen gotta
1hu1 pa11cn10 111h 1a avainlo nan1tl aynévano vary gron1ly 1n
1h. typo and truqunnax at 9011111111 111111., 11:1, auhjnatl
withaut «waania 11111 11:11.. uccnﬁxon111y'nna1tun1 1 91111111
tqaodhund 1.11. an. 11.51111: Ib1dh aria. tram 1hnao 11101111109»
'12:: 1} In 11 9111111. 11 11:10123 1r utnaﬂardino 11: d1rfurun1
1ypoo at 11:11: 10111111: an 11150011 i11h pauittv. rto¢~hnna
1
1111!:
In 111:1 1 turrulat1on 10110-1 1h: typo: or #:1311311
11
and a1ftbr1a1 gruupo or 1nbjoe1n?! 3) I. 11.90 a 1:90 at 211911».
uh1ah can ho 0514.19 owner only 1» p.111n13 I11h.scv¢ro 1119110
of 1a. hrl1at 11. pwcaqn1 study 11 :1 attnnpt to tnnuur that!
'
'
quaatioun.
.

.

a)

‘

It

ruv1acid our pwvv1éun 11.111. 1: lbw thundhuua 1111
aunt tn 3111.1 1660 9111131: with 1131111 noutal 13119131, n1!uni ndul1a, and 0611111113110 161111, a: 1111 11 in 11:10: auuw
born at annual ah1ldrua. 191111 1114 ptrveaa. and nuhjtatn 1111
"

‘

������9.6
I.

W

“is?

w -4”,

mt Mmhft; m4

tum

Lift ehmaihraght

tpmnh

hand

.
right «near
lath chunku
m

w,

,

axﬁaupunnannlr

m

W or

mm‘uan

ﬁxasamaaﬁhnutu

nynoo

um; obnmrmt hm: right Mk

touch

'touah

'

tough
touch

men

Intt ahaokwlatt hand,

rasht

righﬁ handplath hand
mam wank-law ham

aarrout
mam

"use ohm-might ham

“#1813:thth ma

plum-Mk
-

pmmak’

pupae:
pinyrink

‘

;
.

'

«hank

'Mb
an

1am

m
«mu-

lnft hand

chunk»
iggia choir

vi

1.11 «unwraac' mm

more

was chub-right

1513M chock

m:

10ft §h0¢k~11tt hand

shut

10:! ah‘utu

dxhrnporaonal

«amnion:
yams-vuratian

anyhow.“
.

mutants:
~

aupxmmt
’

.

aim-um

manna
-qnaaannlthnnxl

apnea

“inpriuk

axon apan)

right dhuol+1urt hand
~

right

dhloku

nxtrupuraaunl

oxalannuﬁhnutt

ipano
gagggggx, $hruaugana and ramruplua uhupuusna invariably:
mum. Mama at bum; may run mm mm m
~

.

-

,

m

um:

'adnlta or tn patinntu with gayuhaapnln allardnrn.
Ehiiﬂ roapaasas any. hcan neetainnaliy naan,-haucvnr,
nawuul childrun anal?

mum; anus.

ﬁt; as: a: niglth).

1n

nova various without

at my hm,» (6.1m mun «run»: (10).
was distribution a: the rutpanauu at tbs childron and ﬁend
povuaua urn rulutcdkmmiaiy an inn. In. gamma-it ihixdaan and

tho oldﬂxi adults anew tar-vagina and Icaruylul nonpunuOI.

�‘

W:

mm
in age mix-m
ﬁlo-plat magma“ ham mm

tum”... mama»
m
mam» at m magma

and

m lmt mull m haw
mug-91m and ”mph: 1'0in m1. m~p1m cm W
plus puma Manhunt: 1:: £11111.le with lush.» mam

with

mum «imam, than;

as».

aluminum at tho raw «than!
win;
a:
mug the vulva:
My

mm I:

typo. a:

mum»

um

”amt

nutlo or

mama.
am

am}:

whim“.
show “1'00me and
my b. «manna 41:5:-

W
mam:

Wu mum Imam.

Mama: at mama. to mun: ”3111M
m~m¢ mat in magma Group: a: Sauna
303.11“ m- m Myron!»

am

oiﬁmenm
nor-a1 Mult- (bola 60
yam-n a: m)
30:11 Momma

Am»

Punch” with mad-t3

“an

.

my:

with an organic mum).

four-plus

1-

with

Faunaa with
arm»Mun-name:

-,
.

mm m
1!
10%

W

25%

11"

a

.

33$

25%

0

0

«um
mu:
Maul; an an»

max-1.1

an.

marl:
13.1

'

mane mu
immar

"

70¢

mm

2121.:

1.

22¢

'

as

mvcw
o

mwr
o

(a1 :50 gram» rimlmd)

Wtmy:
In

an:

an“ 1::
-

10‘

m

quantum

15h:

anal» hadn‘t. mt (out mum-l1 try".

intmdmum.
of 30.181"

15.

�11¢

'rn¢a~hund

tutti

anon» and

that

Ghanc 83y.» ¢ﬁa bu

with aux-aunt swap. or unbjubts

corralﬁtod

(mu 1:). mar-sewn“

rauunod Ininly an inn quaahiam at uhnﬁhor zany. was a
typn a: rinyohho ihieh aaourrua-éuly in patinnt. with ncvarn

‘vun

‘

‘

I

diuoat. or thn.brn1u; A11 adult nubgduta-I&amp;th a thwlonplun
or tanrwﬁlns voaponai ham. argnalo hvnzn diuanpu. Such awn
lpaaaoi'nru'nmvur noon in normal aubjﬁotl a: athtontn with
payohaainxa altardbru, av.“ though knit. satay: In: augusianally
than onnuplns «r tuaapxun ruaponn0!.
rntigatt with a¢r¢hrn1 niacin. Innitlnting n {ourwpiuu
than the utvutpuﬁ ﬂfwﬂnit natunaaa ran:
at unntal shamans. ashtrviau than. a: an anoa aorwnlatian
hiﬁno:ﬁ thy try! at ponlttvn tuna-haaa taut uni sho'spvorﬁﬁy
of thy concavial dnftett. Sana pntxcnta with Iivumu unntal
dhtngtﬂ an; hav. «£17 u tronplua vulva”... In &amp;dd1t£an. 10¢
a: pntlnnhs with an emanate aunts: tynﬂramn hat. a nonstivu
_f&amp;oo~hand that. it in thaliﬁda Ihlt tho as. a: I an. to rauv»
plus nandnnlnturu tar Eh. stung. zapztal,nn mnumuuuins angst.
or curabrul dysfunnt;on. Th1! nannnalatuml was usad'huoaulq
or aonslnlduac and Iuﬁh un'inplioitian in not 1ntqn¢nﬁ.
wospcnnc invnrznbiy

bu

thin alacsiriantion af.a paaztivu'fnaamhuhdvtnnt ahaulﬁ
unoful clinioally. In tau§1n§ unurolagisni patignts, can

uxuat typo a: poattzvo tantahﬂnd‘ﬁautVIhuulﬁ ha ruaurdnﬁ.
ruthnr than tho dusignntion ”ﬁn. flaonhnnq G‘st wt: pasittvn'
tn ht! boon Inna until nun. sunk &amp; procoanrt 1111 I!!! 1%
«suit: h¢ Judga uhgthnr/Shn typo or panttivu flatuhnnd cult
xudiontnn dut£n18¢_oumabrnl altouno or whathnr it any b0 u

lanthanum of may

or

«puma. m an at

mm

n

�1‘

12¢

I1III1110II1II I111 IIII IIII 1t III1II II

'

IIIIIII III IIIIIIII
Va: mama II array-II 1;qu
Mina ﬂaw 111mm. III and-'41I1II. 1% II IIIIIIII 1n IltnioIl IIIII1IIIIIE work. for 1%
III IIII III11II 1n IIII1II It III ItrIIII It dIugI In pilv
intlnﬁg III III IIIIIIIII If IIItIItI II I1IIIIIIhIII IIIII~
IIII. In IIII III11II I1IIrII10I 1n IIIIIIILII III II IIII
IIIII I: IIIIrvzac III IIIII1II III.III 1II11IIII I1 III VIII
My or mam» new-m I»: mung IhI pol-1m I: toning.
'

1

.

IA

IIIIIII11III1II If III IIIIIIIII'IIII

1I

IIIIIntId.

III1I1VI'3III-hInd IIII 1a 1IIII1II1 II III in Ih1Ih
IIrIrI
"III-nus «I» III. IIIII and. 2m «:1qu or
with. {III-

IIIII III IIIIIIII. A ﬂﬂéwylul rIIIuhInd IIII IIII1IQI
It III1III1II III: Iith IIIII II1II11. I IIIupiII IIIIIIII
1I IhIaIItII1II4 I: IxI1III10n with IIIIriIk and rubbing Itiaw.
iznli, II II11 II I1Ih.IIIIh IIIII11 A IIrIIupluI_IIIpIIII
V‘aaallﬂtl I: IIILIII1II III d1IpIIIIIIII Itth
ﬁnish) IIhh1ng,
III pmpmqk “mu. A tour-pm «:2me m In III
III.»
IIIII1II1II I: I IhrII~p1II IIIIIIII III 1n IIIlI1II II IIIII
III of III gallbuina :IIIIIIIx I) IIIIIIIIIIIIxIx I) I11IIIIII1I;
II) pIrIIvIrII1II If IIIIIIIII: Q) IIIIIIIIII-It IIIIII IVII
mm In gamut «In min-3911mm I: In: aux-I11." mu...hard

'

pIII Ind rauruplun F‘lpﬁﬂtiliinV§r1ably 1I41IIII d1IIIII Ir_
IhI brIin 1n IIbJIIII III? IhI I3. I: I1! yIIII. III-IIII
III III~p1II IIIIIIIII IIIIr 1n pII1IIII Ilth brIln dLIIIII

Iu§.-m-mo IInitIIIM

pItmu

um:

1?!

I

mI
Immu-

mu mm a:

mmmd‘ «gammy.

adult?!» ‘Ia-I

um:

roux-III

�13*

”I’m: slaw
in mt.

”van“ yum ohms” ‘bat a» mum
um. man 1: ma autumn” Miami: m “writ:
the

m:
to“ Wand»
autumn“

of thin

that

and

of mm

mm

uni t1»

tarp".

an»

1.

Italy at isthmus clinically

Match

or

with. rut-had

unnatural“: in

magma-u work

��I

3"?

’

ﬂu-h'S-S.%F#M

___________Z;#__~__'——_

��15 November 50

Dear Dr. Bender,

of
outline
the studies in which

Following is an
I an participating under your supervision:
a. Being prepared for presentation:

i.

Patterns in perception in simultaneous tests of

the face and the hand
2. The Face-Hand test in the Organic Eental Syndrome
3. Patterns in perception in simultaneous tests of
parts of the body other than the face and the
hand

4. Caee report- Ethel Beckhorn
Nos. 1-4 with‘Dr. Green.
5. Dyecheirie (with Dr. Shapiro)

i"

i‘b.

Under study:

1. 08? changes following arteriography
2. Gomplicatione of arteriography; evaluation of
the indications for the use of arteriogreﬁhy
and the diagnostic value of the technic
//
Both of these studies with Dr. Stein.
c. Proposed for study under grant by Rational Foundation
&gt;

~

for Infantile Paralysis:

',//

n,

,

1. Relation of sdaptation time, D. S. S. and threshold
stimuli in hemiplegia
2. Patterns and factors in the responses of children
to D.S.S.; comparison with patients with organic
mental changes
5. Gen extinction and displacement be observed in
normal subjects using threshold etimnli ?

��S.R. 5004-590M-701102(50)
.

Q.CITY OF
114

NEW YORK—DEPARTMENT OF HOSPITALS
....................................................................................HOSPITAL

CaseNo..._....__.._____

PROGRESS RECORD
Name...”......................................................................................

Admitted........................................................................ 19 ..........

Ward .......................

Observations and Opinions of Visitings, Consultants and House Staﬁ.
A Final Discharge Note Must Be Entered on This Sheet.
Sign and Date Every Entry.

.1

e

.

@an

A

‘
I

PM

‘

-

"Wx.

Ei‘f~

“.

is

_

\

[and

V5“;-

R‘-

j

"”

r

4

iLIJJzJOU» SMCJE
,

A

'

""19“...“
'&gt;.

-

Binding

for

Blank

Leave

_____________________———_———————-———————————— Continue

Notes on Other Side

�....................................... Division

-_
___.____________.____.______.~________.
Name__________._____.____—____________ Admitted_____.______19___ Ward__.______

HISTORY
Case No...........-.--..._..........

�Prev

/‘

M.
‘

.‘2.

ﬁr M/-

&gt;

mmf‘ég:

WW
“W
$79“me
w /W Cm
_

"

'2)

05/- m

[4

W.“
4.xMWaﬂ-

Y.‘ET&gt;:0&lt;I!WI.’:.6-m¢

3.

‘

,

m

“V

x-‘6

'

/MM
7

5% Wxép

(a;

£44, ﬂZZp/raa

‘

'

414w"

'

*W
V

»

dpg, fast/aw.
.

."

~

,

‘

‘

”

WW

w
44},

W

ﬂm J‘

'

%¢

./

Wugﬁéﬂy‘é {It/*4:

‘7'

'

£4cﬂ/r/oﬂ

/

‘

(a)

c“: M 447‘

014M;

.—

.

W
M¢W7
(a)

ﬂﬂ

‘

lg‘ :11

I

"

'I

Cc)

.A

”..th M
71

M

06‘,”

f

dams.

M
@5447

{a}

)Lgpi

'

‘

CW

“(:1

‘

.

I! 927'.

/

2/41/57

I
I

.-

.

'

�‘-

‘

[ﬁt/F:

/'
.

bgg“

Cﬂ/

ﬂab;

(A)
(C2,

(d)

‘

#9“

‘LLa/
‘

(t/
(6)

—

—

.gaw

7-

~

.

w,

-.

V

,

‘

2

MU .77

.\

.m-

..

N dﬂ.

.

.

2—-»2

mg,

n.»

w'mwﬁuﬁwwmva»'l-.~'N|—*»r'l~"
~

W

WWW

-

.2

“nt‘mmr”

-r---.—"'::.w¢
~

v

.

r

~»

-

A).

.'

I

'

'
-

7W Mug/4; may
MA MA C” MAM.)

‘

g"

23—

‘

,

KMW?’"W

2

,

”vi—7L Maw ‘é‘ﬂ‘””€p’l‘:&amp;7)

Ja 'MLLW‘S—é
'

f

».

«my...

WWW
F3
(’5ch
Marni

WM

$9.44

vyww-W.

K

'

’

_'
,

“we?“

�\
(511;.

,

n

vmmmwmamwmn

,..n,,_1.H
wwmm»

Jag.
Eat]!!!

w
.

ﬂirt;

_
,

��-\\W§

/
r
m
rmk
?
f l“
g. ER

@JQ

04..

\W
U

k).

.

r

,ﬁ,

,

hut/1x!” fM*€?‘/\

@4414)

E.

W Mu'~/./

m.

WW;

I

u...

2’

4;

.

5/

‘

Ij’./‘_
.

(701

mm Zig‘

M7

Wha//,£4Cﬂ~/

I”

.

WQVMU‘7/

”QM/“Mud
"

4/357

5W)

.

4 “

,«('¢
-

�'moc;
Wow/W
Wamgwowg
”I
q

(9'!me

g

(growl

‘W
EM

..

3x07: K7
/I

/

Wz/
~1ﬂ-C/

.

_

.

.

£424
£42

.‘7—‘/

.1”

41’ ’74?
V
'

I

'

-

MMWQ

M(M)/Zm

i

M
NK‘Z

me/W

5'

Wbﬁ-gc %

'4’

[ﬁnd/ff

IV

,7/C/Wﬂ7 MKLKKWWL)

Wot/Logbook,

‘

,t,

611%11f3/144». ”fa/two! 4/1“
7- (WW) AL 14mg Ego; Kilo/offéﬁ:
354‘: J)»; 4995]
27134 2 WWW/4i lnﬁ
w.

M

Karo-4L

_

‘4

...mo

�.i

M’m
a???
MM
Mpg mdM

gm»

9'

%%-Q
zf/Zex/L

"0

§.
‘
7.

'C'meioo
0
-

,'.
:_
‘
,

V

I‘

f
2

w"ww-wrr‘rvmrg'm'rﬂ’wm

.‘

‘

va

~—

4”“)

A.“

I

—W"%*“W,

.M'MJ’

%{d’ #Cnﬁwwﬁu
'&gt;

--

iT

do

n-

u

,7

��'

a: @729;
:x/Ma.
0W
Aw, I M» WWW; cm,
”MM” zz Aggy”: —G/2/m a.

V'aéém

,

�Reprinted from

TRANSACTIONS
OF THE

AMERICAN NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

SEVENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL MEETING, JUNE 13-15, 1949

OBSERVATIONS ON THE EXTINCTION
PHENOMENON IN HEMIPLEGIA
MORRIS B. BENDER
MORTIMER F. SHAPIRO
AND

A. W. SCHAPPELL
NEW YORK

Routine sensory examinations are usually carried out with the method
of single stimulation. This method appears to be adequate, but it does not
always disclose existing defects in sensibility. For example, in a patient with
a right cerebral lesion the left side of the body may be sentient to a single
stimulus. However, the sensation evoked at this very point may no longer
be apparent as soon as another stimulation is made elsewhere, such as on
the opposite side of the body. The same change in sensation may be elicited
with the method of double simultaneous stimulation. This disappearance or
extinction of a sensation is not always complete. At times the patient reports a dulling or obscuration rather than extinction. Extinction and obscuration have been found in tests of all types of sensation. They may be
observed in patients with lesions implicating the sensory pathways of the
brain or spinal cord.
The object of this study was to determine: (a) the method which is
most successful in eliciting the phenomenon of extinction, (b) the pattern
in which extinction manifests itself on the paretic side in cases of cerebral
hemiplegia and (C) the frequency with which extinction of cutaneous pin
prick sensation occurs in patients with hemiplegia.
Fifty patients with hemiplegia were selected at random from the medical
and psychiatric wards of Bellevue Hospital. Patients with aphasia or psychosis were included in the series only when their responses in sensory tests
were consistent in one respect or another. In this study the cutaneous sensory
status of patients with hemiplegia were first estimated by the customary
method of single stimulation with the prick of a pin. The patient was asked
to report whether he felt a sharp or dull sensation. Various regions of the
body were thus tested and compared for degree of sensibility. The same
patient was then examined with the method of double simultaneous stimulation.
Three variations of the method were employed: (A) simultaneous stimulation of points in homologous regions on the two sides of the body, such
as the right and left hand, the right and left side of face, etc.; (B) simultaneous stimulation of points in non-homologous regions on the two sides
160

�Bender, et al.—Extinction Phenomenon in Hennplegia

161

of the body, such as the right face and left hand, the right shoulder and left
face, etc.; (C) simultaneous stimulation of points in two different regions
on the ipsilateral side of the body, such as the right face and right hand, the

right hand and right foot. On each test the patient was asked to report the
location and quality of sensations. When the patient reported only one
sensation, he was asked if he felt another in any other region .of the body.
If he felt two sensations evoked by the simultaneous method, he was asked
to compare them.
RESULTS

The most effective technique for eliciting the phenomenon of extinction
was found to be Method B, or the simultaneous stimulation of non-homologous regions on the two sides of the body, such as the face on the healthy
side and the hand on the hemiplegic side. The next most effective was
Method C, or the simultaneous stimulation of two regions on the hemiplegic side, as for example, the face and hand on the affected side. Method A,
or the simultaneous stimulation of homologous areas on the two sides of
the body, did not reveal sensory defects as frequently as did Methods B
or C.
Although we have been stressing the phenomenon of extinction or the
disappearance or decrease of a sensation, we have not overlooked the other
aspect of the situation obtained on double simultaneous stimulation, namely,
the retention of a sensation. We shall refer to the sensation which is retained as “dominant” and the one which disappears as “extinct”. Examina—
tions with the various methods of double simultaneous stimulation showed
existence of gradients of sensibility throughout the body. One sensory region
was dominant to another. Further studies showed that these gradients were
patterned. The pattern on the hemiplegic side revealed sensory dominance
greatest in the face and less in descending order in the following regions—
face, thigh, shoulder, foot and hand. In other words, when the face and any
other part of the body on the hemiplegic side were simultaneously tested, as
a rule the sensation in the face was perceived while sensation in any other
one part was reported as diminished or absent (extinct).
A phenomenon which appeared directly related to sensory dominance
was that of “displacement”. In some instances when non—homologous regions on both sides of the body were tested simultaneously, the patient reported he felt two sensations of equal intensity, there being no extinction.
The sensation was localized correctly on the normal side. However, the
sensation evoked by the stimulus applied to the affected side was incorrectly
localized. There was an ipsilateral displacement of the sensation toward a
region homologous to the point of stimulation on the normal side. The displacement was usually toward dominant sensory regions. Thus when the
patient was pricked simultaneously on the face on the normal side and the
hand on the hemiplegic side, he reported that both sides of the face had

�162

Bender, et (LL—Extinction Phenomenon in H emiplegia

been stimulated; or if the hand on the normal side and the face on the
paretic side were simultaneously tested, he claimed that both hands had
been pricked. In some cases of disease of the brain the displacement phe—
nomenon was the earliest indication of sensory impairment. As the disease
progressed, displacement was replaced by obscuration and eventually by
extinction.
One of the signiﬁcant ﬁndings of this study was the demonstration of
sensory deﬁcits in patients with a severe psychosis or aphasia. Usually such
patients are considered incapable of giving coherent or consistent answers
in routine sensory examinations. The psychotic or aphasic individual has
trouble in expressing comparisons between two successively induced sensa—
tions. He has less trouble when the stimuli are applied simultaneously. With
this technique the psychotic or aphasic patient usually responds by pointing
to the sentient or “dominant” region and he repeatedly ignores the region
which is apparently “extinct”.
In summary, it was found that a sensation in one region of the body is
readily inﬂuenced by a sensation evoked in another area. This inﬂuence is
most apparent with the methods of double simultaneous stimulation. Using
these methods in patients with hemiplegia it was found that extinction occurred in 44 of the 50 patients, whereas routine single stimulus examination
’disclosed defective sensation in only 29 cases. Furthermore in 28 of the
latter 29 cases the sensory defects became more conspicuous with these
techniques.

����.ﬂmwéﬂ

nMMﬂL—{A‘ay /m4_g.

fa/A/uc/WIZMM

g/éé,‘M/£¢M

�����,

.p~..,

��'

‘D’Mwnrw

hvﬂﬂ

:-

f/‘f/f’l

a,

am» ,

.

MW Wm

V“

‘

“Mm

,¢__,-m..‘

w

ngvm’regﬁww .5

w
(V)

(:3)

gﬂ/hﬂﬂﬂh

"

M 7% rﬁi.

ﬂé’i

ﬂmw

’2

mm
//M
I.“

_

‘
‘

‘
.

;
.

\n

��wifﬁmﬁ’ﬁ;

’

����������51$“ “&lt;4

3

“it
wﬁéu'wéi 3‘” van

���.

hi

illanh.

‘

,

‘

.A

$1.1Hnawwlllflsfalz

”436,...

13.36

Tamrgwuau

.-1...i1w.uiu.«ni.1&gt;

53.53.»,

.

�7,)

3“,

Wu
3.

'

*

-

“aim/ad.

4.54.wa

975‘;

‘au

)

«,2;

MMM) LC“
962.7

‘@

dﬂaﬁcﬁ

.

*3
SI

�����5.9.50
Sensory Studies

In a discussion with Dr Bender today he made the following

suggestions:

1. That studies of the face— hand, face - penis
as carried out in the normal could be extended in the pattern
of shoulder - foot, hand - thigh etc. This will give an outline
of a homonculus of sensory dominance in the normal-2. The studies of the reaction in the normal on
the abnormal in the penis and breast tests
two directions: the influence of amytal
might
on the normal response and the responses to the test in severe

the

test and
initial
be extended in

anxiety states (hysterias

.

.

.).

3. It would be an error at the present time to
describe the testing as a definite aid in the diagnosis of the
organic mental syndrome. With such a figure, the physiological
implications of the testing would be pushed to the background.
But that if the studies can be verified as valid in OMS, then
it might later be described in that condition as another test

like orientation,

patterns

be

4.

A

memory,

etc.

special study in normal children of these

undertaken.

5. The problem of Beckhorn be presented as an
example of a hemisensory syndrome that appears to D83 and SS
upon proper stimulation; and the effect of intersensory testing.
6. In the writing of the definitive paper on the
face - hand test, the following subjects must be covered:
a discussion of the various theories behind dominance as the
rostral idea, medial over lateral structures (concentric),
importance of sexual symbols, skin sensitivity, etc.;
the possibility that the disturbance is related to the state
of consciousness and not the state of the reverbalization
processes (aphasia, apraxia, etc.); order of dominance;
7.

ﬂ“:
4

6)

m—NMWYWKwh./Lu&amp;m"
“mu—~15 4/444./GLL; »

(aﬂdiiaruiuiii7é«vl» «Ajfaa

��w'

-——--

-—-\P,K..

-7.

”w“

,

-..~

»

‘

.

w...

«kw,

-

,

2"” “av

7“,:'71,~',Izﬁivm"’"&gt;:_’r

W."'etrwwgu—cvrw"'_nWWW'-W‘4~‘Xmu_t7$m,va'ﬁ«mv-JzT’n-VH—W-jw

���:5,“
.p

�n.

amm.m,mumaamfummmmm

WWIIWWthﬂph
man. «mmmmmmmmmmw
sun-1m.

mmﬂumuhmmmamtmmmw}
“mummummummmmum. In
”n.1tmtmmtﬂ9dmmtnmuﬂlmmm
mun“
«nu‘mum. mwmwwmwu

mummu$mmmmmmmmm
um. umzmwmwm'mmamu
Manama-Mun

m. memumw,
AtMMmzmmm,mmum-.

m.

‘mmmumasnmammtmuw. m4
ummm‘mmm'mmnpmmwmt
«Mm. In mmatmwmt‘mm
tan-amormmumumuummmu
mMmmmummumma-uum
W.uuamoauucmummnv. MM
mama-mmwpumwmm Mum-.m.

numuummmmmwmtm
ammcmm.
msmmmmuucm
mmummommmmmnm
m
W 3mm “mum. my.
-

‘

cw:
‘Wummmmommwwmmncum
Lu

as

hmmwmmummmum
mWMﬂdeaW. amateud'n’

mm.

mumw-muwmmmmnuxy. mam

pmmmamm.mmcmmm.

'

In

�A.

m-

«mu

about

omru
both

only

out

“Mutt

“man.

“that m mmim many.

agun app“! than much

an am:

as

my

“than“ and not a: 41min”

occur only with much

an. t.

thin

1::

um:
Am

11%

than magnate

min
u an“.
»

arm. will

Although

"111W.

«m: um mm». m m..a; yur on
par mu”;- o; «tawny Au mung. to: as”
A

a

law m um pursue! of am In m. m “mu“. :1.»
m u. may. and in mount. m «:11 mun-oust“: man;

In I not, mutant.

mt. mum am no avid-m
m mm: npydmd dept-nu“.

shufﬂing

‘

at ”upland. "imam dunno.

‘

'

mm ”mm gunman.

A

and «rind

"am.

mo

na-

tartan an intact. him). mad, thotvmmmlom ma
xnms at that ‘91:» mm,~pm31. m umu- in imam-v
uma panama... damned typo. in» we annulus... an
“to tho «ya-alum
69 In
this 9131.!“ that«I I out-91m mum» on the {WW
Ian." A awn»a! nu 'WOPW“ Yemen:
a:
,

W

‘Wt
I

'

“wt

touch

an

'

touch
tumult

tench

Chow-loft hm

right than!

loft ma~n§z was
ﬁght
hm

tough
touch
tough.

;

.

may“
Alma-10“.

rum

13.31:!

i

maintain-ﬂ cum:

right hum-Mu

an Mi:

mam:

ma

«Musician

,.

unnatﬁn
utimtion

mot

it“ in.“

00m."

animation
'

com“

dwt Bulk-tilt; land ”at;
.

chm-k

-

«tintim

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2274">
                <text>The face-hand test as a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome. Neurology. 1952 Jan-Feb; 2(1): 46-58. And, Observations on the Extinction Phenomenon in Hemiplegia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2275">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2276">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-3-005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2277">
                <text>1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2278">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Green, Martin; Bender, Morris B.; Schappell, A. W.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2279">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2280">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2281">
                <text>15 items, each with various amounts of pages. 1: Read at the second biennial meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Virginia Beach, Virginia, April 11, 1951. 2: Reprinted from January—February 1952 (Vol. 2, N0. 1) Issue of NEUROLOGY. 3: New York Society for Clinical Psychiatry: The 116th Regular Meeting of the Society. 4: [Preprint]. 5: list of publications by Fink. 6 and 7: Drafts. 8: handwritten notes. 9: Letter to Dr. Bender from Fink. 10: handwritten note. 11: City of New York - Department of Hospitals/ Progress Record. 12: Handwritten notes. 13: Reprint from Transactions of the American Neurological Association 74th Annual Meeting, June 13-15, 1949; Observations on the Extinction Phenomenon in Hemiplegia (not written by Fink). 14: Handwritten notes. 15: typed pages.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2282">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2283">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74430">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80991">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87552">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94113">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="229" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="20">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/355c4b9504ee5dda4b99daee2b72cb14.pdf</src>
        <authentication>32103451b1f3d9d0d60a0a834fb27af9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100646">
                    <text>Reprinted from—JOURNAL or THE HILLSIDE
Vol. I, No. 1, January, 1952

HOSPITAL

_

TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS IN THE
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF
PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERSl
MD.2 and MAX FINK, M.D.3
New York, N. Y.

MORRIS B. BENDER,

Visual perceptual performance tests like the Rorschach, Thermatic Apperception and Bender Visual Gestalt tests are widely used
in the evaluation of psychiatric disorders. Recently, a simple test
of tactile perception—the face-hand test—has been described (2).
By this test, characteristic performances of normal adults (2) and
patients with diffuse cerebral dysfunction (3) have been differentiated.
The face-hand test is an application of the technique of multiple simultaneous stimulation (1) . The examiner lightly touches,
simultaneously, the cheek and the hand of the subject. The latter
is then asked to describe and localize the stimuli. Normal adults
readily name and localize the two stimuli within the initial few
trials of the test. Once correct, they are thereafter correct on all
similar tactile stimulation tests. In contrast to normal subjects,
patients with psychoses due to disease of the brain are not able
to perceive or correctly localize one of the two simultaneously
applied 'stimuli, even after many trials of the face-hand test. They
consistently make errors in the stimuli to the hand (and con.versely, they rarely make errors in the perception Of the stimuli
to the face). This type of response has been observed in 90 per
v

'

From the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University
College of Medicine, Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital and the Hillside Hospital.
This work aided. in part, by grant #MH 139 from the U. S. Public Health
Service, National Institutes of Health.
2Director of Neurologic Service, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
3 Aided by a Fellowship from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis.
1

,

21

�22

BENDER — FINK

cent of the patients with diffuse brain dysfunction, and has been
described as a sign of the organic mental syndrome (3) .
These simple tactile perceptual tests have now been applied
to patients with hysteria, schizophrenia and psychic depression.
The responses of these patients to repeated trials of the face-hand
test will be described.
SUBJECTS

The subjects were patients from the wards of Bellevue

Psy-

chiatric HOSpital. These patients had one of the following conditions: schizophrenia, psychoneuroses, psychic depressions or organic psychoses. The patients with schizophrenia manifested the
various clinical varieties of the disorder. The patients with psychoneuroses were those hospitalized for severe anxiety, reactive depression, or behavioral outbursts necessitating inpatient observation.
The patients with depression in this group were predominantly
young adults in whom the psychiatrist obtained a history of recent
stress precipitating admission to the hospital. In addition, patients
with diagnoses of “character disorder” or “behavioral disorder,”
and without evidence of psychosis, were included in this group.
Patients with depressions were studied in two groups. The
young adults with “reactive depressions” were included in the
group of patients with psychoneuroses. The second group were
the older adults, in whom the diagnosis of involutional psychosis
was made. In some instances, these patients presented evidence
of impairment of memory, concentration, calculation, and orientation. The diagnostic differentiation of their disorder from psychoses
due to disease of the brain was difﬁcult. The diagnoses were usually
made after extended periods of observation and with the aid of
psychometric studies.
The patients classiﬁed as having organic psychoses manifested
the usual memory disturbances, disorientation, emotional lability
and confusion characteristic of the “organic mental syndrome” (3) .
The etiology in these cases varied between central nervous system
syphilis, posttraumatic states, senility, presenile dementia and
alcoholism.

�TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS

23

METHOD

During a routine examination, the face-hand test is applied.
The patient is asked to close his eyes. In the sitting position, with
his hands lying naturally in his lap, the patient’s cheek, and
dorsum of the hand on the side opposite to the cheek, are simultaneously touched by the examiner’s ﬁngers. The patient is then
asked “What did you feel?” The normal adult usually points to the
cheek and states: “You touched me here" or “I felt something
here,” making no mention of the stimulus to the hand.
The patient is again asked to close his eyes, and the stimulation repeated. This time the opposite cheek and hand are touched.
He is asked whether he had felt anything. The usual response is a
correct localization and identiﬁcation of both stimuli. If only one
stimulus is reported, it is the stimulus to the cheek. At this time,
the examiner asks: “Did you feel another touch anywhere else?”
The normal subject usually points to the hand stimulated and
admits: “I felt something there—I thought you may have brushed
against it.”
On the third and fourth trials of the face-hand test, the cheek
and hand of the same side of the body are stimulated—ﬁrst on one
side and then on the other. Finally, both cheeks and then both
hands are stimulated. This sequence of six tests is repeated. Subsequent to these trials, other parts of the body are tested in a
similar fashion, such as cheek and foot, or breast and hand.
Cutaneous stimuli other than a light touch have been used such
as multiple light touches (rubbing), single pinpricks, multiple
pinpricks, and less frequently, temperature tubes (hot-cold) and
tuning forks (c128). With these cutaneous stimuli the obserVations
are qualitatively the same as with touch stimulations, although the
frequency of errors is much less (2).
In each case where defects were apparent on face-hand tests,
standard tests of single stimulation by touch and pinprick were
applied. Only a few subjects, those with evidence of focal cerebral
damage, myelopathy or peripheral neuropathy, made errors on
these single stimulation tests. Their reactions were not considered
in these results.

'

'

�24

BENDER — FINK
RESULTS

The usual responses of the normal adults to the face-hand test

were: (a) perception of one stimulus only—usually the one to the
cheek, and only rarely the one to the hand; (b) perception of the
two stimuli, correctly localized; and (c) perception of two stimuli,
but one mislocalized. This mislocalization was almost always a
mislocalization of the hand percept, which was displaced to the
homolateral cheek. Such "displacements" were rare in the normal,
but frequent in subjects with disease of the brain.
Normal adults manifested incorrect type (a) and (c) responses
on the initial few trials only. As reported previously, 50 per cent
of the normal adults made errors on the initial trial of the facehand test; 22 per cent on the second trial; and errors became less
and less frequent until by the tenth trial, less than 1/2 per cent
still made errors (2). It is apparent that normal adults can readily
discriminate two tactile stimuli and accurately localize these within
the ﬁrst few trials of the test. Also, once the normal adult was
correct on one trial, he was found to be correct on all subsequent
trials regardless of the body part tested or the rapidity with which
the tests were applied.
Adults with Psychoneuroses: Most of the subjects with psychoneuroses responded in a fashion similar to normal adults on both
the initial and on multiple trials of the face-hand test. Subjects
with manifest anxiety, after identifying the cheek stimulus on the
initial trial, perseverated in this response. Through many trials
they persisted in naming only the cheek stimulus, even insisting
that there was no other stimulus. This type of report was maintained until the examiner emphasized that there were two stimuli.
As soon as the subjects realized that there were two stimuli they
were correct both in naming and localizing subsequent simultaneous stimuli, as well as single stimuli interspersed at random.
During the time that errors were apparent on multiple trials of
the face-hand test, these anxious patients never displaced a
stimulus, i.e., recognized that there had been two stimuli, but
mislocalized one to another body part. It was as if they were in
a mental set of “oneness," and this set persisted until broken by

�TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS

25

the examiner. When they got into a mental set of "twoness," they
were correct on all subsequent trials, perceiving and correctly
localizing the two stimuli.
In a majority of patients with hysteria, including those with
hysterical amnesia, the face-hand tests showed normal responses.
In a few the responses were abnormal. Thus there were some who
reported the sensation on one side of the body correctly, but denied
all stimuli on the side which showed a hysterical type of sensory
defect. There were some patients who showed "allocheiria.”4 They
mislocalized a stimulus from one side of the body to a homologous
part on the opposite side. This mislocalization or displacement
occurred from the side with hysterical defective sensation to the
side with normal sensation.
Adults with Schizophrenia: Most patients with schizophrenia
were able to discriminate the stimulus applied to the face and
hand correctly on the ﬁrst few trials just as normal adults could.
However, there were a number of patients in this group who
presented bizarre responses. The touch stimuli were occasionally
misidentiﬁed and were reported as “a burning” or “a ﬂy crawling.”
Frequently, the number of percepts were multiplied. Instead of
perceiving the two applied stimuli they reported three, four or
even six percepts in a variety of body parts. Similarly, a single
stimulus was reported as two, three or four percepts, occasionally
omitting the locus of the original stimulus. Such patients usually
persisted in the bizarre behavior on repeated testing on subsequent
days. In two instances, there were bizarre responses even when the
test was applied with the eyes open. A number of the paranoid
patients refused to close their eyes and permitted examination
provided they could see. Obviously, under this condition, they
were correct on all trials of the face-hand test.
Patients with schizophrenia, admitted to Bellevue Hospital for
frontal lobe “topectomy” operations, were able to perceive and
4The term allocheiria should be distinguished from allesthesia. According to

Ernest jones, the British psychoanalyst, the crossed sensory displacement manifested by patients with hysteria is to be called allocheiria, while that shown by
patients with disease of the nervous system is to be called allesthesia. Based on
our experience the distinction between the two is made largely on the total
clinical picture. In one there is the long history and symptoms typical of
hysteria, while in the other the history and neurologic signs show patterns
characteristic of organic disease (4).

�26

BENDER — FINK

localize the two simultaneous stimuli during the initial period of
testing. During the ﬁrst two weeks after topectomy operations,
however, the patients manifested the “organic” type of response
to the face-hand test. As will be described later, this pattern consisted of omissions and mislocalizations of stimuli on repeated
testing. As the patients recovered from the operation, the errors
on repeated trials of the face-hand test decreased. Ultimately, they
correctly reported the simultaneous cutaneous stimuli and reacted
in a manner no different from the nonoperated schizophrenic
patients or normal subjects.
Patients with Psychic Depression: Patients with “reactive depression" were co—operative and usually correct on the initial as
well as on subsequent trials of the face-hand test. Their responses
were most like the normal pattern. Of the patients with severe
involutional melancholia, some were frequently unco-operative.
They were suspicious of the request to keep their eyes closed and
if they permitted stimulation, would report only one of the stimuli.
The stimulus they reported was the one to the face. They omitted
the one to the hand. Like the patients with manifest anxiety, they
frequently persisted in giving one response through many trials—
until the idea of “twoness” was apparent to them. Thereafter, they
were usually correct in their responses (Case I).
Patients with a manic excitement correctly identiﬁed the two
stimuli on the initial trial of the face-hand test. On subsequent
trials they were frequently unco-operative, commenting that the
test was too easy, or silly; when co-operative they were usually
correct on subsequent trials.
Organic Mental Syndrome: The reactions of the patients with
organic mental syndromes to multiple trials of the face-hand test
are different from those observed in normal subjects or patients
with neurosis or schizophrenia. Ninety per cent of all patients with
organic mental syndrome repeatedly fail to report one of the two
stimuli, or when reporting two, mislocalize one of them. Again the
perceived stimulus is the one applied to the face. The Stimulus to
the hand is usually not perceived or it is mislocalized. This type
of response is consistent and highly predictable.
A patterned response is also apparent in tests of body areas
other than the face and hand. An “order of dominance” in tests

�TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS

27

of other body areas could be established in these patients. In this
order the face is the most dominant with penis, trunk, breast,
foot, thigh and hand less dominant, in descending order. When
tactile stimuli are simultaneously applied to any two body areas,
the errors in localization will occur in the part of lesser dominance.
For example, if stimuli are applied simultaneously to the cheek
and penis, the patient will report the cheek stimulus alone; but if
the stimuli are applied to the penis and the hand, then the stimulus
to the penis will be reported.
These omissions and mislocalizations of percepts persist for
many trials and on many days of testing. The inability of the
patient with an organic psychosis to discriminate two cutaneous
stimuli is so consistent, that it is considered a sign of the organic
mental syndrome (3) (Case 2).
Eﬂect of Electro-Convulsive Therapy: In patients with schizophrenia or psychic depressions, electro—convulsive therapy induces
a similar “organic" type of reaction to the face-hand test. During
the period of confusion immediately following the treatment, the
patients consistently report only the cheek stimulus or mislocalize
the hand stimulus to the check. This is transient during the ﬁrst
few treatments, but near the end of a course of therapy these reactions persist for longer and longer periods, until they are apparent hours or even days after the treatment. Patients who had
a course of electro-convulsive therapy and were readmitted to the
hospital after a lapse of months failed to show this “organic” re-

action.

CASE REPORTS

The following case reports are selected as illustrating the types

of responses observed.
Case I: S. S., a forty-year-old woman, was admitted to the neurological service complaining of backaches in recurrent episodes of
eight years. During the past year she noted difﬁculties in recollection and in her ability to calculate. She had been a bookkeeper
and now found herself unable to calculate accurately or rapidly
enough to continue work. On occasions she had misplaced valuable
family possessions only to ﬁnd pawn tickets in their place.

�28

BENDER — FINK

During interviews under sodium amytal she cried readily and
related many recent family difﬁculties, including the suspension
of her husband’s license as an auctioneer and her son's classiﬁcation in IA by Selective Service. Her difﬁculties apparently began
with these events.
Medical and neurological examinations were negative except
for some varying areas of hypesthesia and hyperesthesia. Psychiatric
examination revealed marked psychomotor retardation. There were
deﬁcits in memory and calculation. She was able to relate details
of her history and of world events, but was unable to relate details about her work or family affairs. These latter details were
readily apparent, however, in interviews under the inﬂuence of
sodium amytal. On simple calculation tests she made few errors,
though she was slow in response. On more complex tests commensurate with her occupation as a bookkeeper, she made numerous errors and showed many hesitations. Many answers were
reported questioningly. The admission clinical diagnosis was “organic disease of the brain.” This was based on such symptoms as
psychomotor retardation, memory deﬁcits and difﬁculties in calculation.
Face-Hand Test: On the initial face-hand testing the patient
persisted in giving the cheek response only for eight trials, but
thereafter, was consistently correct for twenty trials. There were no
displacements of percepts. On subsequent days she was correct on
the initial and all subsequent tests. These ﬁndings suggested that
the symptoms were not due to disease of the brain.
Course in Hospital: To exclude organic disease the patient
was subjected to a series of tests. Neurological examinations,
electroencephalography and pneumoencephalography revealed no
evidence of organic brain disease. A psychological survey revealed
an average intellectual capacity (IQ 106) without any evidence
of organic deterioration. The personality survey revealed severe
anxiety and depression, with some bodily preoccupations. The
ﬁnal diagnosis was depression and the patient was discharged
for further care in the psychiatric clinic.
Comment: This case illustrates the problem in the differentiation of psychic depressions and organic psychoses. As a rule we
found that the preservation of the ability to discriminate and

�TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS

29

localize double tactile stimuli speaks against organic disease. Only
10 per cent of patients with organic mental syndrome showed
normal response to the face-hand tests. The converse was not true.
There were no instances in which a normal person made persistent
errors on face-hand tests. If errors are made, it usually turns out
that the patient has disease of the brain, no matter how bizarre
the mental picture may be. This is illustrated by the next case.
Case 2: H. B., an elderly white male appearing about sixty years
of age, was admitted by the police who found him wandering
about the streets. He was unable to give his name or home address. He did not answer questions, though he spontaneously requested water and food. A few days after admission he began to
speak freely, gave his name as “The Messiah” and his home as the
hospital. He was facetious, quick in speech and coherent. A complete delusional system relating to God, the patient’s previous
sojourn in heaven, his mission on earth, etc., was related. No
other anamnestic data were available.
Under further observation he showed the Ganser syndrome.
For all questions of orientation, general information and calculation, he answered relevantly but was only approximately correct. He
was almost but not quite right. He did not answer any questions
of personal history except for the distant past and then he related
a disjointed, rambling, confabulatory story. To many observers it
seemed as if the patient had a “hysterical” type of psychosis.
During examination on admission the patient appeared chronically ill. The blood pressure was 180/100 and urine contained
four plus sugar. There were hemorrhages and exudates in the
ocular fundi. Neurological studies showed absent ankle jerks, diminution of vibration sense in toes and ankles, with normal position,
touch and pinprick perception. Other defects were apparent on
special sensory studies.
Face-Hand Test: On the face-hand test this patient presented
an “organic" pattern. In the initial testing, he repeatedly reported
only one of the two stimuli—that of the face. After many trials
and a number of trials with eyes open, he began to report the
two stimuli but now mislocalized the hand percept to the cheek.
In testing on consecutive days, similar mislocalizations and omiso
sions were apparent, both on the face-hand test and on similar

�BENDER — FINK

30

tactile tests of other body parts. An abstract of the record, which
evinces the “organic” pattern on double simultaneous stimulation
testing with light touch stimuli is presented here.

Stimulation
Right cheek, left hand
Left cheek, right hand
Right cheek, right hand
Left cheek, left hand
Right and left cheeks
Right and left hands
Right cheek, left hand
Left cheek, right hand
Left cheek, left hand
Right cheek, right hand

Response
Right cheek
Left cheek
Right cheek
Left cheek
Correct
Correct
Right and left cheeks
Right and left cheeks
2 percepts left cheek
Right cheek
»

Further neurological studies revealed a diffusely abnormal
electroencephalogram; a symmetrically, diffusely dilated ventricular
system on pneumoencephalography; and evidences of organic deterioration on the psychological tests.
Course in the Hospital: Under observation the patient showed
a gradual and persistent improvement. After six weeks in the hospital he recalled some facts whichled to his entering Bellevue. He
remembered his address and social security number. As he improved clinically errors on the face-hand tests became infrequent.
When the errors were sparse, intravenous administration of three
grains of sodium amytal produced once again the persistent omission and mislocalization of percepts characteristic of the organic
mental syndrome.
Comment: Here is a patient who was thought to be hysterical
but the face-hand test contradicted this impression. The persistence
of errors on multiple trials of the face-hand test made us think
of an organic disorder. The subsequent special Studies conﬁrmed
this suspicion.

CONCLUSION

‘

As with visual perceptual tests, such as the Rorschach, this
simple tactile test- the face-hand test—has been found to be useful

�TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS

31

in evaluating psychiatric patients. Anxiety, paranoid attitudes,
autistic thinking and misinterpretation of environmental stimuli
are manifest on face-hand tests. Characteristic behavior patterns
are seen in some schizophrenic and hysteric patients. In the evaluation of patients with mental changes due to dysfunction of the
brain the face-hand test is of diagnostic signiﬁcance. The inability
of these subjects to discriminate the two simultaneous stimuli on
repeated trials and the characteristic errors of omission or mislocalization of the hand stimulus are unique. Such errors are not
observed in normal, schizophrenic, hysteric or depressed adults.
REFERENCES

(l) Bender, Morris B.: “The Advantages of the Method of Simultaneous Stimulation in the Neurological Examination." Med. Clin. North America,

32: 755-758, 1948.
(2) Bender, Morris B., Fink, Max and Green, M.: “Patterns in Perception in
Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand." Trans. Am. Neurol. Assoc, 75:
250-252, 1950; and Arch. Neurol. da- Psychiat., 66: 355-362, 1951.
(3) Fink, Max, Green, M. and Bender, Morris B.: “The Face-Hand Test as a
Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome.” Neurology, 2, 1952.
(4) Jones, Ernest: “The Pathology of Dyscheiria." Rev. Neurol. 62' Psychiat., 7:
499, 599, 1909.

�Adrxbﬁéf
.74

8}

Mr €14;di

£;¢/Cﬁ¢é/

"551,35”

MIL! 1'me mmnmmmmmem

WWW.“

t

I!!!” ’0

m; '0”.

m ”It. lab.“

mmalmdodm1m.

u”W I 3mm
’W.
M

from
'

m mum: Wt!” :09 mm

�1.

m1 mm: Mm mu 11h th- mm,

Ana-mum m um- "um: mun mu no new
mm
and the minus! WW
month. I
W.
bun
ﬂu fun-hm mt ..
“I910 «at at mun
1a

mutton (1).

01’

Mus:

III-

m»

wanton. mmquwA‘omo-«mx

ummmamuqmnm
““1”“qu
ummm.
mwmeummnuumotmmoammu
Imam «mum new W W. um:mu.man-mummme. mamas-m
(3).

.Iommumxu
umumumnmm-ms.
“mammmm-mnumnmmmlmmo:

must. MOMMMMWWtuInImm
mun imam mu. In “an.“ to null). lawn“. ”than

uawmuamamhuuammmnuunnn

”0mm 1mm“ mor m mix-mm» mat-cum.
mt. ”mutant:
metMude-vm
mma‘mumumm, (Manama-"11, swam»
”mummunwmumuumm). mm.

«mummmwmwpumtamutmu
nummmmummmmmnmuaamu
(9).
cu

mm
m.
m
Mswumuummmuuummmxmu

”that. with mm.

W

In!

mm Winn.

ﬂu

mamumummmumtmmm:
uni-mm.

W muummmummm ”hum
no

Bsychiatric

MAMEAM—

������mun.
m'msm'vcmmmmmwmumnmu.
”In!!!“
mmmwmmmumm
mmu'mm. bummumunwwm‘m.m

M
smut-um “mm. ‘m an mm»:
Human“ u: m [mun to m when an am «a u

1'.

rmm‘mum mummmmmmmu-

W‘W
mwnw»mmmm(mxb
muxmmcu*m”mmtum.

mum amt” mum m m
u‘mmmmmmnwmmmmt.
mu.- Mvm may Wﬂﬂﬁ. mun: mt m ”It
1mm“ mm a mu

mw’

mmm.uumtmmxum~owmmt

«:th
mommmummumamwm
mmmmwmmmmauumuum
,

,

tum-«mumnmuu

mun "mum

Mmmnmumunu
mamm:mmmymummmumm

am.u'mmaummhwmwm.mm
thswmmumm/umm. mama-tom“

summ~m1munumamm. MIWUIW

nammmmmmm
AutmmumowmmtoMWmu

‘

owmmmum.xu*m«m'mmnc
mwmamhnmwumucm. tum

ommmummwuum.m.m.m.
mums!»

Mummm.nmm.
«mxmnmwumuuummmm.mm
mxmnunmuummuimwmm.
to

‘mph.

3.:

m m mauummx:

m!

mm m m.

���AWmmu
mmwmtwmxwumwmw
woman.
”mummm
”10%:qu uuoumumum. m

3.9.

darn-Mammalian.

'

mmumwmmntwmmrn
mnmnmummmmmmmm
“In“!!!
ttuﬂﬂmeMMOW.
.tmmmmumummnwuwum
mmmudtmzmmtmcm.
”tourm‘ammumumommm
”mu-mm.
“mumwm.
mwmmmmuam'mmmumt

Rmmm.nmmm
mammu.
mtmcmmmmmwmmmummm
mmpumwh. mummwmmmc.

Mumlumommuwmuouﬂm

«m.ummwmmumrmmmma.
ammuunmmnmm.
mm.
wwwmm.wummummnm
“to“. AMM‘Mth_Mhmm.In
”Mamu'mm'ummummm.
nouns-awn»:
mm”..wamwmm.
mu- mums. to on. m mu Mm cum in W,
qunmnm. m.,mnum. scum mm an
au-

mmmu.

mwmuuummmm.
muxmammmmnmmmm.
umwuuimwuuw. mm
-__,

'

._

,._,-_-__A

,,

7.

��W
.Iwm.mm
mm.wtm

18.

W
mm

mm
mm
mm
cm:

numm,msm

Lanna-«.mm

summit-um
umumm
mm» .m. 1mm
mm.mm
Mum. 3mm

com:

mcmxmm
unusual-um

ame- am one»:

mm
minim am.- man may W
W
nuts-mogul”; mun-menu. my alum mutual"
mu- maniacs-19w;
We «men.

amt¢m4ﬂwtm

_

u

n

and

an

m

or

an on tho monument mu.
4... .4
4 4. m omen the pun-at
'

m
mlmmum Wt. maummmmxm

hmm-mmumchmumumuuum.

a

In

muumummxmwm. Mun-mm:
mm
ultumummmwmmmt.
auburn. um manta-um mm
mm
«nmumnmmmmmumt mum-m
of

mama-non at

W

sun-«mum or at.

We mm

m.Wmuaum.mmwuumm1

but the

tau-m um minnow m. slam-1m.

'l‘lu pm“

humus-rm mummy crux. ammo-m mum-u

mammumm.
mmmmxnmu
scanned m. madam

�13.

unumwmm.mamummmm

mumuxomkmmmmtmmmzmuhm
in ”mm Wax-10 nun». mm. mm cm”...

”Mm m
WWI We!umwuum
W
mannmmwmmunoum.
In

man: ”I“.

mmmmtudWm-W. mama»
umwmuumnmmmmumun
mummMMMouomdumuum~
xmun«mmumumu. “Immune!

mum.m.mmunmmmm

�1"

5.3..
In “tumA:tn mum
mm.
m.
a! mom
tn Imam”11mm“:
tutu
«am
12!. ISO-$52. 1950
(h)
In Putt"!!! 1!! Mun
I3. ’3‘.
ﬁ
lm
I.“
or
in“
a)

g

.

m

m.
2&amp;3.ass-m.mum. 195;.
3131,! “m;
'o.nl
I151!

ﬂ“1»

3.
'

u.’

1:1...)t
I

M‘u
m.
m

I.“
mac-In

or

u

11.3.; a». «mm»
mm,
“mum in m

of

M‘(coho
a. “‘CM
[mien II”.
'

m
minimum.

Mini“!
Wu:
up ”may of Mama-n
‘99.
999»
IL
1909
31, 755.753:

m

W:

IMO

o:
‘

MW
ammu-

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2284">
                <text>Tactile Perceptual Tests in the Differential Diagnosis of Psychiatric Disorders. Journal of the Hillside Hospital 1: 21-31, 1952.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2285">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2286">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-4-006</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2287">
                <text>1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2288">
                <text>Bender, Morris B.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2289">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2290">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2291">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from Journal of the Hillside Hospital Vol. I, No. 1, January, 1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2292">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2293">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74431">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80992">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87553">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94114">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="230" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="21">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/dd6aa613ad864b41d42710aa943de4df.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e331912b9bfc1f22ac2706d3f155e8a5</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100647">
                    <text>5

,ﬁ,

.

1

Confinia Neurologica

9/

NEURQPHYSWLUEY [ABQRMURY
HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS' N' Y-

Borderland of Neurology -— Grenzgebiete der Neurologie
Les conﬁns de la Neurologie
Edidit: E. A. SPIEGEL

Basel

S. KARG ER
Separatum Vol. 12, Fasc. 4 (1952)

:

3

.

New York
Printed in Switzerland

From the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University College
of Medicine and the Neurological Service of the Third Division, Bellevue Hospital,
New York City

A Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Angiography
by MAX FINK and JOSEPH M. STEIN

._.I
I

‘

f

.3
I

Since carotid angiography has become a routine procedure in
the management of intracranial conditions, an evaluation of its use
is necessary. Both the indications and hazards of the procedure
must be considered in recommending it for diagnostic purposes. It
seemed valuable, therefore, to review the angiograms done on the
neurological service of a general hospital. During the past 20
months, 117 percutaneous diodrast angiograms were completed by
members of the resident house staff. The majority were done di-

rectly by the authors.
A variety of neurological conditions including suspected brain
tumors, vascular anomalies, subdural hematomas, vascular diseases and diffuse degenerative diseases were selected by the attending staff as suitable candidates for angiography. In each case, a
percutaneous carotid angiogram was performed according to the
usual descriptions (1). Either local inﬁltration by novocaine or
general anesthesia by pentothal or surital was used. A CournandGrino needle was inserted into the carotid artery at the level of
the thyroid cartilage. In most instances the common carotid artery
was cannulated; in a few instances the internal carotid alone.
Ten to twelve cc. of 35 % diodrast solution were used in each
injection. A simple manual multiple cassette holder was used. This
permitted three consecutive lateral ﬁlms and a single anteroposterior (A—P) view.
In each case the A—P and lateral ﬁlms were immediately
developed, and, if indicated, the injection was repeated. If no
pathology was noted on these ﬁlms, the procedure was repeated
on the other side whenever advisable. Bilateral procedures were
carried out in 26 subjects.

�182

Max Fink and Joseph

M.

Stein

Results
Diagnoses of various conditions were made prior to angiography.
Of these, “brain tumor suspects” made up the largest group;
suspected vascular anomalies and subdural hematoma were the
next largest groups (see Table I). The interpretation of the ﬁlms
was based on descriptions by Moniz (2 a), Lima (2b), and Green
and Arana (l b) .
Brain Tumor Suspects
Of 55 patients in whom intracranial masses were suspected,
angiographic diagnoses of brain tumor were made in thirty. Of
these, 25 were conﬁrmed by subsequent surgery or air studies. Conﬁrmation was not obtained in three patients because further studies
were contraindicated by patient’s age or family’s refusal to give
permission. In two cases the angiograms were interpreted incorrectly and these cases are described.
Case I: D.H. a 48 year old woman was admitted to Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital because of headaches and progressive confusion. The examination revealed
early papilledema, left central facial palsy, skull tenderness on the right and memory
deﬁcits. An electroencephalogram showed a right cerebral focus.
Bilateral carotid angiography under general anesthesia revealed deﬁnite elevation (displacement) of the parietal branches of the right middle cerebral artery.
Subsequent to this procedure the spinal ﬂuid syndrome was noted to be positive
for active syphilis. Anti-luetic treatment was instituted and the patient improved

rapidly.
Five weeks later, the right carotid angiogram was repeated.
These ﬁlms showed the parietal vessels to have a normal conﬁguration.
Case II: 0. 0., a 64 year old male was admitted because of recent onset of
grand mal seizures and left-sided weakness. Examination revealed a mild left
hemiparesis, most marked in the lower extremity. There was a positive Babinski
response and increased reﬂexes. The cerebrospinal ﬂuid syndrome was normal.
A right carotid angiogram under local anesthesia was performed and demonstrated good ﬁlling of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries. There was straightening and depression of the pericallosal artery on the lateral views; and increased
vascularity near the termination of the anterior cerebral artery on the A—P ﬁlm.
These changes were interpreted as evidence of a parasagittal tumor mass displacing
blood vessels.
A pneumoencephalogram was done and this did not demonstrate the mass. The
patient improved without treatment and was discharged. He was readmitted a few
weeks later with evidence of an acute brain stem syndrome. In View of the course
of the illness and multiplicity of lesions, it was believed that the patient’s symptoms
were due to degenerative changes, and not a neoplasm. No further studies were
undertaken.

In this group of suspected brain tumors

22 angiograms did

not
show any pathology. Eleven of these were conﬁrmed by air studies
or autopsy. In two patients, however, satisfactory angiograms
failed to demonstrate lesions later demonstrated by other studies.

�A Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Angiography

183

III:

F. M., a 57 year old man was admitted to the hospital because of
left hemiparesis, bladder and bowel incontinence, and grand mal seizures of 4 weeks
duration. On examination, there were severe personality changes, and a spastic left
hemiparesis with pathological reﬂexes. Cerebrospinal ﬂuid syndrome was normal.
A right carotid angiogram under pentothal anesthesia was done. Two sets of
lateral ﬁlms and one A—P view were taken. The ﬁlms showed no evidence of cerebral tumor.
One week later a ventriculogram demonstrated a large right fronto-temporal
mass. The presence of a malignant glioma was conﬁrmed by surgery.
Case IV: J. S., a 49 year old man developed left sided seizures and aphasia
during hospital treatment for furunculosis. On neurological examination there was
evidence of a lesion in the right hemisphere. On skull x-ray the pineal shadow was
shifted to the left.
An arteriogram on the right side under general anesthesia was done and no
pathology demonstrated. A pneumoencephalogram, however, revealed a deformity
of the right frontal born.
The patient expired one month after angiography and at postmortem, multiple
cerebral abscesses were demonstrated bilaterally.
Case

Other erroneous angiographic diagnoses were made in patients
who proved to have vascular thromboses. In two patients with
signs of a brain tumor, the angiograms revealed an avascular area
in the parieto-temporal region with displacement of middle cerebral
vessels. Surgical exploration revealed edematous necrotic brain
tissue, without evidence of tumor. Each case came to autopsy, and
TABLE

I

ANGIO GRAPHIC DIAGNOSES
Group

No. of

Patients

Intracranial Mass
Vascular Anomaly
and Aneurysms
Suhdural Hematoma
Occlusive Vascular Disease
Other (f)

55

_

Pos.

30

Pos.
Neg.
Not
Diagnosis Diagnosis Incorrect
Neg. Diagnostic (3) Conﬁrmed Conﬁrmed Diagnosis

22

3

25

1

2

21
17

9
9 (d)

ll

11

7

13

2

4
10

8

—
—

l

ll

4

(b)

1

(c)

9
6 (e)

7

—

1

——

5

——

——

Notes:
(a) Technically unsatisfactory ﬁlms.
(b) Two cases conﬁrmed by surgery but 7 other patients'with anomalies demonstrated on arteriograms were not subjected to further studies.
(c) The 11 patients with negative arteriograms were not subjected to further study.
((1) Includes seven diagnoses of subdural hematoma, one of intracerebral hematoma
and one of brain tumor.
(e) F ailurc of the anterior or middle cerebral, or internal carotid artery to ﬁll on
at least two consecutive injections, while the remainder of the circulation
ﬁlled well.

(f) Includes three “follow-up” angiograms, seven patients with diﬁuse degenerative disease and three patients with lesions of the skull.

�184

Max Fink and Joseph

M.

Stein

in both, thrombosis of a branch of the middle cerebral artery was
found. The angiograms could not be differentiated from those seen
in cases of tumors in the same region.
Vascular Anomalies: Twenty-one patients suspected of intracranial vascular anomalies or aneurysms were subjected to angiography. The angiograms were bilateral in only three of these, and
unilateral in the other nine. One set of ﬁlms were not satisfactory
and were not repeated.
Seventeen of these patients had manifested spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhages. In nine cases an anomaly was clearly
outlined on the arteriogram. Five of these were aneurysms at the
base, and four, vascular malformations of the hemisphere. No anomaly was demonstrated in eleven cases.
Conﬁrmation of ﬁndings by other methods of study was most
difﬁcult to obtain in this group. In the nine cases where the anomaly was demonstrated, further conﬁrmation was achieved in two
cases. In one, an angiomatous malformation was amputated at
operation. In the other, an aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery was dissected at post mortem. Air encephalograms were
normal in two patients, despite the angiographic evidence of a large
angioma of the cerebrum. The speciﬁcity of angiography in the
diagnosis of vascular malformations is demonstrated by such cases.
Of the eleven patients with negative angiographic ﬁndings,
two were subjected to air studies. These ﬁlms were normal. The
other nine patients were discharged without further study.
Subdural Hematoma: The diagnosis of subdural hematoma was
made angiographically in seven of seventeen patients suspected of
traumatic intracranial hematomas. The characteristic separation
of the vascular patterns from the internal table of the skull as seen
on the A—P projection was the basis for these diagnoses. In each
of these cases the diagnosis was conﬁrmed by trephination.
Furthermore, in the eight patients in whom a diagnostic vascular
pattern was not seen, diagnosis of no blood in the subdural space
was made. These diagnoses were all conﬁrmed by pneumoencephalography.
In two patients angiography demonstrated an intracerebral
mass, rather than a subdural process. In one case, this diagnosis
made it possible for the surgeon to approach the lesion by a well
localized and deﬁnitive procedure. The diagnosis was conﬁrmed in
the second at autopsy.
Vascular Disease: Angiographic studies were done in 11 patients
in whom occlusive vascular disease was believed to be the basis

�A Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Angiography

185

for their neurological ﬁndings. Failure of a portion of the vascular
distribution to ﬁll on two consecutive injections was observed in
seven of these cases, and normal vascular patterns were seen in
the other four. In the ﬁrst group incomplete ﬁlling of the middle
cerebral artery was seen in four cases; of the anterior cerebral
artery in one case; and of the internal carotid artery in two cases.
The vessels which appeared involved on the ﬁlms were in each
instance the same vessels as indicated by the patient’s clinical
syndrome.
In four of these patients pneumoencephalography demonstrated
areas of atrophy in the involved region of the brain. In one case,
post mortem studies conﬁrmed the angiographic ﬁndings. No conﬁrmation was obtained in the other six cases.
Miscellaneous Group: Of the 13 angiograms in the group, seven
were done in patients with diffuse cerebral disease of a degenerative
type. These ﬁlms were not characteristic but in each case air
studies demonstrated an enlarged ventricular system without
shift or deformity. In three patients with lesions of the skull angiography failed to demonstrate any cerebral involvement. Pneumoencephalograms were done in only two of these patients and
were normal.
Complications: In an evaluation of the indications for a diagnostic procedure the incidence and severity of complications must be
considered. In this series of 117 angiographic studies, 36 patients
suffered a total of 43 complications. There were ﬁve cases with
severe and permanent complications. In all other instances the
complications were mild and transient. Of the transient complications, 22 hematomas of the neck were recorded. This was recorded
only when the hematoma was large. In one case, in a child, the
hematoma was large enough to cause tracheal shift and respiratory
difﬁculties. It was necessary to intubate the patient and maintain
the airway during the evening of the procedure. Transient hemiparesis or transient increase in an existing hemiparesis was seen
in 7 cases, and a grand mal seizure was observed in 2 patients. In
each instance the phenomena disappeared within 48 hours. In 4
cases urticaria, chills and vomiting followed angiography, and
seemed to represent an allergic response to the diodrast. In one
patient, in whom a vascular anomaly was demonstrated, fresh
blood was manifest in the spinal ﬂuid the morning after the procedure.
Of the severe complications, death occurred within 24 hours of
angiography in two patients (cases V, VI). In three other patients

�186

Max Fink and Joseph M. Stein

severe complications were directly related to angiography. In a
young child an osteomyelitis of the transverse process of the ﬁfth
cervical vertebra resulted after a difﬁcult cannulization (case VII).
A permanent mixed aphasia (case VIII) and an intensiﬁcation of
a pre-existing hemiparesis (case IX) were also observed.
Case V: G. B. male, 62. Craniotomy, three months before arteriography, had
demonstrated a right middle fossa spongioblastoma polare which was spreading
along the sphenoid ridge and had crossed the midline. The patient completed a
course of x-ray therapy and was alert and ambulant. A vertebral angiogram was

suggested to evaluate the intracranial mass. The patient was sedated with demerol,
scopolomine and luminal. Three injections of 11 cc. each of 35% diodrast, were
made. The record states that: “while attempt was made to enter right common
carotid, patient became cyanotic, respirations shallow, and pulsations of the artery,
which were strong, became weak.” The patient expired within 20 hours after
developing hematemesis, melena, and two grand mal seizures. No autopsy was
obtained.
Case VI: R. W., a 40 year old male, was admitted because of sudden onset of
headache and stiff neck. The spinal ﬂuid was grossly bloody and the diagnosis of a
spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage made. Patient developed pneumonia and
ran a septic course. This responded to antibiotic therapy and patient seemed well
one month after admission when he developed a second episode of subarachnoid
bleeding. One week later, while patient was comatose, a right carotid angiogram
was done. The ﬁlms were not diagnostic and patient expired within 18 hours of
the procedure.
An aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery with hemorrhage extending
into the lateral ventricles was seen at post mortem.
Case VII: N. B., a 5 year old girl, was admitted because of petit mal seizures
for two months. Examination demonstrated left homonymous hemianopsia and an
electroencephalographic focus of abnormal activity on the right parieto-occipital
region.
A right percutaneous carotid angiogram was done under general anesthesia,
with difﬁculty, and a normal vascular pattern demonstrated. Patient had a large
hematoma of the neck with tracheal shift, necessitating intubation that night.
Patient recovered rapidly, but complained of pains in the neck and kept the head
ﬁxed with chin turned to the left. Repeated x-ray examinations eventually disclosed an area of rariﬁcation in the transverse process of the ﬁfth cervical vertebra.
This responded to immobilization and chemotherapy. When seen six months later,
the child had recovered completely.
Case VIII: M. C., a 30 year old male, was admitted to the neurological service
because of left sided headaches of a few years duration and three episodes of loss
of consciousness during the previous six months. On examination there was diminution in perception of tactile stimuli in the right hand. This defect was exaggerated
by double simultaneous stimulation. Electroencephalography demonstrated a
persistent focus in the left parietal region. The pneumoencephalogram was normal.
A left percutaneous carotid angiogram was done. Four injections of diodrast
were made. After the last injection a complete hemiplegia, hemisensory syndrome
and hemianopsia was observed on the right. The patient was totally aphasic but
responsive. During the ensuing weeks the weakness and sensory changes cleared,
so that when seen one year after the episode, only minimal sensory changes in the

�A Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Angiography

187

right upper extremity were observable. The aphasia, however, after some initial
resolution, persisted. The patient expressed himself with difﬁculty and made
many errors, could not carry out complicated commands, and made errors in
imitating mouth and hand movements.
The angiographic ﬁlms were interpreted as within normal limits except that
the vessels of the middle cerebral group were few in number and widely separated.
Case IX: E. B., a 64 year old man, was admitted because of headache and
“nervousness” of some months duration; and repeated episodes of loss of consciousness without convulsive movements for one month. On examination there
were mental changes, hyperreﬂexia and a positive Babinski on the left, but no

manifest weakness or sensory changes.
A right percutaneous angiogram was done with local anesthesia using four
injections of diodrast. Immediately after the last injection the patient lapsed into
a torpid state, his eye movements became dissociated, and the left upper and lower
extremities were ﬂaccid. During the ensuing days, the torper diminished until the
patient could respond verbally to command, but the hemiplegia became spastic. It
persisted until the patient was transferred to another hospital one month later.
The angiograms were interpreted as normal. A pneumoencephalogram revealed
bilaterally dilated ventricles Without shift or distortion.

A number of factors such as sensitivity to the contrast medium

the amount of drug and rapidity of injection (3b), and existing hypertension (3 c), have been suggested as causes for complications. In the present series, these factors are not outstanding in
the patients who developed complications when these are compared to the uncomplicated cases.
Either conjunctival or intradermal diodrast sensitivity tests
were carried out in every subject. In one case, the onset of wheezing, sweating, and palpitation after the intradermal test caused us
to cancel the studies. In all other subjects, including the patients
with complications, the sensitivity tests were negative. This was
notably true in the four patients who developed “allergic-like”
reactions of urticaria, chills, and vomiting, following the angiography, but who failed to react to the test dose.
There is no apparent relation in the data between complications
(excluding hematoma of the neck) and the number of injections of
diodrast (see Table 2).
(3 a),

TABLE II
No. of Injections
No. of patients with complications
No. of patients without complications
*

1
1

3

more than
2
0
9

3
6

4

5

6

6

2

1

6
0

27

22

13

8

3

Total"
16
85

Excluding 16 uncomplicated cases in whom total dosage was not recorded.

Similar analyses of the factors of anesthesia and the number of
carotid punctures at one session (unilateral or bilateral angio-

�188

Max Fink and Joseph

M.

Stein

graphy), reveal no signiﬁcant correlation between these factors,
taken singly, and the incidence of complications.
Arterial hypertension was not a contraindication in the selection
of patients for angiography. Ten hypertensives (all with diastolic
pressures of 100 mm. Hg. or more, and systolic pressures of more
than 160 mm. Hg.) were subjected to angiography, and in none of
these were there any complications. Of the patients with severe or
transient complications (other than hematoma of the neck) none
had hypertension.
Discussion
Recent reviews have emphasized the diagnostic reliability of
carotid angiography in vascular anomalies (4), suspected brain
tumors (lb, 5), traumatic cerebral states (6), and occlusive vascular
diseases (7). Our observations conﬁrm the recommendations of the
authors in the ﬁrst three groups.
Prior to angiography’, the diagnosis of vascular anomaly could
not be conﬁrmed except by surgical exposure or autopsy. Since air
studies are not reliable in demonstrating vascular anomalies or
is
choice
of
in establishing
the
procedure
angiography
aneurysms,
such diagnoses. In 43 % of the patients in this series in whom such
a lesion was suspected, the anomaly 'was satisfactorily demonstrated by angiography. In an unpublished series of similar cases
studied by one of us (Fink) at Monteﬁore Hospital, ﬁve aneurysms
were demonstrated in 14: suspects.
Similar results are recorded by other authors (4), and numerous
recommendations have been made to increase these results. Routine vertebral injection, combined with bilateral carotid punctures,
will demonstrate anomalies in the posterior portion of the Circle of
Willis (14). Oblique A—P views at 45 degrees have been recommended to demonstrate small aneurysms of the carotid (4 (1). With
these modiﬁcations in the procedure, it is to be expected that the
incidence of positive identiﬁcation of anomalies will increase.
The role of angiography in the management of spontaneous
subarachnoid hemorrhage is not clear. Recent reviews emphasize
the importance of demonstrating the lesion where surgical intervention is indicated (4b, e). The effect of angiography during the
acute phase of bleeding has not been clariﬁed. Many authors have
recommended angiography only after the bleeding has ceased.
Others, such as Wechsler and Cross (7 b), suggest early use of angiography during active bleeding. This principle of waiting until
bleeding ceased was adhered to in the cases in this series, and no
statement of the effect of angiography on bleeding can be made.

�A Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Angiography

I89

Angiography is the diagnostic procedure of choice when a supratentorial brain tumor is suspected. It is recommended for lesions
located in the anterior two-thirds of the cerebrum. Occipital lobe,
posterior fossa and some midbrain tumors are not consistently
demonstrable by this technique. Angiography is recommended in
subjects with papilledema, since this procedure, unlike air studies,
does not make immediate surgical intervention necessary (5, 7).
Furthermore, numerous reports emphasize the differences in the
patterns made by gliomas, meningiomas, intracerebral hematomas
and vascular tumors (1, 2, 3c, 5). Such clues are helpful to the
surgeon in planning the operative procedure. In a few of our cases,
multiple foci of a metastatic tumor were demonstrable on the ﬁlms,
clarifying the management of the case. Such discriminations are
usually not possible by other diagnostic techniques.
The diagnostic reliability of angiography in cases of brain tumor
is high. In this series, 25 of 29 conﬁrmed brain tumors were outlined
by angiography. In a series of 96 brain tumor suspects, 39 of 42
veriﬁed neoplasms were demonstrated (5 a). In the series from
Monteﬁore Hospital angiography revealed the neoplasm in 45 of
52 conﬁrmed cases. Similar satisfactory correlations are seen in
the negative angiograms of these three series. This diagnostic
reliability of 88 % compares favorably with encephalography. The
value of air studies in brain tumor diagnoses has been frequently
reported. In one such study by Grant (8), ventriculography demonstrated the lesion in 130 of 150 cases—an incidence of 87%; while
pneumoencephalography in 69 cases, revealed the tumor in 81%.
Further indications for angiography are in cases of traumatic
intracranial hemorrhage. Numerous reviews emphasize the displacement of the anterior cerebral artery and separation of the
ﬁne vessels from the calvarium on the A——P ﬁlm as diagnostic of
subdural hematoma (6). Furthermore, angiography differentiates
intracerebral and subdural lesions, altering the surgical approach
(6 a). This was clearly demonstrated in two of our patients in whom
subdural hematoma was suspected, but in whom the angiogram
demonstrated an intracerebral mass.
In cases of cerebral vascular accident angiography appears less
helpful. Failure of a vessel to ﬁll may be due to a variety of reasons
including slowing of the circulation, vascular spasm, and anomalies
of the system. These factors have been emphasized (7b). Angiography, however, is not contraindicated in vascular disease. It provides a useful means in differentiating a thrombosis from an intracerebral clot, or from a tumor, in cases where the diagnosis is unclear.

�190

Max Fink and Joseph M. Stein

While the indications for angiography are many, they cannot
be evaluated without a discussion of the risks involved. The complications of the procedure are of three types: (a) transient local
phenomena; (b) transient cerebral vascular phenomena; (e) permanent severe deﬁcits. In the ﬁrst group of transient phenomena
are burning pains in the head during injection, hematoma of
the neck, and allergic reactions. Hematoma of the neck is a potentially dangerous complication (see our Case VII) but in a recent
review no sequellae were observed (9). Allergic reactions are infrequent and usually mild. It was noted in this series that the routine intracutaneous or conjunctival testing for sensitivity was not
found satisfactory in predicting these complications.
Transient hemiparesis, aphasia, seizures and elevated blood
this
In
(10).
have
been
following
angiography
reported
pressure
series these complications were observed in nine cases—an incidence
of 8%. A similar incidence was observed in the Monteﬁore Hospital
series. That these phenomena are probably due to temporary
vascular insufﬁciency (spasm?) is evidenced by the clinical pattern
of neurological ﬁndings and their duration. Of seven patients with
hemiparesis, the deﬁcits had disappeared within three hours in
three patients, while in three others it was gone in 24 hours. In one
of the subjects angiography was repeated in the other side six days
later, without complication. In the seventh patient, arteriography
had demonstrated an aneurysm of the internal carotid artery on
the left and the common carotid artery was ligated on that side.
One month later, angiography was repeated on the right side and
following the ﬁrst injection of diodrast, the patient developed a right
hemiplegia. This disappeared during the ensuing 72 hours.
Vascular syndromes of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries
have been observed. In one patient a lower limb monoplegia
developed after two injections of diodrast. A third injection on the
same side was done within 15 minutes of the appearance of the
defect. The arterial views obtained showed good ﬁlling of all
branches. The monoplegia disappeared within 12 hours. These
complications were not observed in patients with hypertension.
Deterioration of a patient’s condition or death following angiography has been reported in a number of instances. Bull (5d)
summarizes the mortality rate of the procedure as 3 per 1000,
which he states compares favorably to ventriculography. More
recently, Dunsmore, Scoville and Whitcomb (10b) report three
fatalities in 147 cases, and Olsson (11) reports three cases of “deterioration of patient’s condition” in a series of 360 angiograms.

�A Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Angiography

.

191

There were two fatalities in our present series, and one patient had
a severe aggravation of a pre-existing hemiparesis. Each of these
patients, like those of Dunsmore, Scoville and Whitcomb and
Olsson, were severely ill before the procedure.
In contrast to this are the large series of Curtis (5b), Wickbom
(1 c), Torkﬂdsen (Sc), Lindgren (la), and Green and Arana (1b)
wherein no deaths were related to the procedure. It is possible that
with widespread use of angiography, subjects with more advanced
cerebral lesions are selected for these studies and the risks thereby
increased.
A number of reports by Olsson and associates (3b, 11, 12)
emphasize the summation of the toxic effects of large doses of
diodrast given over a short period of time. They indicated the
nature of the toxicity as an increased permeability of the blood
vessels and a change in hemodynamics. Furthermore, the relation
between concentration of diodrast and toxicity was demonstrated
by Cross (13) when he introduced diodrast for angiography. His
observation that seizures follow the use of 50% and 70% diodrast
has been conﬁrmed by numerous investigators.
Despite the use of 35% diodrast and low total dosages of diodrast, in this series, complications ensued. There was no signiﬁcant relation between dosage and complications. Other factors
must be operative and some hint has been given in the observation
on circulation time (41') and the effect of other injurious agents
summating with diodrast (3).
Conclusion

Angiography is preeminent in the management of cases of intracranial disease suspected of vascular anomalies, supratentorial
tumors, and traumatic hematomas. It is a satisfactory non-surgical
method of demonstrating a vascular anomaly, malformation or
aneurysm. In the diagnosis of supratentorial masses it will outline
90% satisfactorily. In addition to establishing the presence of a
tumor, arteriography is superior to other diagnostic technics in
yielding evidence as to the type of mass and its locus. In cases with
papﬂledema, surgery is not made immediately mandatory by the
procedure. It is not a satisfactory method in demonstrating obscure
and diffuse lesions of the ventricular system, or tumors of the
posterior fossa or occipital lobe.
In cases of traumatic intracranial lesions, angiography is a
satisfactory method in outlining subdural hematomas, and differentiating such lesions from intracerebral hematoma or tumor.

�192

Angiography is

Max Fink and Joseph M. Stein

thromboses
cerebrovascular
in
not clearly helpful

and hemorrhages.
would
and
not
transient,
the
for
most
part,
Complications are,
are
The
complications
in
cases.
most
the
limit
procedure
seem to
bilatnumber
or
anesthesia,
not directly related to hypertension,
factors
a
Other
play
diodrast.
of
erality of injections, or amount
is necessary.
further
and
role
study
more important
Summary
reviewed
were
carotid
angiograms
A series of 117 percutaneous
in
involved
angiography.
risks
and
for
indications
the
to evaluate
studied
including supraconditions
were
intracranial
of
A variety
and
hematoma
traumatic
anomalies,
vascular
tentorial tumors,
of
intraevidence
with
disease.
patients
Fifty-ﬁve
cerebrovascular
cranial tumors were subjected to angiography, and a positive
in
conﬁrmed
were
These
diagnoses
diagnosis was made in thirty.
ﬁlms
misinterpreted.
the
were
subjects
In
two
only
of
the
cases.
83%
in
in
conﬁrmed
50%;
were
the
diagnoses
Of the negative ﬁlms,
demonlater
lesion
show
fail
a
to
did
the angiograms
only two cases
intracranial
with
suspected
21
Of
patients
strable by air studies.
of
In
two
outlined
angiography.
by
vascular anomalies, nine were
air
manifest
on
not
revealed
anomaly
an
these, the angiograms
traumatic
of
suspected
of
seventeen patients
studies. In a group
in
made
seven
was
diagnosis
positive
intracranial hematoma, a
in
cases,
eight
ﬁndings
the
well
negative
as
as
These
diagnoses
cases.
all
conwere
in
two
demonstrated
cases,
intracerebral
tumors
and
lesions
cerebrovascular
of
In
studies.
cases
ﬁrmed by subsequent
complications
Transient
value.
of
diagnostic
not
angiography was
consisted
and
of
the
one-third
patients,
in
of angiography were seen
In
urticaria.
and
seizures,
of hematoma of the neck, hemiparesis,
These
and
severe
permanent.
ﬁve patients (4 %) complications were
discussed.
factors
the
and
described
cases are
cerebral
of
angiorisks
limited
the
conclude
that
authors
The
of
the
in
usefulness
management
its
from
detract
do
not
graphy
intracranial vascular malformations, suspected supratentorial
tumors and traumatic lesions.
Zusammenfassung
117 durch perkutane Injektion in die Arteria carotis gewonnene
und
Indikationen
der
Gesichtspunkte
Angiogramme werden vom
Gefﬁﬁanomalien,
Tumoren,
Gefahren besprochen. Supratentoriale
der
GehirngefﬁBe
und
Erkrankungen
Haematome
traumatische

�A Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Angiography

193

werden besprochen. 55 Patienten mit Zeichen von intrakraniellen
Tumoren wurden mit Angiographie studiert; in 30 wurde eine
positive Diagnose gestellt. In 83% der Falle wurde die Diagnose
bestatigt. In 2 Fallen wurden die Filme falsch gedeutet. In 50%
der negativen Filme wurden die Diagnosen bestatigt. Nur in
2 Fallen vermochte das Angiogramm nicht eine durch Luftfiillung
demonstrierbare Lasion zu zeigen. In einer Gruppe von 21 Patienten mit vermuteten intrakraniellen GefaBanomalien wurde in
9 Fallen die GefaBstﬁrung demonstriert. In 2 dieser Falle zeigte
Angiographie die Anomalie, wahrend Luftfiillung ein negatives
Resultat ergab. In einer Gruppe von 17 Patienten mit Verdacht
auf traumatisches intrakranielles Haematom wurde eine positive
Diagnose in 7 Fallen gestellt. Diese Diagnosen, wie auch die negativen Befunde in 8 Fallen, und intracerebrale Tumoren, die in
2 Fallen demonstriert wurden, konnten durch weitere Studien bestatigt werden. In Fallen von Gehirnlasionen, die durch GeféiBprozesse bedingt waren, hatte Angiographie keinen diagnostischen
Wert. In 1/3 der Falle kam es zu voriibergehenden Komplikationen
(Haematoma des Halses, Halbseitenlahmung, Kréimpfe, Urticaria).
Bei 5 Patienten (4%) waren die Komplikationen schwer und
dauernd. Diese Falle und ihre Besonderheiten werden besprochen.
Die Autoren gelangen zu der SchluBfolgerung, daB die begrenzten
Risiken der cerebralen Angiographie von der Anwendung dieses
wertvollen Verfahrens in F ﬁllen von GefaBanomalien, supratentoriellen Tumoren und traumatischen Lasionen nicht abhalten sollen.
Résumé
Les auteurs passent en revue une série de 117 angiographies
carotidiennes percutanées, dans le but d’évaluer les indications et
les risques qu’elles comportent. La série d’aﬁ'ections intracraniennes étudiée comprend des tumeurs supratentoriales, des anomalies
vasculaires, des hématomes traumatiques et des affections vasculaires du cerveau. Cinquante-cinq patients présentant une symptomatologie de tumeur intracranienne furent soumis a l’angiographie et un diagnostic positif put étre fait dans trente cas. Ces
diagnostics se conﬁrmérent dans 83% des cas. Chez deux patients
seulement, les radiographies furent mal interprétées. Parmi les
angiographies négatives, 1e diagnostic clinique fut conﬁrmé dans
50% des cas; dans deux cas seulement les angiogrammes ne montrérent pas de lésion qui, plus tard, put étre mise en évidence par
injections d’air. Parmi 21 patients suspects d’anomalie vasculaire

�194

Max Fink and Joseph

M.

Stein

intracram'enne, 9 purent étre révélés par l’angiographie. Dans deux
cas, les angiogrammes révélérent une anomalie que les ventriculogrammes n’avaient pas rendu manifeste. Dans un groupe de 17
patients suspects d’hématome traumatique intracranien, un diagnostic positif fut conﬁrmé dans 7 cas. Ces diagnostics, de meme que
les résultats négatifs de 8 autres cas, et les tumeurs intracérébrales
démontrées dans 2 cas, furent tous c0nﬁrmés par des études ultérieures. Dans les cas de lésions cérébrales d’origine vasculaire,
l’angiographie est restée sans valeur diagnostique. Des compli—
cations passagéres de l’angiographie furent observées dans un tiers
des cas et consistérent en hématomes de la région du cou, hémipareses, crampes, et urticaire. Chez 5 malades (4%), des complications durables et plus graves apparurent. Ces cas sont étudiés
en détail et les facteurs on cause discutés.
Les auteurs concluent que les risques limités de l’angiographie
cérébrale ne sauraient faire renoncer a une méthode aussi utile
pour le diagnostic des malformations vasculaires intracraniennes,
des tumeurs supratentoriales et des lésions traumatiques.
REFERENCE S
1. a) Lindgren,

E.: Br. J. Radiol. 20, 326, 1947. — b) Green, J. B., and Arana, R.:

Am. J. Roent. and Rad. Ther. 59, 617, 1948. — c) Wickbom, 1.: Acta Radio]. Suppl.
72, 1, 1948. — 2. a) Moniz, E.: “L’Angiographie Cérébrale”, Masson &amp; Cie, Paris,
1934. — b) Lima A.: “Cerebral Angiography”. Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1950. 3. a) Olsson, 0.: Acta Radiol. 35, 65, 1951.
b) Broman, T., Forssman, B., and
Olsson, 0.: Acta Radiol. 34, 135, 1950. — c) Torkildsen, A.: Acta Psych. and Neur.
Suppl. 55, 1, 1949. — 4. a) Lowman, R. M., and Duﬁ, S. D.: Amer. J. Roent. and
Rad. Ther. 53, 341, 1945. — h) Poppen, J. L.: Radio]. 53, 347, 1949. — c) Wickbom, I.: Acta Radiol. 34, 387, 1950. — d) Lo'fstedt, S.: Acta Radiol. 34, 339, 1950.
e) Wechsler, I. 5., Gross, S. W., and Cohen, I.: J. Neur. Neurosurg. and Psych. 14,
25, 1951. — f) Raney, R., Raney, A. A., and Sanchez-Perez, J. M.: J. Neurosurg. 6,
222, 1949. — 5. a) Culbreth, G. E, Walker, A. E., and Curry, R. W.: J. Neurosurg.
7, 127, 1950. — b) Curtis, J. B.: Brit. J. Surg. 38, 295, 1951. — 0) List, C. F.: Radio].
55, 327, 1950. ~ d) Bull, J. W. D.: Postgrad. Med. Jour. 26, 157, 1950. — e) Fabritius, H. F., Frovig, A. G., and Kristiansen, K.: Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat. 61,
352, 1949. — 6. a) Wickbom, I.: Acta Radiol. 32, 249, 1949. — b) Kristiansen, K.:
Surgery 24, 755, 1948. — c) Webster, J. E., Dawson, R., and Gurdjian, E. S.:
J. Neurosurg. 8, 368, 1951. ~ d) Raney, R. B., and Haney, A. A.: Calif. Med. 73,
342, 1950. — 7. a) Govons, S. R., and Grant, F. C.: Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat.
55, 600, 1946. — b) Wechsler, I. S., and Gross, S. W.: J. A. M. A. 136, 517, 1948. —
c) Lusignan, F. W., and Gross, G. 0.: Calif. Med. 73, 240, 1950. — d) Alorris, A. A.,
and Fulcher 0. H.: Surg. Clin. North Amer. 30, 1783, 1950. — 8. Grant, F. C.: Arch.
Neurol. and Psychiat. 27, 1310, 1932. — 9. Berdal, P., and Emblem, L.: Acta
Psych. and Neurol. 26, 1, 1951. — 10. a) Chusid, J. G., Robinson, F., and MargulesLavergne, M. P.: J. Neurosurg. 6, 466, 1949. b) Dunsmore, B., Scoville, W. B.,
——

-—

——

�A Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Angiography

195

and Whitcomb, B.: J. Neurosurg. 8, 110, 1951. — 11. Olsson, 0.: J. Neural. Neurosurg. and Psychiat. 12, 312, 1949. — 12. Broman, T., and Olsson, 0.: Acta Radiol.
30, 326, 1948. — 13. Cross, S. W.: Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat. 46, 704, 1941. —
14. Sugar, 0., Holden, L. B., and Powell, C. B.: Amer. J. Roent. and Rad. Ther.
61, 166, 1949.

�[ha

/

A

M777, APP/f5; (#4)/7.rz.

omen tummu W mm “KW
W

II: link,

3.».

ma
asap}:

:1.

Stein, IL».

.7"*'*‘ , 9W
.m
§
"v.1
"t; ,
‘
waiver-1w canon of Indiana and the lam-01931.11 8min
if the aura mun-u. hollow Rental, lav mark 633:.
-

.V

T?!“

1*

'

=

'

�line. antacid

aaczozruphw

tn mum of 1:1th

an: bocgnn a ruuttun proaoﬁuro'xn
cautions. In ovulation at 18..

no in nun-um. lath 15h. inﬂation and mm at cm proa«dun mt be amid-M in humans it for «lacunae
aux-pom. It «and valuable, thereto”, to an.” tn «non-m
am on tho Wei-clan um.“ or u acuml human . Min;
m put to math, :17 panama“: Mount animu- nn can»
put“ him-n or the minim hm amt. m mama were
«at directly by tho “than .
5 variety of “urological amnion: including
11min Mon, moan: alt-mun, ”Maul hunts-nu, vascular
dunno: Ion “law by tho
dam“ and arm.
“twang um: u with» «Midﬁe- ror WWW. In «ch
mu, 9020qu met“ mien-u was performed «cording to
the W1 «Manama (1) .' mum.- 10011 infiltration by normal”
A
01f 3mm manhunt. by mutant}, or «mm m and.
Gem-Grin» mu. m inﬁrm into the mend artery at tho
101010: 1'.» thyroid M11130. In no“ mum» the «non

«3th

WM"

0..

carotid artery

13th “an.

.‘

m mm;

in a

In butane“ tho into!!!)

M 1:0 mm: u. ref 35! “can“

inﬂation.

A

solution were and in «on
«1:91. mm). “18133110 auntie Miner m and.
that amounts." luau). 11m tad a um. mun.

m: 130th
yuurior

(5-21 view.

m

In «on me the Au! and lateral £11m
mantel:
«#010904. lad, 1: indium. the injection In mutant. 1: no

It: noted on than mm,
the other 11¢. than» manna.

pathology

the

vacuum at

Bilateral

mum on

panam- urn

�2.

«aid but in 36 gnaw».
..

mm amtlm‘ mu nu prior mum.
Wu
at the», ”bum W mu“ am
1m.“ my.
:0

of

"

up the

muted moun- manna lad «mu but... an an mt

“m “wanna” or the film's!"
(«0 m1:
m:
mod tn «mimic» t7 In“ (a). amt»),- md ﬁrm I Am:

1m.»

1-).

(1b).

‘
‘

'

m amount). mm «spotted,at
ammo nun-u «WWMMthMy.
than. nu «ma «haunt sum or as: .m».
continuum m not attained in turn ”that: boom mm
than m quM B: gaunt“ m or “all”: W
M cm ”mm“. In
on» the mom I»! 1&amp;th
described.
than»
of 55 pun-nu in

were

by

25

-

two

tumour m

m» m

an A; 3.3». a #8 na- a:s.“ W m «Ilium to 1011mm
humane mam been“ mm m manna" amt-n.
m ail-inﬂux mallard «1-11 mum-u, 10ft mm rum
pa”. mm Wu 0:: the ”at and nun «11:18:.

m

An

rim 3mm}. “on
Ilium-n1 mm magma under new“ mamas
mound donut. olmtim (”apnea-ant} or the mum Who.
of tho right
W). Mm. museum in this

ﬂaunt/annulus”:

the

a.

.-.

w.
uphill mm Indra” m not“ to

be

We
posits." for “’61"

until” . Annama- mm: m taunted
'

11pm“

with.

nw inks later,

the right

and

the

mum:

mum mum as meat“.

�“

&gt;

luv

In

want-um“
m
ﬁr

NHI

II

,

mkamm
WWW

(Minimum: mutant—imam m»
H CW u
(CHI-um m
‘

.

.‘

WWW‘rude-buﬂm

�3.

it... (11:: Innuud

tho par1ota1 vantols ta have n nomlll

cen—

figuration.

6.3. II: 0.0., a

yin: 91¢.la10 an: Idlitted buotule at
roeunt onset at grina.unl aniline. .nﬂ lortantdcd untknoia,
lxnuhntion rO'Dnlid a I114 10th bullpIrCItl, taut unwind in the
6%

lénbr caﬁrunity. lhnru in: a punitive llbiulki response and
incr¢:sod rutlaxtn.Moorutvuop1n31 fluid OIRQrUID III nounu1.
A right curatld
nn¢1o¢run undar local unauthonia III pur~
rarlnd and dIInnIttltod 390d 21111n¢ at tin Interior and l1ddlo
oorobrn1 uttering. that. Ill straightening and dcprognian at tho

pertain“). mar:
am- the

an...

on

up

mm; um;

and

manned yum-mt:

“mum. at cm manor mm: at»; on the 1.1- an.

changes wort intorprutod
Ian- 41-piuozn; blood vetucln.

ll

avtdlnoo at a pnruaagsitnl tumor
‘

pnnunninaophnlocrul,ula done and thin did not dclnnntruec
thy IIII. It. patiant anarovud withaut troutncnt and lit dinohnrsod.
In It: rtlanattod a to! lick! 1:10: with avid-not or an aunt. talin
Ital syndronn. In '10! a: tin ¢uuruo a! uni 111ncll and.nultxplxoity of 1051.33, at in: bolicvod that the pntiaut'n uyggtanl
A

1

'

taro

duo

to doccatrntiio ahnaccs, and net a unoplaun. lo turthgr

Itudiou var. andnrtaknn.
In this group or lunpcatod brain tumors 22 ausiogruln 414 not
than any pathnlo;7. ilovcn at that. 10:. canrialnd by I1! studio:
or tntapsy. In tun pationts, houovcr, untilrtotery angiogra-s

failed to dalunltrutc lesions lttcr

other Itudicl.
mum to m

danmmstrntod by

an. m; n... .1 57:»:- em m m
hospitdl koala-c of lift Inilplroutu, bladaor and
and

mud no.1

gum: or

1;

inks

aux-«zen.

6::

bcuul incontinence,

man. than

�#.

never. poroonnlity ohoncoo, and o opootlo loft honiporoo1o with
pathological roam: . embrupinll nun snare-o was nor»). .

were

right oorottd onciogron.undor pontothnl onoothnoin on: dono.
outs of lotorll £11.. and on. to? via! Into taken. in: films
A

two

thouod no ovidonoo or lorehrol tumor.
can rock Into: a vantrtoulogrln dolonotrotod a large right
con“
trontooto-porol IISI. Ibo protons. of a malignant slioln

ill

tin-0d by ournory.

:

Goo. IV; 3.3.é°:bzzkzoor old man developed

loft stood toizuroo

Iphlliu during/$rottlont for turunonlooil. on anurolucicll
ennuinltion chore woo ovidonoo at n lotion in tho risho honiophoro.
en Ikull x—ro: tho piuill outdo! In: shirtod to tho 102%.
An ortorioaru on on right nu
scum). mom-1a m

and

done ond no pathology dononotratod.

ma

A

pnounoonoophnlosrln, houovor,

revollod a dofornity of the right frontal horn.
in: patient uzpirod on: lonth otter oust-graph: and ot pout.

norm, mum} emu-u 0”qu mm anon-mm autumn.
9th.: erroneous onaiocrlphio d1oanoIOI our. and. in patient.
who provod #0 have vooonlor throubosoo. In tlo potionto with Iisnl
the oncxosru-o rovoolod on oraoaulnr are: in tho
poricto-tonporol vision with dioplooonont o: Iiaolo oorohrll voooolo.
Surgical exploration rovoolod odouotono necrotic brain tilooo,
without ovidonoo of tolor. loch oooe oono to antopoy and in both
or

I brain only».

man:- or . branch or. on. man «mm mm m rm. o:m

angiogruno onulo not be dittoronttotod from thou. noon in on...
tnnoro 1n the Inn: raglan.
Vaoogggg.tnoup11oog ﬂuonty~ono patient: Iuopootod or intro»
'

ornniol vaooulor Inouolioo or Quintin-o not. oubjootod to lnslo~
stools. 1h» Insaosrunl wort billtdrtl in only throo or thooo. and

���7.

mt N contact“.

um“.
m nu

In this aorta of 117 WWMB
36 ”tum- “from a to“: at is «unusual.
and peanut «mutation. In an mm
can with
the «mutation
and
at in
Of the a»: mo
«Quantum. 22

m

«W

mm
m an mum.
man:
mm.
mm
MmmuMuHthmm-uw. ammo. in
am. mutumnmwummmmm'
manta: mun It as mm to tntubtn m yum:
mmmmmmmmmumpmmm;
mun mom mm: man a «um
mummuwmu.
mnmmnmmomm
a nun“. :3 Wk mm. m
within
.

an

ou-

pm mm

#8

W. talcum-Wont... cummmuurmmwowhy. all no.“ to rcpt-aunt an mung mpm h m atom-Mt.
Inmautmh

umummmmmmmrua
Hummutumnmauammmm
W.a: m mm causation. loath um um Mr.
in in ”man (mu 7. n). In tum ash-r

W

or

1“

mm.
Inamcuul‘uumum otmmvmupmuat th:mn mm mm mm m s difficult W31“ (mo
m). W: m spa-nu (em um m mmmuu-n
a: Mum mm“ («m I!) m an. «W.
mum: sum emanation we «may “um 80
an

A

m
mm.
panamamumnmmmmmmmmmuu
a

Wow. than. 11mm Mm
m twink“ I mm mm. tau ”Omnimtm

ma. all... 63.

elm

was... an muons

am and Mt.

A

completed a

13W and as
most“ to «3.1qu

war» a: may

mm mam

was

���10.

at 1a.; or

np1nud¢c

on.

mth.

aunne1ausntgt u1thout convulu1vo unvunnne: for

«nan-11:11:,»

and a pou1t1vt lub1nlk1 on

than mm mm
tbs 10:1.ths

no

I

sensory «Itasca

am», Winn

lua1tcut weaknass a:

‘

1 31331 percutancona In31u3zun was inns u1th 10011 tainthna1n
nn1n3 {our 1njoot1ons of diodralt. &gt;xllad1a$oly Ittcr tho last
1nJ¢¢t1an thy pat1ont lapsed 1319 a 102911 3:11., M1: cyuruovanantt
3101.0 d1llo¢18ttd, and tan loft layer and In!!! tatul1t1o§ I09.

N

mum
nonpanﬂ

anon.

am

the

tmu Mum mm m

Vtrhully to «allnnd. but tum han1pl¢31t booinpit10at 00114
tplnt1c. It porn1ltad ant11 tn. put1on1 its trunnruraod to ancillt
anap1¥I1 can nanth 11102.

tn31usrnll I110 tatcrprttod an annual. A pnaulalnoaphnlo~
3run.rovualtd b1latcrnlxy 61.301 vuntr1c10u u1thout nh1tt er
1%.

.d1lvort1an.1 walker
(31) the

at stator: that’s:

Ions111v1ty tn the eonsrust Indtwn,

amt a; m me many at 1111009103 (33),

and

mum

tar «aupl1ant1onl
In in. prusuat 19:10., till. {natori It. nut ant-taun1n3 1n tn.
pat1enta uh. 107110301 «unpliont1aa- when tunic tr. 01.31301 10 tin
hwptrtonn1un (38), havu bola a133Ot$ed as OIIIOI

_

unoonpl1enta1’onacs.

l1thsr eonsaapt1v11 at 1ntaadnrlal aiadrnst gonn1t1v1ty tent:
turn cnrr1od out 13,0?!93 luhaoot. In out cute, in: cane: at
«humus, means, an: myzuum mu- the
m: am»
an to ouncol tan I9I11II.

3111th mm
1B1:

In

111

1mm:
1n51ud1n3 an.

athgr turnouts,

amuuum, m Im1t1uty to». m mun.

Ill notably

true

1n

tbs {tar pat1outs

who dtvu1opod “n11.331c~

rsaot1ons of urtiolr1t, oh111n,“ van1t1n3, tolleu1a3 tho
In31osraphy. but who £11101 to rule: to tbs tent 4916.
Shaw. 1: an apparent rolae1an 1n tho ant: bntanon «anp11out1ons
11km”

�13..

(luntudias hunttuun If

In.

it. acct)

and

tin

ms

it 13:00t10an

1 2 3

mania: or 1n1¢otzunn

t 5 6 Iﬂﬂ"th‘ﬂ‘6

lo. .1 patiouta 11th cu-pzioctiaun'l e 6 6 I 1;
lo. at pt... without «uncanny 3 9 1m :38

'

it

Ebﬁazﬁ
'

o

16

'3

as

*Ixnluata; 16 Inna-plsnusad «Isa: 13.1huu tutu: data.» uua ngt

rocordnd.

o: m t’utoru or nae-than and m'
author I: carotid punstaraa at on. Ion-1:: (unilaturtl or bilaterll
Iagiacrlph!) rtvttl as significant entrolltton botluon thtao riotorl.

3mm mm»

t3. inolaunno at calvlaltxaau.
Arm-1n max-«mun m in a eonmuuan in m.
poxootxon or patzants tar Ingtosrlphy. ihn.hw)hrtoanzvoa (:11 with
diastnlia prisaurio at zoa-n. It. or'nnvi. and urtialto ar0§turtu at
more than lﬁaun. In.) It». subjueted to nasitgrOphy, and in nan. at
Shut. the. that. lay tonplioaticna. .0: thn paticnta with Icvorc up
titan singly.

and

--

‘tsnnszont oclplzsaﬁiaan («chit than hGIRQﬂlﬂ ot‘tho unak) aunt and
V

hrpdrﬂlnlzan.
unseat mortal: hart alphlatlid tan diagnottta rtlzuhalat:
it alrutid lasincruah: 1n vascular nan-alto: (k), auapoetod brutu
talnru (lb. 5), tram-I310 aurchmt1~utdbn (6). tan ooaluntvu vascular
axsaaaon (7). our ebucrvataons coatirn.thn rocounnadatzana at tho

ham 1:. um run m

m.in.

_

diagnnst- a: van¢u1nr nan-n17
could nut he ountlmuld Cincpt iv insulin} Impaiurt at luttpuy.
Itnte sir trudiyi are nut vuiiuilo 1n dlnanntrntins vautnlur annualaos
a!”IEIIrIIIITMInﬂtﬂcrlrhr“tﬁmiﬁlﬁpiiﬂtiuri"ttwin%00w%nwiiitblllhins

Iran? to ausiouruphw.

�13.

sign ailsnnsts.

Xn-haﬁ

at

th@“p&amp;t10nﬁs

in this surint-An shun.nnth

,

n luntan was unspoctea, tho yam-p1: was natzutaggarilr“dauauntmatad
um
«am:
or
miagrap‘hy; man ‘mnu‘blishad

w

am»

um“

lbnte£tta0lnbsp£bai, five anenrwnnn wore dn-waatritoa-an la anapoota.
ﬁtnilar ”caulk: are rooardea by tthar ﬁlth!!! {¥), can anagrams

mmemuona

have.

hem

nae ta inn-cue than

Wis.

Routine

mtehml injectim, scanned with bilateral 6:th panama. will
«laminate maladies 1n the posterior portion at the 611-010 at
‘ﬂillin (1!). Oblique A.P views tt #5 403:... have been ruoanuoadnd
to damonltratc until aneurysms er tn. aaratid (#d). with thtne
noditicatiana 1n~the prooed&amp;re, 1t 13 to—bq§gxpeoted that the
incidence at positive 1d¢ntﬂiut1m at
will
the rule of angiogrnphy 1n the management or apontansaua

am”

mm.

Iuharaahnoid hannrrhnes 13 not alear. Recent review: emphlstxo in.
1n»9rt&amp;a¢e of alnnnltrtting tha Xenian nhmrs turaiaal intervaattun
1! indiettnd (ﬁt. a.) !hc affect of Iaszonxlphw 03:13:
twat.

it.

53:10 a: blending his act beta a1nr::1¢d. lung nuthnra tutu roan-acalid
:a;1¢lxnphy only :ttor tho blending has 09:306. 0th.». such an

(m. mm «:1: m u mama-v man
m
nun mm. m. mun um... um um mu m
tn in
5::o0t
in

mum: and
adhorul

at

4

or

the cases

thin 3095's, and no ntutqnnnt of tho

Inciozraphw an binoding can be undo.
Aagiogrnyh: in tho diagnoctio panoodnro o: «halt. visa a

Quaratoatawiil human tumor :1 auspoetod. it 1: rcounnandnd tar Ionian:
lecaﬁol in :3. Iatortcr tlu~thsrds a: tht_¢¢rolvun. ana$p1tt1 1th..
posterior toast and nuns unabrszu innnru a». uni conntttnntly

Mutable by

this

Hath pip111@dama,

team”.

11mm“! in lawn”
WW
ant
unltki

ztntc than venucdnro,

lit ntuditc. anon

��1‘.
In snot: or cnrcbgll vuucniqr;acutdant,Inciﬂlllvi¥~tnrﬂﬁrl,1003

helpful. .rlilurv 0:,a rental to

£111 any Do

an:

t. u.vurtety t:

mamas 310m»:ntm1umut1m. .mmm min. in!
”mm at m sum. mm mum mm boon ”but!“ (75).
1;- aot ,imwmwludzu
Mimi!»
mum man. It
proud” \- mam. mu 1i: arm-gamut” o. twain tron m
tntrusarnhmtl 010%, or f!!! a tunes, in OIIOI Ihnre tho I1tsnonll-as
mucus

W.

unelcwr.

'

ﬂhile the indications tar angiography are many, that cannot be
evaluated uithuut ; aincuauian at thy risk: involved. ‘iha emm911a1~
,tiuau or the praceanre are a: turccthpoat.(n) trunnient latul
phcnunanlg (b) trannient cerebral vascular phenlnnnlg (o) pcmlanant

2mm «£1411».

,

xn the

vburaias Dﬂlnl 1n the

:1“:ng at trmniont mama m m

It‘d during

1nJooeton, hauttuul in.tho noak, and
ullorzie venetiann.. numatann.1n the acek in a potentially dangcraus
samplicntien (see aur.Caso VII) but in a ragent review no Inqucllas

varc,aha§rve¢=(9). »Allor¢10 notation: «we larreqaant and usually
llld. .1: in: nat¢¢ in thin action that ﬁns manila. intvaautlanouu
or csngunntivua talking tar sensitivity It: not fauna untitraotorw $n

prudiottus ﬁnale-clnpliotticnl.

lblnninat,hun1paanszs. aphlltl. :eiunros nna citritod blaod
pruuunre haw: hath reported fallouina unstogrtphv (16). In that
series than. qunmlieationn n!!! OttarVQdfin nine canal »~ an incidenae
of 35. {A similar tantdanao uni-nhucrvud In tho lbntcrluao Ibnpaell
30:103. lint.th030

Philll'n!.!rﬁ pribttly in: to tunporary vaaaulnr

innutriuionﬂr (I’lﬂlﬂ) 1: I71lnnn¢d by the cliniunl pattorn at
nourolngzctl findings and thair‘dnrutzun.. at asv¢u 3:310:90 with

�it. M101”

15.

m

an tin-00
unwanted 01ml: than.
0m:- it no so” in an laws. In m
panama, mu m
of the amsun autograph: m "mm in a. 0M um 01: an
um, 01MB «manna. In tho 0mm: mum, Woo-0m

banana-«10,

and

tm

mammmuumamummuamnmm
left me the
0min
1mm that
m

m»: later,
in»

first

0m

may m

0100.

an

mm m mind”that run
an tho

0100 and

mum

M01090! 0 right M4-

13:00:10! 0: 01941-0“. tho

MWMmth-Wﬂm.
Vacant OW
M
0mm mm.»

9103“.

of that mun-101-

hue

been observed.

02:0:

m 13300151”:

in: do» within

15

010010

plant 0 1000: am manna 007010904
0:? “can”.
third Quintin 0: m "I! 0140

In an.

A

mm 0: tin 09m“ 3: m «rent.

an.

m
mumnmnwsmnmgumma.
within
Wu.
omnuum m0 not
unwind:

61mm

m.

19

in ”#103150 01th W103.
6menoun-1mm.»
a: 0 ”um '0 condition or men nun-1a; wemyhymummmmammumm. mud)
,

them-.1319“: ormpmuamxm. mam
Mm
:um «mare; “may to «unanimity. um many.

and mu.» (1») mart «no 1080110100
mm.and80011110
0: “data-imam u:
clown (11)
than

1n

mu

mm.

anus,

1."

”that“ ”mum” in a «£100 a! 36° won-000. no" mo in
«hung: in an:- pmmt 005-100. an: m patient and 0 «m. nunvation 0f

than at

0.

pvt-mung

Mum.

111 b01020

W10.

80071110 and

tin pmodm‘e.

in contrast

00

this

In! 0! than 90810330,

111:.

mum at 910003. 1:090 0010:“:

m the 10:30 has.“ of M1: (53);

,

�(5e), Won (14), m
um he), muten
w
deaths ﬂare related ta
precadure.‘
(1b) thawein no

16.
and

mm

It 13

tum

passablc
adrlannd

that with vidnupread use a: angzoeraphr, Iubﬁeatu titl.naro
cerebrul lesions tru selccted far these stud1eu and tha rink: ﬁharlhv
1n¢rcanod.
A

what 9: mm:

by 01:36::

am

manta: (BB. 11,

12)

alphantxs tho-launntxon at tho taxis atteatn o: 31:30 limit a: diodmalt
given ovar a abort 99:10! a: ﬁans. '1hor tailgatic in. nature at the
toxicity Is an inoréégea permanbility at tho blood 1.33:1! and u
chanxe 1n hennaynlaieh. Furthlxﬂﬂliy aha rolatian between canoentrt~
ma taunt; m, mean-am I» am: (13) when no
am or
introauegd dladraxt far Instagruphy. a1: abtathtiun that seizures
£0116! thc use at 595 and 70% éiearaut has been ovatimnné by unmitiul

amt

invautizatarb.
auspite thc use at 351 diodrast and law total Gasman: er
diodraat, in this series, eumplications ensued. share I81 no nisni~
tioaat rnlntiaa between.dosasc 1nd canaliettionn. ethar raetars
'

not he ”mum

and same

elrculntian tint (#t)

and

mung ma «team:
V

'

H

31.3

‘71...

i

mummy

mt. has

been given

in the

“amnion

an

tau affect of other 1nJurious ﬂaunts

(a).

eri

8h. moment a: em: or man.
cranial aiaenaa :uupoeted or raueular animalios. an;znt¢atar1t1
talcum. and traumatic hu-Itunns. IS 1: n natintcetory non*lurzie¢1
ntthad at dtnunutrntina I Visuallr annuals; nnltoznation or ‘nourrnn.

1.

1::

in: dilsnoail of Iupratuntorill.llnlts it will takiinc 9Q!
tttinruntarlly. In,udﬂ1t1¢u to catnblzlhinz thn pzoqanao at a kunnr.
:rtorauarapny 1! unparacr ta 0th.: asnannstto tookaios 1n yialazna
calling. I: to it. typo ot’lnul lad 1t. local. In Cl!!! with
In

�17.

a not and. Wkly “at”: by tn
mm
ohacuro
13

mined-II».

It alt a Inttlthstaww'litind'13.!UIlaatulﬂmaa
or ﬂu.
and mm. mum of tho nah-unlu- min, or
mimic: fun w ”0199.15”. I»...
1. a
in «us of
tantrum mam,
m Mm»
«turns»: arm "ﬂunk: mm

proucdnri.

m:

mm
mm.
a intricarutrll hilatlll
tiastlt-Ilah
MW m emu mum «now am»
mu.

at taunt.

10.113» tram

1:

1.

eon-punts” mg. “I? tho mt pm, Wink. and would not
in no“ mu. he savanna.» m
no. tn was ﬂu
not
"mm u human-1m math-nu, min or
tutor:
uncanny d: tunings. a sum: of «mu.
r010, and
"My 1. mum.
pm a mu

W

mm

m

W
«mud Woman part-mt
Mm
m rm an: m mm "an“

mm:

mm”no: a:
A

117

hum. mam o:

ta

risk: of Ingiography.
no author. «mum: that the 1mm

taliﬁttionl

and

mt:

ot

at

the

mum” do

«mu m autumn: an the meant or mean:
alumna”, mum mmtarial brain Wm ms! was
not

13th

1.1;-

10am.

'

u ,____

__

_#».47.L_...;M._.z _,_..._.,___L__,

.__u “A, .

�RUIIARY

eeriee a: 117 pereuteneoue oerotid ensiosreee were
revieeed to eveiuete the indidetione for end rieke involved in
engiosrephy. Petieute with e veriety or intredreniei conditione
were etudied including eupretentoriel tenure, veeeuier endeoliee.
A

treaeetio heeetaee

end eerebroveeduler dieeeee.

titty-rive petiente

with evidence at intreoreniel tenure
were eueJeeted to engiogrephy, end e poeitive diesnoeie eee eede
in thirty. fheee diesnoeee were auntie-ed in 83$ or the eeeee.
’

In duly tee eabjedte were the tiiee eieinterpreted. or the
aegetive tilee. the diegnoeee were dentineed in 50!; in only tee
men an the ensiosreee teii to aim e leeion um- deeenetrehie
b7

eir etudiee.

or 21 petiente eith euepeeted intreereniel veeduler endedliee,
nine were outlined by ensiosrephy. In tee of theee, the engiosreee
reveeled en end-e11 not eeniteet on eir etudiee. In e group at
eeveuteen petiente euepeeted o: treneetie intreoreniei heeeteee,
e poeitive diesnoeie wee eede in seven eeeee. Theee diesnoeee
ee well ee the necetive findinse in eight ceeee, end intreeerehrei
theere deeonetreted in ten ceeee, eere e11 contimeed by euheeeuent

etudiee.
In oeeee at cerebroveeduier leeione ensiogrephy wee not at
diecnoetio veiue.
Treneient ddeplieetione of engiogrephy were eeen in one—third
of the petieute, end edueieted or heeetaee or the neck, heeipereeie.
eeieuree, end erticerie. In five petiente (I!) eoepiicetiene eere
eevere end peeeenent. Sheee oeeee ere deeerihed end the restore
diecueeed.
Ehe

‘Vl

eethere deecrihe the ueetulneee or engiosrephy in

�“Hermann“ been»:

intact-mill condition: .
they canal“. that tho united risk: of cerebral miomphy
69 not data“ from it: ”0mm”. in the summon: a: mammal
vacant alternations. unopened «panama-1.1 man and

human hum.

the variety or

��mm
rams.

LG. and mummy, L: mum...»
my...
warms,anion-mph:
ma cox-chm than”. mu.lgu_gnl.mz¢hiat.
omml
Q}, 359“"368: ‘9’11: 39”intmmiu
(1) new. I. : mummy in polt~trmtio
2w¢2583 “tam; 19‘9.
910‘
ES.
4““
WWI.
m
at
in the
(1»)
lumbar, 19W.
intmmid 3.: 9mm}. maximum? 755468, W001:
(o)

5.
6.

WI! New

'

.

_

mm.
3!;

3.8.: m dammit er
mum. B. m
3.!"
mm,
by
intact-unis!
tutu-mic
humane axiom”. J. Imam- .

(6)

Q5, 363~376o

N17. 1951-

LB. and um. ‘.l.8 Eh. contribution at «roam 1950.
mm.
angina-mm in “tannin. «mam. : m $2-3m, catcher,
of
(3) mm. 3.3. and mm. 1.6.: Wriemphic visualisation
600-618,
251.
lesions. mh.!m1.ggzehiu.
ammuni19‘6“3.;
(b) mm. 1.3. and mm, mm carom}. Marion-why in191.8.
nub-mountain Mum. g.i.l.i.. 1.36: 517-581, M...
(a) mzm. 1.1:. am mm. 6.6.: mum-min autograph: in the
tmmnt at «1'0an maul” accident: . can: .M. , m
(4)

7.

,_

V

(a)

LA. and mm, 9.3.: carotid minmtw; It: ".1130
sum.
in pun-.11
t 121th conditim. M£11mgorth “or.
,

8.

m,
the
mmmolwruzohint. 31;

: thrionlmaphy m mmmmw. mu- um.
be.
1.31m: .
localization had tram: or 111%”:er
1310-13“. June, 1932.

m,

P. and

Pmuunum «mud miouaphy:
m,
"farm”
ine“
iota blob. laurel”
I»:

complications in th-

and pun-ms.

‘10 .

11.

b

with special

11:

been

to the larynx.

16;; 1-6, Juan-r1. 1951.

1. sad mum-amen, 1.2.: umimt
3.6., trauma,with.
cyan.
union-why. Lima“.
unbnl
32-191. in unpainted
19‘9466
“ll, number.
g;
of
(b) mm, 3.. 36mm. VJ. and unseen, 3.: cmuaum
1951.
110418,
angina-why. g4, mum. , g;
ham,
India a:
tar emtmt
0. cerebral
unplug £01m»
won,
312-316,
lov.,19't9.
a:
dim» type. 1 .lmu Joni-elm. "paint. E;

(u)

a

»

to a
aid 01,8861. 0.: 103.3ch of «mm: bland vouch
336~3#8,
Indian or the “adult group. mm We}... 32;
lava-tho, 1m.
pines in aux-01min].
13. @038, am. u 8mm}. ”tomography: It: 704-711.,
Oct...

12 .

1*.

mm,
contra-t

‘1'.

‘

«lanolin. Arch.lm¢1.ﬂgguat.. 53!.
6.. mm , run. and
3.3.: Vertebral
'W
tokﬂﬂnt.
‘

rm.
166.5182, "bm’lg‘g.
‘ u‘doMc; £12.

19“.

Wm.

83131 o

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2294">
                <text>A clinical evaluation of carotid angiography. Confin Neurol. 1952; 12(4): 181-95.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2295">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2296">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-5-007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2297">
                <text>1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2298">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Stein, Joseph M.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2299">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2300">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2301">
                <text>[Preprint] and publication. Confinia Neurologica. From the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University College of Medicine and the Neurological Service of the Third Division, Bellvue Hospital, New York City.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2302">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2303">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74432">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80993">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87554">
                <text>Basel; New York: Confinia Neurologica</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94115">
                <text>Spiegel, E. A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="231" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="22">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/159923c8867e9781f49e8300e7f3e2d3.pdf</src>
        <authentication>560d0723c8cbc5298ad5e04e592ff291</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100648">
                    <text>0

Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry
October 1952, Vol. 68, pp. 481-490
Copyright, 1952, by American Medical Association

EXOSOMESTHESIA OR DISPLACEMENT OF CUTANEOUS SENSATION
INTO EXTRAPERSONAL SPACE
MORTIMER F. SHAPIRO, M.D.
MAX FINK, MD.
AND

MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.
NEW YORK

MONG phenomena that may be apparent during examination of patients with
disease of the sensory pathways is mislocalization of a sensory stimulus. It
has long been known that a person with a sensory defect, as seen in the common
varieties of cerebral hemiplegia, may inaccurately localize stimuli applied on the

paretic side.
Such point mislocalizations are apparent in examinations using a single stimulus
and have been described in detail by Head} These mislocalizations can be accentu—
ated by the use of double simultaneous stimulation techniques.2 In addition, when
these techniques of examination are employed, other varieties of mislocalization,
such as displacement,3 become apparent. Displacement is the patterned mislocali—
zation of one of two stimuli simultaneously applied to different body areas. The
direction of displacement is in a deﬁnite pattern, which is dependent upon the parts
of the body stimulated.
Characteristic of mislocalization so far reported has been the fact that their extent
was within the limits of the patient’s body. In the course of studies of cutaneous
perception, we observed a new form of displacement in which the patient consistently
and in a predictable fashion mislocalized stimuli into extrapersonal space. This type
of displacement we have termed “exosomesthesia.” 4
Exosomesthesia is not a commonly observed phenomenon. More than 400
patients with brain disease were examined at Psychiatric Pavilion of Bellevue
Aided by a Fellowship from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (Dr. Fink).
This investigation was supported in part by research grant #MH-139 from the United States
Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health.
From the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University College of
Medicine, and the Neurological Service of the Mount Sinai Hospital and Bellevue Hospital
Center.
1. Head, H.: Studies in Neurology, London, Oxford University Press, 1920, Vol. 2.
2. Bender, M. B.; Shapiro, M. F., and Schappell, A. W.: Extinction Phenomenon in
Hemiplegia, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 62:717-724 (Dec) 1949. Bender, M. B.; The Advantages
of the Method of Simultaneous Stimulation in the Neurological Examination, M. Clin. North
America 32:755-758 (May) 1948.
3. Bender, M. B.; The Phenomenon of Sensory Displacement, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 65:607-621 (May) 1951.
4. The term was derived by Dr. Judah A. Joffe (Hinsie, L. E., and Shatzky, J.: Psychiatric
Dictionary, New York, Oxford University Press, 1940) from the Greek 55w, out of; will“,
body, and 41709710”, perception by the senses.

�2
7

Hospital Center by routine and specialized sensory tests. Exosomesthesia was
observed in only 15 cases, an incidence of about 3%.5 The following case reports
illustrate the phenomenon and demonstrate some of the conditions under which it
was observed.
CASE REPORTS
CASE 1.—H. M.,

a man aged 64, was admitted to the Psychiatric Pavilion of Bellevue Hospital with a history of progressive mental changes of six years’ duration. The ﬁrst four years
of illness were marked by slowly progressive impairment of memory, concentration, and other
intellectual functions and by increasing apathy to his' environment. In the last two years there
was rapid exacerbation of this condition, resulting in the loss of his job as a store manager.
During this period his speech became increasingly garbled and stammering. He vacillated
between irritability and complete apathy. He was occasionally incontinent, ceased bathing, had
difﬁculty in dressing, and was sometimes so forgetful and confused as to wander into the street
without his trousers.
Routine Neurologic Examination—In walking, the trunk was tilted to the right, and there
was a tendency to drag the right lower extremity. However, there was no signiﬁcant motor
weakness, reﬂex change, or tonus abnormality. Coordination tests were well performed. The
cranial nerve functions were intact. Vibration sense was correctly perceived only in the
clavicles and the head, while position sense was lost in the ﬁngers, wrists, toes, and ankles
bilaterally. Temperature differences were poorly perceived except in the face area. His responses
to touch and pinprick stimulation will be described later. A mild degree of “mixed aphasia” was
present. This speech difﬁculty was evident only by special testing or when the patient was
fatigued by prolonged examination. There was a ﬂuctuating dyspraxia of moderate severity.
Occasionally he had difﬁculty in dressing, being unable to handle buttons and sleeves. However, he could perform such functions as feeding himself, combing his hair, and other routine
daily tasks. He was usually unable to mimic the more complicated patterns of the hand-praxis
tests.
An electroencephalogram showed bilateral diffuse abnormality, with decrease in amplitude
and intermittent suppression of activity over the parietal regions. A pneumoencephalogram disclosed bilaterally dilated ventricles and moderate “cortical atrophy,” particularly in the left
temporal lobe.
Psychiatric Status—Although the patient was oriented for place and situation, he made
errors as to date and time of day. There were defects in recent memory, concentration,
calculation, and ability to assume the abstract attitude. He usually sat placidly staring into
space or wandered aimlessly about the ward. He did not mix with other patients. When
approached by members of the staff, he was friendly and passively cooperative. Testing procedures were approached with cheerful indifference. When, however, he was pushed into test
situations greater than his capacity, he reacted with increasing irritability and tension, eventually
culminating in a “catastrophic reaction.” At such times he would become red in the face, shout
that he knew the answers but did not want to continue, and suddenly begin to weep.
Body Schema—He was able to distinguish the right side of his body from the left, but was
unable to make this distinction on the examiner’s body. He had no difﬁculty either in locating
midline structures of his body, such as the nose, mouth, chin, umbilicus, and penis, or in pointing
to his eyes. With eyes open he readily found both ears; but when his eyes were closed he groped
about his face for several seconds before locating them. He could point to his thighs, knees,
ankles, and toes but could not point to any speciﬁc toe other than the big toe.
He frequently had diﬂiculty in locating portions of his upper extremities. If asked to point to
his shoulders, he correctly located one shoulder but then groped behind his neck looking for
the other. This defect was even more noticeable in trying to ﬁnd the “other” elbow and wrist,
and greatest in trying to ﬁnd the “other” hand. His search for the “other” hand or wrist was
bizarre. He would look under the pillow or rummage under the mattress, becoming tense and
Fink, M.; Green, M., and Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign
of Organic Mental Syndrome, Neurology 2:46-58 (Jan-Feb.) 1952.
5.

�3

insisting it was lost. It should be emphasized that, despite the great difﬁculty in locating parts
of his body, the patient was able to name the body parts, except the ﬁngers and toes. This was
true whether the part pointed to was on the patient’s or on the examiner’s body.
Sensory Status—(w) Single Stimulation: He had difﬁculty in differentiating between the
sharp and the dull end of a pin. This defect was present throughout the body, although he made
signiﬁcantly fewer errors in the face and hands. Touch stimulation was poorly perceived.
Usually he could not state whether or not he had been t0uched. Again, there seemed to be
relatively better preservation of this modality in the hands and face.
Except under special conditions of examination of the hands, to be described later, the
patient was able to locate the site of a pinprick by pointing. However, if the pin was repetitively
and rapidly applied to one region, or if the prick was steadily maintained at that one place, he
could not locate the point of stimulation. He would make frantic, random searching movements
over his body, and not infrequently around the bedclothes, grimacing as though in pain and
exclaiming that he was trying to remove the pin. If asked where he was being pricked, he dis—
regarded the question and continued to try to remove the stimulus. This phenomenon occurred
on stimulation of any portion of the body but was most apparent when the hand was tested.
(b) Double Simultaneous Stimulation: The phenomena of extinction and displacement were
frequently observed in tests of different body areas by simultaneous tactile stimulation. On
stimulation of the face and hand, stimuli to the hand were not perceived or were mislocalized
to the cheek. In tests of homologous body areas (as hand-hand) extinction of one percept was
common. The side on which the stimulus was not perceived ﬂuctuated, so that at one moment
only a. right—sided stimulus was perceived and a few moments later only a left-sided stimulus
was perceived.

Exosomesthesia—Whenever his palm was in contact with a portion of his body or any other
object, and the dorsum of that hand was pricked with a pin, the patient consistently mislocalized
the stimulus. This mislocalization was to whatever object the palmar surface of the hand was
touching. For example, if the patient’s hand was resting on his thigh and the dorsum of the hand
was pricked, he insisted that the thigh had been touched, and not the hand. This mislocalization
—exosomesthesia—occurred to the thigh, abdomen, leg, or face and was present with stimuli
to either hand. It was observed even when the patient was urged to look at the hand during
the application of the pin. Exosomesthesia could not be elicited, however, by stimulation of the
palm or palmar surface of the ﬁngers when the dorsum of the hand was resting on a portion of
the body. Furthermore, localization of stimuli to the dorsum of the hand was correct if the hand
was held in space.

Mislocalization also occurred to objects external to his body. If his palm was resting on a
table or on his bed, and the dorsum of the hand was pricked with a pin, he would point to these
objects and state that the pin had been applied “there.” When questioned, he stated that the
hand had been touched but continued to point to the bed or table. Frequently, however, he
insisted that it was the bed or table that had been touched, and not his hand. If asked how he
could feel the bed being pricked with a pin, he would become tense, avoid the question, and
insist, “You touched the bed, not me.”
Displacement into extrapersonal space was not eliminated by simultaneous stimulation, even
when extinction of one of the percepts occurred. For example, if pins were simultaneously
applied to the dorsa of the hands while the palms were resting on a table, he would report
feeling only one pinprick, that on the left (or right, as dominance ﬂuctuated) and point to the
place where the left hand had been resting, saying. “You touched the bed there.”
This phenomenon of displacement into extrapersonal space occurred daily during a period
of more than two months.

C 0mment.——~In this patient a requisite to displacement into space was that the
palm of the hand be in contact with an external object. In other words, there were

two cutaneous stimuli simultaneously in operation, namely, the pinprick on the
dorsum of the hand and the pressure of the object in contact with the palm or
ﬁngers. A single stimulus, such as pricking the dorsum of a hand held in space, did
not elicit the displacement.

�4

Exosomesthesia was elicited only on stimulating the hands. This occurred even
though single pinprick was perceived more sharply in the hands than in any other
area except the face.
Although this patient showed inability to locate correctly parts of his own and
the examiner’s body, it does not necessarily mean that exosomesthesia is determined
by this particular type of disorder in body scheme. The following case illustrates
the phenomenon of exosomesthesia in the presence of the patient’s ability to locate
body parts.
2.—E. K., a woman aged 52, was admitted to the neurologic service of the Mount
Sinai Hospital in August, 1950, with a history of grand mal seizures. She had been in good
health until 1947, when there appeared sporadic, momentary sensations of “blacking out.” About
two years before admission she began to suffer monthly grand mal seizures. There was no aura.
Routine examination on admission showed that her status was within normal limits except
for anosmia in the right nostril. There was no organic mental syndrome. X-ray studies revealed
evidence of a subfrontal neoplasm. On August 12 a craniotomy was done, and after amputation
of a portion of the right frontal lobe, a large bilateral subfrontal meningioma was excised.
Her postoperative course was stormy. For two weeks she was semistuporous. She responded
only to massive, painful stimulation, and these responses were limited to vague, ineffective
attempts to push away the stimulus. In this period she lapsed several times into coma and
showed Cheyne-Stokes respiration. The Babinski response was obtained bilaterally. Her pupils
did not react to light.
From about Aug. 23, 1950, the patient improved slowly and steadily. She began to respond
verbally, and contact could be maintained for short periods. Vision, which had apparently been
absent, began to return, although right homonymous hemianopsia remained for some time. A
marked organic mental syndrome characterized by confusion, disorientation, and anosognosia,
was present.
Routine Neurologic Examination.——Neurologic examination in September, 1950, disclosed
right homonymous hemianopsia, severe impairment of visual acuity with bilateral secondary
optic nerve atrophy, nystagmus in all directions of gaze, a bilateral Babinski sign, and a mild
degree of aphasia. Position sense, vibration sense, and temperature perception were unimpaired.
There were difficulties in perception of touch and pinprick stimuli, as described below.
Psychiatric S'tattusr—The patient was usually friendly and cooperative. However, she was
frequently irritable and would not permit examination. She was disoriented as to time and
occasionally to situation, but not to place. There were defects in retention and recall, covered
by confabulation. She was euphoric and displayed little self-restraint or concern in social
situations. Usually she would lie with her body fully exposed. Not infrequently she soiled
herself or wet the bed. Anosovgnosia was prominent.
Body Schema—On command, the patient was able to identify and locate correctly parts of
her own and the examiner’s body, such as the ears, eyes, feet, and parts of the upper extremities.
She exhibited some confusion about the right and the left side of the body.
Sensory Status.—(a) Single Stimulation: The patient perceived single pinprick stimuli
well, although she made occasional nonpatterned errors in localization. These errors were more
frequent on the left side.
(b) Double Simultaneous Stimulation: On simultaneous application of pinprick to the two
sides of the body, except the hands, extinction on the left or displacement on the left toward the
level of the right—sided stimulus was the usual response. Homolateral simultaneous stimulation
on the right side of the body showed no extinction, but stimulation on the left side elicited
frequent extinction and displacement.
CASE

Exosomesthesia.—Displacement into extrapersonal space occurred when the left hand was
pricked at the same time that either the right hand or the right cheek was stimulated. The
phenomenon could also be elicited when the left hand and any other area of the left side of the
body were simultaneously stimulated.
Under these conditions the patient mislocalized the stimulus to the left hand into space
near that hand, or to the object on which the hand was lying. For example, if pinpricks were

�5

.

simultaneously applied to the right cheek and the left hand, the patient indicated she had been
pricked on the right cheek and the arm of the chair on which her left hand had been resting.
As a rule she answered by pointing. If asked to verbalize, she would say, “The right cheek and
about here,” (pointing to the chair arm or into space near her left hand). If asked directly.
“Was your hand touched?” she would avoid the question, responding only, “Here,” pointing
at the same time to the left chair arm or into space. It is to be noted that, except under the
special condition of simultaneous stimulation, the patient was always able to point to or to name
her left hand on demand.
If pricked simultaneously on the dorsa of the left and right hands, she correctly localized
only the stimulus on the right, both by pointing and by stating, “My right hand.” The stimulus
on the left, however, was localized only by pointing to the chair arm and saying, “Here.”
If asked whether the chair arm and not her left hand, had been touched, she answered, “No,
here,” pointing to the chair arm.
When pinpricks were applied to the left hand and, at the same time, to another area on the
left side of the body, a similar displacement into space was evident. Usually the stimulus to
the left hand was mislocalized onto whatever structure the hand was resting or else 'into
contiguous space. The other stimulus on the left side was usually correctly localized, though
this stimulus, too, was occasionally displaced into space. When this double displacement occurred,
the patient would state that she felt two stimuli and would point into space to the left of the
arm, stating, “Here and here.”
These mislocalizations were repeatedly observed during a period of a month and were not
always limited to the left side. They were occasionally observed to occur on the right side.
At these times localization on the left was always correct, as indicated by pointing and by
verbalization.

C omment.—Exosomesthesia was elicited in this patient only under the condition
of multiple simultaneous stimulation. It could not be elicited by single—stimulation
methods. Also signiﬁcant is the fact that exosomesthesia was apparent even though
there was no gross disorder in body scheme on routine testing. Furthermore, it is

evident that her errors in localization were not simply inability to point to or
identify parts of her body by name, as ordinarily she experienced no difﬁculty in
doing this. on command.
Both patients mislocalized percepts to parts of the body, to objects, or into
space contiguous with the area stimulated. Occasionally, we have also observed
displacement of a stimulus to the person of the examiner. Usually such percepts
are mislocalized to a homologous portion of the examiner’s body; e. g., a stimulus
applied to the patient’s hand is reported by him as though it had been applied to
the examiner’s hand. Rarely, the mislocalization is to any part of the examiner’s
body. This type of displacement is illustrated in the following case.
man aged 52, was admitted to the Psychiatric Pavilion of Bellevue
Hospital with the complaint that he had become confused and depressed. For about a year he
had been disoriented and confused as to date and his relationship to people and had wandered
about the city aimlessly. He had been admitted to the Farm Colony about a half-year before
and had worked as a barber until the week before his admission to the hospital.
Routine N emologic Examimtion.—Neurologic examination showed normal gait and station.
Coordination tests were well performed. The reﬂexes were active bilaterally, with normal
plantar and abdominal responses. Cranial nerve functions were normal. The sensory status
showed changes, but only with special methods of testing. A pneumoencephalogram demonstrated
moderately dilated ventricles, without shift or deformity, and some dilated cerebral sulci.
Psychiatric Status—A severe organic mental syndrome was evident. In the ward he sat
quietly for hours by his bedside, taking little interest in his surroundings. When approached
by members of the staff, he appeared perplexed but was affable. During the testing procedures
he was cooperative unless confronted by a test situation in which the examiner demanded tasks
CASE 3.—-R. M., a

‘

�6
‘

beyond his ability. At such times he showed a “catastrophic” reaction, became excited, and
discontinued his efforts in the examination.
He was disoriented for time, place, and situation. However, he was able to ﬁnd his way about
the ward, locating his bed, the nurses’ desk, the doctor’s ofﬁce, and the lavatory. Severe diﬂiculties in intellectual function were observed. He was unable to give an adequate history.
He could not recall the examiner’s name or the events of several hours before but did not
confabulate. Calculation and symbol—identiﬁcation tests were poorly performed.
Severe aphasic difﬁculties Were evident. He was unable to name common objects, clothing,
or most parts of the body. He could not comprehend written commands, nor could he write,
but he was able to follow simple verbal commands.
Mild dyspraxia was demonstrated in his attempts to imitate ﬁnger and mouth movements.
However, he was able to dress, feed, and otherwise care for himself.
Body Image.—He had difﬁculty both in naming body parts and in locating them by pointing.
The defects were severest in the ﬁngers, wrists, and elbows, and occasionally the feet. There
was difficulty in right-left orientation.
Sensory Status—(a) Single Stimulation: Routine sensory studies of touch, pinprick, and
vibration stimuli showed no consistent impairment. These stimuli were usually correctly
localized and described. Occasionally a single stimulus to the hand or forearm was displaced
to a contiguous object or to space about the upper extremity.
(b) Double Simultaneous Stimulation: On double simultaneous [touch] stimulation the
patient displayed extinction and displacement of tactile stimuli. This was most evident in trials of
the face—hand test 6 but was seen in tests of other body parts as well. For example, on simultaneous stimulation of the cheek and the opposite hand, he would either report only the stimulus
to the cheek (extinction of the hand stimulus) or report a stimulus to each cheek (displacement
of the hand stimulus). The pattern of sensory dominance was that usually seen in diffuse
cerebral disease, the face being most dominant, the hand least.5 There was no lateral dominance.
Exosolm-esthesriav.—Displacement into extrapersonal space was occasionally observed on single
stimulation. This displacement was from the hand, forearm, or elbow to space contiguous to
the part touched. Exosomesthesia was, however, markedly exaggerated when double simul—
taneous stimulation was employed. Again, the areas from which the phenomenon was most
frequently observed were the hands, forearms, and elbows. For example, when stimuli were
applied to the dorsa of the hands as they were lying on the patient’s lap, he pointed to space
in front of his knees. If asked to state where he had been touched, he would say, “The hands,”
but would continue to point to the space in front of his knees. Exosomesthesia was rarely
noted when other body parts, such as the cheeks or shoulders, were simultaneously stimulated.
Occasionally it was found that on tests with double simultaneous stimulation the patient
mislocalized a stimulus from his body to the homologous region of the examiner’s body. For
instance, when the hands were simultaneously touched, he would grasp the examiner’s hands
and affirm he had been touched “there.” Despite the examiner’s insistence that the stimulus
had been to the patient’s hands, the patient would persist in pointing to the examiner’s hands.
When asked to name the parts touched, he would say “There, there.” The same phenomenon
was occasionally observed on simultaneous stimulation of the two elbOWS or cheeks. It was
signiﬁcant that this mislocalization to the examiner’s body occurred even when the patient was
urged to look at the stimulations.
It was observed that emotional tension, increase in the rate of testing or undue prolongation
of the examination increased the incidence of exosomesthesia. For example, to initial application
of pinprick to the right hand and the left cheek, the patient reported only the face percept,
omitting the hand stimulus. Later, he localized the two stimuli to the cheeks. As the examination
progressed and the physician speeded up the testing, the patient became tenser. He then localized
the face percept correctly but insisted that the hand stimulation was into space in front of the
hand. Finally, both stimuli were displaced into space or to the examiner’s body.
These phenomena were observed daily over a period of 2% months.
.

Bender, M. B.; Fink, M., and Green, M.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests
of Face and Hand, Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 75:250-252 (June) 1950; Patterns in Perception on
Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 66:35‘5-262
6.

(Sept)

1951.

�7

Comment—While single stimulation occasionally produced exosomesthesia in
this patient, the phenomenon was more pronounced under conditions of double
simultaneous stimulation. This patient also mislocalized stimuli to the examiner’s
body. Emotional tension, prolonged examination, or increase in the rate of testing
exaggerated the phenomenon of exosomesthesia.
GENERAL COMMENT

On consideration of these cases, it is immediately apparent that exosomesthesia
is associated with a severe organic mental syndrome. Therefore, it might be
argued
that exosomesthesia is merely a manifestation of the patient’s mental confusion;
that the patient simply points into space because he is confused. However, we have
examined many severely confused patients and found exosomesthesia only rarely.
Moreover, exosomesthesia is a patterned phenomenon, demonstrable in each patient
under deﬁned conditions, predictable as to the area from which it will occur and the
extrapersonal spatial region to which the sensation will be projected. For example,
in Case 1 exosomesthesia could be elicited only from the hand, and only when the
dorsum was stimulated at the same time that the palm or ﬁngers were in contact
with another object. Displacement under these circumstances was usually not
haphazard. As a rule it occurred to the object touching the palm or ﬁngers. In
Case 2 exosomesthesia could be elicited only by double simultaneous stimulation.
It was seen most clearly in the hand and could be elicited only unilaterally at any one
examination. Again, the displacement was not haphazard; the stimulus as a rule
was localized to extrapersonal space contiguous to the area actually stimulated. In
Case 3 the phenomenon was observed again under conditions of double simultaneous
stimulation, and the displacements were either to space contiguous to the stimulated
area or to homologous areas of the examiner’s body. It is signiﬁcant that these
displacements could be elicited even when the patient was urged to look at the
application of the stimuli. Moreover, even when the examiner pointed out the error
in localization and emphasized the implausibility of the
response, the patient characteristically insisted on the correctness of the mislocalization.
Factors Inﬂnencing Exosoimesthesiax—Many factors inﬂuence the appearance
of exosomesthesia. Except in children under special conditions, it has been observed
exclusively in patients with severe mental changes resulting from disease of the
brain. It is inﬂuenced by the type of stimulus used and the rate of stimulation,
as
well as by the element of simultaneity of stimuli. Moreover, the emotional
state of
the patient has a signiﬁcant effect on the phenomenon, as does the
part of the body
stimulated. In some cases exosomesthesia has been made apparent by administration
of small doses of amobarbital sodium. These factors will be discussed.
(a) Bilateral Cerebral Disease: The symptom background in every case of
exosomesthesia is an organic mental syndrome secondary to bilateral cerebral
disease. We have not been able to demonstrate exosomesthesia in
an adult unless
there were severe mental changes. But, as previously noted, it is a rare phenomenon,
and only a few patients with severe organic mental syndrome show it. In 400
patients with organic cerebral disease, of varying severity, exosomesthesia was
observed in approximately 3%.5 Even in these patients it was not manifest in
every
examination, and its frequency was readily altered by changes in the conditions of
testing. It is therefore evident that severe bilateral cerebral disease in itself is
not sufﬁcient to produce exosomesthesia.

�8

That simultaneous stimulation may elicit
sensory phenomena not apparent on single stimulation has previously been demonstrated.2 For example, a hemisensory syndrome in a hemiplegic patient may not be
discernible except under conditions of double simultaneous stimulation. Thus, single
stimulation may be well perceived and localized by the patient, but the addition of
a second stimulus simultaneously applied may so affect integration that the phenomena of extinction, obscuration, and displacement become apparent.
Similarly, simultaneous stimulation elicited exosomesthesia when it was absent
on single-stimulus examination, or exaggerated it when it was occasionally manifest
on routine stimulation. In Cases 1 and 2 simultaneous stimulation was a necessary
condition for eliciting the phenomenon. It could not be demonstrated by single
stimulation. In Case 3 exosomesthesia could occasionally be elicited on single stimulation, but with simultaneous stimulation the phenomenon was demonstrated with
much greater frequency.
(c) Type of Stimulus Most Effective: Of the various stimuli used in these
examinations, such as single touch, single pinprick, repetitive touch, and repetitive
pinprick, it was noted that repetitive touch stimuli were most effective in eliciting
exosomesthesia. This was especially true on double simultaneous stimulation.
(d) Effect of the Patient’s Emotional State: Exosomesthesia was exaggerated
by alterations in the test situation which made performances more difﬁcult. Increasing the rate of stimulation or unduly prolonging the examination increased the displacements to extrapersonal space. If the examiner was deliberately critical of the
patient’s errors, the phenomenon also appeared with greater frequency. These
factors increased the emotional tension of the patient and if carried further produced
a “catastrophic” reaction.
(e) Effect of Drugs: It has previously been demonstrated that difﬁculties in
perception may be exaggerated by barbiturate intoxicants.5 Amobarbital sodium
was administered intravenously in doses of 3 to 7 grains (0.2 to 0.45 gm.) to
patients with diffuse cerebral disease. Prior to administration of the drug, these
patients manifested the phenomena of extinction and displacement of percepts on
simultaneous tests, but not exosomesthesia. While under the inﬂuence of the barbiturate, three patients showed exosomesthesia, in addition to extinction and displacement. In two other patients, in whom exosomesthesia had been elicited only
after a protracted testing period, the administration of amobarbital sodium elicited
exosomesthesia at the onset of testing and exaggerated the phenomena of extinction
(2)) Effect of Simultaneous Stimuli:

and displacement.
Relation of Exo'somest‘hesia to: Extinction, Obscumtioln, and Displacement—In
our experience, whenever exosomesthesia has been observed, the phenomena of
extinction, obscuration, and displacement are also present. Exosomesthesia, how—
ever, is a rare phenomenon, whereas extinction, obscuration, and displacement are
commonly observed. Moreover, whereas extinction, obscuration, and displacement
are frequently seen in adult patients with mild cerebral dysfunction,5 displacement
into extrapersonal space is present only in cases of severe mental changes due to
disease of the brain. It may therefore be concluded that exosomesthesia in adults
represents a severer type of cerebral dysfunction than other simultaneous stimulation
phenomena.

�9

Relation of Exosomes'th‘esia; to Body I mage.——It might be said that exosomesthesia is a pathologic extension of the body image. The normal person is continually
extending the boundaries of this image. For example, Head cites the examples of
the woman with a feather in her hat who “feels” when the feather is touched, and
the surgeon who handles his probe as though it were an extension. of his ﬁngers.1
In the normal person, however, these extensions of the body image are ﬂuid,
immediately reversible, and clearly recognized by the subject as artiﬁcial. The
surgeon, for example, is able at any moment to redeﬁne correctly his body image.
He “knows” that the probe is not his ﬁnger. In the group of patients described
above, however, the extension of the body image seems to operate in a pathologic,
rigid form. Under certain conditions these patients lose the ability to maintain a
realistic deﬁnition of the limits of their body. They behave as though portions of the
contiguous external world are concretely incorporated into the inner image of their
body’s extent.
Although we may consider exosomestheisa as a specialized body-image disturbance, it should be noted that patients who do not show difﬁculties in identiﬁcation
and location of body parts still may show mislocalization into extrapersonal space.
On the other hand, patients with an inability to identify or locate their body parts
on command do not necessarily manifest exosomesthesia.
In similar fashion, there is no necessary relationship between exosomesthesia and
position-sense difﬁculties. A patient (Case 3) who manifested displacement of
sensation into extrapersonal space did not make errors in routine tests of position
sense in the extremities. This is consistent with observations previously made by
Head1 that localization of single stimuli is not functionally related to sense of
position of the extremities.
Role of the Hand—Although displacement into extrapersonal space has been
elicited from various areas of the body, it has been observed to occur most frequently
from the hand. Moreover, in no case has it been elicited from another area and been
absent from the hand.
This predilection for the hand is consistent with the manner in which other
dysfunctions of the nervous system are reﬂected. As a rule, when the functioning
of one side of the body is impaired through cerebral disease, the disorder is most
manifest in the hand. Thus, in the usual hemiplegia resulting from a capsular lesion
the paresis, body-image disturbance, and sensory loss are most prominent in the
hand and ﬁngers.
In these patients, and in others with diffuse cerebral disease, the phenomena of
extinction, obscuration, and displacement are also best elicited when the hand is
tested. Furthermore, studies of the order of sensory dominance of various areas
of the body demonstrate that the hand is in the lowest rank. This is true of the
dominance order of patients with cerebral disease,5 and also of normal subjects,
both adults and children.6
Similarly, when allesthesia is observed, it is seen most clearly in the hand. Bender and Nathanson 7 described a case in which the clinical course was reﬂected in a
Bender, M. B., and Nathanson, M.: Patterns in Allesthesia and Their Relation to Disorder of Body Scheme and Other Sensory Phenomena, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 64:501-515
7.

(Oct)

1950.

‘

�10

waxing and waning allesthesia. As this patient improved, the areas from which the
phenomenon could be elicited diminished, until ﬁnally allesthesia was demonstrable
only in the hand.
In autotopagnosia the hands are more profoundly affected than other regions.
Finger agnosia, possibly the earliest sign of body-image disturbance, is frequently
seen in the absence of other gross disturbances of the body schema. Furthermore,
phantom limb, anosognosia, causalgia, and synesthesia are phenomena in which the
role of the hand is especially prominent.
Just as these pathologic phenomena are manifest in tests of other body parts, but
are most clearly demonstrable in the hand, so, too, exosomesthesia, though occasionally demonstrable elsewhere, is most apparent in examination of the functions of the
hand.
Exosomesthesia in the N ormal C hild.—It has been observed that sensory phenomena which occur in patients with cerebral dysfunction may be found in the nor—
mal young child.6 Similarly, exosomesthesia, which we have never found in adults
except when there is severe cerebral disease, can be readily observed in children
up to the age of 4 years. In examination of a large series of normal children it was
noted that the initial responses of children to double simultaneous stimulation fre—
quently included exosomesthesia, although the commoner responses were extinction
and displacement. Exosomesthesia was rare, however, after the initial few trials.
The frequency with which exosomesthesia may be seen in children up to the age
of 4 years suggests that it may represent, in the child, a “normal” developmental
stage in the organization of perception. Its appearance in adults with severe brain
disease may possibly be, as with other pathologic phenomena, a regression in function to a previous level of sensory integration.
SUMMARY

,

The patterned mislocalization of tactile stimuli into extrapersonal space is
described and termed exosomesthesia.
Exosomesthesia is observed in patients with severe organic mental syndromes.
It is apparent only rarely on single tactile stimulation and is more readily elicited by
the technique of double simultaneous stimulation. It is exaggerated by fatigue,
rapid testing, and increased emotional tension. Barbiturate intoxication also may
elicit or exaggerate the phenomenon.
Exosomesthesia is most apparent in stimulation of the hand but has been observed
in tests of other body parts. While it may be considered a pathologic extension of
the body image, it is not dependent upon concomitant body-image disturbances.
Although exosomesthesia has been observed chieﬂy in patients with severe mental changes, it is not a manifestation of confusion, but is a patterned, predictable
phenomenon. It may be a regression, in patients with cerebral dysfunction, to a
previously “normal” stage in sensory development, as suggested by the fact that it is
readily observed in simultaneous tactile tests of young children.

Printed and Published in the United States of America

�EXOBOMIBTHIBIA OR

DIEPLkGIIIIT 0P OBTlﬂlﬂﬂs

83N3£TIOIIINQO EantuflRSOIAL BPACE‘
EV

Martino:- F. Shapiro.

am.

an: Fink, K.D.'*
and

Kerri:

B. Bender, H.D.

.,

" "i 3”“
a"?
,y.
Univcruity College or’ncdieiuc and tn. 3 enrol 651331 Service of
thc Haunt ﬂinﬁi ﬁclpital Ind lollcvuo ﬁbﬂpitﬂl, I0! Yer! 0131.
'Dntdod by a ﬂullaulhip tram thy lationnl roundntion for Infantile
QJ‘

V‘W‘

,

g

j

,

‘9ar111510.

ibis investigltion in. lupportod, in partin:by a rouonroh grant
stutt- Public not ammo. mum
or ﬁanlth.

aun-139 tram tho unit.d

Inltitutel

ﬂ

�Among phenomena bbeb new

be epperenb during exe-inebion or

petienbe eith dieeeee or the eeneory pebbueye is nielooelisebion

It

individual
with e eeneory defeat, on eeen in the cannon vuriebiee or cerebrel
beniplegie, any looeiioe ineoonrebely ebiuuli applied on the
of e eeneory etienioo.

bee long been known

that

on

‘

perebio bide.

point nielooelieebiono ere epperenb in exelinetionl
ueing e eingie ebiunlue, end have been deeoribedbin detail by Hood
(1). These nationalisation: can be eooentuobed/b‘e uee or double
Snob

einnlbeneoue obi-ulebion techniques (2).- In eddidon, when theee
technique. of exeninetion Ire enployed, other veriebiee or

nielooeiieetion,-euob ee diepieoenent (3). become apparent.
niepleoe-nnb ie the petberned nielooelieebion or one or two ebinnli
eiunlbeneouely applied to different body areas. The direction or
diepleoeuent ie in e definite pattern, which is dependent upon the
parts or the body Ibilnleted.
choreoterietio of nieiooelieetion on for reported bee been
‘

tho fact bhet their lxtent VII uibbin the lilibl of the patient’l
body. In the oouree or obodiee or outeneoue peroeption we obeerved
I new torn or diepleoenent in which the patient oonoietenbiy end in
e prediobeble reebion nielooelieel obi-n11 into extra-pereonei epeoe.
Thin type of diepieoenont on have teamed “exoeo-oebheeie'.¢
of the
derived by Dr. Judeh A. Jotte, Editor
19%0,
the
tron
Press.
Oxford
Boivereity
reyobietrio biotic: none",
,
by
”eiotheeie”,
perception
body;
the
Greek "one", out or;
139

FI?’!53'€5§E
eeneee.

wee

ll;

Exoeoleebbeeie ie not e commonly oboerved phenomenon.
more than #00 patient: with brain dieeeee were examined at Bellevue
Peyobietrio Hoopibel by routine end epeoielieed eeneory beete.

�2.
Shoeoneetheeie wee obeerved in only 15 oeeee ~ en incidence of
ebout 3! (5). who following oeee reporte illustrete the phehoaenon
end deoonetrete eoee o: the oonditione ﬁnder which it wee obeerved.
Case 15 H.I., e 6% year old male, wee admitted to Bellevoe

Peyohietrio noepitel with e hietory or progreeeive sentel cheeses
or eix years doretion. The firet tour yeere or illneee were lurked
by eloely progreeeive ilpeirnent of memory, oonoentretion end other
intellectual funotione. end inoreeeing epeth: to hie environnent

la the leet teo

ii

yeere thie oondition exacerbated rapidly, reeulting

the lone of hie Job ee e etore neneser. During thie period hie
epeeoh bean-e inoreeeingly serbled end Ito-nerihg, Be veeoilleted

oolplete epethy.i. 1*: f”;irTWT€nL. he
wee oooeeionelly incontinent. mm bathing; nee dittioulty in
dreeeing, end wee eoneti-ee eo forgetful end oonrueed ee to wander
into the etteet eithout hie troueere.
Routine georologio Ian-ioetion; In welkins the trunk wee
tilted to the right end there wee e tendency to drag the right,
lower extreaity. However, there wee no eignitioent motor weekneee.
reflex change or tonne ebnor-elity. Coordination teete were well
perromned. The oreniel nerve function: were intact. Vibretion
eenee wee correctly perceived only in the oleviolee end the heed,
while poeition eenee wee lost in the tinsere, eriete, toee end
enklee bilaterally. Temperature difference: were poorly peroeived
exoept in the teoe.eree. hie reeponeee to touch end pin prick
between

irritebility

end

nild degree or “mixed
epheeie" was present. This epeeoh difficulty we: evident only
epeoiel testing or then the petient wee retigued by prolonged
eti-uletion will

exeeinetion.

be deeoribed

leter.

A

by

there one e fluctuating dyeprexie of noderete eeverity.

�3.

Occuionally n. ma difficulty in drawing, being unable to handle
button: and alaavca. however, he could partonn Inch tunaticna aa
reading hinaalr, ccwbing hia hair and cthar routine daily taaka.
Ha waa naually unabla to wiwic tha aura ccwplicatad pattarna of the
hand~praxia tanta.

licetrcancaphalcgrwa ahcwad_bilatcral dittuao abncmnality.
with dacraaaa in awplituda and interwittant auppraaaion or activity
ova: tha pariatal regiona. Pnauacancaphalcgranldiaclcaod bilaterally
dilated vanericlna and wodarato “cortical atrophy". particularly in
an ion moral lobe.
szphiatric Statua; Although tha patiant waa ariantcd for
place and situation, he wada crrora an to data and than or day.
Thar. war. datacta in vacant unwary, concentration, calculation and
ability to aaauln the abatract attituda. no uwually aat placidly
ataring intc apaca or wandered aialaaaly about tha ward. Ia did hat
win with cthar pationta. whcn approachad by tag atarf he waa
friendly and paaaivoly cccparativa.' Tasting proceduraa ware
approachad with a chaarful indittcranca. Hhan, hcwavcr, ha was
panhad into Boat aituaticna :raatar than hia capacity, ha reactad

with incrwaainx itvitability and tanaicn, avantually calainating in
a “cataatrcphic reaction.” it such tiwna ha would baccwa rod in
tho taco, about that ha know tha ahawara but didn't want to continua
and mcccniy basin to map.
a. waa can. to distinguish tho right aid. or
his: body tro- the 1321:; but waa unable to wake can distinction on
tha miner's body. 11. had no difficulty either in locating nidlinc
atruccuraa or hia body, auch aa tha uoaa, heath, chin. nabilicua and
pania, or in pointing to hia cyan. With oyoa cpan ha readily fauna

W

'

�e.
hath eere, but when hie eyee were cloned he seeped ebeut hie teee
for eeverel eeeende betere leeetlns then. he eeuld'belne to hie
thighs, kneee, ankles end tees but could not point to any epeclrlo
toe ether thin the his teen.

frequently had Alrtlculty 1n locetlns port1ene or hie
upper extrenltlee. It eeked to point to hle ehouldere. be
correctly located one ehoulder, but then grayed behind his neck
locking for the other. This defect was even more noticeable in
trying tn find the ”other" elbow and wriet, and creeteet in trying
to find the "other" hind. ﬁle eeereh for the ”other" hand or wrist
Be

bizarre.

He would

parts of hie

body, the

look under the pillow, or rummage under
the nettreee becnnlng tenee and ineietius it we. lost. It should
be eupheeieed that despite the great difficulty in lecetlns
was

petlent was able to name the body parts.
except the tinseve end toee. This was true whether the pert
pointed to nee on the petient'e or on the examiner'e body.
33939;; Stetueg

(e) ééﬁﬁl? Btlnhletlon: He had difficulty in differentleeins
between the sheep end dull end of e pin. This defeat wee preach:
throughout the body, elthoush he made eignitieently fewer erreee 1n
the reee end hende. Touch atlauletian was poorly perceived. Heuelly
he coulé not state whether or not he had been tauched. Again, there

�5.

«m to be relatively better preoorvotion or this modality in
'

the hand: and face.

Except under opooiol oonditiono or examinotion of tho hands,
to he described liter, the patient who ohle to locate the eite of

it the pin on. repetitively and
or it the priok woo steadily maintained

a pin prick by pointing. however,

rapidly applied to one rosion,
at that one place, he could not looeto the point of otinmlotion.

tendon scorching lav-neat: over hio body and
not infrequently around the bed olotheo. srinaoing on thouah in
pain and exoloinins that he one trying to renove the pin. If ookod

He

would make

frantic,

where he one being priokod, ho diorozorded the question and con»

mm

on
tinued to try to move the stimulus. "m. phmmnon
stimulation or any portion or the body, but who most apparent when
the hand no tested.
(h) Double SiuultOneouo ethnolotigg; Tho phone-en: or
oxtinotion end dioplooo-ont were frequently ohoerved in tests or
different body area- by oilultoneouo tactile otiuuli. 0n etinnletins tho race and hand. otinuli to the hand we». not perceived,
or nioloooliaod to the cheek. In touting honolosoue bod: stone
(on hondvhond) extinction of one poroept III col-on. The side on
which the stimulus III not pcrooivod fluctuated, no that at one
uooont only a right-sided stimulus one perceived and o for momentleter, only a lott~oided etinnloo not perceived.
Exooonootheoio; Whenever his pal: who in oontoot with a
portion or his body or any other ohJeot, and the dorouh of that hand
In: prioked with o pin, the patient oonoiotently nioloohliaod the

�6.

ottuulun. this nialooaiisation who to whatever object the phi-tr
tartan! of the hand was touching. For txlhplc, 1f the pntioht'l
hand was routing on his thigh and the doroun of tho hand VII
priokod, he insisted that tho thigh had boon touched, and not the
hand. Th1: ninlootlisntion ~ oxooonoothooio - occurrod to the
thigh, obdonnn, 105 or (too, had who present with stimuli to oithor
hind. It Ill observed even when the patient who urged to look 1t tho
hlhdt durtng the application or the pin. nah-anesthesia could not be
elicited, however, by otinulhtion of tho pnln or polmar curtuoes of
tho ringer! uhnn the aorta: of tho hhné ill rooting on a portion or
the My, runner-more. ionization or dorul hand amnion um
correct 1! the hind III hold in space.
Iloloooltsntion also ooourrod to abduct: external to hit
body. It h1o pal: ill rooting on I tabla or on his bad. and the
doroun of tho hand It; prioknd with I pin, ho would point to those
ohjooto and 091th thlt tho pin had been $991106 "thmru." Whoa
quantionod. ho hinted thlt tho hand had huen touched, but continued
to point to tho bid or table. Proquontly. however. ho'inntotod thht
it on. tho bod or tohlo that hon boon touohnd thdhnntphhohhnnd. Ir
alkod how he could too;_tho bod being priokod with a pin he would
booonn ton... avoid the queut1on and inliot ”you touohod the bed,
not In".

III

not ell-inatod
by Itlhltanooun stimulution, oven whnn extinction of one of tho
parocpto occurred. for 03:391., 1! pins hero oinulthnoouoly applied
to the aorta of both hands Ihllo tho pal-n wore resting on o table,
he would report fetish; only on. p1n prick, that on tho loft (or
right, a: dominance fluctuhtod) and point to thn plloo whore the
loft hind huh boon rooting. saying ”you touohod the bed thoro.”
Displheonont into outrouporoonnl than.

�this

phone-enon or

dilplucancnt into cxtra~peroonal tpnoe

occurrcd daily during e period or over two nonthn.
Commont: In this paticnt a rccuicitc to dimplecenmnt into
space was that the pmlm or the hand be in contact with an external

object. In other words. then. were two cutaneooo stimuli
limnltcnecully in operation, nemoly the pin prick on the doreun or
the hand and tho pro-lure or the object in contact with the palm or
ringcro. A single nti-nluc. eooh II pricking the dornun or e hand
held in upeoe. did not elicit the dicplnccmnnt.
luoeomeutholih III elicited only on otimullting the hands.
mu oocumd am though Ilmle pin print as: perceived me cum:
in the hand: than in any other areo. excepting the thee.
Although thin potient showed In lnability to oorroctly
locate phrte or his own and tho esnminor's body, it doc: not
necoecnrily amen that exolcnelthscic in dutenmined by thie particular
type of disorder in body ache-n. the following case illustrate. the
phenomenon or exoocmeetheaiu in the preeonce or to. patient'n
some: to locate body pam.
can. 23 l.l., a 52 your old woman, III edmitted to the.
Neurolosio Service of the ﬂaunt Sinai hoeoitdl in August 1950 with
I history of grand hnl eelxuroo. She had been in good honlth until
1937 uhcn there appeared sporadio, noncntnry ecnuutione of "blacking
out." About two year: before hdniehion she began to suffer Ionthly
'

Ill

leisurel.

There was no euro.
Routino exeminntion on admiulion III within normal limits,
oxoept for dnolmia in tho right nontril. there one no organio honthl
cyndromo. apocinl x~rcy studiel reveoled evidonoo or a oohfronthl

grand

necplcen. an August 19th a oreniotoly mm: done and following
amputation of e portion or the right frontal lobe, a large bilateral

�8.

‘tub-troattl

III

umniaginnn was

axcitcd.

nor pout~opcrutive courts an; stormy. For tut lacks an.
saui~stup¢rann.r 3h. raupondod anly ta lassive, painful stimu—

than: renpanuaa ﬂirt limited to vague ineffective nttenpta
ta.punh Quay tat stimulun. In this pcriod the lnpuod uovcral tin»:

latian,
irate

and

om

um:

"sputum
um chem-Magma
did not
Bar

rttpannoa rare pruatnt.

pupil:

mutem ublmkl

retot to light.

tn. pltiint

inproved slowly and
steadily. an. hogan to rtlpond vcrbtlly and contact could be maintained
far short poriodn. Vinita, union and apparently been absent, begin
Frau about Augunt 23, 1950

to rcturn, tlthough a right unnonyloul halinntpuia tiltinoﬁ for Dunn
tino. A Iarkod orgtnic nanttl syndrtlo characterised by confusion.
disorientation and nuouognusin was prcnant.
Routine laurolggic xxnlinntion: laurtlosit exnuination in
aoptonbor 1950 diteltuoa a right honcnynnun honiunopnil, asthma
impairment of vilual Inuit: with bilatorul nocondnry Optic atraphy,
urttaslnl in all directions or ante, bilaterally patitiv. nabintki

night. and a nild dogree or uphatin. Position nan... vibration and
tonporntur. porcuptian wire unimpairtd. Thor. were difficulties in
perceptien or touch Ind pin prick stimuli at anacribod belwu.
Puzehiutric Status: The patient was usually friendly and
cooperative. Bouvver, the III frequtntly irritable 1nd unuld not
pomnit culmination. an: an. dilaritnt-d II to tins and notational:
to situation, but not to placa. Thar: var. defeat: in retention Ind
maul covered by contabulatian. am am euphoric and 41:91:,“
littlc self restraint er aoneern in social oituatiana. Usatlly uh:
would lie with her body fully oxpoaod. not intrtqunntly she toiled

�bereelt or wet the bed. Anaeognoein In: prominent.
Bod: Scheme: 0n contend the

petient

we: able

to identity

lbette correctly parts of her can and the examiner's body, such
In ears, eyee, feet and parts of the upper extremities. She
exhibited name oenfueion about the right and left eidee a! the bady.
end

Season; statues]
(a) siggie atiuulntian: The patient perceived single pin
prick cumin mi, eitheugh m undo 0003:1011“ nompntterned em»
in localisation. Theta errors were more frequent on the left side.
(b) Double ginniteheaue stimuletion: 0n sinulteneouu epplicetion of pin prick: ta both tides or the body (excluding the hands)
extinction on the left, or dieplaceaent on the left toward the level
at the right-aided stimulus were the usual reepaneee. amneleterll
linulteneaus etimuletion on the right side or the body shaved no
extinction, but ntinuiatian on the left side elicited frequent
extinetian and displacement.
Runneleetheeieg Dieplaeenent lute extra—portend! space
either
occur-m than the lettihahdawn pridked at the me time
the right hand or right cheek were stimulated. The phenamenon could

u

'

ulna be elieited then the left hand and day other are: or the left
side or the body were simultAneeualy etimnleted.
Under theee conditions the patient nislocelixed the stimulus
to the left bend.inte evade near that hand, or to the object on whieh
the mind was lying. For example. it pin pricku were e’imltehemu
applied to m right cheek and the 1m; tune, the patient indicated
she had been pricked on the right cheek and the are or the chair on
Ihich her left bend had been renting; As 1 rule ehe answered by
pointing. I: neked to verbelise the ebuld any, “the right cheek end
about here,“ (painting to the their emu er into space near be: lett

�10.

hand).

1! ssksd dirsotiy, “was year hsnd touched,” sh. sauld avoid

the gunmen mymzug can; "use," pointing st m um em to
tbs 10ft oasis sun at ta spans. It is to be netsd that oxespt undsr
the spssisl condition at sinultsnsaus stimulation tbs patient was
always sbls to point tu as to ash. hsr‘istt hand on dsssnd.
1r prieksd silnltsnsuusiy an tho dorss or was isrt sud
right hands. shs carrots}: localissd only tbs stimulus an tbs right,
been by painting sad ststins. “I: right hand.” 2h! stilnlus an the
new-y». m 190311104me by painting to m chair s:- and
saying, “asrs.* 'It ssksd lasthsr the «hair sun. sud not but 10!:
hand use issn toushsd, shs snsssrsd. ”as. hs:s’ pointing to tbs chair

an,

sun.
Inna pin prints ssrs spplisd to tho lsrt hand. sad It the suns
«ins, to snethsr sass on the 1st: sids or any baay,s 51-11.:
dispisosssus into spsos III status. Ususlly tbs stisulus to tbs
lift hand was sislosslissd onto Instsvsr structurs the hsnd sss
rusting at else t9 contiguous spsos. tbs uthsr‘stﬂsuius an tbs 10ft
sids was ususiiy oarssotly locslissd, though this stimulus too It:
onessionsiiy displaced into spans. when this doubis displsosssnt
oocurrsd, tho psiisnt.soula stats sh. rsit eve stimuli and staid paint
inte space to tbs lots sf tbs ans. stating "bars and have”.
!hsss saslosslisstiens ssrs rspsstsdiy ohssrvsa during s period
or s.smnth, sad wars not sissys limited to tbs 1st: lids. tbs: ssrs
ecossionslly obssrssd to scan: on sh. right sins. At an... c1...
localisation on tho lots its slings aorrsot ss indiestsd by pointing
and

vsrbslisstion.

.

siioitsd in this pstisnu only
the oenditian or Imitiplo smsuitsnsaus sci-ulstian. It scald
can-snsz Ixososssthssis was

'

under

not be

sliaitsd by .1331. summon isthmus. mo signifiosnt :-

�11.

that oxooonoothooid Ill appoxont ovoa though thoro In. no gross
diuordor in body ooh... on routine touting. rurthonuoro, it is
evident that bar errors in localisation not» not oi-ply on inabiiiiy
to point to or identity park: or her body by nine. ll ordinarily the

exporidaood no difficulty in doing this on oonldad.
In hoth onto. paranoia word nioiooolinod to part. or the body,
to abstain. or into npnoe contiguous with tho tron stinulotod.
ooouoiondliy. we have nine observed dilpldodnant or a stimulus to

the pardon or the can-inor; Usually ouch percent: art nioloodlilcd
to o homologous portion of tho cal-inor'o body, 0.3., a otilniud
appliod to tho potiont'u hand in reportod by hin.oo if it had been
oppiiod to tho tau-inor'o hand. 'narolr, tho nioioodlizntion ll to
any part? of the oxaniner'o body.‘ this §ypo or dioplaoonont is
illuotmttod in the following on...
also 3; 1.1., o 52 your old male, to: aduittod to Boliovuo
Payohiltrio Hoopitll with the oonplnint that ha pad hood-o oontuoed
and doprooood. for about a yetr ho had boon disoriented, oootnsod on
to date dud rolutionohipo of pooyIi, and had uialdred ubout the 01¢:
dill-nix. a. and been
to um um colony about a mu
“ you: beforo, and had uorkod no d harbor until tho rook before his
mum“ to the hupiui.

mum

'

Slowing
shouod non-o1
tomnod.

lm;gio ﬁxation! leurologiool examination

gait

and

Itation. coordination Scots our. '01: per-

lagrrotioxoo wore doiive bilaterally with normal plantar

and undo-inol.rolponnoo. Cranial norvo runoiiono ward now-n1.

otltuo thouud Ohtnxil, but only by opooidi nothodo or testing.
A pnou-oonoophalogrnu dononotrutod nodordtoly dilated ventrioloo
"ith°“t '31" 0’ def°flitia Ind ton. dilated cerebral ouloi.
098.1110 mu} Indra.
Status I
donoory

Militia

3

m

“.

�12.

evident.

0n

the

word he

eet quietly for boure

by hie bedside

taking little interest in hie surroundinge. 'Ihen opproeched by
the eterr he eppeered perplexed but one erreble. During the teeting
procedures be one cooperative unleee confronted by e teet eitoetion
in which the emeniner demanded teeke beyond hie ebility. At theee
ti-ee he showed e ”ceteetrophic' reeotion, bece-e excited end
diecontinued the exeeinetion.
Re wee dieoriented for time. place, end eituetion. However,
he nee eble to find hie Hey about the nerd, looeting hie bed, the
nnreee deek, the dootore office end the lavatory. severe ditticultiee
in intellectual function were obeerved. He nee oneble to give en
edeqnete bietcry. ﬁe could not recell the examiner's none nor the
evente or several houre before, but did not contehulete. Celculetion
end eyebol identification teete were poorly performed.
severe epheeic difficultiee were evident. Re nee uneble to
none cannon objecte, clothing or moat body perte. He could not
colorehend written collende nor could he write, but he wee able to
einple verbal cannon.
lilo dreorexie nee demonstreted in hie ettenpte to imitate
ringer end mouth novenente. nouever, he lee able to drone, feed, end
otherwise cere for hinoelt.
Bod: gaggeg He bed difficulty both in neling body perte, end
in locating the: by pointing. the defect: were Imet eevere in the
fingers, wriete end elbows, and ooceeionlly feet. There nee difficulty

mm

‘

'

in right-10ft orientetlan.
age-or: Statue;
(e) giggle Stinuletionx Routine eon-cry etudiee or touch,
pin prick and vibration eboeed no ooneietent inpeinlent. Theee

�13.

correctly looalieed and deaoribed. Oooaaiohally
a eihgle stimulue to the hand or toreahn wee dieplaoed to a contiguous
object, or to apaee about the upper extremity.
(h) Double Simultaneoae stimulation: 0n double aiaultaneoua
touch atinolation the patient dieplayed extinction and dieplaoaleht

atianli

or

were ueually

tactile etinali. lhie

he would

trials

or the teoemhand

teete or other body parte as well. to:
on ai-nltaneouely etindlating the cheek end the oppoeite hand
either report only the etioulue to the cheek (extinction of

text (6), hot
example,

nae moat evident on

nae eeen in

the hand etianlua) or would report e etmlulue to eeoh oheek (displacement or the hand stimulus). The pattern or seneory doainanoe wee that
oeoally eeen in ditruae cerebral dieeaee, the race being aoet dominant.
the hand leaet (5). There nae no lateral doaihanoe.
Rho-oaeetheeia; Dieplaoeeent into extra-pereonal apece eaa
oceaaionelly ohaerved on single etiaulation. This displaoeaent vae
fro- the hand, forearm. or the elbow to apaoe oontiguoue to the part
touched. lxoaoaeetheeia was however aarkedly exaggerated when double
einultaneoua atuuuuon was employed. Again the am. from which
the phenomenon was noet frequently dheerved were the hands. toreeraa
and elbovl. tor ext-pie, when etieuli were applied to the dorae or
both hande ae they were lying on the patieht'e lap he pointed to epeoe
in front of his kneea. It aaked to etate where he had been touched
he uould say. "the hande" but would continue to point to the epaoe
in front or hie knees. laoeo-eetheeie nae rarely noted when other
body parta. euoh ae oheeke or ehouldere were simultaneoualy stimulated.
Occasionally it one found that on teete with double allula
taneoue atinulation the patient nielooeliued a etihnlue tron hie body
to the hoaologoue region or the exeeiner'e body. For inetanoe, when
both hand: were oinultaheoualy touched he would grasp the exauiner'e

�1%.

binds and

strin-

ho had boon touched

“there.”

Dsopito tho
sxosinor's insiotsnoo thst tho stinnlu: hsd boon to tho outiont'o
hoods, tho pstiont would persist in pointing to tho oxouinsr's hands.
When asked to noon the ports touched, he would on: 'thsro. thorc."

The

ﬁll.

phonononon

Isl occasionally

observed on liltltsnoons

sti-nlotions or both elbows or ohooko. It was signirioont that this
nislooslisotion to tho oxosinor's body occurred oven thou tho potiont
urgod to look ot tho otinnlotiono.
It III observed that onotionsl tension, inoresoing tho rot.
or touting or unduly prolonging the oxasinotion, inorossod tho
inoidonoo of oxosolosthosis. ror ext-910, to initisl sppliostion

was

of pin priok to the right hand and loft chock, tho pstiont reportsd
only tho the. psrospt, quitting tho hsnd stimulus. Lstor, ho
localised the two othnulino tho ohooks. As tho sxoninotion pro«
groslod sad the phyoioion opsodod up the testing. tho patient boot-o

sore tohss. no thin looslisod tho toos pore-pt correctly, but
innistsd thst the hand otimlntion as into upon. in front at the hand.
tinslly both stimuli our. displaced into spooo or to tho oxaninor's
body.

those phononons wort obsorvod dsily over s period of two and
a half unhthl.
Coulent: Hhilo single stimulation occasionally produced

oxooolnlthosio in this individual, tho phenomenon Ill note pronounced
under conditions of double oi-ultonoouo Iti-nlstion. this ntiont
sloo lioloooliood stilnli to tho oxsninor's body. lhotionol tonoion,
prolonged canninstion, or inorossing tho onto or touting exaggerated
the phone-anon or ozosonosthosin.
Bisousoion; In oonoidoring thou. ossoo it is illodistoly
opporont thst oxooolosthosis is osoooiotod with o savor. orgsnio

�sentsl syhdrose. therefore, it night he ersued thst exoscseethesis
‘is sorely e ssniteststiou of the petient's sentsl contusion; thst

15.

the petient sisply points into spsce becsuse he is confused. However,
we hsve eyesined sssy severely confused pstieuts end found exososesthesis only rarely. moreover, exososestheeie is e petterned
phenomenon. desonetrstle in eschvpstieat under defined conditions,
predicteble ss to the eree tron which it will occur end the extra»

personel spetisl region to which the sensation will be projected.
For exemple, in Case I, exoscsssthesie could be elicited only from
the head end only when the dorsus use etisuleted st the sese tine es
the psls or fingers were in contsct with smother object.
Displscesent under these circusstsuoes use ususlly not hephsssrd.
sis s rule it occurred to the object touchins.the palm or fingers. In
exososesthesis could be elicited only by double silulteneous
stteulstion. It see seen most clearly in the head end could be
elicited only unileterslly st say one exesinetion. Again the

Case 2,

displace-eat use not hspheesrd; the stimulus es s rule use locslised
to extre-pereonsl speoe contiguous to the eree sctuelly stilulsted.

In Cece 3 the phenosenon use observed sgsin under conditions or double
sinnltsneous stimulation. end the displsceseuts were either to spece
contiguous to the stisnlsted eree, or to honologous srees of the
exsliner'e body. It is signifiosnt thst these displscesente could be

elicited

even when the

or the stimuli.

pstients

to look st the epplicstion
the ensuiner pointed out the error

were urged

noreover, even when
in looelisstion end esphssised the i-plsusebility or their response.
the pstiente chsrecteristioelly insisted on the correctness of the

nislooslistion.
rectors Influencing lxososesthesisa

There ere esny rectors which influence the sppesrsnce of
exoeosesthesis. Except under specisl conditions in children, it

�16.

has been obeerved exclueively in patiente uith severe mental
chensee reeulting true dieeeee or the brein. It ie influenaed by
the type of etianlue need. the rate or etiluletion. ee veil an by the
elelent of einnlteneity or eti-mli. loreover, the e-otianel etete

at the petient nee e eignificent effect

the phenuuenon ee doee
the pert or the body etinnleted. In ease oeeee exoeaneetheeie
nee been nude epperent by edeinietretion at eeell doeee or enoberbitei
eodiun. :heee feature will be diecueeed.
(e) Bilateral Cerebrel Dieeeee; the emlptae beekground in
every eeee or exoealnetheeie ie en arsenic uentel eyndraee eeoondery
to bilateral ceretrel dieeeee. we have not been eble to denonetrute
exeealeetheeie in en adult unleee there «ere eevere neutel thengee.
But,ee previouely noted,it ie e rare phenonenou end only few or the
individuele vith eevere arseniereentel eyndruee show it. In boo
patiente with arsenic brain dieeeee at verging eeverity, exoeaneetheeie
ee- obeerved in ephroxintely as or the one: (5 ). Even in then
patiente, it wee not leniteet in every exeeinetion. end it: frequency
vee reedily eltered by «bungee in the oonditione of teeting. It ie
therefore evident that eevere bileterel oerebrel dieeeee, in iteelr,
ie not sufficient to produce exoeoleetheeie.
(b) Irrect or Binnlteneaue atiunli: whet einnlteneoue
eti-uletion nay elicit eeneory phenaleue not epperent on eingle
eti-nletion nee been previouely denonetreted (2). tor exllple, e
henieeneorw eyndrtne in e heeiplegia petient he: not be diecernihle
except under eonditione or double ei-nlteneuue etinuletion. Tune.
single etilnietion may be well perceived end latelieed by the
petient. but the eddition at e eecond etinulue einulteneouely applied
.1: no effect integration thet the phenomene of extination, obecuretion
end diepleaeeent become epperent.
on

�17.
‘

m

‘sullarly, “alumnus “mutton elicited “comma
1: an aunt an angle annulus umlnulon. or magnum

11: when

'oun

1

n In Manama: mun:

and 2.

man. stimulation. In
ulmltmem «mung» am a menu»: “mum
on

for aligning the phonon-anon. It could not be amount-um by
tingle uttunlatlan. In am 3, ant-tumult could “nationally

onum on .112ng stimulation. but annulment “mutton
dmmtum ﬂu. inhuman run much water frequency.
b0

(a) :12! a! gtggglu! Inst lrtbotgvug or tub vurioua Uzi-”11
and in that Manama. mix as ﬁnal. when. :5.le pin prick,
ripotltlvc tauch and rlpctltlvc pin prick. it It: noted that

mutt" tmh "man mm was: «1'00th 1!: allowing cucum-

thuu. m. m «mull: two on double almlum Itimlltion.
(a) gram o: t! "time's
an»! momentum-la

anal
um amt-mud hr 31%.!!qu in th- m: “mum

which and»

mum“. not. difﬁcult. lama tbs n“ of “hunting, artho

unduly prolonging

mn~m~ml Imo.

tantalum 1mm“
Alta,

11‘

the

the

Multan-nt- to

twin" was deliberately

critical or the mtlmt'o 0mm, tho phonmmm appomd with 5mm
futon mam-d an. action“ switch at tho
Imam”.
patient, and 1t amt-d mun-r. prom.“ I "ututmphlo" mctlan.

m

man of m: It In» boon pmlmly dmtnm that
arugula» in pomcpucm my be magnum by mum-ac.
(0)

nous-mu: team an administered lutnvmmly
la 400.30! or 3 to 7 srllnl tn pltlonta Ilth altrus. ctrohwll distant.
Prior to am “nutrition. thou patent! mnltum the phone-on.
at «amulet: and dllplumt at pump” on ““1”me tutu, but
lntuloanta

not.

(5) .

alumnus“.

m1 lo under the lntlmmc or the

Whitman

�18.

three pationta ahovad oxoaoneatheaia. in addition to extinction and
displacement. In two other patienta. in whoa axoooaootheaia has
boon alioited only after a protraoted taating period. the
administration or anoharbital aodiua elicited exoaoaeatheaia at the
onset or teating and exaggerated the phone-one of extinction and
displace-ant.
Relation of lxoaoleotheaie to Extinction, Ottonretion and
Diaplaoalent: In our experience. whenever exoooaeatheaia haa been
observed.
phonon-nu of extinction, obeouration and displacement
are alao preaent. lxoaoaoathaeia, hou‘var. ia a rare phone-anon,
whereae extinction, ohaouration and diaplaoolent are eon-only
ohaerved. loreover. ahareaa extinction, otaouration end diaplaoaaont
ere treouontly aeon in coult patient: with lilo cerebral dyoronotion
(5). diapleoelent into extranperooael opeoe 1a only preaont in oaaaa
or severe aental ohangea due to diaeaae ot-the brain. It may
therefore he oonoluded that exoeolootheaia in adult: repreaenta a
aora severe type or oarebrel dratunotion than other oiaultenaoua

m

otiaulation phone-one.
nalation of Ixoaoleatheaia to gag: logger

It night

he aeid

that exoaoaaatheaia ia a pathologio extenaion or the body image.
The normal individual is continually extending the boundariea or thia
image. For example, need oitae the eta-plea of tho lolan with a
teeter in her hat who “real!" when the feather ie tonohod, and the
aurgeon who handlea hia probe as though

it were

an axtanaion or hia

tingera (1). In the normal individual, holever, theae extension.
of the body 1-130 art fluid, illediately raveruibla and clearly
recognised by the individual aa artificial. the surgeon for example,
ia able at any'nolent to redefine correctly hia body Liege. no
“known" that the prob. it not his finger. In the group or petionta

’

�19.

described above. hosover. the extension of tho body isage scans to
operate in a pathologio, rigid tons. under certain conditions
these patients lose the ability to ssintain a realistic definition

of tho

lisits

of

their

body.

The: behave as though portions or the
contiguous external world are concrsteix incorporated into tho inner

image of

their body's extent.

Although

say oonsider exosoaesthesis- a spooiaiiaed
body ilage disturbance it should ho noted that patients who do not
show

we

diftionlties in identifioation

location of body parts still
us: show aisiocaiisstion into estrsapersonsl space. Convorsely,
patients with so atolhility to identity or locate their body parts
on oosssnd. do not neoessariiy sanirest eaosoassthesis.
In similar fashion, thers is no necessary relationship between
ascsoaoothsais and position sense difficulties. A patient (Case 3)
who manifested displacessnt of sensation into
extrs~personai space,
did not asks errors in routine tests a: position sense in” tho
extresitiee. this it oonsistent sith observations previously ssdc
by Head that localiation of single stilnli is not functionally
roleted to senss of position or the extrusities (1).
non or the land: Although displsoelont into extrs~persona1
space has been elioited tron various areas or the body, it has been
observed to ooouh lost frocoentiy tron the hand. loreover. in no
ossc hoe it been elicited from another area and been absent tron
and

1

the hand.

this oredileotion tor the

hand

is consistent

with the ssnncr

in shioh other dysfunctions of the nervous system are reflected. As
a role when tho functioning of one side of tho body is impaired
through cerebral disease the pathology is soot saniast in the hand.

�20.

lhne 1n the annex heuiplegit reeultina tram e capeulur leeion the
pereeie, body image diuturhenoe end eeneory late ere use: pruexnene
1n the hind Ind (insert.
In the-e petaente end in other. eleh dzrruee cerebral
dieelee the phennlenl a: extinction. eheourltion end diepleoenent
Ire elee beet e11¢18ed when the head in teeeed. lurthenlore.
etuﬂiee at eh. order at eeneory dullnenee or verioau ereee or the
had: Genoa-trite the hand in the lowest hunk. thie in true in the
eminence order or petunia with cox-em), dieeue (5). and mm
nor-e1 eubjeete, both edulte and children (6).
stallerly, then elleetheaie 1: oheerved, 1% 1e eeen she:
olenrlr 1n khe head. Bender tad lethnneon (it) deeovihed e «nee
1n ehioh'the clinical courae III reflected in e waxing end unnans
alleetheexe. Ae than petient inpraved, the trees from ehseh the
phenunmaen oould be

elicited

amniniehed.
ale delohetreble only in the hand.

until finally alleethneie

In entotopegneeie the hands hre ante proraundly effected
thin other regiane. ringer Isnneie. paneibly the enrlieet etsn or
body image dieturbenee, 1- trequentlr eeen 1n the eheenae or other
groee dieeurbanaee or the bed: eehnne. Furthemeore, phantom 11gb,
tnoeosnoeia. cluellsxn and eyneetheeie Ire phenalnne in which the
role a: the hand 1e eepectclly praninent.
Just an en». ”811010310 puma-em
uniteet in tests or
other body parte. but 3:. that aleerly delonetrehle 1n the hand. so
the. exoealeetheete, though nonunionnlly delanetrnhle eleevhere,
layman: apparent in exnlihntion of the function! at an. hand.
14: It hne been observed that
luaealeytheele 1n the ham-e1
eeneory pheno-mne which aoeur 1n pettente with cerebral dylrunction

m

�.1
{{{{{

21.

h

any bu fauna in tho annual young child (6). Similarly.
have unvor fauna in adult: nxecpt than
QSOOGIOIthlltl, thick

I.

that. in lirkod cornbrnl Ginsu... nun b0 roadily obnorvod in
childrcu up to in. ago or tour. In urn-ining a 13:30 302103 of
norm. chiidm it u. now that the initial mpm or

ohildron to iambic ninnitunooal Itinuiation fruqunatly incinnnd'
axoianucthnuia. nithough tho nor. can-an rosponnos In». «xtinctian
and dispinou-ont. lionenusthonia was IIrO. havuvor. utter tho

initili til trinis.

In» truqunaa: with union uaonalusthnain.nnw he noon in
children up to tho as. or tour insanity that it an: roprouont.
in thy child, 3 ”annual" dovelopnuntai Itsse in on: ergnnisation
of perception. It: uppourunan in uduits with novor. brain €110.30
any possibly ha. I. with aunt: pathologio phauulcnu, a rungIIion
in function to a pruvioul iovvi at ntnnory integration.

aBIIiII;

lillooIIilation of tnotil. Itﬂluli into
axtrn~poruuna1 space is dcnarihad tad tar-pd alone-cathonii.
Bantu-nathnlil 1' aha-trod in pationta with saver. organic
unntal lynarunon. It in apnaront only very rural: on tingle
tactilu Itilnintion and in not. readily elicitdd by tho t'ahnituo
of Gambia lilnltnnsoul atiunlntian. It is exaggcrntod by fatigue,
rigid touting ﬁnd incrOIlld unotional tonlian. lurhitnrttc
intaxiention also may elicit or uxnggorlto the phauuncnon.
Eh. pattoraod

linsannathnuin in swat apparnnt in Itinniutian of the hand,
but his bOCn obsorVCd in tiatl of othnr body part0. ﬂail. it
an: be canaidorod t pathologio axttntian of an. bad: image, it is
act dopondcnt upan othcr ¢on¢anitunt body inns. disturbanotl.

�nelmthOllt Mu bola observed chltfly 1n
gamma nth nun natal chanson, u 1: not a manna»
or contusion, but a patterned pnucun- phonmnm. It may be
a "mum,“ patient: win: Mum}, animation. to I 93110th
“new” was. in smear «alumna, u mated by the rut
Although

that 1t 1.

«mum.

"Ian: abut-"d

in cinnamon-

men. tut:

91‘

mg

�1.
2.

1mm, 3.: Studies
London, 1920.

(a)

£3.

&amp;1mm

in lourolcgy, Vol. II, Oxford Univ. Prom,

ammo, Id. lad wanna, Mm: Extinction
mu, inILL,
humans“. mu.xm1.unzuhut.,
g2; 717-725

phenomenon

member, 19%.

m, m. as:
Itnuutien
(b)

r

advantage. or the method at unannounthe neurological omimtion. monument:
Anal-1c...

11.3.:

12.; 755-458.

1n

V

was.

mm: he pheamnm or union unplacuo‘nt.
mm,
Awhmmelwr .. u. 9 607-621,
lay, 1951.
(I)

MIR,

LB... SWIM), IJ‘. lad
gutuiugggo: the body team.

W

Arcth

m ﬂ.gm1.uq¢nug.,
a

1

m

3.1“:

-

ind
anaemia
§£L tea-am.

Jeannine”

‘

(b)
LB. and “We! 11.: Pattern: in alumni:
their unﬁt»: to disorder
of ﬁnd: when and other unto”

phone-m.
5. vm, I... ﬁlm, I. Ind

g5; 501615, October,

m

and

1950.

tun-mm tut
mm,
Maximum sign or untrue
heatnmiymejnmlm, 3!. £6.58, 1952.
6. (I)
and mm, In Datum 1n perception
I... rm,atII.no.
on IMltlmm 0!
Ind land.
I I
250-»252, June, 1950. aura“)
LBJ

m,

(2:)
an

,

809mb“,

1951.

0.

.

.

111.8. mm, I. and
11.:
mm,
mm,
{out
or
and
hand.
“autumn
no.

§§: 355-362.

£8

Patterns

11:

.

”nation

mammobgguglg8%..

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2304">
                <text>Exosomesthesia; the displacement of cutaneous sensation into extra-personal space. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1952; 56 (77th Meeting): 260-2. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2305">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2306">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-6a-008</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2307">
                <text>1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2308">
                <text>Shapiro, Mortimer F.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Bender, Morris B</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2309">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2310">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2311">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, October 1952, Vol. 68, pp. 481-490</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2312">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2313">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74433">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80994">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87555">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94116">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="232" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="23">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/9cd1485c72c87cfe41a9b822584a53cf.pdf</src>
        <authentication>399d53acd860a7f8f327c824ea2685e0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100649">
                    <text>Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry
October 1952, Vol. 68, pp. 481-490
Copyright, 1952, by American Medical Association

EXOSOMESTHESIA OR DISPLACEMENT OF CUTANEOUS SENSATION
INTO EXTRAPERSONAL SPACE
MORTIMER F. SHAPIRO, M.D.
MAX FINK, MD.
AND

MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.
NEW YORK

phenomena that may be apparent during examination of patients with
AMONG
disease of the sensory pathways is mislocalization of a sensory stimulus. 'It
has long been known that a person with a sensory defect, as seen in the common
varieties of cerebral hemiplegia, may inaccurately localize stimuli applied on the
paretic side.
Such point mislocalizations are apparent in examinations using a single stimulus
and have been described in detail by Head.1 These mislocalizations can be accentu—
ated by the use of double simultaneous stimulation techniques.2 In addition, when
these techniques of examination are employed, other varieties of mislocalization,
such as displacement,3 become apparent. Displacement is the patterned mislocalization of one of two stimuli simultaneously applied to diﬁ’erent body areas. The
direction of displacement is in a deﬁnite pattern, which is dependent upon the parts
of the body stimulated.
Characteristic of mislocalization so far reported has been the fact that their extent
was within the limits of the patient’s body. In the course of studies. of cutaneous
perception, we observed a new form of displacement in which the patient consistently
and in a predictable fashion mislocalized stimuli into extrapersonal space. This type
of displacement we have termed “exosomesthesia.” 4
Exosomesthesia is not a commonly observed phenomenon. More than 400
patients with brain disease were examined at Psychiatric Pavilion of Bellevue
Aided by a Fellowship from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (Dr. Fink).
This investigation was supported in part by research grant #MH-139 from the United States
Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health.
From the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University College of
Medicine, and the Neurological Service of the Mount Sinai Hospital and Bellevue Hospital
Center.
1. Head, H.: Studies in Neurology, London, Oxford University Press, 1920, Vol. 2.
2. Bender, M. B.; Shapiro, M. F., and Schappell, A. W.: Extinction Phenomenon in
Hemiplegia, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 62:717-724 (Dec.) 1949. Bender, M. B.: The Advantages
of the Method of Simultaneous Stimulation in the Neurological Examination, M. Clin. North
America 32:755—758 (May) 1948.
3. Bender, M. B.: The Phenomenon of Sensory Displacement, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 65:607—621 (May) 1951.
4. The term was derived by Dr. Judah A. Joﬁe (Hinsie, L. E., and Shatzky, J.: Psychiatric
Dictionary, New York, Oxford University Press, 1940) from the Greek 3w, out of ; mind,
body, and al’dﬁww, perception by the senses.

�2

Hospital Center by routine and specialized sensory tests. Exosomesthesia was
observed in only 15 cases, an incidence of about 3%.5 The following case reports
illustrate the phenomenon and demonstrate some of the conditions under which it
was observed.
CASE REPORTS
CASE 1.—H. M., a

man aged 64, was admitted to the Psychiatric Pavilion of Bellevue Hospital with a history of progressive mental changes of six years’ duration. The ﬁrst four years
of illness were marked by slowly progressive impairment of memory, concentration, and other
intellectual functions and by increasing apathy to his environment. In the last two years there
was rapid exacerbation of this condition, resulting in the loss of his job as a store manager.
During this period his speech became increasingly garbled and stammering. He vacillated
between irritability and complete apathy. He was occasionally incontinent, ceased bathing, had
difficulty in dressing, and was sometimes so forgetful and confused as to wander into the street
without his trousers.

Routine Neurologic Examination—In walking, the trunk was tilted to the right, and there
was a tendency to drag the right lower extremity. However, there was no signiﬁcant motor
weakness, reﬂex change, or tonus abnormality. Coordination tests were well performed. The
cranial nerve functions were intact. Vibration sense was correctly perceived only in the
clavicles and the head, while position sense was lost in the ﬁngers, wrists, toes, and ankles
bilaterally. Temperature differences were poorly perceived except in the face area. His responses
to touch and pinprick stimulation will be described later. A mild degree of “mixed aphasia” was
present. This speech difficulty was evident only by special testing or when the patient was
fatigued by prolonged examination. There was a ﬂuctuating dyspraxia of moderate severity.
Occasionally he had difficulty in dressing, being unable to handle buttons and sleeves. However, he could perform such functions as feeding himself, combing his hair, and other routine
daily tasks. He was usually unable to mimic the more complicated patterns of the hand—praxis
tests.

An electroencephalogram showed bilateral diffuse abnormality, with decrease in amplitude
and intermittent suppression of activity over the parietal regions. A pneumoencephalogram dis—
closed bilaterally dilated ventricles and moderate “cortical atrophy,” particularly in the left
temporal lobe.
PsychiatricStatus—Although the patient was oriented for place and situation, he made
errors as to date and time of day. There were defects in recent memory, concentration,
calculation, and ability to assume the abstract attitude. He usually sat placidly staring into
space or wandered aimlessly about the ward. He did not mix with other patients. When
approached by members of the staff, he was friendly and passively cooperative. Testing procedures were approached with cheerful indifference. When, however, he was pushed into test
situations greater than his capacity, he reacted with increasing irritability and tension, eventually
culminating in a “catastrophic reaction.” At such times he would become red in the face, shout
that he knew the answers but did not want to continue, and suddenly begin to weep.
Body Schema—He was able to distinguish the right side of his body from the left, but was
unable to make this distinction on the examiner’s body. He had no difficulty either in locating
midline structures of his body, such as the nose, mouth, chin, umbilicus, and penis, or in pointing
to his eyes. With eyes open he readily found both ears; but when his eyes were closed he groped
about his face for several seconds before locating them. He could point to his thighs, knees,
ankles, and toes but could not point to any speciﬁc toe other than the big toe.
He frequently had difﬁculty in locating portions of his upper extremities. If asked to point to
his shoulders, he correctly located one shoulder but then groped behind his neck looking for
the other. This defect was even more noticeable in trying to ﬁnd the “other” elbow and wrist,
and greatest in trying to ﬁnd the “other” hand. His search for the “other” hand or wrist was
bizarre. He would look under the pillow or rummage under the mattress, becoming tense and
'

Fink, M.; Green, M., and Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign
of Organic Mental Syndrome, Neurology 2:46—58 (Jan-Feb.) 1952.
5.

�3

insisting it was lost. It should be emphasized that, despite the great difﬁculty in locating
parts
of his body, the patient was able to name the body parts,
except the ﬁngers and toes. This was
true whether the part pointed to was on the patient’s or on the examiner’s body.
Sensory Stanton—(w) Single Stimulation: He had difﬁculty in differentiating between the
sharp and the dull end of a pin. This defect was present throughout the body, although he made
signiﬁcantly fewer errors in the face and hands. Touch stimulation was poorly perceived.
Usually he could not state whether or not he had been touched. Again, there seemed to be
relatively better preservation of this modality in the hands and face.
Except under special conditions of examination of the hands, to be described later, the
patient was able to locate the site of a pinprick by pointing. However, if the pin was repetitively
and rapidly applied to one region, or if the prick was steadily maintained at that
one place, he
could not locate the point of stimulation. He would make frantic, random
searching movements
over his body, and not infrequently around the bedclothes, grimacing as though in pain and
exclaiming that he was trying to- remove the pin. If asked where he was being pricked, he disregarded the question and continued to try to remove the stimulus. This phenomenon occurred
on stimulation of any portion of the body but was most apparent when the hand
was tested.
(17) Double Simultaneous Stimulation: The
phenomena of extinction and displacement were
frequently observed in tests of different body areas by simultaneous tactile stimulation. On
stimulation of the face and hand, stimuli to the hand were not perceived
or were mislocalized
to the cheek. In tests of homologous body areas (as hand-hand) extinction of one
percept was
common. The side on which the stimulus was not perceived ﬂuctuated, so that at one moment
only a right—sided stimulus was perceived and a few moments later only a left-sided stimulus

was perceived.
Exosomesthesia.——Whenever his palm was in contact with a portion of his body
or any other
object, and the dorsum of that hand was pricked with a pin, the patient consistently mislocalized
the stimulus. This mislocalization was to whatever object the palmar surface of the
hand was
touching. For example, if the patient’s hand was resting on his thigh and the dorsum of the hand
was pricked, he insisted that the thigh had been touched, and not the hand. This mislocalization
—exosomesthesia—occurred to the thigh, abdomen, leg, or face and was present with stimuli
to either hand. It was observed even when the patient was urged to look at the hand
during
the application of the pin. Exosomesthesia could not be elicited, however, by stimulation of the
palm or palmar surface of the ﬁngers when the dorsum of the hand was resting on
a portion of
the body. Furthermore, localization of stimuli to the dorsum of the hand
was correct if the hand
was held in space.
Mislocalization also occurred to objects external to his body. If his palm
was resting on a
table or on his bed, and the dorsum of the hand was pricked with a pin, he would
point to these
objects and state that the pin had been applied “there.” When questioned, he stated that the
hand had been touched but continued to point to the bed or table.
Frequently, however, he
insisted that it was the bed or table that had been touched, and not his hand. If asked
how he
could feel the bed being pricked with a pin, he would become
tense, avoid the question, and
insist, “You touched the bed, not me.”
Displacement into extrapersonal space was not eliminated by simultaneous stimulation,
even
when extinction of one of the percepts occurred. For example, if pins
were simultaneously
applied to the dorsa of the hands while the palms were resting on a table, he would
report
feeling only one pinprick, that on the left (or right, as dominance ﬂuctuated) and point to the
place where the left hand had been resting, saying. “You touched the bed there.”
This phenomenon of displacement into extrapersonal space occurred daily during
a period
of more than two months.

Comment—In this patient a requisite to displacement into space was that the
palm of the hand be in contact with an external object. In other words, there were
two cutaneous stimuli simultaneously in operation, namely, the pinprick on the
dorsum of the hand and the pressure of the object in contact with the
palm or
ﬁngers. A single stimulus, such as pricking the dorsum of a hand held in
space, did

not elicit the displacement.

�4

Exosomesthesia was elicited only on stimulating the hands. This occurred even
though single pinprick was perceived more sharply in the hands than in any other
area except the face.
Although this patient showed inability to locate correctly parts of his own and
the examiner’s body, it does not necessarily mean that exosomesthesia is determined
by this particular type of disorder in body scheme. The following case illustrates
the phenomenon of exosomesthesia in the presence of the patient’s ability to locate
body parts.
CASE 2.-—E.

K., a woman aged 52, was admitted to the neurologic service of the Mount
Sinai Hospital in August, 1950, with a history of grand mal seizures. She had been in good
health until 1947, when there appeared sporadic, momentary sensations of “blacking out.” About
two years before admission she began to suffer monthly grand mal seizures. There was no aura.
Routine examination on admission showed that her status was within normal limits except
for anosmia in the right nostril. There was no organic mental syndrome. X—ray studies revealed
evidence of a subfrontal neoplasm. On August 12 a craniotomy was done, and after amputation
of a portion of the right frontal lobe, a large bilateral subfrontal meningioma was excised.
Her postoperative course was stormy. For two weeks she was semistuporous. She responded
only to massive, painful stimulation, and these responses were limited to vague, ineffective
attempts to push away the stimulus. In this period she lapsed several times into coma and
showed Cheyne—Stokes respiration. The Babinski response was obtained bilaterally. Her pupils
did not react to light.
From about Aug. 23, 1950, the patient improved slowly and steadily. She began to respond
verbally, and contact could be maintained for short periods. Vision, which had apparently been
absent, began to return, although right homonymous hemianopsia remained for some time. A
marked organic mental syndrome characterized by confusion, disorientation, and anosognosia,
was present.
Routine Neurologic Examination—Neurologic examination in September, 1950, disclosed
right homonymous hemianopsia, severe impairment of visual acuity with bilateral secondary
optic nerve atrophy, nystagmus in all directions of gaze, a bilateral Babinski sign, and a mild
degree of aphasia. Position sense, vibration sense, and temperature perception were unimpaired.
There were diﬂiculties in perception of touch and pinprick stimuli, as described below.
Psychiatric Statue—The patient was usually friendly and cooperative. However, she was
frequently irritable and would not permit examination. She was disoriented as to time and
occasionally to situation, but not to place. There were defects in retention and recall, covered
by confabulation. She was euphoric and displayed little self-restraint or concern in social
situations. Usually she would lie with her body fully exposed. Not infrequently she ,soiled
herself or wet the bed. Anosognosia was prominent.
Body Schema—On command, the patient was able to identify and locate correctly parts of
her own and the examiner’s body, such as the ears, eyes, feet, and parts of the upper extremities.
She exhibited some confusion about the right and the left side of the body.
Sensory Status.—(a) Single Stimulation: The patient perceived single pinprick stimuli
well, although she made occasional nonpatterned errors in localization. These errors were more
frequent on the left side.
(b) Double Simultaneous Stimulation: On simultaneous application of pinprick to the two
sides of the body, except the hands, extinction on the left or displacement on the left toward the
level of the right-sided stimulus was the usual response. Homolateral simultaneous stimulation
on the right side of the-body showed no extinction, but stimulation on the left side elicited
frequent extinction and displacement.
Exosomesthesia.——Displacement into extrapersonal space occurred when the left hand was
pricked at the same time that either the right hand or the right cheek was stimulated. The
phenomenon could also be elicited when the left hand and any other area of the left side of the
body were simultaneously stimulated.
Under these conditions the patient mislocalized the stimulus to the left hand into space
near that hand, or to the object on which the hand was lying. For example, if pinpricks were

�5

simultaneously applied to the right cheek and the left hand, the patient indicated she had been
pricked on the right cheek and the arm of the chair on which her left hand had been resting.
As a rule she answered by pointing. If asked to verbalize, she would say, “The right cheek and
about here,” (pointing to the chair arm or into space near her left hand). If asked directly.
“Was your hand touched?” she would avoid the question, responding only, “Here,” pointing
at the same time to the left chair arm or into space. It is to be noted that, except under the
special condition of simultaneous stimulation, the patient was always able to point to or to name
her left hand on demand.
If pricked simultaneously on the dorsa of the left and right hands, she correctly localized
only the stimulus on the right, both by pointing and by stating, “My right hand.” The stimulus
on the left, however, was localized only by pointing to the chair arm and saying, “Here.”
If asked whether the chair arm and not her left hand, had been touched, she answered, “No,
here,” pointing to the chair arm.
When pinpricks were applied to the left hand and, at the same time, to another area on the
left side of the body, a similar displacement into space was evident. Usually the stimulus to
the left hand was mislocalized onto whatever structure the hand was resting or else into
contiguous space. The other stimulus on the left side was usually correctly localized, though
this stimulus, too, was occasionally displaced into space. When this double displacement occurred,
the patient would state that she felt two stimuli and would point into space to the left of the
arm, stating, “Here and here.”
These mislocalizations were repeatedly observed during a period of a month and were not
always limited to the left side. They were occasionally observed to occur on the right side.
At these times localization on the left was always correct, as indicated by pointing and by
verbalization.

C 0mment.——Exosomesthesia was elicited in this patient only under the condition
of multiple simultaneous stimulation. It could not be elicited by single—stimulation

methods. Also signiﬁcant is the fact that exosomesthesia was apparent even though
there was no gross disorder in body scheme on routine testing. Furthermore, it is
evident that her errors in localization were not simply inability to point to or
identify parts of her body by name, as ordinarily she experienced no difﬁculty in
doing this on command.
Both patients mislocalized percepts to parts of the body, to objects, or into
space contiguous with the area stimulated. Occasionally, we have also observed
displacement of a stimulus to the person of the examiner. Usually such percepts
are mislocalized to a homologous portion of the examiner’s body; e. g., a stimulus
applied to the patient’s hand is reported by him as though it had been applied to
the examiner’s hand. Rarely, the mislocalization is to any part of the examiner’s
body. This type of displacement is illustrated in the following case.
CASE 3.—R. M., a

man aged 52, was admitted to the Psychiatric Pavilion of Bellevue
Hospital with the complaint that he had become confused and depressed. For about a year he
had been disoriented and confused as to date and his relationship to people and had wandered
about the city aimlessly. He had been admitted to the Farm Colony about a half-year before
and had worked as a barber until the week before his admission to the hospital.
Routine N euro'logic Examination—Neurologic examination showed normal gait and station.
Coordination tests were well performed. The reﬂexes were active bilaterally, with normal
plantar and abdominal responses. Cranial nerve functions were normal. The sensory status
showed changes, but only with special methods of testing. A pneumoencephalogram demonstrated
moderately dilated ventricles, without shift or deformity, and some dilated cerebral sulci.
Psychiatric StaWs.——-A severe organic mental syndrome was evident. In the ward he sat
quietly for hours by his bedside, taking little interest in his surroundings. When approached
by members of the staff, he appeared perplexed but was affable. During the testing procedures
he was cooperative unless confronted by a test situation in which the examiner demanded tasks

�6

,

beyond his ability. At such times he showed a “catastrophic” reaction, became excited, and
discontinued his efforts in the examination.
He was disoriented for time, place, and situation. However, he was able to ﬁnd his‘way about
the ward, locating his bed, the nurses’ desk, the doctor’s ofﬁce, and the lavatory. Severe difﬁculties in intellectual function were observed. He was unable to give an adequate history.
He could not recall the examiner’s name or the events of several hours before but did not
confabulate. Calculation and symbol-identiﬁcation tests were poorly performed.
Severe aphasic difﬁculties were evident. He was unable to name common objects, clothing,
or most parts of the body. He could not comprehend written commands, nor could he write,
but he was able 'to follow simple verbal commands.
Mild dyspraxia was demonstrated in his attempts to imitate ﬁnger and mouth movements.
However, he was able to dress, feed, and otherwise care for himself.
Body Image.——He had difﬁculty both in naming body parts and in locating them by pointing.
The defects were severest in the ﬁngers, wrists, and elbows, and occasionally the feet. There
was difﬁculty in right-left orientation.
Sensory Statute—(a) Single Stimulation: Routine sensory studies of touch, pinprick, and
vibration stimuli showed no consistent impairment. These stimuli were usually correctly
localized and described. Occasionally a single stimulus to the hand or forearm was displaced
to a contiguous object or to space about the upper extremity.
(b) Double Simultaneous Stimulation: On double simultaneous [touch] stimulation the
patient displayed extinction and displacement of tactile stimuli. This was most evident in trials of
the face-hand test 6 but was seen in tests of other body parts as well. For example, on simultaneous stimulation of the cheek and the opposite hand, he would either report only the stimulus
to the cheek (extinction of the hand stimulus) or report a stimulus to each cheek (displacement
of the hand stimulus). The pattern of sensory dominance was that usually seen in diffuse
cerebral disease, the face being most dominant, the hand least.5 There was no lateral dominance.
,Exosoimestheyiat—Displacement into extrapersonal space was occasionally observed on single
stimulation. This displacement was from the hand, forearm, or elbow to space contiguous to
the part touched. Exosomesthesia was, however, markedly exaggerated when double simultaneous stimulation was employed. Again, the areas from which the phenomenon was most
frequently'observed were the hands, forearms, and elbows. For example, when stimuli were
applied to the dorsa of the hands as they were lying on the patient’s lap, he pointed to space
in front of his knees. If asked to state where he had been touched, he would say, “The hands,”
but would continue to point to the space in front of his knees. Exosomesthesia was rarely
noted when other body parts, such as the cheeks or shoulders, were simultaneously stimulated.
Occasionally it was found that on tests with double simultaneous stimulation the patient
mislocalized a stimulus from his body to the homologous region of the examiner’s body. For
instance, when the hands were simultaneously touched, he would grasp the examiner’s hands
and affirm he had been touched “there.” Despite the examiner’s insistence that the stimulus
had been to the patient’s hands, the patient would persist in pointing to the examiner’s hands.
When asked to name the parts touched, he would say “There, there.” The same phenomenon
was occasionally observed on simultaneous stimulation of the two elbows or cheeks. It was
signiﬁcant that this mislocalization to the examiner’s body occurred even when the patient was
urged to look at the stimulations.
It was observed that emotional tension, increase in the rate of testing or undue prolongation
of the examination increased the incidence of exosomesthesia. For example, to initial application
of pinprick to the right hand and the left cheek, the patient reported only the face percept,
omitting the hand stimulus. Later, he localized the two stimuli to the cheeks. As the examination
progressed and the physician speeded up the testing, the patient became tenser. He then localized
the face percept correctly but insisted that the hand stimulation was into space in front of the
hand. Finally, both stimuli were displaced into space or to the examiner’s body.
These phenomena were observed daily over a period of 2% months.

Bender, M. B.; Fink, M., and Green, M.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests
of Face and Hand, Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 75:250-252 (June) 1950; Patterns in Perception On
Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 66:35-5-262
6.

(Sept)

1951.

'
-

-

�7

Comment—While single stimulation occasionally produced exosomesthesia in
this patient, the phenomenon was more pronounced under conditions of double
simultaneous stimulation. This patient also mislocalized stimuli to the examiner’s
body. Emotional tension, prolonged examination, or increase in the rate of testing.
exaggerated the phenomenon of exosomesthesia.
GENERAL COM MENT

On consideration of these cases, it is immediately apparent that exosomesthesia
is associated with a severe organic mental syndrome. Therefore, it might be argued
that exosomesthesia is merely a manifestation of the patient’s mental confusion;
that the patient simply points into space because he is confused. However, we have
examined many severely confused patients and found exosomesthesia only rarely.
Moreover, exosomesthesia is a patterned phenomenon, demonstrable in each patient
under deﬁned conditions, predictable as to the area from which it will occur and the
extrapersonal spatial region to which the sensation will be projected. For example,
in Case 1 exosomesthesia could be elicited only from the hand, and only when the
dorsum was stimulated at the same time that the palm or ﬁngers were in contact
with another object. Displacement under these circumstances was usually not
haphazard. As a rule it occurred to the object touching the palm or ﬁngers. In
Case 2 exosomesthesia could be elicited only by double simultaneous stimulation.
It was seen most clearly in the hand and could be elicited only unilaterally at any oneexamination. Again, the displacement was not haphazard; the stimulus as a rule
was localized to extrapersonal space contiguous to the area actually stimulated. In
Case 3 the phenomenon was observed again under conditions of double simultaneous
stimulation, and the displacements were either to space contiguous to the stimulated
area or to homologous areas of the examiner’s body. It is signiﬁcant that these
displacements could be elicited even when the patient was urged to look at the
application of the stimuli. Moreover, even when the examiner pointed out the error
in localization and emphasized the implausibility of the response, the patient characteristically insisted on the correctness of the mislocalization.
Factors Inﬂuencing Exosomesthesia.—Many factors inﬂuence the appearance
of exosomesthesia. Except in children under special conditions, it has been observed
exclusively in patients with severe mental changes resulting from disease of the
brain. It is inﬂuenced by the type of stimulus used and the rate of stimulation, as
well as by the element of simultaneity of stimuli. Moreover, the emotional state of
the patient has a signiﬁcant effect on the phenomenon, as does the part of the body
stimulated. In some cases exosomesthesia has been made apparent by administration
of small doses of amobarbital sodium. These factors will be discussed.
(a) Bilateral Cerebral Disease: The symptom background in everycase of
exosomesthesia is an organic mental syndrome secondary to bilateral cerebral
disease. We have not been able to demonstrate exosomesthesia in an adult unless
there were severe mental changes. But, as previously noted, it is a rare phenomenon,
and only a few patients with severe organic mental syndrome show it. In 400
patients with organic cerebral disease, of varying severity, exosomesthesia was
observed in approximately 3%.5 Even in these patients it was not manifest in every
examination, and its frequency was readily altered by changes in the conditions of
testing. It is therefore evident that severe bilateral cerebral disease in itself is
not sufﬁcient to produce exosomesthesia.

�8

Effect of Simultaneous Stimuli: That simultaneous stimulation may elicit
sensory phenomena not apparent on single stimulation has previously been demonstrated.2 For example, a hemisensory syndrome in a hemiplegic patient may not be
discernible except under conditions of double simultaneous stimulation. Thus, single
stimulation may be well perceived and localized by the patient, but the addition of
a second stimulus simultaneously applied may so affect integration that the phenomena of extinction, obscuration, and displacement become apparent.
Similarly, simultaneous stimulation elicited exosomesthesia when it was absent
on single-stimulus examination, or exaggerated it when it was occasionally manifest
on routine stimulation. In Cases 1 and 2 simultaneous stimulation was a necessary
condition for eliciting the phenomenon. It could not be demonstrated by single
stimulation. In Case 3 exosomesthesia could occasionally be elicited on single stimulation, but with simultaneous stimulation the phenomenon was demonstrated with
much greater frequency.
(6) Type of Stimulus Most Effective: Of the various stimuli used in these
examinations, such as single touch, single pinprick, repetitive touch, and repetitive
pinprick, it was noted that repetitive touch stimuli were most effective in eliciting
nexosomesthesia. This was especially true on double simultaneous stimulation.
(d) Effect of the Patient’s Emotional State: Exosomesthesia was exaggerated
by alterations in the test situation which made performances more difﬁcult. Increasing the rate of stimulation or unduly prolonging the examination increased the displacements to extrapersonal space. If the examiner was deliberately critical of the
patient’s errors, the phenomenon also appeared with greater frequency. These
factors increased the emotional tension of the patient and if carried further produced
a “catastrophic” reaction.
(e) Effect of Drugs: It has previously been demonstrated that difﬁculties in
perception may be exaggerated by barbiturate intoxicants.5 Amobarbital sodium
was administered intravenously in doses of 3 to 7 grains (0.2 to 0.45 gm.) to
patients with diffuse cerebral disease. Prior to administration of the drug, these
patients manifested the phenomena of extinction and displacement of percepts on
simultaneous tests, but not exosomesthesia. While under the inﬂuence of the barbiturate;'three patients showed exosomesthesia, in addition to extinction and displacement. In two other patients, in whom exosomesthesia had been elicited only
after a protracted testing period, the administration of amobarbital sodium elicited
exosomesthesia at the onset of testing and exaggerated the phenomena of extinction
and displacement.
Relation of Exosomest‘hesia to Extinction, Obscumtvian, and Displacement—In
our experience, whenever exosomesthesia has been observed, the phenomena of
extinction, obscuration, and displacement are also present. Exosomesthesia, however, is a rare phenomenon, whereas extinction, obscuration, and displacement are
commonly observed. Moreover, whereas extinction, obscuration, and displacement
are frequently seen in adult patients with mild cerebral dysfunction,5 displacement
into extrapersonal space is present only in cases of severe mental changes due to
disease of the brain. It may therefore be concluded that exosomesthesia in adults
represents a severer type of cerebral dysfunction than other simultaneous stimulation
phenomena.
(13)

�9

Relation of Exosomesthle'sia to- Body I wage—It might be said that exosomesthesia is a pathologic extension of the body image. The normal person is continually
of
cites
the
Head
of
examples
For
this
boundaries
example,
the
image.
extending
the woman with a feather in her hat who “feels” when the feather is touched, and
the surgeon who handles his probe as though it were an extension of his ﬁngers.1
In the normal person, however, these extensions of the body image are ﬂuid,
immediately reversible, and clearly recognized by the subject as artiﬁcial. The
surgeon, for example, is able at any moment to redeﬁne correctly his body image.
He “knows” that the probe is not his ﬁnger. In the group of patients described
above, however, the extension of the body image seems to operate in a pathologic,
rigid form. Under certain conditions these patients lose the ability to maintain a
realistic deﬁnition of the limits of their body. They behave as though portions of the
contiguous external world are concretely incorporated into the inner image of their
body’s extent.
Although we may consider exosomestheisa as a specialized body-image disturbin
identiﬁcation
difﬁculties
show
do
who
be
not
that
noted
should
it
patients
ance,
and location of body parts still may show mislocalization into extrapersonal space.
On the other hand, patients with an inability to identify or locate their body parts
on command do not necessarily manifest exosomesthesia.
In similar fashion, there is no necessary relationship between exosomesthesia and
of
manifested
who
dis-placement
A
difﬁculties.
3)
(Case
patient
position-sense
sensation into extrapersonal space did not make errors in routine tests of position
made
by
observations
with
is
consistent
previously
This
in
extremities.
the
sense
Head1 that localization of single stimuli is not functionally related to sense of
position of the extremities.
Role of the Hand—Although displacement into extrapersonal space has been
elicited from various areas of the body, it has been observed to occur most frequently
from the hand. Moreover, in no case has it been elicited from another area and been
absent from the hand.
This predilection for the hand is consistent with the manner in which other
the
when
As
functioning
reﬂected.
rule,
of
a
the
are
nervous
system
dysfunctions
of one side of the body is impaired through cerebral disease, the disorder is most
manifest in the hand. Thus, in the usual hemiplegia resulting from a capsular lesion
the paresis, body-image disturbance, and sensory loss are most prominent in the
hand and ﬁngers.
of
the
cerebral
diffuse
disease,
with
phenomena
in
others
and
these
In
patients,
extinction, obscuration, and displacement are also best elicited when the hand is
tested. Furthermore, studies of the order of sensory dominance of various areas
of the body demonstrate that the hand is in the lowest rank. This is true of the
dominance order of patients with cerebral disease,5 and also of normal subjects,
both adults and children.6
Similarly, when allesthesia is observed, it is seen most clearly in the hand. Ben7
described a case in which the clinical course was reﬂected in a
Nathanson
and
der
Bender, M. B., and Nathanson, M.: Patterns in Allesthesia and Their Relation to Disorder of Body Scheme and Other Sensory Phenomena, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 64:501-515
7.

(Oct)

1950.

�10

waxing and waning allesthesia. As this patient improved, the areas from which the
phenomenon could be elicited diminished, until ﬁnally allesthesia was demonstrable
only in the hand.
In autotopagnosia the hands are more profoundly affected than other regions.
Finger agnosia, possibly the earliest sign of body-image disturbance, is frequently
seen in the absence of other gross disturbances of the body schema. Furthermore,
phantom limb, anosognosia, causalgia, and synesthesia are phenomena in which the
role of the hand is especially prominent.
Just as these pathologic phenomena are manifest in tests of other body parts, but
are most clearly demonstrable in the hand, so, too, exosomesthesia, though occasion—
ally demonstrable elsewhere, is most apparent in examination of the functions of the
hand.
Exosomesthesia in the Normal Child.—-It has been observed that sensory phenomena which occur in patients with cerebral dysfunction may be found in the nor—
mal young child.6 Similarly, exosomesthesia, which we have never found in adults
except when there is severe cerebral disease, can be readily observed in children
up to the age of 4 years. In examination of a large series of normal children it was
noted that the initial responses of children to double simultaneous stimulation frequently included exosomesthesia, although the commoner responses were extinction
and displacement. Exosomesthesia was rare, however, after the initial few trials.
The frequency with which exosomesthesia may be seen in children up to the age
of 4 years suggests that it may represent, in the child, a “normal” developmental
stage in the organization of perception. Its appearance in adults with severe brain
disease may possibly be, as with other pathologic phenomena, a regression in function to a previous level of sensory integration.
SUMMARY

The patterned mislocalization of tactile stimuli into extrapersonal space is
described and termed exosomesthesia.
Exosomesthesia is observed in patients with severe organic mental syndromes.
It is apparent only rarely on single tactile stimulation and is more readily elicited by
the technique of double simultaneous stimulation. It is exaggerated by fatigue,
rapid testing, and increased emotional tension. Barbiturate intoxication also may
elicit or exaggerate the phenomenon.
Exosomesthesia is most apparent in stimulation of the hand but has been observed
in tests of other body parts. While it may be considered a pathologic extension of
the body image, it is not dependent upon concomitant body-image disturbances.
Although exosomesthesia has been observed chieﬂy in patients with severe mental changes, it is not a manifestation of confusion, but is a patterned, predictable
phenomenon. It may be a regression, in patients with cerebral dysfunction, to a
previously “normal” stage in sensory development, as suggested by the fact that it is
readily observed in simultaneous tactile tests of young children.
,

Printed and Published in the United States of America

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2314">
                <text>Exosomesthesia; the displacement of cutaneous sensation into extra-personal space. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1952;56 (77th Meeting):260-2.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2315">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2316">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-6b-009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2317">
                <text>1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2318">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2319">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2320">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2321">
                <text>Reprinted from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, October 1952, Vol. 68, pp. 481-490</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2322">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2323">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74434">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80995">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87556">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94117">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="233" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="24">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/796682f73a8899c60e07650432e2be6b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>47708d42bc2c57225df86d2abf4a24c9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100650">
                    <text>W“
m
mate” om'
n“,
0"

a:

“e,

x

I!

‘e

swam mature:

M Md."

'ene

etmluletlon or the tune and the head.w1th
cuteneeue etilull e ceneleteht pattern or reepanee hee been oheerved
1a which errore in perception ere Ib’. frequent an the head then on
the reae. In thle ﬂeet eltuetlon the reee 1e eeld to he dullnent
over the head. the pettern or teoe dullnenhe cen he found in nah-e1
end eohleophrenle ednlte hue 1e verticalerlr evident in petleute
with oreehle eentel eyndruee end in children 3 to 6 yeere or eye.
rhe pattern wee eo eoneplouohe thet 1t pranpted as to etuay different
etilulue ooehauetlohe in order to detehelhe whether eoneletent
petterue occur for body part: other then the reee end head.
The eehhod at heeelns 1n hhe preeent etudr wee elesler to
theh deeorlhed prevtouely. The euhjeet wee requeeted to alone hle
eyee end twh perte at the had: were teuohed eteulteneauely. he wee
eehed whet he felt end to loanltee the eel-ﬁll.
Teenty heeleute with arsenlo wentel eyndehee due to altruee
Meet» at the brain formed the sun group or etheote . The following
pert: or the body were etudledz tece, ehoulder. head. heck. hreeet,
ehdalen. aenltel eeglou. buttock, thigh end toot. All #5 peeelble
ouehlnetlone between these body perks were heeted e9 the: eeeh or
the ereee wee teeted 1n ouehtnetlon with every other eree. fen heehe
or eeoh cuehlnetloh were done in every petlent in e tench-leed cheer.
!heee included teetlnz the body ereee 1n hath hetereloeoue end
haeoleterel reletlohehlpe. Flee hundred and tart: teat: or elehlteneune
0n elwulteneoue

etheuletlon were done

on each

patient.

eeoond group of 178* euhgeote eoneletlhs at 660 nereel edulte,
58! echleopheenlo edulte end she patiente with arsenic hence: eyhdrnee
A

�studied. the etheote in theee groove eere teeted with
eiualteheoue etinnli out not in en hen: oomhinetione ee eee done in

were eleo

the previoue group. Only 13 or the t5 poeeihle bod: continetione
were studied end different groove of petiente were need for each

continetion.

it leeet lo teete were done on every patient.

Pertiouler

ettention eel directed to the initiel reeponee.
the reeponeee on eilnlteneoue teeting in ell euhjeote fell into
two senerel groupe. rhe etheot either reported both eti-oli
correctly or reported only one etieulue ooereotly end either did not
perceive the eeoond eti-ulue (extinotion) or'nielooelieed it

(diepleoeeent). rho totel number or errors in peroeption over one
pert or the body ee ooeoeteo to the other part of the body in eeoh
continetion eere euelyeed by etetietioel lethode.
In the tiret group or 20 petiente with orgenie heeiu dieeeee
teeted h: the aethod of multiple triele there were 27 oolhinetione
in ehioh the difference in the mocha: of extinction end dieoleoenent
in the two body perte teeted eee etetietioelly eicnirieent. this
occurred in ell continetione in ehioh one or the two perte nee the
reee, the genital tone (nele end tenele), or the head. In the
continetione involving the teoe or the cenitel none errore ih per»
oeption were more frequent in pert: or the body other then theee bod:
ereee. the (poo end the genital zone ney be eeid to he dolinent to
ell other ereee or the body. In combinetione involving the head
there eere uooeerrore in peroeption or the head etinnlue then in en:
other pelted part or the body. ‘rhe hand new be eeid to be the leeet
dolinlnt are. or the body. there were four additional combinationin which dominance wee Innifeeted. !he hottook wee doniuent over
the heok aha ehoulder. the breeet wee dolinent over the heck, end the
heck lee douinlht over the thigh.

�3.
4‘.“

in anniyuil of tho rcspensca or and accend group at pitiontn
with organic Iantal nvndrunn who HUI. touted in u tingle bady
ounbinatien with.» than in multiplt culbinltions ahowua a liliilr
pattern. inn». unto I few important axooptionn howrvor. who race
an: round to b. otvonsly dominant ever tha genital tout, the foot
duuinunt over the thigh And tho buttock duninant over tho fact.

..
_

they. relationuhipu wart not tpplront in in. group or patients tottod
by tn. Inthod of multiple trials.
Th. foregoing rcuuits that that an inns. or duubic uinuitanaaul
”manna in panama um auntie mm, swarm. the "rim
part: or the bear cxhibit a infinite volttianship to on. another:
ﬁhin 1i aunitoutcd hi Vlrvins accrue or dnlinnnoc which.lay ht can~
Iidorod a: gradient 0: nonnation. it the top of en. gridiont in
V

'

.
m «um Ian. in slightly 1.» doninnnt um the he.

the mu.
but in dalinnnt «var all other part: of tn. bad: and i: thnrgby tho
host bad: tron in tho order of dalinanoc. it tho 9th.! 0nd of tho
gradient is en. hand. In. runninins aria. at thu body tail bctuoon
tho no. Ind
um and an acne. mu. body pm. mud
in oeubinntion Iii: «ﬂab other failed. for tho most part, to yield
differtnoos in duninuaoc’cnous than other. Th0 combinstionl in which
daninanoc who Innitontod showed a tondcncy for the hulbek, than-0n.
brains, and taat to ho tho mare dominant part: uni tho hack. magniﬁer,
denim“ par:- within this ﬁrm.
rand cum to be the
In tun series or nanlni and nahisophrcnie adult: that. uvrc
only tun «albinationl in uhieh Eh. dirrorgnoo in the number at error:

men

in“

between the two

ptrti ati-ulatod it! statintioclly significant.

duninant over eh. bruit: and the brnant wax dominant ovar
tn. hind. In both instance: in. pitttrn or danintnoa in: ailiitr
to that Icon in patient: with organic anneal Iyndrnnn.

Th. rhea

III

�m mm or ammo. duomtmtod by suntan-m "Inns
in ﬂinch the no. Ind tho him! for! 2!!! at"... of I Mont

the body pain hu :1» been dam-tum 1n mucosa other
than than with eman- «mm. or the mean. when include nomx
01:11am 3 to 6
or m, nut-t1 adults with transient damnation
or the built: an. to imam“,
unamor
among

m

«lacuna-hook therapy, in!
under 7 your: . not all th-

:utnum

mu,

ma), «noun Mult- with mum use
ymine we: ombmuona have been

«an: Mu.

ﬂavour, at then ammun- um
have been smut! a pattern 1: atom: in mm the no. 13 the
most dominant m: and ﬂu hind the lone 60.1mm.
for n the»:
to
«at: u. mm or 4mm“ mun,
none in
It appear. to b. an inherent ”turn 9:
organization within the mm}. ”an“: man 1.. exaggerated in
tested in than

'

u
«than.

patient:

an:

u m

«an. or the pram.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2324">
                <text>Order of dominance in cutaneous perception. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1952; 56 (77th Meeting): 238-40. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2325">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2326">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-7a-010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2327">
                <text>1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2328">
                <text>Green, M.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Bender, M.B.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2329">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2330">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2331">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2332">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2333">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74435">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80996">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87557">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94118">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="234" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="25">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e80dbde06dd20201f1e94a10beff3999.pdf</src>
        <authentication>14b484b6bedc00163228f7cd6f29a33a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100651">
                    <text>Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry
August 1954, Vol. 72, pp. 233-255
Copyright, 1954, by American Medical Association

PATTERNS OF PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION WITH
SIMULTANEOUS STIMULI
MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.

MARTIN A. GREEN, M.D.
AND

MAX FINK, M.D.
NEW YORK

TUDIES of function of the nervous system by any one method will show

patterns. This is a general law which applies to motor, perceptual, and psychic
functions. Patterns of functions are present in the normal as well as in the abnormal state. For example, normal subjects show variations in the ability to discriminate two closely applied points in different regions of the body. Thus, the pattern
for two—point discrimination is one in which the ﬁnest differentiation is at the
tongue or ﬁnger tips, while other parts of the body, such as the back or the thigh,
require a greater distance between two points before discrimination of “twoness”
2
be
made.1
Pearson
the pattern for the normal sense of vibration
to
According
can
is one in which the threshold is low at the clavicle and high over the sacrum. In
vision discrimination of targets under daylight illumination is best in the central,
and poorest in the peripheral, portion of the perimetric ﬁeld. And so it is with all
other modalities. Each sensation has a pattern in space as well as in time. Each
of these patterns is obtained by adopting procedures in which a single stimulus
ﬁgure is used in testing the subject.
In measuring sensation, we know that there are many factors which inﬂuence
the perceptual response. Intensity and duration of stimulus, the stimulus ﬁgure,
the locus in the sensory ﬁeld, the attention and intellectual capacity of the subject
are but a few of the determinants. Recently we have stressed symmetry as having
a bearing on perception.3 Still another factor is age.4 For instance, there are some
perceptual examinations which could not be carried out in children because the
ability to respond to these tests depends partly on the ability to concentrate on a
particular problem and to cooperate over a matter of many minutes. These are two
properties which most very young children do not possess. Moreover, we have
found that reactions in the old are not the same as those in the younger subjects.
Another condition which inﬂuences the perceptual response is the number of
stimuli employed at one time. Two stimuli when applied simultaneously may yield
responses which are different from those to stimuli applied in succession. Simultaneous touch of the face and hand may be perceived only on the face, whereas
when each of these parts is successively touched with an interval of one or more
Post—Doctorate Fellow, United States Public Health Service (Dr. Green).
Paper read at the Fifth International Neurological Congress, Lisbon, Sept. 7—12, 1953.
This work was aided, in part, by a fellowship grant from the National Foundation for
Infantile Paralysis and the Neurologic Research Fund of the Mount Sinai Hospital.
From the Department of Neurology of the Mount Sinai Hospital, and the Department of
Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University College of Medicine.

�2

seconds, the same subject perceives each stimulus. The simultaneous application
of more than two stimuli may yield other types of perceptual reactions. Cohn5
applied three stimuli all at once and obtained results which were different from
those elicited with conventional single stimuli in the same areas. In 1893 Krohn 6
investigated the effects of simultaneous touch stimulation of multiple (seven)
regions of the skin in normal subjects. Parts of the trunk, extremities, forehead,
and, at times, the chin were touched simultaneously by tambours. With these tests
the subjects made errors in localization of the applied stimuli. However, no distinct
pattern was sought. In analyzing Krohn’s material, we found a suggestion of a
pattern in that there were less errors over the back than over the front. This study
was interesting but not very illuminating.
The technique of double simultaneous stimulation had been known since the
7
of
1882
time
Hippocrates. In
Oppenheim mentioned the method in his textbook.
Since this description there had been few intensive studies of the method until
1943, when one of us began a series of investigations. During the past decade we
have examined several thousands of subjects with this technique. As we gathered
our data, it was noted that in tests involving asymmetrically placed stimuli certain
regions of the body yielded correct .responses, while others yielded consistently
incorrect responses. On numerous simultaneous stimulations of the face and hand
a distinct pattern of response has been observed in which errors in identifying and
localizing the stimuli on the hand became apparent. Conversely, there were very
few errors in perception of the stimuli on the face. In this test situation the face
was “dominant” to the hand. Face dominance has been found in normal adults,
but it is particularly evident in patients with disease of the brain, in very aged
persons, and in normal children, 3 to 6 years of age. This pattern of response,
namely, face dominance, has been found so consistently that it prompted us to
study body combinations other than that of the face and hand. The object of this
investigation was to determine the order of dominance when various combinations
of two parts of the body were tested in this manner. A preliminary note on this
study was reported at the 76th Annual Meeting of the American Neurological
Association, in June, 1951.8
METHOD AND SUBJECT MATERIAL

The method of testing was the same as that described for the face-hand test in previous
communications.9 The subject was requested to close his eyes, and two parts of the body were
simultaneously touched or stroked. He was asked what he felt and to localize the stimuli. If
only one stimulus was reported, the subject was then asked if another was felt.
The subjects used in these studies consisted of patients and normal adults and children.
Series I: Patients who showed mental changes or an organic mental syndrome* as a result
of disease of the brain, such as arteriosclerotic encephalopathy, senile psychosis, severe cerebral
trauma, Alzheimer’s disease, toxic encephalopathy, or brain tumor. In general, patients with
severe mental changes who made many errors on simultaneous stimulation tests were chosen
for a special study group. Patients with aphasia, hemiparesis, or a hemisensory defect were
included in another group. Series II: Normal children and adults. The normal children were
taken from a day—care center and an orphanage. The normal adults were patients on the wards
of the general hospital, those attending hospital clinics, and Army inductees. None of the normal

The mental changes which make up the organic mental syndrome consist of a combination
of at least three or more of the following manifestations: impairment in orientation, memory,
calculation, or general information; rigidity and concreteness in mental performance, and marked
ﬂuctuations and inability to perform when there is more than one aspect to a situation.
*

�3

children or normal adults had manifest disease of the nervous system. They had not been
previously examined by the method of double simultaneous stimulation. We also examined a
group of older people. These were presumably normal, although cerebral arteriosclerosis could
not be entirely excluded in people between the ages of 65 and 90 years. Series III: Patients
with schizophrenia or manic depressive conditions. These patients were adults in the wards
of the Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital and Manhattan State Hospital. No attempt was made to
study the speciﬁc types of schizophrenia. Most of them were of the paranoid, mixed, or simple
schizophrenic varieties.
Inasmuch as previous investigations have shown that patients with severe mental changes
due to disease of the brain and normal young children made frequent errors in tests of simultaneous stimulation, it was natural that we should make the most extensive studies on these
two groups.10 Also, since normal adults make few errors after the ﬁrst two to three trials on
double simultaneous stimulation, it was not possible to detect a pattern in these subjects.
From these three series of cases we studied several groups in detail. Group A, which was
studied in the greatest detail, consisted of 20 patients with organic mental syndrome (10 males
and 10 females). These subjects were tested with the method of double simultaneous stimulation
of different parts of the body and in multiple combinations. The following parts of the body
were examined: face, shoulder, hand, back, breast, penis, pubic region in females, buttock,
thigh, and foot. Patients were tested while they were completely nude and, for the most part,
while they were standing. The speciﬁc areas stimulated for certain parts of the body were as
follows: the dorsum of the hand; the dorsum of the foot; the anterior aspect of the thigh;
just below the scapula on the back; close to the midline on the buttock; the nipple and areolar
area of the breast; the lower quadrant of the abdomen; the tip of the penis or the mons veneris.
Of these body parts there were 45 possible double combinations. It should be noted that the
combinations were of regions distributed along the longitudinal axis of the body. Each patient
was tested in all 45 combinations in. a random but similar order. Twelve tests were done for
each combination. These consisted of ﬁve tests of the two body parts in a homolateral relation,
ﬁve tests of the two body parts in a heterologous relation, and two tests in a homologous
relation, one for each of the body parts. There were 240 tests in every combination for the
total group. Each patient received 540 tests.
The other group, Group B, which we studied in great detail, using thousands of trial tests,
consisted of 40 normal children between 3 and 6 years of age. In 20 of these children (12 boys
and 8 girls), all body combinations of two were tested except those involving the genital zone.
In the other 20 children (12 boys and 8 girls), the genital region combinations were tested as
well as some of the other body combinations. The testing was carried out in the same manner
as described for patients with disease of the brain except that only half as many tests in each
combination were done. The genital zone was usually touched directly, with the child partially
nude. The remaining unexposed body parts were usually tested through the clothing.
To supplement these studies, we also examined a group of 692 normal adults, 605 schizophrenic adults, and 664 patients with organic mental syndrome. However, these subjects were
not tested as intensively as those of the above two groups. Different body combinations were
tested in different subjects. Only one of the following body combinations was tested in any
one subject for 10 trials or more; face—hand, face-breast, face—penis, face-back, face-foot, face—
shoulder, shoulder—hand, breast—hand, penis—hand, thigh-hand, foot-hand, thigh-foot, breast-foot,
breast-thigh, buttock—foot, penis-foot, shoulder—foot, and shoulder-breast. The two parts of the
body were ﬁrst touched in two heterologous relations and then in the two homolateral relations.
Particular attention was directed to the ﬁrst response. If an error was made in any one test,
that particular test was repeated until the patient was correct, or for at least ﬁve times if the
error persisted. At least 10 trials were done on each patient. Stimulation of the unexposed
parts of the body, except for the penis, was done through clothing. The penis was touched
directly.
The pattern of dominance has also been studied incidental to other investigations on perception in groups such as Group C, comprised of patients with focal brain disease manifested by
hemiplegia or aphasia 11; Group D, patients with long—standing or congenital blindness; Group E,
patients who had congenital or long—standing deafness; Group F, normal adults recovering from general anesthesia or while under the effect of intravenous amobarbital (Amytal)
sodium 12; Group G, psychiatric patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy; Group H, mentally

�4
defective adults,13 and Group I, very aged or senile adults.4 It must be emphasized, however,
that we did not test all the possible combinations of body parts in every one of these groups
except in Groups A and B. The emphasis was mainly on determining the relationship of the
face and the hand to the rest of the body areas. The results obtained in these incidental studies
showed that the pattern of dominance was similar to the one obtained in this study of patients
with severe mental changes due to disease of the brain.
RESULTS

The responses on double simultaneous testing of any two parts of the body
fell into several groups. Using the face—hand combination as an example, the subject may report the following responses, as recorded in Table 1.
Responses in which there was extinction or displacement“? of the stimulus over
one area in any combination were tabulated as a single type of response. For
example, in the face-hand combination responses in which the face stimulus was
correctly perceived but in which extinction or displacement of the hand stimulus
TABLE

1.—Pattem of Responses to Double Simultaneous Farce-Hand Tests

Combination of

Body Parts
Simultaneous touch
of face and hand

‘

Possible Response
(a) Face-hand

Classiﬁcation
Correct

(b) Face only

Extinction

Face

Extinction

Hand

Displacement

Face

(c)

Hand only

(d) Face-face

Dominance
None

(e)

Hand-hand

Displacement

Hand

(f)

Face-other part
of body

Displacement

Face

(9) Hand-other

part

Displacement

Hand

(h) Face-and a
in space

part

Exosomesthesia

Face

Exosomesthesia

Hand

of body

(i)

Hand-and a part
in space

occurred were tabulated together under “face” responses. Each of the responses
indicates dominance of the face over the hand. Hence, the reason for grouping
them under “face dominance.” Face dominance responses were much more fre—
quent than any of the hand dominance responses.
The responses for all the body combinations were tabulated in a similar manner. For the patients with organic mental syndrome and for the normal children
tested in all body combinations, the “dominant” responses for one part of the body
as compared with those of the other part of the body in each combination were
analyzed by the t test. The initial responses of the normal and schizophrenic adults
and of the other patients with organic brain disease tested in a single combination
were analyzed by the method of chi-square. There were a small number of responses
The failure of the subject to report one of two simultaneously applied stimuli has been
called “the phenomenon of sensory extinction,” or “extinction.” The part of the body where
the stimulus is perceived is said to be “dominant” to the part of the body where the simultaneous
stimulus is not perceived. When the subject reports two sensations but mislocalizes one of
them, the “displacement” of a percept is said to have occurred. Displacements are usually in the
direction of the dominant stimulus and may be partial or complete. Occasionally, one or both
stimuli are displaced into the extrapersonal space. This has been termed “exosomesthesia.”14
1'

�5
TABLE 2.—Res[&gt;onses of

Twenty Patients with Organic Mental Syndrome to Simultaneous Tests
of Different Body Combinations
Dominant

Dominant

Responses

Other
Total
Errors* Face Part

Face Combinations
Face-genitals ..................
FACE-abdomen i ..............
FACE-buttock .................
FACE-breast ..................
FACE-foot ....................
FACE-back ....................
FACE-shoulder ................
FACE-thigh ...................
FACE-hand ....................

68
109
79
122
89
105
154

37
78
60
104
66
95
127
85
145

104
149

31
31
19
18
23
10
27
19
4

Responses

Genitals Combinations
Genitals-face ...................
GENITALS-abdomen ..........
GENITALS-buttock ...........
GENITALS-breast .............
GENITALS-foot ...............
GEN ITALS-back ..............
GENITALS-shoulder ..........
GEN ITALS-thigh ..............
GEN ITALS-hand ..............

Total
Errors

Geni- Other

68
121

78
106
138
98
90
124
143

Dominant

Hand Combinations
Hand-FACE ..................
Hand-GENITALS ............

Total
Errors

Hand-ABDOMEN .............
Hand-BUTTOCK .............

Hand-BREAST ...............
Hand-FOOT ...................
Hand-BACK ..................
Hand-SHOULDER ...........
Hand-THIGH ................

149
143
152
132
163
136
97
127
142

____/Lﬁ
Other

Hand

Part

4

145
132
131
109
134
117
69
107
114

11
21

23
29
19
28
20
28

H%

Buttock Combinations
Buttock-FACE ................
Buttock-GENITALS ...........
Buttock-abdomen .............
Buttock-breast ................

..................
BUTTOCK—back ...............
BUTTOCK-shoulder ...........
Buttock-thigh .................
BUTTOCK-hand

Buttock—foot

...............

79
78
99
94
118
104
93
105
132

Other

19
12
38
55
43
79
65
45
109

60
66
61
39

Part

75

25
28
60
23

Abdomen Combinations
Abdomen-FACE ...............
Abdomen-GENITALS .........
Abdomen-buttock .............
Abdomen-breast ...............
Abdomen-foot .................
Abdomen-back .................
Abdomen-shoulder .............
Abdomen-thigh ................
ABDOMEN—hand

..............

109
121
99
111
104
97
90
115
152

r

Foot-FACE ....................
Foot-GENITALS ..............
Foot-abdomen .................
Foot-buttock ..................
Foot-breast ....................
Foot-back .....................
Foot-shoulder .................
Foot-thigh .....................
FOOT-hand ....................

89
138
104
118
100
105
96
125
136

23
23
58
75
41
49
51
77
117

66
115
46
43
59
56
45
48
19

Breast Combinations
Breast-FACE ..................
Breast-GENITALS ............
Breast-abdomen ...............
Breast-buttock ................
Breast-foot ....................
BREASToback .................

Breast-shoulder ................
Breast-thigh ...................
BREAST-hand .................

122
106
111
94
100
77
121
85
163

Shoulder Combinations
Shoulder-FACE ................
Shoulder-GENITALS ..........
Shoulder-abdomen .............
Shoulder-BUTTOCK ...........
Shoulder-breast ................
Shoulder-foot..................
Shoulder-back .................
Shoulder-thigh .................
SHOULDER-hand .............

154
90
90
93
121
96
131
93
127

der

Part

27
20
32
28
69
45
53
58
107

127
70
58
65
52
51
78
35
20

Responses
'

'

_ﬁ

18
22
56
39
59
55
52
48
134

104
84
55
55
41
22
69
37
29

Responses

Back Combinations
BaCk-FACE ....................
Back-GENITALS ..............
Back-abdomen .................
Back-BUTTOCK...............
Back-BREAST .................

Back-foot ......................
Back-shoulder .................
BACK-thigh ...................
BACK-hand ....................

Total
Errors
105
98
97
104
77
105
131
127
97

r—A—ﬁ
Other
Back

Part

10
15
53
25
22
56
78
86
69

95
83
44
79
55
49
53
41
28

Dominant

Responses

Responses

Total
Errors

21

Dominant

Dominant

f—A—‘l
Shoul- Other

131

Total
Other
Errors Breast Part

Responses

Foot Combinations

29
61
55
46
44
58
76

78
92
38
56
58
53
32
39

31

Dominant

Dominant
r———A‘—ﬁ
Other
Total
Errors Foot Part

37
29
12
22
23
15
20
30
11

,__JL_____
Total Ade- Other
Errors men Part

Responses

Buttock

31
92
66
84
115
83
70
94
132

Responses

Dominant

Total
Errors

Part

Dominant

Responses

'—

tals

Thigh Combinations
Thigh-FACE ...................
Thigh-GENITALS .............
Thigh-abdomen ................
Thigh-buttock .................
Thigh-breast ...................
Thigh-foot .....................
Thigh-BACK ...................

Thigh-shoulder ................
THIGH-hand ..................

Total
Errors
104
124
115
105
85
125
127
93
142

r-_A_—ﬁ
Other
Thigh Part
19
30
39
60
37
48
41
35
114

85
94
76
45
48
77
86
58
28

Two hundred tests done in each combination were analyzed statistically. The remaining 40 tests in each
combination were of homologous body parts and did not lend themselves to this type of analysis.
i Capital letters indicate dominant part as evidenced by a t test value of 5% or less.
*

‘

�6

which were difﬁcult to interpret, and there were a few that showed characteristic
perseveration in behavior. These responses were not included in the statistical
analysis.
Extinction and displacement occurred in all of the body combinations tested
in all groups. The incidence of these phenomena varied with the method of testing.
On testing body parts in a heterologous but bilateral relation, extinction and displacement occurred with approximately equal frequency. With tests involving
ipsilateral body parts, the majority of errors consisted of extinction.
1. Patients with Organic Mental Syndrome—In Group A 20 patients were
tested in all the combinations of the body; there were 27 combinations in which
the difference in the frequency of extinction and that of displacement in the two
body parts tested was statistically signiﬁcant, as evidenced by a t test value of
5% or less (Table 2). This difference occurred in combinations of the face and
TABLE

3.—Response on the Initial Trial in Patients with. Organic Mental Syndrome Tested
in a Single Body Combination
Responses Indicating
Dominance of
Body Part

Combination of
Body Part

,——-——A———ﬁ
B
A
FACE *
FACE
FACE
FACE
FACE
SHOULDER
BREAST
PENIS
FOOT

THIGH

FOOT
BUTTOCK
PENIS
Shoulder
Shoulder
*

Hand
Breast

Penis
Back

Foot

Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand
Thigh

Foot
Foot
Foot

Breast

N o. of

r—A

gﬁ

Other
Responses
..

Subjects

Correct

156

15
17

136
44

8
7

21

1

0

17
21
17
37
23

2

4

O

0

1

2

5

2

2

0
2
0

71

30
30
30

9

32
51

12
7

31

6
10

49
23
60
35
40
23
13

8

19
5
8
1

3

B
5

6

30

7

15
25
21

O

30
12
5

Capital letters indicate dominant part as evidenced by a chi-square value of

4

12
8

4

1

1

9

1

5

0

5%

1

or less.

other parts, the genital region (penis in males and pubic region in females) and
other parts, or the hand and other parts. In combinations involving the face
or the genital region, errors in perception were infrequent. Therefore the face
and the genital region may be termed as dominant to all other parts of the body.
In combinations involving the hand, the opposite phenomenon occurred; errors
in perception were more frequent in the hand. The hand may be classified as the
least dominant area of the body. Thus, in face-hand tests the results may be
expressed either as degree of face dominance or that of hand errors. There were
four additional combinations in which dominance was manifested. The buttock was
dominant to the back and shoulder, the breast was dominant to the back, and the
back was dominant to the thigh. The remaining 18 combinations showed no domi—
nance between the two body parts tested, as evidenced by t values greater than 5%
(Table 2). These 18 combinations were retested in a different group of 20 patients.
The method was similar to that described previously except that the order of
testing was more randomized. When the statistical probabilities of the two series
of tests were combined, all of these combinations again failed to manifest dominance.

�7

An analysis of the responses of the group of 664 patients with organic mental
syndrome tested in single rather than multiple body combinations showed a similar
pattern (Table 3). There were no instances in which dominance in this group was
different from that of the preceeding group. However, some combinations manifested
dominance which was not shown in the ﬁrst group. Thus, the face was dominant
to the genital region; the foot was dominant to the thigh, and the buttock was
dominant to the foot.
In summary, the foregoing results show that double simultaneous stimulation
tests of parts of the body exhibit a deﬁnite relationship of one part to another.
This is manifested by varying degrees of dominance, which may be considered as
a gradient of sensation. At the top of the gradient is the face, the most dominant
part of the body. The genital region is slightly less dominant than the face but is
dominant over all other parts of the body and is thereby the next body area in the
order of dominance. At the other end of the gradient is the hand, the least dominant
part of the body. The remaining areas of the body fall in the gradient between the
‘

loo—
I’ACE

PERCENTAGE

0r
ooutNAN'r
RESPONSES

GENITAL
R [6| 0 N
ABDOMEN
BUTTOCK
BREAST

6°
5°

FOOT
BACK

SHOULDER

TH IGH

4°

HAND

30
20
no

0
BODY PART

FIG. I. ORDER OF DOMINANCE IN PATIENTS WITH ORGANIC BRAIN DISEASE

face and genital region and the hand. These parts include the shoulder, foot. thigh,
and the areas on the trunk. W'hen tested in combination with each other, these
body parts failed, for the most part, to yield differences in dominance among one
another. There was a tendency, however, for the buttock, abdomen, breast, and
foot to be dominant to the back, shoulder, and thigh. The order of dominance of
all body areas may be illustrated by comparing the total number of dominant
responses for each area in the group of 20 patients tested in multiple combinations

(Fig.

l).

N ownal C lzildrew—It has been shown that normal children make errors in
simultaneous cutaneous sensory tests just as do patients with an organic mental
Syndrome. There was one striking difference, however, between the two groups.
2.

Children tended to learn the correct response as the tests were repeated over a
period of days, whereas patients with an organic mental syndrome showed but
temporary learning tendencies. They soon forgot what they learned and again
made the errors.
When various combinations of two parts of the body were tested in the young
children, an order of dominance became apparent, just as in the patients with an

�8

organic mental syndrome. The order of dominance in normal children resembled,
to a considerable extent, that found in patients with diffuse brain disease. The face
was the most dominant and the hand the least dominant area (Fig. 2). The genital
region was not so dominant as in patients with organic disease of the brain, since
it failed to show dominance to the shoulder, back, and breast, although it was
dominant to all other areas. In tests involving the genital region many children
snickered, laughed, or showed other signs of special awareness of the sexual organs.
Some refused to be touched there and became uncooperative. Because of this atti—
tude, it was necessary to obtain the parents’ permission for the test.
The order of dominance for the rest of the body areas in these children also
showed little difference from that noted in patients with disease of the brain
(Table 4). In only one of these combinations was dominance different from that
demonstrated in patients with an organic mental syndrome. In children the foot
was dominant to the buttock. The same combination tested in the group of patients
with an organic mental syndrome showed the buttock dominant to the foot.
IOO

so

PERCENTAGE

0‘
DOMINANT

RESPONSES

°°
,0

FACE

GENITAL
REGION
SHOULDER

roor

co

aurrocx BREAST

so

BACK

THIGH

4°

ABDOMEN

HAND

30
20
l0

0
BODY PART

FIG.

2. ORDER OF DOMINANCE

IN NORMAL CHILDREN

3-6

YEARS OF AGE

Normal Adults.—Several groups of normal adults were studied. In previous
communications the responses of simultaneous touching of the face and hand were
reported. The results showed a high face dominance. Examination of other body
combinations showed a tendency to similar pattern, as recorded in the foregoing
paragraphs (Table 5). However, the data obtained in combinations other than the
face-hand were not very reliable, because the number of experiments were too few
in number. It should be noted that the normal adult very readily grasps the idea
of “twoness,” or the concept that two stimuli are being used. Consequently, his
chances of yielding a single response on repeated tests are small, especially if he
once correctly reports the perception of the stimuli. Thus, it would be most difﬁcult
for us to get a large number of statistically significant data for other body areas.
In order to obtain reliable data it would be necessary to test a very large
number of normal adults by statistical methods. For the time being, most of our
emphasis was placed on testing patients with organic brain disease, young children,
and very old adults. Judging from our data, it may be presumed that the complete
order of dominance observed in patients with organic disease would also be present
in the normal subject if a greater number of subjects were tested.
3.

�a

m
9

TABLE

4.—Responses of Normal Children Three to Six Years of Age to Simultaneous Tests
of Different Body Combinations
Dominant

Dominant

Responses

Face Combinations
FACE-genitals i ...............
FACE-shoulder ................
FACE-buttock .................
FACE-foot ....................
FACE-breast ..................
FACE-back ....................
FACE-thigh ...................
FACE-abdomen ...............
FACE-hand ....................

Total
Errors*
57
79
52
77

74
74

47
66
71

Responses

,._—A_ﬁ
Other
Face

Part

38
65
35
65
65
55
38

19
14
17

51

64

Genitals Combinations
Genitals-FACE ................
Genitals-shoulder ..............
GENITALS-buttock ...........
GENITALS-foot ...............
Genitals-breast ................
Genitals-back ..................
GENITALS-thigh..............
GENITALS-abdomen ..........
GENITALS-hand ..............

12
9
19
9
15
7

Total
Errors

r—Aﬁ
Other
tals Part
Geni-

57
56
65
87
74
62
81

19
28
45
78
46
39
65
65
79

81

88

Dominant

Hand Combinations
Hand-FACE ...................
Hand-GENITALS .............
H and-SHOULDER ............

Hand-BUTTOCK ..............
Hand-FOOT ...................
Hand-BREAST ................
Hand-BACK ...................

.................

Hand—THIGH
Hand-ABDOMEN ..............

71

7

88
66
72
72
79
85
76
86

9

7
5

9
17
15
27
15

Other

Part

Shoulder Combinations
Shoulder-FACE ................
Shoulder-genitals ..............
Shoulder buttock ..............
Shoulder-foot ..................
SHOULDER-breast ............
SHOULDER-back .............
SHOULDER-thigh .............

64
79
59
67
63
62
70
49

SHOULDER—abdomen. .. . . . . .
SHOULDER-hand .............

71

Total
Errors
79
56
67
63
77
84
59

Buttock Combinations

Buttock-FACE ................
Buttock-GENITALS ...........
Buttock-shoulder..............
Buttock-FOOT ................

Buttock-breast ................

BUTTOCK-back ...............

Buttock-thigh .................

BUTTOCK-abdomen ..........
BUTTOCK-hand ...............

52
65
67
66
59
76
66
56
72

Part

17
20
42
21
30
49
31
40
67

35
45
25
45
29
27
35
16
5

74

66

Foot Combinations

Foot-FACE ....................
Foot-GENITALS ..............
Foot-shoulder .................
FOOT-buttock .................
Foot-breast ....................
Foot-back .....................
FOOT-thigh ...................

FOOT-abdomen ...............
FOOT-hand ....................

Total
Errors

12

9

32
45
32
31
47
40
63

Breast-FACE ..................
Breast-GENITALS ............
Breast-SHOULDER ...........

Breast-buttock ................
Breast-foot ....................
BREAST-back .................

Breast-thigh. . ................

BREAST-abdomen ............
BREAST-hand .................

74
74
77
59
61
64
50
64
79

9
28
21
29
29
42
26
47
62

65
46
56
30
32
22
24
17
17

Dominant

.

Back Combinations
Back-FACE ....................
Back-GENITALS ..............
Back-SHOULDER .............
Back-BUTTOCK ...............

Back-foot ......................

Back-BREAST .................
BACK-thigh ...................
Back-abdomen .................
BACK-hand ....................

Thigh Combinations
Thigh-FACE ...................
Thigh-GENITALS .............
Thigh-SHOULDER ............
Thigh-buttock .................
Thigh-FOOT ...................
Thigh-breast ...................
Thigh-BACK ...................
THIGH-abdomen ..............
THIGH-hand ..................
*

47
81
59
66
65
50
77
66
76

r—A—ﬁ
Other
Thigh Part
9
16

20
35
18
24
28
42
49

38
65
39
31
47
26
49
24
27

Part
65
78
31
21
29
35
18
17
9

Total
Errors
74
62
84
76
66
64
77
61
85

r-

Responses

Back
19
23
29
27
35
22
49
27
70

Other

Part
55
39
55
49
31

42
28
34
15

Dominant

Responses

Total
Errors

Other

Dominant

F—‘A—ﬁ
Other
Breast Part

65
28
42
32
21
29
20
26
7

Foot-

77
87
63
66
61
66
65
57
72

Responses

Breast Combinations

14
28
25
31
56
55

Responses

Dominant

Total
Errors

Part

Dominant

__Jk_ﬁ
Other

tock

der

39
48
59

Responses

f—But-

9

Shoul- Other

Dominant

Total
Errors

28
23
16
16

Responses

r-“—"'"—-—\
Hand

9

Dominant

Responses

Total
Errors

38
28
20

Responses

Abdomen Combinations
Abdomen-FACE ...............
Abdomen-GENITALS .........
Abdomen-SHOULDER ........
Abdomen-BUTTOCK ..........
Abdomen-FOOT ...............
Abdomen-BREAST ............

Abdomen—back

.................
Abdomen-THIGH .............
ABDOMEN-hand
..............

r———*—ﬁ
Total
Ade- Other
Errors
men Part
66
81
74
56

57
64
61
66
86

15
16
26
16
17
17
34
24
71

51

65
48
40
40
47
27
42
15

One_hundred tests done in each combination were analyzed statistically. The remaining 20 tests in each
combination were of homologous body parts and did not lend themselves to this type of analysis.
1 Capital letters indicate dominant
part as evidenced by a t test value of 5% or less.

�10

In testing normal subjects it was noted that they responded by mentioning the
face as being the area touched and only when questioned further did they mention
the hand. In other words, there was a preference for the face in the response.
In another series of simultaneous tests of 20 normal adults the following method
was used. Twenty normal adults were informed that they were to be touched on
two regions of the body and that they were to report only one of the two places
stimulated. The eyes were closed during these tests. Ten tests were done in 8 body
combinations in a random fashion (tests involving contralateral and homolateral
used
in working out the order of
in
similar
that
of
the
to
a
manner
body)
parts
TABLE 5,—Response on the

Initial Trial in N ormal Adults Tested in a Single Body Combination
Responses Indicating
Dominance of
Body Part

Combination of

Part
r———&amp;———-—m
Body

A

FACE *
FACE
Face
Face
Face
Face
BREAST
Shoulder
Penis
Thigh

Foot

Thigh

Breast

Shoulder
Breast

*

No.

of:

B

Subjects

Correct

Hand

160
94
17
30
31
30
76
30
30
30
54
30
30
32
18

77
58

Breast]
Shoulder
Penis
Back

Foot

Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand

Foot
Foot

Breast
Thigh

9
25
22
26
40
24
17
17

44
16
23
19
9

78

29
6
4
6

5

0
0
2

0
2
2
0
0

3
2
2
7
2

6
7
2

1

3

9

6
7
6

o

1

2

4
3

of. 5%

0

or less.

6.—Simnltaneons Touch Stimulations of Various Body Combinations

Body Combination
Face-hand ...............................................
Face-thigh ...............................................
Face-shoulder ............................................

Face-foot ................................................
Shoulder-hand ...........................................
Hand-thigh ..............................................
Thigh-foot ...............................................
Hand-foot ...............................................

There were

. .

0

4
31
2
11
.

Other
Responses

5
2
2
1
1

Capital letters indicate dominant part as evidenced by a chi-square value
TABLE

*

,———J\—-q
A
B

200

*

r—«Choices
Given—ﬂ
Hand 40
Face 160
Face
Face
Face
Shoulder
Hand
Thigh
Hand

175
142
167
158
141
103
114

Thigh
Shoulder

Foot

Hand
Thigh

Foot
Foot

25
58
33
42
59
97
86

tests for each combination.

dominance in Groups A and B. There were 200 tests in each combination. The
6.
in
Table
recorded
results
The
not
are
investigated.
genital regions were
From an analysis of Table 6 it is obvious that the face is the part of the body
which is chosen oftenest when it and other parts of the body are touched simul—
taneously. These ﬁndings support the results obtained by other methods. However,
this method of selection, when the subject knows that two parts of the body are
being touched, did not reveal the expected hand inferiority. This ﬁnding does
not necessarily detract from observations obtained by the methods described above,
where the subject was to report what he perceived after he was touched in two
places without warning.
After this series of tests each of these 20 subjects was asked to indicate which
part of the body they were the most and the least aware of during testing. The
results are tabulated in Table 7.

�11

Of signiﬁcance in both sets of these experiments is the fact that the face shows
a high dominance. However, it must be stressed again that the last two methods
do not reﬂect the low order of hand dominance.
4. Adults with Schizophrenia—When these patients made errors, the errors
were similar to those obtained in normal adults under the age of 65. Each patient
showed signiﬁcant dominance of the face to the hand as well as to the foot, the
breast to the hand and foot, and the penis to the hand and foot (Table 8).
The relationship of all the body areas has not been worked out so completely
in these subjects as in the preceding groups. The difﬁculty in demonstrating the

a“
TABLE 7.——Responses of

Twenty Patients as to Areas of Greatest and Least Dominance

Body Part Most Aware of

Face ..................................
Face and foot ........................
Face and thigh .......................
Hand ..................................

Foot

No. of

Body Part Least Aware of
Subjects
Thigh ..................................
10

Subjects
16
1

1

1

..................................

TABLE

No. of

1

Foot

..................................
Hand ..................................
Shoulder and thigh
...................
Foot and shoulder ....................
Not asked ..............................

1

1

8,—Response on the Initial Trial in Schizophrenic Adults Tested in a Single
Body Combination
Combination of
Body

Part

,——————J%
A
B
FACE *
Face
Face
Face
FACE
Face
Shoulder
BREAST
PENIS
Thigh

Foot

Thigh
BREAST
PENIS
Shoulder

*

4
3
1

Hand
Breast

Penis
Back

Foot

Shoulder
Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand

Foot
Foot
Foot

Breast

No. of

Subjects

Correct

72

24
52
23
29
25

81

30
42
37

13
31
77
43

2

19
29

2O

3!)
31

15

30
30
30
28

15
9
17
15

9

Responses Indicating
Dominance of
Body Part
f————N———ﬁ
A

B

Other
Responses

46

2
11
2
4

4
2
2

14
3
7
12
8
8
44
19
11
8
4
19
8
3

0
3
3

0
0

1

3

3
9

1

1

6

2

10

1

1

1

2

3

8

2

1

Capital letters indicate dominant part as evidenced by a chi-square value of 5% or less.

complete pattern in schizophrenic patients was the same as that encountered in
normal adults. They showed fewer perceptual errors on simultaneous tests than
did either patients with organic brain disease or children. These errors occurred
only during the intial trials, so that one subject could be tested for only one body
combinationi~
There were a number of patients with schizophrenia who presented bizarre
responses. The
touch stimuli were occasionally misidentiﬁed and were reported as “a burning”
or “a ﬂy
crawling.” At times the number of percepts were multiplied. Instead of perceiving the two
applied stimuli, they reported three or more percepts in a variety of body parts. Similarly,
a
single stimulus was reported as two or more percepts, the locus of the original stimulus being
occasionally omitted. Such patients usually persisted in the bizarre responses on repeated testing
on subsequent days. Several of the paranoid patients refused to close their
eyes but permitted
examination provided they could see.
I}:

�12

Senile Adults.—Studies of body combination tests in senile adults 65 to 96
of
the
disease
in
with
found
those
of
similar
results
showed
to
patients
age
years
brain and in very young children.‘ The most dominant region was the face and the
least dominant the hand. In plotting the errors on face-hand tests in normal subjects of all ages, we found that children under the age of 6 years and adults over
the age of 65 show the greatest incidence.
6. Supplementary Studies of Blind or Deaf Subjects.——While we were conducting the foregoing experiments, we, naturally, tried to ﬁnd an explanation for
face dominance. One of the thoughts we entertained was that normal subjects
developed the concept of the face being foremost in importance. It might be assumed
that the earliest sensory image a subject experiences would be the sight of the
mother during infancy. Therefore, the earliest memory of a person and his selfidentiﬁcation would be the visual image of a face. Moreover, young children who
are asked to draw the picture of a man draw the face ﬁrst and foremost, paying
less attention to other parts of the body. Goodenough 15 made similar observations
on the drawings of mentally retarded persons and patients with disease of the
brain. Since visual memory and imagery of a face would seem to be important in
one’s sensory experience, it was thought that the congenitally blind might not
respond as the normal subject does when he is tested with cutaneous stimulations.
With this in mind, a series of congenitally blind children and another series of
adults with an organic mental syndrome and long-standing acquired blindness were
tested with double simultaneous stimulation of the face and hand. Results showed
that there was no difference in the pattern of response between the blind and the
normal subjects.
A. Blind Subjects: I. Children. Forty-two normal children (3 to 14 years of
age) with congenital blindness were tested in face-hand and hand-foot combinations. Ten tests (heterologous and homolateral parts of the body) were done for
each combination in a random order.
The results obtained were as follows:
1. Of all children 6 years of age or younger who were congenitally blind, 79%
showed persistent errors after 10 trials of testing.
2. In the face-hand combination tests the following responses were obtained:
5.

Face Only

Face-Face

Hand Only

Hand-Hand

202

34

2

1

3. In the foot—hand combination tests the responses were as follows:
Foot-Foot and Partial
Displacement of
Hand-Hand
Hand Stimulus Hand Only
Foot Only
51

26

26

9

4. The pattern of all errors throughout the testing was the same as

that for

normal children without blindness.
II. Adults. Ten adults with an organic mental syndrome and blindness acquired
after childhood were tested with multiple face—hand tests. All showed persistent
errors. The analysis of all the errors are as follows:
Face Only
100

Face-Face
7

Hand Only

Hand-Hand

1

1

From this analysis it is obvious that preservation of vision in infancy is not

essential for face dominance.

�13

B. Deaf Subjects: We also thought of other causes for face dominance, namely,
that the touch applied to the face was not only felt but reinforced by the sound
stimulus produced by the touch on the face, which is so near the ear. To establish

or exclude this possibility, we studied a series of deaf people.
Thirty-two adults with deafness acquired in early infancy or childhood were
tested with multiple face—hand tests. These subjects were otherwise normal. They
had no evidence of disease of the brain. The results are indicated in Table 9.
Again we found face dominance. Hearing did not seem to be a factor in face

dominance.

COMMENT

From the foregoing studies it is obvious that we have been investigating perceptual functions from the standpoint of patterns. For many years Lashley§ has
been stressing the fact that the data obtained on neurologic examination should
always be analyzed with reference to pattern of activity. We did this in the compilation of our own results. By clinical observation we learned that when the
cutaneous sensory ﬁeld is examined under conditions of simultaneous stimulation
a distinct pattern is discerned. The pattern is most apparent in testing two non—
TABLE

9.—Incidence of Errors for Deaf Subjects, Initial and Subsequent Trials
Total No. of

Initial

Trial—*ﬁ—ﬁ

Subjects

Correct

Face Only

Face-Face

32

Hand Only

9

19

2

2

r—-———~—Initial and Subsequent Trials———ﬂ
Face Only
86

Face-Face

Hand Only

Hand-Hand

1

4

0

symmetric regions, far removed from each other and situated along the longitudinal
axis of the body. The resultant interaction between these two sensory stimuli yields
a characteristic pattern. In studying the data, it was learned that the face is the
most dominant region of the organism. The genital zone is next in the order of
dominance, while other parts of the body follow in a gradient, with the hand mani—
festing the least dominance. Thus, the most conspicuous gradient is between the face
and the hand. The pattern of response we obtained by testing with the method of
double simultaneous stimulation has been found consistently on numerous occasions, under a variety of conditions, and in many groups of subjects.
In considering our results, we naturally ask what the organizing principle of
this perceptual pattern might be, or with which neurophysiologic or psychophysio—
logic data it may be correlated. Why is the face the most dominant and the hand
the least dominant? Why does the genital region show a high dominance? What
determines such an order of dominance? Is it acquired by learning; is it inherent,
or is it a product of each? If it is inherent, what role does the body image play?
Anatomic or Neuro-“Electrical” Studies—In considering the anatomic substrate, we ﬁnd no apparent correlation of ﬁndings elicited on electrical studies of
the cerebral cortex with areas of the body which show dominance by our method
of stimulation. Some aspects of tactile sensory interaction have been discussed by
§

References 16 through 18.

�14
1" in their
and
Bard
Marshall, Woolsey,
mappings of the cerebral cortex of the
cat and monkey by the method of evoked action potentials. The map of the “sensory
cortex” as determined by electrical stimulation or evoked action potentials does
not serve to explain the order of dominance. It might be supposed that the degree
of dominance found in a part of the body would be proportioned to the area in the
cerebral cortex in which this part of the body is electrically represented. However,
this is not the case. The face and the hand, the most and the least dominant areas.
respectively, in our system of testing, have approximately equal representation in
the homunculus of the human cortex as determined by the method of electric
stimulation of the cerebrum.20
It is not certain whether electrical studies on neuron action will give us the
answer, for, as Lashley has repeatedly pointed out, most studies are made on
surgically isolated or anesthetized animals, and these are far from being in a
physiologic state. Our own clinical studies show patterning of sensory interaction
in the physiologic state of man, whether there is or is no disease of the brain. This
is a physiologic fact. The meaning of this fact, however, is not as yet clear. This
patterning of sensory interaction does not occur in any one region of the cortex.
It is the result of integration of perceptual function, which takes place in the entire
brain at the cortical, thalamic, and even lower levels of the nervous system. There
is no doubt that sensory interaction occurs, but that this interaction is patterned
and how it is patterned is still a mystery.
Psychophysiologic S‘tudies.—Our own psychophysiologic data also fail to shed
any light on our problem. Studies of thresholds of cutaneous sensations, types and
nature of stimuli, and attention of subject and sensorimotor responses did not offer
clues to a solution. Critchley,21 in his interesting article on tactile functions in the
blind. suggested that face dominance may be due to the sensitivity of the skin. It
does not seem to be a matter of thresholds,” for we have been working with crude
supraliminal stimulations. The stimuli we employed consisted for the most part
of ﬁrm taps or scratching and slapping of the face and hand, or repetitive or moving
stimulations, such as rubbing. Moreover, the tactile thresholds. as obtained in
different regions of the cutaneous sensory ﬁeld by use of the method of von Frey,23
using von Frey’s hairs (Table 10), or with a stimulus such as pinprick (Table ll),
show no strict correspondence to the “dominance” values obtained by the method
of simultaneous tactile or pinprick stimulations. The use of stronger or more
noxious stimuli, such a pinpricks, will reveal a lower incidence of errors, but the
pattern of dominance will be the same.
Nor is there any correlation between the acuity of the sense of two—point discrimination and the order of dominance. It will be recalled that the ability to
discriminate two points at the ﬁnger tips or at the hand is much greater than that
at many other parts of the body, excluding the lips and tongue; yet the hand shows
the lowest order of dominance. This lack of correspondence is contrary to the
hypothesis proposed by Denny-Brown, Meyer. and Horenstein, who studied
patients with lesions of the parietal lobe.“ In our studies of normal subjects and
of patients with disease of the brain, including that of the parietal lobe, we ﬁnd
no correlation between incidence of errors as elicited by the method of double
simultaneous stimulation and the two-point discriminative potentialities of a given
cutaneous area.

�15

Still another factor to consider is that of attention. Critchley,“ in a series of
papers, claims that it is a lack of attention which causes the imperception of one
of the two simultaneous stimuli in patients with lesions of the parietal lobe. As
expected, this type of sensory defect is apparent only on the side opposite the
cerebral lesion. It is especially pronounced in the hand and least manifest in the
face, thus reﬂecting a pattern with an order of dominance similar to the one
illustrated in normal children and in subjects with diffuse disease of the brain. If
this pattern in the parietal lobe lesion is interpreted as due to a lack of attenTABLE

10.—5timulus Threshold for Pressure, in Grams per Square Millimeter, After von Frey

Cornea ................................... 0.3
Conjunctiva ............................. 2.0
Tongue ................................... 2.0

...................................... 2.0
2.5
.......................................
Finger tip ................................ 3.0
Eyelid (edge) ............................. 3.0
Infraorbital area ........................ 3.0
Forehead ................................. 3.0
Hollow of palm .......................... 7
Dorsum of ﬁngers ........................ 5.0
Upper arm, ﬂexor surface ................ 7
Thigh, inner side .......................... 7
Forearm, ﬂexor surface .................. 8
Nipple .................................... 8
Anterior edge of deltoid ................. 9
Anterior edge of axilla .................. 11
Xyphoid process ......................... 11
Mucosa of. check .......................... 12
Nose
Lip

12
15
16
16
16
16
17
26
26
26
27
27
27
28

Prepuce ...................................
Spinous processes ........................
Medial edge of scapula
...................
Deltoid muscle ............................
Upper arm, extensor surface ..............
Abdomen ..................................
Oriﬁce of urethra
.........................
Thigh, outer side .........................
Areola of breast ..........................
Undersurface of breast ...................
Sole, noncalloused part ...................
Tibia ...................................... 28
Forearm, extensor surface ................ 33
Inguinal area ............................. 48
Glans penis ............................... 111
Sole, calloused part ....................... 250

11.—Stimulus Threshold for Pain, in Grams per Square Millimeter, After van Frey

TABLE

Cornea ....................................
Conjunctiva ..............................

.....................................
Abdomen ................... ...............
Forearm
Flexor surface ........................
Extensor surface
.
E yelid

0.2
2
10
15

.

Upper arm

...................

Flexor surface ........................
Outer condyle of humerus ................

.....................................
.......................................

Cheek

Calf

Hand, dorsum ............................
Foot, dorsum ............................
Calf .......................................

20
30
30
30
30
30

Upper thigh
Outer surface ------------------------ 30
Inner surface ......................... 30
Extensor surface ..................... 40
50
FOOL dorsum
............................
.
1v
Edild’ dorsum
100

llbla

""""""""""""""

......................................
Internal malleolus .......................
Hand, palm ..............................
Sole, callouscd portion ...................
Finger tip ................................

00
110
130
200
300

tion, it must be that the inattention is only on one side of the body, and particularly
in the hand. In other words, the term inattention becomes synonymous with defective perception produced by the parietal lobe lesion.
Nevertheless, attention tends to modify perceptual responses. According to
William James, “when the things to be attended are small sensations and when the
effort is to be exact in noting them it is found that attention to one interferes a
good deal with the perception of the other.”46 But does this explain the pattern in
dominance or in errors in perception as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2? It might
be claimed that man pays most attention to the face because he is most interested
H

References 25 through 28.

�16

in this part of the body. Such reasoning may explain face dominance, but it does
not account for the frequent errors made in the hand stimulus. The latter ﬁnding
would imply that man pays the least attention to the hand, less than to any other
part of the body. Now, it is hardly likely that one pays less attention to one’s hands
than to one’s back. Yet, according to our data, the back dominates over the hand,
implying that man is more interested in his back than in his hand. This is contradictory, and it becomes obvious that attention does not account for the order of
dominance as depicted in Figures 1 and 2. A defect in attention may crystallize
but not determine the pattern of perception as elicited by the method of double

simultaneous stimulation. Further evidence against the attention theory are the
recent experiments by Hooker.29 He found an order of dominance in sensation,
using double simultaneous touch stimulations, in the human fetus. Eventhough
the response to stimuli in his experiments involves an order lower than that implied
in our results, there was a distinct pattern under his conditions of testing in which
attention was not a factor. When there was simultaneous cutaneous stimulation of
the face and hand, the dominant motor response was that typical of the face.
An important principle to consider in the study of patterns of
response to
sensory stimuli is that every sensation has a motor component. Thus, when we
request the subject to report what is felt when the face and hand are touched
simultaneously, there must be an efferent, or a motor, element. The patient replies
verbally and tends to point to the spots touched. In a series of face—hand combination tests or in combinations involving the face and another body
part, it was
shown that the face is the ﬁrst to be indicated, whether it is pointed to with the
hand or announced verbally (Table 6). Since the hand is used in the pointing, it
would be the last of the two (face and hand) perceived regions to which the sub—
ject would point. On the contrary, the face would be the ﬁrst to be indicated. This,
however, is not always the case, for when both stimuli are perceived, the hand is
sometimes the ﬁrst to be indicated. This is particularly evident in combinations
which do not include the face. When both hands are stimulated, the incidence of
errors is very low and the subject often uses either hand to point to the other.
Learned and Inherent Perceptual Organization—Perceptual organization or
sensory correlation may proceed along two lines: (1) learning or individual acquisition of perceptions and (2) inherited or genetically determined perceptual
patterns. Acquired perceptions are organized in the course of experience by the
postulated mechanisms of pattern identiﬁcation, by a selective process, by sym—
bolization, and by conceptual organization. As Nissen states, “Symbolization helps
in perceptual organization also in connecting percepts with concepts to speciﬁc
30
responses.”
1. Learning Factor: There are
many who believe that all perceptions and perceptual patterns are acquired. Most perceptual reactions are learned during the
maturation period or infancy. In our own studies of perceptual patterns under
conditions of double simultaneous stimulation, we believe that awareness of the
part of the body, such as the genital region, is an example of learning. Infants or
children learn of and become aware of their genitals. Initially, when the pattern was
demonstrated in adults with disease of the brain, the high dominance manifested
in the genital region was not too surprising. The interpretation was that, due to its
special sexual connotation acquired by learning, there is more “awareness” of

�17

stimuli applied in this area. The question then arose as to what the pattern would
be in very young children. If sexual “awareness” was not yet operative, that is,
if the child had not yet learned of the social signiﬁcance of the genital
organs, one
might assume that there might be less dominance of the genital zone than in adults.
However, in our studies we found that young children were indeed “sensitive”
about their genitals. Most of the children under 6 years of age, even the very
youngest, who were just about able to cooperate in the perceptual tests, were
reluctant to expose this area or showed some form of embarrassment or curiosity
when their genitals were touched. Some refused to have more than a few tests done
at one time. Evidently this increased “awareness” is learned prior to 3 years of age.
Since we found a high dominance for the genital area in children, it might be
inferred that this high dominance is related to a sexual awareness which was
probably learned in the ﬁrst two to three years of life.
Schilderﬂ pointed this out in his discussion of the principles concerning the
libidinous structure of “the body image.” # He stated:
The attitude toward the different parts of the body can be determined by the interest the
persons around us give to our body. We elaborate our body image according to the experiences
we obtain through the actions and attitudes of others. The actions of others may provoke
sensations when they touch and handle us. But they may inﬂuence us also by words and actions
which direct our attention to particular parts of their body and our own body. . . . Early
infantile experiences are of special importance in this connection but we never cease gathering
experiences and exploring our own body.31

These principles of symbolization in perceptual .organization apply to genital as
well as to other regions of the body. From the psychoanalytic, or Freudian, point
of view the face and the mouth participate in the oral stage of body image, or, more
correctly, of body schema development. The same school emphasizes that the genital
region plays a great role in the development of the organism. Therefore, it should
not be surprising to ﬁnd the face and genital regions almost on the same level of
dominance as determined by double simultaneous stimulation.
References 31 and 32.
# Smythies,33 in a philosophical paper, criticized the confusion and the loose use of the
term “body image.” Thus, (a) there is “the body image” which describes “a visual, mental,
or memory image of a human body, one’s own or someone else’s.” Body images are experienced.
(b) Body schema should be used only in its original sense. It is part of the subconscious mind,
and thus its presence is inferred, and not experienced. The experiments of Stratton are a good
example of almost a pure disorder of the body schema. (c) Body concept is a conceptual
constellation and depends largely upon the proper function of the relevant memory mechanisms.
Anosognosia is an example of disorder of the body concept. (d) “The perceived body,” or
another name for it, “postural model of the body,” a term to be applied to the somatic sensory
ﬁeld—directly experienced inside central consciousness. An example of this is the experience
of having a phantom limb or autotopagnosia. The perceived body is identiﬁable with the “body
image in the brain.” (e) Actual physical body is a physical object and not the same as the perceived body. What one perceives as to body parts does not always correspond to the actual position of the physical body and vice versa. An example of this is found in the patient’s experiences
in mescaline intoxication, where the perceived body is not the same as the physical body. Also
the postures assumed in some of the dyskinesias are not always perceived. (f) Body image
in the brain of the physical body (theory of psychoneural identity). The homunculus
as
determined by electrical stimulation or destruction of brain tissues is an example.
While we agree with Smythies criticisms, it is sometimes extremely difﬁcult to use his
classiﬁcation of “experiences and description of the human body.” Nevertheless, in our subsequent discussions we shall try to use his terms wherever possible.
ﬂ

�18

Even though Schilder * proposed these theories, there are no clear—cut experi—
ments to show that the face is sensitized the most, and, for that matter, that the
hand is sensitized the least, in the maturation of the normal infant or child. As a
matter of fact, in the same book Schilder emphasized the importance of other
structures in the construction of the “body image.” In considering “sexual sensitization” of body parts in adults, one must compare such erogenous zones as the
breast and buttock with the genital region. Yet analysis of our data reveals no undue
dominance of the breast and buttock over nonerogenous regions, such as the foot
or abdomen. Perhaps there would be no incongruity in dominance of erogenous
zones if we interpreted our data from the standpoint of age, sex, personality, and
social background of the subject. Under such conditions we might have found
different gradients in each group and concluded that sensitizations of the body parts
by learning are, after all, important, but not necessarily the principal factor in
determination of the pattern.
In this connection the question of the development of the “body image” arises.
How does the “body image” develop? Schilder admits that we have no reliable
information as to how this development takes place. He said that there is “reason
to believe that there is an inner development, maturation, . . . and there are inner
factors, which are given in the organism and comparatively independent of experience which determines this development.” He also believed that “the process of
maturation gets its ﬁnal shape through individual experience.” Thus, there is a
factor of maturation which forms the basic structure of the body image, whereas
experience and learning inﬂuence the trends of the development. Maturation and
learning are essential features of all types of development, whether it is body image,
body schema, body concept, perceived body, or perception itself. These conclusions
are partly supported by the experiments of Gesell.34
If this sort of reasoning, namely, development of the body image in infancy,
accounts for face—genital dominance, what explains the inferiority of the hand, as
determined by this series of tests? When the hand is considered in the spectrum
of the “body image,” there seems to be no prominent reason for its inferior position.
According to Schilder, the hand is an important structure in the formation of the
“body image.” The “body image” is continuously inﬂuenced by the almost constant
optic image of its hands. One sees his own hands more frequently than any other
part of his own body. In fact, perceptually and from the motor standpoint the hand
is one of the most important structures in the “perceived body.” Katz 35 says that
the hand makes the most vivid impression. Despite this, it is curious that the hand
is least dominant when it is tested simultaneously with another body part.
2. Inherent Factor: Thus far we have discussed the factor of learning in
perception as the basis for the pattern we obtained on double simultaneous stimu—
lation. It is possible that “learning” during infancy might explain part of, but not
the entire, pattern of sensory organization under conditions of double simultaneous
stimulation. However, our results show that the factor Of “learning” did not enter
in our own tests. An analysis of the responses obtained on the ﬁrst trial in many
children showed that the face was most dominant and the hand was least dominant.
In this situation there was no opportunity for learning; yet this pattern was found
on the initial tests in most subjects. The same consistent initial response was obtained
*

References

31

and 32.

�19

in tests of combinations of other body regions, such as the hand and the thigh, etc.
These ﬁndings strongly suggest that the patterns we obtained are not the result
of a learning process during testing but may be due to inherent
sensory organization.
This theory is supported by the preliminary studies of Hooker.29 Working with
human fetuses, he found that double tactile simultaneous stimulation of the face
and hand resulted only in the face reactions. When the hand and foot were tested,
there was only the hand response. Thus, there was an order of dominance in which
the face dominated over the hand and the hand over the foot. Although the pattern
Hooker obtained in the fetus is not exactly the same as the one we obtained under
our conditions of double simultaneous stimulation in young children, the fact
remains that a pattern has been observed before the organism had an opportunity
to learn. Carmichael,36 after reviewing the available experimental data, concludes
that there is only little evidence that learning modiﬁes fetal behavior. If it is assumed
that the pattern is determined inherently, one should consider the role the body
image plays in organization of perception or in the order of perceptual dominance.
3. Organization of Perception in the Perceived Body, Body Image, and
Body
Concept: (a) Perceived body. In a discussion of the inherent properties of perception we must consider the role of the “perceived body.” There is a theory that mid—
line structures of the body dominate over the lateral or peripheral
parts. In his
monograph on the body image, Schilder emphasized the dominance of the midline
structures. This theory considers the long axis of the body as being the dominant
over other regions. Part of the same theory is that proximal parts of a limb dominate
over distal regions. In our own experiments it is true that the face and the genital
region, both midline or axial regions, are the most dominant parts of the perceived
body. However, this axial theory does not account for the gradients as depicted in
the graph we plotted from our data. There are some midline or axial structures
which show no signiﬁcant dominance over the lateral parts. Thus, the foot, a lateral
area, is dominant or equal to the thigh, which is a proximal area, and to the buttock,
which is an axial structure. Moreover, there is a differentiation of dominance along
the longitudinal axis of the body itself. Thus, the face or the genital region is
dominant over the abdomen, buttock, or midback.
A second hypothesis is the one proposed by Cohn.37 This is similar to the ﬁrst.
Cohn proposed that the pattern of dominance, as elicited by the method of double
simultaneous stimulation, is inherently organized on the basis of rostral dominance,
i. e., the theory that the face is the most dominant
part of the organism, while the
remaining body areas show a descending gradient along the longitudinal axis. The

rostral parts are dominant over the more caudal areas. This theory is consistent
with the extensive observations on the development of the vertebrate nervous
system, in which a rostral—caudal gradient is demonstrated in phylogenesis.38 This
gradient is manifest in the progressive differentiation of the rostrum until, in
Mammalia, the cerebrum is fully differentiated. The gradient is also manifest in
biochemical and physiologic reactions at each phylogenetic level. Similar gradients
have been demonstrated for the musculoskeletal and gastrointestinal systems. A
rostrocaudal order of sensory development has also been shown to exist in onto—
genesis in studies of the fetus with single stimulations.39 More recently, Hooker 29
found such an order in human fetuses when the face and hand, or hand and foot,
were touched simultaneously. Our own data support this theory of rostrality only
in part, inasmuch as there is face dominance. However, other facts tend to contra-

�20

dict the theory of rostrality. There is no continuous downward gradient between
the rostral and the caudal region. Even though the face is most dominant, there are
caudal body parts which are dominant over some of the more rostral regions. For
example, the foot is dominant to the hand and the thigh. Most signiﬁcant is the
dominance of the genital region to all more rostral areas except the face. From
the foregoing data one must conclude that the concept of rostrocaudal order of
be
the
fetal
There
the
is
not
beyond
applicable
stage.
organization
may
sensory
factor of learning and maturity in the postnatal stage. More studies of double
simultaneous stimulation in different parts of the body of the human fetus, particularly the genital region, may shed more light. Similar studies in the ﬁrst year
of life will help us in understanding the development and organization of perception in man.40
(1)) Body image and body concept. Another theory can be evolved in considering the relation of the body to its inner self or that of the ego to its outer world.
This concept implies that the ego has a center and a periphery region, just as the
perceived body has an inside and an outside. We observe ourselves (inside) as we
observe others (outside). When one thinks of himself, what Schilder called
autoscopy,32 there is an image of one’s own face. This is a good example of what
is meant by body image. Children in making drawings of a man indicate the face,
while other parts of the body are less often illustrated.15 Even congenitally blind
children, in whom the hands and ﬁngers are of especial importance, model the head
41 and the
region of the mouth as being the most conspicuous”?
too
large
as being
In expressing the concept of the ego in terms of body parts, the face is visualized
is
face
the most
The
other
than
structure.
the
to
more
foreground
comes
any
or
distinguishing part of the organism itself. The face represents the most central or
inner portion of the ego. In narcissism the self-interest in one’s body is directed
chieﬂy to the face. Claparéde,42 in his studies on localization of the self, concluded
that the ego is conceived as being in the head. More speciﬁcally, he believed the
center of the ego is situated between the eyes. As for the genital region, there are
of
the
this
would
who
body
the
identify
area
psychoanalysts,
particularly
many,
with the inner part of the ego.
The part of the body which has to do with reproduction is probably just as
“deeply in” or central in the organism’s concept of the body as is the head, with
its face, mouth, eyes, etc. In considering the genital region, it is not always easy
to determine whether the importance attached to this part of the body is due to
inherent or to acquired factors. There is a great deal of literature on this subject,
but it is still difﬁcult to ascertain what role the inherent factor plays as opposed
to the learning factor.
Applying the theory of centrality, i. e., that the face-genital regions are innermost in the ego and in the body concept, we are faced with the problem of ﬁtting
the hand into this theory. In contrast to the concept of the face or genitals being
central, the hand is mostly on the periphery. The hand is the medium with which
we or our ego makes contact with the peripheral or outside world. The hand is on
the periphery of our ego structure and, with the aid of vision, is the most important
tool for exploration of the outer world. One might argue that the foot, although a
distal structure, also makes contact with the outer world. However, in this task the
1'

von Stockert,

F.: Quoted by Critchley.21

�21

hand, in most instances, is used more than the foot. Moreover, the impression gained
is that the foot is more inward—it seems more protected and hidden by shoes. In
summary, it would appear that from the standpoint of body concept organization
within the ego, the face and the genitals are the most inwardly situated, while the
hand is least centrally or most peripherally situated in the conceptual organization
of body parts within the ego. Now if we correlate the latter hypothetical pattern
with the pattern we found in our perceptual tests, we create some sort of congruity
between the two, namely, (a) face dominance as obtained on perceptual tests with
face as the most inner portion of the ego, and ([9) hand inferiority with hand as
the most peripheral portion of the ego. From this it might be inferred that the ego
may play a role in the determination of the perceptual pattern. We realize that this
is a highly theoretical explanation. Obviously, the concept of the hand being the
most distal, and the face the most central, portion in the organization of perception
in body image needs testing. We also realize that our results may be colored by an
obscure artifact, although we have checked our data by a variety of methods and
conditions of testing.
If this concept is at all valid, it should be applicable to functions other than
those of cutaneous senses. Thus, the concept of “central” portions dominating over
the periphery may be found in studies of vision. Observations drawn from patients
with mental changes consequent to diffuse brain disease show domination of central
over peripheral vision. Goldsteini and others have found that in these patients
constricted ﬁelds of vision are not uncommon. When such a patient is instructed
to ﬁx at a central target and report whether he sees another target simultaneously
in the periphery of the ﬁeld, the response is that the central target is observed and
not the one in the periphery.45
In studies of visual responses of these patients to rapid exposures of images
with groups of ﬁgures, it was noted that they reported what they saw in the central
portion of the ﬁeld only, often not observing the peripheral ﬁgures. Similar results
were obtained in tachistoscopic examinations of mentally defective persons. In all
these cases the results were uniform, namely, the perception of the central, but
not of the peripheral, ﬁgures. Thus, when the cutaneous sensory ﬁeld is compared
with the visuosensory ﬁeld, the face seems to correspond to the macular region,
and the hand, to the most peripheral part of the ﬁeld of vision. On further com—
parison, it might be inferred that central vision is identiﬁable with the ego in the
same manner as is the face. The optic image we have of ourselves or of others is
situated in the central portion of the ﬁeld of vision. Our ego is projected in the
central regions of the perceptual ﬁeld. In considering these patterns for perceptual
function, we touched on the topic of conceptual functions. When the subject of
the ego is discussed, a pattern for thinking becomes obvious. It is well known that
most of our thoughts are pointed directly or indirectly toward ourselves, and we
think least of what is most peripheral to or away from the ego. This subject has
been amply discussed by William James in his “Principles of Psychology.” The
object of mentioning the parallel was to point out the principle that similar patterns
exist in all types of perceptual functions, as well as in conceptual and motor
functions.
:1:

References 43 and 44.

�22
SUMMARY

Tests of simultaneous tactile stimulation involving many different body combinations were applied to patients with an organic mental syndrome, normal children, normal adults, and schizophrenic adults. By the use of these simultaneous
touch stimuli, a pattern in cutaneous perception was demonstrated in which the
face, as well as the genital region, was the most perceptive or dominant body area,
whereas the hand showed the least dominance. The remainder of the body regions
fell between these two extremes in the form of a mild gradient. No one theory
adequately explains the organization of this pattern. Learning and maturation are
probably factors, but it appears to be mostly inherent. The pattern is found in the
normal subject but is accentuated in the presence of disease of the brain.
REFERENCES
Head, H., and others: Studies in Neurology, London, Oxford University Press, 1920.
2. Pearson, G. H. J.: Effect of Age on Vibratory Sensibility, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.
20:482-496, 1928.
3. Jaffe, J., and Bender, M. B.: Factor of Symmetry in the Perception of Two Simultaneous
Cutaneous Stimuli, Brain 75:167—176, 1952.
4. Green, M. A., and Bender, M. B.: Cutaneous Perception in the Aged, A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 69:577-581, 1953.
5. Cohn, K: On Certain Aspects of the Sensory Organization of the Human Brain: III.
Patterned Response to Three Simultaneously Applied Cutaneous Stimuli, Neurology 2‘»:140-143,
1.

1952.

An Experimental Study of Simultaneous Stimulations of the Sense of
Touch, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 20:169-184, 1893.
7. Oppenheim, H.: Diseases of the Nervous System, Neurol. Centralbl. 4:529—533, 1885.
8. Green, M. A.; Fink, M., and Bender, M. B.: Order of Dominance in Cutaneous Perception, Tr. Am. Neurol. A., pp. 238—240, 1952.
9. Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception, American Lectures in Neurology, No. 120,
Springﬁeld, 111., Charles C Thomas, Publisher, 1952.
10. Bender, M. B.; Fink, M., and Green, M. A.; Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous
Tests of Face and Hand, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 66:355—362, 1951.
ll. Bender, M. B.; Shapiro, M. F., and Schappell, A. W.: Extinction Phenomenon in
Hemiplegia, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 62:717-724, 1949.
12. Jaffe, J., and Bender, M. B.: Perceptual Patterns During Recovery from General
Anesthesia, J. Neurol., Neurosurg. &amp; Psychiat. 14:316-321, 1951.
13. Fink, M.; Green, M. A., and Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile
Stimuli by Mentally Defective Subjects, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 117:43-49, 1953.
14. Shapiro, M. F.; Fink, M., and Bender, M. B.: Exosomesthesia or Displacement of
Cutaneous Sensation into Extrapersonal Space, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 68:481-490,
6. Krohn, W.

0.:

1952.

Goodenough, F. L.: Measurement of Intelligence by Drawings, Yonkers-on-Hudson,
N. Y., World Book Company, 1926.
16. Lashley, K. 5.: Problem of Cerebral Organization in Vision, Biol. Symposia 7:301-322,
15.

1942.

Lashley, K. 8.: Functional Interpretation of Anatomic Patterns, A. Res. Nerv. &amp; Ment.
Dis., Proc. (1950) 30:529—547, 1952.
18. Lashley, K. 5.: Serial Ordering of Action, in Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior, edited
by L. A. Jeffress, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1951.
19. Marshall, W. H.; Woolsey, C. N., and Bard, P.: Observations on Cortical Somatic
Sensory Mechanisms of Cat and Monkey, J. Neurophysiol. 4:1-24, 1941.
17.

�23
20. Penﬁeld, W., and Rasmussen,

T.: The Cerebral Cortex of Man: A Clinical Study of

Localization of Function, New York, The Macmillan Company, 1950.
21. Critchley, M.: Tactile Thought, with Special Reference to the Blind, Brain 76:19-35,
1953.

22. Berlin, L. ; Goodell, H., and Wolff, H. G.: Relation of Pain Threshold and Pain Intensity
to the Phenomenon of Extinction, Tr. Am. Neurol. A., pp. 229-231, 1953.
23. von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Physiologie des Schmerzsinns, Ber. u. Verhandl. konigl.
siichs. Gesellsch. Wissensch., Leipzig, Math.—phys. C1. 47:185-196 and 283-296, 1894.
24. Denny-Brown, D.; Meyer, J. S., and Horenstein, S.: The Signiﬁcance of Perceptual
Rivalry Resulting from Parietal Lesion, Brain 75:433-471, 1952.
25. Critchley,
26. Critchley,

M.: The Parietal Lobes, London, Edward Arnold &amp; C0., 1953.
M.; Russell, W. R., and Zangwill, 0.: Discussion on the Parietal Lobe

Syndromes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 44:337-346, 1951.
27. Critchley, M.: Problem of Awareness or Non-Awareness of Hemianopic Field Defects,
Tr. Ophth. Soc. U. Kingdom (1949) 69:95-109, 1950.
28. Critchley, M.: Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special Reference to Parietal
Lesions, Brain 72:538-561, 1949.
29. Hooker, D.; Early Human Fetal Behavior with a Preliminary Note on Double Simultaneous Fetal Stimulation, A. Res. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis., Proc., to be published.
30. Nissen, H. W.: Phylogenetic Comparison, in Handbook of Experimental Psychology,
edited by S. S. Stevens, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1951.
31. Schilder, P.: The Image and the Appearance of the Human Body, Psyche Monograph
No. 4, London, George Routledge &amp; Sons, Ltd., and Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner &amp; C0., Ltd.,
1935.

32. Schilder,

P.: Mind Perception and Thought

in Their Constructive Aspects, New York,

Columbia University Press, 1942.
33. Smythies, J. R.: Experience and Description of the Human Body, Brain 76:132-145, 1953.
34. Gesell, A.: Maturation and Infant Behavior Pattern, Psychol. Rev. 36:307-319, 1929.
35. Katz, D.; Gestalt Psychology, translated by R. Tyson, New York, The Ronald Press
C0., 1950.
36. Carmichael,

L.: Ontogenetic Development, in Handbook of Experimental Psychology,

edited by S. S. Stevens, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1951.
37. Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of Sensory Organization of the Human Brain: A Study
in Rostral Dominance as Determined by Ipsilateral Simultaneous Stimulation, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment.
Dis. 113:471, 1951.
38. Child, C. M.: Origin and Development of the Nervous System, Chicago, University of
Chicago Press, 1921.
39. Hooker, D.; Prenatal Origin of Behavior, Porter Lectures, Series 18, Lawrence-Kansas
City, University of Kansas Press, 1952.
40. Carmichael, L.: Onset and Early Development of Behavior, in Carmichael, L., Editor:
Manual of Child Psychology, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1946.
41. Bakwin, R.: The Blind Child, J. Pediat. 35:120-128, 1949.
42. Claparede, E.: Note la localisation du moi, Arch. Psychol. 19:172, 1924.
43. Goldstein, K.: Constriction of Visual Fields, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 50:486-487, 1943.
44. Goldstein, K.: Mental Changes Due to Frontal Lobe Damage, J. Psychol. 17:187-208,
1944.

45. Bender, M. B., and Teuber, H.

L.: Ring Scotoma and Tubular Fields: Their Signiﬁ-

cance in Cases of Head Injury, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 56:300-326, 1946.
46. James, W.: The Principles of Psychology, New York, Henry Holt &amp; C0., 1890; reprinted
by Dover Publications, 1950.
Printed and Published in the United States of America

�F‘J‘

5‘

~24"

amass

or

by Doctors:

PM“. cameraman urn axmrunous mm:
lorriskl‘. lender,

sum A. a... m In: nun

Several series of noraal adults, norsal children. patients with
organic aental eyndroee and patients with schisophrenia.were tested‘
i
for the1r ability to perceivesiaultaneoue tactile stiauli.
Iith his eyes closed. the subject was touched sisultaneonelyx
on two different areas of his body and ashed to report what he perceived
and to localise the percepts. the responses to this aethod of testing
,

in all subjects fell into two general groups. The subject either
reported both stisuli correctly or reported only one correctly and
either did not perceive the second stiaulus (extinction) or sislocalised

it

(displaceaent). If the right face—left hand were tested, for
'esasple. the subject sight report the face stiaulus correctly and

either not perceive the stisulus on the hand or aislocalise the hand
stianlns to the left cheek and so report that he felt a single stisulus
on each

side of the face.

*1sentyy

patients with organic sental syndroae

and 20 noraal

children 3-d years of age were tested in all possible coabinations
of two between the aajor body areas. lach subject received 540 tests
in a randos order.. Testing was done with the subject cospletely nude.
When the incidence of errors in the different body areas was
analysed by statistical sethods, a significant and similar relationship
between these areas was found in both groups of subjects. lrrors were
least fequent in the face and genital sons. These were designated as
the scat dominant regions. lrrors were aost frequent in the hand when
it was tested with any other body part. when all the body parts were
thus coapared, a gradientias established with the following order of
dosinance: the face and genital region. followed by abdoeen. breast,
buttock, foot. back. shoulder and thigh. Bosinance was least apparent
“in the hand.

�Thros other groups consisting of 593 norssl adults, 53:
schizophrsnio adults sod 527 pstionts with orgsoio’ssntslisynorons
'

sore tsstodwin.vsrioos body ooshinstions. In those coshiostions is
lvhich.¢osinsnos was sppsrsnt, the order of dosinsnoo sss.sinilar.
'to that found in tho prooooding groups.
this ordor oi.dosinsnco on oisoltsnoous stinulstion sppssrs

.to ho so ishsrsnt psttsrn or organisation. It is prosont in nor-31
children 3~8 yosrs of sgs sad in nor-slisdults. Tbs psttsrn is
sxsggorsfod sad Inch sors sppsrsnt in pstissts with disosss of tho
brsin.
h

I

I

V

_

lerioos thsoriss oxplsining this psttsrn, particularly.tho‘
closonsss of tho toes sud gsnitsl rsgions, sill ho disousssd.

,'

,

'.‘
4

I

C’v

w?”

4.4/{L4/1A

r”
.

If-

7” (Ia

.

.\

ﬁn.

.‘

"

,

an.“ "the

1
‘3

a,
,

v

.h
‘7“ ‘v‘

_.

A

‘

,3.
'1

I"
.iv

/

as“

f’

M

“

,

a

3i“

x'
-

‘

,

' z’ i

»

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2334">
                <text>Patterns of perceptual organization with simultaneous stimuli. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1954 Aug; 72(2): 233-55.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2335">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2336">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-7b-011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2337">
                <text>1954</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2338">
                <text>Bender, Morris B; Green, Martin A.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2339">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2340">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2341">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry August 1954, Vol. 72, pp. 233-255</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2342">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2343">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74436">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80997">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87558">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94119">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="235" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="26">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/a1c70b872beb13c5b56dba9ecef3099b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>de32dee2acdbbfa2e67eb3cd0c31e52d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100652">
                    <text>Simultaneous
of
Perception
Tactile Stimuli in Normal Children
Max Fin/z, M.D. and Morris B. Bender, M.D.

Normal adults readily identify and localize tactile stimuli applied simultaneously to the face and the hand (the “face-hand test”).1 While half the
subjects perceive stimuli incorrectly on the initial trial, all are accurate by
the tenth trial of the test. Young children, however, ﬁnd the task of identiﬁcation and localization of two skin stimulations difﬁcult. They report only
one of the two stimuli, or, if they report the two, frequently mislocalize one
of them. The omission or mislocalization of stimuli is not haphazard but follows a consistent pattern in which stimuli to the face are readily appreciated
(“most dominant”) while those to the hand are not (“least dominant”).
In order to determine the pattern of “dominance” in children and the age
at which such tactile perceptual tasks are correctly performed, a study of
normal children was undertaken. The responses of children to the face-hand
test and to simultaneous tactile tests of other body parts were ascertained.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD

Three hundred normal children between the ages of three and 15 were
examined. They were from a neighborhood child care center, from the wards
and clinics of Bellevue Hospital, and children of neighbors and friends. They
were without manifest disorder of the nervous system. A few children at
two and a half years of age were included in the three year age group, but
younger children were generally not able to comprehend the test.
The subjects were examined individually, but there were many who were
examined in a day-room in full view of other children. The child was engaged
in play and when toys were available they were used to gain his confidence
and interest. At some time during play, the face-hand test was introduced.
From the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of
Medicine and the Bellevue Hospital, New
York City.
This work was aided in part by a fellowship
grant from the National Foundation for In-

fantile Paralysis, and by a grant-in—aid from
the Coordinating Council for Cerebral Palsy
in New York City, Inc.
Read at the fourth annual meeting of the
American Academy of Neurology, Louisville, Kentucky, April 24, 1952.
27

Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, January, 1953, Vol. 3, No.

1

�28

NE UROLOGY

For the face—hand test, the child was told: “I (examiner) am going to
touch you,” and he was to “touch the same place I touch.” He was asked to
close his eyes. The examiner, with the ﬁngers, then touched simultaneously
a cheek and the dorsum of the contralateral hand of the subject. The child
was asked what he felt, and to point to the sites stimulated. After this response, the child was asked to close his eyes again, and now the opposite
cheek and hand were similarly stimulated and the report recorded. If only
one response was given to this trial, the child was asked if there had been
another stimulus anywhere else.
Following these two trials, the cheek and hand on the same side of the body
were tested in a similar fashion. The ﬁfth and sixth trials were not of asymmetric body parts but simultaneous stimulation of both cheeks or both hands.
The following various types of stimulation were used: heterologous stimula—
tion of asymmetric body parts on opposite sides, as right cheek and left hand;
homolateral stimulation of asymmetric body parts on the same side of the
body, as right cheek and right hand; and homologous stimulation of symmetric
body parts, as both cheeks or both hands. Such tests were repeated in each
child until at least ten trials were recorded. Subsequent tests of other body
parts, performed in a similar fashion, were introduced until at least 20 consecutive trials were observed in each subject.
A number of modiﬁcations had to be introduced for young children. Many
would not play the game with eyes closed, but insisted on keeping their eyes
open. In such cases the tests were applied with eyes open. Also, a large number of three and four year old children insisted on pointing to the examiner’s
hands and face on the initial trials. For these children, a few trials of single
touch stimuli applied to the thigh, chest or hand were introduced, until they
grasped the concept of pointing to their own bodies after the stimulation.
These single trials were carried out with eyes open.
After the series of double simultaneous stimulation tests were completed,
single stimuli were applied to various body parts to exclude from the normal
focal
difﬁculties.
with
subjects
any
sensory
group
The children were asked what they had felt and to point to the places
stimulated. Verbal reports of the locus of stimulation were not accepted. It
was occasionally noted that children would correctly name the parts stimulated, i. e., the cheek and hand, but then point to both cheeks, or to two places
on one cheek. It seemed as if naming the locus yielded more accurate responses than did pointing.
These tactile tests were repeated on consecutive days, or subsequently
after a lapse of a few days or weeks in some children. At such times, cutaneous stimuli other than light touch were added to the testing. These included
repetitive touch (rubbing), single pin prick, and repetitive pin pricks.
RESULTS

Incidence of errors: Young children made many errors on face-hand tests.
Eighty per cent of children under the age of six failed to localize both stimuli

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN
I00
m
2,

E

,_

9
II

m
p.

k

no:

m
at
“J
,—
uzJ

u

o:
to
u.

100

90

(“C9,

‘

80

85

70

L2

so

2

|

4

5

6

7

8

9

IO

I2

ll

.‘N‘K

‘

.

'\

x. _
__

“t“

c:
In
a.

3

'_

‘~~.

\._x_x_‘.

-

\K

3

0

\,\,.

-----------.‘

I‘.

E

20

‘

\

LA—

30

‘.

.-

8 so
c:
0 4o
o 30

40

‘-

60

o.

50

--------------

70

Z

60

\
'

90

r:

~-..

a

.
,_\.-___..‘

29

_

3
.........

.

YEARS

5 YEARS

7 YEA

S

.----I ~~~~~

o

.......... 9 YEARS

L345

NUMBER OF TRIAL

AGE
Graph 1.

Graph 2.

during the initial ten trials of the face—hand test; many of these even with
eyes open. In the older children the number of failures fell sharply (graph 1)
so that only 2 per cent of children in the 11 to 15 year age groups continued
to make errors after the initial ten trials. Apparently the ability to identify
two simultaneously applied tactile stimuli was directly related to the age of
the child. This ability was also related to the number of previous trials of the
face-hand test. In table 1 the trial of the test after which the child was consistently correct is recorded. The last column of the table includes all the
subjects who made errors in the ﬁrst ten trials, and on many trials of the test
beyond the tenth. Graph 2 illustrates this relation for selected age groups.
Type of testing: In these studies homolateral and heterologous stimulations
were carried out at random. Errors were made by subjects of all age groups
in tests of either type. Homologous tests, such as both cheeks, or both hands,
randomly interspersed in the testing after the fourth trial, elicited correct reof
this
served
clue
While
all
the older
to
in
as
a
some
cases.
nearly
sponses
TABLE

1

NUMBER OF TRIALS OF THE FACE-HAND TEST NECESSARY FOR PERSISTENT
CORRECT RESPONSES
(

Age
3

4
5
6
7
8

9
10

ll

12
13—15

Total Number
of Subjects
39
34
37
36
26
22
23
20
21
24
29

Touch Stimuli)

1

2

—

—

—

—

—

2

—

——

l

4

2

2
6
8
6

2
6 8
3 7
4 10

Trial Correct
3 4 5 6 7

l
l
1

l

6
3

4

5
2
4
6

—
——

3

2
2
—

5
4

l

6
4

l

8

9

—

2

1

—

2

—

l

—

—

—-

—

2
2
5

4

—

—

1

2

2

1

—

2
2
2

—

1

—

—

—

—

1

—

—

—

—

l

2

1

—

--

—

—

—

l

2

l

l
—

1

—
——

—

2

Errors Beyond
10 Trials
34
28
28
22

10
4
3
2
0
2
0

�30

NE UROLOGY

children that two stimuli were being applied, it did not seem to alter the
results in the younger children. In these subjects subsequent trials of the
face-hand test were incorrectly reported, even though the responses to the
symmetric stimuli had been correct. The perception of symmetric stimuli was
much better than asymmetric stimuli.
Subsequent testing: Of the total group of children studied, face—hand
tests were repeated at varying intervals subsequent to the initial testing in
40 children. Of the children under the age of six, subsequent testing elicited
the same difficulties with face—hand tests as was evident on the initial examination. In a few children over six years of age, who seemed to have grasped
the concept of two stimulations in the initial testing, errors were manifest on
subsequent days. It was as if many trials were necessary for successful learning of the task, and then, even though the task was successfully completed,
the learning was temporary. These observations are in contrast to those made
in normal adults, in whom subsequent testing did not elicit the errors of the
initial test.1
Type and pattern of responses: The errors (table 1) made by children on
repeated trials of the face-hand test were of six types: (a) a touch on the
cheek only, implying no perception in the hand; (b) a touch on each cheek,
implying a mislocalization of the stimulus applied to the hand; (0) a touch
on the cheek, and a second touch on the shoulder, neck or elbow, implying
a partial mislocalization of the stimulus applied to the hand; (d) a touch on
the hand only, implying no perception in the cheek; (e) a touch on each
hand implying a mislocalization of the cheek stimulus to the hand; and (f)
one or two touches on the examiner’s body, implying a mislocalization away
from the child’s body.
Face dominance (responses (I, b, c) was apparent in all age groups. It was
most manifest as extinction“ of the stimulus to the hand (response a), and
was seen in 62 per cent of the errors. Mislocalization of the hand stimulus to
the cheek (displacement) was observed in 31 per cent of the errors. While
most of the displacements were observed in tests involving cheek and hand
on opposite sides of the body, 7 per cent of the errors were displacements
from the hand to the cheek in the simultaneous stimulation of homolateral
body parts, e. g., right cheek and right hand. At such times the child pointed
to the cheek once, saying “a touch here,” and then, moving his ﬁngers 2 to 3
centimeters lower on the cheek, saying “and here.”
Other types of displacement were infrequent. There were partial displacements from the hand to the shoulder or neck. Mislocalization of a stimulus
across the midline of the body, known as allesthesia,3 was occasionally apparent in the stimulus to the hand on heterologous testing. Furthermore, children
*The failure to report one of two simultaneous stimulations has been called “extinction”
of a stimulus? The mislocalization of a percept to the homologous body part of the second
stimulus is called “displacement.” The mislocalization of a percept in the direction of the
second stimulus is called “partial displacement.” In each instance, the stimulus which is
correctly reported is said to be “dominant.”

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN

31

under five years of age frequently mislocalized the initial stimulation away
from their body to parts of the examiner’s body or into space (response 7‘).
This phenomenon, known as exosomesthesia,4 persisted in some children despite repeated stimulations with the child’s eyes open, and despite the examiner’s insistence that it was the child who had been touched.
Another phenomenon was seen during homolateral testing. The child reported only the stimulus applied to the cheek. If the examiner asked insistently, “Did you feel another touch anywhere else?”, a number of children hesitatingly pointed to the symmetrical point in the Cheek on the opposite side
of the body. In order to determine whether this was a unique or a
systematic
phenomenon, tests of other body parts were carried out. In homolateral tests
of foot and hand, shoulder and hand, and cheek and foot, the same phenomenon was observed. The child first reported only the foot, the shoulder or
the cheek—and then, when the examiner insisted on a second locus, pointed
to the opposite foot, shoulder or side of the face.
Furthermore, in some young children the phenomenon appeared on single
stimulation. Single stimuli applied to any body part were localized correctly.
If the examiner then insisted that there had been a second stimulus, the child
pointed hesitatingly to the symmetric part on the opposite side of the body.
As already indicated, hand dominance (responses d and e) was infrequent.
It was observed in 7 per cent of the errors on face-hand tests. In all subjects
in whom it was apparent, subsequent trials of the face-hand test manifested
the pattern of face dominance.
Relation of hand and foot: In tests of parts of the body other than the face
and hand, the hand was always least dominant and the cheek the most. Simultaneous tests of foot and hand, the foot-hand test, were introduced after the
initial ten trials of the face-hand test in most children. In the foot-hand test,
foot dominance was apparent in 51 per cent of the responses (see table 2).
It was demonstrated by hand extinction, by displacement of hand stimuli to
the foot, and by partial displacement to the thigh, knee and leg.
TABLE 2
FOOT-HAND TEST
( Touch

Stimulation
Bilateral
Ipsilateral

Stimuli)

Total
Trials
53

48

Responses

Correct
21

23

Foot
17
16

Hand
1

3

F oot—
Foot
10
3

Partial
F t.—F t.
2
3

HandHand
2

O

Other stimuli: A small group of children who made errors in tests repeated
at varying intervals were examined with other cutaneous stimuli. Extinction
and displacement phenomena were present in face-hand tests using pin prick,
repetitive pin prick and repetitive touch (rubbing) stimulations. While the
number of errors with these stimuli were fewer than with touch stimuli, the

�32

NE UROLOGY

still
extinction
hand
of
and
dominance
face
was
apparent.
pattern
DISCUSSION

The ability to identify and localize simultaneous stimuli separated from
each other at some distance is a complex function which gradually develops
during the ﬁrst decade of life. It is a relatively unstable ability, for many
Focal
discriminations.
such
disturb
of
the
the
in
state
can
organism
changes
cerebral disease as in hemiplegia5 or parietal lobe lesions,2 spinal cord lesions,2
and diffuse brain diseases such as toxic states, senility and inﬂammatory conditions6 can so alter tactile discrimination that the phenomena of extinction
and displacement become prominent. Errors in simultaneous tactile tests are
the
of
the
trials
few
initial
the
test—during
adults
normal
in
during
apparent
period of learning.1 Persons subjected to large doses of barbiturates,6 electroshock therapy6 or anesthesia7 also manifest such inability.
A prominent feature in all groups is the uniformity of face dominance.
When discrimination of simultaneous stimuli is interfered with, for whatever
stimuli
the
in
hand
and
the
stimuli
not
the
made
to
in
the
are
errors
reason,
to the face. The corollary of “face dominance” is “hand extinction.” It, too,
is apparent in all subjects and under the variety of conditions studied. Furthermore, in an “order of dominance” other body parts are between these two
limits. Studies in patients with hemiplegia5 and patients with severe mental
of
dominance
order
revealed
have
disease6
of
brain
result
an
a
as
changes
of face-shoulder—trunk-thigh-foot and hand. Insofar as these other body parts
were studied in these children, a similar order was observed. Since dominance
is evident in young children, it appears that the pattern of dominance is an
inherent function of the organism. This childlike way of responding to simultaneous tactile stimuli is exposed and exaggerated in adults under a variety
of pathologic conditions.
these
of
dominance
rostral
to
explain
has
Cohn
a
theory
suggested
Recently
observations.8 Our observations are not in accord with such a theory. The
dominance of the foot to the hand in children, as well as the dominance of
with
of
series
hand
in
the
two
foot
and
to
patients
large
buttock,
thigh
penis,
diffuse brain dysfunctionfv9 make such an explanation untenable.
with
in
with
children
normal
in
ﬁndings
patients
of
ﬁndings
Comparison
those
with
children
in
the
On
mental
ﬁndings
comparing
syndrome:
organic
previously reported in patients with severe mental changes due to brain dysfunction,6 a close similarity in performance is observed. In both groups the
ability to discriminate simultaneous stimuli is limited. On non-homologous
tactile tests, such as the face—hand test, errors are made on initial and subdisis
the
of
stimulus
most
While
extinction
frequent
trials.
error,
a
sequent
with
a
and
children
both
In
errors
is
occur
patients,
common.
placement
done
be
stimuli.
of
Furthermore,
frequently
testing
cutaneous
may
variety
with eyes open, and in many instances with repeated verbal clues that there
is
of
factor
The
not prommade.
still
and
learning
are
stimuli,
errors
two
are
inent Since testing on subsequent days will elicit the previous patterned errors.

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN

83

In Gestalt terms, patients with organic mental defects and children have difﬁ—
culty in extracting a complex sensory “ﬁgure” from the “background” of the
total sensory “ﬁeld.” Signiﬁcantly in each group there is no difﬁculty in identifying simultaneous stimuli if the stimuli are applied in symmetric regions
of the body, such as each hand or both sides of the face. Here, each stimulus
ﬁgure has a common background in terms of body image, namely the hand.10
Face dominance is apparent in both groups. It is manifest not only on
tests of face and hand but also on tests of face and other body parts. Also,
insofar as it was tested, the order of dominance for other body parts is similar.
While extinction and displacement are the most frequent types of error,
other phenomena are elicited in both children and patients. Partial displacements, e. g., the mislocalization of the percept from the hand to the shoulder
or neck on the face-hand test, are occasionally observed. The phenomena of
allesthesia and exosomesthesia are seen in the more severely affected patients
and in the youngest children; both are frequently associated in the same subjects. In allesthesia, the subjects usually localize the cheek stimulus correctly
but mislocalize the hand stimulus to the opposite hand or elbow, In exo—
somesthesia, the stimuli are mislocalized either to space in front of the subject
or to the examiner’s body. This phenomenon was frequent in the youngest
children, and despite the examiner’s urging that the child point to its own
body, the child persisted in such mislocalizations until a trial of the face-hand
test was performed with eyes open.
In addition to these phenomena which appear spontaneously, patients with
organic mental syndrome also manifest another response to simultaneous stimulation ﬁrst noted in children, i. e., on homolateral testing only one stimulus
(the cheek) is spontaneously reported; but when the examiner insists, the
second is mislocalized to the opposite cheek. Since the patients show so many
similarities to young children in their responses, it was predicted that they
would also show this phenomenon. In a series of patients with severe mental
changes, homolateral tests of the cheek, hand, foot, shoulder and thigh were
applied. When only one stimulus was reported, the examiner asked for the
locus of the second stimulus. Responses were obtained in 20
per cent of the
patients, and in each one the second stimulus was mislocalized to the symmetric body part. Furthermore, in some subjects the same phenomenon was
observed with single stimulation.
This phenomenon appears to be similar to the completion phenomenon
described in Gestalt literature as “closure” and “good continuation.” These
are usually described for other sensory modalities. When a circle is tachistoscopically exposed in the visual ﬁeld so that half falls on a hemianopic ﬁeld,
or if a cross is exposed so that the center falls in the blind spot, many subjects
report a complete circle or cross. This “completion” occurs for “good” ﬁgures.
In simultaneous tactile studies, symmetric ﬁgures appear to be the “good” or
“strong” ﬁgures.

�NE UROLOGY

34
CONCLUSIONS

Ability to identify and localize asymmetric simultaneous tactile stimuli
develops gradually during the ﬁrst decade of life, and is present in 80 per
cent of normal children by the age of eight. Symmetric stimuli are more
readily localized and this ability is well developed in normal three year old
children.
2. The errors on asymmetric (bilateral and ipsilateral) stimulation involve
either extinction (only one of the two stimuli is reported), or displacement
(one or both stimuli are mislocalized). Whenever extinction and displacement occur, stimuli to the face tend to be correctly reported. This face dominance is found at all age levels tested.
8. One can conclude that extinction and displacement of tactile stimuli,
as well as face dominance, constitute a normal and consistent pattern of rechilin
these
addition
In
children.
observe,
in
to
one
can
responses
sponse
dren under six years of age, the phenomena of allesthesia, exosomesthesia and
partial displacement as normal reactions to simultaneous tactile stimulation.
4. The difficulties in recognition of simultaneous tactile stimuli, as shown
by young children, reappear in the same fashion in adult patients With focal
or diffuse dysfunction of the brain. The abilities of tactile discrimination acquired by the child during growth are lost by the adult who develops mental
changes as a result of cerebral damage.
1.

REFERENCES

M. B.; FINK, M., and GREEN, M.:
Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests
0f face and hand, Th Am. Neurol. A- 751
250, 1950; BENDER, M. B.; FINK, M., and
GREEN, M.: Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand, Arch. Neurol.
5‘ P sychiat. 661355, 195.12. BENDER, M. B.: Extinction and prec1p1tation
of cutaneous sensations, Arch. Neurol. 8c
Psychiat. 54:1, 1945; KOLB, L.: Observations on the somatic sensory extinction phenomenon and the bOdY sch—eme after unilateral resection of the posterior central gyrus,
Tr. Am. Neurol. A' 75: 1950'
3- BENDER’ M' 3'; WORTH, 5' B" and CRAMER’
J“: Organic mental syndrome w‘th phenomena of extinction and allesthesia, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 59:273, 1948.
4' SHAMRO’ M . F .'’ FINK’ M. ’ and B ENDER ’
M. B.: Exosomesthesra, or the phenomenon
1c e ment of sensation into extra p er
o f di spa
8‘ Psychiat. 68:481’
Neurol.
Arch.
space,
$109221

717, 1949.

1. BENDER,

_

5'

_

_

M. F and
Extinction
phenomenon in
FELL , A . W,
..
hemiplegia, Arch. Neurol. 8c Psychiat. 62:
BEND-ER

M B

.

SHAPIRO

SCHAP-

M. 3,;
The face-hand test as a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome, Neurology 2:46,

6. PINK, M_; GREEN,

M" and

BENDER,

1952,

J” and

M. B.: Perceptual
patterns during recovery from general anesthesia, J_ Neurol., Neurosurg. &amp; Psychiat.
14:316, 1951_
8 . COHN, R., and RAJNES, G. N.: On certain
aspects of the sensory organization of the
human brain: A study in rostral dominance
as determined by ipsilateral simultaneous
stimulation Tr Am Neurol A '74'162
1949. COHN, R.: On certain aspects of the
human brain:
sensory organization of the
.
.
.1
f
A
Ch‘d‘en’
II
Neurolsggljylfllgastlrgsﬁommancem

7_

JAFFE,

BENDER,

1

9. GREEN, M., FINK, M., and BENDER, M. B.:
.
.
.
Order 0 f dominance in cutaneous perception.

Tr. Am. Neurol. A. In press.

10. JAFFE, J., and BENDER, M. B.:

The factor of

symmetry in the perception of two simultaneous cutaneous stimuli, Brain 75: part 2,
167-176’ 1952’

�All, [:w.,¢fﬂ (f

P

Aﬂu‘

f 1

\. 3/“5

”a...” «w

0'

V

-—«

‘

"1“"

‘3'".

:’
I
‘1

-

momswammanual
I!
W

swam new

m cm

h
I“ m,

I.B.*’

'

and

MM! 3. Bind”. Id).

mun-11:16:11.0.
’0

«mum»: 11» 3.11m mama, 1m: 1m:

mum tar mama.

"Aida! w 1 numbin- fro- the national
Pauly-1: .
than mil: III um. 11: out, by a mat-1114M
contact“ for Cerebral
any in In tori: easy. In: .

m the 0991141th

�1.

max: 160mm and 1mm mun «mu
appliad “minnow” $9 tho that and tho ma (ﬂu ”fleas—hand
lam]. adult.

taut”) (1). una1o halt aha aubaaota ara inanrract on tha 1n1t1a1
trial. all ara «errata hr Ina tenth trial at tho taut. than:
childran, hauavar, find thla tank or teantatyins and laaaliatna can
akin “mutton! mums. may mm only ma of til. we
atianll, at 1: thaw rapart tho tan. traauautly'ataloaaltaa «no or
than (1). 1h» allaazan orjuaalaoaltaattan or actual: 1a not
haphaaard but fallaaa a «cantatant pattarn 1n.wh1¢h atmauli to tha
taco ara raaa117 appraeiatad (Wand: doaanant') lhilﬂ thaaa ta ta.
hand ara not (”laaat duatnant').
In ardar to datawaﬂna aha aca at ahxah anon taetila paraaptual
taaka arr carraetxy partamaad and tho pattara or “daainanaa” in
ohildran. a atudw at naaaal childran was undareakan. 2h. aaaponaaa
or ahildran to tha taaanhand taut, and to ataultanaaua taetila taaha
at othar bad: parts, I!!! aaaartalnad.

m mm. M aura «mm m:- a M15hmm «mu
um
aaraa
altnaaa at lallavua Hospital.
eara cantor. are:
ﬁba

and

and

childran a: naishbara and trianna. an»: aura lithmnm aanitaat
ataardar of tha aarvaua .1".Im A tau childran at two and a halt
yaara or an. aura inclnaad in tha that. win! asp gruup, but
ganaraxly, yuanaar children wart not aha. ta culprahann tho taut.
Qua childran mama aaaaanad individually. in: that. aura nun:
who aura asaainad in a dar~roua in full via! at ethar aubsaata. 1h»
ehtla III ansasad 1n play and ahnn toys vara available thaw aura
and to sun tho mum «mum. and trauma. at amﬁaa during

�2.

W “atom to” an intimate“.
rer tat rue-Mad «at, the «mu um um:

tho 91.7,

”I

(Matt)

a mains to touch you,” and ho m to "touch the «no plan. I
touch.” no m and to 31m hit or». the minor, with an
ringers, then $5..“an mm $ «but and tho donu- ot the
hand
what

m “in“. a» «mu m um
m
tilt. Ind to point 39 HI. um “mama. m” tt“ mpmu,
the an: m and to “on M: om mun. lad an the opposite
emu-tutor”.

at

mm.

can mun-1: imam, tall tho more
an. mpmo no man to ma mu. tn. child m

chock and hand

1: only
1: than

“W

um

an bun new «mm:
an."
that no trial. the shock and hand an tho um
31“ at tho body an “and in 1 3mm mum. m um and
not. or "pawn body Mt int 01mm
tutu trul“mum a: mm: «mm or both
m. vmm up» at

”1le

m
m.
«mum an m - “Mex-01m” «mum of ”M910
316.3,
luft Mud;
parts

body

on

meat.

u 213% chock and

'hmlaum” “mutton or ”mutt-to may put: an the um “do
or t!» body, I: right chock and right hand. and madam"
“mutton or ”mud. body nuts, I. both checks or both man.
1!: «oh child until at hut «a tuna: war.
Such mt- nu
mm
mad“. Bub-cam: «at. a: at»: W mu, portend in a
11-11” fauna”. mu 5.3::ch mu} at last 20 «mun
cm).- were ovum 1:: «oh mun.
A

mm.- at modiﬁcation: and to

tundra. um:
an

am with ma aloud, but imam
men mu tho me: in". mind

would not play the

hoping m1:- Qm can. In

“sacrum.

he introduced ta:- yams

Aloe.

tMomhrotMandtmmem

-

�3.

chum insist“ on pointing to m minor: ms: mm! m. an
the mun mm . For than «mm. a ﬂu train a! 31min
touch mama. mind to m- tm. «m: a: hand an
mm“,

W
"man. rm. um. with an

will km
the

the «can» of pointing to their

own

My gm:

can-1d out with

«you

upon.

mu emu. am is!» «mu or am» Immanuel
twain tutu an «alarm. 31ml. um: In. ”and ta
Mm but: mm to mime any ”5.106“ run run imam-y
In

Monti” m m mm).
Th0

the

ltro

childrun

plan “mum.

an mt accepted.

comet]; ml. the
but than pom: to

«and

u 1:

did pointing.

m.
that that hid {bit
‘

Iaknd

Vorhnl

ﬁnd

to point ta

mm: at the km. of ”melon

It an «autumn; noted that child!» would
MI “mum. 1..., ma. chock and m.
chub. a- to We! also” on one «book. It
the 1m- yxolm non «amt. mm“ than

m

m

m. mun tutu are muted «was» an, or
’

on

tub-mun: after a up»

a? a

um, «hum

tn an or miss

1.11

um

«mm.

“1-311. other than light touch mm mm
to the unsung. Th.“ manned
tomb (rubbing), uncle
pin puck. and mouth. pan prion.

A:

not:

mum;

m:
may

gunman“ gt;

tutu.

mun"

Young

«at

cum I“: my mm on
m

or calm-on and» the
or an
$31106 to localllo both ntﬂlull during tho initial tﬁn trails of
the {mum mt; any of
rub 0n- opon. In the older
of
children. tho
I) go that
ton amply

tutu-hand

Mr

not

MC»:
ham:

(W

�M

muormmmmmumtormmeum:

«manned to lake emu after the initial ten
triﬂe . Aypemtly
the ability to identify two
Immemly applied mule ennui
me directly related to the we of the «and.

m- «mu» m the related tn the mm or previous

mu of the face—head tent.

fun. I, the tr“). 0: the teet
after which the alum nee eminently cmeot 1e recorded. The
net «Inn of the hue mama» en the etheote who nude
emre
1a the nut ten mun; end on
may triu- at the teet
the
tenth. Graph II 11130th thin vellum tar
“looted use

m
etimlettm

man;

In

Wme.

em»

In theee
mute”). Ina heterolesm
were carried out at random. Errata were slide
by
eubJeete at all ese
in teete or either type.
95'

me

Wham

teete. mt: ee both chem, or bath heme.
maul: intenpereea in
the teeting after the fourth
mn. elicited can-eat renames in
nearly e11 onee. Me true «reed
u e clue to em or the older
children that two etmn were being applied.
it did not “an to
alter the reenlte 1n the younger «mum. In the“ eubjeete

“ohm teet mm amarmtu Warm,
even though the reenmeee to the
”metric etinuu m been amt.perception of mute «m: an moi: better this:
“metric
“mu.
“tenant MM‘ or the totel
of ammo“ emu,
m
I'm-bend teete were
«Noemi; tﬂele or the

‘l‘he

A

’

.

reputed at

“mm tntemle eubeeemt to

initial touting in to children. or the children under the ace
an. mmumt tut-1m engage the em ditﬁaultiee emu

teete

over 6

um

me

etmutione

the

of

“cum

evident an the mute). examination. In e ten
children
or «use, who seemed to lave
the concept or two
in the auntie). tenths, emu were meanest on

W

�5._
lubiOQnﬂnt

mooaum

43):.

It III

1mm

a; it'unay trials aura nooonuary tar
of the tuk. and aim, mm though the tuk

Inna-unrully aunplotod, tho laurntnz uni tauparlrw. than:
abacrvutxonn are in central: to that: undo in nernnl
Odnltl. in
lawn tubaoqnant ﬂouting did not ultelt tho
error! 0: Ch. initiil
cost (1).
$223,535,!Itt953lggbggggggggg;

by

mum,

on

Muted

its arrow:

m

(Ethic I) and.

mu. or m tum-Inna m: am at an

typed: (n) u touoh on the chuck only. implying an
pcrcoption in an.
hand; (b) a touch on ouch chock. tnvlyins I
Italoclllsntian of thc
stinulna :pplicd to the bind: (a) a touch on thn dutch, and u aecend
tuueh on the uh auldnr. neck or elbow, implying u

partial

tion or the act-ulna upleud to tan hand; (d) a touch

on

n13100¢11la~

tbs hand

only, Ilplring no porodpttoa 1n thn chock; (a) n taucu on cash hand
implying a niuloealisattan at the chuck stimulus to thn bind. and
(f) on. or tun taught: on tut alaninor's body. implying a

um W m-

Illlocllillw

the «Inw- body.

Flea "dalinundo” (rtspanuoo a, £9 3) an: appurvnt 1n I11
as.
grdupl. It nun Inst unnzthnt as c:t1nction* or the uttnulun to the
hand (response 3). tad II! Icon in 6a! of thc
errata. lialocnlizatton
or the hand Itilnlut tn ch. chock (dtnplnoqnnnt)
wt: obaorvod in 31!
or en. 03:93.. ﬂail. Hunt at thy dinplaocnnutl var. obnorvud

‘03:: involving

in

abnok and hind an

appetite class or the body. I! of
tho aurora was: ddnpllaclauts tram the hand to tun shack in tho
w I rm 1m ‘*vwr‘
Trt“7~
«*~
1*
urn 9 ?“ie' 4L1“
.r‘mr 3
"'1
anon dlzlod “untinatian' at a nut-alum.
Iﬂl
omnlilatton
or
x
gore t to tho hdualasduu bod? part of thy nueand stdlmnnn tn dulled
«up tomcat.”
at a wept 1n the “mum of
the ltdond act-min. 1:unlmnmum
culled
"partial
In much instinct,
tho ntzluznl which 1: corruotly rapewtuddiaplncunnut.”
1: said to be “dominant.“
.

m

w

�6.
sinnltunoans ntﬂnnlattua at hannzutavll body parts. 0.3. right ¢hsok
and right hand. At auah tilt. the chilc Iould point to the catch
once, saying ”a touch hit..” and than. raving his finger: 5-3 can.
lint! an the aback, 3&amp;7. ”and hurt.“

0th.: typcn at «Laplaoa-nat Hurt turraquont. intro wort
partial dimplaocnnntl frnn‘thn hand ta the nhauldcr or nook.

llllocalisltian or

.- anuzmu

(3)

t stinhlu: mat!!! the uidliuo of tho body, known
m ”mama: imam in the «mm. to the

touting. rurthoanuro, childrin under {Iva
years or as. :rvqulntly'ninlooulssnd ta. Initial utiuulation away
tram thair body to part: of tho nan-anor*a boar 9: into space
(rampant. r). rhi- pupae-aaan. known a: iﬁoﬂHIOIihllil (u), per-11:06
in OHIO children despit- rupeutad lt1-n1a330an vita tn. child'- are:
open. and despite tan ell-Lucr'u tastntcnat that 1: III the child
hand an hutcralacoun

that

had beta tauahnd.

A

Anothor phannnnnoa III Inna during ho-mlatovnl touting. ihe
child uuuld ropnrt only tn. ttxunlun applied to the check. It the
uxtntnor askod insistinsly. ‘Bid yuu r001 anothnr touch anywhnro

also?" alanine: at nhildrun

quld hanttatingly point to the

syn-etrlanl point‘ln tan
ordor to

chock on tho apposito side or the body.
detomnxnp uhoﬁhar this vac a unigua or I Iritalntte

phenanonon.

In

tout. or «that bed: parts var. carried out. In henolcternl

tests or root

and hand. showman: Ind hand. and about and

rant. the

It.» phanoInnan.ﬂla ohm-twee. in. «E114 txrnt reported only the
feat, tho thauldor er ‘a. catch - and thou, whoa tho attains? inaxated
a acoand locus. point-d to the appositu fact, guanine» an aids of
thy rice.

on

Furthanlaro, in non. young «aileron, tho phnnulanou appeared
on linslc :ttnulatiou. singlu atannli applied in any body part
would bi correctly localixac. It tho ‘mlninor adv insisted that
"tram
,

_,_, L¥=§

‘&amp;:‘-’

�7.
churn had bcon a Iguana skinning. the child petntod hnl1tltznaly
appease aid. e: um body.
uni-ms pm on
to

m

an

0.1mm indium. and 4mm“ (mpmu g and g)
an tnnu-hnnd
was intrnqunnt. It nus abnothd 1n 7’ of in. crrarl
tents. In all tubdcatl 1n wasn't: an: appurunt, uuhuoqucnt
a: tan ruao~hnnd tout unairnatnd can pn‘%crn at run.
A.

trial.

dcnlnnnoo.

other

sun had:
aggggggggg£,§ga§,gag;zgg§L, In taut. or part. or
ulnar! 10¢It admin-at
uhnn tho ran. and hand, tun hand

It.

loot. salultunooun tent: or 190$ and hand. tn.
toot~annd tout. worn introdaaod after the initial ton 8:111! at
tn. taco-hand tact 1n Inn: ohildrtn. In 8h. feat-hind tent. feet
11).
dauinnnao In: taparont in 5x! at tho rcupanloa (In. that:

and

th.

cup-k tho

nanitoat by hand axttnottou; by dinning-nun: a: hand actual:
and
to uh. tout; and by par£111 displucullut to the this». knot,
1.3.
who and. Irruru
§§§55;5L,A 3-513 area» or childrou.

It

was

with 0th.:
in tents repentod at varrtns tutorVIJu warn nunltnod
cutuusoun Itinnli. Izttnotian Qua allpllaulant phone-nan.unro
prick
prettnt 1n tacoohnad tent. Etta: pin pr1ok. rupotxtivc pin
uuaxo tn. gumbo: at
and rcpotitivo touoh (rubbing) attlulitionl.
tuudh uttunzi.m
orrorl with than. stimuli I‘l‘ town: than with
of tuna dunialnoc and bind untiuotzon In: ntill laplrcnt.
~

W
pattern

ability to idontitr tad 100311£0
sepnruhod tron ouch 9th.» at nun» «titans.
Th.

ntnultanoonn lit-n11
LI 3 culplcx runntion
1:
agenda of 1110.

It
grudullly dcvnlup: during tn. £12.:
tho attic of tho
a relatichy unltahlo ab1lity. tar Inn: china»: in
otrobrnl alt-n:grannimn eta diutnrb tuna disarm-tnntlonn. focal

which

�8.

in heeipiegie (5) er perietei lobe ieeione (a); epinei cord
leeiane (23); end difruee brain dieeeeee ee taxie etetee, seniiity
end inflammatory aenditiane (6) zen eo alter tactile dieerininetiaa
that the phenunene of extinction and diepieeelent became pruninent.
lrrere in simultaneoue teetiie teete ere apparent in aerial eduite
ﬂaring the initiel tee trieie at the tent -- during the period or
“learning” (1). Pereene eubaeotod to ierge doeee or barbituratee
(6), electromehook therepy (6) or eneetheeie (7) eieo leniteet such
en

inability.

'

pro-inent feature in all sreupe ie the unifornity of race
dominance. when dieerieinetion or eieuiteneeue stimuli in
interfered with, for thetever reeeon, the errors are made in the
etmluli to the head and not in the etinnii to the tece. The
cavalier: or “face delinenee” ie “hand extinction.“ it, too. is
apperent in e11 etheete end under the variety or ccnditioue studied.
further-ere, in en ”order or daninenee” other body peril ere
A

tee limite. Bennie: in petieute with helipiegie (5)
end petiente with eevere mental chensee ee e reeuit or brain
between theee

dieeeee (6) here revealed an order at equinenee or teee~ehoui¢er~
trunkathixh-teot and bend. Ineorar ee theee other body parts were
etudied in theee children, e eieiler order tee observed. Since
dominance ie evident in young children, it eppeere that the pattern
or dominenae in en inherent function or the arsenien. This
chidiheed new of reeponding to einniueneaue tactile stimuli in
expoeed end exaggerated in edulte ander e variety or pathological
oonditione.
Recently Cohn bee suggested a theory at reetrli dominance to
explein theee obeervetione (8). Our oheervetione are not in accord
with each a theory. The dominence of the-toot to the hand in

�9.

children, an wall I. the douinlnco of penis, buttock, that and thigh
to the hand in two large aerial of patients with diffuae bruin
artfunction (6, 9) Elk. such an explination untenable.
a in lethal Childrun with Findiggu‘;g

PM

oclparins Eh. tinﬁinsu in ohildron with than. prawiounly
roportod in patient. with .QVOTC Inuit: chtngos an. to hrnin dylrunetian
(6), a clot. nililnriey in pariah-anon in obturvod; In both group:
tn. ability to dilcrilihtti Silaltnntoul Itiluli in lilitod. 0n
aon—hanolosous tactilu touch. Inah II the rte-«hand hatt, error: it.
0n

and: on initial and suhncnunnt triulu. Hhilo astinntioa or a thinning
1! the unit Iroquant error. diaplhoalnnt 1! cannon. In both childvun
and viii-nth, errors occur with a vurioty at cutnnoons Iii-n11.
lurthnmnmrv. touting In: tritulntly h. done with 01': open, and in
sin: ihntcnooa. with ropaatod Vtrhal ulna: that than. tr. ewe
atiluli and still arr!!! Ito undo. 1h. {later or learning 1: not
pro-inont niuoo touting on tableau-ht any: will olioit tho previous
pattctnod errata. In Gottﬂlt tum-n. patient. with organic anneal
dctocta and ohildron have dirtiauity in extracting a ao-piua non-cry
”right!” frun thy ”buneroani” of the total Ionlary "field.”
Significantly in each group inure in no difficulty in idantitying.
linultanoaua Iii-uli if thy stimuli are applied in syn-attic regions
at tho body, Inch it each hind or both 3140. ot-thn than. 3390, each
Itilnlun figure ha. a cal-an background in turns of body insgo, unholy,

en. "mm." (in),

In both groups. that dalinlnco it apparcnt. It in InnlfGIt not
only on test. of tuna and hund but Illa on teats or that had othcr body
part3. Alto, innotlr II it II! tostod, thn order of dunintnec for
othcr body part. in lililnr.
while extinction and displaculont are the halt frequent typco

�10.

or error, othcr annualanu are elicitcd in both children ind patinnta.
Partial dinplusoamnta. 0.5. tan uislocalisation of thc pochpt tram
tho hand to in. nhaulder or neck on the racowhnnd test, It. cool-ioually
obnervod. Th. phcaonnnn or ”allouthnsia" Ina ”axe-anesthesia“ are
seen in the more severely affictcd patiatn and an. raunxoat childrvn;
bath are franunntly unlooiuted in the same subjeeta. In nllcpthoaia,

tat

uuhjootu usually localine tbs chock ltinmluu correctly but

niuloauliuc the hand Itilulus to thc appetitt hand or clbav. In
cxosaunathouia, the ttinnli are ninlocslizod either to Iptcc in front
of th: subject er to the uxnnincr'i body. This phcuancnon was
frequent in the youngest ohildrcn, Ind despit¢ the nan-ingr'a urging
the child pdrnilted in web
the cum to point to its on
niuloellisationn until I trial of the flag-hand toot nus perfornnd

m,

with eye: open.

nation to than phenomena

mm-

apantaneaualy,
patient: with orgtaio umutul syndruno also naniront Iuother respaano
In

sauna

to simultaneous stimulation rirut noted in children. 1.3., an
honolnteral rice-hand testing only on. stimulus (the aback) in
spontaneously reported; but yuan tho examintr insists. tbs second it
ninlocnlixod ta thn apposite chuck. since the pationtl than IO Ian:
niuiltritics in their reapoaacs to young children, it was prodiatod
that they would ulna ahcu this phnnannnau. In I series a! patient.
with tavern nautal chins... hamolateral taut: or the cheek, nine.
(out, thouldor and thigh wart avplicd. ”bun uni: ant nth-alum III
reported, the aI-inor Inked for the loan. at the scoond ntinulua.
Runyon... varb obtained in 20% of thc patientl, and in each one tn.
second utiuulus an: uinlcotlixod to thy ayunetric body part.
Purthornarv, in none subjects tbs name phenomenan III observed with
single utilnlntion.

�11.

This phone-soon sppssrs to ho sisilsr to tho cosplstiou
phone-soon described iu dostslt litersturs ss 'closurs” sud ”good

oontinnstion.” fhsss srs—usoslly describsd for othsr ssnsory
Iodslitiss. Uhsn s circle is tschistoscopicslly sxpossd in tho
visual risld so thst hslr fslls on s hssisnopic risld. or it s cross
is exposed so thst tho contor tolls in tho blind spot, ssny
subjects rsport s cosplsts circls or cross. This ”cosplsticn'
occurs for “good” figurss. In sisnltsnsous tsctilc studios,
syn-stric figurss spoosr to to tho "good“ or ”strong" figurss.

W
’

l. shility

to idshtiry sud locsliss ssyI-stric simultaneous
tsctilc stisuli dsvslops grsduslly during ths first docsds of lits,
using prsssnt in 80‘ or nornsl childrsn by tho sac of sight yssrs.
Syn-stric stﬂ-uli soc smrs oosdily locslissd and this shility is
ssll dsvolopsd in non-s1 three your old children.
2. the own on umtric (hilstsrsl sud ipsilstsrdl)
sti-nlstion involvs sithor extinction (only cos of the two stisuli
is rsportsd). or displscslsnt (cos or both stimuli srs nislocsliscd).
Hhsnsvsr sxtihcticn and displscsssnt occur. stimuli to tho tscs tend
to to corrsotly rspostsd. this "fscc dcsdnshcs' is found st sll sgs

lsvsls tsstsd.
3.

ans can concluds thst sstincticn sud displsoslsnt or

tsetils stisnli. ss ssll ss rscs dosinshcs, oonstituts s

now-s1

sud consistent pottsrn ct rsspohss in childrsn. In sddition to
thsss rssponsss ons osn observe, in childrsn under six yssrs or age,
tho phsncsons or sllssthssis, sacsosssthssis sad psrtisl displscsssnt

ss nonssl resctions to silultsnsous tsctils sttlnlstion.
h. rho difficulties in rscosnitioh ct silnltsasons tsctils
stimuli, ss shown by young childrsn, rssppssr in tho sons rsshion

�12.

in adult patient! with focal or dittuuo dyutuaatian or the bwltn.
The abilities or taettlc discrimination acquired by the child aura»;
growth are lost by tbs adult who develop: Inntal change. an I rniulﬁ
of cerebral Gianna.

�13.

ﬂlFMGE

m,
1;;
(a)

1.

and mm, 11.: Pattern. in pox-owner!
l.
rm.
tut. or no. and hand. Tram.An.umol.Auoc.l

ILL,

tn 31-111mm:

250-252, June, 1950.

'

W,

PINK. I.
mm. 11.3.,tutu
8:) alumnae“:
or no: and hand.

§_6_g_

mm,
unutionn.

a.

(3)

._

309mb“,

1951.

11.:

in perception

Pattern:
mh.nm1.tn Mutt"

and pmlpttation of autumn
ntmtien
”chasm-111.Iul'lzomnt.l 2.}. 1-9. July, 195.

11.3.;

«11m extinction
In: Observttionu on tho scuttle
of thc
unilaton'liinuction
utter
body
and
the
phone-anon
patent: central gym... $311.43.!mol.Auoc., 15}. June. 1950.
11.11.. mm, 3.3. and mm, 1.: tax-mun ”111111 amore“
mm,
of extinction and ant-than. Amhgmﬂﬁﬂnhut.
with
(D)

3.

355.362,

and

um

1101.3,

9mm

11.3.: humane-u, or the
I. or1.,dnpnocunt
rm, I. andormm
situation
into exam-personal men.
human
7111
preparation).

1.

31112130,

5.

SHAPED. NJ. and SCEM’PILL, 1.3.: ntinntion
I.B.,
mm,
phone-anon 1n 11.111103“. mh.£om1.trnzah1ut.l Q. 7174'”,

Decanter, 19kg.

$3.1 m two-dune tent is
tad
m,
m,
stagnant“ sign or organic until Imam. umlm‘ g;
It.

I!”

a

6.

FIRE,

7.

J. and mm, ILB. Parceptual ptttomu during maven
um,
IMIthOIiI. J. gurolquhzcmt.‘ .134.
moral
rm
316—321, 3951.

136.58,

x

'

(a) com, R. and RAM, 0.3.: 011Aeon-tun "peat. of the unnory
organisation or the has»: but!" study in rental «drum. n
«teamed by unilateral umltmomn stimulation. mm.m.nm1.
"""""""""""""'""'""""

8.

”.00., It!

10.

Mo

19%.

or the union crewman at
certain
“poet:
A
dwinunoc 111 children.
or
11.
rantml
Itudy
the bum brain:
(11)

'

169,

com, Rd

On

”union, 3;, 119-122 (nu-ch) 1951.
31., ”It, I. and mm. 11.3.: 0rd» of ammo. 1n tactile
mm,
perception. (in prepmtion).
the are. tint:
J. and mm II.B.: m tutor or ulna-ybe1n911111121106)?
””8,
(to
or two simultaneous 311th “1.1111.
Min,

�m;

mm or May or the now-83M mt

aw

Comet Rupmurp.
(Touch

1‘93-

Nahum

'

sex-nu)

WAGorgoot

manure.
efﬂuent:
3

39

t

31»

5

37

,6

36

7

26

8

22

9

23

10

20

11

21

12

an

13-1529

iggggglgg

rump-mm
all

"

1025

~-1_-11-.2
~~1.22»1~

.21321--».‘,
--125n~2.
1262~122~

£63-21-a-

28‘sal--26515-1--6821-1-21
3746 -3..n106#21~-2

33

‘28
28
22
-_

10
x
3

a
0
2

o

�W

Foot-Band

iblt

(Touch Stimuli)

'8!IIBIITIUR"“TU!I£

IRIALS

.0

00

O

Foot

n

,

Ft.~lt.

Kind

talatoral

53

21

17

1

10

2

2

Ipuilaturnl

#8

23

16

3

3

3

0

�"

FER CENTOF GROUP
,,

I:

\. 4’

PER CENT ERROR AFTER

k

O!

39V

8

N
O

(,J

O

43

O

U1

O

ERRORS

MAKTNG

IO
63

O

K

TRIALS

\l
O

03

O

«0

O

OOI

�THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
NEW YORK CITY

MONTHLX NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH SEMINAR

TUESDAY

27,

NOVEMBER
BOARD ROOM

-

2nd

8:30 P.

1951

M.

FLOOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING

EQGMM

THE PERCEPTION OF MUETIPLE STIMULI

Ia

II.

DR. MEX FINK AND DR. MARTIN GREENE:
TACTILE D.D.S.

DR. ROBERT L.

KAHN AND

DR. EDWIN

A

PATTERNS

WEINSTEIN:

OF

RESPONSES

ON

(UNTITIED PAPER)

DR. W.

S.

CHAIRMAN

BATTERSBY

�}
r
l

x

}

um um.

W“;

%

ﬂu—é“: 145m’

"I 5’44. 1’31“

_

4L
‘

3,

,.

I

Q

~

‘

_n

‘ﬂu‘

I...

A..—

"-4

A4—

‘ﬂ‘
N11,,
’

.‘ “

������Fluid
Spinal
Findings
Following Cerebral Angiography
Joseph M. Stein, M.D. and Max Fink, M.D.

WITH increasing use of cerebral angiography, the problem arose as to whether

the procedure, of itself, produced changes in the cerebrospinal ﬂuid. Fortyeight hours after angiography a spinal ﬂuid examination in a patient suspected
of a brain tumor revealed a cloudy ﬂuid with 3,000 white blood cells per
cu. mm. Prior to angiography the ﬂuid had been clear, colorless and without
any cells. As no information concerning the relationship of pleocytosis to
angiography was available, it was decided to study the changes in the spinal
ﬂuid by the usual clinical methods.
Spinal ﬂuids from 21 patients were examined prior to and following angiography. Lumbar punctures prior to angiography were done at various intervals, but all punctures following angiography were performed between 12
and 24 hours after the procedure. In each instance the spinal ﬂuid was exam—
ined for color, cell count and total protein content.
All angiograms were percutaneous, using 35 per cent Diodrast as the contrast medium. Maximal Diodrast volume was 70 ml. at one procedure. While
the majority of patients were subjected to unilateral carotid punctures, bilateral punctures were done in four, and combined bilateral carotid and vertebral punctures in one patient. Either intravenous Pentothal (14 cases) or
local procaine (seven cases) anesthesia was used.
RESULTS

Of the 21 subjects, signiﬁcant changes in the spinal ﬂuid following angiography were seen in only two cases. In one, a patient with a cerebral angiomatous malformation and multiple aneurysms, 5,000 red blood cells per
cu. mm. were seen in a pink spinal ﬂuid. In the second, a patient with a
chromophobe adenoma of the pituitary gland, the protein content of the spinal
ﬂuid changed from 89 to 151 mg. per cent; also, seven lymphocytes per cu. mm.
were recorded when previously there had been none.
In all other subjects, changes in color, protein content and cell count were
not signiﬁcant. Three subjects showed transient hemiparesis following anFrom the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of Medi—
cine and the neurologic service (third division) and psychiatric division, Bellevue Hos—
pital, New York City.
Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, February, 1953, Vol. 3, N0. 2

137

�NE UROLOGY

138

giography, and in none of these were there signiﬁcant changes in the spinal
ﬂuid. Since Diodrast can cause changes in membrane permeability,1 and the
spinal ﬂuid reﬂects such changes, it could be postulated that a relationship
between complications following angiography and changes in the spinal ﬂuid
might exist. Such changes were not demonstrated in the present cases. F urther investigations with more exacting techniques for protein determination
and protein differentiation are indicated.
CONCLUSIONS

Neither a marked pleocytosis nor a marked increase in protein content of
the spinal ﬂuid are usual concomitants of Diodrast angiography. It may be
concluded that when such spinal ﬂuid changes are found they are unrelated
to the procedure.
REFERENCE

0.:

Cerebral angiography: Tolerance for contrast media of diodrast type,

1. OLSSON,

J. Neurol, Neurosurg.,
1949.

6c

Psych, 12:312,

�afnuéwlc4’43hm
774449711

Min-1.

KM
spam: main ﬁndings mnmm mum: mug-play

Alon/«4J7? 4.5;}2

zlr"

777':

137-?

L/r—s

g-

If...” no 3"}! ”in.

l“ Bax ﬂak $.13.

inoronuiag II. or norohrul ungiogrlyhr up i!!! toot
aoarruncoa with in. )robluu of uhothcr tho proaodurn.?ut itaolr.
pruduaad dhnagoo in the earnbrospianl fluid. rawtyunéght hour:
utter ungiegrnphg; a spinal fluid unanianttca int: yqtimut In.unme900%“ o: a
and; 27mm with
blood tall: pow cubic willltcr. ?tlew to unsiegruphy eh. {lama
and without any any.
ma how
infant“
clan containing tan rolgtleaahlp or pluoaytouta to ungtuguuﬁny
in. avgllablo. 1% Ian aoasdod to study ﬂu. dhanﬁog 1h tho spinal
Wick

m

mu m. mum .

a.“

am. ”mm.

llnid

by ﬁbe_unus1 01131931 nnﬁhndu.

‘

Spinal fluids tram tuouty-uno pationta wank $munincd print
to and running mum-33mg. 1mm: pun-mm Mar to nag!“—
phy tor. don. at various ia$¢rvnln._huk :11 pun-tuﬁcs rolluuinu Ina
glogruphy uumo partarnma hoﬁuoonyln anﬂ

SQ

hear: ﬁitor in» procew

tying: {tula can «hunlncd for 00109.
0011 gaunt ‘nd total protein ooatnnt.
£11 angiogru-I Inn. pnruutaaonua. uniac;aiﬂ aladraut an
Eh. «entrant Inﬁlllm Hand-:1 dioarunt doing. via 70'. a! an. atsa
Isaac, “anal. Eh. aujoritx at pgticnta wort auh1oato¢ to unilateral
anvctid puuttnruug hilnwurnl gunnturua vat. dam. in fan: putluntn
darn. In

Ogah {uncanno ch»

3

an! canbinoﬁ bilazqrul suretzd and v.:%.hrn1 in «at. Eiﬁhar intravunoun ponaothal (I! an...) a: local nrmuntun (v 0....) uaaaehnain
van 3308.

3

�gggultgt
or uh. twentybonp‘nnbjootl, signirionnt «nausea in the
”spinnl fluid thlloving-angiogruphy warn anon in only two out...
In «an. a pttiunt with n acrobtul nugiountoua malformation and
multiplo unnuryunu, 6000 rod blood «.11: pl? cubic millitor won.

in a pinkidh colorod spinal fluid. In the uncond. u pationt
with n ohrauophobo adonaln or the pituitary gland, thy pictoll
content of tho lbinnl fluid oh‘ngod Iran 89 uilligrml por'uone
ta 161 3111151.: par cant. Alto. lava: lynphonyton per aubio mils
noon

lilihor wort
I

And

racowdod whoa prbviaunly thorn bud boon noun.

In ‘11 nth.» nubjootu. chanson in 90102. praz-in aunt-n:
call count war. no: significant. Ebro. subjects aurforod trsnn-

in.noao wcro thnr. significant august. in
tun apinul fluid. In two subjectl. ﬁne apinnl fluid romainod an»
ohangod. In thy third. far aronntod :04 blood cell: and twa
nymphooytoo per eubio nillilitor turn notod, what. non. had boon
inacn prior to thy pron-aura. Binao diodrune can onus. ohungon in
membran- perusubilsey (1}. ﬁnd tho spinal fluid reflect. august:
in cm. manna... u my be paw-ha than a. rel-Mon menu
ounplicntiann ﬁnd such change: axintn. audh changun Into not do-

iont haniparonil.

and

nonntrntod hart. vurchsr inyuatigntioaa vith.noro oxnoting tooha
bio: for protein dutorninntion and protein ditrurontiation are in»
diontod.

W

.

ploooytonin nor a ngrkad inoronno in protoiu content of an. [pinnl fluid urn uuuul oonoanituntu or aiodrn-t
angiogruphy. it'nuy ho aonaluaod Shut ihon Inch apin;l fluid
chanQOa urn found. thqy uri unrolatod to an: groundnut.

llithnr : lurkod

�HO! £3523

'

Angiogmphy: relax-ma. {for
01am. 0.: 00113an
01'
Contact
M1. Diner“: . o J. Roux-o]... Mum-m...
a: hymns. 33:313—816. (am. i949.

�x-

"e" ' " "-’

-

1'

' I?“ .. J-

A"

J

,

~ ~‘,"~’rnr

-m.

_.—»,-nn,v~..wni~

~-

1-...

.

l“. 9,,

.w.

Presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting - American Academy
Louisville
of Neurology - April, 24, 1952
Dr. Costello, Members, and Guests of the Academy:
In the course of sensory studies by the method of dou-

learned that normal adults
readily identify and localize the tow stimuli within the ini-

ble simultaneous stimulation,

we

tial

Young

ten

trials

of the

test.

children, however, seemed
could not identify both sti-

to make persistent errors. They
muli, or if identifying the tWO stimuli} they could not localize them. In order to study the responses and their relation to the age of the subjects, face-hand tests-~the prototype of simultaneous tactile tests—~were applied to 300 normal
children ranging in ages from 5 to 15 years. The children
were all without manifest disorder of the hervous system, and
were from child care centers, hospital clinics and children of
neighbors and friends.
In the course of some nlay with each child, the examiner
introduced the ﬁace-hané test. In this test, the child closes
his eyes, and the examiner, with his fingers, simultaneously
touches the subject's cheek and dorsum of his contralateral
hand. The child is asked to point to the places where he per-

the child
is asked to close his eyes, and the test repeated-~with opposite cheek and hand stimulated. Subsequently cheek and hand
on the same side of the body and simultaneous stimulation of
both sides of the face, or both hands are included. At least
ten consecutive trials of the face-hand test are recorded for

ceived

each

tje

child.

stmmuli, and the report

is recorded.

Again

�2.
Eighty percent of children under six years of age
failed to localize both stimuli correctly during the initial ten trials. The number of errors fell off sharply among
the older children, so that only 2% of children in the 11-15
year age groups continued to make errors after the tenth trial.\
This is represented in the first graph--.. Apparently the
ability to localize two simultaneously applied tactile stimuli
is directly related to the ageof the subject.
This same relationship is represented in the second
graph.

The

percent of the subjents in each age group making

errors on each trial of the test is compared for representative age groups. Ihe older children manifest an ability to

learn from previous

trials

of the test while the younger chil-

dren do not.

incorrect responses of all children were of two
types--failure to identify one dfithe two stimuli, called
"extinction", hr, identifying two stimuli but mislocalizing
The

'one of them termed "displacement". Extinction of hand stimuli

observed in

of the errors, while displacement was in
51%. The preponderance of errors were in the perception of
the stimulus to the hand. The stimulus to the cheek was almost

was

62%

correctly reported. This ability to identify the cheek
stimulus in preference to the stimulus to the hand was pre—
viously observed in normal adults and termed "face dominance."
always

face dominance was uniformlylapparent in the children of
all age groups in theseries.
The errors were apparent in tests
involving the cheek
and hand on Opposite sides of the body as well as cheek and
Such

!

i

�5.
I

’
‘

I"

hand on the same side of the body. WhileverrorSawere frequent
in tests of face and hand, chillren made no errors in identi-

fying symmetric stimuli, as both cheeks. In the younger
children, partial displacement from hand to homolateral shoulderder or neck, or displacements from a hand to the oppo-

site hand(allesthesia), or

even

into snace in front of the

child(exosomesthesia) were seen. The incidence of these dis-placements
was less than 4%.
Since these phenomena were so apparent in younger children
and became less frequent with increasing age,
it was concluded

that extinction

and the

varieties

I

of displacement are normal

phases in the degqlopment of the response to simultaneous tactile stimuli. In normal adults and older children, such phenomena

are apparent during the

initial

trials

only.
From these studies it was concluded that the phenomena
’of extinction and displacement are normal phases in the dev elopment of the perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli. Face
gew

A

Ar:

4,»-

a.

v12.w_

at all age level; and is an inherent
pattern of organization of function. Ihe perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli is directly related to chronological
dominance

is

observed

age, being gradually develOped in the first decade of life,
and being well developed in 80% of children by the age of 8

years.

e

MW.

._

L.

�EBRUPHYSIOLUGY
“¢

,_

4,

.4.

lAB'RATOT‘Y

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

é

0......w...y

-,..‘u.-

’.
”luau

s..»—..._

Perception of Simultaneous
Tactile Stimuli *in Normal Children

wrvq

Ira

‘

r

,
A»

“WV-'1.......;.,...«-_'....

[Wax Kin/L,

M.D. and Morris B. Bender, M.D.
r

1w

l

.
V»

~4M-I’an‘,‘

.

“and”

...-...a_.~.......~.w:..c-

Amman...»

..

-_.

.w

Normal adults readily identify and localize tactile stimuli applied simul1
taneously to the face and the hand (the "fface--l1and test”). While half the
subjects perceive stimuli incorrectly on the initial trial, all are accurate by
the tLIItlI tIi Il oi the I:.est Young children, however, find the task of identiﬁcation and localization of two skin stimulations difficult. They report only
one of the two stimuli, or, if they report the two, frequently mislocalize one
of them. The omission or mislocalization of stimuli is not haphazard but follows a consistent pattem in which stimuli to the face are readily appreciated
(" most dominant" ) while those to the hand are not (' least dominant” ).
lII mdeI to determine the pattern of' dominance” in children and the age
which
such tactile peiceptual tasks are correctly performed, a study of
at
normal children was undeitaken. The responses of children to the face- hand
test and to simultaneous tactile tests of other body parts were ascertained.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD

.

ca...”

.‘ﬁrw'

-‘-—&lt;-“-~»—«

—

'

\,

Three hundred normal children between the ages of three and 15 were
examined. They were from a neighborhood child care center, from the wards
and clinics of Bellevue Hospital, and children of neighbors and friends. They
were without manifest disorder of the nervous system. A few children at
two and a half years of age were included in the three year age group, but
younger children were generally not able to comprehend the test.
The subjects were examined individually, but there were many who were
examined in a day-room in full view of other children. The child was engaged
in play and when toys were available they were used to gain his conﬁdence
and interest. 'At some time during play, the face-hand test was introduced.
From the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of
\icdicinc and the Bellevue Hospital, New
York City.
This work wIs aided in part by a fellowship
grant from the National Foundation for In-

fantile Paralysis, and by a grant-in-aid from
the Coordinating Council for Cerebral Palsy
in New York City, 'Inc.
Read at the fourth annual meeting of the
American Academy of Neurology, Louisville, Kentucky, April 24, 1952.
27

Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, January, 1953, Vol. 3, No.

1

,.

’

4

I»

J

�’3

NEUROLOGY

28
._»--.A:::’mwww

Nu...

..
P...
I.

.

,u.‘

w»

'm

....-w)»...._»:,..-

..

“1'3““-

:7

—y’u«~¢_-'”’(,

.
A

a

""‘f-u-mmﬁr

»«

...._,......&gt;

.I,

.

ww‘.MF—b—4w‘

For the face- hand test, the child was told: "I (examiner) am going to
touch you, and he was to "touch the same place I touch." He Was asked to
close his eyes. The examiner, with the fingers, then touched simultaneously
a cheek and the (lorsum of the contralateral hand of the subject. The child
was asked what he felt, and to point to the sites stimulated After this response. the child was asked to close his eyes again, and now the opposite
(both and hand were similarly stimulated and the report recorded. If only
one Itsponse was given to this trial, the child was asked if there had been
another stimulus anywhere else.
Following these two trials, the cheek and hand on the same side of the body
were tested in a similar fashion. The fifth and sixth trials were not of asymmetric body parts but simultaneous stimulation of both cheeks or both hands.
The following various types of stimulation were used: heterologous stimulation of asymmetric body parts on opposite sides, as right cheek and left hand;
homolateral stimulation of asymmetric body parts on the same side of the
body, as right cheek and right hand; and homologous stimulation of symmetric
body parts, as both checks or both hands. Such tests were repeated in each
child until at least ten trials were recorded. Subsequent tests of other body
parts, performed in a similar fashion, were introduced until at least 20 consecutive trials were observed in each subject.
A number of modifications had to be introduced for young children. Many
would not play the game with eyes closed, but insisted on keeping their eyes
open. III such cases the tests were applied with eyes open. Also, a large number of three and four year old children insisted on pointing to the examiner’s
hands and face on the initial trials. For these children, a few trials of single
touch stimuli applied to the thigh, chest or hand were introduced, until they
grasped the concept of pointing to their own bodies after the stimulation.
These single trials were carried out with eyes open.
After the series 'of double simultaneous stimulation tests were completed,
single stimuli were applied to various body parts to exclude from the normal
group any subjectswith focal sensory difficulties.
The children were asked what they had felt and to point to the places
stimulated. Verbal Ieports of the locus of stimulatiOn were not accepted. It
was occasionally noted that children would correctly name the parts stimulated, i. e., the cheek and hand, but then point to both cheeks, or to two places
on one check. It seemed as if naming the locus yielded more accurate responses than did pointing.
These tactile tests were repeated on consecutive days, or subsequently
after a lapse of a few days or weeks in some children. At such times, cutaneous stimuli other than light touch were added to the testing. These included
repetitive touch (rubbing), single pin prick, and repetitive pin pricks.
_

.

.
.
~‘~-

.mh—wwyﬂn

NJ,“

e.,

.va

RESULTS
.....-..-~_.-

«-~

-

'

’

children made many errors on face-hand tests.
Eighty per cent of children under the age of six failed to localize both stimuli
I ncidcnce‘of errors: Young

,

2mm,

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN

29

iooJ

90‘

3

&lt; 60
E
.. 704

9

6° .

'1

3

50a

S

‘0

:2

i

g

a:
0:
“‘

,

_

.
~....._..

1“

90

5

\.\

70‘

3
5

‘-

604

‘

“\

\‘\

\

10‘

\“ ‘~.‘

/\

.

.

304

’i

H.“ .

3 2°

‘~.

5‘56739Dll12046

‘
U

”M

"

“~- J vans
-- -- s vans

'

‘04

3

x

.

so

g

.
-\

.

no

x3

\s

30‘

'

\-\...-.

‘4‘.

nuns

..... '

-~-- 9

,

‘K

vans

n
'5J4ST709210MEG

names

Y

CF TRIAL

AGE
Graph 1.

,

m~w-~m

\‘x‘ ‘

it

6'20

2f

IOO l

g

D-

I:

~—«—-~-..‘..__;__....~_

x

Graph 2.

during the initial ten trials of the face-hand test; many of these even with
eyes open: In the older children the number‘of failures fell sharply (graph 1)
so that only 2 per cent of children in the 11 to 15 year age groups continued
to make errors after the initial ten trials. Apparently the ability to identify
two simultaneously applied tactile stimuli was directly related to the age of
the child. This ability was also related to the number of previous trials of the
face-hand test. In table 1 the trial of the test after which the child was consistently correct is recorded. The last column of the table includes all the
subjects who made errors in the first ten trials, and on many trials of the test
beyond the tenth. Graph 2 illustrates this relation for selected age groups.
Type of testing: In these studies homolateral and heterologous stimulations
were carried out at random. Errors were made by subjects of all age groups
in tests of. either type. Homologous tests, such as both cheeks, or both hands,
randomly interspersed in the testing after the fourth trial, elicited correct‘respouses in nearly all cases. While this served as a clue to some of the older

.W....m~.

TABLE

.

a
.
.

t

(Touch Stimuli)

c

.

m-‘Wn

Age
...._.-.m..;.

3
4

Total Number
of Subjects
39
S4

37
36
26

5

6
7
8

9

10
WWM..W~«.».-.A_.

1

NULIBER OF TRIALS OF THE FACE-HAND TEST NECESSARY FOR PERSISTENT
CORRECT RESPONSES

11

12
13—15

‘22
-

23
20
21
24

29

2

1

3

Trial Correct
4 5 6

8

-

—

1

2.

4

--

1

6

6
3

2.,

4

2

5

-2

1

—

- -2

1

—

—

1

—

1

-3

1

8

2

6
6 8
3 7
4 10

2

.

4

5
2
4
6

-—

5
4
I

6
4

1

1

2

2

2

2

-

—

l

2

1

1
1
1
—

1

—

-1
—

2
2

9
2

,-

-

—
—

2 - - - 2 l
- 2
—
1

—

- -

—

Errors Beyond
10 Trials
34 '
28
28
22
10
4

3
2
0
2
0

�NEUROLOGY

p

,

it did not seem to alter the
hildrcn that two stimuli were being applied,
trials of the
insults in the younger children. In these subjects subsequent
the
responses to the
lee-hand test were incorrectly reported, even though
stimuli was
of
mmetric stimuli had been correct. The perception symmetric
,iuch better than asymmetric stimuli.
of children studied, face-hand
Subsequent testing: Of the total group
to the initial testing in
fusts were repeated at varying intervals subsequent
of
six, subsequent testing elicited
it) children. ()f the children under the age
on the initial examhe same. difficulties with facc~hand tests as was evident
seemed
to have grasped
who
six years of age,
,nation. In a few children over
manifest on
were
errors
in the initial testing.
ghc concept of two stimulations
learnsuccessful
for
3ubsequcnt days. It was as if many trials were necessary
completed,
successfully
task
was
the
‘iig of the task, and then, even though
These observations are in contrast to those made
‘gie learning was temporary.
elicit the errors of the
{i normal adults, in whom subsequent testing did not

tidal

".4

I

test.1

(table 1) made by children on
Type and pattern of responses: The errors six
of
types: (a) a touch on the
i'peated trials of the faCe-hand test were
touch on each cheek,
heck only, implying no perception in the hand; (b) a
the hand; (0) a touch
implying a mislocalization of the stimulus applied to
neck or elbow, implying
in the cheek, and a second touch on the shoulder,
the
hand; ((1) a touch on
to
stimulus
applied
partial mislocalization of the
in the check; (6) a touch on each
he hand only, implying no perception
cheek stimulus to the hand; and (f)
of
land implying a mislocalization the
examiner’s
body, implying a mislocalization away
pie-or two touches on the
grom the child’s body.
all age groups. ’It was
Face dominance ( respbnses a, b, c) was apparent in
hand
the
(response a), and
host manifest as extinction“ of the stimulus to
hand stimulus to
of
the
Mislocalization
.'as seen in 62 per cent of the errors.
of
the
errors. While
cent
31
observed in
per
he cheek (displacement)i was
and hand
cheek
in
tests involving
observed
{rest of the displacements were
displacements
of
the
were
errors
7
in opposite sides of the body, per cent
of homolateral
stimulation
simultaneous
the
in
check
the
hand
to
tom the
child pointed
the
times
such
At
hand.
ody parts, e. g., right cheek and right
2 to 3
his
ﬁngers
b the cheek once, saying 5‘a touch here,” and then, moving
lentimeters lower on the cheek, saying “and here.”
Other types of displacel‘nent were infrequent. There were partial displaceshoulder or neck. Mislocalization of a stimulus
;ients from the hand to the
occasionally apparfeross the midline of the body, known as allesthesia,3 was
children
Furthermore,
testing.
hand
heterologous
the
on
to
int in the stimulus
p

,

-

“

,,
simultaneous stimulations has been called "extinction”
:The failure to report one of 'two of
of the second
a percept to the homologous body part
3i
a stimulus.2 The mislocalization
of the
direction
the
in
of
mislocalization
a
percept
iimulus is called "displacement." The
the stimulus which is
each
"
instance,
In
displacement.”
artial
is
called
lacond stimulus
iorrectly reported is ‘said. to e "dominant."
.

i
.

.
,

l

.

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN

31

under ﬁve years of age frequently mislocalized the initial stimulation
away
from their body to parts of the examiner's body
or into space (response f).
This phenomenon, known as exosomesthcsia,‘
persisted in some children despite repeated stimulations with the child's eyes open, and despite the
examiner's insistence that it was the child who had been touched.
Another phenomenon was seen during homolateral
testing. The child reported only the stimulus applied to the cheek. If the examiner asked insistently, “Did you feel another touch anywhere else?", a number of children hesitatingly pointed to the symmetrical point in the check on the opposite side
of the body. In order to determine whether this was a
unique or a systematic
phenomenon, tests of other body parts were carried out. In homolateral tests
of foot and hand, shoulder and hand, and cheek and foot, the
same phenomenon was observed. The child ﬁrst reported
only the foot, the shoulder or
the cheek—and then, when the examiner insisted on second
locus, pointed
a
to the opposite foot, shoulder or side of the face.
,Furthermore, in some young children the phenomenon appeared on
single
stimulation. Single stimuli applied to any body
were localized correctly.
part
If the examiner then insisted that there had been a-seeond
sti‘mulus,'the 'ch'ild— pointed hesitatingly to the symmetric part on the opposite side of the
body.
As already indicated, hand dominance
(responses (1 and e) was infrequent.
It was observed in 7 per cent of the errors on face-hand tests. In all
subjects
in whom it was apparent, subsequent trials of the face-hand
test manifested
the pattern of face dominance.
Relation of hand and foot: In tests of parts of the body other than the
face
and hand, the hand was always least dominant and the cheek the
most. Simultaneous tests of foot and hand, the foot-hand test, were introduced after the
initial ten trials of the face-hand test in most children. In the foot~hand
test,
foot dominance was apparent in 51
per cent of the responses (see table 2).
It was demonstrated by hand extinction, by displacement of hand stimuli
to
the foot, and by partial displacement to the thigh, knee and
leg.
-

_‘

_

_

.
.-

_-~qu.-.

‘

7

TABLE 2
FOOT-HAND TEST

_W&amp;-u.~.“.~w

(Touch Stimuli)
5......“

Stimulation

Total
Trials

..,

-_._...

is

a-

Bilateral
Ipsilateral

53
48

Correct
21

23

Foot
17
16

Responses
FootHand
Foot
1

3

10
3

Partial

Hand-

2
3

2
0

Ft.-Ft.

Hand

”ma—”Ayug.

..

.
A
..
r

M»~..-.._—t_..

I

Otlzcr stimuli: A small
group of children who made errors in tests
at varying intervals were examined with other cutaneous stimuli. repeated
Extinction
and displacement phenomena were present in face-hand tests
using pin prick,
repetitive pin prick and repetitive touch (rubbing) stimulations. \Vhile the
number of errors with these stimuli were fewer than with touch
stimuli, the

i

,

,_

'

�w“

o

a.

‘NHJa-w

'

32

.

NEUROLOGY

I

still apparent.
pattern of face dominance and hand extinction was

_

._

f

DISCUSSION

__

NM...

.

~‘ak

,..,~

....

-V~’W~¢-—/“A...

-Mww

,rw

‘r

f
,.

‘....-._..u-n-.

v“\——»\‘

‘.
&lt;

r

3

The ability to identify and localize simultaneous stimuli separated from
each other at some distance is a complex function which gradually develops
for many
during the first decade of life. It is a relatively unstable ability,
Focal
discriminations.
such
changes in the stateiof the organism can disturb
lesions,2
cord
lobe
lesions,2
spinal
cerebral disease as in hemiplegia" or parietal
and diffuse brain diseases such as toxic States, senility and inflammatory conditions" can so alter tactile discrimination that the phenomena of extinction,
and displacement become prominent. Errors in simultaneous tactile tests are
of the test—«luring the
apparent in normal adults during the initial few trials
of
doses
barbiturates," electroperiod of learning.1 TPersons subjected to large
such
inability.
shock therapy“ or anesthesia" also manifest
A prominent feature in all groups is the uniformity of face dominance.
When discrimination; of simultaneous stimuli is interfered with, for whatever
in the stimuli
reason, the errors are made in the stimuli to the hand and not
It, too,
extinction.”
is
"hand
dominance"
_to the face. The corollary of "face
Furstudied.
of
conditions
'is apparent in all subjects and under the variety
these
two
between
thermore, in an "order of dominance" other body parts are
mental
with
and
severe
patients
limits. Studies in patients with hemiplegia“
of dominance
order
revealed
have
disease“
an
of
brain
result
a
as
changes
other
these
body parts
of face—shouldcr-trunk-thigh-foot and hand. Insofar as
dominance
Since
observed.
order
similar
was
these
children,
in
a
studied
were
of
dominance is an
is evident in young children, it appears that the pattern
inherent function of the organism. This childlike way of responding to simultaneous tactile'stimuli is exposed and exaggerated in adults under a variety
of pathologic conditions.
has suggested a theory of rostral dominance to explain these
Recently
observations." Our observations are not in accord with such a theory. The
dominance of the foot to the hand in children, as well as the dominance of
with
penis, buttock, foot and thigh to the hand in two large series of patients
untenable.
such
make
explanation
an
diffuse brain dysfunction,“
Comparison of ﬁndings in normal children with ﬁndings in patients with
organic mental syndrome: On comparing the findings in children with these
previously reported in patients with severe mental changes due to brain dysfunction,6 a close similarity in performance is observed. In both groups the
ability to'discriminate simultaneous stimuli is limited. On non-homologous
tactile tests, such as the face-hand test, errors are made on initial and subdissequent trials.‘ While extinction of a stimulus is the most frequent error,
with
a
placement is eommon. In both children and patients, errors» occur
be
done
frequently
Furthermore,
stimuli.
cutaneous
testing
may
variety of
with eyes open, and in many instances with repeated verbal clues that there
of learning is not promare two stimuli, and still errors are made. The factor
the
elicit
will
patterned errors.
previous
days
on
subsequent
inent since testing

mgvﬁ

.

;
'

'

vb...“

..

,r»

...-

-,4‘-.;.,.va‘

.

A.

w,
..

~’M"|,.I

vauy—as

,
"
'

m-..

....

v
-....

*qu...‘

{U

thn

A

'

-....;..W"

A...

.‘-

"

"

"‘W

,

A

AA

i.

1
1»

1

1

1
l
i

‘

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN

‘

3‘3

In Gestalt terms, patients with organic mental defects and children have difficulty in extracting a complex sensory "figure” from the "background" of the
total sensory "field.” Significantly in each group there is no difficulty in identifying simultaneous stimuli if the stimuli are applied in symmetric regions
of the body, such as each hand or both sides of the face. Here, each stimulus
figure has a common background in tenns of body image. namely the hand.”
Face dominance is apparent in both groups. It is manifest not only on
tests of face and hand but also on tests of face and other body parts. Also,
insofar as it was tested, the order of dominance for other body parts is similar.
'
While extinction and displacement are the most frequent types of error,
other phenomena are elicited in both children and patients. Partial displacements, e. g., the mislocalization of the percept from the hand to the shoulder
or neck on the face-hand test, are occasionally observed. The phenomena of
allesthesia and exosomesthesia are seen in the more severely affected patients
and in the youngest children; both are frequently associated in the same subjeets. In allesthesia, the subjects ,usually localize the cheek stimulus correctly
but mislocalize the hand stimulus to the opposite hand or elbow. In exo~somesthesia,—the stimuli are mislocalized either to space in front of the subject
or to the examiner’s body. This phenomenon was frequent in the youngest
children, and despite the examiner’s urging that the child point to its own
body, the child persisted in such mislocalizations until a trial of the face-hand
test was performed with eyes open.
In addition to these phenomena which appear spontaneously, patients with
rganie mental syndrome also manifest another response to simultaneous stim.
ulation ﬁrst noted in children, i. e., on homolateral testing only one stimulus
(the cheek) is spontaneously reported; but when the examiner insists, the
second is mislocalized to the opposite cheek. Since the patients show so
many
similarities to young children in their responses, it was predicted that they
would also show this phenomenon. In a series of patients with severe mental
changes, homolateral tests of the cheek, hand, foot, shoulder and thigh were
applied. When only one stimulus was reported, the examiner asked for the
locus of the second stimulus. Responses were obtained in 20
per cent of the
patients, and in each one the second stimulus was mislocalized to the symmetric body part. Furthemiore, in some subjects the same phenomenon was
observed with single stimulation.
This phenomenon appears to be similar to the completion phenomenon
described in Gestalt literature as “closure" and “good continuation.” These
are usually described for other sensory modalities. \Vhen a circle is taehistoscopically exposed in the visual field so that half falls on a hemianopic field.
or if a cross is exposed so that the center falls in the blind spot, many subjects
report a complete circle or cross. This “completion” occurs for “good" figures.
In simultaneous tactile studies, symmetric figures appear to be the "good” or
"strong" figures.

R‘f.

,

»

—

“A...

.......~-........1

~

—

-

AI.-

jar-rs:

x
.,
r;'34

�l _‘

Amw—

9

,
..»—-w»4

‘-‘*V—~..

»

._......-.-...

Ms-

34

'1

CONCLUSIONS
1. Ability

,

NE U ROLOCY

,

to identify and localize asymmetric simultaneous tactile stimuli
develops gradually during the first decade of life, and is present in 80 per
cent of normal children by the age of eight. Symmetric stimuli are more
readily localized and this ability is well developed in normal three year old

children.
2. The errors on asymmetric (bilateral and ipsilateral) stimulation involve
either extinction (only one of the two stimuli is reported), or displacement
(one or both stimuli are mislocalizcd). Whenever extinction and displacement occur, stimuli to the face tend to be correctly reported. This face dom-’
inance is found at all age levels tested.
3. One can conclude that extinction and displacement of tactile stimuli,
well
as
as face dominance, constitute a normal and consistent pattern of rein
children. ,In addition to these responses one can observe, in chilsponse
dren under six years of age, the phenomena of allesthesia, exosomesthesia and
partial displacement as normal reactions to simultaneous tactile stimulation.
4. The difﬁculties in recognition of simultaneous tactile stimuli, as shown
by young children, reappear in the same fashion in adult patients with focal
or diiluse dysfunction of the brain. The abilities of tactile discrimination acquired by the child during growth are lost by the adult who develops mental
changes as a result of cerebral damage.
i

.

f

.
..

.-.-~vku-»~‘.

..

,

_

-

-

-

.

REF E1112. ’CES
M. B.; FINK, M., and GREEN, M.:
Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests
of face and hand, Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 75:
2'50, 1950; BENDER, M. B.; FINK, M., and
GREEN, M.: Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand, Arch. Neurol.
&amp; l’sychiat. 662355, 1951.
BENDER, M. B.: Extinction and precipitation
of cutaneous. sensations, Arch. Neurol. 61
Psychiat. 54:1, 1945; Kora, L.: Observations on the somatic sensory extinction phenomenon and‘ the body scheme after unilateral resection of the posterior central gyrus,
Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 75: 1950.
BISNDER, M. 13.; WOR'I‘IS, S. 8., and CRAMER,
1.: Organic mental syndrome with phenomena of extinction and allesthesia, Arch. Neurol. 8t Psychiat. 59:27}, 1948.
SHAPIRO, M. F.; PINK, M., and BENDER,
M. 13.: Exosomesthesia, or the phenomenon
of displacement of sensation into extra-personal space, Arch. Neurol. 8t Psychiat. 68:481,

1.. BENDER,

-&lt;.»»N.-.~,.--~c¢-v--_.a

.
_

.
..

.,.....-._..a..-

.

..

.
.

1952.

’

M. 8.; SHAmno, M. F., and SCHAPPELL, A. W1: Extinction phenomenon in
hemiplegia, Arch. Neurol. 61 Psychiat. 62:

. BENDER,
t
l
l
e
I

lbs: - 3w

1?, M . Q33. (TFGJN'zX’UwAaQ

,

i
l
l

5...”...

.

.

.

.

717, 1949.
FINK, M.; GREEN, M., and BENDER, M. 13.:
The face-hand test as a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome, Neurology 2:46,

.

r

1952.
JAFFE, J., and BENDER, M. B.:

Perceptual
patterns during recovery from general anesthesia, J. Neurol., Neurosurg. a Psychiat.
14:316,1951.
COHN, R., and Rum-:5, G. N.: On certain
aspects of the sensory organization of the
human brain: A study in rostral dominance
as determined by ipsilateral simultaneous
stimulation. Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 74:162,
1949. COHN, R.: On certain aspects of the
sensory organization of the human brain:
II. A study of rostral dominance in children,
Neurology 1:119, 1951.
GREEN, M., FINK, M., and BENDER, M. 3.:
Order of dominance in cutaneous perception.
Tr. Am. Neurol. A. In press.
JAFFB, 1., and BBNDER, M. 8.: The factor of
symmetry in the perception of two simultaneous cutaneous stimuli, Brain 75: part 2,
167-176, 1952.
,

.

l

..

.-

.-—-....

-~..—....-

__..

‘me—M

.

Mums—can

7—.

.

�PERCENT

OF GROUP

ERRORS

MAKING
03

U"

mo

O

_
m

u
ZCmeD

A
m

OT:

m
ﬁnch?

u
m

o........v..m.o

.

_i

2% (be; /C1{»c {ram

62'

(2»
,

—

x?

"55"” 512/

p

i

M1144};

ZI“:.Y&amp;A‘4

6A.,

1M (.4:

V7

“"'

c

/ d4

A

[7

5‘" r’,'.

:e

7§~&lt;1

593%“

75/075

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2344">
                <text>Perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli in normal children. Neurology. 1953 Jan; 3(1): 27-34. And, Spinal Fluid Findings Following Cerebral Angiography.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2345">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2346">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-8-012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2347">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2348">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Bender, Morris B.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2349">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2350">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2351">
                <text>8 items. 1: Reprint from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, January, 1953, Vol.3, No.1. Read at the fourth annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Louis-ville, Kentucky, April 24. 2: [preprint] and graph. 3: Monthly Neurological Research Seminar, Nov. 27, 1951, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City. 4: Report of Activities. 5: 2 items - Spinal Fluid Findings Following Cerebral Angiography; Reprint from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, February, 1953, Vol. 3, N0. 2 AND [preprint]. 6: Presentation at the Fourth Annual Meeting - American Academy of Neurology - April 24, 1952, Lousiville; presented to Dr. Costello, members, and guests of the Academy. 7: Xerox of Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli in Normal Children.  8: graph.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2352">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2353">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74437">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80998">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87559">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94120">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="236" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="27">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/cda4311bdad6b67d755b69d80816976c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2b63fbc4853cb463227378ec92424d29</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100653">
                    <text>[Reprinted from THE

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, Vol. 117, No. 1,

Jan. 1953]

PERCEPTION OF SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI
BY MENTALLY DEFECTIVE SUB]ECTS*1'
MAX FINK, M.D.;t

MARTIN A. GREEN, M.D.§
AND

MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.
In studiesof the perception of two tactile stimuli applied simultaneously, it has been demonstrated that patients with diffuse brain
dysfunction make errors. They persist in making errors either in re—
porting only one of the stimuli (extinction) or in mislocalizing one or
both stimuli (displacement). When errors are made in simultaneous
stimulation of face and hand (the face—hand test) (I), the errors are
in the recognition of the stimulus applied to the hand. The percept in
the cheek is correctly reported. This “face-dominance” is apparent on
initial test trials of normal adults. Similar results have been obtained
in tests of young children.
Children under the age of six years respond to simultaneous tactile
tests almost with the same frequency of errors as do patients with dif—
use brain dysfunction. With these facts before us, it soon became ap—
parent that mental age was a factor in the perceptual response. There—
fore, a study of the responses of mentally retarded adults with mental
ages of young children was undertaken. Simultaneous tactile tests were
applied to a group of mentally defective patients, and three aspects
were studied: their responses to the tests; the order of dominance; and
the relation, if any, to standard psychometric tests.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD

Fifty—seven mentally retarded adults from the wards of

Letchworth
Village, New York were examined. They ranged in chronological age
from 13 to 41, and in mental age from two years, six months to nine
‘From the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University College
of Medicine and the Neurologic Service of Bellevue and the Mount Sinai Hospital,

New York.
fRead before the Seventh Annual Convention and Scientiﬁc Program, Society of
Biological Psychiatry, Atlantic City, May 11, 1952.
IThis work aided in part by a Fellowship from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis.
§Post—Doctorate Fellowship, United States Public Health Service. Work aided, in
part, by a Grand—in—Aid #MH-139 from the United State Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health.

[43]

�Max Fink, Martin A. Green, and Morris B. Bender

44

years, eight months. The ﬁgures for mental ages were those recorded
in hospital records reflecting performance on Stanford—Binet tests; and
in each instance, the most recent estimate was used.

RESPONSES TO SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE TESTS
ON INITIAL AND SUBsEQUENT TRIALS
FACE-HAND TEST
100
odul‘l’s wifh orqanic
------------ .. mental sqndrome

0O
RESPONSES

oO
\l O

DOMINANT

01

O

a!

O

adult-mentally
defective

§O
FACE

PERCENT

N0!

00

..

0

0O

2

3

4

adult-normal
5

6

7

TRIAL NUMBER

8

9

10

showing responses to simultaneous tactile tests on initial and subsequent trials of the face-hand test in adults with organic mental syndrome, normal
children of three to six years, mentally defective adults, and normal adults.
FIG. I.—-Graph

The subject was asked to close his eyes. Following this, he was
simultaneously touched on the right cheek and the dorsum of the
left hand. The examiner asked: “What did you feel?” If there was no
response, the examiner said “Did you feel me touch you” and “Point
to the place Where I touched you.” After this test the subject was again
asked to close his eyes and the left cheek and left hand were stimu—
lated, and the reports recorded. Subsequent tests included stimulation
of left cheek and right hand, right cheek and hand, both cheeks, and
both hands. This sequence of six trials was then repeated so that a
total of 12 tests involving the cheek and hand combinations were

carried out.
Subsequently, tests of other body parts, as hand—foot, cheek—shoulder,
thigh—foot, shoulder—thigh, cheek—foot, and shoulder—hand were intro—
duced—four trials of each asymmetric combination and one trial each
of the symmetric body parts. The entire sequence of tactile tests was
completed with a repetition of trials of the face-hand test.

�Perception of Tactile Stimuli by Mental Patient:

45

RESULTS

On the initial trial, 98 percent of mentally retarded subjects reported the stimuli incorrectly. Eighty percent reported the face percept
only, omitting the percept to the hand, a type of sensory extinctionﬁ“
The remainder localized the face percept correctly, but mislocalized
the second percept to the opposite check, a type of
sensory displace—
ment. No subjects reported the stimulus to the hand alone or mislocalized the cheek stimulus to the hand. These
responses are expressions of “face dominance.”
Face dominance was also apparent on subsequent trials of the facehand test. Fifty percent of the subjects failed to localize the two stimuli
correctly during the ﬁrst ten trials. They repeatedly failed to report
the hand stimulus or repeatedly mislocalized it. The phenomenon of
extinction was manifest in all subjects; while in 46 percent, displace—
ment of percepts were also reported. A smaller number (38 percent)
showed perseveration of responses, i.e., reported previous stimuli even
though new stimuli had been applied to different parts of the body.
The phenomenon of allesthesia (mislocalization of a stimulus across
the midline to the opposite side of the body) (2) was occasionally
observed. Only one patient demonstrated exosomesthesia (the displacement into extrapersonal space) (3).
Half of the subjects succeeded in localizing and identifying the two
stimuli during the initial ten trials. Their ability to localize the stimuli
in the face—hand tests was carried over in the subsequent testing of
other body parts. A few subjects, however, after correctly identifying
the stimuli of the face-hand tests, made occasional errors during the
testing of other body parts. These errors were almost exclusively in a
failure to report one of the stimuli; neither displacement or
perservera—
tion was manifest.
In all subjects simultaneous stimulation of homologous regions,
e.g.,
cheek-cheek, or hand—hand, were interspersed throughout the testing.
Errors were infrequent on such tests, even in those subjects who made
persistent errors on stimulation of asymmetric regions, e.g., cheekhand. Such errors were observed in 15 subjects (26 percent) but only
on occasions were the errors in a pattern as seen in a patient with a
hemisensory syndrome due to a focal cerebral lesion.
Relation to Mental Age—There was a deﬁnite relation between
the incidence of persistent errors and the mental
age of the subjects.
Table I presents subjects grouped according to mental age (as determined by standard Stanford—Binet testing) and their responses to
simultaneous tactile tests. It will be noted that there is a gradual fall

*For convenience in writing we will call this type of response under conditions of
double simultaneous stimulation extinction.

�Max Fink, Martin A. Green, and Morris B. Bender

46

in the incidence of persistent errors on simultaneous tactile tests as
mental age increases.
TABLE
Mental Age Group
(year—month)

I

No. of
Subjects

Persistent
Errors

By 10 Trials

10
10
10
12

10

0

2-6 to 3—11
4—0 to 4—11
5—0 to 5—11
6—0 to 6—11
7—0 to 7—11
8—0 to 9-6

Correct

7

3
6

4
5
2

11

4

7

9
3

1

Relation of Body Parts—During the initial ten trials, face dominance was manifest in all subjects. In the subsequent tests of other
body parts, additional patterns of “dominance” appeared. This was
represented in the subject’s inability to identify and localize one of the
stimuli or to mislocalize one percept in the direction of the second
stimulus. As already intimated previously, the locus of the stimulus
which is correctly reported is said to be “dominant.” In tests of cheek
and shoulder, and cheek and foot, face dominance was observed (Table
II). In tests of foot and hand, and shoulder and hand, both foot and
shoulder are dominant over the hand. In the relationship of thigh and
foot, and shoulder and thigh, both foot and shoulder are dominant over
the thigh.
TABLE

II.——RESPONSES ON MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE
57 MENTALLY DEFECTIVE SUBJECTS

Total No.
of Tests in
All Patients

TESTS IN

.M
Body Combination”

FACE—hand
FACE—foot

576
163

FACE-Shoulder

184

SHOULDER—thigh

170

SHOULDER-hand

151

FOOT—thigh

170

FOOT—hand

231

Incorrect
Responses

Correct

Responses

face

or hand

face and hand

face

or

foot

face and foot

315

36

face
64

9

9

or shoulder
15

252

128

face and shoulder
105

shoulder or thigh

shoulder and thigh

shoulder or hand

shoulder and hand

45

12

63

3

foot
42

foot
58

or thigh
1

7

or hand
33

113
85

foot and thigh
11 1

foot and hand
140

*Capitalized letters (under Body Combination) indicate dominant part as
manifest by t—test value of 5 percent or less.
The differences in the incidence of errors in diﬂ’erent body combinations are
largely due to the order of testing and the factor of learning.

�Perception of Tactile Stimuli by Mental Patients

47

DISCUSSION

These results when compared with those obtained in previous ex—
periments show that there is a striking similarity in the performances
of patients with organic mental syndrome due to diffuse cerebral disease or dysfunction (4a), to normal children below the age of seven
years and to mental defective adults with a low mental age. The
similarity lies in the types of responses, the persistence of errors, and
in the order of dominance.
Extinction and displacement phenomena are frequent in all three
groups. The responses are apparent on the initial and on subsequent
trials. In addition, allesthesia and exosomesthesia are occasionally ob;
served.
The subjects in each group manifest an inability to identify and
localize asymmetric stimuli, that is, cheek and hand. Symmetric Stimuli,
however, as stimuli applied to both hands, are well localized, even by
the most mentally retarded subjects, by patients with severe brain dvsfunction, and by the youngest normal child.
In every group the errors of localization persist through many trials
of simultaneous tactile tests. The subjects are unable to localize the
two Stimuli despite verbal clues offered by the examiner, such as asking
whether there had been another Stimulus. The errors are present even
when the subjects are tested with eyes open. The persistence of errors
on repeated trials in the mentally deﬁcient adult, in the patients with
mental changes, and in normal young children is in marked contrast
to the ease with which normal adults correctly localize and identify
the stimuli. The performances of these subjects are illustrated in the
graph (Fig. I) which compares the percentage of errors during the
initial ten trials of the face-hand test. It should be noted that the curve
for the mentally defective adults includes 15 subjects who have a men—
tal age of seven or more years (Table I). This will account for the
curve being below that of normal children whose average mental age
was rarely above seven years.
Furthermore, the order of dominance observed in mentally re—
tarded subjects is similar to that reported for patients with organic
mental changes (4b). Face dominance is seen in all subjects, while the
hand dominance is hardly manifest. The other body parts are between
these limits.
As in patients with organic mental changes or very young children
one may be inclined to explain the inability of the retarded adults to
localize the two Stimuli as due to “confusion” or “inattention.” Such
an explanation is unwarranted because these subjects can perceive and
localize symmetric Stimuli and the errors are not haphazard. The

�48

Max Fink, Martin A. Green, and Morris B. Bender

errors show in a pattern so that almost all errors are in stimuli to the
hand and none in stimuli to the face. Furthermore, this pattern persists in tests of other body areas and is similar to patterns described for
other groups of subjects (5).
A comparison of the observations in normal young children and
in the mentally retarded adults reveals a striking similarity in perform—
ances when the mental ages of each group are compared. In both
groups, there is a change in performance about the mental age of six
years. It may be concluded that the face-hand test reﬂects the same
performance ability as the Stanford—Binet test. The face—hand test has
validity as a convenient approximation of performance above and
below a mental age of seven years.
SUMMARY

The face—hand test and simultaneous tactile tests of other body
parts were applied to 57 mentally defective adults. Their chronologic
ages ranged from 13 to 41 years and their mental ages as determined
by Stanford—Binet testing ranged from two years, six months to nine
years, eight months.
On the initial trial 98 percent failed to localize both stimuli and on
subsequent trials 50 percent made persistent errors beyond the tenth
trial. The errors were made in stimuli to the hand whereas stimuli to
the face were correctly reported. Extinction, displacement, allesthesia,
and exosomesthesia were observed. These performances of the mentally defective adult to the face-hand test are strikingly similar to the
responses of patients with diffuse brain disease and of normal children

of six years or less.
Furthermore, there is a deﬁnite relation between the persistence
of errors and the mental age of the subject. It is concluded that the
face—hand test reﬂects the same performance as the Stanford—Binet and
has validity as an approximation of performance above and below the
mental age of seven years.
REFERENCES
Bender, M. B., Fink, M. and Green, M.: Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests
of face and hand. Arch. Neural. &amp;' P5ycl1iat., 66: 355, Sept. 1951.
2. Bender, M. B. and Nathanson, M.: Patterns in allesthesia and their relation to
disorder of body scheme and other sensory phenomena. Arch. Neural. 6' P5yc/zz'at.,
64: 501, October, 1950.
3. Shapiro, M. F., Fink, M. and Bender, M. B.: Exosomesthesia or the phenomenon
of displacement into extra—personal space. Arc/2. Neural. é‘r Psychiat. (in press).
4. (a) Pink, M., Green, M. and Bender, M. B.: The face—hand test as a diagnostic
sign of organic mental syndrome. Neurology, 2: 46, Jan. 1952.
1.

�Patients
Mental
Stimuli
by
Tactile
of
Perception

49

in
cutaneous
dominance
of
order
The
B.:
M.
and
Bender,
M.
M.,
Fink,
(b) Green,
perception. Trans. Amer. Neural. Assam, 74: 1952.
in
Extinction
phenomena
W.:
A.
and
Schappell,
F.
M.
5. Bender, M. B., Shapiro,
hemiplegia. Arch. Neurol. 6' Psychiat., 62: 717, Dec., 1949.

1150 PARK AVE,
NEW YORK 28, N. Y.

�~

a!"

hfmaulfﬁﬁg

PIIOI?IIOI

I!

0'

SIIULRAIIOUB

3-

_

«-

$555!”?
‘

“my“, 1.; -A?»

if}

iﬂcllhl ITIIULI

IIIIALEY 931301173 BUBJIB!£.*
By

In: vink, 3.»...
Ina-tin

A. Green.

_

8.3..”

and

ﬂorria

B. Bondar,

u.n.

«mach-r

r“

3'" a”
on
Collegp or undicina and tho Neurolozze service of null-vac
nouns Sinai Hospital, low York city.
‘.

.

9*!h1u vnrk aidod

a

1'

in part

for Infantilc Paralyuin.

"M";

by a

"‘"‘

"

J,

73‘;

"u f

and tho

Ftllauuhsp from the latiennl ronnunt1an
.

aﬁtPott-Dootortte Fellaunhip, Unitcd States Public ﬁbulth surviec.
Hark aided, in part. by n Grantuinind #HH~139 from the United
3t&amp;to Public ahalth Servico. National Inatitutas'ot ﬁnnlth.

�1.

In etudiee or the peroeption of

two

teetile stimuli applied

eieoiteheoueiy, it hee been denohetreted that petiente with
diffuee brain dysfunction Ink! errors. Qhey pereilt in liking.
errore either in reporting only one or the etinnii (extihetioh)
or in nielooeiieihc one or both etiwnii (diepleeeleht). when
error: ere eede in ei-aiteneoue stimulation or face and head (the
teoe~hend test) (1) the errore ere in the reoocnitidn or the
etiluiue eppiied to the head. it. peroept in the cheek it
correctly reported. This “reoe—deninanoe” ie eppereht on initial
tent triele of aerial edulte. Siniier reeuite have been obteihed
in teete or youn‘ children.
children under the ene or six yeere reepond to ei-nlteheoue
tactile teete eieoet with the eene treeuehoy or errore ee do
patients with diffuhe brain dylfunotion. Uith thete flute before’
on, it eoon beoene apperent thet eentei esp wee e rector in the
peroeptuei reepohee. Therefore. e study or the reeponeee or
mentally retarded eduite with mental egee or young children wee
underteken. aieoiteheoue teotiie teete were eppiied to e group or
mentally detective petiente. end three eepeote were studied: their
reepoheee to the tests; the order or doeinenee: end the reletion,
it eny. to standard peyohdletrio teete.

am no me neateily
on!

Pitty~eeven

reterded eduite from the werde or

Letohworth Viilege, lew York were examined. whey ranged in chronologioei ego from 13 to #1. end in wentei use from two yeereueix
nonthe to nine veers-eight nohthe. The figuree tor'uehtei eaee were
thoee recorded in hoeoitei record: reflecting pertoreenoe on
stenrord~nihet teete; end ih.eeoh instance, themeoet recent eetinete

“I “I'd

e

�its

subsoot sss'ssksd to class his oyss. Following this
ho sss sinultsnsously touched on tho right ohsok sod tho dorsal
of tho loft hsno. rho oxsninor asked: ”tht did you tool?" If

thsro uss no response. tho oxssinor sskod "Did you tool as touoh
you'.snd-“?oint to the plans shore I touchsd you." Aftsr this
tsst the subjsot sss sgsin sokod to class his syss sod tho lsrt
ohssk.snd loft hsnd stisulotsd, sud tho rsports rooordsd.
subssQusnt

tssts inoludsd stmsulstion of lsrt

ohssk and right hsno,
right ohosk sud hsad, both chooks,snd both bonds. This ssquonoo

or six trials sss than rspsstsd so thst a totsl or 12 tssts
involving the chuck; Ind hand ounbinstions ssrs carried out.
Subsequsntly, tosts or other body ports, on hsod~root,
ohssk-shouldsr. thigh-toot, shouldsr-thigh. ohook~£oot, and
shouldorvhsnd sore introduced ~ four trials or osoh ssyulstrio
oosbinstion sad on: trisl esoh of tho symmetric body parts. tho
ontirs musnos or mum tssts
omlcm with s rspstition
or trisls of the tsoo~hsnd test.

m

assault:
0n

ths'initisl trisl,

98! of nontslly rotsrdod subjects

roportsd tho stinuli inoorrsotly. light: psr osnt rsportsd tbs
fsos porospt only, omitting the psroopt to ths hand, a typo or
ssnsory sxtiuotion.’ so. rssnindor looslissd tbs tsos psrospt
oorrsotly, but mislooslisod tho second poroopt to tbs opposits
chock, s type of sensory displsosssnt. It subJsots roportsd tbs
stimulus to tbs hand olom or nialoosliud musk stimulus to the

Fla'Ior doﬁ§3nisnos in writing so will osll this

typo or rssponso

undsr conditions or double simultaneous stimulation as extinction.
RID

Pl;

�3._

are unprbtnionn or “race dunintnoa."
tact dulinnnn- an: also apparent on subuognlat triuln of
rib: flacuhnnd tent. titty per cent at eh. handouts failed to
lootliue the two stimuli oorrtetly during the firﬂt ten trillu.
1hr! rupoatediy thilod to vaport tn. hand atinulun or repoatedly
nialoetlized it. 15h: phenomenan at extinction was manifest in all
lubaoatsg while in forty~six per cont, displuocunnt or poroupta
I've alto reportad. A smaller number (335) shorad perceverutien
or runponlon; i.e.,_ri§;r§od previous stiuuli even though now
stimuli had hc¢n~aapli¢d ta different part: of thn hady. The
phenomenon of cilanthnniu (miulooalisntian of a stimulus across
th. nialinn to the opposite 3140 at tho body) (3) was ooaaaiannlly
obnorved. Only out phtiant dauonutrltod oxotaneutheuia (the
dinplaooaonz into extra-pornonnl npaeo) (3).
all! or the number or nubjoota uncooeaed in localising and
identifying the two stimuli Grins the initial ton trinlu. Their
nhility to 1033113. the Itimuli in tho thee—hand tents una carried
over in thn auhnoquont testing or other body parts. A for Inbaoetn,
amour, actor aomctly identifying m5. sen-mu at the hem-hand
haiku. made oaacaiennl errata during the testing or other body parts.
ihole errors ﬂute tlnmut again-ivoly in a failure to roport one ork‘
the stimuli . mum displacement of ”mat-tum Ion unite“.
In all subject. sinultanoaul Itiunlation or hauologoun ii
rngienl. 0.5. aher-ohnck, or hand*hnnd. wort intoruporled
throughout the touting. 3mm mm infrequent on men tutu, «ms
in those subject: who and. periisuont error. on neinulction at
hand.

Ehunu annponnou

asymmetric regions,

0.3. chairman.

fifteen subjects (26!) but only

Mowers were chums!

on occasions ware

in

thc error: in a

�#.

pattern as toga in

t pttiont

with n honiuoanory syndrnna dun ta 3

tonal cornbral Ionian.
Relation to at."

definite relation betunen thu 1nc1denoo or perintent 0mm and thc maul m or the subarea. run- I mount.
.ubjootnerupod acaardins to nantul net (at dateruined by utcndard
There wan a

Stanfordwauant to:t1ns) and their respanaoa to ainultannaua tactile
be noted that there in sauna;
in the
tutu.” It

an

insidonon or porozatcnt errors.on Innultnnaou:

unul m 1mnnﬁn.
mam.

m am

m;

an

tactilo test.

an

th-

"$33“

$233.1.

1o

0

14:

7

3

93313:“

f

(yrnrdnanthn)

to 3-11
Mo to Mn
5-0 to 5~11

10
10

I

5

6.0 ta 6~11
1-0 to 7.41

12

5

7

11

a

9

8-0 to 9-6‘

I

1

3

2-»6

‘

nolntion of 3352 Pitts! During the initinl ton trials, faae daninnan.
was manifest in 311 lubjoata. In the subsequent tent: or ather body
parka. ndditionnl pattcrnn of "dominance” appeared. This wt:
ruprnutnzod 1n the aubjeot's inability to identity and localize on.
of an. utiuuli or to niulooalitn on: poroept in an. dirlotion or thﬁ
Ionand Itinulua.' As already intimated previoutly eh: Lyon: 0: the
stimulus which in correctly reported 1: natd ta be ”daminanc". In

tent: at

check and shoulder. and cheek and

fact, face

dominance was

�5’

obcurvod (Elblc

II). In toot:

both root and thauldcr

at tnxgn

It.

to tho hand. in.tho rulatzonnh39
thigh. both too: and shoulder are

dominant
and shoulder and

root,
daninnnt to tho thigh.
and

or toot and hind. and shoulder and hand.

‘

BL! 11

alsronsna

O! NHLEIPLE 81IULEARIGUS 2ACTILI TESTS
BBFIGEIVI sunqsces

retal
£25: 6nnb1nnt10n'

lumber
of Toot. in

Incorrect

All Patient:

lACI~hnnd

576

'Acl»foot

163

{AGE-shoulder

184

‘

8300LDIR~thigh

170

alonlﬂll¢hnnd

151

Factuthigh

170

toetuhnnd

231

I!

57

NBNEALLY

Carroct

Duo.
315

or

Rand

Rosaenaou
Paco 1nd Band

Fan.

or

loot

taco and root

Faee

or Shouldor

Rougonaol

36

252

9

128

9

Face and Shoulder
105

15

shoulder and Thigh

shouldcr or

ﬁnish

Shouldcr or

Hand
3

Shouldgg and 33nd

#5
63

12

‘

113

Font

or

fhigh

root and Thigh

Foot

ar

Hand

Foot and 81nd

#2

»

(under Body cambination)

letterI/indtoatc dominant part
*g;pltalilod
63‘ 10.3

17

33

111

1&amp;0

as manxregt by t~toae va1ue of

differenaei in tho incidence of errors in airfarent body combination:
is largely duo to the order of talking and the factor or lcarning.

Ema

I

../

�6,
amacuggxggg

inane reunite when compared with thoae attained in previous
experiments then that there in e striking similarity in the per-

patient: with organic mental

tn diffuee
cerebral disease or dysfunction (23). normal children below the
use of seven yeere end mental defective adults with e low mental
age. The similarity lien in.the type: of reapeneee. the pernietenee
5: errors, and in the order of dominance.
Extinction end diepleeenent phenanenn are frequent in all
three groupe. Ibo responses are apparent on the initial end an
Isabeeeuent triele. In addition, allettheeia and exonemeetheeie are
formeneee of

syndrome due

I

oeellioneily obeerved..

the eubJeote in each group unifeet an inability to identity
Ind leeelile lay-nettle stimuli. thet is, cheek and hand. Symmetrie
ntinnii. however, at etinuli applied to both hands, are well

the most nanny named subjects. by patients
with very severe brain dysfunction and by the younspnt annual child.
In every group the errors or localizatien persist through
many trial. of simultaneous teetiie tests. The subject: are unable
ta lonelise the two Itinuli despite verbal clues uttered by the
whether there had mu another etinuiuu.
owner. each
The errors are present even when the subjects are tented with eyes
upon. The pertietenee of error: on repeated trial: in the mentally
deficient eéuit, in the patient: with mental chance: and in annual
young children it in marked contrast to the ease with which harnei
adults correctly iooeiise and identify the stimuli. The per~
tornnneee or these tubaecte are illustrated in the graph which

ieeeiised, even

by

u mam

_

�7:.
compare.

their our cent error: during the initial ton trials

of

It

Ihould be noted that the curve for the
nontally deroctivo adult. includes 15-Iub1003! who have a mental
age or 7 or more yuart, (see~!able I). rhia will account for,
tho curve being below that or honnal children whose average mental
tho race-hand tout.

age was

rarely above-7 yearn.

Further-coo, tho order or conihahce observed in aoutally
rotardcd subjects ia similar to that reported for pationta with
organic nohtal chahuoa (at). Pace dominance in poem in all
aubjeota, while thh hind dominance la hardly annifeat. The other
body part. are tetuecn theaa linita.
A: in patientc with organic tental chancea'or very young
children one nay be inclined to explain the inability or the
retarded adults to localine the two utiauli aa due to ”confusion”
or "inattention." such an explanation in unnarranhcd hecanaa these
subject. can perceive and localite Ion-atria Itinnli and the errata
are not haphaaard. The errors shoe in a pattern to that clncut all
emu are in stimuli to the hand and none in stimuli to the race.
rurtheraore, this pattern per-iota in tecta or other body areaa

la similar to patterns daaoribod for other group: of athects (2).
A comparison of the ohcervaticna in normal young children
and in tho mentally retarded adult. reveal: a striking ainilarity
in perforntnoet than the mental age: or each group are oomparcd. In
both groupa, there in a chahgc in pcrtor-ahcc about tho mental age
or six soars. It may be concluded that the race-hand teat reflecta
and

the same performance ability an the stanrood~nihot tent. tho
race~hahd tent has validity ac a convenient approxmuation at per»
formance above and below a mental age of seven yearn.

�8.

tout and tinnitunnnu: tactila tact. or nth-r body
part: unto Ipplioa to 57 noatnlly narcotivc adults. Qatar
chronological asst runcpd from.13 to #1 start and taut: anntal
yourn-é month.
1303 as dotcrldnld by stanrord~nanot touting rangpd Iran a
The facauhnnd

,to 9 yearauﬁnonthlp

Eris} 9&amp;§.tlilod to 1903118. both act-“11
and an oubuogupne grin}: 50! and. persistent error. hoynnd can
0n

tbs

131%151

trial. 1h. errors ﬂit! lid. in Itlluli to en. hind whovotl
'auumu so. the has am ”metal: "parka. ‘xxtmouon, dinpnomnt,
touch

.

allalﬁhosia and oerquIthnuin wort obocrvod. ihnlo parrot-anac0: tbs Inntally detoetivo'aault to an; tacoohand tent at. utrakxngly
similar tn the response: of puttcntn with dztruto brain agnonua and
of normal children I59 :1: 13:23 or loan.
rurthnmnaao, thorn in a dotinihn rclation botuoon tho p02—
uittcnno of utter: and tbs anneal as. at tho aubJoot. It 1: con~
gludnd thnt tn. floc-hnnd touﬁ rotloots ch. sane pgttarllnno as tho
senatord~31unt and has validity as tumgpprnximntion or performance
V

above and below

tn. acntal an!

or seven yours.

�mung

9.
‘

3.3., rm, I. and «am, Ila rue-m 1n nonunion
mm.
1n nimltmeouo tent: or race and hand. ArchJomlJnnzohnt.

1.

ﬁg, 355-352.

809%... 1951.

14., am, II. and mm, mm: The raeomand tut u
an,
a. diagnostic up) or organic mental undress. Inna-019g, g;

‘6“58;

m,

JW
ll... um, I.

1952'

and

cutaneous perception.

m,
Mn..mx-.lourol.unoou
H.3J

The

-

order of

in
denim
195:.

7k:

11.3. and summon, HA utter-nu 1n alluthuu
mm,
than relation to diaerdor or body when and 0th»

and

unset-i 950.
gs: 501615, October,
SEAPIRO, ILL, 21m, 14. and mum, 14.8.: nouns-thou: or
the plum-anon of dilpllomnt into ours—personal snot.
phenomena.

Atheurothghiut. ,

Archmoumhhrqrohut. (in

m, ILL,

.5.

December, 1919.

)

Vi crib ./
7

{(12%

3!!“‘130,

NJ.

{aha-noun. 1:: 11031910311.

'

pan)

and WRAPPELL, AMA

Minot“!!!

Arch.murol.&amp;Pazch1at.. ﬁg; 717-3724.

�1%
1139:. 1.

Graph gnawing runponnou

tugs:

ta ninultuniaua tantilo

on in1t1a1 5nd subocquant

trials

of tho
in adults with organic mental

faoe‘hand test
‘ayndrunn. normal children. age 3~6 yonrt.

mantally defective adults and normal adults.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2354">
                <text>Perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli by mentally defective subjects. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1953 Jan; 117(1): 43-9.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2355">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2356">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-9-013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2357">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2358">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Green, Martin A.; Bender, Morris B.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2359">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2360">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2361">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, Vol. 117, No.1, Jan.1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2362">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2363">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74438">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80999">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87560">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94121">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="237" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="28">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/7defb938ce2262c49752d69a21de6f6d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5a753824ca2576c05cbbf0c478051e0c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100654">
                    <text>Spinal Fluid Findings
Following Cerebral Angiography
Joseph, M. Stein, M.D. and Max Fink, M.D.

WITH increasing use of cerebral angiography, the problem arose as to Whether

the procedure, of itself, produced changes in the cerebrospinal ﬂuid. Forty—
eight hours after angiography a spinal ﬂuid examination in a patient suspected
of a brain tumor revealed a cloudy ﬂuid with 3,000 white blood cells per
cu. mm. Prior to angiography the ﬂuid had been clear, colorless and without
any cells. As, no information concerning the relationship of pleocytosis to
angiography was available, it was decided to study the changes in the spinal
ﬂuid by the usual clinical methods.
Spinal ﬂuids from 21 patients were examined prior to and following angiography. Lumbar punctures prior to angiography were done at various intervals, but all punctures following angiography were performed between 12
and 24 hours after the procedure. In each instance the spinal ﬂuid was exam—
ined for color, cell count and total protein content.
All angiograms were percutaneous, using 35 per cent Diodrast as the contrast medium. Maximal Diodrast volume was 70 ml. at one procedure. While
the majority of patients were subjected to unilateral carotid punctures, bi—
lateral punctures were done in four, and combined bilateral carotid and ver—
tebral punctures in one patient. Either intravenous Pentothal (14 cases) or
local procaine (seven cases) anesthesia was used.
RESULTS

Of the 21 subjects, significant changes in the spinal ﬂuid following angiography were seen in only two cases. In one, a patient with a cerebral an—
giomatous malformation and multiple aneurysms, 5,000 red blood cells per
cu. mm. were seen in a pink spinal ﬂuid. In the second, a patient with a
chromophobe adenoma of the pituitary gland, the protein content of the spinal
ﬂuid changed from 89 to 151 mg. per cent; also, seven lymphocytes per cu. mm.
were recorded when previously there had been none.
In all other subjects, changes in color, protein content and cell count were
not signiﬁcant. Three subjects showed transient hemiparesis following an—
From the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of Medicine and the neurologic service (third division) and psychiatric division, Bellevue Hospital, New York City.
Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, February, 1953, Vol. 3, No. 2

137

�NE UROLOGY

138

giography, and in none of these were there signiﬁcant changes in the spinal
ﬂuid. Since Diodrast can cause changes in membrane permeability,1 and the
spinal ﬂuid reﬂects such changes, it could be postulated that a relationship
between complications following angiography and changes in the spinal ﬂuid
might exist. Such changes were not demonstrated in the present cases. F urther investigations with more exacting techniques for protein determination
and protein differentiation are indicated.
CONCLUﬁONS

Neither a marked pleocytosis nor a marked increase in protein content of
the spinal ﬂuid are usual concomitants of Diodrast angiography. It may be
concluded that when such spinal ﬂuid changes are found they are unrelated
to the procedure.
REFERENCE
1. OLSSON,

0.: Cerebral angiography: Toler-

ance for contrast media of diodrast type,

J. Neurol., Neurosurg.,
1949.

6c

Psych, 12:312,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2364">
                <text>Spinal fluid findings following cerebral angiography. Neurology. 1953 Feb; 3(2): 137-8.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2365">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2366">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-10-014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2367">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2368">
                <text>Stein, Joseph M.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2369">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2370">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2371">
                <text>Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, February, 1953, Vol.3, No.2</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2372">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2373">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74439">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81000">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87561">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94122">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="238" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="29">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/7e92065b94f7b6d5425d61aa477e6ec4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e45a9c50dfd09b37a641b179b46ee31a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100655">
                    <text>ABSENCE OF A PARENT AS A
SPECIFIC FACTOR DETERMINING
CHOICE OF NEUROSIS

Preliminary Study
SIDNEY TARACHOW,

MD.1 and MAXIMILIAN FINK, MD.2
New York, N. 'Y.

Psychoanalytic experience has made important contributions to
the problem of the differential etiology of various neuroses, psychoses, and character disturbances. This has been accomplished
chieﬂy by the identiﬁcation of the decisive areas of conﬂict in the
patient. Among the factors involved are the nature of the instincts
in the conﬂict, the time of the decisive conﬂict, the intensity of the
frustrations or traumata, the availability of substitute gratiﬁcations, and the characteristics of the historical situation (Fenichel,
1).

It

is difﬁcult to evaluate the speciﬁcity of any one of these

factors in the choice of a particular neurosis. Recent investigations
tend to show that while a particular neurosis may apparently be
an expression of conﬂict at a certain level of development, nevertheless experiences at some earlier or previous level may produce
tendencies which provoke, potentiate or distort conﬂicts of a subsequent period of development.
With increasing psychoanalytic knowledge, the task of isolating
concrete factors inﬂuencing speciﬁc choice of neurosis becomes
ever more difﬁcult. It becomes even more difﬁcult if one attempts
to assess the intangible factor of ego strength of an individual in
his struggle to control and express his various instincts or his
attempts to fashion defenses or character traits. Nevertheless, it
1Attending Psychiatrist, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N.
2 Fellow in Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
67

Y.

�68

TARACHOW—FINK

should be possible to ﬁnd a way of approaching mental operations
in a systematic way which would lead in the direction of solving
the problem of speciﬁcity of choice of neurosis.
In seeking a systematic way to solve this problem, it occurred
to us that perhaps certain elements in the external historical
situation might lend themselves more easily to the preliminary
steps of such a search. If a certain external historical situation were
isolated and studied, perhaps it could be correlated with certain
invariable psychic consequences. Freud (2) made such an observation when he noted that men who have weak or absent fathers
tend to develop homosexual trends.
The external historical factor we selected was the presence or
absence of both parents during the important developmental years
of the child. We decided to investigate the relation of this external
factor to the success or failure of the resolution of ambivalent
feelings, the ability to fuse the instincts of love and hate. For reasons to be noted we selected hysteria and obsessive-compulsive
neurosis as the clinical expressions of the success or failure of the
fusion.
We then set up the following hypothetical basis for this study
and made a tentative prediction of the data to be discovered. A
child brought up by both parents will solve the problem of resolu—
tion of ambivalent feelings more satisfactorily than a child who
has lost one parent for any signiﬁcant period of time. A child
facing only one parent does not have both his love and his hatred
equally and freely available to be directed to the parent. If he
loves the single parent the hate will tend to be repressed, and vice
versa. A child with both parents, on the other hand, has two
objects against whom both sides of the ambivalence can be directed in turn. He can hate one and love the other, or the opposite.
Two objects give the child much more liberty than one. This
freedom would not hinder resolution of ambivalence, but rather
facilitate it. He would have all his feelings relatively more available to him in comparison to the child with one parent. When the
time arrives for the necessary fusion of feelings for more mature
relationships the child who had had both parents is in a better
position. Both sides of the ambivalence having been available, the
fusion is more complete and normal. The other child, having
relatively only one side of the ambivalence available, never succeeds

�CHOICE OF NEUROSIS

69

in fusing his ambivalent feelings and remains with a burden of
one-sidedly more repressed and defused instinctual feeling.
According to our hypothesis the child who had two parents and
had succeeded in fusing his feelings would tend to develop hysteria, if he developed a neurosis. The other child would tend to
develop obsessive compulsive neurosis. This follows from the
familiar psychoanalytic formulations of defused ambivalence in
the compulsive neurosis and the fused genital level of feeling in
hysteria. This hypothesis was tested by consulting the case material from Hillside Hospital. We searched for clearly deﬁned
cases of each category and studied the incidence of absence, death
or loss of one parent for any reason whatever. Only clear-cut cases
were used. All mixed and intermediate syndromes were eliminated,
as were phobias and anxiety states.
Sixty-one records have so far been found suitable: of these,
twenty-seven were patients with conversion hysteria and thirty-four
with compulsive-obsessive neurosis. Separation from a
parent was deﬁned as the absence of a parent for periods exceeding one
year
before the child’s ﬁfteenth year of age. Note was made of the time
of the separation, the reason, the duration, and the
age of onset
of the neurotic symptoms.
Of the twenty-seven patients with conversion hysteria, three
(11%) were subjected to periods of separation. In each the separation
occurred between the ages of ﬁve and nine; in two by death and
in one by emigration. In the latter the period of separation was
of six years’ duration.
Of the thirty-four patients with obsessive-compulsive neurosis,
ﬁfteen (44%) suffered extended periods of separation. Nine occurred
between the ages of ﬁve and nine, four before the age of ﬁve, and
one each at thirteen and ﬁfteen. Separation was caused by death in
nine subjects, hospitalization in three, and emigration in three. In the
latter the separation lasted from one to three years, during the
child’s age of three to seven years. In four subjects there were
double separations. In one subject there was hospitalization of a
parent for a year, return home as an invalid for two years and
then death. In three other subjects there was death of one
parent
and illness of the other at another time in the child’s life. In all
instances the parental loss occurred before the clinical onset of
neurotic symptoms.

�70

TARACHOW—FINK

These data point in the same direction as the hypothesis suggested, namely, that loss of a parent tends to increase the difﬁculties
of solving the problem of ambivalence.3 So many other factors
enter into the situation that we would limit ourselves to the conclusion that these ﬁndings warrant further study of the suggested
correlation.
Other studies of parental deprivation have taken a somewhat
different direction. Oltman et al. (5) studied the difference in rate
of parental deprivation, comparing various psychoses with neuroses. They found that the incidence of loss of a parent did not
vary in schizophrenia and manic-depressive psychosis from their
control group, while psychoneuroses were higher. Their control
group was State Hospital personnel, with 32 per cent deprivation.
Psychoses showed 34 per cent and the neurotic subjects 49 per
cent. The psychoneurotic group was not diagnostically further
differentiated. Madow and Hardy (4), in a study of clinic population in the Army, found parental deprivation by death in 36 per
cent of the neurotics. They used as a control, life insurance statistical tables which indicated an 11 to 15 per cent incidence of
parent loss before the age of sixteen. A third study (3) of a student
health clinic population in a State University indicated that 31
loss
of
neurotic
the
cent
through
subjects
reported
parent
per
death, while only 131/2 per cent of the controls (normal students)
did. None of these workers were searching for the factors we are,
and there is no breakdown into the various neurotic categories.
These observations cannot be used comparatively with our speciﬁc
point in mind. In general the data from the literature indicate
that the incidence of parent loss is greater in neurotic subjects
than in psychotic and control groups, although the various control
groups show a lack of uniformity. Our own subjects taken as
a group (this excludes many mixed neuroses, phobics and anxiety
states) show an average incidence of parent loss of 30 per cent.
The incidence in the obsessional neurotic is higher than in the
cited controls, while in hysteria it coincides with the lower percentages of the controls.
Apart from the subtleties of the psychodynamic processes which
this study overlooks there are also gross difﬁculties in evaluating
3Chi square was calculated as 6.32 which is signiﬁcant at the .01-.02 level.
The chi square was corrected for continuity by Yates’ method.

�CHOICE OF NEUROSIS

71

the statistics. First of all, the sampling is small. This will be
remedied as the study continues. No other study differentiated
among the neuroses, and diagnostic criteria probably vary from
one institution to another.
This study can be reﬁned and develoPed in a number of directions. The dynamics with reference to the separation could be
explored. The presence or absence of parental surrogates should
be looked into. Other factors of separation such as deafness or
blindness or parent’s going out to work must all be considered.
SUMMARY

A hypothesis was formulated stating that unresolved ambivalence (instinct defusion) may be related to the absence of one
parent during the critical formative years. It was tentatively predicted that obsessive-compulsive neurosis (illustrative of instinct
defusion) would therefore show a high rate of parental deprivation and that hysteria (illustrative of instinct fusion) would show
a low rate. The actual data were: thirty-four cases of obsessive-compulsive neurosis showed 44 per cent of parental loss: twenty-seven
cases of hysteria showed 11 per cent parental loss. We consider this
at least a provocative difference. Even though many intrapsychic
factors enter into the problem of unresolved ambivalence, these
data warrant further study along these and related lines.
REFERENCES

(l) Fenichel, 0.: The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis. New York: W. W.
Norton 8: Co., 1945.
:2(2) Freud, S.: Three Contributions to the Theory of Sex. In The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud. New York: Modern Library, 1938.
(3) Ingham, H. V.: A Statistical Study of Family Relationships in
Psychoneurosis. Am. J. Psychiat., 106:91-98, 1949.
(4) Madow, L. and Hardy, S. E.: Incidence and Analysis of the Broken
Family
in the Background of Neurosis. Am. J. 0rthopsychiat., 17:521-528. 1947.
(5) Oltman, J. E., McGarry, J. J., and Friedman, 8.: Parental Deprivation and
the “Broken Home” in Dementia Praecox and Other Mental Disorders, Am. J. Psychiat., 1082685-694, 1952.

�Reprinted from
JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
Volume II, Number 2

April, 1953

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2374">
                <text>A statistical study of a psychoanalytic hypothesis: absence of a parent as a specific factor determining choice of neurosis. Journal of the Hillside Hospital, 2: 67-71, 1953.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2375">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2376">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-11-015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2377">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2378">
                <text>Tarachow, Sidney; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2379">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2380">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2381">
                <text>Reprinted from JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL Volume II, Number 2 April, 1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2382">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2383">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74440">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81001">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87562">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94123">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="239" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="30">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/ee9acc31c3d43280c2889e28c2a5cbdf.pdf</src>
        <authentication>bf2464ff0c5b85a41fb05f4bcfd6dfb6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100656">
                    <text>Inlnary tor All
(—1143

.

turner 0’ Ilill'lﬂﬁﬂﬁ IA‘IIIHIhTI 6' Pllﬁlpilﬂﬂ
In: #13:. u.n.. Horton lathnnsoa. I¢E., villi: a. nits-an, I‘D.
tad Harris

I.

laudmr,

l.n.

ottoat at antravuaona barbiturutu an tbs parcnptxen
of Itltlpl. saunltunoauu antantoun atmnuli In. obsnrvud in lawn.
groupa o: nor-s1 subjectt. puttantu with Iiitﬂlt and lawn! our.»
bani 41:051., tptlul word 10-103. and psychoconic disordqu.
Itch in. attain-d hetero and utter the :10! idltltltrtm
ties of 2 1/25 uulution of Indian snytsl tn dost: o: 3‘15 to 6.50
an. to nyatusnnu. slurred upcoah, ‘ttxza and drauaantsu upponrcd,
The

haltnd tun simulttunoua tacit}. tints war. :9plind. 2h: assaincr ntunltaanounty tauahnd tn. lubjout In two
plaacs - such ll tn. abbot and tho hand - and tutti his ta p.9ort
that wt: ialt* ib3t§ tart rupaatnd with Vtrtoul boa: «ouhtlltiens.
tad thu report: rueardod. It» ottcnts a! median atrial on Indul1:30: 0th.: than touch ‘Qf. sane inronttgntcd.
In :11 labJoctn Indian ‘Iﬂt‘l etuuod arrow. in tin par~
caption a! tbs uisnltaaaaﬁn stimuli. Ibrﬂtl nuhjoats taunt tun
tnxxuaact e1 tn. barbiturate trcqauntly rcportod only «In at tho
two stinnlt (onttantton); a. ., tn tho acubtnutton at £30. and
hand only the stimulus to tat tnao was royortud. It‘s. trrarn
into tt3nsannt :nd tlnntuntod during tho parted a! «was :atton.

tn. indoetlan

was

31.11:: bohavtar van untod

£3

»»1¢, duproauian.

paticntniv1th paychoanatu dtnovdurn

schisophrnntu)¢

-

1 u

�In puttoats with acrobrnl disease, uaytul brought out
anioets ant privaoualy appaiunt or oxnguuruttd oxinttng .113:
of 63:1uautioa. In this group tun orrnru U‘t. not. pronounced,
porstntcd tor lessor porleds, ind abound 1's: tluatuttlon thﬁn
:3 ch. nor-n13. 1h 9&amp;ttontc with~£oanl carohrul dlﬂitit with
00:50:: daftots continua to any urea at thn body. anytaz brought
out utter: which var. ant apparcnm ova: vith Ixnnltnanou: test:
Ind 1t daftnnd tort nightly tho oxtnnt of tho teaser: disturbanco.
Qttiuntn with diffuse aorubrul dyntuantion rho pruvtounly
and. no orroru on atuultnnnoun tnatllo tautg, lhﬂﬂid rcpoatod
Otters a: cxttnntton tug diuplnecnnnt as both 314.: at tn. body
utter anal: dalos o: a-wtal. Pntxonts who angina uxtinattan or
displgoonnnt prior to tha anytnl pertornod attiarantly sitar tin
drug tn: xtvcn. Errata heath» nypnrnnt in body part: which print
to tho naytnl ‘DIO rupartad oarruatly. Furthnr-oru, tho phannuoa:
o: oxouounuthnsia (displaoalant to astrupﬁrnoall apnea), allcun
than (duplwmnt to tho «man. an)
«mom»
son: (incenplntc apailatcrsl displneoaunt) var. also ovidont. In
‘11 pationta with orgnnio unatll uyndron. tn. duration at tho
porcoptuul otter: ‘3: troqunntly 1033.: than the OUOrt 31.3; of
drug sattan. Th. porcuptuﬁl ahtﬂlhi lustod lancer thin in noruul

m mt»:

“suchctu attor stutznr downs tad var. norc canntstcat.
:3 10310:. of tho aptnal nard, tho scanary dl£octn banal!
not. ;ppnront: cutinntion could ho clxaitod «var : mutant unit
and tho 1.?!1 at sonnet: 4.103: bouts» not. ﬂittinct. In two

�inntsnoOI. hounvur, t prsvtounly duturnlnod tensor: 1:!31 could
not be olinltod :ttur tho anytul.
In tout. o: othor century functions, nystncuun on datcct
torvnrd can. In: ‘holiuhod during the potion at drug n¢tten, tad
ch. concomitsat vxlutl disturbunncn (blurring and oaalllopllu)

use

unwed. suzmu, ”that: an tiuitm «mm a

shelttton
uanll

d1.1:ution of this syupton nttor tho insection at
of unytul.

ow

downs

val thorn ta ultor tho porcupttoa
a! ntuult¢nooun tacttln stimuli in all nubjoots. Thar. was an
nltaratson in annnrtl paracptutl tauntian as wall as th. 19¢t1~
laud porutptunl luantlout. ’laistzng nonuary dyltuactiau its
oumutod with the ”actuation of «not: not previously mm at.
it... slt-tntxonn 1n porecption var. 31.11:: to thou. lollowtax
prolonsud unsuthnutn er cloctrolhuck thortpv. Intrsvonoun barw
bituruto any to a «metal tdaunat in oltattin; or oxnggnrutlnc
nournl dystunottun. that. routtnn nuanzaatiou yield: equivocal

53553513

rumults.

Xutruvonoau unytul

�\V‘

“I

'

Reprinted from

TRANSACTIONS
AMERICAN NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
1953

NEIIRIIPHYSIIILIIEY LABZ’IIA'TII'W’

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS, N. Y.

EFFECT OF INTRAVENOUS BARBITURATE ON PERCEPTION
MAX FINK

MORTON NATHANSON
PHILIP S. BERGMAN
AND

MORRIS B. BENDER
NEW YORK

The effect of intravenous barbiturate on the perception of multiple
simultaneous cutaneous stimuli was observed in large groups of normal
subjects, patients with diffuse and focal cerebral disease, spinal cord lesions
and psychogenic disorders.
Each was examined before and after the slow administration of 2% per
cent solution of sodium amytal in doses of 0.15 to 0.50 Gm. As nystagmus,
slurred speech, ataxia and drowsiness appeared, the injection was halted
and simultaneous tactile tests were applied. The examiner simultaneously
touched the subject in two places—such as the cheek and the hand—and
asked him to report what was felt. Tests were repeated with various body
combinations, and the reports recorded. The effects of sodium amytal on
modalities other than touch were also investigated.
In all subjects sodium amytal caused errors in the perception of the
simultaneous stimuli. Normal subjects under the inﬂuence of the barbiturate
frequently reported only one of the two stimuli (extinction) ; e.g., in the
combination of face and hand only the stimulus to the face was reported.
These errors were transient and ﬂuctuated during the period of drug action.
Similar behavior was noted in patients with psychogenic disorders (psychoneurosis, depression, schizophrenia).
In patients with cerebral disease, amytal brought out defects not previ—
ously apparent or exaggerated existing signs of dysfunction. In this group
the errors were more pronounced, persisted for longer periods, and showed
less ﬂuctuation than in the normals. In patients with focal cerebral disease
with sensory defects conﬁned to one area'of the body, amytal brought out
errors which were not apparent even with simultaneous tests and it deﬁned
more clearly the extent of the sensory disturbance.
Patients with diffuse cerebral dysfunction who previously made no
errors on simultaneous tactile tests, showed repeated errors of extinction
and displacement on both sides of the body after small doses of amytal.
Patients who showed extinction or displacement prior to the amytal per—
formed differently after the drug was given. Errors became apparent in
body parts which prior to the amytal were reported correctly. Furthermore,
the phenomena of exosomesthesia (displacement to extrapersonal space),
allesthesia (displacement to the opposite side) and partial displacement

.

244

5’)

«L

I

�Fishman—Intracranial Pressure

245

(incomplete ipsilateral displacement) were also evident. In all patients with
organic mental syndrome the duration of the perceptual errors was frequently longer than the Overt signs of drug action. The perceptual changes
lasted longer than in normal subjects after similar doses and were more
consistent.
In lesions of the spinal cord, the sensory defects became more apparent;
extinction could be elicited over a larger area and the level of sensory defect
became more distinct. In two instances, however, a previously determined
sensory level could not be elicited after the amytal.
In tests of other sensory functions, nystagmus on direct forward gaze
was abolished during the period of drug action, and the concomitant visual
disturbances (blurring and oscillopsia) also disappeared. Similarly, patients
with tinnitus reported an abolition or diminution of this symptom after the
injection of small doses of amytal.
Summary: Intravenous amytal was shown to alter the perception of
simultaneous tactile stimuli in all subjects. There was an alteration in general perceptual function as well as the localized perceptual functions. Existing sensory dysfunction was exaggerated with the production of defects
not previously apparent. These alterations in perception were similar to
those following prolonged anesthesia or electroshock therapy. Intravenous
barbiturate may be a useful adjunct in eliciting or exaggerating neural
dysfunction, where routine examination yields equivocal results.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2384">
                <text>Effect of intravenous barbiturate on perception. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1953; 3(78th Meeting): 244-5. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2385">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2386">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-12-016</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2387">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2388">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Nathanson, Morton; Bergman, Philip S.; Bender, Morris B.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2389">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2390">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2391">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprinted from Transactions American Neurological Association.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2392">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2393">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74441">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81002">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87563">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94124">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="241" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="32">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/ec4cf1a3f19d135cdae9a13c9adf5bf5.pdf</src>
        <authentication>067f3d4f0480ecc6b50bb9561e8d4277</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100658">
                    <text>Standardization of the
Face-Hand Test
Martin

A. Green, M.D.

and Max Fin/z, M.D.

the face-hand test, has been introduced in previous studies and the responses of normal subjects and of patients with
psychiatric disorders described in detail?“ The test consists of applying touch
or pinprick stimuli simultaneously to the face and hand while the subject’s
eyes are closed. The subject is then asked to describe and to localize the
percepts. Two general types of responses occur. The two stimuli may be perceived and localized correctly, or the subject may perceive only one stimulus
and either not perceive the other (phenomenon of extinction) or mislocalize
the second stimulus (phenomenon of displacement).7 Most often the mis—
localization or displacement occurs to another part of the subject’s body, but
occasionally there is displacement into extrapersonal space or onto the examiner (exosomesthesia).R Displacement of stimuli across the midline of the
body (allesthesia) may also occur.”
Normal adults show errors in perception on the initial trials of the facehand test. Characteristically these errors consist of extinction of the stimulus
to the hand whereas the face stimulus is perceived correctly (phenomenon
of face dominance). As tests are repeated the errors disappear so that by the
tenth trial nearly all subjects correctly perceive both stimuli and then continue to be correct on subsequent trials. This type of response has been termed
a “negative face-hand test.” It occurs not only with normal adults but also in
patients with schizophrenia, depression, or severe anxiety.
In contrast, patients with an organic mental syndrome show extinction and
displacement after ten trials of testing or as long as testing is continued. Such
a response is termed a “positive face-hand test.” A “positive face-hand test”
is also manifested by normal children, normal aged
persons, and mental
defectives.
Because of the differential response of these several groups of subjects, the
face-hand test has become useful clinically in detecting the presence of organic
brain disease. During the course of our studies, however, it has been noted
that patients with an organic mental syndrome vary greatly in the type and
A SIMPLE PERCEPTUAL TEST,

From the department of neurology of the
Mount Sinai Hospital and the Hillside Hos—
pital, New York City.

This work was aided in part by fellowships
from the United States Public Health Serv—
ice (Dr. Green) and the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (Dr. Fink).

Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, March 1954, Vol. 4, No. 3

211

�NEUROLOGY

21:2

frequency of perceptual errors. Also, subjects without organic brain disease
occasionally manifest a positive face—hand test. The questions which arise
from these observations are: 1) Is it possible to classify or standardize the
different types of errors occurring in subjects with a positive face-hand test?
2) Is there a correlation between the types of responses and different groups
of subjects? 3) Is there a type of response which can be said to occur only
in patients with severe disease of the brain? The present study is an attempt
to answer these questions.
IVIETHOD AND RESULTS

Previous records of the face-hand test were reviewed for almost 1,000 patients with organic mental syndrome, normal adults, and schizophrenic adults,
as well as lesser numbers of normal children, normal aged persons, and sub—
jects with mental deﬁciency, depression, and severe anxiety. Additional groups
of some of these subjects were also tested in a systematic manner with dif—
ferent types of stimuli. The criteria used to formulate a standardization of
the face—hand test were: 1) type of perceptual error; 2) frequency of various
errors with different stimuli (touch, rubbing or scratching, and pinprick);
3) effect on the frequency of errors when the subject observes the application
of stimuli (factor of attention). Fifteen to 30 trials of the test were usually
done for each subject.
TABLE

1

FEATURES OF POSITIVE FACE-HAND TESTS
(Persistent errors after 10th trial)
One—plus

Extinction
only with
touch stimuli.

Two-plus
Extinction
with touch,
rubbing, and
pinprick stimuli.
Occasional dis—
placement with
touch stimuli.

Three-plus
Extinction and
displacement
with touch, rubbing, and pinprick
stimuli.

F our—plus
Same as three-plus with at least
one of the following features:
a) exosomesthesia,
b) allesthesia,
C) frequent perseveration,
d) occurrence of errors while
subject watches the stimuli

being applied.

Based on these criteria, it was possible to divide patients showing a posi—
tive face-hand test into four groups. The characteristic responses for each
group are summarized in table 1. These responses with examples are described more fully in the following paragraphs.
One-plus face-hand test: Subjects in this group show errors only of extinction and not of displacement. These errors occur only with touch stimuli.
When pinprick is used, both stimuli are perceived correctly, although errors
will again appear when touch stimuli are reintroduced.

Case 1.—A 64 year old man with mild diabetes was admitted with a history of difficulty in walking for the previous year and a half. For at least the same period of time
he had been depressed, slept and ate poorly, and was impotent. The only neurologic ﬁnding was a slow, hesitant, shufﬂing gait. There was no evidence of peripheral vascular disease. The patient appeared depressed, showed psychomotor retardation, and cried readily.
The sensorium was intact. Spinal fluid, electroencephalogram, and roentgenograms of

�STANDARDIZATION OF FACE—HAND TEST

213

the spine were normal. The diagnosis was involutional psychosis, depressed type. The
gait difﬁculties were thought to be secondary to the depression.
This patient showed a one-plus response on the face-hand test. A sample of his

responses follows:

Stimulus
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick
touch
touch

Location

right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand
right cheek—left cheek
right hand—left hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand
right cheek-right hand
left cheek—left hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand

Response
right cheek
left cheek
right cheek
left cheek
correct
correct
right cheek
correct
correct
right cheek
left cheek
correct
correct
correct
correct
correct
left cheek

Type of error
extinction
extinction
extinction
extinction
extinction
extinction
extinction

extinction

Comment: Although this type of response occurs in patients with cerebral
disease, it is not always characteristic for this group. It is also observed in
patients with depression, as this case illustrates, and may occur in anxiety
states, schizophrenia, and, occasionally, in normal adults.
T wo-plus face—hand test: In this group extinction occurs with pinprick
and rubbing stimuli as well as with touch stimuli. These errors may be just
as frequent with both types of stimuli or may be more conspicuous with touch
than with pinprick or rubbing. Displacement is not present, as a rule, but
may occur on an occasional trial.
Case 2.—A 72 year old man had a ﬁve week history of mental and behavioral changes.
These consisted of disorientation, confused behavior, and intermittent mutism. Examination showed an organic mental syndrome characterized by partial disorientation, defects in
recent memory, evasions and circumlocutions in answering questions, denial of illness, and
pain asymbolia. There were no other neurologic disabilities. The spinal ﬂuid, electroencephalogram, and skull roentgenograms were normal. A pneumoencephalogram showed
an increased amount of air over the cerebrum and increase in the size of the ventricles.
This patient’s responses on the face-hand test characterize the two-plus type of response. A sample of these responses follows:
Stimulus
Location
Response
Type of error
touch
left cheek—right hand
left cheek
extinction
touch
extinction
right cheek—left hand
right cheek
left cheek—left hand
touch
left cheek
extinction
touch
extinction
right cheek—right hand
right cheek
touch
correct
right cheek—left cheek
touch
correct
right hand—left hand
touch
extinction
right cheek
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
left cheek
extinction
pinprick

�214

NE UROLOGY

Stimulus

pinprick
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick

Location.

right cheek—left hand
left cheek—left hand
right cheek—right hand
left cheek—right hand

Response
correct
left cheek
right cheek
left cheek

Type of error
extinction
extinction
extinction

Comment: This response occurs most often in patients with cerebral dis—
ease, although occasionally patients with anxiety states, depression, or schizophrenia may also exhibit it. It is not seen in normal adults.
Three-plus face-hand test: This group is characterized by the occurrence
of displacement as well as extinction with both touch and pinprick stimuli.
The frequency of extinction and displacement may be equal or unequal and,
likewise, the number of errors with touch and pinprick will be variable.
Case 8.——A 57 year old chronic alcoholic was found in the street in a stuporous condition. His breath had an alcoholic odor and there was a laceration over his right forehead.
There were no focal neurologic signs. During the ﬁrst hospital day the patient gradually
became fully conscious. Speech was rambling and at times almost incoherent. He was
completely disoriented and had severe memory defects with confabulation. He expressed
paranoid ideas and was hostile and assaultive. There were no hallucinations. Spinal ﬂuid
and skull roentgenograms were normal. The diagnosis was acute and chronic alcoholism
with deterioration.
A sample of this patient’s
responses on the face-hand test, indicative of a three-plus
response, follows:

Stimulus
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick

Location
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek-right hand
left cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek-left hand
right hand—left hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand

Response

right cheek-left cheek
right hand—left hand
right cheek
correct
left cheek
right cheek—left cheek
correct

right cheek—left cheek
left cheek—right cheek
right cheek
'

left cheek

Type of error
displacement
displacement
extinction
extinction
displacement

displacement
displacement
extinction
extinction

Four-plus face-hand test: This group shows the most severe perceptual
errors. In addition to frequent extinction and displacement, as seen in the
three—plus group, one or all of the following phenomena may be seen with
touch and pinprick stimuli: l) exosomesthesia; 2) allesthesia; 3) frequent
perseveration of responses; 4) occurrence of perceptual errors even while the
subject keeps his eyes open and sees the areas stimulated.
Case 4.—A 60 year old man had a three year history of disorientation, forgetfulness,
and loss of interest. On examination he showed a severe organic mental syndrome manifested by complete disorientation, marked memory defects, and inability to calculate. He
was alert and cooperative. There were no other neurologic signs. Spinal ﬂuid and skull
roentgenograms were normal. The electroencephalogram showed moderate, diffuse, bisynchronous slowing with slow alpha. A pneumoencephalogram disclosed abnormal increased amounts of air in the subarachnoid spaces overlying the cerebral cortex.
A sample of the patient’s responses, indicating a four-plus face-hand test, follows:

�STANDARDIZATION OF FACE-HAND TEST
Stimulus
touch
touch

Location

right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand

touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick

right cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand
right hand-left hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand

pinprick
( eyes open )

right cheek—left hand

Response
right cheek
left cheek—
extrapersonal space
right cheek
right cheek
correct
right cheek—left cheek
left cheek—left hand
right cheek—left cheek
left cheek
right cheek
left cheek—
extrapersonal space

right cheek—

215
Type of error
extinction
exosomesthesia
extinction
perseveration

displacement
allesthesia
displacement
extinction
extinction
exosomesthesia
exosomesthesia

extrapersonal space

Comment: Three-plus and four-plus responses invariably indicate disease
of the brain. They are never found in normal adults or in patients with psychogenic disorders.
These responses have been occasionally seen, however, in normal children
under the age of six,4 aged persons without manifest disease of the brain,6
and mental defectives.10 The distribution of responses of children and aged
persons are related mainly to age. The youngest children and the oldest adults
show three-plus and four-plus responses. With changes in age away from
these extremes, one-plus and two-plus responses become more frequent. Of
the subjects with mental deﬁciency, those with the lowest mental age have
three-plus and four-plus responses, while one-plus and two-plus responses
predominate in subjects with higher mental ages.
Table 2 summarizes the distribution of the four different types of responses among the various groups of subjects. Only patients with an organic
mental syndrome show three-plus and four-plus responses. Such responses
may be considered diagnostic of an organic mental syndrome.
DISCUSSION

In answer to the questions raised at the outset of this paper, our results
indicate that four general types of positive face-hand tests occur and that
TABLE 2
PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY OF ONE-PLUS TO FOUR-PLUS POSITIVE FACE—HAND TEST
IN DIFFERENT GROUPS OF SUBJECTS ‘

.............
...................
Patients with anxiety states
.............
Organic mental syndrome
Normal adults (below 60 years of age)
Schizophrenic adults

Patients with psychogenic depression
(all age groups included)

.

.

.

.............

.

Negative
F-H test

Oneplus

10
99

7

nearly
all

occasional
occasional

70

22

all

nearly

l

Twoplus
25
0

Three-

plus
33
O

F ourplus
25
0

rare

never

never

rare

never

never

0

0

8

�216

NEUROLOGY

these types can be correlated with different groups of subjects (table 2).
Our attention was focused mainly on whether there was a type of response
which occurred only in patients with severe disease of the brain. All adult
subjects with a three-plus or four-plus response have organic brain disease.
Such responses are never seen in normal subjects or patients with psycho—
genic disorders, even though these groups may occasionally Show one-plus
or two-plus responses.
Patients with cerebral disease manifesting a four-plus response invariably
show the severest or most advanced form of mental changes. Otherwise there
is no good correlation between the type of positive face-hand test and the
severity of sensorial defects. Some patients with severe mental changes may
have only a two—plus response. In addition, 10 per cent of patients with an
organic mental syndrome have a negative face-hand test. It is realized that
the use of a one to four—plus nomenclature for the groups implies an increasof
because
used
This
nomenclature
of
cerebral
was
dysfunction.
degree
ing
convenience and such an implication is not intended.
This classiﬁcation of a positive face-hand test should be useful clinically.
In testing neurologic patients, the exact type of positive face—hand test should
be recorded, rather than the designation “the face-hand test was positive”
as has been done until now. Such a procedure will make it easier to judge
whether the type of positive face-hand test indicates deﬁnite cerebral disease
or whether it may be a manifestation of anxiety or depression. The use of
such a classiﬁcation will also make it easier to compare the response of patients at different times during their illness. In addition, it is valuable in clinical experimental work, for it has been applied in studies of the effects of drugs
on perception and the responses of patients to electroshock treatment. In
such studies alteration in perception can be measured by observing the duration and incidence of the variety of positive face-hand tests during the periods
of testing.
SUMMARY

A standardization of the face-hand test is presented. A positive face-hand
test is designated as one in which errors persist after the tenth trial. Four
classes of positive face-hand tests are recorded. A one-plus face-hand test
consists of extinction only with touch stimuli. A two-plus response is char-

acterized by extinction with pinprick and rubbing stimuli, as well as with
touch stimuli. A three—plus response consists of extinction and displacement
with touch, rubbing, and pinprick stimuli. A four-plus response has all the
characteristics of a three-plus response and in addition at least one of the
following features: a) exosomesthesia; b) allesthesia; c) perseveration of
observes
while
the
of
(1)
applicasubject
even
errors
occurrence
responses;
tion of the stimuli. Three-plus and four-plus responses invariably indicate
disease of the brain in subjects over the age of six years. One-plus and twoplus responses occur in patients with brain disease but are also manifested
disorders.
with
adults
and
of
normal
number
small
psychogenic
patients
a
by

�STANDARDIZATION OF FACE-HAND TEST

217

Patients with a four-plus response show the severest mental changes but the
converse is not true. There is no correlation between the severity of the mental
changes and the type of positive face-hand test manifested. Usefulness of this
classiﬁcation in the study of patients clinically and in experimental work is
suggested.
REFERENCES
1. BENDEn, M. B., FINK, M.,

and GREEN, M.:
Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of
face and hand, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 66:
355, 1951.
[O
. BENDER, M. B., and FINK,
M.: Tactile per—
ceptual tests in the differential diagnosis of
psychiatric disorders, J. Hillside Hosp. 1:21,
1952.
. FINK, M., GREEN, M., and BENDER, M. B.: The
face-hand test as diagnostic sign of disease of
the brain, Neurology 2:46, 1952.
. FINK, M., and BENDER, M. B.:
Development
of perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli in
normal children, Neurology 3:27, 1953.
. IAFFE, J., and BENDER, M. B.: Perceptual patterns following general anesthesia, ]. Neurol.,
Neurosurg. 81 Psychiat. 14:316, 1951.
6. GREEN, M. A., and BENDER, M. B.: Cutaneous

perception in the aged, Arch. Neurol. 6: Psychiat. 69:577, 1953.
The phenomenon of sensory
. BENDER, M. B.:
displacement, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 65:
607, 1951.
. SHAPIRO, M. F., FINK, M., and BENDER, M. B.:
Exosomesthesia or displacement of cutaneous
sensation into extrapersonal space, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 68:481, 1952.
9. BENDER, M. B., and NATHANSON, M.: Patterns
in allesthesia and their relation to disorder of
body scheme and other sensory phenomena,
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 64:501, 1952.
10. FINK, M., GREEN, M. A., and BENDER, M. B.:
Perception of simultaneous stimuli by mentally
defective subjects, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 117:
43, 1953.

�EIWRDIZATION

OF

m FAGEwm MT

3y

“mm

I.

‘0 “NC“,

Do

und

In: rank. n. n.

ibis tort 1;:

e
status Publia Hoalth
dation of
n‘%

'

_ﬁ{

p
9'» 1 arson) and
survioo (Br.
thy Huttonnl
‘

&lt;"

'

’

'

”

Faun-

Infantila Paralysis (Dr. Pink).
Eran an. Dognvunont or Hourology at thn noun: stnui Hospital
and tho 311

lid.

Houpitnl.

�Introduetiunt
In priviaul studies a tinplo poro‘ptuﬁl taut, uh. rnoia
hnnd ﬁast. was intradnoed and tha rbnﬁonnon bf normal anbjtetn
1nd or pationta with ptyohittrio d1noranrl w¢r¢ dglcribod 1n
dbttil (lab). Tho tout aanniuta or applying tough or pinpriok
.ltinnli nimnltnnsounly to tha tact und.hund uhilo the aubjuot‘n
ayes hr. closed. it. lubjoot in than aambd to annariba and to
lootliso thn poraapta. Two gannrul type: or roaponsol Gaunt.
who ﬁve stimuli may bu poreoivod and localized oorruotly. 0r,
thn nubjoae may piranivo only on. atiuulus and cithor*nat porn
enivo the oﬁhtr (phnnennnan at astinotian) or maniacaliaa thn
sooand stimulus (phannmnnon or diuplacaannt) (7). ﬁaét ottcn
~ﬁh¢ mislaealiuntién or diaplaéqnnnt «can»! to anathnr pirt at
tho wubjoot’s body, but oooailunally thtrn 1n dilplaaahont into
oxtrtparuonnl apnea or onto thy axmnxncr‘(axoaamolthnaia) (8).
Diﬁplgotnoht at stimuli turns: the midlino or thn body ($110.»
thosln) nu: also onenr (9).
ﬂornnl adult: show 0r§oru 1n perception.au tbs initinl
‘

r

mu.- a:

I

tho tuna-hum

4

«at. cmctcrnuaaxy than error:

sonaiut or oxxznetion of thy thinning to ﬁn; hand than... tho
raga Itimnlna is perceived aorrcotly (phcnamonon at face again,nnuo). A: thn that: arc ropoatad thy error: d£luppoar so thnt
by th. tonth trial nearly :11 subjcctu norraetly paragQﬁa both
stimuli and than oontinnu to bq corruat on tubauqunnt trigll.
This typo or roaponno has bran tonmnd a “nagativo raco~hnnd
tout.“ It ooourn not only with manual adult: but also in pttzontn

�2.

‘vith :6h1uayhruniu, dtproaaion. or savor. anxiety.
Kn contrast to tho proo¢d1ng aubjaats, pa§1nnts w1th tn
uorganio mnntnl nyndrumn aha! qxt1not1on and displnecnant Artur
10¢ tr1a1: or toating ar-II long It touting 1- continued. Such
t npupcnlc~1n‘tpnmnd u ”posit1vu {nonwhind tout." A *poaitivu
ftoo~hnnd tout" 13 claw unnLroutod by normnl uh1ldrtn, normal

ugud,p¢auann. Ind:mantnl dofoat1vol.
Bananas of thy dirforont1a1 rnlpenao of thaao aoviral
swung! at luhjoetl, an. faoo~hnnd test has banana astral ul1n~
toally 1n dataating tho prosoneo or orggn1e brain d1aoAIo.
During the court: or our stud1al, hawovor.,1t ha: boan noted
&gt;that pntiants with 1n grannie nantql syndrann Vtrylgrontly 1n
the type and traquancy or porcoptuul Grrort. Also; nﬁbjactn

I

'

without organ1o brt1n é1aoalo occasionally mnn1t¢at a pauitivc
raccuhnnd test. 1h: quantionn ﬁnish arias from that. abnorvutionn
an: 1) .1: 11'. poneiblo to elmxﬁ or mandamus an. autumn
'typu: or orrafa aouurr1ng 1n'1gbjooti v1th I panit1v§ fteowhnnd
80:12:13) In ﬁbﬁro A oorrulnt1on botuuon thb typca or roqpannol
and dirrorun1_gr¢upa or aub:¢atn?; 3) in than. a typ. or ronponno
Ih1ah can bu ugid to ocaur gal: in pitiﬁntl v1th_nav¢ro 61301:et uh. bra1n? the proncnt Itﬁdy is an uttqipt to ‘nalur than.
questionapv

I.

04
1

d B!

‘

t

lb roviornﬁ our provleus record: gt

‘

1h! tuna-hand

103%

in nlmnat 1000 pat1onta with organic mnntnl syndroma, normal adults, and Inhiaoyhrohia adults. an wall an in longer numdam.

born of normal.ohildrun, normal 130d porlena, and ambient: with

�3.

m.nt:1ld¢rieigncy. dnprnaulon and lottrn anxiuty. Additional
stamp! of menu of than. uubjcotl taro 31-0 toatna in a lyutmm—
gtic mannar'viﬁh ﬁlrtoront typaa of stimuli. The aritoria
ulna to fonmultt. a Itandnrdixntion or the raaouhrnd tout wire;
1) typo of poraoptunl

2) frnQunney of various arrays
(touch, rubbing at nergtehing. and p1n~'

crrnr:

airroront stimuli
prick): 3) offset on thy troguoney or orroru vh¢n tho cubjoet
noes tha appliantion at tho I§1IM11 (taotcr or dttcntien).
Firtaon to thirty tritla at tho tait wuro naually done for
wiﬁh

Onah

cubjoet.

«

criterig,

it in:

possiblo to divida pa §
tianti sharing a positive ftoomhnha tqst into {our group:.
Th» oharaaterintie rouponnu: for etch gréup arc summarized
in Tabla I. 'ThoIoAroapann g with oxnmplo; art angeribad morn
fully in tho {allowing par‘grapha.
Based an.thnUO

Fuataruu a: Ponitzvo~nuac-aana’roatn

_(vors1£tont prrorn attdr 10t§ ﬁriil)

W

1
M."
Situation

Extinction

W

Wm»
1

am
plan

mt1not1on

with tough, und dinpltéo—
anly with
tauah stimuli rubbing. and 'mant with
P181314“
touch, rubbing
stimuli.
,tnd pinpriak
occasionul
stimuli
41: laocmant
Ii tauah

‘

u)oxolamauthsaiu

b)nllaathsai‘

‘

,

nttmuli.

a: thug...

with n:
loaat can or uh.
following {autumn

‘

o)trnquont porn¢v~
«ration
d)qc¢urr¢nen of

errors while

just watch»:

sub~

ithmuli buing
nppliod.

uh?

�h.
gnoePlgn.Fheoen§gd Tout:

Tho

subjects in thia group

that error: only at Ixtinatioh and not at displahanant. Thou.
errata oaour only with tauoh stimuli. Whon pinpriak is usod.
both utinnli up. poruoivoa aornootly, although arrhra will
agnhn appatr lhln touhh stimuli urn rhihtroduaod.
Gun. 1:

tad with

3

A

6h your aid huh with mild dinhotpl pus t6n1ﬁ*

xi your hiltary a! dittiaulty in walking. Fbr at

I... patina 0: than hm had boon dnprogacd, alnpe
.and ht. pearly. and It. impatanﬁ. 'Tho only unurologiaul finding
was t slow, halitant, nhurfllng shit. Thor» was nh ovidnnn:
10am: tho

ot‘poriphortl vuioulhr dis-coo. Eh. pationt‘nppoarud doproiaod,
'IhoVGd payahanotor rotnrdutian, tnd dried handily. The non»
aorium

in: intact. Spinal fluid, slactrocnhaphulogrtm,

ertys at

tho spin. ward normal;

who

tional psychoazu. dopranlod type.
hheught to he sccahdnry to

thi

diagnosis In: involuu

The

gait difficultiau tar.

dnpronhion.

_

this patient thalcd l anonpluaerIpanlﬁ
tout. A sample at his ruxponaaa follows:

on tho tau-«hand

‘

‘

Stimulus gggatiog
touch
right ohnak*lott hand

’

wypg

of

ﬁgugcns;
ﬁrrar
right shook: axeinotion
hoxtinntion
10ft shack

tough

loft chock-right

touah'

right ehaokwright hand right

South

10ft annex—loft hand

touch

right ohhak~lnrt ahock earnest»
aerroet
right handwlott hand
right ohsaknloft hand right dhaok

tauah
touch

and

hand

Int:

chagh
about»

uxtinotioh
cxtinotion

'

extinction

�5.

lart ahnak~r1ght hand
left «human 2mm

tauah
touch
touch

right

man

101“:

pinpriok

pinyrick
pinprl ck
pinprick
touoh&gt;

entrust
eon-cot.

riwt

aha-ehwrigﬁ hand

mud“: hand

right absoknlort-hand
lore dh¢ek»right hand
right nhotkwright hand
1am; ehcokdgft ma‘
right «haiknlgrt hund

wt ”chock-avian: hum

loft

.

~

chock
check

axnination
«attraction

aorrooh

correct
garnet“

«may

‘

aorroot

1st: abut:

.munctxm
ggggggﬁ; Althnugh thia typc or.rcnpanno aoaﬁra in patiwntl

teach

aorabrnl diuaano, 1t 1: not dlway: entruatcvistie for
this group. It is Also abhcrvué‘tn patiunts Iiﬁhéaprolaion,

wiﬁh

:

thlg anal illuitratas}
aehisoﬁhranin, and. ocassiénally,'1n nunnnl a¢ulta;
P; V,Eh.0+H Id ’rt In this graup axtinction ooeurt
Iiﬁh pinpriek nag rubbing stimuli a: lull én‘vith taudh #tim»
all. than; arrora mgy ha junﬁ an froqugnt with baﬁh.typta at
stimuli er may be met. conspiauouj\vith-tauah‘ﬁhnn with pinﬁ
prick or'rubbinga Biapluaunnnt 1; not yrbsnntg an a rule.
and may occur xn anxioty at§t¢t,

an

&amp;

7

L

,

but

may

auour on

Case

1!: '1

tn,aoedligna1 téinls
72

year o;d

man

had a 5

'

.

WIOK

history of

anneal and bahnxioral;ohangoae Eben. ganniatcd ar'éiaor10n~
tatian. confused bdhnviar. and intarldtéant muslin; On oxnmp
inntion thara Inn gn organic mnntql lyndran. charactarisod
by partial dinoriontation. 60:00:: in ruannt unwary, OthianI

�Z~g‘

s7”!

ind otteumloauhlann 1n annu¢r1ng quastians, daninl or 1113..“j
and pain uuynhoiit. Thar. var. no oﬁhor nunrolagioal dilw
mutton. mo spin-.1 mum. olootraonaaphuagm. and “all
xnrnys Ibru ndrmal. A pnauﬁooneaphalognmn unusua'un 1n¢ro.nad
«ﬂaunt of air ovor uh. aorobrum and inaroaaa in tha 3110 at
tha ventricles.
was: pat1¢nt§a raaﬁonloa'on tho tuco-hugd taut untran-

torls.

tho tvaapgul typa at ruaponao.

spannon

taller:

samplc of thnsc raw

A

\

a

‘

3352395;

Tg£;o;t

_“§au¢h

aggntgan
1.x: abnohuright hand

10ft «hack

axﬁinotian

tcudh

right ahaak~1at£ hnnd

right

thinstion

'

3tg55;un

left

r.t§ugna

tbuah V.
tough
touch
toudh

’

right
right
right
right

enaok~1a;m hand

‘”
'

unsurpright hana

din:k-1.ft-ahodk
hundnlurt hand
«hookvlhft hand

lgtt

ahnuk

Oxtlnntinn
right chnub extinction‘
about

«errant
eorruat

'

pinpriek

loft ghostwright hand

right chock wyxtinstian
1.1: chuck oxtinctian

pinpriok
ptnprick
pinpriok
pinprlok

right ahcokalort hand

oorreat

1.x: ehaakwlort ngna
right chant~r1ght hand

lart

'

oxtinutidn
oxtinctian
10ft chick cxtinotion
1¢ft ahhek~right hind
adamant: Thin ruaponaa eocuru mast urban 1n pntianta
with cornbrul 6119110 altheugh oncasianally ptt£¢ntl with
anxigty itibﬂlp dnprossion or duhinophronia naq'alto cxhibit
it. It in not soon in nounnl ndulta.
ahﬂak
right ehnok

�0‘:

75

gaggovgggg §33A~§g§§ ruAtt

IhAA

by thy ooaurrunco of diApLAeanAnt

bath touch

And

pinprick atzmuli.

group

wall

AA

who

And displaoumanm

1A

chArAatAriAAd

Axtinction with
frAquAnoy of extinction
AA

,

any bA’Aqual cr unsquAl And. likAAiAA, Aha
number 0: errors Aibh touch And pinpriak'will bu AArAAbIA.
6139

III:

strict in

the

holia odor
There

AArA

hoapital

ntuporoun oundition.

A

And thArA

AAA

thA pAtiAnt

rumbling And

caaplataly diacriuntod
gnnfahulation.

31A brAAth hAd an Alena

HA

3 lAAArAtion

gradually bAoAAA fully oonaaioun.
At tihnn Alnolt inoohArAnt. EA AAA.

And had AAVArA

salary

axprAAAAd pArAnoid idAAA

and

A3AAA1§1VA._ whArA
Aura

And

Akull X-rAJA

AArA

nanmAl.

Th. diAgnosil

Asamplq of thin pAtiAnt'a
A

tout. indiactivo or
giggyggg

saw.

A

ggaation

my“ dunk-daft hand

.

touch

loft

touch

right

touch

urt chum-hrs hAnd

Quota-wright ham.
'

mamm hum!

touch

right aha-kaloft

uhAARArxsht hAnd
hAnd

loft

hoatilo

III aunt.

fluid
and

taco-hand

fallow-t

right abuzz-

‘

with

EpiuAl

T§£§ogf

333223;;

'

lnft

AAA AAA

rAAponAAA on Ah.

thrAAapluA rauponsa,

touch

dAtAAtA

no hAllueihAtianA.

.Ahronie ALedholium with anteriorAhion.
”

found in

AAA

ovor his right torAhAAd.
no fooAl nnurologieAl signs. During uh. tirut

AAy

SpAAAh WA»

57 yoAr old chrenio Alcdhalio

A

chock

‘

diuplmmnt
.

hand;mm
1cm; hum!

displaemne

right about

anemone»:

came:
lcts aback

extination

right

diaplaeAaont

loft

ahAAk~
ohAAk

�touch

right hand-10ft

pinpriak
;

pinpriak

hand

comet

right ahaok~lort hnnd A)right

left

an:

1m; chﬁokumght hand
I

pinpriak
pinpviek
Fb

'

‘

'

right

chock-«right. hand

lcrt «hank-lnrt‘hnnd
Flu;

Hand

chaokn

diaplaoamant

«bank

cheat»

right ahnek
right ohm:

lﬁtt

;

aback

displaeﬁmnnt
.

oxemauon

axtinutien

‘oat

This greup shown tho aovcrast
poréoptual arrara. In addiiion to rr$quont «xtination lné
ainplaeomnnt, an noon in thn thrno~p1us group, on. or .11 at
ﬁba

folloiing

,

with touah and pinprlak
aﬁimnli: 1) uxunanalthnninx 2) allouthoditi 3) truqnnnt pur~
agvcratian at responlttt h) tho oocurrcnnn or paranptunl arrorn
ngn-uhzid ﬁnd aubjoat kaopu hxl'cytu opan and 109: tht Irilﬂ
ﬁbenamnnn may be mean

ﬂimuntud.
Gas:

60 ycnr old man hgd a

thrai your hiatary or
disoricntution, forgatrulnnla. ‘ndVIOIl of intaraut. an axum~
1n£ti¢u h. ahawqa a 3.1.». argania mantal nyndroun
manirnqttd
by cauploto disaritnt‘tian, marked,m¢mary actuati, and inabilo
ity to atliulato. H. In: alart and cooporteivo. whore wire
no other naurological algal. Spinal fluid gnd akull Xbrnya
XVI

‘uuro manual.

A

EEG-abound

anagruto, diffuse. biaynahranoul

alaning with 110! alpha. A pneumnonnephalogrum discloscd dbnormal increasod amount: of air in th» aubnrachnoid apnea:
overlying the anrobrti eortox.
A Iamplo of tho pationt'u
rnuponuua. indicating a four.
plus tacowhnnd tott, tollavla
’

f

�95

Stimulus.

tough
touah

Typa

.

mastic»:

'

right obnokuloft

hand

19ft chnekhright hand

‘

»

of

Emu

Rcaw‘
right aback

axtinctian

left

oxosomoathoslu

:-

chatk~

oxtruporuonnl
apa¢o

tough

right thehwright

touch

loft

touch
tnunh

right handplaft hand
right ahaak~lort hand

tench

loft aback-right

pinpriak

right aback-loft

ptnpriak
pinpriek
pinpriok

10ft chookbright hand

lart

right ahookaright

right

10ft ohuak~lort h:nd

1.1% chook-

axoaanosthnaiu

pinpriek

right chopkwleft

right

oxaaamaathclia

(ayes Open)
.

r.

.

.

adamant:

1

hand

chnokwlerﬁ hand

right «hank
right cheek
torrent
right aha¢k~

qxtinetion
poraevoration
aiaplaeanant

hand

10ft chock
10ft ehaak10ft hand

allouthaslt

hand

right

displtaunant

hand

hand

10ft

ohnak~

aback
ohock

.

dho¢k

«xeraporlonal
span.
shack»

nztrtparuannl

oxtinatien

txtinctian

:pton

rhrno—plun and rouﬁwplul vniponsos

invarisbly
inninatogdinoani of thoﬁbrain. inn: 1:. nnvur fauna in normal
ﬁdults or in patiants with plyahogonin diuordgru.
I

ﬁhnaa rbaponses have bash oocasionnlly noon, howuvor, 1n

nerull childrnn undsr the as. at at; (h);

agad potions withuut
(6) had manual dnroetivna (19).

manifoat disaaso or thﬁ brain
rho diltrdbution of tha ruapanseu a! the ohildron and ugod
poruanl are rolatnd ntinly ta ago. in. yaungnnt childrun and
tho oldnlt adult. show thruo~p1u1 ind rourwplub rulponqon.

�16.
Wiﬁh

thin.

«hangs: in age away tram

untruunu, ono~plun Ind

Iroqunht. or the tubjccbs
lith.nnntal dtfiei¢nny, than. with in. lowgat annual agthavo
ﬁbroeoplun':nd teurvpluj roupannaa whila ona~plus and two91ua rcapensoa prndaminutu in nubjnota with highnr’mnntal
twowplua rulponsaa baoama mare

_

I

aguu‘

II

aummurises thn

dintribution a: tbs four different
typaa at rulpnnyeu twang tbs variau: groups or aubjoetl. Gnly
Tabln

‘pgtlonts with In argania mmntal syndrana.nhow unreguplus and
rourbplua teaponaoa. Such roapunaes may be aansidorad ditgu
nbstio or an organic unntul ayndrumn.

mm ;;
Prwqusnay or 0n¢~P1uu

to

Faun-Elna Tﬁat in Dirforant Gwoupa
nogntlvu Gaga
Pku

Organic Hantal syndruua

adult: (below
your: a: as.)

Norunl

taut

60

99%

Schizophrtnia Adult.
Patimntu with anxiety

nnarly

Patients with plyahn~

-7o%

states

,

asarly

genie dnproasian
(all age grnupa inaludad)

W!

"'

19%

Tue?

Three Paar-

Plgg‘

Plus

7%

25%

33%

25%

15

o

o

a

dooaa~

:11

Paaittvo
at Subjects

Four~P1un

P§uu

P;ul

rarg new.» navor

ionglly
oooas- ray. navar‘ novor

all

tonsil:
22%

85

o

o

,

In unavor to the questions railed in tn» introduation,
our rounltu indicnto that four gonoral typos of paaitiva

�.11.
faooahand touts occur‘gnd that than. typo: «an bo carrolatod
with airfaront greupn at aubjoats (Tablc II). Our attention
Ill fauna-d mainly on thg question cf ﬁhathar there in: a

typ. or rouponse which oeaurrod only in pubinnts with savart
4180330 of chi bra1n._ All adult subjootn with u thrionplun

.

-

or rourwplua v.3ponno haw. orgtn1o brain dictate. Suéh rua
uponaou 1:3 nave: icon in manual subjgatu er patient: with
payahogan1l disardnrn, even though than. group. any oocunlonnlly
than onnnplun or twonplua traponnnn.

'

Patigntn with atrabral dinette manifesting a four-plus
nonpango

invaritbly that tho novonast or must udvunnod foam

of mantul abungal. Othorulao thaw. in nu good aorrolat1an
botwoon thy typo at pou1tivo tiéowhand tout 1nd tho soverreyv
9f thn unhaorial daroatn. 3am: putionta with aovnro monﬁal
ahnngps may'havo

anxy;

two«p1ua vouponso.

1n

additian,

105‘

or pationtu with an orgnnIo manealinyndromn.hnvh a magazivo
faaa~hand taut, It is rhalisod that tho use of I one to taut»
plun nonnnoiutur. £6» Eh. groups umplies an inoronﬁing dagruc
or aeropral'dyatunation. This namnnslntumo van used because
of aonvonicnaa and aunh an implicition in not intended.
Th1; olauitiaatlnn af 3 poauin rues-hand test should
be useful elinioglly. 'In téuﬁing nouiologioal patients, uh.
cxaat type or positive taco-hand tout Ihauld be renordpd.
rather thtn tha datlgnation ”the tao§~haad test was positivo'

until nan. Bach a proeoduro «111 makd 1t
Judgo whatnot tha typo or poaitivo runomhand ﬁont

as has buon don.

aasiar to

indicatcs dotinita oorabrnl discus. or whnthnr
manifcptntiou at tnzitty or dapruauian.

who

it may

be c

use or much a

'

�12.

alanairication will also make it easier to ounpuio tho roayenno
or patlontl at diffcrtnt tin»: during thuir illniaa. In ad»
dition, 1t. 1. “1mm. in cumin). “perm-am work, for it

has bean aypllod in studio: or thn urfpetn otdrugn on pircaption, and tho rutponlal at pat1¢nta t6 olootrouhook truatu
want. in aueh Itudioa altnrution in pottuptian can be mat»

.

stand by abaovwing tbs duration and tho incidnnao cf thn varioty at positive tano~hnnd tests during tho period: of teating.
Sulnagz:

'

stundardizttian of tha {tonohand tout in prntontod.
A positive faoouhnnd taut
it danorihod In on. in uhiéh orrart
portint .13.: tho_tunth trial. Pour clause: of positivo tuto—
A

hdnd

teats urn racerdod.

ann~p1ua fnoo~hand

A

tott aensiaﬁl

of oxtination only with touch stimuli. A tro~plun renponso
is charuatoriaod by axt1notion with p1npr1ck und rubbing atims

uli,
ﬂ

as

‘ill

an

Iith touch

stimuli.

thrna~p1us nonponno
tontlata or oxtinoticn and displaeumont 11th tough. rubbing,
tad pinpriak stimuli. A rourbplup runyonao ha.
til tho tharhl
aotariatica of a throu~p1ul response and invadditian at least
one at thn following ronturos: a) Oxasamntthoaia; b) ulleathnlinz
A

.

c) poraovonntion af roaponnasz d) ooourrenao or errors even
whilo tha subject 8063 tbs application at the stimuli. Throo~

plus and four-plus weaponnea invaritbly indicate dinette of
tbs bra1n in subject: evor tho ago of :11 yours. 0no~plua
and trauplun roapqnaea occur

in ptt1antn with brain disnaac
amall number of normal adult: and

but are 3139 maniteathd by a
ptt1ontn with paychogonia‘diaoranrt. Patients with a faur~plul

�I
“‘"’

13l-

tho ”want maul change; but ﬂan canny“
1.8 not Ema.
morn is no corraluion human t)» unrity
of the manta), uhmgu m4 tho
or punitive: rum-hind
z'oapcmao show

taut

tn.

awaited. m unfulnbu

or this

the study at panama clinically and in

it

indicatad.

_

cluuu‘iutim in

01$“:de

work

�I
-m...‘

‘

‘

hm

W

l:

BEXEER,

‘BENDER.

in

hhn

:nd GREEK, ﬂ.:
.é.:355. 1951.

K.B.: FINE,

«option on sinnlt

2.

.

3.3.;

on: tout: of fans and hsnu.

and FINK, Hg:

airfarontill

guﬁiglgﬁdo H032.

Patterns in par»

M.

Arab.

Tactile parcoptual taata

diagnouia or payohiutriu diuordnrl.

ital.

1952.

3. FIRE. 3.: GREEHA M. and BERDER, M.B.: The faoe~hnnd test.
nign of diieasa of the bruin. yourologz‘g:
:3 dig zontio

.7.

,

FIKK, H. and.BENU£R. K.B.x

.

simmltnnnout

1327p 1953*

J“FFE'

Duvnlopmnnt

tactilu stimuli in

5' ‘nd

333933*

unsathanin.
ggggral
,3

W
md-

7.
8'.

BENDER,

a

H.B.z

SHAPIRQ. HiF0‘

BEHDER,

M.B.:

Th9 phcncmanun

PM,

.

3

«hi .‘ghzslé,

.

'Wmcx. and

nonnnl childronw agggggggz

“'B-' Pofocptunl pace-an: follavinsj.
.3 urcgﬂc

a:

,GREBH.

at pdrcqptian or

.3

entanooun‘pcroaytion 1n uh.
£29.35“. 1953»

er Ionaory diuplucunynt.

@607.

E. and

1951-

Vii-159””.

“‘8‘; Exosmnthuin

or displacannnt or outnnoonu nonnation inté axtraporaondl
upuca‘ ﬁgg§.ﬂiggo;.&amp;Pnzah15§. é§§hﬂl,‘1952.
9. ‘nﬁann, 3.5. and Hamunnaen, u.: Pattorna 1n alloltbouia
tad thair rulation to disordnr of boay sebum. and other:
scnsery phnnamann. Arah.xourol.&amp;9azehiat. ég3501, 1952.
10.
ﬂ.B¢t y.".Pt19n or
I!" GREEN, MuAu ”4
51mm tanaaua stimuli b montully aorontiva subjects.
J-nOPV‘aatnm:3; m1 3. 1953.

m.

W.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2404">
                <text>Standardization of the face-hand test. Neurology. 1954 Mar; 4(3): 211-7.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2405">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2406">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-14-018</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2407">
                <text>1954</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2408">
                <text>Green, Martin A.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2409">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2410">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2411">
                <text>[Preprint] and Reprint. Reprint from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, March 1954, Vol.4, No.3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2412">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2413">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74443">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81004">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87565">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94126">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="242" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="33">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/4092f702c20d2db606a33fb51b3082e2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>eb5e272391290df4e9e5af41a15c37b2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100659">
                    <text>THE “AMYTAL TEST” IN PATIENTS
WITH MENTAL ILLNESSl
ROBERT L. KAHN, Ph.D.,2 MAX FINK, M.D.,3
EDWIN A. WEINSTEIN, M.D.4

and

Recent studies have demonstrated the value of utilizing amytal
sodium as a diagnostic test for the presence of brain damage (9, 10,
ll) . Under the inﬂuence of this drug, certain changes in orientation
and awareness of illness occurred in patients with brain disease that
rarely appeared in persons without demonstrable brain pathology.
These changes included patterns of disorientation for place, time,
and person, and verbal denial of illness and incapacity.
In addition to disorientation and denial of illness, other changes
in verbal pattern and the nonverbal aspects of behavior occur in
both patients with brain disease and in normals.l5 All of these aspects
of behavior have contributed to an understanding of the relationship of the psychological and physiological effects of the drug and
the role of language in adaptation to stress.
Until now the normals have consisted of patients with peripheral
nerve, spinal root and cord lesions and miscellaneous medical and
surgical conditions. There has been no systematic investigation of
patients with mental illness unassociated with demonstrable brain
changes.
1From the Neurological Services of Hillside Hospital and The Mount Sinai
Hospital, New York.
This investigation was supported in part by the Medical Research and Development Board, Ofﬁce of the Surgeon-General, Department of the Army under
Contract No. DA-49-007-MD-376 and by a grant-in-aid from the Lilly Research
Laboratories.
Dr. Max Fink was aided by a fellowship from the National Foundation for
Infantile Paralysis.
2 Research Assistant, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
3 Research Director, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
4Consultant, Neuropsychiatric Division, Army Medical Service Graduate
School, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D. C.
5 Normal is used here to refer to patients without evidence of brain disease.
3

�4

KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

The purpose of this study is, by the administration of the test
to a series of patients hospitalized for mental illness, to:
(l) evaluate further the diagnostic validity of the procedure;
and
(2) compare the patterns of altered symbolic expression found
in mental patients with those shown by other groups.
METHOD

Consecutive admissions to Hillside Hospital were selected. Patients who had recently received electroshock treatment or who were
clinically disoriented were excluded. Sixty-eight interviews were
essayed: eight patients refused the test, three showed insufﬁcient
physiological effects, and one patient was grossly disoriented in the
pretest interview, leaving a total of ﬁfty-six patients who were adequately studied. No attempt has been made to classify the patients
according to clinical diagnosis, although most were considered to
have schizophrenic or depressive reactions. Thirty-four women and
twenty-two men were tested, the ages ranging from sixteen to sixtyﬁve, with a median of thirty-six years.
TEST PROCEDURE

Immediately before and during the administration of amytal
sodium, each patient was examined systematically for orientation
and awareness of illness. These questions were based on previous
observation of certain patterns of disorientation and denial observed
in patients with brain disease (6, 7) and are as follows:
What is your main trouble? Why did you come here? Where are
you now? What do you call this place? What kind of place is this?
Where is this place located? How far from here do you live? Have
you ever been in any other hospital of this name? Where were you
last night? What is today’s date? What month is this? What year is
this? What time is it now? What part of the day is it? Who am I?
Have you ever seen me before?
Along with the routine test, the patients were asked two additional questions to obtain further material for the study of patterns
of symbolic expression:
If you could have one wish what would you wish for? Can you
think of a joke?
The amytal sodium was given intravenously in a solution of 0.5

�“AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

5

gm. in 10cc. of distilled water at a rate of 0.05 gm. per minute. As
the drug was administered the patient was asked to count backwards from 100 to l. The injection was continued until the patient
showed rapid nystagmus on lateral gaze in each direction, slurred
speech, errors in counting backwards and drowsiness. These were
regarded as indicators of the physiological effects of the drug. The
total amount injected depended on the appearance of a maximal
effect of the drug. In this study the quantity given ranged from
0.2 gm. to 0.5 gm.
When the physiological action of the drug was manifest, the
patient was interviewed with the same series of questions. If an
error was made, the question was repeated immediately to determine
its persistence. Only persistent errors have been regarded as indicative of brain disease since it has been found that normal controls
may make transient mistakes (9).
RESULTS

Prior to Administration of Drug
These patients as a group showed many overt indications of fear
and distrust in the test situation. This was shown by the large
number who refused the test altogether. Some wanted to consult
their doctors or their families ﬁrst, while others were too frightened
to enter the examination room. Even among those who took the

A. Behavior

test there were numerous manifestations of distrust. Several were
reluctant to lie down—one sitting up throughout the entire procedure, one constantly keeping one foot on the ﬂoor, and several
keeping their heads raised. Many patients asked for speciﬁc details
of the test—its purpose, what drug they were getting, why they
were selected, whether this was a “truth test,” whether the results
were conﬁdential and, commonly, whether they would go to sleep
or not know what they were saying. One patient asked if he were
going to be killed. Another asked that a nurse be present. Some
patients asked us to postpone the procedure or said, “I shouldn’t
have come.” These manifestations of evasion and suspicion were
much more marked than were encountered when the test was administered to patients in general hospitals. Unlike patients with
physical diseases who usually gave as a “wish" a statement about
getting well or leaving the hospital, these patients gave many more
wishes outside the immediate situation, such as “that all men in the
universe should live in peace and harmony” or “good health for the

�6

KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

sick world,” or “my daughter should
marry a nice fellow.” Further,
there was a greater tendency for patients to answer the questions
using syntax involving the third and second person as “you might
say I had a slight nervous breakdown” or “my main trouble is my

stepmother.” Patients with physical ailments are much more apt
to limit the expression of their difﬁculties to the ﬁrst
person as “I
have diabetes.”
B. Changes in Behavior Accompanying

Amobarbital Sodium

Persistent Errors: Positive Reactions
Five of the ﬁfty-six patients showed persistent changes of behavior similiar to those found in brain disease. In a previous
report
(10) positive reactions were graded from one to four plus, depending on the number of manifestations of disorientation and denial
shown. On this basis, the ﬁve positive cases in this study showed a
one plus reaction. The test was repeated in three of these cases and
showed a persistence of the one plus result in two and a negative
result in the third. Of these ﬁve patients, three showed evidence of
brain disease by other methods of study. One, a boy of eighteen, had
a positive face-hand test (2), an abnormal EEG record, and an
elevated spinal ﬂuid protein on two occasions. Another was a case
of Parkinsonism. The third showed a
memory defect on psychological tests. One was a sixty-four-year—old man who persistently
referred to “Sydenham Hospital” while under the inﬂuence of the
drug. He had a normal EEG and no presumptive evidence of brain
disease. The other patient located the hospital in “Oakland Park”
after having placed it correctly in Glen Oaks prior to receiving the
drug. The second administration of the test in this man gave a
negative result.
1.

Transient Errors
Transient errors (i.e., errors which were either spontaneously
corrected or corrected when the question was immediately repeated)
in orientation and awareness of illness have not been regarded as
diagnostic indices of brain damage. In persons with physical incapacities, the incidence is low, having been found in 16
cent
per
of the original series of ﬁfty control subjects (9). In the
present
study, however, eighteen patients, or 32 per cent, made such errors.
These included giving the incorrect year, naming the place as “Hillside Oaks" and “Psychiatric Institute” and confabulating
having
2.

�“AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

7

been at home or in a friend’s house the night before. Some patients
used euphemisms such as “a place to help people get well,” “a place
for recuperation,” “a place to teach health to sick people,” “a
clinic,” and “the greatest hospital with the most stupendous doctors,” whereas prior to receiving the drug they had simply stated
that they were in “Hillside Hospital.” When the questions were
repeated, however, the original response was again given.

Other Alterations in Language
The use of the second or third person in response to questions
about illness and hospitalization was noted twice as frequently as
in the pre-drug interview. Another person became the subject of the
sentence or another person performed the action or became involved in an experience, whereas previously the patient had described his symptoms in the ﬁrst person. Thus the reason for
hospitalization originally given by one patient as “I was getting
worse and desperate for help” was changed to “the hospital had a
lovely reputation.” Another patient who had detailed his problems
in the ﬁrst person before receiving the drug talked about a friend
who had cancer. The change frequently took the form of concern
over the health of relatives. The wish “that I never get sick" was
changed to “I wish that my kid would stay well.” There was more
of a tendency to employ clichés as “nothing to fear but fear” and
”not for publication.” There was also more selective speciﬁcity in
answer to questions. Thus patients who had originally said that they
had come to the hospital for some illness replied that they had come
because their doctors had sent them. Other patients gave their location in a more precise way, stating for example that they were in
“a treatment room leading off the corridor.” Cryptic remarks were
occasionally given, as in the instance of the patient who, when asked
for a wish, said “If you could help me out then I wish you wouldn’t,
and if you could then I wish you would.”
These patterns were not qualitatively different from those used
by patients with physical incapacities where displacement to the
third or second person, greater speciﬁcity and selectiveness of response and increased use of clichés and slang also occur.
3.

4. Jokes

In many patients the response to the request to tell a joke seemed
to be a symbolic representation of some problem relating to illness,
hospitalization, the procedure itself or their interpersonal relations.

�KAHN ——FINK—WEIN STEIN

8

The content of these responses in relation to the illness will be
considered in a separate paper and only the pattern will be reported

here. Of ﬁfty-three patients, ﬁfteen did not respond either before
or during drug administration. Eleven patients answered by referring literally to their difﬁculties as “It would be a good joke if I
could go home,” or “The joke is my being here." Six patients used
this type of personal reference both before and during the administration of the drug, while ﬁve responded in this fashion only after
injection. Thirty-two patients gave the usual form of structured
joke, the account of the action or experience of some third person
symbolizing some aspect of the patient’s problems or motivation.
Usually patients who responded to the question in this fashion in
the pre-drug interview used the same pattern after the injection.
Seven told the same joke, while different stories were related in
ﬁfteen instances. Here the tendency was toward a more allegorical
representation of the problem. Eight patients told a joke before
receiving the drug but not after, while eight related a story only
with the drug.

Psychomotor Reactions
These changes included withdrawal, overactivity, alterations in
mood and the appearance of comic or melodramatic “ludic”6 behavior. Twelve patients showed withdrawal reactions. In the extreme form the patient failed to respond to any questions for periods
ranging from several minutes to half an hour. In other instances
the questions had to be repeated several times to elicit a response,
there was incoherent mumbling or neologisms, and incomplete
sentences were used. As such times the withdrawal appeared to be a
selective process, since the inadequate response occurred primarily
with questions relating to the patient’s illness. When questions of a
more innocuous nature were asked, such as the date or time of day,
the patient often answered quickly, clearly and completely. Marked
withdrawal has been unusual in control patients in general hospitals but has occurred frequently in patients with brain disease.
Ten patients were overactive during the test. Usually this consisted
of restlessness, shivering, rhythmic movements of the head, hips or
legs, eye blinking, or repeated fussing and adjusting of clothing.
One patient showed behavior which resembled catatonic posturing.
5.

6Ludic is the term used by Jean Piaget (5) to describe the play, imitating
and pretending aspects of behavior in young children. See also VVeinstein et a1.
(8)-

�”AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

9

Alterations in mood were noted in sixteen patients. The
predominant change was in a euphoric direction, although in two
cases the patient became tearful and depressed toward the close of
the interview. Euphoria was shown by increased smiling, giggling
or laughing, joking and expressions of well-being. Some patients
commented that they thought they had “one drink too many."
Paranoid attitudes as indicated by threatening remarks and gestures
and cursing were sometimes intermingled with euphoric manifestations. Thus one patient, who said he felt good and “would like this
more often,” answered with such expressions as “What do you think
it is, you goddamn fool” and “How the hell would I know.” The
incidence and degree of these euphoric and paranoid reactions was
comparable to those previously found in both normal control and
brain diseased groups.
Varying degrees of ludic behavior were shown, but were especially prominent in sixteen patients. In several cases this behavior
was noted in counting backwards while the drug was being injected by variation in tempo, alternately slow and fast, or use of a
sing-song rhythm. One patient barked out the numbers in a staccato
fashion, while another overemphasized the pronunciation in telephone operator fashion. One patient responded throughout the interview with an exaggerated syllabic accent and dramatic
pauses.
Another used “French” expressions such as “00, la, la.” Several
staggered excessively when brought back to the ward, particularly
when they were in sight of the other patients. One patient, who
acted in a dramatic, comic manner throughout the test,
spontaneously remarked, “I need applause.” Such ludic behavior is difﬁcult
to grade statistically but was in general more marked than had been
observed in the previously studied control
groups.
Six women patients showed some form of altered sexual behavior
under the inﬂuence of the drug. This ranged from holding the examiner’s hand and such remarks as “dear” to the behavior of one
patient who tried to kiss the examiner. A few others manifested hip
movements suggestive of sexual activity or partly exposed themselves in restless leg movements.
DISCUSSION

The results of the study provide further evidence of the validity
of the procedure as a diagnostic test for the existence of structural
brain disease. Of the ﬁfty-six patients tested, “positive” results were

�10

KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

obtained in ﬁve. The others showed behavior more like that of
patients without evidence of brain damage in that they did not
develop enduring patterns of disorientation or persisting delusional
denial of illness and incapacity. In a previous study of psychotic
patients in a state hospital (9) , only one of twenty-ﬁve, a sixty-fouryear—old woman hospitalized for thirty-ﬁve years, had a positive result, a one plus response. This compares with a ﬁgure of 1 to 2
per cent positive in over one hundred and ﬁfty normal controls and
an incidence of 65 per cent in over four hundred patients with brain
disease tested in two general hospitals. It may be concluded that
while it is possible for a patient without demonstrable brain disease to yield a positive result, the difference between patients with
brain disease and other groups is statistically signiﬁcant.
In three of the ﬁve cases giving positive results, there was other
evidence of brain disease. One patient had Parkinsonism, in another
the clinical history and ﬁnding suggested a chronic encephalitis,
while in the third, degenerative or arteriosclerotic disease of the
brain was likely. One of the other positive results was found in a
patient over sixty years of age. Adequate control studies on the
effect of age on the results of this test have not yet been completed.
It is possible, however, that positive reactions may occur in older
persons comparable to the ﬁnding of slow waves in the EEG record
(1) and to changes in the perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli
(2, 3). These results suggest that in a group of patients with “functional” psychoses there are some with disease of the brain which
of
methods
of
the
be
demonstrated
by
appropriate
application
may
examination. The amytal procedure and the face-hand test of perceptual function introduced by M. B. Bender and associates (2)
are examples of such techniques and should be employed as part
of the diagnostic work-up of a mental hospital.
In considering the alterations in symbolic expression shown by
these patients it is necessary to review some data relating to the
mechanisms of disorientation for place and time and denial of
illness. These phenomena are not defects directly attributable to
brain damage in the sense that they are the manifestations of
the loss of a functional modality represented in some area of the
brain. They are, rather, forms of adaptation or defense that the
patient uses in situations of stress in a milieu of altered neural function. In disorientation, the misnamed time or place is the symbolic
representation of some motivation of the patient, usually related to
his illness, not a manifestation of memory defect. Thus the patient

�“AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

11

is

apt to state a time antedating his illness; to give the name of a
small hospital or a place where he has been for some trivial illness;
to locate the hospital near his home; or to confabulate that he has
left the hospital. In effect, the patient is expressing his
problems in
another language where places, persons and times are not used in
their original referential context but as vehicles for the
expression
of the individual’s own motivations. Although an
impairment of
brain function is necessary to provide the type of neural organization for the maintenance of this new symbolic system, the behavior
itself is the result of the interaction of a number of factors—what
Wilder (12) has called the organism-environment-observer complex. This includes not only the neural organization, but the fact
of the disability itself, the patient’s motivation to be well, the interpersonal situation of the interview, and the patient’s previous life
experience and personality. For example, if the interview is carried
out with sterile water, there are very few changes in language. Patients with similar brain lesions may show markedly different
reactions under amytal sodium because of different
types of personality
and attitudes toward incapacity. It is quite conceivable that if this
test were carried out under very stressful conditions as in a
concentration camp, then disorientation and delusional denial might
occur in persons without evidence of brain damage.
In interpreting the effects of barbiturates one must distinguish
between purely neurophysiological manifestations such as
nystagmus
and alterations in the EEG record, which occur universally, and
adaptive symbolic changes such as withdrawal, ludic behavior,
humor, disorientation and changes in syntactical tense and
person.
It has been pointed out that even such indubitable neurological
manifestations as drowsiness and ataxia operated as language as well.
The amytal procedure is a stressful one and, contrary to
popular
belief, the drug does not “abolish” anxiety but rather provides
a
milieu where it is converted much as a schizophrenic uses a delusional system or a dreamer expresses a problem in
hallucinatory

personiﬁcations.

The relation of humor to other forms of symbolic adaptation

was of interest. Some of the jokes given used the mechanism of disorientation as in the case of the patients who referred to a hospital
(West Hill) as “Mess Hill,” or to “Hillside Cabaret.” Others used
verbal denial, as stating that the reason for coming to the
hospital
was “because I’m well.” In the usual structured joke the

patient

represented his problems in language involving third persons, more

�KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

12

material symbols (often relating to sex, food, death and violence)
and the past tense.
From this study one cannot state that mental illness is or is not
an “organic” condition. What can be stated is that these patients
exist in a very stressful environment. This is evident not only by
behavior before receiving the drug but by the larger number of
transient errors in orientation and awareness of illness, the greater
occurrence of ludic behavior and withdrawal and the more frequent
use of clichés, euphemisms and expressions involving the third and
second person as compared to the responses of patients in a general
hospital.
SUMMARY

The amytal test was given to ﬁfty-six patients in a mental
hospital. Five patients, three with other evidence of brain damage
yielded a positive result. The results are interpreted as giving further evidence of the value of the procedure as a diagnostic test for
brain damage.
2. Mental hospital patients showed more transient disorientation and denial, more withdrawal and ludic behavior and more
changes in the syntactical aspects of language than did a group of
patients with physical disabilities, but without evidence of brain
damage previously studied in a general hospital.
3. It is considered that this greater use of means of symbolic
adaptation is additional evidence that patients with mental illness
operate in a milieu of greater stress than patients with physical
1.

incapacities.

REFERENCES
Barnes, R. H., Busse, E. W., and Silverman, A. J.: Prevalence and Signiﬁcance of Electroencephalographic Abnormalities in Normal Old People,
Third Inter. Congress of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 79.
(2) Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception. Springﬁeld, 111.: Charles C. Thomas,
(1)

1952.

Fink, M., Green, M., and Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46-58, 1952.
(4) Green, M. and Bender, M. B.: Cutaneous Perception in the Aged. A. M. A.
Arch. Neurol. (9 Psychiat., 69:577-581. 1953.
(5) Piaget, J.: Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York: W. W.
Norton, 1951.
(6) Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Syndrome of Anosognosia. Arch. Neurol.
&lt;5. Psychiat., 64:772-799. 1950.
(3)

�“AMYTAL TEST" IN MENTAL ILLNESS
(7)
(8)
(9)

(10)

(ll)
(12)

13

Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Patterns of Disorientation in Organic
Brain Disease. J. Neuropath. &amp; Clin. Neurol., 1:214-225, 1951.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Sugannan, L.: Ludic Behavior in Patients with Brain Disease. This Journal, 3:98-106, 1954.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Brain Disease. Am. ].
Psychiat., 109:889-894, 1953.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A., and Malitz, 8.: Serial Administration of the “Amytal Test” for Brain Disease: Its Diagnostic and
Prognostic Value. A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. (S- Psychiat., 71 :217-226, 1954.
Weinstein, E. A. and Malitz, 8.: Changes in Symbolic Expression with Amobarbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”). Am. ]. Psychiat., 111:198-206, 1954.
Wikler, A.: Opiate Addiction. Springﬁeld, 111.: Charles C. Thomas, 1952.

�u. «a...

as "am; W'

I!

’51!”

um MM.» 1m.

L. tell. ”.3.
mm:
LB. 0
III
A. "mun.
mt:nu.

leuelegloel mm e! Innu- lealul
beetle
lent um
halal. lee reel.

and

W1

me.
the

_Mlmulgetmmiapnmu
mtnmmmzm
e! the”
tau-teen
m Develop-at lee“. eum
e!
le. WM‘MWIQH‘.

tummmwu
tree the hilly meme “metal...
mu

by e teller-up tree the hum). mum tel- Intent“.
um
mm».
1'

�-L.

IOC.‘C utudicﬂ unﬁt daunuutlntod

$ht

thll .2 I‘llllinu

nnytul social in n atasunntte it‘s for $h0 990...». o! Irtta dn-ugo.
(1) (I) (a). ends: the tazluouat a! this drug. olrtntn chnaat- tu
aria-Sutton uni usnrunnsu a! allnouu ocuurrod 1a pattoutn with brain
«titan. tint rural, appotrod 1n.p¢:soaa without Innmnn%rublo brutn
pathology. 1!... eunuch. tnoludnd‘pattowan a! asaowttntnttoa tar
plint. tin. uni pariah an! vtrhul dauttl at 111...! “In incapacity.

studs... «tint pattatts a! alturod nyuboxto
nzpvtnnton turn found in addition to tin «hangs: in ortaatntion Ind
umnrououu 01 11150.: oaaurrtns in tin pronanan a! hrtta dtiitli. It
Inthnao

II.

indicatod that thaiq «tannin in vurbu: p$ttara :ad nonpvcrbul
Impact. 01 bahtvtor tantrihatod ta II Indornt‘ndtag at tho psychophyltologtanl cttnots a! tin drug and ti. 203’ 01 ltlcuugo 1n &amp;dnp~
an... ‘0
until no. tho control cramp. it's colltntnd a! puttnuta
with yortphcr:l atria. cptnsl root In! our! lotion: ant Ilaccllnanoun
Indian: uni aarglaul cauda‘anun. that. In: boon no IyItOIttlo tuvnut-

am.

“me. a: ”that: an aunt unu- Wat“ can mm»

Ital: chain's.

It. pntpoactot

a! tit
tant to n Intton 01 pnxtoutu Inuvitaltaod In! unatal £11.»... to:
1) ovuluntc turthnr tho dtucuncttc validity at tho pcooo‘uro. 3“

this study in,

by the administration

“to ”tum o: um «smug W1“ tom 1We
units: 3&amp;ttoat- with than; lhﬂ'! otlur
a)

ﬁg

Omnnﬂcustv.

putt-3t.

udltltlous t6

grunts.

lllllidt lonpltul v.39

lcloatod.

i£d vacantly rocutv.‘ olnatmoachoot trtatnnax or who v.90
alt-teal}: diaorinntoi tor. IIBII‘O‘a $11t1~tiﬁht satcrvltun U‘f.
0:33:06. night ytttauta twinned tho taut. thruc alumna innutttctou‘
who

�«i-

an
unattaiul “1mm. m m ”that m puny (Wham m
pro-um utmm. than; a to“; a! to nun“ m m: mm“);
“in“. I. “W m m and. u “but, tho 3““th «mam

iuhtsam
ta cltntail diucaoati. u1*&amp;auci ﬂout ttri caln$dtru£ $6 is?!
and 13 I»
mm
mutton.
nutptm
at
pm“

tum:

W“.
a.“ mum Inn 16» u.

«an

with a

“can at

:1

m

mn.

him and data; m taunts-anon a mu].
owl-taunt); a:
mm. «a ”that u: «and tutmumuy tar
”atom. at “luau. W muons an band on ”aim anor—
nuou at «mun ”km a! amtntnun n4 «aux ohm“ n
”tints um um. “um (42 (a) m m u sum:
laminae-1y

an truth? It: am you cm W? "on
mahmnutmpw Wimotymutm?

me

grammar?

1: your

mum
mutuapuu MM? ”iu'tmhmumuuv
mm but a m at!» man: at an W? M «It you an
this?
night? Int M W's «in? Int mill 1. ti“? “at ya: it
1- st?
u. n I!“ m
a! the
that “no

n It an" Inn put

«or ms In

“in"

a:

m

Am vi.“ ti. mtm Mt. tho ”$1.31! m and «udtuml mum to out“: turn“ mum: to: at um 01 5mm

0! "about: cat’s-«Mon:

I!
you

that 0!

n

m on“ haw Mu mu mt mu m ”at In? a»
39“?

m mu: mm an aim mum}: 1: a «mum at

«utum mm at a an a! 0.0! h at! mm”.
tho ”that m and to «on»
A. a.
manta“
I“
m
no: 109 to 1. m tumult us mum“ at“ no pun.“ am
up“ ”um a am: use an m “mu“. “m“. an“. as
cm" a: own“ mm“ m mun». nu. ma «sum

0.5 in 1. 10“. of

W“

�*3.

“amm- o: u. mum: «tau a: no a... no tout mt

injnotod anyondcd on tin apptsrnnno a! u naslnnl uxtcnt at tho trig.
In tut! atudy tan qﬁnntttr 311:3 rascal iron 0.! an to 0.5 03.
than tan phyulaloﬂianl nation .1 ti. drug was nunttosﬁ.
tic pgttoat In. xitcrvtvvud with t). nguo tartan o! quoutituﬂ. I! an
¢rror was main ﬁn. quanttnn.van rtpuutod aluodiutcly to actor-tn. its
parttatinaa. a;1y porutntant armor: Igru boon rngnvdod an tudtsattvo
u! truth dtuouou 31am. 3% hi. but: tound that tarsal auntrolu any unit
ttuamiant nintulou (1).
. Inhavtar

.

in» t9

.

13$: uttan

a:

.

rtcnc paticut. us I grow» ﬁlowud Inn, owurt tﬁdlaattanl a!
tour Iii Ctnﬁrtﬂt in tit tilt iitlutttu. fhti was shall. by tho titan
:nlbcr vb» 2633.06 tho tout nltogntlor. Son. iua&amp;cd ta calault that!
doctor: at tint: inntltan 1131:. watt. othsru war. tau frightenud to
.ﬁtﬂ? tho caantnattoa soon. 3"» 3.3:; than. via tcotilhu its: that!
unit nalbcraus naniloatnttonu at dintwuat. Savnrul ﬂirt raiuotaat at
1:. 401a - on. ﬂitting up throughout the cutaro procedurc. on. Gonna

illtll Utopia: all fact on tin 1100:.

ktuptlt that! than
tttaad. Inns patients tutti tor apoettta Gettilu a! tit tout - it:
’II’OIO, Ihlt drug thaw tut. ;n%tlug. why the: It?! uoln¢t0d. Ihnthnr
this II! a ”truth tant”. Ibuthor ti. results var. euniidnntlll and.
unusual}. vhnthnr that would 30 ta slut; at not hunt want ti.) Ilrt
nsgtuc. an. putaoat Into: 1: ho vIrQ '91-; to h. hillod. Aunthnr
3330‘ thtt : turn. be pruunnt. I... tatttntn ‘33ud an to potty-nu
and acvarul

tun granular. or 3‘1: "I abouldn't 5": ¢nnn.” than. u:a110ututtona
o: ovation sad tuapaeton vars haul an». marina than unto announsqrud
thin tun tout 1‘s tdiiﬂiutCtOd to putIQntu 1: stunts! Inu3ttnls. BIltkn pntiontu with phyttaul alsoasu: vim usuully 3:1: ti s "stat” a

st;tunnnt than:

Iﬂ‘tllt will or tnavta: It: houpttul.

thQﬂi puttonsg

�'T

ant: taro Uilhll autitda tn. tumullnta nttnsti‘g. Inch ll “tilt
:11 3‘: in tin IIIVirﬂO should 11'. in punau an: h:rnouy* tr ”good
intlth 1.! tin ntct unfit? II ”I; liﬂ‘ht‘t nhnuld ﬂirty a lion tollut.'
turthurunmt. titan vat &amp; [rcattr toxicity in tit: group in czar... tilt:

gnu.

distthXttnu in turns .1 aqua athnr pcraan :3 ”13!.Iiﬂht an: I but a
llxaht Iorvcuu trashinvn” OH “I, uni: trout}: in ny‘ugglagthtr.”
Alﬁhtthtta1_sndtuu.
1) lorntutcna gyrornz ﬁthttvo Innattona
11'! a! ti. ‘0 pattnust nhnuod pcruzatant ohms... of Io~
hgvtor stutlir co tin-c could in hrtlu ﬂaunt... it u IIU'IOII rarest
(l).puuattvu tauntinn: that gvnlud tron an» to soar plus anpculinc en
ti. lumbar at nuntloatuttoan a! itnursoattttoa nah 6.33:1 chain. on
tbtt 5.31.. tho lava pontttvo «use: 1: :81: study thou-d a an; plus
roasting. it. tout was rcpoutud tn turn: at those «:30: sud-nbolod a
ports-tuna: a! th. an. plan rauult in tun and n Ingnttvc ranalt 1n tho
thlrd. a: than: £11. putxnntn. turn: lhﬂlid «vidnnoc of hrtln taunts.
by athnr nothads oi atudy. Out. a haw 01 It. had a pauittvu Inoonhlnl
ﬁtnt (6). ti 33:09:51.356 toourd. sun nu titrated uptunl fluid protoil
on two Oﬂﬂhﬁtﬂll. Anetta: it! u «an. o: Paritnnantnn. r30 thtrt attuan psych-mun mu. mam: at tho
u. a
in: vus$ttvn an... had 0th.: ﬂiﬂll of br‘tn diﬁtllﬂ. an. In: t 64 run:
91‘ Inl‘vho porbtltontly tOIOWROd to ”Byﬂnahnl annpttnl" ‘hili ands!
tho inslumauo at tho drug. It had a nnrnnl BEG :34 no prouu-pttwu
Ovtdtiui a! brain dtloan¢. ﬁt. othtr puttnut loath4 1h; Ioaptt‘l ti
"auklaua.snrlﬁ altar h‘vtnc pinata it narroatlv in exam Oahu proav to
rtoutving tho drug. Tin ﬂaccid tautntntrttaon at tho toit in this has
'

,

m

,

.-‘

,

..

at»:

unvb n.3oust110

mum

litﬂltn

a) trgggtnut Irrorns
1r£anxcns array: (a.¢§

iVFORﬂ

'hiﬂh var: otthot $90.30

ulnouuly corrected or oowrnotod who: tn» ancatian nun iuuodttttly
rn’nntnd) tn cranniatlnn and :nurvaaas a: titans: haw. not bat: ra~

�ubm

mm u «W‘u u but; «an.

:3

ampmm: nun. .mm:Oriﬂﬂlﬂl

a! ti.
untowar. II
unaxrol.tﬁbsn¢tu (1). In the preaeat «tidy.

Icaad
nclttou. tin zlcilnnno in luv. hxvais b¢tn

aortas of

no

£3 19%

includod ¢$Viit tho luaorroct
puttomnn, or 33%. III» neat trworx. rant.
eats" au‘ *ﬂtyuhtntrtn Initituad'
ti"”l111l$dl
91:30
in.
Iﬂhlﬁl
than.
ﬁﬁ hunt or 1‘ a friend’s blunt ‘hn utult
hon:
tiring
ochlttulnt1:¢
tat
such I» "t plaoc to but. .0033.
boxorc. Ian. pustunau «nod cuphauttul
”a piaan t¢ tctah honlth to bank
rtcnpcrnttan,"
tar
"a
plan;
vu11.*
not
hospital with tun not: ntmaunduuu
panama.” ”u “Ilhtﬂ” tad “thy cronttst
drag char but simply
tut
rocctvin:
to
print
shnranu
I!!!
dilitrﬂ.”

mm

“at thy um “I 331th ”pittl.”

M ﬂan motion! m

Bivtﬂ.
rtponxtd. tunnvnr. tun arisinnl rampant. run anti:

tbs lacuna at third airman in rtuponun to
was Intod twist it lrcqummh
and
hospitaltnttion
i11n¢as
about
qunuttaun
booth. in» iﬂhaoct 0!
pinion
anothir
tuttrviov.
yrcudvuc
tin
1:
1: as
or stain. turalvod
tcttau
the
patterned
parucn
santhar
or
tbs statnan:
had dynaribuﬁ it:
tun
patio-t
prcvtauuxy
'hnr¢xa
exportnnoo
1: an
for huapttnltnutmu:
ayuntuun in it! first action. Tins til ratio:
Thu

‘

at. at

mm m mum
«umxu :19“ by an ”aunt u «z umhad”um
’
1
lowly
"mum.”
"the
mun.
in law In abused to
uobnll in tho mm mm
n:
«mud
m
m
“tun
am

m

Thu Qﬁﬂlll

drug tnlknd thaut a tritnd who htd onnaor.
0N0! ﬁlo htnlth a! tolnttvos. tho
aonauru
at
for:
tha
toot
trcqnoutly
vuuld
ohuugud to "t ui¢l that my
on:
tie!“
Invue
jut
“thnﬁ
t
Isak

tiaalrtac tho

ill

ntny unit.“ Thar.
"anth&amp;ac

mo

was

tare

Qt

1:32 but taut? and

eliahlitii an
?Iot tar yubllcntten.* that. in: tits

;.tondna¢y ta 0:919:

¥uun puttanss It.
stloattva spoctitatty in audit! to quantlaun.
for non. 111:..hanpttul
tho
ca
has
oust
tan:
that
said
had originally
doowtrs ha! tilt $hﬂl. Git“!
rtrllo‘ thtt tbs! had noun inaiuat tbttr

Iowa

�cxuupla
ﬁnalists guru that: Iﬁﬂltibt tn t not. ’Uﬂaiiﬂ way stuttn‘ tar
that tic: ivy. In ”t traatngut roe. lindins at! thc corridor."
in tho Lustunaa at tho
cryptic tilt!!! taro ocaasleually [1103 I!
could help :0 out thin
p;t1¢nt who. who: 13306 :0: a 11.». 3‘14 ":1 you

I with

you

3: you «call than I with you wasti‘.
Thiﬂi pattorna Iﬁft net aititrant 12am thus. used ﬂy

itnlau‘t.

ti!

tho tutti-or
patient: vtth-phynsnnl.tnaa'ooittcl that. dtnplnetntut to
Ind
atonnd yoxuau. gruntnr apoetliaity and .alnctzvonou: a: ruppoulu
at
tn¢rosaod use of aliahﬁi and ﬁltﬂﬂ tor. notud uadmr tbs tnfluttcc

tn. drug.
4» 12w.

In I311 pstttntn thﬂ rouyoano to thc rtﬂﬂﬂit in tall 3
prﬁbluu rulnttng
John doc-Id to-ba &amp; tribulia rupwosuntntson of nuns
inaction.
$0 illnous. houpttalinstion. tn: procedurc ttaclt or tint:
centidnrcdv
ﬁnial rolttxuns. 1h: aoutont at tats. rﬁiwﬁﬂﬂtl will bu

at “
hint.
rcpartud
b.
vtll
p&amp;t$ara
and
9.17
it.
papa:
Iipttttﬂ
udllutnn
53 pntiauts, 16 did not roapond cathnr hetero or ﬂaring dru;
4111£~
trutian. llovun pattcnt- aavvcr-d hyirntorrtn; ta thsir can
x!
:nltiua 1n tun {ﬁrst yuruon.uu¢h a. “:t would b. a spot int. I
anal
could no hunt? or “thy Join in my bctns but.." at: paﬁtuttn
adulntna
thin try: at purnaanl rctcronan both taint. gut dating tin
tr;tton $1 tun drug '31:. 11v: runpondnd tn thln~£aahtnn only titar
utructurdd
Alénottob. titrtrwtvo pattuats guru thn asunl turn at
an a

'

a: tilt third
303:. In theta. tho taaouax a! tin unttnn.ur umpnrtonn;
tritium: or
par-on :ppnutcd to nyutalauo not. :upnct a! £3. pnttnmt‘a
‘hau
nottvuttog. annuity pttzalas who rcupondod to tho «nosttoa a:
ch.
1133103 in tin primdntg antirvxcv unad tho ‘5‘; pattutn nitat
wail. ‘lfiﬂﬂliti
indaatxon. aovoa 01 than. patlnntn told tho I!IO John

It:

tovird
ﬂoat}
might
pattonta
problem.
th.
at
reprouontatton
u not. ulltgnrtcal

static: war. rolatod in

15

tantsaats. In?! tho tnaluley

: ”John” bum mum m» m m an aura ran. um: um“

"

�1 47“

2.13th

3)

Gianna. tualudod withﬁruuul, avarauttvtty. ultaruttouu.
u'pnnrunnn 91 unite er lixodrnuttta ”ladle” hohavtor.

an...

in loot uni

tit

it: Cruz.

th:

rulntud a story 011, with

Tvtlvu pataontn thaw-d Itil‘rllII rcaattous. Ia tho lﬂtlﬂll for. tho
puticut tuilod ca rosyend to any quantaonn tow ported: 13:11.. luau
novtrnl innntdn co halt II hour. In othnr anutnuaau tho quouttunn had

rntpnauo; tint. In: tn:ohorou‘
Innhltagi or analogiaua and tuna-plat. Icutcnunu Iﬂrﬂ ulna. At ﬁnch
tans. tin withdrawal sayqarcd t: to u solauttvu pruuocs s‘nuc tin
tu§d¢QIuto roupous¢ oocurrvd 9:133:11: with qn3;ttona rotating O0 tit
ptttont’u illnonu. what quatttoun a! u ﬁﬁ!‘ tuaoaunnn tﬂtﬂrﬁ via.

to

no rapdutna,novurnl

tin.» ta ﬁliait

int. or its. a!

n

tin pattnlt often unnuoraé
unwakly. «13:91: and aauplntcty. quknd Itthlrmlal in: not: unnuunl
control puxlontu ta ulnar:l hospitnln hut in: oaaurrod tttqucntly tn

taint.

such an tho

dag,

LI

patxcntn ittl hrt13.d1:0uno. Tb: patient: unto ovorlutivn aural. tho
303:. Inﬁnity tit: countutod 0d *hyttuta uncut-at: of tan baud. at»:
or Inna. a}. bliskiuu, a? v.9uxtod iﬁlﬁiﬂﬂ and adaasttt' at elatitla.
taunting: tho pttitnxu boos-n vary riitlaan. nut up in 5.6. sud Inliltti
on having a algnrottu. an. unison: sinned prolalcou uhtvurinc at It:
Uliil. bcdy tor nlvurll Iiiﬂlﬁﬂ. titular thuvud bthnvtnr vital roan
cabana ontntostc ponawtnc. uponttnaoualy balding an. urn in it: at!
law atvbrnl utuutou and thin holdtu. 1t 1: vnrtnu$ paitttain pliant by
tho Usualllr.

(stilts:

11%.?t‘tﬁll 1n toad taro nottd in 16 putlontu. it. pr.»
aunt‘s was an “uuptnrtc diruction, lithouch in its 0...: ‘DG

pgttuut itann. tanrlul sad Quartilud tawgra tun alone at tho 1n$¢rvtau.
Implawta in: slow: by tactanlod untltic, ﬂtltltit'or laughtng. 5ohuu|
Ind larvalﬂtalt a! vullabltlc. I... pitttttu Gauntltad thtt tho! KIII‘I
thoucbt tho! hut ”on. GU!!! ‘00 I031.“ ﬁhranotd attituinu In tattontod

�.3.

w tantalum

min mm mm and mm m mum at”.

utnclod~vith ouphnrta unntfoutattann. it»: on. pattuns, who till I!
:alt 330‘ and “vtuld 1110 than unto otttu.” antvmmtd quanta... with

such tzpwnanlauu us “that «a you tat-k it in. IE“ dealt-n 10.1” and
“not
boll ﬁﬂﬂl‘ 1 tauv.” Thu iactdnnoa :nn anuvau a! thil. oaptartc
ranutxoun was cougarghln tn than. pravtausly tau-d in both nor-n1

it.

«0.12.1 sad

ital:

dilussud cvuuva.

Vurvtng ingrown

a! suit. inhuviac var. Ihﬂiu, but

IOU.

ill

patxonln. In ntvbru1.oaaan this hohtvtur
it. until in tint! stunting baakaurd; Ihili tin drag It; 301:: imitatod.
I... vurtod in. tango o1 th¢ir oonattac. altnrnntcly ﬁlﬁ' sun 1.3:, at
tuna a tiuzwaanc rhythm. an. patient bartnd out tit IHIDUII it m

aaaoaiullr vauntntnt in

16

mm» mm“ um» mtm mwmam m wmntm :-

‘ollphonn aparttor annulus. ga. pntitnt rcopouaol tittaghnut tin
tstnrvtuv wit! nxxugnrntud nyllnbta unacnt gun druuutic pant... tn0$lr
ﬂﬂﬁ‘ ”triath“ oxproﬁntens Inch an "an. 1:. 1:.” low «In! uttsunro‘

mainly ma brought m: to m ward. platinum” um an in
in stgtt at tho ether pstiaats. out

Bitiltt,

who

actod in s art-nth:

tin taut. upongannaunly tauntini *1 li.‘
applause.” Inch ladle huha'tor is diffiuult to grad. stutlctlonlly
but it. In contra! not. ItrlOd thin 3:6 30.. abuarvtd in tin prtvtouuly
ntullol control Iron...
81: canon puttuntu ibﬂ'ﬂd saw. for. of ﬁlitrﬂd count; it»
hatter and»: In. anxlutncc at tho crux. thia raaaod tron tilting ch!
onnninug’u It‘d and Vbrhtl rauurln can: a: calling than “dust" to tho
huhuvtor or an. putlatt uh. triad to Etna ti. nunuiulr. A for atlnru
ratatou‘od It: Invoucnt: Ilcguatlvn at ﬁtuual activity at ynrtly-oa’0001
tin-n.1th in rattloul 10c Invclcntc.
gnu «nude unannr throughout

axncuasxal

the tumult: a! tin Itﬁﬂr gravid. :uritur duta ro'nrlilc

�.9-

"1““,

u imam tut far can «tum.

a
a! the prwodum
tho
at tho M
of aluminum: In“:

“at“.
mun: nu. chum a ﬂu.

the

”an“ mud ”yo-tun"

mo nu
um um Mint”
ma ‘W 1- “ti up: in an

«item 0!.
Malay Mum ”am“ of imam-gm or mama. «luau:
mu). «1’ ﬁlm: as may. :3 a ”cum “W a! ”you“:
”that: in a at“. butt“ (1). only an o! a. n a you on

“at

a! put-«tn without

m
M

manna“ for 8! ms, and n mitt" m1: 0! «a 31m.
is» I “an a: 1 «u ”out” m1“ u our no m1
mmh m n inseam. 01 m 1- m m ”cm“ with ma
“mu mm 1: ma «mu mmn. It my be 0.01““ an
nth it is with]; as! n ”that without mwu mm diam
to ”on I; ”out" mum. at “um ham “than with ma
a nutuuully Ituutmt.
“mu and «w
In that. a! m 11" um [um mitt” rm!“

W

W

um

"um 0! mm dam...umon patient

t”
In mum-um,
1n

1mm “warm I am“ cumulanu. an. u: an um. “mu” «- Wlmlmua am» 1.at
the mm «a $13013.
with. malt nu cm a on ”ﬂat
this study a ”11 u u m at tho ”than panama mac n a

man an «11.5.»: “um
A

“no mun who m cm to you: at an. uncut. «um: “mm
an have not ant to»
a no on.“ a: u- n the min a!tutthismm.”
mum In new
mum. It a with)...
to no than: u um am a tit m
1: on,»
mm. “I
not“ (7) m t.
a th- wart“. if imlﬁm
a! nun!
”in.“ with an“). “no m1“ «can! tut in g
0! ﬂu in“
Ilth ~mum1" Wm thin II! to m '1“!
«17 by tin ”pliant“ 0!
nun a: in
I“ m tam-nu tut
utm a: ommtm. a» “muby
and minus: (a)
Ll.
at ”mutual {mun
m min a! mu Manna» an autumn he ”any“ 1: wt a: th

W.
man

W cm

man“

new

m

W.W

W
Watt

�VF

.

«10~

"T

diacloottc Iﬂrknl’ or ;.ann$n1 hanpttgx.
1‘ annitdbriac tun nltatﬁtiuna in mytholis czprunatoa about:
by than. pltliitu it in noccuuary an raviiw you: grovioua ﬁttn t01n¢tll‘
mo tho Ianlsnlsuu a! luu;:tcntnttol for place tad ttloihnd 6.31:1
at
tllnnat. It hit but: 589*! tit: thouo phanouana 3!! an: 60:06:: Iaroain
I: nttrthutuhlo ta brill using. 1113!. runs; that tiny arc tun maﬁtfilu
rattan: or tut In“: or u :uaaiiennl 001.11%: rcprcn-ntod 1: I... tent
at tho brain, Thur arc. rtthnr. tor-a at ninytutton or ﬁotcnsn that
It. pntltut usnn in situations a: Itvcsa in n niltau of altcrcd luaral
inacttnn. In dxnurinututiau, ti. stanuuqd tine-at plan. in tha uylhtiaa
ruprcuontutxum or new; letifttiﬂl a¢_thn ynttunt. usually thst a! hdbu
GOItI¢ null and iota: homo ant a nanatoatntlou at 19:: a! unwary. That
it: gattnnt in apt to stttn a tint untoautiuc :1: 11130.33 to .11: tit
a... a: a small hospital at &amp; vixen that. hs'hn- but: far noun-tttvtnl
illnnia; ta least. tum hospital 33:: hit noun: at to uohxniulaxc tint
ha has 10:: the knapittl. In cltnet, the ytttans 1n oxygenatus his
1: mt»:
when puma. pinata: us than no no:
in that: «algxn‘l retornnttul aunuoxt but it vuhielsu tor in: exproslanl

WM
a: the

1W

muamva mu manta“. 1mm:

‘..

1mm at mu

{aunties in noeoasary to prnvid. can typo a: neural orgnnisttton in!
‘hn nuantonanee of this new synbolie synten the behavior 113.11 a: tin

tOtult a: tin tuturtntton or t numb.» at ttatort u vhtt 1331.! (I) It!
cull-d tn. orgnutuumvnviranmaat—ohﬁurvur euuplnx. wax: tualud0t not
«:1: tbs antral arznnt:at1an. but the ltct $1 tau disability ttucll.
tho putlogt'n untivltion ta b: I'll, tn. tnturpnrooatl tituttton a! $I.
intaxvicv. and the paticnt'a 11!. axpcriauct and parsoaaltty. tar
.i‘nplo. 1! tin interview in warriod out with utcrxli I;to: that. am.
In ch33... 8| lungsmtp. If tho oat-tun! docs not qunctten tho pttlaut
to limit: you to slap. haunt: with, “It!” man 1am my
what marital: ditteront rgnctinun ﬂldﬁr unytal madiuu bocxuuc ox
dittovunl typcu of puricn:lxty Ind uttstndua taunt! incapacity.

�-11canxrol pattantu mitt physlaul disabiltttoﬁ ain'toexskud
with hint: dlncauo. vita quittiunnd unﬁt: smrtni todtun. ‘law «he!
ulturuttana in lttcﬂlﬂﬂ. Tho: «a nut deny thuir tiﬂt’ﬁﬁltt‘i in qadnrw
13¢ ‘tluntaunl itniion nor an thug than luutl‘u diuortcatnttun tar plaeo
or tint. fin! to hau0Vtr. "Iinautcrnwwt" quantinns about illltui it!
an: 0! than ”oblon- ta mu 0! am»:
an. tuphnnlauc. humor. “1“. Ind «lights. I. n.prcriou- ntndy (3) 1t
in; potatud out that vita tun pattcat tuxrodumod nuathar ’Ofiﬂﬂ nttcr
toagtviac tin drug I. it. up: nnuoasartly ruvunltau that had htthgruo
Dana ”ro’wouaud” but yum oitlu clovosntng bin tuclluul 1a a nun

mm

mxulmtm.

”ml“ «mu».

who

um: 91

no

a: a. tuna“
m. m M
he

that in. ion: unployod. :ppaaru to h. thﬁt a! siting tin strong a!
ti. tuvsrnuncntnl attusttun tan or ultcrtna tit unurul orunltluttou in
first-h tit incllrould In! tho tansuilcd an. at tlnpttv. unehnatlli.
la prcvlonn studio. (3) (19). it kiwi itlealnoi its '13::ttotaut a! it. ctphorlu ‘sﬂ ludto bahnrtar tilt II Otttu notod 1%tt
unytnl cudtun. 1% it: pointed out thut tutu hihtvlﬂt «quid not to
intarptotud tiny}: in.Instantaal-phnyiolaui¢nl tart. ﬂint ta ”onrttcll
imprunstau” or as a ”rulounu at anhtbtttOH.” lhthur. tiny It. tynbol;¢
unit: at annptattau an it» unu-nrha1 upturn cougar-b1. to tho ammunitiant ahaaunc in vuriu: zanannuo. on» anuno‘ stat. that tic Gran Ithﬂﬂ
or an. annual. Inn ”than “11 John
putat- lm

mum

hdotnwt, but not

ti. ithctton vial: aﬁhsru do no ant: Its}. undnr
tum ﬁru‘. i‘éiclttuc that t titlur. par It to $011 u

sitar

thn titlioaoo at
got. don: not ruyruntnt *tnhlhtttun” vital 13 “rattan-i? ph1u1olnalaaIXI
by thu'drua. rattantn v.0. ‘nlnd to talk 33km. io¢;unn tn Iﬂlﬁl. tun
patina: alto: uaaroano: hit natal... not 1: a turutl ruxnrcatttl eonttxt
but in u u;ubolt¢ ptttqrs uttltxtns‘trnnstnas doatul. diturtOltattnn and
ittgla¢cnunt ta titties pﬁruon. raw uxtlpln. than nahgd why It can. to
the inupttnl u yuttnnt unciﬁl rcpt}. booaauo "I“: 1011.“ til at»:

tutad manta

no

I

Ina. night titan!

_

,
i

�”'er

«u-

""‘T

“Illluado aahnrotl“ I! h. porntstn in much rtnpouluu. 1‘ may to an
indianttou a! brutn diamana, but t: thy VQI’OII'I as. trniaitlt In!
ungrat‘lly $1 vuiiixn‘ by "ha, ha” tiny £90 annatdnrvd an JONDI. 0i!
Vﬂlhﬂ anarcusod not telling. ahaut tun honyitn1.vhurt in! but tenacity
hat: a puttnnt by votorrtnc ta 1: 3; ”Int: 3311.” in than! attunﬁtani
thy patxtnt x: utilising 1h» man. at th- houyltul at g nynbalia Action
for tho rcyrosoltttanu o! ht: prabltnn.
Thouu.pst1ontn, in thutr rnipoasuu to tho pracn‘uvu I’DOI'~
:0 to rtnoiblo tn; normal group in he». reagents thnu that :sa tho
group with hvaxn dullﬂb.

thiy

416 not dxrnatly dun: tun cssntauno»o¢

problonn an: did tho! show lnattnu pattornu of disortan‘utton. tin
Iyubaliu avionics air. of tin nan. typo atcd hr tho mortal Illu'.

tho: did an. tn... houovdr. t¢ a grants! Court. as ovidsauu‘ Ir it.
1313.: nutter of trnalltat after; in ortcgtatton and ¢strauauu a!
tllnnua. tar: lads: hahnvtar and much not. unriayenntVtaaan Ind.utth~

drnunl. Tics. rusponscs. «ouplcd with chucrvutlan o! thn intatnaactn
to: hohuvtar, nuggtntu that tho total situation cantata. III. I‘lﬂiin
tul Iﬁttﬁrﬂﬂh than 3!. ¢n¢ouaturaa thin tho taat ts “.06 with ’attalsu
in a gunnrtl hospital.

:

�W.
W“.

‘0‘. I“ “it. In!
("My“) mtw)
In“

’o‘o. It... ‘9‘“.
“midi... o:
3.41m
Lunatic
m
1-0.:
3.
Mama.
”max...

mun:

1o

a
0.:
LJ.
I. “mun.LA... an.thoI.L.. tutu-n.
m
an”.
You“
ct
tar
”Aura
man
an:
manna»
W:and um.
LBJ.
him.
its
mt.
m1.
m
11: 3:1th
$11-$28, mu. mud:
3. «man. LA. and an“. 5.:
in swu- Win
A...
J. puma».
(”m1
Mia").
mm
u.

wt»:

a.“
| 9m.

.

max.

W

W“.

a!
3.5. m m. 3.1“:
«man.
1.
1m.
m*. Mind I“ “with” “3 "'9
8. luau“. SJ. «1 an. id“: attun- at atom-mutton
”am. J. mm“. m 6113. m1... 1:
6.

a:

'

‘

”at“
3. arm. a...
I. and um. $3.: I» mm tutu
m.
a!
Egg-mun an erg-nu In“: W.lom1m.m«-u.
‘

g

c

MI... mu. mu... tum. Add mm“ an
mm.
M ammo-9mm“ “uranium 1. m1
autumn
10.
of
and
I m.
on
um
Wu
many-«Mm
mum
3.1.: MW meat“: 1- the u“.
I ”I
Linn.
LIA. not. lam}. ad mun... It: 613-881.. nu.
ﬁnial». Au can» Luann. human. mm c. W,
10. "mun. LA... ma. LL. and
. l»: mu ”no:
3: “cm.
with It“: Mum. 3. It In“ mung.
1.

m

”that:

LMWW
‘r

�Reprinted from
JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Volume IV

January, 1955

Number 1

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2414">
                <text>The “Amytal test" in patients with mental illness. Journal of the Hillside Hospital., 4: 3-13, 1955.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2415">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2416">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-15-019</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2417">
                <text>1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2418">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Weinstein, Edwin A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2419">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2420">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2421">
                <text>[Preprint] and Reprint. Reprint from Journal of the Hillside Hospital, Volume IV, January, 1955, Number 1.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2422">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2423">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74444">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81005">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87566">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94127">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="243" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="34">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f36132b2b1eb8c86e51e7a9456e9e17d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>aca2be98c9971c66ad807e1d64ee1b8a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100660">
                    <text>Reprinted from
JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Volume IV

July, 1955

Number 3

��DELUSIONAL REDUPLICATION OF PARTS OF
THE BODY AFTER INSULIN COMA
THERAPY1
ROBERT

L.

Ph.D.,2

N. GRAUBERT, M.D.,3
and MAX FINK, M.D.4

KAI-IN,

DAVID

In recent years studies of behavioral changes occurring in altered
states of brain function have gone beyond the description and
interpretation of isolated phenomena. Emphasis has been placed
on such factors as the particular environmental situation in which

the behavior occurs, the total constellation or syndrome of associated
behavioral changes, and the inﬂuence of the premorbid personality.
Using these additional methods of study it has been demonstrated
that many types of behavior found in brain disease are not defects,
such as impairment of perception or memory, but represent forms
of adaptation to the stress of illness (16). It has also been shown
that various phenomena are not bizarre curiosities or unrelated
fragments of neurological dysfunction, but form part of an orderly
and meaningful pattern of an altered interaction with the environment.
This report of a single case is presented because of the unusual
opportunity it provides to study some of these behavioral changes.
First, the patient was in a psychiatric hospital, under observation
and in psychotherapy for four months, which made it possible to
have an accurate and comprehensive picture of his behavior prior
to brain damage. Secondly, the neurological symptoms were of rapid
1From the Research Service, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York. This
investigation was supported in part by grant M-927 from the National Institute
of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service
and by a fellowship of the Dazian Foundation for Medical Research (Dr. Kahn).
This paper was read, in part, at a meeting of the New York Society for Clinical
Psychiatry at Hillside Hospital, on March 10, 1955.
2Research Assistant, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.
3Resident Psychiatrist, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.
iDirector of the Research Service, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.
134

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

135

onset and actually developed in the presence of the examiners.
Finally, it was possible to observe the patient intensively for a prolonged period afterwards, so that the subsequent changes in behavior could be adquately studied.
It is the purpose of this report to evaluate (1) the signiﬁcance of
the alterations in behavior, particularly the delusion of having extra
parts of the body, and (2) the implication of the subsequent change
in behavior for the understanding of the mechanism of somatic
therapies.
CASE HISTORY

Present Illness
The patient, a 34-year-old man, became acutely ill the night of
September 25, 1954. Standing with clenched ﬁsts, gritting his teeth
and without saying a word, he kept his wife in a corner of their
bedroom for hours. The patient's family summoned a psychiatrist
who referred him for immediate hospitalization. He received 15
electroshock treatments in a three~week period with some improvement. On transfer to Hillside Hospital, however, the patient was
lethargic and failed to answer many questions. He said that he had
come to the hospital for such reasons as “stomach disease,” “to talk
over something with my wife,” and “to prepare myself for an examination." He felt he was being watched; that he was inﬂuenced
by voices coming through the heating system; was being poisoned
from a distance; and that there were changes in his body. He said he
knew the exact minute when his wife was being unfaithful to him
and expressed feelings that the world was coming to an end. There
were frequent auditory hallucinations of being called unpleasant
and derogatory names.
Past History and Premorbid Personality
This was the patient’s ﬁrst recorded psychotic episode. He is the
youngest of ﬁve siblings, being the only boy. His father and mother
were continually busy running a candy stand, and the patient was
cared for primarily by his sisters. As a child he was dependent,
demanding, and sought to be the center of attention. He developed
a ﬂair for comedy and playing the clown to the extent that he was
expected to have a career as a comedian, and on one occasion won
second prize in an amateur show. At 12 years of age he became
interested in playing drums. This became his sole preoccupation,
for he devoted every spare moment to them. The patient suffered
episodes of rheumatic fever at 10 years of age and again at 20 and,

�136

KAHN—GRAUBERT—FINK

at these times, was pampered by his family. During his late adolescence he was withdrawn, spending much of his time at his
parents’
candy stand. He became overly concerned with his
appearance and
masculinity, brushed his hair for lengthy periods, exercised to acquire a good build, worried about his chest expansion and, according to his family, stared at his reﬂection in a mirror “kind of
waiting
for hair to grow on his chest." He
spent much time exercising his
left arm because he wanted it to be as
strong as his right. He was
concerned about a tooth that had not developed fully
on the right
side of his mouth. To prevent people from
noticing this he developed the habit of talking and laughing out of the left side of his
mouth, giving the appearance of facial asymmetry.
He never enjoyed or settled down to
any work. Besides his efforts
as a comedian and drummer, he worked in a
pocketbook factory, in
a ladies apparel concern, and wrote
songs and short stories. He was
discharged from one position because he clowned all day
long
amusing his co-workers. He became a beautician after a friend interested him in it. He wanted to quit this too, but remained
at the
insistence of his fiancee. He was not ambitious for
money, but very
much wanted to ﬁnd a place for himself,
needing reassurance about
his sense of belonging. Although he comes from
a secretive family
where each member keeps things to himself, the
patient was de—
scribed as warm and friendly and drawn to the
cause of people
he considered the underdog or discriminated
against. He was
sentimental, being quite upset when having to visit someone in
a
hospital. He was overly sensitive and easily hurt, though not
argumentative.
The family reported a change in his behavior during the
past
six years. He had become more secretive about his
friends and
activities. He went with his ﬁancée for more than
a year before
anyone in the family knew about it. He developed many somatic
complaints so that frequent visits were made to his physician, without his family’s awareness. Similarly, he told no one that he was in
psychiatric treatment, and maintained his secret even though he
found it necessary to steal money from his mother’s store to
for
pay
this. He also kept secret his difﬁculty in
hearing for many months.
During the war he was drafted into service, became worried
about having to go overseas, and sought and received a medical
discharge because of rheumatic heart disease. Since 1948 he has
been in intermittent psychiatric treatment. This was
begun at the
persuasion of a friend who was in therapy. The psychiatrist stated
that the main effect of the therapy was to get him to look for
some

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

137

kind of work, although he conﬁrms the patient’s inability to hold
one job for any length of time. During this period two of his sisters
have been under extensive psychiatric treatment for severe phobic
reactions.
He has been married for 21/2 years, never having dated much
previously. His mother believes this the result of his being “pretty
much of a home boy” and his fears about his rheumatic heart. His
sister, on the other hand, reports that the mother made him feel
guilty about leaving her alone in the store. She said he felt the
responsibility of helping his mother ever since his father’s illness
and death, and that he expressed feelings of guilt in leaving her to
get married.
The patient met his wife in 1951 at a party, and was married in
1953. During the ﬁrst two years of their marriage, the patient’s
wife had two miscarriages. The second one in particular affected the
patient. Soon thereafter he complained that there was something
wrong with him, that he was not enough of a man, and that there
must be a sickness in his body causing his wife to have abortions.
He became increasingly depressed, withdrawn and fearful. Later,
he became convinced his wife was unfaithful to him and that his
wife and brother-in-law were conspiring against him.
Course in Hillside Hospital
During his hospitalization he became more withdrawn, and careless in his appearance and in the care of his room. He had little
contact with other patients, and was preoccupied with his delusional
thoughts and hallucinations.
Physical examination revealed a presystolic and systolic murmur at the apex and a systolic murmur at the base without accentuation of the pulmonary sounds, or signs of enlargement of the
heart. His blood serology was negative. There were no neurological
ﬁndings except for right facial asymmetry and bilaterally diminished
hearing. An electroencephalogram shortly after admission showed
well-modulated, occasional random 5-7 cps activity, with 90% alpha.
It was interpreted as showing minimal abnormality, consistent with
drowsiness or a history of recent electroshock therapy.
An amytal test for brain disease (13) was done on November 24,
1954. There was no change in orientation or awareness of illness,
but he became more communicative and showed less overt tension
during the procedure. Insulin coma treatment was instituted on December 8, 1954, and he had his ﬁrst coma on December 30. During
the course of 18 coma treatments there was no signiﬁcant change in

�138

-

KAHN—GRAUBERT—FINK

behavior until the morning of January 27, 1955.
On that day he had
his 19th treatment, was given 370 units
of insulin, and went into
coma for an hour and 50 minutes, comparable to his
previous
reactions. Following gavage he did
not respond in the usual time, and
he was given glucose intravenously. He
awakened promptly, and was
responsive, but a marked right hemiplegia was noted.
He lay in bed with his head and
eyes deviated to the left. There
was no evidence of aphasia when tested for
naming objects. He had
a right facial paresis and a right homonymous
hemianopia
on
confrontation. Reﬂexes were diminished on the
right with a positive
Babinski, and there was a right hemisensory
syndrome with extinction on simultaneous stimulation tests.
He raised his left arm on command but failed
to respond when
told to move his right arm. When his
right arm was raised by the
examiner and he was asked to identify it, he looked
at it for some
moments and said it was a “stranger” and “an intruder.”
He reported
smilingly that there was an extra arm on the
right. He was unable
to move his right leg on command, and he asked
if it were his own.

saying that he had seen him sometime in the
past.
The patient consistently showed this phenomenon of
the reduplicated arm for the next hour. He referred to it
as an “extra arm,”
“a third arm,” and “a bootleg arm,”
or personiﬁed it as a “stranger,”
"this intruder” and “that fellow.” When his
right arm was shown to
him, he denied knowing whose arm it was,
asking one of the attendants, “Did you slip me this arm—did you pick this
old
at
an
up
auction in the neighborhood?” Another time when
asked to whom it
belonged, he said “I’m willing to pay a reward for it,
and you’re
asking me point blank.” He said he was sure that the
arm
was
not
his because “it doesn’t extend from
my body” and “the dirt under
the ﬁngernail is not recognizable.” The
patient denied any disability of his own right arm, but said he’d never seen the
extra
arm
work. He said, “My arm I can move with a brain
impulse; this one
I have to move manually since it isn’t mine.”
During the course of
questions about weakness in his right arm he said, “If that
extra
arm belongs to me, then I’m sicker than I thought I was.”
The patient did not react to painful stimulation
applied to his

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

139

right arm or leg. Even with his eyes open and his attention directed
to the point of stimulation, he denied perceiving any stimulation on
the right arm, saying “You’re not fooling me—you’re not touching
me—you’re touching this third arm, that intruder.” He correctly
identiﬁed stimuli applied to the right shoulder, but from the elbow
down the touch was displaced to the extra arm. The patient lay
with his head and eyes deviated to the left throughout the examination. He had difﬁculty perceiving any stimulus in the right side
of space, a phenomenon which has been termed “spatial inattention." When given phrases to read he ignored the right side, reading
only the material on the extreme left. Thus, “GOOD HUMOR
ICE CREAM” was read as “GL.” When his right arm lay at his side
he had trouble ﬁnding it. Once, when he was asked to show it to
the examiner, he looked over his left side only and said, “I think
I’ve been robbed—where is it?”
A lumbar puncture was done and a clear, colorless ﬂuid obtained.
The ﬂuid was under increased pressure even though the patient
was relaxed. The pressure was recorded as 300 mm., the total protein
was 32 mg. per cent, and there were two white cells per cubic mm.
During the ensuing hours the patient continued to be euphoric
and loquacious. He recited long-forgotten lessons and parts of neurological texts whose source was unknown to him. For instance, he
gave a complete description of the course of the facial nerve, and
described the muscles of the face, calling them by their correct Latin
names. He laughed frequently, and recited cryptic remarks as “in
the instrument—insulin—instrument—insulin—instrument ward.”
Disturbances in memory or recall were not elicited. The delusional
“extra arm” disappeared.
An electroencephalogram obtained that afternoon was ﬂat in all
leads on the left side and showed random 5-7 cps activity, chieﬂy on
the right side. Both alpha and beta were prominent on the right
side only. The record was interpreted as showing diffuse dysfunction
with left-sided accentuation.
In the afternoon the patient was subdued. The weakness of the
leg and arm showed some resolution. His relationship to his therapist was completely changed compared to his previous behavior.
There was a complete absence of anger, negativism, withdrawal and
depression. He clung to his doctor, shook hands, held him back and
did not want to be separated from him. He was pleasantly preoccupied with the morning’s episode and joked about it. He was eager to
communicate, and even his hearing seemed to have improved.
The next morning the patient was depressed, restless, bewildered,

�140

KAHN—GRAUBERT—FIN K

slow in answering questions and failed to
respond when asked about
his illness. He spoke in a low voice, at times inaudible.
He was disoriented for time of day and was aware of “numbness” in his
right
arm. He spontaneously asked, “What happened to
me—why am I
taking all this depletion?" Minimal weakness of the right arm and
leg were noted. There was astereognosis in the
right hand, but
tactile stimuli were correctly localized, and there
was no evidence
of hemianopia or inattention. When asked about the
extra arm the
patient was vague and evasive, but did say, “Evidently
somebody
else was with me and it was their
arm I picked up."
That afternoon the patient was given 0.5
gm. amytal sodium.
Besides its use as a test for organic brain
dysfunction, the drug was
given in an attempt to elicit the delusion again (14). At this time
there was neither a change in orientation nor a
recurrence of the
reduplication. There was, however, a marked change in mood and
language. The patient became very euphoric and talkative. His
speech was characterized by ornate, circumstantial,
pedantic, histrionic, and cryptic features, with much use of clichés. For
example,
asked about the extra arm, he said, “I think it will
come looking for
me when and if the occasion is propitious, as it were.” When asked
why he was here, he said, “On the recommendation of the
right

honorable Dr. Fink, most distinguished doctor on the
eastern seaboard Atlantic area whose fame has spread far and wide."
Several
times he blurted out the cryptic remark—“transference
of aggression." When asked what he meant, he said, “If
you can’t kick your
mother-in-law in the head, you try
your father-in-law.”
When asked about his arm the patient was evasive, circumstantial and jocular. For example, asked how the extra
arm was different
from his own arm, he said, “How was it different? For
one reason,
in the sensitivity of feel. I raised
up my left arm and that was all
right. When I went to raise up what I thought was
right
my
arm
that was all right. But when I went to raise this third
arm I did not
feel any sensitivity when raising it,
lifting it, touching it or otherwise in no manner could I relate it to
my corpus—.” When asked
about weakness in his right arm, he said, “It feels little less
a
dynamic in its volition, and I’m tempted to believe in its
delivery, as it

were.”
While the delusion was not present at this time, the
patient
insisted that there had been an extra arm the
day before, saying,
“I was lying in bed and it came to
my aware the presence of another
arm in my bed.” When he was told that the extra arm was
really
his own right arm, he said, “Well, I’ll tell
you. I never argue with

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

141

facts. You see if you’re surmising that it was, and I were to agree, it
would be only for professional courtesy’s sake.” Or at another time,
when the possibility of the extra arm was being questioned by the
examiner, the patient said, “I don’t think it was mine. It might have
been mine, you see, but then I would have to have a comprehensive
knowledge of the numerous preponderous volumes of ancient history in associated situations. And then I might be even able to
volunteer that extra leg which you spoke of before—and beyond.
I might even—be able to extend some photographs of the uterus
which I own. If I could have the extra arm, the additional leg, and
as I said, other things.”
For the next two days he continued to be depressed, spoke slowly
in a low voice, and showed no spontaneity. He complained of feeling
“depleted.” There was no difficulty getting him into a conversation
and he would elaborate in a circumstantial way about the pain in
his head and the numbness in his hand. He refused to get into conversation about his extra arm, saying, “You're making fun of me."
Neurological examination was completely negative.
An electroencephalogram on February 2, 1955 showed a resolution of the asymmetry and abnormality of the previous record. It
was similar to that obtained on admission. The patient was given
amytal again on February 2 and 9. On both occasions he showed a
similar response to that obtained on January 28, with euphoria and
changes in language. His attitude, however, toward the extra arm
and to the weakness of his right arm was altered. He now said that
the extra arm might have been a hallucination due to the drugs he
was receiving. He also admitted having had weakness of his right
arm, saying, “To the best of my recollection there was a general
weakness which might have had a speciﬁc attenuating dilemma in
the appearance of an arm which might have been, to some degree,
in a state of difﬁculty.” On March 2, he was given amytal again. This
time his reaction was more like that seen on admission, although
he became slightly euphoric and loquacious toward the end.
In the weeks following the eventful insulin coma, there was a
change in his clinical behavior. He appeared more sure of himself,
and was co-operative and friendly. He started to press for his discharge. He said that there were things to be done which he, and not
somebody else, should do, but would not specify these things. His
wife visited him and told him she had decided to divorce him and
would not accept him back in his home. The patient took this
announcement without overt emotion. He was unable to give any
reason for his wife’s plans, and stated that he forgot to ask her why.

�142

KAHN—GRAUBERT—FINK

He still wanted to be sent home as soon as
possible because, he said,
he was ready to take up some kind of business. He felt
that he had
failed up to now because of reasons unclear to
him, but that if he
were careful, it would not happen to him again.
This behavior was markedly different from that shown
admison
sion. In contrast to hisprevious aggressive,
uncommunicative and
withdrawn behavior, he was co-operative,
ingratiating, overanxious
to please, and made attempts at socializing with other
patients. His
of a psychiatrist.
DISCUSSION

The delusion of reduplication of parts of the
body has rarely
been reported. The earliest
reports are by Bechterev (1) in 1926 and
Ehrenwald (3) in 1930. In 1935, Schenderov and
Gamaleja
(9) described six cases and suggested that more
might be found if the
phenomenon were better known. In these early studies the
phenomenon was regarded as a neurologic curiosity and was
explained
on
the basis of sensory disturbances. In the work of
Critchley (2), who
reported a similar case in 1952, it was considered as a manifestation
of disturbance in “body image" due to
a parietal lobe lesion of the
nondominant hemisphere.
In 1954, four cases were reported by Weinstein et al.
(14) demonstrating that the phenomenon could not be explained on the basis
of sensory impairment, and was not
dependent on a focal parietal
lesion. They interpreted the delusion as
a symbolic phenomenon
rather than a sensory or perceptual disturbance, and showed
that it
occurred only in a setting of diffuse cerebral dysfunction.
indiThey
cated that parts of the body were redupli‘cated which
were defective
in some way, regardless of whether or not there
was any neurological

involvement.

It

was pointed out that the delusional
reduplication of body
parts is but one manifestation of reduplicative phenomena. Thus
reduplication for time, place and person has also been
reported
(11). In reduplication for time the patient confabulates
that a present experience has also been experienced at a time in the
past. For
example, a patient identiﬁes members of the staff as old friends
or
relatives. Reduplication for place is the confabulation
that two or
more places with the same name and similar attributes exist, when
actually. there is only one. Thus, a patient
may say there are two

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

143

hospitals with the same name and same staff, but locate one closer
to his home and describes it as a hospital which treats convalescent
or minor cases only. In reduplication for person the patient confabulates the existence of two persons when there is actually only one.
One woman, for instance, said she had two sons, one named “Bill,”
and the other “Willie," when actually she had one son named
William.
It was shown by Weinstein et a1. (14) that reduplication was
usually expressed in more than one modality. All patients with delusional reduplication of body parts showed, in addition, reduplication for time, place and/or person. In the present case the patient
also expressed temporal reduplication, describing one of the examiners as someone he had known prior to his hospitalization.
The symbolic importance of the various phenomena of reduplication is evident in their motivational character. In the perception
of a doctor as an old friend or a relative the patient is reassuring
himself that he has less to fear than he would from a total stranger.
In reduplication for place the patient who locates the extra hospital
near his home or describes it as treating only convalescent or minor
cases is minimizing his illness. The patient who confabulated having
two sons, while denying her own illness, complained that poor
“Willie" was in an accident and was afraid that something terrible
had happened to him, thus displacing her concern from herself to
the extra person.
The delusion of reduplication of parts of the body also is a
mechanism facilitating denial of illness. While the patient states
that there is nothing wrong with his own body, it is the reduplicated
arm or leg which is said to be weak or impaired. In the present
instance the patient, who in his premorbid behavior was excessively
worried about bodily ailments, was unconcerned about his severe
disability. Instead, by denying having any trouble with his arm and
saying it was the ”extra” arm that didn’t work, he was able to maintain his euphoria and jocularity.
While reduplication is shown mainly as a symbolic adaptation
to the problem of illness, it may also be a symbolic expression of
other wishes, needs and feelings. For example, a patient with intractable pain had been noisy and demanding and had aroused the
antagonism of members of the staff. Following a course of electroshock therapy her complaints of pain were gone and her relations
with the staff were considerably improved. Along with other
changes in orientation, she confabulated that there were two Mount

�144

KAHN—GRAUBERT—FIN K

Sinai Hospitals, the old one where people were mean to her, and
the new one where everybody was so nice (12).
The delusional reduplication of parts of the body appears to be
related to certain aspects of the premorbid personality. In the present case, and in those reported by Weinstein et al. (14), all the patients demonstrated a special concern with the symbolic importance
of physical characteristics. Our patient was concerned with his
build, the strength of the muscles of his left arm and the presence
of hair on his chest. He was also sensitive about a tooth which had
not come out fully and attempted to conceal it. In the earlier study
(14) a patient who had developed the delusion of multiple heads
following a craniotomy, had been preoccupied with his baldness and
had engaged in numerous extramarital affairs to prove that he was
capable of attracting women. A patient, who confabulated having
three eyes, was very sensitive about a prosthetic eye and would face
people directly forward so that divergence Of his eye would not
be noticed. He was also preoccupied with his build and physical
appearance, engaged intensively in Yogi and Judo, and was concerned with his ability to satisfy his wife sexually.
In recent writings on “spatial inattention” (16, 17) it has been
indicated that this, too, represents a form of symbolic adaptation.
In this case the patient consistently avoided looking to the right
side, was unable to ﬁnd the “extra” arm when it lay at his side, and
only read the extreme left part of phrases shown to him. This behavior facilitated the denial of weakness of his right arm as well as
helped maintain his delusion of the extra extremity. His personality
also showed features that have been described as characteristic of
persons with “spatial inattention” (17). He was very secretive, especially in recent years, and seemed overly concerned with the symbolic signiﬁcance of violence, as shown by his discomfort on visiting
hospitals, his fear of going overseas and by an apparent confabulation that he had once been a secret witness to a murder.
The marked ludic behavior shown by the patient during the
period of his delusion and during the later amytal tests is also
related to his premorbid personality. He was described as having
been a good mimic with a ﬂair for clowning. Ludic behavior has
also been regarded as a form of adaptive behavior (15) in which the
patient acts out a feeling of well-being, implicitly denying his illness.
It is of theoretical interest that the delusional reduplication and
“spatial inattention” occurred with right-sided symptoms. Disorders
of the “body image” and spatial awareness have been regarded as
characteristic of nondominant lesions. In this case, with apparent

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

145

dominant hemisphere involvement but without aphasia, it was possible to study these behavioral changes as clearly as with nondom—
inant lesions. One must conclude that in the usual case of a dominant lesion, pathology which is sufficiently extensive for these
changes to occur, will also result in an aphasic disorder which masks
the phenomena.
The neurologic lesion which was the basis for the reported
of
diffuse
behavior
in
alteration
dysfunction
a
and
was
phenomena
the cerebrum with accentuation of the left hemisphere. Such disturbances in neurologic function are not uncommon in insulin
coma therapy, and are the result of persistent cellular dysfunction
despite restoration of the glucose level of the blood. While one may
ascribe etiological importance in the production of this patient’s
hemiplegia to the history of rheumatic fever and the cardiac murmurs, this is not warranted considering the absence of other rheumatic phenomena either before or subsequent to the event. It is
more meaningful to regard this incident as one manifestation of the
central nervous system damage incurred by prolonged hypoglycemia.
Such manifestations include all aspects of nervous system functions
including seizures, transient hemiplegia and aphasia, confusional
syndrome and Korsakoff psychoses, prolonged coma and death (6).
Recent studies of the electroencephalographic changes during prolonged coma (18) and minor neurologic signs following insulin
coma treatment (19) amplify the variety of neurologic sequelae of
this treatment.
The importance of cerebral damage in the mechanism of somatic
therapies has recently been re-emphasized by Weinstein and Kahn
(12, 16). They suggest that improvement following somatic therapies
is characterized by manifestations of denial in a milieu of altered
brain function. A study in this laboratory (5) has supported this
hypothesis concerning electroshock therapy; Improved patients
showed signiﬁcantly earlier and more persistent alterations in brain
function as measured by the amytal test (13) and by serial electroencephalographic studies (4), and more changes in language and
behavior indicative of denial, than did patients who failed to
improve.
Recent case reports of the effects of prolonged insulin coma by
Revitch (8), Kwalwasser and Caplan (7), Shagass and Rowsell (10),
and Yeager et a1. (18) point to the behavioral improvement and discerebral
when
of
damage superschizophrenic
symptoms
appearance
venes. In this patient, too, there was an immediate, marked and
cerebral
with
concomitant
behavior
damage.
in
change
persistent

�KAHN—GRAUBERT—FINK

146

It was possible here to demonstrate not only explicit verbal denial
of illness, but other aspects of denial as reduplication, spatial inat-

tention and changes in mood and language. Thus, the observations
in his case are consistent with the hypothesis of Weinstein and
Kahn. Further studies of the role of premorbid personality in denial, and on the mechanism of somatic therapies are now in progress.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

A case history is presented of a 34-year-old man with a fourmonth history of acute mental illness who was placed on insulin
coma therapy. After his 19th coma he developed a right hemiplegia,
hemianopia, hemisensory syndrome and “spatial inattention,” and
became ludic, euphoric and loquacious.'At this time he showed
delusional reduplication of body parts, expressing the conviction
that while there was nothing the matter with his right arm, there
was an “extra" arm in his bed which did not belong to him and
which did not work.
2. The signiﬁcance of reduplication is discussed in terms of a
symbolic adaptation to illness. This phenomenon, as well as his
other changes in behavior such as “spatial inattention" and ludic
behavior, is considered to be related to his premorbid personality.
3. The presence of these phenomena in a case with right-sided
symptoms is considered with reference to anatomical localization.
These ﬁndings contradict the traditional view that “body image"
disorders and “spatial inattention” depend on a nondominant
hemisphere lesion.
4. The subsequent changes in the patient’s behavior, in which
he showed complete recovery from his illness, is discussed in terms
of its implications for the mechanism of action of insulin coma
therapy. The results are considered to support the theoretical view
that improvement in the somatic therapies is characterized by manifestations of denial in a milieu of altered brain function.
1.

REFERENCES
Bechterev, V. M.: Obozr. Psikh., 1926, cited by Schenderov and Gamaleja.
Critchley, M.: A Phantom Supernumerary Limb after a Cervical Root
Lesion, Arq. Neuro-Psiquit., 10:269-275. 1952.
(3) Ehrenwald, H.: Altered Perception of the Body Image with Consequent
Psychosis in Left Hemiplegia. Mschr. f. Psychiat. u. Neurol., 75:89-97, 1930.
(4) Fink, M. and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of Electroencephalographic Changes and
Improvement in Electroshock Therapy. In preparation.

(1)
(2)

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

147

Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.: Relation Between Altered Brain
Function and Denial in Electroshock Therapy. In preparation.
(6) Kalinowsky, L. B. and Hoch, P.: Shack Treatment, Psychasurgery and Other
Somatic Treatment in Psychiatry (2nd ed.). New York: Grune 8c Stratton,
(5)

1952.

and Caplan, M.: A Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma: Treatment. This Journal, 1:145-155, 1952.
Revitch, E.: Observations on Organic Brain Damage and Clinical Improvement Following Protracted Insulin Coma. Psychiat. Quart., 28:72-92, 1954.
Schenderov, L. I. and Gamaleja, K. N.: Peculiar Disturbance of Body Scheme
in Hemiplegics (Pseudomelia). J. Nevrol. Psihhiat. i Psikhogig., 4:361-372,

(7) Kwalwasser, S.
(8)
(9)

1935.

and Rowsell, P. W.: Serial Electroencephalographic and Clinical
Studies in a Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. (‘5' Psychiat., 72:705-711. 1954.
(11) Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Sugarman, L. A.: Phenomenon of Reduplication. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat., 67:808-814, 1952.
(12) Weinstein, E. A., Linn, L., and Kahn, R. L.: Psychosis During Electroshock
Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy. Am. J. Psychiat.,

(10) Shagass, C.

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)

109:22-26, 1952.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium") in Brain Disease. Am. J.
Psychiat., 109:889-894, 1953.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Malitz, S., and Rozanski, ].: Delusional Reduplication of Parts of the Body. Brain, 77:45-60, 1954.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Sugarman, L. A.: Ludic Behavior in Patients with Brain Disease. This journal, 3298-106, 1954.
Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Denial of Illness. Springﬁeld, 111.:

Charles C. Thomas, 1955.
(17) Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Slote, W.: Withdrawal, Inattention and
Pain Asymbolia. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. (9 Psychiat., in press.
(18) Yeager, C. L., Simon, A., Margolis, L. H., and Burch, N. R.: Electroencephalographic Studies in Posthypoglycemic Coma. J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis.,
118:435-441, 1953.
(19) Ziegler, D. K.: Minor Neurologic Signs and Symptoms Following Insulin
Coma Therapy. J. Nero. (3' Ment. Dis., 120:75-78, 1954.

�6&amp;3»; a;

M '4
’

u

��an m w

‘~

w

m at m w m was. M M
,
'

,

..
”MW;
mm a; m.

.

M3mg, W
M §F
mm
man—5....

������������mmmmmwwmmmiw-

mummmuummmnmmmmm~'
hag-6“}

m

IZLv*"'

,-Mv.-..‘w+,w

A

.w

~

��'

~19-

a We
"a

u

'

of

W M w W m M a -::.,.;

m m mm mm M m u m
.

���WW*WWMWW“WWMMWW

‘

WMWNWWWQﬂiwwm‘
a m. m m mm m mm w
-

Wmmwgmmwwmamwmw
.
*meummmim «WM
W W M Wm w w
m «mm W

(X);

.

mammary In

wmmmmmmwmwmm

�,,

m w W» m W mm m m

��m

mM

m

-

,

�Vt,“

~

m

as.

a. m

»
~

~

‘
-

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2424">
                <text>Delusional reduplication of parts of body after insulin coma therapy. Journal of the Hillside Hospital, 4: 134-147, 1955.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2425">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2426">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-16-020</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2427">
                <text>1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2428">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Graubert, David N.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2429">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2430">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2431">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL Volume IV July, 1955 Number 3.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2432">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2433">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74445">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81006">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87567">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94128">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="244" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="35">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/d4673cc7ac4d3b5481723b3db49559a7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7cd1e7dcb45e0955ceb3d6c8e6eafcd7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100661">
                    <text>Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical
Improvement in Electroshock

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.,

Max

Fink, M.D.

Glen Oaks, N.Y.
and
Edwin A.

Weinstein, M.D.

Bethesda,

Md.

Submitted for publication February 23, 1956.

Hillside Hospital (Drs.

Kahn and

of Research (Dr. Weinstein).

Fink). Walter

Reed Army

Institute

supported in part by the Medical Research and
of the Surgeon General, Department of the
Office
Development Board,
and grant M-927 from the
DA-h9-OO7-MD-376;
No.
under
Contract
Army,
of
the
Mental
National
Health
Institutes of
of
National Institute
Health
Public
Service.
U.S.
Health,
This

investigation

was

�\

theories about the mode of action of electroshock
therapy have been offered, the relationship among neurophysiological
and psychological factors remains poorly understood (1,2). Although
While many

changes in brain function

may be

demonstrated

on

electrical recording,

such evidence of impaired function has not been correlated with the
degree of psychiatric improvement. Similarly, although memory defects

learning ability are common manifestations following the
administration of electrically induced convulsions, their severity is
not an index of therapeutic outcome. It would appear that the results
of ordinary clinical and laboratory procedures and psychological tests
do not furnish adequate criteria for a correlation of the alterations
of behavior with the changes in brain function.
In previous studies (3) it has been suggested that the therapeutic action of electroshock therapy was related to the production
of a milieu of brain dysfunction in which denial of illness (anosognosia) might occur. A concept of anosognosia was advanced which
included not only denial of hemiplegia and blindness but denial of
many other aspects of illness and problems of living. It was indicated that anosognosia was not explicable as a focal deficit but was,
rather, a manifestation of a reorganization of perceptual symbolic
function in which the patient represented his problems in an altered
language pattern. In the verbal sphere these language patterns
included explicit denial, disorientation for place and time, reduplication (reduplicative paramnesia), paraphasia, and confabulation.
The patient's feelings about his illness and incapacities could also
be manifested in nonverbal aspects of behavior, such as selective
and impaired

�-2withdrawal, inattention, and muteness (akinetic mutism), altered
sexual behavior, and euphoric, manic states. The particular form
of symbolic adaptation that was used was
of the premorbid personality.

closely related to features

These changes in behavior were found commonly with

infiltrating

neoplasms, with acute vascular

lesions, particularly when associated
with subarachnoid bleeding, and following lacerating brain injury.
electroencephalographic records showed diffuse slow-wave rhythms,
and it appeared that the lesions affected the diffuse projection
systems rather than any specific discrete projection area. Similar
forms of behavior may appear after the operation of prefrontal
lobotomy and, in more transitory form, after the administration of
electroshock convulsions. When the degree of brain damage was
insufficient to permit the elicitation of explicit denial and disorientation on ordinary clinical examination, these phenomena might
be observed when the patient was interviewed after the intravenous
administration of amobarbital (Amytal) sodium. This observation
furnished the basis for the "Amytal test" for brain damage, in which
the persistence of certain patterns of denial and disorientation are
considered as evidence of impaired function (h,5,6,7).
It was reported that in some patients receiving electroshock
treatment for intractable pain, the amobarbital test, which was
previously negative, became positive after a number of convulsions.
Others received as many as 18 shocks without change in the results
The

of the amobarbital

test. It

was

noted that in patients

who

gained

�-3-

relief

from

their complaints

of pain, the amobarbital

positive, whereas in those patients

tests

became

continued to complain of
pain the amobarbital tests remained negative. The purpose of the
present paper is to determine the relationship between the clinical
response to electroshock treatment and the results of the amobarbital test in patients hospitalized for psychiatric illness.
who

METHOD

patient was given a series of amobarbital tests. In this
test, the patient is asked a standard group of questions pertaining
to orientation and the awareness of illness. The drug is then
administered intravenously in a 0.5% solution at a rate of 0.05 gm.
Each

cc.) per minute until nystagmus, slurred speech, drowsiness, and
errors in counting backward are noted. The same questions are then
repeated. The following changes, when persistent,are called
"positive" and are deemed indicative of cerebral dysfunction.
1. Complete denial of illness2. Denial of major aspects of illness, such as attributing
entry into hospital to a trivial or past illness.
(1

hospital, either its proper name or in terms
of some euphemism, such as "rest home".
h. Displacement of the location of the hospital, such as to
another city3.

Misnaming the

5.

Confabulated journey.
Reduplication of the hospital, such as the patient's stating that he is in another hospital of the same or similar

6.

�name.
7.

Disorientation for time of day with confusion of day and

night.
8.

Gross
him a

9.
The

misidentification of the examiner, such as calling
"lawyer" or an "entertainer".

Disorientation for year.
patient was given his first test prior to treatment and

was

retested at weekly intervals. All patients in the series had negative amobarbital tests prior to the ﬂﬁtiation of therapy. Treat—
ments were administered three times a week, so that the patients
were generally tested after every third treatment. A test was given
two days after a treatment and was continued at weekly intervals

after

the termination of therapy

until the result

had become nega-

tive.
Electroencephalographic records and standard tests of memory
and learning ability were also given, but will not be considered
in detail in this paper.
POPULATION

patients at Hillside HOSpital receiving electroshock with the Reiter Electrostimulator were studied. The patients
were not selected by us but were taken on the basis of consecutive
referrals by the clinical staff. Some patients were necessarily
excluded because their treatment was terminated or interrupted before
they were adequately studied. Another patient was omitted because
he had manifestations of brain disease and a positive amobarbital
Twenty—four

�-5-

test prior to electroconvulsive therapy.

The number of

treatments

varied from 9 to 33. Patients who showed clinical improvement
tended to receive fewer treatments. Some of this variability could
also be ascribed to differences in the inclination of the resident
psychiatrists to use this form of treatment. One patient decided
for himself that he had had enough treatment and eloped. Diagnostically, the patients consisted of lh with depressive reactions, 9 with
schizophrenia, and l with manic reaction. There were 15 women and
9 men,

and the ages ranged from 2h to 68, with a median of h?

years.

Evaluation of Response to Electroshock Therapy: All patients
were observed for at least eight weeks after completion of treatment. Determination of the patient's response to electroshock was
made on the basis of the resident psychiatrist's impression, staff
opinion, the nurses' notes, and the clinical evaluation of one of
us (M. F.), who supervised the treatments but was not aware of the
amobarbital test results. On this basis the patients were divided

into three groups.
cases in this group were regarded
as showing recovery or marked improvement. These patients no longer
showed the symptoms which brought them into the hospital: their
doctors felt they were better, and the nurses noted them as being
able to sleep without medication, eating better, getting along with
the other patients, and participating in hospital activities.
A.

Markedly Improved:

The 11

Moderately Improved: The six patients in this group showed
some improvement but continued to manifest indﬂations of mental
B.

�-5-

illness.

patients typically showed symptomatic relief; ELEL’
acute depressive features might be gone, but the dramatic change, so
evident in the first group, was not apparent. Each patient continThese

noticeable disturbance, such as obsessional thinking,
paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
ued to show some
C.

seven

Minimally Improved or Unimproved:

patients in

whom

change was not

showed only equivocal or

In

this group

was

clearly noticeable or

transient improvement.

placed

who

Some showed

fluctu-

ations in behavior, at times appearing somewhat improved. But the
change was not sustained, so that by the end of treatment they
appeared much as they did before.
We are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement.
Others may have differed in the estimates of changes in these
patients. In any case, by using this threefold classification, the
differences between the first and the third group will be distinct.
OBSERVATIONS

Distribution of Positive Reactions: The number of amobarbital tests given to each patient during the course of electroshock
A.

to 13, depending on how long treatment was maintained.
In Table l the data are shown for the number of tests given during
treatment and the number and percentage positive for all the patients

ranged from

3

in each group. The markedly improved patients showed many more
positive reactions than the unimproved group, with the moderately
improved patients between these groups. Every markedly improved
patient had at least one positive amobarbital reaction during

�-7the other hand, one of the moderately improved
patients and five of the unimproved patients never showed a positive
result. A comparison of the results in each group, using the x2
test, is statistically significant at better than the 1% level of

treatment.

0n

confidence.
B.

Positive Reactions at

Each Stage of Treatment:

In the

Figure the groups are compared for the percentage of patients in
each group who had positive results at each stage of treatment.
Almost half the markedly improved patients had positive reac-

tions after only three treatments, and all had positive reactions
after seven to nine treatments. In the unimproved cases, on the
other hand, the number of positive reactions was small and there
was no consistent increase during the course of treatment. Again,
the moderately improved group tends to fall between the other two.
Fig:

Percentage of positive amobarbital test
reactions occurring in each group at
different stages of treatment.

patients received more than 15 treatments, the
data are not presented beyond this point because the number in each
Although some

group became too small for purposes of comparison. Four of the
unimproved patients received more than 20 treatments, with consis-

tently negative amobarbital test results. One of the moderately
improved patients received over 30 treatments, with only an
occasionally positive reaction.

�-8-

variations in
the persistence of positive reactions from week to week. With at
least two consecutive positives as the criterion of persistence,
0.

Duration of Positive Reactions:

There were

nine of the markedly improved, two of the moderately improved, and
only one of the unimproved group showed persistent positives. After
the termination of treatment all patients but one had negative
amobarbital reactions nine days after the last convulsion. The
remaining patient developed a negative test during the second week

after treatment.
Factor of Age: Since the patients in the markedly improved
group tended to be older persons suffering from depressive reactions,
it is conceivable that the difference in amobarbital test results
D.

related solely to age and only coincidentally to clinical
improvement. Underlying this is the assumption that the older
person is more likely to show signs of altered brain function when
given electroshock. In Table 2 the mean age for each group is shown.
It is apparent that the first two groups were older than the

may

be

patients. Yet, while the mean age of the moderately
patients is slightly higher than that of the markedly
group, these patients still had significantly fewer positive

unimproved
improved
improved

reactions.
the number of positive reactions during treatment is
for each group when the analysis is limited to patients more

In Table
shown

3

years of age. In this Table the relationship of positive
reactions in the different groups remains unchanged from that when
than

hO

�-9the groups are considered as a whole.
OTHER

ASPECTS OF BEHAVIOR

Apart from explicit denial of illness and disorientation, there
were changes in behavior that occurred both under the influence of
the drug and clinically during the course of treatment in signifi—

cantly progressive fashion in those patients who improved. These
aspects may be divided into verbal and nonverbal communication.
A.
Changes in Verbal Language: These changes consisted of
denial expressed in evasion, in negative expressions, and in the
use of a syntactical pattern involving the third and second persons.

patients gave such answers as "It's
hard to say", or "I forgot", or "I don't know; I've been waiting
for the doctors to tell me." The change in syntactical pattern is

When

asked about

illustrated

their

symptoms,

"It's

they call a depression",
or "I'm afraid somebody will get hurt", or answering the question
"What is your main trouble?" with "What is your main trouble?"
by such remarks as

what

patients would talk of a relative who was sick.
In patients who improved there was a notable development of such
patterns in a nondrug interview. One such patient, for example when
asked prior to the start of treatment what his main trouble was,
said, "I’m depressed." After two treatments he answered the question with "I don't get along well with my mother-in-law." After
five treatments he said, "I don't get what you mean"; after eight,
"I get sick; that's all I know." After 10 treatments he said, "Right
now, it's that I don’t see my wife," and after 11 treatments he said,
Sometimes

�-10"In what way do you mean?" and "I

don't

know how

to explain

it."

termination of treatment, his main trouble was given as "I
want to get home", followed by an account of how "good" his wife
At the

was.

the other hand, the increased use
of these language patterns did not occur. They were not present in
In the unimproved group,

some and were

on

minimally or inconsistently noted in others.

In some

patients there were actually fewer such language
patterns under the effects of the drug than there had been in the
of the unimproved

preamobarbital interview.
B.

Changes in Nonverbal Behavior:

reactions occurred
frequently in the markedly

Euphoric

in both clinical and drug interviews most
improved group, less often in the moderately improved group, and
least often in the group which were considered unimproved. In the

patient classed as manic, euphoric behavior

present
in his clinical behavior and was not changed by amobarbital.
Changes in sexual behavior appeared during the amobarbital
interviews of four of the markedly improved patients but in only
one patient in each of the other categories. This took the form of
trying to hug or caress the examiner, making remarks with sexual
content, or engaging in masturbatory activity. A patient in the
unimproved group showed this behavior both during pre-drug interviews and under the influence of amobarbital.
unimproved

Withdrawal or
markedly improved

"selective inattention"

was

was shown by

patients, particularly during the

9

of the

ll

drug phase of the

�amobarbital interview. This behavior consisted of failure to answer
the questions about illness and hospitalization or responding in
dysarthric and cryptic fashion. This reaction under the drug occur—
red only once in each of the other groups. It was of interest that
two

patients in the unimproved category who appeared withdrawn before

the test became more responsive under the influence of the drug.
COMMENT

results of the amobarbital tests in these patients indicate
that there is a relation between clinical improvement and the production of brain damage or an altered state of brain function as
determined by this particular method of examination. In patients
The

who

improve, the amobarbital

test

becomes

consistently positive

early in the course of treatment. In moderately improved or unimproved patients there are fewer positive reactions and their frequency does not increase with more treatments. With other methods
of evaluating brain function such close correlation was not present,

all patients

abnormalities in the electroencephalographic
record and impaired learning was found as frequently in patients
who improved as in those who do not. The significance of this
relationship may be more clearly appreciated by a consideration of
the changes in symbolic function that occur in states of altered
brain function.
It has been useful in studying the behavior of patients with
alterations in brain function to distinguish between defects in the
as

showed

formation of symbol patterns and changes of language patterns which

�-12-

interaction in the environment. In
the first category may be included many types of memory defects,
dyscalculia, topographical disorientation, and aphasia. A patient
with such a memory defect cannot select elements of experience,
classify them into significant units, and arrange them into a temporal pattern. These defects are observed with diffuse cortical
lesions and probably occur universally after shock treatments in
transient fashion. They are, however, related very remotely, if at
all, to therapeutic outcome. Alterations in the mode of interaction
in the environment are exemplified in the various patterns of disorientation and denial and in the amnesias that are noted with
lesions of the diffuse projection systems, in chronic barbiturate
intoxication, and following electroshock convulsions. Here there
is no defect in memory, awareness, or perception as such, but the
patient selects or rejects certain aspects of the environment for
the expression of his own motivations. In disorientation for place,
for example, the misnaming and mislocating of the hospital serve as
symbolic representations of the patient's feelings about his incapindicate

abilities

shift in the

a

and problems

be well and go home.

mode of

as the manifestation of his need to
not that the patient is unaware of his

-- often

It is

is in an absolute sense. He
of the hospital and expresses "aware-

problems and does not know where he
commonly "remembers"

ness" of his
unawareness

the name

difficulties in other contexts of language. The
is, rather, of the far greater degree to which he is

expressing his

own

motivations in his perception of the temporal,

�-13-

aspects of the environment.
In considering what constitutes therapeutic improvement, it is
evident that the evaluation that is commonly made by a hospital

spatial, personal,

and somatic

the particular types of symbolic
adaptation and defensive operations that are used. If the patient
denies that he has any problems or that he is troubled by them, or
if he cannot recall any, he is rated as improved. Such patients
characteristically appear affable and uncomplaining, their manner
reinforced by cliches and banalities, themselves adaptive forms of

staff

large part

depends in

on

that general
memory impairment does not persist after electroshock but that there
is a selective "forgetting" of traumatic material in the patient's
life. This does not mean that he has developed a better understand—
ing of his interpersonal relationships or has acquired "insight“.
The observation is also significant in explaining why, although
electroshock may have a short-term beneficial effect, evaluation of
long-term results shows little difference between treated and untreated cases. Also, the fact that therapeutic improvement did not
result in patients with negative amobarbital tests suggests that
methods of administering electroshock by minimally affecting brain
function, such as a unilateral seizure, will not prove generally
efficacious. From the immediately practical standpoint, the amobarbital test given after the third or fourth treatment may be of
language.

Many

studies (8,9,10,11,12) have

shown

prognostic value.
The

amobarbital

test is

not in

itself

a

direct index of brain

�-114-

in that it measures some particular modality of dysfunction
or brings out a specific defect. Rather, under the conditions in
which it is given, one deduces impaired neural function by reason
of the change in the organization or pattern of language in which
the patient expresses himself. A positive result requires not only
damage

certain degree and type of impairment of brain function exist
but that the patient employ verbal denial and disorientation as
adaptive mechanisms. It would be expected that among patients with
equivalent degrees of brain damage the highest incidence of positive
that

a

amobarbital tests would occur among those who characteristically use
denial as an adaptive mechanism in stress.
In relating these findings to the mode of action of electroshock and other somatic therapies, several considerations seem of
importance. There is a combination of an added stress and a change
in brain function. The milieu of brain function determines the

pattern or organization of the adaptive behavior which can be most
clearly formulated in terms of language. These include not only
verbal patterns of denial and disorientation, elicited with the aid
of the drug, but changes in syntactical patterns indicative of an
altered relationship of the self in the environment. There were
also indications that in the improved patients there were more

all

types of symbolic adaptation, nonverbal as well as
verbal. Thus, a patient who appeared withdrawn both in the predrug
and in the drug interview had a poorer prognosis than the patient
The
who became withdrawn only under the effects of the drug.
changes in

�-15-

patient

who showed

altered sexual behavior under the effects of the

drug had also exhibited

this behavior during the clinical question-

ing as well and did not improve with treatment, whereas the four
patients manifesting sexual behavior only under effects of the drug
did improve. It is likely that the faculty of changing symbolic

patterns regardless of content is

a

factor in therapeutic improve-

ment.
SUMMARY

patients referred consecutively for electroshock
treatment were given amobarbital (Amytal) tests before and at
regular intervals during and following the course of treatment.
There was a close relationship between the short-term response
Twenty-four

to treatment and the results of the amobarbital

tests.

The much

patients showed early, persistent, and increasingly positive reactions during the course of treatment. Unimproved patients
showed no positive reactions, or showed them infrequently and inconsistently. An intermediate group, who showed moderate clinical
improvement, showed more positive reactions than the unimproved
group but fell far short of the much improved group in the incidence
of positive reactions.
Changes in language and nonverbal forms of behavior related to
denial were most consistent and pronounced in the improved group,
improved

interviews not employing drugs.
These observations indicate that clinical improvement in elec—
troshock requires the creation of conditions of altered brain function in which new patterns of symbolic adaptation can be maintained.
even in

�TABLE 1

Distribution of Positive Amobarbital Tests
During Treatment

No. of

Tests

Given During

Markedly improved

Moderately improved
Unimproved

(7)

(11)
(6)

No.

%

Treatment

Positive

Positive

50

38

76

39

15

38

hS

6

13

�TABLE 2

Relationship of Clinical Improvement
To Age

Mean

Agez Yr.

Markedly improved

Moderately improved
Unimproved

(7)

(11)
(6)

h7.6h
50.00
35.29

�TABLE 3

Distribution of Positive Amobarbital Tests
in Patients More Than ho Years of Age

No. of

Tests

Given During

Markedly improved
Moderately improved
Unimproved

(3)

(10)
(5)

No.

%

Treatment

Positive

Positive

h6

35

76

3h

15

hS

17

�REFERENCES

1.

Gordon, H.L.:

Fifty

Shock Therapy Theories, Mil. Surgeon,

192: 397, 19h8.
Kalinowsky, L.B., and Koch, P.H.: Shock Treatment, Psychosurgery and Other Somatic Treatment in Psychiatry, Ed. 2, New York,
Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952.
2.

Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic
and Physiological Aspects, Springfield, I11., Charles C. Thomas,
3.

Publisher, 1955.
Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L., Sugarman, L.A. and Linn, L.:
Diagnostic Use of Amobarbital Sodium in Organic Brain Disease, Am.
h.

J.

Psychiat., 112: 889-89u, 1953.
Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L. and Malitz, 5.: Serial Administration of "Amytal Test" for Brain Disease: Its Diagnostic and
Prognostic Value, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 11: 217-226,
S.

195k.

Weinstein, E.A. and Malitz, 3.: Changes in Symbolic Ex—
pression with Amobarbital Sodium ("Amytal Sodium"), Am. J. Psychiat.,
6.

lll=

198-206, 195h.
7.

Kahn,

R.L., Fink,

M.

and Weinstein, E.A.:

The "Amytal

Test"

in Patients with Mental Illness, J. Hillside Hosp., Q: 3-13, 1955.
8. Carter, J.T.: Type of Personal Life Memories Forgotten
Following Electra-Convulsive Therapy, Am. Psychologist, g: 330, 1953.
9. Janis, I.L.: Psychologic Effects of Electric Convulsive
Treatments: I. Post-Treatment Amnesias, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis., 111:
359, 1950.

�-210.

Korngold, M.:

An

Investigation of

Some

Psychological

Effects of Electric Shock Treatment, Am. Psychol., g: 381-382, 1953.
11. Teicher, A.: The Effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy on
the Visual Reactions of Schizophrenic Patients,

Am.

Pszchol.,

hhS, 1953.

12.

Person,

Alexander, L.:
Am.

J. Psychiat.,

Effect of Electroshock
109: 696-698, 1953.

on a "Normal"

Q:

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry
July 1956, Vol. 76, pp. 23—29
Copyright 1956, by American, Medical Association

lee/whorl

.725!
to
o/ﬂmoéaréita/

C/inica/

E/ectrodhocé
jm/orouement in
ROBERT L. KAHN. Ph.D.
MAX FlNK. M.D.. Glen Oaks. N. Y.

and
EDWIN A. WEINSTEIN. M.D.. Bethesda. Md.
lllllllllll|l||[|[|IllllllllllIlllllllllllllll|IIIlIllIlllllllIlllIll|||l||llIll||l|lllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIllllllllllllllllllU

While many theories about the mode of
action of electroshock therapy have been
offered, the relationship among neurophy—
siological and psychological factors remains
poorly understood.* Although changes in
brain function may be demonstrated on electrical recording, such evidence of impaired
function has not been correlated with the
degree of psychiatric improvement. Similarly, although memory defects and impaired
learning ability are common manifestations
following the administration of electrically
induced convulsions, their severity is not an
index of therapeutic outcome. It would apclinical
of
results
the
that
ordinary
pear
and laboratory procedures and psychological tests do not furnish adequate criteria
for a correlation of the alterations of be—
havior with the changes in brain function.
3
it has been suggested
studies
In previous
that the therapeutic action of electroshock
therapy was related to the production of a
milieu of brain dysfunction in which denial
of illness (anosognosia) might occur. A
concept of anosognosia was advanced which
included not only denial of hemiplegia and
Submitted for publication Feb. 23, 1956.

Hillside Hospital (Drs. Kahn and Fink).
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Dr.
Weinstein).
This investigation was supported in part by the

Medical Research and Development Board, Ofﬁce
of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army,
under Contract No. DA—49—007—MD—376; and grant
M-927 from the National Institute of Mental
Health of the National Institutes of Healthy U. S.
Public Health Service.
*

References 1-2.

blindness but denial of many other aspects
of illness and problems of living. It was
indicated that anosognosia was not explicable as a focal deﬁcit but was, rather, a
manifestation of a reorganization of perceptual symbolic function in which the patient
represented his problems in an altered lan—
guage pattern. In the verbal sphere these
language patterns included explicit denial,
disorientation for place and time, reduplica—
tion (reduplicative paramnesia), paraphasia,
and confabulation. The patient’s feelings
about his illness and incapacities could also
be manifested in nonverbal aspects of behavior, such as selective withdrawal, inat—
tention, and muteness (akinetic mutism).
altered sexual behavior, and euphoric, manic
states. The particular form of symbolic
adaptation that was used was closely related
to features of the premorbid personality.
These changes in behavior were found
commonly with inﬁltrating neoplasms, with
acute vascular lesions, particularly when
associated with subarachnoid bleeding, and
following lacerating brain injury. The elec—
troencephalographic records showed diffuse
slow—wave rhythms, and it appeared that
the lesions affected the diffuse projection
systems rather than any speciﬁc discrete
projection area. Similar forms of behavior
may appear after the operation of prefrontal
lobotomy and, in more transitory form, after
the administration of electroshock convul—
sions. When the degree of brain damage
was insufﬁcient to permit the elicitation of
explicit denial and disorientation on ordi—
nary clinical examination, these phenomena
might be observed when the patient was in—
terviewed after the intravenous administra—
tion of amobarbital (Amytal) sodium. This

�observation furnished the basis for the
“Amytal test” for brain damage, in which
the persistence of certain patterns of denial
and disorientation are considered as evi—
dence of impaired function.T
It was reported that in some patients
receiving electroshock treatment for intractable pain, the amobarbital test, which was
previously negative, became positive after
a number of convulsions. Others received
as many as 18 shocks without change in the
results of the amobarbital test. It was noted
that in patients who gained relief from
their complaints of pain, the amobarbital
tests became positive, whereas in those pa—
tients who continued to complain of pain
the amobarbital tests remained negative. The
purpose of the present paper is to determine
the relationship between the clinical response to electroshock treatment and the
results of the amobarbital test in patients
hospitalized for psychiatric illness.

Method
Each patient was given a series of amobarbital
tests. In this test, the patient is asked a standard
group of questions pertaining to orientation and
the awareness of illness. The drug is then administered intravenously in a 0.5% solution at a
rate of 0.05 gm. (1 cc.) per minute until nystagmus, slurred speech, drowsiness, and errors in
counting backward are noted. The same questions
are then repeated. The following changes, when
persistent, are called “positive” and are deemed
indicative of cerebral dysfunction.
1. Complete denial of illness
2. Denial of major aspects of illness, such as
attributing entry into hospital to a trivial or
past illness
3. Misnaming the hospital, either its proper name
or in terms of some euphemism, such as “rest
home”
4. Displacement of the location of the hospital.
such as to another city
5-"

6.

7.

8.
9.
1'

Confabulated journey
Reduplication of the hospital, such as the
patient’s stating that he is in another hospital
of the same or similar name
Disorientation for time of day with confusion
of day and night
Gross misidentiﬁcation of the examiner, such
as calling him a “lawyer” or an “entertainer”
Disorientation for year

References 4-7.

The patient was given his ﬁrst test prior to
treatment and was retested at weekly intervals.
All patients in the series had negative amobarbital
tests prior to the initiation of therapy. Treatments
were administered three times a week, so that the
patients were generally tested after every third
treatment. A test was given two days after a
treatment and was continued at weekly in—
tervals after the termination of therapy until the
result had become negative.
Electroencephalographic records and standard
tests of memory and learning ability were also
given, but will not be considered in detail in this
paper.

Population
T wenty-four patients at Hillside Hospital receiving electroshock with the Reiter Electrostimulator were studied. The patients were not selected
by us but were taken on the basis of consecutive
referrals by the clinical staff. Some patients were
necessarily excluded because their treatment was
terminated or interrupted before they were ade—
quately studied. Another patient was omitted because he had manifestations of brain disease and
a positive amobarbital test prior to electroconvulsive
therapy. The number of treatments varied from 9
to 33. Patients who showed clinical improvement
tended to receive fewer treatments. Some of this
variability could also be ascribed to differences in
the inclination of the resident psychiatrists to use
this form of treatment. One patient decided for
himself that he had had enough treatment and
eloped.
Diagnostically, the patients consisted
of 14 with depressive reactions, 9 with schizophrenia, and l with a manic reaction. There were
15 women and 9 men, and the ages ranged from
24 to 68, with a median of 47 years.
Evaluation of Response to Electroshock Therapy.
——All patients were observed for at least eight
weeks after completion of treatment. Determina—
tion of the patient’s response to electroshock was
made on the basis of the resident psychiatrist’s im—
pression, staff opinion, the nurses’ notes, and the
clinical evaluation of one of us (M. F.), who
supervised the treatments but was not aware of
the amobarbital test results. On this basis the
patients were divided into three groups.
A. Markedly Improved: The 11 cases in this
group were regarded as showing recovery or
marked improvement. These patients no longer
showed the symptoms which brought them into
the hospital; their doctors felt they were better,
and the nurses noted them as being able to sleep
Without medication, eating better, getting along
with the other patients, and participating in hospital activities.
B. Moderately Improved: The six patients in
this group showed some improvement but con~

�tinued to manifest indications of mental illness.
These patients typically showed symptomatic relief; i.e., acute depressive features might be gone,
but the dramatic change, so evident in the ﬁrst
group, was not apparent. Each patient continued
to show some noticeable disturbance, such as ob—
sessional thinking, paranoid ideas, or somatic
preoccupation.
C. Minimally Improved or Unimproved: In this
group was placed seven patients in whom change
was not clearly noticeable or who showed only
equivocal or transient improvement. Some showed
ﬂuctuations in behavior, at times appearing some—
what improved. But the change was not sustained,
so that by the end of treatment they appeared
much as they did before.
\Ve are aware of the difﬁculties in evaluating
improvement. Others may have differed in the
estimates of changes in these patients. In any
case, by using this threefold classiﬁcation, the
differences between the ﬁrst and the third group
will be distinct.

TABLE

Markedly improved (11)-__
Moderately improved (6)-Unimproved (7)____________

Treatment
50
39
45

Amobarbital

No.
%
Positive Positive
38

15.93
6

.4,

76
38
13

treatments, and all had positive reactions
after seven to nine treatments. In the unim-proved cases, on the other hand, the number
of positive reactions was small and there
was no consistent increase during the course
of treatment. Again, the moderately improved group tends to fall between the
other two.
IOO

90
80

Observations

._

MUCH IMPROVEDUI)

----

UNIMPROVEDU)

.\/

'-—MOD.IMPROVED(6)

70
AMYTAL

A. Distribution of Positive Reactions.—

group, with the moderately improved pa—
tients between these groups. Every
markedly improved patient had at least
one positive amobarbital reaction during
treatment. On the other hand, one of the
moderately improved patients and ﬁve
of the unimproved patients never showed
a positive result. A comparison of the
results in each group, using the X2 test,
is statistically signiﬁcant at better than the
1% level of conﬁdence.
B. Positive Reactions at Each Stage of
Treatment—In the Figure the groups are
compared for the percentage of patients in
each group who had positive results at each
stage of treatment.
Almost half the markedly improved pa—
tients had positive reactions after only three

Tests During Treatment
No. of Tests
Given During

REACTIONS

The number of amobarbital tests given to
each patient during the course of electroshock range-d from 3 to 13, depending on
how long treatment was maintained. In
Table 1 the data are shown for the number
of tests given during treatment and the
number and percentage positive for all the
patients in each group. The markedly im—
proved patients showed many more positive reactions than the unimproved

of Positive

l.——Distribution

60
50

POSITIVE

4O
3O

20
PERCENTAGE

5
4-6
NUM BER

7-9

lO-IZ

I3-I5

0F TREATMENTS

Percentage of positive amobarbital test reactions
occurring in each group at different stages of treat—

ment.

Although some patients received more
than 15 treatments, the data are not pre—
sented beyond this point because the number
in each group became too small for purposes
of comparison. Four of the unimproved pa—
tients received more than 20 treatments,
with consistently negative amobarbital test
results. One of the moderately improved
patients received over 30 treatments, with
only an occasionally positive reaction.
C. Duration of Positive Reactions.—
There were variations in the persistence of
positive reactiOns from week to week. With
at least two consecutive positives as the
criterion of persistence, nine of the mark—
edly improved, two of the moderately im—
proved, and only one of the unimproved
group showed persistent positives. After

�the termination of treatment all patients but
one had negative amobarbital reactions nine
days after the last convulsion. The remaining patient developed a negative test during
the second week after treatment.
D. Factor of Age—Since the patients
in the markedly improved group tended
to be older persons suffering from depres—
sive reactions, it is conceivable that the
difference in amobarbital test results may
be related solely to age and only coincidentally to clinical improvement. Underlying
this is the assumption that the older person
is more likely to show signs of altered brain
function when given electroshock. In Table
2 the mean age for each group is shown.
TABLE 2.——Relationship of Clinical Improvemen

To Age

Markedly improved (11)_______-____-___-___________
Moderately improved (6) ___________________________
Unimproved (7) ____________________________________

Mean
Age, Yr.
47.64

gggg

it is apparent that the ﬁrst two groups
were older than the unimproved patients.
Yet, while the mean age of the moderately
improved patients is slightly higher than
that of the markedly improved group, these
patients still had signiﬁcantly fewer positive
reactions.
In Table 3 the number of positive re—
actions during treatment is shown for each
is
limited to pa—
when
the
analysis
group
tients more than 40 years of age. In this
Table the relationship of positive reactions
in the different groups remains unchanged
from that when the groups are considered
as a whole.

Other Aspects of Behavior
Apart from explicit denial of illness and
disorientation, there were changes in be—
havior that occurred both under the in-ﬂuence of the drug and clinically during the
course of treatment in signiﬁcantly progres—
sive fashion in those patients who improved.
These aspects may be divided into verbal
and nonverbal communication.

A. Changes in Verbal Language—These
changes consisted of denial expressed in
evasion, in negative expressions, and in

the use of a syntactical pattern involving
the third and second persons. When asked
about their symptoms, patients gave such
answers as “It’s hard to say,” or “I forgot,”
or “I don’t know; I’ve been waiting for the
doctors to tell me.” The change in syntactical pattern is illustrated by such remarks
Amobarbital
Tests in Patients More Than 40 Years of Age

TABLE

3.——Distribution of Positive

No. of Tests
Given During

Markedly improved (10)--Moderately improved (5)-Unimproved (3) ____________
_

Treatment
46
34
17

N0.
%
Positive Positive
35

15

0

76
45
0

as “It’s what they call a depression,” or “I’m
afraid somebody will get hurt,” or answering
the question “What is your main trouble P"
with “What is your main trouble?” Sometimes patients would talk of a relative who
was sick.
In patients who improved there was a
notable development of such patterns in a
nondrug interview. One such patient, for
example, when asked prior to the start of
treatment what his main trouble was, said,
“I’m depressed.” After two treatments he
answered the question with “I don’t get
along well with my mother-in—law.” After
ﬁve treatments he said, “I don’t get what
you mean": after eight, “I get sick; that’s
all I know.” After 10 treatments he said,
“Right now, it’s that I don’t see my Wife,”
and after 11 treatments he said, “In what
way do you mean?” and “I don’t know
how to explain it.” At the termination of
treatment, his main trouble was given as
“I want to get home,” followed by an account of how “good” his wife was.
In the unimproved group, on the other
hand, the increased use of these language
patterns did not occur. They were not
present in some and were minimally or
inconsistently noted in others. In some of
the unimproved patients there were actually
fewer such language patterns under the

�i

L’

effects of the drug than there had been in
the preamobarbital interview.
B. Changes in Nonverbal Behavior.—
Euphoric reactions occurred in both

sistently positive early in the course of
treatment. In moderately improved or
unimproved patients there are fewer positive reactions and their frequency does
clinical and drug interviews most fre— not increase with more treatments. With
quently in the markedly improved other methods of evaluating brain func—
group, less often in the moderately im— tion such close correlation was not presproved group, and least often in the ent, as all patients showed abnormalities
group which were considered unim— in the e1ectroencephalographic record and
proved. In the unimproved patient impaired learning was found as fre—
classed as manic, euphoric behavior was quently in patients who improved as in
present in his clinical behavior and was those who do not. The signiﬁcance of
this relationship may be more clearly
not changed by amobarbital.
Changes in sexual behavior appeared appreciated by a consideration of the
during the amobarbital interviews of four changes in symbolic function that occur
of the markedly improved patients but in states of altered brain function.
in only one patient in each of the other
It has been useful in studying the becategories. This took the form of try— havior of patients with alterations in
ing to hug or caress the examiner. mak— brain function to distinguish between
ing remarks with sexual content, or en— defects in the formation of symbol pat—
gaging in masturbatory activity. A terns and changes of language patterns
patient in the unimproved group showed which indicate a shift in the mode of
this behavior both during pre—drug inter- interaction in the
environment. In the
views and under the inﬂuence of amobar— ﬁrst
be included many
category
may
bital.
types of memory defects, dyscalculia,
Withdrawal or “selective inattention” topographical disorientation, and aphasia.
was shown by 9‘ of the 11 markedly im; A patient with such a
defect
memory
proved patients. particularly during the cannot select elements of
experience,
drug phase of the amobarbital interview. classify them into
and
signiﬁcant
units,
This behavior consisted of failure to an—
them
into
a
temporal
arrange
pattern.
hos—
the
about
illness and
questions
swer
These defects are observed with diffuse
pitalization or responding in dysarthric cortical lesions and
uni—
probably
occur
and cryptic fashion. This reaction under
versally after shock treatments in tran—
the drug occurred only once in each of
sient fashion. They are, however, related
the other groups. It was of interest that
if at all, to therapeutic
remotely,
very
two patients in the unimproved category
in the mode of inAlterations
outcome.
who appeared withdrawn before the test
teraction in the environment

became more responsive under
ﬂuence of the drug.

the in-

Comment
The results of the amobarbital tests in
these patients indicate that there is a
relation between clinical improvement
and the production of brain damage or
an altered state of brain function as de—
termined by this particular method of
examination. In patients who improve,
the amobarbital test becomes con—

are exempliﬁed in the various patterns of disorientation and denial and in the amnesias
that are noted with lesions of the diffuse
projection systems, in chronic barbiturate
intoxication, and following electroshock
convulsions. Here there is no defect in
memory, awareness, or perception as
such, but the patient selects or rejects
certain aspects of the environment for
the expression of his own motivations.
ln disorientation for place, for example,
the misnaming and mislocating of the

�hospital serve as, symbolic representa—
tions of the patient’s feelings about his
incapabilities and problems—often as the
manifestation of his need to be well and
go home. It is not that the patient is
unaware of his problems and does not
know where he is in an absolute sense.
He commonly “remembers” the name of
the hospital and expresses “awareness”
of his difﬁculties in other contexts of
language. The unawareness is, rather, of
the far greater degree to which he is
expressing his own motivations in his
perception of the temporal. spatial, personal, and somatic aspects of the en—
Vironment.
In considering what constitutes thera—
peutic improvement, it is evident that
the evaluation that is commonly made
by a hospital staff depends in large part
on the particular types of symbolic
adaptation and defensive operations that
are used. If the patient denies that he
has any problems or that he is troubled
by them, or if he cannot recall any, he
is rated as improved. Such patients char—
acteristically appear affable and uncom—
plaining, their manner reinforced by
clichés and banalities, themselves adap—
tive forms of language. Many studies:
have shown that general memory impairment does not persist after electroshock
but that there is a selective “forgetting”
of traumatic material in the patient’s
life. This does not mean that he has
developed a better understanding of his
interpersonal relationships or has ac—
quired “insight.” The observation is also
signiﬁcant in explaining why, although

electroshock may have a short—term bene—
ﬁcial effect, evaluation of long—term results shows little difference between
treated and untreated cases. Also, the
fact that therapeutic improvement did
not result in patients with negative

amobarbital tests suggests that methods
of administering electroshock by minimally affecting brain function, Such as

i References

8-12.

a unilateral seizure, will not prove gen—
erally efﬁcacious. From the immediately

practical standpoint, the amobarbital
test given after the third or fourth treat—
ment may be of prognostic value.
The amobarbital test is not in itself a
direct index of brain damage in that it
measures some particular modality of
dysfunction or brings out a speciﬁc defect. Rather, under the conditions in
which it is given, one deduces impaired
neural function by reason of the change
in the organization or pattern of language in which the patient expresses
himself. A positive result requires not
only that a certain degree and type of
impairment of brain function exist but
that the patient employ verbal denial and
disorientation as adaptive mechanisms.
It would be expected that among patients with equivalent degrees of brain
damage the highest incidence of positive
amobarbital tests would occur among
those who characteristically use denial
as an adaptive mechanism in stress.
In relating these ﬁndings to the mode

of action of electroshock and other somatic
therapies, several considerations seem of
importance. There is a combination of an
added stress and a change in brain function. The milieu of brain function determines the pattern or organization of the
adaptive behavior which can be most clearly
formulated in terms of language. These include not only verbal patterns of denial and
disorientation, elicited with the aid of the
drug, but changes in syntactical patterns indicative of an altered relationship of the
self in the environment. There were also
indications that in the improved patients
there were more changes in all types of
symbolic adaptation, nonverbal as well
as verbal. Thus, a patient who appeared
withdrawn both in the predrug and in
the drug interview had a poorer prog—
nosis than the patient who became withdrawn only under the effects of the drug.
The patient who showed altered sexual
behavior under the effects of the drug
had also exhibited this behavior during

�the clinical questioning as well and did not
improve with treatment, whereas the four
patients manifesting sexual behavior only
under effects of the drug did improve. It
is likely that the faculty of changing sym—
bolic patterns regardless of content is a factor in therapeutic improvement.

REFERENCES
Gordon, H. L.: Fifty Shock Therapy
ories, Mil. Surgeon 103 2397, 1948.
1.

The—

2.

Kalinowsky, L. B., and Hoch, P. H.: Shock
Treatment, Psychosurgery and Other Somatic
Treatment in Psychiatry, Ed. 2, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952.

Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Denial
of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects,
Springﬁeld, Ill, Charles C Thomas, Publisher,
3.

Summary
Twenty—four patients referred consecu—
tively for electroshock treatment were
given amobarbital (Amytal) tests before
and at regular intervals during and fol—
lowing the course of treatment.
There was a close relationship between
the short—term response to treatment
and the results of the amobarbital tests.
The much improved patients showed
early, persistent, and increasingly positive reactions during the course of treat—
ment. Unimproved patients showed no
positive reactions, or showed them in—
frequently and inconsistently. An inter—
mediate group, who showed moderate
clinical improvement, showed more posi—
tive reactions than the unimproved group
but fell far short of the much improved
group in the incidence of positive re—
actions.
Changes in language and nonverbal
forms of behavior related to denial were
most consistent and pronounced in the
improved group, even in interviews not
employing drugs.

These observations indicate that clinical
improvement in electroshock requires
the creation of conditions of altered brain
function in which new patterns of
symbolic adaptation can be maintained.

1955.

Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L.; Sugarman,
L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic Use of Amobarbi—
tal Sodium in Organic Brain Disease, Am. J.
Psychiat. 112:889-894, 1953.
4.

Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L., and Malitz,
5.: Serial Administration of “Amytal Test” for
Brain Disease: Its Diagnostic and Prognostic
Value, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 71 1217—
5.

226, 1954.

\Neinstein, E. A., and Malitz, 8.: Changes
in Symbolic Expression with Amobarbital Sodium
(“Amytal Sodium”), Am. J. Psychiat. 111:198-206,
6.

1954.

Kahn, R. L.; Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.:
The “Amytal Test” in Patients with Mental Ill—
ness, J. Hillside Hosp. 4:3-13, 1955.
7.

Carter, J. T.: Type of Personal Life Memo«
ries Forgotten Following Electro—Convulsive
Therapy. Am. Psychologist 8 :330, 1953.
8.

Janis, I. L.: Psychologic Effects of Electric
Convulsive Treatments: I. Post—Treatment Am—
nesias, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 111:359, 1950.
9.

Korngold, M.: An Investigation of Some
Psychological Effects of Electric Shock Treat—
ment, Am. Psychol. 8:381—382, 1953.
10.

Teicher, A.: The Effect of Electroconvulsive
Therapy on the Visual Reactions of Schizophrenic
Patients, Am. Psychol. 8:445, 1953.
11.

Alexander, L.: Effect of Electroshock on a
“Normal” Person, Am. J. Psychiat. 109:696—698,
12.

1953.

Printed and Published in the United States of Amerira

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2434">
                <text>Relation of amobarbital test to clinical improvement in electroshock. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1956 Jul; 76(1): 23-9.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2435">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2436">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-17-021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2437">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2438">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Weinstein, Edwin A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2439">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2440">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2441">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry July 1956, Vol. 76, pp. 23—29.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2442">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2443">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74446">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81007">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87568">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94129">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="245" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="36">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/ac5e73da19470d46979be1d3e57b7963.pdf</src>
        <authentication>289f176e87e6c22e9a18830dea076106</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100662">
                    <text>Reprinted from
JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Volume V

April, 1956

Number 2

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE
THERAPY FOR RELIEF OF ANXIETY1
MORTON WACHSPRESS, M.D.,2 ARNOLD G. BLUMBERG, M.D.,3
MAX FINK, M.D.,4 and JOSEPH S. A. MILLER, M.D.5

‘

During the past few years increasing interest has been shown in
the role of drugs in psychiatric practice. Previous studies on the
usefulness of extracts of Rauwolﬁa Serpentina at this hospital demonstrated minimal value for this drug in alleviating anxiety symptoms (4). In the light of these studies which contrasted with more
recent enthusiastic reports, an investigation of the effectiveness of
large doses of reserpine in relieving anxiety symptoms and altering
behavior was undertaken.
Numerous reports have appeared in the past two years describing
the effectiveness of reserpine in reducing aggressive and assaultive
behavior (2, 5); alleviating manic states (14); and reducing the need
for electroshock therapy (10). The reports of its potency in reducing
anxiety, affecting neurotic symptoms or altering depressive symptoms (6, 12) have been less laudatory. In addition, reserpine-induced
depressions have been noted in the course of treatment for hypertension (9, 11). No evidence has been forthcoming that reserpine has
altered the course of a psychiatric illness, although many reports
emphasize the quieting effects of the drug or its usefulness as an
“adjuvant to psychotherapy” (7).
This investigation was undertaken to determine the usefulness of
reserpine in a voluntary psychiatric hospital population treated in
an open ward setting. A double-blind placebo controlled study with
1

From the Research Service and Medical Department of the Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks, N. Y.
ZSenior Resident Psychiatrist, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
3 Associate Visiting Physician, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
4 Director of Research, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
5 Medical Director, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
67

�68

WACHSPRESS—BLUMBERG—FINK—MILLER

large ﬁxed doses of drug was selected as a technic of evaluation for
this study. The evaluation of improvement in a psychiatric patient
under therapy presents problems which are all too familiar to careful investigators in the ﬁeld. In a hospital environment where the
total therapeutic regime combines to produce improvement, the
evaluation of the effect of a drug must be carefully controlled. Certain criteria must be established to differentiate between improvement consistent with the course of the disease, and improvement
greater than what may be expected from the normal course of hospitalization. To properly attribute improvement to a drug the following criteria should be satisﬁed: the patient should improve while
receiving medication; this improvement should be greater than at
the time when the medication is replaced by suitable placebo medication; and improvement should be reproducible at a later date with
a similar drug dosage. The use of a double-blind placebo controlled
study provides a method for such an evaluation and it is doubtful if
deﬁnitive conclusions are justiﬁed in the absence of such studies (3).
To further minimize the subjective factor in the clinical evaluation, rating scales have been employed, despite their well-known
limitations. In this study, the revised rating scale of Malamud and
Sands (8) was utilized to provide further experience for the observers
in standardizing their reports and to permit a constant frame of
reference for changes in symptoms and behavior during therapy.
METHOD

The patients in this study were those who presented, both subjectively and objectively, severe anxiety and agitation. They were
selected from the patients recommended by the resident
psychiatrists
for electroshock or drug therapy. The ﬁnal decision as to which
patients should receive reserpine was made by the two psychiatrists
working on the study, who based their selection on the presence of
severe anxiety and tension symptoms.
Of the original group of seventeen, ﬁfteen patients
completed
the study. Two male patients, one diagnosed as schizophrenia and
one as psychoneurosis, discontinued the treatment because of increasing tension, agitation and nausea while on the drug regimens. Of
the seventeen patients, eleven were diagnosed as schizophrenia, ﬁve
as psychotic depression and- one as mixed psychoneurosis. There
were eight males and nine females. The age range was 19 to 52 with
a median age of thirty-three.

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE

69

Each patient was observed for a period of twelve weeks. Every
patient received an intramuscular injection of 2cc. of reserpine6 and
ﬁve tablets daily throughout the twelve-week period. Depending on
which regimen was selected, placebo tablets and injections were substituted for the drug.
The four regimens were:

reserpine, 10 mg. daily—5 mg. orally and 5 mg. intramuscular;
(2) reserpine, 5 mg. daily—orally;
(3) reserpine, 5 mg. daily—intramuscular; and
(4) placebo only.
(1)

Regimens were selected in random order by the internist, and the
regimen was unknown to the patient, therapist, evaluating psychiatrist or nursing personnel.
Weekly psychiatric evaluations were done on each patient by an
evaluating psychiatrist. A modiﬁed Malamud scale was employed as
well as the subjective reports of the patient and the impressions of
the observer.
The patients were concurrently studied by the internist at regular intervals. Blood pressures and pulse rates were measured in a
sitting position on casual examination at irregular intervals. Only
two patients could be classiﬁed as hypertensive before treatment.
Each patient was weighed weekly. A radioactive iodine determination was performed before starting treatment and repeated no
sooner than three weeks after instituting treatment with an effective
dose of reserpine. Routine blood counts, urinalyses and other laboratory tests were conducted as indicated.
RESULTS

Psychiatric Observations
Of the ﬁfteen patients, seven showed a signiﬁcant alteration in
behavior which could be related to drug dosage. Of these, three
showed a relief of anxiety and tension, and four, an increase in depression, tension and agitation. The remaining eight patients manifested no change in behavior. In addition, the two patients who
discontinued the drug regimens did so because of an increase in
tension and anxiety accompanied by nausea and vomiting.
We are indebted to the Ciba Pharmaceutical Company for the reserpine
(Serpasil) and placebo medication used in this study.
6

�WACHSPRESS—BLUMBERG—FINK—MILLER

72

total scores, an item analysis of the individual behavior items was
undertaken. Those representative items were selected which clinical
experience suggested might reveal changes due to drug action. The
items chosen were: feeling, mood, motor activity, and thought processes. An analysis of these scores failed to indicate any consistent
difference in these characteristics in the patients as a group.
Regarding the differences in the drug regimens, it was the clinical impression of the evaluating psychiatrists and resident therapists
that more moderate doses of reserpine were preferable, giving fewer
objectionable symptoms. Six of the ﬁfteen patients were subjectively
worse on the daily dose of 10 mg. These six included A. 8., one of
the patients who improved on drug regimen, and two of the four
patients whose condition became worse.
Toxic Symptoms
Of seventeen patients who started on the study, two stopped
because of side effects. These patients manifested increased tension
and anxiety, in which nausea and vomiting became prominent symptoms. Numerous other side elfects were observed, and the incidence
of each is noted in Table II. Drowsiness and dizziness were seen
in most of the patients, but caused serious difﬁculty in none. Six
TABLE I
BEHAVIORAL RATINGS—TOTAL SCORE

H.C.
G.W.
ES.
M.C.
R.S.

R.D.
A.S.

F.G.
S.G.

LE.

M.D.

S.K.

P.M.
A.L.
M.B.

Sex

Age

F
F
M
F
F
M
F
F
F
M
F
F
M
M
M

24
52
45
19
19

20
46
28
37
50
42
37
22
37
22

Diagnosis

Schiz.

No Medica tion Placebo
27

Invol. Mel.

Schiz.
Schiz.
Schiz.
Schiz.

Invol. Mel.
Schiz.

M.D.D.
M.D.D.
Invol. Mel.

Schiz.
Schiz.
Schiz.
Schiz.

23-36
20
35,36
30,35
37-46
29-35

34,30
12-19

20
27
36-45
16-22

27,25
27-38
6-9
23-43
16-30
18-29
18,9
19-33
26-28

53

46—57

51,64

57,66

Oral

Intramus- Combined
cular

15

17

28-34

50,53
23,25
27,26

38
29-39

2542

18

20-31

26
40
15,3
45,31

22,15
47,31

25,28
28

27
34
16-28
20-26

23,27
28-36
12,15
29-40
20
29

27

18—26

16—30

53
44,61

53
32-51

51-56

27

825

12,13

37,39

29—38

19
25-38

63—55

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE

73

patients developed a Parkinsonian muscular rigidity, which disappeared within a few days after the drug was discontinued. Four patients had one or more episodes of generalized ﬂushing lasting up to
twenty-four hours. This occurred in patients on placebo as well as
on drug, and was interpreted as an allergic reaction to impurities in
the intramuscular solution.
TABLE II
TOXIC EFFECTS

Incidence

.................................
.................................
......................
Nausea
....................................
Parkinsonism
...............................
Painful legs
................................
Hot ﬂashes
.................................
Restlessness
.................................
Swollen feet
................................
Drowsiness
Stuffy nose
Dizziness and Weakness

l4
13
10

7*
6

4
4
3

l

In 2 patients nausea was accompanied by vomiting and was a factor in
discontinuing treatment.
*

Depression

The enhancement of existing depressive symptoms was noted in
three patients, and in another, depressive symptoms appeared where
none had been evident before reserpine therapy. In each instance,
electroshock therapy was recommended and improvement resulted.
Electroshock therapy induced a remission of the anxiety and tension
components of the illness, as well as the depressive. Of the eight patients who manifested no change with reserpine, two were eventually
treated with electroshock, without clinical improvement.

Physiologic Observations
The systolic blood pressure was reduced in ﬁfteen of the sixteen
patients observed over an extended period of time. The magnitude
of this lowering was between 10 and 20 mm. Systolic blood pressures between 90 and 100 mm. were not unusual while on treatment
and were not accompanied by adverse symptoms.
Table III represents average ﬁgures for the highest and lowest
blood pressure and pulse rate recorded during each regimen. There

�74

WACHSPRESS—BLUMBERG—FINK—MILLER

drop in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure and
in pulse rate with reserpine therapy. There is no difference in the
hypotensive or bradycardiac effect of intramuscular or oral administration of 5 mg. reserpine; nor is there any indication that a dosage
of 10 mg. produces a greater effect on blood pressure or pulse rate
than 5 mg. These observations are consistent with previous reports
of the ﬂat dose response curve for reserpine (1).
is a signiﬁcant

TABLE III
Medication

Range Systolic Range Diastolic
Pressure
Pressure Range Pulse Rate

Placebo

135-117

5 mg. p.o.
5 mg. i.m.
10 mg. combined

116—108

118-106
119-109

84-69
70-64
71-63
68-61

98-7 8
74-67
74-68
78-68

Most patients on reserpine reported an increase in appetite, and
there was a tendency for these patients to gain weight. In seven patients, such gains varied from 3 to 20 pounds on the entire treatment
program. Three patients lost weight and four showed no change.
There was no consistent change in the radioactive iodine (1-131)
uptake following the administration of reserpine. Nor could a correlation between weight change and this index be found. Thus, only
two of the patients who gained weight had a decrease in the iodine
uptake. One patient who lost weight had a rise in iodine uptake.
It was concluded that the weight gain and increased appetite were
not related to alteration in thyroid function.
DISCUSSION

High-dose reserpine therapy did not affect the symptoms of
anxiety or tension in these patients. For the most part, patients
were made uncomfortable by the high doses used in this study. Of
the three instances where a relationship between changes in anxiety
and tension could be related to drug dosage, two were noted in
severely ill patients in whom overactivity and agitation were ﬁrst
controlled. The relief of anxiety was secondary to the decrease in
motor excitement. The previous study at this hospital demonstrated
the limited usefulness of low-dosage reserpine therapy for the relief
of anxiety. Considering this, and the results of the present study of

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE

75

high-dosage reserpine, it may be concluded that reserpine therapy,
either in low or high doses, has limited use for its relief of anxiety
symptoms in this hospital’s population. Its use is further limited by
the exacerbation in depression which was observed.
Our observations, however, tend to support the reported usefulness of this medication as a sedative in the control of destructive and
overactive behavior. This is seen in our two cases (R. S., M. B.) and
in a series of other overactive patients at the hospital who were
noted to respond to the sedative action of reserpine when this was
introduced in lieu of restraints and massive sedation.
The doses of reserpine in this study were generally too high. Patients were unable to tolerate 10 mg. without uncomfortable side
effects. In no instance were the side effects severe or disabling, however, and in each instance the symptoms responded to a decrease
in drug dosage. The symptom of depression, however, has assumed
special signiﬁcance in these patients. Reserpine exaggerated this
symptom and, in one instance, elicited a depression with suicidal
trends. The reports of increased depression (9, 11) are thus conﬁrmed; and the usefulness of electroshock therapy in relieving these
depressions can be re-emphasized. In this regard, the earlier enthusiastic reports of the usefulness of reserpine as a substitute for electroshock therapy (10) need reassessment. Reserpine is no substitute for
electroshock therapy in the treatment of depressive states. It may
substitute, however, for the use of electroshock as a sedative in the
management of overactive and assaultive behavior.
This study exempliﬁes the advantages and disadvantages of a
drug evaluation study by the double-blind placebo method. With a
limited number of subjects, it is possible to obtain a meaningful
evaluation of the primary effects and complications of a medication.
The drug effects may also be separated from the natural course of
the illness, and from the investment of the therapist in the conclusions. Such a technic has the following limitations: rigidity of
dosage; inability of the therapist to separate drug-induced effects
from alterations in the disease process during the study period; and
the necessity of the selection of patients who are tractable and can
tolerate discomfort for extended periods. Furthermore, such a study
may rob the therapist of his faith in the drug as a therapeutic
vehicle, and thereby limit the patient’s response to the physiologic
effects alone. It also limits the therapist’s control over the care of his
patient, and thereby arouses feelings of helplessness and apprehension in the therapist. In such instances, the cooperation of a mature

�76

WACHSPRESS—BLUMBERG—FINK—MILLER

therapist is essential because there is considerable opportunity for
the manipulating, demanding, and paranoid patient to arouse the
therapist’s anxiety and hostility to the experimental program.
This study also provided an opportunity to assess the usefulness
of rating scales. In assessing the changes seen during treatment the
rating scales failed to provide any information not available in the
descriptive statements. They did provide, however, a frame of reference for the many items of the psychiatric interview that needed
rating, and provided a base for the comparison of observations made
by different observers.
'

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

In a double-blind placebo evaluation of 5 mg. and 10 mg. doses of
oral and intramuscular reserpine, ﬁfteen voluntary hospitalized
psychiatric patients with severe, overt symptoms of anxiety were
studied. Three patients manifested relief of anxiety related to drug
dosage. In twelve patients no relief was noted, and of these, four
exhibited severe depressive reactions which eventually responded to
electroshock therapy.
Cardiovascular effects of high doses of reserpine were not signiﬁcantly different than previously reported effects of low dosage.
There was no evidence that reserpine altered thyroid function, although weight gain frequently occurred.
The usefulness of high-dose reserpine therapy in the relief of
anxiety symptoms is limited. The dangers of induced depressions,
as well as the rationale of placebo studies and psychiatric rating

scales are discussed.

REFERENCES

(l) A. M. A. Report of Council On Pharmacy and Chemistry, J. A. M. A., 159:

1206, 1955.
(2) Barsa, J. A. and Kline, N. 8.: Treatment of Two Hundred Disturbed Psychotics with Reserpine. J. A. M. A., 158:110, 1955.
(3) Beecher, H. K.: The Powerful Placebo. J. A. M. A., 159:1602, 1955.
(4) Blumberg, A. G., Cohen, L., and Miller, J. S. A.: The Effect of Rauwolﬁa
Serpentina on Anxiety States. This Journal, 3:140-146, 1954.
(5) Cowden, R. C., Zax, M., and Sproles, J. A.: Reserpine—Alone and as an Adjunct to Psychotherapy in the Treatment of Schizophrenia. A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. c9" Psychiat, 74:518-522, 1955.
(6) Drake, F. R. and Ebaugh, R. G.: The Use of Reserpine in Ofﬁce Psychiatry:
Preliminary Report. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 61:198. 1955.
(7)

Hoffman, J. L. and Konchegul, L.: Clinical and Psychological Observations
on Psychiatric Patients Treated with Reserpine: A Preliminary Report. Ann.
N. Y. Acad. Sci., 61:144, 1955.

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE

77

Malamud, W. and Sands, S. L.: A Revision of the Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Am. ]. Psychiat., 1042231, 1947.
(9) Muller, J. C., Pryor, W. W., Gibbons, J. E., and Orgain, E. 8.: Depression
and Anxiety Occurring During Rauwolﬁa Therapy. J. A. M. A., 159:836,

(8)

1955.

(10) Noce, H., Williams, B.,

and Rapaport, W.: Reserpine (Serpasil) in the Man-

agement of the Mentally Ill. 1. A. M. A., 158:11, 1955.
(ll) Schroeder, H. A. and Perry, H. M.: Psychoses Apparently Produced by Reserpine. ]. A. M. A., 1592839, 1955.
(12) Smith, S. K.: The Use of Reserpine in Private Psychiatric Practice. Arm.

N. Y. Acad. Sci., 61:206, 1955.
(13) Wilcoxon, F.: Some Rapid Approximate Statistical Procedures. New York:
Am. Cyanamid Co., 1949.
(14) Zeller, W. W., Graffagnino, P. N., Cullen, C. F. and Rietman, H. J.: Use of
Chlorpromazine and Reserpine in the Treatment of Emotional Disorders.
1. A. M. A., 16021791956.

�W...Vw

W «tum..W w :wWwW
M

AW
M M m.
5%

”a (I)
(3)

W 5. m, mam.)
gt.

.x

q»

~Mh

‘,....¢

dug“.

-H.

«mama-mam.
{2)
{3)
(1:)

mumm,mm
Warn-m

WW

'

Wx zé/nga

ALfJuf “-54

��wmm'

“Raw mm‘wmw.m w 'Qmw-‘w'mx‘twv 7:. 1miuw‘ux

m-

yum-m

w‘w

~rwm—qmvmwwwuv—i—

mwwmummwummmm,mm
”.mmwmwmmmwwtmuwm
ttahwaatouma-dem Mmdammm
Wammxmtwmmmmmmuuma
Wuummmmmwmmmammmm.

mm
mmmmmmummmmum.
www.mmmmmxmmmmmmamwm

WMﬁMWMWkWNerMWWg

��.

.W——.wv-..._. Viﬂw—mr—m.

r

«mm,

..._._..f_rw.._.w.,_...m

.

_..4~,.._.w_
.

“mm‘wmm...” mw—mww—mmmpmr—m_.

—..,

..

‘

=‘-rnu'V4"v~-'w'-'Iw-nmw-UWVVT

.
_
.

t

.

i

T. m"... u.

.

L
,

l

u“... "runwnﬁmpvwnuwu

-—-.—.

«ha»

V

mwmmmwmmumumum
m. mwmmummmmanmmumm
mmmnwmm.wmmmummm
"W'Mmmmm Mmummuwmy.
1m

"

mmMSWWMMﬁuWWﬁﬂEaMwM-ﬁ‘m-

Wu

'

����q1

'W‘W;1

“""‘W‘

4

3‘16.

’1

ﬁg

3.3.
1:3.

23.25

an»

.

I...
3.43:...
,

14.3.

35.36

22.15

39:35

am

m mi.

b.3a

ﬁﬁﬁﬂﬁgﬂgﬁﬁggﬁ

am:

mm.
mm.

1M8

mm.

25438

23,
V

3.3.

.

tees-a

13:9

a?

3min.

”~36

£7

Pm.

Ada

I

m»

Ken.

8.1.

W31

53

51.6:

1%

53

5%“

53155

��21‘

“I

B!

I

W

a

.“wl

m

h
.

1
1::

3
6-

h
13

ahapmummwuwmmmamgwmmm

�5

s

WW.

hmmm,mmmmmmmm

i
s

“@Wuummmmmuﬂumw. arm-mm

mmmmmwwmsnm.a~mnmmmmuu

mummwm. hammocmmm4mmu

mammmmmm muumm—zw

ume-WmeamuuwnWm
’mamm»
m. mummthww
«

Wermmmm«5u.mgmumwmmm
awat'm-ggmagmmctMmWmeuum
5am.

mummmmuﬁpmmmwmmtm

erwmm).

\

|

V

��MammmmMmmm-uthwﬁu,wmmm

ummmmumm kmmﬁuu,mmm
Win w W mWE an m M m m a m: in
WW;$m W mm was gamma“:
in! :

�math-um. rammm,puumum,mwmn
wWMMWhtﬂ-nmg ammmmnumm
mmmmmmwmammmwm.m.m

mwnmemnummmuv-mmuumwnm
mmamﬁmumaemnmwm
mt. WPWMItWWMWWWWMWﬂ
mmmwrwwwamm www.mdm
mudmwtmdmmmgﬂwmmaa
mmw,nwnMwmm,u-mwwrnmm
eta-attuned.

«mwmmwmumum It‘tmumnﬁmw

mmmummmﬂwm
mm,m,mtommuummmam

mmuuMuummzumﬁuumewmw.
mnmhwmm(uulgll}mdiaum¢towwmﬁﬂ

pumatmmmmmwummmmuumaw
WMWqun-uwmummm‘mm
dermma-mmsmmuwmw. hm

wnmnumenémng.umwmmmm. 213mm

wnmuadMumeW,ummwmm

“WMaMMmdrwm mwmdmmm,

m
mummmm,mum;WaWW
umrdmwwm(6)mm‘mmmmumat
WWWHWMWMMWM mm;
www.mrmemudmmamuam

�45w

W

mwumolmmaw(h)mw
stunt. ma:
them in an

Wanna-ab.
tmm Wu mm. x: w

aubmm,m.mmmumm,uumuummm

ofmmﬂmmxmﬁumm.

mwmmmmmmmmmammmmuuwmn
hWMMnWanﬁm‘ﬁtMMOﬁbcth
amattmhm MWMmmumhdtmfhum

mwmmmrmmmmgmmmmmm.
Mammmmmmms mwuwmuwa
wwuhmumwmumnmumumm-w

«ummmmmmmwummde
m tncmle w
Mum
Mama, m

W
ammmdeWtuwmmdmuammﬁam
disco-arm

and

pariah.

wwwzmth‘aW-mm a: «mud-u «3'
“was Wt: mm mm m. m.mung MW
hunt»
m,mwmdtmmmumm1umuumm
mmmwmm-mmsmmmmwpwum
to
«V

WthWﬁWﬂWﬁ.
my

thy

thew: my many
me!

can

Wk). mum.

MWMWthyummmdnm
mamaamumm.
mwmmtm-I

mammmtmwmmmmmmmmmm
www.mha‘Mdnhrm-twmm
imammmnummMMnm-mmmnmmrm
cumin-um».

”mummmmwwmmm

‘

�htW,M'W£5mmmn.Mdonl

WWII: Wt:
mm
W
ammgmﬁWd-mtymm Mupmmm
«a mtmcnlnr

mm, mm

nmpamummm
mammumw;
MmamummmmWWnWMmW

WhWW.
Wmuudmmammmmummw
‘

~

7

mmmum
wommmmmmamm
mt.
mummy mama.
wand mun, awwwu

w.»
mm aw
mmdmmmwnmmam
magnum mmawmiamJummm

mammmmmnmnmmmmm

��70

WACHSPRESS—BLUMBERG—FINK—MILLER

In the improved patients, an alleviation of anxiety was apparent
and related to drug administration. M. B., a 22-year-old male, diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenia, was anxious, depressed, withdrawn,
blocked, delusional and hallucinating. He had been hospitalized
for three of the previous ﬁve years, and had received courses of insulin coma and electroshock therapy with only transient periods of
improvement. After ﬁve months of hospitalization at Hillside Hospital he showed no improvement. During the drug regimens, there
was a diminution in his anxiety, depression, agitation and preoccupation with delusions. These symptoms recurred when on placebo
medication. Introduction of the drug regimen again resulted in the
alleviation of these symptoms, with the progressive amelioration of
his depressive feelings. With the reduction of his drug dosage to

mg. oral, he again manifested a recurrence of symptoms, only to
have them relieved by the combined (10 mg.) regimen. The patient
was maintained on this treatment and discharged, improved, six
months after the treatment was instituted.
A. S., a 46-year-old hypertensive woman, manifested severe tension, anxiety, depression, tremulousness and insomnia, which had
ﬂuctuated over a two-year period. Her diagnosis was involutional
melancholia. While on 5 mg. drug regimens, there was considerable
relief of anxiety with a decrease in tremulousness. Insomnia became
less, but her depression was unaffected. Placebo regimen resulted
in a recrudescence of her symptoms. The combined (10 mg.) drug
regimen increased the feelings of depression, induced somatic complaints and failed to abate the anxiety. A lowering of her medication
to 5 mg. resulted in a repetition of the period of relief of anxiety
and tremulousness. The patient was discharged, improved, on this
dose of oral reserpine.
R. S., a 19-year-old girl with hebephrenic schizophrenia, was
overactive, anxious, tense, fearful, and manifested both ideas of
reference and auditory hallucinations. Electroshock and insulin
coma therapy afforded her only transient relief. While on 5 mg. drug
regimens, she became less active, less anxious but more depressed.
Her dress became bizarre. When placebo medication was introduced,
her hallucinations ceased, her anxiety was more manifest but the
depressive features were less. On combined drug regimen, she became calmer, more controlled in her behavior, but the bizarre appearance and ideational disturbances persisted.
In these three cases, a relationship between drug regimens and
the relief of anxiety symptoms could be demonstrated. In both M. B.
5

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE

71

and R. S., the overt manifestations of severe schizophrenia were sufﬁciently modiﬁed to permit participation by the patient in milieu
and psychotherapeutic programs. In the other twelve cases, no such
relationship could be demonstrated.
Of the four cases in whom the drug regimen induced increased
symptoms, each manifested severe depressive feelings, crying spells,
and one, suicidal preoccupations. The following case exempliﬁes
the group.
G. W., a 52-year-old single woman, was admitted with a sevenyear history of depression and hypochondriasis. A previous course of
electroshock therapy was not completed because of injuries sustained
in a fall. She was tense, anxious, tremulous and depressed. While on
drug regimens she became more depressed and retarded. Her anxiety
and agitation increased. With placebo medication there was some
amelioration of these symptoms. Electroshock therapy was instituted.
She received ﬁfteen treatments, with a rapid relief of her tension,
anxiety and depression. She was discharged one month later, much
improved.
There were eight patients in whom the drug regimen or placebo
periods were indistinguishable. There was neither a relief nor an
exaggeration of symptoms. The following case history illustrates
the group.
F. G., a 28-year-old woman, had a two-year history of severe anxiety, tension, feelings of depersonalization and obsessive ruminations
which followed the birth of her ﬁrst child. She had previously been
treated with insulin coma and three courses of electroshock therapy,
with only transient relief. During the periods of reserpine study, she
showed no change in her symptoms while on drug or placebo

regimens.
The changes in behavior determined by psychiatric interviews
and rated according to the Malamud scale are represented in Table
I. In these tables, the ﬁgures represent the total scores for each observation period. The higher scores indicate deviation from more
“normal” behavior. The “control period” is a period of observation
without any drug medication. While the table lists the different
regimens in a deﬁnite sequence, the actual sequence varied from
patient to patient, in a random fashion. A statistical study, using
Wilcoxon’s method of paired replicates, (13) demonstrates no signiﬁcant difference in the group between any of the drug or no-drug
periods.
Because no signiﬁcant change was demonstrated in the study of

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2444">
                <text>Evaluation of high dose reserpine therapy for the relief of anxiety. Journal of the Hillside Hospital, 5:67-77, 1956.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2445">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2446">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-18-022</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2447">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2448">
                <text>Wachspress, Morton; Blumberg, Arnold G.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Miller, Joseph S. A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2449">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2450">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2451">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL Volume V April, 1956 Number 2</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2452">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2453">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74447">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81008">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87569">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94130">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="246" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="37">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/83ffbada2aade577e8a98ad3651523e9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>fc1b31ed52223d2b16d46a30284791a4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100663">
                    <text>Borderland of Neurology —

BASEL (Schweiz)

Conﬁnia Neurologica
Grenzgebiete der Neurologie - Les Conﬁus de la Neurologie
Editor: E. A. SPIEGEL
S.

KARGER

NEW YORK

Separatum Vol. 16, No. 2/3 (1956)
Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Electroshock Research Association
Atlantic City, New Jersey, May 8, 1955
Karin, H., M. Fink and S. Kwalwasser: Conﬁn. neurol. 16, 88, 1956

Printed in Switzerland

From the Research Service of Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York

Relation of Changes in Memory and Learning to
Improvement in Electroshock 1'
**
Max
FINK
*,
KORIN
By Hyman
and Simon KWALWASSER ***

Read by title. This investigation was supported in part by a research grant
M-927 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Public Health Service.
Received the annual $ 100 prize awarded by the Electroshock Research Association.
* Research Assistant (psychology).
** Director of Research.
*** Associate Medical Director.
T

�In the course of studies of the relation between altered brain function and improvement following electroshock therapy, the present
investigation of memory functions was undertaken. By serial testing
of learning and recall variables, an attempt is made ﬁrst to study and
quantify memory changes; and then to determine the relationship
between therapeutic outcome and such changes.
Amnestic effects during electroshock therapy are commonly observed, and are both of practical and theoretical interest. Although

differences in methodology, materials, subjects and electroconvulsive
techniques make direct comparison difﬁcult, a few conclusions related
to the questions of concern in this study can be derived from published

investigations.
The majority of investigators state that no signiﬁcant memory loss
or other intellectual impairment remains two or three weeks after
treatment 1—4. One study 5, however, noted that 5 patients, otherwise
fully recovered, reported defects affecting long familiar names of
6
and
Zubin
places,
found no indication
lasting a year or more.
persons

�Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser

89

that electroshock destroyed memory traces, and concluded that where
memory loss persists, the progress is one of slow recovery rather than

obliteration.
In studies of personal memories selective circumscribed amnesias
at least four and ﬁve weeks after therapy are described for material
elicited in pretreatment interviews 7' 8. The amnesias, however, are
construed as due to subtle emotional factors, rather than permanent
8
memory loss. From such observations, Janis postulates that memory
impairment facilitates repressions and thereby reduces affective
disturbances.
Regarding the question of memory impairment as a prerequisite
for improvement, Wilcox 9 notes that three techniques of electroconvulsive therapy, namely, the “organic shock”, the “standard” or
Cerletti and the “brain-facilitation” techniques, are based on concepts which attribute varying degrees of importance to amnestic
change. Studies based on the “brain-facilitation” technique where
the low current type Reiter and “brief-stimulus” electrostimulators
are used, emphasize the diminished memory change induced as compared to the “standard technique”, although reported therapeutic
results are analogous 1°. Hoch and Kalinowsky 11, believe the “standard” technique to be the most effective therapeutically; and numerous clinicians using the “organic-shock” method hold that a
12.
is
for
of
electroshock
essential
success
therapeutic
regressive type
13
Wilcox
of
In a speciﬁc study
this problem,
recently found no relation between improvement and either the treatment induced confusion seen immediately following an initial Reiter electroshock, or
after a series of ten electroshocks.
Method and Materials
The subjects are 40 consecutive patients referred for electroshock treatment and
21 untreated controls at Hillside Hospital. The clinical diagnosis in the electroshock
patients include involutional depression, 7; manic depressive psychosis, 18; reactive depression, 4; paranoid schizophrenia, 3; catatonic schizophrenia, 5 and
hebephrenic schizophrenia, 3. The depressed patients tend to be older — between
40 and 68 years of age; the schizophrenic patients are younger, between 24 and
40 years. For the untreated group, patients designated as possible electroshock
candidates were selected. They are a representative sample of the electroshock
group matched proportionately with respect to diagnosis, age, education and
previous electroshock treatment.
The Reiter CW 47 C electrostimulator was used in all cases. Treatment was
administered on alternate days 3X per week, and was reduced after the second
week depending on the clinical condition of the patient.
8

Conﬁnia Neurologica, Vol. 16, No. 2/3 (1956)

�90

Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser, Relation of Changes

Methodologically, the study involves a test of the ability of patients to recall an
original learning of lists of eight, three letter common words, at weekly intervals
under two conditions: (a) immediately after an interpolated learning of a list of
nonsense syllables; (b) after a ten minute rest period during which a copy of “Life”
magazine is read.
The choice of testing method and materials was based on studies in retroactive
inhibition which indicate that the degree of retention of a learning task varies with
the type of activity interposed between an original learning and the later measurement of retention. Thus, by interpolating nonsense syllables and the reading of a
magazine on separate test days each week, two indicators of recall function of
varying sensitivity are obtained.
In the test procedure lists of common words and nonsense syllables are arranged
according to established experimental procedures respecting successive consonants
and vowels 14. Each list of words was presented manually on ﬂash cards by the
examiner. The time interval of exposure was not deﬁnite during learning and
seldom exceeded ﬁve seconds. For recall, however, 10 seconds was uniformly

permitted.
In the presentation of the lists for the interpolation condition the common words
were presented for a maximum of ten trials; or less if the list was learned earlier.
The list of nonsense syllables was then similarly presented. In the no-interpolation
condition the learning procedure was similar, except that reading “Life” magazine
was substituted for the nonsense syllables. Each condition was tested weekly on
non-electroshock days, alternating between successive treatments.
The control group was tested in the same way, twice weekly for ﬁve weeks, to
simulate the testing for 12 electroshock treatments. Following completion of
treatment, ratings of improvement were determined independently by the supervising psychiatrist on the basis of observations of ward behavior and psychiatric
interviews. The improved patients were those in whom there was a marked change
in behavior, and whose acute symptoms had subsided. In the moderately improved
The
behavior
but
in
persisted.
transient
there
change
symptoms
a
was
group,
unimproved patients were those in whom symptoms persisted or increased and in
whom there was no change in behavior.

Results
(I) Original and Interpolated Learning.
Impairment in learning function occurred during treatment in the
electroshock group. This was seen in the increased mean number of
failures to learn the words and syllables as the number of treatments
increased (Fig. 1). The decrement in learning is maximal in the 4—6
and 7—9 electroshock periods. In the 10—12 treatment period this
decrement in learning ability decreases. This decrease may be the
result of a change in therapy from three to two treatments weekly
in many of the patients. Considerable recovery in learning function
3—4
administered
when
at
day intervals.
treatments are
occurs

�in Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

9].

RELATION OF ERRORS IN LEARNING
TO ELECTROSHOCK TREATMENT

50

\
/
+/_____
n‘
+

0Z

40

2

E 30
Lu
.1

E
U)

(I
O

ELECTROSHOCK GROUP

0—4-

0—0

LEARNING

0F NONSENSE SYLLABLES

LEARNING OF COMMON WORDS

UNTREATE o GROUP

+

o---+

+

0—--o

LEARNING
LEARNING

or Nonsense

POST

POST
TREATMENT
3 WK.

SYLLABLES

or connou wonos

20

O:

5

IO

0
PRE
TREATMENT

I

«3

4 -6

7-9

IO-I2

POST
TREAT—

MENT
I
WK.

TREATMENT
ZWK.

INTERVAL OF TREATMENT

Fig.1

Following termination of therapy, the decrement in learning is
completely reversible, so that the mean errors are signiﬁcantly fewer
than pretreatment. For the untreated group, the errors decreased in
each of the simulated intervals of electroshock (Fig. 1), probably due
to the factor of practice.
These data for original and interpolated learning indicate therefore
that a signiﬁcant decrement is obtained during electroshock which is
reversible after termination of therapy when intra-individual comparisons are made. This observation conﬁrms previous reports 1—4.
(II) Recall-Interpolation and N o-Interpolation.
On tests of recall of learned words after interpolation, the decrement from pretreatment was signiﬁcant at the l per cent level for all
intervals of treatment in the electroshock group. In contrast with the
original and interpolated learning which was ﬁrst signiﬁcantly altered
during the 4—6 treatment period, the recall function was signiﬁcantly
impaired within the 1—-3 interval (Fig. 2).
When evaluations are made of recall of the learned word lists after
reading “Life” magazine (“no-interpolation”), the changes are similar

�92

Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser, Relation of Changes

.

RELATION OF RECALL OF COMMON WORDS
TO ELECTROSHOCK TREATMENT

RECALLED

WORDS

COMMON

a "°__-_

.—a

o——--""°

MEAN

ELECTROSHOCK GROUP

+——+ no INTERPOLATION
o mrenpounou
UNTREATED GROUP

4----+

o---c

PRE
TREATMENT

l-3

4-6

7-9

IO-IZ

POST
TREATMENT
l

WK.

POST
TREATMENT
2 WK.

N0 INTERPOLATION
INTERPOLATION

POST
TREATMENT
3 WK.

INTERVAL OF TREATMENT

Fig. 2

to those obtained for original and interpolated learning. These observations indicate that the type of activity interposed between an
original learning and a later measurement of retention is an important
and useful factor in eliciting subtle changes in function. Post therapy,
the decrement is reversible for both interpolation and no-interpolation
recall.
The foregoing results indicate that a signiﬁcant memory change
occurs within the 1—3 treatment period and that recall following interpolation is a more sensitive measure of change in function than
learning.
(III) Relation of Recall and Learning Responses to Improvement.
In the analysis of individual data for the relation of recall function
to clinical improvement, the scores of 38 patients, treated three times
3
Of
assessed.
week
for
least
weeks,
these, twenty-nine
were
at
per
showed a pattern of decrement in recall function (scores of zero or
below pretreatment). Of the matched controls, four showed the same
pattern of decrement in recall in a similar testing period while seventeen showed no decrement.

�in Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

93

The treated patients were then characterized as to improved,
moderately improved, and unimproved by the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the electroshock treatment unit. The number of
subjects in each group are tabulated according to memory loss in
Table 1.
'

TABLE

1

Decrement and No Decrement Groups During Recall Compared
with Respect to Degree of Improvement

Improved
Moderately Improved
Unimproved

Decrement

No Decrement

l2

2

4

1

13

6

To facilitate statistical study the improved and moderately improved groups are combined, and compared with the unimproved
group. A chi square of .22 indicates that no signiﬁcant difference
between these two groups exists. Thus, there is no indication that
clinical improvement is necessarily related to decrement on interpolated recall tests.
Following this analysis for recall, the data for the learning of
common words is similarly evaluated. Of the 38 patients, 26 showed
a pattern of decrement in learning function (number of errors above
pre-treatment), and 13 showed no decrement (errors below pretreatment score). In the control group of 21 subjects, only one subject
was in the decrement range.
When these patients are grouped according to their psychiatric
ratings, there is an apparent relationship between improvement and
decrement in learning (Table 2). This relationship, however, is not
statistically signiﬁcant by the chi square test. It is concluded,
therefore, that no relation exists between clinical improvement and
decrement in the pattern of learning.
The above patterns of response are based primarily on changes
during the 4—6 and 7—9 intervals of treatment. For the majority of
patients, these are points of maximum decrement, and at such times
electroshock therapy was reduced or discontinued. Five patients,
however, were treated three times per week for 18 or more treatments.
Clinical changes during this period were minimal and following

.

�Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser, Relation of Changes

94:

TABLE

2

Comparison of Degree of Decrement During Learning
with Ratings of Improvement
Decrement

+++

++

Improved

7

(44%)

3

Moderately
Improved

2

(40%)

0

Unimproved

4 (24%)

3

No Decrement
—
——

+

(18.5%)

2

(12.5%)

l (20%)
(18.5%)

3

(18.5%)

2

(12.5%)

2

(12.5%)

1

(20%)

1

(20%)

1

(6%)

6

(35%)

termination of therapy, all were rated as unimproved. The learning
patterns in these patients remained at a minimal or no decrement
level throughout. For recall following interpolation, however, these
patients showed a decrement during treatment with scores below
both pretreatment and also post therapy. Thus, these patients did
show evidence of brain dysfunction by the more sensitive recall interpolation variable. Nevertheless, failure to develop changes in the
learning function after relatively prolonged treatment suggests that
improvement is unlikely when there is minimal brain dysfunction.
This interpretation of the data is supported by the ﬁndings of Kahn
and Fink 15 who, in this laboratory, used the electroencephalogram
and Amytal tests 16 as indices of cerebral change, and found a high
correlation between degree of brain dysfunction and improvement.
Discussion

In similar investigations of memory function with lists of words and
syllables, the learning task was completed before therapy and recall
was tested at varying intervals after termination of therapy. In this
study serial measures of change in learning and recall obtained on the
day following treatment are assessed. As group data, they verify the
ﬁndings of other investigators that signiﬁcant decrements in learning
and recall functions occur during electroshock which are reversible
by the third week following termination of therapy.
Recall after interpolation is the most sensitive indicator of dysfunction. For this variable, a signiﬁcant pattern of decrement is
evident in 29 of 38 of the electroshock group. Thus, the majority of
these patients show some quantiﬁable memory change during treat-

�in Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

95

in
the
occurs
impairment
signiﬁcant
a
memory
ment. Furthermore,
24
hours
measurable
is
1—3
which
the
treatments
between
week
ﬁrst
electroReiter
the
is
This
though
EST.
even
true
after the single
stimulator used here is reported to minimize amnestic eﬁ'ects. During
and
second
the
is
during
only
signiﬁcant
the
impairment
learning,
week
7—9
4th
the
In
and
interval).
(4—6
of
weeks
treatment
third
This
of
the
scores.
less
is
learning
there
impairment
(10—12 interval)
of
method
treatment
of
is
artefact
particular
a
an
however,
change,
clinical
favorable
reduced
is
a
as
electroshock
frequency
whereby
7—9 interval, the
the
between
Thus,
becomes
apparent.
response
20
others are on reand
discontinued
is
12
of
patients
treatment
of
the
mefor
peak
most
patients
Nevertheless,
duced treatment.
ninth
and
treatments.
fourth
the
between
reached
is
decrement
mory
time.
this
derived
is
beneﬁt
at
therapeutic
Seemingly, greatest
When the patients categorized according to individual patterns of
their
with
ratings
and
compared
recall
are
both
learning
in
response
of improvement, a relatively high proportion with marked memory
brain
that
dysfunction
This
ﬁnding
fail
suggests
to
improve.
changes
induce
sufﬁcient
is
a
to
recall
and
not
measured
learning
36
by
as
per
Wilcox
her
in
reached
conclusion
A
by
similar
was
effect.
therapeutic
13.
this
in
The
data
study
confusion
of
to
relation
of
therapy
the
study
further indicate that when only minimal memory impairment deveresult.
is
to
likely
no
improvement
after
prolonged treatment,
lops
While some of the patients in this study seemed to beneﬁt thera-

peutically with minimal memory impairment within ten treatments,
of
indices
brain
dysother
with
marked
showed
changes
usually
they
15. As these patients are
and
EEG
test
the
Amytal
such
function
as
in
rather
treatdiscontinued
early
reduced
or
frequency
placed on
receivwith
them
patients
is
to
there
no opportunity
compare
ment,
similar
fashion,
basis.
In
week
times
three
a
20
a
on
treatments
ing
also
has
and
of
lack
improvement
no
between
change
a relationship
been observed in a study of eosinophile levels following electroshock 17.
is
here
measured
not
as
induced
the
impairment
Although
memory
subtle
remains
that
the
possibility
related
to
improvement,
directly
7» 3
memories
selective
of
the
facilitate
repression
changes
memory
reinforce
which
such
denial,
reactions
defensive
as
of
or the emergence
mechanisms
defense
15.
these
induced
by
behavior
in
Changes
changes
used in this
those
than
other
with
measurable
be
techniques
may
study.

�Korin,Fink and Kwalwasser

96

Summary and Conclusion
Studies of changes in learning and recall function during electroshock were undertaken.
Group data indicated: (1) a signiﬁcant decrement in the recall of
common words following the interpolated learning of nonsense
syllables which persisted during all intervals of treatment (P = .01)
for both intra- and inter-group comparisons; (2) a signiﬁcant decrement in learning at the 4—6 and 7—9 interval of treatment where
change from intra-individual pretreatment scores was maximum;
(3) the return of both learning and recall functions to the pretreatment
level or better within 3 weeks of termination of treatment.
Analysis of individual patterns of response indicated that 29 of
32 patients showed a pattern of decrement following recall with interpolation during treatment.
When the improved and unimproved patients were evaluated
res P ectin g the P resence of memorY imP airment, no si gniﬁcant diﬂ'erence was obtained between the two groups.
It is concluded that electroshock with the Reiter CW 47 C electrostimulator (1) induces memory change as measured here and that
such change is reversible; (2) that marked memory changes are not
a prerequisite for improvement but that (3) the lack of marked
memory changes with 20 treatments is associated with lack of improvement.
Bibliography
2
—
1947.
abnorm.
206,
Brower, D., and S. OppenP.: J.
soc. Psychol. 42,
heim: J. gen. Psychol. 45, 171, 1951. — 3 Luborsky, L. B.: J. nerv. ment. Dis. 107,
531, 1948. - 4 Michael, S. T.: Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. Chicago 71, 362, 1954. —
5
Brody, M. D.: J. ment. Sci. 90, 777, 1944. 6 Zubin, J.: J. Personality 17, 33,
1948. 7 Janis, I. L..' J. Personality 17, 29, 1948. — 8 Janis, I. L., and M. Astrachan:
9
—
1951.
Wilcox, K. W.: Papers of Michigan
abnorm.
501,
46,
Psychol.
soc.
J.
1“ Liberson, W. T., and
—
1949.
Arts
and
of
Letters
35,
357,
Science,
Academy
P. H. Wilcox: Digest Neurol. Psychiat. 13, 292, 1945. 11 Hoch, P. H., and L. B.
Kalinowsky: Shock Therapy: Psychosurgery and Other Somatic Procedures in
— 12 Kennedy, C. J. C., and D. Anchel:
&amp;
1952.
New
York
Grune
Stratton,
Psychiatry.
13
—
1942.
Wilcox, K. W.: Conﬁn. neurol. 14, 318, 1954. 317,
22,
Psychiat. Quart.
14
Stevens, S. S.: Handbook of Experimental Psychology. J. Wiley &amp; Sons, N.Y.
1951. — 15 Kahn, R. L., and M. Fink: Relationship between Altered Brain Function
and Denial in Electroshock Therapy. Presented at American Psychiatric Association
Meeting in Atlantic City, May 1955. — 1“ Weinstein, E. A., R. L. Kahn, L. A. Sugar17
1953.
Amer.
L.
Alexander, S. P., and J.
and
Linn:
109,
389,
J. Psychiat.
man
F. Neander: Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chicago) 69, 368, 1953.

1

Stone, C.

—

——

——

——

�April 15, 1955

Relation of Changes in

Memory and

Learning to Improvement in Electroshock*

by
Hyman
Max

Korin, M.S. (1)

Fink, rm”).

(2)

and
Simon Kwalwasser, M49. (3)

From

the Research Service of Hillside Hospital, ulen Uaks,

New York

*This investigation'was supported (in part) by a research grant
from the National

Institute of

HA92?

Mental Health, Public Health Service:

(1) Research.Assistant (peychology)
(2) Director of Research
(3) Associate Medical Director

�Relation of Changes in

Memory

and.Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

In the course of studies of the relation between altered brain function
and improvement following electroshock therapy, the present investigation of
memory

functions

was

undertaken.

variables, an attempt is

made

serial testing of learning

By

first

to study and quantify

and

recall

memory changes; and

then to determine the relationship between therapeutic outcome and such changes.

effects during electroshock therapy are commonly observed, and
are both of practical and theoretical interest. Although differences in methodAmnestic

ology, materials, subjects and electroconvulsive techniques make

direct

compar-

ison difficult, a few conclusions related to the question of concern in this
study can be derived from published investigations.
The

majority of investigators state that no significant

other intellectual impairment remains
study, (5) however, noted that

two

memory

loss of

or three weeks after treatment (l-h).

patients, otherwise fully recovered, reported defects affecting long familiar names of persons and places, lasting a
year or more. Zubin, (6) found no indication that electroshock destroyed.mems
One

5

cry traces, and concluded that where memory loss

persists, the progress is

one

of slow recovery rather than obliteration.

In studies of personal memories selective circumscribed amnesias at

least four

and

five

weeks

after therapy are described for material elicited in

pretreatment interviews (7) (8).

The amnesias, however,

to subtle emotional factors, rather than permanent

vations, Janis (8) postulates that

are construed as due

loss. From such obserb
facilitates repressions and

memory

memory impairment

thereby reduces affective desturbances.
Regarding the qestion of memory impairment as a prerequisite

for improv-

that three techniques of electroconvulsive therapy,
"
"
the
the
standard or Carletti and the "brain-facil"organic shock",
namely,
ement, Wilcox (9) notes

itation

"

techniques, are based on concepts which attribute varying degrees of

importance to amnestic change, Studies based on the "brain-fanilitation" tech»

�-2nique where the low current type Reiter and 'brief-stimnlus' electro-stimulators

are used, emphasize the diminished

memory change

induced as compared to the "stand~

ard technique", although reported therapeutic results are analogous. (10)
Kalinowsky (11), believe the "standard" technique

is

Koch and

the most effective therap-

clinicians using the "organic-shock" method hold that a
therapeutic
of
electroshock
is essential for
success (12). In a
regressive type

eutically;

and numerous

specific study of this problem, Wilcox (13) recently found

no

relation between

either the treatment induced confusion seen immediately following
initial Reiter electroshock, or after a series of ten electroshocks.

improvement and

an

METHOD AND MATERIALS.

The

ment and 21

subjects are ho consecutive patients referred for electroshock treatuntreated controls at Hillside Hospital.

The

clinical diagnosis in

the electroshock patients include involutional depression, 7; manic depressive
psychosis, 18; reactive depression, h; paranoid schizophrenia, 3; catatonic
schizophrenia,

5 and

hebephrenic schizophrenia, 3. The depressed patients tend

to be older - between to and

68

years of age; the schizophrenic patients are young-

years. For the untreated group, patients designated as
possible electroshock candidates were selected. They are a represenative sample

er, between

2h and he

of the electroshock group matched proportionately with reSpect to diagnosis, age,
education and previous electroshock treatment.
The

was

Reiter

CW

h?

C

electrostimulator

was used

in all cases. Treatment

administered every day, and was reduced after the second week depending on

the clinical condition of the patient.

test of the ability of patients
to recall an original learning of lists of eight, three letter common words, at
weekly intervals under two conditions: (a) immediately after an interpolated learning of a list of nonsense syllables; (b) after a ten minute rest period during
which a copy of "Life" magazine is read.
Methodologically, the study involves a

�The

choice of testing method and materials was based on Studies in retro-

active inhibition which indicate that the degree of retention of a learning task

varies with thetype of activity interposed between an original learning and the
later measurement of retention. Thus, by interpolating nonsense syllables and

test days each week, two indicators of recall function of varying sensitivity is obtained.
In the test procedure lists of common words and nonsense syllables are

the reading of a magazine on separate

arranged according to established experimental procedures respecting successive
consonants and vowels (1h). Each

cards by the examiner.

The time

list

of words was presented manually on flash

interval of exposure

was

not definite during

learning and seldom exceeded five seconds. For recall, however, 10 seconds

was

uniformly permitted.

lists for the interpolation condition the
maximum of ten trials; or less if the list was

In the presentation of the
words were presented

earlier.

The

list

for a

common

learned

of nonsense syllables was then similarly presented. In the

no-interpolation condition the learning procedure

was

similar, except that reading

"Life" magazine was substituted for the nonsense syllables. Each condition was

tested weekly
The

on non-electroshock days,

control group

was

alternating between successive treatments.

tested in the

same way,

twice weekly for five weeks, to

simulate the testing for 12 electroshock treatments. Following completion of

treat-

ratings of improvement were determined independently by the supervising psychiatrist on the basis of observations of ward behavior and psychiatric interviews.

ment,

The improved

patients

were those

in

whom

and.whose acute symptoms had subsided.

there

was a marked change

In the moderate improved group, there was

a transient change in behavior but symptoms persisted.
were those

in

in behavior.

whom symptoms

in behavior,

persisted or increased

and

The unimproved

in

whom

patients

there was no change

�RESULTS

1. Original and.Interpolated Learning -

in learning function occurred during treatment in the electrogroup. This was seen in the increased mean number of failures to learn the
and syllables as the number of treatments increased (Fig.1). The decrement
Impairment

shock
words

in learning is maximal in the

h—6

and 7-9 electroshock periods.

In the

10—12

treatment period this decrement in learning ability decreases. This decrease
be

the result of a change in therapy from three to two treatments weekly in

of the patients.

\

Considerable recovery in learning function occurs when

at 3-h

ments are administered

day

mean

many

treat.

intervals.

Following termination of therapy, the decrement

reversible, so that the

may

in learning is completely

errors are significantly fewer than pretreatment.

For the untreated group, the errors decreased

in each of the simulated intervals

of electroshock (Fig. 1), probably due to the factor of practice.

This'data for original and interpolated learning indicates therefore that a
reversible
which
obtained
significant-decrement is
during electroshock
after
is
termination of therapy

when

intra-individual comparisons are

made.

This obser-

_vation confirms previous reports (l—h).

II.

Recall—Interpolation and no-Interpolation Ontests of recall of learned.words

from pretreatment'was

significant at the

l

after interpolation, the

per cent level for

decrement

all intervals

of

treatment inThe electroshock group. In contrast with the original and inter-

polated learning which

was

first significantly altered

during the h-6 treatment

period, the recall function'was significantly impaired Within the 1-3 interval.
(Fig. 2)
When

evaluations are

made

of recall of the learned word

lists after

reading

"Life" magazine ("no-interpolation"), the changes are similar to those obtained

for original

and

interpolated learning.

These obserbations

indicate thatthe type

�later

of activity interposed between an original learning and a

measurement of

re-

tention is an important and useful factor in eliciting subtle changes in function.
reversible
Post therapy, the decrement is
for both interpolation and no-interpolation recall.
foregoing results indicate that a significant

The

in the 1-3 treatment period
sensitive measure of change

III.

occurs with-

that recall following interpolation is
in function than learning.
and

a more

Relation of Recall and Learning Responses to Improvement In the analysis of individual data for the relation of recall fun-

ction to clinical improvement, the scores of
week

memory change

for at least

3

weeks, were assessed.

Of

38

patients, treated three times per

these, twenty-nine showed a pattern

of decrement in recall function (scores of zero or below pretreatment).

of the

pattern of decrement in recall in a similar

matched controls, four showed the same

testing period while seventeen showed no decrement.
The treated patients were then r‘cate'gorizled. as to improved, moderately improved, and unimproved by the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the electro~

unit. The number of subjects in each group are tabulated accordloss in Table 1.

shock treatment

ing to memory
Table

I.

Decrement and No Decrement Groups During Recall Compared with Reapect to Degree of Improvement.
Decrement

Improved

12

Moderately Improved

h

Unimproved
To

No

13

facilitate statistical study the

Decrement
2

’

1
6

improved and moderately improved groups

are combined, and compared with the unimproved group. A chi square of .22 indicates that no significant difference between these two groups exists. Thus,

there is no indication that clinical improvement is necessarily related to decrement on interpolated

recall tests.

�this analysis for recall, the data for the learning of common words
is similarly evaluated. Of the 38 patients, 25 showed a pattern of decrement in
Following

learning function (number of errors above pre-treatment), and

(errors below pre-treatment score). In the control group of

ment

only one subject was
When

is

13 showed no

in the decrement range.

relationship between improvement and decrement in learning (Table 2).

is not statistically significant

This relationship, however,
concluded, therefore

decrement

subjects,

21

these patients are grouped according to their psychiatric ratings, there

an apparent

It is

decre-

that

by the chi square

relation exists between clinical

no

test.

improvement and

in the pattern of learning.
Comparison of Degree of decrement During Learning with Ratings of
Improvement.

Table 2:

Decrement

+++
7(ML%)

3(1805%)

Improved

2(h0%)

0

Unimproved

h(2h%)

3(18.5%)

Improved

Moderately

++

-

+

No

Decrement

-

2(12 05%)

2(1205%)

2(1205%)

1(20%

l(20%)

l(20%)

3(18.5%)

1(6%)

6(35%)

patterns of response are based primarily on changes during the
and 7-9 intervals of treatment. For the majority of patients, these are
The above

h—6

at such times electroshock therapy was reduced
or discontinued. Five patients, however, were treated three times per week for
18 or more treatments. Clinical changes during this period were minimal and

points of

maximum

decrement, and

following termination of therapy,

all

were rated as unimproved.

patterns in these patients remained at a minimal or
For

recall following interpolation,

however, these

no decrement

patients

The

learning

level throughout.

showed a decremhnt

during treatment with scores below both pretreatment and also post therapy.

these patients did

show

Thus,

evidence of brain dysfunction by the more sensitive re-

call interpolation variable. 1“evertheless, failure to develop changes in the
learning function after relatively prolonged treatment suggests that improvement
is unlikely when there is minimal brain dysfunction. This interpretation of the

�data

is

supported by the findings of Kahrland Fink (15) who, in this laboratory,

used the electroencephalogram and Amytal tests (16) as indices of cerebral change,
and found a high, correlation between degree of brain dysfunction and improvement.
DISCUSSION

In similar investigations of
the learning task

memory

function with

lists

of words and syllables,

before therapy and recall was tested at varying

was completed

intervals after termination of therapy. In this study serial measures of change
in learning and recall obtained on the day following treatment are assessed. As
group data, they

verify the findings of other investigators that significant decrements in learning and recall functions occur during electroshock which are reversible by the third week following termination of therapy.
Recall after interpolation
For

is the

most

this variable, a significant pattern of

sensitive indicator of dysfunction.
decrement

is evident in

the electroshock group. Thus, the majority of these patients show
memory change

in the first
the single

some

of 38 of

quantifiable

during treatment. F'urthermore, a significant memory impairment occurs

week between

This

EST.

is reported to

29

the 1-3 treatments which

is true

even though the Reiter

minimize amnestic

effects.

measurable 2h hours

after

electrostimulator used here

During learning, the impairment

significant only during the second and third

terval). In the hth

is

is

weeks of treatment (h-6 and 7-9

in,

interval) there is less impairment of the learning scores. This change, however, is an artefact of a particular method of treatweek (10-12

ment whereby electroshock frequency
becomes apparent.

is

reduced as a favorable

clinical response

Thus, between the 7-9

interval, 12 patients are discontinued
and 20 others are reduced. Nevertheless, for most patients the peak of memory
decrement is reached between the fourth and ninth treatments. Seemingly, greatest

therapeutic benifit is derived at this time.
When

the patients categorized according to individual patterns of response

in both recall and learning are

compared with

their ratings of

improvement, a

�relatively high proportion with marked memory changes fail to improve. This
finding suggests that brain dysfunction pg; §g_as measured by learning and

recall is not sufficient to induce a therapeutic effect. A similar conclusion
was reached by Wilcox in her study of the relation of confusion to therapy(13).
The data in this study further indicates that when only minimal memory impair-

after prolonged treatment,
of the patients in this study

ment develops

no improvement

While some

seemed

is likely to result.

to benefit therapeutically with

minimal memory impairment within ten treatments, they usually showed marked

test

changes with other indices of brain dysfunction such as the.EEG and.Amytal

(15).

As

these patients are placed on reduced frequency or discontinued rather

early in treatment,'ueiris

no

opportunity to compare then with patients re-

ceiving 20 treatments on a three times a week basis. In similar fashion, a

relationship between lack of change and

also been observed.
in a study of eosinophile levels following electroshock (17).
no improvement has

Although the induced memory impairment as measured here

related to improvement, the possiblity remains that subtle

ilitate

is not directly
memory changes

fac-

the repression of selective memories (7,8) or the emergence of de-

fensive reactions such as denial, which reinforce changes in behavior (18).
Changes induced by these defense mechanisms may be measurable with techniques

other than those used in this study.

�SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Studies of changes in learning and recall function during electroshock were
undertaken.

data indicated: (1) a significant decrement in the recall of common
words following the interpolated learning of nonsense syllatles which persisted
Group

all intervals

during

of treatment (P

=

.01) for both

intra

parisons; (2) a significant decrement in learning at the

and

h—é

enter group

and 7-9

comp

interval

of treatment where change from intra-individnal pretreatment scores was max(3) the return of both learning and

imum;

level or better within

3 weeks

recall functions to the pretreatment

of termination of treatment.

Analysis of individual patterns of response indicated that 29 of 32 pat-

ients

Showed

a pattern of decrement following

recall with interpolation during

treatment.
When

the improved and unimproved patients were evaluated respecting the

presence of memory impairment, no significant difference was obtained between

the two greups.

It is
or induces
2)

that

that electroshock with the Reiter CW h? C electrostimnlat-“
change as measured here and that such change is reversible;

concluded
memory

prerequisite for improvement but that'changes with 20 treatments is associated with lack

marked memory changes are not a

3) the lack of marked memory

of improvement.

�[REFERENCES

l.

Stone, C.P.: Losses and Gains in Cognitive Functions as Related to Electroconvulsive Shocks, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
ha: 2-6-21u, (April) 19u7.

8.:

Effects of Electrcshock Therapy on Mental
Functions as Revealed by Psychological Tests, Journal of General Psychology, g5: 171-188, (April) 1951.

Brewer, D. and Oppenheim,

,The

Luborsky, L.B.: Psychometric Changes During Electric Shock Treatment, JOur.
Nerv. and Ment. Disl, 191: 531-536, (June) l9h8.
-

Michael, S.T.: Impairment of Mental lfunction During Electric convulsive
Therapy, A.M.A. Arch.Neurol. and Psychiat. 11:362-366, 195k.
Brody, M.D.:

Zubin,

J.:

Prolonged Memory Defects Following Electrotherapy, Jbur. Ment.
Sci. 90: 777-779, (July) 19hh

Functioning in Patients treated with Electric Shock Therapy, Journ/ pf Berspnality, 17: 33-h1, (April) l9h8.

Memory

Janis, I.L.:

Fellowing “lectroc Convulsive Treatments, JOurn.
of Personality, 11: 29-32, (April) 19h8.
Memory Loss

Janis, I.L.and.Astrachan, M.: The Effect of Electroconrulsive Treatments
on Memory Efficiency, Journ. Abner. and boc. Psych., ﬁg; 501511, (October) 1951.

9. wilcox.

.

K;W;: Psychological Studies in ﬁlectroshock Therapy, Michigan
Academy of Science, Arts and J«etters,
357-368, l9h9.

ii:

Electric Uonvulsive Therapy:

10. Liberson, W.T. and wilcox, PlH.:

Comparison

of Brief Stimuli Technique with the Friedman Wilcox - Reiter
Technique, ”igest Neural. and Psychiat. 12; 292-302, l9h5.
—

L.B.: Shock Therapy: Psychosurgery and Uther
Somatic Procedures in Psychiatry, Grune and Stratton, New York

Hoch, P.H. and Kalinowsky,

1952.

12. Kennedy, C.J.C., and Anchel,D.: Regressive Electric Shock Thur: Treatment
in Schizophrenics Refractory to Other Shock Therapies, Psychiat.
Quart. ﬁg; 317, 19h2.
13. Wilcox, K.W.:

finia

S.S. Stevens:

1951.

15.

Confusion and Therapy in Electroconvulsive Treatment, ConNeurologica, lg; 318-326, l95h.
Handbook of Experimental Psychology,

J.

Wiey and Sons, N.Y.,

Fink,M .: Relationship Between Altered Brain unction and
Denial in Electroshock Therapy, Presented at American Psychiatriﬂ
Associatimn, May 1955.

Kahn, R .L. and

-

�.12-

16. Whinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L., 5ugarman, L.A., and Linn, L.: The Diagnostt
Use of Amobarbital Sodium ("Amytal Dodiumf') In Brain Disease,
Amer. Jour. Psych. ;92: 889-89h, (June) 1953.
17. Alexander, S. P. and Neander, J.F1: Adrenocortical Responsivity to Electic
Shock Therapy and Insulin Therapy, Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat.
92: 368-371;, (March) 1953.

�up“

ELECTROSHOCK RESEARCH ASSOCIATION
DFF'GERS 1954‘1955

DR. PHILIP a. REED, (Ex-Plaza.)
1800 E. TENTH S12, INDIANAFULIS 1. IND.
on. TITUB H_ HARRIS,
316 STRAND, BALVESTDN, TEXAS
DR. HOWARD D. FAEINB
2314 AUBURN AVENUE, CINCINNATI 19. :1th
DR. ERNEST H. PARSONS

DR. BERNARD L. PAGELLA, FEES.
a. 5131. 57.. New YORK 21. N. Y.
DR. WILLIAM L. HOLT, dﬂq VICE-FEES.
ALBANY HOSPITAL. ALBANY, N. Y.
DR. PAUL H. WILCDX, SEC'Y-TREAI.
526 w. TENTH 5T.. TRAVERBE ClTv. MIGHi

us

(“dun“)

nggg;
may

PRLLE AWARD

8, 1955

Atlantic City, m.J.
Prize Paper:
at

on

of

Uh

'earnin to

es ‘n memorr nd

in electroshock

1m

rovement

by

Korin, a.S.
Fink, M.D.

Hyman

max

and

Simen nwalwasser, m.D.
hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

m.r.

the Prize Committee, wish to congratulate the
authors on their excellent paper. Our decision was made because
this paper is based on a carefully worked out research design
and reports the development of a sensitive measure of the
transient mental impairment occurring following elecﬁpshock
convulsions. We anticipate that this method will have broad
ap;licatmon in the evaluation of the various physiodynamic
We,

therapies."

Enclosed herewith is a check for $100.00 to be
divided among the authors.

iguana

liBernard L. Pacella, m.u.
i

M;

ta

”William L.

«4 /,/%
7w,
3m.
nolt, dr.,
:7

7v
-

.

~p

.

MIA/Mb»
PM
Paul
Wilcox,
H.

m.u.

The Electroshock Research Association is incorporated under the laws of Michigan as a non-proﬁt corporation to promote
and coordinate research and clinical investigations regarding electroshock therapy and related therapies in mental diseases.

�w.-b ::

m and Clinical threats 0: New
Wattle amdmguith maptic pregame: aniline-ta theme:
Sam Medias have iadieatad

meme},

its

nee thnnuwith untrusel and

in aativeting the

m.

pnamt away emeem

r

_
_

ephrenia and
suspected

that

tint 1a” aypmhmian mm

it in a safer and antler drug

Heginida also has an enema-barbiturate
an evaluatim

with

ta use
effect. a»

at these properties at agenda.

ho patients with

meal aim”, chieﬂy achie-

invelatiml «pneum, as well as more}.

We brain disease, mm studied.

with definite er

gums mid. it is available in
sciatica: for m. mention at a mum. emu-sum a: 0.5% (5 mg. in
Ice). Itmmmmuamtemedmbedyunight. This ranged
ﬂames is a

eyelie derivative ef

truth tam eaparninnta 03‘20 to 95m. perms. Thirtaonpationta
mime mama initially mum be intmveneue Mu anytal. In the

15061me
“W
amatemd.
We» Watered

remaining instances

magma
based an

was

given

The sodium

initiallyandthm
at a rate

M Wt and in am” nemmry to indme mums, alerted

speech and

Wine”.

Hasty de 619'.

altered the

:‘

m in allpatiants but

memwéwarthiaehmgevmaefmpatienttopetim. Thom

frequwt initial altemtim m the appeamm a: elm: activity at Iva-5% ape,
at low to
voltage. This was irregular,
aeeaaimnm appear»
ing in shat-t bursts, met
at the frontal and Moral electmdea,

ma

2'

but diffuse

am! always:

W

M

amtrieal.

As

wt
beam mm

the injection emtimm! the

aetivity incmaed and its appearance in bursts sometime
In a few instances
freeman The veltaga of this delta activity
of

eleva-

mm.

_

\
i
F

Presented at

the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, Jew York, Dec. 5, 1956.

&gt;

4
r

t

��93*

mmsmmpmmmwgwmmamim.
mﬂupnagmtermmaf
mamas:
Md
w;
mmmm,
m
m mﬁmts mm given 1mm swim «mamas, after mam
Irish”

am .6

|

GBQRIM¢

W

mt» aim amid be attained ( 1.», mama, alumd spam}: and
new) aim amiss of. man-him '31: M: 500 ms. me mm EEG mtivitw
a":
In mt
Meet! byﬁeglﬂée mm ﬁlm:

mm,
the

:

amloped. In a fw instances, hmr,
fast
activity usually pmdmd by barbiturate failed to, develop; and accumully
af slur mtiﬁ’ay irregularhr ar in mm. appeared.
mm
the usual habitat-at:

EEG

mm

SLIDE
1::
,

given 1a amounts necessary

was

03*

81m;

Mr W

ta

manna

01‘

W,W

”was mwgim‘ at“:

alarm

The meat. ski-129.22g 611223.931

at mama me the

patients:

spawn, and drums»

ammm

during the

H

‘

9.1an a: m 13mm. m patient mm mm, the

max-canned,

mmemmehdiupmd.

Atthamaof’ﬂm

wordinggwiammSwlSmmaﬂorthﬁtWﬁmwmmﬁd.

Wt.

mm

car
mums:- mm cm
patimtm alert. the
ané
clear.
meat,
pit. mindiag hula-taunt walking, as study.
m

the

W

muaﬂmmmmmmmmmmmmmnpummme
Witmm unto.
4::
the
was
“the 133%th
aux-am Motion mamas m

m
3W
moﬁmmmmmummmm

alpha nativity mtumeé m-

bursts a:

slam:

Witty

Atmendomhewwumme

in

wt mm

WWW,

and
Tim

high manage

{at maturity m managed.

��in"

as...

m

not appreciably attend by magnum: tn. these eases st barbiturate meme
12:3 in view 9f the name. alerting,
fanning
pram by I:

Wm“.

Psmgs tho stage at metabolism at museum in the
tether stats muted or barbiturate 11:12th «mime! is the pmestt
than.
study is éiftwent
in the am]. Wimto poisoning.

negate has Maptic

1..

pm

193a appmmum than mm“).
ta
in mutating gamma.

appears

to

page

2.

properties statue:- ta these es
and

mm)... It

my be an

W

drag

mmtsnmtagmmtemmemsimmmmsfmm

ital. Its

eg
the
use

Maui».

‘

tht
I

at barbiturate panning

m

further

in.»

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2454">
                <text>Relation of changes in memory and learning to improvement in electroshock. Confinia Neurologica 1956;16(2-3):88-96.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2455">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2456">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-19-023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2457">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2458">
                <text>Korin, H; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kwalwasser, s.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2459">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2460">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2461">
                <text>[Preprint] and publication. Confinia Neurologica. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Electroshock Research Association Atlantic City, New Jersey, May 8, 1955. From the Research Service of Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2462">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2463">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74448">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81009">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87570">
                <text>Basel; New York: Confinia Neurologica</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94131">
                <text>Spiegel, E. A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="247" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="38">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f7c87e4b8450f1ed2913d4dcd19d8101.pdf</src>
        <authentication>28b2641c12bb8afccfb2c988034e1cc8</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100664">
                    <text>Reprinted from the
ISRAEL STRAUSS COMMEMORATIVE VOLUME

Journal of the Hillside Hospital
Volume V, Numbers 3 - 4

October, 1956

�DENIAL OF BLINDNESS FOLLOWING
CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY
MAX FINK, M.D.1

In the ﬁfty-eight years since the original report of Anton (1),
there has been controversy in the literature as to whether denial of
blindness is the result of a speciﬁc focal cerebral lesion or of a
generalized disturbance of brain function without speciﬁc localizing signiﬁcance.2 In reviewing the cases of denial of blindness, the
majority of reports describe the patients as “confabulating,” “disoriented,” or “showing a Korsakoff psychosis.” Such descriptions
lend support to the concept that denial occurs in a milieu of altered cerebral function. Studies of denial of hemiplegia, usually
described under the term “anosognosia,” bring out identical arguments as to the signiﬁcance of the phenomenon for localized dysfunction. Indeed, in many reports of denial of blindness, note is
made of simultaneous denial of hemiplegia or of other defects.
The literature of denial of illness, as well as clinical and experimental evidence to support their concepts, has been recently summarized by Weinstein and Kahn (23). They conclude that various
forms of denial are a unitary phenomenon without cerebral localizing value, and that denial is an adaptation to a defect in the milieu
of diffusely altered cerebral function. In this regard, most of the
defects denied are of rapid onset, are not limited to one defect, are
accompanied by confabulation, amnesia, changes in mood and
absence of anxiety. The degree of altered cerebral function which
provides the milieu for such adaptation is usually severe. Thus,
their reports, as well as those of other authors cited (see footnote 2),
Director, Research Service, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
2The reviews of Critchley (6) and Weinstein and Kahn (23) present the two
aspects of this problem. For speciﬁc reports ascribing the phenomena to focal
cerebral disease see Barkman (2), Gerstmann (10), von Hagen and Ives (21, 22),
Ives and Nielsen (l2), and Paul (16). Reports ascribing the phenomena to diffuse
cerebral disturbances include Lunn (13), Redlich and Bonvicini (l7), Redlich and
Dorsey (18), and Sandifer (19).
238
1

�DENIAL OF BLINDNESS

239

describe the phenomena of explicit denial of blindness and of hemiplegia as occurring in patients with brain tumors, subarachnoid
hemorrhages and vascular disease.
The following case history is presented as exemplifying various
aspects of the syndrome of denial. The data support the thesis that
the phenomenon is an adaptive response to a defect under the
conditions of altered cerebral function, rather than the result of
focal cerebral pathology. A patient, under observation for enlargement of the sella turcica presumably the result of pituitary adenomatous growth, was subjected to cerebral Iodopyracet (Diodrast)
angiography. Before the procedure he was alert and oriented, but
immediately following the second series of injections of Iodopyracet,
he developed left hemiplegia, which gradually resolved. In the ensuing hours, blindness developed and was denied by the patient.
The syndrome persisted for 48 hours, and then resolved. When the
patient was seen in a follow-up visit eight months later there was
an amnesia for the period of denial.
Case Report:3 E. S., a 58-year-old right-handed male, was admitted for diagnostic study to the Monteﬁore Hospital with a sixmonths history of headaches and blurring of vision. Four months
previously he had an episode of ptosis of the right lid associated
with dilatation of the right pupil, which had persisted for a few
weeks. Headaches became increasingly severe, and X—ray examination of the skull prior to admission demonstrated an enlarged sella
turc1ca.
He related his own history; appeared neither acutely nor chroni—
cally ill; was alert, well oriented, and cooperative, with good
memory and calculating ability. He was jovial, made friends readily,
and was well liked. He denied previous severe illnesses, or persistent
somatic complaints. He was fastidious about his personal belongings
and was reluctant to intrude. The general examination was normal
except for palpable enlargement of the right lobe of the thyroid
gland. Neurological examination was normal except for the cranial
nerve examination. His pupils were dilated, the right larger than
the left. The reaction to light was sluggish on the right, and the
pupils reacted well to near vision. The fundi showed well-outlined

papillae with clear margins, deﬁnite temporal pallor, and normal
vascularization. Visual acuity was 15/20 on the right, and 15/40
on the left. Visual ﬁelds to 1/2000 white test object demonstrated a
relative bitemporal hemianopsia without macular sparing.
The lumbar puncture and routine blood and urine studies were
normal. Skull X-ray revealed enlargement of the sella turcica; atrophy of the anterior and posterior clinoids; and calciﬁcations along
3

Patient studied through the courtesy of Dr. Nathan Savitsky at the Monte-

ﬁore Hospital.

�240

MAX FINK

the lateral border of the sella. Pneumoencephalography demonstrated encroachment of the cisterna chiasmatis and pontis by a
mass originating from the sella. An electroencephalogram showed
a slight degree of electrical abnormality on the left side, mainly
inferior and posterior. Alpha frequencies and amplitude were
symmetric.
For further clariﬁcation of the pathologic process, carotid angiography was recommended. Under local anesthesia, the right common carotid artery was exposed, and forty cc. of 35% Iodopyracet
(Diodrast) was administered. Since the serial angiograms thus made
were unsatisfactory, another injection of 15 cc. Iodopyracet was
made. Immediately following this injection, the patient developed
a complete left hemiparesis, including the face. He was restless,
confused and irritable. He appeared drowsy; failed to obey commands and was irrelevant in speech. Vasodilators were administered,
and the hemiparesis showed some improvement.
That evening he was restless, directing his gaze most often to
the right. When spoken to from his left side, he would turn his
head to the right or backward, before ﬁnally localizing the voice
correctly. He answered questions relevantly. Visual acuity was reduced to light perception, and pupillary reactions were present,
though sluggish. He was unable to localize the position of a light
nor identify ﬁngers or objects; yet he denied his inability to see,
confabulating seemingly appropriate responses. He was oriented for
place but only approximately for time and date. Despite a large
neck bandage, he denied the recent cutdown. A lumbar puncture
was performed. The initial pressure was 140 mm. CSF, ﬁnal pressure
of 60mm. after the removal of 8 cc. of clear, colorless ﬂuid which
had no cells and a protein content of 43 mg%.
Twelve hours later, now oriented in space and time on gross
questioning, he was still unable correctly to localize light or perceive objects. There was a residual left hemiparesis. He denied both
his weakness and his blindness. When walking about the room he
stumbled over objects and bumped into the wall and the bed. He
correctly identiﬁed the various examiners by their voices, and
named a coin, key, pencil and comb by touch. There was no sensory
loss on single stimulation; gait was hesitant; and the reﬂexes were
increased on the left with bilateral Babinski responses and absent
abdominal reﬂexes.
Thirty-six hours later the hemiparesis had cleared except for a
residual left Babinski response. He perceived light and localized
it well in‘space, but image formation for reading or ﬁne identiﬁcation was impaired. Despite the partial nature of his vision, he still
failed to recognize his impairment, confabulating many responses.
An electroencephalogram at this time showed a change from the
original record. There was bilateral asymmetry with high per cent
time delta activity and a slowed, poorly organized alpha rhythm,
mostly on the right.
Forty-six hours later his vision had returned so that he was able

�DENIAL OF BLINDNESS

241

to read. He was oriented, alert, affable and friendly. He maintained
that he had been able to read and to see throughout the previous
two days. He had an amnesia for the surgery, the hemiparesis and
the blindness. During the ensuing weeks, visual acuity returned to
normal; with visual ﬁelds manifesting minimal bitemporal hemianopic defect. An electroencephalogram one week later showed
posterior voltages to be less depressed; per cent time delta activity
had decreased; and there was desynchronization of the record on
delta
the
of
accentuation
focal
abnormality
There
was
opening.
eye
in the right frontal leads. Three weeks later the electroencephalo—
inwith
abnormalities
of
the
resolution
increased
showed
gram
creased and bilaterally equal per cent time alpha; decreased per
cent time delta and resolution of the electrical asymmetry of the
hemispheres.
On examination eight months after this episode and after a
course of radiation therapy for pituitary adenoma, this patient was
alert, oriented and cooperative; with only occasional complaints of
headache. The neurological examination was completely negative
with normal visual acuity and a slight (10°) bitemporal hemianopic
defect with 1/1000 white test objects. He denied any experience of
blindness or weakness but did recall the neck dissection that preceded the angiography. When told of the experience, he jokingly
denied the weakness and the blindness by saying that I was mistaking him for another patient.

Discussion: Two aspects of this case report warrant ampliﬁcation: the signiﬁcance of the denial phenomenon and the cause of
complications following cerebral angiography. The various aspects
of denial of illness described by Weinstein and Kahn are well exempliﬁed here. The acute onset of hemiplegia and blindness was
followed by a period of restlessness, disorientation, and altered consciousness. Within a few hours, these gross symptoms were replaced
by a calm, disinterested, smiling attitude in which the multiple
defects of left-sided weakness and blindness were denied. He confabulated, was disoriented for time and date, and later was amnestic for this period. An electroencephalogram demonstrated bilateral diffuse slow wave activity of high voltage. Furthermore,
despite the visual loss, the phenomenon of spatial inattention4 was
observed. This complex of symptoms and signs is generally noted in
diffuse cerebral disorders. While much effort has gone into localizing these defects, it is difficult to conceive a single focal lesion
affecting the visual tracts bilaterally, the right hemisphere in an
Various terms have been applied to the unawareness of one half of the body
and the body space, such as imperception for one half of body (Schilder, 20),
hemi-depersonalization (Ehrenwald, 7) and autosomatagnosia (Gerstmann, 10).
See also Critchley (6, pp. 237-241), and Brain (4).
4

�242

MAX FINK

area productive of hemiplegia and the frontal areas assumed to be
productive of apathy, denial, and loss of anxiety. While the possibility of a focal lesion as the basis for this syndrome cannot be
ruled out, it is more tenable to conclude that diffuse cerebral dys~
function was present. This conclusion is supported by the electroencephalogram, and also by experimental evidence noted below,
demonstrating the effect of intra-arterial Iodopyracet as inducing
severe vasospasm followed by generalized cerebral edema and increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier.
The signiﬁcance of the phenomenon of denial is to be seen in
its defensive nature. While undergoing a test procedure, the patient suddenly suffers a catastrophic disability. His initial response
of severe anxiety, manifested by restlessness, startle reaction, and
irritability, is soon replaced by explicit denial. This primitive, “psychotic” defense is normally present only in childhood. But under
the special conditions of cerebral dysfunction, with disturbances in
spatial and temporal orientation and perception, denial of reality
becomes tenable. It is maintained so long as the disability and the
milieu of cerebral dysfunction persist. In this patient, as soon as
visual perception was sufficient for reading, confabulation and
explicit denial were no longer actively maintained for ongoing
events. In the special situation of interviews with the staff during
the period of visual and motor loss, the patient manifested no concern and confabulated responses readily. When visual acuity returned and his hemiparesis cleared, he maintained the same
is
imthis
it
In
attitude.
unconcerned
regard
affable,
friendly,
of
denial
in
factor
the
explicit
characterological
to
note
portant
illness. To the extent that the information is now available, this
patient manifested a considerable number of the features described
by Weinstein and Kahn (24).
Special note should be made of the phenomenon of spatial inattention. The patient’s original visual complaint of blurred vision
was accompanied by a minimal bitemporal hemianopia, apparent
only on testing with 1/2000 white test objects. During the period
of visual loss he was unable to locate a light and confabulated responses. One week later the bitemporal hemianopia was present to
3/2000 white test object, but in addition there was an irregular left
homonymous upper temporal ﬁeld defect to 5/2000 white. Evidence
of a left homonymous ﬁeld defect persisted in examinations for
three weeks, after which only residual bitemporal defects were persistently reported. Left spatial inattention was prominent in the
ﬁrst 48 hours of this syndrome only, at the time when visual im-

�DENIAL OF BLINDNESS

243

pairment was maximal, and when hemiparesis was present. When
the hemiparesis receded, visual function returned, and orientation
was intact, then spatial inattention disappeared. Thus, spatial inattention was an aspect of the total disturbance in function, possibly motivated by the left-sided defects, and was probably not
dependent on a speciﬁc visual ﬁeld defect.
The syndrome of blindness and its denial following cerebral
angiography is unique. Focal lesions producing transient hemiplegia, hemisensory defects, seizures, aphasia, and various cranial
nerve syndromes have been described. In a series of 117 percutaneous carotid angiograms, Fink and Stein (9) noted an 8 per cent
morbidity of such transient phenomena. Other series variously report such complications from 3 to 15 per cent of the cases.5 These
ﬁgures do not include the few patients in whom the complications
as hemiplegia, aphasia or exaggeration of their basic disease are
permanent; or who succumb. In these studies of the complications
of angiography, emphasis is placed on the relation of the concentration of the contrast medium, the rate and quantity of contrast
substance injected and the time within which the injections are
repeated. In experimental studies Olsson (14), Broman and Olsson
(5) and Bloor et al. (3) demonstrated summation of toxic effects
when the contrast substance was rapidly injected into animal arteries; and noted increased vascular permeability, cerebral edema
and petechial hemorrhages not limited to the side of the injection.
While it is possible that the complications of angiography are the
result of thrombus formation at the needle site and focal embolization, it is more likely that diffuse toxic cerebral vascular changes
are induced as seen experimentally. The diffuse character of the
defects and the transient nature of the phenomena in this patient
are readily understood in this context.
Summary and Conclusions: In the course of carotid angiography
in a patient with evidence of a pituitary adenoma, an acute transient episode of blindness and hemiplegia developed. Following a
short period of restlessness and confusion, the patient became
calm, denied his blindness and weakness, confabulated responses to
questions, was disoriented, and manifested spatial inattention.
The diffuse nature of the cerebral dysfunction underlying this
syndrome is emphasized by noting the distribution of the presumed
lesions, the bilateral, diffuse slowing of the electroencephalogram,
5For reviews of the complications of cerebral angiography, see Engeset

Fink and Stein (9), Green and Arana (ll),

(8),
Perese et a1. (15) and Wickbom (25).

�244

MAX FINK

and the diffuse nature of the toxic sequellae of intra-carotid Iodopyracet (Diodrast).
The defensive-adaptive signiﬁcance of the syndrome of denial
of blindness and hemiplegia is discussed, with emphasis on the
development of this attitude under the special conditions of altered
frames of temporal and spatial reference provided by altered
cerebral function.
REFERENCES
(1)

Anton, G.: Uber Herderkrankungen des Gehirnes welche von Patienten
selbst nicht wahrgenommen werden. Wien. Klin. Wchnschr., 11:227-229,
1898.

(2)

Barkman, A.: De l’anosognosie dans l’hemiplegie cerebrale. Acta Med.

Scand., 62:235-254, 1925.
(3) Bloor, B. M.: Wrenn, F. R.; Margolis, 6.: Experimental Evaluation of
Certain Contrast Media Used for Cerebral Angiography. ]. Neurosurg.,
8:585—594, 1951.

Brain, W.: Perception and Imperception. ]. Ment. Sci, 1022221-232, 1956.
Broman, T. and Olsson, 0.: Tolerance of Cerebral Blood Vessels to a Contrast Medium of the Diodrast Group. Acta Radiol., 30:326-342. 1948.
(6) Critchley, M.: The Parietal Labes. London: E. Arnold 8: Co., 1953 (see
Chap. VIII, pp. 225-255; IX, pp. 258-263).
(7) Ehrenwald, H.: Verandertes Erleben des Korperbildes mit konsekutiver
Wahnbildung bei linksseitiger Hemiplegie. Mtschr. Psychiat. (2» Neural,
(4)
(5)

75:89-97, 1930.
(8) Engeset, A.: Cerebral Angiography with Perabrodil. Acta Radial, Suppl,
56, 1944.
(9) Fink, M. and Stein, J. M.: A Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Angiography.
Conﬁm'a Neural, 12:181-195, 1952.
(10) Gerstmann, J.: Problem of Imperception of Disease and of Impaired Body
Territories with Organic Lesions. Arch. Neural. (5' Psychiat, 48:890-913.
1942.

J. R. and Arana, R.: Cerebral Angiography: A Clinical Evaluation
Based on 107 Cases. Am. ]. Raentgenol., 59:617-650, 1948.
Ives, E. R. and Nielsen, J. M.: Disturbances of Body Scheme. Bull. L. A.
Neural. Soc., 22120-125, 1937.
Lunn, V.: Uber mangelnde Wahrnehmung der eigenen Blindheit. Acta

(11) Green,
(12)
(13)

Psychiat. é} Neural, 16:191-242. 1941.
(14) Olsson, 0.: Cerebral Angiography: Tolerance for Contrast Media of Diodrast Type. J. Neural, Neurosurg. é, Psychiat., 12:312-316, 1949.
(15) Perese, D. M.: Kite, W. C.; Bedell, A. J.; Campbell, 12.: Complications Following Cerebral Angiography. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. é} Psychiat., 712105-115,
1954.

(16) Potzl,

0.: Uber Storungen der Selbstwahrnehmung bei linksseitiger Hemi-

plegie. Ztschr. ges. Neural. (9 Psychiat., 93:117-168, 1924.
(17) Redlich, E. and Bonvicini, G.: Uber das Fehlen der Wahrnehmung der
eigenen Blindheit bei Hirnkrankheiten. Jahrb. f. Psychiat., 29:14.23, 1908.
(18) Redlich, F. C. and Dorsey, J. F.: Denial of Blindness by Patients with
Cerebral Disease. Arch. Neural. {‘7 Psychiat., 53:407-417, 1945.
(19) Sandifer, P. H.: Anosognosia and Disorders of Body Scheme. Brain, 69:122137, 1946.

(20)

Schilder, P.: Localization of the Body Image. Assoc. Res. New.
Dis., 13:466-484. 1932.

{9'-

Ment.

�DENIAL OF BLINDNESS

245

(21) von Hagen, K. and Ives, E. R.: Anosognosia, Imperception of Hemiplegia.
Bull. L. A. Neural. Soc., 2:95-103, 1937.
(22) von Hagen, K. and Ives, E. R.: Two Autopsied Cases of Anosognosia. Bull.
L. A. Neural. Soc., 4:41-44, 1939.
(23) Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Denial of Illness. Springﬁeld, 111.:
Charles C. Thomas, 1955.
(24) Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Personality Factors in Denial of Illness.
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (5» Psychiat., 69:355-367, 1953.
(25) Wickbom, I.: Angiography of the Carotid Artery. Acta Radiol., Suppl.,

72,1948.

�"

Mamma:

.

mm.

W

W W6

63mm WWW

mm,ljh9.*

3

Iran tau
_.;

a»
V

1

3,

Baum Sam»,

mill-ids Hospital, 61m Oaks, law

mm ”imam, Rinaldo Hospital.

W
1%
2’

A Luz/$4M“

[/m Mace

rm

éwm M429 Jaw /

W1T

�W a:

Blindness removing Gombml 112310ng

mm

In an titty-.0131“; years since the
apart or mm (1398);
at
than has Mon cmtroveuy 1n the litommm as to whether
hunches; in tho result at a. specific fecal cembral lesion or at I. gua-

«mum

m1

disturbame or brain: Motion without specific localizing

Moving the use: at initial or manna, tho
majority of reports describo tho wasn‘t: an ’emfabulating,‘ “Manta
maximums» (1). In

ad,“ or ”shaving o lonakat‘f paychem.‘ Such

satanptim lend

support

to tho meapt that denial com in a milieu of: almond heroism mum.
studios of denial. of heniplagu, usually described under the term ”moon
cantata", bring out Martina}.
as to the significance at tho
1:: many topaz-ts of denial
phenmm for lowland dysfunohim.

W»

of blinmhs, note

ma,

is undo of aimultmeun denial at haiplema or of

other defects.
Th:

literature. at donul at 113m”, as

imam evidence
by

to support

3013th and Kuhn

ao

611111.081

and expert-

”may amazed
They concludo that various farm of dam

than

(1955) a

ten

cmcaptn, has

tea:

m a mitary Monomer: without tantra}. Realising value, and that
mm is an adaptstian to a Meet in tha milieu a: dummy alt-sud
eembml function. In thin regard, mat of the defeat. mm are at
0:1.th (1953) and Museum and m (1955) prom
the taro aspects of m: prom“. For mastic raparta “exiting the
to fetal «am-um; disease as. Bum (1925). 9mm (19M),
Hagan me 1m (1937. 1,939). I»: sue 3181301: (1937) and Pots}. (1921:).
(1) the

minus or

y

Reports aseribing tho phenomena to

Mano

mm disturbances mamas

m (19M), Retinal: and mm (1911), Ramon and money (1916) and

8mm" (191:6).

-

����*5and

m “was mt m m

m: hummus,

than

@13me the will mmm.

K0

unnamed

mr 915398“

earnestly iamutied

them»

1m Wnbythoirwim, mamas. am, by, mailman}:

by tmxch. Thus was no

amou- W a: single: swam; gait. m

mutant; mam mm»; mm inward an
Babinski

mama”:

and album. thawing}.

the

ma um: mama

reflexes.

Minna”
W
mm
51ml Mt
light
napalm.

W

mater tho

had cleaned

mph for a nu

it well
in am... but. 1mg: {amnion tar reading or ﬁne identiﬁcation m mpaired.

new“ the

Be

pameiveé

and

106mm

WWWW my reams.still mm:
nature or his vision, he

to

An
name him impairment,
319W
ﬂagmatthiamathamngofmﬁuoﬂm remand. Wm

may

with high par mm; was @91th activity
bilateral
poem armined alpha rhythm mm an that» right.

and

a»

slaved,

Wan-six hours later his vision had returned «a that be we able
to read. Ha an: omenmd, alert, affable and friendly. E maintained

mthehadhemabhtomadmwmthmughoutmmmmu

mail; far the surgery, the: hemipamm and tho Minn“.
Baring the ensumg nah, visual wuw'm’mmd ta normal} with man.
tieléa Wetting minim}. bimmpom Wop“ detect. in
He

had an:

W

caphnlow we we): later came! posterior manages to he lean dam-us:ed; per mt time delta activity had gamed; md than was Wehrmmm or the mom-d m syn .;,- Thor. m mm accantmmm at
the claim 3.1930th in the right imam 1m. nurse weeks later the
incmaad mwluum o: the swam-111m: with
olectmemeqahahgm

ma

�am; dacmmd pa:- wt
was clans. am! maeluum a: the chemical awn-y or the
mmﬁmughtnmm mum apiaode Matter-a 3mm
of radiation therapy £0: pituitary Wm, this patient was alert, orient-u
ed and Wmum “weal: Wilma]. complaints of headache. m
mmlom
m mlately negatim with. normal visual acuity
and a 311mm” amoral ammo. arm. with 1/1000 mu is»
mama and 1311315911113

aqua).

per cent

the

may.

mm

9mm.

Ra

_

denied any experience a!

13mm“: or weakness but

can an moi: dimatim that mama the Mummy.

W

did

ran—

m mm of

my mm» and, tho blindness w mumums, he saw
m we I m Blanking him tar mother mutant.
the

��.3.

«swung
mmwmmmmnamm,
m effact or mtmmm Wmt as inducing mam mam
followed
«Magma.

'

by generalized

131006431913

W.

«row-1 em

Wand pamabili‘by at the

and

muwmuoxmmnmotmmnmummm

'

mnwmm.

miter: a. ontastmphia disability.

Wily
new of mm mm

His

Muted by mam-mu, aw maﬁa,

13w,

ma ”placed by mum.
is

pm,
initial

a test

Whil-

m.
chum.

min punitive,

normally prawn. mly in

the

and

gamut

irritability, in

"Wm”

Mme

3mm the special amdiﬁmn
of oembml. dysfuncﬁm. with MammGea in spatial and Wm].
estimation and panoptim, denial of minty bums tenable. It is
mintamd so long as the disability and m mum at eembnl gym;
china

mint.

But

In this patient, an saw as visual pompmm

m M!»

fur reading, «Mahatma .ami explicit denial are no 1mm
3mm maintained for main wants; In the main). Inuktitut at interview with thy staff charm; the period or visual and mum- loan, the
14mm.

pat—Lark

Wound m mum and Mahmud

vim acuity mtumd and hi:

W

readily. Mm

alumni, he maintainad the
same
«farm, memeamd amimm In this regard it u mportant to note that chamtemlegim factor in upliait
at 111mas. it: w extant mm. the momma: i.- naw available, this patient
11033119111931:

mm,

m1

Wasted a Widemble new of

the

reams

download by

and Kuhn (1953).

special note should be

made

the patina“: original visual

WW

of the phenomena of spatial inattemﬁm.

Wt

of

ma Man

was

mama

�.9...

by a

W humeral manom,

apparent

any

out

team with 1/2900

white teat. obgews. During the pexied or visual loss be was unable to

Meats a

Mt and cmfubulated mums.

later tho
um. obﬁaet, but in adﬁﬁm
One week

'

mu
m pmmt
m
kW
mmimmmlmhmmnmpertmpom madafoettOSﬂOw
to 3/2009

mm“ of a lots;

mm.

A

1101:!

mm persim in

m

‘um for thm mm,- after which unity residual mammal. detect;
mm persistently reporwd. Loft spatial inatmuon m prominent. in

mam my, nun mmumw
paiment m maximal, and m Mme!” m pram“. Hum tho mummmhahoam «this

pares“ receded, visual function rammed, and orientation was intact,
than spatial inattontim amppcmd. 21m:, spatial imthntion m an
3» Wm, 1:08“ny motivated by the
aspect at the tow.
Emit-aim Mac“, and w“ pro-mar Mt; 25¢th an a mafia visual
field Moat.

mm

The

grapm 1:

1:an of hunting“ am! its denial £91m osmium). anginmm.

hum producing transient heuiplegia, new...
«hum, «Ma, and various cranial nor" man-ms
mm.

mow Menu,
have hm deans-Aha.

In

a.

W’ of 317 pemtanwua carotid angiagrm.

m and Stein (1952) now an

What nation variaualy row-s

as!
much

mama; at

mm.

transient
Whammy: tram 3i W 15% of the
such

cases (3% when figure: do net inaluda the few patients in was:

thin

ammonium as Mplegu, aphasia or Manama: at their bum
(3) Fur
(191%),

W: a! the «@11qu at «alum angiagraphy, sea mm.

m and 3m {1953), emu and Anna (19w),

(19514) and

Him (191$).

Fem-as

a a.

�diam m parliament;
Imam a: Mommy,

or

m mm.

In than studio: at tbs

mm in phone! an the mutton

of!

the

mun-

cm

mum: at 132m coma-alt man, we rat. and quantity or mtmst sub-n
same wasted and the um vim which tho. indoctim an mpoam

Wan]. studies 018m (19%, Em and 01m (19%) and Bloc:
(1951}
mum of Ma ﬁst-mt. M the cantmt suntan“

in

mm

m mpddly instead in?» animal arteries; and noted Mama mam:pemammy, mmbral «dam
aids of the

macaw.

331111;

ram“
an
mm
tom Wéum, it
uh:

and patéchial hemorrhages mt.

9:?

it is

3303311311:

that the

maidens

likely

m durum We «mm.

mm.
um
Mums am} the Walnut mm of; m phenomm in
m

indumd

uxparimntauyg

Th»

wade-ram in this context

of

0‘

W

chamber at tho

@2113,

11y

I

Wu: .famtim at. m: needle site and

5.. mar.

{ﬂanges

mm to the

patient an

mad-n

�WWW in I. mum: with Mama: 0:

In the warm anarchic!
a

19:1me

mu transient walled. blmmMs
m5Waving
ashore patina at waﬂamw
of

an

plagia developed.

mum, thapamntbocm ma,

mmtm.

Wu

and own

mmbmmmwomu. can»

tabulated responses to questions.
‘

and

m 6180an and manifested spatial

mm» nature, at the annual mum underlying thin «yaw
arm in mum by mung an distribuum of the pramd mam.
‘

5

[the

mmm5 wmmwmmmmemmmw»

fuss nature at

that

m defend“

We

aoqmllae at

inn-«mud

(mm).
1W:mm

of
aiminam o: the uyndrm of
blindness and Mylegia is ﬂawed, with emu-t m m
a! ma atﬁtudo mm the mam. mum' of alum
at bupawl and spatial aroma provided by altered comm Manna.
a;

adapts.”

Wt
m

�um:- ﬁarchrkmnmgm do: Eskimo: Velma

Anton, a. (1893),

nelbst niaht
2

..

9,.

.1.

A. {1925): DI

WW

£2“;

mm. m. w.- Hahnmgg" 3;:

9

*

van

limaegmsio

clans

Patienm
227-239.

Planning“ combmlm .5331; 34.

23545!»

mow, 3.14., “rum, LR. and litmus,

G.

(1951);

Maximal

Mum

03m Gmtmt Media Used tar cerebral lagiograpiv. 5. Human“.

of

E! 5354“?

‘

.

am; (1955), Parcaptian and Wampum. g. m. w. m:

Brain, w.

W32.

Rm; '2. and Men, '0. (19143), 2019mm at 60:10me Blood Vessels to
Cmtrast

Mun at

Grimm 24.
m1.

(1.953),

Pp.

the

Madmt

Groups

m Page“;

225—2553

11,

133:.

“NE

W

Landau: n.

258—263.)

3:

o.

326cm.

Amid a no. (no chap.

(1930),?omnaarm 3mm m mmmum nit maekutiwr
ma,
mm.
wmnm
3.

mm 393%.

no: linkaaei’aigar Hemiplegio.

89497.
,

set,

i

A. (19111:); Gorabml

$123me a.
Rink, 2;. and sum, m.

W

60mm. J.

n

an.

Magnum with kmbmdil. $5.“;

(1952),

A

clinical Evaluation or Carotid

mummy.

m:

Immptinn

of

(19132), Problem

remnants
Gram,

'12,.

15,:

with Organic

brim. 5%.

and Arena, R. (191:8),

Bum! an 107 Gaul.

&amp;-

g.-

of

91mm and at

ﬂ!
w. W.
i
Mum
890.913.

Eambm angiagraphy:

Eoenm-1.

Impaired Bow

52: 617-650.

611mm

�7'93

Ham: :0 and IND, Edi. (193?).

m‘ a.

m m.

a.»

(1939),

W3.

O

-

Womeptiom a!

a: 95403.
Tim Autapsied Cases

Wash.

of Anoaognosia, ibid. 5:

hum.

mam, MI. (193?),
359$ 3.} W5...

Ives,

3.22. and

Disturbance of Bow schem«

%‘

.13.

5

W.
Vina».
1mm
mm. am
191m.
g gm.
m.
613m; one (19w). comma. momma relax-am for 6mm mm a:
5. W“
mm“
3:
W.
Puma,
Bacall, Ad.
(191a).

Luna,

.

Hahmehmng der Eigam

Echo)?

ya:

‘

Type.

Kenmsum..

nu, 16.0.,

33.11.,

10m.

Paul, 6‘ (19%);
Kamiplagia.

Bedlam, E. and

w.
W.
du
13mm.
g...

m.

Pm... ("19%).

123-137.

Egg.

:9.

6. (1938). Helm

mm.

bed. 31

(1932).

53

W

and

mum of the

Qt hMﬁh.

Thoma.

,

'

i'ehlen do:
5,.

Wahmalmmng

W.

as:

g3: 1-9133.

Blindness by Patients with

53} M’Hal'iu

of

Body

3m. ﬁg Q:

(.1953),

W
Body Image.

5. M“

b

m. gm.

Springfield.

ma

Pemmlity Factors in mm o: Mama.

W&amp; a Egghiuh Q3 355”367a
new, 32. (19M); ingiomplv of mo emua Artery. W
hwmt Eu
I. Enid ‘36:}.

l‘

1;:

_

charm 6.
7

m. a mutant.

m.
a:

m.
W.
Magnesia
Warden
5%.

Manama, 3m and ham, 3.1.. {1955),

,

cmmum

213 117MB;

and Barﬂy, mu. (191:5).

Gembral 131mm.

3mm»,

(1951;),

Haber Stet-tinge}: der selbumhmahmng bai unkemitigaw

aim Blinéiwit

ﬁendifer,

0mm; B.

cambm Angina-am. 5.2%.» 9.9;.

Renewing

Web, me.

and

312616..

g5

W

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2464">
                <text>Denial of blindness following cerebral angiography. J Hillside Hosp. 1956:5:238-245.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2465">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2466">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-20-024</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2467">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2468">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2469">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2470">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2471">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the ISRAEL STRAUSS COMMEMORATIVE VOLUME Journal of the Hillside Hospital Volume V, Numbers 3-4 October,1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2472">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2473">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74449">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81010">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87571">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94132">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="248" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="39">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/83ab48a2c2deaa99207d2c9a9f5a4a5d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5d4afa38e2ad19bfcb3084fe8746be25</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100665">
                    <text>111: 9/55

Egbert I» Kuhn, mm.

Hillside Raspiul, Glen
Despite ”posted attomptn,

wmlatiam

am, my Ia‘rk

between

aim

we activity

dwed by «hammock and subsequent. therapeutic outcome haw ham

Email, mrtain
ahock therapy

indum alterations in the sleetmncophalogm in all subjects.

mamas

voltage whim

wmmuml.

conclusions are wan-entree! Iran previous studies (1).- Electra:-

Three pattema we generally dowribad: ‘1) slowing of tha

2) the

in-

may

of

mam, symtria

awn {remiss}

51w wave activity, generality a: high

appear as burnt nativity) and 3) didnu‘him

cios in rate and amplitude.

mm in

din-act.

a

at beta rm;—

relatim human

12m

degree or

Mg”, and the number and imam a! mama. In my subjoéts
”mum paint at change is daaeribod, which can be maintained by further

those
a.

tmamnt, but which is

apparently not increased. Such indueod oloatroenccpmlu

ographic ehangaa are ﬂux-aims.

to the pretreatment

lswls is

number, frequency and
Another area

than

type

m ate at“ return at the: cem’bml

generally 1 to h weeks, dcpending

mhﬁmﬁhip between dagraa of manifest

and authors is

the

the ha}: of direct

wry loss and aonfusim and the

degree of electroencephalogmphie

abmmlity.

wry changes with few tmamants

and without.

Cases are demribed of

3mm

significant olaetmncaphalogmphic

mm without manifest clinical

ﬂange; and also a: never: changes in cerebral
emmnicn cf
inpaimsnt. In these reports,
ganic

dimam an

at tmtnen‘b.

a! agreement ”mg the

wry

patterns

it is?

stated that

Wim also correlates poorly with clinical results.

Hammad at tbs Eastern me Society, Bethesda, September 30,

1955»

mach

or»

��Whﬁla

and

EEG

these

twa

“mommy,

atuéies dananatrute a ralatianship betwaen clininal ralult
tho majority

91’

reports

fail to

do

m. It

3.8

mt 11h]:

that this diucrupanay is tha mosult a: diifarunt populatiana, but rather; tun
dimer-macs in methods of evaluating Swami, than him at Matias; and
diffexunaea in ontinnting change: in aarubrul runntian.

In in» ﬁgurae at stuﬁias a! alﬁarnd twain tunetian indueed by

at

elsatma—

in SW Yak, further data m the mkﬁiamhip
betaaun EEG ahangea aaa clinical atfoeta of aluetrenhoek wars colleetcd. ’lhs
genaral reaulta a: pruviaun investigatiena an the alteratienn in tho EEG with
shank

this 311137149 Hospital

taro anniixnnd, but 313a, a ﬁatinite rmlatianahip betwaan.ﬁﬂﬁ
effects and has clinical rasult was dnmnnstratod. Throa £661 are preaanted

alaetmeshock

today:
(1) the

m pattem mum electroshock

and

their

“hum to in-

pwavument.

(2) The internorrelatianl at airfarant quantitieatians

at ddlta acttvity.
(3) m relation of these abaemtiam to a theary at abet
whim.
:'vzvﬁhgggggga§§§y
Ihuntvmfaar aanaegutava patianta ratarrea for aleetre—
3

shock wart studied. Electruanczgu:.m¢~q

us

'

5

warn nan:

priar ta traatmant, at uaokly intsrvala ﬂaring traatment aha grist treatment.
In 8 ehanns1_ﬂhdcra£t instrunsnt, uaodlo eloatrudus, and bipolar racording
Hypervnntilaxdan was tha anly

was unad.

activatian tachnic utilixoé.

truatnant, raaarda ware takna tbs day'attor; ganamully

25

to

31 hunts

Datum:

after

traatmnnt.
Th3

Baiter
and

the

tmmnta wen administered by the staff paychia‘bris’m,

6 h?

electrnatinulator. Treatment scheéulas

namber

of treatmants variad tram

impruvemant, the

9

to 33.

warm

An

thrae

wing

a.

timma a'waek;

patianta shaved alinical

psychiatrist tended ta give raver treatments,

and warn widely

��m5:-

are mam of the diffieultiea in evaluating impmvmnm More might
have «momma in the estimates of change in those patients. In any
me, by
E‘o

wing this threefold clusifieatiem, the diffemooa between the
groups will be

distinct.

9E gag

EVALUATIOX

first and third

W!

A

total. of

160

meow: were obtained in these who

Following the suggestion of Strauss

(h), the
delta mm am determined for three: lead mmbinetiam (frontal—swam,
anterior temporal - vertex, and
lobe) for 180 ascends of Hoarding
for not load. The delta index :13
on the pemont time woupiod by
aerate.

”ﬂame
mm

of '3 ops- or slower. Tho avenge delta-dude: for the thm loads,.’md the
highest delta may: in my load were the 1mm: and in the final tabulation.
waves

Sinateneouoly, the record me

mad for the almost frequency 1am»

tifiea at least twioe in my load; the highs» voltage of

any

delta may and

the duration of the longest beret.
cm

the basis of those

were placed
160

mores

in

It rank

ﬁn indie”

order from the

of slow wave activity the meordu

ngt

abnormality to the

lawn.

The

were then divided into 3 groups! a Met. upper thins? high degree

abnormlﬂy, and

lmat

m

were .. 1m demo mbmmlitm
mum-*3: 1. 0m- nouns show a Mitim aomlntion human early out dugm
m; okxomlity and improvement. Thane relationships are demonstrated
11:

Slide 1.
By

utilising

sleetroehock, we
of

troutmt is

quantification of slow wave abnormality induced by
conclude that snob EEG abnormality induced in the first 3
theme

on “mental

response.
2..

clinical

mm minimums

We,

and than

m
clinical

Mama for the short tom favorable
mot bathroom

met

each of the

eeeh other?

indie”, first with the
‘

��WWW £611.3ng ehetrashock
mum

is

the mault of the

emﬁm in

the

mtiant

functim in winch new panama of adaptaum, part».
Mae me “when amnamu
1mm thaw 6! dental, my be.
of a

inﬂame! brain

as?

WM.

that: an. alts-rad milieu of eon-ohm}.

a puma-equate for
~

30W,

:1:

mmnt.

mum as measured by delta abnormality is

Ta @115

extent the

first

part.

at the Mates».-

”WWI:

many of quantitative
far the duaidatian at ”Wm 51‘ 27mm
mans studies paint. to the

Em

5mm:

�mm.

1..

than

39mm Lu Th0 Eleatmmeplulm in
Thempim, J. Raw. 8: Kent. 131»... Egg 95.107, 3.9512.

Jemph a. and Panelist,

maetrie

311w]:

3., Harland, W... Kaufman, and Pincus, 6.: Changes in the 81qumaﬁmlegm and in the ke-mtion at 17 {shoutemida [teeming Enam-

3.

shmk mommy af Agitated Mpmvam, Payuhoaom. Had... Qt

mm, mm: own in the me Mr Barbiturau Anesthesia mma by
Elw£mcanwlsin Mama’s and mm SiWicanee for the Timmy (31‘ E01

3..

m and Olin. Rummy“, g; 26l—280, 1951.

mum,

h. 8km“; Km: Clinical
-

at mm.

madmaophalogmphie Studies a eomhtim
Elwtmmawralegmphie and Anatomic Ganges in Gases with

m: 14260, 191th.
Hammin, Eel” and him, Rd": Mastic U“ a! Mbaﬁihl 3mm!
(“Mm Sodium“) in Ma Brain 31m”, Am. J. Wat" m: 12,
m,

6. Fink,

3.,

Am.

J. Psychnti,

'

1953.

m,Rental

Bead», ﬂu

H; and

a! Qrmie
7.

and

Dimse,

Org-mm Brain

5.

Wﬁ; 19%.

as n Diagnostia Sign

Baum, at 246—58, 1952‘

W

in now-y and
Mauser, 3.: 33mm a:
Impmmment in Wmhoak, cant. "euraloguu, 1‘? W6,

mm, m, Fink,
Lamina to

Byndram,

ﬁne Farm-Hand East

u. and

1956.
8...

www, EM”
mumps“

Its

my “~26,

Kuhn,

8.1. and MM, 1.: Paychoais During mew-9mm

Bushman he the Them? of
1952.

312302

Therapy,

Am. 3»

WM,

�������MW“: ﬁwzww/Z

WW!
::

Var/7

.

a;

/W‘
/
/

MMﬁw l-I’M)
/, VMW

5/

We W /
'

-

’

/

ri

'

L

444:1”
/~57:é'(/

*'

.

'

�/WW
WQMW
We. WDZM/JMD szd
4

”Ma/Z7444444944“
M—IWM W43,
g;
ﬁw/
444
W544.»
MM
ﬂWM
AM MW ZIMMWQ
L

SCAMUE‘D

%

”M W“
”774/

W'

AWQQ
”W47
ﬂaw/44¢;”jg Mix/«442

�ﬂ

,

V

MW/a/é/WWM
Mat/c9245.?

M/W7M7Wa.

MW/ZWa/d —%¢%7AQWW

2%
H

M AA/W/Wd4

Mama/21¢

#wdfm?/
WWWWX‘JP ﬂux/(‘5‘
WWW/LWMW/AW
W%WW&amp; ,MAW’ZmV/
%/laﬂ6¢r¢£Wﬂu~

WM 30%....

.

�@:

’OZQJWWM

%W
M,:/éw€

£W7WW
éwaf‘W

Jazz/WW //~JW’{)W
W
/ W,”
make—4441M

@ace
WMA,
W
mg
WWW—jfszd, éﬂfﬁé;e.

I

wmbéMW

ﬂW;
WWW
MW
@yagﬁa
/
mm

V
UZW‘ﬂm
W4
M
ﬂed/2W

"

�W cam/um aim W
,mmvwr‘MA/ﬂﬂ
M Ma ://Z~M~/Z~;/

.

.2.

‘

W
ﬁWZW/LM/AM

WYAMCMMWWM
WW

M562Qﬂﬁ7~fw
W/QWWMW
/¢éa¢d/W
@ngaiu/é
Mh/o/VW

/MM*/WwWéAﬂ.—A
74%. MW/%Wé&lt;~v
ﬂms
M—/k

MM
ﬂoWW/I
ﬁ/ch/M
ﬂWM,W/%9%Wﬂ-

WK
WW
%W
MMWMWWJ

�3WWﬂw/y/QWW7/W

/x£¢¢:W/ZW

~

ﬂ Mé/éex WA’8
75WW/iu7sﬁéw/A/AW/o
ﬂmwMM éﬂyiw/(Wga

ﬁ

WQM/yr/x
M.

inAM.
ﬂ/j/W/W/fgl/M ﬁﬁéz)’

aim/ah‘muzt

V

4

UM
a/“Z
A/dxﬁAMMW

-‘

��;WW%AM a/A/W

&amp;M
MmW%M;/A

Adm/M' ”#7

Wet/«.4145

W%WZ;¢M¢MA

w!
W
ﬁﬂéﬂﬁfdeWQMW'
WWWW m

km,MW7ML
L'

MM
_

WI/Jﬁ

W

W

.

'

-

�Q

.

MM
W
WWW
WM‘“
~AAAM/AAWM4’W

AM‘v/Wzy’g

A

'

$4MM wz/Z’WWW/

AMAWW AWM

�WWW
“WMMW
MM

WW

MMWMI "WK,
MZMMMVMW
ML,
I'M/”MW

W
W
ﬂbthxWM
WWW
/A%W/2Wg

MM7 MW.

V

WM

gifMMWﬂ/%M%‘7

4 MW
MZM
WM
7/134
(12%)
Mc/Zzw/anéﬂff"
Wm/m

Mzgf

�0%,.
MAW/WW wWM
Wr/WA/ZnaWk/
WWW—MW
//6W7/» f/A/ay/MW/

W

9Z2WWA»
ZaWZM'
A:
4w/
W/ﬁ
UV

ngégfiﬂmm

”2% M”;

j

�“”1“ ”PM“ “was

by ehetmeheek end euheequent

um

correlations batman elm

traumatic

eenelueiane from previous etudiee ere

m «was; We
Ge”

cut-cone have been unsuccessful.

«muted,

1

however. A11 pastime ﬁlth-A
~

seated to eleetroeheek thenpy nutter alteretione in the

"

electmneemme

patterns. Three pltteme ere generally described as 1) the

am ”3'“? am

of high voltage which pregneeeee to burst activity; the 3) Mutation at but:
3

frequencies in rate and amplitude. There 1e e direct relation between the
-

of these changes, and the

utmtien point of

number and frequency

ehmge 1e deeeriheé, which

meat, but whieh, seemingly,

frequeney and the type or

is

or treatments. In may

an

be maintained by

eebjeeahe

further

’6

‘

treetmt,

ship between degree of manifest

M0113
memory

the cited authors

is

lees and centueion

maneephnlegnphio abnormality. Ceeee ere eited of severe

the leek er

and

mm

‘

the degree of e

memory

We

with

significant electroencephalographic (ﬂange; and
ﬂeece: aﬁWii..¢m”e in cerebral rhythm without. with“ clinical

m

Manet memory inpeimnt. In theee zeperte, aphasia in "month"
he: on such organic ashram also earmletihg poorly we azmm
rem! te ,

.,

not inereeeed. Alec, such electmeneephalegmmw

Another area of easement

few treatments and without

6:3

7‘
g“3*

�PM

n2.

awn”, homer.

Two

my be cited which mud n oomlatiem

ham

clinical improvemnt. Rowland, Halo
mud, Kaufman and Peanut: in this 19% study of involutional woman ~( chums
in the olectmncophalegm and in the accretion of 17 katostoroida new

Electmncaphalognphic oranges

wing alien-omen]:
ens-251, 19M).

and

at agitated depreaeion, Paychoum. Hod. Q:
a relation bunch changes in their clinical

therapy

roporbed

activity as the disturbed be:havior boom now must, tho 13 cps activity incmaed. So treatment
induced bohuviounl immanent, 13 ops activity diminished. with recurrent»
of symptm, thorn m.- an increase in the 1 time 13 ops activity.
rating scale and the per cent time

manly,

Mort

Pmdnm

by

Theory of
a

Bath (changes

Eloctroconmlaiw

EGT

action, we and

”no. of mums in which

EEG

13 cps

in the ma under Rumbas-ate Amsthaain
and Their Significance for the

hum

cm. Hem-own.

1. 261-280,

a relationship hottest: thiepontom manna

We: and the recovery process “solicited.

to inpmvomant.

By

that

it

Both noted

that slow

irregular in appuranm,
could not be ntiatuctorily related

mm antivity as new in a routine rcéord
and be confirmed the reports

1951) described

wan

adminlltermg an intravenous aolutian of a barbituuto

thmpentone, Roth elicited characteristic changes in the ma titer metroshock in mxy subjcct. Early than waé random irregular claw mu untidty,
bilaterally
which, with more treatment, increased to a highly

We),

synchronous, high amplitude delta runs and

bursts. The” urn chiefly

2.3 cm, with voltages of 200.350 uv and cantlnuoua durations of 30.80
seconds. Winn the mating mcord cum“: rhythmic: Golta activity, umpontem increased

its basic

pm»

its

Imam.

voltage and duration, spread
Roth believed

its

urea,

and

decmuod

that than chug" warn rehtod to the

a! recovery, although, mo concluded:

" Hanover, my development

at

a typical we cameo does slot ensure memory and 10 a! the 36 pntiontl who

am

men a

mag. rams to

me for longer m'tw wreaks. m

M
"Wu-v-

3‘
'

�~3¢

tmsicnt impmment in album).

"lat-d. to tho

EEG

«mating

EEG

oondition mom to be
pationto. .1: in are correct in

W cm in thanmommue aﬂoat

it would

ammo: with tho

seem, 31mg mat.

tho

of tho

patients develop typical changes, that the physiological basis for in-

provmnt is acquired by the majority or one»; it.
«man in promoting recovery.“

w or' my not pm

In the course of studiea of altered brain function induced by electron

at this mums. Hospital in New York, further day. on the ”Intimaships betmn EEG chanson and :31ch effects of electroshock were collected.
shock

The general

remain of

mum innoMga’oiom on the alterations in the

elontmhook mm omﬂmd, but. also, I doﬂnito relationship
between on“ attacks and tho clinical remit
«immtmted. Throo fooi
are presented today:
£30 with

-

m

(1)

Tho EEG

patterns following electroshock and their relation to

mpmmt.
(2) mo intercormlationl of

nativity.

mama; qmtifioaumo

or down

"

(3) The rolotion of those obaomtiona to a theory of electroshock
I

.

SUBJECTS

‘

action.

w W:

prior to treatment.

1

Twentyofour

common“ portion“ referred for ehctm»

shook were awaited.
An 8

and bipolar moording was

Elootmnoephalogms

channel Madonna instrument ,

and. Hypomtiution

mdlo electrodes,

m the only activation

technio mod. During ornament. records wore taken on the day
treatment, generally 25 to 31 hours after

worn don.

trauma“

after a.

.

��In this group

in

mt chum amiable or who

moan change was

transient immanent. 3m

amt. impa‘md.

of

chm ﬂuctuatians in behavior, at tins appearing.

appeamd much as they did

EV.

diffsmd in tha
third groups

mmm

or?

2

-

Strauss (Clinical

ham.
Bruin

that by tha and

boron.

Wu
In w

of the difficulties in evaluating impinmeﬁ'o.
aa’oimataa

of

w

H111 be
A

in than patients.

change

cam, by using this thmefald classiﬁmtim,

firlt and

sown pnuanu

shaved only equivocal or

But the ammo was not sua’oainod, no

tm¢mnt, they
We are “are

might. have

plum

ware

distinct.
total at 160

thus

11001113

differences botmn the

mm obtained in than

manta. Following the maggostion or Dr. Rana
me! mctmmphubgmc Studies
Garrolations a!
«.-

Electmneophalogmphiu and Antonia chanson in Cases with Organic

Dim.

Al. J.

Payout“... 3&amp;1: hz—so. 19%); the delta ind»:

:19th for thm lads (twahlupuriem.

anterior tampon)... vortex.
«comm of renaming for own land. The

and puriﬁed-aunt love)

for 180

don: mm is deﬁned

an the ﬁgment.

slmr.

1m

m

tin maupiod by waves

or

7

tsp:

daluninéex for the three loads, and the: highest
in my 1nd ware ten mm: and in the final tabulntiom
The average

or
c1011»

Simultmebunly, tho ruéorci was scanned for the slowest freqmncy

m imuﬁod M. lean twice
wlta

Have;

ed, but

ivity,

m

in my load; the highest voltage of my
and. the ruration 01’ the longest burst. %er aspect: recordwe! in m final Malawian, worn m mgulamy of ham act.-

aim of Alpha activity“

and um

degm fraqmciu and amplitude

of fast activitiea. “than indie” ‘14 net land
study;

Qua

Inn

«mm diam

not.
by

thumb": to statistical
meow. Fat amounts." mm

identifiablo in all tho
the clinical administration of barbiturates. A: thin

'

��07‘!

Similar

mm» or the relation at nah or the: Macs and minim

mm mm mm. be tho group cum than boron. Slide 2
mmmmlaumormauummmmwmt. 1‘1»me
result.

the

much

upmd group Jump! to

cut-1y lam-wad

and unimpmvod group: mm: a

by tho 10-12

10—80%
A

52:: by tho 7-9

m
1123mm

tmtmntz mm

gnaw,

alum

-

the

#0

tmamm.

‘

similar out or our”: is demonstrated in 511603 for the man

um delta 1:: am 1nd.
In tho nut. slide the man ﬂaunt Imam in recorded, ma this
ahm tho am aigniﬂunt nhﬂomhipl. Whiz. the mania imprond

highest
too

‘

pox-«em.

patients than delta waves dam to 3 61:! or I.” by the «com! we]: or
tmtmnt, th- at)»: two groups mm: man h 03:: by my fourth wok cf

tutti-oat.

and;
The

S

and: improved group

tho fourth
the

much

new by

show

highar mm... by the

not the elitism:

Madly, slide 6
Vat

«minim for tho mean highest amntndu

chm the am

are

”mam far :11 three groups.

manta the mean

aunties: of bursts.

111

(nu-ﬂint}.

In

than

ml: of

Hot noted

long bun-at”

treatment. Burnt:

m

no less

”mg. m.

wave

neural

more than 7

{remnant in

W

m significantly 9119er

hen, the is the fact” or “gummy of hm“.
£91m!- rmthntly mm more maul“ in troqmcy

“plum!” than in the other We groups;
than studio: my be interpmud u demonstrating that

manure: of slow
and

The

patient: lbw longer hunts, winging
1W
tho third

unimprmd and modes-«uh inpmvod groups and

and

mm: mm: and by

activity

aria

from the

«wk

01‘

than

am myuological pm”,

m «imam in ablation to the diaturbmoos in earn-bun.

function induhd by elactmahock.

�3. ﬁnally, can these alterations in

npoets of «tubal function mid:
In

tho» undies,

the myriad.

1mm:

current-d with own:but been altered by olectroshaok?

mama af «tubal function were assayed-

tut or Weinstoin and m um 01' double

stimulation and

tom

text

showed a

W test

thus EEG.

013110?

any

m we ho

of

tan.

In than

ation of intuvumu

memory and

mum”

sodium

until.

racing. 0: than threw indies», only

correlation with

the subject

simultaneous

is

interviewed

1.21th and can
and’

qmatiom of orient-

mm, the quantum an reputed errors in

orientation, mnfabuhuan, dank). at 3.11am: and rsduplicauon are

mud

n 'poaitiw' myul tut, and are indicatiw of cerebral wilful-mum;
Comet roman to than qmstim after and an a ‘mgatiw' W'm “at.
In the wt click, #7. the pox-0mm positivc mm tom are
4

,

m
wanna. botmn tn.

cmpund for
meat. me

much

in titanium.

of the

m1.

gmupa, with the number or weeks

ovary patient

much

improm and

at

trut-

m other tam gram

.

in the and: improved group had u positive

mm by the third weak a! mama, m m abnomaiity panama;
in tho unimproved swaps only me patimm

had a

positive

as tram-£19m «opus command mam-m.
In 311d.
high degree

8. the an relation between,

1‘

EEG

abnomlity

shows a

maul? The“

.

’

tinntmaus tactile tom

inclines

alarm). maxim and tho

distinct carnation which in autism

tinny signifiemt.
Hint of tho

an

m1 and thin

ahmd no won-elation with

mama’s, it. can be concluded that

tutu of wry and
impromt. In an:

and the

than are axiom! typo. of mmbml

dam-

m cannot. speak in gm tom 9! g hrk a! comhum
batman m m and 00me dyarnncum or organic payment,
function tad taut

�‘9.
this point I should like us muss m findings and mass
thoughts as to thsir significance for s theory or electmshoak mm.
At.

m

moss

is 11m. doubt that eloctmshwk

m. It

3.:

all

upmsds to

almr,

symwio,

We.

induces delta nbnomnty

1::

tbs

may frontal, but with Mmamrtmmm,
With

immune trusmt thaﬁsqmncios beam

the smplitudu higher, tho

bunt activity longer sad more regular.

mile den: sbnomlity is pussnt in every mpord “ﬁr olsctmhock, its
Roth‘s mum‘s mammg Manning emu .mmw
«gm 9.:
with bat-bum“ are Digniﬂmt 1n pmﬁmg the 11m” emu Mum by

«wk.

furthsr slntroahwk. In sans subjects

sanity

is

not. induced

despite atoms.”

Our aux-relations of

Guam

0!."

test, um s meeasary
chm-"u fail to wear in the

tram.

delta

ammlity with 13pm srs

«:1»th thorium.

significant far tbs ”amiss: o:
alteration in cox-ohm function as

mm

War, a high dogma «hits smorAn

early, autumn

mm

by the EEG, and

(and in the

m1 taut),

also

by

m.

'

pmummﬁSiM for improvemt. when such
EEG

H

u sign-

nificmt clinical improvement V111 rail to wear in the patient' a hshs'dar.
with wry loss, points
Tbs rm. that than camlatiws mm not
to the poasihiuty that. this is not a significant master in improvement.
In conclusion, than studs.“ land uppers to s theory at E8?
action moﬁntly unwanted by Gamma sud can at us (Kuhn). Thou

“at

‘

authors postulstsd that

wwwmt fanning olactroshoek is than malt

of tbs amtion 1:: tbs patient 91' a min at altered brain function in
much now puttéms or mputim, a-srtioulorly mm a! denial; my be main--

mm. mm m nudist Winn that :5 «land milieu of «avatar-J.
museum u assured by mu abnormality is ,s pm~mu1s1u for improvisamt. ‘ro this extent the first. part. of ﬁns unseen-am Wall is
’“PPGTst

�%

m

W, mm

«was: m-

studs.» punt to
ﬂuaiﬁﬂﬁim of

m “grammar of quantum"

Wm

at

mum

'

�Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller.

To:
From:

Dr. Max Fink

May

I

have your approval to submit

this technical paper to the Eastern
EEG Society for its October meeting in
Bethesda ?

��mmmMmmwmtmmam
mm m m mum
as?

(3)

a»

in

mm. warm “at m

m a: m mam a: mm mm: mwvm

mmmmymmm mm,mzm

�112:?

My)

Quantitative Studies 2;: Slow

Wave

I M
9/5"!»

Activitz

Following Electroshock
Max

Fink,

HOD.

Robert L. Kahn, PhoD.

Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks, New York

Despite repeated attempts correlations between slow wave activity induced
by electroshock and subsequent therapeutic outcasts have been unsuccessful. Howconclusions‘pfrom

W;

”avg/a...

rewart-m
previous studies?“
"W Wm“

Ail—pam-

over, certain
mduuo
are
Electroshock therapy suffer alterations in the electroencephalogram«a»‘ﬁz
9%.-

.

3m

Three pattems are generally describedzu

l)

b

slowing of the alpha frequen-

cies; 2) the appearance of random, synmetxic slow wave activity, generally of;
activity, and 3) diminution of beta frehigh voltage which

Wﬁbwburst

quencies in rate and amplitude. There is a direct relation between the degree
of these changes, and the number and frequency of treatments. In many subjects
a saturation point of change

treatment, but

the pretreatment levels
mnnbe r,

described, which can be maintained by further

is
which”
are reversible.

Qfﬂdeef Mir.
not increased.
The

ographic changes

the

is

«he,

we!“ c,at!”

5mm electroencephal-

rate of return of the cerebral patterns to

is generally l to

b,

weeksxgﬂ’ipending

directly ugh- on

frequency and the type of treatment.

cited authors is the lack of direct relationship between degree of manifest memory loss and confusion and the degree
Another area of agreement among the

of electroencephalographic abnormality. Cases are describedgevere

memory changes

with few treatments and without significant electroencephalographic change; and

also of severe changes in cerebral
or memory impairment.

In these reports,

Weclinical
is

correlatgug poorly With
organicconfusion also
Presented

at the Eastern

E E

W

rhytlmls without manifest

0 Society, Bethedda)

-~--

clinical confusion

&gt;

Md

“HA0?

8 such

gM’Y’EJ

results.
-

Septembee 30,

”0...... «.~.—.._._,___...~—-—

4...“ ._....

195?

�Two

studies, however,

may be

cited as noting a correlation between

ectro-

u:
encephalographic changes and clinical improvement. Hoagland, Malamud, Kaufman
rt-

ﬁdand Pincus in

their l9h6 study of involutional

L’

women

‘1)

-

tonnage-MW:
reported a

=§W19§9+

relation between changes in their clinical rating scale and the per- cent time
4'40

W61
131, ‘ctivity.

more than

3.2% activity increased.

cw

activity diminished.
%

A

time 1301;: a
More

As

treatment induced behaviojral improvement,—-B=eps

tivity.C3,)
Roth

ﬂ"

there

was an

MK,

increase in the

.

Mow-W

.--__

,

WWW-WBW‘UI
relationship
msngmmeWeWw5M—
the

Mby.
~.

the disturbed behavior became more manifest, the

With recurrence of symptoms,

e WA

recently,

As

.

1

described a

between thiopentone induced

EEG

changes and

recovery process. Roth noted

that slow wave activity as seen in a routine post-shock record was irregular in
appearance, and he confirmed the reports that it could not be satisfactorily

m

,

related to improvement.

the

However, by administering an intravenous

thiopeﬁ‘tone, he

elicited characteristic

changes

solution of

in the

EEG

after

electroshock in every subject. Early’there was random irregular slow wave act-

ivity, whichyéith

increased to a highly rhythmic, bilaterally

more treatmen

synchronous, high
amplitude delta runs and

M ILKoVol'PS

bursts.

These were

with voltages of 200-350 is and continuous durations of 30-80 seconds.

When

its

the resting record evinced rhythmic delta activity, thiopentone increased
voltage and duration, spread

its

believed that these changes were

m F4»
lemma;

chiefly 2-3

area, and decreased its basic frequency.
related to the process of recovery, and

Both
v

�he concluded: “The development of a typical
and 10 of the 36

patients

who

attained such a

than two weeks. But transient improvement

related to the
ing the

EEG

EEG

change does not ensure recovery

failed torsmit for longer
in clinical condition seemed tolae
change

in these patients.
changes with the therapeutic effect it
EEG

change even

If

we

are correct in connect-

would seem,

since most of the

patients develop typical changes, that the physiological basis for improvement
is acquired by the majority of cases; it may or may not prove effective in promoting recovery."

Whileathesettwoﬁstudiessdemonstrate a relationship between clinical result
and

EEG

abnormality, the majority of reports

fail to

do so.

It is

not likely

that this discrepancy is the result of different populations, but rather, the
differences in methods of evaluating improvement, the time of evaluation, and
differences in estimating changes in cerebral function.
In the course ofestudies of altered brain function induced by electroshock

at the Hillside Hespital in

further data on the relationship! be~
tween EEG changes and clinical effects of electroshock were collected. The
general results of previous investigations on the alterations in the EEG with
New

York,

electroshock were confirmed, but also, a definite relationship between

effects and the clinical result

was demonstrated. Three

EEG

foci are presented

today:
(1)

The EEG

(2)

The

patterns following electroshock and their relation to improvement.
intercorrelations of different quantifications of delta activity.

(3) Athe relation of these observations to a theory of electroshock action.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD:

Twenty~four consecutive patients referred

for electroshock

were studied. Electroencephalograms were done

treatment, at weekly intervals during treatment and after treatment.

prior to
An 8

channel

�.5‘
but the dramatic

in the

change so evident

patient continued to

first

group was not apparent.

Each

noticable disturbance such as obsessional think-

show some

ing, paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
C.
whom

Minimalyy or Unimproved:

In this group were placed seven patients in

change was not clearly noticable or who showed only equivocal or

improvement.
improved.

Some

showed

transient

fluctuations in behavior, at times appearing

But the changes were not

sustained,

so

that

somewhat

by the end of treatment,

they appeared.much as they did before.
we

are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement. Others might

have differed in the estimates of change in these

patients. In any case,

using this threefold classification, the differences between the

third groups will

be

by

first and

distinct.

EVALUATION OF EEG RECORDS:

A

total of

jects. Following the suggestion of

LJ.aPsychiatemgggnehZ-Sewwl9hhd,

w

160 records were obtained

in these subStrauss

the delta index was determined for three lead

(frontal-parietal, anterior temporal - vertex, and parietal-ear
lobe) for 180 seconds of recording for each lead. The delta index is defined
combinations

as the perbcent time occupied by waves of

7

cps or slower.

The average

for the three leads, and the highest delta index in any lead
indices used in the final tabulation.
index

Simultaneously, the record

was scanned

delta-

were the

for the slowest frequency identified

at least twice in any lead; the highest voltage of any delta wave; and the durb
ation of the longest burst.

(V)

�Ch.
Medcrart instrument, needle electrodes, and bipolar recording was used.

Hyperb

ventilation was the only activation technic utilized. During treatment,:records
were taken the day

after, generally 25 to

31 hours

The treatments were administered by the
C

h? electrostimulator.

number of treatments

after treatment.

staff psychiatrists, using

a Reiter

Treatment schedules were three times a week; and the

varied

from 9 to 33.

As

patients

Showed

clinical improve-

ment, the
There

psychiatrist tended to give fewer treatments, and more widelyfspaced.
were 15 women and 9 men in the series, and ages ranged from.2h to 68 with

a median of h7.
EVALUATION QE CLINICAL RESPONSE:

All the patients
eight

were observed

for at least

after termination of therapy.
determined on the basis of the res-

weeks

patient's reaponse to electroshock was
ident psychiatrist's impression, staff opinion, the nurse's notes and the clinical evaluation of the supervisor in charge of electroshock. The patients were
The

divided into three groups
A.

Markeglz ggproved:

~

markedly improved, moderately improved and unimproved.
The 11

cases in this group were regarded as showing

recovery or marked improvement. These patients no longer showed the
which brought them

symptoms

into the hOSpital; their doctors felt they were better;

and

the nurses' notes confirmed such aspects as being able to sleep without medic-

ation, better appetite, and improved capacity to get along with the other patients and participate in hospital activities.
six patients in this group showed some improvebut continued to manifest indications of mental illness. These patients

B. iModerately ggprove : The
ment

typically Showed symptomatic relief, i§,, acute depressive features might be gone,

�On

the basis of these five indices of slow

wave

activity the records

placed in a rank order from the greatestabnormality to the lowest.
cords were then divided into

3

groups

-

g

uﬁbr

were

The 160

third - high degree

EEG

re-

abnorm-

ality) and lowest third =£w degree abnormality.
RESULTS:1.0ur results show a positive correlation between early high degree

EEG

abnormality and improvement. These relationships are demonstrated in
Slide

I.

utilizing these quantifications of slow wave abnormality induced by electroshock, we conclude that such EEG abnormality induced in the first 3 weeks of
‘By

is

treatment

an

essential pre-requisite for the short term favorable clinical

response.
2. What relationships exist between each of the indices,

clinical response, and then

/

amongst each

first with

the

other?

Similar analyses of the relation of each of the indices and clinical result

identical curves to the group curve shown before. Slide 2 shows the
relation of the delta index to improvement. The mean index in the much im-

showed

proved group jumps to

52%

by the 7-9 treatment; while the moderately improved

and unimproved groups show a gradual, slow increase to 10-20% by the 10-12

treatment.
A

similar set of curves id demonstrated in slide

3

for the

mean

highest

percent time delta in one lead.
In the next
shows

the

show

delta

other

two

Slide

same

slide the

slowest frequency

is recorded,

significant relationships. While the

and this) tbo/

much improved

patients

to 3 cps or less by the second week of treatment,
groups Sarely reach )4 cps by the fourth week of treatment.
waves down

5

shows the same

much improved group show

week the

mean

correlations for the

mean

and-

*{e

highest amplitude, the

higher voltages by the second week and by the fourth

differences are persistent for all three groups.

�Finally, slide

6 shows

the

duration of bursts.

mean

The

records of the

much Improved

patients

third

treatment. Bursts are less frequent in the unimproved and

week of

show

longer bursts, averaging more than

7

seconds by the
mod-

erately improved groups and are significantly shorter in duration. not noted
here, however, is the factor of regularity of bursts. In the longer bursts,
wave forms frequently were more regular in frequency and amplitude, than in the
other

two groups.

These studies may be interpreted as demonstrating

of slow wave activity arise from the

same

that each of these measures

physiological process, and assume the

significance in relation to the disturbances in cerebral function induced
by electroshock.
same

I

3. Finally, can these alterations in the
pects of cerebral function which

EEG

may have been

be correlated with other ap-

altered by electroshock? In

these studies, three other indices of cerebral function were assayed - the
amytal test of Weinstein and Kahg? tests of double simultaneous tactile stim-

ulatioaj and tests of
amytal

test

showed a

memory and

recalfz)

Of

these three indices, only the

positive correlation with

improvement and.with the EEG.

results were presented recently at the American Psychiatric Association
we will forgo a discussion at this time. ‘93
__,wle

These
and

It.;::; suffice

demonstrates the correlation berel
éF,
tween the amytal eating and the high degreerhEG abnormality. n—v_
this iigﬁgLshows
ﬁb£

that the next slide, #

7

'

,

distinct relationship between the two factors.
At this point I should like to summarize our findings and express some
thoughts as to their significance for a theory of electroshock action. There
is little doubt that electroshock induces delta abnormality in the EEG. It is
a

symmetric, chiefly

frontal, but with increasing treatment, spreads to all leads.

With increasing treatment the frequencies became slower, the amplitudes higher,

the burst activity longer and more regular.

in every record after electroshock,

its

‘While

degree

delta abnormality is present

is variable. Roth's experiment's

�~8-

inducing increasing delta abnormality with barbiturate are significant in predicting the later changes induced by further electroshock. In some subjects
however, a high degree delta abnormality

is not

induced despite extensive

treatment.
correlations of degree of delta abnormality with improvement are also
significant for the theory of the mechanism of electroshock. An early, SusOur

tained alteration in cerebral function as measured by the EEG, and also by the
amytal test, appears to be a necessary pre-requisite for improvement. Where

*-

in the amytal test), the:
the patient's behavior.
€l%n ificant clinical improvement will fail to occur in
fact that the correlations were not evident with memory loss, points to the
possibility that this is not a significant factor in improvement.
such changes

fail

to occur in the

EEG

(and

The

In conclusion, these studies lend support )to a theory of EST action recently
(Kahn)(.r These
authors postulated that
enumerated by Weinstein and one of us
improvement following electroshock

is the result

of a milieu of altered brain function in which

of the creation in the patient

new

patterns of adaptation, part-

icularly those of denial, may be maintained. These EEG studies demonstrate
that an altered milieu of cerebral function as measured by delta abnormality
is a pre-requisite for improvement. To this extent the first part of tbs Weinstein-Kahn hypothesis

is supported.

Secondly, these studies point to the

validity or quantitative

the elucidation of mechanisms of behavior.

EEG

studies for

�1533

m a???"

September 21, 1955
MEMORANDUM

TO:
FROM:

Dr. Soseph S. A. Miller
Dr.

(1)

Max

Fink

entitled "Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity
Following Electroshock" will be presented at the Eastem EEG meeting
at
Our paper

Bethesda, Friday September 30th.
(2)

May

I

have permission for Dr. Kahn (the co-author) and myself to

attend the sessions of the society?

�(new?

'

£5)“;

saw» 21.. 1955
m!

m1

Mamaahamr

”gum

(1) our

W amt-MM *mpmuu saw» a: 3m 1m Mtiviw

(a) lily

1:

MWMWﬂnbapWMWMMWmM at
whim! is!»

ma pammaa tear m».

”aim at the am

m (m mama!) and W ta

357‘

�III:
Quantitative Studies 2;

Slow Wave

9/55

Activity

Following'Electroshock
Fink,

Max

MOD.

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.

Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks, New York

Despite repeated attempts, correlations between slow

wave

activity in-

duced by electroshock and subsequent therapeutic outcome have been unsuccessful.
However,

certain conclusions are warranted from previous studies (1). Electro-

shock therapy induces

alterations in the electroencephalogram in all subjects.

Three patterns are generally described: 1) slowing of the alpha frequencies;
2) the appearance of random, symmetric slow'wave

voltage which

cies in rate

may

activity, generally of high

appear as burst activity; and 3) diminution of beta frequenThere

and amplitude.

is

a

direct relation between the degree of

these changes, and the number and frequency of treatments.
a saturation point of change

is described,

to the pretreatment levels

The

1

to h weeks, depending directly on the

treatment.

relationship between degree of manifest

memory

degree of electroencephalographic abnormality.

memory impairment.

in cerebral

loss and confusion

of

direct

and the

Cases are described of severe

at the Eastern

EEG

rhythms without manifest

In these reports,

ganic confusion also correlates poorly with
Evesented

is the lack

with few treatments and without significant electroencephalographic

change; and also of severe changes

confusion of

further

Such induced electroencephal-

Another area of agreement among the cited authors

memory changes

subjects

rate of return of the cerebral patterns

is generally

number, frequency and the type of

many

which can be maintained by

treatment, but which is apparently not increaSed.
ographic changes are reversible.

In

it is

clinical

stated that such or-

clinical results.

Society, Bethesda, September 30, 1955.

�-2studies, however,

Two

cited as noting a correlation between

may be

electroencephalographic changes and clinical improvement. Hoagland, Malamud,

in their l9h6 study of involutional

Kaufman and Pincus

women

relation between changes in their clinical rating scale
time more than 13 cycles per second

activity.

and the

per-cent

the disturbed behavior be-

As

manifest, the fast activity increased.

came more

(2) reported a

treatment induced behavior-

As

al improvement, such fast activity diminished. With recurrence of
there

was an

More

induced

increase in the

Roth (3) described a

recently,

EEG

time 13 cycles per second

%

provement.

Roth noted

it

tone, he elicited characteristic changes in the
was random

irregular

and

bursts.

w

act-

wave

solution of the thicpen-

EEG

after electroshock in every

slow wave

activity, which increased

bilaterally synchronous, high

with mere treatment to a highly rhythmic,

litude delta runs

51

was

However, by administering an intravenous

subject. Early, there

that

irregular in appearance, and
could not be satisfactorily related to imr

ivityas seen in a routine post-shock record
reports that

activity.

relationship between thiopentone

changes and the recovery process.

he confirmed the

symptoms,

amp-

chiefly 2-3 cycles per second, with

These were

voltages of 200-350 microvolts.and continuous durations of 30-80 seconds.
the resting record evinced rhythmic delta activity, thiopentone increased
voltage and duration, spread

its

believed that these changes were

patients

than

But

two weeks.

related to the
ing the

patients

EEG

EEG

transient

change even

improvement

change does not ensure recovery

failed to remit for longer
in clinical condition seemed to be
change

in these patients. If

effect

it

we

are correct in connect-

would seem, since most of the

typical changes, that the physiological basis for

by the majority of cases;

moting recove 1y."

EEG

attained such a

changes with the therapeutic

deveLOp

is acquired

who

its

area, and decreased its basic frequency. Roth
related to the process of recovery, and he

concluded: "The development of a typical
and 10 of the 36

'When

it may or may not prove

improvement

effective in pro-

�.3While these two

studies demonstrate a relationship between clinical result'

and EEG abnormality, the majority of

reports

fail

to

do

It is

so.

not likely

that this discrepancy is the result of different populations, but rather, the
differences in

methods of evaluating improvement, the time of

evaluation, and

differences in estimating changes in cerebral function.
In the course of studies of altered brain function induced by electro-

at

shock

the Hillside Hospital

in

New

York,

further data

on

the relationship

clinical effects of electroshock were collected. The
general results of previous investigations on the alterations in the EEG with

between

EEG

changes and

electroshock were confirmed, but also, a definite relationship between

effects and the clinical result

was

EEG

demonstrated. Three foci are presented

today:
(1) (The

EEG

patterns following electroshock

and

their relation to

imp

provement.
(2)

The

(3)

The

SUBJECTS

intercorrelations of different quantifications of delta activity.
relation of these observations to a theory of electroshock acticn.

AND METHOD:

Twenty-four consecutive patients referred

for electro-

shock were studied. Electroencephalograms were done

prior to treatment, at weekly intervals during treatment
An 8

and

after treatment.

channel Medcraft instrument, needle electrodes, and bipolar recording

was used.

Hyperventilation

was

the only activation technic utilized.

treatment, records were taken the day after, generally 25 to
treatment.
The

Reiter

C

31 hours

During

after

treatments were administered by the staff psychiatrists, using a
h?

electrostimulator.

Treatment schedules were three times a week;

and the number of treatments varied from 9 to 33.

improvement, the

As

patients

psychiatrist tended to give fewer treatments,

showed

clinical

and more widely

�.u.
There were 15 women and 9 men

spaced.

to

68

in the series,

and ages ranged from 2h

with a median of h7.
g3

EVALUATION

CLINICAL RESPONSE:

All the patients

were observed

for at least

eitht weeks after termination of therapy.
patient‘s reSponse to electroshock'was determined on the basis of the
resident psychiatrist's impression, staff opinion, the nurse's notes and the
clinical evaluation of the supervisor in charge of electroshock. The patients
The

were divided

into three groups - markedly improved, moderately improved and

unimproved.
A.

Markedly Improved: The 11 cases

in this group

showing recovery or marked improvement. These
symptoms which

brought them into the beepital;

patients

were regarded as

no longer showed

the

their doctor felt they were

better; and the nurses' notes confirmed such aSpects as being able to sleep
without medication, better appetite, and improved capacity to get along with
the other patients and participate in hospital
B.
improvement

activities.

six patients in this group showed some
but continued to manifest indications of mental illness. These

Moderately,lmproved:

patients typically

The

showed symptomatic

relief, i:g;, acute depressive features

might be gone, but the dramatic change so evident in the

apparent.

Each

patient continued to

show some

first

group was not

noticable disturbance such as

obsessional thinking, paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
C.

Minimally g£_unimproved: In

this group

were placed seven

patients

in whom change was not clearly noticable or who showed only equivocal or transient improvement. Some showed fluctuations in behavior, at times appearing
somewhat improved.

But the changes were not

treatment, they appeared

much

sustained, so that by the

as they did before.

end of

�.5are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement. Others might
have differed in the estimates of change in these patients. In any case, by
we

using this threefold classification, the differences between the
groups

first and third

will be distinct.
93

EVALUATION

delta index

EEG RECORDS:

was

A

total of

160 records were obtained

in these sub-

jects. Following the suggestion of Strauss (h), the
determined for three lead combinations (frontal-parietal,

anterior temporal - vertex, and parietal-ear lobe) for 180 seconds of recording
for each lead. The delta index is defined as the per-cent time occupied by
waves of 7 ops or slower.

delta-index for the three leads, and the
highest delta index in any lead were the indices used in the final tabulation.
The average

for the slowest frequency idenp
tified at least twice in any lead; the highest voltage of any delta wave; and
the duration of the longest burst.
Simultaneously, the record

0n the

was scanned

basis of these five indices of slow

wave

activity the records

were placed in a rank order from the

greatest abnormality to the lowest.

160 records were then divided

into

groups

abnormality, and lowest third

=

RESULTS:

in Slide

3

- i;g=_upper third=

The

high degree

EEG

low degree abnormality.

l.

Our

EEG

abnormality and improvement. These relationships are demonstrated

results

show a

positive correlation between early high degree

I.

utilizing these quantifications of slow wave abnormality induced
electroshock, we conclude that such EEG abnormality induced in the first 3
By

of treatment

is an.essential pre-requisite for the short

term favorable

by
weeks

clinical

response.
2.

What

relationships exist between each of the indices,

clinical response,

and then amongst each other?

first with

the

�~6-

Similar analyses of the relation of each of the indices and clinical result

identical curves to the group curve shown before. Slide 2 shows the
relation of the delta index to improvement. The mean index in the much improved
showed

group jumps to

52%

by the 7-9 treatment; while the moderately improved and un-

improved groups show a gradual, slow

increase to

10720% by

similar set of curves is demonstrated in slide

A

3

the

10-12

for the

mean

treatment.
highest

percent time delta in one lead.
In the next slide the
shows the same

delta

show

other

two groups

to

the

same

much improved group show

week

h cps by the

much improved

While the much improved

fourth

correlations for the

week of

mean

all three

6 shows the mean duration of

patients

this, too,
patients

treatment.

highest amplitude, the

higher voltages by the second week and by the fourth

the differences are persistent for
Finally, slide

and

cps or less by the second week of treatment, the

3

rarely readh

5 shows

is recorded,

slowest frequency

significant relationships.

waves down

Slide

mean

show

groups.

bursts.

The

longer bursts, averaging more than

records of the
7

seconds by

the third week of treatment. Bursts are less frequent in the unimproved and
moderately improved groups and are significantly shorter in duration. Not noted

here, however, is the factor of regularity of bursts. In the longer bursts,
forms frequently were more regular

wave

in frequency and amplitude, than in the other

two groups.
These

ures of
the

studies

may be

interpreted as demonstrating that each of these meas-

activity arise from the same physiological process, and assume
significance in relation to the disturbances in cerebral function in-

31 w wave

same

duced by

electroshock.

3. Finally, can these alterations in the
pects of cerebral function which

may have been

EEG

be correlated with other as-

altered by electroshock? In

these studies, three other indices of cerebral function were assayed - the amytal

�-7-

test

of Weinstein and Kahn (5),

(6),

and

tests of

memory and

tal test

showed a

positive correlation with

tests of double simultaneous tactile stimulation
recall (7). Of these three indices, only the amyimprovement and with the EEG.

These

results were presented recently at the American Psychiatric Association and we
will forgo a discussion at this time. It may suffice that the next slide, # 7,
demonstrates the correlation between the responses on amytal
of

abnormality. This graph

EEG

tests

and the degree

distinct relationship between the

shows a

two

I

factors.
this point I should like to summarize our findings and express
thoughts as to their significance for a theory of electroshock action.
At

is little

doubt

that electroshock induces delta abnormality in the

symmetric, chiefly

There

It is

EEG.

frontal, but with increasing treatment, spreads to all leads.

increasing treatment the frequencies

With

some

became slower, the amplitudes

the burst activity longer and more regular. While delta abnormality

in every record after electroshock,

its

higher,

is present

is variable. Roth's experiment's

degree

inducing increasing delta abnormality with barbiturate are significant in predicting the later changes induced by further electroshock. In some subjects
however, a high degree delta abnormality

is not

induced despite extensive

treat-

ment.
Our

correlations of degree of delta abnormality with

significant for the theory of the

mechanism of electroShock.

tained alteration in cerebral function as measured
amytal

test,

such changes

clinical

improvement are also
An

early, sus-

by the EEG, and

also

by the

appears to be a necessary pre-requisite for improvement. Where

fail

to occur in the

improvement

in the amytal test), then significant
will fail to occur in the patient's behavior. The fact that
EEG

the correlations were not ivident with

(and

memory

loss, points to the possibility

that this is not a significant factor in improvement.
In conclusion, these studies lend support to‘a theory of
enumerated by Weinstein and one of us (Kahn) (8).

EST

These authors

action recently
postulated.that

�-8improvement following electroshock

of a milieu of

is the result of the creation in the patient

altered brain function in which new patterns of adaptation, part-

icularly those of denial, may be maintained. These EEG studies demonstrate
that an altered milieu of cerebral function as measured by delta abnormality is
a pre-requisite for improvement. To this extent the
first part of the weinsteinKahn

hypothesis

is supported.

Secondly, these studies point to the
.

for the elucidation of

validity of quantitative

mechanisms of behavior.

EEG

studies

�REFERENCES

l.

Chusid, Joseph G. and Pacella, Bernard L.:

the Electric Shock Therapies, J. Nerv.

The Electroencephalogram
&amp;

Dis., 11g: 95-107, 1952.

Ment.

Hoagland, H., Malamud, W., Kaufman, and Pincus, 6.:
encephalogram and

in the Excretion of

17

in

Changes

in the Electro-

Ketosteroids Accompanying Electro-

shock Therapy of Agitated Depression, Psychosom. Med., §; 2&amp;6-251, 19h6.

3. Roth, Martin: Changes in the

EEG

Under

Barbiturate Anesthesia Produced

Electroconvulsive Treatment and Their Significance for the Theory of
Action,

EEG

by
ECT

and Olin. Neurophys., 2; 261-280, 1951.

Strauss, Hans: Clinical

and Electroencephalographic Studies ~ Correlations

of Mental, Electroencephalographic and Anatomic Changes in Cases with
Organic Brain Disease,
So

Am.

J. Psychiat., 191:

and Kahn, R.L.:

weinstein, E.A.,

("Amytal Sodium")

Diagnostic

hZ-SO, l9hh.

Use of Amobarbital Sodium

in Organic Brain Disease,

Am.

J. Psychiat., 192: 12,

889-89h: 1953.

6. Fink, M., Green,

M.

and Bender, M.:

The Face-Hand

Test as a Diagnostic Sign

of Organic Mental Syndrome, Neurology, 2: h6-58, 1952.
7.

Karin, H., Fink,

M.

and Kwalwasser,

5.: Relation of

Changes

in

Memory and

Learning to Improvement in Electroshock, Conf. “eurologica, 1Q: 88-96,
1956.

Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L. and Linn, L.: Peychosis During Electroshock
Therapy:
19.9.:

Its Relation to the

22-26, 1952.

Theony

of

Shock Therapy, Am.

J. Psychiat.,

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2474">
                <text>Quantitative studies of slow wave activity following electroshock. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 8:158, 1956. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2475">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2476">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-21a-025</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2477">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2478">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2479">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2480">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2481">
                <text>Several [preprint]s, drafts, and handwritten manuscripts of this title. Three short letters from Fink to Joseph S. A. Miller.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2482">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2483">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74450">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81011">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87572">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94133">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="249" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="40">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/de95bf5b301da53b216f4fe5fa8c04dd.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c38414ee0bbef11434639b42d1daddd0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100666">
                    <text>Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology (“7 Psychiatry
November 1957, Vol. 78, pp. 516—525
Copyright 1957, by American Medical Association

Relation of Electroencephalographic Delta Activity to
Behavioral Response in Electroshoek
Quantitative Serial Studies
MAX FINK, M.D.,

and

ROBERT

L KAHN, Ph.D., Glen Oaks, N.

Recent theories of'electroshock therapy 1'3
have emphasized the role of neurophysiologic
changes as. the basis for the therapeutic ac—
tion of electroshock. Consistent with these
theories, we have observed a relation between
changes in certain measures of brain function and behavioral response. We have noted
that evaluations of clinical improvement fol—
lowing electroshock are related to changes in
orientation and confabulation after intra—
venous amobarbital,4 learning and recall,5
and syntactical aspects of language.6
In view of these observations, it could be
expected that electroencephalographic studies
would show a similar relationship. Numerous
observers have reported consistent changes in
the electroencephalogram after electrically
induced convulsions. There is diffuse slowing with increased voltage and dysrhythmic
activity?"12 Fast activity decreases, both in
voltage and in percent time}3 and in patients
who are intensively treated there is a slowing
of persistent alpha frequencies.14 The degree,
duration, and extent of delta activity are
directly related to the frequency and number
of grand mal convulsions?"14 Such activity
is usually symmetric and appears maximal
in anterior leads, and the electroencephalog—
Received for publication June 18, 1957.
From the Department of Experimental Psychia—
try, Hillside Hospital.
Presented at a meeting of the Eastern Associa—
tion of Electroencephalographers, Washington,
D. C., September, 1955.
Aided, in part, by Grant M—927, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of
Health, U. S. Public Health Service; and the
Dalian Foundation for Medical Research, New
York.

Y.

raphic effects usually disappear in the four
to eight weeks following the last treatmentfgi9
In contrast to the consistency of these
observations, studies of the relationship between the electroencephalographic and the
clinical changes show conﬂicting results.
Chusid and Pacella,15 after an extensive
review of the literature, concluded that the
number of treatments rather than the degree
of induced delta activity, was the primary
factor related to a favorable therapeutic re—
sponse. On the other hand, Hoagland et
al.16 reported a relation between changes in
the percent time fast activity (more than 13
cps) and independent clinical ratings of be—
havioral change._ Roth2 similarly reported
a relationship between changes in the clinical
state and alterations in the delta response
induced by intravenous thiopental sodium.
The divergent observations reﬂect variations in methodology. The present study is
an attempt to apply quantitative methods of
analysis of serial electroencephalographic
records to this problem. The purpose of this
study is to determine (1) the relation of
changes in electroencephalographic delta
activity to the behavioral response in electro—
shock, and (2) if a relationship does exist,
the signiﬁcance it may have for an under-standing of the electroshock process.

Subjects and Method
1. In the initial series, 24- consecutive patients referred for electroshock were studied. Electro—
encephalograms were obtained prior to treatment
and at weekly intervals during and after treatment,
using an eight—channel Medcraft electroencephalograph and needle electrodes. Recording was bi—
polar, and hyperventilation activation was utilized

516

,.

“(34.x

�EEG DELTA ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE
during each recording. During the treatment pe—
riod, records were taken on the day following a
treatment, generally 25 to 31 hours later.
Grand mal electroshock therapy was administered
by staff psychiatrists, using a Reiter C-47 electrostimulator. Treatment schedules were three times
a week, and the number of treatments varied from
9 to 33. As patients showed a clinical response,
the psychiatrist tended to give fewer and more
widely spaced treatments. There were 15 women
and 9 men in the series, and the ages ranged from
24 to 68, with a median of 47 years.
Evaluation of EEG Records—A total of 160
records were obtained on these subjects. Following the suggestion of Strauss,17 the delta index was
determined for three lead combinations (frontal—
parietal, anterior temporal-vertex, and parietal-ear
lobe) for 60 seconds of recording for each lead.
The delta index is deﬁned as the percent time
occupied by waves of 7 cps or slower.
The run of each selected lead combination was
scanned, and 180 cm. (60 seconds) of recording that
was artifact-free was noted. An additive map
measure was run along the base of all waves of
7 cps or slower, determining the number of centi—
meters occupied by such slow activity. The ratio
of this ﬁgure to 180 was the delta index of that
combination.

’

After these measurements were made, the rec—
ord was scanned for the slowest frequency clearly

The total record was also scanned
for burst activity. The duration of burst activity,
the regularity (modulation) of the waves in the
burst, and average voltage were noted.
In the ﬁnal estimates of degree of delta activity,
the average delta index for the three lead corn—
binations, the highest delta index in any one lead,
the slowest frequency, highest delta voltage, and
duration of longest period of burst activity were
listed for each record. The 160 records were ar—
ranged in sequence for each index and the per—
centile rank determined. The ranks were added
and the records then arranged in rank order ac.—
cording to this score. On the basis that the higher
score reﬂected a greater degree of delta activity,
the upper third of the records was classiﬁed as
“high—degree delta”; the middle third, as “moderate-degree delta,” and the lowest third, as “lowdegree delta.” An example of each is shown in
Figures 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
High—degree delta records were characterized
by an average delta index of at least 18%, a delta
index of 21% or more in one of the three measured leads, a slowest frequency of less than 3%
cps, a highest delta voltage of more than 100pv,
and a burst duration of at least two and a half
slow waves.

LF-LO

WWWAWWWNIWW

WWW
RF'RO

LAT- LPT

WWWVWWW
RAT-RPT

WWW/WWW
PRE-EL

seconds.

Low-degree delta records were characterized by
an average delta index of less than 2%, a highest
delta index in one lead of 3% or less, frequencies
no slower than 5% cps, voltages of less than 60pv,
and burst duration of less than one—half second.

W
“WW
W
W

identiﬁed at least twice in these selected lead
combinations, and for the highest voltage of these

R P‘E
AMNVWWWNVW

L F _ LO
«wanjVMImWW-ﬂm

WMWMWMMW

RF- RO

awmwwm

WW

LC-LMT

LC-LMT

RC-RMT

“WW

RC-RMT

LP-E

WWW

WW
RP-E

RP‘E

WWWNAMMMMMWMW

WWW
WWW

LAT' L PT

LAT-LPT

RAT-RPT

PRE- ELECTROSHOCK

ISECOND

,

24 HOURS AFTER EST

Fig. 1.—Low-degree delta activity.

Fink—Kuhn

I50 M,

it l2

5-17

.

‘

WWW
RAT-RPT
WWW

PRE-ELEC

.maﬁ-”

_,__._---_.,

__..-_t

r-.-

518

�vs

WWWWﬁ

.,

.v.

h

A. M. A.

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

LF LO

WMWWWWWW
WWWWWWWW
LC-LMT

WWW

RC-RMT

LP-E

KEN-W

LAT- LPT

WWWWWNWWNWMNA

W
WWW»!
I

RAT RPT
VWVWWNWWWWWWNwWV‘WWW/wm

PRE-ELECTROSHOCK

24

HOURS

SECOND

1:5on

AFTER EST 4*

IO

Fig. 2.—Moderate-degree delta activity.

L F “ LO
WWEJVANWWWJWWWMk/‘W‘mgfaNJWW‘AMW
R F - RO

JVWMWWWWAW

WWW
LC'LMT

RC-RMT

LP-E

WWW-”WW
.

RP-E

WWW“
LAT- L PT

WWW
RAT-RPT

PRE-EL ECTROSHOCK

WW

ISOMV

WWW/meﬂwx
24

HOURS AFTER EST 4*

M

Fig. 3.—High-degree delta activity.

518

Vol. 78, N07J., 1957

�EEG DELTA ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE

I

Moderate-degree delta records were between these
two groups, with an average delta index between
2% and 18%, a highest delta index in one lead of
3% to 20%, a slowest frequency of 4-5 cps, high—
est amplitude of between 60yv and 90,uv, and burst
duration of one-half to two seconds.
2. In a second series, of 54 consecutive, unselected electroshock patients, electroencephalo—
graphic records were obtained prior to treatment.
during the second and third weeks of treatment,
and two weeks after treatment.
These records were analyzed using measures
identical with those in the initial series. Using
the original cut-off points, these records were
classiﬁed as high-, moderate—, and low—degree—delta
records, and the initial observations were tested in
a predictive study of therapeutic response.
Evaluation of Clinical Response—All patients
were observed for at least eight weeks after termination of therapy. The patient’s response to
electroshock was determined on the basis of the
resident psychiatrist’s impression, the staff opinion,
the nurse’s notes, and the clinical evaluation of the
supervisor in charge of electroshock. The patients
were divided into three groups—much improved,
moderately improved, and unimproved—according
to the following criteria:
A. Much Improved: The 11 cases in this group
were regarded as showing recovery or marked
improvement. These patients no longer presented
the symptoms which brought them into the hospital; their doctors felt they were better, and the
nurses’ notes conﬁrmed such aspects as being able
to sleep without medication, better appetite, and
improved capacity to get along with others and
participate in hospital activities.
B. Moderately Improved: The six patients in
this group showed some improvement but continued
to manifest symptoms of mental illness. These
patients typically showed symptomatic relief; i. e.,
acute depressive features might be gone, but the
dramatic change, so evident in the ﬁrst group,
was not apparent. Each patient continued to show
some noticeable disturbance, such as obsessional
thinking, paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
C. Minimally or Unimproved: In this
group
were placed seven patients in whom change was
not clearly noticeable, who showed equivocal or
transient changes, or who became worse. They
showed ﬂuctuations in behavior, at times appearing
less ill. The changes were not sustained, however,
so that by the end of treatment they appeared
much as before.

activity and clinical ratings demonstrated a
signiﬁcant relationship between the early ap—
pearance of high—degree delta activity and the
“much-improved” clinical ratings. Of the
records in patients who were rated as much
improved, 80% were classiﬁed as high—de—
gree delta in the second week, 91% in the
third week, and 88% in the fourth week of
treatment. Of the records in patients who
were rated as unimproved, none showed
high—degree delta in the second or third
weeks of treatment, and only 20% were
classiﬁed as high—degree delta in the fourth
week. The data are expressed in Table 1
and graphically in Figure 4.
TABLE

1.—Electroencephalographic Percentage of
High-Degree Delta Records

Degree of EEG Delta Activity and
Clinical Ratings.——The initial analyses of the
relation between the degree of induced delta
F ink—Kahn
1.

MUCH IMPRO
+——Moo. IMPRO\

50_ .---- UNIMPROVEI

TIME

A ‘13
A.

4‘“
PERCENT

o: C?

-.__~_

,.

m &lt;.3
AVERAGE

...__.—_____.-._,

c3
MEAN

WAVES

I50} .—- MUCH
+——Moo.

IMPROVI
IMPROVI

---~ unmpnovso
DELTA

Treatment
Period

Much improved (11)

OF

1-8

4—6

7—9

10—12

25

80

91

88

Moderately improved (6)

0

16

50

40

Unimproved (7)

0

O

0

20

IOOAv

AMP(LITU)DE

u- c.’

HIGHEST

Indices and Clinical Ratings.——An
analysis of the relation between each of the
ﬁve indices used in the ﬁnal estimate of the
degree of delta activity and the clinical ratings also show signiﬁcant correlations. In
Figure 5A to E, each index is related to the
number of convulsive treatments and the
eventual therapeutic evaluation. The curves
2. Delta

OOACTIVITY

90.
80-

DELTA

MUCH IMPROVED

.—— M00.

(III

IMPROVE-10(6)

._-— UNIMPROVEDU)
‘

70'
60‘

DEGREE

504
HIGH

40‘

20I

0‘

o.
O

/

'\.

/

3O~

PERCENTAGE

Results

DELTA

/

I-3

/

/

'

/
4-6

__/'
7-9

NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

MEAN

L

Fig. 5.—A-E, rt
each index of delt:

'

\\
/'

/
IO'IZ

Fig. 4.—.Re1ation of clinical ratings to development of high—degree delta activity.
519

for the highest—am
5C) and the slow
are most similar tc
of delta activity (
The other three
clearly differentia
group from the p2
520

�/\

A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
f3
__J

g

. MUCH IMPROVEDUJ)
IMPROVED (-6)
50_ pgmoo.
o----UNIMPROVED(7)

&lt;
60’3

.

w

2 40-

E

,:

PD 4

z

as.

8

a:
ling

a: 30m

a.

aLu
&gt;
‘1

qz
m
2

-

lO-

.

_,e-’::.—//

0

"5'

.V

/

U

3
:5

.J,
Lu

o

a-

//’

53

a
+—

m
u:

I

I9Z
&lt;

g

O

0

________-_

. ..........

_______

o
8

g
2
3

g 4§

E

g.

x «e

—«'

w
D-

W to

5
onZ

I

4-6

’

T

7-9

"

IMPROVENS)

.._.. UNIMPROVED(7)

'

T

IO-IZ

'

-. '
—-—:—-—-"/

,,«+

/
/
/
{,x’
”x”

5~

.t’ ----/’/
,./ "

/‘ ,xf

“i3u
Q

(ll)

MUCH IMPROVED

o——MOD.

Z
6-3
IL]

+,.__._-,——‘

0—

3-

6-

a2

.
1—3

I

7-9

----'

C

OK.

100-

50-

'

4—6

IO-‘IZ

I50- ._Muc|-.1:|MPROVED(II)
+——MOD. mpnovsom)
,_.- ummpaovso m

0

IL

V" T

I

_.

7-9

A

&lt;&gt;K

//i1/

------- °- -----MA’65...

x
2
1m
5

NUMBER! OF TREATMENTS

(I)

.
///
//
i

2
.

NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

4-6

1-3

3

‘2

/+
,, ........... .,
-—-“"”
’4'

,

‘

A -------2’

a:
I
l—

// /"

20

o

IMPROVED(II)
0--MO‘D. IMPROVED (6)
°~--~U~NIMPROVED(7)

LU

p—

{‘3

-— MUCH

m
D

.

o

‘‘‘‘‘
————

-4ﬁ‘”

415
1-3
719
NUMBER OF TREATMENTS
7

r

D

I0--I2‘

NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

B

.9.

g

7‘

3a:

6‘

m
n:
lL

,

.9
,r—e
'

-— MUCH IMPROVED

(u)

+——MOD.IMPROVED(6)
o----UN‘IMPROVEO(7)

l0-l2

'\.

I

A
.m 5..

22

9 8 4—

.—

Fig. 5.—A-E, relation of clinical ratings to

each index of delta activity.

33.

3:

3o V 3-.

z

a
2

2a
l

_

. I”
+’/”
//’
“““ ---------- o-"""
.ﬁu‘idiﬁ“
,

a

_

O
O

”_‘..—°V

°

I

‘l

‘l

l.

l-3
4.96
7-9
IO‘IZ
NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

E

for the highest—amplitudedelta activity (Fig.
5C) and the slowest frequency (Fig. 5D)
are most similar to the curves for the degree
of delta activity (Fig. 4).
The other three indices (Fig. 5A, B, C)

clearly differentiate the much improved
group from the patients with the other two
520

ratings, but fail clearly to distinguish the
moderate and unimproved groups. With in—
creasing treatment, however, the separation
of classes becomes clearer.
Each index of delta activity, therefore,
demonstrates a relation to the eventual short—
term clinical rating which is much like that
Val. 78, Nov., 1957

�EEG DELTA ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE
TABLE
I

i/

"

.

”

Average delta

2.—Interc0rrelati0ns of Individual I ndices and Degree of Delta Activity
-

-

Average

63%qu

Longest
Dﬁﬁiéi‘é“

350831153

+0.72

+0.67

+0.80

+0.72

+0.68

+0.84

—0.78

—0.47

-—0.90

Delta

One Lead

FkZVJSEEy

Aﬁié’ﬁiie

-

+0.98

—0.79

_

Degree

Highest delta in one lead

+0.98

_

—0.67

Lowest frequency
Highest amplitude

—0.79

—0.67

__

+0.72

+0.72

—0.78

--

+0.57

+0.88

Longest duration bursts

+0.67

+0.68

—0.47

+0.57

__

+0.63

Degree of delta activity

+0.80

+0.84

—0.90

+0.88

+0.63

--

demonstrated for the combined index of de—
gree of delta activity.
The intercorrelations of each of these in—
dices are shown in Table 2. All correlations
are signiﬁcant at better than the 1% level of
conﬁdence, although the highest correlations
with the degree of delta activity are noted
for the frequency and amplitude measures.
The lowest correlations are noted for the
duration} of burst activity. These observa—
tions indiCater that in future studies or in
clinical application frequency response and
amplitude changes may serve as criteria for
the degree of induced delta activity.
3. EEG Delta Activity as Index of Clinical
Outcome—Following these observations, a
study was undertaken to determine whether
the degree of delta response was predictive
of the short—term therapeutic outcome. On
the basis of the observation that the much
improved patients had developed high—degree
delta activity early and had sustained such
activity, electroencephalograms were obtained during the second and third weeks of
treatment 011 54 consecutive electroshock
patients.
The records were scored as to whether
high—degreedelta activity was achieved dur—
ing both, one, or neither of the four—six and
seven-nine treatment periods, and the data
TABLE

were

Both high

(18)

12 (67%)

One high

(16)

4 (25%)

None high (20)

6 (30%)

*

(Table 3).
Of the patients who manifested high—degree
delta activity during the second and third
weeks of treatment, 67% were rated as much
improved, while only 30% of patients with-

.

1

out high—degree delta activity were so rated.
Thus, the early induction and persistence of
high-degree delta activity are seen to be re—
lated to the short—term clinical evaluation.

Comment
The present study demonstrates a con—
sistent relationship between the degree and
duration of induced electroencephalographic
delta activity and clinical evaluation of behavioral change. While it is conceivable that
the difference between our results and
previous reports may be due to a variation
in population, it is more likely that methodo—
logical aspects are important factors. Serial
records were obtained during the course of
therapy, so that the sequence of electro
encephalographic change was evident. The
records were obtained at a constant time in—
terval following a treatment. Finally, quantitative analyses of the records were made
instead of relying on clinical impressions.
Of other investigators of this problem, both

Moderately Improved

2 (11%)

8

(50%)

4 (25%)

7

(35%)

7

T

ship between ind
havioral
respor
therefore, perm
changes in the o
attendant alterat
the physiologic
process.* A simil.
by Roth 23 on the
*The

Unimproved

4 (22%)

ac’tivity.18’21’22

we.

biochemical

received limited stu

on acetylcholine-chi
tion in blood—brain
and protein equilibri
without deﬁnitive C(

(35%)

Signiﬁcant at the 2% level of conﬁdence.

Fink—Kuhn

the induced neu1
behavioral respoi
these observation
of action of elect
1. Relation ofi
Behavior.—Beha
accompaniment
function. Chang
tude, judgment,
and insight atten
tion, from what
extensively docu
literature.
In this study, e
consistently to alt
in a fashion whic
with states of altc
studies of Davis
Strauss,19 Ostow
have afﬁrmed the
activity as an in&lt;
tion. Symmetric,
has been interpre
tion of midline
centrencephalic s
also indicative oi
of consciousness
being directly rel:
tude, and freqi

related to the clinical evaluations.

Clinical Rating

Much Improved

21

further elaboratii

3.—Patients with High-Delta Activity During Second and Third Weeks of
Treatment*

EEG Delta

Roth 2 and Hoa
out systematic E
to demonstrate
variables and be]
Two aspects oi

521

522

�A. M. A.

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

Roth 2 and Hoagland et al.,16 who carried
out systematic EEG analyses, were also able
to demonstrate a relationship between EEG
variables and behavioral changes.
Two aspects of these observations warrant
further elaboration: the relation and role of
the induced neurophysiologic change to the
behavioral response, and the signiﬁcance of
these observations for a theory of the mode
of action of electroshock therapy.
1. Relation of Neurophysiologic Change to
Behavior.—Behavioral change is a consistent
accompaniment of alteration in cerebral
function. Changes in mood, language, atti—
tude, judgment, thought process, perception,
and insight attend changes in cerebral function, from whatever cause, and-- have been
extensively documented in the neurologic
literature.
In this study, electroshock has been shown
consistently to alter the electroencephalogram'
in a fashion which we have come to associate
with states of altered cerebral function. The
studies of Davis and Davis,18 Ostow and
Strauss,19 Ostow and Ostow,2‘0 and Jung 21
have afﬁrmed the signiﬁcance of diffuse delta
activity as an index of altered brain func—
tion. Symmetric, dysrhythmic delta activity
has been interpreted as evidence of dysfunc—
tion of midline hypothalamic centers—the
centrencephalic system?9 Such activity is
also indicative of an alteration in the state
of consciousness, more marked alteration
being directly related to the duration, ampli—
tude, and frequency of the slow—wave
activity.18'21’22

The demonstrated relation—

ship between induced delta activity and beafter electroshock,
havioral
response
the
conclusion that
therefore, permits
in
the
centrencephalic system with
changes
attendant alteration in consciousness are
the physiologic basis of the electroshock
process."&lt; A similar conclusion was presented
by Roth 23 on the basis of his studies of the
*The biochemical substrate of this process has
received limited study. Emphasis, has been placed
on acetylcho-line-cholinesterase change,”25 altera—
tion in blood-brain barrier,8 and changes in ionic
and protein equilibria 26"” by different investigators,
without deﬁnitive conclusions.
522

effect of thiopental on electroencephalo—
graphic delta activity.
Another example of the relation of the
electroencephalographic delta activity to be—
havior is seen in reports of epileptic patients.
Landolt 28,29 describes a young epileptic who
was ordinarily pleasant, friendly, and cooperative for his clinic visits. At these times,
records were consistently dsyrhythmic. On
one occasion he was surly, irritable, and
withdrawn, and his EEG was without delta
activity. On the subsequent visit, the EEG
was again dysrhythmic, and a behavioral
“improvement” was noted. Similar observations have been reported by Brockman .et
£11.30 and Fabing.31
In a previous study4 we had applied the
amobarbital test for brain disease 32 in a
serial fashion to this group of patients and
reported a relationship between changes in
this index of cerebral function and be—
havioral change. Were other tests of cerebral
function to be applied in a similar fashion, it
is anticipated that these, too, would demon—
strate consistent changes during treatment
and a relation to behavioral response, within
the limits of the sensitivity of the test to reﬂect changes in cerebral function. In this
context, electroshock may be said to be a
method of inducing a state of altered brain
function for extended periods, in order to
achieve changes in behavior.
From this point of view, the development
of a signiﬁcant degree of electroencephalo—
graphic delta activity may be a readily determined guide in the rational management
of electroshock therapy. In these studies we
have examined various delta indices and/or
the intercorrelations and have noted that the
amplitude and the frequency of the induced
slow waves are the best guide to the degree
of delta'activity. In patients in whom the
behavioral response to electroshock is inconsistent with the therapeutic expectation, examination of the electroencephalogram may
provide a criterion for clariﬁcation. If the
induced slow—wave activity is faster than 4
cps and lower than 100,u.v in anterior
temporal—ear lobe or anterior temporal—
frontal lead combinations, then there is
Vol. 78, Nata; 1957

�EEG DELTA ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE

presumptive evidence of inadequate electro—
shock therapy. When frequencies less than
3% cps and voltages higher than lOOuv are
maintained for a number of weeks, the assumption may be made that an adequate
degree of altered brain function had been
induced and that other factors (environ—
mental, personality, pathophysiologic) were
operating to preclude a favorable behavioral
response to electroshock. A similar applica—
tion can be made for amobarbital tests 4 or
syntactic language after intravenous amobarbital.6
2. Theory of Electroshock Action—These
studies of the electroshock process have
demonstrated that alteration in brain func—
tion is induced early and is sustained in
patients in whom the greatest degree of
behavioral change is noted. We have em—
phasized high—degree EEG delta activity and
positive amobarbital tests as indices of
altered cerebral function, with the knowledge
that other indices of altered brain function,
applied in the same serial fashion, may also
show signiﬁcant alterations and a relation
to behavioral change.
We have been impressed that the ratings
of improvement are value judgments of the
behavioral response. All patients in whom
cerebral changes are induced by electroshock
manifest changes in behavior. The range of
behavioral patterns induced under these conditions is wide. Only certain patterns are
evaluated as improved, however, while
others are regarded as “unimproved.” “Improvement” is a special case of behavioral
response, being a subjective evaluation on
the part of the observer that the patient is
“better.” Electroshock does not induce “improvement”; it induces a milieu of cerebral
activity in which behavior is different than
before electroshock. To the extent that the
induced behavior in depressed patients is
perceived as less complaining, depressed,
agitated, or anxious, or in schizophrenic
patients as less delusional, hallucinatory, or
excited, the patient is evaluated as “im—
proved.” When behavior, however, is per—
ceived as anxious, agitated, paranoid,
complaining, or withdrawn, it is evaluated
Fink—Kahn

as “unimproved.” The particular type of
behavioral pattern induced by electroshock
is dependent on a number of factors, such as
personality.33
Another aspect of the rating of improvement is the environmental response to
the induced behavior. The modiﬁcation of
mutism, withdrawal, and negativism to excitement, overactivity, and irritability may
be considered a positive movement by the
therapist but a disorganization by the ward
physician or family. The goals of the
therapist and the family, and their expectations and tolerances, are signiﬁcant factors
in the behavioral response of the patient to
therapy, and, also, in the ratings of improve—
ment.
These same factors are signiﬁcant in the
duration of the electroshock effect. The in—
duced change in cerebral function persists
for only two to eight weeks following even
intensive courses of therapy. In many cases,
the behavioral response is limited to this
period of altered brain physiology. When in—
duced changes in behavior are not adaptive
in the milieu of the patient, the behavior
reverts to pretreatment patterns. In other
instances, the induced behavior is adaptive
to the environment, and, we assume, sus—
tained thereafter not by the initial change
in brain function but by the newly developed
interaction of ‘the subject with environment.
That this is indeed true is seen by the fre—
quent successful adaptation of the patient
to the hospital milieu after electroshock, only
to have a recurrence of symptoms when dis—
charge planning is discussed or discharge
is consummated. Altered brain function
provides the physiologic milieu in which
there is an altered interaction with the en—
vironment—the doctor, family, or society.
These observations lead to the conclusion
that electroshock therapy is a nonspeciﬁc
induction of persistent states of altered
cerebral function. Such altered cerebral
function provides the physiologic milieu for
an alteration of the organism’s adaptive
interpersonal behavior. Changes are in—
duced in perception, language, mood, recall,
and judgment which constitute a mode of
523

interaction with
of behavior indu
is dependent up
subject, the envii
action occurs, an
of altered cerebrz
A similar View
was initially exp
and Kahn,1 who
tionship of neu:
behavioral respor
electroshock pr0(
the observations
Aird et al.3
The neurophys
tion of electrosh(
deﬁnition of the
of further elabor:
a hypothesis also
standing of ther
coma therapy, 1(
agents.

j

Summary

Serial electroe:
weekly intervals
referred for elect
analyzed for the
A signiﬁcant
tween the degrec
delta activity an(
behavioral chang
ﬁrmed in a predi
54 patients.
Differences bi
those obtained It
terms of differen
A neurophysi
tion of the electrt
It is concluded t]
speciﬁc inductio:
altered cerebral
physiologic miliei
tive interpersona
Improvement
as a special case c
these conditions.
by an observer
factors, including

1

r'

524

�A. M. A.

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

interaction with the environment. The type
of behavior induced under these conditions
is dependent upon the personality of the
subject, the environment in which the inter—
action occurs, and the duration of the state
of altered cerebral function.
A similar view of the electroshock process
was initially expressed by Weinstein, Linn,
and Kahn,1 who emphasized the interrela—
tionship of neurophysiologic changes and
behavioral response. This description of the
electroshock process is also consistent with
the observations of Ulett et al.,34 Roth,2 and

Aird et al.3

The neurophysiologic—adaptive interpreta—
tion of electroshock provides an operational
deﬁnition of the process, which has promise
of further elaboration and observation. Such
a hypothesis also has application to an under—
standing of therapeutic process in insulin
coma therapy, lobotomy, and tranquilizing
agents.

Summary and Conclusions
Serial electroencephalograms obtained at
weekly intervals in 24 consecutive patients
referred for electroshock were quantitatively
analyzed for the degree of delta activity.
A signiﬁcant relationship was found be—
tween the degree and duration of induced
delta activity and the clinical evaluation of
behavioral change. The results were conﬁrmed in a predictive study in an additional
54 patients.
Differences between these results and
those obtained by others are explained in
terms of differences in methodology.
A neurophysiologic-adaptive interpreta—
tion of the electroshock process is presented.
It is concluded that electroshock is the non—
speciﬁc induction of persistent states of
altered cerebral function, providing the
physiologic milieu in which changes in adaptive interpersonal behavior occur.
Improvement after electroshock is seen
as a special case of behavioral response under
these conditions. The rating is an evaluation
by an observer depending on numerous
factors, including the type of adaptation, the
524

and

expectation of the observer
(therapist, family, or administrator), and
the setting in which the behavior occurs.

goal

Mrs. Helen Donovan, Miss Gayle Wankel, and
Mrs. Hannah Mosquera gave technical assistance
in this study.
Hillside Hospital.

REFERENCES

l. Weinstein, E. A.; Linn, L., and Kahn, R. L.:
Psychosis During Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy, Am. J.
Psychiat. 109 :22-26, 1952.
2. Roth, M.: Changes in the EEG Under Bar—
biturate Anaesthesia Produced by Electro—Coxnvulsive Treatment and Their Signiﬁcance for the
Theory of ECT Action, Electroencephalog. &amp;
Clin. Neurophysiol 3 :2612-80, 1951.
_
3. Aird, R. B.; Strait, L. A.; Pace, A]
W.;
Hrenoff, M K. and Bowditch, S C.: Neurophysiologic Effects of Electrically Induced Con—
vulsions, A. M. A. Arch Neurol. &amp;
Psychiatl- 75:
3371—3781956.
4. Kahn, R.L

; Fink, M., and Weinstein,,E. A.:
Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improve—
ment in Electroshock, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 76 :23—29, 1956.
5. Korin, H.; Fink, M, and Kwalwasser, 5.:
Relation of Changes in Memory and Learning to
Improvement in Electroshock, Conﬁnia neurol. 16:
88-96,1956.
6. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in Psychopathology of Communications, edited by P. H.
Hoch and I. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton,
Inc., 1956.
7. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Quantitative
Studies of Slow Wave Activity Following Electro—
shock, Electroencephalbgi&amp;-Clin. Neurophysiol. 8:

(abstract),

158

1956.

Pacella, B. L.; Barrera, E. S., and Kalinowsky, L.: Variations in the'Electroencephalogram
Associated with Electric Shock Therapy in Pa—
tients with Mental Disorders, Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 47:367-384, 1942.
9. Proctor, L. D., and Goodwin, J. E.: Clinical
and Electrophysiological Observations Following
Electroshock, Am. J. Psychiat. 101:797-800, 1945.
10. Bagchi, B. K.; Howell, R. W., and Schmale,
H. T.: The Electroencephalographic and Clinical
Effects of Electrically Induced Convulsions in the
Treatment of Mental Disorders, Am. J. Psychiat.
8.

102 :49-61, 1945.

Levy, N. A.; Serota, H. M., and Grinker,
R.: Disturbances in Brain Function Following

11.

R.

Convulsive Shock Therapy, Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 47 :1009-1027, 1942.
12. Mosovich, A., and Katzenelbogen, S.: Elec—
troshock Therapy, Clinical and ElectroencephaloVol. 78, N00,, 1957

���mum m 3%:

«u

mmwgmwzum,mm

muJ.MiMMﬁW3MhWW
m
if
mwmum.
“

w.

Mr
maummwmmmmmd
W.
mam.
mm

W.

‘

����Wﬁmmmamhmmuwmmuw

(mﬁmumlmwmmumwmm

MQ}WW#WWWMWW
W“Nmmmuwmﬁummxmwmmmmm
Wan.

'meummmmm-umm m
MW‘Mﬂqumemmuw-ua
MW“
'

“-

MWWW

manna
a)

mxmmmmmmmwmm

�������I

‘1“

A—

�Wgwmmwmg MWMﬂmmmgw

MWmmtmmum4h
mwmm.
wmmamm.mwm«mm*

�����������.

v

,9

M»

ﬂ..V

4%5..

������..:
3 0%»
.4
4L,

“.4 .:‘

».:4,

J

�����«ﬂit

WWMM.

m

twmnmmmm

�����.14.

u

J,
wring

&gt;,R

�‘

’

,.

"M

:jﬁ"

W;

Walt

��W W M“ WWW!»

mu?Wmmm mm:

at W

mm: in.

{1.

a»

a)

mum at *1?" mm in
W WW;

W
m

m at

��77

was“W
r

I

€25” 0551:

(”n-hum or Inn-I
4

-5«-r.:.5“......”"55. {/7

m mu “$17115: to Word mm. in Whack:
wants." Serum. Studies
.

"v

a»

5,

g

an m HDandRoborbL ma. 3.5.5»
I:

M.
'

ﬂ

at mammal WW; Hillside Hospital, 01m Oaks,
truths
Want.
lbw but.
Aid-d, m m by gum. 14-927. mama mum. at Kent-.1 Health, mum).
of ﬁnd/m, v.3. mm Health San-1a.; and the mm mem
mum
for Mad. Ragnar-9h, nWJa-rlcM mt: ,
of mammeephalcmphoro, Won,
Present!!! aththe mum
Duct, WWI} 1955.
m: M57»
‘

'

.

'

“mm

.—

;

�Relation
5??

-.._..

a:
_

Meet

w
{Mari-ea

m, Delta Activiw to More}. mm in Wanna:
antiutive Serial Studies;

a: electroshock therapy

m

(

1,

2,. 3) have emphasized the

rule of neurophysiologic changes as the basis for the therapeutic

.1

.

mutant with these

,L

theories,

we have observed

auction

of

a mutual:

bum changes a: new means of brain function and behavioral name.
We

have noted
an...

$73

WW 40
electmsheek/‘aﬁ- changes in orientation
embarbital (2;), flaming and
&lt;6) .

null

and

clinical hpmment following
cmfabuletion after

111th

(Shana syntactical aspects at
'

1%

In view of these observations it. could be expected that. electroencephala
ogrephie shudiee mld
report-ad
inﬂamed

relationship.

Nmaerous observers have

eminent changes in the electmeneephelogm utter eleetzically

Mime.

rhyﬁMc

em 1 similar

utivity

There 18 6.1.th9 slewing with increased voltage and dye.

(7 ~ 12). Feet

percent—tum (13), and

utivity decreases,

both in voltage and in

in patients we are intensively trauma, there is e

naming of persistent alpha frequmcies (1h).

The

degree,

mum and extent

or éelte amenity is directly rented to the r'nquemy and amber of grand

ml
I

Wane (8 -- 11;).

Such

activity is usually swede, appears maximal
effects usually disappear

1:1meme

in anterior leads, and the
in ma mks renewing the 1m treatment-,3. 9).
In contrast to the comiateney or them observations, studies of the
relationship between the elmtmmephelogrephie and the dilated
conflicting menus. ohmic: and mean: (15). after an

mag”

show

mun review of

the literature, £9011ch that the amber er treatments rather then the degree
of named delta. activity we: the primry factor

pantie response.

011

the other hand,

rented to a fwomble there-

21qu 93 g}; (16)

:0pr a relation

how changes in the percent time feet eetivity (more than 13 cps) and

���.4...

In the rim]. estimates or degree of deli: activity, the average delta
index for the 3 load oombimtiono, the highest 3011:: index in any one load,
the ulwest frequency, Most delta. voltago and out-aunt: of longest period
of burst activity was listed for each macro. The 160 noorda were mangod
in aoquemo for one): index and the percentile ram: dotemined. The ranks wen
oddod and

the

the ﬂoor!!! than Imnged in rank order awarding to this score. a:

that the higher score refloctod a. grotto; agree of delta activity,
the upper third of the mom were classified as “high dogma
the middle mm 58 "mm. degree delta“ and the lowest third as ﬁlm dogmo‘
“main

dolu:~,

delta? .
ohmotorizod by an ﬂange delta index
delta 1mm of ‘2135 armors in one o! the three

High degree «sum record- wore

of at. least. 18%; a

mound

1m;

voltage mm
second»,

w

slam“

frequency of loss than

m madman;

m: a

Inn-at.

3 3/1;

ops;

highest

mu

mum of u least 2 1/2
‘

Low

degree dorm noords was characterised by an

loss than

2%;

slower than

S

meat. delta

1m in one lead of

1/2 ops; volt-.93 loss than 60

loss than 1/2 nomad. ’Hodornto degree delta
groups with an
60-80

20%;

Mormons; and

31m“ from

Inn-at

indoor or

or 1am mquanom no
naming and burst duration
3%

room-do won Minoan ”lose two

mugs delta index between 2% and 18%;

no load of 3 to

mugo delta

‘

mm ﬁnite 3mm in

of h-S cpl; highest amplimdo bemoan

duration of 1/2 to

2

seconds.

fiftyafour omomtivo, unselected electroshock patients, oloctmonooplulogmphic records worn obtained prior to trustmne, during the We! and third weeks of treatment, and tam weeks after
13)

In

a.

second aortas of

mama‘s.
mesa rooonin were

mlyud

using:

the identical

moms as

in the initial

����W

degree

the” %%Ru.® was

WW3 to datamine whether the
at delta response was Mauve of the short bum theramutic cum.

m the baéis of thﬁ observation that the much improved panama had dweloped
high dtgrae delta #ctivity unﬁt-1y and had. sustained such activity, chew
mamalogms ware obtained tinting; the second and third weak: of mutant in

pltiants.
The records- were Scored as ta whether high degree dolta actiut‘y was
acldwed timing; both, on: or with: of the h—é and 7.9 treatmnt pariah,
the data was muted to the clinical evaluatimm (Table III).
Sh

eonsecutiva electroshock

and

mm III

'

‘

EEG

man

Delta.
_

(18)

Both High
One

mgr;

..

“Home High

(16)
(20)

f

who

pntienta without.

mm

W
2 (113)

12 (67%)

h (225‘)

u (292:)

a (sex)

h (25;)

6 (30%)

7 (35%)

7 (355)

//

anwx‘uaummm,m

M down delta activity?» rated. M, the surly 1n-

ducbion and persisteme of mg; dogma delta

the short mm. clinical

4»

Moderatelx

manifest high degree delta activity during tha second and
onlgrBOSof
attainment.

or the patients

'mm

-

ma

activity is seen to be related

multim

Meant at the m1 of cmm.
2%

to_

��J

We

“WWW“

1111111111:

delta activity has

m integrate as evidence of dysfunction at

manna centers {mtmmphmc systoml (19) .

mpothalandc and

Such

activity is also indicatim of an alteratim in the cuts of consciousness,
with more marked alteration being directly related to this duration, mum.

activity (If, 21, 22). me dmstmted roala‘bianchip between induced delta activity and behavioral response after electric

and tmquency of the slow wave

hint- conclucion that. changes

shock, themfom , permits the

cephnlic

3513mm

with attondant. alteration in conscimmnesa

basis of the electroshock pmccas.
m the basic cf his stwiea of the
Another example of the

behavior

is tut-h

seen

£81

~11

A

‘

11.:1‘rect
.

M

of

me

b

visits.

cooperativefar hie

01.111111

MW”.

occaa11m be

was

1153110111;

mic

9.1213

:1

ported by

we

delta activity,

belmvioral

On

At.

an

WW
$133114.

(23)
'1'?—“1/1'54"?

W 55130)

reports of epileptic patients. Landon

ordimrlly pleasant, fﬁendly and

them times, records

the subsequent

and
118

warn

mimuy

unit,

Similar

was mated.

ram

111111

the

EEG

was again ﬁgsrhyth-

obaomtionaﬁ ﬁre?”

(31).

applied the

Maximal test 101» brain

h
nthembml

serial fashian to this group of patients, and
reporwd
a mlatiomhip between changes in this index
fwtion and
behavioral changci. Herc Other tests of ccmbml {metion to be applied in a
disease (32) an a

31:13::

331131

fashion,

11'.

is anticipated that thou, tab,

would demonstrate

bicchmcal substrate of this process has received 11mm: cm
placed 011 acctyldlommholineatemse changes (2 ) (25),
W818 has1nbean
blooMrain
barrier (3) and chasm in ionic and pmtoin
nautical
(£6)
(2{)
diffcmnt
by
aquilibria
investigators, witho 1t definitive: con-

it The

13111810113

.

m surly, inﬂame and withdrawn, and his 1%

”13111101791331”

In a prcvionl atudy (h)

wwé‘gm

relation Iof clactmcnceﬁulograpmc delta to

(28) (29) describes a young synaptic: who was

011

the Gem-im-

% the pigsiclcgic

mansion

similar

3.11

���«18‘
{gnawing

mu intents.“

name is

courses of therapy. In

limited to this

40f

,peziari

many

cases, the behavioral

altemé! brain phys‘iolégz'f.

When

induued

in behavior are net. aﬁaptive in ﬁhe mien of the patient, £16: behavior
be pwmamm patterns. In cther instances, the induced behavior is
Idaptive to the environment, and, we assume, sustained thereaﬁer not. by the
changes"

mm

in brain function, but by the newly dmleed interaction at M2
subject with envirmmnt. Theft. miss is indeed true is sea: by the fremwnt
suscaasm adamuon at the patient to we hospital milieu after electroshock.

initial

only

change

to We a marten-ea of

symptoms when discharge planning

is

discussed or

is mummied. Altered brag». function provides the Manage
Mm: in which there is an altered hibernation with the environment -- the
diIcharge

doctor, famﬁly er society.
I

These
’

obm’cim

lead to the canclusion that electroahack tirxerapy

ﬂﬁmum

Such
Wyenﬁfic induction of persistent states of altered
altemd mm; hid. rum um provides the physiologic milieu for m: altera-

a
-'

tion of the organism‘: adaptygtexfgersoml behavior.

in

pemwp’oion.

“a

Changes

WW3,W, mé‘m, and MW: which

Max-scum with the ‘mirmn‘o.
Mead ms:- than oonditim is deg-3mm

I

is

The type of
upon

are induced

m

constitute

31 new

behavior

the personality of the 813123“,

the environment in which the interaction occurs, and the duration of the

stat.

cf altered cerebral function.
A

similar

View

of the electroahock pmeesa ﬁas initiélly expressed by

rm and Kuhn

Heimtein,

Minibar:

(1),

who

mﬁmaized the interrelationship of

changes and behavioral msponse. This doseription of ma

shock pmoess is also consistent with the observatians of Ulett
Roth (2) and Aird
(3).

533

new
electro-

$3; (31:):

gig}.

Th5

meioloMptim

Mode.

interpretation of electmmock pmviaiea
m mutational definition of the pmaaa uhie‘n has promiaa of further 3mm

'

49’

�“on and

wax-mum.

_

Such

a.

a; Wilma
‘

standing of therapeutic procesa in

quillizing agents.

.

also has

appliuticn to

1mm coma therapy, lobobono'

an man».
ané

tran-

�«is.
J

‘
,

‘

1. Serial aloutmmoyhnlogmma

Waive

W

ohm!“

at many intervals in

patients Mama! for electroshock were quantitatively
for the degree of delta activity.
’

2.

215

W

aimifioant relationahip was found between the degree and aux-aﬂoat
of induced delta activity and clinical ”elation of behavioral change. The
results wen: confirmed in a meditative study in an additional 51: patients.
A

3. Diffemnooa between them results

and mono obtain-d by

others are

explained in toms of differences in m'modolow.

h.

A

mmphyeiologic

use is presented. It is
duction

-

adaptive interpretation: of the elootmshock pro»

concluded

that electroshock is the non-Specific in-

pomatantvatatea of altereri cerebral function, providing the
ogic 31113:; in inch changes in adaptive interpersonal batman: occur.
oi".

3. laymen)“.
maponz—ze

afar abotroshoch is

under those conditions.

"

The

seen

u

at 81300131

case of

#133191“

botanical

rating in an evolution by an observer

(lemming on numerous faahora, including the type of adaptation. the goal and

expectation of the observer (therapist, family or sminiatrator),
ting in which the behavior mm.

and

the set-

�4-43.6-

Acknﬂedgemnt :
We

wish to

Ranks]. and

m.

31pm: our asppreciation to Mrs. Hahn Ewan, Miss Gayle
Hannah
fer their mammal assistance in this study.

Wm

�~17».-

1. Weimtein, E.A., Ling
max-spy:

Psychiat.,

z.

MW

13., and Kuhn, R. .2 Psychosis During

Its Rahtion ta the
Log: 22.26, 1952.

"zeory

of

Elan-maxed:

J.

Shank Thempy, Am.
‘

'

Bui‘biturato Anesthesia Produced by
Changes in the
m:m, wmm:
Electra-convulsive Wmt and Their Significamo for the Theory
EEG

»

act Action, Em. (315.11. Neurophys" 33 261-280, 1951.
3. Aim, R.B., Strait, LA" Pace, Jﬁ'q Hemoff, 14.x. ind Witch, 5.0.:
of

ﬁe‘grophysialmc Effec'ta of Electrically Induced Gomulsions, Adidmam. a: Paychiat” 15.: 371-678, 1956.

Arch.

a;

3.5.: Relation a: mom-banal Test
to Clinical Imgmemnt in mctmmack, AJLA. Arch. Neurol.

Kahn, 3.1,... Pink, 5:. and Heinatein,

2;;

chum... 163 23.29, 1956.

S.

Hg Fink,

aR'Z'Efrim,

M.

to
Legging
19
1o

6.

Kahn, 3.1.. and Fink

Wt

and

Fur--

8.: Relation of Changes in Mmery and
Nasser,
in Electmahmk, Cont. Mauro]...
ya:

rm; Changes in

8M6,

Language During Electmshoek Therapy,

in “PSy‘chopathangy of Cmmication," Trumaaticns Amr. Psychopaﬂml. Lame” 1955, Gram: Stmttan, Raw York.
7. an», m. ané Hahn, Ram Quantimm Studies of Slaw wave Activity Faun£2

Elactmshock,

8.

1236.. 63.111.

Haumpkys" Q:

1538

(Ethan), 1956.

13.1." Barrera, 31.8. ant-3 Kalinowslgr, 2...: Variations in the Elect»
encephalogm Maociateé with Electric: Shack Theta: in Patients
with ﬁen’oal Eiisordern, Arch. neural. {é Psychiat” :1: 367-681;, 192:2.
9. Metar, Id)... and Goodwin, J.E.: Clinicnl and EleuhroMiologioal Observation! Following mammhmk, Am. J. Psychiat., 391.: $7.800, 1925..
33336113.,
'

3-“

10. Bagahi,
'

'11.

My,

3.211.,

Ewell, 3.33., and Somalia, 8.1.:

The Electreencepmlegrarphia

Clinical Effecta of Elegtrically Induaegi Comnlsicms in the
reament of Mental Disorders, Am. J. Paychiam, gag: 1&amp;9~é1, 1915.

HA... Beret... Km” and Grinker, R. Ru Disturbances in 3min
Function I“
ComlsiVe Shock ’Faerapj. Arch. fieurol. Pay1914-2a
MI
10094027,
plain.”

cum

12. Hamish A" and Katzenelbgen; 3.: Electmshock themm, 51mm. and
517'éacti‘oﬁgcehhalogmphic isms-Ems) J. Harv. ‘I Mani... Dis...
39, 9 we»

m:
‘

13.

24A. and “111mm 3.13.: Significance of Changes in Elect.
mm, alogram
Zhsults from Shock "therapy.
J.
chiat" 105 ,'
'va'hicit:

11045, 19%.

Am.

PB

��’19..
29.’ Landau, Ru Uber

)9

undw
Vemer-‘mm
W:- fur

zguatwdsbilder be:

PW3hmm$g 1?} 313‘331’

a

1mm,I'

19%50

schizophmxe

Neurologio mu!

Goo.
918178,
W”,
Related
Type of TrutG.A.:
to
Thaw
‘3erE} 97-10%a1956.
mnt, Confinia neurologica,

30»

Bm:m,.ﬁoJo Bmcm,

31..

Ming, IL: Personal cmmication,

.3:»:.

Veins’oein, ‘EJ... Kuhn, 1m... Sugaxman, Ink. and 1mm; 1“: The Diagmstic
Use of murbital "Sedan (”Am-tel sodium“) in Brain Disease,
Am. J. Psychiat" ngﬁsws’h, 1953.

ngaa 1n

JOC.’

Jaebbsm’
1956.

$16:

U...

'

Pemmuty raetor‘a 1n mum: Psapmae to
m,a.s
hilactroahock Tharapy, Gent. Kennel. (in prose).

Kahn, R.L. and

833%,

8A.,

Smith, K. and

thconvulsive

6

ham,

(3.6.: Evaluation of Convulsive and

Shock Therapies

W‘.’ at 79m,

1956.

Utiliniqg

2.,

Control. Group,

Am.

J.

�~20-

136mm

m

1.

Lou Dogma Delta

Activity

.

m

Figure 1.1.

Moderate Dogma Delta Activity

“M 3.11.

High Degree Delta Activity

Figum 1?.

Relation of Clinical Ratings to Development
of High Degree Delta Activity.

Figure v.0. - 6)

Ralation
Clinical Ratings to
Delta Activity.
(11'

ill-Ia

EAL-k

M Index of

�12.5553"

’53?!

$3.4

vii.
‘

'3

�HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

FOR PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT. TRAINING AND RESEARCH

75-59 263m:

STREET

GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

Flaws-ran: 3-7800

s. A. MILLER. M. D.
MEDICAL DIRECTOR

JOSEPH

MAURICE BAC‘HRIACH
ADMINISTRATOR

SHRON KWALWASSER- M. D.
ASSOC. MEDICAL DIR.

AN AFFILIATE OF FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK

�,

v—v—v

ﬂu

;

{'ZﬂA/C’

,

—

S’s/"- 4—'-J-{/

,

-:v»-

mm-

-- -&lt;

-

-

.»

,.

-

—~

:~- -~--7—

«—

u

«

,

v-«wy—

——

v~vn~~m~——.W»,M—-&gt;w—

yw—W “H's—WW

£46 4/? /7¢3

far]Flaw/t
M(",qu
”may
Webcw~aa M4£27%01;“,
6W
f5 Wm
awe/W
m Moxie/M

M
W
¢m MJM WM
W
’@.A.:f;4m
«4%

dw.;&amp;%-m/: Midang/fvaf
mam ”I‘M/MM 2/49“”{24414

WMMMWJW
M41; {W MWMM

W.

I,

r

�“qua-7 r.l_~- ".w. v

"/ﬂ/Wd'
Q/a

7

_.,;m,‘_&lt;,,,,,..ﬁ_

.mm. uvr...“

4

¥

77“..

,,

Va-

.._

,

"W,

,V

_._

.—-.~

.,.

V

.7

.,,.‘

;....-

.

,

.:__,&lt;W

dag ,u/

W
WM
W
M
‘

_

,_.,.

.

.

,

qr, .._.;

x7443

A4414M4M

7’7

’

“ 74'

m
WW/M

.W We!

l..—

my

MAJ
WM
W
M
:W mm
_

.

(NV,

Aux-5&amp;2; 7

ﬂ
£;W

Jar/tamed

4

Ztaw a

M..WA
2/ M44."

64;“..“4

92%]

”(“44ng l/amﬂv,

(I

,

�.

_. ~...v.;.,

,

r“...—

E

,

.

V

~,~~—~

,

»-

.

“-‘"‘ «(y—av“ .v.

.r-

.

'-»v"l|‘-—

‘

m

n: “0..

3—wW-u—e-wr-—7-- -.—v,~u-W~v-.- "vV—Z‘V:

‘(Wﬂm twrﬁ'wwuml"fw W?“ W" rw-Dv' ,.,...,.:-_“tum-“warm“. numwx-cunmvrp-w

-

-

,

.

r

_

‘

~

‘

_

.

‘

.

x

{

.iimgulvms

fJW (luv/W 34:: 7&amp;9};
,

'

T.

_@_ALW

~

19“ 7M4

@

%

;

E

sifﬂm

AA“

W’Vwrﬂ Q
25%!

\

:22.

,

34/..46/

’55 ”5.

?W
\

ﬂ)
3’5

£7),

(9

/,¢

@

136"?)

472
46

_
w

‘

"Q

415’

77
9L:

C
'

17/44.;

a’J’
.36.

"
ﬂ

--

gt

M
MW W
W4
._

,

g

.

I

_/

”/W

"

61’2"

«I

(

,

.1

M‘éw/ﬁ 5m:

MIL/{7%

#5?

AMW

5

�W,“ -W’
/
I/WﬂAz/WW
mMﬂAMé-wcwr

W
/W49MM/4~J
I

a]

'1

W
.3/W//hﬁWM/MZW
”DZ/We

I;

J
l

Wamumﬂﬁﬂiw
M
//

4/”ﬂ‘dmﬂéWu-éﬁ/u4em 149W
In, wmwwgw
MVéW
Z74,
Owd’éwdlmmmﬁk
/

V

.

’

�MZLW'W~V
//

�1

. am,”

..
‘

‘

:"!~n\vJ-A-;—eru€m

9

ﬂ:

@LIfWQLJ-y

3

‘

Stay.

¥

5

0W , May/M919».[4999;
“H“ ‘5‘“44:7; /
)3”
aQ/VéiW'
:9)an or“,
J
*

¢)(I\3&amp;6H¢M

:3)

4)

5’)
.

"

“MM

JV

V

.

(NWQI’
607-:

.

f
5

——-i

44:4".

1/”?

.93 {7'47

5

4-09

Q‘QV

010'

2-5

W
M?i
9

”Lama;
fate. 'Mo

7

.

A

We», and

f§

41172:”)

{WV—9‘83“

f‘ﬁ’J’bOw‘f'

mm

x"

(I

M )v‘é"

,

‘

m

O

.1

1m

Maul/{4'

7

‘loAQ

141", m:-

.9th

Oics‘r- ovm’

MM
,

)&lt;

V

ﬂu,

0/

‘

”(I
.

4.: (2274214

/

J

1-3/3“,

5

“7442...? {Z
1

E

”Hp

{£—

'

.
,

03k1—f.-0'/our/m;

J70 1494/ 0"”

,

.9 4999999 MW 4999

.

’

0
26m
’
{j‘u AU ~&gt;M
‘

”
if”)

46H

3/Wt
4

'

4' {M

""‘ﬂﬁ Fcfo

m‘,
”‘5 écfm—ag
*‘d"

+(m—c.

wwwwca‘
+Zwau$£
Wyw
W96
WWI—w W.
ﬂak/4':

100 900 M

lacy/o’ZWJA
5%,

.
__

@1993.

‘9?

(/2413

5:9?) nevi/M
a

Maw” 94»

‘

w

20-40

“71/”

MW
'

'

-_ 9

\

9.—

�(a

‘1,

SP

£59

a)Waé,¢dWI- $927 A w}: A;

�ﬁ

/

WI
”I

3(
EM!
I

L..,

ALAIZMA,

32}

W
'

,,

ﬂak

'

_———'—

-y{-¢7

'57-,“

«7.4/5.

’

,7

'W

II/ MM

m

n-

M5,

Mm AwemmM

44/

m

I“ * 4
30‘6“”{4/00“ X 1%
,1:

£199.42; 21/4 (“/0614va

,

,

V‘SIJ’Z-;/£WAo—4

WM“!
-‘Janm.

42‘41V/a'/7¢V

31.57 Via

w xcf/Zle/x /44/

W44

4!.

7794,;
‘

0” 52",“

W

m

M

104/

U

’60

FWuAAWI

W
f‘ (E.

.%_w2ré’ww1
Urn

_/fj/§/o

94d: éy/-5vé_

�042/

Mf677MM§ka
@w'

,)

)9

W

11.0,

dug/mm»
V

1%,,19/73».

A
WWW
AW/MW“
mWngsUﬁat/Lg, ‘4 M

M
MlefWWﬂ/L‘XW

W
Wséaz

W M»

Md

WW
+2637

'-

AAA/M4

M-M.é"/.2£

Wot/(WA

(WM

mam.

�(16)

3

5

ﬂth,

% Wk. MW
'
-

.

3

@3W Mr

WM

gge

,7

4%
W

A“ % W
twé WK
77'W754’WW

J
calm/(P6,,
(ii)

Wot/7! MA:

an

32AM“ a
(6}

W30

W

A;

1

¥

‘—

6&amp;3,“ A [ﬂ/t

“M” C,

“5&amp;7:

I

�LW

23m

W
(“’W

21%;.“

2

W15—

a.

éd// /7//

I

.

$5

(0)

/4,'

ﬂair!“ M (W

‘-"

(Axle—26‘)

W/Wr
d/ﬂmﬁ/Wﬂwxw‘

W4”-

(f)

kn/WK

A [OJ-W

[6}

gt/M W

(4717

(02/2

@WV4

=1

loo-WM

W2a..

23% 26/?

VFW

A"
,2

Amt“

E

�jW/MM/
r_

QawaQ/ducfﬁ
@ﬂ
)4)

1/)
,

3)

i

W
mgW

W551”

:M
/
H

MM? ge/fsf?
)krqu.

ﬁfth ﬂaw“

AﬁéﬂQ—m
Mﬂe

2:.
/

M
.

-

5/3;

”a“,

mgwk

/W&amp;”’V

:

�Bambi, B.

It, Emil,

R.

m,

and Schmidt, 3.13.8

inﬂated convulsions 1n the treatment of
triaaﬁly_1
1023‘
1]7 9

”The alwtroancaphalogmphia

effects

mad 3111113511

1:1li

an!

aim

disordem.“ém. J. Pqnhigt.

'

Barrera, St
American

J.

Egg and P866118, B:

In:

“EEG

finding! ”‘001amd

With

31Wtﬂ¢

therapy in patients with mental

333.: 206119ﬂ3.

3118.559}...

GOldtarb, W" Laughlin, J3 Ma;

8336.

Kiwﬁ’ H. Ea: ”P19163336.

1113111111

$193k

dimm.“

Shaﬁkdu VMO

Gottlieb, J.S., Ashby, PLO", and Kimble; L.L.:'mamamlogi¢ study of schimphn
min and depressim. IV. Ina
fluence of electriu cenmlaiva them on, the aodium mm]. reapmua of the saleabmencephalcgrm.‘ Am. J. Psychiat. 10 : 6869696§ 1958::
»

Harris,

Roma, W.A.:"ﬁsa of cur-are in mtraxol
mnmlaant timer: with
15 3 5376 £1 19111“
observations.” maniatric
Land

2mm, and Panama, E.

Wt

electmencephalograﬁxiu

England, Hr, whim,

Mum, and Cinema, D.E.: " me electroencephalogram

hypoglycemia and recovery."
7

J" Wigton,

Hughes,

Arena Neural.

Ward,

Am.

13., and

at 13816111312.

14.11., and Rims,

Jardon, F.:“Electmencephalogmphie studies on patimam meshing electm~shoek mamnt.”
19141.

“SWiamm of

L.F.:

«hmgas in thy alecmenecphu

ﬂagram whichmsult from

Each,

‘1'.

0.,

and

autumn, Ed

251.13..

Arch. Neural.
MO

“The

other

effact of benmdrine and

@2th

ant: upon the

(21mm Shank) EEGJIi'amatiun Pmc. 5:62“ 12%,.
8mm, mm, and Grinkar, 12.3.: Diaturbanaea in brain

pastconvulsiw
Levy,

therapy." 53:

shew}:

W.

ehiatu 50f 53§¥537g 12h3 8:

1mm, mm,

1'

Payehnt.

&amp;

m; J;

Haul, B; H0;

of

schizophrenics curing insulin
1202 559‘5791 3.9;};

Gottlieb, J.S.: ”Chang” in. the eleetmeneephalogrm renewing
insulin shack therapy."
Neural. and Page

and

«1.12.,

J. $1131.01.

as: ﬁgumg
_

Jg.P§Fdhiﬂta 105‘,h0*h53 19h5v

Knott,

,

mum

reﬂuxing wnmlsiw shack mummy.”

1:7:

1009402“: 192:2.

Go»;

Wu,

{

G; Rn, Pma‘bor, IN Dr; and

600%,

J“ E03

"Parallel psychologisal, psychiatria and Whalesinn). findings: in sahimphmnie patieats undar insulin ahcmk treatment." Am. J...
Psychiatr.» 933

1422-4129. 121:1...

lbriaﬁy, LB...

and

Siam,

573 112*.»718‘ 1913!.

maevich, A"

nut.

and,

shoal: therapy.” Arch. Neural. g

mint.

Katzenelogen, 8.x “meatmslmck therapy, alibical and

10?: 517620.
,

J. 0.: “Ehctmmeemalogmphm study of electria

1214 8.

encephalograpmga studiem

J.

03.ch
ant...

Mex-v. 5:

�«2.
Pacena,

B.

Bax-rm, S. W" and Kalinawaw, I“:

I“,

elwtzic‘ shank therapy or

?:

Hawk 1122 .

V498—

’

” Variatim in the 319nm.811661312310ng assaeiated with

patina with mm mm".
,

60
m
.9341“;

is
_

_’

N.

.

Wt.

.

;

13m. and Goodwin, v1.8.3

tit)”

mm

‘.

andﬁliactmuﬂxyaiologiaal churnefanwm aleﬂmﬂhgakc M». J. ngaik‘bt
:“x

ilk

H‘

\

Ibsen, 8. R5, Samaria, L., and Finlay,
P3192»

11

(315.113.1331

101: 79%3094L 19kg;

111nm.

'

J. Ea Camativq tlwtmeneemalogtmhia abs
serrations / gnawing electroahaek therapy
Am J.and
alternating
unidimctmm ﬂuematmg
m1:
5'

using

Proctor,

trim

1

'

i

13.30.; and Goadwln,

Proctor,

Harold: VP:

Arch.

mm,i

@533 . 1.7.; 617.6111,

conservative approwh to ﬁne

111%

uhq of sneak therapy in

1M;
‘

mm

arggi‘ijd Suthﬁrlmd’ Gt Fa:
was experience with alwtric:
aback treatment in mental (mama-35, with $963.91 regard to vamua psychowmtie
99:
phenomena and to certain elcctmteahniaal “Worm”? Agni J.

531M,

W5»;

ﬁllet-350:1, K. JV,

6111133511, Wk"

" A eonsic‘haratim‘ M

Mint;

Pacella,

La 'me aigmﬂicancegﬁnf abnormal elentmmﬁt$3ng; prior t6 electmmnmlsiva many.

Taylor, R.

34., and

Jr Nam.

‘8;
Manta may 1073 2204.23....

Mar,

.

51'.

B.

_

l
,

w. J”, Lewinger, L., and

Wail, A. A“ manager, :4. C‘:

l9 1‘

-

F

mdﬂeam,

thorapwtic result in amiaophrmim
’

‘

Am.

J uW

pmlecW»

3.2%}: eomlation or

J3

'ghwk eleetmenaephalagmm and

Win“ 1023 299‘ 1.9%

‘

._

,

'5

(,1

”Elaatmmeephalq/{gmkﬁﬁc studies renewing elwtrie
57-; 112"
aback therapy; #13:). Wenml. s:

mist.»

.:

3

(I

{V

l

l

.

\
I

‘

V

3
,

‘

1‘

‘2

l

‘

1

"x

\f.‘

1

.
'

‘a

I

L
‘

'

2%,

~
‘

\

‘

i

:
;

E

‘
i.

'

J

‘

l‘

‘*

a

‘

l
v

1,‘

2‘

‘2\

1

E

\

'1

.
6
w

f

‘

/

‘

,

,

4‘

‘.\

.‘
,

"V

{3‘
'

w'

l

4

i

i

4/

e

J

L

5

'

-’

I“
"7

,r
_

ii

e

:y

,

ﬂ
’1'!

,_

‘

Y

.
,

‘,

y

.

'

��1

'___,

Y?

3b

CW
#31

1416mm.)

W

2’

71ml afar}:

JJngtu/zw:
é/‘f

M

W
.39“.
5““

ww—w—WWWT
,

{EM-ﬁn. 7/ aux... GMM‘ ”£73
7;. 23/ , rfr3.

MM WWW; ﬂV/ZM
(36¢

3
—-—-—

W7

"

.,

@//

"

"

{If

557

nr—

j

’7’7

Ik

fer"

(”a“)

’&gt;’3

yum ¢7

i

Lﬂﬂyl :7 94,}, ‘/f,

557
'

[5/

f7

l007-/¢v§

’4’“ [7‘4“ ”3 ”7

-

9%

2/F/.

”I‘lfj

"

"

547+,4m7m «m
1‘-

l7

[%’/&amp;?Jﬂﬂ n/V‘é gédnw

awn-£5:H

"

If”

415(ﬂ/Ia 7"(K

O’ermlw

ﬁf:

7" w 7 W

1
4

o2? 3v

:

~———~r

.1

£143de

WI

,“d. _

L?

'

‘

I

T) Q -1

F8

‘

,4, ,1,

@1574”!

Jﬂm

'2

’1

wri-ryn

334/

m

;

"‘

“
:~
&lt;-

W
V

3K3»:

-;M
"

HJWAM

�Levy, N.A. and Grinker,

and
8.3., ”Electroencephalogranhic
and

ElectriC9llylln-

Clinical Studies Following Metrazol

.

duced Convulsime herany of Affective Disorders", Archives
of Neurology and Psychiatryh7, 19h2. 1009-1099.

L., "Variations
Pacella, g. L., Barrera,.3. E,, and Kalinowsky,
Electroshock
Therany
with
Associated
~in El’ectroencenhaloggram
Archives
of
Neurology
Disorders."
Mental
of Patients with
and Psychiatry A7, 19h2, pp. 367-38hk
Sﬂnon, A., Yeager, C.L., and Bowman, K. 5., "Studies in Electronarcosis Therapy IV EEG Investigationsﬂ' J. Nerv.and Mental'

Dis., 118, on.

131-1M33

"Clinical and Electrophvsiological
3..
Following ileotroshock". Am. J. Psych. 101,

Proctor, D., and Goodwind,
Observations

laué, pp. 7a7-8a0.
of Electricéghock TreatKarliner, W.,A "Neurolowic Comnlications
review." J. of Nerv. and Mental Dis. 107, on. 1-10.
ments:
Rosen, A. R,, Secunda, L., and Finley, K. H., "Conservative
In—
Mental
'

of Shock Therapy in
Illness,
Tracings
Before,
Electroenoenhalographic
of
cluding Study
Therapy".
Quarterly
r"sychiatric
and
After
ghack
,
During

Approach

17, 19h3,

to

Use

pp.6l7-6hl.

Turner, W.J., Lowinger, Lg, and_Huddleson, J. 3., "The Correlation
of Pro Electroshock Electroencephalogram and Theraneutic
Results in Schizonhrenics? Amer. J. of Psych. 102, lghg,
I

ﬁa+41?1 r8}+d*uw~

CZ-2§ (hﬁwt

lqﬁi

;

:ryfugzo a9m~ﬂ¢3
_

_

”—4“;

«-4

�’5?

[Evy—q“

..

x“.

7v

,

“aw—.77“

.

...,-._:$..

.1

,

.

fa?"

Em:

E».
\‘a

H

:1

.

.7

.

,

.

.

1

”way"-

,7

m

”V.

'55:

A“:

-

.

Pup-&lt;12:

‘

F.»

7“"

,s-n

,

Bagchi, B. K., Howell, R. W., and Schmale, H.T.:

"The

electroencephalographic

clinical effects of elecmental
disorders."Am. J. Psychiat.
of
treatment
trically induced convulsions in the
and

102: A9-61, 19A5.

Barrera, S. E., and Pacella,

B.

L.:

findings associated.with electric Shock
therapy in patients with mental disorders."

"EEG

J. Physiol. 133.: 206,71951.
Goldfarb, W., Laughlin, J. M., and Kiene,

American

H.

E.:."Prolonged.insulin shock."

Am.

J. Psychiat. 101: 827, l9h5.

Ashby, M.C., and Kinble, L.L.:"Pharmaoologic study of schizophrenia and depression. IV. Insodium
the
amytal response of the electfluence of electric convulsive therapy on
10h:
l9h8.
Am.
686-696,
J. Psychiat.
roencephalogram."

Gottlieb, J.b.,

of curare in metrazol
convulsant théerapy with
electroencephalographic observations." Psychiatric Quart. 15: 537—5h3, 19h1.
Hoagland, H., Rubin, M.A., and Cameron, D.E.: ” The electroencephalograms of
schizophrenics during insulin
120:
559-570, 1937.
Am.
J. Physiol.
hypoglycemia and recovery."

Harris,

M.M., and

B. L.and Horwitz,‘w.A.:"Hse

Pacella,

7

‘

Wigton, R., and Jardon, F.:"Electroencephalographic studies on pat—

J.,

Hughes,

Arch. Neurol.&amp; Psychiat. us:
_

7h8—7h9,

ients receiving electro-shock treatment."

l9hl.

Kennard, M.A., and Nims,

L.F.: "Significance of changes in the electroenceph-

J. Psychiat.

l9h8.

105:

Ao—AS,

alogram whichresult from.shock therapy." "'Am.“

Knott, J.R., and Gottlieb, J.S.: "Changes in the electroencephalogram following
insulin shock therapy." Arch. Neurol. and P532

chiat.

50: 535-537, l9h3

a.

Lennox, M.A., Ruch, T. C., and Guterman, B.:

"The

effect of benzedrine

and

Other chemical agents upon the
postconvulsive (Electric Shock) EEG."Feraration Proc. 5:62, l9h6.
Levy, N.A., Serota, H.M., and Grinker, R.R.:

‘Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat.

D7:

Disturbances in brain function
following convulsive shock therapy."
"

1009-1027, 19h2.

Neel, B. H., Dswan, J. G., Myers, C. R., Proctor, L. D., and Goodwin, J- E.:
"Parallel psychological, psychiatric and physiolog—
ical findings in schizophrenic patients under insulin shock treatment." Am. J.

Mo

_

Psychiatr.

98: h22—h29,

l9hl.

Moriarty, J.D., and Siemens, J. 0.: "Electroencephalographic study &amp;of electric
shock therapy." Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.
57:712-718, l9h7.
Nbsovich, A., and Katzenelogen,

Dist.

107: 517-530, l9h8.

8.: "Electroshock therapy, clinical and &amp;electroencephalographic studies. J. Nerv. lent.

V

�-2Pacella,

B.

L., Barrena, S.

W., and Kalinowsky,

L.:

"

Variations in the electro-

encephalogram assbciated with
electric shock therapy of patients with mental disorders. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiatric.
h? 367-38h, (March) 19u2.

Proctor, L.D., and Goodwin, J. E.:
using raw 60 cycle

alternating

Egychiat. 99:525-530, 19h3.

and

Comparative electroencephalographic ob-

serVations following electroshock therapy

unidirectional fluctuating current.

J.
“““‘
Am.

observaProctor, L.D. and Goodwin, J.E.: Clinical and electro-physiological
Am.
J. Psychiat.
tions following electroshock.

101: 797—809, 19h51

Rosen, S. R., Secunda, L., and Finley, K.H.:

conservative approach to the
use of shock therapy in mental
The

illness. Psydhiatric Quart. 17: 617-6u1, 19h3.

Sutherland, G. F.:
experience with electric
consideration of
shock treatment in mental diSeases, withspecial regard to various psychosomatic
phenomena and to certain electrotechnical factors." Am. J. Psychiat. 99:

Sulzbach, W., Tillotson, K.

J.,
" A

Gullemin, V.,

and
Jr.,some

519-52h, 19h3.

Taylor, R. M., and Pacella, B. L.:
.

J. Nerv.

_&gt;

&amp; 1VLent.

significance of abnormal electroencephalograms prior to electroconvulsive therapy.

The

Dis. 107: 220, l9h8.

Lowinger, L., and Huddleson, J. H.: The correlation of pre-electro—
shock electroencephalogram and
therapeutic result in schizophrenia. .Am. J. Psychiat. 102: 299, l9h5.

Turner,

Neil,
l9h7.

W.

J.,

A. A.,

Brinegar,

W.

0.:

"Electroencephalographic studies following electric
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 57: 719,

shock therapy.

�286.lﬂ§elation
EEG
Number
Delta
of
Manuscript
re:
Activity ..." by Fink and Kahn
Dear Doctor Fink:
I am very pleased to inform you that your paper
has been accepted by the Editorial Board for publica-

NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY.

tion in the
of
issue
in
an
early
article
It is planned to use your
A.M.A. ARCHIVES OF

the

ARCHIVES.

Yours very truly,
ROY R. GRINKER, M.D.

Editor-in-Chief for Psychiatry
P.S. It is necessary for publication that you forward an additional copy of your paper directly to Mr. G.S.Cooper, Managing
Editor, A.M.A. Specialty Journals, 535 North Dearborn St.,
Thank you.
Chicago 10, Illinois, as soon as possible.

�L___E,,

_,

WW--.

,

,

,

,

R. GRIEKEE, .
DIRECTOR, P. a

BOY

MICHAEL REESE".

29th

SIREET

CHICAGO

AND

,.

pgmg's 2mg; E

16. ILLIIS|957

in %£;"3 Max Fink,

Department

M.

DEdeEimental

°f

Hillside HOSPigg;
75
263rd Stfeéi “
‘

Glen Oak§,3

c‘.

NEWTYGRKE
.

-“

i

V.

-

.

I

J

.'

--E
EVE
I

;

.

3

i...'

-_

.*-«

.

n
a"

Psychiatry

l,
‘pja.'ff~xﬁE=b
.

.4

-'

.

',

3‘,

.

2“”

ﬂ

�C

'

o

Please return to

r;’

MD

Publications Inc.,

30

East 60th

St.,

New

York, 22, by Jan.

2

1958.

Relation of Electroencephalographic BeltavActiviiy to Behavioral Response in
.
Electroshock, Quantitative Serial Studies. EAX FENK Ali RDbnﬁT L. AAHN. AMA-Archives
of. e rology &amp; Pegcniatry 78: 516-525, November, 1957
-

I

In a study of the neurophysioloch correlates of convulsive more”, serial
electroencephalogram were obtained at weekly intervals in an consecutive patients
referred for electrodzock. no records were quantitatively analysed for the
degree of delta activity by

moments of the

per cent. tine delta, latest frequency and highest amplitude delta in the record, and daemon of burst activity.

signiﬁcant relationship was found batsmen the degree and duration of
induced delta activity and clinical evaluation of behavioral change. The results were conﬁned in a predictive study in m additional 9; patients.
A

Differences between these results and those obtained by others are ex’
plained in tonne of differences in methodology.
A

presented.

It

-

adaptive interpretation or convulsive the repy is
is concluded that convulsive therapy is the nonspeciﬁc induction

neurophysiologic

of persistent states of altered cerebral function, providing the physiologic
milieu in which changes in sdaptive intezpersonel behavior occur.
Ilprosrenen’c steer electrooonvulsive therapy

.

is

seen es

:1

special. case

of behavioral response under these conditions. the rating is an evalmtion by
an observer depending on annex-one teeters, including the type of adaptation,
the goal and expectetim of the observer (therapist, family or adainistrstor),
and the

setting in

which the behavior

occurs.

�In a-study of the neurophysiologic correlates of convulsive therapy,

serial electroencephalograms were obtained at weekly intervals in

2h

conseCutive patients referred for electroshock. The records were quantita-

tively analyzed for the degree of delta activity

by measurements of the

per cent time delta, lowest frequency and highest amplitude delta in the
record, and duration or burst activity.

significant relationship was found between the degree and duration
of induced delta activity and clinical evaluation of behavioral change.
A

The

results were confirmed in

a

predictive study in

an

additional

Sh

patients.
Differences between these results and those obtained by others are
explained in terms of differences in methodology.
A

therapy

‘

neurophysiologic - adaptive interprdation of the-ele- convulsive

is presented. It is

concluded

thataai-lil-convulsive therapy is

the nonspecific induction of persistent states of altered cerebral function,
providing the physiologic milieu in which changes in adaptive interpersonal
behavior occur.
Improvement

after eledtrégggzﬁﬂiz’gfezwzz a special case of behavioral

response under these conditions.

The

rating is

factors, including the type of adaptation, the goal
expectation of the observer (therapist, family or administrator), and

depending on numerous
and

an evaluation by an observer

the setting in which the behavior occurs.

�v

w

a,
z.

K

.

.3

2.»

w\

A

Y;
.

369

.36

N =

W.

��EEG DELTA ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE
graphic Studies, J. Nerv.

&amp;

Ment. Dis.

107 :517—530.

1948.

13. Kennard, M. A., and Willner, M. D.: Signiﬁcance of Changes in Electroencephalogram
Which Result from Shock Therapy, Am. J.
Psychiat. 105:40—45, 1948.
14. Callaway, E.: Slow Wave Phenomena in
Intensive Electroshock, Electroencephalog. &amp; Clin.
Neurophysiol. 2 :157-162, 1950.
15. Chusid, J. G., and Pacella, B. L.: The Electroencephalogram in the Electric Shock Therapies,
J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 116:95-107, 1952.
16. Hoagland, H.; Malamud, W.; Kaufman,
I. C., and Pincus, G.: Changes in Electroencephalogram and in the Excretion of 17—Ketosteroids
Accompanying Electroshock Therapy of Agitated
Depression, Psychosom. Med. 8:246-251, 1946.
17. Strauss, H.: Clinical and Electroencephalo—
graphic Studies: Correlations of Mental, Electro—
encephalographic and Anatomic Changes in Cases
with Organic Brain Disease, Am. J. Psychiat. 101:
.

42-50, 1944.

18. Davis, H., and Davis, P. A.: The Electrical
Activity of the Brain: Its Relation to Physiological
States of Impaired Consciousness, A. Res. Nerv.
&amp; Ment. Dis, Proc. (1938) 19:50-80, 1939.
19. Ostow, M., and Strauss, H.: The Signiﬁcance
of Bilateral Abnormality in the Electroencephalogram, J. Mt. Sinai Hosp. 20:173-193, 1953.
20. Ostow, M., and Ostow, M.: Bilaterally
Synchronous Paroxysmal Slow Activity in the
Electroencephalograms of Non-Epileptics, J. Nerv.
&amp; Ment. Dis. 103 :346-358, 1946.
21. Jung, R.: Correlations of Bioelectrical and
Autonomic Phenomena with Alterations of Con—
sciousness and Arousal in Man, in Brain Mecha—
nisms and Consciousness, edited by J. F.
Delafresnaye, Springﬁeld, 111., Charles C Thomas,
Publisher, 1954, pp. 310-344.
22. Strauss, H.; Ostow, M., and Greenstein, L.:
Diagnostic Electroencephalography, New York,
Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952.

Fink—Kuhn

23. Roth, M.: A Theory of ECT Action and

Its Bearing on the Biological Signiﬁcance of

Epilepsy, J. Ment. Sc. 98 244—59, 1952.
24. Bornstein, M. B.: Presence and Action of
Acetylcholine in Experimental Brain Trauma, J.
Neurophysiol. 9:349—366, 1946.
25. Tower,‘ D., and McEachern, D.: The Content and Characterization of Cholinesterases in
Human Cerebrospinal Fluids, Canad. J. Research,
Sect. E. 27:132-145, 1949.
26. Spiegel—Adolf, M.; Wilcox, P. H., and
Spiegel, E. A.: Cerebrospinal Fluid Changes in
Electroshock Treatment in Psychosis, Am. J.

Psychiat.

104:697—706,

1948.

and Spiegel-Adolf, M.:
Physiological and Physiochemical Mechanisms in
Electroshock Treatment, Conﬁnia neurol. 13:38—63,
27.

Spiegel,

E.

A.,

1953.

28. Landolt, H.: Das EEG bei epileptischen
Psychosen und schizophrenen Schiiben, Personal
communication to the authors.
29. Landolt, H.: Uber Verstimmungen, Dam—
merzustande und schizophrene Zustandsbilder bei
Epilepsie, Schvveiz. Arch. Neurol. u. Psychiat.
76 1313—321, 1955.

30. Brockman, R. J.; Brockman, J. C.: Jacobsohn, U.; Gleser, G. C., and Ulett, G. A.: Changes
in Convulsive Threshold as Related to Type of

Treatment, Conﬁnia neurol. 16:97—104, 1956.
31. Fabing, H.: Personal communication to the
authors, 1956.
32. Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L.; Sugarman,
L. A., and Linn, L.: The Diagnostic Use of Amobarbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Brain
Disease, Am. J. Psychiat. 109:889—894, 1953.
33. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, Conﬁnia neurol, to be published.
34. Ulett, G. A.; Smith, K., and Gleser, G. C.:
Evaluation of Convulsive and Subconvulsive Shock
Therapies Utilizing a Control Group, Am. J.
Psychiat. 112:795-802, 1956.

Printed and Published in the United States of America

525

as

�/

4

I

Tax

A

“ﬁn?

.A

g.

_
MW.»

.15.

__

O
\Q

«
A

A"

33

9%

~

,.

\a

E

,

+3?

“a

.

§

mm“

‘

g...

.496

=

a

«a.
.«F

N
.

.

my
3s

\AVUFQV.

.

a

SEN

z

«Kay

pm“

Aw

‘

.

ﬁ

0.

3

qu$v

g

c.

.

E
«7}

Vi

__

ramﬂjﬂaj~

a

=

Arsﬁv

xaxwrwmﬂu

f»

r

«UN:

:15.

_

.n

A
an

é

it MW: a. N»

“.3 M‘\

«R

.

R.“

A
Mi

31.. A}

_

“$me

_

3J3

..

mamme

.

.rrn:

=

h
J

H

mﬁuMMc

«s

V

4.

NAQV

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2484">
                <text>Relation of electroencephalographic delta activity to behavioral response in electroshock; quantitative serial studies. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1957 Nov; 78(5):516-25.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2485">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2486">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-21b-026</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2487">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2488">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2489">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2490">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2491">
                <text>7 items. 1: Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry November 1957, Vol.78, pp. 516—525. 2: Two final draft copies. 3: Several pages of handwritten notes. 4: Reference list (mix of typed and handwritten). 5: Postcard from Roy R. Grinker to Fink. 6: Copy of same page. 7: Scans of missing pages fromthe items listed above.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2492">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2493">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74451">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81012">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87573">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94134">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="250" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="41">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/4829a346731c642d4b009d69ede20ef4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f52f80e5b4fabf3b53f885310a3d6354</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100667">
                    <text>Clinical and electroencephalographic
effects of Megimide in patients
Without cerebral disease
Martin A. Green, M.D., and Max Fink, M.D.
the introduction of Megimide (beta, beta methylethylglutarimide) as an antagonist for barbiturate intoxication in 1955, considerable interest has been stimulated in its
clinical applicability. Initial reports noted its
efﬁcacy in barbiturate poisoning,1—4 but subsequent studies failed to substantiate this applicationf)"8 In this laboratory, barbiturates
are frequently administered under the standardized conditions of the “amobarbital test.”9
It was thus possible to assess the efficacy of
Megimide in altering the behavioral response
of human subjects to physiologic equivalent
amounts of barbiturate.
In addition to its suggested antagonism to
barbiturate, Megimide induces both paroxys—
mal discharges in the electroencephalogram
and clinical grand mal seizures.10—14 The present report concerns our experience with both
the behavioral and electroencephalographic effects of Megimide.
FOLLOWIXG

AIATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-four hospitalized voluntary psychiatric patients with psychoneurosis, depression,
or schizophrenia, ranging in age from 27 to
64 years, were studied. Megimide in a concentration of 5 mg. per cc. was administered
intravenously at the rate of 0.5 mg. per kg.
per minute, until deﬁnite changes were observed in the electroencephalogram and often
beyond this point. The amount of Megimide
varied from 45 mg. to 250 mg.
In 15 subjects Megimide was administered
without prior amobarbital. In 19 patients it
was given following the administration of in—
travenous amobarbital which was injected at
0.5 mg. per kg. every 40 seconds, in amounts
necessary to induce nystagmus, slurred speech,
and marked drowsiness or sleep.

All experiments were undertaken in the elec-

troencephalographic laboratory. An electroencephalogram was made prior to the injections
and was run continuously during the administration of both drugs. The electrode placement consisted of frontal, motor—parietal, occipital, anterior temporal, posterior temporal,
vertex, and earlobe'. Both scalp—to-earlobe and
scalp-to-scalp combinations were used.
RESULTS

The electroencephalogram in all subjects
prior to the administration of the drugs was
“normal,” that is, symmetric and non-dysrhythmic.
Electroencephalographic Response
In the amount and rate of injection of
Megimide employed, electroencephalographic
changes occurred in every patient. The type
of response and the amount of drug necessary
to induce such a response were highly variable.
The electroencephalographic changes included
irregular low- and moderate-voltage slow ac—
tivity, bursts of slow activity (usually of high
voltage), single spike discharges, and spikewave forms (ﬁgure 1 A, B, and C). These ef—
fects were diffuse and symmetric, with greatest prominence in the temporal leads.
The sequence of these responses was inconstant. Irregular, low-voltage slow activity
was the most frequent initial change in the
record. In other instances, bursts of highvoltage slow activity or spike activity appeared
initially. As the injection continued, the amplitude and per cent time delta activity inFrom the department of experimental psychiatry, Hillside
Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, New York.
Read at the meeting of the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, New York, December 1956.
Aided by Grant M 927, National Institute of Mental
Health, National Institutes of Health, US. Public Health
Service.

Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, September 1958, Vol. 8, N0. 9
Copyright 1958, by Lancet Publications, Inc.

�EFFECTS OF MEGIMIDE
"NV‘VV

Mvw

LP-RP

*V‘JlWMAA/‘fr'rwm“MWHWIMS‘WWVWWMmeLMMA.
L0‘

R

0

(memwwmewwWWW»

WM

WﬂM‘j(Ml/\rlY/‘Vr'j‘ﬂuj'wwMWWWWWWJWMW VWLWMW

WWW/wWWJMWW *WWWWWWW

AT R P T
I‘
5A
,
”v
w.
a
WW1
'«M
“-34x4“ MW‘WMMWW
I ‘A ‘M’m‘rv‘v‘rﬁ‘w Jam.M’w’M—‘ﬁ' draw;
R

“ij

MW
®

.I

50

35cc

MEGIMIDE (5

cc/

MIN)

mv

lSEC,

LP-RP

@

30 cc MEGIMIDE (Soc/MIN.)

'

SEC'

creased. Bursts of high—voltage slow activity
were seen eventually in almost all patients.
Spike discharges, however, were less frequent,
even with relatively large doses of Megimide.
For example, the tracings in one subject after
receiving 220 mg. of Megimide and in another
after receiving 250 mg. showed irregular diffuse slow activity without spike activity.
Seizures
Because of the nature of the population and
the goals of our study, we specifically avoided
administering Megimide in rates and amounts
that would produce clinical grand mal seizures.
Despite these precautions, a grand mal seizure
was inadvertently induced in one patient. A
33 year old woman was given 200 mg. of
Megimide at the rate of 50 mg. per minute.
Up to 150 mg. there was only a decrease in
the voltage of the alpha activity. After 200
mg. there was a sudden long run of diffuse,
rhythmic 4 to 5% cycles per second high voltage activity, with intermixed spike activity
which was immediately followed by the seizure. The electroencephalogram during injection and prior to the seizure showed minimal
changes, and the seizure was not anticipated

35M: MEGIMIDE

(Sac/MIN.)

SE“

F IG. 1. Different types of electroencephalographic response to Megimide. A, delta activity, irregularly and
in bursts, B, single spike activity, C, spike-wave activity

Subjective Response
The subjective reaction to Megimide was
minimal, even when the induced changes in
the electroencephalogram were severe. A few
subjects complained of nausea, “dizziness,”
“shakiness,” or a peculiar sensation in the abdomen. It was possible, however, to continue
the injection without further increase in the
symptoms. Two subjects became apprehensive,
and in one of these the injection had to be
discontinued.
Myoclonic jerks occurred frequently. They
were usually mild and conﬁned to one extremity. Less frequently they were bilateral
and more severe. The relationship between
these movements and spike activity was inconstant. The myoclonic jerks usually preceded
the appearance of spike activity, althOugh the
reverse occurred occasionally. The simultaneous appearance of spike activity with myoclonic jerks was infrequent.
The effect of Megimide was short-lived.
There were no instances of seizures or other
abnormal responses later in the day following
its administration. However, since intravenous
amobarbital followed in all patients, this may
have prevented such occurrences.
The clinical and electroencephalographic responses to intravenous amobarbital following
Megimide appeared similar to those seen in
subjects in whom amobarbital is administered
without prior medication. The slow-wave or
spike activity induced by Megimide disappeared and the usual patterns associated with
barbiturates developed (ﬁgure 2). However,

�NE UROLOGY

684

the well-modulated high per cent time beta
activity usually noted after barbiturate administered was less prominent.
M egz’mide Following Amobarbital
One group of subjects received intravenous
amobarbital prior to Megimide until drowsiness, slurred speech, and nystagmus were induced. The electroencephalogram showed the
patterns commonly associated with barbiturates, that is, an increase in voltage and per
cent time fast activity and a decrease in
amount and voltage of alpha activity. The most
prominent clinical change was the awakening
of the subject. Within the few minutes necessary for the injection, the patient became more
responsive, slurred speech disappeared, and
drowsiness, both on subjective and objective
evaluation, was minimal or absent. Nystagmus became inconstant, unsustained, or disappeared completely. Gait, including heel-totoe walking, was steady. However, the awakening effect was not uniform for all aspects
of behavior altered by barbiturate. For ex—
ample, if the subject became euphoric and
more talkative with barbiturate, such behavior
may have persisted in a milder form, even
after the drowsiness of amobarbital was abolished by Megimide.
These clinical changes were accompanied by
alterations in the electroencephalogram (figure 3). Patterns of drowsy activity disappeared. Alpha activity increased both in
amount and voltage. Fast activity induced by
amobarbital usually persisted unchanged or
was reduced only sightly. In some instances
it increased in amount and voltage. The prior
administration of amobarbital did not prevent
the appearance of paroxysmal discharges.

WW W

LP-RP

W
WJMWW
LO'RO

LF-RF

-om

A

mmwwwwwwvwvv

WWW/”WWW

AT-PT

@RESTING

RECORD

W

wa~VMMMWh~WMphﬁwnw~
L

AT-F

R

MMKWWWMMVWVJ

@

UL

‘vr—WW‘W

wabwuvmh1-vun~pa~h4qu

WWW»
50!”?—
1

azsrmc

RECORD

252

(28

mg. AIOBARBIYAL

rug/40

SEC.)

40 c: IEGEIIDE
(5 cc / III.)

FIG. 2. Effect of amobarbital following administration

of Megimide

ﬁWWA/VWW
38cm MEGIMIDEHScc/MIN.)

r.

W

WWW
WWWWHW
WWW
WWW

WVNMWMWWM
o

LO . R0

F:

MNVWVWVWVW—M’NW’

Megimide is similar to pentalenetetrazol
(Metrazol) in that it induces delta activity,
spike and spike-wave activity in the electro—
encephalogram, and clinical grand mal seizures. Such changes occur in nonepileptic subjects without brain disease, and considerable
individual variability in the threshold for these
changes exists. These discharges are nonspecific and cannot be used as evidence of
the presence of a seizure disorder.
The possibility of using Megimide in activating the electroencephalogram has received
study.10—1‘-’ Several investigators have noted a
more gradual onset of the electroencephalographic and clinical changes with Megimide
than with Metrazol. For this reason, the opinion is expressed that Megimide may be more
facile in reproducing both clinical and electro—
encephalographic seizures in patients with
seizure disorders. It should be emphasized,
however, that in the one patient in the present
study in whom a grand mal seizure occurred,
the seizure began suddenly and was not anticipated either from the electroencephalogram
or previous clinical responses.
Megimide is effective in counteracting the
clinical effects of small doses of intravenous
amobarbital. This property has been previously
demonstrated in animals3 and is being utilized

LF-RF

k

WN-WINW‘MWMNWVM

DISCUSSION

0%va6Wwaw'wwrwwqp'v

LM-RM

{-0

Bursts of high-voltage slow activity, spike activity, or spike-wave activity often appeared,
usually during or after awakening. Such activity was not a necessary accompaniment of
the awakening response, however, since other
subjects in whom clinical drowsiness disappeared did not show such discharges.

500 mg.AMOBARBlTAL
(50 mq./40 SEC.)

Effect of Megimide following administration
of amobarbital
FIG. 3.

SEC.

�EFFECTS OF MEGIMIDE
in anesthesiology to shorten the recovery period from barbiturate anesthesia postoperatively.15 It is questionable whether this action
is speciﬁc for barbiturates or whether it also
applies to states of altered consciousness due
to other agents as well.16
CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-four psychiatric patients without
cerebral disease were given Megimide (beta,
beta-methylethylglutarimide) before and after
the administration of intravenous amobarbital.
2. Megimide produces irregular delta activ~
ity, bursts of delta activity, and spike and
spike-wave activity in the electroencephalo1.

685

gram. Such effects are similar to those produced by pentalenetetrazol (Metrazol).
3. Considerable individual variability exists
in the amount of drug necessary to produce
these changes.
4. A grand mal seizure was inadvertently
induced in one patient. The electroencephalogram during the injection and prior to the seizure showed minimal changes and the seizure
was not anticipated.
5. Megimide counteracts the clinical and
some of the electroencephalographic effects of
small doses of intravenous amobarbital.
Megimide supplied through the courtesy of A.
las Ltd., Slough, Bucks, England.

&amp;

I. Nicho-

REFERENCES
A., SHAW, F. H., CASS, N. M., and
\Van, H. M.:M. A new treatment of barbiturate intoxication. Brit.
J. 1:1238, 1955.

1. SCHULMAN,

to .

3.

4.
5.
6.
1.

8.
9.

F. H.: Further experiences with Megimide—a
barbiturate antagonist. M. J. Australia 2:889, 1955.
SHAW, F. H., SIMON, S. E., CAss, N., and SCHULMAN,
.-\.: Barbiturate antagonism. Nature 174:402, 1954.
HARRIS, T. A. 13.: A barbiturate antagonist. Lancet
1:268, 1955.
L()U\V, A., and SONNE, L. M.: Megimide in the
treatment of barbituric acid poisoning. Lancet 2:961,
1956.
PEDERSEN, ].: Amusing effect of Megimide and Ami—
phenazole in allypropymal poisoning. Lancet 2:965,
1956.
PLUM, F., and SWANSON, A. G.: Barbiturate poisoning
treated by physiological methods. J.A.M.A. 163:827,
1957.
CERSHON, S., and SHAW, F. H.: Effects of Bemegridc
on barbiturate overdosage in humans. Brit. M. J. 2:
1509, 1957.
\VEINSTEIN, E. A., KAHN, R. L., SUGARMAN, L. A.,
and LINN, L.: The diagnostic use of amobarbital sodium (“Amytal sodium”) in brain disease. Am. J.
Psychiat. 109:889, 1953.
SHAW,

10. COURJON, 1., and BONNET, H.: Comparative effects of
Metrazol and Megimide in activation of epileptic pa-

tients. EEG

11.

12.

13.
14.

15.

Clin. Neurophysiol. 8:710, 1956.
DROSSOPOULO, G., GASTAUT, H., VERDEAUX, G. and J.,
and SCHULLER, E.: Comparison of EEG “activation”
by pentamethylenetetrazol (Metrazol) and Bemegride
(Megimide). EEG &amp; Clin. Neurophysiol. 8:710, 1956.
Room, E. A., RUTLEDGE, L. T., and CALHOUN, H. D.:
Megimide and Metrazol (A comparison of their convulsant action in man and in the cat). EEG &amp; Clin.
Neurophysiol. 10:208, 1958.
SOD‘TRBERG, U.: Eﬂect of Bemegride (Megimide) on
cerebral blood flow and electrical activity of brain.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 792239, 1958.
PEACOCK, J. M.: An electroencephalographic examina—
tion of the effects of Megimide and Daptazole in bar—
biturate narcosis. EEG 8: Clin. Neurophysiol. 8:289,
1956.
VVYKE, B. D., and FRAYVVORTH, E.: Use of Bemegride
in terminating barbiturate anesthesia. Lancet 2:1025,
&amp;

1.957.
16. BOTTINGER, L. E., ENGSTEDT, L., and STRANDBERG,
0.: Is Bemegride a speciﬁc barbiturate antagonist?

Lancet 1:932, 1957.

�6mm

and

m We“: at Was

in Patients WW?» 66”me Mum

W m
A.

11.3.

‘W-AMWI

&lt;

I

.

the
m Gala,
Wt30!.of mm mm. mm swam.
Glen

1mm...

matting at the Max “manhunt: or
m at thoMubor
Elsemmm.
1956.

Nam Yam-k,

"

Aiéadhy Grant

Wham

3/58

65f

I! 92?, Katina}. M‘W‘lﬁi at mm
Kalil), 0.3. ﬁbula Knuth 3031“.

mm. Ram

��4-:—

hospnmua
Wm
Mulmon

ma,
yam, um studied.

a:-

whammy

mum“! ranging in

We inat

an Watered inbmmaly
per

mama“ gamma with psycho0.39

tram 27 to

a maxim-inﬂux: o: 5 mg; put am,
the mm

at 9.5 mg. par

mm. until «ﬁnite 611mg” m ubsowad in tin
Ma mm. the amt»

beyond

am:
may

he wounds, in

spam,

We varied

Mm

viii and

aim

m. ta 290 mg.
lumen» Home» was magnum without mic: m»
In mum 1.4: as given immg New summation at
unhrbital which as inject“! at 0.5 as. per

rm
mum.
m

6k.

M“

from

1:5

mm

amt: Wavy ta induce mums,

and marked «112%:thme~ or

slurred

ﬁlm.

m momma mm mama in the ma Mathew.An memeephamm m 13m Mar to tho mmctiw and was

Wavim

cantmmly during tho
phmt mm mind 91‘ frontal,
run

Mama-cl,

memo:

at“

both ﬁxings. The

mam

WWam, manta}... mtariw

W31, vim ma earlobe inads.

mm: mm scalp ’w snip «mum awn aplayad.

Bail:

map ta

��.V

of gang.

Warmth

voliaga at iha alpha
lang mm

.

Up

a»

than“: only: deem” in'iha
After 206 as... than-a we a sum

“150%.,

activity.

at diffuse, rhyihﬁa

W am high value. wiivzliy with

mm m immialy 2mm
mm mm minty
injaaiian
print ta
Mam

'ma

EEG

during the

iha

am

itva

Ros

The

a

,

mm

same}

W!‘ and tho «ism-a was not mucmm.
Sub;

subjective mailer: to Magma

mm, man when the induaad ahangea in tho

EEG

were

mam.

by iha

m

am”.

A

mm, ”minnow,“ Was," er a.
manna! mum in tha nbdamm Xi m pauiblo, however, to
amtima iha inﬂation wiihaui further 1mm in the symptom.

few subjaaia combined

of

mhjeets boom appﬂhamiva, and in
be

arm

Two

at ilmsa the injaaiia‘n had m

ﬁsmniimad.

Winnie Jarka momma Imumily. ‘2'th were usually mild, and
matinee? ia ans mtmiiy. has tramway they were bilateral and
mam am. The “humans: batman than. awn-mania and spike nativity
39m usually panama iha appearance at?
m immimi. the

We

31mm «nativity, aliheuﬁz

imam mmmea at

iha

spike

maimauy
W
aciiﬂiy

oaaurrod. me

with maeloma

am

m m Mmmt.

affaci a: Hashim m mama-mm. There were no inatmaaa‘
at amsma or oihar abnormal lawman hint in the day ramming its
The

Waimiim. timer,

since mi «was mobarbiial

paiimia, this my have Want.“

main

in all

oaaumnaaa.

The 63.1mm md EEG rasponaaa in inimvanana

Mamas manna similar to

mum

ihm am in

mmmiial “liming

ant-210431;:

in

when

what-him

��tor

in mm

the

mung We, hm».

ma Wu dimming

did

£11130

mat. «that

«ﬁxer

swam,

am we mam”.

��1..

WWW pmwm patients ﬁtment «relate: We

were given

arm

Minds (mu, umwlamymunmm) Mum and

«hints tratim af “ﬁnances

2.

”We prudence irregular dame mtivity, bursts of delta

activity. we mike

and

emu Wﬁty in the elutrmoephelngm,

mm to WMWGI (kiwi) .

effects are
3. ﬂammable

Sum

agent.
.

The

WM.

the

meant-y to
h; A. grand

mum variability mm in the amt er

pram the"

We

'

u: «um um: inadvertently manage in m mum.
«rum

showed

mm

emanate the clinical, and was

of the

EEG

W «hang the manage; and Mar to the

alumna and the seizure

5. Magma:

as net 6.1119195.qu

of men. dawn of tutu-amp“ maba'rhim.

etfeete,

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2494">
                <text>Clinical and electroencephalographic effects of megimide in patients without cerebral disease. Neurology. 1958 Sep; 8(9):682-5.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2495">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2496">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-22b-027</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2497">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2498">
                <text>Green, Martin A.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2499">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2500">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2501">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, September 1958, Vol.8, N0.9</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2502">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2503">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74452">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81013">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87574">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94135">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="251" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="42">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/11575e68e7e18c8231219284212ca0ba.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8597351b5fddeee289bccffd6b5c1c4f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100668">
                    <text>9Q

J. Hillside Heapital,
1957

6: 197-206,

A UNIFIED THEORY OF THE ACTION OF

PHYSIODYNAMICTHERAPIES1
MAX FINK,

MD.2

The proper role of the physiodynamic therapies (convulsive,
insulin coma and lobotomy) in psychiatry remains poorly deﬁned.
In part, this results from the lack of an adequate formulation of
their mode of action. In the past six years increasing evidence for a
neuropllysiologic-adaptive view of electroconvulsive therapy has
been presented (41, 32, 38, I). This view ascribes the therapeutic
process in electroshock to a persistent alteration in cerebral function
which provides the milieu for a change in adaptation of the subject
to his environment. The type of adaptation evoked is dependent
upon the personality of the subject, the environmental situation,
and the duration of the induced alteration in cerebral function.
Concurrently, an awareness of a similar mode of action in insulin
coma (31) and lobotomy (40) has developed.
During the past four years we have studied the relation between
alteration in various indices of brain function and the behavioral
response of psychiatric patients to therapy. The neurophysiologicadaptive view of electroshock has been supported and ampliﬁed (11,
12, 13, 19, 21); evidence for a similar view of insulin coma has been
presented (22); and recently the concept has been extended to the
newer “tranquilizers" (9). These studies provide the basis for a
generalization concerning the efﬁcacy of these therapies. It is our
purpose in this report to examine the experimental evidence to
determine whether or not the mode of action of each of these thera—
1From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

Read at the. 2nd International Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, September

6, 1957.

Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service; and the Board of Directors’
Research Fund of the Society of the Hillside Hospital.
2 Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
197

12-»

�198

MAX FINK

pies may result from their ability to induce sustained alteration in
cerebral function; and the corollary question, whether measurable
alteration in cerebral function is a necessary condition for the efﬁ—
cacy of these therapies, or a “complication" or "untoward effect."
The indices of brain function used in these studies have varied.
These include memory scales (2G), visual (20) and tactile (10) perceptual tasks, and changes in language patterns of orientation both
clinically (19) and after intravenous amobarbital (21). In electroencephalographic studies of this problem, changes in the delta index,
both in routine records (ll, 12) and after activation by intravenous
thiopentone (32, 33), and in the beta index (16) have been applied
Successfully. For this review, two indices will be stressed: changes in
the delta index of the unactivated EEG, and clinical neurologic
signs. These indices have been selected because of their successful
application in the analysis of the electroshock process, and because
data is available for each of the therapeutic modalities.
OBSERVATIONS

(a) Electroshock

4.1
"1M

The following notes summarize our experimental studies of the
role of 'changes in EEG delta activity in the response of subjects to
electroshock (11, 13). In these studies, electroencephalograms were
obtained before treatment, and at weekly intervals on a day after a
treatment in consecutive electroshock referrals. Grand mal treatments were administered three times a week, for twelve to twenty
treatments. The EEG records were quantitatively analyzed for the
amount of induced delta activity, and classiﬁed into categories of
“high,” “moderate” and “low” degrees of delta activity. At the end
of treatment, the patients were independently rated for their shortterm clinical response into the categories of “much improved,"
“moderately improved” and “unimproved."
In the initial series of patients, a signiﬁcant relationship between
the early induction of high degrees of delta activity, and clinical
ratings of “much improved” was observed. Eighty per cent of the
records in the much improved group were high degree delta by the
fourth to sixth treatment; and the percentage was sustained at 90
per cent in the third’ and fourth weeks. In contrast, none of the unimproved patients developed high degree delta records in the ﬁrst
three weeks, and only 20 per cent of the records in the fourth week
were so classiﬁed.
In a subsequent predictive study, the EEG records during the

a

wan-pow

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

199

second and third weeks of treatment were analyzed. Of the patients
who had high degree delta records on both occasions, 67 per cent
were rated as much improved, while of the patients without such
records, 70 per cent were in the unimproved and moderately improved categories.
Roth (82, 33), studying the EEG delta activity evoked by intravenous thiopentone after electroshock, has related both the stability
and the rate of remission of patients with endogenous depressions
to the peak value of the induced slow activity. He concluded that
patients not attaining a speciﬁed delta activity level "have not acquired an adequate physiological basis for recovery,” and recommended measurement of delta activity levels after thiopentone as a
guide to the clinical management of patients.
Further information is obtained from convulsive-subconvulsive
control studies. While convulsive electroshock induces degrees of
delta activity that vary from low to high, subconvulsive therapy
rarely alters EEG patterns or induces low degrees of delta activity
(13). In their comparative study of different convulsive and subconvulsive techniques, Ulett, Smith and Gleser (38) demonstrated a
signiﬁcantly greater recovery rate for the convulsive than the subconvulsive group.
In a similar study (13) recently completed here, twenty-seven
patients received a course of subconvulsive therapy. Electroencephalograms, taken at weekly intervals, demonstrated minimal
changes—none of the records were scored as middle or high delta
activity. Of the twenty-seven patients, no change in behavior was
noted in twenty-three, and of these, nineteen were referred for a
second course of treatment. Grand mal electroshock induced a high
degree of delta activity in fourteen. All patients in this group
showed signiﬁcant changes in behavior, while of the ﬁve who did
not show the delta response, only two showed a behavioral change.

Tranquilizing Drugs
When the newer drug therapies are studied from the viewpoint
of their electroencephalographic and clinical neurologic effects, a
meaningful classiﬁcation emerges. Furthermore, a relationship between the degree and type of induced change in cerebral function
and therapeutic efﬁcacy may be noted. The ability of these agents
to induce such signs of central nervous system dysfunction as motor
rigidity, depression, excitement and seizures are well known. Less
well documented, however, are the clearly deﬁnable electroencephalographic patterns. Based on observations made in chronic admin(b)

�MAX FIN K

200

istration of drugs in adult psychiatric patients, the EEG changes
may be classiﬁed according to predominant changes in the frequency
spectrum. There are three broad types:
Increased slow wave activity with hypersynchrony
(“bursts")—“delta shift"
II._ Desynchronization with voltage and frequency
irregularity and irregular theta activity—“desynchronization”
III. Increased high voltage fast activity—“beta shift.”
Of the group of drugs inducing a delta shift, the phenothiazine
derivatives chlorpromazine, promazine, and perphenazine are clear
examples. Each drug induces seizures in nonepileptics or exaggerates
seizures in epileptic patients (7, 8, 15, 29, 37). Each drug induces
clinical parkinsonian neurologic patterns when given in adequate
dosage. In our laboratories, we have induced parkinsonism in all
patients receiving chlorpromazine (l4) and have observed seizures
in 10 per cent of a group of psychotic patients without previous
ltistnl'y of seizures. Induced delta activity, including burst activity,
\ms nlm-ned in more than half the patients in this series.
Rrxrxpiue also ernkes delta activity when given in large doses
(3- \t liitth tlnugt‘ levels. it exaggerates seizures in epileptics and
"I'lihrs wzmtes in animals (35). .-\t the usual clinical dosages, howr.:-:, ”supine imluu's desynrhronization of frequencies with a
t; w-lrtxh‘ mitease in theta activity (28), without seizure induction
in: mm definite motor rigidities. In a series of patients treated here
("T'H. parkiuwuism was induced in all patients. EEG
Changes were
limited to desynchronization only, without delta burst activity.
The primary response of two other drugs, mepazine and benacty.
.
Ime. is the induction of EEG desynchronization. Mepazine, a phen()t‘ttLt/mt‘ derivative. induces desynchronization with small amounts;
it n\n\ \ \ l‘h'lt'h .‘n‘H\'n\ has nx‘u t\\\‘ll 'li‘it‘l‘ﬁk‘n. nor have
.-'
m: Immd reports either of seizures or parkinsonism in the clinical
literature. Benactyzine, a potent anticholinergic compound, induces
a blocking of alpha, ﬂattening of the record and occasional theta
activity (5, 17). Neither seizures nor parkinsonism have been described for this agent.
Meprobamate is the clearest example of the group of drugs inducing a beta shift in the EEG (3). This agent further differs from
the phenothiazines and reserpine in not producing parkinsonism
and not only are clinical seizures not induced, but deﬁnite antiepileptic activity has been described (30). Habituation is readily
1.

x

a

w

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

f

201

achieved, and withdrawal phenomena of agitation and seizures have
been observed (42). In these actions, meprobamate is more like
barbiturates than like the other new tranquilizers.
If we determine the clinical efficacy of these agents, we note a
parallel between the induced EEG effects and their potency in
altering behavior. The drugs that most readily induce a delta shift
in EEG frequencies—the phenothiazine compounds—are those with
the greatest clinical efﬁcacy in the therapy of psychoses. The compounds with lesser activity in this direction are less efﬁcacious clinically.

i
f
,1

,i

/

I/
!

Insulin Coma Therapy
The effects of insulin coma therapy on the nervous system are
well documented. During each coma, EEG delta activity is induced,
which usually persists for minutes to a few hours after gavage. Not
infrequently, in approximately one third of patients receiving deep
coma therapy in this hospital, seizures, aphasia or prolonged coma
results. After such events, EEG changes of delta activity persist for
days, and in cases of prolonged coma, for weeks and months (43).
The relation between prolonged coma, altered brain function
and behavioral response has been discussed at length. Revitch (31)
reported eight cases of prolonged coma and concluded that improvement may be attributed to the induction of organic brain damage,
similar to lobotomy. Yaeger, Simon, Margolis and Burch (43), describing twelve cases of prolonged insulin coma, noted a correlation
between length of coma, degree of organic confusion, remission of
mental symptoms and degree of EEG abnormality. Shagass and
Rowsell (34), emphasizing EEG data, and Kwalwasser and Caplan
(27) presented individual cases to support the same conclusion.
We reported a similar relationship between prolonged coma and
behavioral response in a case study (22). A 34-year-old schizophrenic
patient with paranoid ideation developed a left hemiplegia during
insulin coma therapy. With the onset of neurologic signs of hemiparesis, hemianopsia, hemisensory syndrome and spatial inattention,
there was a marked change in speech and behavior. He became lucid,
loquacious and denied his illness. His former paranoid-withdrawal
type pattern was replaced by a friendly cooperative attitude. These
changes were accompanied by delta changes in the EEG, as well as
language changes after amobarbital indicative of altered brain
function. The neurologic symptoms resolved, but the behavioral
changes persisted so that he was discharged two months later as
“much improved."

,

l

5,

'

‘

(c)

m..-

aunts..-

5

’j
2

“

\lU,

5‘

r
'

-

�202

MAX FINK

(d) Lobotomy
to study lobotomy
While we have not had the opportunity
of
of view of this summary, the reports
the
point
from
EEG
patients
a similar relationship.
numerous observers clearly documentin all subjects postoperatively
of
changes of delta activity are present
Walter et al. (40) in a study
(6) and persist for varying periods.
EEG
persistence of abnormal
150 patients, found an 80 per cent
be?
relation
noted
a
also
authors
activity after three years. These
of
postextent
and
and the degree
tween clinical improvement
operative slow wave activity.
“complication," being variPostoperative seizures are a frequent
(25).
in up to 20 per cent of subjects
ously reported as occurring
of brain
extent
the
between
Furthermore, there is a relationship
Circumscribed surgical
tissue cut and the therapeutic outcome.
improvement rate lower than
lesions, regardless of locus, have an
are frequently inadequate
unilateral lobectomy; and these latter
bilateral procedure (36).
and are “improved” upon by a

and

i

there

havi
Thﬁ
tior
the

pa
5V

1,,“

F

.'r'
l
s.

l
‘_

DISCUSSION

are essayed from the
When the various physiodynamic therapies
mode
in brain function, a common
point of view of an alteration
which
therapies represent devices
of action becomes apparent. These
function, with resultant change
induce appreciable changes in brain
and lobotomy induce measurable
in behavior. Convulsive therapy
directly; insulin coma primarily
diffuse changes in brain function
the phenothiazine and reserpine
when complications ensue; and
when given in adequate dosage.
groups of tranquilizers
function affect behavior is
How persistent changes in cerebral“reversed" or “obliterated."
is not
not clear. Psychotic behavior
the central nervous system milieu,
in
Rather, with an alteration
of behavior including perception,
there is an alteration in all aspects
attitude. The speciﬁc adaptive
mood, affect, memory, judgment and
each subject and is dependent on numerous
response is variable for
Premorbid personality (18),
historical and environmental factors.
and the duration of
environmental situation and expectations (13),
have recently been discussed as
the alteration in brain function (12)
under these conditions.
determinants of the behavioral response evaluated by the psychiaThe induced changes in behavior are
the degree of “improvement."
trist, administrator or family as to based
the
upon such factors as
These ratings are value judgments,
tolerance
behavioral response, the environmental
type of induced
.

JUN-laws

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

"Omy

0f

‘S

E15G

VC‘Iy

}

'Of

l

EC

‘1

’6

_

W

.

-

.

f

.

.-‘

i

/
/
.

‘
y

.
“

(a

203

and the observer's expectations. In this context, the physiodynamic
therapies do not induce “improvement"——-rather they induce behavioral change which is secondarily evaluated as improvement.
The alteration of cerebral function is therefore not a “complication" or an "untoward effect" but the desired goal of these forms of
therapy. Of the many “organic" therapies introduced during the
past thirty years, none apparently has been a speciﬁc agent for the
therapy of psychoses (in the sense that penicillin is speciﬁc for neurosyphilis and nicotinic acid for pellagra dementia), but rather devices
with greater or lesser degrees of applicability and efﬁcacy in altering
behavior by altering the cerebral milieu.
In this context, the various physiodynamic therapies are not speciﬁc for a type of psychosis. The early enthusiasm that reserpine or
chlorpromazine was speciﬁc for schizophrenia, or hypotheses that
ascribe signiﬁcance to an antagonism between these drugs and “psychosis" or "schizophrenia" are not tenable. Similar enthusiasm
claiming a speciﬁcity of insulin coma for schizophrenia is also untenable, and support for this view is presented in a recent chlorpromazine-insulin coma control‘study (l4).
EEG analysis of these therapies permits a more explicit deﬁnition of the induced alteration in brain function. Changes in cerebral
function reﬂected by a shift in the spectrum of EEG frequencies
toward the slower range, with a concomitant increase in voltage and
a periodicity described as “bursts" or “hypersynchrony” provide the
change in milieu that is more effective in altering behavior. The
signiﬁcance of the delta shift has been clearly demonstrated in
electroshock therapy; and can be inferred from the available data
in lobotomy, insulin coma, and the tranquilizers.
That a delta shift has some speciﬁcity is seen in the analyses of
the drug effects. Those drugs that induce the delta shift—the phenothiazines and reserpine—have been consistently reported as effective
modiﬁers of psychotic behavior. Changes in brain function reﬂected
by EEG desynchronization only, or a shift in frequency spectrum to
the faster range, have a limited efﬁcacy in altering psychotic behavior.3 The signiﬁcance of a delta shift is further seen in the
limited efﬁcacy of subconvulsive electroshock when compared to
convulsive electroshock in the management of psychoses.
Another aspect of the alteration in brain function which may be
deﬁned is the change in seizure threshold. With the delta shift in
3 These observations suggest the application of EEG screening of new chemotherapeutic compounds for therapeutic efﬁcacy according to their ability to
induce delta burst activity with a minimum of side effects.

�MAX FINK

204

the EEG, an increase in clinical seizures would be anticipated. This
is indeed true. Seizures have been described following electroshock
(4, 24); they are prominent after lobotomy (40) and a common “complication” during and occasionally following insulin coma therapy
(23). With the tranquilizers, the parallel of clinical efficacy and
seizure induction is most striking. Phenothiazine compounds induce
seizures commonly; reserpine rarely; benactyzine not at all; and
meprobamate is a potent anticonvulsant! The lowering of seizure
threshold parallels the extent of the EEG delta shift induced by
these compounds. Similar analyses can be made for the potentiation
of sedative action and induction of parkinsonism—both potent indices of an alteration in cerebral function.
The neurologic basis for the delta shift and increase in seizure’
frequency is unclear. Whether this represents a persistent change in
function of some speciﬁc brain stem nuclear system, as the centrencephalic, thalamic or hypothalamic, is conjectural. From the wide
range of agents that can induce a delta shift, with or without hypersynchrony, it appears more likely that the EEG changes reflect an
alteration in the diffuse biochemical activity of the nervous system
rather than in a focal activity of speciﬁc cellular masses.
SUMMARY
1.

The neurophysiologic and clinical neurologic aspects of con-

vulsive therapy, “tranquilizers,” insulin coma and lobotomy, are
reviewed.
2. The efﬁcacy of each therapy in the treatment of psychoses is
related to the ability to induce a persistent change in cerebral function, of which a delta shift in the EEG spectrum and an increase in
incidence of seizures are two indices.
3. Alteration in cerebral function is an essential prerequisite of
behavioral change with each of these therapies. Such alteration is
neither a “complication,” nor an “untoward effect," but is the sine
qua non of the mode of action of these therapies.
4. No evidence has been educed in these studies that the physiodynamic therapies are speciﬁc agents for the relief of psychoses; nor
do they affect a speciﬁc segment of the nervous system; nor do they
induce speciﬁc behavioral'changes.
5. The therapeutic process of convulsive therapy, insulin coma,
lobotomy and tranquilizers may be ascribed to the induction of a

persistent alteration in cerebral function which provides the milieu
for a change in adaptation of the subject to his environment.

r.—-r,y.,.",,,,

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

205

REFERENCES
(1)

(2 V

i
l

l
:

Aird, R. B.: Strait, L. A.: Pace, J. “7.; Hernolf, M. K. 8: Bowditch, S. C.:
Neurophysiologic Effects of Electrically Induced Convulsions. A.M.A. Arch.
Neural. (9 Psychiat., 75:371-378, 1956.
Arellano, A. P. 8.- ]eri, R.: The Ellcct of Reserpine on the Scalp and Basal
Electrocncephalogram. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 8:150 (abst.), 1956.
Berger, F. M.: The Chemistry and Mode of Action of Tranquilizing Drugs.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 67:685-699, 1957.
Blumenthal, I. j.: Spontaneous Seizures and Related Electroencephalographic
Findings Following Shock Therapy. ]. New. &amp; Ment. Dis., 122:581-588, 1955.
Coady, A. 8.: jewesbury, E. C. 0.: A Clinical Trial of Benactyzine Hydro.
chloride (“Suavital”) as a Physical Relaxant. Brit. Med. 1., Mar. 3, pp. 485-

487, 1956.
Colin, R.: EEG Study of Prelrontal Lobotomy. Arch. Neurol. 65' Psychiat.,_
532351-357, 1945.
(7) Dcnber, H. C. B.: Discussion, Symposium on the Psychopharmacologic
Approach to Schizophrenia. Second Int. Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, 1957.
(8) Fabisch, “7.: Effect of Chlorpromazine on the Electroencephalogram of
Epileptic Patients. J. Neurol., Neurosurg., (‘5' Psychiat., 20:185-190, 1957.
(9) Fink, M.: Therapy of Schizophrenia: Role of Alteration of Brain Function
in Behavior. Presented Second Int. Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, 1957.
(10) Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8: Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46-58, 1952.
(11) Fink, M. 8: Kahn, R. L.: Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity Following Electroshock. EEG Clin. Neuraphysial., 8:158 (abst.), 1956.
(12)' Fink, M. Sc Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral
Response in Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies. AM.A. Arch. Neurol.
(‘5Psychiat., 78:516-525. 1957.
(13) Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L. 8: Green, M. A.: Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. 1. New. (9- Ment. Dis. (in press).
(14) Fink, M.; Shaw, R.: Gross, G. 8.- Coleman, F. 8.: Comparative Study of
Chlorpromazine and Insulin Coma in the Therapy of Psychosis. ]. Am.
Med. Assoc. (in press).
(15) Hankoif, L. D.; Kaye, E.; Engelhardt, D. M. 8.: Freedman, N.: Convulsions
(5)

(16)

1946.
(17) Jacobson, E.: Suavitil, et Nyt Stat Med Speciﬁk Virkning pa Centralnervesystemet. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 117:1147-1151, 1955.
(13) Kahn, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Personality Factors in Behavioral
Response to
Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neural. (in press).
8:
(19) Kahn, R. L.
Fink, M.: Changes in Languages During Electroshock Therapy. In: Psychopathology of Communication. New York: Grune 8c Stratton,
(in press), 1957.
(20) Kahn, R. L. 8c Fink, M.: Perception of Embedded Figures After Induced
Altered Brain Function. Am. Psychal., 12:36] (abst.), 1957.
(21) Kahn, R. L.; Fink, M. 8: Weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital Test
to
Clinical Improvement in Electroshock. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. 6' Psychiat.,
76:23-29, 1956.
(22) Kahn, R. L.; Graubert, D. 8: Fink, M.: Delusional
Reduplication of Parts
of the Body After Insulin Coma Therapy. This Journal, 4:134-148, 1955.
~

,,L...-.u..

.

.

Complicating Ataractic Therapy, Their Incidence and Theoretical Implications. N. Y. State J. Med., 57:2967-2972, 1957.
Hoagland, H.; Malamud, W.; Kaufman, I. C. 8c Pincus, 0.: Changes in
Electroencephalogram and in Excretion of l7-Ketosteroids Accompanying
Electro-shock Therapy of Agitated Depression. Psychosom. Med., 8:246-251,

�MAX FINK

206

and Other
Hoch, P.: Shock Treatment, Psychosurgery
8c Stratton, 1952.
Grune
York:
New
Somatic Treatments in Psychiatry.
This
States Following Electroshock Therapy.
(24) Karliner, W.: Epileptic
Journal, 5:258-263, 1956.
in Prefrontal Loof Seizures, with EEG Findings,
(25) Klotz, M.: Incidence
1955.
74:144-148.
65'
Psychiat,
and
botomy. A.M.A. Arch.8.- Neurol.
Kwalwasser, 8.: Relation of Changes in Memory
1956.
16:88-96,
(25) Korin, H.; Fink, M.
Neurol.,
Electroshock. Conf.
Learning to Improvement in A Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma: Treat8.- Caplan, M.:
(27) Kwalwasser, S.
1952.
ment. This Journal, 1:145-155,
Drugs on EEG. EEG Clin.
“Tranquilizing”
of
Effect
T.:
W.
(23) Liberson,
Neurophysiol., 8:523, 1956.
Fits in LeuN.: The Occurrence of Epileptic
(29) Liddell, D. W. 8: Retterstol,
Neurol., Neuro].
Therapy.
Chlorpromazine
cotomized Patients Receiving
20:105-107, 1957.
Disorders.
surg, &amp;» Psychiat., Miltown,
Its Use in Convulsive and Related
A.:
M.
(30) Perlstein,
1956.
161:1040,
J. Am. Med. Assoc.,
ImproveOrganic Brain Damage and Clinical
28:79-92, 1954.
(31) Revitch, E.: Observations on
Quart.,
Coma.
Psychiat.
ment Following Protracted Insulin
Produced by
the EEG Under Barbiturate Anesthesia
(32) Roth, M.: Changes in
for the Theory of
Signiﬁcance
Their
and
Treatment
Electro-Convulsive
3:261-280, 1951.
ECT Action. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol.,
and Pentothal
K.; Shaw, J. 8: Green, ].: Prognosis
W.
D.
M.:
Kay,
Roth,
Treatment.
(33)
Electra-Convulsive
in
Induced Electroencephalographic Changes
1957.
9:225-238,
EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol.,
and Clinical
P. W.: Serial Electroencephalographic Neural. &amp;
(34) Shagass, C. 8: Rowsell,
Arch.
A.M.A.
Coma.
Insulin
Studies in a Case of Prolonged
Psychiat., 72:705-711, 1954.
Interaction of
A.: Mechanisms Involved in the
(35) Sigg, E. B. 8: Schneider, J.
Neurophysiol., 9:
Clin.
EEG.
Reserpine.
and
Various Central Stimulants
419-426, 1957.
M.: Unilateral and
L. 11.; Adams, J. E. 8: Bowman, K.
(35) Simon, A.; Margolis,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 6'
Evaluation.
Controlled
A
Bilateral Lobotomy:
Psychiat., 66:494-503. 1951.
Use to Activate Electroencephalographic
(37) Stewart, L. F.: Chlorpromazine:
9:427-440, 1957.
Neurophysiol.,
Clin.
EEG
Seizure Patterns.
of Convulsive and SubEvaluation
C.:
8c
G.
Gleser,
K.
(38) Ulett, G. A.; Smith,
Am. J. Psychiat.,
Control
Group.
a
convulsive Shock Therapies Utilizing

(23) Kalinowsky, L. B.

8:

.

.

112:795-802, 1956.
of
A. G.; Fink, M. 8: Miller, J. S. A.: Evaluation
(39) Wachspress, M.: Blumberg,
Journal, 5:67-77,
This
of
Anxiety.
Relief
for
Reserpine Therapy

High-Dose

1956.
C. L.; Margolis, L. H. 8: Simon, A.: The EEG Changes
111:590(4°) Walter, R. D.; Yaeger,
and Bilateral Frontal Lobotomy. Am. J. Psychiat.,

in Unilateral

594, 1955.
and Physiologi8c Kahn, R. L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic
(41) Weinstein, E. A.
1955.
cal Aspects. Springﬁeld, Ill.: C. C. Thomas.
Communication.
(42) Wilder, A.: Personal
L. H. 8: Burch, N. R.: Electroencephalo(43) Yaeger, C. L.; Simon, A.; Margolis,
Ment. Dis., 118:

Coma. ]. New. 6'
graphic Studies in Posthypoglycemic

435-441, 1953.

.

39W"

_

.

w

.

if

�A

Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies

Max

Fink, M.D.

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Respital, Glen Oaks,

Read

at the

2nd

International Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, September 6,

N.Y.

1957.

of the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes
of Health, U.S. Public acalth Service; and the Board of Directors' Research Fund of
the Society of the Hillside Bbspital.
Aided by

10-7-57

grant

M-927

�Iv:

unified

A

The

10/5/57

Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies

proper role of the physiodynamic therapies (electroshock, insulin

coma and lobotomy)

in psychiatry remains poorly defined. In part, this results

from the lack of an adequate formulation of

their

mode

of action. In the past

six years increasing evidence for a neurophysiologic-adaptive

view of

electro-

(hl, 32, 38, 1). This view ascribes the there“

shock therapy has been presented

peutic process in electroshock to a persistent alteration in cerebral function
which provides the milieu

environment.

The

for a

change

in adaptation of the subject to his

type of adaptation evoked is dependent upon the personality

of the subject, the environmental

situation,

and the duration of the induced

alteration in cerebral function. Concurrently,
of action in insulin coma (31) and lobotomy
During the past four years

we

(MO)

of psychiatric patients to therapy.

The

a

similar

view of

insulin

relation between

and the behavioral response

neurophysiologic-adaptive view of

electroshock has been supported and amplified (9, 10,

for

mode

has developed.

have studied the

alteration in various indices of brain function

similar

an awareness of a

coma has been

ll,

20, 21); evidence

presented (19); and recently the

concept has been extended to the newer "tranquillizers" (12).

These

studies

provide the basis for a generalization concerning the efficacy of these therapies.

It is

our purpose in

this report to

examine the experimental evidence

whether or not the mode of action of each of these therapies may

to determine

result

their ability to induce sustained alteration in cerebral function;

from

and the coroln

lary question, whether measurable alteration in cerebral function is a necessary

�-

-

2

condition for the efficacy of these therapies, or a "complication" or "untoward

effect."
The

include

indices of brain function used in these studies have varied.

memory

scales (26), visual (22)

and

tactile

changes in language patterns of orientation both

intravenous ambbarbital (20).
changes in the

clinically (21)

and

after

In electroencephalographic studies of this problem,

by intravenous thiopentone (32, 33), and

successfully. For this review,

have been

(13) perceptual tasks, and

delta index, both in routine records (9,

delta index of the unactivated

These

and

after activation

in the beta index (16) have been applied

two indices
EEG,

10) and

will

be

stressed: changes in the

clinical neurologic signs.

These indices

selected because of their successful application in the analysis of

the electroshock process, and because data is available for each of the therapeutic
modalities .

�OBSERVATIONS:

(a) Electroshock:
The

role of changes in

following notes summarize our experimental studies of the

EEG

delta activity in the response of subjects to electro-

In these studies, electroencephalograms were obtained before

shock (9, 11).

treatment, and at weekly intervals
electroshock referrals.
week,

for

after a treatment in consecutive

Grand mal treatments were administered

treatments.

12-20

on a day

The EEG

three times a

records were quantitatively analyzed for

the amount of induced delta activity, and classified into categories of "high",
"moderate" and "low" degrees of delta

patients

were independently

the categories of
In the

At the end of treatment, the

activity.

rated for their short term clinical response into

"much improved”, "moderately improved" and "unimproved".

initial series

of

patients, a significant relationship between

the early induction of high degrees of delta activity, and clinical ratings of
"much improved" was observed.

Eighty percent of the records in the

much improved

group were high degree delta by the h-6 treatment; and the percentage was sus-

tained at

90%

In contrast, none of the unimproved

in the third and fourth weeks.

patients developed high degree delta records in the
20%

third

weeks of treatment were analyzed.

delta records

on both occasions, 67% were

patients without such records,
categories.

70%

and only

classified.

of the records in the fourth week were so

In a subsequent predictive study, the
and

first three weeks,

EEG

Of

records during the second

the patients

rated as

who

had high degree

much improved,

while of the

were in the unimproved and moderately improved

�*“1

h

Both (32, 33) studying the

EEG

-

delta activity

thiopentone after electroshock has related both the

evoked by intravenous

stability and the rate of

remission of patients with endogenous depressions to the peak value of the induced slow

activity.

activity level,

He

......

"

concluded

that patients not attaining a specified delta

have not acquired an adequate physiological basis for

recovery," and recommended measurement of delta activity levels after thiopentone

clinical

as a guide to the

management of

patients.

Further information is obtained from convulsive-subconvulsive control

studies.

While convulsive electroshock induces degrees of

vary from low to high, subconvulsive therapy rarely alters
duces low degrees of delta

delta activity that
EEG

patterns or in-

activity (11). In their comparative study of different

convulsive and subconvulsive techniques, Ulett, Smith and Gleser (38)

demon-

strated a significantly greater recovery rate for the convulsive than the subconvulsive group.
In a similar study (11) recently completed here, twenty-seven patients

received a course of subconvulsive therapy.
weekly

Electroencephalograms, taken at

intervals, demonstrated minimal changes

as middle or high

delta activity.

Of

- none of the records were scored

the 27 patients, no change in behavior

was

noted in 23, and of these, 19 were referred for a second course of treatment.
Grand mal electroshock induced a high degree of

delta activity in fourteen.

All patients in this group showed significant changes in behavior, while of
the five

who

did not

show

the delta response, only two showed a behavioral change.

(b) Tranquillizing Drugs:
When

the newer drug therapies are studied from the viewpoint of

�-5their electroencephalographic

and

clinical neurologic effects, a meaningful

classification emerges. Furthermore, a relationship between the degree

and

type of induced change in cerebral function and therapeutic efficacy may be

noted.

The

ability of these agents to induce such signs of central nervous

system dysfunction as motor

rigidity, depression, excitement

and

seizures are

well known. Less well documented, however, are the clearly definable electro—
encephalographic patterns.

Based on observations made

of drugs in adult psychiatric patients, the

EEG

in chronic administration

changes may be

according to predominant changes in the frequency spectrum.

classified

There are three

broad types:

I.

Increased slow

wave

activity with hypersynchrony

("bursts") - "delta shift"

II.

Desynchronization with voltage and frequency irregularity
and

III.
Of

irregular theta activity - "desynchronization"

shift."

Increased high voltage fast activity - "beta
the group of drugs inducing a delta

derivatives chlorpromazine, promazine,
Each drug induces

shift, the phenothiazine

and perphenazine are

clear examples.

seizures in non-epileptics or exaggerates seizures in

epileptic patients (7, 8,
neurologic patterns

15, 29, 37).

when given

Each drug induces

in adequate dosage.

clinical parkinsonian

In our laboratories,

have induced parkinsonism

in all patients receiving chlorpromazine

have observed seizures in

10%

(1%)

and

of a group of psychotic patients without previous

history of seizures. Induced delta activity, including burst activity,
observed in more than

we

half the patients in this series.

was

�-5Reserpine also evokes delta
At high dosage

levels,

it

activity

when given

in large doses (2).

exaggerates seizures in epileptics and induces

seizures in animals (35). At the usual clinical dosages, however, reserpine
induces desynchronization of frequencies with a moderate increase in theta

activity (28), without seizure induction but with definite motor rigidities.
In a series of patients treated here (39), parkinsonism was induced in

patients.

EEG

all

changes were limited to desynchronization only, without delta

burst activity.
The primary

the induction of

EEG

response of two other drugs, mepazine and benactyzine, is
desynchronization. Mepazine, a phenothiazine derivative,

induces desynchronization with small amounts of theta

activity has not been described, nor
or parkinsonism in the

have we found

activity (7). Delta

reports either of seizures

clinical literature. Benactyzine, a potent anticholin-

ergic compound, induces a blocking of alpha, flattening of the record and
17). Neither seizures nor parkinsonism have

occasional theta activity (5,
been described for

this agent.

Meprobamate

beta shift in the
and

EEG

is the clearest

example of the group of drugs inducing a

(3). This agent further differs

reserpine in not producing parkinsonism

from the phenothiazines

and not only are

clinical seizures

not induced, hut definite anti-epileptic activity has been described (30).
Habituation is readily achieved, and withdrawal phenomena of agitation and
seizures have been observed (h2).

barbiturates than like the other

If we

determine the

In these actions, meprobamate
new

is

more

like

tranquillizers.

clinical efficacy of these agents,

we

note a parallel

�-7between the induced
drugs

EEG

effects

and

their potency in altering behavior.

that most readily induce a delta shift in

thiazine

compounds - are those with the

therapy of psychoses.

The compounds

EEG

frequencies - the

The

pheno—

greatest clinical efficacy in the

with lesser activity in this direction

are less efficacious clinically.
(c) Insulin

Coma

The

well documented.

Therapy:

effects of insulin

During each coma,

persists for minutes to a

few hours

EEG

coma

delta activity is induced,

after gavage.

imately one third of patients receiving deep

seizures, aphasia or prolonged

coma

therapy on the nervous system are

coma

which usually

infrequently, in

Not

approx—

therapy in this hospital,

results. After such events,

of delta activity persist for days, and in cases of prolonged

changes

EEG

coma,

for

weeks

and months (h3).

relation between prolonged

The

coma,

altered brain function

ioral response has been discussed at length. Revitch
of prolonged coma and concluded

tion of organic brain

damage,

that

(31) reported

improvement may be

insulin

eight cases

attributed to the

similar to lobotomy. Yaeger,

Burch (#3), describing twelve cases of prolonged

and behaVo

induc—

Simon, Margolis and

coma, noted a

correlation

between length of coma, degree of organic confusion, remission of mental symptoms
and degree of

EEG

abnormality. Shagass and Rowsell (3h), emphasizing

and Kwalwasser and Caplan (27) presented

EEG

individual cases to support the

data,
same

conclusion.
We

reported a similar relationship between prolonged

response in a case study (19).

A

3h

coma and

behavioral

year old schizophrenic patient with paranoid

�-8ideation developed a left hemiplegia during insulin

coma

therapy. With the onset

spatial

of neurologic signs of hemiparesis, hemianopsia, hemisensory syndrome and

inattention, there

was

a marked change in speech and behavior.

loquacious and denied his illness.
was

by

He

ludic,

became

His former paranoid—withdrawal type

pattern

replaced by a friendly cooperative attitude. These changes were accompanied

delta changes in the

as well as language changes

EEG,

dicative of altered brain function.

The

neurologic

after amobarbital

symptoms

in—

resolved, but the

behavioral changes persisted so that he was discharged two months later as

"much

improved."
(d) Lobotomy:
While we have not had the opportunity
from the point of view of
document a

this

summary,

similar relationship.

all subjects postoperatively
(#0) in a study of 150

after three years.

EEG

(6) and

to study

patients

lobotomy

the reports of numerous observers clearly

changes of delta

activity are present in

persist for varying periods. Walter et al.,

patients, found

an 80%

persistence of abnormal

These authors also noted a

EEG

relation between clinical

ment and the degree and extent of postoperative slow wave

activity
improve—

activity.

Postoperative seizures are a frequent "complication," being variously
reported as occurring up to

relationship

between the

20%

of subjects (25). Furthermore, there

extent of brain tissue cut

and the

is

therapeutic

Circumscribed surgical lesions, regardless of locus, have an improvement
lower than

unilateral lobectomy;

are "improved" upon by a

and these

a
outcome.

rate

latter are frequently inadequate

bilateral procedure (36).

and

�DISCUSSION:
When

view of an
These

the various physiodynamic therapies are assayed from the point of

alteration in brain function, a

therapies represent devices

of action becomes apparent.

common mode

which induce appreciable changes in

brain

function, with resultant change in behavior. Electroshock and lobotomy induce
measurable diffuse changes in brain function
when

directly; insulin

coma

primarily

complications ensue; and the phenothiazine and reserpine groups of

quillizers

when given

How

tran—

in adequate dosage.

persistent changes in cerebral function affect behavior is not

clear. Psychotic dehavior is not "reversed" or "obliterated". Rather, with
an

alteration in the central nervous system milieu, there is

all aspects of behavior including perception,
and

attitude.

is dependent

The

affect,

alteration in

memory, Judgment

specific adaptive response is variable for each subject

on numerous

historical

and environmental

sonality (18), environmental situation
of the

mood,

an

alteration in brain function

factors.

and expectations

(10) have

(ll),

and

Pre-morbid perand the duration

recently been discussed as

determinants of the behavioral response under these conditions.
The induced changes

in behavior are evaluated

by the

administrator or family as to the degree of "improvement."

psychiatrist,

These

ratings are

value judgments, based upon such factors as the type of induced behavioral

response, the environmental tolerance and the observer's expectations. In this
context, the physiodynamic therapies do not induce "improvement" - rather they
induce behavioral change which

is secondarily evaluated as

improvement.

alteration of cerebral function is therefore not a "complication" or

The

an "untoward

�-10..
effect" but the desired goal of these forms of therapy.
therapies introduced during the past thirty years,

Of

the

many

"organic"

none apparently, has been a

specific agent for the therapy of psychoses (in the sense that penicillin is
specific for neurosyphilis and nicotinic acid for pellagra dementia), but rather
devices with greater or lesser degrees of applicability and efficacy in altering
behavior by altering the cerebral milieu.
In

this context, the various physiodynamic therapies are not specific

for a type of psychosis.
was

The

early enthusiasm that reserpine or chlorpromazine

specific for schizophrenia, or hypotheses that ascribe significane to

an

antagonism between these drugs and "psychosis" or "schizophrenia" are not tenable.

Similar enthusiasm claiming a specificity of insulin

coma

for schizophrenia is

also untenable, and support for this view is presented in a recent chlorpromazine—

insulin

coma
EEG

control study (1h).
analysis of these therapies permits a

the induced alteration in brain function.
by a

shift in the spectrum of

EEG

Changes

more

explicit definition of

in cerebral function reflected

frequencies toward the slower range, with a

concomitant increase in voltage and a periodicity described as "bursts" or
"hypersynchrony" provide the change in milieu

behavior.

The

that is

more

effective in altering

significance of the delta shift has been clearly demonstrated in

electroshock therapy; and can be inferred from the available data in lobotomy,

insulin

coma, and the

That a delta
drug

effects.

reserpine

tranquillizers.
shift has

Those drugs

- have been

some

specificity is seen in the analyses of the

that induce the delta shift

- the phenothiazines and

consistently reported as effective modifiers of psychotic

�- 11 -

of psychotic behavior. Changes in brain function reflected by

EEG

desynchroniza-

tion only, or a shift in frequency spectrum to the faster range, have a limited
efficacy in altering psychotic behavior.

*

The

significance of a delta shift

is further seen in the limited efficacy of subconvulsive electroshock

when com-

pared to convulsive electroshock in the management of psychoses.
Another aspect of the

is the

change

alteration in brain function

in seizure threshold.

delta shift in the

With the

in clinical seizures would be anticipated.

which may be defined

This

been described following electroshock (h, 2h),

EEG,

an increase

is indeed true. Seizures have
are prominent after lobotomy

(ho) and a common ”complication" during and occasionally following

insulin

coma

therapy (23). With the tranquillizers, the parallel of clinical efficacy and
seizure induction is most striking.
commonly;

reserpine rarely; benactyzine not at all;

anticonvulsant!
EEG

Phenothiazine compounds induce seizures

The lowering of

delta shift induced

and meprobamate

is a potent

seizure threshold parallels the extent of the

by these compounds.

Similar analyses can be

made

for

the potentiation of sedative action and induction of parkinsonism - both potent
indices of an alteration in cerebral function.
The

quency
some

neurologic basis for the delta shift and increase in seizure

is unclear.

Whether

fre—

this represents a persistent change in function of

specific brain stem nuclear system, as the centrencephalic, thalamic or

hypothalamic, is conjectural.

From

the wide range of agents that can induce a

screening of new chemo—
therapeutic compounds for therapeutic efficacy according to their ability
to induce delta burst activity with a minimum of side effects.

* These

observations suggest the application of

EEG

�-

12

-

delta shift, with or without hypersynchrony,
EEG

changes

it

appears more likely that the

reflect an alteration in the diffuse biochemical activity of the

nervous system rather than in a focal

activity of specific cellular masses.

�- 13 SUMMARY:

1.
shock,

The

neurophysiologic and clinical neurologic aspects of electro-

"tranquillizers, insulin
H

2.

The

coma and lobotomy,

efficacy of each therapy in the treatment of psychoses is

related to the ability to induce a persistent
of which a delta shift in the
seizures are
3.

two

EEG

change in

cerebral function,

spectrum and an increase in incidence of

indices.

Alteration in cerebral function is

behavioral change with each of these therapies.
a "complication," nor an "untoward
mode of

are reviewed.

an

essential prerequisite of

Such

alteration is neither

effect," but is the sine 92a

action of these therapies.
h.

No

evidence has been educed in these studies

that the physiodynamic

therapies are specific agents for the relief of psychoses; nor
specific

non of the

segment of the nervous system; nor do they induce

do they

affect a

specific behavioral

changes.
5.
and

The

therapeutic process of electroshock, insulin

tranquillizers

may be

in cerebral function

coma, lobotomy

ascribed to the induction of a persistent alteration

which provides the milieu

the subject to his environment.

for a change in adaptation of

�L.A., Pace, J.W., Hernoff, M.K. and Bowditch, S.C.
(1956): Neurophysiologic Effects of Electrically Induced
Convulsions, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 15: 371-378.

Aird, R.B.,

Strait,

Jeri, R. (1956): The Effect of Reserpine on the
and
Basal Electroencephalogram, EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol.
Scalp

Arellano, A.P. and
g:

150

(abet).

Berger, F.M. (1957): The Chemistry and Mode of Action of Tranquillizing Drugs, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. é]: 685-699.

I.J.

Spontaneous Seizures and Related Electroencephalographic Findings Following Shock Therapy, J. Nerv.
Ment. Dis. 122: 581~588.

Blumenthal,

(1955):

Coady, A. and Jewesbury, E.C.O. (1956):

A

Clinical Trial of

Benactyzine Hydrochloride ("Suavital") as a Physical
Relaxant, Brit. Med. Journ. Mar. 3, pp. ABS-#87.

Cohn, R. (l9h5):
&amp;

EEG

Psychiat.

Study of Prefrontal Lobotomy, Arch. Neurol.

5;:

351—357.

Denber, H.C.B. (1957): Discussion, Symposium on the Psychopharmacologic
Approach to Schizophrenia, Second Int'l Congress of Psychiatry,

Zurich.

Fabisch,

Effect of Chlorpromazine on the Electroencephalogram
of Epileptic Patients, J. Neurol. Neurosurg;_&amp; Psychiat. 29:
W.

(1957):

185—190.

10.

Fink,

M.

Fink,

M.

Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave
Activity Following Electroshock, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol.
§: 158 (abst).
and Kahn, R.L. (1956):

Delta Activity to
Quantitative Serial
Psychiat. (in press).

and Kahn, R.L. (1957): Relation of
Behavioral Response in Electroshock:

Studies,

ll.

.

A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

EEG

Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Green, M.A.: Experimental Studies of the
Electroshock Process, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. (in press).
Fink,

M.

(1957): Therapy of Schizophrenia: Role of Alteration of
Brain Function in Behavior, Presented 2nd Int. Congress of

Psychiatry, Zurich.

�- 15 REFERENCES

13.

Fink, M., Green, M.A. and Bender, M.B. (1952). The Face-Hand Test as
a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome, Neurology' 2:
h6—58.

14.

Fink, M., Shaw, R., Gross, G. and Coleman, F.S.: Comparative Study
of Chlorpromazine and Insulin Coma in the Therapy of
Psychosis, J. Amer. Med. Assoc. (in press).

15.

Hankoff, L.D., Kaye, E., Engelhardt, D.M. and Freedman, N. (1957):
Convulsions Complicating Ataractic Therapy, Their Incidence
and Theoretical Implications, N.Y. State J. Med. 51: 2967-2972.

l6.

Hoagland, H., Malamnd, w., Kaufman, 1.0. and Pincus, G. (l9h6):
Changes in Electroencephalogram and in Excretion of 17
Ketosteroids Accompanying Electro-shock Therapy of Agitated
—

Depression, Psychom.

Med. Q:

2h6~251.

17.

Jacobson, E. (1955): Suavitil, et Nyt Stof Med Specifik Virkning
pa Centralnervesystemet, Ugeskrift for Laeger, 117: 1147—1151.

18.

Khhn, R.L. and

19.

Kahn, R.L., Graubert, D. and Fink,

20.

Kahn, R.L., Fink,

Fink, M.: Personality Factors in Behavioral Response
to Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol. (in press).
(1955):

of Parts of the Body After Insulin
Hospital. '3: 13h-1h8.

Coma

Delusional Reduplication
Therapy,

J. Hillside

and Weinstein, E.A. (1956): Relation of Amobarbital
Clinical Improvement in Electroshock, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.
M.

Test to
Psychiat.

&amp;

21.

M.

1g: 23-29.

(1957): Changes in Languages During Electroshock
Therapy, in Psychopathology of Communication, Grune &amp; Stratton,

Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

M.

(in press).

(1957): Perception of Embedded Figures After
Induced Altered Brain Function, Am. Psychol. 12: 361 (abst.).

22.

Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

23.

Kalinowsky, L.B. and Koch, P. (1952): Shock Treatment, Psychosurgery
and Other Somatic Treatments in Psychiatry, New York: Grune
&amp;

2h.

Karliner,

M.

Stratton.

W.

(1956):

J. Hillside

Epileptic States Following Electroshock Therapy,
HOSp.

2:

258—263.

�- 16 REFERENCES

25.

Klotz,

Incidence of Seizures, with

(1955):

M.

Prefrontal

Findings, in
Psychiat. 1E:

EEG

Lobotomy, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol

&amp;

Ink—1&amp;8.

26.

and Kwalwasser, S. (1956): Relation of Changes
in Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock,

Korin, H., Fink,

M.

Conf. Neurol.

16:

88-96.

27.

Kwalwasser, S. and Caplan, M. (1952): A Case of Prolonged Insulin
Coma: Treatment, J. Hillside Hosp. 1: Ins-155.

28.

Liberson,

W.

EEG

T. (1956):

Effect of "Tranquillizing"

Clin. Neurophysiol.

Drugs on EEG,

8: 523.

(1957): The Occurrence of Epileptic
Fits in Leucotomized Patients Receiving Chlorpromazine Therapy,
J. Neurol., Neurosurg., &amp; Psychiat. 29: 105-107.

29.

Liddell,

30.

Perlstein,

D.w. and

Retterstol,

M.A. (1956):

Disorders, J.

Revitch, E. (l95h):

Clinical

N.

Miltown, Its Use in Convulsive and Related
Assoc. 161: thO.

Am. med.

Observations

on Organic

Improvement Following

Psychiat. Quart. 28:

79-92.

Brain

Protracted

Damage and
Insulin Coma,

(1951): Changes in the EEG Under Barbiturate Anesthesia
Produced by Electro Convulsive Treatment and Their Significance
for the Theory of ECT Action, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. g: 261-280.

32.

Roth,

33-

Roth, M., Kay, D.W.K., Shaw, J. and Green, J. (1957): Prognosis and
Pentothal Induced Electroencephalographic Changes in ElectroConvulsive Treatment, EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2: 225-238.

3h.

Shagass, C. and Rowsell, P.W. (195k): Serial Electroencephalographic
and Clinical Studies in a Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 12: 705—711.

35-

Sigg, E.B. and Schneider, J.A. (1957): Mechanisms Involved in the
Interaction of Various Central Stimulants and Reserpine,
EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol.
2: h19-h26.

36.

Simon, A., Margolis, L.H., Adams, J.E. and Bowman, K.M. (1951):
Unilateral and Bilateral Ldbotomy: A Controlled Evaluation.

M.

A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat.

gg; ugh—503.

�- 17 REFERENCES

Chlorpromazine: Use to Activate Electroencephalographic Seizure Patterns, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol.
2: #27-hh0.

37-

Stewart, L.F. (1957):

38.

Ulett, G.A., Smith,

K.

Convulsive and

Control Group,

6.0. (1956): Evaluation of
Subconvulsive Shock Therapies Utilizing a

and Glesser,
Am.

J. Psychiat.

112: 795-802.

Wachspress, M., Blumberg, A.G., Fink, M. and Miller, J.S.A. (L956):
Evaluation of High—Dose Reserpine Therapy for Relief of
Anxiety, J. Hillside Hosg. 2: 67-77.
#0.

Walter, R.D., Yaeger, C.L., Margolis, L.H. and Simon, A. (1955):
The EEG Changes in Unilateral and Bilateral Frontal Lobotomy,
111: 590-59h.
Am. J. Psychiat.

hi.

Symbolic
Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L. (1955): Denial of Illness:
Thomas.
C.C.
and Physiological Aspects. Springfield, 111.:

he.

Wikler, A.:

Personal Communication.

(1953):
Yaeger, C.L., Simon, A., ﬁargolis, L.H. and Burch, N.R.:
Electroencephalographic Studies in Posthypoglycemic Coma,
J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 118: h35—hhl.

�A

Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies

Max

Fink,

M.D.

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Read

at the

2nd

International Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, September 6,

N.Y.

1957.

Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes
of Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the Board of Directors' Research Fund of
the Society of the Hillside Hospital.

Aided by grant M-927 of the National

10-7-57

�Iv:
A

The

10/5/57

Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies

proper role of the physiodynamic therapies (electroshock, insulin

coma and lobotomy)

in psychiatry remains poorly defined. In part, this results

from the lack of an adequate formulation of

their

of action. In the past

mode

six years increasing evidence for a neurophysiologic-adaptive
shock therapy has been presented (hl, 32, 38, 1).

view of

electro-

This view ascribes the thera-

peutic precess in electroshock to a persistent alteration in cerebral function
which provides the milieu

environment.

The type

for a

change

in adaptation of the subject to his

of adaptation evoked is dependent upon the personality

of the subject, the environmental situation, and the duration of the induced

alteration in cerebral function. Concurrently,
of action in insulin

mode

coma (31) and lobotomy (ho) has developed.

During the past four years

we

have studied the

alteration in various indices of brain function
of psychiatric patients to therapy.

The

view of

insulin

relation between

and the behavioral response

neurophysiologic-adaptive view of

electrhshock has been supported and amplified (9, 10,

for a similar

similar

an awareness of a

coma has been

ll,

20, 21); evidence

presented (19); and recently the

concept has been extended to the newer "tranquillizers" (12).

These studies

provide the basis for a generalization concerning the efficacy of these therapies.

It is

our purpose in

this report to

examine the exPerimental evidence

whether or not the mode of action of each of these therapies may

to determine

result

their ability to induce sustained alteration in cerebral function;

from

and the corol-

lary question, whether measurable alteration in cerebral function is a necessary

�-2condition for the efficacy of these therapies, or a "complication" or "untoward

effect."
The

include

indices of brain function used in these studies have varied. These

memory

scales (26), visual (22)

and

tactile

changes in language patterns of orientation both

(13) perceptual tasks, and

clinically (21)

changes in the delta index, both in routine records (9, 10) and
by intravenous thiopentone (32, 33), and

successfully. For this review,
have been selected because of

after

In electroencephalographic studies of this problem,

intravenous amobarbital (20).

delta index of the unactivated

and

in the beta index (16) have been applied

two indices
EEG,

and

after activation

will

be

stressed: changes in the

clinical neurologic signs.

These indices

their successful application in the analysis of

the electroshock process, and because data is available for each of the therapeutic
modalities .

�OBSERVATIONS:

(a) Electroshock:
The

role of changes in

ll).

shock (9,

following notes summarize our experimental studies of the

EEG

delta activity in the response of subjects to electro-

In these studies, electroencephalograms were obtained before

treatment, and at weekly intervals on a day after a treatment in consecutive
electroshock referrals.
week,

Grand mal treatments were administered

for 12-20 treatments.

The EEG

three times a

records were quantitatively analyzed for

the amount of induced delta activity, and classified into categories of "high",
"moderate" and "low" degrees of delta

patients

were independently

the categories of
In the

activity.

At the end of treatment, the

rated for their short term clinical reaponse into

"much improved", "moderately improved" and "unimproved”.

initial series

of patients, a significant relationship between

the early induction of high degrees of delta activity, and clinical ratings of
Eighty percent of the records in the

"much improved" was observed.

much improved

group were high degree delta by the h-6 treatment; and the percentage was sus-

tained at

90%

in the third and fourth weeks. In contrast, none of the unimproved

patients developed high degree delta records in the
20%

three weeks,

and only

of the records in the fourth week were so classified.
In a subsequent predictive study, the

and

first

third weeks of treatment

delta records

were analyzed.

on both occasions, 67% were

patients without such records,
categories.

70%

EEG

records during the second

0f the patients

rated as

who had

much improved,

high degree

while of the

were in the unimproved and moderately improved

�Roth (32, 33) studying the

EEG

h

.
delta activity

thiopentone after electroshock has related both the

evoked by intravenous

stability and the rate of

remission of patients with endogenous depressions to the peak value of the induced slow

activity.

activity level,

"

He

......

concluded

that patients not attaining a specified delta

have not acquired an adequate physiological basis for

recovery," and recommended measurement of delta activity levels after thiopentone
as a guide to the clinical management of patients.
Further information is obtained from convulsive-subconvulsive control

studies.

While convulsive electroshock induces degrees of

vary from low to high, subconvulsive therapy rarely alters
duces low degrees of delta

delta activity that
EEG

patterns or in-

activity (11). In their comparative study of different

convulsive and subconvulsive techniques, Ulett, Smith and Glaser (38)

demon-

strated a significantly greater recovery rate for the convulsive than the subconvulsive group.
In a similar study (11) recently completed here, twenty-seven patients

received a course of subconvulsive therapy.
weekly

Electroencephalograms, taken at

intervals, demonstrated minimal changes

~

none of the records were scored

as middle or high delta activity. 0f the 27 patients, no change in behavior

was

noted in 23, and of these, 19 were referred for a second course of treatment.
Grand mal electroshock induced a high degree of

delta activity in fourteen.

All patients in this group showed significant changes in behavior, while of
the five

who

did not

show

the delta response, only two showed a behavioral change.

(b) Tranguillizing Drugs:
When

the newer drug therapies are studied from the viewpoint of

�-5.
their electroencephalographic

and

clinical neurologic effects, a meaningful

classification emerges. Furthermore, a relationship between the degree

and

type of induced change in cerebral function and therapeutic efficacy may be

noted.

The

ability of these agents to induce such signs of central nervous

system dysfunction as motor

rigidity, depression, excitement

and

seizures are

well known. Less well documented, however, are the clearly definable electroencephalographic patterns.

Based on observations made

of drugs in adult psychiatric patients, the

EEG

in chronic administration

changes may be

according to predominant changes in the frequency spectrum.

classified

There are three

broad types:

I.

Increased slow

wave

activity with hypersynchrony

("bursts") - "delta shift"

II.

Desynchronization with voltage and frequency
and

III.

irregular theta activity

—

"desynchronization"

shift."

Increased high voltage fast activity - "beta

Of the group of drugs inducing a

derivatives chlorpromazine, promazine,
Each drug induces

irregularity

delta shift, the phenothiazine

and perphenazine are

clear examples.

seizures in non—epileptice or exaggerates seizures in

epileptic patients (7, 8, 15, 29, 37).
neurologic patterns

when given

have induced parkinsonism in
have observed seizures in

10%

Each drug induces

in adequate dosage.

clinical parkinsonian

In our laboratories,

all patients receiving chlorpromazine (1k)

and

of a group of psychotic patients without previous

history of seizures. Induced delta activity, including burst activity,
observed in more than

we

half the patients in this series.

was

�-

6 -

Reserpine also evokes delta activity
At high dosage

levels,

it exaggerates

when given

in large doses (2).

seizures in epileptics and induces

seizures in animals (35). At the usual clinical dosages, however, reserpine
induces desynchronization of frequencies with a moderate increase in theta

activity (28), without seizure induction but with definite motor rigidities.
In a series of patients treated here (39), parkinsonism was induced in

patients.

EEG

changes were limited to desynchronization only, without

all
delta

burst activity.
The primary

the induction of

EEG

response of two other drugs, mepazine and benactyzine,

is

desynchronization. Mepnzine, a phenothiazine derivative,

induces desynchronization with small amounts of theta

activity has not been described, nor
or parkinsonism in the

have we found

activity (7). Delta

reports either of seizures

clinical literature. Benactyzine, a potent anticholin—

ergic compound, induces a blocking of alpha, flattening of the record and
1?). Neither seizures nor parkinsonism have

occasional theta activity (5,
been described for

this agent.

Meprobamate

beta
and

shift in the

EEG

is the clearest

example of the group of drugs inducing a

(3). This agent further differs from the phenothiazines

reserpine in not producing parkinsonism

and not only are

clinical seizures

not induced, but definite anti—epileptic activity has been described (30).
Habituation

is readily achieved,

seizures have been observed (ha).

barbiturates than like the other

If

we

determine the

and withdrawal phenomena of

agitation

In these actions, meprobamate
new

is

and

more

like

tranquillizers.

clinical efficacy of these agents,

we

note a parallel

�- 7 between the induced
drugs

that

thiazine

most

EEG

effects

their potency in altering behavior.

and

readily induce a delta shift in

frequencies - the pheno-

the greatest clinical efficacy in the

compounds - are those with

therapy of psychoses.

EEG

The

The compounds

with lesser activity in this direction

are less efficacious clinically.
(c) Insulin

Coma

The

well documented.

Therapy:

effects of insulin

During each coma,

persists for minutes to a

EEG

coma

delta activity is induced,

after gavage.

few hours

imately one third of patients receiving deep

seizures, aphasia or prolonged

coma

therapy on the nervous system are

coma

which

usually

infrequently, in approx-

Not

therapy in this hospital,

results. After such events,

changes

EEG

of delta activity persist for days, and in cases of prolonged coma, for weeks
and months (h3).

relation between prolonged

The

coma,

altered brain function

ioral response has been discussed at length. Revitch
of prolonged

coma and concluded

tion of organic brain

damage,

that

(31) reported

improvement may be

insulin

eight cases

attributed to the induc-

similar to lobotomy. Yaeger,

Burch (h3), describing twelve cases of prolonged

and behav-

Simon, Margolis and

correlation

coma, noted a

between length of coma, degree of organic confusion, remission of mental symptoms
and degree of

EEG

abnormality. Shagass and Rowsell (3h), emphasizing

and Kwalwasser and Caplan (27) presented

EEG

individual cases to support the

data,
same

conclusion.
we

reported a similar relationship between prolonged

response in a case study (19).

A

3h

coma and

behavioral

year old schizophrenic patient with paranoid

�- 8 -

ideation developed a left hemiplegia during insulin

coma

therapy. With the onset

of neurologic signs of hemiparesis, hemianopsia, hemisensory syndrome and spatial

inattention, there

was

a marked change in speech and behavior.

loquacious and denied his illness.
was

by

became

He

ludic,

His former paranoidowithdrawal type pattern

replaced by a friendly cooperative attitude. These changes were accompanied

delta changes in the

as well as language changes

EEG,

dicative of altered brain function.

The

behavioral changes persisted so that he

neurologic
was

after amobarbital in-

symptoms

resolved, but the

discharged two months

later

as "much

improved."
(d) Lobotomy:
While we have not had the opportunity
from the point of view of
document a

this

summary,

similar relationship.

all subjects postoperatively
(to) in a study of

after three years.

150

EEG

to study lobotomy patients

the reports of numerous observers clearly

changes of

delta activity are present in

persist for varying periods. Walter et al.,
patients, found an 80% persistence of abnormal EEG activity
(6) and

These authors

ment and the degree and

also noted a relation between clinical improve-

extent of postoperative slow

wave

activity.

Postoperative seizures are a frequent "complication," being variously
reported as occurring up to

20%

of subjects (25). Furthermore, there is a

relationship between the extent of brain tissue cut

and the

therapeutic

Circumscribed surgical lesions, regardless of locus, have an improvement
lower than

unilateral lobectomy;

are "improved" upon by a

and these

outcome.

rate

latter are frequently inadequate

bilateral procedure (36).

and

�DISCUSSION:
When

view of an

the various physiodynamic therapies are essayed from the point of

alteration in brain function, a

therapies represent devices

These

of action becomes apparent.

common mode

brain

which induce appreciable changes in

function, with resultant change in behavior. Electroshock and lobotomy induce
measurable diffuse changes in brain function
when

when given

How

clear.

is

primarily
tran—

in adequate dosage.

persistent changes in cerebral function affect behavior is not

Psychotic dehavior is not "reversed" or "obliterated". Rather, with

alteration in the central nervous system milieu, there is

all aspects of behavior including perception,
and

coma

complications ensue; and the phenothiazine and reserpine groups of

quillizers

an

directly; insulin

attitude.

The

mood,

affect,

an

alteration in

memory, Judgment

specific adaptive response is variable for each subject

dependent on numerous

historical

and environmental

sonality (18), environmental situation

factors.

and

Pre-morbid per-

and expectations (11), and the duration

of the alteration in brain fUnction (10) have recently been discussed as
determinants of the behavioral response under these conditions.
The induced changes

in behavior are evaluated

by the

psychiatrist,

administrator or family as to the degree of "improvement." These ratings are
value judgments, based upon such factors as the type of induced behavioral

response, the environmental tolerance and the observer's expectations.

context, the physiodynamic therapies
induce behavioral change which

do not induce "improvement" -

is secondarily evaluated as

In this

rather they

improvement.

alteration of cerebral function is therefore not a "complication" or

The

an "untoward

�- lo -

effect" but the desired goal of these forms of therapy.
therapies introduced during the past thirty years,

Of

the

many

"organic"

none apparently, has been a

specific agent for the therapy of psychoses (in the sense that penicillin is
specific for neurosyphilis and nicotinic acid for pellagra dementia), but rather
devices with greater or lesser degrees of applicability and efficacy in altering
behavior by altering the cerebral milieu.

this context, the various physiodynamic therapies are not specific

In

for a type of psychosis.
was

The

early enthusiasm that reserpine or chlorpromazine

Specific for schizOphrenia, or hypotheses that ascribe significane to an

antagonism between these drugs and "psychosis" or "schizophrenia" are not tenable.

Similar enthusiasm claiming a specificity of insulin

also untenable,
insulin

coma
EEG

and support

control study

for this

view

coma

for schizophrenia is

is presented in a recent chlorpromazine-

(1’4).

analysis of these therapies permits a

more

explicit definition of

the induced alteration in brain function. Changes in cerebral function reflected
by a

shift in the spectrum of

EEG

frequencies toward the slower range, with a

concomitant increase in voltage and a periodicity described as "bursts" or
"hypersynchrony" provide the change in milieu

behavior.

The

that is

more

effective in altering

significance of the delta shift has been clearly demonstrated in

electroshock therapy; and can be inferred from the available data in lobotomy,

insulin

coma, and the

That a delta
drug

effects.

tranquillizers.
shift has

Those drugs

some

Specificity is seen in the analyses of the

that induce the delta shift - the phenothiazines

and

reserpine - have been consistently reported as effective modifiers of psychotic

�-11...
of psychotic behavior. Changes in brain function reflected by

tion only, or a shift in frequency

Spectrum

efficacy in altering psychotic behavior.

is further

to the faster range, have a limited

*

The

significance of a delta shift

seen in the limited efficacy of subconvulsive electroshock when

Another aspect of the

alteration in brain function

in seizure threshold.

change

With the

which may be defined

delta shift in the

in clinical seizures would be anticipated. This is indeed true.
been described following electroshock (h, 2%), are prominent

(to) and a

common

comp

‘

pared to convulsive electroshock in the management of psychoses.

is the

desynchroniza—

EEG

EEG,

an increase

Seizures have

after

lobotomy

"complication" during and occasionally following insulin

coma

therapy (23). With the tranquillizers, the parallel of clinical efficacy and
seizure induction is most striking.

reserpine rarely; benactyzine not at all;

commonly;

anticonvulsant!
EEG

Phenothiazine compounds induce seizures

The lowering

delta shift induced

and meprobamate

is a potent

of seizure threshold parallels the extent of the

by these compounds.

Similar analyses can be

made

for

the potentiation of sedative action and induction of parkinsonism - both potent

indices of

an

The

quency
some

alteration in cerebral function.
neurologic basis for the delta shift and increase in seizure fre-

is unclear.

Whether

this represents a persistent change in function of

specific brain stem nuclear system, as the centrencephalic, thalamic or

hypothalamic,

is conjectural.

From

the wide range of agents that can induce a

* These observations suggest the application of EEG screening of new chemo~
therapeutic compounds for therapeutic efficacy according to their ability

to induce delta burst activity with a

minimum

of side effects.

�- 13 SUMMARY:

1.
shock,

The

neurophysiologic and clinical neurologic aspects of electro-

"tranquillizers," insulin
2.

The

coma and lobotomy,

are reviewed.

efficacy of each therapy in the treatment of psychoses is

related to the ability to induce a persistent change in cerebral function,
of which a delta

shift in the

seizures are

indices.

3.

two

EEG

spectrum and an increase in incidence of

Alteration in cerebral function is

behavioral change with each of these therapies.
a "complication," nor an "untoward
mode

an

essential prerequisite of

Such

alteration is neither

effect," but is the gigs 333

299 of the

of action of these therapies.
M.

No

evidence has been educed in these studies

that the physiodynamic

therapies are Specific agents for the relief of psychoses; nor
specific

do they

affect a

segment of the nervous system; nor do they induce Specific behavioral

changes.
5.
and

The

therapeutic process of electroshock, insulin

tranquillizers

may be

in cerebral function

coma, lobotomy

ascribed to the induction of a persistent alteration

which provides the milieu

the subject to his environment.

for a

change in adaptation of

�-

1a -

REFERENCBS

Pace, J.w., Esrnoff, M.K. and Bowditch, 8.0.
(1956): Neurophysiologic Effects of Electrically Induced
Convulsions, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 12: 371-378.

Aird, R.B.,

Strait, L.A.,
Jeri,

Arellano, A.P. and

R. (1956):

The

Effect of Reserpine on the
EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol.

Scalp and Basal Electroencephalogram,

§:

(abet).

150

The Chemistry and Mode of Action of
Drugs, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. é]: 685—699.

F.M. (1957):

Berger,

lizing

I.J.

Tranquil-

Spontaneous Seizures and Related Electroo
Following Shock Therapy, J. Nerv.
Findings
encephalographic
Ment. Dis. 122: 581-588.

Blumenthal,

(1955):

Coady, A. and Jewesbury, E.C.O. (1956):

A

Clinical Trial of

Benactyzine Hydrochloride ("Suavital") as a Physical
Relaxant, Brit. Med. Journ. Mar. 3, pp. h85-h87.

Cohn, R. (l9h5):

Study of Prefrontal Lobotomy, Arch. Neurol.
ﬁg; 351-357.

EEG

Psychiat.

&amp;

Discussion, Symposium on the PsychOpharmacologic
Approach to Schizophrenia, Second Int'l Congress of Psychiatry,
Zurich.

Denber, H.C.B. (1957):

Fabisch,

Effect of Chlorpromazine on the Electroencephalogram
of Epileptic Patients, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. &amp; Psychiat. g9:
w. (1957):

185-190.

Fink,

M.

and Kahn, R.L. (1956): Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave
Activity Following Electroshock, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol.

g:
10.

Fink,

M.

158

and Kahn, R.L. (1957): Relation of EEG Delta Activity to
Behavioral Response in Electroshock: ‘Quantitative Serial

Studies,

11.

(abet).

A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat.

(in press).

Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Green, M.A.: Experimental Studies of the
Electroshock Process, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. (in press).
Fink,

M.

(1957): Therapy of Schizophrenia: Role of Alteration of
Brain Function in Behavior, Presented 2nd Int. Congress of

Psychiatry, Zurich.

�- 15 REFERENCES

13.

Fink, M., Green, MlA. and Bender, M.B. (1952): The Faceoﬁand Test as
a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome, Neurology .§=
”6‘58.

1h.

Fink, M., Shaw, R., Gross, G. and Coleman, F.S.: Comparative Study
of Chlorpromazine and Insulin Coma in the Therapy of
Psychosis, J. Amer. Med. Assoc. (in press).

15.

Hankoff, L.D., Kaye, E., Engelhardt, D.M. and Freedman, N. (1957):
Convulsions Complicating Ataractic Therapy, Their Incidence
and Theoretical Implications, N.Y. State J. Med. 21: 2967—2972.

16.

Hoagland, H., Malamud, W., Kaufman, I.C. and Pincus, G. (l9h6):
Changes in Electroencephalogram and in Excretion of 17 Ketosteroids Accompanying Electra-shock Therapy of Agitated

Depression, Psychom.

Med,

g: 2h6~251.

17.

Jacobson, E. (1955): Suavitil, et Nyt Stof Med Specifik Virkning
pa Centralnervesystemet, Ugeskrift for Laeger, 117: llh7-1151.

18.

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.:

19.

Kahn, R.L., Graubert, D. and Fink,

20.

Kahn, R.L., Fink,

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response
to Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol. (in press).
(1955):

of Parts of the Body.After Insulin
Hospital. ‘3: 13h-1h8.

Coma

Delusional Reduplication
Therapy,

J. Hillside

and Weinstein, E.A. (i956): Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

21.

M.

M.

Psychiat.

{1§:

23~29.

Changes in Languages During Electroshock
Therapy, in Psychopathology;of Communication, Grune &amp; Stratton,

Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

M.

(1957):

(in press).

M. (1957):
Perception of Embedded Figures After
Brain
Altered
Induced
Function, Am. Psychol. lg: 361 (abst.).

22.

Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

23.

Kalinowsky, L.B. and Koch, P. (1952): Shock Treatment, Psychosurgery
and Other Somatic Treatments in Psychiatry, New York: Grune
&amp;

2h.

Karliner,

Stratton.

W.

(1956):

J. Hillside

Epileptic States Following Electroshock Therapy,

Hosp. g: 258-263.

�-

16

-

REFERENCES

Incidence of Seizures, with

(1955):

25.

Klotz,

26.

Korin, H., Fink,

M.

Prefrontal
lhh-lh8.

Findings, in
Psychiat. 13:

EEG

Lobotomy, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol

&amp;

and Kwalwasser, S. (1956): Relation of Changes
Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock,

in

M.

Conf. Neural. 1Q:

88-96.

27.

Knalwasser, S. and Caplan, M. (1952): A Case of Prolonged Insulin
Coma: Treatment, J. Hillsidewﬂosp. 1: 1&amp;5-155.

28.

Liberson,

W.

EEG

T. (1956):

Effect of "Tranquillizing"

Clin. Neurophysiol.

§: 523.

(1957): The Occurrence of Epileptic
Fits in Leucotomized Patients Receiving Chlorpromazine Therapy,
J. Neurol., Neurosurg., &amp; Psychiat. 29: 105-107.

Betterstol,

29.

Liddell,

30.

Perlstein,

31.

Revitch, E. (l95h):

D.W.

and

N.

Miltown, Its Use in Convulsive and Related
Am. Med. Assoc. 161: thO.

M.A. (1956):

Disorders, J.

Clinical

Observations on Organic Brain

Improvement Following
Pszghiat. Quart. g§z 79—92.

Roth,

M.

Drugs on EEG,

Protracted

Damage and
Insulin Coma,

(1951): Changes in the EEG Under Barbiturate Anesthesia
Produced by Electra Convulsive Treatment and Their Significance
for the Theory of ECT Action, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. g: 261-280.

33-

Roth, M., Kay, D.W.K., Shaw, J. and Green, J. (1957): Prognosis and
Pentethal Induced Electroencephalographic Changes in ElectroConvulsive Treatment, EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. ‘2: 225-238.

3h.

Shagass, C. and Rowsell, PM. (195M: Serial Electroencephalographic
and Clinical Studies in a Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. lg: 705~711.

35-

Sigg, E.B. and Schneider, J.A. (1957): mechanisms Involved in the
Interaction of Various Central Stimulants and Reserpine,
EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol.
‘2: h19-h26.

36.

Simon, A., Margolis, L.H., Adams, J.E. and Bowman, K.M. (1951):
Unilateral and Bilateral Lobotomy: A Controlled Evaluation.

�-

17

-

REFERENCES

Chlorpromaiine: Use to Activate Electro~
encephalographic Seizure Patterns, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol.
2: h27-hh0.

37-

Stewart, L.F. (1957):

38.

Ulett, G.A., Smith,

39-

Wachspress, M., Blumberg, A.G., Fink,

#0.

Walter, R.D., Yeager, C.L., Margolis, L.H. and Simon, A. (1955):
The EEG Changes in Unilateral and Bilateral Frontal Lobotomy,
111: 590-59h.
Am. J. Psychiat.

kl.

Weinstein, E.A. and Kenn, R.L. (1955): Denial of Illness: Symbolic
and Physiological Aspects. Springfield, 111.: C.C. Thomas.

#2.

Wikler, A.:

R3.

Yaeger, C.L., Simon, A., Margolis, L.H. and Burch, N.R.: (1953):
Electroencephalographic Studies in Posthypoglycemic Coma,
J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 118: h35~hhl.

Glesser, 6.0. (1956): Evaluation of
Convulsive and Subconvulsive Shock Therapies Utilizing a
Control Group, Am. J. Psychiat. 112: 795-802.
K. and

Miller, J.S.A. (L956):
Reserpine Therapy for Relief of
M.

and

Evaluation of High-Dose
Anxiety, J. Hillside Hosp. E: 67~77.

Personal Communication.

�-

12 _

delta shift, with or without hypersynchrony,
EEG

changes

it

appears more

likely that the

reflect an alteration in the diffuse biochemical activity of the

nervous system rather than in a focal

activity of specific cellular masses.

�gﬁéW
W

¢

mA/LWWW“???

ﬂﬂmw

”ﬂ

0

WA; .Wbﬂ' WV WW/W»
Wﬁwé
W
erﬂc/ééé/‘nggg
WW Wan/Raw ,5,

wage;

4* ”Jaw“

£5149

MM

55¢?”

44%“

€40»

MW + mama

5-an

we

9

MA

401:

é’U—k

,

é1w%(b

Wdyk
7"
«anlwn/em

r

6

MW Www MAM/:2
WAMWMmM
”acacia/77¢“ M
0.4.2.
407973

WWMMWM
MWMA
Wﬂ’wwvéob
(law
w
W
MfM
3k-

(WALK-MW

—~

c

w

mQa—éﬂaec.

"1426

7'":wa ﬂow
szC 2’

,

VM’bgek-«tk’

ﬂ/Lf/wa «6% Egg kw Mgr

,

LWwaCA/I

wwaﬂ/VL/e .Z 9744M

/,’_5._

J

1(HMWA‘QWW

CWc/QW'OA‘:

/\
("‘1‘

fyék"

W
W
“FM
W
(aw/WWW
wa»
W/MW
W»!
W
(mow,
My;
Wm
awe;
1WMAWW ﬁx KM MWA
{a
WK»
Afr—Ti.
90¢
684?
”wag @iﬁmm
MWQﬁZ/k‘f;
WAN, W
L Li week w \W%
a.“
We,“ wdai/
we
#mﬁf/fég
bliss:
Vague,

k

4").

6:64,?)

“21A 020%
4

#1:gag/1%WV/(Q

(/L

4217(60

MAMAMK

)&lt;\

ngé

“7am
2L4“
W/WA—OLL/
9( #:9601256)“

(pl/V“

/3—

ﬁt

‘

QZIE.

M7—

5;

M

A

M
¥¢Jéw
W
WAWQM
{:6
meA
Mch
LA

94,4,

A

”Hill;

(,9.

0&amp;4,

W/«; 4%
.

«Akoéﬁ

m“

we

Mi
j%%
v Wf‘akwmm
claw A“,

0k)
{L13what

W/
W
351%

WH/ﬂfk
””011"

elk

“Lara/WWW

pfré’kpkfﬁﬂ

{Ga/“7‘6,

‘

aﬁédeywmwﬁ

WWW

;.

cam/1

6-54 VQQOMK/a/g, W062... n, ““1é‘é/

muwtwwiw

AWL—94k

2“%

Wm WWW

�.gyilim

‘W ‘3

32213313“
‘

I $153

JV

,5. 3)\.
~

1

.

,

,3;

x

'

*3"

I:

1.

1‘

i. a“:

c

3

)3.

3

3

.3

.

&lt;1

‘~

'

.,

..
‘K‘L‘
.

3‘

,3

‘
TAQF’W

.

:4"

-

C\\\
v-

.__

\F“

‘3.

‘

“'9' ~j‘S-A _;Q
.

ﬁ

\

-J\"‘-"’» x;

:

LF‘VLV

(.13

J3

.I ‘L‘

.

“

N

-3
"A
3

\l

V
‘

vau

\\*“§u

SLK

,

;

'v

‘

W

7

(R

‘

.

1‘

Mg

ﬁtw‘S

x

3‘3"

~

:‘K\

,JJ

.3

_

I

.

"4

"

*
,,

.

beg

"J-

1‘

;

l

4

.._.

\\
ju/ VASE].

N.

J x3

\

w )3

.
w
worms 33 e\rJ ”'3

._4

‘

X

.

\

1X

v_\

._\

27') 4"

,

““0

DJ}

-.

~

-

r’

It

33’ J “:J

3*

,.

«

rm

J.

‘.

»

V

V,

J

J

‘

93

,

,1».

‘

.An

v

A

x

,

v

'A

n";
\

W

v‘

‘

,

h

&gt;3.

\N J

333‘JE-‘i‘

3

3

M

‘3“;
y~._

WWW

3

3

o

\

‘

it.

{I

A

“*2

~31\
i

\

3.1 4

'3‘

,‘V‘

_

K

'—

‘3
.

‘

\

n

;

¥

(J}~7£;\

,3

J9

77

-1

3

.

3

3

1,43» AngN

‘

\

-Wi'\¢x&gt;‘a

.

)1-1.

3..w.

\x‘

\

9A};

.\
)U
‘

u\»~-

..

‘»\
585};

,3

--~' ,2.

N

,3

-

J \\‘ \

- —-\I

«,4

\J

|

x

‘

“’NW}

,rJJVJ‘

,

..

’73
T

3k .

;

,.

‘.

41$

S‘i,‘

43,1...1) 5

‘x

.

\

1

«‘

)

94

x
_

S

&lt;

,1.

.-

--

,,

‘3

25-3 ‘ r

:33. .;»,_-._~.».

..

'

3

\J

NJ

4'3)

H"
L”
‘

‘

s

34

r

.3.

‘.

.'

,

)3
1/

M} *_

A

x

'

:

-»3r~-'L5'

H

r

A»

V

573

"‘Jr'-

7)

-

‘K

f1

.

’

.

Y3

’

J\

r‘
“L.”

Lw

,

1333’)

J?

.1

3

\
fa

L

3

[V p\\ 3

I

.

3

J

7“#k’J

1‘0"")4:.) *‘a
W3M5
r)

.3

.,

r:‘ I
.

1
\‘l:
:7 5 u"

a

3"
f"

‘..

\ J

.

N "d

'

V”.

‘»

‘33

..

,

3

3,

m?~33}.A¢2¢k\3\
‘

3J4;

ng3‘H3J‘f},

\
Wk
‘

Jﬁ

‘3‘

m

.

\

Math

I 5"“Q3)
A

J

(0‘)“)

A
,

.

‘33,“

L

t3} 3.

,

,

msammw 33w;
F
ﬂ“

3

_

_

v

X

\

'

A
:9

.

_.

,

...A&amp;-*=¥3"“,

X

H

‘

\:

u

3

ML; ‘\JK $3

6x

K

3}

~

,

as \)&gt;

’3

,

at}

h

»

..

.

§3

1

&gt;3

s

,3,_

X"

\

&lt;2» ‘3

v-J; ‘3
7‘

.

\

ﬁx

i303

\

\(“m

4.1:!
‘

‘N

¢4-JQ;~\1)

.213

}\\

quLJJﬁ, 03343; 1,.

Jj-m

‘

\Q‘;

amwas» 3.33. 3 \
‘5‘“

R

.3

\‘V

“\x

»,

4‘)

FJIW.8

3“\

,3

A?

13:.
X 1.

P

(
a

3:&amp;\&lt;‘1

S

V

/

.M'
~

_

3

’1‘

r

"

4min

\

*Nva-‘hxr‘d 3.x. Afgmwxqgm
\"

.3.

.

\

3"‘\G\’{3‘3~k\ )3‘5“
.__;k,)Q.,,4-\‘2
.3

:23

-~

a.

Ag»
)~ 5‘“

J\‘\!)

5

LL {a

«

-

_

‘bAJ’X

,

~

«§«,‘~3,)\N\

(:3

1

’

f'‘

'L‘

.‘x

"‘

v

ﬁg:

3‘
\

‘3

«4.x:

J‘KyJ

“A
»

\‘k.

‘1

2

1

\

"

S

\

J_

\Aa‘i’!‘
~.

‘5

\

ﬁx

"\:\FAM\

“A

.

3?]

,7

v-BD'N

3/430

"X

“3&amp;3
x

‘1

“k 3

i

«.

&gt;

I.

N‘{)"~‘P"'-’9~(‘\*

‘W
Y‘

,,J

2

~

3mM

M‘¥

wsmé)
‘31

-

"v.2

3

V

3

,

¥\I‘~$\

;

,

‘\

.3

‘

3‘

J»;

w,

-.'

.

A

,

Y

‘2

MAD
ark'

x

W» 3

‘

-‘Q,—C

YiékﬁfJQmﬁi‘g3

\0

'

‘

’:
,

‘

I

3

H

’k

W,

‘3

rnz

&gt;

,_.
—\

}

1

M“

V

“NJ

.

z

M
x
ci/J!”
;f #5.,” i? -W! .szxjji.
v

‘

* Is».

r

~

.

l
AI3

&lt;;\;
I‘

\‘L

s

Y

A

\.

'

’

3

\

‘A "“\5\\J

r-

L.

~

"9"3'5‘WEX

3

\
‘\ N:\\Jo\) .W ’--J«_

K

~

~13

\

'

-

1

w_

v3}:

\MnNry—vmﬁ
\

3

A

v~__t~,3

___J
3. 3&amp;9,

k

,_

‘
.‘

\ f'\
»‘_k3,‘

vvv'v

,

1‘

3

\

~

.;

‘

1

‘

—

~V"'1G-(“l

7‘

X»

“.4

'

A

\

3

4

:-w

»

,, 3,..ﬁjv—w3‘h 4‘3

,

3

I

,

‘

\’

V‘

.41.

1

\
r‘

~\_)\4

3%

&lt;\

'

'*

r».

’

‘

i',

K

I

l.

_

‘3.
1

,

3

9
‘

L

‘

H“

.3)»V ’3

-.

A

13
.

"

7

3

\

,
,3,rkika/‘r’k‘u
'

v

3
Jw‘JVB

,

J 3‘.
J

.

/
w

3

f

I

I».

‘

‘

.

‘E

3

‘N‘Z‘Irj‘ibj-E 2)

A)

'\

:33

x

’

:1

'

~

-

K:

‘1‘

J

“a Rw

ré

_,_.a

.

.1

,

‘

&gt;

*

-

\g\:

W

‘

~,

x

’3]

‘

,»~

~

‘

1

&gt;

A
l

..

\_

g

‘

Ab¥¢¢£lk
'\

.

A r»

A

.,

a

A?)

.

-

f)o a; “x. .5”.

,

r'3

V

‘

m3
3

(‘3

.—.‘

\‘3

,

)—:)\l

..

'

”i'QUq

\
qi‘ﬁ-«x;.¢'\§§\r

"ix

‘3

,,

3

F—J-n

,

r)

,,

.,

--

M

A

v

=

‘\

-

|

J) J} \3_ } 9531‘wNAQDQ
s;-

"(f‘ LJ)

'

l

.

3

r

k1\
J

_

‘53

x 1- 2' 743. \3:

-

4344;-

3‘*‘ AV‘JJQ.» ’

‘2‘J&amp;\

I

a

“432.35

«3513:;

)vaia

r"3-1-3 51,5r

‘
*7

\

,

._3

~

\

,

.

3

(\x
,‘
.3-.M—vx;“*

f

T

.

.

3

\I-J‘IJL‘J

‘

,3

3.3\J

-\_)\r§ 3 Q [11-43)

"

j

J—‘~f'\'

{t

’3‘

.3.

3

3,

u
r

“331,-.

‘

is

m N3
a

.

v

�QFURTHER OBSERVATIONS MADE SINCE THE ARTICLE

"Electro-cncephalo-

graphic Evidence of Bersonality Changes by Ataraxic Drugs in
Mentally Disturbed Patients." WAS WRITTEN.
l) A number of mistakes due to faulty or non-standardized technique in the assessment of alpha
a) Duration of the recording:

It

was found

that

some

activity for the first

stability

patients

had

were made.

little

alpha
five to ten minutes of the
who

recording deve10ped a more stable alpha activity,

later

it is

on.

therefore suggested that samples of alpha activity should be taken at least ten minutes after the
beginning of the E.E.G. recording.
b) Period of the day:
Slight differences of habitual alpha activity were
observed in one and the same patient according to the
time of the day when the E.E.G. recording was taken.

applies also to the period of the last meal.
It is therefore suggested that the E.E.G. tracings

The same

should be taken at the same time of the day and at the
same intervals after the last mealhad been taken.
c) Waiting of the patient before the E.E.G. recording.

It

observed that if patients had to wait for long
periods in the waiting room before his E.E.G. recordwas

ings were taken the alpha activity was poorer than on
d) Noises.
The

effect of any noises, particularly of any talk,

during the E.E.G. recording changed thexalpha E.E.G.

pattern imedia-telyss
It seems therefore that the total absence of any noise
is necessary to produce a valid E.E.G. recording for
the assessment of alpha
0)

A

stability.

Special alpha run, allowing the simultaneous trac-'

ing of temporal and parietal occipital alpha was found
to be useful.

�2) The alpha

stabilizing effect of Largactil

and

Serpasil.

a) Single administration:

intravenous and intramuscular administration
of a single large dose of Largactil (100 mg.) or Serpasil (5 mg.) often had little or no effect on the
1.

The

alpha

stability.

ii.

The

period of

administration of the
3

days to

2

same

drugs, over a

weeks, did produce an alpha

stabilization.
b)

Age

groups:

effect of these two drugs, in sufficient
quantities, was observed in all children whose habitual alpha activity was poor.
ii. In adults there were some exceptions to the rule,
particularly elderly people suffering from depression.
0) Quantitl:
The effect of alpha stabilization, even after a long
period of administration, was sometimes only observed
when large quantities of the drugs were given.
It is therefore suggested that in case of a negative
E.E.G. effect the test should be repeated after in1.

The

creasing the dosage of the drug.
d) Temporal Alpha:

It is

observed that in sons cases the alpha stabilization occurred equally in the temporal and parietal
occipital regions. Most often however, the alpha

stabilization

was more marked

in the temporal regions,

infrequently the alpha stabilization occurred
in the temporal regions only.

and not

e)

An

experiment was conducted on 30 schizophrenic pmients,

10

patients received Serpasil 3 grs. daily, 10 patients
received a new drug to be tested and 10 patients received a placebo. E.E.G. tracings were taken before the
'administration of the drugs and on one occasion after
the course of drugs was started. Psychological tests
were made to assess the clinical improvement.

�It

that the patients who had received Serpasil
showed a statistically significant improvement of their
alpha-stability. The ten patients who had received the new
drug that was to be tested showed a significant diminution
was found

of alpha-stability in the temporal regions. The patients
who received the placebo showed a random distribution of improvement or deterioration of their temporal alpha rhythm.
The

correlation between

improvement of

alpha-stability int.-

the temporal region and clinical improvement was about +0.45
only, in all 30 cases, whether this was due to the effect of
drugs or not.
The Doctor who was

conducting the experiment, the

statistician

of the Mental Hygiene Department and our own observations in
our E.E.G. Department showed that many relevant factors during
the psychological testing (in which unfortunately "socialis-

ation“

was

not a part) suggesting improvement were not controle'

led.

f) It is

that alpha-stability
may be correlated with relaxation and alpha-blocking with tension, though this is certainly not the full story, probably
a reasonable hypothesis to assume

only an approximation. About 80% of true melancholics, who are
certainly not relaxed, have an exceptionally high alpha index.
Ostow's suggestion thatwalpha activity generally respons to a

preparation for constructive thinking and the disappearance of
the alpha activity when the constructive process was put into
action, probably, is nearer to the truth. The more correct
hypothesis would seem to be that relaxed patients generally
ruminate less than tense subjects.
3) Further references bearing on the subject of alpha stabilization:
a) "By hypnotic suggestion to relax, Ford and Yeager reported
the induction of "good" alpha patterns in several patients with
anxiety states, whose previous E.E.G.'s showed little or no
alpha-rhythm.' Relaxation suggestions were not followed by EE.G.
changes in subjects whose E.E.G.'s

rhythm."

naturally

showed "good"

�-

4 _

Ford, W.L. and Yeager, C.L. "changes in the electroencephalogram in subjects under hypnosis. "Dis.nerv.
systo 1948, 9, 190—192.

H

a) There are several references in the literature to
the fact that short courses of electro-shock-treatment
tend to increase the E.E.G. alpha activity.

4)

W:

quoting a reference of Ellingson a mistake occurred
in my article which should be corrected.

When

Should read

-

preposition by Saul and Davis that passive indiv—
iduals tend to have regular persistent alpha rhythms of
high index has been often cited in the literature and
“The

appears to have been accepted as fact. Sisson and E11ingson reviewed the evidence upon which that preposition
was based and found it unconvincing.”

uni?“

�/

g

,

§n\3\

L.

@

6

W
Q

wwwwwsméo
WﬁpﬂoA

Ni

Nf

\\

WWUWMNW

.

w

glwﬁg

ENK

:xWng

W
.

(GMWECQMV

wmim

3%

13mm

v

Eé

.

IVSNEPSNxMPIQXB

\m\§§£§§w\%
‘

gmxmigg

§§\

W

I

\KQ‘PVGV

\um
m

EQ®

“Sag

V

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2504">
                <text>A unified theory of the action of physiodynamic therapies. J Hillside Hosp., 6: 197-206.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2505">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2506">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-23-028</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2507">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2508">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2509">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2510">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2511">
                <text>5 items. 1: Xerox copy.  2: Two presentation copies. 3: Handwritten manuscript.4: Draft copy. 5: Chart.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2512">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2513">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74453">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81014">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87575">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94136">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="252" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="43">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/31ade8ace56aaea325e0c1b5774137fb.pdf</src>
        <authentication>34c1dccec8167a1f1d6a23f225341ecc</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100669">
                    <text>F

,

Perception of

Eknbedded

Figures after Induced

Cerebral Trauma

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D. and

Max

Fink,

M.D.

1/?

"a

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

M—927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service.

Aided by grant

Presented
11—27-57

at

American Psychological Association, New York, August, 1957.

NJ.

�Perception of

Embedded

Figures after Induced

Cerebral.Trauma

Studies of complex visual perception
man

are not always clear or consistent.

after cerebral
The

damage

in

disagreements may be due,

in part, to difficulties in evaluating the extent of the disease process
or the degree of alteration in cerebral function. In contrast, conditions
in'Which there is control of the degree of brain damage, as in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), provide a unique opportunity

for studying this

problem.
While investigations of brain-injured populations have focused an

the role of location of lesion on behavior, current studies of
emphasized the
been shown

to

EDT.

have

factor of individual differences. marked.variability has

for perceptual (l), behavioral (2)

and physiological reSPonses

In addition, various personality (h) and social factors (5) have

1.

C. Landis, D. Dillon and S. Leopold, Changes

2.

M.

3.

R.L. Kahn,

'

ECT

in flicker-fusion

threShold are in choice reaction time induced by electroconvulsive
therapy, J. Psychol., bl, 1956, 61-80.

Fink, R.L. Kahn and M. A. Green, Experimental studies of the
Electroshock process, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. (in press).
M. Fink and E.A. weinstein, Relation of amobarbital test
to clinical improvement in electroshock, A.M.A. Arab. Neurol. &amp;

PWChiato, 76’ 1956, 23-29;

Fink and R.L. Kahn, Relation of

EEG delta activity to behavioral
in
electroshock; quantitative serial studies, A.M.A. Arch.
response

M.

Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat. 78, 1957, 516-525.

h.

R. L. Kahn and M. Fink, Personality

5.

R. L. Kahn, M. Pollack ahd

factors in behavioral response

to Electroshock, Conf. Neural. in press).

F. Fink, Social factors in.the selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, J. Hillside Hosp., 6,

1957, 216-228.

�-2been related to differences

In the course of

an

in reSponse to treatment.

investigation of the perceptual

and behavioral

changes with ECT, a convulsive-subconvulsive control study was undertaken.

In this report, performance

on complex

visual tasks is presented.

Specific-

ally, the aim.was to determine whether perceptual change induced by ECT
is related to the degree of altered brain function and clinical behavioral
change; and whether the pretreatment perceptual pattern was related to

physiologic changes with treatment.
The method used

in the study

was the perception of embedded geometric

figures - a technique which has been Widely
studies of perceptual changes

accompanying

in recent years in
cerebral dysfunction (6).
employed

Lethe:
1) Population:
were
22

Fifty-three consecutive patients referred for

studied. These included

16 men and 37 women, with ages ranging_fran

to 66 with a median of h9 years.

into

ECT

The

patients

two groups. An experimental group of 29

were divided

at

patients (Convulsive

random
A)

received grand.mal electrotherapy with pentothal premedication three times
a week, using
C—h?

either a Medcraft alternating current instrument or a Reiter

electrostimulator.

A

minimum of 12

treatments were given.

of treatments was determined by the supervising

The number

psychiatrist in charge of

clinical criteria. A control group of
treated in similar faShion, except that only subconvulsive

the treatment unit on the basis of
2h

6.

patients

was

5. Battersby, H.P. Krieger, M. Pollack and M. B. Bender, Figure
ground discrimination and the "abstract attitude" in patients with
cerebral neoplasms, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 76, 1956, 369-379;
H. L. Teuber and S. Weinstein, Ability to discover hidden figures
after cerebral lesions, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 763 1956,
369-379; F. Pollack, W.S. Battereby and M. B. Bender, Figure-ground
discrimination in patients with cerebral tumor, presented at Eastern
Psychological Association, 1957.

W.

�"1

-3stimulation was given following the pentothal. Fourteen patients in the
control group

were subsequently given a

regular course of convulsive

therapy (Convulsive B).
2)

Perceptual task: In the week prior to treatment and on the

day following the 12th treatment each

patient was tested with a modifica-

tion of Gottschaldt's hidden figures developed
The

by Battersby

subject is presented with a page containing

geometric

figure,

figure is

embedded

it

and below

(fig. 1).

-a

simple

a complex figure in which the simple
The

patient is asked to trace a Specific
by

geometric figure from the background/outlining
~The

two fonns

gt 2;.(7).

it with a

colored pencil.

discriminations ranged in complexity from relatively simple to more

complex. There were 25 such discriminations.
was allowed

for each. Performance

of errors.

To minimize a

was

A

maximum of two minutes

scored in terms of total number

practice effect

two

equivalent forms of the test

were used.
3)

Evaluation of physiologic change:

Two

the electroencephalogram and the amobarbital

tests of brain function -

test

(8)

-

were given to

at weekly intervals during treatment.

each

patient prior to,

7.

Battersby, Krieger, Pollack and Bender, op.

8.

E. A. weinstein, R.L. Kahn, L.A. Sugarman and L. Linn, Diagnostic
use of amobarbital sodium ("amytal sodium") in organic brain
disease, Am. J. Peychiat., 112, 1953, 889-89h.

and

cit.,

The

703-712.

�.uelectroencephalogram was evaluated as to the degree of delta activity
induced according

to criteria previously published (9)°

’The

amobarbital

test for brain disease was noted as positive or negative according to the
standardized criteria (10). The results of these tests obtained during
the second, third and fourth weeks of treaunent furnished the criteria
for physiological change.

A

combined physiological index was obtained

by ascribing to each high degree delta

barbital test a score of one.
ranged from zero to six.
h)

EEG

record and each positive amo-

The range of

Behavior ratings: Each

physiological alteration thus

patient's behavior

was

evaluated

at

weekly

intervals. After the 12th treatment, a rating for the degree of behavioral
change was made according to

»..none.

These

ratings of

four classes: marked, moderate,

change were

minimal or

not value judgments as to the quality

of change, but rather quantitative estimates of differences in behavior

patterns under similar conditions of observation.
vpatterns as euphoria, paranoia or withdrawal might

[Thus such behavior

all

be

rated as equivalent

degrees of quantitative change, although the implications of each for qual-

itative evaluation of

9.
10.

improvement were

Fink and Kahn, op.

cit.,

quite different.

éin~pressl. 37$-5§ﬁn.

'Weinstein, Kahn, Sugarman and Linn, op.

cit.,

889-89h.

�Results:
pre-treatment and treatment scores

The

number of

errors with treatment is

intragroup analysis

shows

shown

and the mean change

for

each group

that the subconvulsive group

in the

in Table I.

made

The

significantly

fewer errors during treatment, while the combined convulsive patients made

significantly more.
TABLE

I

Intragroup Comparisons for

Number

Before and During

ECT

Mean No.

Type of Treatment

Subconvulsive
Convulsive

A

Convulsive

B

Before

E}

ECT

of Errors

Errors
During

EDT

Difference p_*

2h

9.96

7.67

-2.29

4:1.02

29

10.59

12.62

+2.03

NS

7.36

10.1h

+2.79

‘=1.05

+2.28

“=1.02

**

1h

Combined Convulsive

h3

‘

* Intragroup analyses in this and subsequent tables based on
Wilcoxon's method of paired replicates.
** Patients originally in control group, then placed on convulsive

treatment.

group

is

period.

The score obtained during treatment

used here as the pretreatment score

Prior to treatment. subcgnvulsive patients

made

in the control

for the convulsive
approximately the

same

number of

errors as the original convulsive group. During treatment, however, subconvulsive subjects made fewer errors (7.67), while the errors in
convulsive patients increased to 12.62 errors - a difference significant

at better than the

1%

level of confidence.

�-6When

the data is analyzed with respeCt to physiologic change, significant

increases in errors are found only in those patients with the greater
degrees of physiologic change. This relationship is present in analysis
of the amobarbital

tests are

test

and the

combined (Table

EEG

as separate indices, and when the two

II).
TABLE

II

Intragroup Comparisons for Number of Errors Before and After
ECT in Relation to Degree of Physiological Change
.

Physiological Index

N

Mean Difference in Number of
Errors during Treatment

Amobarbital Test.

or

None

positive

one

13

-O.23

NS

28

+3.714

.01

23

+1.73

NS

18

+3.33

.05

3

21

+1.00

h to 6

us

20

+3.90

.01

Two

or three

positive

Electroencephalogram

or

None

one

High Delta
Two

or three

High Delta

.

.

Combined Physiological
0

to
The

in

relationship between

number of

ﬂue degree

errors during treatment is

of behavioral change
shown

with no, minimal or moderate behavior changes

difference in
made

number of

errors.

in Table

III.

do not show an

and the change

Those

patients

appreciable

Those with marked behavior changes, however,

significantly more errors during treatment.

�TABLE

III

Intragroup Comparisons for Number of Errors Before and During
ECT in Relation to Degree of Behavioral Change
Degree of Behavioral Change

Difference Nnmber
Errors During Treatment

Mean

N

_
marked

2h

Moderate

1h

p

&lt;1.0l

+3.58

+1.00

NS

-0.h0

NS

l

Minimal

or

5

None

Analysis of the pretreatment error scores in relation to the degree
of physiological change

is

shown

in Table

IV.

The

results

show

that subjects

with large pretreatment error scores manifest greater degrees of physiolog-

ical

change during treatment.

Patients with

little physiological

change

during convulsive therapy had a mean pretreatment score of 7.88, while

physiological effects,

had a mean pretreatment

score of 13.25 errors. The triserial correlation
the .05 level of confidence.

is +.3h, significant at

those

who developed marked

TABLE

IV

Relation of Pretreatment errors to Eventual Degree of Physiological
Change During Treatment
N

Mean Number

Errors Prestreatment

Physiologic Change:
o

to

211’

3/ and

my

16

7.88

19

11.21

�Qualitative Data:
Alterations in size of figure or in

minor aspects of form were common

types of error during both testing periods. Certain qualitative patterns
were

frequently noted during treatment,

however, which occurred only

or to a lesser extent in the pretreatment period.

patients to
.was

make no

It

was common

attempt to trace the more complex figures.

rarely

for
This response

often associated with a generalized withdrawal reaction in which the

patient

was unreSponsive to any stimulus or procedure.

Others became

hostile and negativistic toward the testing.

l

i

Patients

wiﬂn

the greatest

amount of physiological change seemed to

difficulty following instructions. They would trace the lines indiscriminately without regard for the Specific figure to be outlined, repeated

have
‘

a previous figure despite changes in the

actually existed,
the

more complex

and impulsively, and showed

Such

little

drew

lines

where none

trace the stimulus figure while ignoring

and attempted to

test figure.

test figure,

patients were likely to respond quickly

concern about making an error even

they might spontaneously comment, "I

know

that's

not

right."

when
‘

�Discussion:

results of this study clearly danonstrate a relationship between
the degree of cerebral dysfunction and perceptual alteration. Patients
‘The

with subconvulsive stimulation

make fewer

errors

on

retesting.

A

slight

decrease or no change in errors occurred in those patients receiving
vulsive therapy

who showed

only minimal physiological changes.

vulsive patients, however, with the
showed a

significant increase in

alteration,
of errors. This interrelation-

number

is in

accord with studies of patients

with altered brain function due to head injury and brain tumor.

(ll),

The con-

most marked physiological

ship of brain fUnction and perception
and Weinstein

con—

Teuber

applying a similar technique in cases with penetrating

’brain,wounds, concluded that performance was unrelated to locus of lesion
but that aphasic patients

made

significantly more errors than a non-

aphasic brain-injured group.

Pollack gt §l3(12), using the identical

in this study, reported

relationship between perceptual errors

as

no

test
and

the location of lesion in tumor patients. They reported, instead, that

defective perception

related to the severity of other rental changes,

was

‘

such as

It

disorientation.
Should'be pointed out that the

all patients referred for
to that found by Pollack

ECT

was 10.35

total pretreatment

cit.,

Teuber and Weinstein, op.

12.

Pbllack, Battersby and Bender, op.

13.

Ibid.

score for

errors, a score almost identical

gt §l5(13) in theﬁ‘brain

11.

mean

369-379.

cit.

tumor

patients. Since

�the two populations are comparable in terms of other parameters as age
The

and education.

defects in figure ground discrimination cannot

be

’regarded as reflective of cerebral dysfunction as an isolated entity

abstracted from the totality of behavior. Rather than being in a
to one relationship, poor performance on such tasks

interaction of

many

there are

cases with cerebral

many

may

be due

to the

factors, brain dysfunction; being only one.
not

damage who do

show

one

Thus

defects.

Con-

versely, the present findings indicate that the inability to perceive
embedded

as

it is
The

figures

may be

related as

much

to certain types of mental illness

to brain disease.

!

relationship of perceptual alteration to behavioral

is clearly demonstrated.

treatment

The

patients

increase in errors during treatment were those
pronounced change

in clinical behavior.

who showed

also

who

change during

the greatest

showed

the most

They manifested such behavior

patterns as euphoria, hypomania, withdrawal, somatization or paranoia.
Comparable to these are the
embedded

figures test during treatment.

related to
paranoid
was

qualitative aspects of performance

an evasion

The

some

may

as well be

was

cases, and to a

lack of concern in correcting errors

associated with clinical patterns of euphoria

increase in errors

the

Failure to attempt the task

or withdrawal reaction in

hostility in orders.

on

attributed to

and hypomania.

change

The

in motivation or

attitude toward the task or examiner as it is to any Specific aSpect of
the altered brain function. Changes in performance on this complex perceptual task can thus be understood as

one

manifestation of changes in

the patterns of interaction with the environment.
The

relation between behavioral

this type of task, has been noted

and perceptual

by Witkin to be

patterns, using

true of persons without

9

�-11..

demonstrable cerebral dysfunction as well.

He

individual differences in the perception of

embedded

be

related to personality factors (15).

The

found

that the

wide

figures (1h)

may

finding in the present

study of the prognostic significance of the pretreatment score to the

eventual physiological reaponse is in accord with his observations.
7

Personality factors

may

thus be related to the degree of changes in
In a previous study (16) certain person-

brain function.with trauma.

ality patterns

were associated with the

ment following ECT.

short term behavioral improve-

basic characteristics of persons with a
favorable prognosis defined in that study were an inability to think

critically

The

or sensitively about

their

own

or other's needs or feelings,

patterns characterized by oversimplified generalizations,
,stereotypy and conventionality. The present data that persons with
greater difficulty in making the necessary analysis and figure-ground
and response

discriminations

on embedded

figures

show a

greater alteration in behavior

with treatment, is consistent with the previous observations.

Witkin,.Individual differences in case of perception of
figures, J. Pers., 19: 1950, 1-15.
15. H. A. Witkin, Nature and importance of individual differences
in perception, J. Pers., 18, l9h9, 1&amp;5-170.
1h.

16.

H. A.

embedded

Kahn and Fink, op.

cit.

�.12Summary and Conclusion:

1. Fifty-three consecutive patients referred for electrotherapy
were studied before and
embedded geometric

after treatment

figures.

An

on

their ability to perceive

experimental group of

29

patients

received

A.
regular grand mal therapy wiﬂa pentothal premedication.
control group of 2h patients received subconvulsive stimulation only.

2.

The

experimental group

made

significantly more errors following

treatment than did the controls.
I

3. 'Within the experimental group, however, there was considerable
I

variability. Increase in errors

was found

to

be

significantly related

to the degree of altered brain function, and the degree of behavioral
change.

h.

The

pretreatment error scores were significantly related to the

degree of altered brain function developed during treatment. The significance

in terms of personality factors is indicated.
5. Performance in this complex visual task mirrors the pattern of

of this

behavioral change observed clinically.
6.
one

It is

concluded

that performance

on a complex

visual task is

manifestation of a generalized pattern of interaction with the environ-

ment.

,4
Lu...

�.13-

Legend

Illustrations of test figures.

Fig. 1.

used to acquaint the subjects with the task
the task

is

The

is

preliminary sample
shown

in a. In

d

complicated by having the subject determine which of

the two simple figures can be found in the complex figure.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2514">
                <text>Perception of embedded figures after induced altered brain function. American Psychologist, 12: 36, 1957.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2515">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2516">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-24-029</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2517">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2518">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2519">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2520">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2521">
                <text>[preprint].</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2522">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2523">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74454">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81015">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87576">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94137">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="253" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="44">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/2e0c07f8713070c07cedfceccd13935e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f963256ba3adedd04d38ff5d4403fc1f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100670">
                    <text>Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy

in a Voluntary Mantel Hospital

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Max

From

Fink,

M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Aided by Grant Me927 of the National

Health Service.
10-8-57

N.Y.

Institute of Mantel Health, U.S. Public

j

M M

3:)

�Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between social

class

and

illness (3, 5, 6,
and

and incidence of mental

psychiatric disorder with respect to type

therapeutic

selection

13, 1h),

outcome (10).

The

and maintenance of treatment (2,

6, 15),

present study is concerned with social

factors in the selection of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Bollingshead, Redlich and their co—workers
(3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of

classes

New Haven was

divided into five social

basis of weighted criteria of education, occupation

on the

of residence.

Of

the residents

who were under

and place

psychiatric care, those

from

the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while
organic treatment or custodial care
Of

was more common among

the psychotherapies, psychoanalysis

groups.

was

entirely restricted to the

two upper

Social class was the predominant determinant of the type of treatment

selected even
as follows:

when

the diagnosis

"..... it is

found

was

held constant. They summarize their results

that treatment does not

and medical determinants alone, but on the

well.

the lower classes.

depend on psychological

status position of the patient as

degree
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high

to the upper social levels.

The

data of this study

would seem

to indicate that

most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where the background of the patient

is similar to that of the therapist" (15).

It is

possible to relate the results obtained from these

community

studies to such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the

�- 2 -

extent and type of treatment facilities available.

A

more

critical test of the

importance of social factors affecting choice of treatment would be in a setting

therapeutic techniques and services are available to

where the same

This requirement

is

met

all patients.

at Hillside Hospital. It is a non-profit,

sectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with "early
curable mental symptoms" (h),
pay.

are admitted regardless of their

and

ability to

criteria for accepting patients is their "ability to

of the main

One

who

non-

participate profitably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy

available

is regarded as the

when needed.

primary method of treatment with organic therapies

The average

length of hospital stay

is six

months,

al-

though some patients remain for as long as a year.
The

present investigation is

of electroshock therapy.

an outgrowth of

In previous work

several years of study

it has been

shown

that certain

aspects of personality were significantly related to patient selection and

therapeutic efficacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose

patients differ

of the present study

from those

was

to determine whether electroshock

receiving other forms of treatment in regard to

cultural background, including such factors as education
and

personality as measured by the California

F

and place

of birth,

scale (1); secondly, whether

these factors were also related to referral for adjunctive hoSpital services.

�m:

Population:

as of March 7,

The

1957 was

entire in-patient adult population of Hillside Hbspital

studied. This constituted a total of

ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a

mean

172

of 3h.6, and including

patients,

58 men and

11h women.

1) The population was subdivided

Procedure:

into three groups according

to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy, (b) insulin

coma

therapy,

and (c) psychotherapy only. *

2) The groups were compared for age, education and place

of birth.
I

3)

of the California

naire (see

F

All patients

were

tested

scale suggested by Levinson (9).

Appendix) which has been

The F

scale

The

patient reads ten statements

indicates whether he agrees or disagrees with each statement

tent.

The

and

score given for each item ranges from one to seven and the

score range is

tained.

is a question-

related to such factors as authoritarianism,

acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
and

** with a ten-item.modification

The

10

to 70.

The

to what ex-

total

greater the agreement the higher the score

ob—

statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this
management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data was
included in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subJects.

* All

patients were tested with the F scale
prior to treatment. In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on march 7th their pre-treatment scores were used in the statistical compar-

** As

part of

ison since
treatment.

an ongoing study

all the

EST

it had been found that EST

significantly affects the score during

�-uh) The population was subdivided in regard

of certain adjunctive services in the hospital.

Among

to utilization

such services available

are group

activities, occupational therapy, psychological testing

therapy.

The

latter is a diagnostic

and

and

creative

therapeutic service consisting of a

series of controlled painting procedures which are considered to be analogies
of

life experience (18). Psychological testing

and creative therapy were

selected for this study because both require a specific referral from the

therapist.

�RESULTS:

data

The

1) comparison of the treatment

was analyzed as follows:

scores and place of
groups for age, education, F scale
where diagnosis

is held constant,

prior to treatment,

birth, 2) comparison

significance of length of hospitalization

3)

and h) comparison between groups

referred for adjunctive

hospital services.

I.

Comparison of Treatment Groups:

For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard devia-

-tions for the
Table

I.

F

scale scores,

The EST group had

age and years of schooling are presented in

higher

P

scores,

was

older and had fewer years

of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These

differences
reach

were

statistically significant for

statistical significance for education.

cation to differentiate the groups
electroshock group contained

many

was due,

F

score and age but failed to

The

failure of years of edu-

in part, to the fact that the

foreign born patients whose education

was

treatment groups were subdivided into

difficult to evaluate accurately.

When

number of

eight years of education, the difference

was

patients

above and below

significant at the .01 level.

not differ

statistically for

The

insulin

any of these

and psychotherapy groups did

factors.

�Hague

uwumuom

auom

$5

$5

nMﬁmnom

m
mo

2
$3

Agooav

muwam
awamuom

.nuom

no

modem
m&gt;ﬁuaz

nvuwm

amousm

a

m

m

383

“somv

33$

mm

mﬂ

8

$8

Aﬂoav

no

qmﬁwuom

$8

anon

a

nowpwoscm

um

anon

can

muaam

wkﬁd

.ummm

3me
nuhum

o

nahwm

m

$ﬁ&gt;u%

ma

once

$8

.mw&lt;

H
6m-

.cm

no

auhoom

we

0

b

made»

How

0

8H

$5

Ammv

:5

m

H

.~

m;

w.m

*Réudx

.cm

am

Ho

unmanamua

ma

aonm

mqmdg

masono

a.

$8

Aﬁmmv

mummy

cams

8.3

«a

0.3

H.ma

8;:

m.:

can:

mi

m.mm

3m

am

93

m.ma

9.:

gums

3:

am

p

***om.w

dﬁa

m.w

N.H

a

***mm.a

***ww.m

m:.~

mm.”

H.H

m&gt;.H

pnmnwuhan

mw¢

can:

.33

~.m

o.m

&gt;.:H

mo

nomwnmmsoo

a

**Aa.m

mm.

m&gt;.m

Hm&gt;oﬁ
amped

Hm&gt;ma

no.

do.

«a

pa

pa

pauu««Hanm

aguoﬁqumﬁw

endowmﬁnwam

macaw

m

can:

9.3

9%

m.Hm

ado: .&amp;B

~.m

o.ma

so:

”om“

G3
nonu
naasmnu

9%

Hoe.

uonuhmmanwaamnm

madamnH.amm

nacho

m.m

Rama»
mm

-onohnm.emm

mgauon»

ammumnp

*

**
K

***

�-

-

7

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign born patients

than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group being highest of
Among

the foreign born patients, those

who came from

all.

Eastern European countries

received somatic therapy predominantly, while the majority of those from Western
Europe reneived psychotherapy alone.

II.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation
The

to Diagnosis:

diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable

to those reported in previous studies of the hospital population (12).

Of

the

fl72 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as psychotic depression,
32

as psychoneurosis and two with other diagnoses.

portion of the depressed patients
with other diagnoses.

To

(52%)

As

expected, a larger pro-

received electroshock than did those

control for the factor of diagnosis in choice or

treatment, the psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those
received electroshock and those
are

shown

who

were given psychotherapy alone.

.02

The

results

in Table II.
While the two groups were comparable

shock

who

patients had a

much

level of confidence.

higher

It is

mean F

for

age and education, the

electro-

score, a difference significant at the

also demonstrated that a significantly higher

proportion of the electroshock patients were born in Eastern Europe.

�‘hmavo

aﬁmv

as:

a

a

Agmmv

:83

nunwm

no

nnmpmmm

muonsm

ma

unusuauua

m
#moi

madam

Aﬁmmv

mo

m&gt;apaz

333
u,

whom

ma

NN

mm

mumwa

0903

$8

anoumhuwn

Aaawv.wm
.usdm

no

w
Mo
cwbaoumm

mm
Pm...”

m
Ammmv

mama»
soamm

3?:

u

m

a

NN

3.:

a

p

cams.

m.o~

0.2

am

:.mH

.92

spas

gum:

0.0:

9S

mpnuupdm

am

0a:
HH
.ust

IQ-

mm

mama
noummohmmn

no
uuaow

$03

.MHS

p

canonohmm

mad

omd

mN.o

mmm.

m.ma

{3

m.om

0.3

9602

33.3

v

No.0

*m:.m

muoom

mo

m
can:

502

.935

0N6
Hm&gt;oH

nomuhdmaco

mo.

pa

as

pnwowgﬁamum

namv

3203393
-ongmmm.amm

hmdhmﬁ.

9mm

b

it;

*

�-9.
III.

Comparison of Electroshock

Patients According to Length of Hospitalization

Prior to Treatment:
While the electroshock
from those

receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there

intra-group differences.
postulated that the

To account

While most of the

less than three

months

for

some

were

who

EST

scores and were older were treated
Place of birth

h0%

months were born

earlier than the

is also a significant factor.

cance, although

28%

in the U.S.

The

were

also

compared according

Patients

who had

on

higher

younger and lower F scale
While hh% of those

all patients referred after
data

was

referred after a period

were

III the patients are

within three months were foreign born,

six

it

were placed on treatment

to the period of hospitalization prior to electroshock.

groups.

considerable

of these differences

received

after admission, about
In Table

to differ

patient was referred for electro-

which a given

patients

of three to twelve months.

F

still

shown

factors involved in selection of treatment

same

related to the readiness with
shock.

patients, as a group, have been

education Just

treated

a period of

fails of signifi-

of those treated earlier had less than eight years of

edu—

cation.
IV.

Use

of Adignctive Hospital Services:
Comparison of the

logical testing is

shown

patients referred for creative therapy

in Table

IV.

It is clear that

of these procedures had significantly lower
more education and more were

for these services.

F

and psycho~

those referred for either

scores, were younger_in age, had

native born than patients

who were

not referred

�.350

Agmv

m

Agmmv

nuHHm

cumwmmm

0935

Mo

NH

o

o

haemv

o

m
*ma.m

pamapmmne

madam

0p

“away

Aﬁowv

ma

w

AgooHv

u

m&gt;wuwz

anon

Ha

N

x

nownm

933
Ammuv

Aﬁomv

mm

m

no

m

mo
noﬁpduwawpwmmom

Aaooav

HH

maﬁpwuscm

made»

w

mm.:

0

Agmmv

Agoav

m

H

an

&gt;.m

m.m

o.m

gm:

m.m

».ad

m.mH

333

mo

a

N

x

HHH
nnwan
'0‘"-

no

mqm¢9

on

p

aw.”

mm.o

mm.o

aoavmosu

mama»

cams

mm.H

.Muaa

Hm.a

Po.nw*wm.m
mnwcnoou&lt;

am

m.ma

m.ma

m.oa

30E

m.m;

w.mm

H.om

u

FH.H

Hw.H

mm¢
Hp.m
mpqmwgwm

m~.m

swag».meg

‘

~:.mnwrmw.m

mm

9mm

o.:a

w.HH

a

m.~H

mm.a

mm.a

,

_

macaw

mo

m

new:

H.a:

~.N:

m.mm

mama

.Mqu

m:.m

m~.m

ma.ma

nomwuwmaco

ncwpcuﬁawpunmom

.moa

Hmpmﬂ

mo.

Ho.

pa

96

AHHV

Ammv

angdwha

Hm&gt;oH

Aoﬂv

.mos

:

u

.moa

.woa

.noa

.moa

n

m
mo

nvmumq

m

m

.moa

on

nova

gang

swap

mama

w

m
0p

m

mama

can»

pnaowwﬂnmﬁm

pqaoﬁmﬁnmﬁm

nun»

can»

m
on
mama

m

m
.moa

on
mnoz

mama

mm
.moa

whoa

«nos

m

*

**

�nmnpo

hmmnmna

$8

Away

m

m

Asmav

m

Aamv

m

npuwm

a3

Amwmv

Aﬁmv

cnmpmdm

#

muonsm

m&gt;wpwmuo

A

mo

mm

Aﬁmav

ma
*mm.m

*mm.®

$3

mqwam

cam

hﬁmwv

Agapv

Aﬁmpv

u

u
m&gt;w¢dz

upon

mwﬁpmme

3

a»

ﬂame

Amway

Aapmv

“*pmv

8

mm

my

mm

MN

am

H»

«x

whoa

no
Haowwoaonommm

m

mo

*mm.:

mowpmosum

*mm.m
mndow

m

mo

soamm

:5

Awmav

Aﬁmv

a

A$MHV

n

H

ma

mtm

H.:

Nx

m

«x

ma

&gt;H

p

mwuw&gt;hmm

am

IHHI
mgm¢H

m.m

mm.m

mo

***&gt;.m

m».H

aowpwuscm

mama;

can;

3;

aw

v.0“

«.mH

m.HH

m&gt;ﬁponmmd¢

m.mw**om.:

mm

no“

O.H

h%ﬁ

add

m.ma

5mm

m.mm

m.HH

p

:.ma

mm.m

om¢

o.&gt;
cams.

p.0m

p.»m

mam:

.men

H.oa***mm.m

a

dmunmwmm

am

3:

m.m~

cum:

9mm

p.m:

w.:~

m.ma

r*wm.m

choom

mgqmwpwm

m

H.mm

$.H:

can:

.umﬁn

m.w

m.:a

rm&gt;¢r
amped

Ho&gt;oa

mo
mo. Ho.

:8

pa pa pa

amoavhmanona

Appv

newwnwmabo

3239
mumua

«CC.

Ammv

.a.o
pnmUHuHamHm

pacuHMwumHm

*

**

HQNUﬁMHanm

oz

mmsouo

.Hoaohmm

m&gt;wpmmuo

mummy

:.Honommm

8385

.Honoamm

oz

oz

.a.o

oz

***

�DISCUSSlON:

results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of birth

The

and F

scale score

were

significantly related to the type of therapy received

and

to the utilization of adjunctive services in this hospital.

Psychotherapy was

the treatment of choice for those patients

better educated,

native born

and had lower F scores.

Such

who were younger,

patients

were

also referred

more

frequently for the auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and
creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores,
were

older, poorly educated

were most

likely to

be

and foreign born,

referred for

EST.

particularly in Eastern Europe,

These

patients

infrequently

were

referred for psychological tests or for creative therapy. Furthermore, these
relationships

were

still

significant when diagnosis

was

held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of Hbllingshead, Redlich
and

their co-workers (3, 5, 6, 13,

15) who demonstrated

related to the type of therapy received in a

community.

that social factors are
The

present study

demonstrates that such factors are also significant in a hospital setting where

ability to pay is not a criteria of therapeutic selection and
of therapy are equally available to the
With

financial aspects

and the

where

all

forms

entire population.
availability of therapeutic facilities

eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the selection
of treatment, two alternative interpretations

factors

may

of therapy.

may be

considered.

The

social

relate directly to the empirically established criteria for choice
On

this basis a patient is referred for electroshock because

older, poorly educated or foreign born, clinical experience having

shown

he

that

is

�such persons respond best to
adequate since

13

-

this type of treatment. This explanation is in-

half the patients with psychotic depression received psychotherapy

alone, even though electroshock

is generally considered the treatment of choice

for this illness.
An

alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to

‘choice of treatment because they

also affect certain psychological patterns of

behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy, such as

mode

of

communi-

cation. Thus, a patient is not referred for electroshock because he is foreign
born or poorly educated, but

rather, these factors provide the difference in

cultural background between patient

and

therapist

which makes successful communi»

cation less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship.

Robinson 33 EE' (15)

in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that psychotherapy is
most

likely to take place

where the

cultural background of the patient is similar

to that of the therapist. Conversely, patient-therapist differences in systems
of value and communication may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic rela-

tionship. In the present study, similarly, the patients

who

received psycho-

therapy alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors studied.*
Apart from the problem of

patient-therapist differences, certain patterns

of communication exhibited by the patient may be

intrinsically incompatible with

the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have

score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9.
Sixteen percent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education
was over 20.

* The 18

therapists had a

mean F

�-1ushown

that verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy

and use of cliches are

patterns appear to be

likely to receive electroshock (7, 8).
more frequent

Such language

in persons with poorer socio-cultural back-

grounds.

Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect on

cation patterns,

that,

has noted

may

communi~

also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler (11)
patients diagnosed as schizophrenic, differences in

among

symptoms

are related to differences in cultural background. Frank gg'gl. (2), studying
psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose

symptoms were

expressed

in somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those
mained had

ideational

shock patients (8)

we

In a study of personality factors in electro-

have noted

that certain patterns of symbolic value

The F scale

and

likely to be associated with the development of a
The

indicates that

symptoms

re-

symptoms.

communication were more

depressive psychosis.

who

relationship between communication pattern

symptoms themselves

are a

mode

and

of communication.

furnishes a quantifiable index of attitude and communication

patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers were less receptive to entering a
psychotherapeutic relationship and were more likely to receive electroshock.
Tougas (17), using an

ethocentric scale similar to the

F

scale, found that

psychotherapy was more effective in patients with low scores.

study the

F

scale

was

In the present

the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment

groups.
These

results have clinical as well as theoretical significance.

�-

15

-

Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that lowbscorers on
the

F

scale have a poor response to electroshock,

and

that those with high

F

scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone. Another clinical application
may be

in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient.

This may be done by minimizing

closely for

age and place of

necessity for developing new

their social differences,

by matching them more

birth. 0f possible greater importance is the
modes

of communication when treating patients

who

are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic approaches.*
While epidemiological

studies have clearly structured

some

of the

problems involved in selection of treatment, and have indicated the direction

of further study,

it still remains

for

more process~oriented

definitive answers.

* See Esecover's

presentation of this topic in this issue.

research to provide

�-

16

-

SUMMARY:

1.

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection

of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which

all

forms of therapy were

equally available, education, age, place of birth and score on the California
F

scale were significantly related to the type of therapy received and to the

utilization of adJunctive hospital services.
2. Patients
and were
be

who were

older, poorly educated, had higher

foreign born, particularly in Eastern Europe,

referred for electroshock.

those patients

who most

were most

F

scores

likely to

Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for

closely resembled the therapist in these aspects.
were present even when diagnosis was held

3.

These

relationships

h.

Among

the electroshock patients the

constant.
significant in choice of therapy
which a

patient
5.

was

It is

were

same

factors found to be

also related to the readiness with

referred for electroshock.
postulated that treatment selection is the result of the

communicative interaction between patient and
be important insofar as they are

therapist. Social factors

may

related to different modes of communication.

�-

17

-

REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., FrankeloBrunswik,

(1950):
&amp;

The

E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,

Authoritarian Personality,

New

R.N.

York: Harper

Brothers.

Frank, J.D., Gliedman, L.H., Imber, S.D., Nash, E.H. and Stone, A.R.
(1957):

Why

Neurol.

Am.

Leave Psychotherapy, A.M.A. Arch.

Psychiat., 11; 283-299.

&amp;

Freedman, L.Z. and

Patients

Hollingsheadﬁj. (1957): Neurosis

J. Psychiat.,

Hillside Hospital, 29th

113: 769-775.

Annual Report, 1956.

Schizophrenia and Social

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Structure,

Am.

and Social Class,

J. Psychiat.,

110: 695-701.

Social Class and Psychiatric

Ecllingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Disorders, in Interrelations Between the Social Environment
and

Psychiatric Disorders,

New

York:

Milbank MEmorial Fund,

pp. 195-208.
-3

Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

Therapy.
Zubin,

M.

(1957):

Changes

in

Language During Electroshock

In Psychopathology of Communication (Roch, P. and

J. Eds.),

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.:

New

York: Grune

&amp;

Stratton.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol., in press.
Levinson, D.J.:
10.

Personal Communication.

Morgan, N.C. and Johnson, N.A. (1957):

Chronic Hospital Patient,

Am.

Failures in Psychiatry:

J. Psychiat.,

The

113: 82h-830.

�-18.
REIFEEENCES

ll.

Opler,

Schizophrenia and Culture, Scientific American,

M.K. (1957):

..

191: 103-110.
12.

Rachlin, H.L., Goldman, 6.8., Gurvitz,
(1956):

ll}.

Redlich, F.C., Hollingshead, A.B., Roberts,

33.,

Robinson, H.A.,

KJ. (1953): Social Structure

and Psychiatric Disorders,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

ﬂ: 729-73h.

Rennie, T.A.C., Srole, L., Opler, M.K. and Langner, T.S. (1957):
Am.

Titus,

Psychiatric Treatment,

Am.

H.E. and Hollander, E.P. (1957):

Tougas, R.R. (19511):

Urban

J. Psxghia‘b” 3.3;: 831-837.

Robinson, H.A., Redlich, F.C. and Myers, J .K. (195M:

Psychological Research:
17.

Rachlin, L.

Freedman, L.Z. and Meyers,

and
16.

A. and

J. Hillside Hospital, 2: 17-40.

1950,

Life and Mental Health,
15.

Lurie,

Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from

Hillside Hospital in
13.

14.,

Social Structure

J. Orthopsychiat., g5: 307-316.
The

California

F Scale

1950—1955, P331301. Bu11.,

Ethnocentrism as

8.

it:

in
147-64.

Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy,

In Psychotheragy and Personality Change, C.R. Rogers and R.F.
Dymond,

18.

Zierer,

E. and

eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. l96-21h.

Zierer,

E. (1956):

of Creative Activity,

Am.

Structure

and Therapeutic

J. Psychotherapy, i3:

Utilization

11833519.

�-

19

-

APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM

Below are a number of statements.

For each statement

we

want you to

give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree. Answer each

statement according to one of the following:

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY

I

AGREE A

I
I

LITTLE

1.

No

MUCH

MUCH

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a

close friend or relation.
2.

Science has

its place,

but there are

many

important things that

must always be beyond human understanding.
3.

If

people would

talk less

and work more, everybody would be

better off.
h.
think about
5.

ation,

When

it,

6.

the youth needs most is

will to

wOrk and

is best for

strict discipline,

fight for family

Nowadays when so many

much, a person has
an

it

him not

to

but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

What

and the

a person has a problem or worry,

rugged determin-

and country.

different kinds of people

mix

together

so

to protect himself especially carefully against catching

infection or disease

from them.

7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more than
mere imprisonment; such

criminals ought to be publicly whipped, or worse.

�-20..
8.

is to

The

best teacher or boss is the

be done and how

9.

the strong.

go about

to get over

them and

tells

us exactly what

it.

Young people sometimes

up they ought

10.

to

one who

get rebellious ideas, but as they

settle

grow

down.

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak and

�Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization. Discharge Ratings. and Diagnosis

ROBERT L. KAHN. Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK. Ph.D..
AND

MAX FINK. M.D.
GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of General Psychiatry
December 1959, Vol. I, pp. 565—574
Copyright 1959, by American Medical Association

Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings, and Diagnosis
ROBERT L. KAHN,

Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK, Ph.D., and MAX FINK, M.D., Glen Oaks, N.Y.

The increasing studies of the sociopsy—
chological aspects of psychiatric treatment
in recent years have primarily been concerned with treatment patterns in the community,12 private practice,29 and outpatient
clinics.24'2” In the studies reported by
Hollingshead, Redlich, and their co—work—
ers ”'27 it was found that social class was
a major determinant of the type of psy—
chiatric treatment in the New Haven com—
munity. Patients from the upper classes
were more frequently treated with psycho—
therapy, while somatic or custodial care was
commoner among the lower classes. They
summarized their results by noting: “It was
found that treatment does not depend on
psychological and medical determinants
alone, but on the status position of the pa27
well.”
tient as
Weinstock,29 reporting the
results of a poll of the American Psycho—
analytic Association, observed that the pa—
tients being treated by their members in
private practice came disproportionately
from the better—educated, high-income pop—
ulation.
Similar ﬁndings have been noted in
studies of outpatient facilities. Myers and
Schaffer 2" showed that the higher a per—
son’s social class the more likely he was to
be accepted for psychotherapy, treated by
more highly trained personnel, and treated
intensively over a long period of time. In
another study Rosenthal and Frank 28
Submitted for publication April 16, 1959.
From the Department of Experimental Psychia—
try, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by Grants M-927 and MY-2092,
National Institute of Mental Health, National In~
stitutes of Health, US. Public Health Service.

found almost a linear relationship between
educational level and frequency of referral
for psychotherapy.
A more critical test of the importance
of sociopsychologic factors in relation to
psychiatric treatment would be in a setting
where the same therapeutic techniques and
services were equally available to all patients. This requirement is met at Hillside
Hospital, which is a nonproﬁt institution for
the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable symptoms,” 11 who are
admitted regardless of their ability to pay.
One of the main criteria for accepting pa—
tients is their “ability to participate proﬁt—
ably in psychotherapy.” 11
Individual
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is
regarded as the primary method of treatment, with physiodynamic therapies available when needed. The average length of
hospital stay is seven months, although
some patients stay for more than a year.
In a previous study of the Hillside Hos—
pital population,“ it was shown that the
factors of age, education, place of birth,
and degree of stereotypy, as measured by
the California F Scale,1 were related to the
selection of therapy. Those patients who
were older, had less education, were
foreign-born, and had high scores on the F
Scale were more likely to receive convulsive
therapy. In contrast, patients who were
younger, better—educated, and native—born
and obtained low scores on the F Scale re—
ceived psychotherapy as their sole form of
treatment.
The purpose of the present study was to
determine the relation of sociopsychological
27/565

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

factors to (1) the duration of hospitaliza—
tion, (2) the clinical evaluations at time of
discharge, and (3) the ﬁnal diagnosis.

Population

Method
Population—The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside Hospital on March 7, 1957, was
studied. This consisted of 171 patients, 57 male and
114 female, ranging in age from 16 to 68 years,
with a mean of 35 years.
Procedura—The patients were divided according

to the duration of hospitalization, clinical response
to treatment, and diagnosis. The duration was de—
termined by the number of complete months in the
hospital. The clinical response and the diagnosis
were determined by the medical director at a staff
evaluation conference, usually held just prior to the
patient’s discharge. Each patient was rated as
recovered, much improved, improved, or unim—
proved on the basis of the reports of the therapist,
supervising psychiatrist, and milieu staff. The
discharge diagnoses were divided into four major
groups: involutional psychosis, manic—depressive
psychosis, schizophrenia, and psychoneurosis. These
diagnostic categories included all but three patients
in the population.
Each patient was tested with a lO—item modiﬁcation of the California F Scale.20 The F
Scale is a questionnaire which has been related to
such factors as authoritarianism, acquiescence,
ethnocentrism, and rigidity.1 The subject reads 10
statements and indicates to what extent he agrees
or disagrees with each, i.e., “a little,” “pretty
much,” or “very much.” The score for each item
ranges from 1 to 7, and the total score range is
10 to 70. High scores indicate greater agreement
with the statements. These are extreme, uncritical,
or stereotyped expressions. For example, one state—
ment is this: “If people would talk less and work
more, everybody would be better off.”

1.

Results
Length of Hospitalization—In this

population the duration of hospitalization
ranged from 1 to 16 months, With a median
of 7 months. For the purpose of analysis,
the population was divided into three
groups: 49 patients who were hospitalized
for 1 to 5 months; 64, for 6 to 9 months,
and 58 for 10 or more months.
The relation of sociopsychological factors
to the length of hospitalization is shown in
Table l. The group of patients who were
hospitalized for the shortest period had
28/566

1.—Dnration of Hospitalization: Total

TABLE

Months in
Hospital

No.

to 5
to 9
or more

49
04
58

1

6
10

F Score.
Mean
43.9

Age,

Mean
Yr.
45.5
32.5
27.9

40.1

31.0

Education.
Mean
Yr.

ForeignBorn

10.0
11.9
12.8

41%
19%
10%

x’=l5.0 I
Moan

Mean

Diﬁ'i r-

Diﬁ‘eiences

Differences

13.0

§

1.9

T

§

ences

to 1‘s.
l to 5 vs.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
1

0

lo

10
10

9

3.4

Mean

or
12.9

§

17.6

§

2.8

9.5

§

4.6

*

0.9

or

P&lt;0.05.
t P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

the highest mean F scores, were oldest, and
had the least education and the largest per—
centage of foreign—born. Conversely, the
group in the hospital for 10 months or more
had the lowest F scores, were youngest, and
had the most education and the smallest
percentage of foreign births. Patients who
were hospitalized for an intermediate period
fell in beLween these two groups for each
of the factors.
When the data for those patients who re—
ceived convulsive therapy (Table 2) and
those who received psychotherapy (Table
.3) as their only form of treatment were
analyzed separately, similar relationships
between sociopsychological factors and
length of hospitalization were found within
each group.
In the psychotherapy group there was an
increase in mean years of education with
greater months of hospitalization, but the
differences fail of signiﬁcance. It may be
noted, however, that many of the patients
who were in the hospital for 10 months or
more were under 19 years of age and were
thus unable to achieve more than a limited
number of years of schooling.
These same relationships of sociopsychological factors to length of hospitalization
were found when the patients were classiVol. 1,

Dec, 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE

2.—Dnration of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Convnlswe Therapy

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
No. Mean

to 5
6 to 9
10 or more

15

1

to 5 vs.
1 to 5 vs.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
1

“
T

1
§

17
25

to 9
10 or

6

58.2
45.6
34.9

.

Mean
Yr.
51.7
42.2
32.1

Yr.

Born

6.5
12.3
13.2

67%
24%
16%
x2=12.0 I

Mean
Diﬁer-

ences

ences

ences

12.61

9.5 ‘

5.81

1

of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Psychotherapy Only

Education,
Mean
Foreign-

Mean
Diﬁer-

Months in
_

1

6
10

or

§

19.6

§

*

10.1

t

NO-

t0 5
to 9
or more

33
43

6.7

to 5 (is.
to 5 vs.
more
to 9123.
more

1

*

11-4
11.7
12.4

30%
16%
8%

Mean

to 9
10 or
6

1.6
12,4

10

*

Diﬂ‘er-

Differ—

ences

ences

14.1

*

0.3

18.4

*

1.0

or
10.8

Mean

4.3

0.7

.

.
almost
deﬁnlte,
a
hnear, relat1onsh1p be—
tween the ratings of improvement and these
factors. Patients in the recovered group
had the highest F scores, were oldest, least
educated, and showed the highest incidence
of foreign birth. In contrast, patients in
the unimproved group had the lowest F
scores, were younger, better educated, and
were mostly native—born. Because of the
wide variability within each group, however,
only the factor of age reached a level of
statistical signiﬁcance. Education also sig—
niﬁcantly differentiated the groups when
dichotomized according to those who had
less than eight years of education and those
who had eight years or more. Of the re—
covered patients, 29% had less than eight

IS

TABLE

43-2
29.1
24-8

ForeignBorn

P=0.001.

.

ﬁed according to four major diagnostic
groups (Table 4). For each diagnostic
class, the lowest F scores, youngest mean
ages, most years of education, and least
percentages of foreign—born were characteristic of patients hospitalized for the longest
periods. As a group, patients diagnosed
as schizophrenic were the most homoge—
neous in relation to time in the hospital,
showing major differences only in the F
score, without a consistent trend for the
factors of education or place of birth.
2. Results of Treatment—The relation
of sociopsychological factors to evaluation
on discharge is shown in Table 5. There

40-2
38-6
27-8

Differences

0.9

p&lt;omL

Mean
Yr.

Mean

§

P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
P&lt;0.01.

F Score,
Mean

Education,
Mean
Yr.

26

Mean
Diﬂer-

6

10.7

HOSDltal

Age,

x’=5.4

1

23.3
10

Age,

TABLE 3.——Dui*a_tion

_

_

4.—Duration of Hospitalization in Patients Classiﬁed According to Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
Mean

Mean Yr.

Involutional psychosis ___________________

1-5

58.2
50.9
35.0

58.8
54.5
52.3

9.6
16.0

40.0
46.1
33.1

46.8
39.1
35.5

11.0
11.7
12.3

39%
23%

40.1
36.6
36.1

41.0
27.1
27.1

8.7
12.5
12.5

50%
19%
13%

36.3
38.5
27.6

27.8
27.8
24.1

13.3
12.3
12.9

10%

‘

6—9

10+
Manic-depressive psychosis

..............

1-5
6-9

10+
Psychoneurosis

...........................

1-5
6—9

10+
Schizophrenia

............................

1-5
6—9

10+

Kahn et al.

Age,

Education,
Mean Yr.
7.1

Foreign-Born
57%
43%
0

0

8%
12%

39/ 567

�M
a?

A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

TABLE

Evaluation

...............................
..........................
................................
.............................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved
Unimproved

5.—Discharge Evaluation

No.
17

82
63
9

F Score,
Mean
42.9
39.0
36.1
31.1

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

44.5
35.6
31.2
31.1

10.7
11.2
11.2
13.2

41%
22%
16%
11 %

x 2=6.1

Mean

Differences

Recovered vs. Much Improved
Recovered vs. Improved
Recovered vs. Unimproved

.............................
....................................
.................................
Much Improved 08. Improved
.............................
Much Improved vs. Unimproved
...........................
Improved vs. Unimproved
.................................

3.9
6.8
11.8
2.9
7.9
5.0

Mean
Differences
8.9 *
13.3 I
13.4

4.4
4.5
0.1

*

T

Mean
Diﬂ'erences
0.5
0.5
2.5
0.0
2.0
2.0

' P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
t P&lt;0.01.
1‘

years’ education, while all of the unimproved
patients had more than eight years’ educa—
tion; the much improved and improved pa—
tients were in between. By X2—analysis
these results were signiﬁcant at the 5%
level of conﬁdence.
When the data were analyzed for the
patients treated with convulsive therapy, the
trends noted for the population as a whole
were intensiﬁed (Table 6). Analysis of the
patients who received psychotherapy as
their only form of treatment (Table 7),
however, failed to show any statistically
signiﬁcant pattern. The recovered patients
were oldest and had the highest percentage
of foreign births, but education and F score
did not show any clear trend.
TABLE

3. Diagnosis.~—The relation of sociopsy-

chological factors to diagnosis is shown in
Table 8. Those patients classiﬁed as show—
ing involutional reactions had the highest
F scores, the oldest mean age, the least
years of education, and the highest inci—
dence of foreign birth. In contrast, pa—
tients classiﬁed as schizophrenic had the
lowest F scores, the youngest mean age, the
most years of education, and the least num—
ber of foreign—born. Patients classed in
manic—depressive psychosis and psycho—
neurosis categories were in between with
regard to these social factors.

Comment
The present study has demonstrated that

sociopsychological

factors, in addition to

6.—Discharge Evaluation in Patients Receiving Convnlsive Therapy

Evaluation

N 0.

F Score,
Mean

Recovered _______________________________
Much improved __________________________
Improved and unimproved _______________

8
26
23

53.1
41.8
39.7

Mean
Differences

Recovered vs. much improved ______________________________
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved___________________
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved _____________

11.3
13.4 ‘
2.1

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

51.6
43.8
32.3

9.4
10.6
12.3

Mean

Foreign-Born
50%
35%
17%
x *=3.5

Differences

Mean
Diﬁerences

7.8
19.3 I
11.5 t

1.2
2.9
1.7

*

’ P&lt;0.05.

P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.001.
’r

30/568

Vol. 1,

Dec,

1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE 7.——Discharge

Evaluation in Patients Receiving Psychotherapy Only
F Score,
Mean

N 0.

Evaluation

...............................
..........................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved and unimproved ...............

54

32-6
38.1

39

33.5

9

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

38.2
32.2
31.9

12.3
12.0
12.2

33%
15%
18%

x '= 1.8
Mean
Differences

..............................
...................
.............

Recovered us. much improved
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved

5.5
0.9
4.6

their previously determined importance in
the selection of treatment, are also signiﬁcantly related to the duration of treatment,
the evaluation of the results of treatment,
and the psychiatric diagnosis. If such results were obtained in a survey of private
practitioners, as in the Weinstock report,29
it could be concluded that the limitation of
the number of practitioners and the expense
of treatment served to select preferred persons from the upper social classes who
could afford the treatment in terms of time
and money. The present results, however,
were obtained in an institution where the
various kinds of'treatment were equally
available to all patients and where the ability
to pay was not a factor in the management
of the patient. We postulate, therefore, that
TABLE

Mean
Differences

Mean

Differences

6.0
6.3
0.3

0.3
0.1
0.2

the observed relationships are not due
merely to mechanically selective aspects,
such as income or the prestige status of the
patient. Social factors are important because they are also related to psychological
processes, such as the habitual patterns of
communication, modes of expression, and
symbolic values. We shall attempt to
evaluate these processes and their effect on
the psychiatric relationships studied in
terms of the inﬂuence of sociopsychological
factors on the attitude and behavior of the
therapist, the patient, and the therapist-patient interaction.
Current data both from this laboratory 14
and from others 12'24’27'28 have demon—
strated that psychotherapy is most likely
to be sustained with those persons who most

8,—Diagnosis

Diagnosis

N 0.

F Score,
Mean

Involutional psychosis ___________________
Manic-Depressive psychosis ______________
Psychoneurosis ___________________________
Schizophrenia ____________________________

24
39
37
68

52.3
40.8
36.9
32.8

Age,

Mean Yr.
56.7
41.9
29.4
26.1

Education,
Mean Yr.
8.9

,

11.5
11.9
12.7

Foreign~Born
46%
26%
22%
10%

x’=14.2 I
Mean

Involutional vs. Manic-depressive psychosis
................
Involutional psychosis vs. psychoneurosis __________________
Involutional as. schizophrenia ______________________________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. psychoneurosis _____________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. schizophrenia_______________
Psychoneurosis vs. schizophrenia ___________________________

Mean

Mean

Differences

Differences

Differences

11.5 I
15.4 I
19.5 §

14.8
27.3

§

30.6

§

3.9
8.0
4.1

12.5
15.8
3.1

§

2.0 ‘
3.0 I
4.5 §
0.4
1.6
0.8

T

§

§

P&lt;0.05.
T P&lt;0.02.
1 P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

Kahn et al

31/569

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

closely resemble the therapists with regard
to cultural' background, systems of value,
and communication patterns. With stress at
Hillside Hospital on psychoanalytically
oriented psychotherapy, it is consistent that
those patients who are most like the
therapists with regard to these factors would
be kept in the hospital for the longest
period. This was true for patients receiving
convulsive therapy or psychotherapy and
for all diagnostic groups.
The length of time a patient remains in
a psychiatric facility is related to the par—
ticular function and philosophy of the insti—
tution. In studies of outpatient clinics
which have a psychoanalytic orientation 24,28
it has been observed that persons from the
higher social classes, determined by educa—
tion or income, are treated for a longer
period. In contrast, in state mental hospitals, patients with the least education are
kept longer and form a higher proportion
of the chronically hospitalized groupfi'l'ﬁ23
The state—hospital therapist, viewing the in—
stitution primarily as a custodial facility,12
is evidently oriented toward the more rapid
discharge of those patients who come from
a background most like his own.
The observation of the relation between
sociopsychological factors and improvement
rating, particularly in those patients receiving convulsive therapy, may also be related
to differences in communication patterns
between therapist and patient that result in
referral for convulsive therapy. The
therapist may set different criteria for im—
provement for theolder, less educated pa—
tients than he does for the younger, more
sophisticated ones. In the patient with littl/
education and with modes of expression
different from his own, he may regard, for
example, the manifestation of denial or
minimization of symptoms as improvement.15 But in patients culturally like him—
self, the expression of denial is regarded
as a defensive operation, and the patient is
considered unimproved.
Ratings of improvement are also related
to the base line of premorbid functioning.
32/570

.

Thus, the rating of recovered is deﬁned at
Hillside Hospital as “the reasonable ex—
pectation that the patient will be able to
return to his community and function as
well, or better, than he did before he became
ill.” 11 The therapist’s perception of the
patient’s premorbid functioning may be inﬂuenced by the distance between his value
system and that of the patient’s. The greater
the social distance between therapist and
patient the less rigorous the requirements
for behavioral change may be. For ex—
ample, for older, lower—class patients the
ability to resume work may be the major
criterion of improvement. For bettereducated patients work adjustment may be
one of many criteria, including such intangible aspects of behavior as insight, work
gratiﬁcation, and ease of sociability. The
patient’s expectancy not only of the type
of psychiatric treatment but of improvement is also dependent upon social back—

ground.12

While the same trends were shown in the
psychotherapy patients, the results did not
reach the level of statistical signiﬁcance.
This may have been due to the greater
homogeneity of these patients for the
factors studied, in contrast to the convul—
sive group. The outpatient study by
Rosenthal and Frank 28 also failed to ﬁnd a
relation between social factors and improve—
ment rating in the patients who received
psychotherapy. This observation, also,
was obtained in a population that was more
homogeneous after the initial admission
selection process and after the spontaneous
screening effected by the patient’s willing—
ness to attend treatment after he had been
accepted.

The marked relationship between socio—
psychological factors and diagnosis is not
surprising. Certainly, the relationship of
age and diagnosis is an established concept
in clinical psychiatry. In the involutional
disorders and in dementia precox the names
themselves have a chronological connota—
tion. Landis and Page,19 in 1938, stated that
age was the “most important single deter—
Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

.

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

mining factor that we can know about men—
tal disease.” They asserted that, given the
age distribution of a group of patients, they
could accurately predict the number in each
diagnostic group, as well as the probable
outcome with respect to recovery and the
length of hospital residence. More recently,
Frumkin,8 reporting the median ages of ﬁrst
admissions to a mental hospital in Ohio,
observed data similar to our own with re—
gard to the ages for the various diagnostic
groups.
In the .present study, however, we have
also shown that education, place of birth,
and F score signiﬁcantly differentiate the
major diagnostic groups in the hospital. In
View of these ﬁndings, we have postulated
that a psychiatric diagnosis is not just a
one—to—one reﬂection of a speciﬁc type of
behavior pattern but is also a value judgment in terms of social interaction. Thus,
both in our own studies and in the work of
12
it has been noted that patients
others
with similar symptoms will receive different
diagnoses, depending on their social background.
An additional hypothesis relating socio~
psychologic factors to diagnosis may be
based on the concept that persons from dif—
ferent social backgrounds acquire different
habitual modes of adaptation, communica—
tion, and expression. Accordingly, under
conditions of stress, altered brain function,
or states associated with the onset of mental
illness, a person will show those behavior
patterns or symptoms which are similar to
his habitual patterns. Thus, persons from a
lower-class social background are more apt
to communicate in nonverbal, physical
terms, while upper—class people are more
likely to do so in ideational and verbal
modes. Thus, anger may be expressed by
lower—class people by physical violence,
while persons from the upper classes are
more likely to resort to exhortation or argu—
ment.
Opler and Singer,25 studying schizo—
phrenic Irish and Italian patients in a
Veteran’s facility, found signiﬁcant difKahn et al.

ferences in the types of symptoms related
to cultural differences in the family backgrounds. Patients from Irish families in
which the active expression of emotions
were frowned upon and who had dominant,
overprotective mothers, were passive, compliant, and withdrawn, and were fearful of
anything which might separate them from
the protection of the hospital. Patients with
Italian family backgrounds that encouraged
free expression of emotion and who were
ruled by a dominant father, showed as—
saultive and destructive behavior, were difﬁ—
cult to manage, and were rebellious against
authority.
In a comparable study, Miller and Swan22 noted
that hospitalized schizophrenic
son
patients exhibited signiﬁcant social—class
difference in symptomatology. Lower-class
patients showed a predominance of “motoric themes,” while middle—class patients
exhibited “conceptual or r u m i n a t i v e
themes.”
Hollingshead and Redlich12 found a
marked difference in the type of neuroses
shown by persons from different social
classes. While hysterical reactions were
found predominantly at the lowest social
levels, obsessive—compulsive patterns were
characteristic of the upper classes. They
felt thatthe lower—class patient expresses
his neurosis by acting out, whereas the
upper—class neurotic shows his symptoms
in ideational dissatisfaction with himself.
According to our hypothesis, then, we
should expect that persons from lower
social levels would show symptoms that are
nonverbal, and are expressed predominantly
in sensory or motor patterns. Among such
types of symptoms Would be psychomotor
retardation, anorexia, catatonic stupor,
muteness, hysterical blindness, and paral—
ysis. In this connection it is noteworthy
that both hysteria and manic—depressive
psychosis have been reported on the wane
in the general populatio-n.2v4'8'10 This de—
crease, in our view, is related to the general
increase in educational level of the country
as a whole. One cannot, of course, ascribe
33/571

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

the decrease in hysteria to a greater freedom
in sexual matters; hysteria is commonest in
more poorly educated people, who are least
26 has
Rees
inhibited sexually.”6
reported
that those British soldiers who had hysterical symptoms in World War II were mainly
the mental defectives. He noted that
hysterical symptoms were related to intelli—
7
indi—
has
education.
and
Freyhan
gence
cated not only that the present clinical
patterns of hysteria are different from those
shown at the turn of the century but that
such schizophrenic manifestations as “cataleptic stupors, stereotypical motor peculiar—
ities, grandiose excitement, and violent
behavior” are difﬁcult to ﬁnd today. These
observations suggest that a sociopsycho—
logical framework can lead to the prediction
of future patterns of mental illness.
In our investigations of persons with de—
pressive psychoses, we have frequently
noted a pattern of premorbid behavior characterized by lack of imagination, creativity,
and introspective capacity, and by conven—
tionality and general rigidity.13 Similar
patterns have been reported by other
authors.3'5""21 We believe that a deprived
cultural background, such as that involving
little or no education, with the early years
spent in an illiterate environment with
meager cultural resources, is conducive to
the development of such a personality pat—
tern. When mentally disordered, such per—
sons react with the repertoire of behavior
patterns that we term “depression.”
It is important to keep in mind that while
the relationship between social factors and
the psychiatric aspects described is probably
applicable as a general principle, the speciﬁc
ﬁndings may vary in different settings or
institutions. For example, Hollingshead and
Redlich12 found that schizophrenia was a
diagnosis proportionately commoner among
the lower than among the upper classes,
while at Hillside Hospital the schizophrenic
patients had the highest education. This
discrepancy may be related to differences
in composition of the two populations, the
Hillside patients being drawn largely from
34/572

the middle-class groups, with relatively few
from the upper or lower social classes. In
Hillside Hospital the diagnosis of schizo—
phrenia may indicate an “interesting” pa—
tient, while in a state hospital population the
same diagnosis may represent a patient who
is “hopeless.”
From the perspectives developed in this
report, observations which are commonly
explained in motivational and “dynamic”
terms may also be understood in other
ways. Thus, some situations where a pa—
tient is said to be “hostile” or “resisting
psychotherapy” may reﬂect a problem in
communication between patient and ther—
apist, related to their differences in social
background.
It also is apparent that the social back—
ground of the majority of the mentally ill
paients is such as to make the current prac—
tice of universally employing a verbal, in—
sightful-oriented therapeutic approach a
difﬁcult, if not inappropriate, procedure.
The answer to the problem of how to treat
the vast number of mentally ill may be
not to train more and more psychother—
apists, but, rather, to develop therapeutic
techniques more suitable to the patient’s
own systems of value and communication.

Summary and Conclusions
Signiﬁcant relationships were found

be—

tween sociopsychological factors and dura—
tion of hospitalization, discharge evaluation,
and diagnosis in a voluntary mental hos—
pital.
Patients hospitalized for the shortest
period were oldest, had the least education,
were most likely to have been foreign—born,
and had the highest scores on the California
F Scale. Younger, native—born, more edu—
cated, and lower F—score patients were hos—
pitalized the longest.
The same relationship of these factors
to length of hospitalization was found
when analyses were made according to type
of treatment (convulsive therapy or psycho—
therapy) and diagnosis.
Discharge evaluations of improvement
were signiﬁcantly related to age, the older
'

.

Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

patients having the more favorable ratings.
Analysis of the data by type of treatment
demonstrated that patients rated as recovered or much improved after convulsive
therapy had the highest F scores, the least
education, and were most likely to be
foreign-born.
Diagnoses of schizophrenia or psychoneurosis were associated with lower F
scores, younger ages, more education, and
native birth. The older, less educated,
foreign—born, high-F-score patients were
most frequently classiﬁed under involutional or manic—depressive psychosis.
It is postulated that these relationships
reﬂect the inﬂuence of social background on
psychological processes, such as the habitual
patterns of communication, modes of expression, and symbolic values. These not
only contribute to the pattern of mental ill—
ness but affect all aspects of the patient—
therapist interaction.
Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263d St. (Dr. Fink).

REFERENCES
Adorno, T. W.; Frenkel-Brunswik, E.;
Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.: The
Authoritarian Personality, New York, Harper &amp;
Brothers, 1950.
2. Arieti, S.: The Decline of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis: Its Signiﬁcance in the Light of Dynamic and Social Psychiatry, paper read at 113th
Annual Meeting of American Psychiatric Association, Chicago, 1957.
3. Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 76 :617-618,
1.

1956.
4. Chodoff,

P.: A Re-examination of Some

Aspects of Conversion Hysteria, Psychiatry 17:
75—81, 1954.

Cohen, M. B.; Baker, R; Cohen, R. A.;
Fromm—Reichmann, F., and Weigert, E.: An Intensive Study of 12 Cases of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiatry 17:103-137, 1954.
S.

H. W., and Meltzer, B. N.:
Predicting Length of Hospitalization of Mental
Patients, Am. J. Sociol. 52:123—131, 1946.
7. Freyhan, F. A.: The Impact of Somatic
Therapies on Course and Clinical Proﬁle of the
Schizophrenias, J. Clin. &amp; Exper. Psychopath. 19:
6.

Dunham,

195-201, 1958.

Frumkin, R. M.: Occupation and Major
Mental Disorders, in Mental Health and Mental
8.

Kahn et al.

Disorder, prepared by a committee of the Society
for Study of Social Problems, edited by A. M.
Rose, New York, W. W. Norton &amp; Company,

Inc., 1955, pp.

136—160.

Hamilton, D. M., and Mann, W. A.: The
Hospital Treatment of Involutional Psychoses, in
Depression, Proceeding 42d Annual Meeting of
American Psychopathological Association, edited
by P. H. Hoch and J. Zubin, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952, pp. 199—209.
10. Harvey, W. A.: Changing Syndrome and
Culture: Recent Studies in Comparative Psychiatry,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat. 2:165—171, 1956.
11. Hillside Hospital: Twenty-Ninth Annual Report, 1956.
12. Hollingshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C.:
Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community
Study, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
13. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, J. Neuropsychiatry, to be published.
14. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
9.

216-228, 1957.

Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
Psychopathology of Communication, Proceedings
of 46th Annual Meeting of American Psychopathological Association, edited by P. H. Hoch and
J. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1958.
16. Kinsey, A. C.; Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin,
C. 13.: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,
Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company, 1948.
17. Kramer, M.; Goldstein, 11.; Israel, R. H.,
and Johnson, N. A.: A Historical Study of the
Disposition of First Admissions to a State Mental
Hospital, Public Health Monograph No. 32,
Government Printing Ofﬁce, 1955.
18. Kramer, K.; Pollack, E. S., and Redick,
R. W.; Studies of Incidence and Prevalence of
Hospitalized Mental Disorders in the United
States: Current Status and Future Goals, paper
read at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American
Psychopathological Association, New York, 1959.
19. Landis, C., and Page, J. D.: Modern
Society and Mental Disease, New York, Farrar &amp;
Rinehart, Inc., 1938.
20. Gallagher, E. B.; Levinson, D. J., and
Erlich, I.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics
of Patients and Their Relevance for Psychiatric
Treatment, in The Patient and the Mental Hospital, edited by M. Greenblatt, D. J. Levinson, and
R. H. Williams, Chicago, Free Press, 1957.
21. Malamud, W.; Sands, S. L., and Malamud,
I.: The Involutional Psychoses: A Socio—Psychiatric Study, Psychosom. Med. 3:410—426, 1941.
22. Miller, D. R., and Swanson, G.: Defense
Against Conﬂict and Social Background, paper
15.

35/573

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

read as part of a symposium at the meeting of the
American Psychological Association, September,

Disorder, New York, Milbank Memorial Fund,

1953.
23.

A.; Redlich, F. C., and
Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric

Morgan, N. C., and Johnson, N. A.: Failures
in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient. Am.
J. Psychiat. 113 :824-830, 1957.
24. Myers, J. K., and Schaffer, L.: Social
Stratiﬁcation and Psychiatric Practice: A Study
of an Out-Patient Clinic, Am. Sociol. Rev. 19:
307-310, 1954.

25. Opler, M. K., and Singer, J.

L.: Ethnic

in Behavior and Psychopathology,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat 2:11-22, 1956.
26. Rees, J. R.: in discussion on paper by
Gruenberg, E. M., in Epidemiology of Mental
Differences

36/574

1950, pp. 51—52.
27. Robinson,

H.

Treatment, Am. J.

Orthopsychiat.

24:307—316,

1954.
28. Rosenthal, D., and

Frank, J. D.: The Fate
of Psychiatric Clinic Outpatients Assigned to
Psychotherapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 127 :330343, 1958.
29. Weinstock, H. 1.:

Report of the Central
Fact—Gathering Committee of the American
Psychoanalytic Association, paper read at the 48th
Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathological Association, New York, 1958.

Prénted and Published in the United States of America

��J. Hillside Hospital, 6:

216-228, 1957.

SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF
THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY MENTAL
HOSPITAL1
ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,2 MAX POLLACK, PH.D.,3
and MAX FINK, M.D.4

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between
social class and psychiatric disorder with respect to type and incidence of mental illness (3, 5, 6, l3, l4), selection and maintenance of
treatment (2, 6, 15), and therapeutic outcome (10). The present
study is concerned with social factors in the selection of therapy in

voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich, and their coworkers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of New Haven was divided
into ﬁve social classes on the basis of weighted criteria of education,
occupation and place of residence. Of the residents who were under
psychiatric care, those from the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while organic treatment or
custodial care was more common among the lower classes. Of the
psychotherapies, psychoanalysis was entirely restricted to the two
upper groups. Social class was the predominant determinant of the
type of treatment selected even when the diagnosis was held constant. They summarize their results as follows: ". . . it is found that
treatment does not depend on psychological and medical determinants alone, but on the status position of the patient as well.
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high
a

1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, U. 8.
Public Health Service.
2Senior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Hillside Hospital.
3Scnior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital.
4 Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
‘

216

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

217

‘

degree to the upper social levels. The data of this study would seem
to indicate that most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where
the background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist" (15).
It is possible to relate the results obtained from these community studies to such selective factors as the patient’s ﬁnancial resources or the extent and type of treatment facilities available. A
more critical test of the importance of social factors affecting choice
of treatment would be in a setting where the same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients.
This requirement is met at Hillside Hospital. It is a nonproﬁt,

k,

h

.

....-_.._...-.,...v.....

nonsectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable mental symptoms" (4), who are admitted regardless of their ability to pay. One of the main criteria for accepting patients is their “ability to participate proﬁtably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is regarded as the primary method of treatment with organic therapies
available when needed. The average length of hospital stay is six
months, although some patients remain for as long as a year.
The present investigation is an outgrowth of several years of
study of electroshock therapy. In previous work it has been shown
that certain aspects of personality were signiﬁcantly related to patient selection and therapeutic efﬁcacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether
electroshock patients differ from those receiving other forms of
treatment in, regard to cultural background, including such factors
as education and place of birth, and personality as measured by the
California F scale (1); secondly, whether these factors were also
related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.

mum

METHOD

Population: The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside
Hospital as of March 7, 1957 was studied. This constituted a total
of 172 patients, ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a mean of 34.6,
and including 58 men and 114 women.
Procedure: (1) The population was subdivided into three groups,
according to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy,
(b) insulin coma therapy, and (c) psychotherapy only.‘5
5All patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during ’hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data were included
in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

....

“.4.

na.

._‘....-..—._4.,_....—««...

.

gbnyw.

C)

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

218
(2)

birth.

The groups were compared for age, education and place of

(3) All patients were tested6 with a ten-item modiﬁcation of the
California F scale suggested by Levinson (9). The F scale is a questionnaire (see Appendix) which has been related to such factors as
authoritarianism, acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
The patient reads ten statements and indicates whether he agrees
or disagrees with each statement and to what extent. The score given
for each item ranges from one to seven and the total score range is
10 to 70. The greater the agreement the higher the score obtained.
The statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

(4) The population was subdivided in regard to utilization of
certain adjunctive services in the hospital. Among such services
available are group activities, occupational therapy, psychological
testing and creative therapy. The latter is a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a series of controlled painting procedures
which are considered to be analogies of life experience (18). Psychological testing and creative therapy were selected for this study because both require a speciﬁc referral from the therapist.
RESULTS

The data were analyzed as follows: (1) comparison of the treatment groups for age, education, F scale scores, and place of birth;
(2) comparison where diagnosis is held constant; (3) signiﬁcance of
length of hospitalization prior to treatment; and (4) comparison
between groups referred for adjunctive hospital services.
Comparison of Treatment Groups
For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard
deviations for the F scale scores, age and years of schooling are
presented in Table l. The EST group had higher F scores, was
older and had fewer years of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These differences were statistically
signiﬁcant for F score and age but failed to reach statistical signiﬁcance for education. The failure of years of education to differentiate the groups was due, in part, to the fact that the electroshock
1.

6As part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F
In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on March 7 their pretreatment scores were used in the statistical comparison
since it had been found that EST signiﬁcantly affects the score during treatment.
scale prior to treatment.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.850

:wmuuom

Eon

$5“

82m
39.7114?

$.32

o

ammokoh

we

219

55

..ﬁ.:namo

cwMuSh

.ummmﬁuom

omen”.—

ﬁamr:

$.85“

$83

:25
.PEaZ

x0
3::
3::

Eom

$.8va

$532

ﬁvawm

55m

mo

.minamo

82m

-ﬁmuuoh

Eon

@EE

$3“

ﬁmmIv

$.32

Agar:

:otugﬁm

985

.me

.3—

$.8va

now

.«o

0

.Ssnamo

.Eeum
988w

ﬂ
”55H.

K

$5; ax?

3?:

Gm

3. ea

mm

532

2: 2:

qﬁ

wzoﬁom

‘8.“

$336

6m

mow—mo?

“2253‘;

a
532

.59

...23

3

2,

N.—

o
o

.
~23»me

«I

m5.—

Gm

q:

3

2;.

n:

gm

3”

a

:32.
.8.”

mi

ed

3

ow&lt;

x0

532

:82

a5

n:

a
a

tantamwﬁcc

Gm

92

”.2

a:

mi.

3»

3m

.

:2.»

tmhd

£5
E2 BE

3::

38mm

532

:82

.En

3:

3

hm

any

.3.

8.

So.

a

an

3

38%?2.85:»; Esscma
.o&amp;u&gt;m&amp;.::=n=—

aozéemﬁ

335-5“

585-98—

-OH—U
smvhmm

$5.19

r7305

.53.:

uh

.382:

.

..

2..

�220

KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

group contained many foreign-born patients whose education was
difﬁcult to evaluate accurately. When treatment groups were subdivided into number of patients above and below eight years of
education, the difference was signiﬁcant at the .01 level. The insulin and psychotherapy groups did not differ statistically for any
of these factors.

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign-born
patients than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group
being highest of all. Among the foreign-born patients, those who
came from Eastern European countries received somatic therapy
predominantly, while the majority of those from Western Europe
received psychotherapy alone.
Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis
The diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable to those reported in previous studies of the hospital popution (12). Of the 172 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as
psychotic depression, 32 as psychoneurosis and 2 with other diagnoses. As expected, a larger proportion of the depressed patients
(52%) received electroshock than did those with other diagnoses.
To control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of treatment, the
psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those who received electroshock and those who were given psychotherapy alone.
The results are shown in Table 2.
While the two groups were comparable for age and education,
the electroshock patients had a much higher mean F score, a difference signiﬁcant at the .02 level of conﬁdence. It is also demonstrated
that a signiﬁcantly higher proportion of the electroshock patients
were born in Eastern Europe.

2.

Comparison of Electroshock Patients According to Length of
Hospitalization Prior to Treatment
While the electroshock patients, as a group, have been shown to
differ from those receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there were still
considerable intragroup differences. To account for some of these
differences it was postulated that the same factors involved in selection of treatment were also related to the readiness with which a
given patient was referred for electroshock. While most of the patients who received EST were placed on treatment less than three
months after admission, about 40 per cent were referred after a
period of three to twelve months. In Table 3 the patients are compared according to the period of hospitalization prior to electro3.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.550

$.23.

ax”:

5.3m

538mm
jigli‘l

EuEEEh

we

“Egan

$53”

«Rana—

.Sauamu

REE

Kc
.0332 50m

§$§

$53“

EOENN

§£Vmw

awash

208
39$me

a;

How

no
con—8.6m

938»
name
Bwamwunﬁ

exam;

15.3.

Gm

3.

3

532

3:

3:

Gm

wﬁ

n2

:32

3:.

9:.

Ga

3:

«.2

h :32

new

q:

wzogum

0:3

N
.vm

38C.
somnuﬁﬁum

we
mama?

:32

.

86

£5

85

utoﬁbﬁ

5.3»

a

mud

ow&lt;
582

a3

and

3:»..qu

kc

.

é.“

38m

:ontﬁwEoU

:32

ea

BE
3m

8.

«liq.

a
$6

.
‘
.

:3

Hammama
.oﬁrmémm

-onuwnm

ha.

,

.

2!!!!)

..

,

‘

W

7

832:

.

,1"

w

322:

,

221

�KAHN—POLLACK—FIN K

222

.,
.550

@va

c

o
sin

uo

.£6

.
33mg

583m uncuzm

$53

m

o

$53

ﬁgs:

a

:

Mano

cum—m
2.25355

-0322 50m

3

@932

3.2%
308

$.83
$5me

:

mm

new

“o
:otuggxwmom

QUE

:oumusvm

wweﬂamo

“26&gt;

w
Aﬁwua

32::

c

3015

kc
m
Ewnud

45

55H.

S

a

85

:2

85

£5

a:

8....

a;

9

:4

:3.”

3»

:82 .En

E...“

2.2

N:

ms:

a

8;

:3.“

5*

3...

Gm

5..

am

3..

38&gt; 582

am

hi

3.;

Gm

3:

mﬁ

2:

532

93

mg

Gm

q:

582

2:.

mo
can:

mEEouuV

Szuzcm

8..

uw&lt;

:3

Sam

\0

.

m3

38m

zowtuiEeU

h
mo

as

3

.88

him
-mNSSEmo:

52:

Susannah.

sum—SA

€3.88...

no:

4 w.

$04

,w

‘

8

e5

$6
kwoa

:2:

o

m

532

c:

m
Gan—u

.85
0.82

c

33

o2

2.2

e

2

»

.22

me.

8.

aa

-608

.88

~22

m
Ema—u

30..—

288

:2:

308

.85.

3

n

285:? 385:”;

52:

o

308

88¢

.

2.
.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

223

Shock. Patients who had higher F scores and were older were treated
earlier than the younger and lower F scale groups. Place of birth is
also a signiﬁcant factor. \Vhile 44 per cent of those treated within
three months were foreign-born, all patients referred after a period
of six months were born in the U. S. The data on education just
fails of signiﬁcance, although 28 per cent of those treated earlier
had less than eight years of education.

.,,.

,,

.

mug-r;

Adjunctive Hospital Services
Comparison of the patients referred for creative therapy and
psychological testing is shown in Table 4. It is clear that those referred for either of these procedures had Signiﬁcantly lower F scores,
were younger in age, had more education and more were nativeborn than patients who were not referred for these services.

4. Use of

DISCUSSION

..

"155'

.

,

The results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of
birth, and F scale score were signiﬁcantly related to the type of
therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive services‘ in this
hospital. Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for those patients who were younger, better educated, native-born and had lower
F scores. Such patients were also referred more frequently for the
auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores, were
older, poorly educated and foreign-born, particularly in Eastern
Europe, were most likely to be referred for EST. These patients
were infrequently referred for psychological tests or for creative
therapy. Furthermore, these relationships were still signiﬁcant when
diagnosis was held constant.
These observations are compatible with those of Hollingshead,
Redlich, and their co-workers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15) who demonstrated that
social factors are related to the type of therapy received in a community. The present study demonstrates that such factors are also
signiﬁcant in a hospital setting where ability to pay is not a criterion
of therapeutic selection and where all forms of therapy are equally
available to the entire population.
With ﬁnancial aspects and the availability of therapeutic facilities eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the
selection of treatment, two alternative interpretations maybe considered. The social factors may relate directly to the empirically
established criteria for choice of therapy. On this basis a patient is

'

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

224

.850

ﬁn“;

$me

Amwutch

35:30

533mm

«@055

A03:

Aﬁmwvmw

H

1%:

35:2

@33

@3:

@8va

§§8

.mwmuamo

«50

853

.25“

«:8

$63

.23

2:5

go

ARE;

50m

aways

$95:

$.38

138%

Z

MFGSK.

805

1%»

3w

.uo

H

~838va
PﬁmSaﬁbﬁ

.Nmenamu

mud“;

«Eu

3?:

$.27:

33“ $.32

Gm

ﬂ.

3

a.»

38&gt; 582

3:

2:

3“ N:

mic—om

kc

v
8.938%

.Um

35?

we

8.“

:82

a

octhd

£5

QN

m5

3

,

uptuzzbuv.

.

.Sx

2:

we

a:

E:

532

SN

3».

5.8

5.3

Gm

2:

”.2

a: 2:

3w

5.3

3»

ASV

32v

Gm

.tnowJ.

....ewm

"A:

S.

vw&lt;
Vutﬁwm

:8:

.

2:».zum

Kc

a5

tooomd

:8.”
~22

3,2

no.

8.

38m

h

582
532

£5
Nﬁu

«.3.

2

:32

so.

a3a

:oﬂuEwEoU

st

333.5

3380
u&gt;tmuu0

332:.

REEF

oz

285:?“

285:»;

..H..U
.._oau&gt;mm

.355
38.“.

Saucmcmmm

.355

Amaze...

oz

uhu

OZ

0z

.

.3

2.

�,amr»:

.

“

‘

..

SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

225

,

..

new...

4..

,wu

referred for electroshock because he is older, poorly educated or
foreign-born, clinical experience having shown that such persons
respond best to this type of treatment. This explanation is inadequate since half the patients with psychotic depression received
psychotherapy alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice for this illness.
An alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to
choice of treatment because they also affect certain psychological
patterns of behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy,
such as mode of communication. Thus, a patient is not referred for
electroshock because he is foreign-born or poorly educated, but
rather these factors provide the difference in cultural background
between patient and therapist which makes successful communication less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship. Robinson et al.
(15), in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that
psychotherapy is most likely to take place where the cultural background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist. Conversely,
patient-therapist differences in systems of value and communication
may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic relationship. In the
present study, similarly, the patients who received psychotherapy
alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors

studied.7

.

Apart from the problem of patient-therapist differences, certain
patterns of communication exhibited by the patient may be intrinsically incompatible with the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have shown that
verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy and use of cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8). Such
language patterns appear to be more frequent in persons with
poorer sociocultural backgrounds.
Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect on communication patterns, may also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler (11) has noted that, among patients diagnosed as
schizophrenic, differences in symptoms are related to differences in
cultural background. Frank et a1. (2), studying psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose symptoms were expressed in
somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those,
who remained had ideational symptoms. In a study of personality
7 The 18 therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and
a mean age of 33.9. Sixteen
per cent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education was over

20.

,
.vr"

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

226

factors‘in electroshock patients (8) we have noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and communication were more likely to be
associated with the development of a depressive psychosis. The relationship between communication pattern and symptoms indicates
that symptoms themselves are a mode of communication.
The F scale furnishes a quantiﬁable index of attitude and communication patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a
mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers
were less receptive to entering a psychotherapeutic relationship and
were more likely to receive electroshock. Tougas (17), using an
etlmocentric scale similar to the F scale, found that psychotherapy
was more effective in patients with low scores. In the present study
the F scale was the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment groups.
These results have clinical as well as theoretical signiﬁcance.
Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that lowscorers on the F scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that
those with high F scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone.
Another clinical application may be in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient. This may be done by
minimizing their social differences, by matching them more closely
for age and place of birth. Of possible greater importance is the
necessity for developing new modes of communication when treating
patients who are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic ap1

proaches.

While epidemiological studies have clearly structured some of the
problems involved in selection of treatment,‘and have indicated
the direction of further. study, it still remains for more processoriented research to provide deﬁnitive answers.
SUMMARY

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which all forms of
therapy were equally available, education, age, place of birth, and
score on the California F scale were signiﬁcantly related to the type
of therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive hospital
1.

servrces.

’

Patients who were older, poorly educated, had higher F scores
and were foreign-born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most
likely to be referred for electroshock. Psychotherapy was the treat2.

�.

.
p

*Wﬂg
g

“A

4““
..

)WA-W.~»‘,.I_~HWW‘W«

"r
.t.

SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

227

ment of choice for those patients who most closely resembled the
therapist in these aspects.
3. These relationships were present even when diagnosis 'was
held constant.
4. Among the electroshock patients the same factors found to be
signiﬁcant in choice of therapy were also related to the readiness
With which a patient was referred for electroshock.
5. It is postulated that treatment selection is the result of the
communicative interaction between patient and therapist. Social
factors may be important in so far as they are related to different
modes of communication.
APPENDIX

“Wadwﬂ

a

F SCALE FORM

.

Below are a number of statements. For each statement we want
you to give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree. Answer each statement according to one of the following:
I AGREE A LITTLE
I AGREE PRETTY MUCH
I AGREE VERY MUCH

3),."

glue»:

‘.

1. No sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation.
2. Science has its place, but there are many important things
that must always be beyond human understanding.
3. If people would talk less and work more, everybody would be

better off.
4. When a person has a problem or worry, it is best for him not
think
about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.
to
5. What the youth needs most is strict discipline, rugged determination, and the will to work and ﬁght for family and country.
6. Nowadays when so many different kinds of people mix together so much, a person has to protect himself especially carefully
against catching an infection or disease from them.
7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse.
8. The best teacher or boss is the one who tells us exactly what
is to be done and how to go about it.
9. Young people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow
up they ought to get over them and settle down.‘
.

\4

I DISAGREE A LITTLE
I DISAGREE PRETTY MUCH
I DISAGREE VERY MUCH

�\‘
KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

228

People can be divided into two distinct classes: the weak
the
and
strong.
10.

REFERENCES
(1)
(2)

(3)
(4)
(5)
(5)

(7)

Adorno, T. W.; Frenkcl-Brunswik, E.; Levinson, D. J. 8c Sanford, R. N.:
The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper 8.: Brothers, 1950.
Frank, J. D.; Gliedman, L. H.; Imber, S. D.; Nash, E. H. 8: Stone, A. R.:
Why Patients Leave Psychotherapy. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (9' Psychiat., 77:

283-299, 1957.
Freedman, L. Z. 8: Hollingshead, A. B.; Neurosis and Social Class. Am. J.
Psychiat., 113:769-775, 1957.
Hillside Hospital: 29th Annual Report, 1956.
Hollingshead, A. B. 8: Redlich, F. C.; Schizophrenia and Social Structure.
Am. ]. Psychiat., 1102695-701, 1954.
Hollingshead, A. B. Fe Redlich, F. C.: Social Class and Psychiatric Disorders.
In: Interrelations Between the Social Environment and Psychiatric Disorders. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, pp. 195-208, 1954.
Kalm, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy.
In: Psychopathology of Communication, ed. P. Hoch 8: J. Zubin. New York:

Grune 8: Stratton, 1957.
Kahn, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to
Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neural. (in press).
(9) Levinson, D. J.: Personal Communication.
(10) Morgan, N. C. 8.: Johnson, N. A.: Failures in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:824-830, 1957.
(11) Opler, M. R.: Schizophrenia and Culture. Scientiﬁc American, 197:103-110,
-

(8)

1957.

Rachlin, H. L.; Goldman, G. S.; Gurvitz, M.; Lurie, A. 8: Rachlin, L.:
Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from Hillside Hospital in 1950.
This Journal, 5:17-40, 1956.
(13) Rcdlich, F. C.; Hollingshcad, A. B.; Roberts, B. H.; Robinson, H. A.:
Freedman, L. Z. 8c Meyers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Disorders.
Am. ]. Psychiat., [09:729-734, 1953.
(14) Rennie, T. A. C.; Srolc, L.; Opler, M. K. 8: Langner, T. 8.: Urban Life and
Mental Health. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:831-837, 1957.
(15) Robinson, H. A.: Redlich, F. C. 8: Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Treatment. Am. ]. Orthopsychiat., 24:307-316, 1954.
(15) Titus, H. E. 8c Hollander, E. P.: The California F Scale in Psychological
Research: 1950-1955. Psychol. Bull., 54:47-64, 1957.
(17) Tougas, R. R.: Ethnocentrism as a Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy. In:
Psychotherapy and Personality Change, ed. C. R. Rogers 8: R. F. Dymond.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 196-214, 1954.
(13) Zierer, E. 8: Zierer, E.: Structure and Therapeutic Utilization of Creative
Activity. Am. ]. Psychother., 10:481-519. 1956.
(12)

.

�Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy
in a Voluntary Mantal Hospital

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Max Fink, M.D.

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Aided by Grant M-927 of the National
Health Service.
10-8-57

Institute of mental Health,

U.S. Public

N.Y¢

�Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between social

class

and

psychiatric disorder with respect to type

illness (3, 5, 6,
and

therapeutic

and incidence of mental

selection and.maintenance of treatment (2, 6, 15),

13, 1h),

outcome (10).

The

present study is concerned with social

factors in the selection of therapy in.a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich and

(3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of

classes

on the

of residence.

New Haven was

their co-workers

divided into five social

basis of weighted criteria of education, occupation
Of

the residents

who

were under

and place

psychiatric care, those

from

the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while
organic treatment or custodial care
Of

was more common among

the psychotherapies, psychoanalysis

groups.

Social class

selected even
as follows:

when
"

was

was

held constant.

They summarize

is found that treatment does not

and medical determinants alone, but on the

well.

entirely restricted to the

two upper

the predominant determinant of the type of treatment

the diagnosis

..... it

was

the lower classes.

their results

depend on psychological

status position of the patient as

Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high degree

to the upper social levels.

The

data of this study would

most psychotherapy takes place in a

setting

seem

to indicate that

where the background of the

patient

is similar to that of the therapist" (15).

It is

possible to relate the results obtained from these

community

studies to such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the

�extent

and type of treatment

facilities available.

A

more

critical test of the

importance of social factors affecting choice of treatment would be in a setting
where the same

therapeutic techniques

This requirement

is

met

and services are

available to

all patients.

at Hillside HoSpital. It is a non-profit,

sectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with "early
curable mental symptoms" (h),
pay.

of the main

One

who

non—

and

are admitted regardless of their ability to

criteria for accepting patients is their "ability to

participate profitably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy

available

is regarded as the primary

when needed.

The average

method of treatment with organic

therapies

length of hospital stay is six months, al-

though some patients remain for as long as a year.
The

present investigation is

of electroshock therapy.

an outgrowth of several years of study

In previous work

it

has been shown

that certain

aspects of personality were significantly related to patient selection and

therapeutic efficacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose

patients differ

of the present study

was

to determine whether electroshock

from those receiving other forms of treatment in regard

cultural background, including_such factors as education
and

personality as measured

by the

California

F

and place of

to

birth,

scale (1); secondly, whether

these factors were also related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.

�Mame:
Population:
as of March 7,

16

entire in-patient adult population of Hillside Hospital

studied.

1957 was

ranging in age from

llh

The

This constituted a

to 68 with a

mean

total of

172

of 3h.6, and including

patients,

58 men and

women.

Procedure:

1) The

population

was

subdivided into three groups according

to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy, (b) insulin

coma

therapy,

and (c) psychotherapy only. *

2) The groups were compared for age, education and place

of birth.
3)

of the California

naire (see

F

All patients

were

tested

scale suggested by Levinson (9).

Appendix) which has been

indicates whether

tent.

The

scale

is a question-

The

patient reads ten statements

he agrees or disagrees with each statement and

to

what ex-

score given for each item ranges from one to seven and the total

score range is

tained.

The F

related to such factors as authoritarianism,

acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
and

** with a ten-item modification

The

10

to 70.

The

greater the agreement the higher the score

obs

statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this
management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data was
included in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

* All

part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F scale
prior to treatment. In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on march 7th their pre-treatment scores were used in the statistical comparison since it had been found that EST significantly affects the score during

** As

treatment.

�- h h) The population was subdivided in regard to

of certain adjunctive services in the hospital.

Among

such services available

are group

activities, occupational therapy, psychological testing

therapy.

The

latter is

and

be analogies

life experience (18). Psychological testing and creative therapy

selected for this study because both require a specific referral

therapist.

creative

a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a

series of controlled painting procedures which are considered to
of

utilization

were

from the

�RESULTS:

data

The

was analyzed

as follows:

1) comparison of the treatment

groups for age, education, F scale scores and place of
where diagnosis

is held constant,

prior to treatment,

birth, 2) comparison

significance of length of hospitalization

3)

and h) comparison between groups

referred for adjunctive

hospital services.
I.

Comparison of Treatment Groups:

For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard devia—

tions for the
Table

I.

F

scale scores, age and years of schooling are presented in

The EST group had

higher

F

scores,

was

older and had fewer years

of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups.

differences
reach

were

statistically significant for

statistical significance for education.

cation to differentiate the groups
electroshock group contained

many

was due,

F

These

score and age but failed to

The

failure of years of edu-

in part, to the fact that the

foreign born patients whose education

was

difficult to evaluate accurately.

When

number of

eight years of education, the difference

was

patients

above and below

significant at the .01 level.

not differ

statistically for

The

treatment groups were subdivided into

insulin

any of these

and psychotherapy groups did

factors.

�***

**

ﬁg

*

$3qu

dumumww

33mg.
menwmwowOa

mmwnwOu

macaw

mmeanmcpwn

Humcﬁuamov

Hamcwwuawmwoan

mnmunHnmUd

md

.oow

mumbwwwomsw

309

mwmuwwwomud

ma

ma

.OH

.ow

38

w.w

ma

Hw.o

83..

Emma

wrm

ﬂaw

ES.

Emma

w
macaw

Hm&lt;ww

ooavaHmOd

Hm&lt;mw

Hm&lt;mw

.mm

whw
w.ww**

ﬁrm

a

5:0.

55

mu

ow
.msa

mb

H:.&lt;

9%.

saws

wma

35

5....“

Emma

pmm
wawmumba

P.4m
r.mm**+

d

m.w

92..

EL

mu

Fm

:78

Pmmiiw.»

H.H

w.:m

fmm
m.wo**x

a
xm"

Emma

“Po

Wm

5L

Pm

Emma

8.0m

ammum

aummwﬁmuw

0%

Fe

mu
mm.
mwocvm

:

2%

m

prbw
wow

wwwos

ESE

Ems

.70.?

pom

E.

m

xmmum

w

m

ow

macaw.

on

Hmeé

ma.

8%

Gm§

pmm.
Scam

5

xv."
53$

macomdwou
moumumb

wwmom

moan

Si:
.39.
mm

3

Gwé

8&amp;3

m

5

mﬁow‘ngmamoé

ow
mum

wwwau

wows

xmu

zwdH&lt;m

wwmom

ow
moan.
mcwoww
wowmums

3%

mﬁooé

mwmnm

333
mmma.

Pd:

wuwﬁw

5

o

ow

m
wonmumu

Smﬁ

3%

wean

woumumu

Carma

wwwdw

H

�f 7

'

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign born patients

than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group being highest of
Among

the foreign born patients, those

who came

all.

countries

from Eastern European

received somatic therapy predominantly, while the majority of those from Western
Europe received psychotherapy alone.

II.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis:
The

diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable

to those reported in previous studies of the heapital population (12).
172
32

patients,

as psychoneurosis and two with other diagnoses.

with other diagnoses.

To

(52%)

As

expected, a larger pro-

received electroshock than did those

control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of

treatment, the psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those
received electroshock and those
shown

who

were given psychotherapy alone.

.02

The

who

results

in Table II.
While the two groups were comparable

shock

the

78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as psychotic depression,

portion of the depressed patients

are

Of

patients

for

age and education, the

electro-

had a much higher mean F score, a

difference significant at the

It is also

that a significantly higher

level of confidence.

demonstrated

proportion of the electroshock patients were born in Eastern Europe.

�*

mug
$0.33
mmHImeoUOI

wﬁduogmumg

$5

mHmUManmﬁw

$8

ma

.Om
ooswmuwmom

Hm&lt;mw

9mm

waw.

Emma

5.0

8Q

Emma

w

ow

mnoum

m}?

9mm

a
maﬁa.

5.:

2mmb

ab

5.m

55

Sh

”5.:

mu

mmdwmmdm

Emma

audr

mmm

0.8

0.8

9%

a
cwmw.

ma
wmwaUOdwo

Emma

a

8.0

Hob

9m

fr

Emma
MmmHm

ow
unmammmwos

prﬁm

mu
Waco.

xm
u

:

w

2:3

3&amp;3

HH

:30
waves
«mmum

m

H.mu

mmomu&lt;ma

0%

m

mm

0H

8253

@050.

25%

Uumwmnmua

Beam

vamm

xm
u

mm

pm

Smé

383

wowu

wwmom

#.0w

*

0%

zmaw&lt;m

w

pm

Hammaamsa

mcwovm
mmmdmun

30,3

ow

3me
wwudw

p

H

3&amp;3

GE

oawmw

�- 9 -

III.

Comparison of Electroshock

Patients According to Length of Hospitalization

Prior to Treatment:
While the electroshock
from those

receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there

intra-group differences.

postulated that the

same

To account

While most of the

less than three

months

for

some

have been shown
were

patients

who

received

after admission, about

EST

h0%

was

to differ

considerable

of these differences

patient

which a given

of three to twelve months. In Table

it

was

were also

referred for electro—

were placed on treatment

were

referred after a period

III the patients are

to the period of hospitalization prior to electroshock.
F

still

factors involved in selection of treatment

related to the readiness with
shock.

patients, as a group,

compared according

Patients

who

had higher

scores and were older were treated earlier than the younger and lower

groups.

Place of birth is also a significant factor.

within three months were foreign born,

six

months were born

cance, although

28%

in the

U.S.

The

While hh% of those

all patients referred after
data

education just

on

F

fails

scale

treated

a period of
of

signifi-

of those treated earlier had less than eight years of

edu—

cation.
IV.

Use of Adjunctive

Hospital Services:

Comparison of the

logical testing is

shown

patients referred for creative therapy

in Table

IV.

It is

of these procedures had significantly lower

clear that those referred for either
F

more education and more were native born than

for these services.

and psycho-

scores, were younger in age, had

patients

who were

not referred

�**

*

w
Beam

Bowm

bmmm

ﬁo

m
Em:

«was

dams

mumuwwwomba

m

3

w

Hmmm

308m

m

ma

mw

w

0

gem.

Bow.

Bow.

80m.

o

n

ma

Hm&lt;mw

mHMou
bmmmaw

do

38.

ow

w
$8

38.

awwmdamua

momvwdmwwumawon

32

“Hwy
.OH

5%

arms

wsmu

u
Bow.

3

m

dumb

38.

80m.
mwmbHWHomUd

w

.Om

Hm&lt;mw
ooswmwwmos

m.4m

3.5

95

Emma

UH%H.

ww.m

5.4

SL

Ewan

w
ow
macaw

Ema

H.Mm

H4.w

d

Fm

tro

ww.m

Sam

mme

mu

m.mm**.wm.5

mu}

$.4H

Tme

UMWﬁ.

wo.H

.zmmu

mmwwmbam

bmm

v.5

H.mw

d

Ho.w

Hm.“

53

mu
&gt;ooowawum

wamxwmbu

v.8

H.mw

UHHH.

Kama

Hm.m

ﬂ;

mb

Emma

Mmmwm

ao

mocnmawou

o.wm

PS

0.3

ebwﬁw

om

d

m.o

Pm

“.4

mb

u

Ho
Hammaw

HHH

N

m

H

H

0

m

ow
waves

323

333

m

:.mm

ammwm

manomdwoa

HP

AHOO$V

m

mw

60ch

SR3

momvwdmwwnmawou

m

ow

on

Baum

wHHow

xm

PH

n
AHOO$V

a

Hm

393

3&amp;3

wows

do

zmdw&lt;m

wwmom

m.wm*

Hammdams¢

w

o

383

0

0

pm

ow
mcuowm
mmmdmus

395

wwuwu

m
R§

oawmu

u

�zo
***

**

*

ac

n.e.

zo
593.

wanWOH.u

-

oummdw&lt;m

ammﬂm

wmwauou.
mammaw&lt;m

zo
mwmuwwwnmbﬁ

mHmuwanmbd

owocwm

mumswwwombd

Awmv

o.e.

Sea
gamumww

mw

2.:

m» ma

oosvaumOb
ewmuquawomv

Amqv

.ow .Om

ow
.OOH‘Hmamu

wm&lt;mw

wm&lt;mw

m.w

up.»

uwww.

Emma

:H.:

w:

:w.4

mm.“

Saws

w

wmdeUdm

mooam

Hm.w

a

w.wm*4

arm

Hm.w

po.m

mu
wmwmwuma

m.wm***po.w

cwww.

Emma

w&amp;.4

we;

Wm.m

mm.a

Emma

4.0
bmm

%

m.mm**.w.o

Hw.:

a

5.»

Hm.m

5.»

Ho.a

wow

Ho.p

mu

:.mo**wm.w
&gt;aucundwdo

ﬁuww

smmu

Hp.m

rw.m

Emma

wmmwm

wacnmdwou

H.4w
m.&lt;***

&amp;

m.wm

ow

E

p.»

w.“

Bbmbm

mu
mmH&lt;Hnmm

H&lt;

N»
u

Hm

prwv

m

33

mm

ww

p

mmwot

ow

u
Awmﬁv

Am$v

m

«mmdm

m.mw*
macomduon

r.mm*

mw

d

mm

Am4$v

3.33

Ammﬁv

mm

m

ow

mmRnwowomwoww

0%

Amway
Beam

ammﬁwmm

xm

4H

mp

u

N»

Q:

my
moan
zmdu&lt;m

u
Aqmav

8%

A4H$V

“mpgv

mum
wwmnm

m.wm*

m.mm*

Hm

v

mw

H

ow
mcuowm

owmmaw&lt;m

mmmdmwu

prﬁv

Q:

“MN$V

Amﬁv
wwudw

m

m

m

m

Amﬁv

:3:

Amﬁv

Ammv

akumnm

OdWmH

�-12..
DISCUSSION:

results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of birth

The

and F scale score were

significantly related to the type of therapy received

and

to the utilization of adjunctive services in this hospital.

Psychotherapy was

the treatment of choice for those patients

better educated,

native born and had lower

F

scores.

Such

were younger,

who

patients

were

also referred

more

frequently for the auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing
creative therapy. Conversely, those patients
were

older, poorly educated
likely to

were most

be

and foreign born,

referred for

EST.

who

and

had higher F scale scores,

particularly in Eastern Europe,

These

patients

were

infrequently

referred for psychological tests or for creative therapy. Furthermore, these
relationships

were

still

significant

when

diagnosis

was

held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of Hollingshead, Redlich
and

their

co—workers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15) who demonstrated

related to the type of therapy received in a

community.

The

present study

that such factors are also significant in a hospital setting

demonstrates

ability to

that social factors are

is not a criteria of therapeutic selection

pay

and where

all

where

forms

of therapy are equally available to the entire population.
With

financial aspects

and the

availability of therapeutic facilities

eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the selection
of treatment,

factors

may

of therapy.

two

alternative interpretations

may be

considered.

The

social

relate directly to the empirically established criteria for choice
On

this basis a patient is referred for electroshock because

older, poorly educated or foreign born, clinical experience having

shown

he

that

is

�- 13 such persons respond best to
adequate since

this type of treatment. This explanation is in-

half the patients with psychotic depression received psychotherapy

alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice

for this illness.
An

alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to

choice of treatment because they also affect certain psychological patterns of
behavior fundamental to conventional

cation.

Thus, a

modes

of therapy, such as

mode

of

communi-

patient is not referred for electroshock because he is foreign

born or poorly educated, but

rather, these factors provide the difference in

cultural background between patient

and

therapist

which makes successful communi»

cation less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship.

Robinson 33

Ei'

(15)

in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that psychotherapy is
most

likely to take place

where the

cultural background of the patient is similar

to that of the therapist. Conversely, patient-therapist differences in systems
of value and communication may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic

tionship. In the present study, similarly, the patients

who

rela—

received psycho-

therapy alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors studied.*
Apart from the problem of

patient-therapist differences, certain patterns

of communication exhibited by the patient may be

intrinsically incompatible with

the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations

haVe

therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9.
Sixteen percent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education

* The 18

was over 20.

�-11).shown

that verbally

and use of

uncommunicative persons, prone

to denial, evasion, stereotypy

cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8).

patterns appear to

be more frequent in persons with poorer

Such language

socio-cultural back-

grounds.

Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect

cation patterns,

that,

has noted

may
among

on communi-

also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler

(11)

patients diagnosed as schizophrenic, differences in

symptoms

are related to differences in cultural background. Frank 33 a}. (2), studying
psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose

symptoms were

expressed

in somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those
mained had
shock

ideational

patients (8)

we

symptoms.

symptoms

likely to

The

indicates that
The F

In a study of personality factors in electro~

hare noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and

communication were more

depressive psychosis.

re~

who

be associated with the development of a

relationship between communication pattern

symptoms themselves

are a

mode

and

of communication.

scale furnishes a quantifiable index of attitude and communication

patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a mental hospital
lation, Levinson (9) found that high—scorers

were

popuu

less receptive to entering a

psychotherapeutic relationship and were more likely to receive electroshock.
Tougas (17), using an

ethocentric scale similar to the

F

scale, found that

psychotherapy was more effective in patients with low scores.

study the

F

scale

was

In the present

the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment

groups.
These

results have clinical as well as theoretical significance.

�Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that low—scorers
the

scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that those with high

F

on
F

scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone. Another clinical application
may be

in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient.

This may be done by minimizing

closely for

age and place of

necessity for developing

their social differences, by matching

birth.

new modes

Of

them more

possible greater importance is the

of communication

when

treating patients

who

are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic approaches.*
While epidemiological

studies have clearly structured

some

of the

problems involved in selection of treatment, and have indicated the direction

of further study,

it still

remains for more process-oriented research to provide

definitive answers.

* See

Esecover's presentation of this topic in this issue.

�_

16 -

SUMMARY:

1.

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection

of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which

all

forms of therapy were

equally available, education, age, place of birth and score
F

on

the California

scale were significantly related to the type of therapy received and to the

utilization of adjunctive hospital services.
2.

who

were

older, poorly educated, had higher

F

scores

foreign born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most likely to

and were

be

Patients

referred for electroshock.

those patients

who

most

Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for

closely resembled the therapist in these aspects.
were present even when diagnosis was held

3.

These

relationships

h.

Among

the electroshock patients the

constant.

significant in choice of therapy
which a

patient
S.

was

were

factors found to

be

also related to the readiness with

referred for electroshock.

It is postulated that

treatment selection is the result of the

communicative interaction between patient and
be important

same

therapist. Social factors

may

insofar as they are related to different modes of communication.

�m

17 -

REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford, R.N.

(1950):
&amp;

The

Authoritarian Personality,

New

York: Harper

Brothers.

Frank, J.D., Gliedman, L.H., Imber, S.D., Nash, E.H. and Stone, A.R.
(1957):

Why

Neurol.

&amp;

Patients

Leave Psychotherapy, A.M.A. Arch.

Psychiat., 11:

283—299.

Neurosis and Social Class,

Freedman, L.Z. and Rollin gsheadﬁﬁ. (1957):
Am.

J. Psychiat.,

Hillside Hospital, 29th

113: 769-775.

Annual Report, 1956.

Schizophrenia and Social

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Structure,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

110: 695-701.

Social Class and Psychiatric

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Disorders, in Interrelations Between the Social Environment
and

Psychiatric Disorders,

New

York:

Milbank Memorial Fund,

pp. 195-208.
Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

Therapy.
Zubin,

M.

(1957):

Changes

in

Language During Electroshock

In Psychopathology of Communication (Hoch, P. and

J. Eds.),

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.:

New

York: Grune

&amp;

Stratton.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol., in press.
Levinson, D.J.:
10.

Personal Communication.

Morgan, N.C. and Johnson, N.A. (1957):

Chronic Hospital Patient,

Am.

Failures in Psychiatry:
J. Psychiat.,

The

113: Sen-830.

�_

18

_

REFERENCES

11.

Schizophrenia and Culture, Scientific American,

Opler, M.K. (1957):

£91: 103» 110.
12.

Rachlin, H.L., Goldman, G.S., Gurvitz, M., Lurie,
(1956):

J. Hillside Hospital, 2:

1950,

and

Psychiatric Disorders,

Am.

Social Structure

J. Psychiat.,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

109: 729-73h.

Titus,

Psychiatric Treatment,

Am.

H.E. and Hollander, E.P. (1957):

Urban

113: 831—837.

Robinson, H.A., Redlich, F.C. and Myers, J.K. (l95h):
and

16.

l7—h0.

Rennie, T.A.C., Srole, L., Opler, M.K. and Langner, T.S. (1957):

Life and Mental Health,
15.

L.

Redlich, F.C., Hollingshead, A.B., Roberts, B.H., Robinson, H.A.,
Freedman, L.Z. and Meyers, K.J. (1953):

1h.

Rachlin,

Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from

Hillside Hospital in
13.

A. and

Social Structure

J. Orthopsychiat., g3: 307-316.
The

California

F Scale

in

Psychological Research: 1950-1955, Psychol. Bull., 53: h7-6h.
17.

Tougas, R.R. (195%):

Ethnocentrism as a Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy,

In Psychotherapy and Personality Change, 0.3. Rogers and R.F.
Dymond,

16,

Zierer,

E. and

eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. l96-21h.

Zierer,

E. (l956):

of Creative Activity,

Am.

Structure and Therapeutic Utilization

J. Psychotherapy, lg: h81-519.

�-

19 -

APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM

Below are a number of statements.

For each statement

we

give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree.

want you to

Answer each

statement according to one of the following:

I

AGREE A

I
I

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY

LITTLE

1.

No

MUCH

MUCH

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a

close friend or relation.
2.

Science has

its place,

but there are

many

important things that

must always be beyond human understanding.

3.

If

people would

talk less

and work more, everybody would be

better off.
h.

think about
5.

ation,

an

it,

a person has a problem or worry,

it

is best for

him not to

but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

What

and the

6.
much, a

When

the youth needs most is

will to

work and

strict discipline,

fight for family

Nowadays when so many

rugged determin-

and country.

different kinds of people

mix

together

so

person has to protect himself especially carefully against catching

infection or disease
7.

from them.

Sex crimes, such as rape and

mere imprisonment; such criminals ought

to

attack
be

on

children, deserve

more than

publicly whipped, or worse.

�”"1
‘

-20..
8.

is to

The

best teacher or boss is the

be done and how

9.

to

go about

10.

the strong.

tells

us exactly what

it.

Young people sometimes

up they ought to get over them and

one who

get rebellious ideas, but as they

settle

grow

down.

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak and

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2524">
                <text>Social factors in selection of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. J Hillside Hosp., 6: 216-228, 1957.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2525">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2526">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-25-030</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2527">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2528">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2529">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2530">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2531">
                <text>4 items. 1: [Preprint]. 2: Reprint from the A. M. A. Archives of General Psychiatry December 1959, Vol. I, pp. 565—574; title: Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital. 3: Xerox of J. Hillside Hospital publication. 4: Another [preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2532">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2533">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74455">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81016">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87577">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94138">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="254" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="45">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/a0dd669fe6ef80d3f920fa82ad004579.pdf</src>
        <authentication>922f3407ada0d1bf7f975f2fcd3d0f5a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100671">
                    <text>From

the Journal of the Hillside

Vol. VI October, 1957.

I1oslojfoait,

ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
OF SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL
CUTANEOUS STIMULI1
HYMAN KORIN, PH.D.2

and

MAX FINK, M.D.3

In the course of extensive investigations (1, 2, 3) into the perception of multiple simultaneous stimuli, the pattern of failure of
subjects accurately to report one of two stimuli led to a concept of
an “order of dominance” in cutaneous perception. Since then, the
relationship of the observed pattern of dominance to biologic and
psychiatric concepts of body image and body scheme has been the
subject of considerable speculation (4, 7, 8, 14).
The interrelationship of body areas was initially clearly demonstrated in simultaneous tactile tests of face and hand (2), in which it
was noted that the stimuli to the hand were frequently not reported
or mislocalized. These phenomena of “extinction” and “displacement” led to the inference that cheek area stimuli were “dominant”
to hand stimuli. In subsequent reports (3, 10, ll, 12) a
pattern of
dominance for tactile stimuli was described in which the face and
the primary genital areas were the most perceptive or dominant
areas; the hand was the least dominant; and the shoulder, foot,
buttock, breast, back, thigh and abdomen fell between these extremes in a mild gradient. These observations were made in normal
adults and children and psychiatric patients, but were most clearly
discerned in patients with brain disease. Indeed, the major portion
of the data relates to a group of patients with severe diffuse brain
dysfunction under observation in a general psychiatric hospital.
1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M—927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service.
2Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside

Hospital.
3 Director,
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
241

�242

KORIN—FINK

unclear. In a review of the
problem (3) consideration was given to hypotheses ascribing signiﬁcance to anatomic, psychophysical, genetic, environmental and neurophysiologic factors. In their conclusions, Bender, Green and Fink
of
the
organization
“no
explains
that
adequately
theory
one
note
this pattern. Learning and maturation are probably factors, but it
brain
with
of
studies
In
inherent.”
be
patients
to
mostly
appears
disease and normal young children, Cohn (4, 5) emphasized the
rostral order of dominance and ascribed signiﬁcance to “an ontogenetic or phylogenetic thalamic residue in the sensory organization
of the human brain.” He also noted speciﬁcally that this pattern
was primarily associated with “the over-all sentient function of
the brain.”
A more extensive elaboration of a maturational and developmental explanation of the order of dominance has been proposed
(14). Taking the infantile patterns of sucking and feeding as a
model, Linn ascribes dominance to the face as it is the oldest element
in the body image; the dominant role of the genital area to the intensity of pleasurable sensation that the infant elicits from masturbation; and the subordinate position of the hand to its role as an
second
holds
it
wherein
and
appendage
tension-relieving
exploring
place in awareness to its stimulation of the more exciting mouth
and genitalia.
A neurophysiologic view was advanced by Critchley (6, 7), who,
after expressing a preference for the term “tactile inattention” instead of “extinction,” emphasized the rostral order of dominance.
He stated that “strong stimulation of the healthy side suppresses
the attenuated sensations on the impaired side,” and concluded
that “tactile inattention in parietal patients is probably no more
than an instance of local neglect or disregard, which may be demonstrated at times in many other spheres of consciousness besides the
tactile—whether motor, visual or spatial.”
A psychophysical explanation was eschewed by Bender, Fink and
Green (3, 10, 11), who found no relation between the order of
dominance and the tactile threshold for touch or pin prick. DennyBrown, Meyer and Horenstein (8), however, insisted that these patloss
of
alteration
there
when
or
was
an
only
terns were
apparent
the
that
demonstrated
exfurther
discrimination.
They
two-point
tinction of the hand stimulus by a stimulus to the leg could be
cheek
the
of
dominance
hand.
The
the
stimuli
four
to
overcome by
the
stimuli
altered
to
be
ten
by
however,
could
hand
the
not,
to
hand in their subject.

The basis for these phenomena

is”

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

243

The following data further emphasize psychophysical factors in
perception under the conditions of multiple simultaneous stimulation. These studies represent the initial report of an investigation
into the application of simultaneous tactile stimulation tests to the
problem of measurement of the alteration in brain function induced by electroshock therapy. In the course of this study electrical
stimuli were applied to the cheek and hand of psychiatric patients.
Stimuli were either at threshold or suprathreshold levels.
Two aspects of the data are presented: (a) the effect of alteration
of relative strength of stimulus in the order of dominance on facehand tests; and (b) relation of perceptual thresholds to the order of
dominance.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

The subjects were thirty-four consecutive psychiatric patients
referred for electroshock therapy. The range of their ages was between 21 and 65 and the mean age was 45. Eleven patients were
diagnosed as involutional melancholia, thirteen as manic-depressive,
depressed, eight as schizophrenia, and two as psychoneurosis mixed
type. All testing was done prior to a course of electroshock therapy
and no patient had clinical or EEG evidence of altered brain function. Each patient was tested in one session for the purposes of this
report.
Two model S-4B Grass square wave stimulators were synchronized to deliver either single or two simultaneous electrical stimuli.
An isolation unit was connected to each stimulator to eliminate
artifacts and the output was monitored visually by an oscilloscope.
A switch box inserted in the circuit permitted independent selection
of the various body parts. An active and an indifferent electrode,
required for each body part, were small 3%; inch steel discs placed
1 inch
apart and secured with tape. Bentonite electrode paste (Medcraft) was rubbed into the skin of each area before the electrodes
were applied. The electrodes remained affixed to the selected body
parts throughout the period of testing.
The patient was placed on a couch in a relaxed and supine position. To alleviate undue anxiety the nature of the testing was described. It was emphasized that only a slight tap-like sensation
would be felt. The electrodes were then placed on (I) the dorsum
of the hands, (2) the mandibular area of both cheeks, and (3) the
medial calf area of the legs.
In the testing procedure, thresholds for the various body parts
were ﬁrst determined. At a frequency of .3 cycles /second, and a pulse

�244

KORIN—FINK

duration of 50 milliseconds, the voltage was increased in uniform
time increments of .67 seconds (2 pulses) monitored from the oscilloscope, until the subject perceived 100 per cent of the stimuli. Increments of 5 volts were applied to the hand and increments of 1 volt
to the cheeks. After a ten-second interval, the voltage was decreased
until sensation disappeared. Following another ten-second interval,
the voltage was gradually increased by 1 volt each six seconds until
the patient again reported 100 per cent of the stimuli. This reading
was considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold

sensation.
Such stimuli, at threshold and 10 per cent above the threshold,
are reported by the subjects as a “tap,” a “prick” or a “sting.” Complaints of painful perception were not elicited at these levels of
stimulation.
After the thresholds were determined, testing with a series of
single and double simultaneous stimuli followed. The body parts
tested were the right hand and left cheek (heterologous stimulation)
and the right cheek and left cheek (homologous stimulation). Both
parts were stimulated simultaneously, or one part singly, in a mixed
order for ten trials for each of the following conditions: (1) threshold, (2) suprathreshold (10 per cent above the threshold), (3) one
body part at suprathreshold and the other at threshold, and (4) the
reverse of (3). The order of presentation of conditions (1) and (2)
was alternated for different subjects and the same was done for
conditions (3) and (4). Similarly the order of presentation of the
heterologous and homologous stimulation was alternated.
Single stimuli were introduced as a control. Failure to report
the single stimulus indicated that the threshold had changed. When
this change occurred, stimulation was increased until a new threshold was determined and ten trials were started anew.
RESULTS

Threshold Values
The threshold stimulation for perception was determined for
the hands, cheeks and legs (Table I). The threshold values for the
hands and legs are three to four times higher than the thresholds
for the cheeks. While the threshold values in the legs are less than
in the hands, these differences lack statistical signiﬁcance. Variability of the threshold is considerably greater in the hands and legs
than in the cheeks. There is virtually no overlapping of thresholds,
however, Where the cheeks and the hands are concerned.
A.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

245

I
Mean Thresholds and Standard Deviations of Body Parts
TABLE

Mean
Thresholds (volts)
Standard
Deviation

Right

Cheek

Left
Cheek

Right
Hand

Left
Hand

Right

Leg

Left
Leg

6.76

7.85

29.25

22.35

24.50

19.52

4.47

4.86

14.88

13.60

13.99

13.64

Extinction Patterns
The difference between the number of extinctions of the right
hand or the left cheek on stimulation of both parts with either
threshold or suprathreshold stimuli was not signiﬁcant (Table II).
Also, when both cheeks were stimulated with either threshold or
suprathreshold stimuli, there were no differences in the number of
extinctions in each cheek (Table III).
In contrast to these observations, stimulating one body part with
a suprathreshold stimulus and the other at threshold resulted in a
signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the body part stimulated
at threshold. Thus the cheek was dominant over the hand, or the
hand was dominant over the cheek depending on the body part to
which the stronger stimulus was applied (Table II). Altering the
relative strength of the stimuli applied to the cheeks resulted in a
similar predictable change in the pattern of dominance (Table III).
Further analysis of the data in Table II indicates that the hand
B.

TABLE

II

Mean Extinctions of Cheek and Hand for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation
Mean
Mean
Extinctions Extinctions
of Hand
of Cheek
Hand and Cheek at
Threshold
Hand and Cheek at
Suprathreshold
Hand at Suprathreshold
and Cheek at Threshold
Cheek at Suprathreshold
and Hand at Threshold

Difference Signiﬁcance

1.55

1.56

.01

NS.

1.02

.59

.57

NS.

2.30

.22

2.08

p&lt;.01

.32

1.36

1.04

p&lt;.01

�KORIN—FINK

246

was dominant over the cheek with greater mean frequency (2.08)
than the cheek was dominant over the hand (1.04) for the thresholdsuprathreshold condition. This tendency is also evident when both

parts were simulated at suprathreshold. If it is considered that the
mean threshold for the hands is approximately 30 volts, while for
the cheeks the threshold is 7 volts, the difference in incidence of
extinction may be explained. Suprathreshold stimulation was set
at 10 per cent above the threshold value. The hand stimulus was
TABLE 111

Mean Extinctions of Both Cheeks for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation
Mean
Extinctions
of Left
Cheek

Mean
Extinctions
of Right
Cheek

Difference

Signiﬁcance

Threshold

.39

.45

.06

N.S.

Both Cheeks at
Suprathreshold
Right Cheek at

.18

.37

.19

NS.

.96

.14

.82

p&lt;.05

.03

1.28

1.25

p&lt;.01

Both Cheeks at

Suprathreshold and
Left Cheek at Threshold
Left Cheek at Suprathreshold and Right
Cheek at Threshold

therefore increased by 3 volts and the face stimulus by only 1 volt
above the threshold value. Such an increase, although proportionately equivalent, appears to have given greater relative strength to
the hand stimulus.

Extinction
Regardless of pattern, the mean total of the number of extinctions was greater when heterologous body parts were stimulated at
threshold than when these parts were stimulated with suprathreshold stimuli (Table IV). For these same conditions of stimulation the
dilferences between the mean number of extinctions obtained on
homologous stimulation of the cheeks lack statistical signiﬁcance,
but the results are in the direction which indicate that a greater
number of extinctions occur when two body parts are stimulated
at threshold (Table IV). The failure to obtain a signiﬁcant difference in the latter instance is partly due to the fact that relatively few
C. Incidence of

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
TABLE

247

IV

Mean of Combined Number of Extinctions For Varying Conditions
of Threshold and Suprathreshold“ Stimuli

Both Parts at Both Parts at A-Suprathreshold A-Threshold
Threshold Suprathreshold B-Threshold
B-Suprathreshold
A-Cheek

B-Hand

3.11

1.63

1.68

2.43

.85

.56

1.31

1.10

A-Left Cheek

B-Right Cheek
*

Differences between the mean number of extinctions at threshold and the
other three conditions of stimulation are signiﬁcant for the cheek and hand but
are insigniﬁcant for both cheeks.

extinctions are elicited when homologous parts are stimulated.
These ﬁndings on the total number of extinctions are in agreement
with previous observations (2).
DISCUSSION

The pattern of extinction followingelectrical stimulation of the
skin with threshold and suprathreshold stimuli has been determined.
In contrast to the ﬁndings of investigators (3) who used clinical
(tactile) stimulation, the face stimuli were not reported more frequently than the hand stimuli. Under the conditions of the method
of testing in this investigation, nevertheless, it is clear that the
pattern of extinction for any two body parts can be readily altered
by varying the relative strength of the stimuli. Thus a suprathreshold stimulus applied to the hand tends to obscure a threshold stimulus applied to the cheek and when these stimulus intensities are
reversed, the cheek tends to obscure the hand.
Theories which hold that dominance of the cheek over the hand,
in Simultaneous tactile testing, is due to an inherent factor, perceived body image, rostral dominance, developmental principle or a
learned factor, are not supported by these observations under our
conditions of testing. If any of these factors were involved, a pattern
of face dominance should have been elicited when the hand and
cheeks were stimulated with equivalent electrical stimuli at threshold and suprathreshold intensities, despite the methodological dif-

�248

KORIN—FINK

ference introduced by the procedure of afﬁxing electrodes to the
skin.
The ﬁndings in this study, namely that differences in the strength
of the simultaneous stimuli can alter the pattern of extinction, supin
differences
inference,
By
hypothesis.
stimulus-intensity
a
ports
threshold also play a signiﬁcant role.
That an intense stimulus elsewhere can raise the pain threshold
and
Wolf
demonstrated
been
has
by
Hardy,
35
much
cent
as
as
per
Goodell (13). This effect of a relatively intense stimulus on the
threshold of another stimulus has also been found by investigators
how
however,
still
remains,
The
stimuli
9).
problem
(8,
other
using
it is that a pattern of dominance may be elicited when presumably
stimuli.
touch
stimuli
by
are
applied
equivalent
The results of this study suggest an explanation. Stimuli of
for
sensation
threshold
elicit
a
to
intensities
are required
differing
various body parts. When these stimuli are increased 10 per cent,
the resultant stimuli are proportional and are perceived as equivastimuli
the
two
body
in
parts,
touching
clinically
lent. In contrast,
are disproportionate relative to the threshold value although apthe
of
Because
their
in
of
application.
intensity
equal
proximately
differences in threshold for the hand and cheek, the tactile stimulus
the
than
threshold
the
above
is
more
cheek
the
proportionately
to
stimulus to the hand. Thus the cheek is perceived more frequently
than the hand stimulus and has been considered “dominant.”
A threshold hypothesis was rejected (3) on the basis that the
thresholds obtained by von Frey (16) for pressure and pain do not
double
the
elicited
order
by
dominance
the
to
strictly correspond
simultaneous stimulation tests. Most difﬁcult to reconcile is von
which
the
of
threshold
penis,
glans
the
that
Frey’s ﬁnding
pressure
is second in dominance rank only to the cheek in a group of ten
the
while
millimeter;
111
is
tested,
grams per square
body parts
12
is
is
least
dominant,
only
which
at
the
grams
of
hand,
threshold
per square millimeter.
feand
male
for
the
in
area
thresholds
genital
Unfortunately,
thresholds
of
list
Von
determined.
Frey’s
been
seldom
have
male
(16) is based on a single subject. His more detailed observations (17),
however, indicate that there is virtually no pressure sense in the
and
warmth
of
the
pain,
perception
clitoris,
although
or
penis
glans
cold is well developed. It is quite possible that the punctate presthe
where
touch
with
genital area
correlate
does
threshold
not
sure
is concerned but that instead some other sense or combination of
senses is involved.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

249

Thresholds for the dorsum of the hand and the cheek obtained
by von Frey and other investigators indicate that the cheek is considerably more sensitive than the hand. These ﬁndings are in agreement with the thresholds obtained in this study. In a recent study
of electrical thresholds at various body sites Sigel (15) reported that
“leg areas including thigh and ankle, also dorsum of the hands and
the palm showed a deﬁnite tendency for higher thresholds. Scalp,
temple, forehead and face tended to have lower thresholds. The
anterior chest and upper arm and anterior wrist areas showed a
tendency for lower thresholds. Neck areas, abdomen and upper back
showed no deﬁnite trend.” In this statement there is no disagreement with the clinically observed order of dominance.
From the experimental results obtained here, it is proposed that
the dominance hierarchy elicited under the conditions of simultaneous testing may be explained on the basis of the relative strength
of the stimuli and the stimulus threshold.
SUMMARY

Using square wave electrical stimuli, the threshold for perception in the hands, cheeks and calves were determined in thirtyfour psychiatric patients. Simultaneous stimuli were applied in
random sequence to combinations of cheek and hand and both
cheeks, at threshold, suprathreshold and combinations of threshold
and suprathreshold intensities.
With simultaneous threshold, or simultaneous suprathreshold
stimulation, the differences between the number of extinctions in
either part were not signiﬁcant. With stimuli of unequal intensity
(one stimulus at threshold and one suprathreshold), however, there
was a signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the threshold
stimulus.
The total number of extinctions is greater with threshold than
with suprathreshold stimuli; and greater in heterologous than in
homologous patterns of stimulation.
It is concluded that the observed order of dominance in simultaneous cutaneous tests may be explained by psychophysical relationships.
REFERENCES
(1)

Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception. Springﬁeld,
1952.

(2)

111.:

Charles Thomas,

Bender, M. B.; Fink, M. 8c Green, M. A.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. é» Psychiat., 66:

855-362, 1951.

�KORIN—FINK

250
(3)

Bender, M. B.; Green, M. A. 8c Fink, M.: Patterns of Perceptual Organization
with Simultaneous Stimuli. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (5" Psychiat., 72:233-255,
1954.

(4)

(5)

(5)
(7)
(8)
(9)

(10)
(11)

Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of the Sensory Organization of the Human
Brain: A Study in Rostral Dominance as Determined by Ipsilateral Simultaneous Stimulation. 1. Nero. (5. Ment. Dis., 113:471-484, 1951.
Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of Sensory Organization of the Human Brain:
II—A Study in Rostral Dominance in Children. Neurology, 1:119-122, 1951.
Critchley, M.: The Parietal Lobes. London: Edward Arnold 8c Co., 1953.
Critchley, M.: Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special Reference
to Parietal Lesions. Brain, 72:538-561, 1949.
Denny-Brown, D.; Meyer, J. S. 8c Horenstein, S.: The Signiﬁcance of Perceptual Rivalry Resulting from Parietal Lesion. Brain, 75:433-471, 1952.
Duncker, K.: Some Preliminary Experiments on the Mutual Inﬂuence of
Pains. Psychol. Forseh, 21:311-326, 1937.
Fink, M. Sc Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli in
Normal Children. Neurology, 3:27-34, 1953.
Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8: Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile
Stimuli by Mentally Defective Subjects. ]. Nerv. 63'» Ment. Dis., 117:43-49,
1953.

(12) Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8: Bender, M. B.:

The Face-Hand Test

as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46—58, 1952.
(13) Hardy, J. D.; Wolf, H. S. 8: Goodell, H.: Studies on Pain. A New Method

for Measuring Pain Threshold: Observations on Spatial Summation of Pain.
1. Clin. Invest., 19:649-658, 1940.
(14) Linn, L.: Some Developmental Aspects of the Body Image. Int. ]. Psychoanal., 3621-7, 1955.
(15) Sigel, H.: Cutaneous Sensory Threshold Stimulation with High Frequency
Square-Wave Current: 11. The Relationship of Body Site and Skin Diseases
to the Sensory Threshold. ]. Invest. Derm., 18:447-451, 1952.
(15) von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Physiologic des Schmerzsinns. Ber. Sdchs. Ges.
Wiss., 462185-196, 283-296, 1894.
(17) von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Sinnesphysiologie der Haut. Ber. Siichs. Ges.
Wiss., 47:166-184, 1895.

�JOURNAL of the
HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

VOL.

VI, No. 4

l

.

l

OCTOBER, 1957'

*
.

.

CONTENTS

Papers» from the Department of Experimental Psychiatry
A UNIFIED THEORY: OF THE ACTION‘OF- PHXSIODYNAMIC- THERAPIEs—‘——Max

Fink

-

’

A

19.7

AN OBJECTIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATION .IN‘ PSYCHIATRIC,

INmRyIEws—Jbseph Iaﬂe

207‘

SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF THERAPY IN
TA—RY

MENTAL HOSPITAL—Robert

and Max Fink

L

Kahn, Max Pollack

SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN
TO ELECTRosHOC'x—Martin

A. Green

A VOLUN-

EEG

.216

RESPONSE

229

ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION 0F SIMULTAN'EOUS‘
ELECTRICAL CUTANEOUS STIMULI—Hy‘mqn

Max Fink

Korzn and
"241

‘

NEWS AND NOTES

--

"I

'

'

I

" "

——

——-——————_—.
V

,

,

V

Published quarterly for the Hillside HOspit-al, Glen Oaks,- N. Y., by
7

‘

251

'

THESOCIETY 0F HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
Copyﬁght_1957, The Society

OE

Hillside HOSpital, Inc.

v”

"V

'

�Hillside Hospital is a nonsectarlan, nonproﬁt mental hospital
for the treatment Of voluntary patlents sufferlng from early and
curable mental illne-SS; regardless o'E the1r ability to pay. A special
department for adolescents1's 1ncluded:1n the Hospital program. The
Hospital teaches and trains" phys1c1ans ‘;in‘ psychiatry and psychotherapy, and also prOVidEs graduate training to graduate students1n
psychology, social service and psych1atr1c nursing. Research programs are in progress in psychiatry, med1c1ne and1n the laboratories.
The teaching and training program carefully organized and
integrated with the clinical serv1ces and 1nvolves the participation of
the administrative staff, a staif of superv1sors and the cooperation
of a large psychiatric attendmg staff almost entirely psychoanalyti—
cally trained. In addition to all the usual inpatient adjunctive
therapies, the Hospital condiu‘cts anact’e extramural program
including an aftercare clinic, an outpat1et1c11n1c afﬁliation with
Adelphi College for the tralnmg'of’ psychologists, nurses and social
workers, an organization of formerpatients; lectures to the general
public, and a close afﬁliation with the LongIsland Jewish Hospital.
The Hospital traces itsbegmmngsto orgamzatlonal meetings in
1917 held under the sponsorsh1p of Dr Israel Strauss which led to
the formation of the Committee for Menta 'iI-Iealth among Jews, in
11919. Hillside Hospital was opened anddedlcated in 1927. Its
original location was in Hastings-on-Hudson, mQVing' to its present
location in 1941. It is an aﬂiliate of Federatlon oﬁ Jewish Philanthropies of New York, and has been growmg stead1lyin bed capacity,
the present size being 200 beds.

is

"

'

�JOUBNAL of the
HILLSIDE HGSPITAL
Published as a function of the Publications Committee of the Medical Board.
The Hospital is an agency of The Federation of Jewish Philanthropies
of New York.

VOL.

VI, No. 4

OCTOBER, 1957

Editorial Advisory Board
MORRIS B. BENDER,

M.D.

DUDLEY

SANDOR LORAND,

D. SHOENFELD, M.D.

MD.

Editor
SIDNEY TARACHOW,

MD.

Associate Editors
M.D.
JOSEPH S. A. MILLER, M.D.
ABRAHAM S. LENZNER, M.D.

M. DAVID EPSTEIN, M.D.
SYLVAN KEISER, M.D.

EMANUEL KLEIN,

Distributed by
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227 West 13 Street, New York 11, N. Y.

�Information to Contributors
Manuscripts—Original manuscripts should be sent to Sidney Tarachow, M.D.,
123 East 80 Street, New York 21, N. Y. All parts of the manuscripts should
be typewritten, double-spaced, on one side of bond paper. References
should conform to the style of this Journal.
Reprints—Orders for reprints should be addressed to International Universities
Press, 227 West 13 Street, New York 11, N. Y.

ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION, $3.00, SINGLE ISSUES, $1.00

Editorial communications should be addressed to Sidney Tarachow, M.D., Editor, Journal of the Hillside HosPital, 123 East 80 Street, New York 21, N. Y.
Business communications, remittances, subscriptions and advertising material
should be addressed to the Administrator’s Ofﬁce, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, N. Y.

�EDITORIAL NOTE
The Editors are happy to devote this issue to the work of one
of the Hillside Hospital research departments, the Department of
Experimental Psychiatry. While from time to time the pages of this
Journal have carried reports of the various research activities within
the Hospital, this is the ﬁrst time that an entire issue of the Journal
has been given over to presenting a comprehensive picture of the
activities of a single department. Future issues will carry reports of
our other research activities, in different spheres and carried on with
varying methodologies. In our next issue we expect to present a
large report on the many activities of the in-Hospital and attending
staffs in professional and public education. We turn this issue over
to the Department of Experimental Psychiatry. It is a young department, its workers are searching for scientiﬁc measurable factors in
psychiatry, and hope by their ﬁndings to contribute to the multidisciplinary approach in psychiatry.

195

�PREFACE
The reports in this issue of the Journal are representative of
studies now in progress in the Department of Experimental Psychiatry. The Department was established in September 1954 upon
the initiative of the late Dr. Israel Strauss. The goal of its full-time
research personnel was deﬁned as the study of psychologic and
physiologic aspects of behavior. In establishing the operational,
experimental principles of the Service we have leaned heavily on
our previous experiences with Drs. M. B. Bender and E. A. Weinstein at the Bellevue and Mount Sinai Hospitals of New York.
These studies are supported ﬁnancially by the Board of Direc.
tors of the Society of the Hillside Hospital. In 1954 the United
States Public Health Service, National Institute of Mental Health
established their support of the program, which has continued.
Funds have also been obtained from the Dazian and Kaufmann
Foundations, and recently from the Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry.
The Staff has shown rapid growth, and at the present time
includes:

Martin A. Green, M.D.
Joseph Jaf‘fe, M.D.
Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D. '
Hyman Korin, Ph.D.
Max Pollack, Ph.D.

Assistant in Neurophysiology
Assistant in Psychiatry
Senior Assistant in Psychology
Assistant in Psychology
Senior Assistant in Psychology

——

—-

—
—
—

Technical assistants include Mrs. Hannah Mosquera (EEG), Mrs.
Jean Kolodny (Psycholinguistics) and Mrs. Janet Bowie (Secretary).
During the past year Dr. Harold Esecover, Senior Resident in Psychiatry, has been associated with the Department on a half-time
basis.

October

10, 1957

Max Fink, M.D., Director
Department of Experimental Psychiatry
196

�A UNIFIED THEORY OF THE ACTION OF

PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES1
MAX FINK,

MD.2

The proper role of the physiodynamic therapies (convulsive,

insulin coma and lobotomy) in psychiatry remains poorly deﬁned.
In part, this results from the lack of an adequate formulation of
their mode of action. In the past six years increasing evidence for a
neurophysiologic-adaptive View of electroconvulsive therapy has
been presented (41, 32, 38, 1). This view ascribes the therapeutic
process in electroshock to a persistent alteration in cerebral function
which provides the milieu for a change in adaptation of the subject
to his environment. The type of adaptation evoked is dependent
upon the personality of the subject, the environmental situation,
and the duration of the induced alteration in cerebral function.
Concurrently, an awareness of a similar mode of action in insulin
coma (31) and lobotomy (40) has developed.
During the past four years we have studied the relation between
alteration in various indices of brain function and the behavioral
response of psychiatric patients to therapy. The neurophysiologicadaptive view of electroshock has been supported and ampliﬁed (1 l,
12, 13, 19, 21); evidence for a similar view of insulin coma has been
presented (22); and recently the concept has been extended to the
newer “tranquilizers” (9). These studies provide the basis for a
generalization concerning the efﬁcacy of these therapies. It is our
purpose in this report to examine the experimental evidence to
determine whether or not the mode of action of each of these thera1From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

Read at the 2nd International Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, September

6, 1957.

Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service; and the Board of Directors’
Research Fund of the Society of the Hillside Hospital.
2Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
197

�MAX FINK

198

pies may result from their ability to induce sustained alteration in
cerebral function; and the corollary question, whether measurable
alteration in cerebral function is a necessary condition for the efﬁ—
cacy of these therapies, or a “complication” or “untoward effect.”
The indices of brain function used in these studies have varied.
These include memory scales (26), visual (20) and tactile (10) perceptual tasks, and changes in language patterns of orientation both
clinically (19‘) and after intravenous amobarbital (21). In electroencephalographic studies of this problem, changes in the delta index,
both in routine records (11, 12) and after activation by intravenous
thiopentone (32, 33), and in the beta index (16) have been applied
successfully. For this review, two indices will be stressed: changes in
the delta index of the unactivated EEG, and clinical neurologic
signs. These indices have been selected because of their successful
application in the analysis of the electroshock process, and because
data is available for each of the therapeutic modalities.
OBSERVATIONS

(a) E lectrosh ock

The following notes summarize our experimental studies of the

role of changes in EEG delta activity in the response of subjects to
electroshock (11, 13). In these studies, electroencephalograms were
obtained before treatment, and at weekly intervals on a day after a
treatment in consecutive electroshock referrals. Grand mal treatments were administered three times a week, for twelve to twenty
treatments. The EEG records were quantitatively analyzed for the
amount of induced delta activity, and classiﬁed into categories of
“high,” “moderate” and “low” degrees of delta activity. At the end
of treatment, the patients were independently rated for their shortterm clinical response into the categories of “much improved,”
“moderately improved” and “unimproved.”
In the initial series of patients, a signiﬁcant relationship between
the early induction of high degrees of delta activity, and clinical
ratings of “much improved” was observed. Eighty per cent of the
records in the much improved group were high degree delta by the
fourth to sixth treatment; and the percentage was sustained at 90
per cent in the third and fourth weeks. In contrast, none of the unimproved patients developed high degree delta records in the ﬁrst
three weeks, and only 20 per cent of the records in the fourth week
were so classiﬁed.
In a subsequent predictive study, the EEG records during the

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

199

second and third weeks of treatment were analyzed. Of the patients
who had high degree delta records on both occasions, 67 per cent
were rated as much improved, while of the patients without such
records, 70 per cent were in the unimproved and moderately improved categories.
Roth (32, 38), studying the EEG delta activity evoked by intravenous thiopentone after electroshock, has related both the stability
and the rate of remission of patients with endogenous depressions
to the peak value of the induced slow activity. He concluded that
patients not attaining a speciﬁed delta activity level “have not acquired an adequate physiological basis for recovery,” and recommended measurement of delta activity levels after thiopentone as a
guide to the clinical management of patients.
Further information is obtained from convulsive-subconvulsive
control studies. While convulsive electroshock induces degrees of
delta activity that vary from low to high, subconvulsive therapy
rarely alters EEG patterns or induces low degrees of delta activity
(13). In their comparative study of different convulsive and subconvulsive techniques, Ulett, Smith and Gleser (38) demonstrated a
signiﬁcantly greater recovery rate for the convulsive than the subconvulsive group.
In a similar study (13) recently completed here, twenty-seven
patients received a course of subconvulsive therapy. Electroencephalograms, taken at weekly intervals, demonstrated minimal
changes—none of the records were scored as middle or high delta
activity. Of the twenty-seven patients, no change in behavior was
noted in twenty-three, and of these, nineteen were referred for a
second course of treatment. Grand mal electroshock induced a high
degree of delta activity in fourteen. All patients in this group
showed signiﬁcant changes in behavior, while of the ﬁve who did
not show the delta response, only two showed a behavioral change.
(b) Tranquilizing Drugs

When the newer drug therapies are studied from the viewpoint
of their electroencephalographic and clinical neurologic effects, a
meaningful classiﬁcation emerges. Furthermore, a relationship between the degree and type of induced change in cerebral function
and therapeutic efﬁcacy may be noted. The ability of these agents
to induce such signs of central nervous system dysfunction as motor
rigidity, depression, excitement and seizures are well known. Less
well documented, however, are the clearly deﬁnable electroencephalographic patterns. Based on observations made in chronic admin-

�200

MAX FINK

istration of drugs in adult psychiatric patients, the EEG changes
may be classiﬁed according to predominant changes in the frequency
spectrum. There are three broad types:
1. Increased slow wave activity with hypersynchrony
(“bursts”)——“delta shift”
11. Desynchronization with voltage and frequency
irregularity and irregular theta activity—“desynchronization”
III. Increased high voltage fast activity—“beta shift.”
Of the group of drugs inducing a delta shift, the phenothiazine
derivatives chlorpromazine, promazine, and perphenazine are clear
examples. Each drug induces seizures in nonepileptics or exaggerates
seizures in epileptic patients (7, 8, 15, 29, 37). Each drug induces
clinical parkinsonian neurologic patterns when given in adequate
dosage. In our laboratories, we have induced parkinsonism in all
patients receiving chlorpromazine (14) and have observed seizures
in 10 per cent of a group of psychotic patients without previous
history of seizures. Induced delta activity, including burst activity,
was observed in more than half the patients in this series.
Reserpine also evokes delta activity when given in large doses
(2). At high dosage levels, it exaggerates seizures in epileptics and
induces seizures in animals (35). At the usual clinical dosages, however, reserpine induces desynchronization of frequencies with a
moderate increase in theta activity (28), without seizure induction
but with deﬁnite motor rigidities. In a series of patients treated here
(39), parkinsonism was induced in all patients. EEG changes were
limited to desynchronization only, without delta burst activity.
The primary response of two other drugs, mepazine and benactyzine, is the induction of EEG desynchronization. Mepazine, a phenothiazine derivative, induces desynchronization with small amounts
of theta activity (7). Delta activity has not been described, nor have
we found reports either of seizures or parkinsonism in the clinical
literature. Benactyzine, a potent anticholinergic compound, induces
a blocking of alpha, ﬂattening of the record and occasional theta
activity (5, 17). Neither seizures nor parkinsonism have been described for this agent.
Meprobamate is the clearest example of the group of drugs inducing a beta shift in the EEG (3). This agent further differs from
the phenothiazines and reserpine in not producing parkinsonism
and not only are clinical seizures not induced, but deﬁnite antiepileptic activity has been described (30). Habituation is readily

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

201

achieved, and withdrawal phenomena of agitation and seizures have
been observed (42). In these actions, meprobamate is more like
barbiturates than like the other new tranquilizers.
If we determine the clinical efficacy of these agents, we note a
parallel between the induced EEG effects and their potency in
altering behavior. The drugs that most readily induce a delta shift
in EEG frequencies—the phenothiazine compounds—are those with
the greatest clinical efﬁcacy in the therapy of psychoses. The compounds with lesser activity in this direction are less efﬁcacious clinically.

Insulin Coma Therapy
The effects of insulin coma therapy on the nervous system are
well documented. During each coma, EEG delta activity is induced,
which usually persists for minutes to a few hours after gavage. Not
infrequently, in approximately one third of patients receiving deep
coma therapy in this hospital, seizures, aphasia or prolonged coma
results. After such events, EEG changes of delta activity persist for
days, and in cases of prolonged coma, for weeks and months (43).
The relation between prolonged coma, altered brain function
and behavioral response has been discussed at length. Revitch (31)
reported eight cases of prolonged coma and concluded that improvement may be attributed to the induction of organic brain damage,
similar to lobotomy. Yaeger, Simon, Margolis and Burch (43), describing twelve cases of prolonged insulin coma, noted a correlation
between length of coma, degree of organic confusion, remission of
mental symptoms and degree of EEG abnormality. Shagass and
Rowsell (34), emphasizing EEG data, and Kwalwasser and Caplan
(27) presented individual cases to support the same conclusion.
We reported a similar relationship between prolonged coma and
behavioral response in a case study (22). A 34—year-old schizophrenic
patient with paranoid ideation developed a left hemiplegia during
insulin coma therapy. With the onset of neurologic signs of hemiparesis, hemianopsia, hemisensory syndrome and spatial inattention,
there was a marked change in speech and behavior. He became lucid,
loquacious and denied his illness. His former paranoid-withdrawal
type pattern was replaced by a friendly cooperative attitude. These
changes were accompanied by delta changes in the EEG, as well as
language changes after amobarbital indicative of altered brain
function. The neurologic symptoms resolved, but the behavioral
changes persisted so that he was discharged two months later as
“much improved.”
(c)

�202

MAX FINK

(d) Lobotomy
While we have not had the opportunity to study lobotomy

patients from the point of view of this summary, the reports of
numerous observers clearly document a similar relationship. EEG
changes of delta activity are present in all subjects postoperatively
(6) and persist for varying periods. Walter et a1. (40) in a study of
150 patients, found an 80 per cent persistence of abnormal EEG
activity after three years. These authors also noted a relation between clinical improvement and the degree and extent of postoperative Slow wave activity.
Postoperative seizures are a frequent “complication,” being variously reported as occurring in up to 20 per cent of subjects (25).
Furthermore, there is a relationship between the extent of brain
tissue cut and the therapeutic outcome. Circumscribed surgical
lesions, regardless of locus, have an improvement rate lower than
unilateral lobectomy; and these latter are frequently inadequate
and are “improved” upon by a bilateral procedure (36).
DISCUSSION

When the various physiodynamic therapies are essayed from the
point of View of an alteration in brain function, a common mode
of action becomes apparent. These therapies represent devices which
induce appreciable changes in brain function, with resultant change
in behavior. Convulsive therapy and lobotomy induce measurable
diffuse changes in brain function directly; insulin coma primarily
when complications ensue; and the phenothiazine and reserpine
groups of tranquilizers when given in adequate dosage.
How persistent changes in cerebral function affect behavior is
not clear. Psychotic behavior is not “reversed” or “obliterated.”
Rather, with an alteration in the central nervous system milieu,
there is an alteration in all aspects of behavior including perception,
mood, affect, memory, judgment and attitude. The speciﬁc adaptive
is
and
is
each
for
variable
dependent on numerous
subject
response
historical and environmental factors. Premorbid personality (18),
environmental situation and expectations (13), and the duration of
the alteration in brain function (12) have recently been discussed as
determinants of the behavioral response under these conditions.
The induced changes in behavior are evaluated by the psychiatrist, administrator or family as to the degree of “improvement.”
These ratings are value judgments, based upon such factors as the
tolerance
environmental
the
behavioral
of
induced
response,
type

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

203

and the observer’s expectations. In this context, the physiodynamic
therapies do not induce “improvement”-—rather they induce behavioral change which is secondarily evaluated as improvement.
The alteration of cerebral function is therefore not a “complication” or an “untoward effect” but the desired goal of these forms of
therapy. Of the many “organic" therapies introduced during the
past thirty years, none apparently has been a speciﬁc agent for the
therapy of psychoses (in the sense that penicillin is speciﬁc for neurosyphilis and nicotinic acid for pellagra dementia), but rather devices
with greater or lesser degrees of applicability and efﬁcacy in altering
behavior by altering the cerebral milieu.
In this context, the various physiodynamic therapies are not spe—
ciﬁc for a type of psychosis. The early enthusiasm that reserpine or
chlorpromazine was speciﬁc for schizophrenia, or hypotheses that
ascribe signiﬁcance to an antagonism between these drugs and “psychosis” or “schizophrenia” are not tenable. Similar enthusiasm
claiming a speciﬁcity of insulin coma for schizophrenia is also untenable, and support for this view is presented in a recent chlorpromazine-insulin coma control study (14).
EEG analysis of these therapies permits a more explicit deﬁnition of the induced alteration in brain function. Changes in cerebral
function reﬂected by a shift in the spectrum of EEG frequencies
toward the slower range, with a concomitant increase in voltage and
a periodicity described as “bursts” or “hypersynchrony” provide the
change in milieu that is more effective in altering behavior. The
signiﬁcance of the delta shift has been clearly demonstrated in
electroshock therapy; and can be inferred from the available data
in lobotomy, insulin coma, and the tranquilizers.
That a delta shift has some speciﬁcity is seen in the analyses of
the drug effects. Those drugs that induce the delta shift—the phenothiazines and reserpine—have been consistently reported as effective
modiﬁers of psychotic behavior. Changes in brain function reﬂected
by EEG desynchronization only, or a shift in frequency spectrum to
the faster range, have a limited efficacy in altering psychotic behavior.3 The signiﬁcance of a delta shift is further seen in the
limited efficacy of subconvulsive electroshock when compared to
convulsive electroshock in the management of psychoses.
Another aspect of the alteration in brain function which may be
deﬁned is the change in seizure threshold. With the delta shift in
These observations suggest the application of EEG screening of new chemotherapeutic compounds for therapeutic efficacy according to their ability to
induce delta burst activity with a minimum of side effects.
3

�MAX FINK

204

the EEG, an increase in clinical seizures would be anticipated. This
is indeed true. Seizures have been described following electroshock
(4, 24); they are prominent after lobotomy (40) and a common “complication” during and occasionally following insulin coma therapy
(23). With the tranquilizers, the parallel of clinical efﬁcacy and
seizure induction is most striking. Phenothiazine compounds induce
seizures commonly; reserpine rarely; benactyzine not at all; and
meprobamate is a potent anticonvulsant! The lowering of seizure
threshold parallels the extent of the EEG delta shift induced by
these compounds. Similar analyses can be made for the potentiation
of sedative action and induction of parkinsonism—both potent indices of an alteration in cerebral function.
The neurologic basis for the delta shift and increase in seizure
frequency is unclear. Whether this represents a persistent change in
function of some speciﬁc brain stem nuclear system, as the centrencephalic, thalamic or hypothalamic, is conjectural. From the wide
range of agents that can induce a delta shift, with or without hypersynchrony, it appears more likely that the EEG changes reﬂect an
alteration in the diffuse biochemical activity of the nervous system
rather than in a focal activity of speciﬁc cellular masses.
SUMMARY

The neurophysiologic and clinical neurologic aspects of convulsive therapy, “tranquilizers,” insulin coma and lobotomy, are
1.

reviewed.

The efﬁcacy of each therapy in the treatment of psychoses is
related to the ability to induce a persistent change in cerebral function, of which a delta shift in the EEG spectrum and an increase in
2.

incidence of seizures are two indices.
3. Alteration in cerebral function is an essential prerequisite of
behavioral change with each of these therapies. Such alteration is
neither a “complication,” nor an “untoward effect,” but is the sine
qua non of the mode of action of these therapies.
4. No evidence has been educed in these studies that the physiodynamic therapies are speciﬁc agents for the relief of psychoses; nor
do they affect a speciﬁc segment of the nervous system; nor do they
induce speciﬁc behavioral changes.
5. The therapeutic process of convulsive therapy, insulin coma,
lobotomy and tranquilizers may be ascribed to the induction of a
persistent alteration in cerebral function which provides the milieu
for a change in adaptation of the subject to his environment.

'

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

205

REFERENCES

Aird, R. B.; Strait, L. A.; Pace, J. W.; Hernoff, M. K. 8c Bowditch, S. C.:
Neurophysiologic Effects of Electrically Induced Convulsions. A.M.A. Arch.
Neural. (9 Psychiat., 75:371-378, 1956.
(2) Arellano, A. P. 8: Jeri, R.: The Effect of Reserpine on the Scalp and Basal
Electroencephalogram. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 8:150 (abst.), 1956.
(3) Berger, F. M.: The Chemistry and Mode of Action of Tranquilizing Drugs.
(1)

Arm. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 67:685-699, 1957.
(4) Blumenthal, I. J.: Spontaneous Seizures and Related Electroencephalographic
Findings Following Shock Therapy. J. Nerv. é» Ment. Dis., 122:581-588, 1955.
(5) Coady, A. 8: Jewesbury, E. C. 0.: A Clinical Trial of Benactyzine Hydrochloride (“Suavital”) as a Physical Relaxant. Brit. Med. J., Mar. 3, pp. 485487, 1956.
(5) Cohn, R.: EEG Study of Prefrontal Lobotomy. Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat.,
53:351-357, 1945.
(7) Denber, H. C. B.: Discussion, Symposium on the Psychopharmacologic
Approach to Schizophrenia. Second Int. Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, 1957.
(8) Fabisch, W.; Effect of Chlorpromazine on the Electroencephalogram of
Epileptic Patients. J. Neurol., Neurasurg., (5» Psychiat., 20:185-190, 1957.
(9) Fink, M.: Therapy of Schizophrenia: Role of Alteration of Brain Function
in Behavior. Presented Second Int. Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, 1957.
(10) Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8c Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46-58, 1952.
(11) Fink, M. 8: Kahn, R. L.: Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity Following Electroshock. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol, 8:158 (abst.), 1956.
(12) Fink, M. 8: Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral
Response in Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies. A.M.A. Arch. Neural.
(5» Psychiat., 78:516-525, 1957.
(13) Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L. 8: Green, M. A.: Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. J. Nerv. 6} Ment. Dis. (in press).
(14) Fink, M.; Shaw, R.; Gross, G. 8c Coleman, F. 8.: Comparative Study of
Chlorpromazine and Insulin Coma in the Therapy of Psychosis. J. Am.
Med. Assoc. (in press).
(15) Hankoﬁ', L. D.; Kaye, E.; Engelhardt, D. M. 8c Freedman, N.: Convulsions
&lt;16)

Complicating Ataractic Therapy, Their Incidence and Theoretical Implications. N. Y. State J. Med., 57:2967-2972, 1957.
Hoagland, H.; Malamud, W.; Kaufman, I. C. 8c Pincus, G.: Changes in
Electroencephalogram and in Excretion of 17-Ketosteroids Accompanying
Electro-shock Therapy of Agitated Depression. Psychosom. Med., 8:246-251,
1946.

(17) Jacobson, E.: Suavitil, et Nyt Stof Med Speciﬁk Virkning pa Centralnervesystemet. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 117:1147-1151, 1955.
(18) Kahn, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neural. (in press).
(19) Kahn, R. L. 8c Fink, M.: Changes in Languages During Electroshock Therapy. In: Psychopathology of Communication. New York: Grune 8c Stratton,
(in press), 1957.
(20) Kahn, R. L. 8c Fink, M.: Perception of Embedded Figures After Induced
Altered Brain Function. Am. Psychol., 12:361 (abst.), 1957.
(21) Kahn, R. L.; Fink, M. Sc Weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital Test to
Clinical Improvement in Electroshock. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (5- Psychiat.,
76:23-29, 1956.
(22) Kahn, R. L.; Graubert, D.

Fink, M.: Delusional Reduplication of Parts
of the Body After Insulin Coma Therapy. This Journal, 4 :134-148, 1955.
8:

�MAX FINK

206

(23) Kalinowsky, L. B. 8: Hoch, P.: Shock

Treatment, Psychosurgery and Other
Somatic Treatments in Psychiatry. New York: Grune 8c Stratton, 1952.
(24) Karliner, W.: Epileptic States Following Electroshock Therapy. This
Journal, 5:258-263, 1956.
(25) Klotz, M.: Incidence of Seizures, with EEG Findings, in Prefrontal Lobotomy. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 65- Psychiat., 742144-148, 1955.
(26) Korin, H.; Fink, M. 8: Kwalwasser, S.: Relation of Changes in Memory and
Learning to Improvement in Electroshock. Conf. Neurol., 16:88-96, 1956.
(27) Kwalwasser, S. 8c Caplan, M.: A Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma: Treatment. This Journal, 1:145-155, 1952.
(28) Liberson, W. T.: Effect of “Tranquilizing” Drugs on EEG. EEG Clin.
Neurophysiol., 8:523, 1956.
(29) Liddell, D. W. 8c Retterstol, N.: The Occurrence of Epileptic Fits in Leucotomized Patients Receiving Chlorpromazine Therapy. J. Neurol., Neuro(30)
(31)
(32)

(33)

(34)

(35)

surg., (g. Psychiat., 20:105-107, 1957.
Perlstein, M. A.: Miltown, Its Use in Convulsive and Related Disorders.
]. Am. Med. Assoc., 161:1040, 1956.
Revitch, E.: Observations on Organic Brain Damage and Clinical Improvement Following Protracted Insulin Coma. Psychiat. Quart., 28:79-92, 1954.
Roth, M.: Changes in the EEG Under Barbiturate Anesthesia Produced by
Electro—Convulsive Treatment and Their Signiﬁcance for the Theory of
ECT Action. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 3:261-280, 1951.
Roth, M.; Kay, D. W. K.; Shaw, J. 8c Green, 1.: Prognosis and Pentothal
Induced Electroencephalographic Changes in Electro-Convulsive Treatment.
EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 9:225-238, 1957.
Shagass, C. St Rowsell, P. W.: Serial Electroencephalographic and Clinical
Studies in a Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 65Psychiat., 72:705-711, 1954.
Sigg, E. B. 8c Schneider, J. A.: Mechanisms Involved in the Interaction of
Various Central Stimulants and Reserpine. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 9:

419-426, 1957.
(35) Simon, A.; Margolis, L. H.; Adams, J. E. 8c Bowman, K. M.: Unilateral and
Bilateral Lobotomy: A Controlled Evaluation. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (‘5'
Psychiat., 66:494-503, 1951.
(37) Stewart, L. F.: Chlorpromazine: Use to Activate Electroencephalographic
Seizure Patterns. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 9:427-440, 1957.
(38) Ulett, G. A.; Smith, K. 8c Gleser, G. C.: Evaluation of Convulsive and Subconvulsive Shock Therapies Utilizing a Control Group. Am. ]. Psychiat.,
112:795-802, 1956.
(39) Wachspress, M.: Blumberg, A. G.; Fink, M. 8: Miller, J. S. A.: Evaluation of
High—Dose Reserpine Therapy for Relief of Anxiety. This Journal, 5 :67-77,
1956.

(40) Walter, R. D.; Yaeger, C. L.; Margolis, L. H.

Simon, A.: The EEG Changes
in Unilateral and Bilateral Frontal Lobotomy. Am. J. Psychiat., 111:5908c

594, 1955.

(41) Weinstein, E. A. 8: Kahn, R. L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. Springﬁeld, Ill.: C. C. Thomas, 1955.
(42) Wikler, A.: Personal Communication.
(43) Yaeger, C. L.; Simon, A.; Margolis, L. H. 8: Burch, N. R.: Electroencephalographic Studies in Posthypoglycemic Coma. ]. New. 6’ Ment. Dis., 118:
435-441, 1953.

�AN OBJECTIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATION
IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS1
JOSEPH JAFFE,

The clinical interview

MD.2

is the psychiatrist’s

primary tool for
diagnosis of psychopathology, the modiﬁcation of behavior, and
collection of research data. Only in recent years, however, have
actual transactions which comprise the interview been studied

the
the
the
ob-

jectively.
Investigators of the interview have usually employed systems of
content analysis (1), which are based upon various theories of psychodynamics. Currently, there is increasing emphasis upon formal
aspects of interaction such as temporal patterns of speech (14),
drastic change of subject (3), physiological relationships of the participants (2), grammatical patterns of language (5, 6, 9), and speech
disturbances and silences (10). These aspects, in contrast to content
categories, are relatively independent of theoretical preconceptions,
and are more readily quantiﬁed and studied statistically.
In many investigations of these formal variables, however, the
patient’s communications are abstracted from the total context of
the interview. These approaches neglect the fact that the psychiatrist is a participant observer, i.e., a signiﬁcant variable in the interaction (ll). Others have attempted to control this variable by means
of structured interviews in which the doctor’s contribution is
standardized according to a predetermined experimental design (6,
7, 14). These structured situations delete the very quality of living
relationship that is the ultimate concern of the psychotherapist (7).
1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

Read at the New York Divisional Meeting, A.P.A. November, 1957.
Supported by Grant 56-151 of the Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry.
2Assistant in Psychiatry, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
Hospital.
207

�208

JOSEPH JAFFE

We are in need of methods of verbal interaction analysis that
neither preclude nor prescribe the doctor’s clinical responses.
The purpose of this paper is to present a method of interview
analysis which (a) is objective and quantitative, (b) preserves the
natural patient-therapist relationship, and (c) treats the interview
as an integrated system of interpersonal communication. This is accomplished by including the doctor’s usual clinical behavior in the
data to be studied. The raw material is not the patient’s speech, but
rather the total verbal output of the “two person” or “dyadic”
group (8).
METHOD

The tape-recorded interview

transcribed, without
regard to the speaker of the words. Careful attention is given to
subtle repetitions such as “I—I mean,” “Well as—as I say,” and to
(i
i,
such
“so
as “you know,”
to speak,
interpolated expressions
as I
said,” etc. These have a tendency not to be heard since they are
irrelevant to the content.
The transcript is then arbitrarily divided into consecutive units
of 100, 50 or 25 words, depending on the discreteness of the phenomena to be investigated. Thus a unit contains contributions of
words from either doctor or patient alone, or from both in varying
proportions.
The measurement applied to these units of dyadic speech is the
type-token-ratio (TTR). This is an index of the balance between
repetition and variety of words (12). The TTR is the ratio of the
number of diﬂerent words (types), to the total number of words
(tokens), in a sample of language. For example, in a lOO-word sample the repetition of the identical word 100 times in succession
would produce the lowest possible ratio of .01 (1 type/ 100 tokens).
The highest possible ratio of 1.0 would result if every one of the
100 successive words were different (100 types/ 100 tokens). These
extremes of stereotypy and diversity are rarely encountered, and
then only in grossly pathological situations (8).
The “word-type,” i.e., the numerator of the TTR, is arbitrarily
deﬁned. All words are different which are pronounced or spelled
differently. Thus, give, gives, gave, given and giving are considered different types, as are know and no. Vocalizations not
clearly identiﬁable as words are omitted, with the major exception
of “mmhmm” which is a frequent utterance of the interviewer in
our records. Contractions are retained as single words, but vulgarisms such as “I dunno” are edited to read “I don’t know.”
is precisely

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS

209

The TTR

is calculated for each unit and the pattern of consecutive scores is graphically plotted, as illustrated in Figures 1 and
2. For additional precision, the units may be overlapped; e.g., 50word units may be advanced 25 words at a time, so that each unit
is composed of the last half of the preceding and the ﬁrst half of the

subsequent unit. This often smoothes the resultant curve. The overlapping technique is illustrated in Figure 3.
Previous studies of the TTR have dealt with the over-all average in a single person’s language (12). The present method studies
the sequential pattern in dyadic language.
OBSERVATIONS

In the last eighteen months approximately sixty recorded interviews have been investigated by this method. The material includes
forty patients in all diagnostic categories. The dyadic TTR patterns
have been found to be sensitive to a variety of clinical phenomena
(8). This report illustrates the changes in language interaction
occurring during the course of hospitalization and therapy, as well
as changes in rapport and defensive operations within individual
interviews.

TTR Pattern in Clinical Change
Figure 1 shows the pattern of the ﬁrst 1500 words of three separate interviews during the clinical course of one patient. The doctor
(a) Dyadic

DYADIC TTR PATTERN WITH CLINICAL CHANGE
(CONSECUTIVE

PRE-TREATMENT

T53
I.

25

WORD

UNITS)

POST-TREATMENT# I2

0N DISCHARGE

.92

.84
.76

M

M

.68

."-'

—

‘

.60

I

lo

20 30

40

UNIT NUMBER

5060

I

I0

20 30 40
UNIT NUMBER

FIGURE

1

5060

I

I0

20

30 4O 50 60

UNIT NUMBER

#40
#49
#59
I957

�210

JOSEPH JAFFE

in each. This case was selected as an unequivocal example of gross clinical change. In the ﬁrst interview the patient was
agitated and depressed. She refused to be seated and paced about
the room, reiterating stereotyped self-recriminations, crying hysterically, with marked pressure of speech. At the time of the second
interview, following a course of grand mal electroshock, the clinical
picture was grossly altered. She was less agitated and more cooperative, although withdrawn and complaining of a memory deﬁcit. On
discharge two months later, she appeared alert, poised, conversational and, at times, surprisingly insightful. She had been rated
is the same

clinically as “recovered.”
The TTR of consecutive 25-word units of interaction, for each
of the three periods described, is graphically represented in Figure 1.
Consecutive points are connected by lines so that the ﬂuctuations in
the graph reﬂect the difference between successive scores. The mean
TTR for the complete interview from which these samples were
taken is represented by a horizontal line through each graph. The
pattern of scores demonstrates a ﬂuctuating equilibrium about the
mean.
'
The interviews at these three successive stages show a sequence
of changes. The mean level of the interaction is seen to increase as
the clinical status changes from psychosis to “recovery.” There is a
concomitant restriction in the amplitude of the pattern, i.e., a decrease in variation about the mean.
Comment: The sequence of change in the TTR pattern parallels
the progressive improvement in interpersonal communication that
was apparent clinically. This suggests an approach to the quantiﬁcation of clinical change, deﬁned as an altered pattern of verbal interaction in the interview.
(b) Changes in Communication Within the Interview

Figure 2 is an enlargement of the ﬁrst of the three interactions
shown in Figure 1. Here the sequence of changes within a single
interview is examined rather than comparing the patterns of
successive interviews. As described before, the patient was speaking
continuously in a disorganized affective outburst. The lower line
indicates the 25-Word units in which the interviewer participated.
Following the doctor’s introductory remarks, units 3-12 represent
the patient’s uninterrupted speech. Wide oscillations of the pattern
are prominent. From samples 13 onwards the doctor made repeated
efforts to communicate with the patient. Two independent judges
reviewed the transcribed protocol, and both identiﬁed three areas

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS

211

in which there seemed to be an understandable, rational interchange
between the participants. These periods are labeled “rapport” in
the upper line. During these three periods the oscillations of the
pattern are much constricted. Compare other nonrapport periods
such as 23-24 and 39—41, in which the doctor’s participation ampliﬁed the oscillations.
DYADIC TTR PATTERN
(CONSECUTIVE 25 WORD UNITS)

——

'RAPPORT"

TTR

36
DOCTOR'S
PARTICIPATION
l

5

l0

IS

3035 4045

20

25
UNIT NUMBER
FIGURE

2

50

#40
I957

Comment: This illustrates a method of quantifying interpersonal
phenomena, such as the degree of “contact” with a severely disturbed patient. The affective pattern in this patient represents the
psychotic integration, and for this reason, the occasional occurrences of conventional, rational conversation are described as periods of “rapport.” The restriction in the amplitude which characterizes these periods is similar to the over-all pattern at the time
of “recovery.”
Complete Interview
Figure 3 demonstrates the initial dyadic TTR analysis of a complete interview. This interview is the discharge evaluation of a
patient who had been hospitalized following a bizarre suicide at(c) Analysis of a

�JOSEPH JAFFE

212

tempt. After seven months of hospitalization, she had “improved”
clinically. This took the form of a hypomanic mood and a gross
denial of her severe emotional conﬂicts. The interview is scored by
the method of successive 50-word units advancing by 25-word steps.
The mean TTR for the interview is shown by the horizontal line
drawn through the graph. The pattern falls into several natural
segments. There are two areas in which ten consecutive points fall
below the mean (areas 4 and 7). These are unusual in this interDYADIC TTR ANALYSIS
TTR

OFA PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEW

(OVERLAPPING so woao UNITS)

.98

.94
.90

:3:

::2 I.I—'i—'.I—'Ij==
.70

.r. III

-.

v.

255-

-/1-’1

I

II

~

JUL—I- ---.r

I

4I—I—I—I----I----—I——-—I-—I—|*I—---|—I—I
I

3

4

7

5

9

8

l0

II

I2

it 54

|957

FIGURE 3

There are also areas of gross deviation from the mean (such as
area 2). Thus we allow the objective pattern to determine our
criteria for phenomena to be studied. In general, we look for per-

View.

sistent changes in the TTR level, gross trends or sudden shifts.
Several of the deviant areas are described to illustrate the
method. The interview begins with a hypomanic monologue in
which the patient describes her successful visit home, her euphoric
outlook and plans for a rosy future.
Area 2 has been delineated because of gross deviation from the
mean. The beginning of this period coincides with a change of topic
to her plans for going back to her job two days hence. Her optimism is’interrupted by a period of confusion as she tries, with some
difﬁculty, to recall one of the details of the job. The end of the gross
ﬂuctuation coincides with the rationalization “I don’t think I’ll
have too much trouble.”
‘

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS
213
Area 4 was delineated as one of the two sections in which
ten
consecutive scores fall below the mean. Its beginning coincides
with
a statement about her depression on admission to the
hospital. This
area ends with the lowest score of the interview, which
precedes by
only a few words a spontaneous reference to her suicide
attempt.
This large deviation at the end of area 4 embodies the
main characteristics of the following area.
Area 5 is characterized by large ﬂuctuations above and below
the
mean. The content of this area is completely on the theme of suicide.
She attempts to prove how much she
now wants to live. The doctor’s
queries at the end of the period meet with increasing resistance. In
the beginning of the next segment (area 6) she
stubbornly refuses to
discuss the subject of suicide further, at which
point she changes the
subject abruptly.
Area 7 was delineated on the basis of two criteria. It
begins with
a precipitous drop in the TTR, followed by ten consecutive
scores
below the mean, and ends with an equally
abrupt rise. Its beginning
coincides with a change of subject by the doctor in the
form of a
question about her feelings at that moment in the interview. This
content area, i.e., the “you-me” relationship, is pursued
at a very
repetitive level. The period ends when she abruptly changes the

Area 9 is delineated because of an extremely low
score enclosed
by two large deviations. It coincides with a brief
mention of a
meeting with a young man who told her how well she looked. It
ends with an embarrassed r'emark and her
statement “I decided to
get him off the topic.”
These examples illustrate areas of disturbance or
disequilibrium
in the verbal interaction pattern. In
contrast, 3, 6, 8 and 10 are areas
of relative stability or equilibrium in the record.
These periods are
marked by a different quality of communication.
They consist either
of a euphoric, hypomanic monologue which avoids all
stressful subjects, or of evasion of the doctor’s probing questions by
superﬁcial
rationalization and conventional cliches.
Comment: Recent reports of objective interview studies
using
other techniques (10) have noted that the interaction
goes through
a series of deﬁnable phases, which may correspond to
periods of
stressful disorganization and successful defense
respectively. The
phases demonstrated here, and the events that delineate them,
suggest an analogous formulation. The content areas that disturbed the
pattern in this ﬁnal interview also did so on the initial interview
seven months earlier. We anticipate that the discussion of
a subject

�214

JOSEPH JAFFE

that had resulted in disequilibrium, but now no longer does so,
may constitute an operational deﬁnition of “resolution of an area
of conﬂict.”

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Diverse and highly personal interpretations of interview data
limit the growth of psychiatry as a science. Systematic study of the
actual transactions may lead to operational deﬁnitions of hitherto
subjective phenomena. For example, it is likely that the patterns of
verbal diversiﬁcation presented here constitute part of the subliminal cues to which therapists respond when making clinical judgments of anxiety, affect, etc.
Objective investigations of the interview must encompass the
behavior of both participants since the events observed are interpersonal processes. Gill, Newman and Redlich (4) deﬁne even the
initial interview as the “diagnostic evaluation of an interpersonal
relationship.” Ruesch (13) has recently stated that “observations
made in social situations do not have the characteristics of a scientiﬁc procedure in which one aspect is studied in detail while all
other variables are held constant.”
The method presented here is an attempt to convert these concepts into practical research methodology. It permits a quantitative
statement of various clinical phenomena occurring either within
single interviews or in the course of therapy. Disturbances of verbal
interaction are deﬁned operationally in terms of the conﬁguration
of the TTR pattern. Applications to the deﬁnition of clinical change
and transactions within the interview have been presented.
The TTR is only one of many quantiﬁable aspects of dyadic
speech. Pace of interaction, time reference, and relative amounts of
participation by doctor and patient are also being measured. Further
applications of these techniques are under investigation.
REFERENCES

(l) Auld, F. 8c Murray, E. J.: Content-Analysis Studies of Psychotherapy. Psychol.
Bull., 52:377-395, 1955.
(2) Coleman, R.; Greenblatt, M. 8: Solomon, H. C.: Physiological Evidence of
Rapport During Psychotherapeutic Interviews. Dis. New. System, 17:2-8,
1956.

H.; Hamburg, D. A.; Inwood, E. R.; Salzman, L.; Meyersburg,
H. A. 8c Goodrich, G.: A Procedure for the Systematic Analysis of Psychotherapeutic Interviews. Psychiatry, 17:337-345, 1954.
(4) Gill, M.; Newman, R. 8c Redlich, F. C.: The Initial Interview in Psychiatric
Practice. New York: International Universities Press, 1954.

(3)

Eldred,

S.

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS
(5)

215

Goldman-Eisler, F.: A Study of Individual Differences and of Interaction in
the Behavior of Some Aspects of Language in Interviews. ]. Ment. Sci.,

100:177-197, 1954.
(6) Gottschalk, L. A.; Gleser, G. C. 8c Hambidge, G.: Verbal Behavior Analysis.
A.M.A. Arch. Neural. 63'» Psychiat., 77:300-311, 1957.
(7) Grinker, R. R.; Sabshin, M.; Hamburg, D. A.; Board, F. A.; Basowitz, H.;
Korchin, S. J.; Persky, H. 8c Chevalier, J. A.; The Use of an AnxietyProducing Interview and Its Meaning to the Subject. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. (5*
Psychiat., 77:406-419, 1957.
(3) Jaffe, 1.: Language of the Dyad: A Method of Interaction Analysis in
(9)

(10)
(11)

(12)
(13)
(14)

Psychiatric Interviews. Psychiatry (in press).
Lorenz, M. 8c Cobb, 8.: Language Patterns in Psychotic and Psychoneurotic
Subjects. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (5. Psychiat., 72:665-673, 1954.
Mahl, G. F.: Disturbances and Silences in the Patient’s Speech in Psychotherapy. ]. Abn. é» Soc. Psychol., 53:1-15, 1956.
Mandler, G. 8c Kaplan, W. K.: Subjective Evaluation and Re-enforcing
Effect of a Verbal Stimulus. Science, 124:582-583, 1956.
Mowrer, O. H.; Verbal Behavior in Psychotherapy. In: Psychotherapy:
Theory and Research, ed. 0. H. Mowrer. New York: Ronald Press, 1953.
Ruesch, 1.: Disturbed Communication. New York: W. W. Norton, 1957.
Saslow, G.; Matarozzo, J. D. 8: Guze, S. B.: The Stability of Interaction
Chronograph Patterns in Psychiatric Interviews. J. Consult. Psychol., 19:

417-430, 1955.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF
THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY MENTAL
HOSPITAL1
ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,2 MAX POLLACK, PH.D.,3
and MAX FINK, M.D.4

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between
inci—
and
with
to
disorder
class
and
type
social
respect
psychiatric
dence of mental illness (3, 5, 6, 13, 14), selection and maintenance of
treatment (2, 6, 15), and therapeutic outcome (10). The present
in
of
selection
the
in
factors
social
therapy
is
with
concerned
study
a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich, and their coworkers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of New Haven was divided
into ﬁve social classes on the basis of weighted criteria of education,
under
who
residents
the
Of
were
residence.
of
and
place
occupation
freclasses
social
more
were
the
from
those
upper
psychiatric care,
quently treated with psychotherapy, while organic treatment or
custodial care was more common among the lower classes. Of the
the
restricted
two
to
was
entirely
psychoanalysis
psychotherapies,
of
the
determinant
the
class
Social
was
predominant
upper groups.
held
conthe
when
was
diagnosis
selected
even
of
treatment
type
is
that
“.
found
it
follows:
results
.
.
as
their
summarize
stant. They
determedical
and
psychological
does
on
not
depend
treatment
well.
the
of
as
the
patient
status
but
position
minants alone,
on
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high
1

Glen
Hillside
Hospital,
of
Psychiatry,
Experimental
the
From
Department

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, U. S.
Public Health Service.
2Senior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Hillside Hospital.
3Senior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital.
4Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
216

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

217

degree to the upper social levels. The data of this study would seem
to indicate that most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where
the background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist” (15).
It is possible to relate the results obtained from these community studies to such selective factors as the patient's ﬁnancial resources or the extent and type of treatment facilities available. A
more critical test of the importance of social factors affecting choice
of treatment would be in a setting where the same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients.
This requirement is met at Hillside Hospital. It is a nonproﬁt,
nonsectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable mental symptoms” (4), who are admitted regardless of their ability to pay. One of the main criteria for accepting patients is their ”ability to participate proﬁtably in psychotherapy.” Individual psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is regarded as the primary method of treatment with organic therapies
available when needed. The average length of hospital stay is six
months, although some patients remain for as long as a year.
The present investigation is an outgrowth of several years of
study of electroshock therapy. In previous work it has been shown
that certain aspects of personality were signiﬁcantly related to patient selection and therapeutic efﬁcacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether
electroshock patients differ from those receiving other forms of
treatment in regard to cultural background, including such factors
as education and place of birth, and personality as measured by the
California F scale (1); secondly, whether these factors were also
related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.
METHOD

Population: The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside
Hospital as of March 7, 1957 was studied. This constituted a total
of 172 patients, ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a mean of 34.6,
and including 58 men and 114 women.
Procedure: (1) The population was subdivided into three groups
according to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy,
(b) insulin coma therapy, and (c) psychotherapy only.5
5All patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data were included
in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

218

(2)

birth.

The groups were compared for age, education and place of

(3) All

patients were tested6 with a ten-item modiﬁcation of the
California F scale suggested by Levinson (9). The F scale is a questionnaire (see Appendix) which has been related to such factors as
authoritarianism, acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
The patient reads ten statements and indicates whether he agrees
or disagrees with each statement and to What extent. The score given
for each item ranges from one to seven and the total score range is
10 to 70. The greater the agreement the higher the score obtained.
The statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.
(4)

The population was subdivided in regard to utilization of

certain adjunctive services in the hospital. Among such services
available are group activities, occupational therapy, psychological
testing and creative therapy. The latter is a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a series of controlled painting procedures
which are considered to be analogies of life experience (18). Psycho—
logical testing and creative therapy were selected for this study because both require a speciﬁc referral from the therapist.
RESULTS

The data were analyzed as follows:

comparison of the treatment groups for age, education, F scale scores, and place of birth;
(2) comparison where diagnosis is held constant; (3) signiﬁcance of
length of hospitalization prior to treatment; and (4) comparison
between groups referred for adjunctive hospital services.
(1)

Comparison of Treatment Groups
For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard
deviations for the F scale scores, age and years of schooling are
presented in Table l. The EST group had higher F scores, was
older and had fewer years of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These diﬁerences were statistically
signiﬁcant for F score and age but failed to reach statistical signiﬁcance for education. The failure of years of education to differentiate the groups was due, in part, to the fact that the electroshock
1.

6As part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F
scale prior to treatment. In the case of‘ those patients who were actually on EST
on March 7 their pretreatment scores were used in the statistical comparison
since it had been found that EST signiﬁcantly affects the score during treatment.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

219

-

.550

ammvaom

§3«

50m

$.32

o

ammuuoh

mo

REE

55

:Eduamo

ﬁwmouom

onesm

.ummm.50m

$32

Aﬁoozw

ﬁvwwvm

£me

50m

-0332

«a

ﬁvgvmm

$592

ﬁaéww

:25

83m

mo

.Esnamo

8m:

35

-Gwmuuom

Son

$52

$55“

ﬁmwvvv

$392

$82

“Staggm

088

.vm

GMV

@8va

How

mo
.Ssﬂamo

658%
98on

H
53H.

h

mBOBm

J/

SK

$2; $5:

ﬁx:

l/i

If!!!

3320

6M

Gm

«0
28&gt; 582

EwEuuﬁh

3 3

g

NM

2: 2:

OS

"~on

.qu

:53

9:

«E

MN

S

2

:33.

1&amp;3

fill!!!

“59$th

Qm

q:

3

3;

n:

3w

mum

u

w?

um&lt;

x0

:82

Gav:

£5 .2:

3w

a

3%...“

3

:oﬂkﬁﬁcu

Gm

92

3;

2:

::.m

m2.

:32 E2

28m

h

582

3%

ﬁne:

2m

we”.

a5

3

3:

mm

mo.

8.

32
So.

3 a a
so:

8%

385:me

285:? 385:3

t

1

.onoxmmézsmcu

£35me

339%
@380

532:

-onuwmm

Saga

-935-.me

38%

3&amp;2:

1:.

�220

KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

group contained many foreign-born patients whose education was
difﬁcult to evaluate accurately. When treatment groups were subdivided into number of patients above and below eight years of
education, the difference was signiﬁcant at the .01 level. The insulin and psychotherapy groups did not differ statistically for any

of these factors.
Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign-born
patients than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group
being highest of all. Among the foreign-born patients, those who
came from Eastern European countries received somatic therapy
predominantly, while the majority of those from Western Europe
received psychotherapy alone.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis
The diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are com—
parable to those reported in previous studies of the hospital popution (12). Of the 172 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as
psychotic depression, 32 as psychoneurosis and 2 with other diagnoses. As expected, a larger proportion of the depressed patients
(52%) received electroshock than did those with other diagnoses.
To control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of treatment, the
psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those who received electroshock and those who were given psychotherapy alone.
The results are shown in Table 2.
While the two groups were comparable for age and education,
the electroshock patients had a much higher mean F score, a difference signiﬁcant at the .02 level of conﬁdence. It is also demonstrated
that a signiﬁcantly higher proportion of the electroshock patients
were born in Eastern Europe.
2.

Comparison of Electroshock Patients According to Length of
Hospitalization Prior to Treatment
While the electroshock patients, as a group, have been shown to
differ from those receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there were still
considerable intragroup differences. To account for some of these
differences it was postulated that the same factors involved in selection of treatment were also related to the readiness with which a
given patient was referred for electroshock. While most of the patients who received EST were placed on treatment less than three
months after admission, about 40 per cent were referred after a
period of three to twelve months. In Table 3 the patients are compared according to the period of hospitalization prior to electro3.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.830

ax”:

$.va

vacuum

133$

$2;

ﬁhm

“225355

«0

583m

ainamo

83m

«so
.033

50m

$32

@5th

$.ng

@8va

Z

”REE

208

23$th

a;

how

«0
comumuswm

Envy.
Mano

Sign“

waoﬁum

N

ﬁg;

@E:

23

.vm

HEM—NH

=32»:qu

Qm

3

can:

3:

mo
$3on

3
2:

GNU:

a

$5

a5

86

a

mg

umucxuaﬁm

Gm

mi

«NH

3.2;

vm&lt;
582

3:“

Gm

32

3*

Que:

mg

£5

ﬁtubum

kc

a

ﬂ:

*Nwm

88m

goutumwﬁcu

h

532

3*

non

5N0:

Em:

a5

8d
me.

a

as
3%

285:?

-oﬁwmmémm

-oauwmm

322:

382:

Ha
a.

221

�KAHN—POLLACK——FINK

222

ﬁé

.850

N

a

o
.83

5.85

$me
mo

583m

@888

uneasm

8

8me

H

o

m

«Eu

EuEEush

-0332

3

58m

$88 $85

$8:

2 5

2

ﬁg

$89

$83

mm

a

:

BER

988

How

we
tetanacﬁﬁwem

8.8
H

8098sz

any?

«Eu

183
wBBom

x0

$2:

a

m

m
SMEVN

6mm

559

3

Qm

E

:82

3

«o
928%

3

ca

5.:

8.8

8

88

:2

8.8

:82 .85

cm:

Sn

a;

fill!!!

Mﬁﬁkouuvx

Gm

8.2

25.36%

98

8.2

a

:4

:88

gm

:82 .85

83.

$4:

8...:

a

8.8

:8.“

:2

%&lt;
8.8

582

8%

:3

Ram

88
Qm

Q:

w:

mm;

38m

:oﬂtiﬁcu

BE :52

:8

rm :32

Sim
-mNzﬂmmmom

“cued—88H.

622.:

aa

dawned

.88

:05

8.8

a;

9

mo

E«

$va

.88

m m

.85

$8
288

EMS“

2c

m
52:

o

3

:82

88
who:

8

$04

a;

2.2

8

288

.88

8

8

m

8. S.
8.

m
52:

80A

.89:

5::

988

885.85 88:88.,”

Gmﬂu

.888

c
8

m

UHOE

.888
a.“

I

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

223

shock. Patients who had higher F scores and
were older were treated
earlier than the younger and lower F scale
groups. Place of birth is
also a signiﬁcant factor. While 44
per cent of those treated within
three months were foreign-born, all patients referred after
a period
of six months were born in the U. S. The data
on education just
fails of signiﬁcance, although 28
per cent of those treated earlier
had less than eight years of education.
4. Use of Adjunctz've

Hospital Sewices
Comparison of the patients referred for creative therapy and
psychological testing is shown in Table 4. It is clear that those referred for either of these procedures had signiﬁcantly lower F
scores,
were younger in age, had more education and more were nativeborn than patients who were not referred for these services.
DISCUSSION

The results indicate that the factors of education, age,
place of
birth, and F scale score were signiﬁcantly related to the
type of
therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive services in this
hospital. Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for those
patients who were younger, better educated, native-born and had
lower
F scores. Such patients were also referred
more frequently for the
auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores, were
older, poorly educated and foreign-born, particularly in Eastern
Europe, were most likely to be referred for EST. These
patients
were infrequently referred for psychological tests or for creative
therapy. Furthermore, these relationships were still signiﬁcant when
diagnosis was held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of
Hollingshead,
Redlich, and their co-workers (3, 5, 6, l3, 15) who demonstrated that
social factors are related to the type of
therapy received in a community. The present study demonstrates that such factors are also
signiﬁcant in a hospital setting where ability to
pay is not a criterion
of therapeutic selection and where all forms of
therapy are equally
available to the entire population.
With ﬁnancial aspects and the availability of therapeutic facilities eliminated in accounting for the relation of social
factors to the
selection of treatment, two alternative interpretations
be conmay
sidered. The social factors may relate directly to the
empirically
established criteria for choice of therapy. On this basis
a patient is

�KAHN—POLLACK—FIN K

224

550

.35an

«REE

$5;

$5.:

@2va

$5:

153$

$3:

Axwwvwa

$.8va

@583

$.me

@me

$3

5me

«0

532%.“

vacasm

ﬁw:

ﬁvﬁvmw

H

awwuamu

«Eu

82m
323.5

-0332

3:3

1E3

Eom

a
wumtuh
EOE

$38

kg

How

«0

N

£038st

*Nmenamo

man“;

~e£m£o£uaam

«Eu

.
33:5

ARR“:

waoﬁum

ﬁéw

ﬁévﬁ

u8
w.
8.9.5wa

it’ll;

.wm

539

if}

3.

m.»

Qm

a.»

a

8N

***h.w

mm:

mo
28&gt;

2:

3:

:82

wﬁ

w:

:82

a5

A:

AWN

233::va

.8“
Qm

2:

3:

«.2

:82

EN

3m

Sun

«.2

a

mg

:52 .Em

***©N.m

fwawowé

om&lt;
wmtukum

0.“.

ﬁoa

Scwtek
it$©m6

Gm

kc

2:

QB

inomﬁ

H

as 2:

:32 :32

28m

h

:82

982

3w

5.3

soy

32V

3.»

iv

55

m.w

mg:

A5

s.

so.

a a a

23.23%:80

O&gt;UNQHU

mo.

:52

Esme? 385:?

$3389

385:?

Aonuwmm

3:80

.rH.U
03330

322?

3225

Oz

Jonowmm

.Hoaowmm

and.

oz

-Hd

OZ

*
oZ

i

I;

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

225

referred for electroshock because he is older,
poorly educated or
foreign-born, clinical experience having shown that such
persons
respond best to this type of treatment. This explanation is inadequate since half the patients with psychotic depression received
psychotherapy alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice for this illness.
An alternative interpretation is that social factors
are related to
choice of treatment because they also affect certain
psychological
patterns of behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy,
such as mode of communication. Thus, a
patient is not referred for
electroshock because he is foreign-born or
poorly educated, but
rather these factors provide the difference in cultural
background
between patient and therapist which makes successful
communication less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship. Robinson
et al.
(15), in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have
pointed out that
psychotherapy is most likely to take place where the cultural background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist. Conversely,
patient-therapist differences in systems of value and communication
may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic relationship. In the
present study, similarly, the patients who received psychotherapy
alone were more like the therapists with
regard to the factors
studied.7
Apart from the problem of patient-therapist differences, certain
patterns of communication exhibited by the patient may be intrinsically incompatible with the establishment of conventional
psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have shown that
verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy and use of cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8). Such
language patterns appear to be more frequent in
persons with
poorer sociocultural backgrounds.
Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect
on com—
munication patterns, may also determine the manifest
symptomatology. Opler (11) has noted that, among patients diagnosed
as
schizophrenic, differences in symptoms are related to differences in
cultural background. Frank et al. (2), studying psychoneurotic
patients, reported that patients whose symptoms were
expressed in
somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while
those
who remained had ideational symptoms. In a
study of personality
The

therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9. Sixteen
per cent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education was
7

20.

18

over

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

226

factors in electroshock patients (8) we have noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and communication were more likely to be
associated with the development of a depressive psychosis. The relationship between communication pattern and symptoms indicates
that symptoms themselves are a mode of communication.
The F scale furnishes a quantiﬁable index of attitude and communication patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a
mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers
were less receptive to entering a psychotherapeutic relationship and
were more likely to receive electroshock. Tougas (17), using an
ethnocentric scale similar to the F scale, found that psychotherapy
was more effective in patients with low scores. In the present study
the F scale was the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment groups.
These results have clinical as well as theoretical signiﬁcance.
lowthat
indicate
in
from
observations
study
a
progress
Preliminary
scorers on the F scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that
those with high F scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone.
Another clinical application may be in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient. This may be done by
minimizing their social differences, by matching them more closely
for age and place of birth. Of possible greater importance is the
necessity for developing new modes of communication when treating
conventional
psychotherapeutic apwho
to
refractory
are
patients
proaches.
While epidemiological studies have clearly structured some of the
indicated
have
and
of
selection
in
involved
treatment,
problems
the direction of further study, it still remains for more processoriented research to provide deﬁnitive answers.
/

SUMMARY

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which all forms of
and
of
birth,
education,
place
available,
age,
were
equally
therapy
score on the California F scale were signiﬁcantly related to the type
of therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive hospital
1.

services.

Patients who were older, poorly educated, had higher F scores
and were foreign-born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most
likely to be referred for electroshock. Psychotherapy was the treat2.

�held constant.
4. Among the electroshock
patients the same factors found to be
signiﬁcant in choice of therapy were also
related to the readiness
with which a patient was referred for
electroshock.
5. It is postulated that
treatment selection is the result of the
communicative interaction between patient and
therapist.
Social
factors may be important in so far
as they are related to different
modes of communication.
APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM
Below are a number of statements. For
each statement we want
you to give us your personal opinion of whether
disyou
or
agree
agree. Answer each statement accordi
ng to one of the following:
I AGREE A LITTLE
I DISAGREE A LITTLE
I AGREE PRETTY MUCH I DISAGREE
PRETTY
MUCH
I AGREE VERY MUCH
I DISAGREE VERY MUCH
I. No sane, normal, decent
close friend or relation.
2. Science has its place, but
there are many important
things
that must always be beyond human
understanding.
3. If people would talk less
and wor k more, everybody would be

better off.

pe and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals
ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse.
8. The best teacher or boss is
the one wh 0 tells us exactly what
is to be done and how to
go about it.
9. Young people sometimes
up they ought to get over them and settle down

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

228

weak
the
classes:
distinct
into
divided
two
be
10. People can
and the strong.
REFERENCES
8c Sanford, R. N.:
D.
Levinson,
J.
E.;
Frenkel-Brunswik,
(1) Adorno, T. W.;
8: Brothers, 1950.
York:
New
Harper
The Authoritarian Personality.
St: Stone, A. R.:
E.
H.
S.
Nash,
D.;
L.
Imber,
H.;
(2) Frank, J. D.; Gliedman,
(33»
77:
Neurol.
Arch.
Psychiat.,
A.M.A.
Leave
Psychotherapy.
Why Patients

283-299, 1957.
(3) Freedman, L. Z.

8c

Hollingshead, A. B.: Neurosis and Social Class. Am. ].

Psychiat, [13:769-775,

(4)
(5)

(5)

(7)

(8)
(9)
(10)

(11)
(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)
(16)
(17)

(18)

1957.

Hillside Hospital: 29th Annual Report, 1956.
8c Redlich, F. C.: Schizophrenia and Social Structure.
A.
B.
Hollingshead,
Am. ]. Psychiat., 110:695-701, 1954.
Disorders.
Class
and
Social
Psychiatric
8:
C.:
F.
A.
B.
Redlich,
Hollingshead,
Disand
Psychiatric
Environment
Social
the
Between
In: Interrelations
orders. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, pp. 195-208, 1954.
Kahn, R. L. 8c Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy.
8c J. Zubin. New York:
P.
Hoch
ed.
Communication,
In: Psychopathology of
Grune 8c Stratton, 1957.
to
Behavioral
in
8c
Response
Factors
M.:
Personality
L.
Fink,
R.
Kahn,
Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neurol. (in press).
Levinson, D. J.: Personal Communication.
8c Johnson, N. A.: Failures in Psychiatry: The Chronic HosC.
N.
Morgan,
1957.
113:824-830,
Am.
Patient.
].
Psychiat,
pital
197:103—110,
American,
Scientiﬁc
Culture.
and
K.:
M.
Schizophrenia
Opler,
1957.

8: Rachlin, L.:
A.
Lurie,
M.;
Gurvitz,
G.
S.;
Goldman,
Rachlin, H. L.;
1950.
in
Hillside
from
Hospital
317
Patients
Discharged
of
Follow-up Study
This Journal, 5:17-40, 1956.
Redlich, F. C.; Hollingshead, A. B.; Roberts, B. H.; Robinson, H. A.;
Disorders.
and
8:
Social
K.:
Structure
Psychiatric
Z.
L.
J.
Meyers,
Freedman,
Am. J. Psychiat., 109:729-734, 1953.
Rennie, T. A. C.; Srole, L.; Opler, M. K. 8: Langner, T. 8.: Urban Life and
Mental Health. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:831-837, 1957.
Robinson, H. A.; Redlich, F. C. 8c Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Treatment. Am. ]. Orthopsychiat., 242307-316, 1954.
Titus, H. E. 8: Hollander, E. P.: The California F Scale in Psychological
Research: 1950-1955. Psychol. Bull., 54:47-64, 1957.
In:
Verbal
in
Factor
Therapy.
Ethnocentrism
as
Limiting
a
R.:
R.
Tougas,
8c R. F. Dymond.
C.
ed.
R.
Rogers
and
Change,
Personality
Psychotherapy
1954.
196-214,
Press,
of
Chicago
pp.
University
Chicago:
Creative
of
Utilization
8c
and
E.:
Therapeutic
Structure
E.
Zierer,
Zierer,
Activity. Am. ]. Psychother., 10:481-519, 1956.

�SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY
IN EEG RESPONSE TO ELECTROSHOCK1
MARTIN A. GREEN,

MD.2

The assumption is often tacitly made in studies of nervous system function that the capacity for neurophysiological change is
similar for animals or humans in the groups under study. Differ-

ences in response are ascribed to different parameters of the stimulus
or to differences in the location and extent of lesions, either spontaneous or experimentally produced. Such an assumption may not
be warranted, however. Perhaps another factor in the variability of
response under these conditions is an individual variability in
neurophysiological reactivity or responsiveness. The initial “base
line” may not be similar in all individuals.
The possibility of different inherent patterns of reactivity has
been suggested by the studies of the alterations in the EEG during
electroshock. We have been impressed by the high degree of variability in such alterations both in their quantitative and qualitative
aspects. Although this variability has been described by previous
investigators, it has not been stressed sufﬁciently; nor have possible
explanations been advanced or systematically investigated.
The present report concerns a description of the changes in the

EEG during electroshock in the Hillside Hospital material. The
concept of neurophysiological reactivity is presented and studies
that may clarify this problem are suggested.
MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients who received electroshock for psychiatric
illness were studied. The patients were voluntary admissions to
1From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

2Assistant in Neurophysiology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital.
229

�230

MARTIN A. GREEN

Hillside Hospital and the majority had not received electroshock
previously. The diagnostic groups included psychotic depression,
manic-depressive psychosis and schizophrenia. The largest group
was patients with depression. Ages ranged from 20 to 68 years with
a median of 47 years.
Treatments were given three times weekly, each patient receiving at least twelve treatments. The Medcraft instrument (alternating current) was used for twenty-eight patients and the Reiter instrument (unidirectional current) for sixty-one patients. Electro—
encephalograms were taken prior to, at weekly intervals during, and
two weeks following the course of treatment. Patients Whose pretreatment EEG was abnormal were speciﬁcally excluded from study.
Tracings were done on a nontreatment day (from 24 to 36 hours
following the previous treatment) with an eight channel Medcraft
machine using needle electrodes. Frontal, motor, parietal, occipital,
anterior temporal, posterior temporal, vertex and earlobe placements were employed with scalp to scalp and scalp to earlobe
combinations.
RESULTS

Delta Activity
A. Quantitative Diﬁerences: The delta activity was analyzed according to the method described by Fink and Kahn (7). The duration of burst activity, the lowest frequency, the average delta index
in several leads, the highest amplitude, and the highest per cent
time delta in one lead were measured. Records were classiﬁed as
showing a low, middle or high degree of delta activity (Fig. 1) according to criteria previously described (7).
All patients developed delta activity during the course of twelve
treatments, but differences in the amount of the slow activity and
its rate of development were very apparent (Table I). Some patients
developed “high delta activity” early in treatment, whereas other
patients showed only “low” or “middle” changes even after twelve
treatments. These latter patients were followed further with serial
EEGs. As treatment was continued, a high degree of delta activity
did not develop in some of these patients until twenty or more
treatments, or until treatments were given on a daily basis. They
were resistant to neurophysiologic change. This individual variability in EEG response was independent of the type of electroshock
current employed, being present both with alternating and with
unidirectional current applications.
1.

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

231

WWW
WWW
WWW’VW’WW
WWW
WWW
WWW
"WWW WWW-«MW
WWW
WWW
LF-LO

RF-RO

.,,

LC-LMT
RC-RMT

RP-E

LAT-LPT

WWWWWWWVW

”W
ISECOND

RAT-RPT

PRE- ELECTROSHOCK

FIGURE

la

24 HOURS AFTER EST

150 W

4%:

l2

Degree of Delta Activity—Low
From Fink and Kahn (7)

Qualitative Diﬂerences: Although the total amount of delta
activity may be similar, records differ as to type, frequency and
voltage of delta activity. One prominent qualitative difference is the
ratio of irregular delta activity to bursts of slow activity. Nearly all
B.

W
WW

LF‘ LO

WWWMWMWW

LC-LMT

R C -R MT

L

P-E

RmANWMMW-E
LAT- LPT

'

WNW/“WWW

WWW/MW
Ison

"WWW
WWW

WWIMMMMMMWNVWMMWWMMMMMHM

£59932.

RAT-RPT

PRE-ELECTROSHOCK

FIGURE 1b

24 HOURS AFTER EST #10

Degree of Delta Activity—Middle
From Fink and Kuhn (7)

�MARTIN A. GREEN

W
W
W mm
232

LWW WWW
«WWW
- L MT

T

ELEM“ Mwmwwaw

MR

LP'E

RP-E

”WWW

“H”

WWW

lSECOND

RAT- RPT'

PRE-ELECTROSHOCK

24

FIGURE 1c

{5,on

HOURS AFTER EST =11:”

Degree of Delta Activity—High
From Fink and Kuhn (7)

records show burst activity during a course of twelve treatments. In
some patients the initial delta change is in the form of bursts
which become more frequent, slower and of higher voltage as treatments are continued. The irregular delta activity in such records is
much less prominent and usually occurs at faster frequencies. In
other patients the reverse occurs. Delta activity appears chieﬂy in an
irregular and scattered form. Although burst activity is also present,
it is not conspicuous. In a third group of patients the amounts of
irregular delta activity and bursts are approximately equal (Fig. 2).
These differences in the form that the delta activity assumes
are usually constant during the course of treatment. At times,
TABLE

I

Degree of Delta Activity in Serial Electroencephalograms
during Electroshock
(2-4 records were taken for each patient)

No. of Records in Each Treatment Period
EEG Activity
No change
Low delta activity
Middle delta activity
High delta activity

EST 1-3

4-6

7-9

10-12

5

l

1

37

0

21

7

20
28

22
45

10
25

16
3
1

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

233

however, burst activity will become more prominent than the
irregular delta only during the latter part of the course of treatment; or burst activity which appears prominent early in treatment
may be overshadowed and obscured in later records by a large
amount of continuous irregular delta activity.

WWWW
A

HH

I486

WWW
AT‘VERTEX

R

5

HH

F-VERTEX

1392

WWWNWWVWWW
R

WWWWWWWWW
‘3

HH

l599

AWWWWWWWMMMMWNWWW
D

HH

50

mv.

I572

|____
SEC.
l

FIGURE 2

Qualitative Changes in Delta Activity
A—Irregular Delta
C—Rhythmic Runs
B—Delta Bursts

D—Asymmetry

The slow activity is maximal at the anterior temporal and
frontal electrodes and less pronounced at the more posterior electrodes. Often it is asymmetric, being of higher voltage, slower, and
in greater amounts at the left anterior temporal and frontal
electrodes as compared to the right (Fig. 2). Only
rarely is the
reverse true, i.e., accentuation on the right side. This
asymmetry
occurs during treatment both with alternating and with unidirectional currents.
Another type of abnormality is the appearance of rhythmic
runs
of delta activity which may continue for 10 to 20 seconds
(Fig. 2).

�MARTIN A. GREEN

234

The regularity of the frequency and voltage of the slow waves in
these runs is very striking. These runs are usually infrequent, but
may be the most prominent alteration in the record.
In many records the amount of delta activity ﬂuctuates during
the tracing. At times, some portions of a record may appear nearly
normal, while in other parts of the same record the delta activity
may be quite pronounced. This variation is independent of the
electrode combinations employed.

or Spike-Wave Activity
A large number of records show single spike activity of low,
moderate or high voltage. Most often such spikes are slower and
not as prominent as those present in patients with seizure disorders.
A small number of records show spike—wave activity. This is usually
at irregular, mixed frequencies and, again, does not resemble the
regular rhythmic bursts commonly seen in patients with seizure
disorders (Fig. 3).
2. Spike

3. A lpha

Activity
The alpha activity shows changes both in amount and frequency.
As the amount of delta activity increases the amount of alpha activity usually decreases. Changes in frequency occur but are not proHH

A
F

I40!

a

~wvv~uu~vv*1qJJWV’V‘r
0

W

“H

3‘

WWW

AT-VERTEX

TO EARLOBES

AT

VERTEX

'5“

P-EARLOB

”PT
50

mv.|
I

SEC.

FIGURE 3

Spike and Spike-wave Activity

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

235

nounced. The frequency will be slowed by 1-2
cps but at times will
remain the same as in the preelectroshock
tracing. In a small number of patients the amount and voltage of
alpha activity increases
during treatment. This change persists during the
posttreatment
period after the slow-wave activity subsides (Fig. 4).
F-O

HHI484

L
R

WW
PRE-EST

HH

|597

WWW’WWWWWMMWWWWMAMWMWW
L
F-O
2

wxs. POST-EST
FIGURE 4

50

mv.|_
l

SEC.

Change in Alpha Activity

Beta Activity
The fact that many sedatives, particularly
barbiturates,
induce
fast activity in the EEG and the
difﬁculty in controlling the administration of these drugs in the population studied
makes it difﬁcult
to evaluate changes during the course of
treatment. In most instances changes in fast activity are minimal.
The most frequent
change, when present, is a decrease in the activity.
4.

DISCUSSION

The problem being raised is that of the individual
variability
in the type and degree of EEG alteration
during electroshock

therapy. AS described, this is manifested in: (1) the
amount of slowwave activity and its rate of development; (2)
qualitative
differences
in the slow-wave activity (amount of burst
activity vs. irregular
delta activity, symmetry, ﬂuctuating
appearance of slow activity,
runs of rhythmic Slow activity); (3) presence of Spike
or spike-wave
activity; and (4) changes in alpha and beta activity.
Previous investigations (2, 4, 5, 10, ll, l2, l4, 17,
18, 19, 20, 25)
have stressed possible correlations with
age, sex, frequency of treatment, type of current employed, psychiatric diagnosis,
and clinical

�236

MARTIN A. GREEN

change. Increasing the frequency of treatment, for example, will
increase the degree of alteration in the EEG. However, when patients of similar sex, age and psychiatric diagnosis are given treatments at the same frequency with the same type of electroshock
current, variability in the rate of development of changes in the
EEG and their type and degree are still very prominent.
One explanation for this variability might be the distribution
of the electroshock current in the brain. Perhaps minor differences
in the resistance of the skull, in the distribution of blood vessels
and their permeability or in the arrangement of nerve tracts create
differences in the pathways taken by the current. Under such circumstances, different portions of the brain may receive more or less
current in one patient as compared to another. Differences in the
type of electrical activity generated by these variously affected areas
might account for variability in the EEG.
Available studies employing direct intracerebral measurements
indicate considerable diffusion of current throughout the brain (6,
9, 16, 21). However, a concentration of current anteriorly and along
large neuronal pathways, such as the corpus callosum, has been
demonstrated. No further information is available as to amounts
of current received by more speciﬁc cerebral areas.
Due to the high resistance of the skull only a small portion of
the applied current actually reaches the brain. The amount of
current entering different portions of the brain is said to be determined by the resistance of the skull overlying these areas, the anterior concentration of current being the result‘of the thinness of
the temporal bone with its consequent lower resistance as compared
to other parts of the skull (9, 21).
Several considerations, however, indicate that individual differences in these factors of resistance and amount of current reaching
different areas of the brain are of minor, if any, importance in the
EEG response during electroshock. It is the occurrence of the generalized seizure per se, rather than the passage of electricity, which
is the primary factor. During a course of grand mal therapy induced
by nonelectrical means such as metrazol, EEG changes occur which
are similar, in general, to those seen with electroshock (13, 14).
Diffuse slow-wave activity, accentuated anteriorly, and spike or
spike-wave activity are described. The amount of slow-wave activity
increases during treatment'but shows individual variability unrelated to the number of treatments. Another observation is that
electroshock therapy which induces petit mal (8, 18) or focal (3)
seizures rather than grand mal does not produce the characteristic

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT
237
build-up of slow-wave activity. In addition, there is no increase in
the degree of delta activity in our patients in whom
mal

grand
therapy is given with high suprathreshold stimuli as compared to
those in whom threshold stimuli are used.
Factors of current cannot be entirely dismissed, however.
Even
with grand mal therapy, the type of current
employed may inﬂuence the EEG change. We have conﬁrmed a previous
study (20)
showing that the rate of increase of delta activity is slower in
therapy with unidirectional current than in that with
alternating
current. Similarly, brief stimulus therapy is said to produce smaller
degrees of alteration in the EEG as compared to alternating
current
therapy (15).
The other theory to be considered in explaining the
variability
in EEG responsiveness, and the one which is
probably more decisive,
involves inherent differences in neurophysiological
reactivity. By
this is meant both the quantitative and
qualitative aspects of the
inherent capacity of the nervous system to respond to stimuli
or
injury. Not only the degree of response, but also the
type of response, may have these determinants. The type and degree of EEG
abnormalities developed during electroshock therapy
to be
appear
the reﬂection of such inherent individual differences in
neurophysiological reactivity.
Several types of investigation may serve to test this
hypothesis.
Methods other than electroshock known to produce EEG
alterations
could be applied prior to treatment. These might include
lowering
the blood sugar by parenteral insulin, intravenous administration
of
convulsants such as metrazol or Megimide, photic
stimulation, or
the intravenous administration of drugs such as barbiturate.
In addition, perhaps the actual electroshock seizure threshold or the
pattern
or severity of the seizures may be a measure of nervous
system responsiveness. Data from such investigations could be correlated
with the degree and types of EEG change during electroshock.
In
this manner it might be possible to demonstrate different
patterns
of neurophysiological reactivity and to classify individuals
accord-

ingly.
Such studies may not only help in understanding the
variability
in the EEG alterations during electroshock but would have
wider
application to other problems in clinical electroencephalography
and neurology. For example, the basis for the development of
spontaneous seizures secondary to traumatic, vascular, or
neoplastic
lesions of the nervous system is not known. Patients with lesions

�238

MARTIN A. GREEN

comparable in type, size and location may or may not develop
seizures. As previously described, some subjects show spike or spikewave activity during electroshock. This suggests an inherent difference in the capacity to develop clinical seizures or EEG seizure
activity following “injury” to the nervous system, whether the injury
is spontaneous or induced. Differences in this capacity may be
reﬂected in varying patterns of neurophysiological reactivity.
Differences in neurophysiological reactivity may also be manifested in the pretreatment EEG. Patients in whom the pretreatment
record is abnormal (ll), “instabile” (22), or shows a predominant
alpha rhythm (5) are said to develop the greatest alteration in the
EEG during electroshock. Other investigators have not conﬁrmed
these observations (2, 23). Actually, such correlations depend on the
method of analysis of the pretreatment record employed and the
criteria used for “abnormality.” Further investigation of this relationship is necessary.
Suggesting that neurophysiological reactivity is an inherent
process does not imply that a physiological basis does not exist or
cannot be investigated. This may reside in the central nervous
system itself, consisting of individual differences in neurochemical
systems or in the permeability of cells or blood vessels; or it may be
outside the nervous system. Individual differences in hormonal or
other humoral substances produced during the stress of electroshock
may serve to “sensitize” or “desensitize” the cerebrum with regard
to developing different amounts and types of electrical activity.
That such factors may be operative is suggested by the following
studies. Trypan red injected intraperitoneally in cats before a course
of electroshock decreased the permeability of the blood-brain barrier and reduced the degree of EEG changes as compared to control
animals (1). Atropine and scopolamine administered during a
course of electroshock in man blocked the development of the usual
slow-wave activity (24).
Electroshock therapy affords an excellent opportunity for the
experimental investigation of the problem of an inherent neurophysiological reactivity. One is able to apply studies directly to man
rather than animals. The stimulus to the central nervous system can
be standardized and the degree of neurophysiological change controlled, within limits, by changing different parameters. Tests of
EEG responsivity can be given before such changes are induced as
well as during and after treatment. Restudy of patients is often
possible when subsequent courses of treatment are necessary.
I

‘

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

239

SUMMARY

Individual differences, both quantitative and qualitative, in
the EEG changes during a course of electroshock
treatment in
eighty-nine patients are described.
2. These differences are pronounced and
are not explainable
by age, sex, type of shock current, frequency of treatment,
psychiatric diagnosis, or clinical change.
3. An inherent capacity for
neurophysiological change that has
both quantitative and qualitative aspects may be the
primary determinant of these differences.
4. Variation in skull resistance and in the
amount of current
reaching the brain appear to be minor factors.
5. Investigations that might serve to
test the hypothesis presented are described. Such studies may lead eventually to a classification of individuals as to different patterns of
neurophysiological
reactivity and clarify other problems in clinical neurology and
electroencephalography.
1.

REFERENCES
Aird, R. B.; Strait, L. A.; Pace, J. W.; Hrenoff, M. K. 8: Bowditch, S. C.:
Current Pathway and Neurophysiological Effects of Electrically Induced
Convulsions. J. Nerv. (‘5' Ment. Dis., 123:505-512, 1956.
(2) Bagchi, B. K.; Howell, R. W. 8: Schmale, H. T.: The
Electroencephalographic and Clinical Effects of Electrically Induced Convulsions in the
Treatment of Mental Disorders. Am. ]. Psychiat, 102:49-61, 1945.
(3) Bergman, P. S.; Impastato, D. J.; Berg, S. 8c Feinstein, R.:
Electroencephalographic Changes Following Electrically Induced Focal Seizures. Conf.
Neurol., 13:271-277, 1953.
(4) Callaway, E. 8c Boucher, F.: Slow Wave Phenomena in
Intensive Electroshock. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2:157-162, 1950.
(5) Chusid, J. G. 8c Pacella, B. L.: The
Electroencephalogram in Electric Shock
Therapies. ]. Nerv. €7- Ment. Dis., 116:95-107, 1952.
(6) Delgado, J. M. R.; Alexander, L..&amp; Hamlin, H.: Effects
of Electroshock on
the Cortical and Intracerebral Electroactivity of the Brain in
Schizophrenic
Patients. Conf. Neurol., 13:287-294, 1953.
(7) Fink, M. Sc Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta
Activity to Behavioral Re»
spouse in Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (‘3‘Psychiat., 78:516—525, 1957.
(8) Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L. 8c Green, M. A.:
Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. J. Nerv. &amp;- Ment. Dis. (in
press).
(9) Hayes, K. J.: The Current Path in Electric Convulsion
Shock. Arch. Neurol.
é} Psychiat., 63:102-109, 1950.
(10) Hoagland, H.; Malamud, W.; Kaufman, I. C. 8c
Pincus, 0.: Changes in the
Electroencephalogram and in the Excretion of 17-Ketosteroids
AccompanyElectroshock
ing
Therapy of Agitated Depression. Psychosom. Med., 8:246251, 1946.
(1)

�MARTIN A. GREEN

240

Willner, M. D.: Signiﬁcance of Changes in the Electroencephalogram Which Results from Shock Therapy. Am. ]. Psychiat., 105:

(11) Kennard, M. A. 8:

40-45, 1948.

'

(12) Klotz, M.: Serial Changes Due to Electrotherapy. Dis. Nerv. Sys., 16:120-122,
1955.
(13) Knott, G. R.; Gottlieb, J. S.; Leet, H. H. 8c Hadley, H. D., Jr.: Changes in
the Electroencephalogram Following Metrazol Shock Therapy: A Quantitative
Study. Arch. Neural. (5" Psychiat., 50:529-534, 1943.
(14) Levy, N. A.; Serota, H. M. Sc Grinker, R. R.: Disturbance in Brain Function

Following Convulsive Shock Therapy. Arch. Neurol.
1027, 1942.

(‘5'

Psychiatu 47:1009-

(15) Liberson, W. T.: Current Evaluation of Electric Convulsive Therapy. Res.
Publ. Ass. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 31:199-231, 1951.
(16) Lorimer, F. M.: Sega], M. M. Sc Stein, S. A.: Path of Current Distribution
in Brain During Electroconvulsive Therapy. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1:
343-348, 1949.
(17) Moriarity, J. D. 8c Siemens, J. C.: Electroencephalographic Study of Electric
Shock Therapy. Arch. Neurol. é» Psychiat., 57:712—718, 1947.
(18) Pacella, B. L.; Barrera, S. W. 8c Kali'nowsky, L.: Variations in the Electro-

encephalogram Associated with Electric Shock Therapy of Patients with Mental Disorders. Arch. Neural. E} Psychiat., 47 :367-384, 1942.
(19) Proctor, L. D. 8c Goodwin, J. E.: Clinical and Electra-physiological Observations Following Electroshock. Am. J. Psychiat., 101 :707-800, 1945.
(20) Proctor, L. D. 8: Goodwin, J. E.: Comparative Electroencephalographic
Observations Following Electroshock Therapy Using Raw 60 Cycle Alternating and Unidirectional Fluctuating Current. Am. ]. Psychiat., 99:525530, 1943.

Wegener, C. F .: On Electric Convulsive Therapy with Particular Regard to a Parietal Application of Electrodes Controlled by Intracerebral Voltage Measurements. Acta Psychiat. et Neural, 19:529-549, 1944.
(22) Sulzbach, W.; Tillotson, K. J.; Guillemin, V., Jr. 8: Sutherland, G. F.: A
Consideration of Some Experience with Electric Shock Treatment in Mental
Diseases, with Special Regard to Various Psychosomatic Phenomena and to
Certain Electra-technical Factors. Am. J. Psychiat., 99:519-524, 1943.
(23) Taylor, R. M. Sc Pacella, B. L.: The Signiﬁcance of Abnormal Electroencephalograms Prior to Electroconvulsive Therapy. J. Nerv. (S; Ment. Dis.,

(21) Smith, J. W.

8c

107:220—227, 1948.

-

Johnson, M. W.: Effect of Atropine and Scopolamine Upon
Electroencephalographic Changes Induced by Electro-convulsive Therapy.

(24) Ulett, G. A.

8c

EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol, 9:217-224, 1957.
(25) Weil, A. A. 8c Brinegar, W. C.: Electroencephalographic Studies Following
Electric Shock Therapy. Arch. Neural. é" Psychiat., 57 2719-729, 1947.

�ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
OF SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL
CUTANEOUS STIMULI1
HYMAN KORIN, PH.D.2

and

MAX FINK, M.D.3

In the course of extensive investigations (1, 2, 3) into the perception of multiple simultaneous stimuli, the pattern of failure of
subjects accurately to report one of two stimuli led to a concept of
an “order of dominance” in cutaneous perception. Since then, the
relationship of the observed pattern of dominance to biologic and
psychiatric concepts of body image and body scheme has been the
subject of considerable speculation (4, 7, 8, 14).
The interrelationship of body areas was initially clearly demonstrated in simultaneous tactile tests of face and hand (2), in which it
was noted that the stimuli to the hand were frequently not reported
or mislocalized. These phenomena of “extinction” and “displacement” led to the inference that cheek area stimuli were “dominant”
to hand stimuli. In subsequent reports (3, 10, ll, 12) a pattern of
dominance for tactile stimuli was described in which the face and
the primary genital areas were the most perceptive or dominant
areas; the hand was the least dominant; and the shoulder, foot,
buttock, breast, back, thigh and abdomen fell between these extremes in a mild gradient. These observations were made in normal
adults and children and psychiatric patients, but were most clearly
discerned in patients with brain disease. Indeed, the major portion
of the data relates to a group of patients with severe diffuse brain
dysfunction under observation in a general psychiatric hospital.
1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service.
2Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside

Hospital.
3 Director,
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
241

�242

KORIN—FINK

The basis for these phenomena

is unclear.

In a review of the

problem (3) consideration was given to hypotheses ascribing signiﬁcance to anatomic, psychophysical, genetic, environmental and neurophysiologic factors. In their conclusions, Bender, Green and Fink
note that “no one theory adequately explains the organization of
this pattern. Learning and maturation are probably factors, but it
appears to be mostly inherent.” In studies of patients with brain
disease and normal young children, Cohn (4, 5) emphasized the
rostral order of dominance and ascribed signiﬁcance to “an ontogenetic or phylogenetic thalamic residue in the sensory organization
of the human brain.” He also noted speciﬁcally that this pattern
was primarily associated with “the over-all sentient function of
the brain.”
A more extensive elaboration of a maturational and developmental explanation of the order of dominance has been proposed
(14). Taking the infantile patterns of sutking and feeding as a
model, Linn ascribes dominance to the face as it is the oldest element
in the body image; the dominant role of the genital area to the intensity of pleasurable sensation that the infant elicits from masturbation; and the subordinate position of the hand to its role as an
exploring and tension-relieving appendage wherein it holds second
place in awareness to its stimulation of the more exciting mouth
and genitalia.
A neurophysiologic View was advanced by Critchley (6, 7), who,
after expressing a preference for the term “tactile inattention” instead of “extinction,” emphasized the rostral order of dominance.
He stated that “strong stimulation of the healthy side suppresses
the attenuated sensations on the impaired side,” and concluded
that “tactile inattention in parietal patients is probably no more
than an instance of local neglect or disregard, which may be demonstrated at times in many other spheres of consciousness besides the
tactile—whether motor, visual or spatial.”
A psychophysical explanation was eschewed by Bender, Fink and
Green (3, 10, 11), who found no relation between the order of
dominance and the tactile threshold for touch or pin prick. DennyBrown, Meyer and Horenstein (8), however, insisted that these patterns were only apparent when there was an alteration or loss of
twopoint discrimination. They further demonstrated that the extinction of the hand stimulus by a stimulus to the leg could be
overcome by four stimuli to the hand. The dominance of the cheek
to the hand could not, however, be altered by ten stimuli to the
hand in their subject.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

243

The following data further emphasize psychophysical factors in
perception under the conditions of multiple simultaneous stimulation. These studies represent the initial
report of an investigation
into the application of simultaneous tactile stimulation tests to the
problem of measurement of the alteration in brain function induced by electroshock therapy. In the course of this study electrical
stimuli were applied to the cheek and hand of psychiatric patients.
Stimuli were either at threshold or suprathreshold levels.
Two aspects of the data are presented: (a) the effect of alteration
of relative strength of stimulus in the order of dominance
on facehand tests; and (b) relation of perceptual thresholds to the order of

dominance.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

The subjects were thirty-four consecutive psychiatric patients
referred for electroshock therapy. The range of their
ages was between 21 and 65 and the mean age was 45. Eleven patients were
diagnosed as involutional melancholia, thirteen as manic-depressive,
depressed, eight as schizophrenia, and two as psychoneurosis mixed
type. All testing was done prior to a course of electroshock therapy
and no patient had clinical or EEG evidence of altered brain function. Each patient was tested in one session for the
purposes of this
report.
Two model S-4B Grass square wave stimulators were synchronized to deliver either single or two simultaneous electrical stimuli.
An isolation unit was connected to each stimulator to eliminate
artifacts and the output was monitored visually by an oscilloscope.
A switch box inserted in the circuit permitted
independent selection
of the various body parts. An active and an indifferent electrode,
required for each body part, were small 5%; inch steel discs placed
1 inch
apart and secured with tape. Bentonite electrode paste (Medcraft) was rubbed into the skin of each area before the electrodes
were applied. The electrodes remained afﬁxed to the selected body
parts throughout the period of testing.
The patient was placed on a couch in a relaxed and supine position. To alleviate undue anxiety the nature of the testing was described. It was emphasized that only a slight tap-like sensation
would be felt. The electrodes were then placed on (1) the dorsum
of the hands, (2) the mandibular area of both cheeks, and
(3) the
medial calf area of the legs.
In the testing procedure, thresholds for the various body
parts
were ﬁrst determined. At a frequency of .3 cycles/second, and a pulse
I

�244

KORIN—FINK

duration of 50 milliseconds, the voltage was increased in uniform
time increments of .67 seconds (2 pulses) monitored from the oscilloscope, until the subject perceived 100 per cent of the stimuli. Incre1 volt
of
increments
and
the
5
hand
volts
to
of
were applied
ments
to the cheeks. After a ten-second interval, the voltage was decreased
until sensation disappeared. Following another ten-second interval,
the voltage was gradually increased by 1 volt each six seconds until
the patient again reported 100 per cent of the stimuli. This reading
was considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold

sensation.
Such stimuli, at threshold and 10 per cent above the threshold,
are reported by the subjects as a “tap,” a “prick” or a “sting.” Complaints of painful perception were not elicited at these levels of
stimulation.
After the thresholds were determined, testing with a series of
single and double simultaneous stimuli followed. The body parts
tested were the right hand and left cheek (heterologous stimulation)
and the right cheek and left cheek (homologous stimulation). Both
in
mixed
singly,
a
one
stimulated
or
simultaneously,
were
part
parts
order for ten trials for each of the following conditions: (1) threshold, (2) suprathreshold (10 per cent above the threshold), (3) one
body part at suprathreshold and the other at threshold, and (4) the
reverse of (3). The order of presentation of conditions (1) and (2)
was alternated for different subjects and the same was done for
conditions (3) and (4). Similarly the order of presentation of the
heterologous and homologous stimulation was alternated.
Single stimuli were introduced as a control. Failure to report
the single stimulus indicated that the threshold had changed. When
this change occurred, stimulation was increased until a new threshold was determined and ten trials were started anew.
RESULTS

A. Threshold Values

The threshold stimulation for perception was determined for
the hands, cheeks and legs (Table I). The threshold values for the
hands and legs are three to four times higher than the thresholds
for the cheeks. While the threshold values in the legs are less than
in the hands, these differences lack statistical signiﬁcance. Variabiland
hands
the
in
legs
is
threshold
considerably
the
of
greater
ity
than in the cheeks. There is virtually no overlapping of thresholds,
however, where the cheeks and the hands are concerned.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
TABLE

245

I

Mean Thresholds and Standard Deviations of Body Parts

Mean
Thresholds (volts)
Standard
Deviation

Right

Cheek

Left
Cheek

Right
Hand

Left
Hand

Right

Leg

Left
Leg

6.76

7.85

29.25

22.35

24.50

19.52

4.47

4.86

14.88

13.60

13.99

13.64

Extinction Patterns
The difference between the number of extinctions of the right
hand or the left cheek on stimulation of both parts with either
threshold or suprathreshold stimuli was not signiﬁcant (Table 11).
Also, when both cheeks were stimulated with either threshold or
suprathreshold stimuli, there were no differences in the number of
extinctions in each cheek (Table III).
In contrast to these observations, stimulating one body part with
a suprathreshold stimulus and the other at threshold resulted in a
signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the body part stimulated
at threshold. Thus the cheek was dominant over the hand, or the
hand was dominant over the cheek depending on the body part to
which the stronger stimulus was applied (Table II). Altering the
relative strength of the stimuli applied to the cheeks resulted in a
similar predictable change in the pattern of dominance (Table III).
Further analysis of the data in Table II indicates that the hand
B.

TABLE 11

Mean Extinctions of Cheek and Hand for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation
Mean
Mean
Extinctions Extinctions
of Hand
of Cheek

Hand and Cheek at
Threshold
Hand and Cheek at
Suprathreshold
Hand at Suprathreshold
and Cheek at Threshold
Cheek at Suprathreshold
and Hand at Threshold

Difference Signiﬁcance

1.55

1.56

.01

NS.

1.02

.59

.57

NS.

2.30

.22

2.08

p&lt;.01

.32

1.36

1.04

p&lt;.01

�KORIN—FINK

246

was dominant over the cheek with greater mean frequency (2.08)
than the cheek was dominant over the hand (1.04) for the thresholdsuprathreshold condition. This tendency is also evident when both

parts were simulated at suprathreshold. If it is considered that the
mean threshold for the hands is approximately 30 volts, while for
the cheeks the threshold is 7 volts, the difference in incidence of
extinction may be explained. Suprathreshold stimulation was set
at 10 per cent above the threshold value. The hand stimulus was
TABLE 111

Mean Extinctions of Both Cheeks for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation

Both Cheeks at

Threshold

Both Cheeks at

Mean
Extinctions
of Left
Cheek

Mean
Extinctions
of Right
Cheek

.39

.45

.06

N.S.

Difference Signiﬁcance

Suprathreshold
Right Cheek at
Suprathreshold and
Left Cheek at Threshold

.18

.37

.19

N.S.

.96

.14

.82

p&lt;.05

Left Cheek at Suprathreshold and Right
Cheek at Threshold

.03

1.28

1.25

p&lt;.01

therefore increased by 3 volts and the face stimulus by only 1 volt
above the threshold value. Such an increase, although proportionately equivalent, appears to have given greater relative strength to
the hand stimulus.

Extinction
Regardless of pattern, the mean total of the number of extinctions was greater when heterologous body parts were stimulated at
threshold than when these parts were stimulated with suprathreshold stimuli (Table IV). For these same conditions of stimulation the
diﬂerences between the mean number of extinctions obtained on
homologous stimulation of the cheeks lack statistical signiﬁcance,
but the results are in the direction which indicate that a greater
number of extinctions occur when two body parts are stimulated
at threshold (Table IV). The failure to obtain a. signiﬁcant difference in the latter instance is partly due to the fact that relatively few
C. Incidence of

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

247

TABLE IV

Mean of Combined Number of Extinctions For Varying Conditions
of Threshold and Suprathreshold‘ Stimuli

Both Parts at Both Parts at A-Suprathreshold A-Threshold
Threshold Suprathreshold B-Threshold
B-Suprathreshold
A-Cheek

3.11

1.63

1.68

2.43

.85

.56

1.31

1.10

B-Hand
A-Left Cheek
B—Right Cheek

Differences between the mean number of extinctions at threshold and the
other three conditions of stimulation are signiﬁcant for the cheek and hand but
are insigniﬁcant for both cheeks.
*

extinctions are elicited when homologous parts are stimulated.
These ﬁndings on the total number of extinctions are in agreement
with previous observations (2).
DISCUSSION

The pattern of extinction following electrical stimulation of the
skin with threshold and suprathreshold stimuli has been determined.
In contrast to the ﬁndings of investigators (3) who used clinical
(tactile) stimulation, the face stimuli were not reported more frequently than the hand Stimuli. Under the conditions of the method
of testing in this investigation, nevertheless, it is clear that the
pattern of extinction for any two body parts can be readily altered
by varying the relative strength of the stimuli. Thus a suprathreshold stimulus applied to the hand tends to obscure a threshold stimulus applied to the cheek and when these stimulus intensities are
reversed, the cheek tends to obscure the hand.
Theories which hold that dominance of the cheek over the hand,
in simultaneous tactile testing, is due to an inherent factor, perceived body image, rostral dominance, developmental principle or a
learned factor, are not supported by these observations under our
conditions of testing. If any of these factors were involved, a pattern
of face dominance should have been elicited when the hand and
cheeks were stimulated with equivalent electrical stimuli at threshold and suprathreshold intensities, despite the methodological dif-

�248

KORIN—FINK

ference introduced by the procedure of affixing electrodes to the
skin.
The ﬁndings in this study, namely that differences in the strength
of the simultaneous stimuli can alter the pattern of extinction, supports a stimulus-intensity hypothesis. By inference, differences in
threshold also play a signiﬁcant role.
That an intense stimulus elsewhere can raise the pain threshold
as much as 35 per cent has been demonstrated by Hardy, Wolf and
Goodell (13). This effect of a relatively intense stimulus on the
threshold of another stimulus has also been found by investigators
using other stimuli (8, 9). The problem still remains, however, how
it is that a pattern of dominance may be elicited when presumably
equivalent stimuli are applied by touch stimuli.
The results of this study suggest an explanation. Stimuli of
differing intensities are required to elicit a threshold sensation for
various body parts. When these stimuli are increased 10 per cent,
the resultant stimuli are proportional and are perceived as equivalent. In contrast, in clinically touching two body parts, the stimuli
are disproportionate relative to the threshold value although approximately of equal intensity in their application. Because of the
differences in threshold for the hand and cheek, the tactile stimulus
to the cheek is proportionately more above the threshold than the
stimulus to the hand. Thus the cheek is perceived more frequently
than the hand stimulus and has been considered “dominant.”
A threshold hypothesis was rejected (3) on the basis that the
thresholds obtained by von Frey (16) for pressure and pain do not
strictly correspond to the dominance order elicited by the double
simultaneous stimulation tests. Most difﬁcult to reconcile is von
Frey’s ﬁnding that the pressure threshold of the glans penis, which
is second in dominance rank only to the cheek in a group of ten
body parts tested, is 111 grams per square millimeter; while the
threshold of the hand, which is at least dominant, is only 12 grams
per square millimeter.
Unfortunately, thresholds in the genital area for male and female have seldom been determined. Von Frey’s list of thresholds
(16) is based on a single subject. His more detailed observations (17),
however, indicate that there is virtually no pressure sense in the
glans penis or clitoris, although the perception of pain, warmth and
cold is well developed. It is quite possible that the punctate pressure threshold does not correlate with touch where the genital area
is concerned but that instead some other sense or combination of
senses is involved.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

249

Thresholds for the dorsum of the hand and the cheek obtained
by von Frey and other investigators indicate that the cheek is considerably more sensitive than the hand. These ﬁndings are in agreement with the thresholds obtained in this study. In a recent study
of electrical thresholds at various body sites Sigel (15) reported that
“leg areas including thigh and ankle, also dorsum of the hands and
the palm showed a deﬁnite tendency for higher thresholds. Scalp,
temple, forehead and face tended to have lower thresholds. The
anterior chest and upper arm and anterior wrist areas showed a
tendency for lower thresholds. Neck areas, abdomen and upper back
showed no deﬁnite trend.” In this statement there is no disagreement with the clinically observed order of dominance.
From the experimental results obtained here, it is proposed that
the dominance hierarchy elicited under the conditions of simultane—
ous testing may be explained on the basis of the relative strength
of the stimuli and the stimulus threshold.
SUMMARY

Using square wave electrical stimuli, the threshold for perception in the hands, cheeks and calves were determined in thirtyfour psychiatric patients. Simultaneous stimuli were applied in
random sequence to combinations of cheek and hand and both
cheeks, at threshold, suprathreshold and combinations of threshold
and suprathreshold intensities.
With simultaneous threshold, or simultaneous suprathreshold
stimulation, the differences between the number of extinctions in
either part were not signiﬁcant. With stimuli of unequal intensity
(one stimulus at threshold and one suprathreshold), however, there
was a signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the threshold
stimulus.
The total number of extinctions is greater with threshold than
with suprathreshold stimuli; and greater in heterologous than in
homologous patterns of stimulation.
It is concluded that the observed order of dominance in simultaneous cutaneous tests may be explained by psychophysical relationships.
REFERENCES
(1)

Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception. Springﬁeld, Ill.: Charles Thomas,

(2)

Bender, M. B.; Fink, M. 8c Green, M. A.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (9 Psychiat., 66:

1952.

355-362, 1951.

�250
(3)

KORIN—FINK
Bender, M. B.; Green, M. A. 8: Fink, M.: Patterns of Perceptual Organization
with Simultaneous Stimuli. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 67- Psychiat., 72:233-255
,
1954.

(4)

(5)

(5)
(7)
(8)
(9)

(10)
(11)

Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of the Sensory Organization of the Human
Brain: A Study in Rostral Dominance as Determined by Ipsilateral Simultaneous Stimulation. J. New. 6» Ment. Dis., 113:471-484, 1951.
Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of Sensory Organization of the Human Brain:
II—A Study in Rostral Dominance in Children. Neurology, 1:119-122, 1951.
Critchley, M.: The Parietal Lobes. London: Edward Arnold 8c Co., 1953.
Critchley, M.: Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special Reference
to Parietal Lesions. Brain, 72:538-561, 1949.
Denny-Brown, D.; Meyer, J. S. 8c Horenstein, S.: The Signiﬁcance of Perceptual Rivalry Resulting from Parietal Lesion. Brain, 75:433-471, 1952.
Duncker, K.: Some Preliminary Experiments on the Mutual Inﬂuence of
Pains. Psychol. Forsch, 21:311-326, 1937.
Fink, M. Sc Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli in
Normal Children. Neurology, 3:27-34, 1953.
Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8c Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile
Stimuli by Mentally Defective Subjects. J. Nerv. 69'» Ment. Dis., 117:43-49,
1953.

(12) Fink, M.; Green, M. A.
(13)

(14)
(15)

(15)

Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46-58, 1952.
Hardy, J. D.; Wolf, H. S. 8c Goodell, H.: Studies on Pain. A New Method
for Measuring Pain Threshold: Observations on Spatial Summation of Pain.
J. Clin. Invest., 19:649-658, 1940.
Linn, L.: Some Developmental Aspects of the Body Image. Int. J. Psychoanal., 36:1—7, 1955.
Sigel, H.: Cutaneous Sensory Threshold Stimulation with High
Frequency
Square-Wave Current: 11. The Relationship of Body Site and Skin Diseases
to the Sensory Threshold. J. Invest. Derm., 18:447-451, 1952.
von Frey, M.: Beitréige zur Physiologic des Schmerzsinns. Ber. Siichs. Ges.
8c

Wiss., 46:185-196, 283-296, 1894.
(17) von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Sinnesphysiologie der Haut. Ber. Siichs.
Ges.
Wiss., 47: 166-184, 1895.

�NEWS AND NOTES

DR. MILLER ANNOUNCES APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTOR OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller, Medical Director of Hillside Hospital, has
announced the appointment of Dr. Lewis L. Robbins of Topeka,
Kansas as Director of Professional Services at Hillside Hospital,

starting July 1, 1958.
Dr. Robbins has been connected for many years with the Menninger Foundation, and has held many senior positions at the
Foundation, including the Directorship of the Outpatient Depart
ment, and up to about a year ago, the Directorship of the Department of Adult Psychiatry. During the past year, he has been Senior
Psychiatric Consultant and Chairman of the Psychotherapy Research
Project at Menninger’s.
Born in Chicago, Dr. Robbins was graduated from the University
of Chicago and received his medical training at the Rush Medical
School. He interned at the Michael Reese Hospital, Chicago; and
had his psychiatric residency training at the latter hospital as well
as at the Menninger Sanitarium. He graduated from the Topeka
Institute for Psychoanalysis. He is a Diplomate of the American
Board of Psychiatry and Neurology and also holds the American
Psychiatric Association’s Certiﬁcate as a Mental Hospital Administrator.
Dr. Robbins has been an instructor in psychiatry at the Washington School of Medicine and a lecturer in psychiatry at the University of Kansas Medical School, the Menninger School of Psychiatry
as well as a training analyst at the Topeka Institute for Psychoanalysis. He is a member of numerous national and regional societies, including fellowship in the American College of Physicians,
the American Psychiatric Association, American Orthopsychiatric
Association, the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry; and he
also holds important ofﬁces on the executive and other committees
of the American Psychiatric and American Psychoanalytic Associations, and is currently the Secretary of the American Psychoanalytic
Association.
Hillside welcomes Dr. Robbins to its staff. The position of Directorship of Professional Services will include the general direction
of the Hospital’s treatment, teaching, and some of the important
research programs of the Hospital.
251

�252

NEWS AND NOTES
SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR RESIDENTS DURING 1957—1958

We are pleased to announce that we have engaged the teaching
services of three prominent psychiatrists and psychoanalysts for the
special instruction of our Residents during the 1957-1958 season.
These are:
(1) Dr. Robert C. Bak, whose course will be on “The Psychopathology of the Psychoses, with Special Reference to the Schizophrenias.” The lectures will be given at the Hospital on Wednesdays
from October 1957 through May 1958, from 12:00 to 1:00 P.M.
(2)Dr. Paul Goolker, who will be giving the course on “Principles
and Practice of Dynamic Psychotherapy for Hospitalized Patients.”
This course will be given during the same period on Fridays from
12:00 to 1:00 RM.
(3) Dr. I. Peter Glauber will be in charge of the course on
“Important Readings in Psychoanalytic Psychiatry.” This will be
given at the Hospital on Thursdays from 11:45 A.M. to 12:45 P.M.
As has been the custom, these lectures to the total Resident staff
will be preceded by three hours of special conferences including
group preceptorship of a number of Residents and their particular
Supervisor.
A SPECIAL COURSE OF LECTURES ON GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY

We have the pleasure of announcing that Dr. Aaron Stein, the
Director of the Group Psychotherapy Program at the Hospital, will
be giving an introductory course of lectures to our Resident staff;
and that all members of the psychiatric Attending Staffs and the
Clinical Assistants of both the Manhattan and Queens Clinics are
cordially invited to attend.
The lectures will be held at the Hospital in Glen Oaks on Saturday mornings from 9:00 to 10:15 A.M., beginning Saturday, September 28 and up to Saturday, December 21.
Dr. Stein is an Associate Attending Psychiatrist at the Hospital
and an authority in group psychotherapy. He plans to cover the
important practical aspects of the subject, including general principles, selection of patients, group psychodynamics. the role of the
group therapist, relationship between group and individual psychotherapy, etc.
J.S.A.M.

�Recent and Forthcoming Publications
INSTINCTIVE BEHAVIOR
The Development of a Modern Concept
Translated and edited by CLAIRE H. SCHILLER
Introduction by KARL S. LASHLEY
With contributions by Konrad Lorenz, Paul H. Schiller, Nicholas
Tinbergen, Jakob von Uexkiill
120 illustrations, $7.50

EROGENEITY AND LIBIDO
Some Addenda to the Theory of the Psychosexual Development of

the Human
Psychoanalytic Series, Volume I

By ROBERT FLIEss

$7.50

YOUTH AND CRIME
Proceedings of the Law Enforcement Institute Held at New York
University
Edited by FRANK J. COHEN
$6.00

ON THE UTILITY OF MEDICAL HISTORY
Institute on Social and Historical Medicine, Monograph I
The New York Academy of Medicine
Edited by IAGO GALDSTON

$2.00

ON NOT BEING ABLE TO PAINT
New Revised Edition
By MARION MILNER

Foreword by

illustrated, $4.50

ANNA FREUD

or order directly from
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227 West 13 Street
New York 11, N. Y.

At your bookstore

1]

�THE INDEX OF PSYCHOANALYTIC WRITINGS
ALEXANDER GRINSTEIN, M .D.
5 Volumes, sold as set only, $75.00

Volumes I and II, now available

Volume III, Fall, 1957

The Index covers the entire psychoanalytic literature through 1952.
Every book, article, review or abstract is listed in alphabetical sequence
according to authors and titles. There are approximately 37,500 listings
drawn from 25 psychoanalytic publications and some 75 journals containing articles by psychoanalysts or about psychoanalysis and closely
related subjects. Psychoanalytic books and articles, published in 21
languages, have been included, and foreign-language titles have been
translated into English. The most invaluable feature is a separate subject
index with some 30,000 topical entries. In addition, there are a number
of appendices. One of them lists nonanalytic books reviewed in psychoanalytic journals. The others are devoted to a chronological listing of

the writings of psychoanalytic pioneers. Among them is the ﬁrst complete bibliography of Sigmund Freud’s writings and published letters.
Dr. Heinz Hartmann says: “Psychoanalysis has reached a stage at
which a truly comprehensive index of analytical literature has become
a necessity. Many questions of principle had to be decided, on the
methods of listing, on the degrees of inclusiveness, etc., in order to
make this Index a valuable tool for research workers in psychoanalysis
and related ﬁelds. Dr. Grinstein made these decisions with considerable
wisdom and objectivity, guided by a lucid understanding of all the
rather complex problems inherent in his tremendous task. This task
might well have looked forbidding and frightened off many a less
courageous man. Having become accustomed to using Volume I of
The Index of Psychoanalytic Writings (other volumes are to follow
soon), I can say that the obvious difﬁculties of this comprehensive
venture have been successfully overcome and that this imposing work
has proved of the greatest value to me, and without doubt to very
many others.”
At your book store

or order directly from
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227 West 13 Street
New York 11, N. Y.
.
1]

�JOURNAL of the

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
VOLUME

VI

1957

NUMBERS 1-4

CONTENTS
Scientiﬁc Papers
Blane, Howard T. and Glad, Erik—THE

PSYCHOLOGIST AND
THE PSYCHIATRIC TEAM IN A RESPIRATOR CENTER
.

Boyer, L. Bryce—THE MEANING
SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENT

Desmonde, William H.—THE
ANIMAL SACRIFICE

.

.

OF INSULIN THERAPY TO A
.

.

24

.

.

.

.

.

.

ORIGIN OF MONEY IN THE
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Devereux, George—THE

CRITERIA OF DUAL CO‘MPETENCE IN
PSYCHIATRIC-ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDIES .

87

Fink, Max—A

UNIFIED THEORY OF THE ACTION OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Glynn, Eugene—THE THERAPEUTIC USE
ADOLESCENT PAVILION

.

.

.

OF SECLUSION IN AN
.

.

Green, Martin A.—SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL
IN EEG RESPONSE TO ELECTROSHOCK .
.

Jaﬁe, Joseph—AN OBJECTIVE

1 9‘7

.

.

.

.

156

VARIABLIITY
.

229

.

STUDY OF COMMUNICATION IN
.

207

FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY
MENTAL HOSPITAL .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

216

PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Kakn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; and Fink, Max—SOCIAL

Karin, Hyman and Fink Max—ROLE

OF STIMULUS INTENSITY
IN PERCEPTION OF SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL CUTANEOUS

STIMULI.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

241

�Locke, N orman—REMARKS

PSYCHOLOGY AND THE

ON THE

GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY OF THE HARD OF HEARING

100

.

M eerloo, ]oost A. M .—Kos

AGAINST KNIDOS: AMBIVALENCE AS
THE PSYCHIATRIC OUTLOOK ON MAN .
.
.
.
.

67

M ullan, H ugh—GROUP

PSYCHOTHERAPY IN PRIVATE PRACTICE:
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS

34

Nz'ederland, William

G.——THE SYMBOLIC RIVER-SISTER EQUATION IN POETRY AND FOLKLORE

Reider, N OTman—TRANSFERENCE

PSYCHOSIS

Slap, Joseph William—PSYCHOTHERAPY

91
131

.

WITH A CASE

OF

43

MALADIE DES TICS

Slap, [oseph William—SOME CLINICAL

AND

THEORETICAL

150

REMARKS ON CHESS

Clinical Symposium
OUTPATIENT TREATMENT VIA PSYCHOTHERAPY OF A CHARACTER NEUROTIC WITH IMPOTENCE
Part 1: Case presentation by Lionel Blackmcm

Part II:

Discussion

Book Review
News and Notes

107
160
180

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

55,121,182,251

�NO and YES
on the genesis of human communication
By RENE A. SPITZ

$4.00

Dr. Spitz, well known for his original studies of the psychological

‘

i

development of infants, devote-s a monograph to the beginnings of com~
munication. He tackles this most important problem from a broad
basis, using the theoretical framework of pSychoanalysis; direct ob’servations of infants, both normal and abnormal; and the newest
ﬁndings of animal ethology, experimental psychology, embryology and
physiology. Skillfully integrating the dataiobtained by thesescience'sr
Dr. .Spitz presents a most fascinating and thought-provoking theory of,
the roots of communication, both verbal and nonverbal.
Dr. Spitz eXa-mines the inherited or preformed motor behavior patterns whiCh have a function in the earl1est nursing situation. Both
negatiOn as well as afﬁrmation have such early motor prototypes, which
in the Course of deve10pment undergo a change of' function. Divorced,
fromthe behavior they originally subserved, these motor patterns can
now be utilized exclusively as signals of communication. Later, endowed with semantic meaning which the child acquires through identiﬁcation with the adult’s “No” gesture, they are used for communication proper.
Though drawing upon the data and theories of other sciences, the
framework of this monograph rests upon Freud's fundamental insights
into human pSychological development. Its, major contribution is the
minute examination of some of; the building blocks of‘Freud’s theory.
This proc'edUre permits the author to throw light on hitherto unexplored interrelations between speCIﬁc aspects of behaviOr1n infants.
these ﬁndings emerges the generally applicable concepts of
From
‘
“organizers of psychic development" as well as a description of the
origins of the Selfin infancy. These ﬁndings have the widest implications for clinical psychoanalysis as well as the study of human relations
in general.
.

.

‘

.&lt;

..

.1

2...:

.J

_

‘

’

—.—___‘_____________________
At your bookstore.
or order directly from
‘

1]

INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227. West 13 Street
'New York 11, N. Y.
.
,

'

�M
THE PS’YCHOANALYTIC STUDY OF THE CHILD
Volume XII, $8.50

Contents. of the Newest Volume

ERNST KRIS,

1.9004957

Contributions to Psychoanalytic Theory

Nature and Development of the Concept of Repression in Freud's Writings
PHYLLIS GREENAcRE—The Childhood of the Artist
EDITH JACOBSON—On Normal and Pathological Moods
Pathoand
Normal
JEANNE LAMPL—-DE GRoor—On Defense and Development:

‘CHARLES BRENNER—The

logical

RUDOLPH M. LOE-WENSTEIM—eSomt}

Thoughts on Interpretation in the Theory

and Practice of Psychoanalysis
SEYMOUR L. LUSTMAN—Psychic Energy and Mechanisms. of Defense

’

Aspects of Early Development

CAsusoe-Anxiety Related to the Discovery of the‘Penis': An Observation. With an Introduction by ANNA FREUD
MARIANNE KRIS—The Use of Prediction in :1 Longitudinal Study
WILLIAM G. NIEDERLAND—The Earliest Dreams of a Young Child
GABRIEL

_

‘

ANNEMARIE SANDLER, ELIZABETH DAUNTON and ANNELIESE SCHNURMANN—
Inconsistency in the Mother as a. Factor in Character Development: A
Comparative Study. With an Introduction by ANNA FREUD
V

Clinical Contributions

PETER BLos—Preoedipal Factors in the Etiology of Female Delinquency
ERNA FURMAN—Treatment of UndeﬁFiV'es by Way of Parents
ELISABETH GELEERD—Some' ASPects

cents

of Psychoanalytic Technique in Adoles-

BELA MITrELMANN—‘Motility in the Therapy of Children
NATHAN N. ROOT—A Neurosis in Adolescence
MARGARETE

and Adults

RUBEN—Delinquency; A Defense Against Loss of ObjeCts and

Reality
LISBETH J. SACHS—On Changes in Identiﬁcation frOm Machine to Cripple
‘

Applied Psychoanalysis

the Salamander’
StanislaVsk-i
PHILIP WEISSMAN—The Childhood and Legacy of

ROBERT PLANK—On ‘fSeeing

______—__‘_____._______———————————or- order directly from
{I
At your bookstore
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
0
New York 11, ‘N. Y.
227 West 13 Street,
.

.

�jam;
Rah at smug/1n Pox-caption of Simultaneous mm. swam
Pub}!

m

2

Karin $.13. and 3"!“ Fink Kenn

”amt at emu“ in “armament until. puma“: ha
m
been the object at midst-able discussion was. it: «napalm by Bender
and common and matron: wlmtim hm bun errand.

Ema:
12h.
threshold for perception
9150mm
maand
“mm,
3!;
mm
w psychiatric putienta.
«in:
mm,
simianeoua stimuli are applied in madam nqumo to lamination: o!
cheek md hand and both check: at 111mm, mthruhold and mama”
cf throdwld and mmthruhold human.

Bung aqua-o
in ’01:. hands,

Results:

40de

3mm:

cinnamon”
or
supnthromold «imam,
wmw,
the differences between the number of “auctions in aither part. were not.
nigaiﬁunt. Him «ml: or
mummy (m sum“ at thmhold
and one supmthmshold), Mater; then m a signiﬁcant meme in the
£13,1an ta «part tho thruhom.
with

W

Cancyuam
Thou data suppert tho
1:: simultaneous cutaneous

‘o‘ono "

”Ix/57

mmnm: tint the obnmd nrdor of Wm
mm are pmd upon paydmﬁysieal anaemia“.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2534">
                <text>Role of stimulus intensity in perception of simultaneous cutaneous electrical stimuli. J Hillside Hosp., 6: 241-250, 1957.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2535">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2536">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-26-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2537">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2538">
                <text>Korin, Hyman; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2539">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2540">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2541">
                <text>Reprint From the Journal of the Hillside Hospital,Vol. VI October, 1957. Full copy of the Journal of The Hillside Hospital, Vol VI, No. 4, October 1957, Table of contents: A UNIFIED THEORY: OF THE ACTION OF PHYSIODYNAMIC- THERAPIEs by Max Fink; AN OBJECTIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS by Joseph Jaffe; SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY MENTAL HOSPITAL by Robert L Kahn, Max Pollack and Max Fink; SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG RESPONSE TO ELECTROSHOCK by Martin A. Green; ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION 0F SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL CUTANEOUS STIMULI by Hyman Korin and Max Fink; NEWS AND NOTES.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2542">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2543">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74456">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81017">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87578">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94139">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="255" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="46">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/7bd07b6cfa28408a13dfb7a2b134ee43.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7a8e9dcb7ef041dbb63226e8de460992</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100672">
                    <text>�Reprinted from Psychopathology of Communication
Grime &amp; Strstton. Inc., 1958
Printed in. (1.5.4.

9
CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING
ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY
By ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,

I

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.*

Weinstein and his associates have described patterns
of symbolic adaptation in patients with cerebral dysfunction.l The
main emphasis in their work has been placed on altered language patterns. Their observations have shown the similarity and relationship
between various kinds of behavior which were previously regarded as
disparate phenomena. Instead of being isolated defects due to focal
brain lesions, these phenomena can be understood as uniﬁed aspects of
an altered pattern of adaptation under the conditions of a diffuse disturbance in brain function. Some of the factors which determine the particular type of adaptation shown include the premorbid personality and the
nature of the environmental stresses.
This emphasis on language has been shown to be a useful method of
study. For example, the presence of certain characteristic changes in
language under the influence of amobarbital sodium, such as disorienta—
tion for time and place, denial of illness, and reduplication, has been
standardized as a diagnostic test of brain disease in neurological patients?! 3
This technique has application in the study of other conditions of
altered brain function, as in the somatic therapies. The electroshock
population is of interest for two reasons. It is possible in these patients,
as it is not in those with neurological diseases, to manipulate experimentally the stimulus causing changes in brain function. Secondly, the mode
of action and the psychological changes associated with electroshock
treatment remain poorly understood. In a previous study we have shown
that a favorable clinical response to electroshock treatment is related to
early and persistent manifestations of language changes with amobarbiN RECENT YEARS

*

Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New
York. Prepared with assistance from the National Institute of Mental Health, Public Health Service and the Dazian Foundation for Medical Research.

126

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

127

tal sodium characteristic of altered brain function} This ﬁnding was
considered to support the hypothesis advanced by Weinstein and
Kahnl’ 5 that the mechanism of therapeutic action of electrically induced convulsions lay in the creation of a condition of altered brain
function in which the patient might express his problems in a new
symbolic fashion, particularly in the form of denial.
The present investigation is a further attempt to test this hypothesis
by studying changes in language that occur with treatment. The following questions speciﬁcally were studied:
1. Are there characteristic identiﬁable changes in language which develop in the course of electroshock treatment?
2. Are these changes related to the clinical response?
3. Are these changes related to the degree of alteration of brain function?
4. Does the administration of amobarbital sodium prior to treatment
produce any changes in language which have prognostic value for the
eventual clinical response to treatment, the development of altered brain
function, and the development of language changes during treatment?
METHOD

Population: Sixty-ﬁve consecutive referrals for electroshock treatment
at the Hillside Hospital were studied. The Reiter electrostimulator was
used on 49 patients, while 16 were treated with the Medcraft. There were
20 men in the series and 45 women and ages ranged from 21 to 68.
Each patient was tested prior to treatment and retested during the
second week of treatment after having received 4-6 convulsions, and during the third week after having received 7-9 convulsions. On each of
these occasions the patient was ﬁrst tested clinically and then after
amobarbital sodium had been administered at the rate of .05 grams per
minute until nystagmus, slurred speech, drowsiness, and errors in counting backward were noted.2
The test consisted of a standardized series of questions concerning
orientation and awareness of illness. This study is based, however, on
the response to only three of the questions used: (1) What is your main
trouble? (2) Why did you come to this place? (3) If you could have
one wish, what would you wish for? All responses were recorded verbatim. Observations were also made on such nonverbal aspects as smiling, laughing, gestures, and other bodily movements.

�128

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

or

COMMUNICATION

RESULTS

Patterns of Language Change Noted Clinically During Treatment
In evaluating the changes in language, the original responses to the
three questions given clinically prior to treatment were used as the baseline. The evaluation of what constituted a change was based on explicit
objective changes in grammar rather than on subjective or interpretative
changes as to affect, mood, feeling, pitch, voice quality, etc. In this
manner the following types of language change were noted clinically
during the course of treatment: (1) alteration in the syntactical use of
person, (2) evasion, (3) verbal denial, (4) qualiﬁcation, (5) change in
tense, (6) displacement, (7) stereotyped expressions and cliches, and
(8) smiling and laughing.
Alteration in the syntactical use of person. Instead of using the ﬁrst
person singular as in the pretreatment period, 28 patients used the second or third person and, occasionally, the ﬁrst person plural. To the
question concerning main trouble such responses were given as, “It’s
what they call a depression,” “They told me I was emotionally and
mentally sick,” “We’re having a lot of trouble with my mother-in-law,”
“My cousin brought me; she said I was nervous,” “What’s your main
trouble, or don’t you know?” and “My Mrs. is sick and I would appreciate it if they would let her in here as soon as possible.” The reason for
coming to the hospital was variously given as, “My wife brought me,”
“My father told me to come here,” or “My doctor said this was a good
hospital.” The wish was given as “Perfect health for my family,” “My
children, my husband, and all my good friends should be healthy and
happy,” and “There should be peace in the world.”
Evasion. Evasion in answering the question about their illness was
shown by 27 patients. This commonly took the form of answering this
question with another, as, “What do you mean by my main trouble?,”
“What do you expect me to say?,” “Well, what it it?,” and “What did I
say last time?” Other language patterns considered evasive included
such responses as, “I don’t know how to tell you,” “I don’t get what you
mean,” “Let me think,” “It’s hard to say,” and “I just don’t know how
to express it.’ One patient asked the examiner to give her a hint.
Verbal denial. Explicit verbal denial of illness was shown by 23 patients. They either said they had no main trouble, were well or else, after
giving evasive ‘I don’t know” responses, denied their illness and symptoms when speciﬁcally questioned about them.

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

129

Qualiﬁcation. Qualiﬁcation of a response in the direction of less commitment was shown by 19 patients. This language pattern was characterized by the use of such words as “guess,” “kind of,” “sort of,” “think,”
“apparently,” “probably,” “possibly,” “might be,” “seem,” “assumed,”
9,
and “perhaps. Thus such responses were given as, “I guess I have
been jittery,” “I seem to be very much depressed,” “Probably that I’m
nervous,” “I suffer from anxieties, apparently,” “Possibly worry about
the future,” “I have sort of gotten frightened,” “Mentally upset, I assume,” and “I think I’m a little insecure.”
Change in tense. In 18 patients there was a change in tense in describing their illness. In most cases the patient used the past tense: “I was
depressed when I came here” or “I had been nervous.” In other cases
the patient answered the question about his main trouble by putting it
in the future tense as a wish.
Displacement. In 20 cases there was a displacement of the complaint
to something other than originally given prior to treatment. This was
invariably less serious than the original complaint. Sometimes the displacement was in the form of a somatic complaint, as saying the main
trouble was “diarrhea,” “headaches,” “pain in the feet,” “I slammed the
ﬁnger in the door,” and “I’ve got an itch.” In other cases the displacement was to some concrete aspect of the hospital situation, as “My main
trouble is getting these treatments,” or “I’m upset because I was transferred to another ward.”
Stereotyped expressions and cliches. The use of stereotyped expressions and cliches was shown by 11 patients. They gave such responses
as “It seems to me under the proper circumstances I’d be all right,” “ [My
trouble is] monetary problems with people that are honorary and sincere,” “That’s the root of the whole thing,” “The only thing certain is
death and taxes,” “Learn my lesson and be a good boy,” “To be a person
of pep and reliability,” and “I just want to stop being a lazy lout.” One
woman responded to a question of her one wish with, “I think I should
consult my husband before I make a wish because he’s a lawyer and the
father of my children.”
Smiling and laughing. In 20 cases the patient was noted to smile or
laugh either immediately preceding or following his response to the
question concerning his illness.
Language Changes Shown with Amobarbital Sodium During Treatment
The language patterns after amobarbital sodium during the second

�130

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION

and third weeks of treatment were similar to those noted clinically. With
the drug, however, the changes appeared earlier in the course of treatment. A given language pattern might be noted in the second week of
treatment with the drug, but would not occur clinically until the third
week. In addition, the reactions to the drug took more extreme forms,
which are described as (l) cryptic responses, and (2) withdrawal reactions.
Cryptic responses. These were shown by 23 patients. Responses were
classed as cryptic when they had no obvious relevance to the test question or when their meaning was obscure, representing a very personalized expression. Thus one patient, when asked his main trouble, said,
“Nightmare of the afternoon of the evening of the nightmare.” Others
do
the
know
the
didn’t
“I
such
problems—couldn’t
as
responses
gave
problems,” “Getting my husband to write down what he does,” or “What
could I say—you don’t get the crossword.”
Withdrawal reactions. Some pattern of withdrawal was noted in 33
patients. This behavior was characterized by incomplete sentences, incoherent mumbling, neologisms, perseveration, the use of a foreign
language by bilingual patients, and delay or failure to respond to the
questions. These patients would characteristically lie with their eyes
open, would smile or turn their heads when the examiner spoke, and
would speak clearly and promptly and in English when asked questions
not pertaining to their illness.
Other Changes in Language
Other changes in language were noted both clinically and with amobarbital sodium in response to the other questions of the test battery but
not as a part of this study. There was frequent misnaming of the examiner or reference to him as “Mister.” With the drug those patients
who had a “positive reaction,” i.e., one characteristic of altered brain
function, showed the characteristic patterns of disorientation for place
and time and confabulation described in previous communications. (2)
Relation of Language Changes to Clinical Response
The evaluation of clinical response to treatment was made independently of this study. The patients were rated by the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the treatments, by the patient’s own therapist and supervising psychiatrist, and by the medical director. On the basis of these
ratings the patients were classiﬁed into three groups: 28 patients were

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

13].

considered much improved, no longer showing the symptoms which had
brought them into the hospital; 22 patients were rated as moderately
improved, showing some symptomatic relief but still showing disturbing
features; and 15 were regarded as unimproved, having shown only
equivocal or transient changes at best. The ratings were short term
evaluations, being made within two months after completion of treatment.
For quantitative purposes the language changes shown during both
the second and third weeks of treatment have been grouped together as
though the patients had been tested only once. If a particular pattern
was shown during both periods, the item was scored only once. Altogether, 89 per cent of the patients showed at least one of these patterns of
language change clinically during treatment. Such changes were found
in all of the much improved patients but in only 73 per cent of the unimproved group. It was apparent that there was a relation between the
degree of clinical improvement and the number of changes in language
patterns. When the data are analyzed for the patients who showed three
or more language pattern changes, there is a signiﬁcant difference between the groups (table 1). While 68 per cent of the much improved
patients showed three or more language changes, only 20 per cent of
the unimproved patients showed this degree of language change. Using
Chi-square, the over-all difference is signiﬁcant at better than the 1 per
cent level of conﬁdence.
TABLE

1.—Relation of Language Changes Shown Clinically to Response to

Treatment

Three or more
*
patterns

Fewer than three

Change

No.

Much improved
Moderately
improved
Unimproved

28

19

22

7

32

15

68

15

3

20

12

80

65

29

45 per cent

36

55 per cent

Total

*X’

=

11.26; P

&lt;

68 per cent

patterns
9

*

32 per cent

.01

When each language pattern is analyzed individually (as shown in
fig. 1) it becomes apparent that not all patterns discriminated equally

�132

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION

between the groups. In all but one case, a greater percentage of the
much improved group was most likely to show denial, use of the second
or third person, evasion, and displacement of complaint. The only lanmuch
the
between
found
diﬁerence
which
little
was
on
pattern
guage
improved and unimproved patients was the incidence of smiling and

laughing.
Analysis of the changes shown by the diﬁerent groups under amytal is
shown for the cryptic and withdrawal reactions only in ﬁgure 1. While
the crytic responses did not vary much with the different groups, the
showing of a withdrawal reaction differentiated the three groups signiﬁcantlyﬁ‘ occurring in 71 per cent of the much improved, 45 per cent of
the moderately improved, and only 20 per cent of the unimproved patients.
Relation of Language Changes to Electroencephalographic Response
In a previous communication a method of quantitatively evaluating
electroencephalographic records was described.6 Criteoria were established for rating records as showing relatively high, middle or low degree of slowing according to ﬁve criteria: average per cent time delta
waves (waves of six or fewer cycles per second), the highest per cent time
delta waves at any one lead, the lowest frequency in the record, the
highest amplitude of delta waves, and the longest duration of a burst
of delta waves. In the present study, an electroencephalogram was obtained prior to treatment and in the second and third weeks of treatment.
Each record was evaluated according to the dichotomy of showing a
relatively high degree of delta activity or not, using these criteria.
In table 2 the relationship is shown between electroencephalographic
slowing and changes in language. Those patients with the highest
degree of cerebral dysfunction, having high degree delta in both the
second and third weeks of treatment, show a greater number of language
changes both clinically and with amobarbital sodium. Using the withdrawal reaction as an index of the drug effect, however, the difference
just fails to be statistically signiﬁcant.

Pretreatment Language Patterns
The language patterns described in this study were considered as
changes only when they occurred after the original pretreatment clinical
test which was used as a baseline. Seven patients, however, showed some
"

X2

=

10.72, signiﬁcant at better than the 1 per cent level of conﬁdence.

�133

CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY
TABLE

2.—Relation of Language Change to High Degree Delta on the Electroencephalogram During the Second and Third Weeks of Treatment

Withdrawal reactions
with amobarhital
sodium T

Change

No.

Three or more
changes clinically

Both weeks
high
Delta
Activity
One week
high
Delta
Activity
No high
Delta
Activity

25

16

16

8

50

9

56

24

6

25

8

33

= 7.62; P &lt;
TX” = 4.87; P &lt;
* X2

*

64 per cent

15

60 per cent

.05
.10

M

form of these language patterns in the initial clinical test. The manifestation of these same patterns by these patients at any other time was
accordingly not scored as a change.
When given amobarhital sodium prior to treatment, however, 30 patients (or 46 per cent of the total) showed some language change comparable to that noted during treatment. Table 3 shows the relation between
such changes at this time and the eventual clinical
response. These
changes were found in 68 per cent of the much improved patients, in 36
per cent of the moderately improved, and in 20 per cent of the unimproved groups.
TABLE 3.—-—Relation

of Pretreatment Language Changes with Amobarbital Sodium
to Eventual Clinical Response

Change

No.

Much improved
Moderately
improved
Unimproved

28

19

22

8

36

15

3

20

“ X2

=

10.30; P

&lt;

.01

Change with amobarhital sodium
68 per cent

*

�134

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION

In table 4 it is demonstrated that the pretreatment change with the
drug was also prognostic of the eventual physiological response to treatment as measured by the degree of electroencephalographic slowing.
The over-all distribution just falls short of statistical signiﬁcance, although when those who showed high delta activity in both periods are
compared with all the other cases as a group, the difference is signiﬁcant
at the 5 per cent level of conﬁdence.
of Pretreatment Changes with Amobarbital Sodium to High
Degree EEG Delta Activity During the Second and Third Weeks of Treatment

TABLE 4.———Relation

Both weeks
high Delta Activity
One week
high Delta Activity
No high
Delta Activity
"‘X2

= 5.27;

Change with amobarbital sodium

No.

Change

P

&lt;

*

64 per cent

25

16

16

6

38

24

8

33

.10

Finally, the initial response to amobarhital sodium was also prognostic
of the degree of language change shown clinically and to the manifestation of withdrawal reactions with the drug during treatment (table 5).
Between Pretreatment Language Response to Amobarbital
Sodium and Clinical Changes and Withdrawal During Treatment

TABLE 5.——Relati0n

No.

Pretreatment

Three or more
clinical lan*
guage patterns

barbital sodium

= 4.26; P &lt;
'l'X2 = 6.88; P &lt;
"‘X2

.05
.01

tions to amobarbital sodium '1‘

30

18

60 per cent

21

70 per cent

35

11

31

12

34

response to amobarhital sodium
N0 pretreatment
response to amo-

Withdrawal reac-

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

135

DISCUSSION

The relationship of the language changes to the development of altered
brain function and to the clinical response is consistent with our original
hypothesis concerning the mode of action of electroshock treatment. In
6
studies4’
we have shown that the clinical outcome is related
previous
to the presence and degree of alteration in cerebral function. Using the
“amytal test”2 and the EEG as indices, it has been found that those
patients with the earliest and most persistent manifestations of cerebral
dysfunction were most likely to have a favorable response. Such physiological changes create the milieu which facilitates behavioral change.
The present study, analyzing language patterns, clariﬁes the nature of
the behavioral changes that occur with treatment.
The language shown originally (prior to treatment) may be summarized in the statement, “I have this particular illness.” The subject of
this sentence answers the question “who,” the predicate refers to “what,”
and the verb describes the relationship, including the temporal and intensity aspects. During treatment the subject of the sentence may be modiﬁed by changes in the use of person, so that the sentence might read,
“You [or he, she, or they] have this particular illness.” Changes in the
predicate are shown by such patterns as displacement or evasion. In displacement the sentence might read, “I have some other kind of illness,”
while, with evasion, it would be, “I have something, but I don’t know
what.” Changes in the verb are shown by denial, qualiﬁcation, or alteration of tense. In denial the statement would be, “I don’t have this particular illness;” a qualiﬁed sentence would read, “I might have this particular illnessg” while with alteration of tense the sentence would be, “I had
this particular illness.”
Some language patterns modify the sentence as a whole. If the patient
smiles, or if he introduces his statement by saying, “The doctors tell me
that . . . ,” any part or all of the sentence may be modiﬁed. In other
reactions, particularly those noted under amytal, the patient avoids giving any meaningful statement at all. In the withdrawal reaction he says
nothing or omits part of the sentence. In the use of cliches or cryptic
expressions no speciﬁc referential meaning can be drawn from the language.
It is evident from this analysis that the language changes are not
random or bizarre, but form a patterned reorganization of communica-

�136

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION

tion characterized by an alteration in the patient’s attitudes to his problems and his illness. The patient either says he is not now and never has
been ill, displaces his illness temporally, spatially, or personally, is less
committed to his awareness of his illness by the use of qualiﬁcations, or
avoids the whole problem by evasion and noncommunication.
These patterns are comparable to those noted previously by Weinstein
and Kahn:l in patients with cerebral disorders, and referred to by these
authors as the “language of denial.” Similar language changes have also
been described following other somatic therapies. Frank“ 8 reports that
lobotomized patients avoid talking about the operation, and he states
that “the facility and glibness with which they say ‘well I had an operation for my nerves, I guess’ contain the quality of unconscious denial.”
Legault,9 working intensively with post-lobotomy patients, found persistent attitudes of denial. One patient, when asked why she came to see
the doctor, said it was her relatives’ idea. Many gave qualiﬁed responses,
saying they “supposed” they had had an operation. Others doubted that
the operation was on the brain, or used an evasive, stereotyped expression
as “some nerve in there,” or displaced the procedure as in, “Oh, yes, I
went to the hospital and got two black eyes.” When asked about the symtoms that led up to the operation, patients gave such response as, “It
seems to have gone.” In studying patients who showed clinical improvement following prolonged coma reactions in insulin coma therapy, we
have noted similar changes in language. In a case report10 we noted the
appearance of reduplicative phenomena, evasion, verbal denial, displacement, increased use of stereotyped expressions and cliches, cryptic responses, and much smiling and laughing, at a time when clinical improvement was most marked.
Since these language changes occur most frequently in patients who
are clinically evaluated as improved, may not the language patterns
themselves be the critical cues that give a favorable clinical impression?
There is traditionally much difﬁculty in rating patients after treatment.
Such evaluations are highly variable because of the lack of suitable
objective criteria. While there are other objective cues which can be used,
such as the amount of sedation required or the quantity of food eaten,
the appearance of these language patterns may constitute an operational
basis for clinical evaluation in the psychiatric interview.
Not all patients, however, who showed at least three of the language
changes were regarded as much improved, and not all of the much im-

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

137

proved patients showed this degree of change. There may be other
aspects of language and communication not covered by this study which
are signiﬁcant. Another explanation is that the use of these language
patterns may vary in time or in different situations. On the basis of our
previous observations of the “Amytal test” and the electroencephalogram
in electroshock patients, we should predict that unimproved patients
would show these language changes only transiently, while improved
patients would show them persistently. Future work should also be
directed toward comparison of language patterns shown when the patient
is speaking to a physician with those used when he is with his family or
friends. The degree to which members of the patient’s family are made
more comfortable by the changed language, and even their inclination to
use similar language, may explain the variability in the duration of
11 and
Both
Kahnl'
Weinstein
and
improvement following treatment.
Legault9 have indicated a relationship between the patterns of communication of the patient and those of his family.
Finally, our results demonstrate the prognostic usefulness of amobarbital sodium administered prior to treatment. The prognostic value of
the drug in the somatic therapies has been noted previously by Hoch12
and others,““14 who felt that patients who became more normal in
speech, ideation, and behavior under the inﬂuence of barbiturates were
most likely to improve with treatment. In the present study the manifestation of a change in language with the drug was related not only to
the development of altered brain function and to the clinical outcome,
but to the eventual manifestation of these language patterns clinically.
On this basis, an operational deﬁnition of the goal of electroshock therapy might be described as enduring clinical manifestation of those language patterns which occur initially only with amobarbital sodium.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

consecutive patients referred for electroshock treatment
were studied prior to and during the second and third weeks of treatment.
Each patient was tested at these times both clinically and with amobarbital sodium with a standard series of questions concerning attitude toward
illness.
2. The results showed that characteristic changes in language occurred
both clinically and with amobarbital sodium during treatment. These
changes were signiﬁcantly related to the clinical response to treatment
1. Sixty-ﬁve

�138

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION

M

and to the degree of alteration of brain function as measured by the
electroencephalogram.
3. The presence of these language patterns with amobarbital sodium
prior to treatment was related to the eventual clinical response, the development of altered brain function, and the development of language
changes clinically during treatment.
70

a

6050

40
'lo

30

FIG. 1.

CLINICAL

WITH

AMOBARBITAL

r-——|

I

uucu Imovso-

Ei Ionmovw
Cl ‘ummovso

Relation of each language pattern to response to treatment.

4. It is felt that these language changes constitute an operational basis

for the evaluation of the clinical response.
5. The results support the hypothesis that the therapeutic mechanism
of electroshock treatment is the development of different patterns of
symbolic adaptation to the patient’s problems and illness under the conditions of altered brain function.
REFERENCES
1. WEINSTEIN, E. A., AND KAHN, R.

2.

L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. Springﬁeld, III., Charles C. Thomas, 1955.
SUGARMAN, L. A., AND LINN, L.: Diagnostic use of amobarhital
sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in organic brain disease. Am. J. Psychiat.

—, —,

112: 889-894, 1953.
3. —-~,
, AND MALITZ, 5.: Serial administration of the “Amytal test” for
brain disease: its diagnostic and prognostic value. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.
71 : 217-226, 1954.

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

139

Relation between altered
brain function and denial in electroshock therapy. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.

KAHN, R. L., FINK, M., AND WEINSTEIN, E. A.:

76: 23-29, 1956.
WEINSTEIN, E. A., LINN, L.,

AND

KAHN, R. L.: Psychosis during electroshock

therapy: its relation to the theory of shock therapy. Am. J. Psychiat. 109:

22-26, 1952.
FINK, M., AND KAHN, R. L.: Quantitative studies of slow wave activity following electroshock, Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol. 8: 158, 1956.
FRANK, J .: Clinical survey and results of 200 cases of prefrontal leucotomy.
J. Ment. Sci. 92: 497-508, 1946.

—:

Some aspects of lobotomy (prefrontal leucotomy) under psychoanalytic
scrutiny. Psychiatry 13: 35-42, 1950.
LEGAULT, 0.: Denial as a complex process in post lobotomy. Psychiatry 17:

153-161, 1954.
10. KAHN, R. L., GRAUBERT, D.,

ll.

FINK, M.: Delusional reduplication of parts
of the body after insulin coma therapy. J. Hillside Hosp. 4: 134-137, 1955.
WEINSTEIN, E. A., AND KAHN, R. L.: Personality factors in denial of illness.
AND

Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 69: 355-367, 1953.
12. HOCH, P. H.: The present status of narcodiagnosis and therapy. J. Nerv. Ment.
Dis. 103: 248-259, 1946.
13. HARRIS, M. M., Honwn‘z, W. A., AND MILCH, E. A.: Regarding Sodium
Amytal as a prognostic aid in insulin and metrozol shock therapy of mental
patients (dementia praecox). Am. J. Psychiat. 96: 327, 1939.
14. GOTTLIEB, J. 5., AND HOPE, J. M.: Prognostic value of intravenous administration of Sodium Amytal in cases of schizophrenia. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 46: 86-100, 1941.

��r
i

,

‘

4‘

__

W

g

1"

'

3

m' 13 1956

‘

L

g

0

cm

In

meme: mama wrmsnocx mm!
Robert L.

mm, mm. (1)

m m; 3.9.

(2)

x
a

3

E

m the Roman Service, Rama 303mm,

f

610::

om, In

Ion-k

Research Assistant (Psychology).

(1)

(2) Inmmumrtufﬂmumrdn

:

um,upon,bymtmavrmmhmmmmeumwmmum

l

hum). Instant-a

We quiz
.

.____.,_T
f

3

32

I

m

M“

7

,

,

,

‘

of Heath, Public Health Service, and tin

mm mum :m'

W/we‘bé
,

.

I

��.————n.~—

um w-w—w,

m

,

c121:

ll‘ynbolié

rum“, gamma: in we tan a: mu.
m pal-amt imadglﬁm 1- 5 mm»: «mm t0 tut this Methods by

studying changes in

1mm:

um. ocetu' wﬁh transom.

speculum,

in: quantum war. ”mad:
1) he then numb-nun 1631153113131. chug“ in language
in the
a: 93.00th tmmu
2) An thug changes routed tn the clinical
rum?

cm
3)

1;)

tho

Imm-

which develop
‘

mmwmmmadummrmumz
1:.an
m
&lt;3th

no»

mum-mum at amour-him swim prior to

mm mane

pm

«no any chaugu Salaam
mu tax-tho mutual 611M681
“spams t0 tmtmnt, tho Moment 6:! ahead brain mum, and the m1»-

mt of language We! during treatment?

�www.—

mm
Pbpﬂatim

8mm.” «causative mun-.1- for 0103th mama

3W.

n: tho 3:11.146. Hoopim were
ha

ma Rutter mootmtimlator

was used an

puma, m: 16 mm trhud with m Index-art. mm was 20 m m that

nﬂaoanthm,andthoagaamngoﬁfm21t068o

1361th mudprbrto What, and nuuuddurxng tbs soc.
nadmok o: tmhent arm-hum medMM amen... and man; the third
Each

Mattel-havingmiv'ud'l-‘P

convulsions.

am was first team clinically,

m

and

muchatthcnoemiona tbsp“-

that after

Win]. ”dim had bun mun-

mm, slurred speech, dram

intend at the at. of .05
Per mm mm
sine” and awn 1n counting hackurd was We! (2).

m tut consist-d of

a.

“1m and ”mane” at 111m".

a»

standardised

an» of Question concerning orient»

nu stumr in band, hammer,

on

thg

mm”

to

was a.) ﬂaw in your Iain troublo? 2) Why am you
com to this 131100? 3)Ifmcon1dhnve mum, whutwoﬂdmwinhfar? 111
responses was mom 19mm. Mmum am: also
on such mam}.
only three or

.

aspects as

questions

mum,

laughing, gestural: and cum- bodily

m

mu.

�._.

m-

WW.Mmmmmm.m

W

—...—

,

"Hwy—n

warm

munmmgtmmsmmmemom nmaeatothathm
questions

gm clinically prior to treatment. were and at tho Malina.

uﬁmofwhat

mﬁWaWmewut
a:
chug-l,

1)

as to affect, mod,

um mm: m. mum Amen a: mg.

mum m.

nag. change wars noud

oval-

objoeuva changaain

gm author than mm” or inﬁerprouuw
In
mung, pitch, vein.

The

clinical): during the

saw at {amen-at:

alumna in ma tynucuml m a: pox-on, 2) 0mm. 3) «M

ma. h) Mama, 5) ohms. mu, 6) amt, 7) stereotyped
11:

oxpzésum and cliches, and a)
1. Album

ﬁrst pom singular is

wing and 12mm.

,

in tho pmtmttmt

Warmingtha

patient. used the second
or third pom and occasionally the ﬁrst. person plural. to me question anoaming min trouble such reopen.” ward given us ”It's what they call a depress-

10a.”-

17823.64, 28

Whaytoldmlmmﬁomuyandmmliuck,‘ We'mhavingalatef

trouble with

w mﬂme-lm,“ my cousinbrnght

no; she said

I was

mus,“

mam troublo, er mm mm,“ and my lira. it sick and I tram
tppmciato it
bar in how u soon a pas-ibis.”
thq mum
team
for coming to the heapiul m anomaly given a W wife hm: no," "W
"What‘s

11‘

tamortaldm to

m hora! oriwdeow mid mama mumm.‘

will: an: grim as “Part-rat
'

The

3.0%

mu: for w M13,"

W alumna.-

my

Tho

husband and

anwgoodfm uhauldbelnnlﬂvandhappy' mﬁmmaummmm
m Md.“

�“”1

‘

~5i
I

LAW

Men Wiring
m.
m
M
2.

w

1::

21

patients. rm-

with a question, as

”What. do.

mm; m
Wm momma

the queetioh about their
tea: the tom of

you new by

m main trouble?,' “that

do you

«poet

mo; won, what 1:: m,“ and "What «he 1 may last than?“ Gum-1W
patterns considered and" included such responses as ”I don't know how
to tell
you,“ ”I don’t get what you mean," "Let ale think,“
um hard to any,“ ad “I
no

to

m

Just don‘t
hint.

how

to expanse

11:."

One

patient asked the «minor to give her a

W. mutwmmammummwzspu
an,”
Wm
W.

1mm. they either

math-y

had no

um

«am or an

axing evasive “I don't mow” reapeneeo, denied
specifically questioned about. him.
'

eomltmont
the use

their illness and

a... arm-

mention a: a meme in the dimtion a: 1»-

m ohm by 19 patients.

a: were. as

”31103:,"

ably, " "possibly,“ ”man. be,“
were given no

'1 gun: I have

”pmbably that I'm

This lulguago pattern was characterised
by

”kind of,

“an,“

been

'

,

“sort at " ”think " “apparentlyﬂ "prob-

“assumed," and “perhape." That such

Jittery,” “I seen to

he very

ream

mammaed,“

mom,” “I suffer from emotion, apparently,“ ”Poenbly early
about the fume," ”I have sort or! gotten
momma,“
upset, I
and ”I think I'a a little inseam..."

W.

”W

‘

Inlapntiente therewaeaohangein

um,”

mum»

in; their 1111:)“. In most cane the patient used the past tense, as "I wan
depressed when I one here” or 'I had been
mm.” In other canoe the patient answered
the question about his main trmzble by
'

131%(2mg. In 20 cases

mung it in the future
there no a diamamnt

tense as 3 Huh.

of the

Wt

‘

W

to something other than originally given prior to
treatment. This was mummy
lest Bonan- than the original comm. Sometimes the
dilplacamnt was in the
tom of a emetic complaint, as laying the main trouble
was ”diarrhea," “headaches,“

�WWWWMI—Fr‘

.6.

'

”pm in the tests," “I slams the rings;- in the door,“

stair case: the displacemnt
as

‘33: main

form»!

m to some mores. aspect or the:

itch.” In
hospital situation,

trauma in getting those treatments," or “I'm upset because I

to another
7.}

and "I‘vs got. an

was

trans-

wand.”

Suﬁsm mania and 011mg.

Tho

use of stereotyped sxpmssim

andsliohumaambyupltisntl. Thsygan-uehnnponauunltmtam
undo:- the proper circumstance: Igd be

alright,"

with pupils than. are honorary and sinners,“
“The only
'1‘0 be

thing

«mm is

“(my

tmblo in)

monetary

"Tut’- the root of the

(bath and taxes,“ "Loam

my

pmblou

whole thing,“

lesson and be a

good boy,”

person a! pep Ind

nhtbility,” and “I just want to stop being a hly lent.“
Muhammlpmbdto‘aqusstimothsrmwishuth, 'Imnkllhmaoonsultw
a.

W.

husband borers

8.
laugh

I make a wish

became ho'a a

lawn: and the {nth-r or

InﬁOcaauthopatimtmmtodtoamoor

01m manuly wounding or following his

coming

xv childish."

suspense to the question can-

nu 111m".
to.

language

”zoom um:- ambarbitsl mom during to. mono and tom:

units of treatment. were 11min:- to those noted clmenlly. with the drug, haunt,
the changes 5mm earlier in the sour» or treatment. A given Imguags
pattern
might be noted in the second was]: at insistent with tho drug, but. would not occur

annually until the third

mt.

In Audition, the motions to the drug took more
extreme forms, which are ascribed
cryptic responses and withdrawal remnants.

1.

W.

u

patients. 3031mm” wars class-sdas cmtiswhmthsyhndmobﬁm relevance to the testqueetion ormthsir
31118

was shown by 23

m obscure, 1'31)an a very momma-d «pr-union. Thu: ms patient,
MWMsMntmnble, ma'mghmoftmuumomofmmmgattm
naming

night-am.” Others gave such msponsoa an

to. problem," ”gutting no husband to
you duo‘s get. the

naturism."

'1 MN. know the pmblsm -

cm‘t do

ma dm mo he does,“ or ﬁrm oouu I uy ..

�M_W~«W.“hm... ,Wﬁr—yyw'V‘amn"WW—wzmw. wm-u.www‘wex"w\’murvxl'ww’byum—lam. 7, am....-.. We.
.:

.

~

.

,

V

.

...

7

or

Wham-x“...

.3».

&gt;

my-

a.

~u..r-_..L-r.-‘~w

ﬂaw. ,‘m,r__ wry",

“Tee

‘11ng reaction. 8m pattern or withdrawal was noted in 33 patients.

2.

m: behavior we: ohenoteriled by ineomlete
egim, pomemtdon, the use
or failure to

eve-pond

of e

totem Manage

by

bilingual patients, and delay

to the questions. meet; patiente would cheruoterietioelly lie

m1.

with their eyes open, would

or turn their heed

clearly end promptly and in

would speak

eentencee, incoherent mumbling, mela-

when

the

miner epoke,

and

Well when asked motions not pertaining

to their illness.

comm

sodium

My

endwith ambarbitel
oom- changes in hnguege were newborn
in neponee to the other qua-time of the tut battery but not part of thie
more use frequent dimming of the manner, or uteri-mg to hm :- .‘Eﬂater.’

with the drug these Intimate

who had

e “punitive reaction,“

my

one

characteristic

characteristic patterns of acclimation for
place and time and contebuhtion deeorlbed in preview! communion! (2) .
of altered

man Motion,

showed the

the evaluation of clinioel

memo

to treatment we

mede

independently of

thie may. The Intimate were mted by the supervising peyohietnet in charge of
the teammate, the patient‘ﬂ om therapist end eupenieing peydxiatﬂat, anaby
the
director. 0:: the beeie of these ratings the petiente were unsealed

“eel

into three gmpa:

W

turned,

28

pmenu um widened much

which brought then

aiming

em

into the hoepitel;

eynptometio

22

improved, no longer showing the

petiente were rated as moderately

relief, but still

ehowing

dimming restore"

15 were ragweed ee mmproved, having elbow: on]: equivocal or

trmeient

and

We at

beet. me rating: were abort term evaluations, being ude within two loathe after
coupletim of

them.

�PERCENTAGE SHOWING EACH LANGUAGE PATTERN
ACCORDING TO RESPONSE TO TREATMENT

70
60

CLINICAL

I—————————-‘

WITH

AMOBARBITAL

l———_I

I

MUCH IMPROVED

El

UNIMPROVED

I400. IMPROVED

�*8.
For quantitative purposes the language change: diam during both the

mead

third week: of tmtaent have been grouped together“ as though the patient: had
been tested only once. If e particular pattern we chm during both periods, the
the: me scored only wee. ntegether, 895 of the petiente enabled at least one at
and

then patterns of

We manually

dining treatment. Such changes were

fomdinullthemch mpmvoepauembntinonly7motuuunmpmdm.

It as

nmt. and the amber
[the

patients

a:

chengee

who showed

mungmgo patterns.

three or

more leaguege

language change.

em

a.“ is

analysed

for

Wed petm
enlyZOSottbeunimpmedpaﬂenu

ienteehmdthmotmnlmgugechangee,
this degree of

When

We-

petum changes, there is a signiﬁ-

I).

‘gieent differ-wee between the groups (Table
shaved

clinieel

apparent that. there me e relation between the degru of

681 of the much

Bung cm! the menu dietdbuﬁdnie lim-

mMatbetmtnmth-uwaercmnm.
Relatian

of.

W

m 1mm (28)
WW MW (22)

W

(15)

1‘0“!- (65)

Chang"

W

Shawn

3.

Wally to Ream“ to Treatment.

lie.

lo.

5

1

19

685

9

32:

7

)2!

15

681

3

201

12

895

29
'

W

36

551

:2 - 11.25
1!

&lt;m

Hheneachlengmge pettemiemelyeedmdivimm,um1nﬂ¢m1,

itbecaneeeppemtthetnotenpe‘btem

wcmmequmymmw.

Inﬁlbntoaeem,emmmtmeftmmmmdpeumuwmmn

’

�Y

«my

v m. n.“ .-‘

nmxw

“gamma. — yawn
,

v

mama-gm

m

w“... n-

,.—., »1—0”

—W -.~.-

-

V

,

,

n «Fur

run...“ .-

-

. 17,1,»

-

.

,

men-1mm, mottheeecmdormmpeum, Wanda-Newt
o!

ambush;

The

aﬂy

1111311130

petum

on While}:

little airtime

was found between

mmmmmmmdmmamemdmmmum.

.Anuymatmmemwmwrmmmup-meumm
termerypueandwithdmel mam anlyinrigun 1. mmaypuc reepeneee did

mtnrymeh

with the

afferent groups, the

withdml,

moving of e

mum differentiated the three gmupe eigﬁfimm: occurring in 711 of the mach
Whﬂdthemdenﬂhhpmndmdmmzﬁottbmnpmdpauwu.
x.

:

mu.“

Mum of
In a

e to

.,

vs;

mea
new

M
of qumtitaﬁvm Mam electro-

Mama
pm
ducribed (6).
emeMgraphic
'

a

resend:

records an

m

inning relatively high,

middle

,a;

criteria
62‘

~

were established

low degree

for rating

of abnonnliia according

to five agitating avenge percent. time delta. wee (waves at :11 cycles per mood
or lees), the highest percent time delta. mm at my one low. the lowest tremmney

lathe moord,thehigheetamplitudeofdelteme,
burst. of delta

me.

mummumote

In the present study, an electroencephelogm wee obtained
priortotmmntandm the ”Windmirdmk a: treatment. Each ”comm

«alum mending to the dichom at showing
eliw er m, using the-e axe-Lurk.
In Table

ality
V

and changes

the relation-hip

2

in

animation, Wag
show a

1mm.

am

reletively h1g1 demo at ebnon'e-

mm mm abetroonaeplulognphtc linem.

Tho: patients with the

in
Why
of

high

mate; mm:

18

I.

greatest degree at cerebral

both the «can!

I2 a 10.72,

thinner:- at

mmt,

hmge change- both clinicallyxand with Waite]. and“...
the mama.
mum at! mime-u: at the drug effect.
'

m,

was the
3m. ran- to be statistically signiﬁcant.
I»

end.

Wimt

1%

better than the

'

11

level or

comm.

�ﬂ‘rﬁwwwme—wmm.
.

‘ermmmﬁmvﬁmimmw'

TABLE

Relation of Language Ghana.

’60

High

3

WW

(25)

OnMunimzé)

‘

lo 315: Ahnamauw (2h)

mm

withdrawal Motion!
with W191}. Seem:

i

lo.

1

15

as

a

50%

6

255

-

15

601

_

9

5“

‘

B

335

. Yoa
P &lt; 0°,

:2

12

Language

when they

._._.r,._r.

Eloctmmmalom Dunne

,

m1:

&lt;

‘

Both Weeks 31g:

2h:

,

of Treatment

clinical]:

lo.

may
“at

on the

or Kan

changes

m._.—r.m~.

2.

83m and Third ﬂecks

the

,

P

pat-Mm «termed in that: stuck wan

manned afar tho original

’ has?
.19

&lt;

midsmd a:

change:

mmmm clinical test which an

and u a. baseline. Bum patients, 11mm, .Ihmd can form of than 1mm
puttem in the initial 91.1mm test. me minimum or thus same pattern!

bythaeepnuenuatmomrtimmmonnnmnatuconduachmgo.
mm gum

Wits). actual prior to tmtmt, War, 30 patients", at

Wot‘ﬂwmu,mmdmhngmgammnbhmmntnommtmh
neat. In‘hbh3thonhumbomahmgamhchmguat mamumhm
m'mmmeumm mm». Manfmdméﬁﬁdmmw
pmdpmmnu, thwzyséiutlmnoammynwdwamozmmmd

W.

.

‘

,

par" .—
.V

�w :u—v-r—wwxv—mww:

Relatim of

W

W3

Pn-tmmt Language

Ghangon

autumnal Mun

with

mm

and

clinical Mona

cm. with Ambarbital mu
1

Ho.
Knob Impravod (28)

Hodomtely

MIMI:

W

68$

19

(28)

8

36%

3

W

30

It“

(15)

Tom (65)

l

:3 - 10.30

P&lt;
In Tab}.
was

I;

.01

it 1. “inﬁltrated that the pm-vtmtmnt change with the

also prognostic of tho eventual

drug

Widow anionic to tmtment as mound

ouctmcaphalogmmc abnomanw. Tho mun distribution 3m;
tall: chart at statistical lawman, although
than who
my: almonby

m.

magic.

01'

m

mlityinboﬂpeuoda an conpnrodwiﬂzall’ehsothor
crence is significant at th- 51 1m]. 91‘ canﬂdonoo.
Relation of

ma

mnuam, thaw:-

Pwtmmt Languag- Ghanges with manual. Sodium and High Basra

Em Abnomliw Drug the Second and Third Weeks of Tmman‘b

Both Wuks High
One week

mmty (25)

M Announnw (16)

Chung: With Amobarbital Sodium
Ho.
1

16

6&amp;1

6

.

38$

’

la

High Abnormality (2h)

8

335

- 5.27
P&lt;olO

1a

�many,

the

initial

degru a! Ianguagl clung. I‘hm cunicamand
"actions with the drug during twat-ant (km: S).
tho

m
hcpom to
5

.

human at Pro-tantalum

sodium.an pregnant?“ at
to tho Mutation otirithdmnl

response to ambarbital

Language

.

NW
mm mm:

5041mm

.

1':

011mm Chang“

and Withdrawal Remuom

3

Clinical
PatternLeague.
03' Hora

lo.

Pmtmmm Respom to

max-mm Sodium

(30)

In l’ru—treatment Response
to Mammal Soditm (35)

18

,

11

:2 aims

9‘00;

Withdrawal Reaction!
ﬁo Amour-Mu]. Sodium

1

30.

i

601

21

705

311

12

3M

- 6.38
P&lt;ll°1

x2
_

�'Iwwa‘v-rI—Ku,WM wc-v—

~33-

w".—

«my. qzwrr

*

Discussim
the relationship or the language changes to the development of sltsred brain
function and to the clinicsl reepcnee is cmistent with our original vaethesie cenceming the nude
have shown

ct action or electmehock treatment. In previous stmnee

that the clinical

outcome

is related to the

(hﬁé) we

presence and degree of

alter-

”mm

test" (2) and the we as indicse, it
has been fomd that those patients with the earliest and most persistent Mutations
were met likely to have a favorable response. Such physioof cerebral
aticn in cerebral function. Using the

mm

logical changes create the milieu which facilitates behavioral change.
present study, analysing language petteme, clezii’ies the nature a: the
beheviorel changes that occur with treatment.
the language chem criginelly, mic:- tc. treatment, my be amused in the
The

statement, "I have this particular illness.”

The

subject or this sentence answers

the questicn 'Who,’the predicate refers to What,‘ and the verb describes the relationship, including the femoral and intensity aspects. During treatment the sub-

dectoi’thesentencemybenoﬂtiedbycmngesinthemotpereon, eothntthe
sentence night read "You (or he, she or they) have this particular illness." Changes
in the predicate are shown by such. ﬁettem as displacement or evasion. In displncs-

nent the eentencc night tied “I have ecu other kind of illness," em... with evasion,
whet.” Change: in the verb are
it would be, "I have something, but I don't

m

qualification or alteration of tones. In denial the statement would
be, “I don‘t have this particular illnessg' a. qualified sentence would read, “I light
have this particular illneseg“ while with alteration or tense the sentence would be,
"I as this particular illness,”
ﬂown by deniel,

Sons language psttems- modify

the sentence as a whole.

"

If

the patient

mice,

or 1: n. introduces his etstewent by saying. "no doctors tell me theta...“ any, pert
or all of the sentence my be emailed. Other reactions, particularly those noted
under mytcl amid giving any meaningful
statemt at ell. In the withdrawal reaction

w”...

�W,

wwcww—mw '-—-—'- ..r.-_m..—w.,

”ﬁr .,,,,.:.._._‘,._.. r_.‘-“‘1KvW“ﬁW——r—W‘w‘wwﬂwmwwi'w

,_,.
WWW .Vw—ya-awwmwnmr

an...

Wpemsaysnoﬂﬁngormiupertottlnsen’om. Intheuseotoliohesot
cryptic expxessions no specific referential meshing can be dram free the language.
or

numemm-WumtwmoW-mmom
bot rose mourned

him,

mrzaniutim

a

of

omioeuon Motorised by

so

alteration in the petient's attitudes to his problems and his illness. The patient
either says he is not now and never has
ill, displaces his illness temporslly,
or parsmslly, in less committed to his
or his illness by the
use of quelifioeums, or avoids the whole problem by evasion and
These pettems en oonpereble to these noted previously by Weinstein end
Kahn (1) in patients with cerebral disorders, and who Memo to than as the
"m3.

w

spam

use

of detain."

Sinus: lsngusge

mm”

Manon.

changes have also been described following other

emetic therapies. Frank (7,8) reported that lebotonised ptiente avoid talking
sheet the operation, end he states that " the teoility and glibness with which they
say Well 1 had so operation for
nerves, I guess' contain the quality a! moon-:'

scion!»

q

denial." Benoit (9), working

mummy with postnlobotouy patients,

some

‘

persistent attitudes a: denial. the patient. when asked why she ems to see the doot-or, said it was her, relatives' idea. new game qulii'ied responses, saying they
owned the operation was on the brain, or
used an evasive, stereotyped «passion as "sou nerve in there,” or aispleoed the
procedure es in “oh, yes, I went to the hospital and got one black eyes.“ when asked
“suppose“ they had an operation. Others

'

about the symptoms that led up to the eperstioo suoh responses were given as

”it

seems

to have gone." In stucbring patients who showed clinical improvemt following prelooged om reactions in insulin eons thin-em, we have noted sinilsr changes in lengoege.

In a ease report

(.10) we noted

the sppeerenoe of nduplicetive phenomena,

evasion, verbal dermal, displacement, incmsed use or stereotype expressions and

cliches, eryptio responses and moh mung and laughing at

pmemt was most marked.

s.

time than

clinical ile-

�wmmmemMMp‘mmm
mmmamuwmmmmpmmmum

mmmum nugtammmmmr ‘mmumm

mmwuumpmmmm MWmm
mmammammwmwmm ultimatum

awn'mmamhMMuMdemwmm
utyotrmdummwdmmpmmwmututamw
mmmrormmumummm um.
mapm,m,mmummumwmu
unwumwwmmammwpﬂmm
mommd'm mummommdhwudmmmm
.

mmwmsmméhmummt. Wruﬂmﬂmumtﬂnm

amewma-wmmmwmmnmm. fathom

deﬂumﬂmdtﬂ‘WM’udm-Wm
an,uwmmtmmpmmmmg
mmwtm.mwpmmmmmupem
may, WMWMMWMWWRWM
n-

wtbpmsnumammmmmuummmorm.
mumwtbpmvammyummnmmbnbymmm,
mammmmmwmmm,mmmnmmhmwdm
duration of
tone-mg
and

!

1

Wt
hmt(9)mmmamumummpmmammam
mutant;

nmmmrumv

Both

Hon-ma

Km (1,

n) and

'

'

m.mmquWWde-ob
iummmummg mpwmamwmmmm
‘

’

mmmmmupmmwmm)uomm.mmmz
mtmmmmmumgw,mmnmwmurwm

i

�”mm

“mm“..m—wwaww—lw"""
,

A

m.

wl’vr-w—w-‘mx'r-

:46nnuanco at barbiturates were most likely to 1W0 with treamnt. In the pumt
at. chum mmguagowieh‘mdmgm nut-daetenlyto
an Mom's a! alum bmn sanction and to the clinics].
but to the av.

mmwamum

5mm mutation of then

1mm puttom' clinically.

mm.

this built, an aparauaml definition at the god of electroshock therapy night be «scribed an enduring
On

mm museums: of than mm natural which only occur initially with no.

humui main.

'

�v."

77—79». mm?

-

,

WW.

W'm“wu}—r¢ MN '-v" r

0.: navy—w

'

,

_

,

4

“aw—Ia

W.wmv3ww,wmx-. WW,'—-‘W ~01”

my

iyg‘w 'w-w Hunwyw—m...“

4.7.»

may
1.

,

GWI

saw-an ammunw mums rotomd for!" platteﬂmck What an
tmtasnt. Mmﬁent’

ammwwmmmmmmu
clinicallymdwith
m
umummww

suburbia). BOMﬂthiltﬂndu,

am: at Mom mooning unwa- mm 1111mm.
2. mo result: :1th that. ahamoteriatia chug“ an language We both
01mm and after gum-mm ”dim during mums. mm ohmgu we. sign“-

and

1canﬂy

”hudtothe

chainsaw-panes to tmtmntmdtaﬂmdegreoufalund

mum at maund by thc alwmlogm.
3. Tho presume at then 1mm mam with ambit-him ”(than pain:to tmtmt was directly mum to th- mntml clinical aspen-e, tho Malay-sent

bruit:

'

otaltendbrainfmcﬁm. undthadmlomntutlanguagcchmgu clinicallydnring
treatment.

that than language éhangu What. an opomtim bun
m- m mluntim of the clinical
5. the mum: ‘n'mport an hypoﬂmia that tho thanpeutio
or
oloctroshoak Mama“. in the develomt of walnut putt-m at symbolic adapt.
1;.

It. in

$311:

mm.

mum to the pntiont'u problem and 111m”

talcum.

am.
_

War the

conditions

a:

slum brain

.w-wm.

__..,‘ ’n’rr' 2-}—

�1o

“sustain, E.

A. and Kuhn, R. L.

AW, Springticld,
2.

,

1111mm,

8mm,

,

.

W
cum:

of

L. A. and Man,

("mm Sodium")

39am.

I

maul!

Evacuated.

mm, 1955.
L. : Dwain Us. at Ambaxbitul

6.

argma Brain

1n

Symbolic and

maul, Ann-1m J. meant...

$183943?!» 1953..

”J

3. _____,

and

mm,

Psychintg,

E:

Serial Administration at the

for

”Am/ta]. Test."

“mm,

MILL. Arch.

217.226, 1951;.

1!. and Yul-match, E. A. s

h. mm, R. 1... Pink,
cation and

x

It: Diagnostic and Prognostic Vila,

Brain 131mm:
a:

3.

mm in Ebotroﬂxock Therapy,

361.31% Between

Alum: Bran rm-

L114. Arch. ”enrol.

G:

'

Pageant...

in press.
5. Renown, E.

It:

am:

1.,

L. and Kuhn, B.

Linn.»

Kantian be the

of

Timmy

La Psychosis During Electmhock
Shock Ehex'npy, Am.

J. Paychiatu

'

14.

and

mm, 3. Lu Quantitative Studies

mammm. m. cm
7. Frank,

J.

I

clinical Survey

J. ﬂuent. 301.,
8.

23!

1;th, 0.:

Dani-.1

161. 1994.
10.

ram,

R.

Body

at

1956.

,

7

(Putnam

mom) Under Psychoanalytic

u a comma m” in Post know, yummy, u: 1531

1mm 0m

11.:

morally. a.

11. Hem-tan, E. A. and Kuhn, R. In:
Arch.

Activity Founding

354:3. 1950.

I... Gmubert, n. and Fink,
Am:-

-

mm o: 200 Cm: or Putnam Macaw,

of lobotomy

Scrutiny, Psychiatry.

9.

(mm).

Heumphysiol. g: 158
and

Slow wave

”7-508. 13%.

Some Aspects

I

01‘

mt

'

22-26, 1952.

6. Pink,

Burk»

mm. a: Pawn»... éi‘

Delusional Redupliaation of Parts at th-

mum. Wm,

Personality Eastern

b; ”Iv-1&amp;7. 1955.

1:: Denial of
’

355-367, 1953.

Inna”,

�"ﬂ..- v.w-m,.__wWR—v~.....,1,..e..r.»-w.q.w,__ v7

Koch, P.

313.,

n. : no

Prognostic

n W

“F"

_~—,w .—

Mm

vunw

H.‘

r u-vn

~..»u-,Ww—~wwwwnw~. WVWVWW

,wuwyﬂ—w ”Maw—v.4.

1911.6:

Roma, 3. A. and men, n. 4.:
lid in Insulin and Home]. Shock

mgammg
‘I‘hompy

(was Pmeox), m. a. Paychitt" 2g: 327. 3.939.

11;.

‘swa

ant. Status as Memo-1- and Thoupy, J. Harv. Mont,

m8 W59;

13. Harris, :4. a...

,

scum was. as a

of Inantal Patients

Mm», a. s. and Hop-,4. u. ! Pragmatic van; ,0! 1:11.va amusmum
at Mm W]. in ease: of Schisommin, Arch. 3mm}... &amp; Wt.f 5g:
86400.

'

191.1.

'

um"

,

l u, ,,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2544">
                <text>Changes in language during electroshock therapy. In P.H. Hoch and J. Zubin (eds.), Psychopathology of Communication. Grune and Stratton, New York, 1958: 126-139.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2545">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2546">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-27-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2547">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2548">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2549">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2550">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2551">
                <text>[preprint] and reprint. Reprint from Psychopathology of Communication Grime &amp; Stratton. Inc., 1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2552">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2553">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74457">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81018">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87579">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94140">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="256" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="47">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/73f23282cc67af28739fea856ee770e8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e300a093a9da17b1283d89c0561639fc</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100673">
                    <text>Reprinted from ”Electroencephalography and Clinical NeurOphysiology Iournal"
Vol. 10, No. 1, February 1958.
LATERAL GAZE NYSTAGMUS AS AN INDEX OF THE SEDATION THRESHOLD

1

MAx FINK, M.D.

With the technical assistance of
HANNAH MOSQUERA

Department 0] Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N.Y.
(Received for publication: October 17, 1957)
On reading the report of Thorpe and Barker
(1957) in the recent issue of the Archives, we were
moved to assess our own experiences with the sedation
threshold, and to report a clinical guide to the “inflection point” that we have found useful.

Following the initial description of the technique
by Shagass (1954), we modified our tests which included the administration of the amobarbital test for
brain dysfunction (Weinstein et al. 1953) to obtain
a measurement of the sedation threshold as well. Our
technique was identical to that of Shagass, with
the addition of the measurement of nystagmus on
lateral gaze which the latter test required. The change
in beta amplitude in the EEG was measured visually
in consecutive samples of record, using the additive
ruler described by Shagass.
In the initial group of patients, two observers were
unable to identify the onset of slurred speech with consistency. Disagreement led to administration of
amounts of amobarbital greater than was required,
with the frequent induction of sleep. As we were also
obtaining a record of the induction of nystagmus on
lateral gaze, we became aware that this index was
reliably agreed upon by the two observers, and a correlation with the sedation threshold was sought.
We, therefore, omitted the instructions regarding
counting and substituted the following instructions.
Subjects were told that at periodic intervals they
would be requested to open their eyes and to look
first to one side and then to the other at pre-arranged

tion period. The administration of barbiturates con—
tinued until nystagmus was observed, and then an
additional 2 cc. were given.

RESULTS
To date, we have 91 measurements. The following
table notes the difference between the number of milli-

grams of amobarbital per kilogram body weight for
the EEG measure (the sedation threshold) and for the
onset of nystagmus. Differences greater than one
unit did not occur in this series. The two measurements are seen to be reliably related by a unit of 0.5
or less in more than 90 per cent of the observations.

M
TABLE I
Frequency Distribution of Difference in
Amount of Amobarbital
Necessary to Induce EEG Change and Nystagmus
(mg. amobarbital/kg. body weight)

No. Tests (91)

1

47

12

+0.5

+1.0

27

4

Test-Retest Reliability:
During these studies we have also had the opportunity to repeat the sedation threshold measurement
three to five times in the same patient at weekly
intervals. These measurements were done in randomly
selected patients receiving subconvulsive doses of elec-

TABLE II
Absolute Range of ST. Values

Range

0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

No. Subjects (16)

0

2

6

2

4

fixation points.

This was repeated twice in each
direction, usually within ten seconds, while the observer noted the development of sustained regular
nystagmus on lateral gaze. Such observation was
repeated after each injection of 1 cc. of amobarbital
solution, between the 25th and 40th sec. of the injecSupported by the Board of Directors’ Research Fund of
the Society of the Hillside Hospital.
1

2

tric current under barbiturate premedication as part
of a study of convulsive-subconvulsive electroshock.
The behavioral changes in this group were small
14 of the 16 were referred for grand mal electroshock
within 4 weeks after the subconvulsive treatment
-——

period.
The range of sedation threshold measurements
under these conditions is noted in table II.

[162]

�LATERAL GAZE NYSTAGMUS OF THE SEDATION THRESHOLD
Being unable to ascribe greater validity to one reading
than to any other, we determined the mean sedation
threshold for each subject, and the range of variability
about the mean. In table III we have listed the subjects in each range of variability about the individual
mean value.
Thus, the intra-patient inter-test variability for this
test in this series is considerable. The test reliability
of nystagmus as an index of the electroencephalographic change is well within the retest variability
of the test in these subjects.

163

lographique mesuré chez ces malades et dont la validité a été démontrée. Il est recommandé d’utiliser
cette méthode en remplacement de celle qui est basée
sur l’apparence de troubles dysarthriques.

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
Das Auftreten von Nystagmus mit lateralem Blick
ist ein klinisches Mass fiir die Sedationsschwelle,
welche gut mit dem gemessenen EEG-Index iibereinstimmt und dessen Verlasslichkeit nachgewiesen
werden konnte. Gebrauch dieser Methode wird daher

TABLE

III

Range of ST. Values from the Mean
Range
No. Subjects (16)

0.1——

0.6——

0

0.5

1.0

0

6

4

CONCLUSION
The appearance of nystagmus on lateral gaze is
a clinical guide to the sedation threshold, with a
variability from the measured EEG index well within
the test-retest reliability of the test itself. It is recommended as a substitute, therefore, for the onset of
slurred speech. Further studies of the retest reliability of the sedation threshold are necessary.

RESUME

L’apparition d’un nystagmus dans le regard latéral est une mesure clinique de la sedation qui montre une bonne correlation avec l’index electroencepha-

1.1—

1.6—
2.0

&gt;2.0

4

1

1

1.5

empfohlen als Ersatz fiir diejenige basiert auf dem
Auftreten von verwischter Sprache.

REFERENCES
The sedation threshold. A method for
estimating tension in psychiatric patients. EEG
Clin. Neurophysiol, 1954, 6: 221-233.
THORPE, J. G. and BARKER, J. C. Objectivity of the
sedation threshold. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat, 1957, 78: 194-196.
WEINSTEIN, E. A., KAHN, R. L., SUGARMAN, L. and
LINN, L. The diagnostic use of amobarbital sodium
(“Amytal Sodium”) in brain disease. Amer. J.
Psychiat, 1953, 109: 889-895.

SHAGASS, C.

threshold.
sedation
the
of
index
M.
Lateral
as
an
FINK,
nystagmus
Reference:
gaze
physiol, 1958, 10: 162-163.

EEG Olin. Neuro-

63:3

�‘

“W
9.13.5?

W

W ma w

Mai mm

0

�mmmmtwmwmmmmmeum

MWW,wmnwummmmﬂm-uwm

amummm,mmmauammmmumﬁmaummv

Wtwmfmm.

wmvmpumwmmmwmmtz),
Wm
”memmwzmmmmumdmmml
*mt

Warm.

{ﬁwo‘hWtWt 92mm“
wwwmxmmmwmtamm.nw

mmumwmetummmummmm
ﬁﬁwmmm.

mmmmwnmmmmmww

mmawmmmumm,mmwawmwwm
WW:

hwqmmeﬁMgMWWWth

mmmmawmeapmmmmm.

MW“

aim
“Wamﬂmdmuaf
mammmmotdw. uwmduobmmtmmdw

ﬁWmumlmgwmmmtthm
numwummmmmmwnWMvmmmm
‘

V

“.mm,mimmmmmummmmm

MW m 3mm mmmﬁ mm um um am it mom

mummymmummmwmmmawwmnmw
mramquWWamrmWWﬂanummu. Mm
MMMmmmmum,ummymm£-nmm.mum

mmmmzﬂmmwwnwamuum
we.

mmwmmmmatmmmmwxma

mummmm,hommzmwmwwmmmm
mm. m mumm WWW Mme mm mm m
«1’

�mammammmzmmam.

mammmﬂmm.

thmmm

wwmbmwem(wmmmum)mmrmwt

Wmummrmmthnwmmwmh
”W;
m Mmummwwﬁpmf- mmwammtmﬁu

Wmmwmmumtwmmw

mmmm«mhmammmwmwwma

mmmmmthmwtmmmmmumuu
mm Wu awn w We: m: m WW“ Mum

umwamwmmmwmmmmm

mm

mmmwmmmmmwmmt

�«2w

«mum

11.

W
m mm (as)
mmmmuwmmwummmmmmow,m
humammmuwmmmmwmwwwa
wwwmmm. hmmwmmwmmmuum

M,WWM$WWW£W wumtmmm

ummm. MMW‘Wﬂanmmwmnm
W‘s-mm“

�mwas-mmmummsummmw

ummmmwwmmuw. “MW
unmm,
Wm,mmmwﬁww.

WW

�'

1_

W

'

”W
«mummy

MW “mm.“
wmmm.muwg

mm
Wigwam
m3.
é»

3n

&amp;

199:.

W”;
WW

4:
’

“

'

�W

WWW Emmtxy
WM? 13' 1957‘

W9;
Miter, Section or
Awhim Baumlm 5:. ,
AM.
29th
a mu ham,

W Wm,

DP. Roy

W mum.
0mm.

7

of

‘

‘\

\

16,,

Dear Dr. Grimmer:

W

Inmadmzhoramtmmloafmmdmrmm
pmblem.
undead short 45an
my
am
vb» m nth-mung an ”gamut of tho «mum
tgnsumtoﬂ
this that.

cmMahala," we are md to
“(nativity at w M15192:
than
111th this tout, u an as our solution to
puﬂlol mama
“the
be of help to
note

W

this note is
I: the taunt. at
pinned to follow your momma.

would be

for the Archives, I

m Fink, 1w.

K3563

�PUBLICATION OFFICE
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
535 NORTH DEARBORN STREET
CHICAGO IO. ILLINOIS
AUSTIN SMITH, EDITOR,
A. M A. SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

A. M. A.
ArChives Of
NEUROLOGY and PSYCHIATRY

GILBERT s. COOPER, MANAGING EDITOR
A. M. A. SPECIALTY JOURNALS

SECTION ON PSYCHIATRY

DR.

EDITORIAL BOARD

RCY R. GRINKER $R., M.D.
CHIEF EDITOR. CHICAGO

STANLEY COBB, M.D.. BOSTON
GEORGE E. GARDNER, M.D.. BOSTON

““353?st

JOHN WHITEHORN, M.D., BALTIMORE

Institute for Psychosomatic and Psychiatric Research
29th Street and Ellis Avenue, Chicago 16

September 20, 1957

Max

Fink,

M.D.

Department of Experimental Psychiatry
Hillside HOSpital
75-59 263rd Street
Glen Oaks, New York

Dear Doctor Fink:

it will

not be possible to publish
and we like to
backlog,
large
have a wide selection of papers on many subjects and feel that we have
published already all that seems important on the sedation threshold
test as devised by Shagass..

I
the
in
your paper

am very sorry, but
ARCHIVES. We have a

Regretfully yours,
Roy R. Grin

er,

M.D.

Editor~in-Chief for Psychiatry

RRszm

enclosure

�3.er
Dr.

Mort 3. Sam,
General

Putnamtu
Boa: (7&amp;3
{’4’
BOWEN,

ah. 1957.

Hospital,

Mt

Du:- Dr. Scarab:

In vnading : recent. article on the ”mmuvity of the Station
Threshold" in the Archives or Barclay and Paychntx-y, we were mud to
parallel «panama with we test, as well as our 301an
to the problm. I would appreciate your enumeration of this short
clinical not» for the Section of 61mm. uni laboratory Notes of the

mm m

EEG

hum]...

Simon]: you",

mm,
130th
HE‘BJB

or

menu-m1

Paychutry;

“on.

�3-8200
EXT. 380

TEL. LAFAYETTE

ROBERT s. SCHWAB. M.D.
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL

BOSTON 14

September 27, 1957
Dr. Max Fink
75-59 263rd

Street

Hillside Hospital
Glen Oaks,

New

York

_

C.N. #61

Dear Dr. Fink:

received and I would like to conditionally accept
for Clinical Notes in the EEG Journal as it stands subject to the approval

Your manuscript has been

it

of the Bditor—in—Chief, Herbert Jasper.

MW

Yours very
RSS:mc

sincerely,

Robert S. Schwab, M.D.

�1g

33

‘12,

McGILL UNIVERSITY
MONTREAL

Department of
Electrophysiology

Allan Memorial Institute,
1025 Pine Avenue'West,
Montreal.

September 30 1957
Dr.Max Fink,

Hillside Hospital,

75-59 263rd Street,

Glen Oaks,
New

York.

Dear Max,

to see

you

for your note on the nystagmus. It was nice
at Zurich, and I hope that we shall be able to meet

Thank you

again soon.

My

best regards.
Sincerely,

Cw
CS/ef

%
,

C. Shagass, M.D.

�12/3/58
Discussion:

Dr. Shagass
Dr.

H.

Fink -

Hillside HOSpital

Dr. Thompson, Members and Guests:

It is

always a pleasure to read another chapter in the
unfolding saga of sedative tolerance tests as they have been
developed by Dr. Shagass.‘ This study,

like its predecessors,

relates neurophysiologic indices to behavioral measures
this area of psychiatry, reflects a welcome application
science to clinical problems.

a

and in

of basic

appropriate to examine this report in the perspective
of recent concepts in experimental psychiatry. During the 1930's,
when electroencephalography was a new science considerable effort

It

seems

in relating EEG patterns to "personality types" or
”diagnoses,” without success. With more refined instrumentation,
there have been sporadic re-assessments without noticeable success.
In the sedation threshold, however, Dr. Shagass, did succeed
in achieving such a relationship. In these earlier studies, he

was expended

related the amount of barbiturate necessary, under standard conditions
of rate of administration and concentration, to induce a specific
EEG voltage and frequency change, to the personality profiles of
the Handsley-Eysenchian school. It is important to note that the
relationship was not between any fixed aspect or index of the EEG
and behavior but between a measure of reactivity or responsivity of

clinical behavior.
We may carry this description a bit-further.
The electroencephalogram is a reflection of central or brain neurochenistry,
and the reactivity of the electroencephalogram to any chemical
stress, a measure of the reactivity, or reSponsivity, or buﬁbring
the

EEG

and

�of the biochemical enzymatic systems ﬂat make up the nervOus

system.

It is

in this organisnic biochemistry that much activity is
now directed in experimental psychiatry. The wide variety of
phrenotrOpic agents, the new and more potent hallucinogens,
and the expanding technics of enzyme and steroid chemistry are
providing experimental psychiatry with research tools of
consideraﬂe adaptability. One application of these technics

highlighted yesterday by Dr. Gottlieb and his co-workers
at the Lafayette Clinic,who reported their ihitial observations
on the significant relationships between schizophrenic behavior

was

and the

reactivity

of insulin.

These

of the glucose-enzyme systems to the

authors carefully noted that there

stress

was no

relationship between the initial levels of their biochemical
measures and behavior.
Dr. Shagass'

earlier studies

of the sedation threshold -

end-point - are clearly within this tradition.
His report today is also in this general tradition, but instead
of a neurophysiologic index of clear definition has utilized a
clinical index ~ lack of a verbal motor response to a verbal
command - as the end-point. In the report today, he has related
the amount of pentothal necessary to induce this state of lack
of response (which is defined as "sleep") with the affective
state of the individual at the time of the experiment. He has
observed that the more fearful,disturbed, tense, angry and
worried a subject is, the more barbiturate is necessary to induce
using an

EEG

�-3-

quieter, more indifferent, inactive and retarded
patient is, the less barbiturate is necessary for sleep. He

sleep.
a

Ehe

titration

is thus achieving a biochemical titratinn, and is, in essence,
measuring the subject's responsivity or reactivity to barbiturate.
By repeating the studies seriatim, he is able to report shifts
in this state of reactivity.
In his desire to extend the sedation threshold technic to
situations in which the EEG was not available, and provide for greater

clinical applicability, some of the precision of the earlier
studies has been forfeited. It is not unexpected, considering
the lack of precise definition of behavior as well as the endpoint of titration, that the reactivity-clinical relationships
I have noted two puzzling relationships.
Increasing sleep thresholds are associated, on the one hand, with
excitement, worry, restlessness and anger; but also, with clinical
improvement in a course of convulsive therapy. Also, in one

are somewhat cloudy.

patient,

transient

induced psychosis
sharp drop in threshold, while in the same
a

LSD

is associated with
patient, fear of

a

treatment, restlessness and increased tension are associated with
rising thresholds. I would snapect that these apparent discrepancies
arise frOm the non-Specific nature of behavioral reaponse to neuro—
physiologic change and to the poverty of our descriptive language
for behavioral change. I would wonder what shape the curves
would take if the change in sleep threshold were plotted against
other indices of brain function as predominant EEG frequency
pattern or degree of synchronization; or such psychologig indices
of brain function as the perception of embedded figures or OFF;
or such behavioral indices as dyadic or

syntactic linguistic

�-hanalyses. Alternatively, more precise,— operational measures
of the behaviorll subsumed under "anger," restlessness,¥ "worry”
may proiido, again, the relationships indicated earlier by the
sedation threshold studies.
Lest these comments be misconstrued, let me say, in closing,
that Dr. Shagass is to be warmly congratulated in these studies

basis for the developing neurOphysiologicadaptive hypothesis of behavior. His demonstrations of central
neurophysiologic reactivity in the sedation threshold are in the
best exPerimental traditions. We are eagerly looking forward to
further experimental neurophysiologic studies from his new

which are providing a firm

laboratories in Iowa.

�12/3/58
Discussion:

Dr. Shagass
Dr. H. rink

—

Hillside Hospital

Dr. Thompson, Henbers and Guests:

It is

always a pleasure to read another chapter in the
unfolding saga of sedative tolerance tests as they have been
developed by Dr. Shagass. This study, like its predecessors,

relates neurophysiologic indices to behavioral measures and in
/‘this area of psychiatry, reflects a welcone application or basic
science to clinical problems.
It seaas appropriate to examine this report in the perspective
—

of recent concepts in experimental psychiatry. During the 1930's,

electroencephalography was a new science considerable effort
was expended in relating EEG patterns to ”personality types" or
"diagnoses," without success. With more refined instrumentation,
there have been sporadic re-assessnents without noticeable success.
In the sedation threshold, however, Dr. Shagass, did succeed
in achieving such a relationship. In these earlier studies, he
related the amount of barbiturate necessary, under standard conditions
or rate of administration-and concentration, to induce a specific
EEG voltage and frequency change, to the personality profiles of
the Handsley-Eysenchian school. It is important to note that the
relationship was not between any fixed aspect or index of the EEG

when

and behavior but between a measure of

reactivity or resphnsivity of

clinical behavior.
The e1ectro~
We may carry this description a bit further.
encephalogran is a reflection of central or brain neurochenistry,
and the reactivity of the electroencephalogram to any chemical
stress, a measure or the reactivity, or responsivity, or buﬂhring

the

EEG

and

�«2e-

of the_biochenica1 ensynatic systems ﬁat make up the nervous
system.
It is in this organisnic biochemistry that much activity is
now directed in experimental psychiatry. The wide variety or
phrenotropic agents, the new and more potent hallucinogens,
and the expanding

technics of enzyme and steroid chemistry are
providing experimental psychiatry with research tools of
consideraﬂs adaptability. One application or these technics
was highlighted yesterday by Dr. Gottlieb and his co-workers
at the Lafayette Clinic,vho reported their initial observations
the significant refationships between schizophrenic behavior
and the reactivity of the glucose-enzyme systems to the stress
of insulin. These authors carefully noted that there was no
on

relationship between the initial levels of their biochemical

measures and behavior.

earlier studies of the sedation threshold using an EEG endspoint ~ are clearly within this tradition.
Bis report today is also in this general tradition, but instead
or a neurophysiologic index of clear definition has utilized a
clinical index - lack of a verbal notor response to a verbal
Dr. Shagass'

- as the endnpoint.' In the report today, he has related
the amount of pentothal necessary to induce this state of lack
of response (which is defined as asleep“) with the affective
state or the individual at the tins of the experiment. He has
command

observed that the more feartn1,distnrbed, tense, angry and
worried a subject is, the more barbiturate is necessary to induce

�-3sleep. the quieter, gore indifferent, inactive and retarded
a patient is, the last barbiturate is necessary for sleep. He
titration
is/thna achieving a biochemicat titration, and is, in essence,
measuring the subject's responsivity or reactivity to barbiturate.
By repeating the studies seriatin, he is able to report shifts
in this state of reactivity.
In his desire to extend the sedation threshold technic to
situations in which the EEG was not available, and provide for greater
clinical applicability, eons of the precision of the earlier

studies has been forfeited. It is not unexpected, considering
the lack of precise definition of behavior as well as the endpoint of titration, that the reactivity-clinical relationships
are somewhat cloudy. I have noted two ﬁnssling relationships.
Increasing sleep thresholds are associated, on the one hand, with

excitenent, worry, restlessness

also, with clinical
improvement in a course of convulsive therapy. also, in one
patient, a transient LSD induced psychosis is associated with a
sharp drop in threshold, while in the sane patient, tear of
treatment, restlessness and increased tension are associated with
rising thresholds. I would suspect that these apparent discrepancies
and anger; but

arise from the nonnspecific nature of behavioral response to neuro~
physiologic changa and to the poverty of our descriptive language
for behavioral change. I would wonder what shape the curves
would take if the change in sleep threshold were plotted against
other indices of brain function as predominant EEG frequency
pattern or degree of synchronisation; or such-psychologtg indices
of brain function as the perception of embedded figures or 61?;
or such behavioral indicee as dyadic or syntactic linguistic

�l-h‘

analyses. Alternatively, more precise,~ oﬁerstionsl measures
of the behavioral subsumed under ”anger,“ restlessness,1 “worry"
hey provide, again, the relationships indiohted esrlier by the
sedation threshold studies.
Lest these comments he misconstrued, let me say, in closing,
that Dr. Shegsss is to be warmly congratulated in those studies
which are providing o firm basis for the developing neurophysiologica
adsptive hypothesis of behavior. his demonstrations of central
neurophysiologio reactivity in the sedation threshold are in the
best experimental traditions. we are eagerly looking forward to
further experimental neurophysiologic studies from his new
laboratories in Iowa.

�qt-

I

ZIN’EIQAL.

614245
'

‘

QM

r

r;

m

Marlyn»;

#ng

/% 4n

Z/{[ 5/ ’f/e.

/3~f7

Ska/177m

Amt gnaw;

E

u,

.

.
7:va

E

Wu”

E

:1va

E

I
.

m,“

1W

1W"

‘
quwr—rrw—nw—v

/M
/W ﬂaw @524: // M"

am/ZEWW/éwu

Lb

7%“
@43’
W
WM &amp;%M/w/’
Aruéda 54%

E

E

E

E

M7424

-

.

�W
we

moved

reading the report of Thorpe and
'

in the

to assess our

own

W5
/Q1(LLAAjr

Barke%ajm
issue of the Archives,

we

were

experiences with the sedation threshold, and to

(2

report anether clinical guide to the "inﬂection point" that

useful.

'

‘

’“

n

U

Following the

initial description

the adninistration of the amobarbital

W

/

)1

"#

WWW
Our

’

'

/

'

“‘

'*

have found,

we

,,
I

_

/

"

ﬁr

of the technique by Shagass

we modified

ﬂat:

is: iiﬁ—

our seaside which included

test for brain

dysfunction

(-Weéna-teim,

to obtain a measurement of the sedation threshold as well.

technique was identical to that of Shagass, with the addition of the

measurement of nystagmus on
775:

lateral

q

change

gaze which the

latter test required.
7h4¢4ww¢16f
EEG was done- visually
‘

‘

in beta amplitude in the

in consecutive samples of record, using the additive ruler described by
Shagass.

In the

initial

group of

patients,

two observers were unable to

the onset of slurred speech with consistency.

identify

Disagreement led to administration

of amounts of amobarbital greater than was required, with the frequent induction

�-2l?!‘

sleep.

gaze,

As we were

also

We,

ML.

Wis-of
:_ reliably

that this index was

we became aware

observers, and

w/umd 9/
obtaining

/“45“¢’7""

nystagmus on

?/

lateral

agreed upon by the slur-e

W..a.correla.tion withthe sedation thresholdwv W/{Z‘

therefore, omitted the instructions. regarding counting

stituted the following instructions. Subjects
intervals they would
one side and then

be requested

to

were

their

open

and sub-

told that at periodic

eyes and to look

first

to the other at pre-arranged fixation points. This

to

was

repeated twice in each direction, usually within ten seconds, while the
observer noted the development of Sustained regular nystagmus
gaze. Such observation was repeated

after

The

injection of

lateral

1 cc of

amo—

N,

~:
‘

. “42"

barbital solution,

each

on

between the 25 and ho seconds of

the injection period.

administration of barbiturates continued until nystagmus was observed,

and.
MW
’00
(Lou

and then

?WU°:

——————-—_

To

more were given.

date,

we

have 91 measurements.

,,

difference between the

number of

thes926an threshold

and

W

W

.

MW)

not!“ the

:

milligramkl

(/19 m7...

of ambbarbitaljfo/r

Maﬁa,”

for the Onset of nystagmus, reﬂects-enemi-

Differences greater than one unit did not occur in this series.

The two measurements

7,2 79/1;

following table 4

The

arenreliably related by a unit of 0.5 or lessxw

Wamﬂm~

Z...

‘

'

�-3I

TABLE

Frequency Distribution of Difference in Amount of Amobarbital
Necessary to Induce

EEG

Change and Nystagmus

(mg Amobarbital/Kilogram Body Weight)

No. Tests

.100

.005

0

+0.5

+1.0

l

12

h?

27

h

\

?//

;

Test-Retest Reliability:
During these studies

all»

we

'

havenhad the opportunity to repeat the

sedation threshold measurement three to five times in the

intervals.-

weekly

These measurements were done

patient at

same

in randomly selected patients

receiving subconvulsive doses of electrnc current under barbiturate premedicationqi
as part of a study of convulsive-subconvulsive electroshock.
changes

in this group

were small

- fourteen of the sixteen

The

were

behavioral

referred for

/z~n/¢‘¢A{4”~*¢¢ég«~0 '
grand mal electroshock within four weeksye7/ngr
.

‘

(fl/$4,224.

The

range of sedation threshold meaSurement?under these conditions

noted in Table

II.

TABLE

II

Absolute Range of S.T. Values'
Range
My,

Subjects

(/4)

0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

o

2

6

2

h

&gt;2.S
2

ff’a./§L»«#
is

�-hBeing unable to ascribe greater

é

validity

.

the

we determined
we

have

mean

sedation threshold for each subject,

subjects in
the-m
mdmadud
MM.
value.
the

listed

WE:

W
W

one reading than ﬁes any

each range of

M basis

variability

’

mean

III

TABLE

Range

Range

/o. ﬁubjects (/5)

other,

of S.T. Values from the

e

0.10.5

0.61.0

o

6

h

1.6-

101'-

1.5
’

“N‘r‘m-wrv .,.m

52.0

2.0

7

h
J

Mi."-

Mean

1

1
,

.

.,

K.,.ﬁm’WhﬁW-am~w-.w:122-w

7 Wat, {is mus-patient;inter-test variability for this test in this series
is considerable.

test reliability of

The

electroencephalograpmzhc change

is well within the retest variability of

test in these subjects.

Qéz:
the

adapted the appearance of nystagmus on

m

a

;

/

J1/

J

1/},

C-

i

’

/
A

A

f"

is

/

/

/z€——

"/5

I

I

,

[KI-A

,5

-

,v

clinical guide to

a

‘4’; my:

M

,

ﬂ»

gray 1.47! /’L! CW/m4‘4ﬂt (331’; ﬁ{

I, ;’(f

ﬂ ,Cy «a,
'

M;

gaze

WWK
.ma- Asa/2w ,Aaé .4
//

My 4 Wﬁffeéé: fr!»

WI mat?»

lateral

WRﬁ—WW

the sedation threshold,

a;

nystagmus as an index of the

AA“: iséwtu/MA‘I

(2:

7! /)/”/»£¢A/L.( M #63“e/ Ca”
we

'1’
.11“

ﬂ¢»%ﬂw//L{u¢{304?“:{3’
a?

/
,.

3

if

'4"

”17’2“"

r

,

_.;__.‘

4’

"I;

a: A"

{ﬁ’ﬂg‘t
.

,,

,4?

Ayiﬁ ”(:4'5‘

Alt—‘3

/
A’Jik

�,
..‘

)-

I
*’

Wv
.1.

C

.

ya $407M
Mann};

4

M4,

/:7 a4“!!-

C
.

74V galvauE/Zw/

I

£44373;

59:7.

Z—f:

M4. 41%
’7sz

/f4/A/75, (”ﬁf)

W77er?“
'

#1

%@‘*’5‘“

g

CL

.‘

«9-9/-'.?33,

‘

/7f¥,

M

.

‘

/

$42M”

~

i

) ﬂtm
NA

/‘J3,
/ﬂf: ff7~ff~c '/

$4,441,,
V

.

ﬂu d

{7

.

/%

(1;.1'5

7.

�THE LONG ISLAND JEWISH HOSPITAL
270-05 76th AVENUE
Department of
MEDICINE

0

NEW HYDE

PARK, LONG ISLAND, N.

Y.

-

TELEPHONE:

Fleldstone 3-6700

�Suptonbar 21, 1961

ntrtin H. rats, Ph.n.
Reiuurch Piyuholosint

Paychophurnnaoloxy surviuc Cantu:

o: nautnl Bonita
lation:1 Institutg
Md.

Buthnldn 1h,
Dcar
_

ﬂirtin,

tour lattqr regarding 1 r0110! o: it: Iodaiitn
thrcihold attack a oynpsthcsia chord, and I an caconr:god
to share my Vitus with rat, Buvavcr, tin probla: in acuu
plax tad perhaps no as: not anido tan. tin. in Huntington
fur a dutuiled diacunuion.
Hy

interest in tho sedation thronhaid van

cooulionnd

onrlicr intarout in tho at. 0: intravoaonn snibirhitll
an a fast tar brain dynrunation. Hoinltciu and Ichni
Donitl at Illa-an c c. ThOIIl, 19 S) In tn. court. of
ofcoiﬁucﬁoci 05:310.,
we curriod out many out13¢tau at tho
8.2. .36 can. to it. eontlalion taut sh. inst was phyliylogically and itchnically Hound. Finding dylgrthriu I difficult
ondnpoiut, I lubntitnicd nyutccnuu; but in raulity, thin
can b: dilponlod wish, ninco tn. acnlurod and-puini in
to. EEO
tbs
3.3995:
by ny

aarpud nhoui drunrthrin,
corroct ll tar an int: hlvo (out, but thin dittiauliy intr.not
inlnrunuBStblo, uni boar: no aigaitiaing rolgtion to the
valet at $8. tout.

the critic:

who have

The quantiann

It

inane trot

II it. tlli stunt. in in: can. individual .v-rtiuo?
2. In thuro a charteturiltio tcapanao which
boar: a oiguir10§nt1y high corroliticn
with n bchnvioral Vlriibli - ntnnly, sh.
oililifiottion by psychiatriltl a! tangent:
iuia uolclogic (racy-9

1.

�0-2-

3. Thirdlr, your quclhiou, “it true, it (8.1.)
ahvioualy can b. very alarm! in trtttnaut
ﬁrodiotion nhndicl'.
1. Out Inn uxp.richou indiohtUI that : high intrh~
individual variabiliir; a limited ran 0 at vuluon tar thc halt
(tvclvc point. from 1-6 in half than. and an oqnivocnl EEG
0nd»point in 10-20! a: test: lit?! to nuko tha rnlihbla duturu
ainntion if tho 8.!. difficult.’ that. vurinblcn soon inhurout
in th. taut danish, and Ira not, in :1 opinion, I luck or
know-haw by uh. ohlurvcrl.
2. no. Hy nogahiva unuwar to thin question is partly
hhoad on (1); Ind partly on tho uuucl dittioaltios at nonology.
in somewhat limplowmiadod to uspuat a high corrolntion
It
betwocn a 'uinplt’ phyiinloxic rotativity naulurc had a
“90:91.3” hypnthctie clhatrnat with '0 Inch inhtront unhigui»
3

hy Ind

variability.

in: 3.2. may hat bu rnlutcd in
diagnosis; aha the 3.T. h. unoful in truttacnt prediction?
I think it uh: ha, ~~ not for hhc losicul raglan: anuuily
IiVOI, but blcinll of the value of tha tout an I .anctivity”
nth-urn. In the pulh tow ybnrn variouu indict: huvo blln
nhaua to huar IOll rolatiou to trontnont or to diacnnlis ~hnd ouch inﬂux it halt huh-ulna under tho hgru or a 'ruautivio
inﬂux”. HO utatod hhht pationth vhe chowod two or nor.
tr
laughing «hangs. utter intrtvonoun uncharhitnl war. nor.
likely to thaw curly EEO ehnnsun httnr uloetrouhock, had to
3.

Evan ihough

aha: gruntor dncrucn or hohnviortl church and iuprovonnnt
of Cenaunieatign, 126 - 139, 1958). Goldntn
pantothnl burnt. tr. 010'
’3'; a o
thin
in uppchrsaoo in achiIOphronic nnhjocta, and ht! unod
tout protnouticclly. Siuilhr mittencutl hart bath midi, in
£36 Ctt‘uli
nor. quantitttivo Itudinu, by Itil (Erlungun)
(Milan), why havu rclntod thn changod EEO putt-run to corehrnl ltrophy on pucnnaoneophulozrtphy. In hnothcr type of
studios, tho bland prolhnro rcupan-au to nocholyl and to
harshnlin have bath roptahcdly Incgnutod an a dilﬂnﬂltic
had prognontic 136.3. A cannon bhaiu in thcnc Ithdiou in
that u link of reactivity or a alow ranchivihy in zanornlly
taunted vith schiloyhruni: 0» brain atrophy ~~ a poor
proxnoutic high to: the artillhlo thsrtpiol; whil. high
rtnotivity in aquutnd with écprcauivc syndronon ~~10w: [and
tauntivprognostic sign with awnilhblh thnrapitu. Than,
invoked
indux
or
but
hi
an
high
any
your
prtgnoling
a:
it:
ruaahivity will bchr A high wurrulation with hshhvioral
chaugu, had a varinhlo In. with inprOthont rutinzs. (3.0

�.3our views of beteviorel change and inpreveuent ratings, Arch.
Gen. Feloniet. g; 259, end 5; 30, 1961)
Thus, there is much merit in Shannen 8.1. -- not, in
.my View as e diegnoetic index (for age is much more relieble
and easier to ascertain), but ea one guide to neurophyeielegic
reeetivity -- e eubaect that needs {nether study as e preg-

noetic and as]: noeelogicel teal!
I trust this in reeponeive to your inquiry. I would
16-1? ?)
like to disease it acre fully in doWashington (October
the 8.1.,
in
end wenld recommend that if yen
get interested
on
veriene reactivity
that you consider 3 eeriee or aeetinge
ueeeuree in plyehietry .. the neehelyl test, the 8.2. end
the coldnen ee exemplee at the more explicit.
My

regerde.
sincerely yours,

Hrcdte

ex

n ,

“.5.

�I1

I. I.

I

$5 I

[3

EE

P1

(3

55 F’

I'T'l\

I.

FOR PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT. TRAINING AND RESEARCH

75-59 263RD
A. MILLER, M. D.
,
,
Medical
Director

JOSEPH S.

SIMON KWALWASSER,

FIELDSTONE

LEON LOWENSTEIN

8-7800

Department Of Experimental Psychiatry

M. D.

Assoc. Medical Director
MAURICE

STREET. GLEN OAKS. NEw YORK

BACHRACH

Honorary Chairman
Board of Directors
ROY .FOSTER
Chairman
Board Of DWWOH
ALVIN E. COLEMAN

Administrator

President

September 12, 1957.

Dr. Roy Grinker,

Editor, Section of Psychiatry,

A.M.A. Archives Neurology &amp; Psychiatry,
29th Street &amp; Ellis Avenue,

Chicago, 16,

Illinois.

Dear Br. Grinker:

In reading the report of

issue of the Archives,
the sedation threshold,

Thorpe and Barker

in the latest (August)

to assess our own experiences with
and to report another clinical guide to the

we were moved

"inflection point" that we have found useful.

During the past two years we have included a measurement of the
sedation threshold in our tests of brain function. we initially followed
the technique described by Shagass (EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. é: 221-233,
l95h). Measurement of the beta amplitude reaponse is done visually in
several samples of record using the additive ruler described by Shagass.

initial group of patients, two observers were unable to
onset of slurred Speech with any consistency. 'We, therefore,
the
identify
omitted
this step, and continued drug administration until
gradually
drowsiness was clearly manifest, combined by a statement by the technician
that an increase in beta amplitude in the record had occurred at least 1%
In the

minutes before.

that occasionally amounts of amoreach
an inflection point were administered. We,
barbital inadequate to
therefore, began to note'the onset of nystagmus on lateral gaze as a guide
to the sedation threshold.
This technique had the drawback

Subjects were told that at periodic intervals they would be requested
to open their eyes and to look first to one side and then to the other at
pre-arranged fixation points. This was repeated twice in each direction,
usually within ten seconds, while the observer noted the development of
sustained regular nystagmus on lateral gaze. The administration of barbiturates continued until nystagmus was observed, and then 2 cc more were given.
The EEG records were then measured for the inflection point by the visual
method.

AN AFFILIATE OF FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK

�Dr. Roy Grinker (Contd)

-2—

To date, we have 91 such.measurements. In the following table, the
difference between the point of onset of nystagmns (nystagmus index) and
the inflection point of beta amplitude change (EEG index) is reported.

Difference .100
1

EEG

Index s-Nystagmns Index

.005

0

+05

+1.0

12

h?

27

h

Differences greater than 1.0 unit did not occur. It is apparent that the
nystagmus end point for the sedation threshold is reliably related to the
EEG end point by a unit of % in more than 90% of the trials. Since the
error of the sedation threshold under test - retest conditions is between
0.5 and 1.0 units, this nystagmus index is a satisfactory guide to the
sedation threshold, as defined by Shagass.
W
In our continuing studies of the sedation threshold, we have,
therefore, ceased measurement of slurred speech or drowsiness, but have
relied on the onset of nystagmns as the clinical guide to this index.

I trust that this data

may be

helpful to other investigators.
Sincerely'yours,
v

,4

a’V‘wﬂwc

has:

MF:JB

_

Fink, mm.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2554">
                <text>Lateral gaze nystagmus as an index of the sedation threshold. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1958 Feb;10(1):162-3.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2555">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2556">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-28-003</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2557">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2558">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2559">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2560">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2561">
                <text>12 items. 1: [Preprint]. 2: Reprint from Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Journal Vol.10, No.1, February 1958. 3: Letter to Dr. Roy Grinker form Fink. 4: Letter from Grinker to Fink. 5: Letter to Dr. Robert S. Schwab from Fink. 6: Letter to Fink from Schwab. 7: Letter to Fink from C[harlie] Shagass. 8: [preprint] to Dr. Thompson, members and guests discussing Dr. Shagass (2 copies). 9: Handwritten notes. 10: Draft with edits. 11:Letter to Martin M. Katz from Fink. 12: Letter to Roy Grinker from Fink. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2562">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2563">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74458">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81019">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87580">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94141">
                <text>Mosquera, Hannah</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="257" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="48">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f8b5cf3cf6b847561379d21a8181ceef.pdf</src>
        <authentication>550c4683b921dafa008583e1e9dd5aff</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100674">
                    <text>��COPY

Clinical Release
PRODUCT

Combination of 'Thorazine' and Diparcol (SKF #1026-A)

Diparcol alone

'Thorazine'

mg/cag.

ca .

FORMULAS

50.0 mg.

H01

2.0

Magnesium.Stearate
Lactose

200.0

-__-

----

mg.
mg.

300.0 mg.

is.
Restricted Medical Utility Studies - Dr.

Herman Denber

TOXICITY

Acute Intravenous Toxicity The intravenous acute toxicity of a combination of
SKF #1026—A ('Diparcol') and 'Thorazine' in the ratio of 5:1 was determined.
Intravenous LD50'S in male mice (CFl) were determined for SKF #1026-A, 'Thorazine'
and a combination of SKF #1026-A and ‘Thorazine' in the ratio of 5:1. The mice
were observed for a 2h hour period, at which time all surviving mice appeared
—

normal.

Combination

significantly

more

toxic than

SKF #1026-A

(T.R.

=

1.2)

'Thorazine' ngt_significantly'more toxic than combination.

(T.R.

'Thorazine' significantly more toxic than

- 1.36)

SKF

#1026-A (T.R.

=

1.13)

acute intravenous toxicity in mice of a combination of 'Thorazine' and
‘Diparcol', in the ratio of 1 part of 'Thorazine' to 5 parts of 'Diparcol',
did not differ significantly from that of 'Thorazine' alone. Such a comparison
is valid since the slopes of the toxicity curves are parallel. The combination
is significantly more toxic than 'Diparcol' alone, but the comparison is subject
to criticism.that the slopes of the toxicity curves are not parallel.

The

December 9, 1955

�DIPARCOL

In answer to your request an attempt has been made to find data comparing the
anticonvulsant activity of Diparcol (Diethazine, SKF #1026) with.that of other
phenothiazine derivatives: Phenergan (SKF 1&amp;98), 'Thorazine‘ (SKF 2601),

Promazine (SKF 3h06), 'Compazine' (SKF h657), SKF 5277 and SKF 5116. No such
studies have been done in our laboratory. The only SKF lab report on Diparcol
gives its toxicity as LDSO * 31.2 mg/Kg I.V. as compared with 22.9 mg/Kg I.V.

for 'Thorazine'.

Balestrieri

(1955) compared Diethazine, Phenergan, Parsidol and chlorpromazine
with respect to their protective action against electroshock and Metrazol
seizures in rabbits. Phenergan and chlorpromazine showed no anticonvulsant

action against electroshock seizures; Diethazine, 5 mg/Kg I.V. protected
2/5 animals and at 10 mg/Kg I.V. 3/5 animals. Parsidol protected 2/5 animals
at both doses. These results confirm SKF data obtained using maximal electroshock seizures in mice which showed no anticonvulsant activity for SKF lh98,
2601, h657 or 5116. SKF 3h06 did protect mice against seizures; the ED§Q was
155 mg/Kg p.o. SKF 5277 also demonstrated anticonvulsant activity with an
oral ED50 of 71.0 mg/Kg.
,

Balestrieri

snowed chlorpromazine to be
Metrazol seizures. Phenergan was inactive

inactive in protecting
at 5 mg/Kg I.V.
rabbits against
but a 10 mg/kg I.V. protected h/5 animals. Diethazine protected h/5 animals
at 5 mg/Kg and 5/5 at 10 mg/kg. ParSidol protected 5/5 animals at both doses.
’No similar SKF data are available.
The experiments of

Anticonvulsant action and molecular structure of phenothiazine
derivatives. .krch. Int. Pharmacodynam. 103:1-11, 1955

Balestrieri,

HLM:pz

hc

A.

�COPY-

PHARMACOLOGY REPORT

November 8, 1956

10-(2'-Diethy1aminoethyl)-Phenothiazine
Hydrochloride 0R (Diparcol)

SKF No. 1026-A

Compound:

Code No. Lot No. 99

Structure:

)W
ii

/”
'\\
K\//h\§v/\
EV

1

9H2
l

c H2.N-( 02H37~2

mignzim.R.T.Cmma'
Tested for:

Dose Range

-

.HCl

Mmda

Studies in mice after intravenous administration (11/10/55)

Observations

Dose
rug/kg

side effects

2.5

No

5.0

2/2 slight depression, loss of pinnal reflex
2/2 ataxia, sl. depression, loss of pinnal reflex, 'Thorazine'
walk.
2/2 ataxia, marked depression, dyspnea, 'Thorazine' walk,
loss of pinnal reflex.

10.0

15.0

6/6 clonic convulsions, apnea, prostration, ataxia after recovery, hypotonicity, 3/6 dead
2/2 clonic convulsions, apnea, prostration, ataxia after re-

20.0

25.0

.

cover

h

otonicit

Note-—all animals recovered from.prostration within 60 minutes..
Summary:

exhibited 'Thorazine'-like side effects after intravenous
administration in mice. Slightly higher doses were required to produce
depression than with 'Thorazine' and the depression produced was of
shorter duration.

SKF #1026—A

'Thorazine'-like

Activity:
Charge:

Biological screening

GW/IB/m/mh

�LILLY LABORATORY FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH
INDIANAPOLIS GENERAL HOSPITAL

INDIANAPOLIS

7, U.

S.A.

December 29, 1955

Max

Fink,

MOD.

Hillside Hospital
75-59 263rd Street

Glen Cake,

New

York

Dear Dr. Fink:

In answer to your recent request, Storey et a1. (Antibiotic
Med. &amp; Clin. Therapy, 2c258, September, I§§STI though
they do not report electroencephalogram findings, do
discuss the behavioral effects of cycloserine. There
have been no publications, to my knowledge, reporting
EEG findings in patients receiving 'Seromycin' (Cycloserine,

Lilly).

Veterans Administration hospitals have been doing
EEG tracings but their reports have not yet been published.
They will probably present their data at the Veterans
Administration Conference on the Chemotherapy of Tuberculosis
to be held in St. Louis in February.
do
be
not
we
of
further
please
may
assistance,
any
If
hesitate to w rite us.
The

Very

truly yours,

f th, M.D.
ri
Clinical esearch Division

R.
mlw

18760EIGHTIETH ANNIVERSARY-1956

�TELEPHONE: LEHIBH

Form 90a-Adm.

4-1300

State of New York
Department of Mental Hygiene
MANHATTAN STATE HOSPITAL

JOHN H. TRAVIS, M. D.
DIRECTOR

IN

Ward’s Island, New York City 35, N. Y.

ANSWERING REFER To

______.______._____

Dr. Max Fink

June 20, 1957

Hillside Hospital
75-59 263rd Street

Glen Oaks, N. Y.
Dear Max:

your findings on
I should like very much to include
Chloram
on
I
that
writing
the
final
in
paper
the 'Diparcol'
me
send
Could
of
you
Treatment
Depression.
promazine-Diethazine
diethazine
I.V.
of
the
effects
in
general,
note
indicating,
a brief
on the EEG? Were there any concomitant psychological effects?
of
"personal
reference
under
the
of
note
I will
course,
this,
communication."
Many

thanks.
Sincerely yours,

[/7
HD:SS

Herman C. B. Denber, M. D.

Director of Psychiatric Research

�4;:-

x}

June a?) 1957.

Dr.

Hem 6.

B. Ember,

Dimmr of Payehiatma Bsmmh,
Mahatma; State ammm,
”55W"! 1818M, ”at.
f:

,

Dear Hm

Itwaaaplmto
Atlantic city. I am aomr that

mm
we

We

withyouandymwﬁein
mum
could not. get. smother for "mucus“

much.
Johanna
and
cmvisit.
I
social
enjoyed
bht
very
Mb:
5.3
who:
moth
with
a wry Might. boy, But this yw' almdy
may:
Mahala,
Ina
1mm. A9 fer our “parlance with
your suggestion in
1 obtained some intmous manual from SKI. In the last 1w
‘mths we hm given it. to six ”news intmmly. Evin subject and
tt. {um
at" electroshock therapy and the trim of the
I.
of
much. In sank instance high
height. of m:
mo
1n
In: an
the
premix
"mag
abatmmphdogm
u’mrity
tam.
the
but situation, in which I and an we qmamm
3 and than remand
after the
parlour M the Watt-attests cf the d
50
2
of
the
The
rate
was
mm.
dosage
drug
gvmat
smnmum.
and
than
abuut
for
thirty
”cording
a
at.
of
the
air.
rate
mast
how
the
to
for
eight
Manama unplug
:pprmntnly mm hour.

mm. mm

mm,

W

93.03th

m
m mm

W» 6!me

We:

m.
mum

WW m
W
m

ma

Way m

hiring the ministmtion, each patient Moped, batman the
coma um fourth cc. m epdseda of waging. mare m
macaw
in breathing which an trunnion. This was the mat untoward attach a:

m

m

alaotromcophnlosnphia ohms pared gradually but was mt.
M:
the:
tho
of
minutes
n
injection.
within
tan 150 ace
mm
apparent.
to
thin tin mm
veto mead rm a may a!
than
mansions
70
rum
rmmyms
toammcf

in
mm»

Wt.-

mmumm.
tamper-u
MWalimdzm;wnwegemmWofﬁmSma
cent. tin 691th, however, mad about the sum. Mb 3:: «that peanut!
far one to an hours and in :1]. WWW 1n the maples “loan about four to
time: hours liter the Gilt: activity at at the pro-injection m1. In an.
“outpatient:mdauutiﬂtymmotthaomrofhto66330.3“
caploﬁon of the Winn
in value” of he to 70 UN. mm
the delta activity am: ”My ma in pomnt tiny and in voltage u:
that. m an: amount! mam- him he Waits. nun appeand stupor-impound
ﬁlm

�Dr»

new

at

Bar

mr,

#2

a clearly defined 25 cpl. nativity...
Tlmm
records
the
the
was an ”alerting?
following.
report
Warmly
animated by an incmaad methane” ai‘ we patient and a
crust. “ibis
greater difficulty in having the patient maintain his eyes gazed, ma
tbs change in hm patients from: a
"Home for this alerting phenm
effect to a mgative am)... The changes in language after
positive
were the reverse of the changes in language which we have axperlmcod
131ml
1n the past after tho amatmtion a! mama-him. Since we use the identical
w scone the changes in 11am in an Mammal fashion. In
maimaim,
three Mamas the questions prior to the
of Dime}. wen
11-.
and
therefore
to ovum.“ the changes in Imam.
negative
Waible
&amp; “manure"
In one manna tha max-d changed
in
to
an
1mm.
mama
clung» of the kind tkmt we see: with mbarbim. This dinmponcy
I. cannot explain.

m

m

m1

m

1mm

W10

rm

manna;

am eontinning this study and I would 11m to pmmt the behavioral
and electroeneephalog‘aphia effects My in the £111 to the Eastern EEG
Association. Thaw observations are, of eourse, migratory and I am not 8m 8 UT
the next batch or patients may not shot-7 us some other patterns. To tho
ﬂat
extent. that. this inmatigation has confirmed the observations of Leann”, I
an moat yieased.
Ha

I

have no objection to war reporting some of this itﬂ'omtian in
outline. If
is of any help ta you, I will be pleased to see the paragraph:
as yen intend to report, them and give you my reaction as to how they reflect.

it

our axpoziemaa,

Sincerely yours,Kn: Fink,

Dani-haunt at
MFtJB

mammal Pnyuhiatry.

H.130

�“,f
‘i? ziirect
i
v

.

i

of Diethazine on

EEG

’5‘
0+3

qt

I

for

and Significance

Theory of

Convulsive Therapy

Mauougﬂwk.ﬂdb
Previous studies of the role of

EEG

changes

in convulsive therapy
delta activity for

have demonstrated the significance of the induced

the behavioral re3ponse. Investigations concerning the biochemical

substrate of

delta in electroShock and convulsions

EEG

have indicated

significance for the cholinesterase - acetylcholine system.

reports
on

by

Ulett concerning the effects of atropine and

Recent

00’
scogﬁlﬂhine

the delta response-efﬁhe-EEE-showed a reversal of the-induced

patterns. Boncurrent

iswmvaﬁ.
reports by
r and

of diethazine on normal

EEG

and

that following

Lechner on the

EEQ

effects

trauma provided the

stimulus for the study of the effects of this drug in electroshock.

Subjects:
Twenty

voluntary

psychiatric patient in an openyward/psychiatric hospital

have been tested to date.

d

"

£5?
During
recording,

at various

maturing

(Biparcol)

is administred intravenously at

per minuteI

Maw
“'5’57- £155;
xi

treatmen .

rmi

94°"

"

the rate of 25 milligrams

‘1 250 milligrams,

{My

diethazime

70.,qu

*

�Observations :

a)

by
the
of
All
dryness
cmgling,
respond
subjects
Behavioral“
mouth and

thickness of speech. Feelings of weakness of extremities

illusory sensations are

and

There

common.

is

an increase

in rest-

lessness and difficulty in maintaining eyes closed. In patients
who have had

sufficient electroshock to manifest syntactic

and

orientation language changes indicative of altered cerebral function,

is

there
‘

b)

EEGSq

a

reversal of language patterns.
.

In all subjects there

is

desynchronization of frequencies

\

and decrease

in voltage. Alpha rhythms are less prominent.

!

low
Occasionally,
\

-—-a

c" In

voltage

“ILA

577’

frequencies appear.

\

voltages-a25of
delta
with
degrees
varying
activity,
patients

in

decrease‘, frequencies decrease and burst activity disappears. Irregular
alpha and beta frequencies of low voltage become
c)

The EEE and

persist

clinical effects consist for

gradually disappear.

one

mmminent.
to three hours, and

�Discussion:
The pharmacologic

effects of diethazine are described as "anti-

cholinergic" and "atropine-like," and in patients with altered brain

function

may be
h

described as "allert‘

electroshock induced

m

(Ulett).

EEG

delta is

P

The

action of diethazine an
0

.

scopﬂl ine
similar to atropine and eeelpalemine

(Zinc

ﬂoss observations era‘similar

to those in subjects

with head injury (Jeéhker and Lechner).
Conclusion:

‘1'“
Based on this data, as well as the cerebr¢{:§pinal ﬂuid cholin-

esterase studies of Bornstein) and

Tower and McEachern,

.

fuedJLb£1
diethazine hes-e ready

that: (l)

'

'

it

is

.:
enter the central

axrhnL;
and
trauma
induced
electroshock
by
by
delta
system3(2)
a
.

concluded
nervous

4'

may

similar
A

have

biochemical substrate;(3) electroshock may be looked upon as a controlled

6F Alana;
method tc.indnge ce ebral dysfunction for
The

its

induced behavioral

significance of these observations for

EEG

studies of head

trauma and the mode of action of gin-ilpconvulsiVe therapy

discussed.

effects.

will

be

�//—

£3th at Diethuine on 3%: and Significance for Theory at
Germanium

mm

Previous studies of the rule of
have

demtrnted

EEG

changes

in convulsive thenpy

the eigmfieam or the induced delta activity for

the behwioral response. Imeatigetions containing the

substrate of

EEG

1:10ch

delte 1n electroshock and convulsions have inﬂated

significance for the eholinestemae - mtwlchonne system.

reports

Ulatt concerning the «treats a! atropine and

by

anthedalta
patterns,

response

otheEEGshemdamml

of

napalm

theinducedm

Goncurrent reports by Jemkner and Lochner an the

ofﬂiethum «1110;14:11me

Recent.

effects

mtrmmmmmmm

atimelua for the study of the effects or this drug in electmahock.
Subagetet
Twenty

voluntary

psychiatric patimte in en upward/psychiatric hospital

have been tested

to date. Electroencephalogm have been obtained

mutant.

During the recording,

at. various

ﬁnes during

(limit)

is administer! intmemualy

per

me

until

at. the

250 Milligrams have been

rate of

Metered.

diethume

25 milligrams

a

an

�¢2~

mumations:
a.)

Behavioral

-

51].

subjects respand by coming, dryness (J the

math and thickness of speech. Feelings of weakness of extremities
and

mm.

illusory sensations are

Mamas

is

news in mt.

an

difficulty in maintaining eyes closed. In pgtients

3nd

who have had

There

Mficient ehctmhwk to manifest syntactic

and

onentation language changes indicative of altamd cerebral function,
them in a reversal of language pattern»
b)

EEG

~

In all subjects than

in Voltage.

and decrease

Damionﬂly,

10w

is «synchronization

Alpha

W

of Inqueneies

are less prominent.

tnqmncies appear.

voltnga

In pstinnta with varying dogma of delta activity, voltaga is

deemed, tmquemiea

in

“cram am}

burst wtivity disappears; Irregular

alpha and but: fmqmnoioa of law voltage become more
a) Tho

W

and

liy

clinical eﬂwta

diuppnr.

.

pox-stat

mm

gamut.

for om to than hours, and

�A!

mammalian
The phnmaeolog'ic

effects of diethuine are described as ”anti-

cholinergia“ and “atmpimlﬂm,” and in patients with altered brain

function

may be

doacribod an ”martini." The action of

electroshock induced

(Butt).

EEG

delta is 3min:- to atropine

Also, than. observations

with hast!

11131211

(«bunker and

m

diothum

8nd

n

W
napalm

51:11” to than in subdue“

Mr).

091191113th

Band on this data, us

all

0

as the carom spinal ﬂuid wanna

«tea-am swarms of Bernstein and

Tower and IicEnchem,

it is minded

that: (1) diothuine has a randy ability to enter the central nervous
system (2) delta induud by electroshock and by trauma my have similar

Mommioal substrate (3) electroshock my be loolwd upon as a controlled
m’chod

to induce cerebral dysfunction for

Ema

tm

its

induced behavim'al effects.

hand
for'EEG
of
atxﬁias
of
these
obsamtiona
significant:

and the mode of

discussed.

act-.1031

of electmcomluvo therapy will. be

�MM

or

blow

swam

m

and
Gmmlaim Therapy
on

m m,

for

1119on

of

24.13.

me changes in wmulsive therapy
have
the signifiam of the induced delta actdxiw for
the
biochemm
umoarning
the
Invasﬁgatlans
tome.
have
EEG
and
indicated
electroshock
emulsions
of
delta
in
mutate
nignﬁmm tor the ahonmuem - mmdcholine system mm.
Pruvioua studies

Wand
1:6de

at the rails

of.

otatropdmandaoopolmo
Wbymttcommmgmeﬂw
EEG
induced
showed
EEG
or
cloctrashook
a moral
in
an
pattom.
am:
Comm-rent reparts by Janka»: and Lechner an the: extent: of
on mm]. EEG and that. following tram provided this stimulus far the
study of the effects at this drug in electroshock.

mm

Salaam”
treatment
various
during
ht
stages
patina“
puma-lo
in an open—ward voluntary psychiatric hospital have been tested to
(Dimmol) is manicured
date. "During EEG recording,
int-.mwaly at the rate of 25 milligrams- por minute, for a total
at 2%
Twenty

diam

W0
Mmtionu

'

:

a)

%:

b)

m
m

All subjects respond by coughing, dryness of the
thickness of mach. Feelings of weakness of emu-mitten
mm
and illusory marathons are cam. more is an immune 1h restless.
mas and mamty 1n maintaimng eyes clued. In patients who
have had sufficient. electroshock to manila“ syntactic and orientation
language changes indicative of album earabral function, there is a
reversal of language patterns.

more 13a doaynchrmiuuon of rmmdes
down» in voltage. Alpha rhythms are less lament.
Occasionally, 1m? voltage theta frequencies appear.
In

all subjects

In patients with varying demos of delta activity, voltageand
burnt
increase
frequencies
activity disappears. Irregular
decmo,
alpha and beta Imumcies of low voltage become prominent.
c) The EEG and clinical effects persist for one to three hours, and
gradually disappear.

Fm

Department of
men Oaks, ELY.
than

1.1-6.5?

-

EAEEG

mmm

Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,

�‘5

of
downbeat
aﬂoat:
dawn»
m
Wohgie
u
”antiwhonmtgie" and 'ttropine‘uka," and in patina“ With slated
brain imam any be 6030de as ”wrung.” the mum at
on ahctroshack induced EEG delta is amm to atropine
610mm
um! £39me (010%). mm ebmmﬁom an aim similar to
ﬁrm in aubjccta with bud injury (Janina: and helmet).
The

cmcluaiam
Mac! on this duh, as «11 as this cerebmspinal fluid
cholimatamso studios of Ben-MW, and Tower and Wuhan,
is wmludod that: (1) damn» mam entm the «antral
nervous system; (2) delta nativity inducod kw alwtrodmck and
and
by tram may ham: 3 similar
(3)
mutate:
mm be lookad upon an o. watt-0119c! ”that! of naming «mural
to: its behaviaral affaa‘w.

it

mmwu

m
Wanna
The

«:1ng
the
or action of convulsive: therapy will

trauma and

node

of

thew

than mamtiom for m ”adieu or had
be

animated.

�v

-r:‘V?\'(‘r.uv'

w--w—ILW|&gt;L‘»V‘V'~B—w"y:mm w—r-mw-vwn»vww.,u—A » v —.-.r. -- .vr.

w—y

~

w

—

"av/\—

&lt;7

r

,rw-I'IWK

.

aw

u

'mwl'

-

-

-

"a.“

AM'HV'Wwv _,,,

A

was

�wan-my

r'm

��Form 90-Adm.

éhhft$nk jﬂuh

ﬁsgrlﬁatrit gustitute
722 WEST 188'"! STREET.
LAWRENCE B. KDLI, M. D.

nlnlm'run

NEW YORK

December 4, 1957

Dr. Max Fink
Dept. of Experimental PSychiatry
Hillside Hospital
75—59 263rd Street
Glen Oaks, New York
Dear Max:

feelings about Saturday night are reciprocal.
Weihoroughly enjoyed the gracious company of you and
Martha. With the intuitive perceptiveness of the female, Yetta informed me of a forthcoming event in your
family, and we Wish you the best of everything.
I indeed look forward to the reprints on your Work
which you described in your letter and our discussing
them together. The next edition of the Kalinowsky and
Hoch will be expanded to include tranquilizers, and I
would also appreciate any reprints of yours in this area.
I have enclosed my own reprint on the clinical
effects of Win-2299 and the basic paper by Luduena
and Lands. As you will note, the compound is a peripheral anticholinergic and produces a "disorientative"
reaction in cats by central action. Its psychotomimetic
action in man appears basically to be an acute toxic
reaction type. I would imagine that its central mech~
anism of action is similar to that of atropine (which
also produces acute confusional states in high doses).
Win—2299 is effective at much lower dosages than atro—
pine. Possibly both atropine and Win—2299 both produce
central effects by an anticholinergic action but, as
far as I know, this modus operandi has not been pinned
down crucially as far as the C.N.S. is concerned.
I would not expect all anticholinergic agents to be
psychotomimetic, of course. Win-2299 is a tertiary
amine. Monodral is a closely related drug, differing
only by quaternization of the terminal nitrogen in
Win—2299. It is Win~4369 in the paper of Luduena and
Lands (p.283), i.e. the methobromide form. According
to Winthrop-Sterling, it is a peripheral anticholinergic
in man in doses of 5-40 mg. per day. Central or psychic
actions are not mentioned in their account. Presumably,
quaternization reduces central activity by reducing
permeability.
Our

�Dr.

Max

Fink (cont'd)

’

-2—

I imagine that other agents in the Win series with
central effects in cats might also be active as psychotomimetics in man. I am not familiar with the formula
of diparcol and if you have it available would appreciate
learning where to look it up. The drug is not covered
by Goodman and Gilman. I would appreciate return of the
Luduena and Lands paper when it has served your needs.
We

gave the Win—2299

the
orally,
The

compound being
drug was supplied as the

supplied in tablet form.
racemic mixture, the asymmetric carbon atom being terminal in the aliphatic chain. Sterling—Winthrop may
have it for intravenous use and I suggest that you write
M. L. Tainter, M.D., Director, Sterling-Winthrop Research Institute, Rensselaer, N.Y. about it. Our oral
supply was used up in the study.
As you know, all psychotomimetics not only create
new symptoms in mental patients but also intensify or
revive pre-existent symptoms.
Best of luck.

Cordially,

”2a
Harry
Pennes,
H.

HHP/ys

Encl.

M.D.

�PA

if

..
_

*

(on

1M5?

I

Effect of Diethazine

on EEG and

we

Significance for Theory of Convulsh

M

Therapy

MD
Mow
In a previous report to-this society we noted the relationship between
the degree of induced delta activity during the course of therapy and the
behavioral reSponse to electroshock. Those patients, in

delta activity were induced early,

and were

degrees of behavioral change, as well as a

significantly greater percentage

W
gm

vial

£64414a

Law In.

Box}

EH:

acetylcholine

and

in

whom

only low degrees

were induced (Fink and Kahn, 1957).

activity

1,

(ii;

'1.)

high degrees of

sustained, manifested the greatest

of improvement and recovery than those patients
of delta

whom

,hML-wQA‘O‘
. a, W"
,
‘Jawc‘z
MM
L

Mkﬁl‘g‘f‘” ’M‘Af‘z‘ mv’efrff
"
in!“
(.4

Mﬁanges infree”
'

a variety é‘fu‘reports,

cholinesterase in the Spinal fluids of patients (Sachs,
9.

Ward) and animals (Bdrnstein, Tower and McEachern) following head

Wig;
.

.

I

the observations that
by trauma

M

o

(Bfrnstein,

ﬂue/4%

In

1956

.c‘

E

agents liq—alter the

EEG

patterns induced

Ward, Jenkner-Lechner) and by electroshock

(

“knew“at?mp

(Ulett)pu_l

Ulett reported that atropine g’scbpolaminerwhea-aéiénéstered—

/

W,

blocked the appearance of the delta

wea»...have
come to associate with
- _,-.,..«-'V'F-r -v~ WWW ahaaul,” "‘4“qu

w.

traumalawﬂ

electroshock therapy.

A!” 791’]
am’LlLJ/g/J
M ’L “‘2‘“ 4“““4/ié’MWrrW ”“an“
j?”

activity

{lama/Wye?

v»

�-ebeervetions~ Previously, ward (193) following the suggestion of Bornsteiny
(19h6) had noted

that atropine altered both the

EEG

patterns

and the

neurologic signs induced in.man by head trauma. aﬁereT-tee, the side
ZZ,AQA7V

~effects were marked. In 1955: Jenkner and Lechner reported that

EEG

behavioral effects similar to atropine were achieved by diethazine

istered in patients with head trauma.‘

They

and

admin—

also reported the effect‘of

diethazine in normal subjects.

It is

the purpose of this report to describe the effects of intravenous

diethazine on the

EEG

of patients during electroshock therapy; and to

relate their these findings to the present neurophysiologic-adaptive
hypothesis of the ndde of~action of convulsive therapy.
w

‘ﬂwmwmﬂmwwwﬂ_ﬂ____.imm

3"

Diethazine is a soluble phenothiazine

compound

with phamacologic

properties similar to atropine. In experimental animals,
(19h?) have noted

that diethazine blocks vagal slowing of the heart‘)

M

suppresses the bradycardia, bronchospasm, salivation, and fasciculation
and

seizures induced

by

acetylcholine,

DFP

‘‘‘‘‘ ‘wywwﬂﬁmgimww‘ﬁzoxsum-“:- w'

”mm—«MA..-

and pilocaxxﬁxg and induces

dry mouth, mydriasis and hypotension.

L/——'

/

Heymans EE.E£

a“: nevus-aw» 4.: '2‘ YW',‘47"’~"5‘W1‘-05 Emma-gwhz

-

.—

'

.~_4~:_MD~J

�93"

”w

W

Subjects: Twenty-two

psychiatric

42‘

patients,” various

stages of electro-

shock treatment in an open-ward, voluntary psychiatric hOSpital have been

studied.
the

laboratory. Following a routine

EEG

administered intravenously at the rate of
of

2630

to 250

mgm,

the

i
Tl’br.‘

EEG

25 mgm

per minute, for a

total

effects. Prior to the

historical interview and a structured

questionnaire period were tape-recorded.
EEG

recording, diethazine was

depending upon the behavioral

drug administration, an unstructured

both

EEG

gubjects were tested in

Following drug administration,

recording‘ and recorded interview periods were continued until
record again manifested.the pre-injection patterns on visual

inspection.
Mm New.

‘&gt;IIVW~..

Qbservations:

in Le

,,

(a) Clinical: AH su jects manifesm Spontaneous coughing mutual-i33-

@

followed by a dryness of the mouth and a thickness of speech.
ﬂgrtrf

They

note‘,

'
3'37

a feeling of lassitude and weakness of the extremities? soon followed by

increased restlessness and difficulty in maintaining eyelid closure.
phenomena were

PSymW/clearly

between 15 and 30 minutes

.

manifested in

after

some

subjects. In the rest period

drug administration, six subjects spontan-

..,. _‘ ...

_

A

�4,.
eously voiced feelings of unreality, visual and haptic illusions, and

delusional thoughts about their illness, the setting of the test procedures or our

identity.

Such

patterns

were

transient

and had disappeared

In

by the termination of the experiment,-asaallyhiééﬁﬁurdﬁnnxrdnmzns.

three subjects, increasing agitation
.

and panic led to a cessaﬁon of

the recording. éHere7-tccy—restétation_a£—pme—énjenﬁﬁnnrdnﬁuuﬁuuaauua
I

'li'
g“,

,

I!

i

.

ﬁilliwuwﬁ

(b) In previous studies,

the intimate relationship

we had noted

between changes in syntactic language patterns with

alteration in cerebral

function induced by electroshock. In subjects tested prior to electroshock,
diethazine induced changes in syntactic pattern of an "alerting" variety.
I

-

gal

[5%
In subjects with elta activity‘ with clinical syntactic patterns indicative

of an

alteration in cerebral function, diethazine induced a transient dis-

appearance or minimzation of Such language

in language
(c)

was concurrent with changes

EEG

Patterns: In

all

patterns.

The

period of changes

in electroencephalogram.

records, there is a decrease in voltage and

desynchronization of frequencies. There

is

a decrease in prominence of

prevailing rhythms. In patients without delta activity (pre-electrodhock)’

�-s5‘ 4/

this deéhronization

and voltage decrease

is

occasionally accompanied

by the appearance of small amounts of low voltage
These

are demonstrated in Slides 1,

not appear to be altered.

The

and 2.

The

5’7

'5' cps activity.

basic alpha rate does

build-up in voltages and appearance of

thm

slower frequencies with hyperventilation is blocked.

In patients with varying degrees of induced high voltage

activity

voltage”, both

random and

4

This change

It

and

3

dub

is a decrease in

burst delta activity disappears; and irregular,
/

low voltage alpha and beta frequencies become prominent.

are noted in Slides

delta

These changes

LL.

5W

in

is

manifest in

appears during drug administration, and

all

electroshock subjects.

persists for

awe. [WM
ﬁlwwx
13%
2/1.
ﬂoncurren WithAelectroencephalographic
hours

vtwv
‘

”fly
to three
age

MM»

Wrens-em

ﬁith the

8&amp;3 17TH 770 n

moustita—tion—

of the pre-injectionEl'I} patterns, the pre-injection behavioral and
language patterns again appeared.

�DISCUSSION:

report of Jenkner and Lechner of the
t”t.¥£~£ dikd/“4lz‘ijzz7'
effects of diethazine in"normal" subjects. 'Wa.alsa—nnta_tha§21iethazine
These observations confirm the

alters records-snd-ﬁith electroshock induced delta activity in‘a fashion
similar to atropine

and scopolamine, as described by

Ulett,

A Mada»
W
was.
.

1%,.

is apparent, therefore, thatngﬁ readily affects the central nervous
and.é53 duration

system,

ofiactivity is most useful for experimental purposes.

The-previeusiy—eitnd studies by numerous Observers of nervous system

effects of head trauma point to

an intimate

relationship between the degree

of neurologic dysfunction, the degree of

EEG

alterationjgand the level of

free acetylcholine in the spinal fluid.

The

effect of atropine both

the Echand

ill

on

concomitantly on behavior in subjects with head trauma lends

further support to the significance of ﬁgs: acetylcholine as the biochemical
basis for the observed

EEG

patterns.

In these studies of diethazine

electroshock, the intimate relationship between

EEG

patterns

and

and behavior

�-7have been reported.

We

note the parallel to the observations in head

\

trauma.

On

the basﬁs of these observations, as well as studies of Spinal

fluid

Woholinesterase levels; (Tower
we would

and HoEachern, Fink and Goldenberg)‘

suggest that the biochemical substrate of the electroshock process.

is isimilar to that of head
controlled

trauma.9

method of inducing

ectroshock
hLauri.

may be looked upon

cerebral dysfunction for

its

as a

behavioral

effects.
Previous studies have demonstrated

that alteration in cerebral function

provides the physiologic basis for the behavioral changes in electroshock
(Fink and Kahn, 1957).

Such

alteration in cerebral function provides the

milieu for a change in the organism's adaptation to his environment.
aSpects of behavior, as perception, language,

mood,

recall,

memory,

All

affect,

undergo change, and provide the basis for the

therapist's evaluation

of improvement. The studies of diethazine amplify

this neurophysiologic

9.39.9.

adaptive hypothesis of electroshock by suggesting the type of biochemical

substrate that underlies both the physiologic

and the behavioral changes.

�Mm=
0

Diethazine, a pftent anti-cholinergic compound,

u

was

experimentally

introduced intravenously in psychiatric subjects,;ﬁ various stages of
convulsive therapy.
Electroencephalograms manifested a desynchmnization of frequenciesfue («C

decrease in voltage
records without prior delta activity.

Records with

delta activity

showed

similar changes with disappearance of delta burst activity.
Concomitant with the electrographic

patterns indicative of

It is

concluded

a

effects, behavioral

reversal of the electroshock effect

enters the central nervous

System upon intravenous

(b) The biodemical basis for

that of head trauma;
(c)

therapy

The
may

EEG

compound

that readily

adninistration.

changes in electroshock

is similar

and

biochemical basis of the

lie in

were observed.

that:

(a) Diethazine is a Bitent anti-cholinergic

to

and language

mode

of action of convulsive

the acetylcholine-cholinesterase system.

a,

�@

Research and Development Division

SMITH, KLINE

&amp;

FRENCH LABORATORIES

PHILADELPHIA

-

I

ESTABLISHED I84|

December 11, 1956

Max

Fink, M.D.

Director of Research
Hillside Hospital
75—59

263rd

Glen Oaks,

Street

New York

Dear Doctor Fink:

associate, Mr. C. W, French, has referred your letter of November 12
requesting a supply of diethazine to me for reply. It has taken me a
little While to uncover-sufficient supplies for the short clinical trial
you want to conduct since our interest in diethazine alone and in come
bination with 'Thorazine' isn't too great at this time.
My

not have this compound available in 500 mg. capsules as you requested. It is only available in 250 mg. tablets. A supply of this
strength has been sent to you together with a supply of the intravenous

we do

material so that you

is all the literature we
this will be of some help.

Enclosed
hope

the

may Observe

EEG

effects

on 10

have available on

Sincerely yours,
.\

to

15

patients.

diethazine. I

,

J”,
Meagan?
Ms
(,7

.

John F. Buckley
a Research
Associate

/

’

'

Medical Department

JFB:hc

Enclosures

P.S. Will you kindly sign the enclosed FDA card and return
so that we may keep our files up-to-date.

it

to us

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2564">
                <text>Effects of Diethazine on EEG and significance for theory of convulsive therapy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 10 207-208. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2565">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2566">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-29a-004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2567">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2568">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2569">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2570">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2571">
                <text>13 items. 1: Handwritten notes. 2: Clinical Release. 3: Diparcol. 4: Pharmacology Report. 5: Letter to Fink from R. S. Griffith. 6: Letter to Fink from Herman C. B. Denber. 7: Letter to Denber from Fink. 8: Draft with edits. 9: Two drafts. 10: Handwritten notes. 11: Letter to Fink from Harry H. Pennes. 12: Draft with edits. 13: Letter to Fink from John F. Buckley</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2572">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2573">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74459">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81020">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87581">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94142">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="258" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="49">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/78017191476d8e778612e5c61eff422b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>82ede86cdae7bcc77cb09f6c0bbd0389</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100675">
                    <text>Mammal
in

studios of Germain ﬁnd Drug max-span
mun-ya Theoﬁtio Imitation!

In swans a: aonvnluivo, payohophumcmgic and inaulin

a»

therapist,
msalon

of
"idem tar a mmphysiolozimpuve W011! or the and. of
these ﬂux-apt!» has wwmhtod. This hypotmsia “crib“ the officwy 01'
each therapy

in the trantaont of wohma to their ability to

induae a

persistent alternates: in cerebral function. mien provides the am“: for u
changa in adaptation of the subject to his anviroment. In those studies,
in Em have been and as indie» of uttered brain tumuom
In convulsive thong, the shift in EEG tmuoneias to the delta range
has been directly rented to the behavioral changa (AMA, Arch, Emmi. and

analyses

at

r3;chiat.

(J:

com
be

(n)

«hangs:

16;: 516,

1957).

A

maid. H292. 5:

“1&amp;1;in has been observed

31:11.:

Bk. 1955).

classified ascending to their

EEG

From

ﬂat

fnqucncios, with in-

(mpmbmu, barbiturates); and (c)

(domains, bemctysine and asp-nine).

then analyses, a shirt in

unused synchronisation

tnnquiliutim

m

EEG

mggasmd

sedation.

1.957):

mums». pruning, perphenaame,

reserpine); (b) indueo a ahiﬂ. to

crewod synchronization
frequencies

Viviana psychophameologe uganta can

offsets: (J. Hillside Ham. 9; 197,

mum a mm to delta frequenciu

and high dose

to insulin

«mama

frequencies to delta range and in»

u the nmrophysiologic

concomitanta

mmphyaiologimdaptim hypothoais hm
applicatim to the ammonia of physiodymmic mempiee, acmning or psychoplumeologic agents and as a trans of refemnce for the study a: bmior arid
of

and

The

mmphyaiology.
From

L010,

the

Dayna-meat

“at;

or Workman.

rm. Hemlogical Society,
MAR

2 6‘85

Why, Hillaido Hospital, Glen mks,

March 11, 3.958.

�«W W
WWW
AFTER 225 mg.

PRE-DRUG

LF-LO
RF-RO

WIN/WWW

SOyvl

_

#I64IHH

�PRE- DRUG

AFTER 150 mg

�W
WW
”“va W W
W
WW
WW
WW
+

PRE-DRUG

+ 25 mm

200 mg.

LF-LO

WWWNVMMJVW

RF R0

NWvaw-AAW

“T'RWWJWMM

H

”ﬁn.

MM

LF-RFNWWN

WWW”

LPT'LO

WWWM

50

)Lvl

I

$|631

NH

�PRE-DRUG

@.

AFTER 250 mg.

W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
50pvl_
SEC.
1

#IZQS

NH

�Effect of Anti-Cholinergic Agent, Diethazine,
Significance for Theory of

Max

From the Department of Experimental
L015, NJ.

Fink,

on

EEG

and Behavior:

lesive Therapy

14.1).

Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks,

in part, by grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health,
National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service.

Aided,

(in part) at the meeting of the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, N.Y., December 1957,‘
4.7444417
Jazz;

Read

33?: 3-58

/“ a

M 14/11.” 050,?wa

�3.3-58

Effect of Anti-Cholinergic Agent, Diethazine,

on EEG and Behavior:

Significance for Theory of Convulsive Therapy
Recent investigations of convulsive therapy have emphasized

EEG

delta

activity as the neurophysiologic basis for the induced behavioral change
(1,2,3,h,5). Little study, however, has been given to the biochemical
effects of this therapy, except in the course of investigations of head

injuries.
In investigations of head trauma significance has been ascribed to

in the acetylcholine-cholinesterase systems both for the behavioral
and the electroencephalographic effects. An increase in free acetylcholine
(6) and an alteration of the ratio of cholinesterases (7) in the spinal
fluid have been positively correlated with the degree of EEG abnormality
changes

and degree of heurologic
improvement

deficit.

in clinical status

The EEG

patterns were "blocked," and

was reported following

atropine (7,8). In convulsive therapy, atropine
observed to block the appearance of delta

some

the administration of

and scopolamine were

activity, (9) although the

systemic effects of the large doses of these agents were marked.
Recent reports (10) noted

that

EEG

and behavioral

effects similar to

atropine {were achieved in patients with head trauma by intravenous diethazine a phenothiazine

compound

systemic effects.

with anticholinergic properties

- with

minimal

In our continuing studies of the role of delta activity

in electroshock (3), the effect of diethazine was studied. It is the purpose
of this report to describe the effects of diethasine on EEG patterns and on
behavior of patients during electreconvulsive therapy; and to relate these
observations to the present neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis of the mode
of action of convulsive therapy.

�SUBJECTS AND METHODS:

Forty psychiatric patients,

at various stages of electroshock

therapy in an open-ward, voluntary psychiatric hospital have been studied.

All observations have been
Following a routine

at the rate of

EEG

made

in acute experiments in the

laboratory.

recording, diethazine was administered intravenously

25 ngm per minute,

upon the behavioral

EEG

effect.

for a total of

Dosage

varied

from

to 250 mgn, depending
2.8 to h.0 mgm per kilogram
175

body weight.

Diethazine

is

a soluble phenothiazine

compound

with pharmacologic

properties similar to atropine. In experimental animals, diethazine blocks
the bradycardia, bronchospasm, salivation, fasciculation and seizures
induced by acetylcholine, di-isopropyl fluorophosphate and pilocarpine.

suppresses salivation, and induces mydriasis and hypotensicn
EEG

It

(ll).

Anilxses:
Recording was continuous

for the duration of the observation period,

except during interview periods. Needle electrodes, and an
Moderaft instrument were used. All records were analyzed

delta activity (3); the per cent time
the relative amount of fast activity.
measured in anterior temporaldvertex,

and
The

and

8 channel

for the degree of

principal alpha frequency; and
alpha and delta activity were

parietal-ear ldbe lead coMbinations.

Behavior measures:

Prior to drug administration an unstructured psychiatric historical
interview and a structured questionnaire period (12) were tape recorded.
Following drug administration, periods of recorded interview were alternated

�~3-

with

EEG

recording periods,

until the me

had again manifested the pre-

injection pattern on visual inspectioné
Two estimates of behavioral effects were used: clinical descriptions
subject, interviewer and technician - of the changes
occurring during the drug period, and language analyses of the recorded interviews. Changes in language were evaluated by a syntactic analysis (12)
and an analysis of the variability in verbal interaction in the dyad (13,1h).*
by

the participants

~

Both measures have been shown to be sensitive to
induced by changes

in the central nervous system.

* Detailed analyses of these observations
DPS.

J. Jaffe

alterations in behavior

and

Re

In Kahn.

will be reported separately by

�OEERVATIONS:

(a) Clinical:
Within two to five minutes of the

start of the injection,

subjects manifested spontaneous coughing follow ed by a dryness of the
of speech.

and a thickness

They reported a

feeling of lassitude,

mouth

and a

heaviness and weakness of extremities which was soon succeeded by increased

difﬁculty in maintaining eyelid closure.
Reports of visual and haptic illusory sensations, feelings of unreality
distance, and delusional thoughts about their illness, the setting of

restlessness
and

and

test procedures or

identity were voiced Spontaneously in eighteen
subjects in the period between 15 and 60 minutes after drug adninistration.
the

our

In three instances, increasing agitation and panic led to a cessation of the
In two subjects withdrawal and negativism was the prominent

recording.

behavioral response. Such patterns of behavior were transient and had
disappeared in
(b)

EEG

1%

-

h hours

in all subjects.

Patterns:

Alteration in the

EEG

patterns

was concurrent with

the behavioral

effects. In all records, changes occurred during drug administration and were
sustained, with gradual diminution and restitution of the pre-injection
patterns, in

one

to five hours.

The

initial

response was a decrease in

voltage and desynchronization of all frequencies. There
prominence of prevailing rhythms.

was a decrease

in

In patients without delta activity

(pm-electroshock), desynchronization and voltage decrease

was occasionally

activity, symmetric and prominent in frontal
and anterior temporal leads (Figure l, 2). The alpha frequency was not altered.

accompanied by low voltage 5-? cps

�~5The

build-up in voltage and appearance of slower frequencies with hyper-

ventilation was blocked.
In patients with varying degrees of high voltage delta activity there
was a prominent decrease

in voltage

and desynchronization

of the record.

burst delta activity diminished or disappeared, and irregular
voltage alpha and beta frequencies became prominent (Fig. 3, h). The

Both random and
low

hyperventilation response was no longer apparent.
(c) Language Patterns:

In previous studies, an intimate relationship between changes

in syntactic language patterns and the behavioral response in electroshock
had been reported (12). With alteration in brain function, increased use
of third person, veroal denial, qualification, displacement and cliches
became prominent.

These

effects could be enhanced by the administration

of intravenous amobarbital (1h).
In the subjects in the present study, syntactic analyses demonstrated
a reversal of the patterns noted

in electroshock.

Use

of third person,

qualification and displacement decreased. Explicit verbal denial was modiﬁed
and replaced by minimization and displacement, or by a reiteration of
complaints of

illness. In dyadic analyses, the verbal interaction was

characterized by a greater diversity of vocabulary

and

less variability in

the diversity scores for 25 word units.

qualitative nature of these changes in the language patterns
is opposite to that of amobarbital and electroshock. The duration of language
changes was concurrent with the changes in the electroencephalogram.
The

�DISCUSSION:

These observations confirm the report of Jenkner and Lechner of

the effects of diethazine in "nonmal" subjects (10). Diethazine also alters
electroshock induced delta activity in a fashion similar to atropine and
sncpolamine, as described by Ulett and Johnson (9), with minimal unpleasant
symptoms.
EEG

The

effects of intravenous diethazine are immediate, both

and behavior, and thus provides a

cholinergic" properties.

Two

on the

useful experimental agent with "anti-

aSpects of these experimental observations

warrant discussion: the role of acetylcholine-choldnesterase in the electroconvulsive therapy progress, and the significance of die thazine "alerting"

for concepts of hallucinogenic activity.
1. Biochemical Basis of the Convulsive Therapy‘l’rocess:
While there has been considerable study of the psychologic
neurophysiologic aspects of convulsive therapy,
biochemical processes

is available.

The

little

and

infomation concerning

studies of biochemical changes

following head trauma and spontaneous seizures provide some analogic data.
Bernstein (6), in a classical experimental study of head trauma in cats,

that within a few minutes after trauma, free acetylcholine
appeared in the Spinal fluid and persisted for periods up to 148 hours. He
further demonstrated a positive relation between the severity of head trauma

demonstrates

and the

quantity of free acetylcholine, degree of electroencephalographic

the severity of the behavioral changes. The electroencephalographic records initially showed short periods cf high voltage fast activity,

alteration

and

transient period of flattening of electrical activity, followed by prolonged
periods of high amplitude sharp waves in the delta frequencies. Concomitantly,

a

�-7alteration in consciousness, changes in reflexes
seizures

EEG

change.

Tower and HbEachern (7) confirmed

studies in

man.

In

post-traumatic

highest concentrationSOf free acetylcholine

were most prominent with

and greatest degree of

and

112 neurologic

these observations in clinical

patients, free acetylcholine was found

in the cerebrospinal fluid only in patients following head trauma and recent
grand mal seizures; and the level of free acetylcholine varied directly with
the degree of cerebral damage.

In addition, these authors assayed the cholin-

esterase activity of the spinal fluid, (7, 16). In patients following head
trauma, they noted a sharp rise in non-specific cholinesterase (benzqylcholine-

in.the specific cholinesterase (meoholyl-splitting)
activity of the spinal fluid. No such inversion was noted in fluids containing
splitting)

and a drop

free acetylcholine following spontaneous seizures. Electroencephalograms
were taken

at varying intervals following

correlation of the extent of

EEG

trauma, and demonstrated a

direct

abnormality and the appearance of free

acetylcholine in the spinal fluid.
Tower and MhEachern

also reported observations in six patients

In patients after 3-7 induced convulsions,
they noted free acetylcholine in the spinal fluid in two, and an increase in
non-Specific cholinesterase with reversal of the cholinesterase ratio in five
receiving electroconvulsive therapy.

of the six. They concluded that the spinal fluid changes in electroshock are
more

like those of craniocerebral trauma than those found in epilepsy. *

patient of the six who failed to show either free acetylcholine or a reversal of the cholinesterase ratio, they noted: “It is
interesting that this patient was the only one of the six to show no

* Regarding the one

response to treatment."

�-8recently, Sachs (17) confirmed the reports of free acetylcholine in
the spinal fluid after head trauma and after electroshock.
In his studies, Bornstein (6) administered 0.5-1.0 lug/kg atropine

Mcre

effects, and a
modiﬁcation of the behavioral and neurologic signs. Atropine also
blocked the EEG and clinical signs induced by intracisternal acetylcholine.
and demonstrated a

reversal or a blocking of the

Ward (8) applied these observations

with varying degrees of head trauma.

atropine induced both clinical

EEG

to the treatment of

Subcutaneous doses of 0.1 mg/kg of

improvement and

reversal of

These observations were recently confirmed by Sachs
Hughes

(19).

Based on

subjects

human

these observations, Ulett

(l7),

EEG

effects.

Rugs (16) and

and Johnson (9) noted the

effect of atropine and scopolamine in blocking the Em changes of electroshock tharapy, without noting the effect on clinical behavior. Concurrently,
Jenkner and Lechner (10) reported effects similar to those of Ward, in
studies of diethazine in cases of head injury.
Another group of investigations complete the available data. Studies

of anticholinesterases, as

DFP

(di-isopropyl fluorophosphate) and

(tetraetlwl-pyrophosphate), which block the enzymatic

TEPP

breakdcvm of

acetyl-

choline, demonstrate the development of high amplitude rapid frequency
mac patterns similar to status epilepticus as well as lesser degrees of
abnormality as noted in post-tramnatic states (20, 21, 22, 23). In these

studies, atropine blocked both the electroencephalographic

and the

clinical

toxic effects.
Thus, both from experimental and
trauma we may assume

clinical studies of craniccerebral

that (a) the acetylcholine activity of the spinal

�-9-

fluid increases; (b) pseudo-cholinesterase activity increases with a
reversal of the ratio of cholinesterases; (c)
slowing

agents
From

parallel these biochemical alterations;

may

EEG

tamer-synchrony and

and (d)

anticholinergic

block both the electroencephalographic and the clinical effects.

it is probable that the biochemical basis

the data available

convulsive therapy

is similar to that of craniocerebral trauma.

of
Convulsive

therapy results in free aoetylcholine in the spinal fluid (7, l7) and a

reversal of cholinesterase ratios (7, 16).

The electroencephalographic

effects of repeated induced convulsions is the developnent of high voltage,
activity, occasionally with spike activity (3, 2h, 25),
which is similar to that observed in severe head trauma (26, 27). In
symmetric slow wave

previous studies

we have

reported the relationship between the degree of

activity and behavioral reaponse (3). The studies
reported here and that of Ulett and Johnson (9) demonstrate a reversal
of the EEG and the behavioral effects of convulsive therapy by antiinduced slow wave

cholinergic

In each characteristic, convulsive therapy is thus

compounds.

similar to cerebral trauma. While the acetylcholine-cholinesterase system

is highlighted
(17).

These

studies, other enzyme systems may also be altered
studies also suggest that convulsive therapy provides an
by these

excellent experimental

method

for studies of craniocerebral trauma.

Studies of the brain stem activating system by Jasper and DroogleverFortuyn (28) and Lindsley

gt a},

(29) had

laid the foundation for the

prevailing conclusion that symetric EEG slow wave activity has

its

origin

in mesencephalic structures, and that these structures intimately affect
the states of "alerting" and "drowsiness." More recently, Rinaldi and

�-10-

site of action of atropine and cholinergic
to this mesodiencephalic activating system. It is also probable that

Himwich

drugs

(30, 31) have related the

these structures

may be

selectively affected by the convulsive therapy

process, and that both the clinical and electrographic effects

may be

intimately related to changes in this systan.
2. Diethazine "Alerting"
The

and Hallucinogenic

Activity:

behavioral effects of diethazine provide information regarding

another aspect of the convulsive therapy processxs. In patients without

prior convulsive therapy, illusory

phenomena and

feelings of unreality were

observed. These were similar to the hallucinogenic effects of
and mescaline (33). Again analogic data about the

of these agents

may

provide

some

no change,

(31;)

clinical and EG effects

noted that the

intermittent or continuous

increase in alpha frequency.

(32)

information about convulsive therapy.

In studies of mescaline, Wikler

either

LSD

low voltage

EEG

danonstrated

fast activity or

Denber and Merlis (35) noted a

similar

acceleration of alpha frequency, decrease in per cent tine alpha including

its

disappearance, and non-specific random beta

activity. Delta activity

did not occur. In patients with delta activity induced by electroshock,
Merlis and Hunter (38) noted that intravenous mesoaline markedly diminished
the amplitude and per cent time delta activity with an increase in per
cent time alpha activity.
The

effects of

LSD

on EEG are

similar. Gastaut at g. (36) noted

an acceleration of alpha frequency of 0.5 to

of beta rhythms.

Rinkel

gt 9;...

14.0

(37) confirmed

cps with an aocentuation

this observation and noted,

�-11-

in addition, a reduced reaponsivity to hyperventilation.*
In summarizing his studies Wikler (3h) concluded that

"

. . .

regardless of the drug administered, shifts in the pattern of electroencephalogram in the direction of desynchnonization occurred in association
with anxiety, hallucinations, fantasies, illusions or tremors, and in the

direction of synchronization with euphoria, relaxation or drowsiness."
This generalization provides a meaningful construct
may be

assessed. Agents that

in which these agents

evoke EEG desynchronization tend

to

be

are clear examples. Agents that
synchronize frequencies, such as barbiturate and meprobamate in the beta
delta
frequency range, and chlorpromazine, promazine and

hallucinogenic,

and mesoaline and

LSD

Wainthe

frequency range (39) tend to be sedatives, euphoriants and relaxants.
'Ihe observations on diethazine reported here are consistent with

this hypothesis. In patients without delta activity, the EEG demonstrated
desynchronization of frequencies, and this was associated with clinical
illusory

phenomena.

In patients with delta activity desynchronieation

occurred, and alerting and reversal of the speech patterns induced by
electroshock were observed.
Electroconvulsive therapy
We

*-

have previously noted a

may

also be understood in this framework.

direct relationship between clinical evaluations

Studies are now in progress of the effects of LSD, Win-2299, benactyzine
and other anticholinergic compounds on post-convul sive EEG delta activity.
Initial experiments m. ah intravenous ISD (50-100 gamma) demonstrated
marked diminution in per cent time and amplitude of delta activity.

�of improvement and the degree of

conditions, sedation

Under these

EEG

slowing induced by electroshock (3).

and euphoria are most prominent and

hallucinatory activity diminished. In patients in
not induced, behavioral change

is limited

whom

hypersynchrony

and 'improvement' does

is

not occur

(in) .
Previously

that the

we have concluded

therapies is based

on the

mode

of action of convulsive

induction of a state of altered cerebral function,

in which changes in adaptive interpersonal behavior occur,
preted as 'improvement' (3, h, 39).

The

inter-

present studies amplify two

aspects of. this neurophysiologc-adaptive hypothesis.

substrate of the behavioral change

and are

is reflected

by an

The

biochemical

alteration in the

acetylcholine-cholinesterase relationships of the central nervous system.

It is also

probable that

EEG

basis of the milieu change
euphoria and

mpersynchrony provides the neurophysiologic

which

is evaluated as

is clinically manifest as sedation

and

'imprcvement.‘

The neuropklysiologi.C-adaptive

hypothesis of convulsive therapy

has provided a meaningful basis for studies of other physiodynamic

therapies (39) . In this study,

it has

been possible to amplify our

understanding of neurophysiologic aspects of hallucinogens as well.

�SUMMARY:

effect of an anticholinergic agent, diethazine, on the
behavior and language patterns was observed in to psychiatric patients,
1.

EEG,

The

at various stages in the course of electrooonvulsive treatment.
(a) Behavior: Increased restlessness and agitation, haptic and
visual illusory sensations, and delusional thoughts about their illness
or examiner's identity were observed.
(b) Egg; Alteration in
There was a decrease

in voltage

EEG was

concurrent with behavioral changes.

and desynchronization of

In patients with delta activity, the per cent time

all frequencies.

and voltage of

delta

activity decreased.
(c) Language: Syntactic patterns described for convulsive
therapy were reversed.

Use

of third person, qualification and displacement

decreased. In dyadic analyses, there was a decrease in the coefficient
of variation.

2. These observations are discussed in the

framework

of the

neuro—

physiologic-adaptive hypothesis of the action of convulsive therapy; and

it is

concluded

that:

(a) the biochemical basis for convulsive therapy

is

similar to

that of craniocerebral trauma;
(b) changes in acetylcholine-cholinesterase metabolism are
intimately related to the behavioral effects;
(c)

EEG

desynchronization

may be

and

a physiologic concomitant

of hallucinogenic activity; and EEG-hypersynchrony associated with euphoria
and sedation.

�.m.

W

1.

Weinstein, E. and Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness, 0.0. Thomas,
Springfield, I110, 1955.

2.

Roth, M., Kay, D.W.K., Shaw, J. and Green, J.: Prognosis and
Peutdzhal Induced Electroencephalographic Changes in

Electroconvuleive Treatment,

EEG

225‘237’ 1957.

Clin. Neurophxsiol. 2:

and Kahn, R.L.: Relation of Electroenecephalographic
Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in Electromock, A.M.A.
Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat. 1Q: 516-525.. 1957.

3.

Fink,

h.

Fink, 24., Green, M.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Experimental Studies of the
Electroehock Pracess, Dis, Nerv. SE . (in press).

5.

Ulett, G.A., Smith,

6.

Bornstein, M.: Presence and Action of Acetylcholine in Experimental
Brain Trauma, J. Newcphzsiol. 2: 3113-366, 191:6.

7.

Tower, 13.3. and McEachern, D.: Acetylcholine and Neuronal
Canad. J. Research, 3.1: 105-131, 191:9.

8.

Ward, A.: Atropine

9.

Ulett,

M.

K. and

Glaser, G.C.: Evaluation of Convulsive

and Subconvulsive Shock Therapies Utilizing a Control Group,
Am. Jo Pszghia‘b. gala-3 795’802, 1956c

in the Treatment of Closed

Neurosurg., 1:

398—102, 1950.

G.A. and Johnson, M.W.:

Head

Effect of Atropine

Injury,

Activity,
,1.

and Scopelamlne

Electroencephalographic Changes Induced by Beetroconvulsive
Therapy, EEG Olin. Neurophlsiol. 2: 217-2224, 1957.

Upon

10 .

Jenkner, F.L. and Lechner, H.: The Effect of Diparcol on the Electroencephalogram in the Normal Subject and in Those with Cerebral
Trauma, EEG Olin. Neuromzsio . _7_: 303-305, 1955.

11.

Heyman,

Sur la
0., Estable, J.J. and de Bonneveaux, 8.0.:
de la menothiazinyl-Etlnrldiethylandne (2987 R.P.) ,
Pharmac

12.

in Language During Electroshock
in {exchomthologg of Communication, pp. 126-139,
Stratton’ NoYo 9 o

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, 11.: Changes

Therapy,
Gr‘me

13.

. 12: 123-138, 1919.

Pharmacologie
Arch. Int.

Jaﬁ‘e,

8C

Objective Study of Comuuﬁcation in Psychiatric
Interviews, J. Hillside Hospital, é: 207-215, 1957.

J.:

An

�.15..

Jaffe, J.: Language of the Dyed: A Method of Interaction Analyses
in Psychiatric Interviews, mchiatgy, (in press).
15.
16.

Weinstein, E.A., Kehn, R.L., Sugarman, L.A. and Linn, 1...: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium in Organic Brain Disease, Am.J.
mchia . 1-}.2.‘ 889-8911, 1953.
Tower, D.B. and McEechern, D.: The Content and Characterization of
Cholinesterases in Human Cerebrospinal Fluids, Canad, J .
Research, 21: 132-115, 19349.

17.

Sachs, E.: Acetylcholine and Serotonin in the Spinal Fluid,
Neurosurg., 11*: 22-27, 1957.

18.

Rugs, D.: The Use of Cholinergic Blocking Agents

Cranio-Cerebral Injuries, J. Neurosurg.,

,1.

in the Treatment of

I_l._1_:

77-83, 19514.

Injury, J. Neural.
of Acetylcholine in Head
1957.
chia . g9; p.70,

19.

Hughes, B.: The Role
Neurosur . and

20.

Freedman, A.M., Bales, P.D., Willis, A. and Himwich, H.E.:
Experimental Production of Electrical Major Convulsive

Patterns,

21.

Am.

J. @8101” ﬁg:

117-1214, 19149.

GrOb, Do, Harvey, A.M., Iangworthy, 00R. and Lilienthal, Jolie 3
The Adminis tration of Di-Isopropyl Fluorophosphate (DFP)
257.266, 19,47.
Man, B11110 Jo H0215. Hogan,

to

a:

22.

McCauley, A. and Hinmich, H.: Effects of
Di-Isopropyl Fluorophosphate (DFP) on mectroencephalogram

Hampson,

J., Essig, C.F.,

EEG

23.

01in.

3:

141448,

Neuropﬂsio .
Activity,
angocmlinesterase
19 .
Himwich, H.E., Essig, C.F., Hampson, J.L., Bales, P.D. and Friedman,
A.M.: Effect of Trimethadione (Tridone) and Other Drugs on
Convulsions Caused by Di-Isopropyl Fluorophosphate (DFP),
J. Psychiat., 106: 816-820, 1950.

Am.

2h.

Callaway, E.: Slow Wave Phenomena in Intensive Electroshock, Egg.
Clin. Neurophysiol., g: 157-162, 1950.

25.

Green,

26.

Jasper, H.H. , Kershman, J. and Elvidge, A.: Electroencephalographic
Studies of Injury to the Head, Arch. Neural“: Psychiat” 1A:

Significance of Individual Variability in EEG Reaponse to
Electroshock, J. Hillside Hosp” _6_: 229-2ho, 1957.
M. :

328~3h8’ 19,400

�~16~

W

Ostow, M. and Greenstein, L.: Dia
Gmne 8: Stratton, N.I.,

ostic
$35.

Electro-

27.

Strauss, H.,

28.

Jasper, H.H. and Droaglever-Fortuyn, J .: Experimental Studies on the
Functional Anatonw of Petit Mal Epilepsy, Res. Publ. A. Nerv.

Mt.

Dis.

2-6-3

272-298’ 19117.

Lindsley, 1)., ‘Schreiner, L.H., Knowles, W.B. and Magoun, H.W.:
Behavioral and EG Changes Following Chronic Brain Stem
Lesion in the Cat, EEG Olin. Neuropmsiolu 2: 1:83-1:98, 1950.
Rinaldi, F. and Him-rich, H.H.: Alerting Responses and Actions of
Atropine and Cholinergic Drugs, A.M.A. Arch. Neural. and

29.

-

PﬁzChiate, 123 387-395) 19530

31.

Himwich, H. and Rinaldi, F.I:'The Effect of Drugs on Reticular System,
in Brain Mechanism and Dru Action, 15-4411, C.C. Thomas,
Springfie d, 19 7.

32.

Stall,

W.: Lysergsaure

Phantaetikum aus der
Arch. Neurol. PsEhiat. , §_Q:

diethylamid, ein
-Schweiz

Mutterkomgruppe,
1-h7, 19m.

'

Neural. Psychiat., 1-315,

33.

Beringer, K.: Der 'Meskalinrausch
Springer, Berlin, 1927.

3h.

Wikler, A.: Clinical and Electrencephalographic Studies on the Effects
of Mescaline, N-allylnarmorphine and Morphine in Man, J. Nerv.
Wilt. 1318., 120: 157-175, 19%.
i

Monog.

on Mescaline I: Action in Schizo~
Psychiat. Quart., g2: 1.21-1.29, 1955.

3.: Studies

35.

Denber, H. and Merlis,

36.

Gastaut, H., Ferrer, S. and Castello, 0.: Action de la diethylamide
de l'acide d-lysergique (LSD 25) sur lee fonctions psychiques
at l'electroencephelograxme, Conf. Neuro1., 12: 102-120, 1953.

37-

Rinkel, H., DeShon, H.J., Hyde, R.W. and Solomon, H.C.: Experimental
Schizophrenia-Like Symptoms, Am. J. Psychiat., 108: 572-578, 1953.

38.

Merlis, S. and Hunter, W.: Studies on Mesaaline II: nectroencephalogram
in Schizophrenics, Psychiat. Quart. , g2: 1:30-4:32, 1955.

39.

Fink, M.:

ha.

Fink,

phrenic Patients,

A

Unified Theory of the Action of Physiotbmamic Therapies,

J. Hillside

Hosp. ,

{3:

197—206, 1957.

and Green, M.A.: Electroencephalographic Correlates of the
Electroshock Process (in proparation).

M.

‘

��~24...

1m

1955.

mm:- and WM )mpwm that EEG and human-n

oﬂam swim to

abopinn were achieved by

mm mama in

paﬁenta with head trauma. Fran thaw report in

mute“.

the ayatemic attacks of

We at
(

am-

theme and

diam nppamd mam.

intamt in the

nativity 1n enmeshed:

r613 of 6311;:

), an immigauon a: the «that of dint-hum,

in patients manning eomlain therapy

wmsuport

to describe the oft-hats

bazwiw sf pitienta

mm

in

was

both

m

EEG

and behavior,

mama. It in the puma

«mm mthexmmdm

aux-lag olwhmﬂmek’ therapy; and to

unto the”

obsomtiom to the meant neurapbyaioloac adaptive hypothesis a! the
mode

of widow: of convulaive

them.

Wamwthodg:

mum pitta cuts, at. “nuns sagas or electroshock ﬂmmpy
in an awn-mad, volmtu'y psychiatric haepital have been studiad. All

mum hm ham
EEG

and.

Mot-ding, diafhuine

25 mm per minute,

in the me laboratory.

3‘an a mum

m amateur! intravenously at. the

for a total of

175

to

.200 mm, depending upon

rate of
the

�uh

Wm: «that.
Ins/k8 1»

wording to

m ram, (SW mm mm 2.8

b0 Int/ks.

mum is a column Wino W: with

am to “reprint. “perineum
the
Wen. bmnehm, Wmtim, rummum
lawman

«mm by mﬁylmolm,

«1»:meth

15W “Maiden,

M

and

«1

and

‘

A

mum: in»

(DFP and

plum-pins.

new Wis 1nd momma

(Raymu-

19189):

All records were unlisted
the por
car

animals,

22::

We

mi: time and

fast nativity.

far the: dams of dolta aébiviw

principal 31pm “ﬂuency;

Drug

errata

were

emailed

ﬁnd the

relative meant

as synchronising (I) or

Warning (n) «@0ng to the mam mama by um» (
In In

W,
mm,

tapers].

both

and

81m

parietal

and

)3

(

).

mu nativity was mum in natal-ion»

m m m mum.

War Wm:
Prim to drug

twain-rattan an mmzmmd psychiatric historical

�.3;-

intern“ and a structmd

Wm

1?ng drug achinistmtian, pat-1363
altamted with
ma

EEG

mm.

period 1mm tape

31’

taps

new 13me m

”cording parieda, until the

again. manifested

EEG 1236

Macaw pattern 0213131231 inspection.
M Minutes or behaviorai

by the

m“.
a

offsets

warn

and:

311111331

Maithmjoct, 1mm:- and Mam

naming

and

,

aux-mg drag

W
6:13.616

period, and

in language

were

«-

awriptions

at the

was:

1mm annlynn of tha awarded inten-

named

by a syntactic

minis of the amtﬂeient of variability

mm (x. a r)

(63113).“

M~3W1;
(t)

W:
W

mm of the start of the injection,
the math
subaaeta mitigated apaxtmeoua 0011M follow by mm
hm to five

a.

and a

thinness of speech.

11337111333

m6 weakness

mammalian

6

and

31‘

They

I.

feeling of hasitude, and 3

was: mien us

difficulty in

W136 mlynoa

worked

of trace

31‘

soon mceedud by

33mm cyclic: «gleam.

obmtim will

appear separately.

{mama

�Marts

of visual and baptis illusory

mantiann, rulings a!

witty and diam», and aslunisml thsugats about their ﬁlms”,
the setting of the tact.

prams

can

can identity

wax-s

winsd apmtan»

1

annular

mm in the mat period batman

in

after «hag satinistrntim. In thus
panic lad
and

ts a

suhaostn.

W

m disappomd in

W!

sitscta. In all retards,
wars

in

éanon

W

by!!!

;of

.. h

Such

pattsms sf

bum in all

Wm; and mutation sf tha wan-injection

pattanm in ms to five hours.

Wings. and

instants, vathdrwal

shaman mam-Nd during, drug administration and

Mama, with gradual

1

1%

and

m pattsms m smut with tbs behavioral

Alteration in the

‘

one

smut Miami-a1 response.

behavior slam transient and

mm

W8, harassing agitatian

newsman of the mar-ding. In

negativisn was tbs

15 amt 30

pmailing

its initial mouse

of all

W.

ancias.

was

a dwram in

Thar-a was

a

63mm

In patients without dalta activity

shatmsbock) , dasymhmnixaﬁm and voltage ésmasa was messiamlly

�”mania by low voltage

5-?

frontal and anterior tampon:
intimacy was not altered.

Ops

nativity,

um.

The

(Figum 1, 2). The basic alpha

build-m: in voltage and

aim: immanent: with mementmmn
In patients with ﬂying
there was a

mm.

Writ; and prominent in

W

ma

mm.

am: at

of high valtugo data «cavity

Want deem” 1n mum; and «mm-am of tin

Both random and

1w mltaéu alpha

and

burst

beta

mm nativity

Imemiaa

diaappearad and irregular,

banana pronnenb (Fig. 3.

h);

‘

(a)

’

Pammz

'

In previous «main, an intimate

in

We

language mun-nu

hid been mported

(

mtimmxn batman amass

maths Won].

). with diorama: in

13min

weapon” in electmahack

function, increased as?

a! third person, verbal denial. qmlifimtian, displaoomi;

am] 311011”

Name lax-Wat. Those «mm mum ha mhanced by the adamant-.1011

ef intrmmua mobarbiml

(

).

In the subjects in the man’s study, syntactic
a reversal of the pattoma noted in ehctrmhock.

Use

mm WM
of

mm

mm,

��us»

”mama aspects of wmldm threw, 1.1m» infomuw cumming
Mechanical

We”: is «mum. Mac of biochemical mama 1'0an

head

trim and spontaneous mums

(

), in a

that

am a

W

provide

am analogs data. Romain

expat-1mm “My of had

tmm in «ta,

ammo: after tmm, than appoarod

few

free mtylaholino which permit“! far periods up ta

1n

1:8

dunmatmted

the spinal ﬂuid,

hours. Bernstein

Wr max-um positive mint-1m batman the annuity of

1&amp;0 hand

trams and ma quantity of fun autylehaum, degree of alasbmmephalagnphic

W

Warn]. changea.

and tha newt-My of tho

martin initially

abound shcrt.

The

pounds a: tug: voltage

electroenmpmlomphic

fut nativity.

and a

trmaimt period of ﬂattering at alwtriml nativity followed by pmlonged
wands of hm amplitude ahup man in the delta {mmnciam Gmﬂtmtly,

altemﬁm in consciousness, ohms“ in reﬂexes.

and

pout-tramtie mama

mm most prominent with highest mueammtion of true acetylcholim and

mum

W

Tmr

and

m

stadium

the

of mm «hinge;

mm

in man. In

(

)

mammal bu obsomtim in 31mm

Wham patients, true mtyldmlim m

ﬂuid

pm

in 31.1mm following head trauma and

town!

mm

in

�g9...

gum m1 Minna: tad that the

M761

011‘

true acetylchonm varied

W.

dimctly with the degree of mmbéal

In addition,

We authors

swam the «hummus. nativity of the spinal fluid. In Quanta
taﬂwing head

mm,

my

(Whhoﬁmaplitung)

110th a

I

and

m rise in

drop

in the spooiﬂc «immanent-use (matchb-

splitting) activity or the spinal ﬂuid.

Whining

man-Speeific cholineatoraae

no such

rm mtylohaline following apontamous seizures.

those subdue“, electroencephalogram were taken
ing mama, and damonatrﬁted a direct

new in ﬂuid:

inversion me:

In most at

at “wing intervals ram.-

emulation of tha extant of

EEG

«morality md the amaranca 9f free acetyloholine in the spinal fluid.
In their reporta,

Tm and ﬁshermen;

report

«on

via:

aeivixg electrocanvuniw thumpy. swaying the patients
convulsions, they reported rm
and an

imam

aateraaa

rad-.19

Micheline in

patients ro-

after

34-?

Sadness!

the spinal fluid in

m,

in non-specific ohelineatamo with reversal of the abounin five

91‘

the six patients. They concluded

that {m apinal
I

6W3

flute!
than

are

in electroshock and

than row in opium}

more

like those of nraﬂnworebml trauma

many, Sachs ( ) cuiﬂmd tbs
a? the. six who max in show gum fm
“It. 13
Mare

patient
WW
at
cholimatem mun, they note:
an
mum).
at
a.

Em one

this patient was the only

one

of the

31::

to

mm

interesting that
tmtmant.”

show no response to

��‘

YEP?

(«mun/1

the ensyutie

, mien bleak

pyraphoaphate).

13:9an

91'

tmtyloholim, demonstrate the

cf high amplitude rapid frequemy

mm

Malawi.

similar to status epileptmug

u “11 as lessor demos of abmmality noted in postutramtio status
(

,

,

). In those swam, ntmpina blocked both the algatm

mauphalmsphic and clinical

talc “feats.

m, both in maximum and clinical studies of cmmbnl
we

my

mum that (a)

the

mtylehulim nativity of the spinal fluid

increases, (b) pundwhounestamae nativity
231'

the: ratea of

mung";

ad

chommﬂseu;

(6) that

(6) me change:

with a mama].

13.111101

than bioehoﬂcal

mtigholimgm «wounds my block both the shown-

whalomphic mad the clinica stints.
proth

memes

From

the data available it.

that the Mechanical basis of the eonvulsive therapy process in

am to that of nth amowmbml

trauma.

infrae mtylcholine inthe spimlﬂnid£
imatamae mum

(

).

g.

Gmlaivc Manny results

)m amenal of chol-v

m alanimcaphuomphic affects of

”pasted manned convulaims is tha amazement of high voltago,
slaw

is

ma activity, mmimlly with spike

activity

(

-.

,

mimic
),

�awe»

mid'xiemtosmmhoadhrAWC ,
studies-we have reported the relationship

hem the degree of WW ﬁt»!

me utivity and behavioral respme (i).

thbe

a

moml of the

61W
my
‘

The

studies method here.

new

«feet: at cumin“

the Marion).

In each ehmeterietie, emuisive

Wheemimmbni tnm.imhthemmm1im~
system is Weave by those studies, other animals mm

am be altered

provides In

and

cm.

therapy by antichoiinergie

Wrapyisthul

EEG

L Inpmim

g

).

(

Theta

«mam suggest that

mum mm

«comet experimental maxed fer studios of emioeembni

ensue
Baum mains of the brain stem activating system by Jasper and

mmmrem

(

fer the wailing

nomination

its erigln

1n the

mtraymm at
and

mm (

) and

Waleyw. (

”macaw

that

“matures,

Morning? and

,

) have

ehoiinergic drugs to this

”mute

) bed

“We!

thmfom,

that.

the» structures are

Here

may, Rama.

ream: the hits of nation
masodiWMg4.,mnung

”M

prohehie,

we nativity hm

ma aim

and that.

than

stmehm’ec

may be

we the feundntion

at umpim m6

We

It is 3130

selectively affected!

�hr;

the

Wire therapy pm”, and that. both the clinical and electrou

angina streets my be intimately muted to

shanghai

in thin

mm.

�m

um

*13-

«mu of

mm mm

wax-nation

”mmmammammym.mw
patients without may

Wu

and ﬁndings

WW thorny or mm mm, 111nm
at

many um

mmmmWemmotm(

W.

Thane were

).uaennm(

mum

human“

mm£2dcmm1omammwmmmm
“Imumu-WwWWMWm about mm.
them.

Inatndiunfum,mkhr( )wmmmma
Mata-um am no

m, mumm

an-

em 1a

values

:mmntywmmmamtm.‘mma&amp;mn(

)

Wammmmotmrmm,mmmnmtm
aw inﬁnding its diam, and

We

w W.
mmwmmammmm.

Belt: «mum did

random

bots nativity.

wunJ

)nm
11130003.th dfm1Wﬁ0aSWhuﬂmuihmteaMﬂm

wmum.m1otn( ) WWnpm'hmmd,
in

mm, 3 mm aspen-131w to mus-mam».

),

�.31...

In punish with 601k

mdﬁutaW

W

«adv

by

dwhromok, mm.-

)ammtmmmmmmmwmmm

mummmmmmumuuw uthanimminpmm
ammuwy

EWWWIMI‘( )mnaludedthat“...
mammmmm,m1nmepmmdmam

memmumw
”9061an
m,

ddsmhrmtutimommd

in

m,
W Winona nth 9W3, similar: W."
MmMnWanmehmmw
mmmwmtwwmummmwn
with

hallucination...

a!

in the

manna. mums

or

m:

or

mdmm,MaMMmﬁmm.Wthh
mm” Wamﬁummuwuwmuumum
rang“,

and

Wine, lira-um dem in the an: mean an

manymmmmmm.
Jthe

mm

on

ammm

mm hire am also amine-at

War. In 3W without we: mum the m Wham
mmmumqums, andthismmociaud umamm

with

this

illusory Momma In gamma with

ma mama dammit-am

mmwamwmmoxmwpmmmmw

�~65-

WW

(

)

mm

Wwwmamhmmmmrw.

MmemmaWnuumummmmﬁm

«Wmmamormummwamm(

)a

mm, mm upland: are mt Wat. In puma“
mmammwummmwmumm ma

Radar

than

and

‘mmat‘dmwtm.

WmWWﬂWtWMﬁwﬁmdﬂm
«mnwmmasrmmwmioaatamanumm
Man, in mm W. in mm” inmm We: cam,

MWWM'W'C ,

,

)Jhemmtm

wmmwwummmmwmm.

Thu

mmmmmofﬂwbmmmwh,orwha

mm by,

an aluminum

in the mwlahelmmehonmsm

mum” at the mm: muons man.

It in also probable that.

mmmmmmummmmimmmmamwm

momwaammnwmummmmmmummm
u ’Wﬂt’
.,

�WWW at

cm“ thirty

form
mWanu
blathuamdnitmmlmuﬁhtonwxym
ﬂmmdodynnue

thanpﬁu(

mammamotmmmsunn.

�Effect of Anticholinergic Agent, Diethazine, on EEG

and Behavior
Signiﬁcance for Theory of Convulsive Therapy

MAX FINK. M.D..
GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

�Reprinted from the A. Ill. A. Archives of Neurology 6“ Psychiatry
September 1958, Vol. 80, pp. 380—387
Copyright 1958, by American ﬂiedical Association

Effect of Antieholinergic Agent, Diethazine, on EEG
and Behavior
Signiﬁcance for Theory of Convalsive Therapy
MAX FINK, M.D., Glen

Oaks, N.

Y.

Recent investigations of convulsive therapy have emphasized EEG delta activity as
the neurophysiologic basis for the induced
behavioral Changel"5 Little study, however,
has been given to the biochemical effects of
this therapy, except in the course of investi—
gations of head injuries.
In investigations of head trauma signiﬁ—
cance has been ascribed to» changes in the
acetylcholine—cholinesterase systems both for
the behavioral and for the electroencephalo—
graphic effects. An increase in free acetyl‘6
choline and an alteration of the ratio of
cholinesterases 7 in the spinal ﬂuid have been
positively correlated with the degree of EEG
abnormality and degree of neurologic deﬁ—
cit. The EEG patterns were “blocked,” and
some improvement in clinical status was
reported following the administration. of
atropine.“8 In convulsive therapy, atropine
and scopolamine were observed to block the
appearance of delta activity,9 although the
systemic effects of the large doses of these
agents were marked.
Recent reports 10 noted that EEG and
behavioral effects similar to atropine were
achieved in patients with head trauma by
intravenous diethazine—a phenothiazine
compound with anticholinergic properties—
Submitted for publication March 24, 1958.
From the Department of Experimental Psy—
chiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by Grant M-927 of the National
Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of
Health, U. S. Public Health Service.
Read (in part) at the meeting of the Eastern
Association of Electroencephalographers, New
York, December, 1957. Awarded A. E. Bennett
Psychiatric Research Award of the Society of
Biologic Psychiatry, May, 1958.
380

with minimal systemic effects. In our con—
tinuing studies of the role of delta activity
in electroshock,3 the effect of diethazine: was
studied. It is the purpose of this report to
describe the effects of diethazine on EEG
patterns and on behavior of patients during
electroconvulsive therapy, and to relate these
observations to the present neurophysiologic—
adaptive hypothesis of the mode of action of
convulsive therapy.

Subjects and Methods
Forty psychiatric patients, at various stages of

electroshock therapy in an open-ward, voluntary
psychiatric hospital were studied. All observations
were made in acute experiments in the EEG lab—
oratory. After a routine EEG recording, diemhazine
was administered intravenously at the rate of 25
mg. per minute, for a total of 175 to 250 mg,
depending upon the behavioral effect. The dosage
varied from 2.8 to 4.0 mg. per kilogram of body
weight.
Diethazine is a soluble phenothiazine compound
with pharmacologic properties similar to those of
atropine. In experimental animals, diethazine
blocks the bradycardia, bronchospasm, salivation,
fasciculatio-n, and seizures induced by acetylcholine,
ﬂuorophosphate, and pilocarpine. It suppresses
salivation and induces mydr‘iasis and hypotension.11
EEG Analyses.~—Recording was continuous for
the duration of the observation period, except dur—
ing interview periods. Needle electrodes, and an
eight—channel Medcraft instrument were used. All
records. were analyzed for the degree of delta
activity,3 the per cent time and principal alpha
frequency, and the relative amount of fast activity.
The alpha and delta activities. were measured in
anterior temporal—vertex, parietal-ear lobe, and
frontal-occipital lead combinations.
Behavior Mensures—Prior to drug administra—
tion an unstructured psychiatric historical interview and a structured questionnaire period” were
tape-recorded. Following drug administration,

�EFFECT OF ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENT ON EEG
periods of recorded interview were alternated with
EEG recording periods, until the EEG had again
manifested the preinjection pattern on. visual inspection.

Two estimates of behavioral effects were used:
clinical descriptions by the participants—subject,
interviewer, and technician—of the changes oc—
curring during the drug period, and language
analyses of the recorded interviews. Changes in
1“
evaluated
by a syntactic analysis
language were
and an analysis of the variability in verbal interaction in the dyad?"14 * Both measures have been
shown to be sensitive to alterations in behavior induced by changes in the central nervous system.

W
W
W
W
WW
W
WW
AFTER I50 mg.

PRE-DRUG

LF-LO

RF.“
LAT‘LF
RAT-RF

LF-RF
LPT-LO

0-0
RPT-RO

WWW-MN

WWW“

MWVVUWVV’WMWM

50va___
SEC.
l

Observations
(a) C1inicwl.—Within two to ﬁve minutes
of the start of the injection, subjects mani—

fested spontaneous coughing followed by a
dryness of the mouth and a thickness of
speech. They reported a feeling of lassi—
tude and a heaviness and weakness of the
extremities, soon succeeded by increased
restlessness and difﬁculty in maintaining eye—
lid closure.
Reports of visual and haptic illusory sen—
sations, feelings of unreality and distance,
and delusional thoughts about their illness,
the setting of the test procedures, or our
identity were voiced spontaneously by 18
subjects in the period between 15 and 60
minutes after drug administration. In three
instances increasing agitation and panic led
Detailed analyses of these observations will be
reported separately by Dr. J. Jaffe and Dr. R. L.
Kahn.
*

AFTER 225 mg.

PRE-DRUGI

0-0

W

{Wyn-—
SEC.

=0?

IGQI HH

1

Fig. 1.—Effect of intravenous diethazine prior
to electroshock in a man aged 27.
Fin/e

#1125

NH

Fig. 2.——Effect of intravenous diethazine prior to
electroshock in a woman aged 57.

to a cessation of the recording. In two
subjects withdrawal and negativism were
the prominent behavioral response. Such
patterns of behavior were transient and had
disappeared in one and one~half to four
hours in all subjects.
(I?) EEG Potterns.——Alteration in. the
EEG patterns was concurrent with the be—
havioral effects. In all records, changes oc—
curred during drug administration and were
sustained, with gradual diminution and resti—
tution of the preinjection patterns, in one to
ﬁve hours. The initial response was a decrease in voltage and desynchronization of
all frequencies. There was a decrease in
prominence of prevailing rhythms. In patients without delta activity (preelectro—
shock), desynchronization and voltage
decrease were occasionally accompanied by
low—voltage 5—7 cps activity, symmetric and
prominent in frontal and anterior temporal
leads (Figs. 1 and 2). The alpha frequency
was not altered. The build—up in voltage and
appearance of slower frequencies with
hyperventilation were blocked.
In patients with varying degrees of high—
voltage delta activity, desynchronization of
the records became prominent, with a sig—
niﬁcant decrease both in voltage and in per
cent time of slow wave activity. From an
average per cent time delta of 45% in
frontal—occipital leads, there was a reduction to a mean of 20%. Both random and
burst delta activity diminished or disap‘
381

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
PRE-DRUG

AFTER 250 mg.

W
W
”W W
W
W
W
WW
W
W
WW
WW
W

LAT-LF/W
RAT

WWWW‘

WWWW

RPM/MW

LF-

+5HRS.

+|.HR

WVJMWWVV'

LPT'LQ’W’W‘VWW
0

°

”WNW

RPT—RW

WMw/V

*1249

SOpv [TEE—C

HH

Fig. 3.—Effect of intravenous diethazine on delta activity after electroshock.

peared, and irregular low—voltage alpha and
beta frequencies became prominent (Figs.
3 and 4). The hyperventilation
response
was no longer apparent.
(c) Language Patterns.——In previous
studies, an intimate relationship between
changes in syntactic language patterns and
the behavioral response in electroshock had
been reported.” With alteration in brain
function, increased use of the third person,
verbal denial, qualiﬁcation, displacement,
and cliches became prominent. These: ef—
fects could be enhanced by the administra—
tion of intravenous amobarbital.15
In the subjects in the present study,
syntactic analyses demonstrated a reversal
of the patterns noted in electroshock. Use
of the third person, qualiﬁcation, and dis—
placement decreased. Explicit verbal denial
was modiﬁed and replaced by minimization
and displacement, or by a reiteration of

complaints of illness. In dyadic analyses,
the verbal interaction was characterized by
a greater diversity of vocabulary and less
variability in the diversity scores for 25
word units.
The qualitative nature of these changes
in the language patterns is opposite that of
amobarbuital and electroshock. The duration
of language changes was concurrent with
the changes in the electroencephalogram.

Comment
These observations conﬁrm the report of
Jenkner and Lechner of the effects of di—
ethazine in “normal” subjects.10 Diethazine
also alters electroshock—induced delta activity in a fashion similar to atropine and
scopolamine, as described by Ulett and Johnson,9 with minimal unpleasant symptoms.
The effects of intravenous diethazine are
immediate, both on the EEG and on

W
W
“MW
MN
“$wa
W
W
WM
W
W
W
W
“”wa
PRE-DRUG

+

200 mg.

+25

min.

+

70min.

LF-LO

Rm

MWWW

st

UT'LWMW ”NM-«MW
WVMW“

LF-RF

LPT~LO

°'°

WWW

WWW/“M

5°}‘VL._.
ISEC.

WWW/WWW

#l637

HH

Fig. 4.—Effect of intravenous diethazine on delta activity after electroshock.
382

Vol. 80,

Sept, 1958

�EFFECT OF ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENT ON EEG
behavior, and thus provide a useful experi—
mental agent With “anticholinergic” proper—
ties. Two aspects of these experimental
observations warrant discussion: the role
of acetylcholine-cholinest‘erase- in the electroconvulsive therapy process, and the signiﬁ—
cance of diethazine “alerting” for concepts
of hallucinogenic activity.
1. Biochemical Basis of the Convulsive
Therapy Process.——While there has been
considerable study of the psychologic and
neurophysiologic aspects of convulsive therbiochemi—
information
little
concerning
apy,
cal processes is available. The studies of
biochemical changes following head trauma
and spontaneous seizures provide some analogic data. Bornstein,‘6 in a classical experi—
mental study of head trauma in cats,
demonstrated that within a few minutes after
trauma free acetylcholine appeared in the
spinal ﬂuid and persisted for periods up to
48 hours. He further demonstrated a posi—
tive relation between the severity of head
trauma and the quantity of free acetylcholine, the degree of electroencephalo—
graphic alteration, and the severity of the
behavioral changes. The electroencephalographic records initially showed short peri—
ods of high—voltage fast activity, and a
transient period of ﬂattening of electrical
activity, followed by prolonged periods of
high—amplitude sharp waves in the delta
frequencies. Concomitantly, alteration in
consciousness, changes in reﬂexes, and post—
traumatic seizures were most prominent with
highest concentrations of free acetylcholine
and greatest degree of EEG change.
7
Tower and McEachern conﬁrmed these
observations in clinical studies in man. In
112 neurologic patients, free acetylcholine
was found in the cerebrospinal ﬂuid only
in patients following head trauma and re—
cent grand mal seizures, and the level of
free acetylcholine varied directly with the
degree of cerebral damage. In addition, these
authors assayed the cholinesterase activity of
the spinal ﬂuid.7’1‘6 In patients following
head trauma, they noted a sharp rise in.
nonspeciﬁc cholinesterase (benzoylcholine—
Fink

splitting) and a drop in the speciﬁc cholin—
esterase (methacholine—splitting) activity of
the spinal ﬂuid. No such inversion was
noted in ﬂuids containing free acetylcholine
following spontaneous seizures. Electroen—
cephalograms were taken at varying inter—
vals following trauma and demonstrated a
direct correlation of the extent of EEG
abnormality with the appearance of free
acetylcholine in the spinal ﬂuid.
Tower and McEachern also reported ob—
servations in six patients receiving electro—
convulsive therapy. In patients after three
to seven induced convulsions, they noted free
acetylcholine in the spinal ﬂuid in two pa—
tients and an increase in nonspeciﬁc cholinesterase with reversal of the cholinesterase
ratio in ﬁve of the six. They concluded
that the spinal ﬂuid changes in electroshock
are more like those of craniocerebral trauma
than those found in epilepsyj' More re17
Sachs
conﬁrmed the reports of
cently,
free acetylcholine in the spinal ﬂuid after
head trauma and after electroshock.
In his studies, Bornstein6 administered
0.5—1.0 mg/kg. of atropine and demonstrated a reversal or a blocking of the EEG
effects and a modiﬁcation of the behavioral
and neurologic signs. Atropine also blocked
the EEG and clinical signs induced by intra—
cisternal acetylcholine.
Ward8 applied these observations to the
treatment of human subjects with varying
degrees of head trauma. Subcutaneous doses
of 0.1 mg/kg. of atropine induced both
clinical improvement and reversal of EEG
effects. These observations were recently
conﬁrmed by Sachs,17 Ruge,18 and Hughes}9
On the basis of these observations, Ulett
and Johnson 9 noted the effect of atropine
and scopolamine in blocking the EEG
changes of electroshock therapy. Con—
10
currently, ]enkner and Lechner reported
'

Regarding the one patient of the six who
failed to show either free acetylcholine or a re—
versal of the cholinesterase ratio, they noted: “It
is interesting that this patient was the only one
of the six to show no response to treatment.”
1‘

383

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

effects similar to those of Ward, in studies provides an excellent experimental method
for studies of craniocerebral trauma.
of diethazine in cases of head injury.
Studies of the brain—stem—activating sys—
Another group of investigations complete
the available data. Studies of anticholines— tem by Jasper and Droogleever-Fortuyn 28
terases, such as fluorophosphate, and tetra— and Lindsley et al.2‘9 had laid the founda—
ethylpyrophosphate (TEPP), which block tion for the prevailing conclusion that sym—
the enzymatic breakdown of acetylcholine, metric EEG slow—wave activity has its
demonstrate the development of high-ampli— origin in mesencephalic structures, and that
tude rapid—frequency EEG patterns similar these structures intimately affect the states
to those of status epilepticus, as well as of “alerting” and “drowsiness.” More reslighter degrees of abnormality, as noted in cently, Rinaldi and Hivaich 30"” have re—
post—traumatic states.”23 In these studies, lated the site of action. of atropine and
atropine blocked both the electroencephalo— cholinergic drugs to this mesodiencephalic
activating system. It is also probable that
graphic and the clinicaltoxic effects.
these
be
structures
may
selectively affected
clinical
and
both
from
experimental
Thus,
studies of craniocerebral trauma we may by the convulsive therapy process, and that
both
ef—
clinical
the
and
the
of
electrographic
the
that
acetylcholine activity
(a)
assume
the spinal ﬂuid increases, ([9) pseudo- fects may be intimately related to changes in
cholinesterase activity increases, with a re— this system.
2. Diethazine “Alerting” and Hallucinoversal of the ratio of cholinesterases, (c)
EEG hypersynchrony and slowing parallel gem'c Activity—The behavioral effects of
these biochemical alterations, and (d) anti— diethazine provide information. regarding
cholinergic agents may block both the elec— another aspect of the convulsive therapy
troencephalographic and the clinical effects. process. In patients Without prior convul—
From the data available, it is probable that sive therapy, illusory phenomena and feelthe biochemical basis of convulsive therapy ings of unreality were observed. These
is similar to that of craniocerebral trauma. were similar to the hallucinogenic effects of
Convulsive therapy results in free acetylcho— lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD32) and
line in the spinal ﬂuid 7'17 and a reversal of mescalinef“3 Again, analogic data about the
clinical
and EEG effects of these agents
cholinesterase ratios.”6 The electroencepha—
information
provide
about
some
con—
may
induced
effects
of
con—
repeated
lographic
vulsive
therapy.
is
the development of high—voltage,
vulsions
34 noted
In
studies
of
Wikler
mescaline,
symmetric, slow—wave activity, occasionally
that
the
EEG
demonstrated
no change, or
is
which
similar
to
with spike: activity,3"24’25
intermittent
continuous
low—voltage
fast
or
trauma..2627
that observed in severe head
increase
in
activity,
or
alpha
frequency.
In previous studies we have reported the
Denber and Merlis 3'5 noted a similar accel—
relationship between the degree of induced eration of
decrease in per
alpha
frequency,
slow—wave activity and behavioral response.3
cent time alpha, including its disappearance,
The studies reported here and, the work of and
random
beta
nonspeciﬁc
activity. Delta
9
Ulett and Johnson demonstrate a reversal activity did not
occur. In patients with
of the EEG and the behavioral effects of delta activity induced
by electroshock, Mer—
convulsive therapy by anticholiner‘gic com— lis and Hunter 38 noted that intravenous
pounds. In. each characteristic, convulsive mescaline markedly diminished the ampli—
therapy is thus similar to- cerebral trauma. tude and per cent time delta activity with
While the acetylcholine—cholinesterase sys— an increase in per cent time alpha. activity.
tem is highlighted by these studies, other
The effects of LSD on EEG are similar.
enzyme systems may also be altered.17 These Gastaut et al.3‘6 noted an acceleration of
studies also suggest that convulsive therapy alpha frequency of 0.5 to 4.0 cps, with an
384

Vol. 80,

Sept, 1958

�EFFECT OF ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENT ON EEG

accentuation of beta rhythms. Rinkel et
al.3‘7 conﬁrmed this observation and noted,
in addition, a reduced responsivity to hyper—

ventilation:
In summarizing his studies, Wikler 34
concluded that “regardless of the . . drug
administered, shifts on. the pattern of elec—
troencephalogram in the direction of de—
.

synchronization occurred in association with
anxiety, hallucinations, fantasies, illusions
or tremors, and in the direction of synchronization with euphoria, relaxation or
drowsiness.” This generalization. provides a
meaningful construct in, which these agents
may be assessed. Agents that evoke EEG
desynchronization tend to be hallucinogenic,
and mescaline and LSD are clear examples.
Agents that synchronize frequencies, such
as barbiturate and meprobamate in the beta
frequency range, and chlorpromazine, pro—
mazine, and perphenazine in the delta fre—
39
tend to be sedatives,
quency range
euphoriants, and relaxants.
The observations on diethazine reported
here are consistent with this hypothesis. In
patients without delta activity, the EEG
demonstrated desynchronization of f requen—
cies, and this was associated with clinical
illusory phenomena. In patients with delta
activity desynchronization occurred, and
alerting and reversal of the speech patterns
induced by electroshock were observed.
Electroconvulsive therapy may also be
understood in this framework. We have
previously noted a direct relationship be—
tween Clinical evaluations of improvement
and the degree of EEG slowing induced by
electroshock.3 Under these conditions, seda—
tion and euphoria are most prominent, and
hallucinatory activity diminished. In, pa—
tients in whom hypersynchrony is not in—
of

iStudies are now in progress on the effects
LSD,

Win—2299

(2~diethylarminoethy1-cyclo—

pentylhydroxy—Z-thienylacetate), benactyzine, and
other anticholinergic compounds on postconvulsive
EEG delta activity. Initial experiments with these
compounds have demonstrated marked diminution
in per cent time and amplitude of delta activity
associated with behavioral changes similar to those
seen with diethazine.
Fin/a

duced, behavioral change is limited, and
“improvement” does not occur.4
Previously we have concluded that the
mode of action of convulsive therapies is
based on the induction of a state: of altered
cerebral function, in which changes in adap—
tive interpersonal behavior occur, and are
interpreted as “improvement.” 3'4'39 The
present studies amplify two aspects of this
neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis. The
biochemical substrate of the behavioral
change is reﬂected by an alteration in the
acetylcholine—cholinesterase relationships of
the central nervous system. It is also prob—
able that EEG hypersynchrony provides the
neur‘ophysiologic basis of the milieu change,
which is clinically manifest as sedation and
euphoria and is evaluated as “improvement.”
The neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis
of convulsive therapy has provided a meaningful basis for studies of other physiody—
namic therapies.39 In this study, it has. been
possible to amplify our understanding of
neurophysiologic aspects of hallucinogens as
well.

Summary and Conclusions
The: effect of an anticholinergic agent,

diethazine, on the EEG, behavior, and lan—
guage patterns was observed in 40 psychiat—
ric patients, at various stages in the course
of electroconvulsive treatment.
(0) Behavior: Increased restlessness and
agitation, haptic and visual illusory sensa—
tions, and delusional thoughts about their
illness or the examiner’s identity were ob—
served.
(b) EEG: Alteration in EEG were con—
current with behavioral changes. There
were a decrease in voltage and desynchroni—
zation of all frequencies. In patients with
delta activity, the per cent time and voltage
of delta activity decreased.
(c) Language: Syntactic patterns de—
scribed for convulsive therapy were re—
versed. Use of third person, qualiﬁcation,
and displacement decreased. In dyadic
analyses there was a decrease in the coefﬁ—
cient of variation.
385

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

These observations are discusSed in the
framework of the neurophysiologic—adap—
tive hypothesis of the action of convulsive
therapy, and it is concluded that (at) the
biochemical basis for convulsive therapy is
similar to that of craniocerebral trauma;
(1)) changes in acetylcholine-—cholinesterase
metabolism are intimately related to the be—
havioral effects, and (c) EEG desynchroni—
zation may be a physiologic concomitant of
hallucinogenic activity, and EEG hyper—
synchrony, associated with euphoria and
sedation.
Mrs. Hannah Mosquera gave technical assistance
in the EEG recordings, and Dr. Joseph Jaffe and
Dr. Robert L. Kahn made the analyses of the tape
recordings.

Diethazine was made available through the
courtesy of Smith, Kline &amp; French Laboratories,
Philadelphia.
Hillside Hospital,

75—59

263d St.

REFERENCES
Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Denial
of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects,
Springﬁeld, 111., Charles C Thomas, Publisher,
1.

1955.
2. Roth,

M.; Kay, D. W. K.; Shaw, J., and
Green, J.: Prognosis and Pentothal Induced Elec—
troencephalographic Changes in Electroconvulsive
Treatment, Electroencephalog. &amp; Clin. Neuro—
physiol. 9:225—237, 1957.
3. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of
Electroencephalographic Delta Activity to Be—
havioral Response in Electroshock, A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 78:516—525, 1957.
4. Fink, M.; Green, M. A., and Kahn R. L.:
Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process,
Dis. Nerv. System, 19:113—118, 1958.
5. Ulett, G. A.; Smith, K, and Gleser, G. C.:
Evaluation of Convulsive and Subconvulsive Shock
Therapies Utilizing a Control Group, Am. J.

Psychiat. 112:795—802, 1956.
6. Bornstein, M.:
Presence and Action of
Acetylcholine in Experimental Brain Trauma, J.
Neurophysiol. 9:349—366, 1946.
7. Tower, D. B., and McEachern, D.: Acetyl—
choline and Neuronal Activity, Canad. J. Res. 27:
105-131, 1949.

Ward, A.; Atropine in the Treatment of
Closed Head Injury, J. Neurosurg. 7 :39‘8-402, 1950.
9. Ulett, G. A., and Johnson, M. W.: Effect of
Atropine and Scopolamine upon Electroencephalo—
graphic Changes Induced by Electroconvulsive
8.

3.86

-

7

Therapy, Electroencephalog. &amp; Clin. Neurophysiol.

92217—224, 1957.
10. Jenkner, F. L.,

and Lechner, H.: Effect of
Diparcol on the Electroencephalograim in the N ormal Subject and in Those with Cerebral Trauma,
Electroencephalog. &amp; Clin. Neurophysiol. 7:303-

305, 1955.
11.

Heymans, C.; Estable, J. J., and de Bonne—
veaux, S. C.: Sur la Pharmacologie de la
phénothiazinyl-éthyldiéthylamine (2987 R. P.),
Arch. internat. Pharmacodyn. 792123438, 1949.
12. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in Psy—
chopathology of Communication, edited by P. H.
Hoch and J. Zubin,.New York, Grune: &amp; Stratton,

Inc,

1958, pp. 126-139.

Jaffe, J.: An Objective Study of Communication in Psychiatric Interviews, J. Hillside Hosp.
13.

6:207—215, 1957.
14. Jaffe, J.: Language

of the Dyad: A Method
of Interaction Analysis in Psychiatric Interviews,
Psychiatry, to be published.
15. Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L.; Sugariman,
L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic Use of Amobarbital Sodium in Organic Brain Disease, Am. J.
Psychiat. 112:889—894, 1953.
16. Tower, D. B., and McEachern, D.: The
Content and Characterization of Cholinesterases in
Human Cerebrospinal Fluids, Canad. J. Res, Sect.

E. 27:132—145, 1949.
17. Sachs, E., Jr.: Acetylcholine and Serotonin
in the Spinal Fluid, J. Neurosurg. 14:22-27, 1957.
18. Ruge, D.: Use of Cholinergic Blocking
Agents in the Treatment of Cranio—Cerebral Injuries, J. Neurosurg. 11:77—83, 1954.
19. Hughes, B.: Role of Acetylcholine in Head
Injury, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. &amp; Psychiat. 20:70,
1957.
20. Freedman, A.

M.; Bales, P. D; Willis, A.,
and Himwich, H. E.: Experimental Production of
Electrical Major Convulsive Patterns, Am. J.

Physiol. 146:117-124, 1949.
21. Grob, D.; Harvey, A. M.; Langworthy,
O. R., and Lilienthal, J. L.: The Administration
of Di-Isopropyl Fluorophosphate (D‘FP) to Man,
Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 81 :257—266, 1947.
22. Hampson, J. L. ; Essig, C. F.; McCauley, A.,
and Himwich, H.: Effects of Di—Isopropyl Fluorophosphate (DFP) on Electroencephalogram and
Cholinesterase Activity, Electroencephalog. &amp; Clin.
Neurophysiol. 2:41—48, 1950.
23. Himwich, H. E.; Essig, C. F.; Hampson,
J. L.; Bales, P. D., and Friedman, A. M.: Effect
of Trimethadione (Tridone) and Other Drugs on
Convulsions Caused by Di—Isopropyl Fluorophosphate (DFP), Am. J. Psychiat. 106:816—820, 1950.
24. Callaway, E.: Slow Wave Phenomena in
Intensive Electroshock, Electroencephalog. &amp; Clin.
Neurophysiol. 2:157-162, 1950.
Vol. 80,

Sept, 1958

�EFFECT OF ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENT ON EEG
M.: Signiﬁcance of Individual Variability in EEG Response to Electroshock, J. Hillside
25. Green,

Hosp. 6:229-240, 1957.
26. Jasper, H. H.; Kershman, J., and Elvidge,
A.: Electroencephalographic Studies of Injury to
the Head, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 44:328-348,
1940.
27. Strauss,

H.; Ostow, M., and Greenstein, L.:

Diagnostic Electroencephalography, New York,
Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc, 1952.
28. Jasper, H. H., and Droogleever—Fortuyn, J.:
Experimental Studies on the Functional Anatomy
of Petit Mal Epilepsy, A. Res. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis.,
Proc. 26 :272-298, 1947.
29. Lindsley, D. B.: Schreiner, L. H.; Knowles,
W. B., and Magoun, H. W.: Behavioral and
EEG Changes Following Chronic Brain Stem
Lesion in the Cat, Electroencephalog. &amp; Clin.
Neurophysiol. 2 :483-498, 1950.
30. Rinaldi, F., and Himwich, H. H.: Alerting
Responses and Actions of Atropine and Cholinergic
Drugs, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 73 :387395, 1953.
31. Himwich,

H., and Rinaldi, F.: Effect of
Drugs on Reticular System, in Brain Mechanism
and Drug Action, edited by W. S. Fields, Springﬁeld, Ill., Charles C Thomas, Publisher, 1957.

Fink

32. Stoll, 'W.

A.: Lysergsaure—Diathylamid, ein

Phantastikum aus der Mutterkorngruppe, Schweiz.
Arch. Neurol. u. Psychiat. 60:279—323, 1947.
33. Beringer, K.: Der Meskalinrausch, Seine
Geschichte
und
Berlin,
Erscheinungsweise,
Springer—Verlag, 1927.
34. Wikler, A.: Clinical and Electroencephalographic Studies on the Effects of Mescaline, N—
Allylnormorphine and Morphine in Man, J. Nerv.
&amp; Ment. Dis. 120:157—175, 1954.
35. D‘enber, H., and Merlis, S.: Studies on Mescaline: I. Action in Schizophrenic Patients, Psychiat. Quart. 29:421-429, 1955.
36. Gastaut, H.; Ferrer, S., and Castells, C.:
Action de la diéthylamide de l’acide d—lysergique
(LSD 25) sur les fonctions psychiques et
l’électroencéplhalogramme, Conﬁnia neurol. 13:102—
120, 1953.
37. Rinkel,

M.; DeShon, H. J.; Hyde, R. W.,
and Solomon, H. C.: Experimental Schizophrenialike Symptoms, Am. J. Psychiat. 108:572—578, 1953.
38. Merlis, S., and Hunter, W.: Studies on
Merscaline: II. Electro—Encephalogram in Schizophr‘enics, Psychiat. Quart. 29:430—432, 1955.
39. Fink, M.: A Uniﬁed Theory of the Action
of Physiodynamic Therapies, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
197—206, 1957.

Primed and Published in the United States of America

387

��rf‘"”“““

@ﬁ

,

Mom MMdeh-m

E

!

‘

1

33mm

mchxm-mmmw,wm:mmm.m..naa

“3mm
MWaf MWGIMMM‘WUGMMMW’M
mmmmwm.

�mummw.nmmw

mmamnwmw
“uVumwmmtutb-WWW
umm.m.mmg{mum

mu

‘

(MM.

am:w.mmmamamum«mm

nmwnwmmmmmmu

Wawmwmmmmmmw
ammrmmwm

ummmm
(wannaxmmsmmdmmmmmlnm

mmmuwmwuesmmamwwwm

“Mad-nut. hwyntm'muM'mea-mt

ammumwmmmmma‘mnm.

amnw.‘mmmmwwmm
Wumuuuum(9)uwmmumawm

demmm
mw(m)wwwsmmmmmmumto

‘mmmmnpmmuwwmwumwu

aWWﬂtbmWWn-ummmtmo

mmmmmauatmmamuuuuwum
wk(3).mm¢mmmm Itummouotmm
wwwwmgWMmmupmmmngp-mm

arm.

7

mammnwgmmmhmwmumummt
at an we a: man a: swam.

WWH Win

mm.

�MWWFQMgﬂmWIMMwMW

mum,wmmnwwmmmmm

A11

Mmmmmmmmmmummmm.

atmuuafisulprm,tusmotlﬁhzﬁmm
mmmﬁm WWMRJHMQIMW

Wnumwmuwm
pummwm. mwmmmamm

“Mgmm
law
bye-W.anwmm.
m.‘—

mum, and

m

E“3’
‘

m

we:

-.. mammal-I‘M

L

(11).

f’”

Wmmmmmmummumm

mamuuuemw
wmmum
Win-mute. mMmmmtwth-mgtmh

wuwuhwmmmmdpwmmuwmw
mummum mmmﬂhwuvﬁnumn

WW.wm&amp;WM-Wm.
mwmmmumgwmwm
mwawmpmm)mmmm

mmmmmmezmmmuw
ummmmm.mummmmummmm

�W

pm as.“
ammmummdma-mmsmmmm

”mmmamwwmutmw
mimmmmgmmmdmm
Mm. mummmwumm
(mwmmotmmwummuww
(13,121)“:

mmmmmuumamnuumw

nmmwwnmmW-wm

��.5.

uduuWaquuwhn-mmmam
numuummdmmmumuwm
mawwmmmmwmdmm.
mmwmmumuwwmwamum
mmupmmwrmmmm(md.m. an

memmw
nmummmmummpmw
(c)

'

‘

1,

.

kw».

*.

‘

ﬂ

.

.

U

.

a,
..11‘
‘

l

mMmpmwwwmmmmk
NMWQZL mmnmmnmmummmW
ammmm,mmmmawwm
mutmwumwmmmeu
MW.
awmmM).
nmmmmmm,mmammmw
aMﬁWp‘WWﬂW.

MOIWM

meme-nun:
wxmaamtm
mewmmmw.nwnmmm
«Warm»... www.mmmm'
Ww;mwamwdmmmwwm

25m mu.
m
mwuuamundmwmwmmm
umuuthtammmmm MW“!!!
mampwmwumwwmmam
ib-

dtmiv

for

�W:
mmmmmmarmmma
mom»: «awn-1am“

want-(m). Diothuimnhodﬁnu

mwmmummyuatmmw;mw

mm,umnwwvhamm(9huwmw
W. mmmwmmmmmmmmmm

www.mmmammmmumiw
mwammmmmm
WW.
mm“: Wmdeuuuumchetm

Wummmmﬂammdm'w
tormdmmwmutm

mmmmmmmdmpmm
mammnw,mmwmmm
Madman-am. numerumm

mmmmmmmmmcau.
mm&lt;6),,mummmm¢am§unnum
mnwamsnmsmmmmtmmm &amp;

wmummnwwwm-mmwuwm
MrmwaMﬂﬂMGhMWWth-wm
mmmwatmmwmm.mot
amunmmmnwammmm WWW

mummmwtmmdwmmrmwum.wmm
marmarammmummmep-ma
mqummmmmuarmm. mmm.amm
1n

w

,Wmmmmmmmmam

�Wumwmumndtmmwmmmm
mama-nan.

wwmt7)mmmmmmw
Wanna.
A

nmwmthMu-arm
mmmxnwmupamummmwmmmt

mmmymm1matmmmmmmmuw
mmarmnm mammmummw

W‘muwdwmmwm

3.6).

human-2mm

W
nwmmmmtmsmm.

WMWWIMMiﬂWEW
(awn.
man in spam:
(“Wm“)
mmmmuvotmmma. ammuummm
and

a

Mm-

Wnnwmumgmmammwmmmummumuwmtdmwvmm

W‘dmmmmmmmnm.
mmmnummmuwmmmummm
rammmwwm,m
WMW.
w‘mmmummnwmm,wmmuw
M'WueaMotmwu-nmnmmmwu
amass.

-mmmtmwamwmmm
mnhmuuWMMMﬂmde.‘

www.munmmmmuatmmmw

wmmmmwmm.
i

mummammmmucmammmmm;
«gmammmml'
Mummtamﬁmk‘
mtpﬁmtmmoﬂymotthnm mmunummmt

�can

mmswau.mmn(6)mmmsmom¢m
mmmwummaamemwmm-mammj
“imam: at the mien} and mm new. AW £136 W

mmwwnmnmmwnmmwmm.

WW) mdmwummwmmmmormwu

nmmmofhudtum. WWM¢MW

at

ammmmmwmmammm.
MMWmmmemmdmsm(17hW(w)m

may). Wanna- amt-rm”, m:-mm&lt;9)mmm
«rumor‘mwummmmmmsmwdamm»

mwguMMWMmolwuh-mw. Comm-mu).

mmmtm)w&amp;mmmmammm¢m

MWWMWOIWW.
Another amp of Mpﬁm. Win ﬂu W10 dim mm

cthW,um(aW2Wh)mdm
mm mammmmmammﬂ
(MW‘O),
an autumn afhié: withd- up“ 1mm

we
Wu“
pmmtommmmmuwéummwamww
3W,‘ah-omu
23).

mount.

"Winn-macaw“ ('20, 21,22,

Inmate

was»; We «mu.
acctmm-Mompmc
Wm,mtmmumnmammmaamm
bath the

and

m.

wwwummuunmmvmmmuwammnm

nglm
magma/m;
Wed

mubymmumnm¢m

Mm

mdmgmdmm

“mum; ma (6) MWc muwhlock mam

���41-

mqummmmnwmm
mama”, mm, mm WI,
Ma:
mum

ar

with

and

in tho

a!

«2M, macawma mismana-

mmmammmmmmmmwum
WWﬁMW ,wmbommmmom
Wumtqmurmm“,

Wmmmezmmlm

mnmimuwmummmrmum,wm
in an
(391mm! to
pro-mm,

m man
mummy
W
Samum,mumdmm
mumummdmmmmnmmmmuum
amt mu mum m
M.
Wﬂmdtmiu,mdthnmmmmnmcmm
was

m:

In

an

mum"

damn-aw

mm W. In Man“ nth “113 «um: Waﬂm
W.wmrmgmdmnuammhmmmhy
clochMGbsm

mmm-mwuynwmmmmwm.

mmmmmuaummwp‘ummmmmW

uwmmmmmmmwammmm.
Mrmmm,mammmmmmtm
W‘mumm'
muty

WmMaulmm.1mm

not

chum is

Wood,

and

'Wmﬁl do” not cam

(hi3).

Wyummlwmtwmascumotmlﬂm

W

is hand

an

it» muoum at a the; o: nut-ad

aux-ohm

mum,

�db

mmwumumummaw,mmmm
(3.13.39). kwtmuplmm
Wu'Wt'
mammmmmwmwhw. MW”

W

mmuammmamumawmdunmmm
mumps of the
M.
Itasmmumsmmmmwmmmmmmmac
md‘mwmmmaummmumumumw

«5&amp;me

'Wt.’
wMe-anﬁﬂ

“inborn ma 1:

muted u

WMadman.
mmadauummmmrmarammmc
awn”. mwmmummmbumnpm‘ym

deWmmuwt-dmwum

�WVW .. -ww-

m

WWW—W_Wm

'mm-‘um'm Pu’rw-Ww'

was

mmammmnmmt, Mgmwm,
memwtmmWMMWMQpﬁmu. a
1..»

W the“

in tho

am a! 0W1” What.

ram-mu mutton,
W:
W
um 111nm mm, «91mm Wt: than
(I)

as!

man:

was

«mm mutymomm.
Altman: in

111nm

'

mm

ml

(‘29)

lunatic m6

amt dth botanical

Mm;mmmwmmm¢m
mt m w valuamania. mm: an: much
ms.
o:

with

mu mgy
(a)

Hammad.
In

use pu-

w.
m: WM:

In

H

‘

“tum 600mm for Win mm
,

muwmmmmmmmwmm.
at
ﬂu
mm

mam: “ability.
mu
‘2. MWWqudeWn-am»

M: mien»,

at a

W3
is
it Wilma m:

Mdogimmw

91' than

mam gr

Wu W

erwmnpyu
$.me
W111
W “whammy.“ 30W
m;
W
Wﬁm w We ewmt

ammho

(t)

thaws

and

mm;

'

in

(1:)

are

mummy mum to tho
(a)

m

and

bar

a

aim-0mm;
mmemuwmmW
”antiwar

Ind

“my—-

���23.
293

.

m m “‘0.
W.
W
W,
m
mm
M m um
in an, w W
MI}

Egg

in

,1???“

H

.

“on.

3M

.

My.wam¢.a&amp;amngmmm¢
2.953.
n.
WW '

m.“

395.

i

.

J

..

32.
33.

«mm
75.19: snowman-min gm,
mun-.mnmmmdeMnmmm
mo.

stmWI:

3 1955.
311M“mum“
Ho.
”’83mm GoOmﬁhdﬂnW
ul’MW(mlﬁmmMMW

ngml;
Plum“, 3
M

35.12»:
)6.
370

3B.

39.

£12.;

_;;J3 ;

“1‘02.”me
m
W8331M W.
Hm m
_m.a.mamu.smummn
121W; m m” W;
mmummmaunmumm,
”W
WM: 5.3.

a

u:

M

‘

a!

'

L50.

’

45*

,_

*

a; i!

madmamﬁv

31957.

1953:

3.6.:
H

3m. :95).

19559.

�ﬁx. '3.

�wcmmwmk

Mt’

�WdWWWWrW-a

m; 3;

�rmxmmmummw

Mk

�Immmum.mmtormrmm

mmmmmmmmawm‘mpnmum
:Wn.mtorwmmmarmwhmm.3w

-W
WWMWMMS
IMMI“)
’f‘

,f

C‘

fUaM’Ln.

�JUN

‘DMO
_____f

/1/0

E A

A/o.

9

2s

Hr. A f

pﬁf-ﬂargéq

/7

/.5"

SN". 3 [/4

gLJ/N 22??

I;

5'

47.5'rﬁ

Bulaefﬂuq

J’

a

352.6%

9

/

g

5/

LSD
r

ﬂ'f/JXQIWLJ

“,3 j

in

U

9'5.

.

A

m, 4.,
«

20.3”];
2.2.00;

4.474
As“.

(1

��Effect of Anticholinergic

Compounds on

Post Convulsive

EEG

and Behavior

In 1956 Ulett and Johnson (1) reported to this society that large doses of
atropine or scopolamine blocked the appearance of the high voltage delta

activity usually induced by convulsive therapy. They also noted that the
dose of atropine necessary to affect the EEG-was such as to be associated
with unpleasant systemic effects.

The

reports

describing diethazine as an anticholinergic

by Jenkner and Lechner (2)

compound

with potent neurologic

but minimal systemic effects led us to undertake studies similar to those
of Ulett and Jehnson; and these observations, in turn led to an investigation
of other similar agents.

clinical

and

EEG

It is

correlations

the purpose of this report to describe the

on the intravenous

administration of various

hallucinogens and anticholinergic agents in psychiatric patients

it various

stages of convulsive therapy; and to relate these observations to the
recently expressed neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis of the mode of
action of convulsive therapy and of hallucinogens.
Subject and Mathod:
Our

subjects were consecutive referrals for convulsive therapy in an

open ward voluntary

psychiatric hospital. Patients have

various stages of therapy, with observations being

in the
17

EEG

laboratory. Following a standard

leads using needle electrodes, the

intravenously

at

a

made

been studied

in acute experiments

8 channel EEG

compound under

at

recording from

study was administered

set rate per minute, until clinical behavioral or

�electrographic changes
diethazine,

were observed.

Win 2299*, LSD-25,

benactyzine,

Diethazine was administered at 25
mgm;'Win-2299 and benactyzine

at

10 gamma per minute

per minute for 1.2-3.6

mgm.

at 0.5

for 50-150

studied

The compounds
JB—318*

and JB-336.*

per minute, for a

mgm

gamma;

have been

total

per minute for 2-5

of 175-250

mgm; LSD-25

and JB~318 and JB-336

at 0.h

mgm

mgm.

Observations:
the administration of diethazine, in 15 patients prior to convulsive
therapy, there was a decrease in voltage and a desynchronization of all
On

frequencies. Prevailing rhythmic patterns
some

instances, symmetric

prominent in the
was not
hy

frontal

altered, but the

became

low voltage 6-? cps

and

less prominent. In

activity appeared, most

anterior temporal leads.
in voltage

build—up

The

alpha frequency

and slower frequencies induced

hyperventilation was blocked (Fig. 1, 2).
In 17 patients during convulsive therapy, with varying degrees of

induced high voltage

delta activity, there

was a

significant decrease both

in voltage and in per cent time of slow wave activity. From an average per
cent time delta of h5% in the fronto-occipital leads, there was a reduction
to a

mean

of

20%.

Both random and

burst delta activity diminished

voltage alpha and beta frequencies became prominent.
response was no longer apparent.

hyperventilation

electrographic effects persisted for

is 2-diethy1aminoethyl cyclopentyl (2-thienyl) ggycolateg
is n-ethyl-B-piperidylbenzilateg JB-336 is memethyl-3-piperidy1benzilate.

”'Win-2299
JB-313

These

The

and low

�one

to five hours (Fig. 3, h).
Concurrent with these

Patients

changes.

EEG

became more

effects,

we observed

irritable

and

distinctive behavioral

restless and complained of

sensations of unreality with dysesthesias of the extremities. Visual

illusory

phenomena and

delusional thoughts about their illness, the

setting of the test procedure or the examiner's identity were described.
Their language patterns were characteristically altered in a fashion
opposite to that previously described for amobarbital (3), so that verbal
denial, minimization, cliches, third person mode and past tense became less
prominent.
The

These changes were concurrent with maximum electrographic change.

behavioral observations with diethazine led to a review of the

effects of hallucinogens on EEG activity. In 1955 Denber and Merlis (h) had
reported that mescaline altered EEG delta activity induced by electroshock,
in a fashion similar to diethazine. They described a marked reduction in
amplitude and per cent time of high voltage symmetric slow wave bursts with
an increase

in alpha per cent time

and

in

low

voltage,

random leW'wave

activity.
Reports by fennes (5)

that

an experimental compound, Win-2299 manifested

both potent anticholinergic activity and induced hallucinations in

to our study of this

compound.

The

effects

were

(Fig. 5).

led

similar to that observed

in the diethazine group. In patients pre-convulsive therapy,
desynchronization and decrease in voltages of

man

all frequencies

EEG

were induced

In eleven patients with high voltage delta activity there was a

decrease in amplitude and per cent time of slow wave activity with an
increase in alpha and beta frequencies.

activity dropped from

50%

to

23%

The mean

per cent time delta

in these subjects. Associated with these

�-helectrographic effects
and

hallucinatory

and

clinical patterns of restlessness, excitement,
illusory activity (Fig. 6). As the hallucinogenic
were

activity of LSD-25 was well established, these studies were next repeated
with this compound. Here, too, the behavioral and electroencephalogrgphic
effects,
was a

administration,

on intravenous

were

similar to diethazine. There

difference in the time constant in that the behavioral effects

occurred

1%

to

2

after

hours

drug administration, but the electrographic

changes were concurrent with the behavioral change. While there was

desynchronization with
Mean

LSD,

less

the delta activity was significantly repressed.

fell

per cent time delta activity

in five subjects

from h7% to 16%

(Fie- 7, 8, 9).
Recalling reports that benactyzine, a potent anticholinergic compound,
induced

EEG

desynchronization

next administered this

we

compound

intravenously in eleven subjects, and again observed similar clinical and

electrographic patterns. Both in the well modulated alpha record

and

in

the record with high voltage delta activity, desynchronization was prompt.
Delta activity decreased from a

subjects (Fig. 10, ll).’

clinical restlessness
same

per cent time of

electrographic patterns

39%

to

17%

we

in

8

were accompanied by

and excitement. While we did not observe

hallucinatory activity,
in the

These

mean

illusory or

did note that the language patterns were altered

fashion as with the other agents tested.

Lately, following reports by

Abood

(6) that various piperidylbenzilates

had potent anticholinergic properties and induced

activity,

we

patterns

were

tested

two

of these,

clinical hallucinogenic

JB~318 and JB-336.

identical to those of

Win-2299 and

The

electrographic

in each instance in which

desynchronization was observed, clinical restlessness and hallucinatory

�~5-

activity
for l to

(Fig. 12, 13).

was noted
3

The

hallucinatory activity persisted

hours, and during this period, electrcgraphic alteration was

prominent.
Thus, six compounds have been shown to have similar electrographic
and behavioral

effects.

Each has

definitive anticholinergic activity.

Each induces hallucinogenic or

excitatory activity; and these behavioral

changes are accompanied by

desynchronizaticn.

compounds have a
vamine

EEG

Furthermore, these

similar chemical structure (Fig. 1h).

The

tertiary

in a substituted diethylaminethanol is prominent, corroborating

the recent reports by Denber (7) on the hallucinogenic activity of tertiary
amines, and amplifying his studies by the common concurrent electrographic

patterns.
These observations amplify our understanding of the convulsive

therapy process.

In earlier studies

high voltage slow wave

activity

we

indicated that the development of

was the neurophysiologic

correlate of

behavioral change in convulsive therapy, and a necessary, though not

sufficient, condition for clinical
years, studies

improvement

(8). During the past ten

by Bernstein, Tower and MeEachern, ward, Sachs, Bugs and

others have noted similarities in the biochemical changes in convulsive
therapy to craniocerebral trauma (9). They reported an elevation of free

acetylcholine and pseudonholinesterase in the spinal fluid during
convulsive therapy.

In addition, topical administration of acetylcholine

induces high voltage bursts uni spike

activity. Ulett and

Johnson

emphasized the blocking of these cholinergic effects by the anticholinergic

activity of atropine

and scopolamine.

The obsumvaticns on

this report

on

�~6-

diethazine, Win-2299,

benactyzine and the piperidylbenzilates

ISDbZS,

support their observations.

Each of these compounds has potent

anticholinergic

clinical behavioral and language effects areqpposite to
those described for convulsive therapy. we may thus amplify the earlier
conclusion that the neurophysiolegic basis for behavioral change in

activity

and the

convulsive therapy
by noting

is

that this

the development of high.voltage slow wave

EEG

change

activity

reflects an alteration in the acetylcholine-

cholinesterase relations of the nervous system, probably in the direction
of increased cholinergic activity.
These observations lend themselves

to application in studies of

craniocerebral trauma. .ward's (10) reports of the efficacy of high doses
of atropine in altering the clinical manifestations of head trauma also
indicated that effective doses brought with

It would
more

them severe systemic

be advisable to repeat these studies,

neurologically specific anticholinergic

utilizing such

effects.

more

compounds as used

potent,

in these

experiments.

Finally, these observations, and our earlier reports
significance of

EEG

on the

delta activity in convulsive therapy, support the

his report on mescaline,
morphine with the comment that: "... regardless

observation of Wikler (11)
n-allylnormorphine and

who concluded

of the drug administered, shifts in the pattern of the electroencephalogram

in the direction of desynchronization occurred in association with
anxiety, hallucinations, fantasies, illusions or tremors, and in the
direction of synchronization with euphoria, relaxation or drowsiness."
This conclusion, supported by our observations, permit a more meaningful

�.7-

._

generalization of the recently expressed neurophysiologicuadaptive twpothesis
of the mode of action of somatic therapies in psychiatry. We may infer that
agents that synchronize

EEG

in the beta frequency range

frequencies, like barbiturate and

and chlorpromazine, promazine and perphenazine

in the delta frequency range, tend to
while agents that evoke

hallucinogenic, as

EEG

meprobamate

be

sedative, euphoriant

and

relaxant;

desynchronization tend to be excitant and

was noted

for diethaaine,

mescaline, and the piperidylbenzilates.

LSD-25, Win-2299, benactyzine,

�~8~

In summary,
and

the effects of various hallucinogenic

we have observed

anticholinergic

compounds on

the electroencephalogram and behavior

in psychiatric patients at various stages of convulsive therapy.
Behaviorally, these compounds induced increased restlessness, haptic
and

visual illusory sensations

and delusional thoughts about the

illness or the examiner's identity.

The

subject's

syntactic language patterns

described for convulsive therapy and barbiturate were reversed. Concurrent
with these changes were a decrease in voltage and a desynchronization of

all

freQuencies in the

In patients with high voltage delta

EEG.

activity,

the per cent time and voltage of the delta activity were markedly decreased.
These observations have been discussed
common

in the

framework of the

biochemical structure and anticholinergic properties of these agents

with the conclusion that:
(a)

The

biochemical basis for convulsive therapy and for&gt;high

alteration in the acetylcholinecholinesterase relation of the nervous system, probably in the direction

voltage

EEG

delta activity

may be an

of increased cholinergic activity.
(b)
of the

mode

The

recently expressed neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis

of action of somatic therapies in psychiatry

is amplified

to encompass the action of hallucinogens.

It is
cholinergic
more

recommended
compounds

that further studies of the effects of anti-

in creniocerebral trauma to

neurologically specific

Win-2299.

compounds

be undertaken,

utilizing

as diethazine, benactyzine and

�REFERENCES

1.

.2.

Ulett,

Effect of Atropine and Scopolamine
Electroencephalographic Changes Induced by ElectroOlin. Neuro aio . 2; 217-22h, 1957.
convulsive Therapy,
G.A. and Jehnson,1MJﬂ.:

Upon

Jenkner, F.L. and Lechner, H.:
wig;
19

3.

5.
,6.

Effect of Diparcol

on the

.

in

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Changes

Therapy, In
Grune

,h.

The

Electroencephalogram in the Normal subject and in Those
Cerebral Trauma, EEG Olin. ' NeuropQXSiol. I; 303-305,

&amp;

EEZOhOEEthOlOEY

Stratton,

Denber, H. and marlis,

N.Y. 19 8.

8.: Studies

Language During Eleotroshook

of Communication, pp. 126-139,
on Nescaline

I: Action in

Schizophrenic Patients. Eﬁychiat. Quart., g2; h21-h29, 1955.

Pennes, H. and Koch, P.: Paychotomimetics, Clinical and Theoretical
Considerations, Amer. J. Psychiat. _1_1_;: 887-892, 1957.
Abood, L.G.,

Catfield,

A.M. and

Biel, J.:

A New

Group of

Psychotomimetic Agents, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Mad. 21:

h83‘h861 1958 o

7.

Denber, H.C.B.: Drug-Induced States Resembling Naturally Occurring
Paychosee, in ggzchotrogic DEEES: eds. Garattini, S. and

.8.

-

, l9 7.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R.L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to
Behavioral Response in Electroehock: Quantitative Serial
Studies, A.M.A, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 1Q} 516-525, 1957.

Ghetti, V., Elaevier,

9.

Fink, M.: Effect of Anti-Cholinergio Agent, Diethazine, on EEG
and Behavior: Significance for Theory of Convulsive Therapy,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. a Psychiat. §Qr W88, 1958.

10.

Ward, A.: Atropine

in the ”heatinent of Closed
398.).‘02’ 1950.
7:
Neurosurg.,

Head

Injury,

,1.

Clinical and Electaoencephalographic Studies on the
Effects of Mescaline, Nealkylnormorphine and Morphine in

‘Wikler, A.:

Man,

J. Nerv. Ment.

1318., 120: 157.175, 195h.

�Effect of Anti-Cholinergic Agent, Diethazine,

on

EEG

and Behavior:

Signiﬁcance for Theory of Omleive merepy

Max

From

LOI.’

Fink,

14.1).

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
NOYI

Glen Oaks,

in part, by grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health,
National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service.

Aided,
Read

(in part) at the meeting of the Eastern Association of Electroenceplmlo-

graphers, N.Y., December 1957.

SBP: 3-58

�3-3-58

Effect of Anti-Cholinergic Agent, Diethazine,
Significance for

Theory

on EEG-and Behavior:

oi Convulsive Therapy

Recent investigations of convulsive therapy have emphasized

EEG

delta

activity as the neuroprxyaaoiogic basis for: the induced behavioral change
(l,2,3,h,5). Little study, however, has been given to the biochemical
effects of this therapy, except in the course of investigations of head
injuries.
In investigations of head trauma significance has been ascribed to

in the acetylcholine-cholinesterase systems both for the behavioral
and the electroencephalographic effects. An increase in free acetylcholine
(6) and an alteration of the ratio of cholinesterases (7) in the spinal
fluid have been positively correlated with the degree of EEG abnormality
changes

and degree of neurologic
improvement

deficit.

in clinical status

The EEG

patterns were "blocked," and

was reported following

some

the administration of

atropine (7,8). In convulsive therapy, atropine and scopolamine were
observed to block the appearance of delta activity, (9) although the

effects of the large doses of these agents were marked.
Recent reports (10) noted that EEG and behavioral effects similar to

systemic

atropine were achieved in patients with head trauma by intravenous diethazine a phenothiazine compound with anticholinergic properties - with minimal
systemic effects.

In our continuing studies of the role of delta activity

in electroshock (3), the effect of diethazine was studied. It is the purpose
of this report to describe the effects of diethazine on EEG patterns and on
behavior of patients during electroconvulsive therapy; and to relate these
observations to the present neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis of thexnode
of action of convulsive therapy.

�SUBJECTS AND METHODS:

Forty psychiatric patients,

at various stages of electroshock

therapy in an open-ward, voluntary psychiatric hospital have been studied.
All observations have been made in acute experiments in the EEG laboratory.
Following a routine

recording, diethazine was administered intravenously

per minute, for a total of 175 to 250 mgm, depending
the behavioral effect. Dosage varied from 2.8 to h.0 mgm per kilogram

at the rate of
upon

EEG

25

mgm

body weight.

Diethazine

is

a soluble phenothiazine compound with pharmacologic

properties similar to atropine. In experimental animals, diethazine blocks
the bradycardia, bronchospasm, salivatim, fasciculation and seizures
induced by acetylcholine, di-isopropyl fluorophosphate and pilocarpine.

It

suppresses salivation, and induces nwdriasis and hypotension (11).

me

An

ses:
Recording was continuous

for the duration of the observation period,

except during interview periods. Needle electrodes, and an
Medcraft instnnnent were used. All records were analyzed

delta activity (3) 5 the per cent time
the relative amount of fast activity.
measured in anterior temporal-vertex,

and
The

and

8 channel

for the degree of

principal alpha frequency; and
alpha and delta activity were

parietal-ear lobe lead combinations.

Behavior Measures:

Prior to drug administration an unstructured psychiatric historical
interview and a structured questionnaire period (12) were tape recorded.
Following drug administration, periods of recorded interview were alternated

�+3-

with

EEG

recording periods,

injection pattern

on

until the

EEG

had again manifested the pres

visual inspection;

No estimates sf behavioral effects were used: clinical descriptions
by the participants - subject, interviewer and technician - of the changes
occurring during the drug period, and language analyses of the recorded interevaluated by a syntactic analysis (12)
views, Guanges in language were
.*
and an analysis of the variability in Verbal interaction in the dyad (13.11:)
Both measures have been shown
induced by changes in the

to

be

sensitive to alterations in behavior

central nervous system.

* Detailed analyses of these observations
Drs. J. Jaffe and R. L. Kahn.

will be reported separately by

I

�OBSERVATIONS:

(a) Clinical:
Within two to five minutes of the

start of the injection,

subjects manifested spontaneous coughing followed by a dryness of the
anzl a

thickness of speech.

They reported a

feeling of lassitude,

mouth

and a

heaviness and weakness of extremities which was soon succeeded by increased

difﬁculty in mintan eyelid closure.
Reports of visual and haptic illusory sensations, feelings of unreality
distance, and delusional thoughts about their illness, the setting of

restlessness
and

and

test procedures or

identity were voiced Spontaneously in eighteen
subjects in the period between 15 and 60 minutes after drug aduinistration.
the

our

In three instances, increasing agitation and panic led to a cessation of the
recording. In two subjects withdrawal and negativism was the prominent
behavioral response. Such patterns of behavior were transient and had
disappeared in
(b)

EEG

1%

-

14

all subjects.

hours in

Patterns:

Alteration in the

EEG

patterns

was concurrent with

the behavioral

effects. In all records, changes occurred during drug administration and were
sustained, with gradual diminution and restitution of the pre-injection
patterns, in

one

to five hours.

The

voltage and desynchronization of

initial

response was a decrease in

all frequencies.

praninence of prevailing rhytlms.

There was a decrease in

In patients without delta activity

(pm-electroshock), desynchronization and voltage decrease

was occasionally

activity, symmetric and prominent in frontal
and anterior temporal leads (Figure l, 2). The alpha frequency was not altered.

accompanied by low voltage

5—7

cps

�~5The

build-up in voltage and appearance of slower frequencies with hyper-

ventilation was blocked.
In patients with varying degrees of high voltage delta activity there
was a prominent decrease

in voltage

and desynchronization

of the record.

burst delta activity diminished or disappeared, and irregular
voltage alpha and beta frequencies became prominent (Fig. 3, h). The

Both random and
low

hyperventilation response was no longer apparent.
(c) Language Patterns:

In previous studies, an intimate relationship betwaen changes

in syntactic language patterns and the behavioral response in electroshock
had been reported (12). With alteration in brain function, increased use
of third person, verbal denial, qualification, displacement and cliches
became prominent. These effects could be enhanced by the admirﬁstration
of intravenous anobarbital (1h) .
In the subjects in the present study, syntactic analyses demonstrated
a reversal of the patterns noted in electroshock. Use of third person,
qualification and displacement decreased. Explicit verbal denial was modified
and replaced by minimization and displacement, or by a

complaints of

illness. In

dyadic analyses, the verbal

characterized by a greater diversity of vocabulary

and

reiteration of
interaction was
less variability in

the diversity scores for 25 word units.

qualitative nature of these changes in the language patterns
is opposite to that of amobarbital and electroshock. The duration of language
changes was concurrent with the changes in the electroencephalogram.
The

�DISCUSSION:

report of Jenkner and Lechner of
the effects of diethazine in "normal" subjects (10). Diethazine also alters
electroshock induced delta activity in a fashion similar to atropine and
These observations confirm.the

s cpolamine, as described by Ulett and Johnson (9), with minimal unpleasant
symptoms.
EEG

The

effects of intravenous diethszine are immediate, both

and behavior, and thus provides a

on the

useful experimental agent with "anti-

aspects of these experimental observations
warrant discussion: the role of acetylcholine-cholinesterase in the electrocholinergic" properties.

The

convulsive therapy progress, and the significance of diethasine "alerting"

for concepts of hallucinogenic activity.
1. Biochemical Basis of the Convulsive Therapy Process:
While there has been considerable study of the psychologic
neurophysiologic aSpects of convulsive therapy,
biochemical processes

is available.

The

little

and

information concerning

studies of biochemical changes

following head trauma and spontaneous seizures provide

some

analogic data.

Bernstein (6), in a classical experimental study of head trauma in cats,
demonstratadthat within a few minutes
appeared in the Spinal

fluid

and

after

trauma,

free acetylcholine

persisted for periods up to

h8 hours.

He

further demonstrated a positive relation between the severity of head trauma
and the

quantity of free acetylcholine, degree of electroencephalographic

alteration

and

graphic records

the severity of the behavioral changes.

initially showed short periods

The electroencephalo-

of high voltage

fast activity,

transient period of flattening of electrical activity, followed by prolonged
periods of high amplitude sharp waves in the delta frequencies. Concomitantly,

a

�.7 -

alteration in consciousness, changes in reflexes

and

post-traumatic

seizures were most prominent with highest concentrationsof free acetylcholine
and

greatest degree of

EEG

change.

Tower and HbEachern (7) confirmed

studies in

man.

In

112 neurologic

these observations in clinical

patients, free acetylcholine was found

in the cerebrospinal fluid only in patients following head trauma
grand mal seizures; and the level of free acetylcholine varied

the degree of cerebral damage.

and

recent

directly with

In addition, these authors assayed the cholin-

esterase activity of the spinal fluid, (7, 16). In patients following head
trauma, they noted a sharp

splitting)

and a drop

rise in non-specific cholinesterase (benzoylcholine-

in the specific cholinesterase (mecholyl-splitting)

activity of the spinal fluid.

No

such inversion was noted

in fluids containing

free acetylcholine following spontaneous seizures. Electroencephalograms
were taken

at varying intervals following

correlation of the extent of

EEG

trauma, and demonstrated a

direct

abnormality and the appearance of free

acetylcholine in the spinal fluid.
Tower and MbEachern

also reported observations in six patients

receiving electroconvulsive therapy.

In patients

after 3-7

induced convulsions,

they noted free acetylcholine in the spinal fluid in two, and an increase in

non-specific cholinesterase with reversal of the cholinesterase ratio in five
of the six. They concluded that the spinal fluid changes in electroshock are
more

like those of craniocerebral trauma than those found in epilepsy. *

patient of the six who failed to show either free acetylcholine or a reversal of the cholinesterase ratio, they noted: "It is
interesting that this patient was the only one of the six to Show no
response to treatment."

* Regarding the one

�-8recently, Sachs (17) confirmed the reports of free acetylcholine in
the spinal fluid after head trauma and after electroshock.
In his studies, Bernstein (6) administered 0.5-1.0 mg/kg atropine

More

and demonstrated a

reversal or a blocking of the

EEG

effects, and a

modification of the behavioral and neurologic signs. Atropine also
blocked the

EEG

and

clinical signs induced by intracisternal acetylcholine.

Ward (8) applied these observations

with varying degrees of head trauma.

atropine induced both clinical

to the treatment of

subjects

human

Subcutaneous doses of 0.1 mg/kg of

improvement and

reversal of

EEG

effects.

recently confirmed by Sachs (1?), Huge (18) and
these observations, Ulett and Johnson (9) noted the

These observations were
Hughes

(19).

Based on

in blocking the Em changes of electroshock therapy, without noting the effect on clinical behavior. Concurrently,
Jenkner and Lechner (10) reported effects similar to those of Ward, in

effect of atropine

and scopolamine

studies of diethazine in cases of head injury.
Another group of investigations complete the available

of anticholinesterases, as

DFP

data. Studies

(di-isopropyl fluorophosphate) and

(tetraethyl-pyrophosphate), which block the enzymatic

TEPP

breakdown of

acetyl-

choline, demonstrate the development of high amplitude rapid frequency
EEG patterns similar to status epilepticus as well as lesser degrees of
abnormality as noted in post-traumatic states (20, 21, 22, 23). In these
studies, atropine blocked both the electroencephalographic and the clinical

toxic effects.
Thus, both from experimental and
trauma we may assume

clinical studies of craniocerebral

that (a) the acetylcholine activity of the Spinal

�-9-

fluid increases; (b) pseudo-cholinesterase activity increases with a
reversal of the ratio of cholinesterases; (c) EEG hypersynchrony and
slowing

agents
From

parallel these biochemical alterations;

may

and (d)

anticholinergic

block both the electroencephalographic and the clinical effects.

the data available

convulsive therapy

it is probable that the biochemical basis

is similar to that of craniocerebral trauma.

of
Convulsive

therapy results in free acetylcholine in the spinal fluid (7, 17) and a

reversal of cholinesterase ratios (7, 16).

The electroencephalographic

effects of repeated induced convulsions is the development of high voltage,
symmetric Slow wave activity, occasionally with spike activity (3, 2h, 25),
which

is similar to that

previous studies

we have

observed in severe head trauma (26, 27). In

reported the relationship between the degree of

activity and behavioral response (3). The studies
reported here and that of Ulett and Johnson (9) demonstrate a reversal
of the EEG and the behavioral effects of convulsive therapy by anti-

induced slow wave

cholinergic

compounds.

In each characteristic, convulsive therapy

is thus

similar to cerebral trauma. While the acetyloholine-cholinesterase system

studies, other enzyme systems may also be altered
studies also suggest that convulsive therapy provides an

is highlighted
(17).

These

by these

excellent experimental

method

for studies of craniocerebral trauma.

Studies of the brain stem activating system by Jasper and DroogleverFortuyn (28) and Lindsley

gt|§l.

(29) had

laid the foundation for the

activity has its origin
in mesencephalic structures, and that these structures intimately affect
the states of "alerting" and "drowsiness." More recently, Rinaldi and
prevailing conclusion that symmetric

EEG

slow'nave

�-mrelated the site of action of atropine and cholinergic
drugs to this mesodiencephalic activating system. It is also probable that

Himwich (30, 31) have

these structures

may be

selectively affected by the convulsive therapy

process, and that both the clinical and electrographic effects

may be

intimately related to changes in this system.
2. Diethazine "Alerting
The

and Hallucinggenic

Activity:

behavioral effects of diethazine provide information regarding

another aSpect of the convulsive therapy processt.

prior convulsive therapy, illusory

phenomena and

In patients without

feelings of unreality were

observed. These were similar to the hallucinogenic effects of
and mescaline (33). Again analogic data about the

of these agents

may

provide

some

no change,

(31;)

noted that the

intermittent or continuous

increase in alpha frequency.

(32)

and EG

effects

information abmt convulsive therapy.

In studies of mescaline, Wikler

either

clinical

LSD

low voltage

EEG

demonstrated

fast activity or

Denber and Merlis (35) noted a

similar

acceleration of alpha frequency, decrease in per cent time alpha including

its

disappearance, and non-specific random beta

activity. Delta activity

did not occur. In patients with delta activity induced by electroshock,
Merlis and Hunter (38) noted that in travenous mescaline markedly diminished
the amplitude and per cent time delta activity with an increase in per
cent time alpha activity.

similar. Gastaut gt g. (36) noted
an acceleration of alpha frequency of 0.5 to h.0 cps with an accentuatim
of beta rhythms. Rinkel 33 al. (37) confirmed this observation and noted,
The

effects of

151)

on EEG are

�4L1-

in addition, a reduced responsivity to hyperventil‘aﬁon.*
In smnmariaing his studies Wikler (3h) concluded that

"

. . .

regardless of the drug administered, shifts in the pattern of electroencephalogram in the direction of desynchnonization occurred in association
with anxiety, hallucinations, fantasies, illusions or tremors, and in the

direction of synchronization with euphoria, relaxation or drowsiness.“
This generalization provides a meaningful construct
may be

assessed. Agents that

hallucinogenic, and mascaline

in which these agents

evoke EEG desynchronization tend
and

1813

to

be

are clear examples. Agents that

synchronize frequencies, such as barbiturate and meprobamate

in the beta

frequency range, and chlorpromazine, promazine and pezﬁmaz‘mainthe delta
frequency range (39) tend to be sedatives, euphoriants and relaxants.
The

observations on diethazine reported here are consistent with

this hypothesis. In patients without delta activity, the EEG demonstrated
desynchronization of frequencies, and this was associated with clinical
illusory

phenomena.

In patients with delta activity desynchronisati.on

occurred, and alerting and reversal of the speech patterns induced by
electroshock were observed.
Electroconvulsive therapy
We

~31-

have previously noted a

Studies are

now

may

also be understood in this framework.

direct relationship between clinical evaluations

in progress of the effects of

LSD, Win-2299,

benactyzine

other anticholinergic compounds on post-convul sive EEG delta activity.
Initial experiments w- ah intravenous LSD (SO-100 gamma) demonstrated
marked dinﬁnution in per cent time and amplitude of delta activity.
and

�of improvement and the degree of
Under these

conditions, sedation

EEG

slowing induced by electroshock (3).

and euphoria are most prominent and

hallucinatory activity diminished. In patients in whom hypersynchrcny is
not induced, behayicral change is limited and 'imprcvement' does not occur
(hO)

.
Previously

we have concluded

therapies is based

on the

that the

mode

of action of conVulsive

induction of a state of altered cerebral function,

in which changes in adaptive interpersonal behavior occur, and are inter»
preted as 'hmprovement' (3, h, 39). The present studies amplify two
aspects of this neurcphysiologic—adaptive hypothesis. The biochemical
substrate of the behavioral change is reflected by an alteration in the
acetylchcline-cholinesterase relationships of the central.nervous system.

It is also

probable that

EEG

basis of the milieu change

hypersynchrony provides the neurophysiologic

which

is clinically manifest as sedation

and

euphoria and is evaluated as 'imprcvement.‘
The

neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis of convulsive therapy

has provided a meaningful basis for studies of other physiodynamic

therapies (39). In this study,

it has

been possible to amplify our

understanding of neurophysiologic aspects of hallucinogens as well.

�SUMMARY:

effect of an anticholinergic agent, diethazine, on the
behavior and language patterns was observed in to psychiatric patients,
1.

EEG,

The

at various stages in the course of’electroconvulsive treatment.
(a) Behavior: Increased restlessness and agitation, haptic and
visual illusory sensations, and delusional thoughts about their illness
or examiner's identity were observed.
(b)

pg: Alteration in

There was a decrease

EEG

was concurrent with behavioral changes.

in voltage and desynchronization of all frequencies.

In patients with delta activity, the per cent time

and voltage of

delta

activity decreased.
(c) Language: Syntactic patterns described for convulsive

of third person, qualification and displacement
decreased. In dyadic analyses, there was a decrease in the coefficient

therapy were reversed.

Use

of variatian.

2. These observations are discussed in the

framework

of the neuro-

physiologic-adaptive hypothesis of the action of convulsive therapy; and

it is

concluded

that:

(a) the biochemical basis for convulsive therapy

is

similar to

that of craniocerebral trauma;
(b) changes in acetylcholine-cholinesterase metabolism are
intimately related to the behavioral effects;
(c)

EEG

desynchronization

of hallucinogenic activity; and
and

sedatidn.

EEG

may be a

and

physiologic concomitant

hypersynchrony associated with euphoria

�.Ih~
REFERENCES

1.

Weinstein, E. and Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness, C.C. Thomas,
Springfield, 111., 1955.

2.

Roth, M., Kay, D.W.K., Shaw, J. and Green, J.: Prognosis and
Pentcthal Induced Electroencephalographic Changes in

Electroconvulsive Treatment,

EEG

225-237. 1957.

Clin. Neurophysiol. 2:

R.L.: Relation of Electroenecephalographic
Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in Electromock, AMA.
Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat. '_?_8_: 516-525, 1957.

3.

Fink,

h.

Fink, M., Green, M.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Ehcperimental Studies of the
(in press).
Electroshock Process, Dis. Nerv.

5.

Ulett, G.A., Smith,

6.

Bornstein, M.: Presence and Action of Acetylcholine in Experimental

7.

Tower, D.B. and McEachern, 13.: Acetylcholine and Neuronal

8.

Ward, A. : Atropine

9.

Ulett,

M. and Kahn,

st.

K. and Glaser, 6.0.: Evaluation of Convulsive
Shock Therapies Utilizing a Control Group,
Subconvulsive
and
m. J. chhiat. 1.2-: 795‘802, 19560

Bra-in

Jo Neurophym:01. 2.: 3:49.366, 19,460

Tram,

Canad.

J.

Research, g1: 105-131, 19h9.

in the Treatment of Closed

Neurosurg., 1:

398-1102, 1950.

Head

Injury,

Activity,
,1.

Effect of Atropine

and Scopolamine
Induced
by Electroconvulsive
Upon Electroencephalographic Changes
1957.
Therapy, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. 2: 217-221;,
G.A. and Johnson, M.W.:

10 .

Jenkner, F.L. and Lechner, H.: The Effect of Diparcol on the Electroencephalogram in the Normal Subject and in Those with Cerebral
Trauma, EEG Olin. Neurophysio . 1: 303-305, 1955.

11.

Heyxnan,

C., Estable, J.J.

de

and de Bonneveaux,

la menothiazinyl-Ethyldiethylamine

Pharmacggyg. 12: 123-138, 19119.

12.
13.

5.0.: Sur la mamacologie
(2987 R.P.) , Arch.

Int.

in Language During Electroshock
in Mogatholo% of Cannmnicaucn, pp. 126-139,
Grune &amp; Stratton, .Y. 9 .
Jaffe, J.: An Objective Study of Communication in Psychiatric
207-215, 1957.
Interviews, J. Hillside Hospital,

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, H.: Changes

Therapy,

_6_:

�.15..

15.

Jaffe, J.: Language of the Dyed: A Method of Interaction Analyses
in Psychiatric Interviews, Exchiatgz, (in press).
Weinstein, E.A.. Kahn, R.L., Sugarman, L.A. and Linn, L.: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium in Organic Brain Disease, Am.J.
Egzchia

o

2:12.:

889-391;, 1953.

Characterization of

16.

Tower, D.B. and McEachern, D.: The Content and

17.

Sachs, E.: Acetylcholine and Serotonin in the Spinal Fluid, ,1.
Neurosurg., g: 22-27, 1957.
Ruge, D.: The Use of Cholinergic Blocking Agents in the Treatment of
Cranio-Cerebral Injuries, J. Neurosurg., 2.3;: 77-83, 1951;.

18.

Cerebrospinal Fluids, Canad, J.

Cholinesterases in
Research, 21: 132-115, 19h9.
Human

19.

Hughes, B. : The Role of Acetylcholjne in Head Injury,
his . _2_9_: p.70, 1957.
Neurosur . and

20.

Medman,

21.

Grob, 1)., Harvey, A.M., Langworthy, 0.11. and

J. Neurol.

Bales, Pens, Willis, A. and HiRMiCh, HeEe:
Ehrperimental Production of Electrical Major Convulsive
Patterns, Am. J. @5101 a , 1146: 11.7.1211, 19,49 0
AoMo,

Lilienthal, J.L.:

The Administration of Di-Isopropyl Fluorophosphate (DFP)
257.266, 191,7.
Man, Bull. J. H025. Hosp.,

to

§_:_L_:

22.

McCauley, A. and Hinmich, H.: Effects of
Di-Isopropyl Fluorophosphate (DFP) on Electroencephalogram

Hampson,

J., Essig, C.F.,

andsoCholinesterase Activity,

l9 .

EEG

Olin. Neuropgxsio .

_2_:

Bales, PUD. and Friednlan,
A.M.: Effect of Trimethadione (Tridone) and Other Drugs on
Convulsions Caused by Di-Isopropyl Fluorophosphate (DFP),
Am. J. PSyChiat., 106: 816‘820, 1950.

23.

Him-1°11, HQEQ, E55518, CeFe, Hampson, Jolie,

2h.

Callaway, E.: Slow Wave Phenomena in Intensive Electroshock,
Clin. Neurophysiol., a: 157-162, 1950.

25.

Green,

26.

’41-'48,

3133.

Significance of Individual Variability in EEG Response to
Electroshock, J. Hillside Hosp., 9: 229-2ho, 1957.
hic
Jasper, H.H., Kershman, J. and Elvidge, A.: Electroencephalogra:£1;
:
Neurald:
Arch.
Psychiat.
Head,
the
to
of
Studies
,
Injury
M. :

328-3h8, 19h0.

�W

~16-

Ostow, M. and Greenstein, L.: Dia ostic
Grune &amp; Stratton, N.Y., 1935.

Electro-

27.

Strauss, H.,

28.

Jasper, H.H. and Drooglever-Fortuyn, J .: Experimental Studies on the
Functional Anatomr of Petit Mal Epilepsy, Res.
" " A.' Nerv.
" Publ.

29.
30.

Lindsley, D., Schreiner, L.I-I., Knowles, W.B. and Magoun, H.W.:
Behavioral and EG Changes Following Chronic Brain Stem
Lesion in the Cat, EEG Olin. Neuroplgsiol” _2_: h83-h98, 1950.
of
Rinaldi, F. and Himwich, H.H.: Alerting Responses and Actions
and
Atropine and Cholinergic Drugs, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

ngchiatu 1;:

31.

'

'

Ment. Dis. gg: 272-298, 191.7.

387-395, 1953.

Himich, H. and Rinaldi, F.: The Effect of Drugs on Reticular System,
in Brain Mechanism and Dru Action, 15-1114, C.C. Thomas,

Springfield, 1937.

aus der

32.

dietmrlamid, ein Phantastikmn
Stoll, W.: Lysergsaure - Schweiz
Neurol.

33.

Beringer, K.: Der Meskalinrausch
Springer, Berlin, 1927.

35.

Wikler, A.: Clinical and Electrencephalograwic Studies on the Effects
of Mescaline, N—allylnormorphine and Morphine in Man, J. Nerv.
mnto D180, 120: 157-175, 19%.
Denber, H. and Merlis, 3.: Studies on Mescaline I: Action in Schizophrenic Patients, PsEhiat. Quart. , 2_9_: 1421-1429, 1955.
Gastaut, H. , Ferrer, S. and Castello, 0.: Action de la diethylamide
de l'acide d-lysergique (LSD 25) sur lee fonctions psychiques
at l'electroencephalogranme, Conf. Neum1., 3;: 102-120, 1953.

36.

Pslchiat. ,

Arch.

Mutterkomgruppe,
1-h7, 19m.

Monog.

§_Q:

Neural. Psychiat., 1-315,

37.

Rinkel, M., DeShon, H.J., Hyde, R.W. and Solomon, H.C.: Experimental
Schizophrenia-Like Symptoms, Am. J. Pszchiat" 108: 572-578, 1953.

38.

Merlis, S. and Hunter, W.: Studies on Mescaline II: Electroencephalogram
in schizophrenics, Psychiat. Quart., g2: 1.30-1.32, 1955.

39.

Fink, M.:

ho.

Fink,

A

Unified Theory of the Action of mysiodynamic Therapies,

J. Hillside

M.

Hosp. ,

é: 197-206, 1957.

and Green, M.A.: Electroencephalographic

Electroshock Process (in preparation).

Correlates of the

��j:

q-»-\’X

mm or mumma manganese»
w Panama“ m and Behavior
4"

tho abmﬁm at W
Fm;black-d
the

W

mek,

m

mathem-

diam!” induced

«synchronization of ma fmquamisa and

in ”mums. In ptﬁent! with dais: activity, voltage

ﬂowed,

nativity diuppeumd.

muﬁms,

m,

amt

mm

mm function.

ath
an
was

amt alpha

and beta

and

bdnvioral changes

Wynn in mm“

therapy. the behavioral

wager?
airﬂow}:

11:01:16.6

mm o! the language patterns indicative

psychotonmotio nativity nf

2299, um

mm

frame“: increased

WV Mutton and withdrawal, immaod asthma,

in maintaining eyelid closure,
of 1115”“

and

W
muuhdmrgic comm, amine.

tine of delta nativity
and burnt.

“W

that

«It: w’dﬂty .méucad by convulsiw mum,

studies mm max-tutu: with
a

and Jamie»:

419mm led 1» may of
Mme sum or cmlsive

for ml: of mu
W:
In
recordings
of

compounds 1::

tbs dons

matreutmt, each
MOW. m
amt induced memmauon at can record with momma in beta “unity,

mm, par-1103.06 mm
md 1n

fmuemy and per-cent time at

alpha.

m nativity, both the mug. and ppm
meat. was “at Imam" mm,

nativity. In ”cards with 01w
was of thin: activity

and ﬁlm alpha

Wan}.

Bombwnt of

mm: W58

APR 2

:5:

tummy immacd.

(many: new concurrent with than ehctmgnphic manages, use

both mm inhibited by

Pram the

mm,

mtmm

WW

mummsim.

Psychiatry, Hillside

Kama, Cam

Oaks,

LL,

NJ“.

�nﬁa‘

m alumna”

are

Mar ta thwa of Dunbar a}. 3;. tor Winn.

Wt Michalimmio prawn", and
signiﬁcanaa
structurally, each contain: 1 mm nitrogen linkage.
Each

of theme

compounds have

The

01’

than

ﬁanrapy

of

amatima far the theazy of ﬁlm made of nation at convulsiw
mama‘s. as will u tor the wommbmr and Wing

$.13

1:311qu 1:111 b0 discusud.

K

�new cat Antichollnergle Game at mmmm me and Bob-71w *

3mm the observations
2: 217, 1957)
by

cumin

ergie

(W.

ﬁle“ and Johnson
um. atropine and 309130le blocked the delta wtiuty induced
than”, dMlar studies were undemken with another madmanof

diet-henna. Prenloe’oroehock, dietbuine induced demahrmiution
tuuuaned.“ end a decrease/1n voltages. In peasants with delta. activity,

compound,

of ER;

voltage md pennant time of delta

emvity hemmed,

frequencies increased and burst activity diuppeared.

dam all” end beta

.

Concurrent behavioral

mum,

illusory
maid ideetion and withdrawal, increased
restlessness, difficulty in maintaining eyelid closure, and reversal of the
language patterns «scouted with altered eerebml function after canvulsive
changes included

therapy

(m
amt.

tholog 9; Gomniggtion,

_

The

Gram

a:

Sure/atom, pg. 126, 1958)

psychotoulmtle aunt}; of diethuim led to the study at

hear-ac and diethyhﬂde, Win 2299 and bemtysim in voluntary momma
patients at venous stages of convulsive ﬁrm-aw. These antichaunerglo compounds
were Metered intmenously in amounts! of 50-150 gm, 2 to S m and 1.5

m respectively,
dung“

mder continuous

and language mum-es

mutmtmt,

nah

compound

EEG

mm.

‘For

«ch

compound the behavioral

peremled those of diethuine. In ma meanings
induced EEG demchmieeuon with an increase in

beta activity and in the alpha fmqueney. In renews with slow wave activity,
both the voltage and pop-neat time of this activity decreased, pement time

feet rmuemlea manned, and the alpha frequency increased. Behavioral
ahmgea mm concurrent with these ehctrographlc changes, and both were inhibited
by intravenous uhlorpmmine.
A

it

Fm: the

61.1}.

m.

Amos Mia/SB

ﬂuent of Experimnbal Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
.1. NW York.

�«a.

3mm ahauntim for muslin. we boon reported by Dunbar. We

and

(W.

W want].
the

33:

m. 1955).

of postoonvulain Em and bah-uric: pattoma by these potent

“mallow «unwound: “was“ a naumphyuiologic but: for comma“ thorupy.
Purim 39mm acted that. the clinical ropoma to manned comm m
«peach;
m the dmlemﬁt af Wain hiya voltnga aim: we nativity

(W.

my than be

19,: 516..

mmiaud with

ma

1957).

An

1mm in ahalinorgic nativity

Wchrazv and clinical sedation and whom.

SWy. a decrease in choumrgia activity may bu associated with

EEG

«syncing-am

mum and 6111:1031 psychotmuc nativity.
as therapy or the mad. or whim of amulaiu ”exam and tho mou-

phyamlogic

«ﬂoat: of mﬁebalmergic

command-

will be dismantled.

�\\

"v

Mint:

of Ant-1011mm:

W311:

Minimums

on

Wm

E39 and

neopolmim blocked the dclta activity induced by convulsive therapy, studies

are Wart-ken with moflar mama“

0136th dinthuim
«cram in voltages.

induced

compound,

diothuine.

m.

«mm-m on of frequencioa and

In putianta with delta activity, volﬁge and pen-mt

m of delta nativity acct-cu», tramway immune and law“ activity
disappears.
Concurrent behavioral chanson: 11:01am

imam and withdrawal,

illusory sensations, paranoid

incmaod ”ﬂatleusnass, difficulty in maintaining

mud. of the ham patterns indicative of altered
The apparent. hallucinogenic activity m to any of

eyelid cio'sum, and

«mm. ﬂirtation.
various

Wu inoluang
The

of

hmetysim

LSD. Win 2299,

bohuvionl changes in the dam

dawns.

In m6 Hoarding

intizm at the record with

an

employed were

mutmhaant, «eh

mousse in

'58"

parallel to those

agent

indmd «manom-

an fmuemiu, max-cue in

alpha Inquency, and alpha voltaga tad para-mt
601%:

and masculine.

tins. In records mm

activity, both the valtagc md pox-«mt tins of delta. activity duel-sand,

�duh

4...,

par-43m tine

fut {maintains

Manama,

Behavioral (changes were
ugd both

wm inhibited

by

and.

alpha Inquancy increased.

emmnt with

than electramphie mung»,

intramm «human-um.

00de hm patent mticholimrgic properties a
wall as n
W tertiary W W... Wm“ or them absent»Each

at then

The

um 29:: thus timery
:5

of thg an“

a: nation or combs.”

therapy in payments,

all «a fur the mumphysialogy and pinmcology of hallumogana

61mm.

11.111

be

�Effect of Anticholinergic

*
Compounds an Post—Convulsive EEG and Behavior

Following the observations of Ulett and Johnson

(EEG

Clin. Neurophysiol.

2; 217, 1957) that atropine and scopolamine blocked the delta
by convulsive therapy, similar studies were undertaken with

ergic
of

compound,

EEG

activity induced

snail-l anticholin-

diethazine. Pre-electroShock, diethazine induced desynchronization

frequencies and a decrease in voltages. In patients with delta activity,

voltage and per-cent time of delta activity decreased, donﬁnant alpha and beta
frequencies increased and burst activity disappeared.

Concurrent behavioral

illusory sensations, paranoid ideation and withdrawal, increased
restlessness, difficulty in maintaining eyelid closure, and reversal of the
language patterns associated with altered cerebral function after convulsive
changes included

therapy.
The

apparent psychotomimetic activity of diethazine led to the study of

lysergicl;:dudiethylamide,

benactyzine in voluntary psychiatric

Win 2299 and

patients at various stages of convulsive therapy.
were administered intravenously
mgm

in

reSpectively, under continuous

These

anticholinergic

amounts of 50-150 gamma,
EEG

recording.

2

EEG

5 mgm and

1:5

For each compound the behavioral

changes and language measures paralleled those of diethazine.
pre—treatment, each compound induced

to

compounds

In

EEG

recordings

desynchronization with an increase in

in the alpha frequency. In records with slow wave activity,
both the voltage and per—cent time of this activity decreased, per~cent time
fast frequencies increased, and the alpha frequency increased. Behavioral
beta activity

and

changes were concurrent with these electrographic changes, and both were inhibited
by intravenous chlorpromazine.

%

From the Department

Glen Oaks,
AEEG:

L.I.

u/3/58

New

of Experimental Peychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
York.

'

.

H.“

as...

�a-2-n

Similar observations for mscaline have been reported by Denber,
Merlis and Hunter
. w» “inhuman“.

ﬁJ/A‘revious reportstzgoted that the clinical response to induced
convulsions

the development of extensive high voltage

was dependent upon

slow wave,activity.QAaH7k7~Aznh.aNauroi7v9SyChtat?"j§7"516?“t959}n The

reversal of postconvulsive
cholinergic

compounds suggcrests

and euphoria ’

WC

ﬁes

G

The

EEG

and behavior

“patterns

thatEEmersynchrony

by these potent
and

anti-

[clinical sedation

{increase in cholinergic acti@

desynchronization and clinical psvchotomimetic activity,ere
4:.
decrease in cholinergic activl$291

5M7

Wild

relation of these observations to studies of head trauma, and

to the neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis of the
convulsive therapy will be discussed.

mode of

action of

�Effect of Anti cholingeric

Compounds on Post Convulsive EEG

and Behavior

,

In 1956 Ulett and Johnsgon repcrted to this society that large doses
(jig

of atropine erscopolamine blocked the appearance of high voltage delta

,.
Its-their—smdyzhey noted
6?

activity usually induced by convulsive therapy.

that the dose! of atropine necessary to affect the

W"

'

with“

carried

m

unpleasant

W5 mic

”We effects.
‘

'

Jenkner and Lechner

M

compound.

It is

m

were these-sthet—else—

Following. £23 reports by

Modiethazine 4 a—peten-‘t
(Mf‘iam

facts

aw cw. anticholinergic compound with minimal systemic 9

those of Ulett and Johnson

EEG

W.

1'

Mi!

W

XMMA‘.‘
”ﬁr/félcm
studies
to
similar

W

Our observations with

led to an investigation of other anticholinergic

this.

the purpose of this report to describe the clinical and EG correlations

on intravenous
A

administration of

LSD-25, Win-2299, benactyzine and diethazine
.

n

Z;

in pSychiatric patients at various stages of convulsive therapy; and relate

and

these observations to thekneurophysiolog'c-adapative hypothesis of the

mode

of action of convulsive therapy and of hallucinogens.
Subject and Method:
Our

km

subjects ass consecutive referrals for convulsive therapy in an

open ward voluntary
I

psychiatric hospital. Patients

have been studied

at

�.2—

[ll observations mg: made in acute
is?
laborah'y. Following a standardﬁrecording from
experimnts in the
W
17 leads, the compound under study #8 administered intravenously at a W

various stages of therapy,
EEG

1-: rate per minute , until clinical behavioral or electrographic changes

m
I

observed.

The compounds

studied have been diethazine, Win-2299, LSD-25
p

and benactyzine .

Fig.

I-

Diethazine was administered

at

Win-2299 and benactyzine

mgm;

10 gamma

Chemistry structure
25 mgn. per minute,

at 0.5

per minute for 50-150

mgm

for a total of 175-250

per mimte for

2—; men;

and

)5atI

LSD

gamna.

Observations:

‘

low

If;

patients

(Q

Wm

'

there

decrease in voltage and a desynchronization of
rhythmic patterns became

less prominent. In

all frequencies. Prevailing

some

voltage 6-7 cps activity appeared, most prominent
temporal leads.

m

The alpha frequency was not

993 $9321;

Wm

was a

instances, symmetric

in

low

the frontal and anterior

a;

altered, and? the build-up an

by hyperventilation was blocked,

�-u-u— -- .— ---

—-.— --—---

Fig.

2’

\‘V

93

\.

W;

Diethazine

-

EEG

-

g

Pre-Cenvulsive Treatment

vi;

.........._.--

__

W
,

/7

“I

at!

3

InApatients during convulsive therapy, with varying degrees ofﬂhigh

,5

(V
significant decreaseA in voltage and in
We}? ‘1‘! a W
K%W W aways... Flusucu/ISlow
per-cent time of delta activity. Both random and burst delta activity

is

voltage delta activity, there

M

a

M

4

V

-

~

I

0’3

diminished and low voltage alpha and beta frequencies
The

hyperventilation respoxaewas
—

no

Fig.

Diethazine --—----

.-

EEG

-

Patients

’4, S

Convulsive Treatment

EEG

effects,

“wwwwww

for

irritable

Mdysesthesias
1:3»

and

patterns were

‘ ,m

to five hours.

I Me

dest-tive

restless

behavioral

and complained of

of the extremities.

W.

Visual

illusory

their illness, the setting of the test

W1
46M!

procedure; or the examiner's identity were

MAM
Myopposite

one

we observed

phenomena and delusional thoughts about

‘

/
#‘X

became more

sensations of unreality

prominent.

longer apparent.

@hctrographic effects persisted

changes.

been

.—

Concurrent with these

.

l4»

"—

'

Their language

L

w

to that previously described for amobarbital)

5

�-

80

W

thatkdehial, minimization, cliches, third person

were

of

4:mode and

less prominent. These behaVioral changes were pun-at. during the period

46W
W W
W
W
M

maximum EG- chani gs.

We:

led to

i. :qs's’

diethazine

of other-imam hallucinogens

Aru—

m

Denber and Merlis had

W

W
mmdhﬁmmndm
They

WAWWM

t-L

similar to diethazine.

«mt

ﬁche-high voltage symmetric slow wave

time and

in

w
”Mutant

low

voltage,

‘9”

WW
W
wand M ”ma,”led to

‘x

’ril'

‘

~

MWMJ

MIM‘M?
-

MAM“?
Fﬁfﬁw'
W
this compound.
study

ELIZA;

——

51/

bursts were-diminished

WW
activity.

random slow wave

//{/,{r_,,""

fa. etagrm

with an increase in alpha per/cent

”.WMM
@ports by Pennes and

anticholinergic

altered

mescaline

.

it: EEG changes“induced by electroshock in a fashion

The

past tense

M.

‘

x-Jyx'yﬂ

effects were similar to that: in the diethazine group. Inpatients pres

convulsive therapy,

4,.v‘.

I

EEG

.4

‘

'7

.“-'

’
'

,

I

desynchronizationéwas induced.

Fig.
Win 2299

-

6

Pm-Cpnvulsive Treatment

.I‘.\

In patients with high voltage

slow wave

activity induced

by convulsive therapy,

�.5.
P, .
\B
‘2‘
9
\C
.

there

was

of slow wave
adecrease in amplitude and per-cent time
"
OLE, &amp;

WA.

LC—

"1L”

.

”I

,

‘

r

'1‘.“

I

activity

'

with an increase in alpha and beta frequencies. AA‘ssociated with these

electrographic effects

were

clinical patterns of restlessness, excitement,

/

_.__

,

Win 2299

and

hallucinatory

and

- Post

Fig. 7
Convulsive Treatment

We
ﬁremeﬁkwawAﬂ

illusory activity.

.

I,

Th? studies yore7/"repeated with intravenous

-'

4

LSD

{if/(MW isWM inMcbwLW W MAL/”3‘

W.

l

/.I

(

V

W

A’M/[F

There

m

behavioral effects]

W

€265

a difference

In

the time constant bee—names In line/-

M

electrographio changes-.ﬂkhh 144.

’1» A—‘nﬁlvj 5—6796
mi
there me less desynchronization 2-bit the delta activity

WrepressedmMkw M “(p/7L
“79% M7 miﬂlméw} __
(5‘;

a

I/L-v

‘

I,

.

Wﬁ‘ﬁ’Wxﬁi Mose-Al}

Recalling the- reports that benactyzine induced
l
.

“Mﬂx I)?“

‘

EEG

W '3

desy‘nchmnization 5 we

/

adninistered the- ccmpound intravenously: and again! observed similar clinical
and

is

electrographic patterns. In the well modulated alpha record, desynchronization
prcmpt.

In the record with high voltage delta activity, desynchronization

�~6-

'

MWMKL
Wdelta
I790:

V13.

activity

3903+}

__

Fig.

11,’ 12

Bemctyzine

WWW

These pattems were accompanied by
While we did not observe

-

EEG

clinical restlessness and excitement.

illusory or hallucinatory activity,

mguagew m and

Mo

diethazine,

‘éu-e

”,ij
Cl

w

w IL:

cc te-theé-r EEG

M

M
M3
a:

W
desmchrmizWeWw,

thﬁcue

M

compounds

,

an,

Malt/71,)

aaﬂwf/‘04

WM
have In:
W11 chemical structure

W

Jaw/554m these

did note the

Am

to have similar electrographictand behavioral effects.

minced

I”)

we

Win-2299 and LSD.

Thus, four compounds
shown

M

awfﬁijfj

d‘u

a

M

M

“by;

have been

{m W’MM

0’};

Ag,“ écfmmnmé’

é;

444-“

my

1“.”

“In diethyl-anﬁno-ethyl organization.

'

7544..

(5y

--------m-- ---~Repeat
Fig

__________________

WM”;

WWWtK’L/océeuﬁﬂﬁnféawhhmva\

«a

�.

'

I

I

I

These observations

therapy process. In
high voltage slow

a;

i

Ii

.

site amplify

our understanding of the convulsive

earlier studies

wave

activity

was

.

we

indicated that the development of

the neurophysiologic correlate of

behavioral change in convulsive therapy, and a necessary, though not

sufficient, condition for clinical improvement. During the past ten years,
studies

by Bornstein, Tower and McEachern, Ward, Sachs, Bugs and
I“.—

of convulsive therapy

have noted similarities in the biochemical

to craniocerebral trauma.
acetylcholins

They reported thatqguring convu Sl

and pseudocholinesterase

others

erap free

are-eiouated in the Spinal fluid. In

addition, topical administration of acetyicholine induces high voltage burst
and Spike

activity. Ulstt and

cholinergic effects
‘

The

by the

Johnson emphasized

anticholinergic

the blocking of these

i::;::§§s;7:;ropine and

5v

.
.
observation in this
report on dietha21ne,‘Win-2299,

support their observations. Each of these

activity

and

the clinical behavioral

6

AldAbév‘

that the neurophvsiologic eerreiate

compounds has

and language

thfse described for convulsive therapy.

LSD-25 and

thus

scopolamine.

benactyzine

potent anticholinergic

effects are apposite to

we may/amplify

the

earlier conclusion

behavioral changes in convulsive therapy

�.5-

is

the development of high voltage slow wave activity, by

this

EEG

tag—ion that

reflects an alteration.in the acetylcholine-cholinesterase

change

"L”!

J‘
relation of the basin, probably in the direction of increased cholinergic

activity} [Tl'

These observations lend themselves to application

in studies of cranio-

h9,41;r17§

cerebral trauma. The-repeat—ef Ward ll“

e

clinical efficacy of high doses

of atropine in altering the clinical manifestations of head trauma/also noted

that effective doses brought with
be advisable

them severe

peripheral effects.

to repeat these studies, utilizing such

neurologically Specific anticholinergic

more

potent,

It would
more

compounds as Win-2299, diethazine

or benactyzine.

Finally, these observations,
of

EEG

(l95h)

and our

earlier reports

on the

significance

delta activity in convulsive therapy, support the observation of Wikler
who concluded

with the

comment

his report

that:

"....

on mascaline, n-allylnormorphine and morphine

regardless of the drug administered, shifts in

m

the pattern.ofnelectroencephalogram.in the direction of desynchronization
occurred in association with anxiety, hallucinations, fantasies, illusions or

�tremors, and in the direction of synchronization with euphoria, relaxation

M

or drowsiness." This conclusion, supported by these observations, permit
a more near meaningful generalization of the recently expressed neurophysiologic -

adaptive hypothesis of the
We

may

mode

of action of somatic therapies in psychiatry.

infer that agents that Synchronize

frequencies, like barbiturate

”ﬂ

.

and meprobamate

phenazine

EEG

in the

in the

be

r

ge and chlorpromazine , promazine and

deltm; tend to be sedativel,

while agents that evoke

EEG

euphoriant and relaxantl;

desynchmnization tend to be excitant and halluc-

inogenic, as was noted for diethazine,
In smmnary,

per-

we have observed

pf

161), Win- 2299,

benactyzine and meccaline.

the effects of various compounds as diethazine,

,x/

Win~2299, LSD, benactyzine and mescaline on the electroencephalogran and

behavior? in psychiatric patients at various stages of convulsive therapy.
Behaviorally, these compounds induced increased restlessness, haptic and

visual illusory sensations

and delusional thoughts about the

subject's illness

or the examiner' 5 identity. The syntactic language patterns described for
Wham/C
convulsive therapy were reversed. Concurrent with these changes were a
decrease in voltage and a desynchronization of

all frequencies in

the

EEG.

In patients with high voltage delta activity, the per-cent time and voltage

�.10..
of the delta activity were marhedly decreased.
These observations have been discussed

in the

framework of the common

biochemical structure - that of a substituted diethylanimoethanol

thééIanticholinergic properties with the conclusion that:
(a)

The

//

-

and

£74kfzitiég‘

biochemical basis for convulsive therapy;may be an

alteration in the acetylcholine-dholinesterase relation of the nyrvous
system, probably in the direction of increased cholinergic

(b)

The

(Z?
encompass the

activity.

recently expressed neurophysiologic adaptive hypothesis

of the mode of action of somatic therapies

action of hallucinogens;

studies of the effects of anticholinergic
trauma be undertaken,

utilizing

more

in psychiatry is amplified to

t is recommended that further
compounds

in craniocerebral

neurologically Specific

as diethazine, benactyzine and Winr2299.

lﬁfﬁg’

compounds

�Effect of Antichelinergic Hallucinogen:

on

Post Convaleive

EEG

_and Behavior *

tron the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
GlQn OIkB, L010, 3.1.

part, by grant H—927 and HI~2092 of the National Institute
of Hental Health, National Institutes of Health, 0.8. Public Health

Aided, in

Service.
Read

at the

v1: 1/59

~

American
EEG.

EEG

Society neeting, Atlantic City, June, 1958,

�Effect of Anticholinergic Hellocinogens

on

Poet Convnleive

EEG

and Behavior

In 1956

Ulett

and Johnson

(

)

reported that atropine and

ecopolanino blocked the appearance of the high voltage delta

activity usually induced

by convulsive

therapy.

They

that the dose of atropine necessary to affect the

also noted

EEG was

each as

to be associated with unpleasant systemic effects. Reports by
Jenkner
conponnd

us

90

this

J

Leehner

(r) describing diethaeine as

an

antioholinergic

bet minimal eyatenic effects led
vith potent neurologic

endertake studies similar to those of Ulett and Johnson using
compound ( )y and

these observations, in turn, led to an

investigation of other experiaental enticholinergic agents.

is the purpose of this report to describe clinical

and

It

electro~

encephalographic observations on the intravenous administration
of various anticholinergic agents in psychiatric patients at various

stages of convulsive therapy and to relate these obeervationa to
hypotheses concerning the node of action of convulsive therapy
and the physiology

o: hallucinogens

(

).

(

)

�-2SUBJECTS AND METHOD:

Our

subjects were consecutive referrals for convulsive therapy

in an open ward voluntary psychiatric hospital.
numbers of

While varying

subjects have been studied for each compound,

Ages ranged from 18

in 10k eXperinents have been assayed.

subjects

86

to

67

years, and diagnoses include schizophrenic reactions, manic-depressive
and

involutional depressive psychoses.
Patients have been studied at various stages of the treatment

process.

observations were

The

laboratory.

1

standard

8

made

channel

EEG

in acute experiments in the

EEG

recorder and needle electrodes

applied in 17 lead placements following Strauss 22.2;

(

)

were

In each experiment, the compound under study was edninistered

used.

intravenously at a set rate per minute, until clinical behavioral
or electrographic changes were observed. The compounds studied have
been

diethasine, Win-2299, benaetyaine,

Each

is

a potent

JB~318, JB-336, and

atropine.

anticholinergic agent in vitrc. Diethasine

(diethylaaineethyl~n~dibensoparathiasine), for example, induces
mydriesis and hypotension, suppresses salivatien and blocks the

�-5.
bradycardia, aalivation and soizuros cf acctylchcline and fluorophosphatc

).

(

Win-2299 (2-diotylaminoothy1 cycloponty1—2-thieny1~
1

(2-diethy1aninoathyl benzilato) are
similar to atropine pcgﬂLt
central offocts
synthetic anticholinorgic agents/but with

glycolatc)

and minimal

and benactyzino

:

peripheral effects

(

,

).

JBo318 and JB-336

(N~ethy1o3-piperidy1bensilate, H-nethyl~3-piperidy1bonsilato)
,

.

are two at a rccant series or synthetic anticholinergic 33:3:
coupounda of high
(

). Diathazino

total or
minute

central potency
was

2

to

5

hallucinogenic activity

adminiatcrod at 25 ngn. per minute for a

175—250 ngn; Win—2299

for

and high

ngn.3 and

anqbonactynine at 0.5 nan. par

JB—BIB)

ngnt per minute for 1.2 to h.o ngn.

JB-336, and atropine

at

O.h

�OBSERVATIOHS:

(a) Diethezine:

A:

previously reported

administration or diethezine in

15

), the

(

patients prior to convulsive
ron

therepy resulted in a decrease ib volteges and a deeychnnnization
or

all frequencies. Prevailing

rhythmic patterns became lees

In some inetences, symmetric low voltage 6-7 ope

prominent.

activity appeared, nest proninent in the frontal
temporal leads.

The

and

anterior

elphe frequency was not altered, but the

build-up in voltage and the slower frequencies induced by hyper-

ventilation vere blocked (fig. 1).
acetone-ounces-

In

25

petiente during convulsive therapy, with varying

degrees of induced high voltage delta activity

significant decrease both in voltage
slow wave

activity.

From an

and in

( )

there

was a

per cent time or

everage per cent tine delta or

hSI in the £ronte~occipita1 lends, there was 1 reduction to
e neen

per cent tine of 201. Both random and burnt delte

�-5-

activity diminished
became

proninent.

and low

increase in degree of slow

The

hyperventilation was

on

effects persisted for

voltage alpha and bets frequencies

longer apparent.

no

one

activity

wave

These

electrographic

to five hours (Fig. 2).

ﬁ-‘-¢’---‘
Fig.

2

--‘------Concurrent with these electrographic effects,

distinctive behavioral changes. Patients
and

restless

and conplained of

we

observed

irritable

became more

sensations of unreality and or

dysthesias of the extremities; Visual illusory phenomena and
delusional thoughts about their illness, the setting or the test
procedure or the examiner’s identity were reported.

syntactic language patterns
a
(

were

Their

.

characteristically altered in

fashion opposite to that previously described for snobarbital
), so that verbal denial, minimisation, cliches, third person

node and

past tense hsaanaﬂhax becane less prominent.

changes were concurrent with

maximum

These

electrographic change.

�«6»

(b) Win-2299: Reports by Pennee
compound, Win 229?, manifested both
and induced
compound.

excitetory etatee in
The

(

)

that

an eXperimental

potent anticholinergic actiity

nan

led to our study or this

observations were einilar to those observed with

diethazino. In five patients without slow

wave

activity,

deeynchronisation of frequencies and decrease in voltages of

all frequencies

were noted

in tour (Fig. 3).
nooﬁﬂﬂ‘vw

Pig.

3

”------In 11 patients with high voltage delta activity there was a
decrease in amplitude and per cent tine of slow wave activity
with an increaee in alpha and beta frequencieec The mean per

cent tine delta activity dropped from

50%

to

23%

(Fig. h).

Fiz.\h

-‘-‘---“
Associated with these electrographio effects were clinical

patterne of reatleaeneea
and

and

excitenent. Patients

became

fearful

tenee. Visual seneatione were reported and in three subjects,

delusional elaboraticne about their hospital experience were

�-7.

proninentdheee behavioral changee appeared during drug administrau

tion or within ten minutes,
'

levels, within

to

Reports that benactycine induced

(c) Benactzaine:

diethazine and

disappeared, at these dosage

tea three hours.

two

deeynchronization

and

(

its structural similarity both to

and

)

Win~2299

EEG

led to our testing of this coupoond.

Intravenous administration in 12 oubjecto elicited oiuilar

clinical

and electrographic

patterns.

Both

in the well modulated

alpha record and in the record with high voltage delta activity,

deeynchroniaation was prompt. Delta activity decreaeed from a
mean

per cent tire of

to 171 in

391

‘--“‘-C“--“
PigS. 5’

8

cuhjecte (Figs. 5, 6).

6

ﬁ“-~--‘---These

electrographic patterns were accompanied by clinical

reetleeeoeee, irritability
was more

difficult.

dittaanxt

The

thoughts econ with the
dosage

levels.

In

and

excitement. Artifact-free recording

illusory sensations

initial

compounds were

and

delusional

not noted at these

patients with manifest dieorientation

language changee associated with convulsive therapy

(

and

), however,

�‘8‘
there

wee en

alerting

and e

revereal or the language patterns.

(d) Piperiqzibenziletee:
Abood (

)

that various piperidylbenziletea both manifested

entioholinergic activity
subjects,
The

Following recent reports by

we

tested

and induced

two or

these,

hallucinations in psychiatric

JB-318 and JB—336 in 2b

subjects.

electrographio patterne were identicel to those other
deeynohronination was during

-

Onset of inaynshxlaxxntx

experimental oonponnde.

injection or within

15

ninntee and persisted for one to four

hours (Fig. 7, 8).

-“Q.*.‘..--‘U.Figs. 7,

8

-nﬂ-~ﬁ--.‘-‘--animation was observed,
In each instance in whioh deeynchrntxixx

clinical restlessness
activity
changes.

were

and

exoitenent, illusory and hallucinatory

noted, and were concurrent with the electrographio

In two inetanoee the behavioral changes were halted

by the subsequent

intravenous adninietration of chlorpronaaine.

�(e) Atrozine: Continuing our etudy or enticholinergic
compounds, we

edniuietered atropine intraveneuely in 12 subjects,

in dosages of 0.8 to h.0ngn.

Systemic

erreeta were prenineut

during the injection with increased respiratory rate, puller,

dial

dry akin and dry mouth, preeorttxxx cenpleinte and eerked teehy~

eerdie (Figs. 9, 10).
und.~¢...mnd.¢Figs. 9, 10

‘b.-’~.ﬁ-‘----Subjects beenne reetleee end feertul (as did the obeervergp) end

Seekxxxnptenxxunxnxpxenixentxlxxte

recording became difficult.

Within ten minutes these symptoms

subsided and the subjects became drowsy and relaxed.
In subjects without delta activity

in the

initial record, to

leeeitude

by decreased

slowing (Fig.

little

be followed during

change was seen

the period at

voltages, desychrenization

and

increased

9).
Fig.

9

In subject: with delte activity, there wee en

initial

decreeee in

voltage and per eent time or such activity during the period or

�~10...

reatlonancaa, following by an increaao during tho period of
quiotudc (Fig. 10).

--ﬁ---.-‘&amp;-ﬂw
Fig. 10

“.Q‘....‘.‘.‘

�-11DISGUSSIOH:
i

Various compound: with measurable anticholinorgic activity
have

that been

effects.

Thoco

shown

to have similar oloctrographic and bohovioralw

oxporinontal compounds oxhibiting the greater

facility in altoring cloctrcgraphic patterns
structure oach containing

a

have a cannon

tortiory nitrogen with

linkage to varying roota (Fig.

ll);

a diothyl

whilo atropine, rolativoly

inpotont in altering oloctrcgraphic patterns contains a quaternary nitrogen. Bohaviorolly each compound induces stimulating,

excitatcry

and

illusory

and

hallucinatory activity.

Electro-

graphically each induces dcaynchronication of frequencioa,

and

docroaac in voltages, most prominent in anhycta with delta activity
c

7

following thoropcntically induced convulsions.
(a) Convulsive theragy process:
Those

observations amplify our understanding of the

convulsive therapy process and at the induced

activity.

In

earlier studios

or high voltoho slow wave

ccrroloto or bohoviordl

we

slow wave

indicated that the development

activitr

chango

EEG

woo

tho nonraphyaiologic

in convulsive therapy, and a

�-12-

-

heceslary, though not sufficient, condition for clinical
improvement

(

). During the past ten years,

.1ncluding Bernstein,
have reported

numerous

Tower and HoEachern, Ward,

similarities in the biochednicsl

authors

Sachs, Rugs
changes or the

central nervous system in convulsive therapy to that seen in
craniocerebral trauma

(

).

They observed an

inorease in

cholnerzic activity as manifest by an elevation of tree
acetylcholine and pseudocholinestereses in the spinal fluid.
In addition, the direct increase in central nervous system

acetyloholine activity by topical administration or eoetyloholine
induced high voltage bursts and spike activity.

Ulett

and Johnson

(

enphesised the blocking of the behevioral and electrographic effects
by the

antioholinergic activity of strapine
The

observations in this report

on

end

scopolenine.

dietheziue, Win-2299,

benectysine and the piperidylbenziletes support their observations.
The

potent enticholinergic activity of such of these compounds (with

apparent predoninant locus of activity in the central nervous
system)

expliries the suggestion that the beechenical basis for the

induced slow wave activity of oonvulsivei therapy results from

�an

increased lova4tf control acetylcholine-cho1inesterase

activity. Support for

such a hypothesis

considerable degrees of slow

adniniotrotion of

DE?

wave

is also seen in the

activity observed after the

(di-ioopropylrlnorophoophote) - a potent

oholinootoraoo blocking agent.
Uhilo these observations demonstrate that anticholinorgic
compounds

or. affective in reducing

slow wovo

activity,.roporto

of othor compounds with similar effectihavo also appeared.
‘Anphotanino (Bonaodrino)

(

acid diothylonido

and diphenhydronino (Bonodryl)

(

)

), moocalino

), lyoorgic

(

(

have been reported as rodncing post-convulsive slow wave
These compounds

)

activity.

are primarily described as oymphthominotio and

ontihiatoninio in phornncologio activity, yet each has exoitotory
ond

stimulating effoﬁoto

on

bahnvior

(

,

,

,

).

The

relations or those observations to than. soon in this report
are possibly boat assessed in relation to synaptic activity.
In

t

study of tho effects or vorioua agonta on the

EEG

and

behavior of unanosthotizod cats with chronic inpltnted electrodes,

�-1hBradley and Elkee

(

)

postulated the exietence of two, or

pcesibly three, types of interacting chemoreaponeive receptors
within the central nervous system: cholinergic, non~cholinergie
eheeeptible to amphetamine, and nonecholinergic susceptible to
LSD

and

tryptaminie derivatives.

Marezei and Hart

(

)

exploring intercortical-(transcollosel) partwaye in the cat,
described the effects of various compounds
on

direct electrical stimulation.

They

on

the evoked potentials

postulated the presence

of two chenoreeeptive potentialities of the synapse - cholinergic
and

adrenergic

~

with Opposing stimulatory and inhibitory aetien.

In both constructs, the administration at antifcholinergie agents,
or at eympatheniaetic agenta, results in equivalent eynaptic

.electrieal effects.
LSD

Thus

adrenaiine, amphetamine, meecaline

inhibit the electrical activity recorded afcreee

and

a synapse.

in ddentieal effect is achieved with atropine.
In the light or these suggestions, the present experiments
permit a.mere specific hypothesis regarding the pharmacologic
baeie of the convulsive therapy preceee.

Repeated induced convulsions

leads to an increase in synaptic eheliaergie activity with an

�-15-

increase in the level at electrical activity of the central
nerveue system, which 1e recorded by surface electrodes es
augmented high voltage slow wave

activity. Adainietratien of

entieholinergic agents reduces the leveﬂef synaptic activity,
resulting in a decrease in tbe manifest cortical electrical

activity to pre-convulsive levels.

The

administration of

ayapathomimetic agente, however, also achieve: the seme

etiolate, not

by

altering the

by increasing the

aloe
EEG

uni“ chelinergic ectivity but

level of adrenergic activity.

activity,

wave

so preninent and so

or the poet-seizure state

electrical

(

The

manifest

persistent in the

) may

waking

thus be related to a

pereiatent alteration in synaptic transmission activity of large
numbers of

The

delicate

thin balance is seen in the ready reversibility with a!

Venture or

alerting

calls at the centre‘rerveee system.

(

), tine

agents neted hare.

(

) and

the wide variety or pharmacologie

Repeated induced convuleione nay thus be

described an a device to creete bioeheaieal changes in the brain

�.16.
for their resulting behavioral effects.

fornuletion is

Such a

consistent with the view that convulsive therapy is
therapeutic process

non~apecitic

).

(

initial suggestion

The

a

(

)

for the convulsive therapy process

may

that the pharmacologio basis

lie in

alteration in

an

acetylcholine-cholinaeteraeo relationships, can, thus
on

be focused

the alteration in the level of synaptic activity.
11:?

regard, the observation that diphonkydranine
anti~hystaninic agent, also reduces slow
convulciono
amount of

),

(

and

wave

Innzyknhni

In

this

primarily an

,

activity of induced

the observations by Sacha

(

)

that increased

cerotinin appear in the spinal fluid otter convulsion:

cuggeet that this image of synaptic activity in convulsive therapy

is oversimplified. Nevertheless, further animal studies or the
effects of various drugs

on

the poat~seizure electrical activity

are warranted.
(b) Neurophysiologz;pf hallucinogenic activitz:
These

observations of anticholinergic compounds

delta activity also nay

activity.

be

on EEG

related to concepts of hallucinogenic

Each of the compounds

studied induced excitatory

�-17behavior including illusory and hallucinatory phenomena.* Here,
-

too, synaptic models

nescaline,

may be

useful. Sympathomimetie agetts, as

amphetamine, and

LSD, and

entieholinergie agents es

those described here, are equally potent hellucinogene,

The

neurophermacologic basis for such behavior may be characterized
ee en

alteration in synaptic balance in the direction of increased

inhibition (decreeeed.trenenieeion) of stimuli.

clinical efficacy of convulsive therapy in

The

hallucinatory ectivity.ney the: lie in
biochemical level.
known

alteration at this

Equally eignifieent are the effects of other

cin
entiehellunuiogene, ee chlorpromezine end reserpine,

electrical activity.
in

an

modifying

men (

nedceline

), block the
(

),

and

Both compounds induce
EEG

EEG

on

hypersynohrony

deeynehronieing effects of LSC.end

in animal studies, block

behavioral and electrogrephic effects

(

,).

LSD

and mesoeline

The

nonospecific

nature of the neurophysiologic basis of orperimental hallucinatory

activity ia thus emphasized.
In the doses need, hellucinetory phenomene were not observed
for benectyeine. A report of such activity was reported at

higher doeege

(

).

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2574">
                <text>Effect of anticholinergic agent, diethazine, on EEG and behavior; significance for theory of convulsive therapy. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1958 Sep;80(3):380-7</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2575">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2576">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-29b-005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2577">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2578">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2579">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2580">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2581">
                <text>6 items. 1: Experimental Studies of Convulsive and Drug Therapies in Psychiatry: Theoretic Implications (one page). 2: Small graphs. 3: [preprint]. 4: Draft. 5: Reprint from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry September 1958, Vol. 80, pp. 380—387. 3: File copy. 4: Handwritten notes. 5:  8 drafts. 6: [preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2582">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2583">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74460">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81021">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87582">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94143">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="259" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="50">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/41d2ce5a639c29832746c6ec9a762f69.pdf</src>
        <authentication>be29ea3cfc0ebd057d49979acc6884d6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100676">
                    <text>�Reprinted from Biological Psychiatry
Grunt &amp; Stratton, Inn, 1959
Printed in (1.8.4.

CHAPTER 14

Effect of An Anticholinergic Agent, Diethazine, on EEG
and Behavior: Signiﬁcance for Theory of
Convulsive Therapy
By MAX FINK, M.D.

of
convulsive
have
therapy
emphasized EEG
RECENT
delta activity as the neurophysiologic basis for the induced behavioral
change.“5 In investigations of head trauma signiﬁcance has been ascribed
to changes in the acetylcholine-cholinesterase systems both for the behavioral
and the electroencephalographic effects. An increase in free acetylcholine6
and an alteration of the ratio of cholinesterases7 in the spinal ﬂuid have
been positively correlated with the degree of EEG abnormality and degree
of neurologic deﬁcit. The EEG patterns were “blocked,” and some improvement in clinical status was reported following the administration of atro8
pine.“ In convulsive therapy, atropine and scopolamine were observed
to block the appearance of delta activity,9 although the systemic effects of
the large doses of these agents were marked.
Recent reports10 noted that EEG and behavioral effects similar to those
produced by atropine were achieved in patients with head trauma by intravenous diethazine—a phenothiazine compound with anticholinergic properties—with minimal systemic effects. The effect of diethazine was studied in
the course of our continuing studies of the role of delta activity in electroshock.3 It is the purpose of this report to describe the effects of diethazine
on EEG patterns and on the behavior of patients during electroconvulsive
therapy, and to relate these observations to the present neurophysiologicadaptive hypothesis of the mode of action of convulsive therapy.
INVESTIGATIONS

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,
Long Island, N. Y. Aided, in part, by grant M-927 of the National Institute of
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, U.S.P.H.S.
Co-recipient of the 1958 A. E. Bennett Foundation Award for research in biological
psychiatry. Reprinted by permission from the A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.

8: 38 (Sept) 1958.
I am indebted to Mrs. Hannah Mosquera for her technical assistance in the EEG
recordings, and to Drs. Joseph Jaﬂ'e and Robert L. Kahn for their analyses of the
tape recordings.
Diethazine was made available through the courtesy of Smith, Kline and French
Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pa.
184

�EFFECT OF AN ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENT

185

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty psychiatric patients, at various stages of electroshock therapy in an openward, voluntary psychiatric hospital have been studied. All observations have been
made in acute experiments in the EEG laboratory. Following a routine EEG recording, diethazine* was administered intravenously at the rate of 25 mg. per minute,
for a total of 175 to 250 mg., depending upon the behavioral eﬁ'ect. Dosage varied
from 2.8 to 4.0 mg. per Kg. body weight.
EEG Analyses: Recording was continuous for the duration of the observation
period, except during interview periods. Needle electrodes and an 8 channel Medcraft
instrument were used. All records were analyzed for the degree of delta activity,3 the
of fast
relative
and
the
amount
time
and
frequency,
alpha
principal
cent
per
activity. The alpha and delta activity were measured in anterior temporal-vertex, and
parietal-ear lobe lead combinations.
Behavior Measures: Prior to drug administration an unstructured psychiatric historical interview and a structured questionnaire period12 were tape-recorded. Following drug administration, periods of recorded interview were alternated with EEG
recording periods, until the EEG had again manifested the preinjection pattern on
visual inspection.
Two estimates of behavioral effects were used: clinical descriptions by the particithe
drug
of
the
during
occurring
and
changes
interviewer
technician)
(subject,
pants
period, and analyses of the language of the recorded interviews. Changes in language
were evaluated by a syntactic analysis12 and an analysis of the variability in verbal
interaction in the dyad 1" “1' Both measures have been shown to be sensitive to alterations in behavior induced by changes in the central nervous system.
OBSERVATIONS

Clinical: Within two to ﬁve minutes after the start of the injection,
subjects manifested spontaneous coughing followed by dryness of the mouth
and thickness of speech. They reported feelings of lassitude and heaviness
and weakness of extremities, soon succeeded by increased restlessness and
difﬁculty in maintaing eyelid closure.
Reports of visual and haptic illusory sensations, feelings of unreality and
distance and delusional thoughts about their illness, the setting of the test
procedures or our identity were voiced spontaneously in 18 subjects in the
period between 15 and 60 minutes after drug administration. In three
instances, increasing agitation and panic led to a cessation of the recording.
In two subjects withdrawal and negativism were the prominent behavioral
had
and
transient
of
behavior
disappeared
Such
were
patterns
responses.
in one and one-half to four hours in all subjects.
*Diethazine is a soluble phenothiazine compound with pharmacologic properties
similar to those of atropine. In experimental animals, diethazine blocks the bradycardia, bronchospasm, salivation, fasciculation and seizures induced by acetylcholine,
di-isopropyl ﬂuorophosphate and pilocarpine. It suppresses salivation, and induces
mydriasis and hypotension.11
'j'Detailed analyses of these observations will be reported separately by Drs. J. J affe
and R. L. Kahn.

�186

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY

WWW

Wm mm
PRE-DRUG

LF-LO

RF-RO

0-0
RPT-RO

AFTER 225 mg.

WWW/«WNW

WWW
WW
50ﬂVl——
l

FIG. l.—-EHect

SEC.

of intravenous diethazine, pre-electroshock (male, age 27).

PRE-DRUG

0-0

1r I64l HH

AFTER I50 mg.

WW
5°)‘VL—
SEC.
I

FIG. 2.—Eﬁ'ect of

we

I725

HH

intravenous diethazine, pre-electroshock (female, age 57).

�187

EFFECT OF AN ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENT
PRE-DRUG

W
W
”W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
+

200 mg.

+ 25 min.

4-

70min.

“WWW-

50 )‘VI

I

SEC.

#l637

HH

3.—Eﬂect of intravenous diethazine after electroshock (note especially effect
on delta) .
FIG.

PRE-DRUG

+|HR

AFTER 250 mg.

W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
SGML...—
I

FIG. 4.——-Effect of

on delta) .

SEC.

+ 5 HRS.

WwL/M
*l249

HH

intravenous diethazine after electroshock (note especially effect

EEG Patterns: Alteration in the EEG patterns was concurrent with the
behavioral effects. In all records, changes occurred during drug administration and were sustained, with gradual diminution and restitution of the
preinjection patterns in one to ﬁve hours. The initial response was a decrease
in voltage and desynchronization of all frequencies. There was a decrease
in prominence of prevailing rhythms. In patients without delta activity (pre-

�188

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY

electroshock), desynchronization and voltage decrease were occasionally
accompanied by low voltage 5 to 7 cps activity, symmetric and prominent
in frontal and anterior temporal leads (FIGS. 1 and 2). The alpha frequency was not altered. The build-up in voltage and appearance Of slower
frequencies with hyperventilation were blocked.
In patients with varying degrees of high voltage delta activity there was
a prominent decrease in voltage and desynchronization of the record. Both
random and burst delta activity diminished or disappeared, and irregular
low voltage alpha and beta frequencies became prominent (FIGS. 3 and 4) .
The hyperventilation response was no longer apparent.
Language Patterns: In previous studies, an intimate relationship between
changes in syntactic language patterns and the behavioral response to electroshock had been reported.12 With alteration in brain function, increased
use Of third person, verbal denial, qualiﬁcation, displacement and clichés
became prominent. These effects could be enhanced by the administration
of intravenous amobarbital.“
In the subjects in the present study, syntactic analyses demonstrated a
reversal of the patterns noted in electroshock. Use of third person, qualiﬁcation and displacement decreased. Explicit verbal denial was modiﬁed and
replaced by minimization and displacement, or by a reiteration of complaints
of illness. In dyadic analyses, the verbal interaction was characterized by a
greater diversity Of vocabulary and less variability in the diversity scores for
25 word units.
The qualitative nature of these changes in the language patterns is Opposite
to that of amobarbital and electroshock. The duration of language changes
was concurrent with the changes in the electroencephalogram.
DISCUSSION

These Observations conﬁrm the report of Jenkner and Lechner of the
effects Of diethazine in “normal” subjects.10 Diethazine also alters electroshock-induced delta activity in a fashion similar to atropine and scopolamine,
as described by Ulett and Johnson,” with minimal unpleasant symptoms. The
effects of intravenous diethazine are immediate, both on the EEG and
behavior, and it is thus a useful experimental agent with “anticholinergic”
prOperties. Two aspects Of these experimental Observations warrant discussion: the role of acetylcholine-cholinesterase in the process of electroconvulsive therapy, and the signiﬁcance Of diethazine “alerting” for concepts
of hallucinogenic activity.
Biochemical Basis of the Convulsive Therapy Process: Bornstein,6 in a
classic experimental study of head trauma in cats, demonstrated that within
a few minutes after trauma free acetylcholine appeared in the spinal ﬂuid

�EFFECT OF AN ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENT

189

and persisted for periods up to 48 hours. He further demonstrated a positive
relation between the severity of head trauma and the quantity of free acetylcholine, degree of electroencephalographic alteration and the severity of
the behavioral changes. The electroencephalographic records initially
showed short periods of high voltage fast activity and a transient period
of ﬂattening of electrical activity, followed by prolonged periods of high
amplitude sharp waves in the delta frequencies. Concomitantly, alteration
in consciousness, changes in reﬂexes and post-traumatic seizures were most
prominent with highest concentrations of free acetylcholine and greatest
degree of EEG change.
Tower and McEachern7 conﬁrmed these observations in clinical studies.
In 112 neurologic patients, free acetylcholine was found in the cerebrospinal
ﬂuid only in patients following head trauma and recent grand mal seizures;
and the level of free acetylcholine varied directly with the degree of cerebral
damage. In addition, these authors assayed the cholinesterase activity of the
16
ﬂuid.“
spinal
They noted a sharp rise in nonspeciﬁc cholinesterase (benzoylcholine-splitting) and a drop in the speciﬁc cholinesterase (mecholylsplitting) activity of the spinal ﬂuid in patients following head trauma. No
such inversion was noted in ﬂuids containing free acetylcholine following
spontaneous seizures. Electroencephalograms were taken at varying intervals
following trauma, and demonstrated a direct correlation of the extent of
EEG abnormality and the appearance of free acetylcholine in the spinal ﬂuid.
Tower and McEachern also reported observations in six patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy. ’In patients after three to seven induced
convulsions, they noted free acetylcholine in the spinal ﬂuid in two, and an
increase in nonspeciﬁc cholinesterase with reversal of the cholinesterase
ratio in ﬁve of the six. They concluded that the spinal ﬂuid changes in
electroshock are more like those of craniocerebral trauma than those found
in epilepsy.* More recently, Sachs17 conﬁrmed the reports of free acetylcholine in the spinal ﬂuid after head trauma and after electroshock.
In his studies, Bornstein6 administered 0.5 to 1.0 mg./ Kg. atropine and
demonstrated a reversal or a blocking of the EEG effects, and a modiﬁcation
of the behavioral and neurologic signs. Atropine also blocked the EEG and
clinical signs induced by intracisternal acetylcholine.
Ward8 applied these observations to the treatment of human subjects
with varying degrees of head trauma. Subcutaneous doses of 0.1 mg./Kg.
of atropine induced both clinical improvement and reversal of EEG effects.
These observations were recently conﬁrmed by Sachs,17 Ruge,18 and
*Regarding the one patient of the six who failed to show either free acetylcholine
or a reversal of the cholinesterase ratio, they noted: “It is interesting that this patient
was the only one of the six to show no response to treatment.”

�190

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY

Hughes.19 Basing their study on these observations, Ulett and Johnson"
noted the effect of atropine and scopolamine in blocking the EEG changes
of electroshock therapy. Concurrently, Jenkner and Lechner10 reported
effects similar to those of Ward, in studies of diethazine in cases of head

injury.
Another group of investigations complete the available data. Studies of
anticholinesterases, such as DF P (di-isopropyl ﬂuorophosphate) and TEPP
(tetraethyl-pyrophosphate) , which block the enzymatic breakdown of acetylcholine, demonstrate the development of high amplitude rapid frequency
EEG patterns similar to status epilepticus as well as lesser degrees of abnormality as noted in post-traumatic states.”23 In these studies, atropine blocked
both the electroencephalographic and the clinical toxic effects.
Thus, both from experimental and clinical studies of craniocerebral
trauma we may assume that (a): the acetylcholine activity of the spinal
ﬂuid increases; (b) that pseudo-cholinesterase activity increases with a
reversal of the ratio of cholinesterases; (c) that EEG hypersynchrony and
slowing parallel these biochemical alterations; and (d) that anticholinergic
agents may block both the electroencephalographic and the clinical effects.
From the data available it is probable that the biochemical basis of convulsive
therapy is similar to that of craniocerebral trauma. Convulsive therapy
results in free acetylcholine in the spinal ﬂuid“ 17 and a reversal of cholinesterase ratios.“ 16 The electroencephalographic effects of repeated induced
convulsions is the development of high voltage, symmetric slow wave activity,
occasionally with spike activity,3' 24’ 25 which is similar to that observed in
severe head trauma.” 27 In previous studies we have reported the relationship between the degree of induced slow wave activity and behavioral
response.3 The studies reported here and that of Ulett and Johnson" demonstrate a reversal of the EEG and the behavioral effects of convulsive therapy
by anticholinergic compounds. In each characteristic, convulsive therapy is
thus similar to cerebral trauma. While the acetylcholine-cholinesterase system
is highlighted by these studies, other enzyme systems
may also be altered.17
These studies also suggest that convulsive therapy provides an excellent
experimental method for studies of craniocerebral trauma.
Studies of the brain stem-activating system by Jasper and DroogleverFortuyn28 and Lindsley et al.29 had laid the foundation for prevailing
conclusion that symmetric EEG slow wave activity has its origin in mesencephalic structures, and that these structures intimately affect the states of
“alerting” and “drowsiness.” More recently, Rinaldi and Himwich30’ 31
have related the site of action of atropine and cholinergic drugs to this
mesodiencephalic activating system. It is also probable that these structures
may be selectively affected by the process of convulsive therapy, and that

�EFFECT OF AN ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENT

191

both the clinical and electrographic effects may be intimately related to
changes in this system.
Diethazine “Alerting” and Hallucinogenic Activity: The behavioral effects
of diethazine provide information regarding another aspect of the convulsive
therapy process. In patients without prior convulsive therapy, illusory
phenomena and feelings of unreality were observed. These were similar to
the hallucinogenic effects of LSD32 and mescaline.33 Again, analogic data
about the clinical and EEG effects of these agents may provide some information about convulsive therapy.
In studies of mescaline, Wikler34 noted that the EEG demonstrated either
no change, intermittent or continuous low voltage fast activity or increase
in alpha frequency. Denber and Merlis35 noted a similar acceleration of
alpha frequency, decrease in per cent time alpha including its disappearance,
and nonspecific random beta activity. Delta activity did not occur. In patients
with delta activity induced by electroshock, Merlis and Hunter38 noted that
intravenous mescaline markedly diminished the amplitude and per cent
time delta activity with an increase in per cent time alpha activity.
The effects of LSD on the EEG are similar. Gastaut et a136 noted an
acceleration of alpha frequency of 0.5 to 4.0 cps with an accentuation of
beta rhythms. Rinkel et a1.37 conﬁrmed this observation and noted, in addition, a reduced responsiveness to hyperventilation.*
In summarizing his studies Wikler34 concluded that “ . . . regardless
of the drug administered, shifts in the pattern of electroencephalogram in
the direction of desynchronization occurred in association with anxiety,
hallucinations, fantasies, illusions or tremors, and in the direction of synchronization with euphoria, relaxation or drowsiness.” This generalization
provides a meaningful construct in which these agents may be assessed.
Agents that evoke EEG desynchronization tend to be hallucinogenic, and
mescaline and LSD are clear examples. Agents that synchronize frequencies,
such as barbiturate and meprobamate in the beta frequency range, and
chlorpromazine, promazine and perphenazine in the delta frequency
range89 tend to be sedatives, euphoriants and relaxants.
The observations on diethazine reported here are consistent with this
hypothesis. In patients without delta activity, the EEG demonstrated desynchronization of frequencies, and this was associated with clinical illusory
phenomena. In patients with delta activity desynchronization occurred, and
alerting and reversal of the Speech patterns induced by electroshock were
observed.

*Studies on the effects of LSD and such anticholinergic compounds as Win-2299,
benactyzine, and hallucinogenic piperidyl benzilates (JB-318, 336) demonstrated
marked diminution in per cent time and amplitudes of delta activity, associated with
behavioral changes similar to those seen with diethazine.“

�192

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY

Electroconvulsive therapy may also be understood in this framework.
We have previously noted a direct relationship between clinical evaluations
of improvement and the degree of EEG slowing induced by electroshock.3
Under these conditions, sedation and euphoria are most prominent and
hallucinatory activity diminished. In patients in whom hypersynchrony is
not induced, behavioral change is limited and ‘improvement’ does not
occur.‘1

Previously we concluded that the mode of action of convulsive therapies
is based on the induction of a state of altered cerebral function, in which
changes in adaptive interpersonal behavior occur, and are interpreted as
4’ 39
‘improvement’F"
The present studies amplify two aspects of this
neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis. The biochemical substrate of the
behavioral change is reﬂected by an alteration in the acetylcholine-cholinesterase relationships of the central nervous system. It is also probable that
EEG hypersynchrony provides the neurophysiologic basis of the milieu
change which is clinically manifest as sedation and euphoria and is evaluated
as ‘irnprovement.’
The neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis of convulsive therapy has
provided a meaningful basis for studies of other physiodynamic therapies.39
In this study, it has been possible to amplify our understanding of neurophysiologic aspects of hallucinogens as well.
SUMMARY

The effect of an anticholinergic agent, diethazine, on the EEG,
behavior and language patterns was observed in 40 psychiatric patients, at
various stages in the course of electroconvulsive treatment. Behavior: Increased restlessness and agitation, haptic and visual illusory sensations, and
delusional thoughts about their illness or examiner’s identity were observed.
EEG: Alteration in the EEG was concurrent with behavioral changes. There
was a decrease in voltage and desynchronization of all frequencies. In
patients with delta activity, the per cent time and voltage of delta activity
decreased. Language: Syntactic patterns described for convulsive therapy
were reversed. Use of third person, qualiﬁcation and displacement decreased.
In dyadic analyses, there was a decrease in the coefﬁcient of variation.
2. These observations are discussed in the framework of the neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis of the action of convulsive therapy; it is
concluded that: (a) the biochemical basis for convulsive therapy is similar
to that of craniocerebral trauma; (b) changes in acetylcholine-cholinesterase
metabolism are intimately related to the behavioral effects; and (c) EEG
desynchronization may be a physiologic concomitant of hallucinogenic
activity; and EEG hypersynchrony may be associated with euphoria and
1.

sedation.

�EFFECT OF AN ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENT

193

REFERENCES
.

Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Denial of Illness, Illness: Symbolic and
Physiologic Aspects, Springﬁeld, Ill., C. C. Thomas, 1955.
Roth, M., Kay, D. W. K., Shaw, J. and Green, J.: Prognosis and pentothalinduced electroencephalographic changes in electroconvulsive treatment.
EEG &amp; Clin. Neurophysiol. 9: 225-237, 1957.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of electroenecephalographic delta activity
to behavioral response in electroshock. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 78:
516—525, 1957.

Green, M. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Experimental studies of the electroshock, process. Dis. Nerv. Sys. 19: 113-118, 1958.
Ulett, G. A., Smith, K. and Gleser, G. C.: Evaluation of convulsive and subconvulsive shock therapies utilizing a control group. Am. J. Psychiat. 112:
795-802, 1956.
Bornstein, M.: Presence and action of acetylcholine in experimental brain
trauma. J. Neurophysiol. 9: 349-366, 1946.
Tower, D. B. and McEachern, D.: Acetylcholine and neuronal activity. Canad.
J. Research. 27: 105-131, 1949.
Ward, A.: Atropine in the treatment of closed head injury. J. Neurosurg. 7:
398-402, 1950.
Ulett, G. A. and Johnson, M. W.: Effect of atropine and scopolamine upon
electroencephalographic changes induced by electroconvulsive therapy. EEG
&amp; Clin. Neurophysiol. 9: 217-224, 1957.
Jenkner, F. L. and Lechner, H.: The effect of Diparcol on the electroencephalogram in the normal subject and in those with cerebral trauma. EEG &amp; Clin.
Neurophysiol. 7: 303-305, 1955.
Heymans, CL, Estable, J. J. and de Bonneveaux, S. 0.: Sur la pharmacologie
de la phenothiazinyl—ethyldiethylamine (2987 R. P.). Arch Int. Pharmacodyn.
79: 123-138, 1949.
Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M.: Changes in language during electroshock therapy.
In Hoch, P. and Zubin, J. Eds: Psychopathology of Communication. New
York, Grune &amp; Stratton, 1958, pp. 126—139.
J affe, J.: An objective study of communication in psychiatric interviews. J.
Hillside Hospital. 6: 207-215, 1957.
: Language of the dyad: A method of interaction analyses in psychiatric
interview. Psychiatry. 21: 249-258, 1958.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A. and Linn, L.: Diagnostic
use of amobarbital sodium in organic brain disease. Am. J. Psychiat. 112:
889-894, 1953.
Tower, D. B. and McEachern, D.: The content and characterization of Cholinesterases in human cerebrospinal ﬂuids. Canad. J. Research. 27: 132-145,
,

10.

11.

12.

13.
14.
15.

16.

1949.

17. Sachs, E.: Acetylcholine and serotonin in the spinal ﬂuid.

J. Neurosurg. 14:

22-27, 1957.
18. Ruge, D.: The use of cholinergic blocking agents in the treatment of craniocerebral injuries. J. Neurosurg. 11: 77-83, 1954.
19. Hughes, B.: The role of acetylcholine in head injury. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. and
Psychiat. 20: p. 70, 1957.
20. Freedman, A. M., Bales, P. D., Willis, A. and Himwich, H. E.: Experimental
production of electrical major convulsive patterns. Am. J. Physiol. 146: 117124, 1949.

�194

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY

21. Grob. D., Harvey, A. M., Langworthy, O. R. and Lilienthal, J. L.: The administration of di-isopropyl ﬂuorophosphate (DFP) to man. Bull. the Johns
Hopkins Hosp. 8]: 257-266, 1947.
22. Hampson, J. L., Essig, C. F ., McCauley, A. and Himwich, H. E.: Effects of diisopropyl ﬂuorophosphate (DF P) on electroencephalogram and cholinesterase
activity. EEG &amp; Clin. Neurophysiol. 2: 41-48, 1950.
23. Himwich, H. E., Essig, C. F., Hampson, J. L., Bales, P. D. and Friedman, A. M.:
Effect of trimethadione (tridone) and other drugs on convulsions caused
by di-isopropyl ﬂuorophosphate (DFP). Am. J. Psychiat. 106: 816-820, 1950.
24. Callaway, E.: Slow wave phenomena in intensive electroshock. EEG. &amp; Clin.
Neurophysiol. 2: 157-162, 1950.
25. Green, M.: Signiﬁcance of individual variability in EEG response to electroshock. J. Hillside Hosp. 6: 229-240, 1957.
26. Jasper, H. H., Kershman, J. and Elvidge, A.: Electroencephalographic studies
of injury to the head. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 44: 328-348, 1940.
27. Strauss, H., Ostow, M. and Greenstein, L.: Diagnostic Electroencephalography.
New York, Grune &amp; Stratton, 1952.
28. Jasper, H. H. and Drooglever-Fortuyn, J.: Experimental studies on the functional anatomy of petit mal epilepsy. Res. Publ. A. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 26:
272-298, 1947.
29. Lindsley, D., Schreiner, L. H., Knowles, W. B., and Magoun, H. W.: Behavioral and EEG changes following chronic brain stem lesion in the cat.
EEG &amp; Clin. Neurophysiol. 2: 483-498, 1950.
30. Rinaldi, F. and Himwich, H. E.: Alerting responses and actions of atropine
and cholinergic drugs. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 73: 387-395, 1953.
31. Himwich, H. and Rinaldi, F.: The effect of drugs on reticular system. In Brain
Mechanism and Drug Action. Springﬁeld, 111., C. C Thomas, 1957.
32. Stoll, W.: Lysergsaure—diethylamid, ein Phantastikum aus der Mutterkorngruppe. Schweiz Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 60: 1-47, 1947.
33. Beringer, K.: Der Meskalinrausch, Monog. Neurol. Psychiat. Berlin, Springer,
1927.
34. Wikler, A.: Clinical and electroencephalographic studies on the effects of mes35.
36.

37.
38.
39.

40.

caline, N-allylnormorphine and morphine in man. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 120:
157-175, 1954.
Denber, H. and Merlis, 8.: Studies on mescaline. I: Action in schizophrenic
patients. Psychiat. Quart. 29: 421-429, 1955.
Gastaut, H., Ferrer, S. and Castello, 0.: Action de la diethylamide de l’acide
d-lysergique (LSD 25) sur les fonctions psychiques at l’electroencephalogramme. Conf. Neurol. 13: 102-120, 1953.
Rinkel, M., DeShon, H. J., Hyde, R. W. and Solomon, H. 0.: Experimental
schizophrenia-like symptoms. Am. J. Psychiat. 108: 572-578, 1953.
Merlis, S. and Hunter, W.: Studies on mescaline. II: Electroencephalogram
in schizophrenics. Psychiat. Quart. 29: 430-432, 1955.
Fink, M.: A uniﬁed theory of the action of physiodynamic therapies. J. Hillside Hosp. 6: 197-206, 1957.
Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds on Post-convulsive EEG and
.
Behavior, EEG and Clin. Neurophysiol. 10: 776 (Abst.) 1958.

#3....”

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2584">
                <text>Effect of anticholinergic agent, diethazine, on EEG and behavior; significance for theory of convulsive therapy., In JH Masserman (ed.), Biological Psychiatry. Grune and Stratton, New York, 1959, 1:184194.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2585">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2586">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-29c-006</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2587">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2588">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2589">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2590">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2591">
                <text>Reprinted from Biological Psychiatry Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2592">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2593">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74461">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81022">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87583">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94144">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="260" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="51">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/b574305356446714449f347eaa71e515.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4bf163bfe85fee82b5e7d9be3ad5c243</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100677">
                    <text>Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process
MAX FINK, M.D., ROBERT L. KAHN,

In the last seven years, increasing study
by various authors“5 of the neurophysiologic alterations occurring in electroshock
has resulted in a re-assessment of the mode
of action of this form of therapy. The present neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesisly2
states that an induced change in brain function provides the milieu in which behavioral
changes can occur, depending upon the characterologic predisposition of the subject.
This report summarizes the data of three
groups of studies which have been completed
in the continuing evaluation of the electroshock process in this laboratory. These include:
The relation of changes in neurophysiolog‘ic indices to behavioral change;
2. Types of psychologic response expressed and
factors in the evaluation of “improvement;”
1.

3.

and
The role of personality in the behavioral response.

and Method:
The studies have been carried out in
groups of consecutive, unselected electroshock referrals. The subjects are voluntary
patients in an open ward psychiatric hospital. All patients are treated by resident psychiatrists, who make the referral to the elec—
troshock therapy unit. The duration and
type of therapy, however, are determined by
the supervising psychiatrists in charge of
the treatment unit. Patients varied in age
from 20 to 66, and have been diagnosed as
suffering from depressive and schiz0phrenic
I. Subjects

illnesses.
(a) Tests of Brain Function: Two indices
of cerebral function have been stressed:
Quantitative measures of the degree of induced delta activity in the electroencephalogram,6 and changes in orientation and aware—
ness of illness after amobarbital sodium.7
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
Aided, in part, by grant M-927, National Institute
of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health,
U.S. Public Health Service.
Read at the Twelfth Annual Convention, Society
of Biological Psychiatry, Atlantic City, N. J ., June,
1957.

PH.D., and MARTIN A. GREEN, M.D.
1) EEG: Electroencephalograms were done
weekly prior to treatment, and on a day following a treatment. Bipolar recording was
used, and selected leads were measured fOr
the degree of delta activity. The average

percent time delta for each of these selected
leads, the highest delta index in any one lead,
the highest amplitude and slowest frequency
of delta, and, the longest duration of bursts
were the measures utilized in the classiﬁcation of the recOrds into “high degree]? "‘mod—
erate degree” and “low degree delta activity.”6

Amobarbital Test: This is a structured
interview, in which the patient is asked a
standard set of questions pertaining to ori—
entation and awareness of illness. Amobarbital is then administered intravenously, in
a concentration based upon body weight, at
a rate of 1 cc to every 40 seconds, until
nystagmus and slurred speech are induced.
In the initial series, a 5% solution of amobarbital was administered at the rate of 1 cc
per minute. Recently, to permit simultaneous estimates of the sedation threshold} the
procedure was modiﬁed to allow for weight
differences of subjects. The same questions
are repeated, and persistent changes in orientation, denial of illness, confabulation,
and reduplication are called “positive” and
are indicative of states of altered cerebral
function.7 Tests were carried out before electroshock, and at weekly intervals during
elestroshock on the day following treatment.
(b) Evaluation of Behavior: In addition
to the notes of the patient’s therapist and
supervising psychiatrist, all patients were
seen by the research psychiatrist at weekly
intervals during treatment and 2-4 weeks
after the last treatment. Evaluation of
changes in behavior induced by electroshock
were based on these descriptions. Ratings of
improvement 'Were based on the behavioral
response two to three weeks after the last
treatment, and reﬂect a short term clinical
rating. The patients were divided into three
groups: much improved, moderately improved and unimproved, based on criteria
2)_

described.2

Reprinted from Diseases of the Nervous System, Vol. XIX, No. 3, March 1958.

�(0) Evaluation of Personality .' The initial
method of personality assessment employed
has been a structured family interview. In

their original observations, Weinstein and
Kahn described the characteristics of the

maintenance of high degree delta activity
and short term clinical ratings.6 Of the pa—
tients who were rated much improved, 90%
had high degree delta EEG records in the
3rd and 4th weeks of treatment, While of the
unimproved patients, only 20% had such
records. The relationship between delta activity and clinical ratings is seen in Figure 1.

“explicit verbal denial personality.”9 To determine the signiﬁcance of this personality
type for behavioral response, a structured
questionnaire was developed. In interviews OO
.— MUCH IMPROVED (u)
with two members of the family, the patient’s usual attitudes and interests in 15 90 .-—— moo. IMPROVENG)
UNIMPROVEDW)
.-.—
characEach
speciﬁc areas were explored.
80
teristic was rated as being absent, moderately present or markedly present. Scores 7O
of 0, 1 and 2, respectively, were assigned, '60
and added—the resulting score being termed
50
the “denial personality score.”1°
(d) Treatment: Electroshock was admin- 4o
istered on a schedule of three treatments 3.
30
12
week. A minimum of
treatments was
given, except in a few cases where a. severe 20
confusional state appeared earlier. The
course of treatment was determined by the
supervising psychiatrist in charge of the
lO-lZ
electroshock unit, based upon clinical criteria. Treatments were grand mal, using either a Medcraft alternating current instruobservations
In
these
series,
subsequent
ment or a Reiter C-47 electrostimulator. Pain
Based
extended
predictive
were
study.
a
tients were generally premedicated with inthe
earlier
it
on
was suggested
observations,
travenous Pentothal prior to the treatment.
those
the
much
that
were
improved
patients
In the past year, a subconvulsive therapy
been
in
had
whom
delta
high
activity
degree
group was instituted. Randomly selected induced
in
and
the
of
treatment
course
early
electroshock referrals received 12-42 suband
Records
second
sustained.
the
during
convulsive treatments, under Pentothal preweeks
of
third
treatment, therefore, were
medication. These patients were subjected
in
54
consecutive
The
results
assessed.
pato the same test procedures and the same bein
Table
Of
I.
the
noted
tients
patients
are
therevaluations
mal
havioral
as the grand
delta
who
degree
developed
activity
high
makthe
Neither
psychiatrist
apy subjects.
weeks
of
third
second
the
and
treatduring
ing the evaluation, the patient’s therapist,
while
much
rated
67%
improved,
were
ment,
nor the patient was cognizant of which pawithout
the
such
of
30%
aconly
patients
tients received which form of therapy. The
rated.
so
were
tivity
data for this series of patients is now being
evaluated, and reference will be made only
TABLE I
to the general observations.
Patients With High Delta Activity During
II. Observations:
Second, Third Weeks of Treatment
RATING
CLINICAL
in
Cerebral
Role
Function
of Altered
(a)
'8
&gt;.
Behavior:
i’
75w:
a:

Electroencephalogram:
In these studies, we have emphasized the
degree of delta activity. In the initial series of patients a direct relationship was
noted between the early development and

a

1.

.c:

EEG Delta

Both High (18)
One High (16)
None High (20)

S

E

to.

E

5

8

a

5
12 (67%)
4 (25%)
6 (30%)

a; 8

’5‘

Q

sE

(22%)
8 (50%)
7 (35%)

4

a

D

2
4
7

(11%)
(25%)
(35%)

.

�Amobarbital Test
In the initial series of 24 patients, ‘previ:
ously reported,‘-’ eleven patients were rated
as much improved,,andall had positive aniobarbital test reactions after 7 to 9 treatments
and sustained this response. Of the unimproved patients, 15% had positive amobarbital responses in the third week and 28%
in the fourth week, but these were not Sustained.
A comparison of both the EEG observations and the amobarbital test data, as related to the eventual clinical rating is seen
in Table II. In 77 patients tested to date,
observations during the second and third
weeks of treatment were examined for the
presence of high degree delta activity and
positive amobarbital test results. Of the
much improved patients, 75% had both positive amobarbital tests and high EEG delta
activity during this period. Of the unimproved patients, however, 57% had neither
positive amobarbital tests nor high EEG
delta activity. It is apparent that the cluster of positive amobarbital tests, high EEG
delta activity and much improved clinical
ratings is a signiﬁcant one; and equally signiﬁcant is the cluster of negative amobarbital tests, low and moderate EEG delta activity and clinical rating of unimproved.
TABLE II
EEG and Amobarbital Test Results During
Second, Third Weeks of Treatmenﬁt
2.

:,

.c:

8

2

8

Total .................................................... 33
.01

E

3 8

E

e s
E

Both Positive Amobarbital and High
EEG Delta Activity ........................ 25
Either Positive Amobarbital or High
EEG Delta Activity .......................... 8
Neither Positive Amobarbital nor
High EEG Delta Activity .............. O

*Significant at better than

2
2

Q

E

sD

10

3

12

5

3

11

25

19

level of confidence.

(b) Clinical Patterns of Behavior:
In these patients, we have observed varied responses to electroshock including the
absence of noticeable symptoms with a return of pre-morbid behavior; hypomania, euphoria, and denial; paranoid states with

ideas of reference and delusional formation;
confusional states with varying degrees of
memory disturbance; increased somatic com.plaints and pre-occupations, states of in—
creased panic, excitement and agitation and
varying degrees of withdrawal, and seclusiveness. The degree of’behavioral change
is seen to be related to the degree of alter'a}
tion in the neurophysiologic indices. During
electroshock, with the gradual induction of
states of altered brain function, and their
restitution in the weeks following cessation
of therapy, behavior shows characteristic
patterns. The following are but a few of the
gross patterns that are observed during the
period of increasing and waning states of
altered brain function.
An early change in behavior in retarded
subjects, for example, may be a change in
the degree of participation in ward activities and increased neatness and interest in
personal care. This is succeeded by a phase
of minimizing symptoms and displacement
of complaints, mild euphoria, denial of illness, and insistence upon going home. At
this time, the EEG shows the greatest degree of delta activity and amobarbital tests
are positive. With the cessation of treatment, the overactivity diminishes, and interest in the future becomes prominent. Premorbid patterns of behavior are in evidence,
and the EEG returns to normal and the amobarbital test becomes negative.
Other depressed subjects, however, become increasingly disturbed during treatment, withdraw from participation in hospital activities, and complain increasingly of
memory loss, physical distress and insomnia. Amobarbital tests and electroencephalograms may show the same degree of
change as in the ﬁrst group. With cessation of treatment, there is either a return
to the depressed state, or a persistent emphasis on the memory loss and physical
complaints of the treatment.
Another pattern, seen in hostile, negativistic and withdrawn patients, is the development of hyperactive, hypomanic, and impulsive behavior. Memory loss is marked,
and clinical disorientation and confusion
may be noted at the height of neurophysiologic change. After treatment is ended, ideas
of reference, negativism and delusional for.3

�mation become prominent, to be followed by
withdrawal and mutism.
(c) Eﬁect of Subconvulsive Therapy:
The interdependence of these adaptive
patterns with the state of altered brain function is more clearly demonstrated by obser—
vations in the subconvulsive group. TWentyseven subjects received subconvulsive therapy instead of grand mal. Minimal changes
in the electroencephalogram and in amobarbital tests were induced, and the changes in
clinical behavior were limited. The electroencephalograms demonstrated either no delta
or a minimal amount of such activity. In no
patient were moderate or high degree delta
activity records observed. In the amobarbital tests, only three patients had positive
tests during treatment, and in each instance
it occurred only once. No change in symptoms or behavior was noted in twenty—three.
Nineteen were referred for a second course
of treatment. Grand mal electroshock in—
duced changes in brain function of high de—
gree delta activity and/or repeated positive
amobarbital tests in fourteen of these. All
fourteen showed signiﬁcant changes in behavior; While of the ﬁve patients in whom
the physiologic indices showed only minor
changes, only two patients showed a deﬁnite
behavioral change.
(d) Role of Personality in the Adaptive Respouse:
Another variable in the adaptive response
of the patients is the personality—the habitual attitudes, patterns of perception and behavior and defenses of the patient. The
initial study of the role of personality related the characterological disposition of patients showing denial mechanisms to the
clinical result. The relatives of 47 patients
were interviewed, and denial personality
scores assessed. Scores ranged from 0 to 25,
with a median of 11. The scores were divided into two groups: scores from 11 to 25
were classed as the “high denial group” and
those from 0-10 as the “low denial group.”
Of the patients with high denial personality scores (Table III), 58% were in the
much improved group, and only one patient
(4%) was in the unimproved group. The
ratings of improvement for the patients with
low denial personality scores were random—'4

about one third appearing in each rating
category.
TABLE III
Relation of Denial Personality Scores to
Clinical Response to Electroshock
Personality

Score
11-25

0-10

Total

Much

Improved
14

Moderately Unimproved
Improved

7

9
9

1
7

21

18

8

Total
24
23
47

The difference in the denial scores between
the much or the moderately improved patients, when compared to the unimproved
patients, is statistically signiﬁcant.
That the personality ratings were indeed
reﬂective of the patients’ adaptive response
under the conditions of altered brain function is noted in the correlation of these
scores with actual changes in language patterns which had been described11 as indicative of denial responses. As in that study,
changes in language in structured interviews
with the patient were studied. Each patient
was classiﬁed according to whether he
showed three or more explicit language
changes. The group of patients With high
denial personality scores showed a signiﬁcantly greater number of language changes
than patients with low personality scores.
The coefﬁcient of correlation is +.71, which
is signiﬁcant at better than the 1% level of
conﬁdence.

Discussion:
These studies of the neurophysiologic and
psychologic aspects of electroshock support
and amplify the hypothesis of electroshock
action initially expressed by Weinstein, Linn
and Kahn,1 and again by Kahn, Fink and
Weinstein,2 and the observations of Roth,3
Aird,4 and Ulett.5av Alteration in brain function is the central effect of electroshock
therapy, and is a pre-requisite to behavioral
change. We have emphasized delta activity
in the electroencephalogram and the patterns of disorientation, confabulation, and
denial of illness after amobarbital as indices
of altered brain function. Other measures,
applied in the same serial fashion, will, we
believe, demonstrate the same relation to
changes in behavior or alteration in brain
function.
Under the conditions of the induced
111.

‘0

�change in brain function, altered patterns of
adaptation are expressed.» The type of adaptation varies, apparently dependent upon the
personality organization. In these studies
we have noted the relationship of an “explicit verbal denial” personality type with
the development and maintenance of clinical language patterns of denial, displacement, and minimization in structured interviews.11 We have observed that patients
with high denial scores are those who are
more likely to be evaluated as “much improved” (Table III). The type of adaptation
is varied, however, as we have described
here. In this context, therefore, the conclusion is afﬁrmed that electroshock is a means
of inducing change in cerebral function in
which altered patterns of adaptive-interpersonal behavior can be sustained.
We have emphasized “change in behavior”
in this report. In previous studies, we related our observation to “improvement.”
“Improvement” is a derivative evaluation of
the induced behavioral change, which is dependent upon the expectations of the therapist, the family, or the administrator, in the
milieu in which the behavior is observed.
When a depressed patient, who had been
withdrawn, crying, and had expressed suicidal thoughts, no longer is seclusive, and is
jovial, friendly and euphoric, denies his prob—
lems and sees his previous thoughts of suicide as “silly,” a rating of “much improved”
is made. To the extent that a schizophrenic
patient is perceived as less delusional, less
excited, and less Withdrawn, he is rated as
“improved.” When, however, the induced behavior is one of increased anxiety and fear—
fulness, or persistent complaints about memory loss, pain or other physical symptoms, or
excitement and delusional thoughts, a rating
of “unimproved” will be made.
These studies amplify the present neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis of electroshock action. Further studies, deﬁning the
signiﬁcant aspects of personality and of the
expectations of the environment on the patterns of behavior which are observed under
the condition of altered brain function are
suggested. Application of this hypothesis
to the effect of newer tranquilizing agents is
in progress. Finally, studies of individual
differences in the neurophysiologic response

to equivalent amounts of cerebral trauma
warrants exploration.
IV. Summary and Conclusions:
1. This report summarizes continuing experimental studies of the mode of action of
electroshock therapy.
2. Behavioral change in electroshock is
dependent upon an alteration in brain function as evidenced by serial changes in delta
activity in the electroencephalogram and disorientation and confabulation with intravenous amobarbital.
3. The pattern of behavioral alteration is
shown to vary markedly, depending upon the
degree of induced cerebral dysfunction, the
personality of the subject and the environmental situation.
4. “Improvement” ratings are seen as a
special case of behavioral change dependent
upon the type of adaptation elicited, the expectation of the therapist, administrator and
family, and the tolerance of the milieu.
5. The extension of this neurophysiologicadaptive hypothesis of electroshock action
to other forms of somatic therapies is suggested.
1.

REFERENCES
Weinstein, E. A., Linn, L., and Kahn, R. L.:
Psychosis During Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy. Am. J.

Psychiat, 109:

22-26, 1952.
2. Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.: Re-

lation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock. Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 76: 23-29, 1956.
3. Roth, M.: Changes in the EEG Under Barbiturate Anesthesia Produced by Electro—Convulsive
Treatment and Their Signiﬁcance for the Theory of EST Action. EEG 01m. Neurophysiol., 3:

261-280, 1951.
4. Aird, R. N., Strait, L. A., Pace, J. W., Hernoff,
M. K., and Bowditch, S. C.: Neurophysiologic
Effects of Electrically Induced Convulsions.
Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat, 75: 371-378, 1956.
5 a. Ulett, G. A., Smith, K., and Glesser, G. C.:

Evaluation of Convulsive and Subconvulsive
Shock Therapies Utilizing a Control Group. Am.
J. Psychiat, 112: 795-802, 1956.
5 b. Ulett, G. A., Glesser, G. C., Caldwell, B. M.,
and Smith, K.: The Use of Matched Groups in
the Evaluation of Convulsive and Subconvulsive
Photoshock. Bull. Merm. Olin, 18: 138-146, 1954.
6 a. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity Following Electroshock. EEG Olin. Neurophysiol., 8: 158 (Abst.)
1956.

�6’ b.

.

.

Relation of EEG Delta Activity
to Behavioral Response in Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies. Arch. Neurol. and P31chiat, 78: 516-525, 1957.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A.,
and Linn, L.: Diagnostic Use of Amobarbital
Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Organic Brain
Disease. Am. J. Psychiat, 112: 889-894, 1953.
Shagass, C.: The Sedation Threshold. A Method
for Estimating Tension in Psychiatric Patients.
EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 6: 221-233, 1954.
:

.

Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Personality
Factors in Denial of Illness. Arch. Neurol.» and

Psychiat, 69: 355-367,

1953.

.

Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Personality Factors
in Behavioral Response to Electroshock. Therapy. Conf. Neural. (In Press.)
11. Kahn, ;R. L., "and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy in Psycho~
pathology of Communication (Hoch, P., and
Zubin, J ., Eds.). Grune and Stratton, N. Y., 1957.
(In press.)
10.

_

��.thv-

AyiAuu. .gypZZILu

Experimental Studies of the Electrcshock Process

Max

Fink,

14.13.,

Robert L. Kahn, 31.1).

and Martin A. Green, M.D.

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside HOSpital, Glen

Oaks, N.Yo

of Mental Health,
part, by grant M—927, National Institute
Service.
Health
Public
U.S.
of
Health,
National Institutes

Aided, in

Twelfth Annual Convention, Society of Biological Psychiatry,
Atlantic City, N.J., June, 1957.
Read

Vo

at the

6‘27-S7

�-2Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process

In the

last

seven years, increasing study by various authors

(1-5) of the neurophysiologic alterations occurring in electroshock has re-

sulted in a re-assessment of the
The

mode

of action of

this

fcnm of

therapy.

present neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis (1,2) states that an

induced change in brain function provides the milieu in which behavioral
changes can occur, depending upon the characterologic predisposition of the

subject.
This report summarizes the data of three groups of studies which
have been completed

in this laboratory.

in the continuing evaluation of the electroshock process
These

include:

relation of changes in neurophysiologic indices in
behavioral change;

1) The

2) types of psychologic response expressed and
evaluation of "improvement;" and
3) the role of personality

factors in the

in the behavioral response.

�II.

-3“
Subjects and Method:

studies have been carried out in groups of consecutive, unselected

The

electroshock referrals.
ward

subjects are voluntary patients in an

The

open

psychiatric hospital. All patients are treated. by resident psychiatrists,

who make

the referral to the electroshock therapy unit.

type of therapy, however, are determined by the supervising

unit. Patients varied in age from

charge of the treatment
have been diagnosed as

sufferina from depressive

(a) Tests of Brain Function:
have been

Two

duration and

The

psychiatrist in
20 to 66, and

and schizophrenic

illnesses.

indices of the cerebral function

stressed: Quantitative measures of the degree of induced delta

activity in the electroencephalogram,(6) and changes in orientation
awareness of illness after amobarbital sodium (7).
1) Egg: Electroencephalograms were done.weekly

ment, and on a day following a treatment.

selected leads

were measured

and

prior to treat-

Bipolar recording

was

for the degree of delta activity.

used, and
The average

percent time delta for each of these selected leads, the highest delta
index in any one lead, the highest amplitude and Slowest frequency of delta,
and the

longest duration

of

bursts

were the measares

utilized in the class-

ification of the records into "high degree," "moderate degree"

and "low

degree delta activity" (7).
2) Amobarbital Test: This

the patient

is

and awareness

asked a standard set of questions pertaining to orientation

of illness. Amobarbital is then administered intravenously,

in a concentration based
seconds,%

is a structured interview, in which

upon body weight,

until nystagmus

and

at

a

rate of

1 cc

slurred speech are induced.

to every

ho

The same

1"“.%

In the initial series, a 5% solution of amobarbital was administered at
the rate of 1 cc per minute. Recently, to permit simultaneous estimates
of the sedation threshold (8), the procedure was modified to allow for

weight differences of subjects.

�~12.-

questions are repeated, and persistent changes in orientation, denial of

illness, confabulation, and reduplication are called "positive" and are
indicative of states of altered cerebral ftnction (7). Tests were carried
at weekly intervals during.electroshock

out before electrodiock, and
day

on a

after a treatment.
(b) Evaluation of Behavior:

In addition to the notes of the patient's

therapist and supervising psychiatrist, all patients were seen by the research psychiatrist at weekly intervals during treatment and Z-h weeks after
the last treatment. Evaluation of changes in behavior induced by electroshock were based on these
on

descriptions. Ratings of

the behavioral response

reflect

a short term

groups:

much improved,

described

(

two

to three

clinical rating.

weeks
The

improvement were based

after the last treatment,

patients

were divided

and

into three

moderately improved and unimproved, based on

criteria

).

(c) Evaluation of Personality:

The

initial

method of

personality

assessnent employed has been a structured family interview. In their orig-

inal observations, Weinstein and

Kahn

described the characteristics of the

"explicit verbal denial personality" (9).

To determine

the significance of

this personality type for behavioral reSponse, a structured questionnaire
was

developed. In interviews with two members of the family, the patient’s

usual attitudes and interests in 15 Specific areas were explored. Each

characteristic was rated as being absent, moderately present or markedly
present. Scores of 0,

l and

2, reapectively, were assigned, and added

-

the resulting score being termed the "denial personality score" (10).
(d) Treatment: Electroshock was administered on a schedule of three

treatments a week.

A

minimum

of

12

treatments was given, except in a few

�cases where a severe confusional state appeared
ment was determined by

earlier.

The

course of

treat-

the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the electro-

unit, based upon clinical criteria. Treatments were grandznal, using
either a Medcraft alternating current instrument or a Reiter C-h? electro-

shock

stimulator. Patients

were

generally premedicated with.intravenous pentothal

prior to the treatment.
In the past year, a subconvulsive therapy group was instituted.
Randemxy selected electroshock referrals received 12-h2 subconvulsive treatthe
ments, under pentothal premedication. These patients were subjected to
same

test procedures

and

the

same behavioral evaluations as the grand mal

therapy subjects. Neither the psychiatrist making the evaluation, the
patient's therapist, nor the patient was cognizant of which patients received which.form of therapy.

The

data for this series of‘patients

being evaluated, and reference will be

made only

is

now

to the general observations.

�III.

Observations:
A. Role of Altered Cerebral Function

in Behavior:

1. Electroencephalogram:
In these studies,

we have emphasized

the degree of delta

activity. In the initial series of patients a direct relationship was noted
between the early development and maintenance of high degree delta activity
much
and short term clinical ratings (6). or the patients who were rated
weeks of
improved, 90$ had high degree delta EEG records in the 3rd and hth
treatment, while of the unimproved patients, only

relationship between delta activity

and

20%

had such records. The

clinical ratings is seen in Figure

1.

In subsequent series, these observations were extended in a predictive
much
study. Based on the earlier Observations, it was suggested that the
improved

patients

were those

in

high degree

whom

delta activity had been

in the course of treatment and sustained. Records during the
ant third weeks of treatment, therefore, were assessed. The results

induced early
second

in

Sh

consecutive patients are noted in Table 1.

veloped high degree delta
ment,
such

67%

rated

were

activity were

activity during the second

much improved,

so

while only

EEG

High Delta

and

who

de-

third weeks of treat-

of the patients without

I

Activity During Second, Third‘weeks of Treatment.
Clinical Rating

Much Imgroved

Delta

30%

the patients

rated.
TABLE

Patients with

Of

Mbderately'lrunnved

Unimproved
(11%)

Both High (18)

12

(67%)

h

(22%)

2

(16)

u

(25%)

8

(50%)

h (25%

None High (20)

6

(30%)

7

(35%)

7

One

High

(35%)

�a7;
2. AmObarbital Test:
In the

of 2h patients, preViouSly reported (2),

initial series

eleven patients were rated as

testreactions after

7

to

much improved, and

all

9 treatments and sustained

had positive amObarbital

this response. 0f the

positive amobarbital reaponses in the third week
and 28% in the fourth week, but these were not sustained.
A comparison of'both the EEG Observations and the amobarbital
test data, as related to the eventual clinical rating is seen in Table II.

unimproved

In

77

patients,

15%

had

patients tested to date, observations during the second

weeks of treatment were examined

activity
75%

and

had both

and

third

for the presence of high degree delta

positive amobarbital

test results.

positive amobarbital tests

Of the much improved

and high EEG

patients,

delta activity during

patients, however, 57% had neither positive
amobarbital tests nor high EEG delta activity. It is apparent that the
cluster of positive amobarbital tests, high EEG delta activity and much improved clinical ratings is a significant one; and equally significant is

this period.

Of the unimproved

the cluster of negative amobarbital

activity

and

tests,

low and moderate EEG

clinical rating of unimproved.

delta

�9
..—--

m

TABLE

EEG

II

and Amobarbital Test Results During Second, Third Weeks of Treatment.*
Much

Mbderately Improved gnimprovsd

Improved

Both Pbsitive Amobarbital
and High EEG Delta Activity

25

10

3

Either Positive Amcbarbital
or High EEG Delta Activity

8

12

5

_£L_

L
(25)

Neither Positive Amdbarbital
nor High EEG Delta Activity

(33)

(Total)
B.

1.1

(19)

Clinical Patterns of Behavior:

In these patients,

we have observed

including the absence of noticeable

varied responses to electroshock

symptoms

with a return of yrs-morbid

behavior; hypomania, euphoria, and denial; paranoid states with ideas of
reference and delusional formation; confusional states with varying degrees
of memory disturbance; increased somatic complaints and preoccupations,
states of increased panic, excitement and agitation and varying degrees of

withdrawal, and seclusiveness.

The degree

of behavioral change

is

seen to

alteration in the neurophysiologic indices.
brain
During electroshock, with the gradual induction of states of altered
function, and their restitution in the weeks following cessation of therapy,

be related to the degree of

behavior

Shows

characteristic patterns.

The

following are but a few of the

are observed during the period of increasing and waning
gross patterns that

states of altered brain.function.
Anearly change in behavior in retarded subjects, for example,
rO-‘ﬁ’lt.

* Significant

at hotter than

.01 level of confidence.

x»,-~-n---.'

~rmw-n.

may

it...“

�be a change in the degree of

neatness and

participation in

interest in personal care.

This

ward

is

activities and increased

succeeded by a phase of

minimizing symptoms and displacement of complaints, mild euphoria, denial

this time, the EEG shows
the greatest degree of delta activity and amobarbital tests are positive.
With the cessation of treatment, the overactivity diminishes, and interest
of

illness,

and

in the future

insistence

upon going home.

becomes prominent. Pre-morbid

evidence, and the

EEG

returns to normal

At

patterns of behavior are in

and the amdbarbital

test

becomes

negative.
Other depressed subjects, however, become increasingly disturbed
and
during treatment, withdraw from.participation in heapital activities,
Amocomplain increasingly oi memory loss, physical distress and insomnia.

barbital tests and electroencephalograms may show the same degree of change
as in the first group. with cessation of treatment, there is either a return
to the depressed state, or a persistent emphasis
physical complaints of the treatment.
Another pattern, seen

is the
loss

is

on

the

memory

loss

and

in hostile, negativistic and withdrawn patients,

development of hyperactive, hypomanic, and impulsive behavior. Memory
marked, and clinical disorientation and confusion may be noted at

thelieight o£1neurophysiologic change. After treatment is ended, ideas of
reference, negativism and delusional formation become prominent, to

be

followed by withdrawal and mutism.
C.

Effect of Subconvulsive Therapy:

interdependence of these adaptive patterns with the state of
altered brain function is more clearly demonstrated by observations in
the subconvulsive group. Twenty-seven subjects received subconvulsive
The

�~10;

electroencephalogram
therapy instead of grand mal. Minimal changes in the
behavior
and in smobarbital tests were induced, and the changes in clinical
limited. The electroencephalograms demonstrated either no delta or

were

a minimal amount of such

activity. In

patient

no

were moderate or high

activity records observed. In the amobarbital tests, only
each instance
three patients had positive tests during, treatment, and in
it occurred only once . No change in symptoms or behavior was noted in

degree delta

treatment.
twenty-times. Nineteen were referred for a second course of
degree
Grand mal electroshock induced changes in brain function of high

delta activity and/or repeated positive amobarbital tests in fourteen of
while of the
these. All fourteen showed significant changes in behavior;
five patients in whom the physiologic indices showed only minor changes,
only two patients showed a

definite behavioral change.

of Personalitywin the Adaptiverg‘e‘spggg:
the
Another variable in the adaptive response of the patient is
and behavior
- the habitual attitudes, patterns of perception

1). Role

personalitw

and defenses of the

patient.

The

initial

study of the role of personality

related the characterological disposition of patients
mechanisms

to the clinical result.

The

showing

denial

relatives of h? patients were inter-

Scores ranged from
viewed, and denial, personality scores assessed.

O

to 25,

scores were divided into two groups: scores from
and those from O - 10 as
11 to 25 were classes as the "high denial group"

with a median of 11.
the “low denial

The

gar-mp."

0f the ,.latients with high denial personality scores (Table
58%;

were in the much improved group,

and.

only one patient

(1%) was

III),
in

�911-

the unimproved group.

The

ratings of

for the patients with
- about one third appearing in

improvement

low denial personality scores were random
i

each

rating category.

lean;

Relation of Denial Personality Scores to Clinical Response to Electroshock
Much

Improved

Moderately
Improved

Unimpmved

Total

M9&amp;1}EI., §9ar£
11

—

25

1h

9

1

2h

0

-

10

7

9

7

23

21

18

8

h?

Total
The

difference in the denial scores between the

improved patients, when compared to the unimproved

much

or the moderately

patients, is statistically

significant.
That the personality ratings were indeed

reflective of the patients'

adaptive reaponse under the conditions of altered. brain function

is

noted.

in the correlation of these scores with actual changes in language patterns
which had *een described (11) as indicative of denial responses. As in

that study, changes in language in structured interviews with the patient
were studied. Each patient was classified according to whether or not he
shone 6. three or more explicit language changes . The group of patients
with high denial personality scores showed a significantly greater number
of language changes than patients with low personality scores. The co-

efficient of correlation is +.7l, which is significant at better than the
1% level of confidence.

�IV. Discussign:
These

studies of the neurophysiologic

and psychologic aspects of

electroshock support and amplify the hypothesis of electroshock action
initially expressed by Weinstein, Linn and Kahn (l) , and again by Kahn,

(3), Aird (’4), and
Ulett (5a, b). Alteration in brain function is the central effect of
electroshock therapy, and is a pre-requisite to behavioral change. He
have emphasized delta activity in the electroencephalogram and the patterns
of disorientation, confabulation, and denial of illness after amobarbital
Fink and 'E-i‘einstein

(2),

and

the observations of

Roth

as indices of altered brain function. Other measures, applied in the

serial fashion, will, we believe, demonstrate the
in behavior or alteration in brain function.
Under the conditions of the induced change

same

same

relation to changes

in brain function,

The type of adaptation
altered patterns of adaptation are expressed.
these
varies, apparently dependent upon the personality organization. In
studies we have noted the relationship of an "explicit verbal denial"

personality type with the development

and maintenance of

clinical language

patterns of denial, displacement, and minimization in structured interviews (11) . We have observed that patients with high denial scores are
those

are more likely to

who

The type

of adaptation

be

evaluated as

is varied,

"much improved" (Table

III).

however, as we have described here.

In

this context, therefore, the conclusion is affirmed that electroshock is

a

in cerebral function in which altered patterns of
adaptive-interpersonal behavior can be sustained.

means of inducing: change

We

have emphasized " change in behavior"

vious studies,

we

in this report. In pre-

related our observation to "improvement."

"Improvement"

�:13-

derivitive evaluation of the induced behavioral change, which is dependend upon the expectations of the therapist, the family, or the administrator,
in the milieu in which the behavior is observed. When a depressed patient,

is

a

who had been withdrawn,

is seclusive,

and

crying, and had expressed suicidal thoughts, no longer

is jovial,

frienc‘ly and euphoric, denies his problems and

sees his previous thoughts of suicide as

is

made.

To

"silly,"

a rating of "Inuch improved"

the extent that a schizophrenic patient

delusional, less excited, and less
however, the induced behavior

one

is

perceived as less

rated as "improved."

When,

of increased anxiety and fearmlness, or

loss, pain or other physical symptoms, or
delusional thoughts, a rating of "unimproved" will be made.

persistent complaints about
excitement and

is

t-Iithdrawn, he

is

memory

studies amplify the present neumphysiologic-adaptive hypothesis
of electroshock action. Further studies, defining the significant aspects of
personality and of the expectations of the environment on the patterns of
These

behavior which are observed under the condition of altered brain function are
suggested. Application of this hypothesis to the effect of newer tranquillizing
agents is in progress. Finally, studies of individual differences in the
neurophysiologic response to equivalent amounts of cerebral trauma warrants

exploration.

�V. gunnery and. Conclusions:

1. This report sumarizes continuing esperimental studies of the
mode

of action of electroshock therapy.

2. Behavioral change in electroshock is dependent

upon an

altera-

tion in brain function as evidenced by serial changes in delta activity in
the electroencephalogram and disorientation and confabulation with intravenous amobarbital.

3.

The

depending upon

the subject
1;.

pattern of behavioral alteration is shown to vary markedly,
the degree of induced cerebral dysfunction, the personality of

and.

the environmental situation.

"Improvement"

ratings are seen as

a Special case

of behavioral

the type of adantation elicited, the expectation of
the therapist , adninistrator and family, and the tolerance of the milieu.

change dependent upon

this neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis of
electmshocl: action to other forms of somatic therapies is suggested.
S.

The

extension of

�m

REFEIUQI‘ICES

l.

Juno‘s—t

Weinstein, E.A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During Electroshock Therapy: Its relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy, Am.

J. Psychiat” 109: 22-26, 1952.

of Amobarbital
1. and Weinstein, E.A.: RelationA.I—-I.A.
Arch. Neurol.
Electroshock,
in
Test to Clinical Improvement
1956.
and Psychiat., IQ: 23-29,
Roth, 1-1.: Changes in the EEG under Barbiturate Anesthesia Proclucec‘v by
Electro-Convulsive Treatment and their Significance for the Theory
of EST Action, EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., _3.: 261-280, 1951.

Kahn, R.L., Fink,

3.

h.

Pace, J.EI., Hernaff, M.K. and Bowditch, 5.0.:
Neurophysiologic Effects of lectrically Induced Convulsions, A.:-I.A.
Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 15: 371-378, 1956.

Aird, Ran,

Strait, L.A.,

.

G.A., Smith, K.
5a. Ulett,
Subconvulsive Shock

and Gleeser, G.C.: Evaluation of Convulsive and
Therapies Utilizing a Control Group, Am. J.

Psychiat., 112: 795-802, 1956.

5b.

Glasser, G.C., Caldtrell, B.M., and Smith, K.: The Use
of I'iatched Groups in the Evaluation of Convulsive and Subcommlsive
Biotoshock, Bull. Mann. 015.11.,

6a.
6b.

_1__8_:

138-1h6, 1951..

H. and Kahn, R.L.: Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave
Followi.n:_; Electroshock, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol” _8_: 158

Fink,

Activity

(Abst.) 1956.

EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral
and
___: Relation of
Response in hilactroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies, A.itI.A. Arch.
Eleurol. and Psychiat. (in press).

7.

E-Jeinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L., Sugarman, L.A. and Linn, L.:Diagnostic Use of Amobarbital Sodium ("Amytal Sodium") in Organic
Brain F‘lisease, Am. J. Psychiatu .133: 889-89h, 1953.

8.

Shagass, C. : The Sedation Threshold.

9.

Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Personality Factors in Denial of illness,

in Psychiatric Patients,

A.1-I.A. Arch. Neurol. and

EEG

A

Method

for Estimating Tension

Clin. Neurophysiol.,

Psychiat.,

_6_:

221-233, 1951;.

99;: 355-367, 1953.

Parsonality Factors in Behavioral
to Electroshock Therapy, Coni‘. Neurol., (in press)

Response

10 .

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, 14.:

11.

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, 141.: Changes in languAge During Té‘lectroshock
Therapy, in P cho tholo g; Comunication (Hoch, P. and Zubin,
J., 13623.), Grune and tratton, N.Y., 1957. (in press).

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2594">
                <text>Experimental studies of the electroshock process. Dis Nerv Syst. 1958 Mar;19(3):113-8.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2595">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2596">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-30-007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2597">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2598">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.; Green, Martin A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2599">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2600">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2601">
                <text>[preprint] and reprint. Reprint from Diseases of the Nervous System, Vol.XIX, No.3, March 1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2602">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2603">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74462">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81023">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87584">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94145">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="261" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="52">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/0cb0657cbbdab38351d56e14b15f8cbf.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7766c5312815a1dcb5171a3528e92d6e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100678">
                    <text>Reprinted from The Journal of the American Medical Association
April 12, 1958, Vol. 166
Copyright 1958, by American Medical Association

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CI] LORPROMAZINE AND INSULIN
COMA IN THERAPY OF PSYCHOSIS
Max Fink, M.D., Robert Shaw, M.D., George E. Gross, M.D.
and

Frederick S. Coleman, M.D., Glen Oaks, N. Y.
With the advent of “newer” drugs for the treatment of psychiatric illnesses and the concomitant
awareness that the effectiveness of insulin coma
therapy was limited, a control drug therapy—insulin
coma study was undertaken. Preliminary trials with
various medicaments available in 1954 demonstrated
chlorpromazine to be potent and relatively safe.
Concurrent reports had noted its value in schizophrenic illnesses, and it was therefore selected as
the experimental agent.
The study was designed to assess the therapeutic
efﬁcacy and indications for intensive chlorproma:
zine therapy, compared to classic insulin coma
therapy, an in open-ward, voluntarily hospitalized
psychiatric population.
Subjects and Method
All patients referred for insulin coma therapy
during the period Sept. 1, 1955, to Dec. 31, 1956,
were observed. Supervising psychiatrists made the
recommendation for insulin coma therapy independent of the research group. Their criteria for
referral were those implicitly held by the hospital
administration and were not altered for this study,
Randomly selected patients were placed on chlorpromazine therapy instead of insulin coma therapy.
This selection was made by the psychiatrist in
charge of the insulin therapy unit without prior
notice of the referring therapist or the supervising
psychiatrist. Sixty patients were referred for insulin
coma therapy during the study period, and half
of these received chlorpromazine.
Insulin Coma.—The standard technique of Sakel
for insulin coma was used. All patients received 50
comas, each of a duration of at least one hour, at
the physiological level of Babinski reﬂex, absent
lid reflex, or deeper. Recovery was induced by
gavage and occasionally by intravenous administration of glucose. Treatments were given ﬁve times
weekly for a period of three to four months.
Chlorpromazine.—To establish an equivalent
group, chlorpromazine was given for at least three
months. Dosages were determined by the research
team and were rapidly increased until well-deﬁned
physiological effects were observed. These included
rigidity, drooling and ﬁxed facies, seizures, or severe dermatitis. In most instances this was achieved
below 1,400 mg. daily, although dosages were increased to 3,600 mg. in one patient. In each instance, the drug dosage was slowly reduced until
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.

The effectiveness of chlorpromazine was
compared with that of insulin coma in 60 patients referred for insulin coma therapy. One-

half the group, selected on a random basis,
received chlorpromazine by mouth for at
least three months in doses adjusted so as to
fall just short of toxicity in the individual patient,- this dosage varied from 300 mg. to
2,000 mg. daily, with a median of 800 mg.
The insulin coma was induced by a standard
technique 50 times in each patient. Although
many minor differences were noted in comparing the effects of these two methods of
treatment, the ultimate results at the time of
discharge were essentially the same for the
two groups of patients. Neither treatment affected the basic schizophrenic process, but
chlorpromazine had the advantage of being
safer, easier to administer, and better suited
to long-term management.

a maintenance dose, just under that producing
toxicity, was obtained. This varied from 300 mg.
to 2,000 mg. daily with a median of 800 mg.
To determine the comparability of the subjects
in the random sampling procedures used in this
study, the groups were compared as to their psychi—
atric diagnoses and ages. Table 1 shows a comparison of the groups as to diagnoses and demonstrates
an equal distribution of subjects in each category.
In the analysis of the age distribution, the median
age for patients subjected to insulin coma was 24
years, with a range of 17 to 38; the median age
for patients receiving chlorpromazine was 28, with
a range of 19 to 42. Here, too, the distribution
shows no signiﬁcant difference.
For both treatment groups, behavioral observations were made by the research staff at weekly
intervals. After completion of the treatment period,
reports of the patients’ behavior were obtained
from the therapist and supervising psychiatrist. The
“improvement” rating was determined by the medical director at the patient’s discharge conference
and was based on the fourfold scale of recovered,
much improved, improved, and unimproved. Neither the authors nor the supervisor of the insulin
therapy unit participated in these evaluations.

�THERAPY OF PSYCHOSIS—FINK ET AL.

Vol. 166, No. 15

Observations
Clinical Observations—The following clinical effects were noted in patients who received chlorpromazine and in those subjected to insulin coma
therapy.
Chlorpromazine: Chlorpromazine induced motor
retardation in all subjects. Overactive, destructive
behavior rapidly disappeared, and patients became
more tractable, less negativistic, and less violent.
The nurses’ and therapists’ records noted patients
as “less easily excited and frightened,” “cooperating
TABLE l.—P.s-ychiatric

Psychoneuxosis .......................
Schizophrenia, paranoid
.....
Schizophrenia, catatonic ............
Schizophrenia, mixed .................
Schizophrenia, hebephrenic ..........
Manic-depressive psychosis ...........

Diagnoses

Insulin Coma

Chlorpromazine

1

2
10
7

10
7

8
3
1

6
2
3

better in ward activities,” and “less restless and less
panic-ridden.” One-third of the patients were more
sociable and less seclusive and were noted to care
for themselves in a more presentable fashion. In

instances where severe motor symptoms supervened, however, the patients were less able to care
for themselves; they became sloppy and failed to
dress themselves. Such periods were usually short
and could be signiﬁcantly modiﬁed either by a
reduction in drug dosage or by anti-Parkinsonism
drugs.
Affective changes during chlorpromazine treatment were varied. Four patients became increasingly agitated, tense, and tremulous and either
refused to continue on the drug regimen or were
induced to do so only with difﬁculty. Such an
affective “storm” appeared early in the treatment
and persisted. In four other patients, depressive
symptoms were relieved with an increase in affective lability and responsivity. Depressive ideation
increased, associated with complaints of insomnia
and anorexia in two patients. The medication was
continued, however, with an eventual alleviation.
In most patients, mood changes were small.
Ideation was dramatically altered during the period of chlorpromazine therapy in 12 patients. Eight
had a loss or a signiﬁcant diminution of their
psychotic ideation. In ﬁve, hallucinatory and referential experiences were no longer reported even on
inquiry, and, in three others, delusional ideas were
less prominent. In one patient, phobias were relieved and the patient could once again participate
in ward activities. In another, hypochondriasis was
sufﬁciently modiﬁed to permit a more meaningful
relationship between therapist and patient. In one
patient, paranoid ideation became more prominent.
This was associated with increasing anxiety and
panic during drug administration and resulted in
discontinuation of the drug regimen.

1847

Insulin Coma: The clinical observations in this
group were similar to those reported by others.‘
Alteration in behavior was prominent in all patients
once repeated comas were induced. Overactive,
hostile behavior rapidly diminished and was replaced by alternating periods of somnolence, irritability, and withdrawal. In most patients, nausea,
abdominal distress, belching, sweating, and lassi—
tude were common sequelae each afternoon and
assumed prominence in the recorded reports. These
symptoms often interfered with the patients’ ability
to care for themselves, and they became unkempt
in their dress.
Changes in ideation appeared slowly during the
course of therapy. In eight patients, paranoid and
delusional thoughts became less prominent, dis—
appearing in these on direct inquiry. Suicidal and
outWardly directed destructive thoughts were modiﬁed in three patients, only to recur in each at the
end of the treatment period.
Mood changes were small. Increasing agitation,
tension, and panic were reported in three patients,
leading in two to a refusal of further therapy. In
one depressed patient, relief of depressive symptoms was noted early in the treatment and was
sustained.
In the usual practice of the treatment unit, con—
current electroconvulsive therapy was instituted
when behavioral control by insulin coma alone was
limited. In six patients, such combined treatment
was instituted primarily because of a continuation
of overactive or delusional ideation. There was, in
four instances, a well deﬁned alteration in behavior,
but this was unsustained. None of these patients
was rated as improved on discharge.
Discharge Evaluation—All patients were dis—
charged from the hospital within four months of
the end of treatment. Table 2 lists the hospital discharge evaluations for patients treated with chlorpromazine and insulin coma.
Ratings in Patients Treated with
Chlorpromazine and Insulin Coma

TABLE 2.-—Discharge

Treatment

........................
........................

Recovered, no.
Much improved, no. ..................
Improved, no.
Iinimproved, no. .....................

Chlorpromazine

Insulin Comaﬁ

2

0

4
17

5
15

7

10

Included in the group of patients treated with
chlorpromazine who were rated as unimproved were
four who received inadequate course of therapy
(less than one month) because of complications of
the therapy. Of the 10 patients treated with insulin
coma who were rated as unimproved, four had inadequate courses of therapy, two because of complications (seizures and prolonged coma), one be—
cause she became more disturbed, and one because
of administrative transfer to another facility.

�‘

THERAPY OF PSYCHOSIS—FINK ET AL.

1848

It

apparent that there is no difference in the
clinical evaluation at the time of discharge between
the group receiving insulin coma and that receiving
chlorpromazine. To determine whether this sample
was biased because of its small number, we compared these discharge ratings with a similar group
treated in this hospital in 1950 and previously
reported.2 In table 3, the discharge ratings for both
is

TABLE 3.-—Discharge

Ratings Compared for 1950 and 1956

.............................
.......................
Improved, % ......... ....................
Unimproved, % ...........................
Recovered, %
Much improved, %

_

Present Group
(30 Subjects)

1950 Group
(48 Subjects)

0

14

17

19
42

50
33

‘25

years are compared. The percentage improvement
rates for each category are not signiﬁcantly different.
Toxicity and Complications—Patients receiving
chlorpromazine and those subjected to insulin coma
therapy were compared as to toxic reactions and
complications, with the following effects noted.
Chlorpromazine: Inherent in the design of this
study were high doses of chlorpromazine, pushed
to a level producing symptoms of toxicity. In this
context, all patients developed signiﬁcant drug
effects. Rigidity of extremities, accompanied by a
decrease in facial expression, drooling, and festination, was frequently observed. In three instances,
rigidity appeared as drug dosage was reduced.
Most patients became drowsy, retarded, and less
active in ward activities. In four patients increased
tension, agitation, restlessness, and excitement
supervened, leading to a discontinuation of the
drug regimen in two.
Seizures occurred spontaneously in three patients. Pretreatment electroencephalograms had
manifested no dysrhythmia, and no history of seizures had been elicited. In each, the drug medication was reduced, and seizures did not develop at
the lower dosages.
Dermatitis was a frequent complication. All patients developed a transient erythema to mild solar
radiation. Severe intractable skin reactions occurred
in three patients, with resultant discontinuation of
drug therapy in two. In the third, promazine hydrochloride therapy was substituted for chlorpromazine, with a relief of the dermatitis. The behavioral
effect of the promazine was indistinguishable in
this patient from that noted in patients receiving
chlorpromazine.
In this group, no patient developed clinical jaundice. This complication has been variously reported
as occurring in less than 0.5% of subjects treated.
In the preliminary studies at Hillside Hospital, 3
patients of a group of 20 developed transient clinical jaundice.

J.A.M.A., April 12, 1958

Electroencephalograms were obtained in 20 of
the patients who received chlorpromazine. With
increasing doses, the modulation of the record became more irregular in each. A moderate amount
of low-voltage 4-7 cps delta and theta activity was
induced, and this activity was exaggerated by
hyperventilation. There was a suggestive relationship between the degree of the induced slow-wave
activity and the drug dosage.
Insulin Coma: The complications of insulin coma
therapy in this series were not unusual. Insulin
resistance was noted only once and was eventually
overcome by the method of alternating dosages.
Prolonged reactions occurred in three patients. In
each, neurological examination and electroencepha—
lography demonstrated signs of persistent central
nervous system dysfunction for at least 10 days.
Aphasia, hemiparesis, and paresthesias were frequent in ﬁve patients and transient in eight others.
Seizures occurred in ﬁve patients and were recurrent in three. Frequent secondary reactions, nausea,
vomiting, abdominal distress, sweating, pallor, lassitude, and generalized weakness occurred in all
patients with varying frequencies.
The complications of both forms of treatment are
listed in table 4. Certain effects, such as dermatitis
and hypotension, secondary reactions, and prolonged coma are individual for each therapy, and
seizures, agitation, and refusal of therapy were
noted with both regimens. The frequencies of these
are not signiﬁcantly different.
Effects on Psychotherapeutic Relationship—Pa—
tients were referred for insulin coma therapy after
a period of verbal relationship therapy. Such referral implies a failure of interpersonal communication.
TABLE

4.-C0mplicati0ns of Treatment with Chlorpromazine
and Insulin Coma
Treatment

_______./\—————5

Agitation and panic ..................
Dermatitis, severe .....................

...............................
Refusal of further therapy ..........
Hypotension ..........................
Secondary reaction, frequent ........
Prolonged coma (&gt;6 hr.) ............
Insulin resistance .....................
Seizures

Chlorpronmzine

Insulin Coma

4

3

3

3
2

5
2

2

6
3
. . .

1

Chlorpromazine: During the period of effective
drug action, 15 of the patients treated with chlorpromazine were described by the therapist in
response to an inquiry as “more accessible,”
“speaking more freely,” and “more amenable to
psychotherapy.” The behavioral changes could be
classiﬁed in two groups: subjects in whom tension
and preoccupation with somatic symptoms became
much less, and those in whom hallucinatory or delusional preoccupations ended. Such changes in

�I

Vol. 166, No, 15

THERAPY OF PSYCHOSIS—FINK ET AL.

in—
described
as
an
we1e
frequuitly
'.*‘-1;welationship
stww‘arease in “contact In 13 subjects, psychotherapy
either was still‘not feasible” or had become less
feasible because of increasing uncontrolled tension,
anxiety, or preoccupation with the side-effects of
wthe drug regimen.

Insulin Coma: Similar observations were made
in the patients treated with insulin. Of the 30 patients, 7 were noted to be less tense and less anxious
during therapeutic sessions. The theiapists noted
that the patient “verbalized more freelv” and was
more aware of his environment.” Four patients
were speciﬁcally treated with a “modiﬁed anaclitic”
approach. In each instance, this relationship was
unsustained during treatment and the therapists
resorted to more conventional tactics. In the remaining patients (19), while supportive, educational, and environmental manipulating techniques
were applied, the therapists were no more successful than prior to insulin therapy. In 11 patients,
the physiological effects of the treatments (secondary reactions, sweating, nausea, vomiting, and
weight gain) were reported as interfering with
psychotherapeutic attempts.
Comment
Clinical Considerations—In these patients, nei—
ther chlorpromazine in high therapeutic doses nor
insulin coma speciﬁcally modiﬁed the psychotic
had
of
88%
these
Since
a diagpatients
process.
nosis of schizophrenic illnesses, we concluded that
neither treatment has a speciﬁcity in altering the
schizophrenic process. When given in adequate
dosage, however, both treatments are potent methods for the alteration of behavior. In the discharge
evaluations, the treatments are similar. In only
20% of the patients were induced behavioral patterns persistent, with the rating “much improved”
or “recovered.” For the others, the induced behavioral changes were transient or minimal.
Since these therapies fail to induce a recovery
from the psychotic process, consideration should
be given to their ameliorative, palliative, and supportive aspects. Symptomatic relief was frequent
but generally limited to the treatment period. Patients were made uncomfortable by both therapies,
however, and the complications and toxic effects
have already been noted.
In assessing the role of concomitant psychotherapy, there is little advantage in either therapy.
Both methods were said to enhance relationship
therapy, although the therapists’ evaluations favored chlorpromazine therapy. Excluding those
who deveIOped increased agitation, patients were
more comfortable, more alert, and physically better
able to discuss their feelings and experiences while
on chlorpromazine treatment. It is clear that“interpretive” psychotherapy is not enhanced, rather,

1849

supportive, educative, reorienting, and directive
types of therapy are. When there is a modiﬁcation
of agitated, hallucinatory, depressed, manic, or aggressive behavior, both the therapist and the patient
are more comfortable and better able to discuss the
reality aspects of the life situation.
Therefore, in this context, the ease of administration and the possibility of continued maintenance of chlorpromazine in an outpatient setting
assume decisive signiﬁcance. To maintain such
therapy after discharge and continue thereby the
relationship established in the hospital setting may
be an important element in sustaining the behavioral changes induced by hospitalization.
Other Studies.—While many reports of the treatment of psychosis by chlorpromazine have appeared, we are aware of only one similar comparative study. Boardman, Lomas, and Markowe,3 after
a review of the problem, reported a study of 100
patients randomly divided into two groups of 50
and treated with either insulin coma or chlorpromazine. The chlorpromazine dosage was lower than
that used in the present series (average 300 mg),
but the drug period (three months) was the same.
Their observations are directly comparable to this
study. They reported no difference either in discharge evaluations or in symptom assessments for
either treatment group.
The patients treated with chlorpromazine, however, remained in the hospital an average of 6.2
weeks less than the subjects treated with insulin.
This was a signiﬁcant difference between the
groups. They concluded, “There is inconclusive
evidence that chlorpromazine has advantages over
insulin in the treatment of schizophrenia [but]
insulin has disadvantages in the form of greater
danger and more unpleasantness for the patients
and greater strain on the nurses. Chlorpromazine
is the ﬁrst treatment of choice in schizophrenia, but
this conclusion is based on the immediate results
of treatment and has not yet been conﬁrmed by an
adequate follow-up study.”
Boardman and his co-workers emphasize the
problem of evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of
insulin coma. They note a number of reports that
raise doubts as to the efficacy of insulin coma
therapy in schizophrenia. Bourne,4 in an extensive
review of the merits of insulin therapy in schizophrenia, concluded, “There is no proof of any
speciﬁc therapeutic effect, and the long term prognosis is in no way influenced.”
The recent observations of insulin treatment of
5
schizophrenia by Ackner, Harris, and Oldham are
relevant. In a carefully controlled study, young
schizophrenic patients were randomly treated either
by insulin or by barbiturate coma in the same
ward and under similar conditions. Evaluations of
results were made by psychiatrists without knowl-

�1850

THERAPY OF PSYCHOSIS—FINK ET AL.

edge of which treatment the patients received. The
authors noted a similar outcome, whether the loss
of consciousness was induced by a barbitufate or
by insulin, and concluded that insulin was not a
speciﬁc therapeutic agent in the outcome.
In the follow-up studies done in this hospital,2
the therapeutic results of insulin coma therapy were
disappointing. Patients referred for insulin coma
had the longest period of hospitalization (6.5
months, as against 6.04 with'psychotherapy and
4.95 with electroshock), the poorest discharge‘ rating (33% recovered and much improved as against
63% with psychotherapy and 67% with electro—
shock), and, within four years, a 50% rehospitalization rate (compared to 33% with psychotherapy
and 29% with electroshock). While these observa—
tions reflect the idea that the more severely ill
patients are referred for insulin coma, they also
support the belief that insulin coma is not a specific
treatment for the patients referred.
From these reports we would conclude that,
despite considerable study and the passage of many
years, insulin coma therapy has not been shown to
induce persistent behavioral changes more frequently than other nonspecific, less dangerous, and
less expensive therapies. To the list of alternate
therapies of limited value in the management of
psychosis we may now add Chlorpromazine, not—
ing, however, its advantage of lesser risk and ease
of administration.
Dosage of Chlorpromazine.—F0r the purpose of
assuring an adequate level of Chlorpromazine dosage for evaluation, the amount of medicament
given was increased in all subjects to t0xic levels.
This level was too high for its behavioral effects,
as evidenced by the reduction in all responsive
cases to maintenance levels of 300 to 2,000 mg.
It is our impression that Chlorpromazine affects
the function of the central nervous system (as
evidenced by changes in modulation and per cent
time delta in the electroencephalogram and the
systemic phenomena of rigidity and lassitude)
and results in a nonspeciﬁc alteration in behavior.6A
Such behavioral change is varied and is dependent
on a variety of factors, of which the personality
organization and the expectancy of the milieu are
signiﬁcant. In this context, the induction of a state
of altered cerebral function is a necessary prerequisite to behavioral change. The only assurance
of achieving a therapeutic level, therefore, is the
appearance of toxicity and a lowering of dosage
from that level to a maintenance dose. The effects
of rigidity, drowsiness, and lassitude, therefore, are
necessary concomitants of the therapy and should
be induced in all patients in whom a therapeutic
effect is desired. In instances where an affective
“storm” supervenes, continuation of therapy at

].A.M.A., April 12, 1958

higher levels, with concomitant administration of
trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride (Artane) and benztropine (Cogentin) methanesulfonate should be
considered. Such an attitude in therapy is comparable to the application of digitalis in cardiology
and to the present concept of the mode of action of
electroshock therapy.6
Summary

In a.study of patients referred for insulin coma
therapy in an open-ward, voluntary psychiatric hospital, patients received randomly either insulin
coma therapy or intensive Chlorpromazine therapy.
Chlorpromazine was found to be as effective in
modifying psychotic behavior as insulin coma therapy. There was no difference in the improvement
rating on discharge, incidence of complications, or
effects on the psychotherapeutic relationship for
either therapy.
In comparison to insulin coma, Chlorpromazine
is safer, easier to administer, and lends itself to
long—term management. Patients receiving chlorpromazine therapy are more comfortable than those
receiving insulin coma. No evidence has been
educed that either therapy has altered the basic
schizophrenic process, nor is there any evidence
that there is greater specificity of either form of
therapy for schizophrenic illnesses.
75—59

263rd St. (Dr. Fink).

This study was supported by the Board of Directors"
search Fund of the Society of the Hillside Hospital.

Re—

The chlorpromazine used in this study was supplied as
Thorazine by Smith, Kline &amp; French Laboratories, Philadelphia.
The promazine hydrochloride used in this study was supplied as Sparine by Wyeth, lnc., Philadelphia.
References

and Hoch, P. H.: Shock Treatments,
Psychosurgery, and Other Somatic Treatments in Psychiatry,
ed. 2, New York, Grune and Stratton, lnc., 1952.
2. Rachlin, H. L., and others: Follow-up Study of 317
Patients Discharged from Hillside Hospital in 1950, J. Hillside Hosp. 5:17-40 (Jan) 1956.
3. Boardman, R. H.; Lomas, J.; and Markowe, M.: Insulin
and Chlorpromazine in Schizophrenia: Comparative Study
in Previously Untreated Cases, Lancet 2:487—494 (Sept. 8)
1. Kalinowsky, L. B.,

1956.
4. Bourne, H.: Insulin Myth, Lancet 2:964—968 (Nov. 7)

1953.

5. Ackner, B.; Harris, A.; and Oldham, A. J.: Insulin

Treatment of Schizophrenia: Controlled Study, Lancet 2:
607-611 (March 23) 1957.
6. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in Electroshock: Quantitative
Serial Studies, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. 81 Psychiat. 78:516—
525 (Nov.) 1957.
6A. Fink, M.: Uniﬁed Theory of Action of Physiodynamic
Therapies, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:197-206 (Oct.) 1957.

�Printed in U.

S. A.

�Cjéz,,4./rv./¢

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CHIDRPROMAZINE AND INSULIN
COIvIA IN THE THERAPY 0}”? PSYCHOSIS *-

Max

ColemanAM.D.
Fink M.D., Robert Shaw M.D., George E. Gross M.D., and Frederick S.

* From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, N.Y.

Supported by the Board of Directors' Research Fund of the Society of the

Hillside Hospital.

7-22-57: IV

�Comparative Study of Chlorpromazine and Insulin
Coma

in the Therapy of Peychosis

for the treatment of psychiatric
illnesses, and the concomitant awareness that the effectiveness of insulin
With the advent of "newer" drugs

limited, a control drug therapy-insulin coma study was undertaken. Preliminary trials with various medications available in l95h demonstrated chlorpromazine to be potent and relatively safe. Concurrent reports

coma

therapy

had noted

was

its value

in schizophrenic illnesses,

and

it was therefore

selected

as the experimental agent.

study was designed to assess the therapeutic efficacy and indications
for intensive chlorpromazine therapy compared to classical insulin coma
therapy in an openaward, voluntary hospitalized psychiatric population.
The

Subjects and Method
All patients referred for insulin

coma

therapy during the period

September 1, 1955 to December 31, 1956 were observed. Supervising psychiatrists
made

the recommendation for insulin

group. Their

criteria for referral

coma

therapy independent of the research

were those

implicitly held by the

beepital administration, and were not altered for this study. Randomly
selected patients were placed on chlorpromazine therapy instead of insulin

psychiatrist in charge of the insulin
therapy unit, without prior notice of the referring therapist or the super-

coma.

This selection was made by the

vising psychiatrist. Sixty patients were referred for insulin
during the study period, and half received chlorpromazine.

coma

therapy

�.2...

a) Insulin

Coma: The

patients received

standard technique of Sakel was used. All

50 comes, each

of a duration of

at least

one hour

at the

physiologic level of Babinski reflex, absent lid reflex, or deeper. Recovery
was induced by gavage and occasionally by intravenous glucose. Treatments
were given five times weekly,
b)

Chlorpromazine:

was given
team and

To

for a period of

B-h months.

establish an equivalent group, chlorpromaziner

for at least three months. Dosages were determined by the research
were rapidly increased until well defined physiologic effects were

observed. These included rigidity, drooling and fixed facies, seizures or
severe dermatitis. In most instances this was achieved below lhOO mgm daily

patient. In each instance,
slowly reduced until a maintenance dose, just under

although dosages were increased to 3600

the drug dosage

toxicity,

was

was obtained.

a median of 800

mgm

in

This varied from 300

one

mgm

to

2000

mgm

daily with

mgm.

To determine

the comparability of the subjects resulting from the

in this study, the groups were compared
as to their psychiatric diagnoses and ages. Table I compares both groups
as to diagnoses, and demonstrates an equal distribution of subjects in

random sampling procedures used

each category.

‘M%

c:

such-on

.m

&amp;

Chlorpromazine supplied as "Thorazine" through courtesy of Smith, Kline
3 French, Inc.

�.3TABLE

I

PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSES

Insulin
Psychoneuresis

Coma

Chlorpromazine

1

2

10

10

Schizophrenia, Catatonic

7

7

Schizophrenia, Mixed

8

6

Schizophrenia, Hebephrenic

3

2

HaniooDepressive Psychosis

l

3

Schizophrenia, Paranoid

In the analysis of the age distribution, the
patients

was

21;

for the insulin

with a range of 17 to 38 ; while the chlorpromazine patients

had a median age of 28 and a range of 19-122.
shows no

median age

Here, too, the

distribution

significant. difference.

For both treatment groups, behavioral observations were made by the

research staff

at

weekly

intervals . Following completion of the treatment

period, reports of the patients' behavior were obtained from the therapist
and supervising

psychiatrist.

Medical Director

The "improvement"

at the patient's Discharge

four~fold scale of recovered,

rating

was determ‘ned by the

Conference and was based on the

much improved, improved and unimproved.

None

of the authors, nor the supervisor of the insulin therapy unit, participated

in these evaluations.

�Observatigns

1. Clinical Observations

all subjects. Overactive, destructive behavior rapidly disappeared,
patients

in

ghlgrpromazine: Chlorpromazine induced motor retardation

a)

became more

tractable, less negativistic

and

less violent.

and
The

therapists' records note patients as "less easily excited and
frightened," "cooperates better in ward activities," and "less restless and
less panic ridden." One-third of the patients were more sociable and less

nurses'

and

seclusive,

and were noted

fashion. In instances
patients

were

to dress.
modified

to care for themselves in a

more presentable

where severe motor symptoms supervened, however, the

less able to care for themselves;

Such periods were

usually short,

became sloppy and

significantly

and could be

either by a reduction in drug dosage or by anti-Parkinson drugs.

Affective changes during chlorpromazine were varied.
became

failed

increasingly agitated, tense

continue

on

and tremulous and

patients

either refused to

the drug regimen or were induced only with difficulty.

affective "storm" appeared early in the treatment
other patients, depressive

affective lability

and

symptoms were

medication was

persisted. In four

relieved, with

an

increase in

patients. The
continued, however, with an eventual alleviation. In most

mood changes were

Ideation

and

Such an

reaponsivity. Depressive ideation increased, assoc-

iated with complaints of insomnia

patients,

Fbur

was

and anorexia,

in

two

small.

dramatically altered during the period of chlorpromazine

therapy in twelve patients. Eight had a loss or a significant diminution of

their psychotic ideation. In five, hallucinatory

and

referential experiences

�.5.
inquiry

were no longer reported even on

once

in three others, delusional

patient, phobias were relieved and the
again participate in ward activities. In another,

ideas were less prominent. In

patient could

and

One

hypochondriasis was sufficiently modified to permit a more meaningful

relatedness of therapist
became more prominent.

and

patient. In

one

patient, paranoid ideation

This was associated with increasing anxiety and

panic during drug administration, and resulted in discontinuation of the
drug regimen.
b)

Insulin

similar to those reported
prominent in

all patients

clinical observations in this group'were
others (1). Alteration in behavior was

The

Coma:

by

once repeated comes were induced.

hostile behavior rapidly diminished,
of somnolence,

irritability and

and was replaced by

Overactive,

alternating periods

withdrawal. In most patients, nausea,

distress, belching, sweating and lassitude were common sequellae
each afternoon, and assumed prominence in the recorded reports. These
abdominal

symptoms often

interfered with the patient's ability to care for themselves,

and ﬂiey became unkempt

in their dress.

in ideation appeared slowly during the course of therapy. In
eight patients, paranoid and delusional thoughts became less prominent,
disappearing in these on direct inquiry. Suicidal and outwardly directed
destructive thoughts were modified in three patients, only to recur in each
Changes

at the

end of the treatment

Mood

period.

changes were small. Increasing

agitation, tension and panic were

reported in three patients, leading in two to a refusal of further therapy.
In one depressed patient,

relief of depressive

symptoms were noted

early in

�-6the treatment, and was sustained.
In the usual practice of the treatment unit, concurrent electroconvulsive
therapy

was

instituted

when

behavioral control by insulin

limited. In six patients, such

combined treatment was

coma alone was

instituted primarily

because of a continuation of overactive or delusional ideation.

There was,

in four instances, a well defined alteration in behavior, but this
sustained.

None

was un-

of these patients was rated as improved on discharge.

2. Discharge Evaluation
All patients were discharged from the hospital within four months

of the

end of treatment.

Table

for both the chlorpromazine

and

II lists the hospital discharge evaluations
insulin

coma

TABLE

treated patients.

I};

DISCHARGE RATINGS

Chlorpromazine

Insulin

1. Recovered

2

O

2.

much Improved

h

5

3.

Improved

17

15

h.

Uhimproved

7

10

Coma

Included in the unimproved group of chlorpromazine patients are four
who

received inadequate course of therapy (less than one month) because of

complications of the therapy.

four

Of

the ten unimproved insulin

had inadequate courses of therapy

(seizures, prolonged

-

coma

patients,

two because of complications

coma), one because she became more

fourth by administrative transfer to another facility.

disturbed,

and the

�-7.

It is

apparent that there

is

no

difference in the clinical evaluation

at the time of discharge between the insulin coma
treated groups. To determine whether this sample

and the chlorpromazine

its

was biased because of

small number, we compared these discharge ratings with a similar group treated

in this hospital in

1950 and previously reported

(2). In Table

III,

the

discharge ratings for both years are compared.
TABLE

Present Group

1950 Group

(30 subjects)

(h8 subjects)

0

1h%

17%

19%

Improved

50%

h2%

Ikrhmproved

33%

25%

Recovered
Much

The

III

Improved

percent improvement rates for each category are not significantly different.
3. Toxicitx and Complications
a) ghlorpromazine: Inherent in the design of this study were high

doses of chlorpromazine, pushed to symptoms of

toxicity. In this context, all

patients developed significant drug effects. Rigidity of extremities,

accom—

in facial eXpression, drooling and festination was
frequently observed. In three instances, rigidity appeared as drug dosage
was reduced. Host patients became drowsy, retarded, and less active in ward
panied by a decrease

activities. In four patients increased tension, agitation, restlessness
and excitement supervened, leading

in two.

to a discontinuation of the drug regimen

�-8Seizures occurred spontaneously in three patients. Pre-treatment
electroencephalograms had manifested no dysrhythmia and no history of

elicited. In
seizures did not develop at the

seizures

each, the drug medication was reduced, and

had been

lower dosages.

Dermatitis was a frequent complication. All patients developed a

transient erythema ato mild solar radiation. Severe intractable skin reactions
occurred in three patients, with resultant discontinuation of drug therapy
in two. In dze third, promazine* therapy was substituted for chlorpromazine,
with a
was

relief of the dermatitis.

The

indistinguishable in this patient

behavioral effects of the promazine
from

that noted for the chlorpromazine

group.

In

this

group, no patient developed

clinical jaundice. This complication

has been variously reported as occurring in less than

%%

of subjects treated **.

Electroencephalograms were obtained in twenty of the chlorpromazine

patients. With increasing doses, the modulation of the record
irregular in each.
activity

A

became more

moderate amount of low voltage h-7 cps delta and theta

was induced, and

this activity was exaggerated by hyperventilation.

There was a suggestive relationship between the degree of the induced slow
wave

activity
b)

series

were

and

the drug dosage;

Insulin

Coma: The

complications of insulin

not unusual. Insulin resistance

eventually overcome

by

the

method of

coma

therapy in this

was noted only once, and was

alternating dosages. Prolonged reactions

* Supplied as "Sparine" through courtesy of Uyeth

&amp;

Co.

as In the preliminary studies at Hillside Hospital, three patients of a group
of twenty developed transient clinical jaundice.

�-9occurred in three patients. In each, neurologic examination and electroencephalography demonstrated signs of persistent central nervous system

dysfunction for

paresthesias

at least ten days. Transient aphasia, hemiparesis,

were frequent

transient in eight others.
were recurrent in three. Frequent

in five patients,

Seizures occurred in five patients, and

and

secondary reactions, nausea, vomiting, abdominal

lassitude

and

and generalized weakness occurred

distress, sweating, pallor,

in all patients in varying

frequencies.
The

complications of both forms of treatment are

listed in

Table IV.

Certain effects, as dermatitis and hypotension, secondary reactions and prolonged coma are individual for each therapy, and seizures, agitation and

refusal of therapy were noted in both regimens.

The

frequencies of these are

not significantly different.
TABLE IV
COMPLICATIONS

Chlorpromazine

Insulin

Agitation and Panic

h

3

Dermatitis, severe

3

-

Seizures

3

5

Refusal of further therapy

2

2

Hypotension

2

—

Secondary reaction, frequent

-

5

Prolonged

Coma ( +

Insulin Resistance

6 hours)

3

l

Coma

�.10.-

h. Effects

on the Psychotherapeutic Relationship

In.this setting, patients are referred for insulin coma therapy
after a period of verbal relationship therapy. Such referral implies a
failure of interpersonal communication.
During the period of effective drug action,

treated patients were described

by the

fifteen of the

chlorpromazine—

therapist in re6ponse to an inquiry

as "more accessible," "Spoke more freely" and were "more amenable to psychotherapy."

subjects in

The

behavioral changes could be classified into two groups:

whom

tension and preoccupation with somatic

symptoms became much

hallucinatory or delusional preoccupations ended.
Such changes in relationship'were frequently described as an increase in
"contact." In thirteen subjects, psychotherapy was either still "not feasible"

less,

and those

in

whom

less feasible because of increasing, uncontrolled tension,
anxiety or preoccupation with the side effects of the drug regimen.
Similar observations were made in the insulin treated patients. Of the
thirty patients, seven were noted to be less tense and less anxious during

or had

become

therapeutic sessions.
more

freely"

The

therapists noted that the patient "verbalized

and "was mere aware of

his environment." Four patients

were

specifically treated with a "modified anaclitic" approach. In each instance,
this relationship was unsustained during treatment and the therapists resorted
to

more conventional

ive, educational
therapists

tactics. In the

remaining patients (19), while support-

and environmental manipulating techniques were

were no more successful than

applied, the

prior to insulin therapy. In eleven

patients, the physiologic effects of the treatments (secondary reactions,
sweating, nausea, vomiting and'weight gain) were reported as interfering with
psychotherapeutic attempts.

�-11Discussion

1. Clinical Considerations
In these patients neither chlorpromazine in high therapeutic doses
nor insulin

specifically modified the psychotic process. Since 88% of
these patients were diagnosed as suffering from schizophrenic illnesses, we
concluded thatiieither treatment has a specificity in altering the schizocoma

phrenic process.

shen given in adequate dosage, however, both treatments are

potent methods for u1e alteration of behavior.
the treatments are similar.

ioral patterns persistent

In only

and

others, the induced behavioral
Since these therapies

20%

rated as

of the patients were induced behav-

much improved

or recovered. For the

transient or minimal.

Chang 5 were

fail to

In the discharge evaluations,

induce a recovery from the psychotic

process, then consideration should be given to their ameliorative, palliative
and supportive aSpects.

Symptomatic

to the treatment period.

Patients

relief

was

frequent, but generally limited

were made uncomfortable by both

therapies,

however, and the complications and toxic effects have already been noted.

In assessing the role of concomitant psychotherapy, there is
advantage of

either therapy.

Both methods were

said to

enhance

little

relationship

therapy although the therapists' evaluations favored chlorpromazine therapy.
Excluding those who developed increased

agitation, patients were more comfortable, more alert and physically better able to discuss their feelings and
experiences while on chlorpromazine, than on insulin coma. It is clear that
"interpretive" psychotherapy is not enhanced, but rather supportive, educative,

re-orienting and directive types of therapy.

When

there is a modification

of agitated, hallucinatory, depressed, manic or aggressive behavior, than
both the

therapist

and

the patient arernore comfortable

and able

to discuss

�-12the

reality aspects of the life situation.

Therefore, in this context, the ease of administration and the possibility of continued maintenance of chlorpromazine in an outpatient setting
assumes decisive

significance.

To

maintain such therapy

after discharge

continue thereby the relationship established in the hospital setting
an important element in sustaining the behavioral changes induced by

and

may be

hospital-

ization.
2. Other Studies
While many

appeared,

we

reports of the treatment of psychosis by chlorpromazine have

are aware of only one similar comparative study. Boardman,

Lomas and Harkowe

one hundred

(3), after a review of the problem, report their study of

patients randomly divided into

two groups of

SO

and

treated either

insulin coma or chlcrpromazine. The chlorpromazine dosage was lower than
that in this series (average 300 mgm) but the drug period (3 months) was the

by

Their observations are directly comparable to

same.
no

difference in the discharge evaluations, nor in

this study.

They reported

assessments for

symptom

either treatment group.
The chlorprcmazine

treated patients,

box-raver, remained

in the hoslaital

less than the insulin treated subjects. This was a
significant difference between the groups. They concluded that: "There is
inconclusive evidence that chlorpromazine has advantages over insulin in the
an average of 6.2 weeks

treatment of schizophrenia," but "that insulin has disadvantages in the form
of greater danger and more unpleasantness
on

the nurses. Chlorpromazine is the

phrenia, but this conClusion
and has

is

for the patients

first

and

greater strain

treatment of choice in schizo-

based on the immediate

results of treatment

not yet been confirmed by an adequate follow-up study."

�«n13-

his co-workers emphasize the problem of evaluating the

Boardman and

therapeutic efficacy of insulin

coma.

They note a number of

raise doubts as to the efficacy of insulin

coma

reports that

therapy in schizophrenia.

(h), in an extensive review of the merits of insulin therapy in

Boume

is no proof of any Specific therapeutic
the long term prognosis is in no way influenced."

schizophrenia concluded that "there

effect,
he

and

recent observations of insulin treatment of schizophrenia by

Harris and

Oldham ( S)

Aclmer,

are relevant. In a carefully controlled study, young

schizophrenic patients were randomly treated either by insulin or by barbit-

urate

coma

results

in the

same ward and under

were made by

patients received.

similar conditions. Phraluations of

psychiatrists without

The

knowledge of which medication the

authors noted a similar

outcome whether the

loss

of consciousness was induced by a barbiturate or by

insulin, and concluded
that insulin was not a specific therapeutic agent in the outcome.
In the fol] oar-up studies in this hospital (2), the therapeutic results

for insulin

coma

therapy were disappointing. In that report, patients

ferred for insulin

coma had

re—

the longest period of hospitalization (6.50 months

for electroshock), poorest discharge rating
(3325 recovered. and much improved, 1?. 63:5 for psychotherapy and 67% for electroshock), and within four years, a 5015 re-hospitalization rate (compared to 33%
for psychotheram and 29% for electroshock). while these observations reflect

1g

6.0).:

for psychotherapy and

14.95

the observation that the more severely
coma,

it also

ill

patients are referred. for insulin

supports the belief that insulin

coma

is not

a specific treatment

for the patients referred.
From

these reports

and the passage of many

we would conclude

years, insulin

that, deepite considerable study

coma

therapy has not been

shown

to

�.mpersistent behavioral changes more frequently than other non~specific,
less dangerous and less expensive therapies. To the list of alternate
induce

therapies of limited value in the
chlorpromazine, noting, however,

management of psychosis we may now add

its

advantage of

lesser risk

and ease of

adninis tration .
3. Dosage of Chlorpromazine

for

For the purpose of assuring an adequate level of chlorpromazine

evaluation, the medication
This level was too high

duction in

was

increased in

all subjects to toxic levels.

fox-its behavioral effects, as evidenced by the re-

all responsive cases to

maintenance levels of 300 to 2000

mgm.

our impression that chlorpromazine affects the function of the
central nervous system (as evidenced by changes in.modulation and percent
time delta in the electroencephalogram and systemic phenomena of rigidity

It is

results in a non-Specific alteration in behavior. Such
behavioral change is varied and is dependent upon a.variety of factors, of
which the personality organization and the expectancy of the milieu are sigand

lassitude)

and

nificant. In this context, the induction of a state of altered cerebral
function is a necessary prerequisite to behavioral change.

The

only assurance

of achieving a therapeutic level, therefore, is the appearance of toxicity,
and a lowering of dosage from that level to a maintenance dose. The effects
of rigidity, drowsiness and lassitude, therefore, are necessary concomitants
of the therapy and should be induced in all patients in whom a therapeutic

effect is desired. In instances uhere an affective "storm" supervenes, continuation of the drug at higher levels, with concomitant artane and cogentin,
should be considered. Such an attitude in therapy is comparable to the application of digitalis in cardiology, and to the present concept of the
action of electroshock therapy (6).

mode

of

�.15Conclusions

1.

In a study of patients referred for insulin

open ward, voluntary

insulin

coma

psychiatric hospital, patients

coma

therapy in an

randomly received

either

therapy or intensive chlorpromazine therapy.

2. Chlorpromazine was as effective in modifying psychotic behavior as

insulin

coma

therapy.

There was no

difference in the

improvement

rating

on

discharge, incidence of complications or effects on the psychoﬂaerapeutic

relationship for either therapy.
3. In comparison to insulin
administer, and lends

itself to

coma, dilorpromazine

long term management.

is safer, easier to
Patients receiving

chlorprcmazine therapy arernore comfortable than those receiving

insulin

coma.

that either therapy has altered the
basic schizophrenic process; nor is there any evidence that there is greater
specificity of either form of therapy for schizophrenic illnesses.
b.

No

evidence has been educed

�REFERENCES

l.

Kalinousky, L.B. and Hoch, P.H.: Shock Treatments, Psychosurgery, and.
other Somatic Treatments in Psychiatry, Grune and Stratton,
13.15. 3 1952.

Rachlin, H.L., Goldman, (3.5., Gurvitz, $1., Lurie, A. and Rachlin, L.:
Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from Hillside
Hospital in 1950, J. Hillside Hosp. §_: 174.0, 195 6.
3.

Insulin and Chlorpromazine
Comparative Study in Previously Untreated
Cases, Lancet, Sept. 8, 1956, pp. 1:87—1:91.

Boardman, R.H., Lamas,

J.

in Schizophrenia -

and liarkma‘e, M.:
A

Boume, H.: The Insulin Myth, Lancet, Nov. 7, 1953, pp. 961;~968.
Ackner, B. , Harris, A. and Oldham, A.J.: Insulin Treatment of
Schizophrenia - A Controller} Study, Lancet, March 23, 1957,
pp. 607-6110

Fink,

1-1.

and Kahn, R.L.: Relation of ETTG Delta
Response in Electroshock: Quantitative

Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat. (in

Activity to Behavioral
Serial Studies, AJ'LA.

press).

�January 31, 1957

Subject:

Drs.

From:
To:

- Insulin Control

Chlorpromazine
Max

Study:

Interim Report

Fink, Robert Shaw, George Gross and Fred Coleman

Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller, Dr. Simon Kwalwasser and the
Research Committee of Medical Board
Following

insulin
During

is

a summary of the observations

in the control chlorpromazine-

study, instituted September 1, 1955 and completed January 1, 1957.

coma

this period,

59

patients

were

referred for insulin

coma

Half

therapy.

of the group was placed, by random sampling, on chlorpromazine * therapy

in-

stead of insulin coma. Four patients received both insulin and chlorpromazine
therapy.

of the patients

of therapy of

less than

who

received chlorpromazine, seven received courses

one month.

patients, three had an

of the 29 insulin

inadequate course of therapy.

I.

During the period l95h—1955, preliminary

PROHLEH:

azime resulted in the awareness
and

safe. In view of the unusually poor

trials of

that the drug

showing of

was

the insulin

chlorpromp

both potent
coma

populat-

ion in the 1950 Fbllowaup Study (1), and the appearance of numerous articles

in the psychiatric literature

recommending chlorpromazine as a therapy

schizophrenia, a comparative study of chlorpromazine
taken.

The

a)

- insulin

for

coma was

under-

following questions were postulated:

What

b) What

is the clinical effect of adequate doses of chlorpromazine?
is its therapeutic efficacy'when compared to insulin coma

therapy?
0)

‘Ehat are the

indications (and contraindications) for the use of

chlorpromazine and/or insulin coma?

* Chlorpromazine supplied as "Thorazine" through the courtesy of Smith, Kline
and French

00., Philadelphia.

Rachlin, H,L., Goldman, G.S., Gurvitz, M., Lurie, A., and Rachlin, L.:
Follow—up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from Hillside Hospital in 1950,
J. Hillside HOSp., _5_: 17-ho, 1956.
(1)

�«2.

II.

All patients referred for insulin

SUBJECTS:

coma

therapy during the

period September 1, 1955 and December 31, 1956 were observed.
Supervising psychiatrists

made the recommendation

independent of the research group. Their
by the

hospital administration,

patients
made by

coma

therapy

criteria were those implicitly held

and were not

were placed on chlorpromazine

for insulin

altered for this study. Selected

therapy.

selection

The

was random and

the supervising psychiatrist of the physical therapy unit, without

prior notice of the referring therapist.

III.

a.) Insulin nga;

EETEQQ:

standard technic of Sakel was used.

The

All patients received 50 comes, each of a duration of one
hour or longer

at the physiologic level

flex or deeper. Recovery
ous glucose.

of Babinski reflex or absent

was induced by gavage and

lid re-

occasionally by intraven-

Treatments were given five times weekly, for a period of 3-h

months.

b.) Chlorpromazin

: To

establish a complementary therapeutic

group, chlorpromazine was given for

at least three

months.

Dosages were determined by the research team and were rapidly increased

clear-cut physiologic effects

ifest rigidity, drooling,
ere dermatitis.

were observed. These included

and fixed

clinically

mans

facies; or toxicity, as seizures or sev-

In each instance, the drug dosage was slowly reduced

a maintenance dose,

until

just under toxicity,

was obtained.

until

This was maintained

for the duration of the observation period.
Laboratory
blood counts,

tests

were

carried out at irregular intervals

liver function tests, glucose tolerance tests

and included

and electroenceph-

alogramS.

In both experimental groups, behavioral observations were

made at'weekLy

intervals. Following completion of the treatment period, reports of the ther-

�4-3-

apist and supervising psychiatrist were obtained. The rating of "improvement"
Conwas that established by the Medical Director at the patient's Discharge
ference.
IV:

RESULTS:

Chlorpromazine

A.

l.

until signs

creased rapidly

of

was achieved

in daily dosages

to 3600

in

mgm.

2000 mgm.

one

patient.

of chlorpromazine was in-

The dosage

QEEEEE.22.22EQEEEEEEEEEEF

rigidity appeared. In most instances this
below lhOO mgm. although dosages were increased
The maintenance dose

varied from

300 mgm.

to

daily.

2. Clinical effects of chlorpromazine:
motor retardation in

all subjects.

Chlorpromazine induced a

Overactive, destructive behavior rapidly

disappeared, and the patients were more tractable, less negativistic and less
violent. The nurses' and therapists' records relate that patients are "less

easily excited and frightened," "cooperates better in
"less restless

and

less panic-ridden."

ward

activities,"

and

One-third of the patients were more

sociable and less seclusive, and were noted to care for themselves in a more
presentable fashion. In the instances where severe parkinsonism supervened,
however, the patients were less able to care for themselves; became sloppy and

failed to dress.
by

Such periods were

short or could

be

significantly modified

anti-parkinson drugsn
Affective changes during chlorpromazine were varied.

In four instances,

the patients became increasingly agitated, tense, tremnlous and either refused
to continue on the drug regimen or were induced only with difficulty. Such an

persisted.
In four other instances, depressive symptoms were significantly relieved,
with an increase in affective lability and responsivity. In two patients, deaffective "storm" appeared early in the therapy

and

�.u.
pressive ideation increased and was associated with complaints of insomnia.
The medication was continued, however, with an eventual alleviation. In most

patients,

mood changes were

small.

Ideation was dramatically altered during the period of-chlorpromazine
therapy in twelve of the patients. Eight patients had a loss or a significant
diminution of psychotic ideation. In five, the hallucinatory and referential
xperiences were no longer reported even on inquiry; and in three others,
delusional ideation was less prominent. In one patient, phobias were relieved

to a degree that the patient could participate in ward activities. In another,
hypochondriasis was sufficiently modified to permit of a more meaningful

latedness of therapist

and

re—

patient.

In one patient, paranoid ideation became more prominent. This was

associated with increasing anxiety and panic during drug administration, with
resultant discontinuation of the drug regimen.
3. Effects en the psychotherapeutic relationship; Patients are
referred for insulin coma therapy after a period of verbal relationship therapy. Such referral implies a failure of interpersonal communication.
During the period of effectiwadrug

activity, ten of the patients

were

described by the therapist in reSponse to an enquiry as "more accessible,"
"spoke more freely" and were "more amenable to psychotherapy." The responses
could be classified into two groups: the subjects whose tension and pre—

occupation with somatic

symptoms became much

less and those in

whom

halluc-

inatory or delusional preoccupations ended. In each instance, the therapist
described the change in relationship as an increase in "contact". In twelve
subjects, psychotherapy was either still "not feasible" or "less so because
of increasing, uncontrolled tension."

�-5.
In no instance did the problem of drug addiction or drug dependence
play a role, nor was there an appreciation that drug therapy altered the

therapeutic relationship adversely.
h. §g§igg§
twenty four have

left the hospital.

thirty patients in this series,

or the

93 "improvement":

Table

I lists

the number of patients

evaluated by the Discharge Conference, according to the four-fold classification in use in the hospital. For comparison, the discharge ratings of the

insulin

coma

therapy patients, following the
TABLE

same

criteria,

have been included.

I

DISCHARGE RATINGS

Chlogpromazine

Insulin

l.

Recovered

1

O

2.

Much Improved

3

1

3.

Improved

15

10

h.

Unimproved

S

8

Coma

Included in the unimproved group of chlorpromazine patients are four
who

received inadequate courses of therapy (less than one month) because of

complications of the therapy.

or the eight unimproved insulin

coma

patients,

four had inadequate courses of therapy - two because of complications (seiz-

ures, prolonged coma), one because she was a severe
the fourth by administrative transfer to the V. A.
5. Toxicity g£_chlorpromazine:

management problem; and

Inherent in the design of

were the high doses of chlorpromazine, pushed

to

symptoms of

this study

toxicity. In

this context, all patients developed significant drug effects. In all, rigidity of extremities appeared; frequently accompanied by a decrease in facial
expression, drooling and festination. In a number of patients the pafkinsona.

�~6—

ian features appeared as the drug dosage was reduced.
symptoms were

became drowsy,

relieved

when

retarded,

the drug

and

was

discontinued.

less active in

ward

In.each patient the
Almost

all patients

activities. In four pat-

ients, increased tension, agitation, restlessness and excitement supervened,
to a degree that led to a discontinuation of the drug regimen.
Seizures occurred in three patients. Ineaach, the drug medication was
reduced, and seizures did not develop

at the

lower dosages.

Dermatitis was a frequent complication. Severe, intractable skin reaction occurred in three patients, with resultant discontinuation of drug
therapy in two. In the third, promazine * therapy was substituted for chloru
promazine, with a relief of the dermatitis. The behavioral effect of the
promazine was indistinguishable

in this patient from the chlorpromazine group.

All patients developed a skin photosensitivity so that

on exposure

to sun,

transient erythema developed.
Refusal of further medication because of drug effects occurred in two

patients. Both developed severe tension and agitation. In two other instances, agitation resulted in the therapist insisting upon a change in treatment regimen.

Table

II lists the complications of both treatments. Certain effects

are individual to the type of therapy, as dermatitis for chlorpromazine; and
prolonged coma, severe secondary reactions and nausea and vomiting in insulin
coma.

0there, as seizures, fainting spells,

and increased

are seen in both.
*-

Surplied as "Sparine" by the courtesy of Hyeth and Co.

states of agitation

�'77“

II

TABLE

COMPLICATIONS

Insulin

_Chlorpromazine

Coma

“

Agitation

h

and Panic

2

-

Dermatitis, severe

3

Seizures

3

3

Refusal of further therapy

2

2

Hypotension

2

-

Secondary reaction, frequent

-

5

-

3

~

1

Prolonged

Coma (+

6 hours)

Insulin Resistance

In this chlorpromazine series, no patients developed clinical jaundice.
This complication has been variously reported as occurring in

less than

%%

of

the subjects treated.* Liver function and blood element studies were done

in this group of patients.

Changes were small, and

at the recommendation of

the medical consultant, the studies were discontinued.
Electroencephalograms were obtained

patients.
and

On

in fifteen of the chlorpromazine

adequate doses, a moderate amount of low voltage

theta activity

was induced.

This

activity

h—7

cps.delta

was exaggerated by hypervent-

ilation.

There was a suggestive relationship between the degree of the induced

slow wave

activity

and the drug dosage.

6. Adjuvants tg_Chlorpromazine:

With the development of

rigidity,

festination, and drooling, patients received cogentin or artane medication.
Both drugs relieved the symptoms, and in a few instances, to a significant
* In the

initial studies at Hillside

twenty developed

Hospital, three patients of a group of

transient clinical jaundice.

�-8degree. Concomitant with the

relief of the rigidity a feeling of euphoria

and wellabeing was occasionally noted.

In one of the patients

who

developed

effect.
therapy, anti-

an affective "storm" the administration of artane had a salutary

In patients

who developed

seizures during insulin

coma

convulsant medication (dilantin, phenobarbital) has been routinely employed.
Such agents were
on lowered

not used with chlorpromazine as the seizures did not recur

dosages.

Insulin

B.

Coma

Theragz

clinical effects, complications, the treatment results of insulin
ccma therapy have been exhaustively reported. In this series, twenty-nine
patients began insulin coma therapy. Of these, nineteen have completed their
period of hOSpitalization and ten are either completing their treatment perThe

iod or are awaiting discharge.
The

over-all ratings of

"improvement" are

listed in Table I.

When comp

pared with the Hillside HOSpital Follow-up Study of 1955, the percent improve—
ment

in each category is not significantly different, although the trend is

less optimistically than the 1950 group.
In Table III the percentages are listed for each evaluation category of this
to rate the present series

somewhat

group compared to the 1950 populatidn.
TABLE

INSULIN

III

COMA THERAPY

Present Group

E

1. Recovered

0%

2.

Much

h%

19%

3.

Improved

52%

h2%

h.

Unimproved

hh%

25%

Such a

Improved

difference in trend,

if

sustained,

1h%

may

reflect a variety of

factors, including changes in criteria of "improvement;" prior administration

�.9...

tranquillizing agents exerting a selectivity on the population
admitted to the hOSpital; and changes in staff criteria for referral for in»
of the newer

Sulin

coma

therapy.

complication rate in this insulin group is comparable to published
studies. No unusual complications, and no deaths were observed.
The role of psychotherapy in patients undergoing insulin coma therapy
The

is complex. In this group, four patients were treated with a "modified anaclitic" approach and an effort at establishing a working psychotherapeutic
relationship was made. In the remaining patients, no unusual efforts at psychotherapy were made, with the consensus

that a supportive, educative, enviru

onmental-manipulative, reassuring type of therapy was achieved, to varying
degrees. Therapists reported (in 7 instances) that patients were less tense

less anxious during sessions while in coma therapy. In eight patients
the physiologic effects of the treatment (secondary reactions, sweating, nausea,
vomiting, weight gain) interfered with relationship therapy to a significant
and

degree.
C.

Therapeutic Results in Relation to Final Diagnosis
Table IV lists the final diagnostic categories for the patients in

each group.

All diagnoses were represented in each series with an equivalent

distribution.
TABLE

IV

EBYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSES

Insulin

Coma

Chlorpromazine

Psychoneurosis

l

2

Schizophrenia, Paranoid

0\

we

U1

O\

U1

\n

\»

to

+4

DD

Schizophrenia, Catatonic
Schizophrenia, Mixed
Schizophrenia, Hebephrenic
Manic Depressive Psychosis

�~10—

No

diagnostic group had a significantly better treatment response than

any

other with either form of therapy.

V.

DISCUSSION:

A.

Comparison of Chlorpromazine and

Insulin

Coma

Therapies:

Neither chlorpromazine in high therapeutic doses, nor insulin
are Specific treatments for schizophrenia.

The discharge evaluations

both treatments are not significantly different. There

is,

coma,

for

however, a def-

inite tendency for more patients in the chlorpromazine group to be rated in
the better classifications than in the insulin coma group. The trend assumes
significance

when

both the type of sampling and the qualitative aspects of

the treatments are taken into account.
the

The random sampling

is exemplified by

resultant matching of diagnoses.
Since these treatments have not resulted in a recovery from the psychotic

process, then their ameliorative, palliative and supportive aSpects must be
considered.

The

insulin

coma

patients are usually uncomfortable throughout

their treatment period. Nausea, vomiting, secondary reactions,
are

Prolonged coma

common.

loss of

is

a

and drowsiness

realistic threat; as well as the threat to

life.

The chlorprcmazine

patients also suffered considerable disagreeable side

effects. Parkinsonism, drowsiness,

and skin

reactions are significant,

must be considered as concomitant management problems.

and

Seizures and jaundice

are the most severe reactions, and to date, have not been permanent.

It is

possible to modify the significance of these side effects to a considerable
extent by anti-parkinson and anti-convulsant medication.
There

is no question, furthermore, as to the ease with which chlorprom-

azine can be administered, in contrast to insulin coma.
A

significant element in the use of these agents in the therapy of schiz-

�.11...

ophrenia is concomitant psychotherapy. Such relationship therapy
by both

It was

therapies.

apparent in the therapist's evaluations, however,

that the chlorpromazine regimen was
apy.

Patients, excluding those

comfortable,

alert

iences while

on

and

was enhanced

more conducive to concomitant verbal

who developed

ther-

increased agitation, were more

physically able to discuss their feelings and exper-

chlorpromazine, than insulin coma.

In another respect, the ease of administration of chlorpromazine

advantage. Patients

who respond

to drug therapy can

is of

be maintained on such

therapy for as long as needed, even on an outpatient basis, while the "course"
of insulin coma

is limited.

Are these treatments equivalent?

Can one be

substituted for the other?

While these questions cannot be answered by the data

the negative can be denied.
groups are not

The

in a positive assertidn,

results of these treatments in equivalent

different with regard to the discharge evaluation.

The changes

in behavior noted and the symptoms alleviated are not significantly different.
In this series, three patients had adequate courses of both regimens. Two
have been discharged"improved," and the third is still in the hospital. There
has been no

significant differences in their reSponse to either

form of therapy.

Comparison With Other Studies:

B.

While many studies of chlorpromazine in schizophrenia have appeared,
only one report of a controlled study

is available.

gt_al_ (2)
after an excellent review of the problem, report their results in one hundred

patients,
coma

randomly divided

into

two groups

of

SO

and

Boardman,

treated either

by

insulin

or chlorpromazine. Their chlorpromazine dosage was lower than in this

series (average

300 mgm) but the drug period ( 3 months ) was the same.

Their

observations are directly comparable to this series. They noted that the over(2)

et a1: Insulin and Chlorpremazine in Schizophrenia —
Study
of Previously Untreated Cases, Lancet g5 h87-h9l,
Comparative
(September) 1956.
Boardman, R.H.

A

�all clinical results were slightly more

favorable in the chlorpromazine group

than in the insulin group judging both by interview status and by a rating

scale of

difference was not of high statistical signif-

The

symptom change.

state, however, that the chlorpromazine patients remained in
the hospital an average of 6.2 weeks less; and that this difference was statistically significant. They concluded that: "There is inconclusive evidence

icance.

They did

that chlorpromazine has advantages over insulin in the treatment of schizophrenia," but "that insulin has disadvantages in the form of greater danger and
more unpleasantness for the patients and greater strain on the nurses.
Chlorpromazine is the first treatment of -choice in schizophrenia, but this
conclusion is based

on

the immediate results of treatment

and has not

yet been

confirmed by an adequate follow-up study."

In Boardman‘s review, due cognizance

therapeutic efficacy of insulin

come.

He

is

given to the problem of the

notes the number of'dissident re-

ports that raise doubts as to the role of insulin
In this regard,

for insulin

it is

therapy in schizophrenia.

important to note the results of the Hillside Follow-up

in which patients referred for

coma,

coma

such therapy had the

period of hOSpitalization, poorest discharge ratings, and a

ization rate (compared to

33%

for psychotherapy

and 29%

50%

longest

rehosPital-

for the electroshock

therapy groups).
Two

other control studies of chlorpromazine in psychoses are relevant

to this report.
"blind" study
ment

at

Feldman gjgggp (5)
Topeka

reporting the observations in a controlled,

State HOSpital noted a significant degree of improve-

for chlorpromazine. They&lt;eoncluded that "thorazine

was found

to be

useful in converting acutely disturbed psychotics into tractable, accessible
patients

who could

(S) Feldman, P.E.

then participate more actively in the hOSpital rehabili-

et al:

A

Controlled, Blind Study of Effects of Thorazine
Clinic, a9; 25-h7, 1956.

on Psychotic Behavior, Bull. Men.

�.13...

tatidn program." Tenenblatt

and Spagno

(6), describing the St. Elizabeth's

Hospital eXperience, in another control study, noted significant behavioral

effects in psychotic illnesses other than involutional psychoses.
Effect of Study

D.
An

on

Staff:

inherent factor in a control study of any therapeutic modality is

the effect that the knowledge of random selection of patients or the use of
placebos has on the therapist in his choice of therapy.

sulin

coma

referrals were to

be given

Knowledge

that in-

either chlorpromazine or insulin

coma

created a feeling of insecurity and impotence in the therapist. Their control
of the therapeutic situation was

in a decrease in the
drug

effects,

and

number of

felt

as severely constricted.

This resulted

referrals, an exaggeration of the physiologic

in the patients expressing doubts as to the therapeutic

efficacy of the drug despite significant changes in

ward behavior.

On

numer-

therapists called to enquire which therapy their patient,
referral for ICT had not yet been made, would get. Prior prejudice

ous occasions,
‘whose

suitability of either therapy resulted in the therapist's expressing disappointment at the modality used. In two instances, such preabout the

judices led to early discontinuation of chlorpromazine therapy,

when the

pat~

ient experienced eanLy signs of drug effects.
E. Dosage of Chlorpromazine:
For the purposes of assuring an adequate level of chlorpromazine for

evaluation, the medication was "pushed" in
level
in

was too high

all

all

subjects to toxicity. This

for its behavioral effects, as evidenced

responsive cases to maintenance levels of

by the reductidn

hOO-lOOO mgm.

The

effects

of parkinsonism, drowsiness and lassitude are prdbably necessary concomitants
(6)

Tenenblatt, 3.8. and Spagno, A.: A Controlled Study of Chlorpromazine
Therapy in Chronic Psychotic Patients, Quart. Rev. Peych. &amp; Neurol.,

�1":114-

of the therapy; and should be induced

effect is desired. In instances where

in all patients in
an

whom

a therapeutic

affective "storm" supervenes, con-

inuation of the drug at higher levels, with concomitant artane or cogentin,
should be considered.
VI.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a control study of patients referred for insulin

coma

therapy,

chlorprcmazine therapy was found to be as effective in modifying psychotic

behavior patterns as insulin
charge ratings to be

coma

therapy.

is

There

better for the chlorpromazine

a tendency for the

group than

dis-

for the insulin

coma group.

In comparison to insulin

coma

to administer, more controllable in

therapy, chlorpromazine is safer, easier

its effects,

and has fewer side

effects.

that either therapy has altered the basic
schizophrenic process; nor is there any evidence that there is greater specificity for either form of therapy for schizophrenic illnesses.
No

evidence has been educed

�February 3, 1958.

that at
a

bucuti

1..

t

:1

1251

:

or EEG Dona Maturity to Bohuioml
Quaint-Adv. 801-111 Studiu, “Hg, .
kaponn in metro-hock:
a:
Arch.
chhnt. 18; 516-525. 1957.

Fink,

H. and Kuhn,

my

a.L.s

3818321511

.

Mime

ﬂux-spin,
Units.“ Theory of the Action of
1957.
197-306.
g. Hillside 3032. 9:
ILL: Significance of Individual Variability in ma human to
moctmlhock, g. Bullio- Raga. Q: 229-21“), 1957.

link,

91.: A

3.

m,

h.

Join,

5.

Kuhn, 3.1.. and

$.

him, 8.1...

J.

«In An

abacus.” Study of Went-.1031

£111.16. Hog. 9,: 207.215, 1957.

link,

In

blink,

PchhiaMc Interview,

Figural Artur Induced
mm
(1957).
g:

Perception of
m5. Puma)...

mum,

Altered Bruin

1n

361

H. and Pink, 15.: Social

Salaam of

Factorl 1n

216-228, 1957.

7.

3. and Pink, Ha Role or Stimulus Intensity 1n Pomcpuan
tom,
'
Simultaneous Gunman: Electrical Stimuli, 1. munch Hog).
9" 2181.250; 195?.

at

‘

mama“

8.

Karin, 8. (With Tameka, 8. and Friedman, 8.): Pomeptim
Stw o: Ambit-lanai, mg, hard, I: inching.. 1Q: 1&amp;7-176,
19 7.

9.

Punter.

in;

H. (with Geldfarb,

Lgﬂé.

knack,

H.

LE.

322‘

E

a

g

Md

it):
gaunt. ﬂ!

(with‘marb, m):

Test in Schilophrcnic 0111mm,

6354-6132,

1957.

htum of Orientation in Childm in

303.1de Instant. for 8mm Bonnier Daemon, her. J.

Mama

. 213538-552, 195?.

n. (with Battarnby, v.3. and Radar, 14.3.): Tnchia’wteopic
hunk,
“minimum of Contour 1n ﬂuent: with Brain mange, J, Cog.
algal. gm 61° ﬂ. 3’ 220.227, 1957.
Pollack, K. (with Battersw, $1.3. and War, 11.3.): Visual Deficit
After Brain Damage in Man as Hammad with Rupidlyakpoud chromatic
Stimn, mr. BIS-“2.9;. £2} 7’ 1‘68, 19570
0

13.

Pollack, u. (with 00161111), in): cum-a1 ma Ehviromntal Factors
attracting Complex Exception in the Institutionaliud Aged, ,1.

Gomntolu

l2“: ’1, “374‘38’ 19570

�Wf—

,.

.

,

,

.

~v-wwwavw—wmvwwnw—wu—va

.

«m

&lt;-~w—-~

uv-v—r rvs—«wv ﬂv‘w—I-‘V n

V'Wuzwr- may,

mm

"—31-—

"Wu

Flbmuy 3, 1958.

Imagination! in Pro”:

1.

3., Mfo, J.
humor,
with mantra-hook

2.

Pink,

3.

Pink, IL, Shut, R... Grass, 0. and Colo-Inn, F.3d

and Kuhn,

Yuma“, J,

3.1.: chhomompenuc Techniques
Hang. (in press).

was

8.. [$11, 3.1.. tad anon, 14.1.:
ﬂuctuahook Prone-l, m, luv.

“perinatal

M.

mama).
J.
r
‘mo (in Phi.)i
and Insulin

Cm in the

Studio: of the

(in press).

Omani» Study of
Therapy of Psychosis,

*

h.

Pink,

5.

ma, LL.

11.:

2E8

Laura}. Gnu

Gun.

In

macaw.

a

u m- Indu a! the Sedation Munch},

in press).

W.

and Pink, 24.: humanity Factors
(in
nutmnhock Therapy,

in Buhuioral

mu).

name

to

.-

v-

w.

1r,

,mrnv

.7

w

K,

-

�Luvzuv-amwnvww

«7,. w—nwrruwm...»~.\,..—...

W. WA

R

.. ran n-«cmvrrme—u»:‘v'

February

m. »u

r’er’I-‘vs

3 , 1958 .

many:
in m Rayon-buy.
Inﬂow“
York, Pom-my 1957.

1.

Fink, IL: Individual

2.

ﬁnk,

Mu

cut-m

3.

Pink,

3.,

Kuhn, 8.1:. 1nd
km :1; the Sociow

no scanty,

In

1n

Enluation of Clinical Bolivian}.

physiologie Alp-ct... Presented

at LBJ...

at Motropoutan

Band

Change: Neuro-

ma tabla, Chicugo, by 1957.

Exporiunm
Gm, LL:
of Biological

Pm“.

Juno 1957.

Studio: of the msctmahock
Psychiatry, Atlantic City,

H. and Kuhn, R.L.I mum of amt-wean: Role of Alteration in
Brain Function in Bah-dot. Pnsented at. Int. Congas: of Pnychntry,
Zurich, Sept. 1957.

h.

ﬁnk,

S.

I!” xﬁn, 3.14. ”d “an, 3.! “ICC“ Qt 01:!qu “tend 3w
m’Function
on Pomaption. Pruemad at the 17 Int. Congrats of Psycholog,
Ema-1c, August 1957.

'

6.

Fink, II. and him, 3.1“: Random Pattoml in Induced Stat» of Aland
Road at w. New Ion Divisional Hating, A.P.A. 1m. 1957.
Brain

7.

Pink, Mu

8.

on m ma sumnwm tar hoary of
Le Enact. or
M,Pmaou
of Conwlaivo Thu-um. Read It. Mom “Inﬂation of manna

mum.
of m quancy Shirt for Plychintz-y.
Simian“SOQCW‘
HoY: 30'. 1957-

”Mum

EEG

13101313511).

anecphalographm, Nov

9.
10.

Road at.

M30, 4.:

1621:, Doc. 1957.

Bahamian). chug” Plyohomum in Evaluation of Clinical Round
Tabla, Chicago, Hay 1957.

lingnhuc “pom. Fromm at A.P.A.,

in hymn-Le Interview.
NationA.P.A..
Nov. 1957.

MIC, J.: Lu Obj-«tin Study of
had at um How Iork Divisions). Mating,

in Buhuioral Euponu to
metre-hock Thonpy. haunted at meta-omen}: Research “mention,

[11:21,

3.1.. and Pink, 11.: Pomonality Factor!

Chicago,
Ram,

New

1957.

LL. and link,

Aland Brain

Mu

Pompticn or

Function.

Road

We! Figures Arte:-InInduood
Ierk, August 1957.

at Ann. Plyehol. Luau”

Karin, H. (with runabout, S. and Friedman, 84): Pomption Expouunu in a
Study of Allah-Amen. End at Suction on lourolog I: Plychintry of Ed.
of Kodiak)! and LY. Roux-01. Socioty, NJ. Jm. 1957.

low

�__. _.__

.7...._—M

wvwwﬁwww

«V

.

.,

m«m1.1m:
1.

_

(5....»“1 .._

_

w. ....,._-,_..,..._..

«1...;

.I.-....._.L,,.r..».

w“ynw-WMW

r‘m-vnr—Vwﬂtnﬂw’all

'

7

I-vrn"

“rm”

‘

nun—mm.—.,.m~

I2

(Iith Italahau; s. and lhindnan, 3.): th- Relation a: Ambasulnneo
Mansion and Monty 1n Wan-antic mum... and at Amt.
Mabel. Ame. Sept. 1957. (New Kerk).
15. Karin, B. (with Tarmac»: and Mama, 8.): Stun” in “bitumen.
1h. lbrin, H.

to

Pnlantad boron Sahildar Sociew,

M York,

00%. 1957.

16. Pamak, H. (with Galena), W. and Dam, 14.): Pain mucus in
Schumann 02:11am. Haunted at Mr. Orthapaychntrio mac.
Chicago, Marah 1957.

17.

‘

M.‘(v1th Integer, H.P.)I.Oan1mtor'and Bantam Put-m 1n
o: lamina,
Sahisophnnia Wldran. P's-mug! at Mr.

knack,

Am

18. Pollack, H. (with Butterﬂy, v.3. and Bond-r, 11.8.): ﬁgure-mane! Pamphlet:
Tumor. But!
*Enmm Payahol. uses... In York
in Plunges with
13111

0“.an

19 7o

it

Pollack, K. (with Batu-thy, H. 3. and Bondar, 3.3.): Datum in Visual
Phraoption in Brain mm:- Patten“. Flaunt-d baton Int. Congrats
or ngcha1., aux: 1957. (Brunloll).
.20.

anuok,

K. (with Battarnby,

v.3. and Bondar, 14.3.): Visual M1611: After

with Rapidly-kpand Chmtia
9mg.
a Mutant!
Assoc" Nu Int-k, Sept. 1957.
Pmud at Ann. PaychoI.

Brain

1:: Man

Stimuli.

Pollack, H. (with Goldhrb, A.): Cultural and Environ-um Factor:
Aged. Presented
“hating (De-plan: Pox-caption in tin Institutiamliud
at the “analogical Society, Cleveland, 00%. 1957.
22. Pollack,

11.:

Brain Dung...

Pmanud It. Nil

mm

Inhalation and Childhood Sauomania.
Hating, MPJ. new. 1957.

York Divisions).

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2604">
                <text>Comparative study of chlorpromazine and insulin coma in therapy of psychosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1958 Apr 12;166(15):1846-50.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2605">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2606">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-31-008</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2607">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2608">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Shaw, Robert; Gross, George E.; Coleman, Frederick S.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2609">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2610">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2611">
                <text>[Preprint and reprint]. Reprint from The Journal of the American Medical Association April 12, 1958, Vol. 166. Observation letter. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2612">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2613">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74463">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81024">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87585">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94146">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="262" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="53">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/6428428b2e8c8dd8c101b89ff0bcc16f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0dca1e713671d6e32179b0a6fd1afba3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100679">
                    <text>Electroencqahalographic Correlates of the Electroshock Process

Max

Fink MJJ.
and

Martin A. Green

14.3).

‘

..

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks,

L.I.,

in part, by grant M—927, National Institutes of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service.

Aided,
Read

at the meeting of the Eastern Psychiatric Research Association,

February 6, 1958.

V:3-l-58

New

York,

N.Y.

�Electroencephalographic Correlates of the Electroshock Process
During the past few years, renewed

attention has been given to the

relation between changes in measures of cerebral function, and the behavioral
changes induced by electroshock (l, 2). Alteration in various aspects of
the electroencephalogram has been emphasized by various observers (3, h)

in cerebral function. In an initial
study in this laboratory, a significant relationship between the degree
and duration of induced delta activity and clinical evaluation of
"improvement" was observed (6). Subsequent studies have focused on
as a sensitive index of changes

'

various parameters of the

EEG

changes including frequency of

type of current, age of subject and pre-treatment record

It is

treatment,'

characteristics.

the purpose of this report to assess the relation of these aSpects

of treatment to changes in the

EEG

and

in clinical response;

and to

describe the role of serial electroencephalograms in the rational management and study of convulsive

therapies.

�-2-

man:
One

hundred and seventy-three consecutive electroshock

referrals

have been studied. Electroencephalograms were taken before treatment,

after treatment at weekly intervals during and following
the course of therapy until the record had achieved its pre-treatment

and on a day

characteristics. Patients in

whom

demonstrated slow wave or spike

All the

EEG

delta activity.

the pre-treatment electroencephalogram

activity

were excluded from

the series.

records were quantitatively measured for the amount of
On

the basis of the per-cent time, slowest frequency,

highest voltage and longest duration of bursts of slow waves, in selected
lead combinations, the records were classified into "high," "moderate"
and "low" degrees of

delta activity, according to criteria previously

published (6).
Three convulsive techniques were employed: suprathreshold alternating

current, threshold alternating current
current methods.

The

and parathreshold

unidirectional

alternating current suprathreShold (7)

and

unidirect-

ional parathreshold (8) treatments followed established techniques.

In

the threshold alternating current method, patients without prior sedation
received small amounts of current (90 volts for 0.2 second), usually

sufficient for a petit mal response.

intervals voltage, and
if necessary, duration.was increased until a grand mal convulsion was inAt 20 second

voltage and duration necessary to induce a grand mal

duced.

The minimal

was the

threshold value.

In addition, a convulsive-subconvulsive control study was instituted
during a period of these observations.

Randomly

selected patients referred

.

�.3for electrotherapy received subconvulsive therapy instead of grand mal.
In this technique, patients were given pentothal intravenously until
asleep, and then either

low

voltage unidirectional current fbr

60 seconds

alternating current of 80 to 120 volts for 0.2 second were administered for one to three applications, for a total of 2h to 36 petit mal
(8) or

responses.
Of

the

173

electrotherapy referrals, lh6 received grand

threshold alternating current,

57 by

current and

63 by

26 by suprathreshold

mal therapy

-

alternating

parathreshold unidirectional current methods.

Twenty-

seven subjects received a course of subconvulsive therapy.

All treatments were given three times a week, for 12-20 treannents.

failed to develop a significant behavioral or clinical response,
or middle or high degrees of delta activity in the EEG, were subsequently

Patients

Who

treated five to ten times per week.
Evaluations of clinical reaponse were

trist
ment

and

resident therapists

on two occasions.

At

the supervising psychia-

the height of the treat-

effect, the degree of behavioral change was scored as ”marked,"

"moderate," "minimal” orfhone."

in behavior in interviews

These

made by

after treatment was terminated.

and were based on the

ratings

were estimates of the change

and on the ward from the

Ratings of "improvement" were also
weeks

made by

pre-treatment patterns.

these physicians two to three

These

ratings were value judgments

four-fold classification of "recovered,"

"improved” and "unimproved or worse" (2,

6).

"much improved,"

�RESULTS:

1. Variability in Delta Activity'with Convulsive Therapy:

variability in the degree of induced delta activity
reparted in the initial 2h patients {6) is confinned in these series of
convulsive therapy referrals (Table I). While the number of high degree
The wide

records increases with treatment,

fourth

week,

are

still

rated as

27%

”low" degrees of

TABLE

Degree of

EEG

in the third

week, and 18%

in the

delta activity.

I

Delta Activity with Convulsive Therapy
(Per-cent of Group)
Treatment Period

h

28

h6

60

Moderate Degree

12

21

27

22

Lou'Degree

68

h8

25

18

16

3

2

o

High Degree

No

Delta Activity
2. Role of Convulsion in
The

EEG

Response:

significance of the convulsion per

gg

in the

EEG

and

behavioral response was assessed in the convulsive-subconvulsive study.
Of the h? subjects*'who received convulsive therapy in this study, 9 had

* These included 28 subjects who received grand mal therapy on a random
selection basis, plus 19 subconvulsive subjects referred for a "second
course" of therapy.

�-5high degree delta records in both second, third and fourth weeks of
ment, 12 during two of the three weeks, and 13 during one of the

periods. Thirteen of the h? subjects failed to

show a

treattest

high degree delta

record on convulsive therapy.
Of

the 27 subjects

who

received subconvulsive therapy, however, none

demonstrated middle or high degree delta

activity records during any week
of treatment. Low degrees of delta activity were noted in three subjects
during both the second and third weeks of treatment, and in 8 subjects
during the fourth week.

In concurrent behavioral ratings,

25 of

initial

28

subjects in the

convulsive group showed marked behavioral change; while of the subconvulsive
group,
Of

the

21;

of the 27 showed Bdnimal or no behavioral changes (Table

latter

group, 19 were referred

II).

for a second course of therapy.

In 1h of these, grand mal electroshock induced high degree delta activity

all

significant behavioral change. Of the five who failed
to demonstrate high degree delta activity on convulsive electroShock, all

and

showed a

showed middle degree
records; and

change.

three of the five

Showed a

behavioral

Thus, of the h? convulsive therapy subjects, h2 showed a

behavioral change.

significant

�—6—

II

TABLE

Ratings of Behavioral Change: Convulsive - Sdbconvulsive Therapies
(Fburth-Fifth'weeks of Treatment),
Moderate

marked

Minimal

yggg
i

Convulsive Therapy (A?)

27

15

5

0

O

3

8

16

Subconvulsive Therapy (27)

In evaluations of the degree of "improvement"
51%

of the convulsive therapy group were rated as

"recovered," and

evaluated as sustaining the
"improved," and only
however,

but

70%

11%

III).

as "improved" (Table

32%

7%

were rated

same

weeks

after treatment,

"much improved"
On

discharge,

degrees of improvement, while

were ”unimproved."

in the

tWo

first two

were “unimproved," two weeks

or

51%

were

h2%

were

0f the subconvulsive group,

categories,

19%

after treatment.

As

in the "improved,"
these were re-

ferred for a second course of therapy, hosPital discharge evaluations

do

not reflect the effects of subconvulsive therapy.
TABLE

III

Ratings of Improvement: CoHVulsive-Subconvulsive Therapies
(TWO

Weeks

After Last Treatment)
Recovered

Much

Improved

Improved

Unimproved,

worse

Convulsive Therapy (h?)

9

15

15

8

Sdbconvulsive Therapy (27)

2

l

5

19

�Convulsive therapy induced
and more favorable evaluations
The

significantly greater behavioral change
of

improvement than did subconvulsive therapy.

clinical observations thus parallel the electroencephalographic data.

Also, patients

who

showed.neither an

convulsive therapy,

EEG

Showed both EEG and

or a behavioral response to
behavioral changes

when

Sub-

placed on

convulsive therapy.

3. Role of

Type

of Convulsive Therapy:

In view of the variety of electroshock techniques employed,
the relationship

between EEG

delta activity

and the behavioral response, an

analysis of the effect of type of electroshock

on

EEG

delta activity

undertaken. The results are graphically presented in Figures

first figure relates

and

1 and

was

2.

The

the treatment type to the percentage of records demon-

strating high degrees of EEG delta activity in each treatment group during
the second, third and fburth weeks of treatment. In each period, treatnent
with alternating current at suprathreshold strength gave the highest percentage
of high degree delta records. Treatment with unidirectional current and with

alternating current at threshold strength

was

less effective than the supra-

threshold alternating current technique in each period; the unidirectional

current treatment being
method only

more

effective than the threShold alternating current

early in the course'of therapy.*

Subconvulsive techniques

yielded no high degree delta activity records.
The second

figure demonstrates the

same

relationship

by measuring the

per cent of each treatment group showing no delta activity or only low degrees
* The differences between suprathreshold and threShold treatment methods are
significant at .05 by chi square in the h-é and 7-9 treatment periods, but
not in 10-12 period. Parathreshold treatment methods are not significantly

different free the other

two methods

during any treatment_period.

�-8of such

activity. Here, the subconvulsive group is

100%

for each

treatment period. Suprathreshold alternating current techniques
the

least

number

of such records in eaoh period, with threShold

show

and

parathreshold techniques in between.

h. Freguenqy of Treatment:
Another factor

is the frequency

in the rate of development of delta activity

of treatment. While

three times a week, a number

activity were treated
were given

more

who

all patients

and

In nine such patients, treatments

in each instance middle or high

degrees of delta activity were induced. Similar
previously demonstrated by Pacella

5. Factor of
In the

initially treated

failed to develop high degrees of delta

intensively.

daily or twice daily,

were

at 31. (9),

correlates were

EEG

and Callaway (10).

V

Age:

initial series of'patients,

it was noted that younger

patients, under hS years of age, developed greater degrees of delta
activity during the first and second weeks of treatment; while older
subjects developed such activity to a significant degree during the third
week. By the fourth week of treatment, age no longer
between the groups. Combining the data from

supports this observation.

all

differentiated

convulsive therapies

During the Second week,

h3%

of records are

in patients under the age of no; but only 30%
in patients from h0-60, and 18% in patients 61 and over. In the third

measured high degree delta
and fourth weeks, the

differences are

no longer present and approximately

2/3rds of the subjects have high degree delta records
times per week.

when

treated

3

�.9TABLE

Variation in Per

IV

Cent High Degree Delta EEG Records with Age *

9

Treatment Period
Second week

Third

week

Fourth'week

in.

is.

2:2

nee

ho years

(28)

15%

61%

69%

’41-50 Years

(28)

29%

h0%

56%

51-60 years

(28)

32%

56%

55%

Over 61 years

(18)

18%

50%

80%

es
To

'

6. Pre-Treatnent Record Characteristics:
Previous reports, summarized by Chusid and Pacella (3),

noted a significant relationship between pre-treatmnt reca» rd character-

istics

and the degree of induced "abnonnality."

Predominant alpha rhythm,

“abnormal" (3) or “borderline abnormal" (11) records were more
develop

alterations in the

EEG

liable to

than those with predominantly low voltage

fast activity patterns.
In these series of patients, subjects whose pre-treatment'record
demonstrated diffuse slow wave activity, spike or spike wave activity
were not included in the statistical analyses. Eight such subjects were

«-

difference in incidence of hig1 degree records is significant at .01
level of confidence between the second and fourth weeks and .05 between
the second and third weeks of treatment in patients over 50 years of age;
but is not significantly different for these periods in groups under 50
years.
The

�-10..

treated with convulsive techniques,
high degrees of delta activity

however; and seven of them developed

earlier,

and for'more sustained

periods,

than patients without such pre-treatment abnormality.
A Specific analysis of the relation between pre-treatment alpha
.

and the degree

of induced delta activity

was undertaken.

Rank order

correlations of the preetreatment per cent time alpha in selected leads
(anterior temporaldvertex) with the degree of delta activity during the

third

and

fourth

weeks of treatment

of +.2h and +.3S reapectively.

The

in

h3

patients demonstrated correlations

relationship in the fourth

week

significant at the .05 level of confidence; while that in the third
fails of significance, although the trend is indicated.

is
week

�.11..
DISCUSSION:

aspects of these studies warrant discussion: the significance of
the convulsion in the electroshock
process; and the role of serial electroTwo

encephalograms

in the rational management and’study of convulsive therapies.

In the early studies of convulsive therapy numerous authors, including
Kalinowsky 23

El. (12)

and Pacella

and electroencephalographic

gt.§£. (9), emphasized both the clinical

differences

between grand mal and

petit

mal

responses. While grand mal seizures induced clinical improvement in 60

to

80%

of cases,

petit

mal induced changes

Similarly, electroencephalograms in grand

activity, while in petit mal therapy,

no

in less than

25%

of subjects.

mal therapy demonstrate

delta

delta activity is seen.

In subsequent years, various subconvulsive, brief stimulus, unidirectional stimulating, monopolar stimulating, and focal convulsive techniques

in each, in.turn,,discarded in routine therapy.
Bergman §§.§l, (13), for example, in describing the electroencephalographic
effects of focal seizure techniques noted that 70% of patients had normal
records at 15 such "seizures;“ while 70-75% had "abnormal” records after
have been described, and

Ulettgt El, (1h), in a careful convulsive-subconvulsive
control study,reported a significant difference in the clinical response of
grand mal seizures.

patients receiving convulsive therapies
convulsive (33%), or controls (38%).
reSponse

in the

He

(60-80%) and those

noted

two groups, and emphasized the

for the therapeutic effect.

ReCent

ﬁne

discrepancy in the

EEG

significance of the seizure

additional reports

based on a variety of data further emphasize

receiving sub-

ﬂue

by various observers,

significance of the convulsion

�.12..

in the therapeutic response (h, 15, 16).
convulsions per g2 are, or
which

thus indicates that

reflect, the significant physiologic events

are the basis for therapeutic efficacy of convulsive therapies.

If

the convulsion is the essential element both in the

the behavioral response, does the
any

The evidence

EEG

and in

induction of the seizure play

mode of

role in.this reSponse?. In the studies reported here, small differences

in both the degree of

EEG

delta activity

and the

rate of its development

different methods of induction of grand mal seizure.
Ulett gt 3;, (1h) reported an improvement rate of 57% for the
alternating current cenvulsive technique, and 76% for the photo-metrazol

were observed between

technique. While the differences are small, the authors ascribe greater

clinical efficacy to the convulsive photoametrazol technique. In a
discussion of this report, Kalinowsky noted.that metrazol convulsions
have impressed various workers as being more efficacious than
induced convulsions.

convulsant drug,

PM

More

electrically

recently, Edwalds, (17) describing a

1090, ascribed to

it

new

clinical results slightly better

than electroconvulsive techniques.

further noted that the convulsions induced by various
techniques have varying characteristics of latency, duration, preponderance~
we have

of clonic or tonic phase, apnea, 332. All grand mal seizures are seemingly
not equivalent; and a seizure is not an

"all or

Different seizure patterns occur and these

may

none" phenomenon.

reflect differences in the

physiologic effect of different treatment methods. Further studies of

this problem are in progress (18).

�-13 .-

While

this variability in clinical results is reported, it is clear

that with repeated canvulsions,

rates

no matter how induced, improvenent

per cent are observed. The differences between various types
of treatment are small, and, for the most part, may be readily obviated by
of 60 to

80

the simple expedient of increasing the frequency or number of treatments.
We

may conclude

way

that convulsive therapy is nonpspecific with regard to the

the convulsion is induced.

The

significant element is the brain

change

subsequent to the convulsion, and not the agent used in bringing about

this brain change. In previous reports (6, 19, 20)
convulsive therapy

we

have noted

that

is also non-Specific with regard to its application

in mental illness, and in its clinical

effects.

and behavioral

The

present

studies, amplify , therefore, the previous conclusion of the non-Specificity
of convulsive
we have

therapies.

applied methods of quantitative, serial

studies reported here.

EEG

analyses in the

clinical estimates of behavioral

While

change

have yielded similar data, such evaluations are more dependent on the

attitudes of the observer (21), and less amenable to quantification than
the

EEG.

Application of

EEG

analyses to problemsin convulsive therapies

provides a rational basis for the comparison of different treatment
techniques.
“we

have previously noted

clinical

management

patients

who

that

EEG

analyses

may be

applied in the

of patients receiving convulsive therapy (6). In

fail to

show a

significant behavioral response

on

treatnent

regimens of three times per week, an electroencephalogram may serve as a

�guide

for further therapy. In those subjects

in.whom high degree

delta

activity has not been induced, increasing treatment frequency, withholding
premedication, or shifting to a more effective oonvulsant method, may
result in the neurophysiologic changes. If the degree of delta activity

is

high and sustained for a number of weeks, other factors as personality

(22) or environmental (19)

may

be assumed

to preclude a satisfactory

behavioral response, even when the neurophysiologic substrate
and

further convulsive therapy

application has been suggested
EEG

may

well be discontinued.

by Roth (5)

A

is assured;

similar

for thiopental activated

records.
The

successful application of quantitative

convulsive therapies, has led to
dynamic

EEG

techniques to

their application to other physio-

therapies. Recent reports from these laboratories note a

similar application for the rational
psychopharmacologic agents (20).

management and understanding of

�.15sunnru

AND

CONCLUSIONS:

Serial quantitative analysis of the degree of induced

activity

in

were made

173 consecutive

EEG

delta

electrotherapy referrals. Patients

were treated by three convulsive methods: suprathreShold

alternating current,

threshold alternating current and parathreshold unidirectional current.

Random

electrotherapy patients received a course of subcdnvulsive treatment instead
of grand mal, in a convulsive-subconvulsive control study.

1.

An

induced grand mal convulsion

is essential both for the electro-

encephalographic and the behavioral changes ascribed to ”shock" therapy.

2.

The

rate
(a)

two

The

EEG

delta activity

of seizure induction: suprathreshold

Mode

techniques induce
techniques.

and degree of induced

EEG

changes

earlier

and

is

dependent upon:

alternating current

to a higher degree than threshold

results of unidirectional current methods fall between these

techniques.
(b) Frequency of treatment: increasing frequency inereases degree

of

EEG

delta activity.
(c)

Age

of subject: Patients under

delta activity earlier than older patients, but
ment, differences are insignificant.
(d) Pre-treatment record

hS develop

by the

greater degrees of

fourth

week of

treat-

characteristics: Patients with dysrhythmic

records or high per-cent time alpha activity develop greater degrees of delta

activityearlier than patients with low per-cent time alpha activity.
3. It is suggested that serial quantitative electroencephalography
provides a rational basis for the study and the clinical management of
convulsive therapies.

�REFERENCES

l.

Weinstein, E.A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During Electroshock
Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy, Am. J.
1.92: 22-26, 1952.

Psychiat.

2.

Kahn, R.L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of Amobartital Test

3.

Chusid, J.G. and Pacella, B.L.: The Electroencephalogram in the Electric
Shock Therapies, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 116: 95-107, 1952.

h.

Roth, 14.: Changes

S.

Roth,

to Clinical Improvenent in Electroshock, AMA. Arch. Neurol.

in the

under Barbiturate Anaesthesia Produced by
Treatment
and Their Significance for the
Electro-Convulsive
ECT
EEG
Clin. Neurophysiol. 2: 261-280, 1951.
Theory of
Action,
Kay, D.W.K., Shaw, J. and Green, J.: Prognosis and Pentethal
Induced Electroencephalographic Changes in Electroconvulsive
Treatment, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. _9_: 225—237, 1957.

7:41.,
’

Fink,

EEG

M.

and Kahn, R.L.: Relation of Electroencephalographic Delta
A.M.A. Arch.

Activity to Behavioral Beeponse in Electroshock,
Neurol. and Psychiat. Z_8_: 516-525, 1957.

7.

Kalinowsky, L. and Hoch, P.: ghock Treatments, Psychosurgegy and Other
Somatic Treatments in Psychiatry, Grune and Stratton, N.Y. 1992.

8.

Alexander, L.: Treatment of Mental Disorder, W.B. Saunders Co.,
Philadelphia, 1953.

9.

Pacella, B.L., Barrera, E5.

and Kalinowsky, L.: Variations in the
Ele ctroencephalogram Associated with Electric Shock Therapy
in Patients with Mental Disorders, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Paychiat.
367-38u, 19u2.

g:
10.

Callaway, E.: Slow Wave Phenomena in Intensive Electroshock,
Neurophysio . a: 157-162, 1950.

ll.

Kennard, M. and Willner, M.D.: Significance of Changes in the Electro—
encephalogram which Results from Shock Therapy, Am. J. Psychiat.
1L2: :

12.
13.

Olin.

uo-us, 19m.

Kalinowsky, L., Barrera,
Reaponse

l9LL2.

EEG

ms.

in Electric

and Horowitz, W.A.: The "Petit-Mal"
Shock Therapy, Am.J. Psychiat. 28;: 708-711,
"

P.5., Impastato, D.J., Berg, S. and Feinstein, R...‘ Electroencephalographic Changes Following Electrically Induced Focal

Bergman,

Seizures, Conf. Neurol. 12: 271-277, .1953.

�W
K. and Gleser, 6.0.: Evaluation of Convulsive and
Subconvulsive Shock Therapies Utilizing a Control Group, A31:
Jo MChiat. 112: 79S~802, 19560

Ulett, GA” Smith,

15. weinstein, E. and Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness, 0.0. Thomas,

Springfield, 1955.

16. Fleming,

“13.0.: An

Inquiry into the Mechanism of Action of Electric
J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 121;: th-hSO, 1956.

Shock. Treatments,

17. Edwalds, R.M.: Intravenous Administration of PM 1090: Clinical
Elmerience with a New Convulsant Dmg. Read at FLY. Divisional
Meeting A.P.A. 1957.

18.

Green, M.A.: Significance ‘of Individual Variability in "EEG Respome
to Electroshock, J. Hillside Hosp. é: 229-210, 1957.

19.

Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Green, “.11.: Experimental Studies of the
Electroshock Process, Dis. New. 835 . (in press).

20.

Fink, M.:

21.

Fink,

A

Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies,

J. Hillside

M.

and Kahn,

9: 197-206, 1957.
R.L.: Behavioral Patterns in Induced States of

Hosp.

Altered Brain Function.
1957.

22.

Read

at

N.Y. Divisional Meeting A.P.A.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to
Electroshock Therapy, Coni‘. Neurol. (in press).

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, 14.:

�ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC CORRELATES OF THE ELECTROSHOCK PROCESS
MAX FINK, M.D.,

and

MARTIN A. GREEN, M.D.

From the Department of Experimental
Psychi:
atry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, .N. Y.

Pro blem :

In the course of an evaluation of the role of altered brain function in the electroshock
process, the
relation between electroencephalographic change
and behavioral response has been re-assessed.

Subjects and Method:
Eighty consecutive electroshock patients have
been studied. All patients received electroencephalograms before treatment; on a day after a treatment at weekly intervals during, and following the
course of therapy until the records had achieved
their pre-treatment characteristics. Treatment procedures varial, including unidirectional and alternating current electroshock, and subconvulsive technics with Pentothal premedication. Treatment was
usually instituted at three times per week for 12-20
treatments. Patients who failed to develop a clinical response, or EEG changes of signiﬁcant degree,
were subsequently treated at 5-10 times per week.
The EEG records were classiﬁed for degree of
delta activity into “high," “middle” and “low" degree delta records using the following indices: the
percent-time delta; highest percent-time delta in
any lead; slowest wave in the record; highest amplitude of delta; and duration of burst activity. (Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 78: 516-525, 1957.)
Evaluations of change in behavior were made by
the supervising psychiatrist at the height of the
electroshock effect; and ratings of improvement
were made two to three weeks following the termination of therapy.
_

Results .'

~

.4];
3,

54

I

._

1) The appearance of a high degree EEG delta
activity during the second and third weeks of treatment was signiﬁcantly correlated with change in
behavior and ratings of improvement.
3) High EEG delta activity was induced in patients receiving convulsive electroshock only, and
was not observed in subCOnvulsive therapy.
3) Alternating current instruments induced high

degree EEG delta activity earlier than unidirectional
but by the 4th week of treatment, the
di' erences were eliminated.
'4) There was a direct relation between the degree
of EEG delta activity and the frequency of treatment; and an inverse relationship to age.

”ﬁruments,
‘

Conclusion:
1) There is a relationship between the degree of
EEG delta activity in the EEG and clinical change

in behavior.
.
2) The time of the appearance of EEG delta activity and its persistence is related to:
a) induction of grand mal seizures;
b) type of current employed;
0) frequency of treatment; and
d) age of the patient
3) Early. and sustained high degree electroencephalographic delta activity is a necessary,, though
not sufﬁcient, pre-requisite for improvement in the
electroshock process.

’4

;

Avf"

�TRQIW

m

Subuuowluve
Conoubwc
\\

d,

AC.

and u“

..

ﬁYc-‘Hol‘b

_

Paiszélﬁftfl’l

_ A

“

\t

W:

0

2a 3!

4¢v

93¢

{I to

057:0

7‘

�.

t‘,

“i.

I

3

“fatig-

‘

ﬂcrld;é

J

1’

3547.79

5‘
”WW

55/
(7.?”
Mfl

m-

a;

V

Ear

ﬂ&lt;.a..ma'" 7”,... Iv E

‘5'

Je/Kv.

ﬂaw;

�T

$w

\I‘VKV

I.

u‘

W‘LVWQ

a:

%M

33k

m

\«
SV
133%

§miﬁilﬁf

*wiﬁa

3.
a. gas.

/o~rv
E ”'7’

ﬂaw

‘ﬁeW

wwww
-

’

a»: no"
#1 l? I7

1/

-

7—":

"um...“L‘, .'

�MAX F'INK, M. D.
275 MIDDLE NECK ROAD
GREAT NECK, N.Y.

GREAT N ECK

2-4542

�it (fr-2'
IQ”;

of
E
1

”7t;

Y

m,

W

Z” @1344 :4

,7

55/”

g 1/ If A/
&gt;6

4a?

74,...

ll' / W?%xwm¢£«ul7

4/“

.

/

I'A-ylg

MW
h

j

.

A."

Wﬂégéé’ IL
I

k

ﬂrucéuaticl

«-

”‘0“!an WM

%; My AWI+M 74,",
ﬂaw/MM: :7 «a. .359.
4M
*-

(kxaﬁJg

ﬁlm: 454”

“44:4

7

%

,uﬂg-gagx

”Mf4cf/ZA WW M4MU: Myst—36%
V

é’éwt ”IQ/W 7

$54 49’4“" ”'1

W/wi‘w;

WWﬁé/®
W/54‘

W 3/

if/

“L

CéwJ/f

Mﬂéé‘l/Iému‘gr h" (ll/Q

@M‘n%

«:7

éﬂéé/Z
WdCAfﬁ

/“’€ "
(1—1.2

'

Way
Aﬁz/pwgﬁJé.Lmﬁzfe We"?
:7

ZSI)_

9957‘

/ZTJWWWH4~ Ian/Cw
:6.

.{2

7

�I

.g

éw’ﬂi yaw
@féaMM

Maw
Wad/f

fare—QM

{MM {#293

Li
I

_

s‘.

E

.

BM

.

_

‘7

&gt;

&gt;‘~

.

J«

V:

,

,

�.7.

‘2‘.)1/3

F7,,

Wpiwy’ﬁ ”6.12.7595

r,

//,%/d1

‘

9W..A,7J»

92%;!»4;

7&amp;me

W

MM
4"

I/Z.

4454.441,

.

WM¢L7A WWMZZ/é
ffffww/CL/MJZ’LWM'ZW
421W
yzzofs‘vwéz
OWW/éﬂéuWWay
/%WMMM/&amp;aw Mu&gt;4/L-a\
WW 4% )O/M/Mé’ Mr IQM

Muwr‘

ﬂay,

$4]de
Wit/WC!
fww
ﬁWM
My“
wag/WM?"
MAW
WM
M WM
WM
MWM‘.
jWL/éjfm/ﬁfou/W

4»!

sd/zw

,e/Ze‘e/MW.

ﬂaw-‘7

��*2

31”ka only; and m
wrehnws
1;)

obaomd in mbcmvulsive or petﬁ» m1

curmt

We! high degree

mm.

shaman?
mam-um). max—mat, but by ﬂu hth ml: of tmtmnt, the

3) Alﬁemﬂng

mar than tbs

not.

me.
mm m a.

instruments

EEG

were
'

mum mm a» dance at m aimmty and

direct

relationshiptom.

thatmqueneyoftmtmntxmdm
L

’

‘

Gmlusgm'i

‘

2mm
2.qu
mmmmummamgammm‘
1)

mm

in a

2-,

mm of mm mmw

he

‘

m m or the Mes-tint: a! damn abnormliw
is rented. to a) the induction of mm m mm.
l

2)

10%

type or electrical

and

us

Mama

mm meme
I

a) 1m frequency or

tnatmt

I

6)

ago of the

3)

ﬁodmmtim

patiant
1n

olectmahmk therapy as

m

mamahouk, manuals-1m alwmszmk, ammatmmm therapy .- wnm do not
dmlep delta abnonmlity in than Wt, fail M
whim tha therapeutic msulta at

mud m1

exmam.

this plaeabo affect.

The

limited

a
arrimy

or mass

pmduru is

probably due to

�Electmaephalagnphio

many

'

ﬂax

1*

From

ﬂak, 11.9.,

comma at the
Prone“

Robert L.

the Department at Experimental

M3. 3“

IMO;

i

Electmhook

m and H. Green, 3.9.

mummy, Hillside Hospital,

613::

���.3

I

“,—

“A

May

.—
-

,.

Mu

may or ﬂu mam-m

M's-3., Mn A. «ma. 3.»... m
mm. 2., an. an».

hm mammmwuuauuudumbmm
mama hm
Wumm
mm meta-W MM mam;
many

bun

W- mu
411

m; tmmt
«www.mtmmmmwmmwm
mm m We!
pun-Wt Wam- mum
www.mmmmwnmmmzw
mum-m Was um mama-1 Mum Me
for
In many mum-ca it Wm
as g dry

their

33m-

mock, ma

M W“ 1240 mm“.
atmum‘mwwmaamm.umwu
mam-m.mnmmmmmammmma

mmmmWWtwmamuwwm

WHWW'WWNMWMWIWMW:
nut-m
tho

pm mu;

mam-*4... mu
I“

awn“, amt
V‘

IMWWdWhmw.mm-WM,M
m'mM§
msmumWMWqu-y,mzomm
“mm;
M

3-95

1997;:

2

‘s
g

1
1

-§
5

��Electroencephalographic Correlates of the Electroshock

H

Max

Fink,

14.13.,

W
Process

MW

1. .

*-

14‘1” P:

Green, H.D./

1/

4..

W.

* From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks, New York.
=,\

�Problem:

In the course of an evaluation of the role of altered brain function
in the electroshock process, the relation between electroencephalographic
change and behavioral reSponse has been

re-assessed.

Subjects and Method:
Eighty consecutive electroshock patients have been studied. All patients received electroencephalogram before
on a day after a

treatment”

mg

card»
oﬁuntime
intervals during, and following
IKE/MA retheir pie-treatment characteristics.

treatment at weekly
.

cords had achieved
‘

.“

-~

7

1-..9-

~.

WW
.

~~~~~

.

mm

'

~

'

~

.

”will.

. Treatment was

stituted at three times per week for 12—20 treatments. West-of atients
who failed to develop a clinical response, or EEG changes of
significant de-

WM
m

gree, were At ated
The EEG

9"“ M" /{“"

records were classified for degree of delta abnomality ﬁih

records/gang the following indices:

“high" "middle" and "low"

the percent-time delta; highest percent-time delta :1
wave

in the record; highest amplitude

ivity.

ng
*

5"“
Results:

M

1)

A

W‘

-Ax/1

74

'
gs
«Ede:94‘»!wa

by the supervising

M M fxwvm/

positive correlation

was

slowest

delta; and duration of burst act-

Kiwi” W W
WM
i/fal law/Mm
a:

fin

oi‘

.0 lead;

any

M

psychiatrist

3f

1‘41.

W
dan—

Mﬂmdgmmzé

“ﬁmmmal?

A}.

established between the development of

ram

I’lZunfgy

��In)"

l-

.J,

nmmwmmuwuuunmbmm
ammmwmmwammmm 7mm
mmwmmgmawmaw
ummmvmrmmwmummumw
mmmmnmmmm; Wt”.-

W
mum‘mmammmwmmru-mmm
mommimmmﬁwmummum

mmmumwuamm.umwu

mummmmmam '
”T”

.

«mﬁwwwumm,mwmm
I

EMA : I/r/rp

��(“7
,.

'

9/“ ;\\

KM

4/ 44(ég/7’M4 4%
4%”‘49444.44.44
/4u44..
ﬁod—n—«a—
A: 44.4.44.

14

m
@

4
4

4

L?!

(«I

,

I

er!)
,1

rd

449-64

-wmm.mm.mnu4—

Md

‘chZJ‘M-

if
éw/AMM
-4444

(24

[44/2444]

444 743444.444.

~

4444424444; (4472442444,)

44 444444

4245/44“

maﬁa-,4
ﬁwjj/WJZM
444444

W
\WW’W
‘
44.4

I

44444444444444

44-

£441,148

‘43

44.474444744-

44.4444/‘

WU)

Ker-44444.4.

447444.544”

MMW

//-/v -n

$4244 77 rte—“4.44.4

1/

44444 45/4
4

’4

(I)

@)(3)

4045':

...44. 4..."...

.....

~

£44444

{Que/7

5:7

82444444 44,444

4

K

M444

4244

5447

47,424,, 4244444

,.

�1: 2/1/58

EEG

Correlates of Electroshock Process

During the past few years, incnasing attention has been given to the

ic
relation between changes in the electroencephalogram and the behavioral
change induced by electroshock.

The

initial application of

EEG

techniques

to the electr0310ck problem in the period l9hO-l950, was summarized in an

excellent review
of treatments

in 1952,

that the

who noted

rather than the degree of induced neurophysiologic

(reflected in the
peutic

by Chusid and Pacella

outcome.

EEG)

These

was the primary

number

change

factor related to favorable thera-

studies, largely based

on

descriptive analyses of

pre and post-treatment records, were followed by serial quantitative

analyses.
In 1951 and 1952, Roth analyzed the

in patients during a course of
was

related to the process

ECT

and

of recovery.

In 1953, in the laboratories

EEG

activated

by this-

He

concluded

that

thiopental
delta
noted that induced detal activity

at Hillside Hospital,

we

analysis of neurophysiologic bases of electroshock, based

"

undertook an
on a hypothesis

expressed by Weinstein and his coaworkere in which they related improvement

in electroshock to persistent states of altered cerebral function.

Our

�-2...

first
did

studies utilized the amobarbital test

show a

provement.

relationShip

and

these, parenthetically,

between changes in language and

Our second index was the

ratings of

delta index of the electroencephalogram.

In our original review of patients, recently reported,

significant relationship between the degree
delta activity

It is

and

im—

and

we

noted a

duration of the induced

clinical evaluation of behavioral

change and "improvement."

our purpose tonight to review these findings; to describe subsequent

studies in

which various aSpects of the treatment process were

the degree of

EEG

delta activity;

and

to conclude with a

related to

summary of

the

present neurophysiologic adaptive view of convulsive therapy.

One

hundred and

have been studied.
a day

forty-eight consecutive patien electroshock referrals
Electroencephalograms were taken before treatment, on

after a treatment at weekly intervals during,

course of therapy,

istics.

until the record

had achieved

and following the

its

pre-treatment character-

Various treatment procedures have been used, including alternating

current threshold and suprathreshold electrodhock; parathreshold unidirectional
current electroshock; and subconvulsive techniques with pentothal premedication.

�-3-

alternating current suprathreshold

The

K

)

and

unidirectional parathreshold

(Reiter) teChniques are well described in the threshold alternating current

patients, without prior sedation, received a

methods,

for 0.1 second, which was usually sufficient for a petit
20 second

second.

intervals, voltage

increased

by 10

volts

90

until a grand

mal absence. At

up

to

mal convulsion was induced.

just necessary to induce a grand

1&amp;0

volts, 0.1

mal was the threshold

voltage and

The

value. In

subconvulsive techniques, patients were given pentothal intravenously

asleep,

volts

Voltage was then reduced to 100 volts x 0.2 second, and increased

by 10 volt steps
time

was

current,

low

and then

either

low voltage

.
current of
or alternating

unidirectional current for

”a

80 nvolts x

until

60 seconds;

.
.
0.1 second were administered
for one

to three applications.
All treatments were given three times a week

treatments. Patients

who

failed to develop

clinical reSponse, or

EEG

changes of

treated 5-10 times per
All

EEG

a

initially, for

12-00

significant behavioral or

significant degree,

were subsequently

week.

records were quantitatively measured for the degree of delta

activity. This index

was determined by measuring the

per cent time delta

�.uin

180 seconds of each of

three lead combinations,

and both the average

_and

the highest index in any one lead were used; the slowest frequency

and

highest amplitude delta;

Records in the

and the

initial series

duration of the longest burst

were placed

those with the greatest changes in slow
Degree Delta

Activity."

Delta Activity" and

"Low Degree

week of

The

specific limits of

ratings of

Low

degree

treatment.

3)

Evaluations of changes in behavior were
and

"High

were "Moderate Degree

following three slides demonstrate a High-Middle and

psychiatrist

upper third -

earlier report.

(Figs. 1, 2,

weeks

thirds

Delta Activity."

record obtained during the fourth

The

The

activity - were called

wave

The middle and lower

each range are described in the
The

into sequence.

.

made by

the supervising

resident therapist at the height of the treatment effect.

"improvement" were made by these physicians two to

after treatment

was terminated, and were based on the

three

four fold

"much improved," "Improved" and "unimproved

classification of "re00vered,"
or‘worse."
In our

initial reports

(

,

) we

noted that patients

who developed

�-5high degree delta

sustained,

activity early,

and

in

whom

such delta

activity

was

were evaluated as "much improved" or "recovered" with a

greater incidence than those patients

who

failed to demonstrate

significantly
delta

such

activity. These observations are portrayed in slide h.
(Slide h;
These

patients had been treated with a unidirectional convulsive therapy.

In a subsequent series of

5b

~

in

Graph EST #1)

which the degree of

patients, a predictive study was undertaken

delta activity induced during the second

weeks of treatment was determined.

0f the subjects in

whom

and

high degrees of

delta activity

were induced during both weeks, 67% were eventually

much improved;

while of those

either

week, only

30%

who did

rated as

not have a high degree record in

were so evaluated.

treated with a unidiructional current;

third

and

Of

these patients, half were

half with

a suprathreshold

alternating current technique.
Slide

5

- (Table I,

Exp. Studies)

Results:
1. Role of Convulsion§:in Therapy.

In the

most

recent series of patients, randomly selected subjects

�-5received subconvulsive therapies instead of grand mal; and both alternating

current
Of

and

unidirectional current techniques were used.

the

subjects

who

received convulsive therapy,

______had high

degree delta records in both second, third and fourth weeks of treatment;
.____

during

periods.

two of

the three weeks, and ____ during only one of the

Only _____

subjects failed to

show a

single high record

test

on con-

vulsive therapy.
Of

27

the/subjects

who

received subconvulsive therapy, however, none

demonstrated middle or high degree delta
of treatment.

Low

activity records during

any week

degrees of delta activity were noted in three subjects

during both the second and third weeks of treatment, and in

8

subjects

during the fourth week.
Concurrent analyses of the behavioral ratings showed _____ of the con-

vulsive group rated as showing marked behavioral change; while of the
suboonvulsive group, 25 showed no behavioral changes.
were

referred for a second course of therapy.

In

1h of

electroshock induced high degree delta activity and
behavioral change.

activity

Of

the five

who

all

Of

these, nineteen

these, grand mal
showed a

significant

failed to demonstrate high degree delta

on convulsive electroshock, all-showed middle degree records;

�-7and two of

the five

2. Factor of

Type

showed a behavioral change.

of Therapy:

In view of the variety of electroshock techniques employed, and the

relationship between

EEG

delta activity

and the behavioral response, an

analysis of the effect of type of electroshock in

EEG

delta activity

was

undertaken. The results are graphically presented in Figures

7.

The

first

related the percentage of records in each treatment group

during the second, third and fourth weeks of treatment
high degrees of

EEG

current techniques
The

gave a lower percentage of high degree

unidirectional technique

was also

degree delta

delta records.

less effective'than the supra-

all

these periods. Although

effective than threshold alternating current

course of therapy.

who demonstrated

delta activity. In each period,threshold alternating

threshold alternating current technique, in
more

6 and

methods

early in the

Note, that subconvulsive techniques yield no high

activity records.

In the next figure, the converse

is demonstrated.

The

relationship

between type of treatment, treatment period and percentage of treatment
group showing no delta

activity or only

low degrees of such

activity.

�-3Here, the subconvulsive group

is

for each treatment period. Supra-

100%

threshold alternating current techniques

show

the least number of

Such

records in each period.
3. Frequency of Treatment:
Another factor on the rate of development of delta

frequency treatment. While

convulsive therapies were treated

given daily or twice daily.

activity

were

initially treated three

failed to develop high degrees of delta activity

times a week, a number who
on

all patients

activity is the

In

all

more

sudh

intensively.

Treatments were

instances high degrees of delta

were induced.

u. Factors of
In the

Age and

Diagnosis:

initial series

of patients,

it

was noted

that younger patients,

under #5 years of age, developedlgreater degrees of delta

the

first

such

activity during

and second weeks of treatment; while older subjects developed

activity to a significant degree during the third week.

week of

treatment,

age was no longer a

By

the fourth

differentiating aSpect between the

groups. With increasing series of patients, utilizing various treatment
techniques, the differences between successive groups is largely a matter
of treatment technique rather than age.

�.9Similarly, conventional discharge diagnoses bear
to the rate or degree of delta activity induced.
in

young schizophrenics,

no

The

relation either

delta activity induced

older depressed, older schizophrenic paranoid,

younger reactive depressed subjects are similar in indidence of high,
middle and low degrees

not, of

itself,

a

at different stages of therapy.

The

diagnosis is

significant neurophysiologic factor in electroshock.

and

�combining the data from

all

convulsive therapies supports this

observa—

tion. During the second week,h3% of records are high degree delta in
patients ho; but only

30%

in patients from uo-so,

and

18%

61 and over.

In the third and fourth weeks, the differences are no longer present
and approximately 2/3 of the subjects have high degree
when

treated

3

delta records

times per week.
TABLE

Variation in

%

High Degree Delta

EEG

Records with Age

Treatment Pe riod

To ho

years

hl-SO

(28)
(25)

h3%

61%

69%

29%

h0%

56%

51-60

(28)

32%

56%

55%

61+

(18)

18%

50%

80%

S.

Pre-Treatment Record Characteristibs:
Previous reports, summarized by Chusid and Pacella;

a

(

)

rated

significant relationship between pre-treatment records characteristics

the degree of induced "abnormality?

Escords with predominant alpha

rhythm or "abnormal" (Chusid and Pacella) or "borderline abnonnal"

and

�.10-

liable to developé alterations in the

(Bagchi §£.El) records were more
EEG

than those with predominantly low voltage fast activity patterns.
Rank

order correlations of the pre-treahent per cent time

alpha in selected leads (anterior temporal - vertex) with the degree of

delta activity during the third

and

fourth

patients demonstrated correlations of +.2h
The

weeks of treatment

in

h3

and +.35 reSpectively

rehationship in the fourth week is significant at the .05 level of

confidence; while that in the third week
the trend

fails

of significance, although

is apparently indicated.

Discussion:
Two

aspects of these studies warrant discussion; the significance

of the convulsion

in the electroshock process;

and ﬁne

role of electro-

encephalography in the rational management and study of convulsive therapies.

(1) Significance of Convulsions:
In the

initial studies

of convulsive therapy numerous authors,

Kalinowsky

including Kalmaasky at al,(l9h2), and Pacella gt_§l:(l9h2) emphasized both
the

clinical and electroencephalographic differences

and

petit-mal responses.

provement in 60 to

80%

While grand mal

between the grand-mal

seizures induced clinical

im-

of cases, petit mal induced changes in less than

�.1125%

of subjects. Similarly, the electroencephalographic reSponse to

grand mal

is

one of

delta activity, and to petit mal, is

delta activity.

no

In subsequent years, various subconvulsive, brief stimulus,
unidirectional stimulating, monopolar stimulating, focal convulsive
techniques have been described, and each, in turn, discarded in routine
therapy.

Bergman gt_§l”(

)

for example, in describing the electroencquh-

eIographic effects of focal seizure techniques noted that

patients

had normal records

"abnormal" records

after

after

15 such

l0%

"seizures;" while

grand mal seizures.

Ulett gt §l°

20

of the

-

75%

had

), in a

(

careful control convulsive-subconvulsive amdy, reported the significant
differences in the clinical changes between the convulsive therapies
(60-80%) and subconvulsive (33%), and noted the discrepancy

response

in the

two groups, and emphasized the

in

EEQ

significance of the

seizure for the therapeutic effect.
These

studies emphasize the significance of the grand

mal

convulsion, both for the clinical therapeutic effect and the electroencephalographic reaponse. Recent reports by various observers, and
based on a variety of data, support

this conclusion.

If the convulsion is the essential

element in the

EEG

and

�-12behavioral reSponse in electrotherapy, does
convulsion

is

the

induced?. In the studies reported here, small differences

in both the degree of
were observed.

it matter in what way

EEG

delta activity

and the

rate of the development

Clinical evaluation demonstrated concomitant greater

degrees of clinical efficacy for the suprathreshold alternating current
method

to the

two

other convulsive techniques.

'Other studies have also

for various convulsive techniques.

shown

differences in clinical results

Ulett gt_§l.

(

)

noted similar

differences in clinical results in a study of patients receiving alternating current5'and photic-metrazole convulsive and subconvulsive techniques.
He

reported improvement rate of Sl%,'76% and

concluded,

33%

respectively;

that the convulsive photoshock technique

clinical efficacy. Epstein

and Wender (1955) compared

unidirectional current techniques,

and reported no

results but that unidirectional techniques required
more

had the

than alternating current methods.

More

a new convulsant drug,.Hﬂ 1090, ascribed to

greater than electroconvulsive techniques.

and

greatest

alternating and

difference in clinical
one to two treatments

recently, Edwalds, describing

it

a

clinical efficacy slightly

�-13while some

variability in clinical results is reported,

is clear that with repeated convulsions,
provement rates of 60
and

for the most part,

treatment.
regard to
have noted

we may

its

80%

are induced;

may be

no matter how induced, imThe

differences are small,

obviated by increasing the frequency of

conclude that convulsive therapy

mode of

tat

-

it

is non-specific with

induction. In previous reports

convulsive therapy

(EEG

is non-specific with

Theory) we

regard to their

application in mental illness, nor is their clinical or behavioral effects.
The

present studies amplify, therefore, the previous conclusion that

convulsive therapies are non-Specific.
2. Role of Electroencephalography in Convulsive Therapy:
we have

applied methods of quantitative, serial

in the studies reported here.
change may give

similar data, such evaluations are

the attitudes of the observer

of

EEG

(

analyses

clinical estimates of behavioral

While

on

EEG

)

than the

EEG.

more

closely dependent

Further application

Analyses to other problems in convulsive therapies may provide a

rational basis for comparison of different treatment techniques.

�We

have previously noted

in the clinical

management of

that

EEG

analyses

may be

applied

patients receiving convulsive therapy.
of

In our experience, the early and sustained induction of high degreaydelta
_

activity provides the physiologic basis for behavioral
vulsive therapy.
a

An

electroencephalogram in patients

significant behavioral response

per

week may

subjects in

change
who

in

fail

on treatment regimens of

high delta

to

show

three times

serve as a rational basis for clinical management.

whom

con—

In those

activity has not been induced, increasing

treatment frequency, withholding premedication, or shifting to a thera-

peutically

more

effective convulsant

If the

physiologic changes.
be maintained

may
(

)

for a

or environmental

(

havioral response, even
and

degree of delta

number of weeks, other
)

may be assumed to

when

further convulsive therapy

records.

result in the neuro-

activity is high;

and

it

factors, as personality

preclude s satisfactory be-

the neurophysiologic substrate is assured;

application has been suggested
EEG

method, may

may

welllae discontinued.

by Roth

(

)

A

similar

for thiopental activated

�.1 5..
lhe successful application of quantitative

EEG

techniques

to convulsive therapies, has led to their application to other physiodynamic

therapies. Recent reports

from these

application for the rational management
pharmacologic agents
Summary and

(

Conclusions:

).

laboratories note a similar

and understanding of psycho-

�to“

Win the Natalya”. Watmﬁmmbun gim
nation bum
inﬂamed by

It:

omwgek.
_

than

olectmnuplaham

In 1953. in the

and behavioral

mum

at.

dung"

mud. Hospital,

We“ of ashram-1019a: upon“ at olmtrouhook m mm.

swim:
(

champs in

)1n

were band on
which may

a.

Win mm

by

Romain and his

muted imprmmt 1n 01.6mm to tho

a»

mom”

Mom: of

paraiamat sum at altered mmbml function.

mmmmmmw&lt; Luminanctwnmtmuump
how the damn am mum a: ﬁn 1mm den-a activity and mum

«alum of huh-mm damp and “W.“
this report to "view than ﬁnding” to describe

mum nmrophyuiolom
to nuggut

aspect: of

u. Almanac-1m or

maps-oat. of minimum:

3%!
On.

W

bun swans.

3nd

It 1. at

W

at

mt Media in mini:

m mun-at woo.” In. ”mud;

MWmm in mud!“

and

and

sum).

mom“.

{Wﬁt acne-anti" «hammock Marni: a".
um um baton taunts-ant,

and an

ammrttmtatmmquadummfmmw-mm

�4-2.

of therapy meal the noon: Md «mum.
45*

M‘

Pntimts- mﬁpn-matnnt

or significant
.

bum

its pwtmhmt

m dual-tramw- 31w m a; mum activity,

mm are «eluded

from tho curios.

Fm tmww madman «playing 611nm
1)

umg/aumam

W

at.

“mm: 3) MW“ mm

mpnthnuhold

It)

mbommlsiva tonhmqwu‘ with pantothnl

Wt 813de
m tall dumrlhod.

5%:

(

9

ma

pmdicttion.

Tm
(

gunman;
)

hummus

damning current. method patients,

Mind 1w “mats,

mu sufficient tor a phi: 3:1 mm”.
and,

(Maugham);

ummmm lawman!

In the thrown!!!

ﬁtment prior «mum.

~

W of “dam he.“

M915 smug a) nun-mung «mm

at.

3*

mm“;

(90 Volt.

M 20

for 0.1 sound),

mad Manila, may,

it mam-,7, duration: in” 1mm mm a and m]. whim m

mama.

mmmomd timmcuurytojutincmma gmdmlmtho,

thruhold value.
In subconvulaiu

m,
m.(

mu

)3

and

um mu”

u {may maimﬁann mt. for

co

ornamtingmté mungvoltnxOJWurn

“31.31th far on.

15mm.

mam, puma“ mm 31m mm warmly

to three Appnoatim, for

a.

total. of

21:

to 36

”ﬁt m1

�A11

tmtmubn an arm: thm tints a wok initially, for

trauma“.

Pantom- Ibo

clinkai n‘spenn, or

EEG

tail“:

to duolop a

changes of

12-20

macaw behavioral

or'

signiﬁcant 4.3190, are subsequently

mam 5-10 than m wok.

m

EEG

Mord: were quntiutivoly manna for the

dogma or délm

mm: in. «data: at to mmr ﬂu: Man-mud ”M,“

activity.

The

"Manta“

or "lav“

63M er delta activity,

mowing to criteria pu-

‘

‘

awn matched (
The

).

mums;

three slides

(immune

a high,

maﬁa and

101!

«n: Mord: duung tho fourth-ml: at twat-cut;

W

l

(Figs. 1, 2, 3)

Ivan-um or

W

m hamm-

an and. by the mmmm Wm“

m6 random. therapist It. the Mia“. of tho treatment

at ”mama-Int"
Weaken:

run and.

by

then physician:- two tn

m tominatod, and were hand on ma

“mound," “men
In our

initial

“tact.
tbs-0e

four tam

W,” M “W or mm."
Wu (

g

) no

The

rating:

mks utter

dasﬁfiéum a!

wind that patients me

wanna

�4‘"
1:131

damn

601%:

activity

.

My, and in when m «1%: activity 1.!

wow. wr- mlulud a “lunch

Wmm

or “uncured" with a

grater muaow than than patient:
activity. Thu. chomum

who

such

delta

m pawn-wed 1n and. h.

(811* In Gnﬁ
511* s

In the

ta damn-tutu

“mutant.”

'1'

M ”J

(km.

1,

nut wont. «run or puma“.

ms

Studio.)

mm «new plum“ w

tame m nmsmmmy mind .mmmvo thmpiu mm or mad

Id;

Ind both atom-$1M
.

W WW“ mt Man. RN
and

mod.

at tho 1:? mm at: who

mm mm

”mm haunt" than”. 9 hid high dome

in both «ems, mm

and

fourth mks at

truth-at]

1.2

wring

hearth-thrum, mummly'motthlmtpoﬂm. thin-In
“their? lubdwtlnuodto Muuuglchiwaogrudﬂumm
convulnu thunpy.

at tho

2? aubjootu who

mum Wain mum,

Wt, m

�.5.
dam-mud new or high down 4.11.: nativity mom
or

mutant. in! now of

during both

ﬂu

my and:

mu activity m not“ in than “hm

new and third min at imam. and

during the fourth

elm-1n;

in

8 ”Mo-ct:

not.

Conoumnbmlymatmbmmﬂungu mmwotthch'?

a the mini” map rum u showing mud behavioral champ;
or no bah":m1. of ”320mm" group, 25 at the 2? ma
101:1 mm. at the 1m» amp, 19
m Mum m- a mad um
want.-

m

than

'

“than”. Inlhotthou.
activity and :11

kind

mmmwkmmmmmmu

mm a “Mimi Wharton]. W.

in damn-at.

01'

tho

tin Ibo

m dom- dolu nativity an convulsive deutmmwk,

mam-a M61. diam

records; and

hoof

this

ﬂ“ mandahwiml

W.
mu, «multiv- thanpy Wad simian-um mam:- antics-:1 change!

macaw
mini-ll

with 3m

Moral mango, and

W

with” in km or mum

placat-

moving

than-aw,

11de both it:

MYI

mm mud
8E0 «an inﬁnity. mum".

«1m nativity, wan. auboomuluvo

EEO

ma

rum“ to «mum

mum-:3. «hang:

m plan“ an mum

�In

via or ﬂu mow of unwock Mama» .uployod, And the

mun-uni}: ham we «1%: activity

mum at

+4.2.

«has a: typo a: 010%ka an

max-nun. Th. gun“
The

Won}. "upon”,

and the

mammal mmw m

at gummy pmmtéd in man- 5 ma 6.

first agar. ulna:

in tub mutant

this

Walnut typo in

8W dating

the

unsung.

EEG

an. activity.

mutant um: daunting «mat It mmknshald
high.”

mom:

In each period,

otnncth

and with

numung

mt

at thmshou

oft-cu" thin tho lupnﬁhnlhad alumnus mnem-

m tho
‘

'

the

tau-angst;

m 1m

mm, in out

mar-cum; curl-mt. tmtamt being not: «mm than

the tux-«hold

11th

Suboomumn

#:00QO yield no high dam «in: activity neural.

cum-at. uthod only curly 1n the

Mum WWW“:
treatment

the

am

come of

mumpwmng

pox-«near wh/mpwoungno «Inactivity
such

trut-

”may of my: (low mu mom. What with Winch

1m). nun-mt

ported;

of

the «new. third and fourth molt: of

mt Whiting mm dam of
»

a:

nativity. Kin, tho «boom!» in map is

WW-

than

'

«01:1:de

1005‘

for «ch

tram

�.7.
ponod. “puma-«hold
uunbor of man

alumina current handgun chow th- but.

rcmd: in «a: period, nth tun-had ma

mmm

“chum. in how.
f Tm

3.

ts

Author factor on the

truancy at tmtmont.

tins

a cock, u mater

on convulsive

nu of mama: of delta activity in tho

While :11
who

patents wore initially treated thm

fund to

therapnn vor-

dculop mu! demo- or :1qu nativity

tmud' non mun-may.

In aim Inch

uncut-,-

an 3110:: an); or win any, and in «eh instant» ﬁddle or
my: damn of 601%: activity an mm. 8mm- ma comm won
prenatally dumtntod by mu. ﬁg... ( ). m1 cumu(
mnmuta

k.

W'
In tho

)_.

mun unit. or patina“,

1%.

was

mind that. younger patients,

Mr 16 your! at ago, dmlepod grater dam of delta nativity during thnrst.

and poems!

activity to
of

&amp;

tnatnnt,

m at “about;

111111.

older subjects. donlopod inch

signiﬁcant dogma during the third weak. 3: the fourth not

m was no 10:15:01- : dittounuatiug ”poet bottom the groups.

�~8—

Gcnhdnmg

“I. data from an.

During tho
undo:-

mom

convulsiv-

m. h)! a! mm m raw demo dam in mutant:

the as. of hot but only

patina“ 61

and.

thonpuu supports this obumum.

mm

no longer present. and

305

in ptﬁmto

rm 1:040,

In the third and fourth ”aka, the

and 183

in

antenna» an

“mantel: 2/3 of the lubjlctl but high degree

«It: «and: uhon trotted 3 tin” par wok.

mu
Yunnan 1n 1 8131. Dog“ mu ma mm with La *

m

m
mm

we no

M

51+

0

m

be

as)

has

(as)

m

(as)
(13)

W
1:2

as

M
691

he:

saw

32:

5a

95::

18:

50:

M

no durum in 1mm of high dome mom 1: significant u .013
andhurthtruaunnd .OSShomthoummtndthird
mic: or tun-em in patient: «or 50 your: at nan) but is not uwimny

manna“

61:1on for the“

put-1m in groups and»

50

yum.

�.9.

mum "pom,

mm

by Gama and

mu“

)mm .

IWmt mktimhip batman pmmst. aunt heard Mauritian and
m

m W “nbmlity.” new nu: mm:
at

or 'abnoml'

(Ohmic! and

alpha

mm

M113) or “bomﬂino ulnar-t3! (Hum 91 9;.)

Wanmmummnunmummmmmum

may
In than

1w may

tut activity ”than.

«an or imam“, abduct: who“ pm-vbrnmcnt

domain-1m um um

«hazy

apn- or space an activity
nah mam.»

Eight

A

manic mimic

or the

mush

pro-Manta“ ﬁnality.

talcum

,mﬁk order

tin am in «new land:

m

pro-smut“

”mutton:

of

an}

mutton.

alpha and

pu-mamnt

(anterior Mignon). worm) with the

601m activity during the third and tour «the cf

gaunt: dalmatﬂm

man of than

and

«It: antivity «run, and for more mm

«It: activity an mandala-n
dam. of

or

are not nausea in an gunman. Won.

that in puma“ without

par aunt

mm... er mama-ac «any.

m tmtod with emu”. taotmiquu

dmlopod high amoe- at

palm

of a

more!

or +31; and «35

tmﬁmt

mpoctinlm

in h3

�.10.

m

mumumrmmmuummtn the 4351.701“

Widen“;
thl

while that in. tho third

‘at

dwiam. although

W6 a mum.

W:

M «poet- at” than

the

not an.

that”...

mt dimuon;

tho

Winn“ of,

whim 1n the 01.6%!“th pm“; and the r910 at «an nontra-

W!

mopbnlomph
(1)

1n the

In the

including

mama: and may or convulsive therapies.

mud and“: of cumulus." therapy lawman whim-c.

hum-kw

the clinical Ind

«Mom:

‘

ﬁg. (19%), and Plum 5;. (193:2) aphasia! bah

01¢“ch diatom bum

the grim n.1,

mpoutm “WM mammmm-Wamm 1mm"mntinwtomofmu. ptﬁtnlindwod Weamhlstmaﬁof
mycu.

mm. ﬂu chem-pulmyhle mm. to

m a! mu ”Univ, and

{no

pout m1, 1:

In subsequent. you-I, various

no

delta

grand

an

in

mum.

W131“, has! CW, mﬂmtiml

“hunting, mopohr unwitting. foul contain"

techniquu have been

�.11.

thd

in mum. than”. Barman 33 3;.
mum, and nah, in turn,
) tar example, in
mung an cloutWaganc «not: or
(

focal "inure manna-u Mad that

art-r
a),

15 inch

"maumr' m1-

"isms.

Matt 93 g.

study, repel-Md a

halving

(

of patients had

- 753 had “abnormal"

), in a

ammo-at autumn

mm mom

_

max-d: utter grand

«ram comm). «muywmbeomhin
1n

«mm-:1

roman "a! panam-

amid" that-apt“ (W) ma theta minus abnormal-1v.

(331). or control: (381). no
tho two

70

70%

mp3,

and

new tho war-may 1n the

3m

noon-- in

mum the signification at ﬂu loam for tho

thanpuutic strict. Mint additional upon-h 17 various ohsarvm, band
an a

«ﬂaw

of

(Rain-“1n and

an, alpha“ th- awinmaa at tho ”amnion.

m, Roth, mung).

rpm, the

mm. mnem- um

minim par a, an a:- mu tho signiﬁcant physiologic mu
mm

m the has for thirty-nut:
If an.

convulsion

«fancy or 'oamluva than-qua."
I

both

it tho mud chant/1n mu m and in tho

behavioral "903380, does

m node of inﬂation

at the

role in um “spam-7. In the chads." ”ported ham.

uny “mama Min-mm in both the dam-

ot‘

“ism play any
Oman

Em

hut-.2

sun-u-

mu activity

�.12.
the

and

at»

of

11:»:

“mu m abut-"d bum Miami mod:

of imitation or grind u).

m. m an m. pmidu

but: far the mama Mm't tint .mpnthxuhold

m

@0an

album-ting current

“chum m mt “tutu. m We cmuloiva than”.
“the: India ban the sham

moms cumulus.“ “Wu”.

exam in clinical results for

813%

g 51.. (

)

mud

31:11.11-

mum.

ms; in mm:- mdiu or Mum waiving atom-um
mt mmlpin and mumml mvulnm m! mbmvukin tech.-

1i:

amen

niquu.

no

"ported

Wat. m. at

$73. 763

ad 331 yumﬁuln

mam ﬂat the Wain Manhunt: Wm bud tho amt.“
clinical «tinny. non may,
W, doom-thing n m «walnut:

and

drug,

a:

1090,

named to

it a clinical mam; unghuy gmur um

dawns." wanna“.

w studios an have mm mm m «Wm mam-d by Mom
Wm» hm! um manna” of latency, duration, prom-mac
In

of claim: or tonic

ammt

phi“,

am, two.

um; not :11 mind

In},

From

that. Sundial,

it has Mm

him: at. minimum; and that :

�:31)’

W;
m

mm a not an an or w“
cum and than my unset
dim-mt. taut-mt aimed.

Dunn-mo

mum

panama

dutannm in Mahala «rout. of tho

Mar mm" 01' this probhn an

11:

9'08“”-

thn this "unmey in clinical

1:3qu in ”period, it in clear

ma, ups-mt. raw
or
- in chum-d. m dﬂhmu human var-1m W or mutant
m 3.311, and, for ma most part, be mm w increasing the 1:qu
ﬂnt with rap-wad comma”. no author he!
60

305

may

com!” may: in nonwith mum to ﬁlm W tho minim in Mad. The simiﬂmt

or amber at mutants. it. any

Mic

«mm

that

amt u the bran W Mum. ta the uranium, and not an mat
mamas-1mm mama“... Inwim mm (3m, Theory)
in we: noted that commits.” map? 1: l1”
1%.

application in

with

mam maul, m: in its clinical

and

with

Wticity of convulsive. ﬂan-pin.

to
I

bender-1

«facts. no pron-at studs.» «3mm winters, the pram»
at the

”and

comm

�U. have appliad ”mode or quantitative, serial me

the

m1:

studies} mporud here.

We in

clinical estimates at behainnl change

‘

may

give

of tho

xinihr data,

obumr

(

'

)

than

an

m.

Us lava

dependent an tho

m

a

prawn/mum]. buns for

Miami tmtmnt technique“

pmionlly noted that

mm

mm: my be applied in the

clinical magnum. or patients receiving oonmlsivo therapy

tin
I

um tad»

Wr applicttion at m analyse: to

other pmhlm in convulsive thumps.”
compariaon of

am

such evaluations am

@mnua

”ported here, the curly

and

(

)- In

sustained induction at high

dam,» a! do“: activity provides the phyaiolagic bait for behavioral
in cumulative mmpy.

«mango

fail to
thm

char 3

mu.

increasing
a

electroencephalogram in patients

uwﬂmt Wen].

times per week

aunt. In

An

w

when

mutant. tummy,

Mummiaogic

more

big: delta activity has

withholding

effective «walnut.

If

changes.

it my be 31an for

tmtmt ”31mm of

norm as a rational basis for clinical manage»

mbaem in

thonpeutiany

aspen”. on

who

o.

tho dome of

nmbor of

not. been induced,

pmdimtien, 0r shifting to
mum, my resuli in the

mm activl ty is 11139

mks, nth» future,

and

a punctuality

�~15—

(

)

or

mama}. (

behavioral response,
and

)

my be

can when the

«me! to panama. a utiatactory

Wide-go mbctrato is assured;

further eomhivo therapy my will

tion has bum suggested by

an

Ruth (

moons-tn]. application of

convulsive therapies,

)

be

discontinue.

m

gaunt:

similar applica-

for buoyant-.1 activated 330 record»

quantum." ‘m tachniquu to

bu led to their application to nth“

hemp-us. accent reports from than laboratories not.
for

A

as

MW“

similar applicatim

mum-1 moment and man-Italians of paychephameolom
(

).

�416~

gagglnnianus

1.‘ In aerial qynntitativn analysis of

aetitity in

degroe of induced

EEG

delta

anhjocta receiving variant convnlaivo therapies, a poaitdvu

relationship betuoon the digrea o! indueod delta activity and bath tbs
dagroe oi'bohavioral ehnngo and ratings of impruvamsnt

2.
and

induced grand mﬂl convulaian

An

is reported.

1: elscntinl for both the

EEG

behlviaral change.
3.

Th3

rate
a.

and dogrcc‘of induced
Hbdo

dalta activity is dependent upon:

at soiturc inductian

b. Fruqunncy at treatment
a. Ag. 0! lnb3oct
d. Pre¢treatmsnt

h.

It is

pmuvidoa a

recommended

EEG

record characteristics

that aerial quantitative electroencephalography

rational basis both for the study and clinical managenant or

variaus paychodynlmie therapies.

�II: 2-5-58.

0131/11.!"
Correlates of the Electroshock Pincess

EEG

During the past feW'years, renewed attention has been given to the

relation between changes in the electroencephalogram and behavioral changes
induced by electroshock. In 1953,
an

analysis of neurophysiologic aspects of electroshock

studies
(

in the laboratories at Hillside Hospital,

)

in

was undertaken.

were based on
a hypothesis expressed by Weinstein and
which they

related

improvement

The

his co-workers

in.electro$hock to the development of

persistent states of altered cerebral function.
In

thii initial

EEG

study

(

),

we

noted a significant relationship

between the degree and duration of the induced delta

activity

evaluations of tIhI=HIIEIEIIEZl=E=IIi§"improvement."

It is

and

clinical

the purpose of

this report to review these findings; to describe recent studies in

which

various neurophysiologic aSpects of the treatment process were assessed; and
to suggest the application of electroencephalography in.studies and rational
management of physiodynamic

One

hundred and

been studied.
a day

therapies.

forty-eight consecutive electroshock referrals have

Electroencephalograms were taken before treatment, and on

after a treatment at weekly intervals during

and following the course

�-2-

until the record

of therapy

ﬂag»!
Patientsbﬂwyhgug‘pre-treatment
IN

EEG

-

.

eggpktfd’ef’d

.,,.,;‘""ﬂWh

.

activity,
an...“

M"M

ﬁignificant asymmetry were
MW’O‘Mmmws-‘W

pre-treatment characteristics.

demonstrated slogwgave or spike

.

WW

its

had achieved

series.

from the

{

‘

{V

.up-w‘

.

Four treatmentt procedures employing

g

different types of stimuli

have

'

i
V

.

1)

been used; /alternating current

at-threshold strength; 2) alternating current

at suprathreshold strength;

unidirectional current (parathreshold);

3)-

h) subconvulsive techniques with pentothal premedication. The alternating

current suprathreshold
are well described.

(

)

and

unidirectional parathreshold

(

)

techniques

In the threshold alternating current method patients,

without prior sedation, received low currents, (90 volts for 0.1 second),
usually Sufficient for a
and,

if

petit

mal response.

At 20 second

intervals, voltage ,_

thewmwmm

necessary, duration! were increased until a grand mal convulsion was

induced.

In subconvulsive techniques, patients were given pentothal intravenously

until asleep, and then either

voltage unidirectional current for

); or alternating current of

seconds (

administered
treatments .

low

l

80

(30

to 120 volts x 0.1 second were

for one to three applications, for

a

total of

2).;

to 36

petit

mal

�All treatments were given three'times a week

Patients

treatments.

clinical response,

who

initially, for

12-20

failed to develop a significant behavioral or

or‘EEG changes of

significant degree,

were subsequently

treated 5-10 times per week.
All

records were quantitatively measured for the degree of delta

EEG

Ml WM!
We!
MM‘AWW
activity

Masada—WW
‘
delta activity,

"moderate" or "low" degreet
.

l‘
.

.

I

i

5

3

.

The

30W

week of

(Figs. 1,

treatment.

2,3)

Evaluations of changes in behavior were

made by

the supervising psychiatrist

resident therapist at the heigat of the treatment effect.

The

of "improvement" were made by these physicians tw0 to three weeks

treatment

"high, "

following three slides demonstrate a high, middle and low degree

delta record: during the fourth

and

M

was

In our

after

terminated, and were based on the four fold classification of

_

"recovered,"

ratings

”va

”much improved,"nand "unimproved

initial reports

('

,

')

we

noted

or worse."

that patients who developed

�high degree delta

activity early, and in

sustained, were evaluated as

whom

such

"much improved" or

greater incidence than those patients

who

delta activity

was

"recovered" with a significantly

failed to demonstrate

delta

such

activity. These observations are portrayed in slide h.
(Slide u:

Est #1)

Graph

Ecsults:
The

“W etweeni“!
relation
neurophysiologic

5"

.
.
and behaVioral
response W111 be

assessed according to five aspects:
1)

0

2)

Type of Convulsive Therapy

3)

Frequency of Treatment

h)

Factor of

5)

Pre-treatment Record Characteristics

’Of

Age

the uz’subgacts’WHo”retaived‘ccnvuISive‘tnerapy, 7 nan nigh

delta records in both second, third
two of

the three weeks,

of the u? subjects

and

fourth weeks of treatment;

and 13 during only one of the

failed to

show a

UEgIEE"
12

during

test periods. Thirteen

single high degree delta record

on

convulsive therapy.
Of

the

27

subjects

who

received subconvulsive therapy, however, none

�high degree delta

activity early, and in

sustained, were evaluated as

whom

such

"much improved" or

greater incidence than those patients

who

delta activity

was

"recovered" with a significantly

failed to demonstrate

delta

sudh

activity. These observations are portrayed in slide h.
(Slide u:

Graph

Est #1)

WWW

Results:

1. convulsive vs Subconvulsive Techniques:
In the most recent series eizpahaaaih randomly selected patients

re—

ferred for electrotherapy received subconvulsive therapies instead of grand
mal; and both

alternating current

and

unidirectional current techniques were

used.
or the h? subjects

who

received convulsive therapy,

delta records in both second, third
two of

the three weeks,

and

show a

had high degree

fourth weeks of treatment;

and 13 during only one of the

of the h? subjects failed to

9

12

during

test periods. Thirteen

single high degree delta record

on

convulsive therapy.
Of

the

27

subjects

who

received subconvulsive therapy, however, none

�.5demonstrated middle or high degree delta
Y3...”

of treatment.§
x

Low

(

/
activity records during any

week

degrees of delta activity were notedhiﬁwthree subjects

during both tgexsecond and third weeks of treatment, and
I“ .,.,_,_.,.-‘ ”mud,”
Y

,

“W",

v

V

.V,.

inAB

subjects

,,

’dmﬁgthefourth Week
alli'lll=l==I-I behavioral ratings

Concurrent

subjects in the convulsive group rated as shining

showed hZ of the h?
marked behavioral change;

hat

‘

while of the subconvulsive group,
,

ioral changes.
of therapy.

the

Of

latter

25

of the

minimal or no behav-

27

group, 19 were referred for a second course

In 1h of these, grand mal electroshock induced high degree delta
n...» . 4,7,.“ .;...-....‘..,r,, 9...“; .. n .mm ., 3.,
,.
.~-wms...mu m-.. _,. ”a”.
..

activity
"Walnut...

all

showed a

V.-.~...,..,..~..,.u.ma..~m.—.~..._..Mn...._,.m.. m

failed

all
4

f.

./

..,,,.A.

.

.-

significant behavioral change.#fgf the five

t.

'

to demgnstrate high degreewdeita
“if

I/VFI'

My"

:

’

activity

a”

,

Thus, convulsive therapy induced

showing

on

five
.

Mm)“.-

.
showed a behaVioral

”n,mmwm

.,wmlumwﬂun.

significantly greater behavioral changes

neither an

EEG

EEG

delta activity. Furthermore,

or behavioral response to subconvulsive

therapy, showed both the-EEG and behavioral changes
therapy.

convulsive”2lectroshock,

delta activity, while subconvulsive therapy induced

minimal behavioral change, and minimal

patients

51/

Who~~

I”

“(my

We“

EEG

,4

.2

shdwed middle degreeprecords; and two of the

associated with

"""

------—---

5"“

,
/,/r
,//'change.;
a

r

and

when

placed on convulsive

r.

e

r.

a

7.“,

�-b2.

Role of Type of Convulsive Therapy:

In view of the variety of electrOShock techniques employed, and the

relationship

between EEG

delta activity and the behavioral response, an

analysis of the effect of type of electroshock
undertaken.
The

first

The

delta activity

on EEG

results are graphically presented in Figures

5

was

and 6.

figure relates the treatment type to the percentage of records

in each treatment group during the second, third

and

fourth

weeks of

treat-

delta activity. In each period,

ment demonstrating high degrees of

EEG

treatment with alternating current

at suprathreshbld strength

gave the

highest percentage of high degree delta records. ieeetment'uéth-unidirect-

ional current and*lith alternating current at threshold strength

was

less

effective than the suprathreshold alternating current technique, in each
period;

a

the udtﬁiEgﬁgie;;%reurrent treatment being

more

effective than

the threshold alternating current method only early in the course of therapy.
Subconvulsive techniques yield no high degree delta
The

next figure demonstrates the

same

activity records.

relationship

by measuring the

treatment
per cent of each/group showing no delta activity or only low degrees of
such

activity. Here, the subconvulsive group is

100%

for each treatment

�-7period. Suprathreshold alternating current techniques
number of such records

in each period, with threshold

show

the least

and parathreshold

techniques in between.
3. Frequency of Treatment:

factor

Another

dn the

rate of development of delta activity is the

frequency of treatment. While
times aweek, a number who
on convulsive

therapies

all patients

were

initially treated three

failed to develop high degrees of delta activity

were

treated

more

In nine such patients,

intensively.

treatments were given daily or_twice daily, and in each instance middle or
high degrees of delta

activity

were induced.

previouSly demonstrated by Pacella gt El.

h. Factor of
In the

(

Similar

EEG

), and Callaway

(

).

Age:

initial series

of patients,

it was noted

that younger patients,

under hS years of age, developed greater degrees of delta

first

correlates were

and second weeks cf

activity during the

treatnent; while older subjects developed such

activity to a significant degree during
of treatment, age was no longer a

ﬁne

third week.

By

the fourth

week

differentiating asPect between the groups.

.

�-8data from all convulsive therapies supports this observation.

Combining the

During the second week,

under'the

age of ho; h=t===:;.30%
'

patients
"www-W”

9,.0.

..

1M
1‘ .

at . on.» .
,

of records are high degree

h3%

M

61 and over. In the
n.-“5.”. m1”- A, “W

third

in patients from

delta in patients

WW

WM

M

‘4

treated

3

~

‘

,

W.

W";
A

.W‘

andﬁdpproXimately 2/;xtf the subjects
n:/}pﬁger present M”
when

cue-yaw

and fourth weeks, the differences arep

~

«idelta records

in

hO-CO, and 18%

timéé per

W99§°

,ffﬂ

have

wwww‘t4m HM\“ "

”a“

“by"

‘

high degree

W“”w"
‘f" Mama.W

”Q

h/‘

WWW,

Wn.ﬁ,,,,.,-r..m

TABLE

Variation in

%

High Degree Delta EEG Records with Age *

Treatment Pariod

5g:

'

in

is.

2:2

are

61%

69%

(28)

m

ul-so

(28)

29%

m

56%

51-60

(28)

432%

56%

55%

61+

(18)

18%

50%

80%

To

no years

* The difference in incidence of high degree records is significant at .Ol%
between the second and fourth weeks and .05% between the second and third
weeks of treatment in patients over 50 years of age; but is not significantly
different for these periods in groups under 50 years.

�S.

\

Pre-Treatment Record Characteristics:

In earlier studies, a relationship between pre-treatment record

characteristics, notably degree of abnormality or predominant alpha,
the degree of induced "abnormality" was noted (
, ).

and
g

In these series of patients, subjects whose pre-treatment record
demonstrated slow wave
Spike or Spike wave

activity of a diffuse, or dysrhythmic variety, or

activity

were not included

in the statistical analyses.

W,

Eight such subjects were treated with convulsive techniques and seven of them
developed high degrees of delta

activity earlier,

and

for

more sustained

periods than in patients without such pre-treatment abnormality.
A

Specific analysis of the relation

delta activity

was undertakenjémk

order

between pre-treatment alpha and

correlations of the pre-treatment

per cent time alpha ée—Ge-lMed-ﬁeds—éea-teWﬂ—aemﬁ-with the
degree of delta

4.

patients demonstrated correlation‘ of
.

95’

M

activity during the third-and four weeks of treatment in

M/Wima

.

4'“ M
+.35’

if

'

I43

f5”

4d”

�-95.

Pie-Treatment Record Characteristics:
Previous reports, summarized by Chusid and Pacella,(

)

noted a

significant relationship between pre-treat ment record characteristics and
the degree of induced "abnormality." Records with predominant alpha rhythn
or "abnormal" (Chusid and Pacella) or "borderline abnormal" (Bagchi 33 13;.)
records were

more

liable to develop alterations in the

EEG

than those with

fast activity patterns.

predominantly low voltage

,1

In these series of patients, subjects whose pre-treatment record~
demonstrated slow wave
Spike or Spike wave

activity of a diffuse, or dysrhythmic variety, or

activity

were not included

in the statistical analyses.

W,

Eight such subjects were treated with convulsive techniquesﬂand seven of them
developed high degrees of delta

activity earlier,

and

for

more

sustained

periods than in patients without such pre-treatment abnormality.
A

Specific analysis of the relation

delta activity

was undertaken'éxk.

per cent time alpha
degree of delta

order

activity during the

third—and

patients demonstrated correlation( of

05’

correlations of the pre-treatment

WWWWith
a,

,

between pre-treatment alpha and

M/W/mu

.

M

the

four weeks of treatment in

4'“ W
+35)

[a

'

1.13

”(tyne/l

@4’”

�gr.“

3

r%

\

-1¢¥“""‘MI‘CWEHi

‘

—

n—fJ‘r‘mWﬁ“

is”

w?

\\\\-

r"

”y,

wwﬂ:;¢"‘”w

{awr

rth geeﬁ'is Significant at the IQ§hlével of

.
the
relatidﬁship in

The

,

.10-

,_

PMW’MW

v

.

.

.

&gt;

I?

if“?

f

e
.
.
iﬁcénfidence; while thatﬂin the
.

”His"

”419"“

M

third
.

a"?

"’1’

if.”
.

ﬁx

,q/J’WNW

lynx-"”61

(”fl
”M" .
.

'

.
the trend rewindicated.

’71"

a/«am

“Mmmmmwmm“minim“..m“,

Discussion:

aspects of these studies warrant discussion; the significance of

Two

the convulsion in the electroshock process; and the role of serial electroencephalogragh

in the rational

management and study of convulsive

therapies.

(1) Significance of Convulsions:’

In the

initial studies

of convulsive therapy numerous authors,

including Kalinowsky gt_gl. (19h2), and Pacella gt ﬁl‘ (19h2) emphasized both

clinical

the

and electroencephalographic
‘3'

petit

and
,

.. “7:4!“{ "5
“vﬁﬂu.. “2.
‘

.,

r

,

mal responses.

',&gt;~'(:.w

’

i

differences

idwmaewa‘huwmmmm.
I'“.ﬁ:W’"amhma-~vmmm~a

While

Sa-‘iukw‘ﬂ-‘Ih-m‘yow'wwmmmww“
‘

anthem,"

between the grand mal.

k»

"

qut‘w'

cal
'mal seizures inducedngﬂmd
c
12

prove-

gﬁetrﬁ‘w
afﬁx),

‘

ducedﬁphaﬁges
MW“

in less than

25% 0

4745“

M

M

one of

delta activity:‘and to petit mal, is

no

delta activity.
.

WW

7

mm M

In subsequent years, various subconvulsive, brief stimulus, unidirectional
stimulating, monopolar stimulating, focal convulsive techniques have been

�.11described, and each, in turn, discarded in routine therapy.
(

gt al.

for example, in describing the electroencephalographic effects of

)

focal seizure techniques noted that

70%

I

after
mal

Bergman

15 such

of patients had normal records
4

"seizures;" while

seizures. Ulett

23

El.

70

-

75%

after

had "abnormal" records

grand

), in a careful control convulsive-subconvulsive

(

study, reported a significant difference in clinical reSponse of patients
receiving convulsive therapies (60-80%) and those receiving subconvulsive
w”

as;

6L.

(33%).{es—eontrele-438%92J He noted the discrepancy in the
.

.

EEG

response in

the two groups, and emphasized the significance of the seizure for the

therapeutic effect. Recent additidnal reports
on a

by various observers, based

variety of data,&amp;emphasize the significance of the convulsion.

(Weinstein and Kahn, Roth, Fleming).

Thus, the evidence indicates

that

convulsions per se, are’or reflectlgthe significant physiologic events
which are

0

the bases for therapeutic efficacy of "convulsive therapies."
.

both

If the convulsion is the essential element/in the
.

.

behavioral reponse, does the

mode

EEG

and

in the

of induction of the seizure play

role in this reSponse?. In the studies reported here, small but
cally significant differences in both the degree of

EEG

any dLr

statisti-

delta activity

�-12—

and the

rate of

its

'

development were observed between different methods

of induction of grand mal seizure.

Ulett gt al,

(

)

reported an improvement rate of

current convulsive technidue, but
and concluded

76%

57%

for alternating

for the photic metrazol technique,

that the convulsive photo-metrazol technique had a

greater clinical efficacy.
convulsant drug,

PM

More

recently, Edwalds, describing a

1090, ascribed to

it

a

new

clinical efficacy slightly

greater than electroconvulsive techniques.
"we

have

further noted that the convulsions induced

by

various

techniques have varying characteristics of latency, duration, preponderance
of clonic or tonic phase, apnea,
seemingly not equivalent; and a

etc. All grand mal seizures are

�‘

.13seizure is not an "all or
occur and these may

none" phenomenon.

Different; seizure patterns

reflect the differences in physiologic effect of the

different treatment method: Further studies of this problem are in
progress.
While

that with repeated convulsions,
of

60

-

80%

are obServed.

The

or number of treatments.

We

Specific with regard to the

differences

is the brain

may

way

is clear

no matter how induced, improvement

are small, and, for the most part,

element

it

this variability in clinical results is reported,

may be

between various types of treatment

obviated by increasing the frequency

conclude‘that convulsive therapy

the convulsion is induced.

change subsequent

rates

to the convulsion,

The

and

is

non-

significant

not the agent

‘

\
.

92;},

\‘&gt;

�-1u-

2.

Role of Electroencephalography in Convulsive Therapy:

have applied methods of quantitative,

We

serial

EEG

analyses in

the studies reported here. While clinical estimates of behavioral change
may

give similar data, such evaluations are more dependent on the attitudes

Wé‘v M30
Further application of

Wt.
of the observer

(

3

than the

EEG.‘

EEG

analyses to

a

(5M

basis rer'ZZ‘
other problems in convulsive therapies'mey
providﬁérational
\
MM41$;r’.11.~:a"3"‘“é-e?fof

we have

clinical

different treatment techniques.
previously noted that

management of

EEG

analyses

may

be applied

patients receiving convulsive therapy

(

in the

). In

the experiences reported here, the early and sustained induction of high
degrees of delta activity provides the physiologic basis for behavioral
change

fail

to

in convulsive therapy.
show a

three times per
ment.

An

electroencephalogram in patients

significant behavioral response
week may

who

on treatment regimens of

serve as a rational basis for clinical manage-

In those subjects in

whom

high delta

activity has not been induced,

increasing treatment frequency, withholding premedication, or shifting to
a therapeutically more effective convulsant method,

neurophysiologic changes.

If the

it may

number of weeks,

be maintained

for a

degree of delta

may

result in the

activity is high;

and

other factors, as personality

�-15(

)

or environmental

(

behavioral response, even
and

) may

when

further convulsive therapy

tion has been suggested by
, _.

*MM‘

,nm4.~~-&gt;

....~,..~v~m

be assumed to preclude a

satisfactory

the neurophsyiologic substrate is assured;
may

well be discontinued.

Roth ( ‘)

A

similar applica-

for thiopental activated
«AW‘~

EEG

records.

V

.

The

successful application of quantitative

EEG

techniques to

convulsive therapies, has led to their application to other physiodynamic

therapies. Recent reports from these laboratories note a similar application

for the rational
agents.(

).

management and understanding of psychopharmacologic

..,. awuwlw'uuw...

�-16Conclusions:

1. In serial quantitative analysis of degree of induced

EEG

delta

activity in subjects receiving various convulsive therapies, a positive
relationship between the degree of induced delta activity
degree of behavioral change and ratings of improvement

2.

An

induced grand mal convulsion

and both the

is reported.

is essential for

both the

EEG

and behavioral change.

3.

rate

The

a.

and degree of induced
Mode of

delta activity is dependent

upon:

seizure induction

b. Eiequency of treatment
_

c.
.

'h. It is

Age of

subject

d. Pre-treatment
recommended

EEG

record characteristics

that serial quantitative electroencephalography

provides a rational basis both for the study and clinical management of
S
various pix-Lodynamic therapies.

�EASTERN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH ASSOCIATIQNHINC.
OFFICERS 1957-1958

DR. DAVID J. IMPASTATO. SEC'Y-TREAS.
40 FIFTH AVENU’ETNEW YORK 11. N.Y.

DR. LEO ALEXANDER. PRES.

‘33

DR. LAWRENCE H GAHAGAN, ASST. SEC'Y-TREAS.
164 EAST 74TH STREET NEW YORK 21. NHY
"

MARLBOROUGH ST.. BOSTON. MASS.

i

DR. THEODORE R. ROBIE. PRES. ELECT
676 PARK AVENUE. EAST ORANGE. N.J.

DR.
DR.
DR .
DR.
DR.
DR

DR. WILLIAM L. HOLT. JR. ‘IST VICE‘PRES.
ALBANY HOSPITAL. ALBANY. N. Y.

DR. CHARLES BUCKMAN. 2ND VICEsPRES.
KINGS PARK STATE HQSPITAL.KINGS PARK. N. Y.

0

0.0

COUNCIL

JOSEPH EPSTEIN

EMERICH FRIEDMAN
WILLIAM FURST' "'
PASQUALE LgorE‘sA'rA
NICHOLAS Locngeio
'*
EVELYN‘IV'EY
'

w

O

.0

TWELFTH SCIENTIFIC MEETING;
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 1958, 8:00 P. M. SgHARP
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL

ALUMNIHALL-‘HALLH AII
30TH STREET AND FIRST AVE.. (ENTRANCE ON 30TH STREET)

(Parking on Grounds)
o
'0.

“O

o
0‘

PROGRAM
I.

Electroencephalographic Correlates in EST.

Max Fink, M. D.
Martin Green, M. D.
2.

A Drawing Completion Test
(An Incisive Interpretation of the Unconscious)
Ferruccio (Ii Cori, M. D.
Discussant: Dr. David Wechsler

3.

Apparatus and Method for the Study of Conditional Reflexes in Man.
Leo AIexander, M. D.

4.

Free for All Questions (if time aIIows)

How much detail do you use in your examination of patients and

the recording of your findings?

��EASTERN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH ASSOCIATION. INC.
OFFICERS 1957-1958
DR. LEO ALEXANDER. PRES.
433 MARLBOROUGH 5.," BOSTON.

_

MAss.

DR. DAVID J. IMPASTATO. SEC Y-TREAs.
40 FIFTH AVENUE NEw YORK
N. Y
.f'W‘"
1“"
AssT
I-I
SEC‘-Y TREAs.
DR. LAWRENCE
GAHAGAN
154 EAST 74TH STREET NEw YORK 21. N. v.

II

COUNCIL

DR. THEODORE R. ROBIE, PRES. ELECT
676 PARK AVENUE. EAST ORANGE. N.J.

DR. JOSEPH EPSTEIN
DR.’ EMERICH FRIEDMAN
DR. WILLIAM FURST
DR. PASQUALE LOTESTA
DR. NICHOLAS LOCA'SCIo
DR . EVELYN IVEY

DR. WILLIAM L. HOLT. JR. IST VICE-PRES.
ALBANY HOSPITAL. ALBANY. N. Y.
DR. CHARLES BUCKMAN. 2ND VICE-PRES.
KINGS PARK STATE HQSPITAL.KINGS PARK. N. V.

,

0

0.0

.0.

I

'
‘

L

I

O

0.0

TWELFTH SCIENTIFIC MEETIN‘C
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 1958, 8:00 P. M. SHARP
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAI_,,SCI:IQOL
ALUMNI HALL— HALL "A"

30TH STREET AND FIRST AVE.. (ENTRANCE ON 30TH STREET)

(Parking on Grounds)
O

0..

M

9
0..

PROGRAM
I.

Electroencephalographic Correlates in EST.

Max Fink, M. D.
Martin Green, M. D.

2.

A Drawing CompIetion Test
(An Incisive Interpretation of the Unconscious)

F erruccio di Cori, M. D.
Discussant:

3.

Dr. David WechsIer

Apparatus and Method for the Study of Conditional Reflexes in Man.
Leo AIexander, M. D.

4.

Free for All Questions (if time aIIows)

How much detaiI do you use in your examination of patients and

the recording of your ﬁndings?

�”mm:

W

A!

W

R433.

mm, W 8mm. an.
«mm
W
Main
~me7 WMMaotmm mm, mm

mw

mum at

can

a, m. mi» mm mm.

3.1.

mum-«math-Wwwmnmaumﬂum,
Wéym.

�������to to

m

m

(as)

29:

ms

(as)

m
m

am (at)

mm

M

«a

(13)

W

«pork,

m
M

m

sea:

M

W

mmwmama mm. ma:
(.3)

wanton-«arm “Manna mmmmmtm,
“W“ (3) or “box-during my (11) mm: m not: 1m
1w
to «:1an aluminum in tum than than with
mew
voltme- M nativity mtma

9”»th rum
m
nmm
mt. «Wm mun
WWW
mmmmdmtho gamma. mum: mam-m
Wﬂthmmutnmmmawoftmmmwm
at Mt:
«ﬂier, for
“W pom, m mama
In

than

not-1» at

Fatima, subjects
nativity,

activity

mad

mm

vim m Wham; Witty.

m

01m
awe may“. at mam
anm
mmmwmmmuwtmtymmm. mm
A

4!-

this

a: my: damn words Miami. It
mm
awmmehonmdmdfmmam .WMMQMW

Tha

diffemm in

19

mathmmdmamthmmmmrﬁemufmymu
mmmwmrmntmrthmmmmmmmm.

�����‘

mm

Ammqmuutmmmemmwuwm
mm ”tamer mm mm W WW. momma
5.»

tommmetthaméfwmafmuﬂumm.m
1.

mwmmmuummmmm

,3"

mtnuwdwatmwmu ”£2,“qu

memumm.
mm:

WWW“
wwamm

M Huh

b.

a.

1300th

m1.
um
Mam” mum“.

W:-

&amp;

both for the. candy and

mm Wm at

���Electroencephhlographic Correlates of the Electroshock Process

MB):

Fink

MOD.

and

Martin A. Green PM).

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks,

in part, by grant M-927, National Institutes of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, [1.8. Public Health Service.

Aided,

at the meeting of the Eastern Psychiatric Research Association,
February 6, 1958.

Read

E: 2- 15- :2

New

York,

N

.Y.

�EEG

Correlates of the Electroshock Process

During the past few years, renewed

attention has been given b

relation between changes in the electroencephalogram and behavioral
changes induced by electroshock ( l-h ). Based on a hypothesis expressed
ﬂie

by weinstein and his coaworkers (5% in which they related improvement in

electroshock to the development of persistent states of altered cerebral

function,

analysis of the neurophysiologic aSpects of electroshock

an

was

undertaken in the laboratories at the Hillside Hospital in 1953.
In

fig initial

EEG

study,” a significant relationship

between

the degree and duration of the induced delta activity and clinical evaluations of behavioral change and "improvement" was reportedayeThis study
was based on

convulsions induced by a unidirectional current instrument

'(Reiter). Subsequent eXperiences with alternating current techniques
demonstrated differences in the rate and degree of development of delta
activity. Age of subject and frequency of treatment were also factors
in the EEG reSponse to convulsions. It is the purpose of this report to
assess the role of treatment method, age of subject, frequency of treatment
and

pre-treatment EEG record Characteristics in the

EEG

and

clinical re-

sponse to convulsive therapy.
Method:

:

hundred and £e££f3i=irt consecutive electroshock

One

been

a day

studied. Electroencephalograms

after

of therapy

Patients
wave

ﬂ

a treatment

were taken before treatment, and on

at weekly intervals during

until the record

referrals have

had achieved

its

and following the course

pre-treatment characteristics.

in.whom the pre-treatment electroencephalogram demonstrated slow

AsymmeM/
or Spike activity, or significant aaaynetcy; were excluded from the

series.

�M
Wﬂnﬁ
rig/L

Wm MW W Jam
”WWW-

ﬁght/M4
W
M WWW W (W)
Jam MM WMWWW/
WWWW2AW
W; Jaww
W

,asJ—u—m

4/—

.49 «3'44»

:L

WWWWW.%II:
WWWWWMMW
W ﬂéﬁw‘jﬂ. W’ W
.WM

MAJJA MM Wag/d

�-2employing different

eatments proceo

Four

‘

van-us

of stimuli

alte .‘. ‘. current at t-- old strengthf"
al - ‘
a
current at suprathreshold
‘directio: current
ngth;
4
w
(parathreshold); t) s unvulsive techniques with -ntothal premedication.

have been used'

,

~.

_

_

nat'
The

‘

-

‘

alternating current suprathreshold (7)
km W

ﬁatients,

unidirectional parathreshold

and

MW
b‘ currenté’
.,

without prior sedation, received

for? second), usually sufficient for a petit mal response.
odes
second

3",

(90 volts

At 20

W

intewals‘voltage, and; if necessary, duration! ale-re increased
.

.

,

until a grand
to

"Nu“

In the threshold alternating current

(8) techniQues aae‘ well described.
method

‘

mal convulsion was induced.

mwmnl-

The “voltage and

induce a grand mal was the threshold value.

be necessary

In subconvulsive techniques, patients were given pentothal intravenously
gor

(&gt;0

until asleep,

either

seconds (8); or alternating

were administered

petit

and then

for

one to three

low voltage,

currentoi'

80

unidirectional current

to l20

voltsﬁrézsecond

applications, for a total of

2b

to

3.6

mal

All treatments were given three times a

treatments. Patients

week

initially, for

12-20

failed to develop a significant behavioral or

m m 55;,
Mew $3 :13; gm W, were
subsequently
who

clinical reSponse, or
Jo
treats (1% times per week.
All

activity.

EEG

‘

b

records were quantitatively measured for the degree of delta

The "records were

evaluated as to whether they demonstrated "high,"

"moderate" or "low" degrees of delta

activity, according; to criteria pre-

viously published (6).
Evaluations of changes in behavior were

psychiatrist

and

made by

the supervising

resident therapist at the height of the treatment effect)

�,

WWW
WM/Jéw
A?%MWW%4
/¢(WWW’MW”
JKWWM

HQWWWi

'

‘

�-3...

and were scored as "marked," "moderate,"'hdndmal"

or "none.”

"improvement" were made by these physicians two

ratings of

The

to three

weeks

after treatment was terminated, and were based on the four fold classifica—
tion of "recovered,” "much improved," and "unimproved or worse.“ (6)
Results:
1. Convulsive vs Subconvulsive Techniques:

W

MW,

'

WW

therapgrfglhad
the h? subjectstwho received convulsive
high degree

Of

delta records in-both second, third

two of

the three weeks, and

of the

)4?

13

subjects failed to

the

27

subjects

who

and

during

Show a

convulsive therapy.
Of

6";gr

one

“a

Low

weeks of treatment; 12 during

of the test periods. Thirteen
high degree delta record on

received subconvulsive therapy, however, none

demonstrated middle or high degree delta
of treatment.

fourth

activity records during

any week

degrees of delta activity were noted in three subjects

during both the second and third weeks of treatment, and in 8 subjects
during the fourth week.
neahJ-l’
21‘
ln concurrent behavioral ratings, hirof the.ﬁﬂ subjects in the
‘

convulsive group showed marked behavioral change; while of the subcdn-

vulsive group,
(Table

I).

therapy.
*»

Y‘aab

éacbndldb

ham,
‘

ﬂ

Of

2h of

the

the

or

27 showed minimal

latter group,

19 were

no behavioral changes.

referred for a

second course of

In lb of these, grand mal electroshock induced high degree delta
.RE

niekagd: uan

W‘LWM

,_

AAAAaaeut

"W

wthwﬁ W

ynxuduvuax “Gunrﬂ nta. waT‘5~/::L¢Gﬁe
,

.
I

�.uactivity and all showed a significant behavioral change. Of the five who
failed to demonstrate high degree delta activity on convulsive electroshock,

all

WW
m

Showed middle degree

behaﬂoral change.

m. L
*3

3

hawk»:

records; and two of the five

47

I

TABIE

Showed a

W! 4‘ 9““..44 b
'

Ratings of Behavioral Change; Convulsive—Subconvulsive Therapies
(Tourth-Fifth'weeks of Treatment)
Degree of Change
Moderate

Minimal

27

15

S

O

O

3

8

16

Marked

ConvulSive Therapy (h?)
Subconvulsive Therapy (27)

None

In evaluations two weeks after-treatment of the degree of "improveof the convulsive therapy grongj::ted as "much improved" or
"recovered," and 32% as "improved."qag% discharge, 51% were evaluatedileZS

ment,"

51%

sustaining the
and only
were
were

7%

same degrees

of improvement, while

were "unimproved."

rated in the

first

Of

"unimproved;"ﬁgﬁgeiggége§:§§:$§%§:red
do

were "improved,"

the subconvulsive group, however,

two categorie51’19%

hOSpital discharge evaluations

h2%

in the "improved,“ but
for a

11%

70%

second course of therapy,

not reflect the effects of subconvulsive

therapy.

II

TABLE

Ratings of Improvement: Convulsive-Subconvulsive Therapies
(Two'ﬂeeks After Last Treatment)
Recovered

Much

Improved

Improved

Unimproved
Worse

Convulsive Therapy (h?)

9

15

15

8

Subconvulsive Therapy (27)

2

l

S

19

�W.
.r

-5...

din=;.€onvulsive therapyinduced signiiicantly greater behavioral

MM“

whichchange and eva uations of improvement thangsubconvulsive therapy

We

The

parallel the electroencephalogr . Also, patients

-EEG

clinical

I

observations“ ”A“!

who showed

neither

showed both
or a behavioral response to subconvulsive therapy,

and behavioral changes when placed on convulsive

an

EEG

therapy.

2.- Role of Type of Convulsive Therapy;

In view of the variety of electroshock techniques employed, and
the relationship between EEG delta activity and the behavioral response,

an analgrsis of the
was undertaken.

2.

The

effect

The

oi‘

type of electroshock on

EEG

delta

actvity

results are graphically presented in Figures

first figure relates

1 and

the treatment type to the percentage of

weeks
record ‘n each treatment group during the second, third and fourth
tre:Egentgggégggggating:high
degrees of EEG delta actigggi) In each
of

period, treatment with alternating current at suprathreshold strength gave
the highest percentage of high degree delta records. Treatment with unicurrent and with alternating current at threshold strength was

directional
less efi'ective than the suprathreshold alternating current techniquef.in
each period; the unidirectional current treatment being more effective
than the threshold alternating current method only early in the course
of therapy.* Vsubconvulsive techniques yielded no high degree delta

activity records.
The second

figure demonstrates the

same

the per cent of each treatment group showing

7“:

relationship
no

by measuring

delta activity or only

low

ncés ..-»_. :v-n suprathe a‘,
ent perins,
tre
Eur, .l-i-o . an.
etho’.'5
- thre o'd reatv t
si " Can at .05 by chi
7—9

“-3 ou-

in}

vDi7”e~' ces b tw-z para
--12 0-" 0d“; no ignifican
'

dWL-

‘

j

.

hold met‘ods, and for each method

�at

Mt“ M74 @WWAEW

�-6Here, the subconvulsive group

degrees of such activity.

is

lOO%_for

each treatment period. Suprathreshold alternating current techniques
show

the least number of such records in each period, with threshold

and parathreshold techniques

in between.

3. Frequengy of Treatment:
Another

factor in the rate of development of delta activity is the

frequency of treatment. While all patients were initially treated three
ltimes a week, a number who failed to develop
high degrees cf delta

activity

on convulsive

therapies were treated

more

intensively. In nine

daily or twice daily, and in each
instance middle or high degrees of delta activity were induced. Similar
such

patients, treatments

were given

correlates were previously demonstrated
Callaway (10).

EEG

h. Factor of
In the

by Pacella

gt'gl. (9),

Age:

initial series

of patients,

it was

noted

that younger patients,

under hS years of age, developed greater degrees of delta

the

first

such

and second weeks of

activity during

treatment; while older subjects developed

activity to a significant degree during the third week.

fourth

week of

treatment,

the groups. Combining
observation.

and

By

the

differentiating aSpect between
the data from.all convulsive therapies supports this
age was no longer a

IMring the second week, h3% of records are high degree

delta

in patients under the age of no; but only 30% in patients from uo—oo, and
18% in patients 61 and over. In the third and fourth weeks, the differences
are

no longer

present and approximately 2/3rds of the subjects

degree delta records when treated

3

times per week.

have high

�-7TABLE

Variation in

%

High Degree

Delta

Suwd
To

DO

years (28)

Records With Age

M ﬁlm
k2

29%

'

W

%

Treatment Period
$9.213
69%

61%

h3%

(28)

Lil-50

EEG

lit-.9.

£211

£59.

III

W

W

‘

31-66

(28)

32%

56%

55%

(18)

18%

50%

80%

‘

61+

5. Pre-Treatment Record Characteristics:
*

Previous reports, summarized by Chusid and Pacella, ($3 noted a

significant relationship between pre—treatment record characteristics
and the degree of induced "abnormality."

Predominant alpha rhythm,

"abnormal" (3» or "borderline abnormal" (11) records were more

liable

to develop alterations in the EEG than those with predominantly low
voltage fast activity patterns.
In these series of patients, subjects whose pre-treatment record
demonstrated diffuse slow wave
were not included

activity, spike or spike

wave

activity

in the statistical analyses. Eight such subjects were

saven of them developed high degrees
”treated with convulsive
technique? and
of delta activity earlier, and for'more sustained periods, than patients

without such pre-treatment abnormality.
A

Specific analysis of the relation between pre—treatment alpha

and the degree of induced

delta activity

was undertaken, Rank order

* The difference in incidence of high degree records is significant at
.0 between the second and fourth weeks and .051 between the second
and third weeks of treatment in patients over 50 years of age; but is
not significantly different for these periods in groups under 50 years.

WW WM

*7

�-8correlations of the pre-treatment per cent time alpha in selected leads
(anterior temporalavertex) with the degree of delta activity during the
third

and

fourth weeks of treatment in

_tions of +.2u and +.35 reSpectively.
week

is significant at

third'week
N£L0
Two

h3

The

patients demonstrated correlarelationship in the fourth

the .05 level of confidence; while

fails of significance,

although the trend

that in the

is indicated.

aspects of these studies warrant discussion; the significance

of the convulsion in the electroshock process; and the role of serial
electroencephalograms in the rational management and study of convulsive

therapies.
(1) Significance of Convulsions:
In the éﬁéggél studies of convulsive therapy numerous authors,

including Kalinowsky

2:".

g.

(12), and Pacella

§_t_

(9)7 emphasized

3;]:

both

the clinical and electroenCephalographic'differences between grand mal
and petit mal responses. While grand mal seizures induced clinical improvement

in

60

to

80%

of cases,

petit

mal induced changes

subjects. Similarly, electroencephalograms in grand
delta activity, while in petit

mal therapy, no

in less than

25%

of

mal therapy demonstate

delta activity is seen.

In subsequent years, various subconvulsive, brief stimulus, unidirectional

stimulating, monopolar stimulating,
been described, and

and

focal convulsive tedhniques have

in each, in turn, discarded in routine therapy.

Bergman

§t_al, (13b for example, in describing the electroencephalographic effects
of focal seizure techniques noted that 70% of patients had normal records
70-75% had "abnormal" records after grand
after 15 such "seizures;”'while
J

�-9mal

seizures. Ulett gt a;. (1h), in

a

careful control convulsive-sub-

convulsive study, reported a significant difference in the clinical response
of patients receiving convulsive therapies (60-80%) and those receiving
subconvulsive (33%), or controls (38%).
EEG

He

noted the discrepancy

in the

response in the two groups, and emphasized the significance of the

seizure for the therapeutic effect.

W

Recent additional reports by various

observers, based on a variety of data further emphasize the significance,
of the convulsion in the therapeutiC'responSe (1, l5, 16).fﬁeinstein—end

thus indicates that convulsions per;
are, or reflect, the significant physiologic events which are the basis
The evidence

se_

fortherapeutic efficacy of convulsive therapies.

If the convulsion is the essential

the behavioral reSponse, does the
any

role in this reSponse?.

in both the degree of

EEG

mode

element both

in the

EEG

and

in

of induction of the seizure play

In the studies reported here, small differences

delta activity

and the

rate of

its

development

were observed between differentxnethods of induction of grand mal

seizure.jh/§

Ulett gt a}: (11;) reportedan improvement rate of 57% for the alternating current convulsive technique, and 70% for the phodio-metrazol technique.
While

the differences are small, the authors ascribe greater clinical

efficacy to the convulSive photo-metrazol technique.

this repert,

Kalinowsky noted

'various workers as being
vulsions.
Eh

More

more

that metrazol convulsions have impressed
efficacious than electrically induced con-

recently, Edualds, (l7) describing a

1090, ascribed to

it

In a discussion of

new

convulsant drug,

a clinical results slightly better than electro-

convulsive techniques.
'We

have further noted that the convulsions induced by various tech-

niques have varying characteristics of latency, duration, preponderance

�.10of clonic or tonic phase, apnea,

not equivalent; and

etc. "All grand mal seizures are seemingly
a seizure is not an "all or none" phenomenon. Different

reflect the differences inhphysiologic
effect of the different treatment methodfp Further studies of this problem

seizure patterns occur and these
‘are in

progress.

While

this variability in clinical results is reported,

that with repeated convulsions,
'of

00

may

-

80%

are observed.

The

differences

element

is the brain

may

way

rates

between various types of treatment

benobv1ated byzincreagang the frequency

we may conclude

specific with regard to the

is clear

no matter how induced, improvement

are small, and, for the most part,
or number of treatments.

it

that convulsive therapy is

the convulsion

is induced.

The

DOD?

significant

change subsequent to the convulsion, and not the agent

in bringing about this brain change. In previous reports (6, 18, 19)
we have noted that convulsive therapy is also non-specific with regard to
its application in mental illness, and in its clinical and behavioral effects.used

The

present studies amplify, therefore, the previous conclusion of the non-

Specificity of convulsive therapies.
2. Role of Electroencephalography in Oonvulsive Therapy:
applied methods of quantitative, serial EEG analyses in the
studies reported here. While clinical estimates of behavioral change have
we have

yielded similar data, such evaluations are more dependent on the attitudes
of the observer (20), and less amenable to quantification than the

EEG.

Further application of EEG-analyses to other problems in convulsive therapies
provide a rational basis for the comparison of different treatment techniques.
we have

clinical

previously noted that

management of

EEG

analysis

may be

applied in the

patients receiving convulsive therapy (6). In patients

�.11Who

fail

to

significant behavioral response

show a

on treatment regimens

of three times per week, an electroencephalogram may serve as a guide

for further therapy. In thise subjects in

whom

high degree delta

activity

has not been induced, increasing treatment frequency, withholding pre-

medication, or shifting to a more effective convulsant method, may result
in the neurophysiologic changes. If the degree of delta‘activity is high
and sustained

for a

or environment#(18)

number of weeks, other
may be assumed

factora',as personality (21)

to preclude a satisfactory behavioral

reSponse, even when the neurophysiologic substrate

convulsive therapy

is assured;

and

further

well be discontinued. A similar application has
been suggested by Roth (3) for thiopental activated EEG records.
The

may

successful application of quantitative

EEG

techniques to

convulsive therapies, has led to their application to other physiodynamic

therapies. Recent reports from these laboratories note a similar application
for the rational management and understanding of psychopharmacologic agents
(19).

��3;; Zn,

~

6w WMMWL,
_

~

4;

�(«My

REFERENCES

1. Roth, 1.: Changes in the

EEG

Under

Barbiturate Anaesthesia Produced by

W.Q

Electro-Convulsive Treatment and Their Significance for the
.

Theory of

ECT

Action,

3: 251-280, 1951.
33.

£5

Clin. Neurophysiol.

Roth, M., Kay, D. W.K., Shaw, J. and Green, J.: Prognosis and Pentothal
Induced Electroencephalographic Changes in Electroconvulsive
Treatment,

EEG

“a..-

Clin. Neurophy61ol.

:2, Chusid, J. G. and Pacella, B. L.:
Shock Therapies,

h. Ulett,

G. and

,1
MM
Johnson,
_

J. Nerv.
m

M. W.:

225-237, 1957.

2_:

The Electroencephalogram

in the Electric:;&gt;

&amp;:Ment. Dis. 116: 95-107, 1952.
m" "'
any...MA...

mm:-W

M

and Scopolamine Upon

Efiect of Atropine

Electroencephalographic Changes Induced

w”,//

1.

By

Electroconvulsive
.

Therapy, EEG.,Clin. Neurophysiol. 2: 217-22h, 1957.
S. ‘Weinstein, E.A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During Electroshock

Its Relation to the

Therapy:

Psychiat.
6. Fink,

M.

of

Shock Therapy,

and Kahn, R.L.: Relation of Electroencephalographic Delta

Neurol.

&amp;

EBSponse

in Electroshock,

A.M.A. Arch.

Psychiat. Z§: 51o5525, 1957.

Kalinowsky, L. and Hoch, P.: Shock Treatments, Psychosurgery And Oﬂier
Somatic Treatments in_Psyohiatry, Grune

8.

éﬂ:_i;

192: 22-26, 1952.

Activity to Behavioral
7.

Theory

&amp;

Stratton, N.Y., 1952.

Alexander L.: Treatment of Mental Disorder, W.B. Saunders Co. fhiladelphia,
1953.

9. Pacella, B.L., Barrera, E.S.

and Kalinowsky, L.: Variations

in the Electro-

encephalogram Associated with Electric Shock Therapy in Patients

with Mental Disorders, Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat. g1: 307-38u,

19h2.

�10°

11 .

Callaway,

3.:

Slow wave Phenomena

in Intensive E1ectroshock,«Elootpa. tag;

ennaphalggrﬁk'Clin. Neurophysiol. a: 157-162, 1950.
t
K)~u~uu¢,nk‘04+&amp;.LUéQQNUM’ antm
3‘ v~n£.aax+ueB

ox

BK

33,;
swam:

n 3,.

H

AW“

um

“3'

W

i?!
p

12. Kelinowsky, L., Barrera E.S. and Horowitz, WA“

in Electric

Shock Therapy, Am.

The

J. Psychiat.

.y.

i'c

I

4"?“

use...

"Petit-Mal" Response

2Q: 708-711,

l9h2.

13. Bergman, P.S., Impastato, D.J., Berg, S. and Feinstein, R.: Electroencephalographic Changes Following Electrically Induced Fbcal
Seizures, Conf. Neurol. 11: 271-277, 1953.
1h. Ulett, G.A., Smith,

K. and

Gleser, 0.0.: Evaluation of ConvulSive and

Subconvulsive Shock Therapies Utilizing a Control Group, gm;_g,

szchiat. 113:

795-802, 1956.

15. Wéinstein, E. and Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness, C.C. Thomas, Springfield,
i

1955.
16.

Fleming, T.C.:

An

Treatments

l7. Edwalds,

Inquiry into the Mechanism of Action of Electric Shock

'Jidbnuav'nﬁuatJWor

,WO-ASO ,

1950 .

K.M.: Intravenous Administration of

with a

New

Convulsant Drug. Read

at

PM

1090: Clinical Experience

N.Y. Divisional Meeting A.P.A.

1957.

18. Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Green, M.A.: Experimental Studies of the ElectroShock Process, Dis. Nerv. Sys.

19.

Fink, M.:

A

Unified Theory of the ACtion of Physiod namic Therapies,

J. Hillside
20. Fink,

M. and

Hosp .__(_3_§ 19 7-200, 1957 .

Kahn, R.L.: Behavioral Patterns

Brain Function.
21.

(in press).

Read

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.:

at

in Induced States of Altered

N.Y. Divisional Meeting A.P.A., 1957.

Personality Factors in Behavioral

Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol. (in press).

Response

to

�mmﬁmu

mumm.

in
M
minions:

W

manta, mm mm am mm mu, 3.1.
a: mm mm, mam
mm
mum
mm
M
Mia
mu: m“.
&amp;, M.
at

mutmmmummmmwmumamrmxm.
VIM

����m W

a:
moo nativity
«many to: tho
uwmmthomw Migration“ (Miamimdmthouoomw
the «Mo

Wvomwmmuﬁml) Withomotmm
room: Woo with Moment,
Magenﬂ
MWm«on ntod u “MAW
of data. muty.

yW
WW

1

4-

..

11111

.

.

mammumuwumamuwmw
25mm

W» W

t

mm
”mm

Wt?

'W

28

12“

21

8'!

a

66."

h“

35

13

16“

3

2

a

M

K

60
t

wowmammmmgmmmw
stumpWM Wommmmmmmlﬁm
at m woman”
mind Wm t1»npy*1n this M. m:
who

34?

9

.3,

ommamae
monmmmmmmmmywamm
19
”loom mu, plat
tofu-rod for t «W

W“

of

thong,

'

Win
.

ﬂ

UWJOOM

�����m
Mm
Mm
am m
1%-

M

61

M

1::

(28)

W

(38)

M

M
W

(28)

311‘

565

(18)

W

30%

,

thmum
mwmmammﬂva thmm

Wsmﬂmt Wampum

“W" (ﬂw‘W W“ (n)mmmmmw

mmnwpum.

mmmerpmmmwmmm~mam
‘-

_'mmunwmmu%%wapm§uwmw

mmmwmmamummwa.

thmmm

�“Nuthmmw
Mgr:

than

m
3mm

of

A.

ma

W,mm,W. mama“mmWWW
pom,

mu nativity

without. such

M for mm

wan-«mam» Mutiny.

WM maym at the man hum put-mm awn

mmarwu1ummuymmm. mum

mumaunpmmmmmmamnmmm
(wwwm)uwmmdmummwmm
m gm was « tantalum w a: mum. mm mum
m
at Nﬂbwhﬁmmunlyo mmumpmm comma
mm“ mw3mmsmmmmm
Wmum
am at mum, among: an m u Mam.
.

��������Reprinted from Diseases of the Nervous System, Vol. XIX, No. 5, May 1958.

Electroencephalographic Correlates of the
Electroshock Process
and MARTIN A. GREEN, M.D.
In the course of an evaluation of the role of a1tered brain function in the electroshock process, the
relation between electroencephalographic change
and behavioral response has been re—assessed.
MAX FINK, M.D.,

Subjects and Method:
Eighty consecutive electroshock patients have
been studied. All patients received electroencephalograms before treatment, on a day after a treatment at weekly intervals during, and following the
course of therapy until the records had achieved
their pre-treatment characteristics. Treatment procedures varied, including unidirectional and alter—
nating current electroshock, and subconvulsive technics with Pentothal premedication. Treatment was
usually instituted at three times per week for 12 to
20 treatments. Patients who failed to develop a clinical response, or EEG changes of signiﬁcant degree,
Were subsequently treated at 5 to 10 times per week.
The EEG records were classiﬁed for degree of
delta activity into “high,” “middle” and “low” degree delta records using the following indices: the
percent-time delta; highest percent-time delta in
any lead; slowest wave in the record; highest ampli—
tude of delta; and duration of burst activity. (Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 78: 516-525, 1957.)
Evaluations of change in behavior were made by
the supervising psychiatrist at the height of the
Read at the meeting of Eastern Psychiatric Research Association, Inc., held Feb. 6, 1958.

electroshock effect; and ratings of improvement
were made two to three weeks following the termination of therapy.

Results:

1) The appearance of a high degree EEG delta

activity during the second and third weeks of treatment was signiﬁcantly correlated with change in
behavior and ratings of improvement.
3) High EEG delta activity was induced in patients receiving convulsive electroshock only, and
was not observed in subconvulsive therapy.
3) Alternating current instruments induced high
degree EEG delta activity earlier than unidirectional
instruments, but by the 4th week of treatment, the
differences were eliminated.
4) There was a direct relation between the degree
of EEG delta activity and the frequency of treatment; and an inverse relationship to age.

Conclusion:

1) There is a relationship between the degree of

EEG delta activity in the EEG and clinical change
in behavior.
2) The time of the appearance of EEG delta activity and its persistence is related to:
a) induction of grand mal seizures;
b) type of current employed;
0) frequency of treatment; and
d) age of the patient.
3) Early and sustained high degree electroencephalographic delta activity is a necessary, though
not sufﬁcient, pre-requisite for improvement in the
electroshock process.
-

�mmmmm Garnish” at the mammoak Mam
Hawaii‘s

WWW at Moan rawhiam, 35.11.3169 363331981, men Oaks, m...
mamas a: mm mm mums.
w grunt 16-927: 33.131th
um, in wt,
M.
”03¢ M116 English
From

the

Mﬂtﬁﬂﬂ
Band at

131-13

Halal,

mm at the Eastern mum autumn ”Manama, ﬁat York,

Pcbmary 6,. 1953.
Whip-$8

Saran.

3.1.

�WWMMW.WMMMMﬁmhm

Wmmmmmmammmwmmmm
WWW.1IW (1.1).. Wﬂﬂmhwma

mmmwmamtaﬂ)
unmuwmwmamMMIMm. mmmw
Want Mummy m an m
a mum 1mm muw um mlmum
may in this laboratory, a
65

«mu

um!

at

Wﬁ'mmw). mammmmuuam
mmmmatmmwmmtmmutmmm,
W a: W, mot mbmwm-mms mm mm“.
Itismmwadmmwtﬁomummuuondﬂauum
MwmumammmwMommmamw

WWWduﬂﬂahquowhﬂnuﬁmlm
mm am of mm" mm.
and

���in mm Wm: GW‘WWW'
The wide variability-1n the mm of
mm mums»newt-w in the initial 2h gamma» (‘6) is aanfimw in them string a:
mmulaiva mmyy ”towns ( table I) . While the number of law
v-meamu

$.12,

mm

We

Ward: mama“ with treatmenb, 7m in the third min; and 3.8% in than
fourth max, urn mu rut-ma a “1M ﬂames at am». nativity.

We of

EEG

Dalia Activity with convulsive Therapy

(Emmi; M
.122

,.

High

MW

h

-

M)

2mmt Pogod

‘

L

1:2

28

1:6

66

2%

Mamie Dame

1?.

21

27

32

W 99W

63

W

25

18

16

3

2

a

m 2mm

mmw

Tim

behavioral

signﬁimm

mama was

of the

amused in

emmion
$110?

m a 1n the:

EEG

ma

muwmbwmlsiva ﬂaw.

m the h? mhjaictu" the maniac! taminva therapy in mi: “My;

«It

m
mlmﬁm mu,

incluéod 28 summit»: the
pins 19 .» .

cm“ of therapy.

9 had

grand m1 therapy can a rmdm
mimd
~
m3aota Mama for a “mound

in

����of

me netiv-ity.

Kara. the mbcomuleive group in

for each

100%

treatment per-lee. Sumthrenheld alternating current techniques
the

least

member

mmmeld

enact

of such remade in each period, with thmmeld me

teehniqma

in between.

it.
leather teeter in the rate

is the Mme? at treatment.
three time a week, a

while

number whe

a Miami. of delta aeﬂvity

all patients were initially treated

failed

develop high degrees of

“be

delta

activity were treated were intoneively. In em! mh peanuts, mama
were given daily or twine daily, and in each instance new» or high
degrees?

91’

delta activity were induced.- Similar

wimely
5.

F-

by
'

ter of
In the

'

Mem'gg g.

EEG

(9),. and

con-slates were

enemy

(3.0).

a

initial «new of ptiente,

it we noted that yemger

patients, under 15 yum of age, Malay-ad greater $339“ ex acne
nativity during the fix-at. and heme! weeks of treatment; while clear
mbjeete developed such nativity he a eigﬁﬂmt degree during the mix-d
week. By the fourth ml: at treatment, age no longer differentiated
batman the gmups.
supports

Cambining the

this observance.

date free all convulsive therapies

During the amend week, ha; of weaves are

magma mg: eeme dam: in mean-es we.» the age at
in pastimes
and

rm bones. and 18% in pemente

mm wake, the difference:

2mm

63.

and

no; but

mr.

my 30%

In the third

are no longer present and

3.15mewa

of the eubaeete have high degree eelta meeree when treated 3

time per week.

�3353;;an mmgwmwmlaa

5%
Ta

ha

W50
Over

has

ascoraanaaaﬁw

rm‘ Huh
ma

SE)...

W

(28)

69%

(28)

56%

years

(28)

55%

m

6-1

6.

*1.

18$

(18)

arms
=

Mag»

Mama

W

30a

50%

ma.

a

6mm and Panama (3).,
mated a signiﬁcant whammy betwan mamatmnt roan rd charaataru
mm and the degree a: mum «WWW mama alpha mum.
abnormal“ (11) awards were mm mam ta
“shawl“ (3) an

Mean reports,

by

imam

Malaya alteratiana in tha am than thaaa with

p «w- tly 1m: whim
:

that nativity pattamm
In these am” er patients, mamas: who»

m

m~matmt

mama

nativity; apika er spike wave nativity
damatmtad diffuse allow
Eight shah subjects were
were not incluéad in the atatisﬁcal

Wat.

,

a ma diffemnaa in incidence af h1g1 dama.,maords in signiﬂaazat at .01
1mm}. of amtidanaa batman tha ascend and 111m weeka am! .05
the aacond and thud mks af ammm. in pntiants over 250 years at age;
but is neat. aigwiaantly diffamnt far than periods in amupa amm- ‘50

mm

Fm»

�����am far Wr mum.

than
12mm, mv
In

m nah been
maimiim, m" mm to
activity

a.

mm in mm high dam «its:
imminent tramway, 33.ng
.

m effusive mamlmt mined, m

mmphysioloaa gimme-u If the dew cf do“: 9.me
for a wiw 01’ Ma, Wimp taggers u 9-. .5, t?
is high and
(23) w ammunbal (19) my be ”m6 to minim a utisfwmxy
. m iﬂma mama is «was
mammal magma, men when Mm

remit

in, ﬁlm

ade

,

,s

..

.

mm“ that-spy m will. (1153de. similar
applicatim has hm suggest“: m (5) far thiamm ”bland

we}

mrahar

ha

A

by

am

mm.

m ammm'vl

maintain ma uwmqma ta
mmhive W121“, but led to their diminution in amt Win--

Me alumina.

W

mec

npplioatim

13$

Mt. “ports firm the” laboratories min a
W mum
amt! (26) ,;

applieatien tar

WM aid warming at

���11;. maids,

15‘;

310 3135

.

W,

30.

Gamay,

An

1935.-

,1:

am

oxidation at mews
1956.
a
nu.
3m.: um
Wan-awn at m 1090. mama.

Inquiry into the

sex-«mm,
3.3.:

'

a: W.

mm,Mariammm»:
with a m
ﬂew 9mg. am at 21:2. minim
Hating LﬁPi‘J
HA. I

19570

Signifimaa or

mmm vmbili‘g in

m magma

Experimental stud-1W
My Edi-m and am; 31*.“
My My;
(in mm).
33m. 8
mun-9mm}: Rowan,

W

‘

.

6f

“13

o

the Action or Physiodsmmia Therapies,
m, 14,: 1 Unwed Thom a:197%.;195?‘
,

21.

LG»:

Shook

m,

19a

K; and

“W,springtiad,m Rd“! W a!

16.
1?.

6:13.: Evaluatim at
ma
Mr,
(3th
00mm}.
ﬁr.
gamma“ m1: Wraps.“ Winning a

£34., Smith,

52*

3.1m Bahamian]. mum in Induced sung or
M; n. ma Kuhn.
Brain mum. Rand at NJ. Biﬁaioml mung MPJ.

Ligand

3‘9 7‘.
‘

22. Kuhn, 3.1:. and Fiat, 14.:

;

A,“

Mummy Futon in Behavioral Mama to

Mammw}: “therapy,

Gama

m:1. (in press).

����“x

1%!

mmmmmmwwmmmwmsw
wuwmmﬁ

‘xmméugunrwar

mum's, far w

mum,mwmmwormmumum

mmwwmwmmmmmwmu
muuwmmuumnwhs. WMWmW
rwmmmmmmummcymmmm
mmmmm.

mum-Mt m m ”##1##“, We“
m
Mmaummwnmwmmywm,mm
want? mam,
MW W
wmmmummmmmthmm mm
mu

to,

at lama

huh

activity,

me!

for my:

Wﬁm a! an mmt ma pu- mum. alpha was the We.
cream mtﬂtymmmmwmormmmmema

‘tgﬁﬁmafwma

“

'

‘

'

mm

u¢mwmm4munmmmwrmw
’

WW.

W!

z.-m:auumnwmummuuuuwumt

mm: man-mm durum
m
mammmmtmmmmwgmmm
(a)

W a:

am mm. m mm

uMmmmmm.

31*

mamam am am am

�mm: mm; 1W m
W
mum
m mmar-W:
Mrwmwmm
at

(M

‘

we.

at

Mm“

(a)

at «inactivity «mm
hf {mm—m.
(a)

m m mums.

warm as inmate-at.

but,

my

the

What W «Woman: “new:

rm m

with

vammﬁmdwmuwm
W‘
mm- M whim:
WW W mu
up» mama.
WIta» W
maﬁa ~1me
m
Mmammmmmmammm
a:

(3)

«1'

1.

Wu W.

nativity

that

aw: 1w

WWt
‘

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2614">
                <text>Electroencephalographic correlates of the electroshock process. Dis. Nerv.Syst., 19: 227, 1958. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2615">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2616">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-32-009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2617">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2618">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Green, Martin A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2619">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2620">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2621">
                <text>12 items. 1: [preprint]. 2: Edit page. 3: Hand drawn graphs. 4: Handwritten notes. 5: Drafts. 6: Program for Eastern Psychiatric Research Association, Inc. Twelfth Scientific Meeting, February 6, 1958 (handwritten notes on back). 7: [preprint]. 8: Final copies. 9: Reprint from Diseases of the Nervous System, Vol. XIX, No. 5, May 1958 (one page). 10: [preprint]. 11: Discussion - NY Neurological Society 3-11-58. 12: [preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2622">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2623">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74464">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81025">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87586">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94147">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="263" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="54">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/549693df019a0cabd2aa7cfa90ad3ced.pdf</src>
        <authentication>62db1d0b502fce82996214e0276f034a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100680">
                    <text>’i'

WM 3mm; lacunae Whammy mum.
a: convulsive ma Ems

in 1:33,“;ant

W Mhim Fth
mm m
1-.

0-.

A.

3.1%

of mmm mmm,
m the
mam. mm m,
34.1., $1”.
W
Hakim}.
W? of the Unﬁml Wﬁm%_ a! Manta
Insti‘MkaWWith, mm ﬁﬂm mm: mm 80m“.
He:

33.113169

-'

Aldus!

3.33.1513,

01'

a Se
Wolagiaal

W

an arm
mmg, Howof1m
3mmandm- ammal Psychiatry,
Kw Yam
assuming
mum
may,
of 10-613mm, ﬂu: Kerk,
13., 1953:.
Promtud

a

mama:
.

»

‘

5..

#-

sky and

Mb

�II: 3-1148
Experiment-3.

Shame at cmvuhive and

13mg

momma: in Psychiatry:

Maﬁa mummy

mum e

the vapor rule a: the

We pearly Mined.
adequate

aw

sumac therapies in

This results, in part,

femhﬂon of their we at aetian.

increasing evidence for a

frw
In the

the leak at an

put

an:

yam

mmﬁyaiolaﬁemptiw view of electromoek

therapy has been presented by Wemtein and Kuhn, Bath, and
view, the

madam

Wynne prawn 1n electrocheek

is

[319128.

in thin

Mex-1m to a Imminent.

alteration in cerebral function mm: madden the milieu for a change in
adaptatim of the aubjwt in his anvimmnt.
having the past four years in the
we have

attuned the

autism

between

mum and the behavioral name
physiedynemic therapioa ..

laboratariu of Hillside hospital,

alteration in urinal: indicate of brain

at psych “trite patients ta three of the

emmmwk,

Win one and *tmqullieere."

me nemyhyaielogcudapuw view at sleet-manna has been

Wind in the” studies;
has been preheated.

and widenae

Recently, the

mar “trimmers.”

:5qu we

for a similar View of insulin

coneep’t.

em

has been fruitfully extended to the

The» studies provide the hands for a

gmmlimtim

�«2*

«meaning

ta
a!

W

the. mode of

the experimental

mum at these therapies

"idem

measurable

éetomine whether or not the

be

tenight
male

mean I’m their ability ta inane: manned-

may

altemtian in aembral function;

it in ear PW

the" therapist.

nation of

and

the

wrelluy questing,

alteration in eerebral fumtion is

efficacy of these thempiea, or mether me}:

a,

necessary

whether

mﬁtien for the

We: in brain aunties: m a

“maimﬁan” er "11331th when"
have used

We

View).

mime indie»

of brain {Manon including mar llama,

m mule pomoptual mice, and uhangea in orientatian patterns

at

new both clinically and utter intmmua mbarbital which be generally
knew

me

the

”m1 test."

the delta index

In electroencephalographic studies, ehanges in

in meuutod words

mm at altered brain

mum.

For

have been

“and to be a

mauve

latm

this mica, ehangos in this

W will be ctr-eased.
In the

initial

rotomd for mmleive

nudism of normative patients

therapy, oleetrmcephalogram were amazed before,

tmemnt at weekly intmala

timing therapy.

m1 therapy three time a week, fer a total of

The

and an

a day

ate: a

patients rewind

312-20

applieatim.

m6

�a,

thte

31w were nativity. In the mun}.

We Wt
the

01'

the

heme witty

tenet, m quantitatively

Mum delta eetivity during

by determining the per tee-t time

maintenm

»

each we}:

at eeeh mﬁﬂty, the

and the duretiee

amt WW,

e: berets in selected

team were then new we the W

thin! were

at treatment

We.

the

emm ae "high,"

theeeeenethieeeeﬁnieﬂcﬁmdﬁmmethMuVW demure!
Mite entirety.

“tee tee their

We: he met meets the noted in the rim.

short term

emu rem (he make poet Wheat)

new means: peyehutuc trauma, and were
“Mentally moved“ and

"We”

elseeed as

”wet theme,“

�.h...

In the

first toms

of mutants, a

Want relationship human

the early inﬂuation of high degree: of delta nativity, and clinical rating.

at

”math

Wad” m crammed. may put: «at at

the “cm-ids in tho

313.1:

much

mma group mm high dogm mu by this 14-6 Manning

pemntaga my unstained at

um 91‘

the unimproved

first ulna mks,

90%

in the third and fourth

mm.

and the

In

mtmt,

pawn“ dumped 121$ dogma! data «cards in tho

and only 20%

of the records in the tenth-h week

are

to

elusifiod.
Baud

can

those

mum, u wanna nudy m undertaken.

mum-d: obtained during the amend ﬁnd

Wad for
that.

15h:-

dogroe

a:

W

w;

third mic: or mutant. mm

delta nativity, and

it tun 0:31:1de

than patients the had high degree: a! (with activity during then

periods would that better ratings of

”Wat“ than puma“ in

two

when

�~s~
such

damn

mm.

of delta activity were not

This prediction was

Fig. 5

m“

'

1mm

1mm, an

occasions were

67%

at the patients with high degree records

”mach improved,"

“minprmd”

705 were

while

m: ”moderately

31‘

on both

patients withaut such "earth,-

tamed."

Further aorrabomtzlon was obtained in a canvulaivoumbeonvulaiva
control ”My. Connemara

m convulsive
who

car

of. middlo

waiving

referrals were plum aims:-

an mboonvulsiva therapy on a random

remind aubaonvulaim

antivity

3110 chrothampy

trauma,

mm

min. a:

Wmm slow wave

or high dogma in any use): of treatment.

Waive therapy,

patients

27

or; 28

EEG

subjects

high degree records were observed in 20

rimming

the second to 1‘0qu weeks of treatment.
Or

23, and

the

27

mboomlsive patients,

at the“,

19

mm retomd for

ml elactromock induood

no change
3.

”cont!

in behavior

coma of tmtmnt.

high dogmas of delta antivity in 1h

in each, a significant behavioral

Me was notad.

in

was when!

at"

Grand

We,

and

In the rim panama

�«a.
Iii-ham; Inch

‘

delta chug», «my m ahead a

m cm“

of

mutant hehmiwal

W183.“ thumw indium that m slaw mo

nanny 1-: as: 1nd»: at tbs chums in «ma imam man are

promise to the Maria“

'

aha-nae

in this turn a:

ﬂwpoim or their elmtmaophdogmpma
1 moaningml

W.

and

a

mum.

annual manage attack,

renump Luther: um dogma ma type of mam W m

mmbml function

and

the clinical behavioral

rum is observed.

The

Waxing agents to imam aim of central nervous
system @atmtion, a motor rigidity, deputation, «summit and. MW

ability of the aver

m Wu Imam.
-

mod

on

ohmumm nude in mm

expat-1mm am in

We

manual: at various ms in ms mama-r143 partisan, m
have also bun notoé. than me «that: m be clusﬂiod awarding to
men in the {macaw spectrum, and m at three broad Wu:
"

met

�“1.?

1.

mm new we mum

II. Instance
111.

high voltage

Bethrmiution

WWW-

with

that activity.

with voltage and

{macaw

Singularity we irregular that». activity.

at the drugs that induce increased

slew

have

mtivity the phonothiaeiha

enemies. pmiee and Wine m elm We.
Each drug also induce; aims in mmeptim, megawatts mum in
ﬁerivatim,

I

epilogue shadow, and induce; enamel “thin-mien naming“ pumm.
’In

the enamel eat-vice

at amazes Hospital, pneumonia but

in all patients reaching Mammalian,
10%

of

and

«um: have been observed in

Whit: patient. ﬁthent 3 Wm history

Renee-pine

how induced

of

”18mm

else moms delta nativity, but only when

gim in

it high dosage levels, it the mggmm Mum: in opium,
Munroe in

mm»,

the clinical

are

elemet maples.

Indeed

We

tut nativity,

barbiturate

“than agents differ from the

phanethiuinee and "sperms in not warming

«hum.

and

whenoeim in me.

at drugs that induce immune high voltage

ah merchants

hm dean.

Woman, or mm

their anhiamlmt nativity is measurable.

�.3.
minimum in readily “Mum.

and

”ism: hm hm charred.
Varima drug: indwo

EEG

domabrmiaatiw with varying

«ﬂaw. lamina and damning;
bamamina

mm W a: mama

two

reports either of
.

MW, in

mt bean

«baa-wad with

miss:

will.

than

eat

that:

drugs, user have

”isms nr parkinamiam in. than clinical

«tents

«gm: at

phnnothimM derimtiws, ma

Wad «synchroninmm with

Dalia activity has

and

«ﬂaw.

we found

Ilium-azure.

mama“, dimm and WWW have been

that: to mam-unis. the

EEG

delta moral! or patient! undergoing

010W tummy.
’16-: 6x '3': 3»

M

the» minor

9.

Winery, ahlorpmsim, parphonuim and ”amino

haw been amiatontly annually reported as
paymwio barman:- panama.

in me frequancioa to the

most.

mus are also the

ma.

range.

mini in $3ng

drugs that.

mmbmte,

Mm

momma and

groan

the man.

1:6an

�m 01mm 1m mm.
in tha

than an

m agents we pmdueo m man-ea

mum at :m tmunwiw er doaynchwniuum.

mum,

an

delta range is

t mcmtmt at signifimt behavioral

in cumulus.“ therapy, an

.3

(i5)

"

may,

12:

the

m tnqumay shut in the
situate.

“

magma ofinmlmemthampymbcamodina

13.22113:-

rwhim.

During

usually pal-auto for

«an am,

EEG

delta mmuw 1: manna,

mm: to a few hams-a after gauge.

not.

23212222

Mmumm,

. 1—

V

mo third of patimta

waiving

hospital, 131mm” aphasia or prolonged
EEG

change: or alarm activity

am, far
“the:

m

2231:!

relation

bahmgral

am

mey in this

am and“. an» such

pomt fer elm, and

122

«mm:

mu of pmlmgad

mm.

how 13th am, ﬁtmd brain function am!

mama has: been (anew at length by various authan Him

(20220121233

that.

dam.

He

We study.

sloop

Woman”: is related

be 22;:

1226226321921

of organia brain

haw abnamd a 31:11“ relationship, and reported am «nah
A 322

you old aabimphme puma“. with puma“ 13mm:

�«It»

Now a loft magnum eating mm: em thmpyi
efmurMe
fom:

With

the unset

nmmmamwmmmmmW.

paw

« withdrawal

cooperative attitude.

the»

mm pattern we

Hie

mum by I Mmdly

We: can wemmd by delta clung“ in

the We,
(6)

W:
While

in him net bad the perennial opportunity to etudy

lobetw intimate from the $93.11*. of View at this awry,

mmeebumere

clearly

dome a

of delta aetivi ty are present

for

W

in 3

1’30

relatienmih me

in all subdue“ peatwpcneivoly

arm periods, up to three yours.

«1mm

the report: at

We

and

peniet

ﬂux-them, pests-operative

m a frequent ”museum, being varieealy report“ a new

26%

of subjects.

�D‘IESE:
has,

what:

"Mm “Moi

thumpiw

point of ﬂaw of an alteration in brain
node

at whim.

Those

m We of

the

imam,

we may

in!” a.

chanson

in hahnvior.

«he» at these madman puma

a

m

mum aﬁmﬁm a! the mam alteratian in brain taxation.

mum 115an by am in than

in Miami

at

W

the

111.1101:

«hangs

data range,

mm is

signiﬂaanaa a:
that-aw; um

with an

W

“we“. Man :0: the mucus af

faction with reaultmt

Ghana“ in brain

.

thawing

m swayed rm the

apoctm of

1mm in aynahrmuatien,

mat. «mouths

in altering Mmatin

EEG

mung”
immunity:

proud“

the

mum m

delta shirt has boa: alearly dwamtmtod in elmtroaonvulsin

ﬁlm

m be mama iron the available data for the W pmm»

Wattage agents, whammy and insulin can.
mat a
«mummy

mu. m

3mg,

mg drug atfce'aa.
and

maarpina

m Manet” mm Wed mmmauon.

has

am apoaificity is

Thou drugs tam

.. have been

at paychntic mutton

soon in the analyses

61‘

mm a delta shift - thc mmﬁﬁum

mandamus! mom as effeetivc Miriam

and 31m.» aa Potent

mumminogans.

�4%."

ma mt‘ma

a.

synchronimman in

1210

have

strum of

ohms: in lawn

beta range, as

in contrast, are poor

Viki“

(

aha

)

.

«

03.80

in has potent.

Drug:

a hammme, dict-hum am! ”mains,

Wars:

mm and illusory Momma.
mamlihathat

WW“: and «9:9me

sedation and trwquinsaﬁm, but

that man“ we avmahmnuaticm,

with than; of

mam mooted by manna-d

and

in 11191

dosage inch-1m

maisty,

obnmtians are clarity maniatent

when

awclw in him mam of marginal: and

. . raga-Glen of the

mm“ a: am am

amum,

shifts in tha pattern a: m alwtrmaephalogrm in thy dimtim of

domchmiumm

new in “mam um Maw, &gt;ha11ueimtiom,

fantasies, illusions or tremors, and in
with

mgriu, mlmtian
801:

alum

and

Mammal of mahmniuuam

‘meﬁ

pursuant clung” in mabrai imam “feat behavior

mm mm»:- m

with an ﬂ'heﬂtiﬁn in tbs
in.

91'

than

we;

*memd' or 'abutomtéd.‘

antral mam

mm mum,

thaw

an upon“ a: mam:- including .mpmn, ma, arm,
attitudo. mo aéaptive

:11

not

Rather,

is

an

alarmist:

mam-Wt.

We mdar an“ conditimn in variable

�.43..

fer eeeh eebJeet end is Gee-Wt

mm.

W

puma-3.1m

and the duration of the

dieeueeed

in behavior are

“Wamhtﬂ

matteetere es the type at

teierenee, nether abut-term

with;

.

ehenge
1d

net

"do

eve-Tented by the

The” rating;

“may

hem

no

value

psychiatrist as

3W,

mentions.
a.

.

«2qu

In this meta-e3" the

Mamie

men”, they

men in «relented ale inpmtehent.

Ahmed

the

Wed behavioral name,

Mm temwmnw

The

induce a hehmveral

alteratim or eerehrel

Imam

themem net I ‘cmlieetien' or [In *entemw «new but the chaired

goal ef these fame of
during the peat
the therapy
.

Mum.

u automate w the individual hehevierel new.

to the degree of
upon

and

alteration in brain renewal: have

The inﬂated ehe’epe

e

W “mm
mm

mmmm and mix-Wm

on

harem. er the may

tine-guest therapies intmchxeeé

thirty rem, me eppehenﬂye has been

a.

epeeitie agent fer

a: psycho»: (in the tense mat penieil‘lin 1e emeiﬂe Tar

WW!

and

nieetmic mid for pellegm émntia) , but rather

with greater or lesser degrees of epplieehmty
behavior by altering the hombre}.

when.

and

mm

etiieaey in altering

�,

in

m,

we

hm:

mm the nmmsiologie upsets at,

mm WW3 woman, and hm «minded am; the therapeutic
pram of ammonia, insulin can, mtw and trmqnilimrs my
Mutant Ilka-mum in «new
in uhptaticm at ﬁn
mama. mm; pmm the silica a» s.
be

3.36de to tha inductian at

.J‘mbsactb his
1-

,

a

em

Wt.

the

«ﬂaw at web mutant. mthod in

mm to its mmw w W a pursuant. «hung: in! mmbml functim,
of mm m «It: shift in the m 'speom with Wad
mum“
may but a,

amuimt W.

management

of

Such a

'

a»

bu appliabﬂity in

m

m at those thumping to the scram of m payohophﬁmuolngia

agents. and as 3 arms of
mnmﬁzysioﬁmwu

atom m further new of Matter

and"

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2624">
                <text>Experimental studies of convulsive and drug therapies in psychiatry: theoretical implications. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chic.), 80:733-734, 1958. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2625">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2626">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-33a-010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2627">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2628">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.; Green, Martin A. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2629">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2630">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2631">
                <text>[preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2632">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2633">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74465">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81026">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87587">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94148">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="264" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="55">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/4d1964245452e951a0fc4a640e62c9dc.pdf</src>
        <authentication>68280c1aa72a42e9812ae2fd531e09b0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100681">
                    <text>50
ALTERATION OF BRAIN FUNCTION
IN THERAPY
MAX FINK

following summary of observations made at a 200-bed voluntary, nonproﬁt, open-ward psychiatric hospital during the past
three years is presented as the basis for discussion. The major
interest of our Research Service is an investigation of the mode of action
of various somatic therapies, especially electroshock and drugs. The
disciplines represented in the research unit are clinical and psycho«
dynamic psychiatry, neuropsychology, and experimental and clinical
psychology. The following data summarize various studies that have
previously been reported only in part:
(I) High-dose reserpine for relief of anxiety: double-blind placebo
study.
(2) Chlorpromazine-insulin coma study.
(3) Electroencephalographic effects of various drugs.
(4) Electroshock process: concurrent psychiatric, psychologic, and neurophysiologic observations.
HE

OBSERVATIONS

Reserpine
In a placebo-controlled, double-blind study of oral and intramuscular
reserpine, consecutive patients referred for drug therapy were rated for
degree of manifest anxiety.1 The patients with high degrees of anxiety
received randomized three-week periods iof reserpine therapy, divided
into the following daily dosage periods: 10 mg. of reserpine (5 mg. oral,
5 mg. intramuscular), 5 mg. of reserpine (oral or intramuscular), or
Reprinted from Psychopharmacology Frontiers. Proceedings of the Psychopharmacology
Symposium of the Second International Congress of Psychiatry held in Zurich, Sw1tzerland on September 2-4, 1957. Published and copyrighted 1959 by Little, Brown and
Company, Boston 6, Massachusetts, USA.

�326

PSYCHQPHARMACOLOGY FRONTIERS

placebo. Drugs were administered daily. None of the observing therapists
knew which sequence was being followed or the dosages administered.
Relief of anxiety symptoms related to drug dosage was seen in 20 per
cent of the group. In 80 per cent no relief was noted, and of these, onethird exhibited severe depressive reactions which eventually responded
to electroshock therapy. The high doses of reserpine administered resulted in signiﬁcant clinical manifestations in every patient. The be~
havioral changes induced were directly related to the degree of concomitant physiologic disturbance.
It was the conclusion of this study that high-dosage reserpine therapy
has limited usefulness in the relief of anxiety symptoms. The dangers of
induced depressions were clearly manifest, and the uncomfortable nature of the side effects of drug administration has resulted in a limited
application of this drug in this environment.

Chlorpromazine-insulin coma
During a ﬁfteen-month period, all patients referred by the supervising
psychiatrists at this hospital for insulin coma therapy were divided by
random sampling into an experimental group and a control group.2
The control group received classical insulin coma treatment, following
the basic technique of Sakel. All patients received ﬁfty comas, each of a
duration of one hour or longer, at the physiologic level of Babinski
reﬂex or absent lid reﬂex or deeper. The experimental group received
chlorpromazine therapy in rapidly increasing dosages until toxicity had
been induced. When toxic signs of rigidity, drooling, ﬁxed facies, seizures,
dermatitis, or marked weakness appeared, the dosage was gradually reduced until a maintenance level was obtained. Patients were sustained
on this regime for a period of three to four months. In both groups, behavioral observations were made by investigators none of whom was the
for
referred
treatment, resulting
were
Sixty
patients
therapist.
patient’s
in two groups of 30 each.
The maintenance dosage of chlorpromazine was 300 to 2000 mg.
daily. Initial dosages ranged from 1400 to 3600 mg. daily.
Chlorpromazine induced motor retardation in all subjects. Overactive,
destructive behavior rapidly disappeared, and the patients were more
tractable, less negativistic, and less violent. One-third of the patients were
more sociable and less seclusive, and were noted to care for themselves in
a more presentable fashion. In the instances where severe parkinsonism
supervened, however, the patients were less able to care for themselves,
became sloppy, and failed to dress.
Affective changes during chlorpromazine were varied. Four patients
became increasingly agitated, tense, and tremulous, and either refused
to continue on the drug regime or were induced to do so only with

�MODE

or

ACTION

327

difﬁculty. Such an affective .storm appeared early in the therapy and
persisted.
..
In 4 other cases, depressive symptoms were signiﬁcantly relieved, with
an increase in affective lability and responsivity. In 2 patients, depressive
ideation increased and was associated with complaints of insomnia. The
medication was continued, however, with eventual alleviation. In most
patients mood changes were small.
Ideation was altered during the period of chlorpromazine therapy in 12
of the patients. Eight patients had a loss or a signiﬁcant diminution of
psychotic ideation. In 5, the hallucinatory and referential experiences
were no longer reported even on inquiry, and in 3 others, delusional
ideation was less prominent. In 1 patient, however, paranoid ideation
became more prominent. This was associated with increasing anxiety and
panic during drug administration, with resultant discontinuation of the
drug regime.
The clinical effects of insulin coma therapy have been exhaustively
reported, and the ﬁndings in this series are comparable to those previously published.
With regard to the evaluation of improvement, all 60 patients of this
study have been discharged from the hospital. Table I lists patients according to the four-fold classiﬁcation in use in the hospital at the discharge conference.
TABLE

I

DISCHARGE RATINGS

Chlorpromazine Insulin Coma
Recovered
Much improved
Improved
Unimproved

2

4

0
5

l7

l5

7

10

Inherent in the design of this study were high doses of chlorpromazine,
pushed until symptoms of toxicity appeared. In this context, therefore,
all patients developed signiﬁcant drug effects. In all, rigidity of extremities appeared, frequently accompanied by a decrease in facial expression, drooling, and festination. Untoward complications are listed
in Table II.
Electroencephalograms were obtained in 20 of the chlorpromazine
patients. On adequate doses, concomitant with a change in clinical
behavior a moderate amount of low-voltage 4 to 7 cps delta and theta
activity was observed. This activity was exaggerated by hyperventilation.
In the 3 patients in whom seizures were induced, the delta activity was
not signiﬁcantly different from the remainder of the group. There was a

�328

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY FRONTIERS

suggestive relationship between the degree of the induced slow-wave
activity and the drug dosage.
TABLE

II

COMPLICATIONS

Chlorpromazine

Agitation and panic
Dermatitis, severe
Seizures

Refusal of further therapy
Hypotension
Secondary reaction, frequent
Prolonged coma (more than 6 hours)
Insulin resistance
Regression of behavior

4
3
3
2

Insulin Coma
3

5
2

2
—
—

Dab—409ml

2

It was the conclusion of this study that neither Chlorpromazine in
high doses nor insulin coma is a speciﬁc treatment for schizophrenia. It

was noted that these treatments were devices to temporarily alter behavior that had been socially unacceptable. Since Chlorpromazine was
safer, easier to administer, and more controllable in its effect and had
fewer side effects, it was recommended that it replace insulin coma.

Role of electroencephalographic changes in behavioral change
As noted in the following section, a direct relation between changes
in electroencephalographic delta and behavioral changes in electroshock had been observed in these laboratories. For this reason, a survey
of the role of various newer drug agents was undertaken to determine
the potential relationship between behavioral change and electroencephalographic effects.
Chlorpromazine and promazine are effective agents for the induction
of changes in motor patterns of behavior. Concomitant electroencephalographic effects are the induction of delta activity, a desynchronization of
the record, and a decrease in the amount of fast activity. Both drugs also
induce seizure activity spontaneously in patients who have not had
seizures prior to the administration of the drugs, and in whom pre-treatment electroencephalograms have not demonstrated dysrhythmic activity.
Reserpine, while inducing a deﬁnite parkinsonian syndrome, does not
generally induce seizures. At therapeutic levels, the changes in the
electroencephalogram are limited to an increase in fast activity. We have
not observed delta activity in any patient receiving reserpine.
In patients receiving meprobamate, also, delta activity has not been
observed. Records consistently demonstrate high-voltage beta activity,
similar to barbiturate. Clinically, meprobamate has some effect in

�MODE OF ACTION

329

reducing seizure activity. When dosages are suddenly reduced, we have
observed spontaneous seizures in 2 subjects. This observation is similar
to that noted in animals.3
Electroshock evalution studies
In the course of an extensive evaluation of the electroshock process,
a direct relationship has been observed between the degree of induced
delta activity and the degree of behavioral change.4 We observed that
serial records taken during the course of electroshock therapy and
measured for quantitative changes in delta activity could serve as a guide
to the therapeutic outcome. Of 11 patients who were clinically rated
much improved, 10 had high-degree delta records in the third and
fourth weeks of treatment, whereas of 7 unimproved patients only 1
had such a record. In a subsequent series,5 these observations were extended in a predictive study. It was suggested by these initial observations that the much improved patients were those in whom high-degree
delta activity had been induced early in the course of treatment and
sustained. Records taken during the second and third weeks of treatment were assessed. The results in 54 consecutive patients are noted in
Table 111. Of the patients who developed high-degree delta activity
during the second and third weeks of treatment, 67 per cent were
rated much improved, whereas only 30 per cent of the patients without
such activity were so rated.
TABLE

III

PATIENTS WITH HIGH DELTA ACTIVITY IN EEG DURING
SECOND AND THIRD WEEKS OF TREATMENT

EEG Delta
Both high (18)
One high (16)
None high (20)

Much Improved
12

(67%)
4 (25%)
6 (30%)

Clinical Rating
Unimproved
Moderately Improved
4 (22%)
8
7

(50%)
(35%)

'

2 (11%)

4 (25%)
7 (35%)

Delta activity in the electroencephalogram reﬂects the state of brain
function, and is a guide to alterations in that state. To verify the relationship between delta activity and behavioral change, concomitant amobarbital tests for altered brain function6 were done in this series of
patients. It was observed that the amobarbital test results were parallel
to the electroencephalographic effects.7 Of patients in the initial series
who had been rated as much improved, all had positive amobarbital
test reactions after the seventh to ninth weeks of treatment and sustained
this response. Of the unimproved patients, however, 15 per cent had

�PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY FRONTIERS

330

positive amobarbital responses in the third week and 28 per cent in
the fourth week, but these responses were not sustained.
A comparison of both electroencephalographic observations and the
amobarbital test data, as related to the eventual clinical ratings, is seen
in Table IV.5
TABLE IV
’

EEG

AND AMOBARBITAL TEST RESULTS DURING
SECOND AND THIRD WEEKS OF TREATMENT

Much Improved Moderately Improved Unimproved

Both positive amobarbital
and high EEG delta activity
Either positive amobarbital
or high EEG delta activity
Neither positive amobarbital
nor high EEG delta activity

Totals

It

25

10

3

8

12

5

0

3

11

33

25

19

apparent that the cluster of positive amobarbital tests, high EEG
delta activity, and the much improved clinical ratings is a signiﬁcant
one; equally signiﬁcant is the cluster of negative amobarbital tests, low
to moderate EEG delta activity, and a clinical rating of “unimproved.”
In the clinical observations in the electroshock study varied behavioral responses were observed. These included the absence of noticeable symptoms with the return of pre-morbid behavior; hypomania,
euphoria, and denial; paranoid states with ideas of reference and delusional formation; confusional states with varying degrees of memory
disturbance; increased somatic complaints and preoccupations; states of
increased panic, excitement, and agitation; and varying degrees of withdrawal and seclusiveness. Similar psychopathologic reactions were observed in schizophrenic patients undergoing either chlorpromazine or
insulin coma treatments, or patients with severe manifest anxiety undergoing reserpine therapy.
In the electroshock group, the degree of behavioral change was directly
related to the degree of alteration in neurophysiologic indices. This
direct relationship between neurophysiologic change and behavior was
even more clearly manifested in a group of patients treated with subconvulsive therapy. In another control study, 27 subjects received subconvulsive therapy instead of grand mal therapy. The electroencephalo—
grams demonstrated either no delta activity or a minimal amount of such
activity during the course of treatment. In no patient were moderate
or high-degree delta activity records observed. In the amobarbital tests,
only 3 patients had positive reactions during treatment, and'in each
instance this. occurred only once. Of the 27 subjects no change in sympis

�MODE OF ACTION

331'

toms or behavior was noted in 23. Nineteen were later referred for a
second course of treatment. Of these, grand mal electroshock induced
changes in brain function reﬂected by high-degree delta activity and /or
repeated positive amobarbital tests in 14. All 14 showed signiﬁcant
changes in behavior, whereas of the 5 patients in whom physiologic
indices showed only minor changes, only 2 showed a deﬁnite behavioral change.
It is important to note that there was no direct relationship between
the physiologic changes and a speciﬁc type of behavioral change. There
was, however, a direct relationship between the degree of induced
physiologic change in brain function and the degree of behavioral
change. In a further attempt to determine the relationship between the
type of behavioral change and other variables, we have carried out
studies on the role of personality in the behavorial response.8 The initial
study of the role of personality was devoted to a study of the relation
between the characterologic disposition of patients to show denial
mechanisms and the clinical results. The relatives of 47 patients were
interviewed and denial personality scores were assessed, following a
structured interview. Denial scores range from 0 to 25, with a median of
11. The scores were then divided into two
groups: scores from 11 to 25
were classed as high denial and those from 0 to 10 as low denial.
Of patients with high denial personality scores, 58 per cent were in the
much improved group and only 1 patient was in the unimproved
group.
The ratings of improvement for the patients with low denial personality
scores were random, about one-third appearing in each rating category.
These studies support the present neurophysiologic adaptive hypothesis of the mode of action of electroshock therapy. This hypothesis
notes that alteration in brain function is the central effect of electroshock therapy and is a prerequisite to behavioral change. It also notes
that under the conditions of the induced change in brain function,
altered patterns of adaptation are expressed. The type of adaptation
varies, apparently dependent upon the personality organization.
CONCLUSIONS

Largely on the basis of these observations, as well as of reports of
numerous other observers, the following conclusions regarding the role
of physiodynamic therapies in schizophrenia are suggested:
(1) None of the present therapeutic regimes, including insulin coma
therapy, electroshock therapy, and the newer drug therapies including
chlorpromazine, reserpine, meprobamate, and promazine, are speciﬁc for
schizophrenic illnesses. No evidence has been educed that any of these
therapies have altered the basic schizophrenic process.

�332

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY FRONTIERS

(2) Behavorial change in electroshock has been shown to be depend-

ent on an alteration in brain function, as evidenced by serial changes in
delta activity in the electroencephalogram. Under these conditions, the
pattern of behavioral alteration varies markedly, depending on the degree
of induced cerebral dysfunction, the personality of the subject, and the
environmental situation.
(3) The newer drug therapies have effects on brain function in direct
proportion "to their ability to alter behavior as determined by clinical
observation. The parallel between electroencephalographic change and
behavioral change leads to the proposition that the mode of action
of newer drug therapies may be similar to that of electroshock therapy;
viz., by altering brain function in a nonspeciﬁc manner, behavioral
changes are induced.9 To the extent that the behavioral alteration is of
a kind that is rated as improved by the environment, the drugs are considered satisfactory therapeutic agents. In this regard, it is important to
note that improvement ratings are but a special case of behavioral
change, dependent on the type of adaptation elicited, the expectation of
the therapist, administrator, and family, and the tolerance of the milieu.

REFERENCES

l. Wachspress, M., Blumberg, A. G., Fink, M., and Miller, J. S. A. Evaluation
of high-dose reserpine therapy for relief of anxiety. 1. Hillside Hosp, 5: 67,
1956.

Fink, M., Shaw, R., Gross, G. C., and Coleman, F. S. Comparative study of
chlorpromazine and insulin coma in therapy of psychosis. ]. A. M. A. In press.
3. Wikler, A. Personal communication.
4. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L. Relation of EEG delta activity to behavioral redr
Arch.
A.
A.
Neural.
M.
studies.
serial
electroshock:
in
quantitative
sponse
Psychiat., 78: 516, 1957.
5. Fink, M., Kahn, R. L., and Green, M. A. Experimental studies of the electroshock process. Dis. Nerv. System, 19: 113, 1958.
6. Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A., and Linn, L. Diagnostic use
of amobarbital sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in organic brain disease. Am. ].
Psychiat., 112: 889, 1953.
7. Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A. Relation of amobarbital test to
clinical improvement in electroshock. A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. 69' Psychiat., 76:
2.

23, 1956.

Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M. Personality factors in behavioral response to electroshock therapy. Conﬁnia neural. In press.
9. Fink, M. A uniﬁed theory of the action of physiodynamic therapies. J. Hillside
8.

Hosp, 6:

197, 1957.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2634">
                <text>Alteration of brain function in therapy. In NS Kline (ed.), Psychopharmacology Frontiers. Little, Brown &amp; Co., Boston, 1959: 325-332.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2635">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2636">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-33b-011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2637">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2638">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2639">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2640">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2641">
                <text>Reprinted from Psychopharmacology Frontiers. Proceedings of the Psychopharmacology Symposium of the Second International Congress of Psychiatry held in Zurich, Sw1tzerland on September 2-4, 1957.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2642">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2643">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74466">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81027">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87588">
                <text>Boston: Little, Brown and Company</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94149">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="265" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="56">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/96ce3f4b6be961e4eabd7724c9d19da6.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a0a4da54e32427732cf5206a7a8e7ac6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100682">
                    <text>m:

603.29%

(f/

3

mammowmmmwmwm
MW“

*

m an W8 at mm. mm, mm- mm, am am, L.,I.. m.
and u. tho mung a: u:- mrim m Mum Atlantic any, m
31;. 3.958.

�’umwuummcmmmmoommm

“We!

mmsémwwmmmwwmumduymmmu

02-00%de mammuotmhighwltago doltn

ants-upon:

nativity woolly

mm by convulsive tux-spy.

may also noted mm the

M 91‘an mammary to affoettm Rem mob an tuba “mama

with

mutant music: aﬁaou. m reporta by Janinar and W!“

mums
W
mmmcmquuammnmmmma-o

mamummo u an miehonmme

with patent

MWtﬁnﬂW;mdthouMmﬁm,intumlodfamlmﬂgatm

ofothormmnu. Itilthowotthilnporttomab tho
Meal and mo oomhtiona on the momma Mutation of "rum
mums and antloholinorgle agents in payohutrio patients nt- Mm
stag” of comm thmpy; and to 2.1m than emu-mum to the
mount]: amused noWiologio-uaptiw

mum of
Our

convulsive Wimpy and of hallucinogam.

for comm-1w
in m
mmPot-untW
studied at
hospital.
hm
mom ham 1am mu

oomtiva

mbjoots ultra

opou ward

WW1: of the node a?

voluntary psychiatric»

been

mutt-hang,
W
ummmmmy. I‘mnwammmﬂm rm
with

1?

m

using

.

as WW6
W
”rm, Mom Mailer

mm «new,

“Witt
mm» W!
not

diathum, Win 2299.

and:

on.

was: away

rut.
van ohumd. use commas

Lon-25 and

ban-em.

W

has

bean

�he. I ..

W Mew.
4‘

memu-muzsmmumrwamanmso

mymammmmnoﬁmwmuzuzém,wrap-a5

“10me farms-mt...

mmmmmudum,n15pnummmmnu

ngmmamMMWnagaandaduynmmumofm
patterns ham 1»: immanent; In
fmuemiaaa Wang
m
m 1mm, manta-1a low voltage 6-? up. nativity

W

W,
pmmmmmmmzmwwh MdMMumcy

mmtnw,mmmmaupmwzwmmrzmmmm
bym-pemtﬂntimmbmhd.

mm
a

1331'?

:11;

mm. 3.

«-

m-

Wu mm
.

:x-

.,, 4M»

Wadmngumm" W, uthvmingmsar

mmvolmomuwuﬁmmmanwxmmm
mvamawinprrmtuuﬁdwmmuw. Mummy:

mmmudhsxmmtmexmmm.mmmamm

“Mammmumuﬂty ., mam

teamwork-6%.
values aim at! but:

,

W105 W ruminant. m mmnﬁhum

mama was no loam ”plant. has.

m w fin hm”.

ﬂWe «fact; psi-aim

for

�“3.3.5

Mam-Gmnmhm
Goumt um: then m «Mus, m mm mama”

Moral 6W.

ﬂuent:

We mam irritable sud muss! 1nd

at mum at Why am: anesthesia: o:
must.
6W.
View mum-y Mann
their mm», the
«1mm
setting of
tut promo or the mm musy mm mm.
mm:
alumna in a tactic:
patuma
the

and

thoughts about

the

unguagu

me mummy

opposite to that prudently

denial,

has

mum, allow, third person

Wat.

W.

dam-5m for what-him, no that verbal
mode and

put tame

W

then change: wm oomumnt with Mm: ewmmhio

mmmmmmmmmmmwamwam

urmamnummmmmum mwSSW-mmm
upon-m mm mm gum-a m dam mm, mm by mammals,
MMMMuWMwmm
nutmmmmm.
mm andporeant mammm syntax: Mmbmuﬂth
mm mumprmsm mvaolugo, madam
«15mm:

both

ammlﬂnwww
memsm‘mm
new 1:111:2de m
“W231!

Mont

activity and

in

M‘tomramm‘tmmdg 'moﬂmhuwwﬁntobw
in ma «dawning group» m 1mm mound“ merma- m

�Wﬁon We
and

in values: of :11 inguinal“

m

16.3.6

W351“ mm

Win 2399 ~
A;

A

-

m

.W

mam laments umwmuge stoma «unuymm
mWMmGwcwt than of Ingram nativity nmmmm
am and m tum-mu. mm m out w» mu minty
to £35 in than mac/cm Manama with than
patterns of
aﬂoat: at”

from 59$

w

I

111W ”ﬁlthy.

1’18.

an 8399 - Pelt
0::

u m hallucinogenic

W
dummwia

mm, «amt,

ﬁlm

W

.

.;

111'

ma Minotaur:
‘

'i

Win treatment

’

nativity at

1633-25

mmummum thine-mama.

m an «um-had, that. am»

Hm,m,

wmmmm

to
manna, mm mmWax-:1
mmme struts, 1mm
constant in ﬂat thin
an

amine.

in: n “from”
1} to a ham mar

There

than

m

m :mmtmm, but an; clamping
man we? Wt mam mm sham. was then! m m
9:er mad

mmum
1%»:er tilll

with

LSD,

m «an activity was mum mud.

ma activity

£8.13.-

fmh‘ﬂ to 16$ infiw mm.

as. a. 9. an

m .. me

�mm mom that mum,

0.

mm mammary»

ewgmmmmummwmmmw
W
a: 01m subjects.
again
mam mum

1::qu
electromphic patterns.
ma

moan-d with high

and

30th in

13119

1011

ma

mm

voltage done activity,

‘
,

,

z

and

Ilphn moot-dual! in

m pmpt.

mlmwuﬂtymumtmammmttmM39$to17$1n8

mm;

.

.

mac-11:33

Warm
anathema pttummmiodhymmﬁ mun-anon
an! exam was It did not
W mm or hallucinatory county,

madmmtmmmpammmdummmmrmas
11%
the

am: mm

W

I

�«6-:

mrwmammummmwmmmmmc

M m Miami” mtieholimrzio ”unity.
M mam WW9 or mum-y “mum and m We}.

and behavioral aﬂoat-I.

Wm

townpnnnd by ma

ﬂan.

‘

‘

‘

Walton, that

cmmaumumrommmmuwummmw
Iigum‘q ﬁlo

Mm min. in a whatihum 1110'!!!le is

WanmmmwmmmmmW
HIP!“

activity of ternary minus,

and

“£01

Wing his studies by tho s'

*

moan-ant chummphic patterns.
‘

mono

ohumhimo may

man.

am-

In «no»

ohms we
high voltage slow nu «ﬂaw no the
thumps?

Moratorium of tho eonmlaivo
indicated hint. on.

dwalomh of

mmphyoiologic correlate or

We in oomulain mum. and a mom, thought. not
outﬂow, mum for clinical inpmh. During tho pat. hon
yum, studies by mum, W wﬂommm, Word, 3m, Mo ma
ommmmammmmmmmmcmummmw
Monarch-cl mm. W «pom on almohim of 2m
thumpy
maintain.

”ho

mwlohoum

and

in
pummm
In
honed.

W.

tho spam.

nun among

mutation of mtylohoiim
mum,
W170
mummmlupwmmaapmm'my. MMJohnaon.

Mind the blocking of thus «mac attach: w m W316

“tin? of atropin-

Ind prolnnﬁmg-

m own-ration. on this report on

�#7419

ms m: Wyﬂm mm m Mmtm“
mammmmmmumacutmtymmo

mm,

Vin 2299..

0113mm magnum ma

m appoint to the” Market!
thus with ﬂu urns: magnum that

11mg. 0&amp;me

tar commas.” than”. “6 may
the Mumimnc built for mama}.

m
”1m aw m

Woman at high
336 Ghana! “than a: 0.1th in the
the

in

activity

convulsive“; therapy

by

noting tint this

mam-mm
Mattel: at

W

Mien of tin mmua ”an, probably in the

$30le

is

nativity:

M Mansions load mam to magnum in mam

W
dammnmmmm

01‘

WWI-'11 tum;

51.1%?!

91'

tho efficacy of high

“nu-stations of

head

do“!

Walla

indium tint struts.” do”: bmught men than 19mm mum streets.
am mm:
It would be
mam, mamas such m potent,
am neurologically
mum: on and in mm

awn
m
Ma mama
mm“;
our «311:: reports an tbs
then ”osmium,
m,
tbs
Mia-am at me delta activity W1” thcupy;
we mama his “part. ”comm,
Mmﬂm m:mm with tbs mm mm 1".“
or the drug mum, mu in
pattern at
a
in the am at mmmum coma in mention mm: minty,
in tho Was a:
Mandamus, mm, mamas w mm,
Wuﬁm um: smug, mm» or Wu.” ma mmm,
Wbymmnm, Wtammgcmuﬁmo:
and

1::

01“

01:13pm

(1951:)

an

and

mental-.033

that

than 01

and

�‘

Nu“ Mom.“ at the

m at

mug thumb; in mum. 1% any infer mat agents that
unmatanu mamgmmmu
frequenay my ad «thiamine, mam nad paramount!» in than
and mutant;data rmuem mg» m to be mm“,
which

a:

Mummm

mm

Mammanmmmmgmmtoummtm
a...

Mmimmu, u
and

W1;

Mad

m mwm. tan-25. m 2299, WW
'

�«an».

In

m.cw WWW Win
bum
“rim
them.

untieholimm

and

u have We the «that: at "new
m the

psychiatnc putt-mt: at

in

and

stages of convulsive

mm,
W
mm mm
than

lame and vim].

Wood

and

1mm math-mu,

Musical sham“ about tin

1W
gamma mm ﬁr 00mm“: therapy
mums. mm.
Commuthtm mammammmmwammum
a: an. raw-mm m m m. In puma“ with man mango don: activity,
the per mt m
Velma at the ma activity are My mm.
subject's illness or ti»

W13 “entity.

the syntactic

and

Item

and

'mmwmmmmnwozmorm

mmmm ommmmmmuﬂmmu
that;
nth the
for
(t) m Wad hum: far amulet" mm
mwmwm
‘

evacuation

and

range m mu may m be

an

high

dmtim 1n ﬂu

mommmmuwmtm Winn
Wmhuwd
at
utiviwu

W We
(b) me

.

”Manama”
somatic

new}; means!

mumdmmotacmor

thumpiuiapayumnttyu

of
the
WW.
was
m
It in
arm: was.» of m- ama

upmud to

M

an

ammo cmmds in Wet-am}.

m Wally lip-01:10

W to h.

Wn

Moth-11m,

or am...

Mart-Jean, utilising

Wynne mt!

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2644">
                <text>Effect of anticholinergic compounds on post-convulsive electroencephalogram and behavior. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol.,10:776, 1958. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2645">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2646">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-34a-012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2647">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2648">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2649">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2650">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2651">
                <text>[preprint].</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2652">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2653">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74467">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81028">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87589">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94150">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="266" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="57">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/ab4087755279fc01b94c0135ed348fc4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b42318ee79fcb2ebd0a6f398dbb0a0b0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100683">
                    <text>EFFECT OF ANTICHOLINERGIC COMPOUNDS (IN POST CONVULSIVE
ELECTROENCEPHALIIGRAM AND BEHAVIOR

0F PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS
MAX FINK, M.D.
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.

Reprinted from "Electrrrrrephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Ioumal"
Vol. 12,

No.2, May 1960.

�EFFECT OF ANTICHOLINERGIC COMPOUNDS ON POST CONVULSIVE
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM AND BEHAVIOR
OF PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS 1
MAX FINK, M.D.
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.
(Received for publication: March 11, 1959)

Demonstrations of the significance of high
voltage EEG delta activity in the convulsive
therapy process (Roth et al. 1951, 1957; Fink
and Kahn 1957) and the report that this delta
activity was blocked by the administration of
atropine and scopolamine (Ulett and Johnson
1957) provided the basis for these studies. As
there were attendant unpleasant systemic effects with the administration of these agents,
reports describing diethazine as an antieholinergic compound with potent neurologic but
minimal systemic effects (J enkner and Lechner 1955; Lechner 1956) led us to undertake
studies similar to those of Ulett and Johnson
using this compound (Fink 1958). Observa—
tions with diethazine led to the investigation
of other experimental anticholinergic agents.
This report describes clinical and electroencephalographic observations incident to the
intravenous administration of various anticholinergic agents in psychiatric patients at
various stages of convulsive therapy and relates the observations to hypotheses concern—
ing the mode of action of convulsive therapy
and of hallucinogens.

Patients have been observed at various
stages of the treatment process. The observations were made in the EEG laboratory, using
a standard 8 channel EEG recorder and needle
electrodes applied in 17 lead placements following Strauss et al. (1952). In each trial,
the compound under study was administered
intravenously at a set rate per minute until

clinical behavior or electrographic changes
were observed.
The compounds studied have been dietha—
zine (Heymans et al. 1949), Win-2299 (Pennes and Hoch 1957), benactyzine (Jacobson
1955), JB-318 and JB-336 (Abood et all.
1958) and atropine. Diethazine was administered at 25 mg. per minute for a total of
175-250 mg. (2.5-5.0 mg/kg.) ; Win-2299 and
benactyzine at 0.5 mg. per minute for 2 to 5
mg. (0.02-0.15 mg/kg.) ; and JB-318, JB-336,
and atropine at 0.4 mg. per minute for 1.2
to 4.0 mg. (0.01-0.10 mg/kg.).

OBSERVATIONS

(a) Diethazine. The administration of
diethazine in 15 patients prior to convulsive
resulted in a decrease in EEG volttherapy
SUBJECTS AND METHOD
ages an-d a desynchronization of all freThe subjects were 90 psychiatric patients quencies. Prevailing rhythmic patterns bereferred for convulsive therapy. Ages ranged came less pronounced. In some instances, symfrom 18 to 67 years, and diagnoses included metric low voltage 6—7 c/sec. activity appeared
schizophrenic reactions and manic-depressive and was most apparent in frontal and anterior
and involutional-depressive psychoses. A va— temporal leads (Fink 1958).
ried number of subjects were studied for each
In 25 patients with varying degrees of
induced high voltage delta activity during
compound for a total of 107 observations.
convulsive therapy (Fink and Kahn 1957),
1Aided, in part, by grants M-927 and MY-2092 there was a significant decrease in voltage and
of the National Institute of Mental Health, National in per cent time of slow wave activity. From
Institutes of Health, US. Public Health Service.
45
of
in
frontothe
delta
cent
an
average
per
Atlantic
Read at the American EEG Society,
occipital leads, there was a reduction to a
City, June, 1958.
[359]

.

�MAX FINK

360

mean of 20 per cent. Both random and burst
delta activity diminished. Low voltage alpha
and beta frequencies became more prominent.
The usual increase in per cent time and in
voltage of slow wave activity with hyperventilation was no longer apparent. These
electrographic effects appeared during drug
administration and persisted for 1 to 5 hours
(Fink 1958).
Concurrent with these electrographic effects, we observed distinctive systemic and

complaints of abdominal griping. Such effects
were generally less prominent than the electrographic or behavioral.
Behaviorally, patients became irritable,
restless, tense and excited, and it was difficult
to maintain eyelid closure. They complained
of feelings of unreality and of tingling, weakness and heaviness of the extremities. Complaints that colors were pale or more intense,
halos about lights and changing shadows were
accompanied by delusional thoughts about

W
W
W
mm W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWW
PRE-DRUG

LF-LO

WWW/(WWW
RF—RO

+ 40 MINS.

AFTER 3.2 mg.

WM

+ 80

MINS.

wwwwvuwwmm

WWWM

wwwmmmw

LAT-LF

MAM-«Mm
RAT-RF

LF-RF

LPT-LO

0-0

RPT'RO

SouVLlsﬁ-

#2016

HH

Fig.1
Effect of i.v. Win-2299. Note desynchronization of frequencies after

behavioral changes. The initial systemic effects were episodes of coughing and complaints
of dryness of the mouth. Skin remained dry
and the heart rate increased by 5 to 10 per
cent. This increase was rarely noted by the
subject, and was not accompanied by precordial distress. There was no change in
pupillary size, and constriction in response to
light was prompt. There were occasional

3.2 mg. (Female, age 41).

their illness, the setting of the test procedure
or the examiner ’s identity.
(1)) Win-2299. The report by Pennes and
Hoch (1957) that Win-2299 induced illusory
and hallucinatory states in man, led to this
next study. On intravenous administration
of Win-2299, both electrographic and behavioral effects similar to diethazine were observed. In 5 patients without EEG slow wave

�ANTICHOLINERGIC COMPOUNDS AND POST CONVULSIVE EEG

activity, desynchronization of frequencies and
a decrease in voltages were noted in four
(fig. 1).
In 11 patients with high voltage delta
activity there was a decrease in amplitude and
per cent time of slow wave activity with an
increase in the per cent time of alpha and
beta frequencies. The mean delta activity
dropped from 50 to 23 per cent (fig. 2).
Associated with these electrographic effects were clinical patterns of restlessness and
excitement, and minimal systemic effects. PaPRE-DRUG

361

rate was unaffected except in patients who
became. overtly excited and fearful, in whom
tachycardia appeared during this excitement
period. Dryness of the mouth was reported
only on direct inquiry.
(c) Benactyzine. Reports that benactyzine induced EEG desynchronization (Coady
and Jewesbury 1956), its anticholinergic
nature, and the structural similarity to diethazine and to Win-2299 led to our testing of
this compound. Intravenous administration
in 12 subjects elicited similar clinical and
+ 40 MINS.

AFTER 2.0 mg.

+ 60

MINS.

LF-LO

W
WW
W”
W WW
W
WWWW
Wm
Wm
M
W
MW
RF- R0

Wm WM

RAT-RF

WWW

WNW

LPT-LO

0-0

RPT-RO

50ml

I

SEC.

#

1977

HH

Fig. 2
Effect of i.v. Win-2299 on post—convulsive delta activity. Record taken 24 hours after
convulsion #8. Note desynchronization of frequencies and persistence after 2.0 mg. (Female,
age 51).

tients became fearful and tense. Visual illusory sensations were reported and were
associated in these subjects with delusional
elaborations about their hospital experience.
Excitement was accompanied by ideas of reference, and in two subjects, intravenous chlorpromazine was administered to halt this process. These behavioral changes appeared during drug administration or within 10 min,
and disappeared within 2 to 3 hours.
Systemic effects were slight. There were
neither cough nor respiratory distress. Heart

electrographic patterns. Both in the well
modulated alpha record and in the record
with high voltage delta activity, desynchronization was prompt. Delta activity decreased
from a mean time of 39 to 16 per cent in 8
subjects (fig. 3, 4).
These electrographic patterns were again
accompanied by clinical restlessness, irritability and excitement. Artifact-free recording
was more difficult. The illusory sensations
and delusional thoughts seen with the initial
compounds were not noted at these dosage

�MAX FIN K

362

levels. Systemic effects were similar to Win2299.

activity and clinical somnolence, we administered this anticholinergic agent intravenously in 15 subjects, in dosages of 0.8 to 4.0 mg.
(.01-.10 mg/kg.). In 6 subjects without EEG
delta activity, there were no changes in EEG
pattern during drug administration nor for
10-20 min. thereafter. During a period of
lassitu-de, decreased voltages, minimal desynchronization, and an increase in per cent time
delta were noted.
In subjects with delta activity, there was

(d) Piperidylbenzilates. Following recent
reports by Abood et al. (1958) that various
piperidylbenzilates with measurable anticholinergic activity induced hallucinations in psychiatric subjects, we tested JB-318 and JB—
336 in 24 subjects. The electrographic patterns were identical with the other experimental anticholinergic compounds. Desynchronization of frequencies was noted during

W
W
W
W
WM W W W
WWW
WWW
WW
PRE-DRUG

LF-LO

+ 30

l0 MINS. AFTER

|.5

+ 50

MINS.

MINS.

mg.

RF-RO

LAT-LF

RAT-RF

LFTRF

..

LPT-LO

..

"A“...

WWW/w

WWW/WW
0'0

RPT-RO

WM
50ml—

WNWMNW‘AMAM.

I

Fig.

SEC.

WWW
# |922
HH

3

Efftct of i.v. benactyzine. Note persistent decrease in voltages and desynchronization after

1.5 mg. (Female, age 34).

the injection or within 15 min. and persisted
for one to 4 hours (fig. 5).
In each instance in which desynchronization was observed, clinical restlessness, excitement, illusory and hallucinatory activity were
noted, and were concurrent with the electrographic changes. In two instances the behavioral changes were halted by the intravenous
administration of chlorpromazine.
(e) Atropine. Considering the numerous
reports that atropine induced EEG slow wave

an apparent initial decrease in voltage and
per cent time of such activity during the first
10 min. after administration, followed by a
return to original values during the period
of quietude. In neither period were the
changes significant (fig. 6).
Systemic effects were prominent during
the injection with increased respiratory rate,
pallor, dry skin and dry mouth, precordial
complaints and an increase in heart rate up
to 100 per cent. Subjects became restless and

�ANTICHOLINERGIC COMPOUNDS AND POST CONVULSIVE EEG

recording became difficult. Within 10 min.
these symptoms subsided and the subjects
became drowsy and relaxed.

363

atropine under similar experimental condi-

tions.
These observations can be related to theories of the mode of action of convulsive
DISCUSSION
therapy; to concepts of the basis of experIn these studies, various experimental imentally induce-d hallucinations; and to recompounds with measurable anticholinergic ports of the effects of atropine on EEG patactivity have been observed to have similar terns.
electrographic and behavioral effects. Elec(a) Convulsive therapy process. Earlier
trographically, each agent induced a desyn- studies indicated that the development of high
PRE-DRUG
LF-LO

RF-RO
LAT-LF

W

+ l0

2 MINS.AFTER

MINS.

|.5 mg.

M

+50

MINS.

WW

Wm

«MW—MAW

.AWNV'VW

W
W
W
WM
W
W
W
WW
WW

RAT-RF

LF-RF

LPT-LO

Wm
MWM'W

0-0

WWW/v

RPT-RO

WW4{)0qu

#ZOIB

HH

Fig.4

Effect of i.v. benactyzine on post-convulsive delta activity. Record taken 24 hours after
convulsion # 7. Note desynchronization of frequencies after 1.5 mg. (Female, age 33).

chronization of frequencies and a decrease
in voltages, which was most prominent in subjects with delta activity following convulsive
therapy. Behaviorally, these electrographic
patterns were associated with stimulating,
excitatory, illusory and hallucinatory activity. To a lesser degree, minimal systemic
changes in heart rate, salivation and sweating
were noted. These latter systemic effects were
more prominent in patients given intravenous

voltage slow wave activity was a neurophysiologic correlate of behavioral change in convulsive therapy, and a necessary, though not
sufficient, condition for clinical improvement
(Fink and Kahn 1957). In summarizing the
observations of numerous authors on the relation of acetylcholine metabolism to trauma of
the central nervous system and to convulsions
(Fink 1958) it was suggested that a biochemical concomitant of the induced EEG slow

�MAX FINK

364

WWW
WWVWWWW
PRE-DRUG

LF-LO

AFTER 2.4 MG.IV

l0 MINUTES

AFTER

WWW

mm

WWW
WWW
W W
WWW
W
PR=|08

PR=96

.18

318- N-ETHYL, 3-PIPERIDYLBENZILATE

PR=84
SOuvL—_ # 2|50 HH
ISEC.

Fig. 5
Effect of JB-318 on post-convulsive delta activity. Record taken 24 hours

after convulsion #9. Note desynchronization of frequencies, decreased voltages after 2.4 mg. Cardiac rate shows 10 per cent increase. (Female, age
27). Similar records observed with

PRE- DRUG

JB—336.

AFTER 2.0 MG. IV

AFTER

30

MINUTES

LAT-LF

# 2|90HH

HR=78

HR=|50

Fig.

50va__
l

6

SEC.

Effect of small doses of i.v. atropine on post-convulsive delta activity. Record taken 24 hours
after convulsion #6. Note minimal effect on delta activity and associated increase in heart
2.0 mg., 025 mg/kg.)
rate, with persistence. (Male, age 18. Atropine

:

�ANTICHOLINERGIC COMPOUNDS AND POST CONVULSIVE EEG

wave activity was an increase-d level of acetylcholine-cholinesterase activity of the central
nervous system. The present observations of
alterations in the slow wave activity of convulsive therapy by these experimental anticholinergic compounds are consistent with this
suggestion.
That the problem is more complex is indicated by reports of compounds with other
biochemical activity also affecting slow wave
activity in a similar fashion. Amphetamine
(Lennox et al. 1951), Mescaline (Merlis and
Hunter 1955; Denber 1955), lysergic acid
diethylamide (Bente et al. 1957 a, b) and
diphenhydramine (Diaz—Guerrero ct al. 1956)
also reduce-d post-convulsive slow wave activity. In these reports, such a reduction was
accompanied by excitatory and stimulating
effects on behavior. These compounds, how—
ever, are primarily sympathomimetic and
antihistaminic in pharmacologic activity and
not anticholinergic.
The similar effects of these diverse biochemical agents on electrographic patterns
and on clinical behavior may be considered
within theoretic constructs of the relation of
synaptic activity to behavior as expressed by
Marazzi (1953, 1957), Bradley and Elkes
(1957), Evarts (1958 a, b), Sherwood (1958)
and Woolley (1958). These authors suggest
that two types of interacting chemoresponsive
receptors exist within the nervous system
which are selectively responsive to cholinergic
or to adrenergic agents. Where such receptors
exist, they exert opposing stimulatory or inhibitory action.
Thus, repeated induced convulsions may
lead to a change in synaptic cholinergic activity, reflected in surface electrodes as high voltage slow wave activity. Administration of
anticholinergic agents may alter synaptic
activity, resulting in a decrease in the manifest
cortical electrical activity to preconvulsive
levels. Administration of sympathomimetic
agents may achieve the same electrical effects
by increasing the level of adrenergic activity.
The manifest slow wave activity, so prominent
and so persistent in the post-seizure EEG,
may thus be viewed as resulting from a persistent alteration in the synaptic activity of
large numbers of cells of the central nervous

365

system. The delicate nature of this balance is
seen in the ready reversibility with alerting,
time, and the wide variety of pharmacologic
agents noted here.
While an alteration in synaptic activity
may underlie the behavioral changes in convulsive therapy, the mechanism by which such
alteration is developed or sustained is unclear.
The observation by Aird et al. (1956 a, b,
1958), that an increase in permeability of the
blood brain barrier followed repeated induced
convulsions suggests one way in which synaptic changes may be mediated.
The consistent nature of these neurophysiologic observations makes an exclusively psychologic explanation of the mode of action of
convulsive therapy less tenable. These studies
are consistent, however, with the neurophysiologic-adaptive view of the convulsive therapy process which suggests that neurophysiologic changes provide the substrate for alterations in all aspects of the subject’s clinical
behavior; the type of behavioral alteration
being dependent upon the type and degree of
neurophysiologic change, the personality of
the subject and the expectations and tolerance
of the milieu (Weinstein and Kahn 1955;
Fink and Kahn 1957; Fink 1957).
(b) Neurophysiology of hallucinogenic
activity. The effects of anticholinergic compounds-on EEG and behavior may also be
related to the understanding of experimental
hallucinogenic activity. Each of these experimental compounds induced excitatory behavior, including illusory and hallucinatory phenomena. Here, too, a synaptic model may be
applicable. Sympathomimetic agents, as Mescaline, LSD and amphetamine, and anticholinergic agents as those described here, are
also potent hallucinogens. A neuropharmacologic basis for such behavior may be characterized as an alteration in the level of synaptic
activity in the direction of increased inhibition (decreased transmission) of stimuli.
The clinical efficacy of convulsive therapy
in modifying hallucinatory activity may lie
in alterations at this neurophysiologic level.
The effects of such hallucinogenic blocking
agents as chlorpromazine and Reserpine on
EEG electrical activity are consistent with
such a view. Both compounds induce EEG

�366

MAX FINK

hypersynchrony in man (Bente and Itil 1954,
1958) and block the EEG desynchronization
effects of LSD and Mescaline (Schwartz ct
al. 1955). Chlorpromazine was found equally
potent in aborting the excitatory activity of
the experimental anticholinergic compounds
in these studies.
(0) Relation to atropine. Comparison of
the systemic and neurologic effects of experimental anticholinergic compounds with atropine reveals differences in initial focus of
action. Experience with atropine at physiologic and toxic levels in man indicate that the
predominant effects are focused at peripheral
nervous structures. Initial bradycardia, followed by tachycardia, loss of sweating and
salivation, pupillary dilation, intestinal relaxation and decreased motility are amongst the
effects at low (0.2-1.2 mg.) dosages. At higher
dosages (2-5 mg), the neurologic effects of
ataxia, irritability, disorientation, and delirium are observed (Goodman and Gilman
1955).

In contrast, the experimental anticholinergic agents in dosages sufficient for central
nervous system effects manifest little peripheral activity. The central effects are observed early and may continue for extensive

the dosage of atropine varied from 0.5 to 7
mg/ kg. — a range roughly comparable to the
dosages used in atropine coma therapy (Forrer and Miller 1958) .
In the present studies, the EEG effects
of low dosages of intravenous atropine (0.01
to 0.10 mg/kg.) were minimal and systemic
effects considerable, confirming similar observations by Verdeaux and Marty (1954)
and by Danielopolu et al. (1955). The slow
wave activity so prominent in animals and
man at high dosages of atropine, may not be
a manifestation of the initial or direct effects
of atropine, but a reflection of a more widespread alteration in body physiology. Thus,
while considerable speculation as to central
neurophysiology has been based on studies
with atropine, such observations provide a
special case of anticholinergic effects. The
anticholinergic activity established in observations in vitro and in the peripheral nervous
system, may not be the effective physiologic
activity in the large doses necessary to affect
central structures. The experimental compounds, however, provide more suitable agents
for the study of central neurophysiologic
(anticholinergic) patterns than atropine, as,
for example, in a re-evaluation of the studies
of craniocerebral trauma and epilepsy. Ward’s
(1950) reports of the efficacy of high doses
of atropine in altering the clinical manifestations of head trauma indicated that effective
doses brought with them severe systemic effects. The failure of atropine and scopolamine
to affect epilepsy may be related to the inability of these compounds to reach the central
nervous system in adequate quantity. It would
seem advisable, therefore, to repeat these studies utilizing such more centrally active anticholinergic compounds as used in the experiments reported here.

periods without gastrointestinal, cardiac or
pupillary changes.
It is within the context of the focus of
activity in relation to dosage that the apparent
discrepant EEG observations of the effects
of atropine (in inducing slow wave activity)
and these experimental anticholinergic compounds may be reconciled. Wescoe et al.
(1948) administering 1.0 to 3.0 mg/kg. atropine in curarized cats and monkeys and Fun—
derburk and Case (1951) using 0.4 to 1.2
mg/ kg. in curarized cats, observed high voltage EEG slow wave activity. Wikler (1952,
1957) reported that 7.2 mg/kg. atropine on
SUMMARY
unanesthetized, uncurarized dogs produced
1.
Experimental
anticholinergic
comslow
similar
to
wave”
sleep.
“spindle
patterns
Rinaldi and Himwich (1955 a, b) reported pounds (diethazine, Win-2299, benactyzine,
JB-318
and
administered
to
JB-336),
psy0.5
2.0
of
doses
to
that atropine in
mg/kg.
chiatric
patients at various stages of convulin curarized rabbits exaggerated EEG sleep
sive
associated
with:
therapy,
were
of
the
inhibited
and
the
alerting
patterns
EEG to peripheral stimuli. Similar observa- (a) desynchronization of EEG rhythms with
tions have been reported by Bradley and Elkes
a blocking of post-convulsive delta activ(1953) in the conscious cat. In each instance
ity ;

�ANTICHOLINERGIO COMPOUNDS AND POST CONVULSIVE EEG

367

(a) des effets systémiques de faiblesse musculaire, sécheresse buccale, sécheresse cutanée et tachycardie.
Les effets de comportement, électrographiques
et systémiques étaient concurrents.
2. Ces observations sont consistentes avec
The electrographic, behavioral and systemic la suggestion qu’un concomittant neurophysiologique de la thérapie convulsive soit l’augeffects were concurrent.
2. These observations are consistent with mentation de l’activité cholinergique du systéme
nerveux central.
the suggestion that a neurophysiologic conco3. Des observations sur le fait que le LSD,
mitant of convulsive therapy is an increase
in central nervous system cholinergic activity. l’amphétamine, 1e Mescaline, et le diphenhy3. Observations that LSD, amphetamine, dramine — agents sympathicomimétiques et
Mescaline and diphenhydramine —- sympatho- antihistaminiques — induisent également une
mimetic and antihistaminic agents — also in— désynchronisation EEG, le blocage de l’acti—
duce EEG desynchronization, blocking of vité delta post-convulsive et l’activité clinique
post convulsive delta activity and clinical excitatoire, soutiennent la suggestion que des
excitatory activity support the suggestion that variations de comportement et electrographibehavioral and electrographic patterns may ques puissent étre basées sur des alterations
be based on alterations in synaptic activity. de l’activité synaptique. On suggere que l’acIt is suggested that increased synaptic activ- tivité synaptique augmentée (effets cholinerity (cholinergic, sympatholytic effects) is giques, sympatholytiques) soit associée a l’hyassociated with EEG hypersynchronization, persynchronisation EEG, la sé-dation clinique
and clinical sedation and euphoria; while de- et l’euphorie; tandis que l’activité synaptique
creased synaptic activity (anticholinergic, diminuée (anticholinergique, sympathomimesympathomimetic) is associated with EEG tique) soit associée a la désynchronisation
desynchronization and clinical excitatory and EEG et des états cliniques excitatoires et
hallucinogéniques.
hallucinogenic states.
4. Des observations contradictoires avec
4. Discrepant observations with atropine
are related to significant differences in dosage. atropine sont en relation avec des differences
Re-assessment of the role of anticholinergic signifi'catives de dosage. Une reevaluation du
role
d’agents anticholinergiques dans les trau—
is
seizure
and
in
head
states
trauma
agents
matismes craniens et les états comitiauX semsuggested.
5. These observations amplify the neuro- ble étre indiquée.
5. Ces observations amplifient l’hypothese
physiologic-adaptive hypothesis of the mode
of action of convulsive therapy and of exper- neurophysiologique-adaptive du mode 01 ’action
de la thérapie convulsivante et des états halluimental hallucinogenic states.
cinogenes expérimentaux.
(b) alerting, excitatory behavioral response
with illusory, delusional and hallucinatory i-deation; and,
(a) systemic effects of muscular weakness,
dryness of the mouth, dry skin and tachycardia.

RESUME

Des composés anticholinergiques eXpérimentauX (diethazine, Win-2299, benactyzine,
JB-318 et J 13-336), administrés a des patients
psychiatriques a des étapes différentes d’une
thérapie convulsivante, étaient associés avec:

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

1.

(a) une désynchronisation des rythmes EEG,
avec un blocage de l’activité delta postconvulsive;
(b) une réponse de comportement excitatoire,
vigilante, avec de l’idéation illusoire, délusionnelle et hallucinatoire, et

Mischungen von experimentellen anticholinergischen Stoffen (Diethazine, Win2299, Benactyzine, JB-318 und J 13-336) wurden psychiatrischen Patienten verabreicht
welche sich in verschiedenen Stadien der konvulsiven Therapie befanden. Hierbei wurde
folgendes beobachtet:
1.

(a) Eine Desynchronisierung der EEGRhythmen mit Blockierung der postkonvulsiven Delta-Aktivit'at.

�MAX FINK

368

(b) Eine Weckreaktion mit erregtem Benehmen, welches mit Illusionen, Halluzinationen und Wahnideen einherging.
(c) Allgemeineffekte charakterisiert durch
Muskelschwache, Trockenheit des Mundes
und der Haut und Tachykar-die.
Die elektrographischen- und Allgemeineffekte,
sowie die Veranderungen des Benehmens erfolgten gleichzeitig.
2. Diese Beobachtungen stehen nicht in
Konflikt mit der Theorie, wonach eine Erhahung der cholinergischen Aktivit'at im zentralen Nervensystem eine neurophysiologische
Folgeerscheinung der konvulsiven Therapie

darstellt.

3. Die

Beobachtungen, dass LSD, Amphetamin, Meskalin und Diphenhydramin
sympathomimetische und antihistaminische
Stoffe —— ebenfalls die EEG-Desynchronisation herbeifiihren, die postkonvulsive DeltaAktivitat blockieren und die klinische Erregtheit dampfen, unterstiitzen die Annahme,
dass elektrographische Veranderungen sowie
solche des Benehmens auf Anderungen der
synaptischen Aktivit'at zuriickgefiirt werden
konnen. Es Wird angenommen, dass eine erh'ohte synaptische Aktivitat (cholinergische,
sympathikolytische Effekte) assoziiert ist
mit Hypersynchronisierung des EEG’s, mit
klinischer Sedation und Euphorie, W'ahrenddem eine verminderte synaptische Aktivit'at (anticholinergische, sympathikomimetische
Effekte) assoziiert ist mit Desynchronisierung
des EEG und mit klinischen halluzinatorischen Erregungszustanden.
4. Abweichende Beobachtungen mit Atropin stehen mit signifikanten Differenzen in
der Dosierung in Beziehung. Die Rolle, welche
anticholinergische Stoffe bei Kopftrauma und
Anfallszust'anden spielen, sollte erneut in
Betracht gezogen werden.
5. Diese Beobachtungen unterstiitzen die
neurophysiologische Hypothese ﬁber die Aktionsart der konvulsiven Therapie und der
experimentellen halluzinatorischen Zust'ande.
I

am grateful for the technical assistance of
Mrs. Hannah Mosquera in EEG recording and analyses.

Supplies of the various pharmaceuticals were
made freely available by Lakeside Laboratories (JB318 and JB—336), Merck Sharpe &amp;Dohme (benactyzine), Sandoz Pharmaceuticals (LSD-25), SterlingWinthrop (Win-2299) and Smith, Kline and French
Laboratories (diethazine, chlorpromazine).

REFERENCES
ABOOD, L. G., OSTFELD, A. M. and BIEL, J. A new
group of psychotomimetic agents. Proc. Soc.
Exper. Biol. Med., 1958, 97: 483—486.
AIRD, R. B. Clinical correlates of electroshock therapy.
A.M.A. Arch. Neural. Psychiat, 1958, 79: 633-

639.
AIRD, R. B., STRAIT, L. A., PACE, J. W., HRENOFF,
M. K. and B‘OWDITCH, S. Neurophysiologic effects

of electrically induced convulsions. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. Psychiat., 1956, ’75: 371-378.
BENTE, D. und ITIL, T. Zur Wirkung des Phenothiazinkorpers Megaphen auf das Menschliche Hirnstrombild. Arzneimittelfarschg, 1954, 7: 418-423.
BENTE, D. and ITIL, T. A comparison of the action
of various phenothiazine compounds on the human
EEG. Trans. Int. Gang. of Neurapsychopharm.,

1958 (in press).
BENTE, D., ITIL, T. and SCHMID, E, E.

Electroencephalographic studies concerning the action
of LSD-25. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol, 1957, 9:
359.

und SCHMID, E. E. Elektroencephalographische Studien zur Wirkungsweise
des LSD-25. Psychiat. Neural, 1958, 135: 273-

BENTE, D., ITIL, T.

284.

P. B. and ELKES, J. The effect of atropine,
hyoscyamine, physostigmine and neostigmine on
the electrical activity of the brain of the conscious cat. J. Physiol, 1953, 1.90: 14-15.
BRADLEY, P. B. and ELKES, J. The effects of some
drugs on the electrical activity of the brain.
Brain, 1957, 80: 77-117.
COADY, A. and JEWESBURY, E. C. A clinical trial of
benactyzine hydrochloride (“Suavitil”) as a
physical relaxant. Brit. Med. J0ur., 1956, 1:
BRADLEY,

485-487.

D., GIURGEA, C. and DROCON, G. Electroencephalographic study of the non-specific
pharmacodynamics of the stimulatory effect of
atropine on the cerebral cortex. Fizialagicheskiy

DANIELOPOLU,

Zhurnal SSSR, 1955, 41: 601—611.
DENBER, H. C. B. Studies on Mescaline: III. Action
in epileptics. Psychiat. Quart, 1955, 29: 433-438.
DiAz-GUERRERO, R., FEINSTEIN, R. and GOTTLIEB,
J. S. EEG findings following intravenous injection of diphenhydramine hydrochloride (Benadrylr). EEG Clin. Neurophysiol, 1956, 8: 299306.

E. V. Neurophysiological correlates of
pharmacologically induced behavioral disturbances. Res. Publ. Ass. nerv. ment. Dis., 1958, 36:

EVARTS,

347-380.
EVARTS, E. V. Chemical bases for psychoses. Chem‘
ical Concepts of Psychases. McDowell, Oblensky
Inc., N.Y., 1958, pp. 41-62.
FINK, M. A unified theory of the action of physio-

dynamic therapies. J. Hillside Hosp, 1957, 6:
197-206.

�ANTICHOLINERGIC COMPOUNDS AND POST CONVULSIVE EEG
FINK, M. Effect of anticholinergic agent, diethazine,
on EEG and behavior: Significance for theory
of convulsive therapy. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. Psychiat., 1958, 80: 380-387; and Biological Psychiatry, ed. J. Masserman, Grune &amp; Stratton N.Y.,
1959, 184-194.
FINK, M. and KAHN, R. L. Relation of electroenceph-

alographic delta activity to behavioral response
in electroshock. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. Psychiat,

1957, 78: 516-525.
FORRER, G. and MILLER,

J. J. Atropine coma: A
somatic therapy in psychiatry. Amer. J. Psy-

chiat., 1958, 115: 455-458.
FUNDERBURK, W. H. and CASE, T. J. The effect of
atropine on cortical potentials. EEG Olin. N enraphysial., 1951, 3: 213-223.
GOODMAN, L. S. and GILMAN, A. Pharmacological
Basis of Therapeutics. MacMillan, N.Y., 1955.
HEYMANS, C., ESTABLE, J. J. et DE BONNEVEAUX,
S. C. Sur la pharmacologie de la phenothiazinylethyldiethylamine (2987 RR). Arch. Int. Pharmacadyn., 1949, 7.9: 123-138.
JACOBS'ON, E. Suavitil, et nyt stof med specifik
virkning pa centralnervesystemet. Ugeslcrift for
Laeger, 1955, 117: 1147-1151.
JENKNER, F. L. and LECHNER, H. The effect of
Diparcol on the electroencephalogram in the nor—
mal subject and in those with cerebral trauma.
EEG Olin. Neurophysiol, 1955, 7: 303-305.
LECHNER, H. On the influence of anticholinergic
drugs on the EEG of recent closed cranicerebral
injuries. EEG Olin. Neurophysiol., 1956, 8: 714715.

and GUTERMAN, B. The
effect of benzedrine on the post-electroshock EEG.
EEG Olin. Neurophysiol, 1951, 3: 63-69.
MARAZZI, A. S. Some indications of cerebral humoral
mechanisms. Science, 1953, 118: 367-370.
MARAZZI, A. S. Effects of psychotomimetic drugs on
cerebral synapses. Psychotropic Drugs. Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 1957, 283-284.
MERLIS, S. and HUNTER, V. Studies on Mescaline:
II. Electroencephalogram in schizophrenics. Psychiat. Quart, 1955, 29: 430-432.
PENNES, H. H. and HOCH, P. H. Psychotomimetics,
clinical and theoretical considerations: Harmine,
Win-2299 and Nalline. Amer. J. Psychiat, 1957,
LENNOX, M. A., RUCH, T. C.

113: 887-892.

369

F. and HIMWICH, H. E. Alerting responses
and actions of atropine and cholinergic drugs.
A.M.A. Arch. Neural. Psychiat., 1955, 73: 387-

RINALDI,

395.

F. and HIMWICH, H. E. Cholinergic mechanism involved in function of mesodiencephalic
activating system. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. Psychiat., 1955, 73: 396-402.
ROTH. M. Changes in the EEG under barbiturate
anesthesia produced by electro-convulsive treatment and their significance for the theory of
ECT action. EEG Olin. Neuraphysial., 1951, 3:
RINALDI,

261-280.
ROTH, M., KAY, D. W. K., SHAW,

J. and

J.

GREEN,

Prognosis and Pentathal induced electroencephalographic changes in electroconvulsive treatment.
EEG Olin. Neuraphysiol., 1957, .9: 225—237.
SCHWARZ, B. E., BICKFORD, R. G. and ROME, H. P.
Reversibility of induced psychosis with chlorpromazine. Prac. Maya Olin., 1955, 30: 407-417.
SHERWOOD, S. L. Central cerebral chemicals and their
relation to psychoses. Chemical Concepts of Psy-

chosis. McDowell, Oblensky, N.Y., 1958, 268-276.
STRAUSS, H., OSTOW, M. and GREENSTEIN, L. Diag—
nostic Electroencephalography, Grune &amp; Stratton,
N.Y., 1952.
ULETT, G. A. and JOHNSON, M. W. Effect of atropine
and scopolamine upon electroencephalographic
changes induced by electroconvulsive therapy.
EEG Olin. Neurophysiol, 1957, 9: 217—224.
VERDEAUX, G. et MARTY, R. Action sur l’électroencé-

phalogramme de substances pharmacodynamiques
d’intérét clinique. Rev. Neural, 1954, .91: 405-427.
WARD, A. Atropine in the treatment of closed head
injury. J. Neurosurg., 1950, 7: 398-402.
WEINSTEIN, E. A. and KAHN, R. L. Denial, of Illness:
Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. C. Thomas,

Springfield,

111., 1955.

0., GREEN, R. E., MCNAMARA, B. P. and
KR-OP, S. The influence of atropine and scopolamine on the central effects of DFP. J. Phar-

WESCOE, W.

macol, 1948, .92: 63-72.
WIKLER, A. Pharmacologic dissociation of behavior
and EEG “sleep patterns” in dogs: morphine,
N’allylnormorphine and atropine. Prac. Soc.
Exper. Biol. Med., 1952, 79: 261—265.
WIKLER, A. The Relation of Psychiatry ta Pharmacology. Wm. Wilkins, Baltimore, 1957.
WOOLLEY, D. W. Serotonin in mental disorders. Res.
Publ. Ass. nerv. ment. Dis., 1958, 36': 381-400.

Reference: FINK, M. Effect of anticholinergic compounds on post convulsive EEG and behavior of psychiatric patients. EEG Olin. Neuraphysial., 1960,12: 359-369.

W
w
IN

�ANNOUNCEMENT
WEEK—END COURSE IN "EEG AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY

IN PAEDIATRIC PROBLEMS”
Institute of Child Health,
Hospital for Sick Children,
University of London, London, England
Saturday, June 18th, 1960
9.45 a.m.

Introduction.

10.00 a.m.

Electrocorticography
During Operations for
Partial Epilepsy.

11.15 a.m.

Coffee.

11.30 a.m.

Motor Function and
The Basal Ganglia.

1.00 p.m.

Lunch.

2.00 p.m.

Behaviour after Cerebral
Lesions in Children and
Adults.

3.15 p.m.

Tea.

3.30 p.m.

Diffuse Systems in the
Brain: Physiological
and Pharmacological
Mechanisms.

Dr. Otto Magnus,
Head EEG Dept, St. Ursule Clinic,
Wassenaar and “Meer en Boslk’ ’,
Hemsteede, Holland.
Dr. John A. V. Bates,
Neurological Research Unit (M.R.C.),
The National Hospital, Queen Square.

Prof. H. L. Teuber and Dr. R. Rudel,
Dept. of Psychiatry and Neurology,
New York University,
Bellevue Medical Centre.
Dr. Philip Bradley,
Dept. Experimental Psychiatry,
University of Birmingham,
Hon. Director M.R.C.,
Neuropharmacology Research Group

Sunday, June 19th, 1960
10.00 a.m.

Circulatory Arrest.

11.15 a.m.

Coffee.

11.30 a.m.

The Clinical Physiology
of the Lower Motor
Neurone.

Dr. G. Pampiglione,
Dept. Clinical Neurophysiology,
Hospital for Sick Children,
Lecturer Institute of Child Health,
University of London.
Dr. J. A. Simpson,
Neurology Unit, Northern General
Hospital, and University Department
of Neurology, Edinburgh.

��,.
,r"

.

7/

Editor-imChief

E L E C T R O E N C E p H A LO G R A p H Y

Montreal Neurological Institute
3801 University Street
Montreal 2' Canada

AND

HERBERT H. JASPER

CLINICAL

Editorial Assistant
Montreal IItlleurological Institute
3801 niversity Street

“m“l 2.

R' S. SCHWAB
.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston 14. Mass” U.S.A.
H. FISCHGOLD

9 ans “élP‘FQ‘”
.
rance
l

NEUROPHYSIOLOGY

PIERRE GLOOR

M

Associate Editors
Clinical and Laboratory Notes

can“ d °

.
An International
)ournal

European Office
Managing Editors

W. STORM VAN LEBUWEN
OTTO MAGNUS

THE E.E.G. JOURNAL

Aid. Electro-Neurologie
Academisch Ziekenhuis
Leiden, Holland.

StreEt
Montreal 2' Canada

.
3801 univerSity

my

6 , 1959 a

Technical Notes
_H. {WM 3,1111%???
D.lVlSlon o
e rca
ec romcs
College of Medicine
Iowa City. Iowa. LI.S.A.
F. BUCHTHAL
Universitetets Izeurofysiologiske Institut
Copen aaen. Denmark
_

_

Index and Review of Literature
C. E. HENRY
Institute of Living

200 Retreat Avenue

Hartford, Conn., U.S.A.

Dr. Max Fink,
Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, L.

N. Y.

Dear Dr. Fink:

I.,

- Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds on Post
Behavior of Psychiatric Patients
Convulsive
I am pleased to inform you that the above manuscript has been
reviewed by members of our Editorial Board and recommended for publication
with some revision.

&lt;

..

”by/ﬁnwﬁlw...

l

,

Re:

MS

981

EEG &amp;

In the first place, I am sorry to have to ask you to condense
the manuscript to about two thirds of its present size, since we have had to
institute a more stringent regulation regarding the length of manuscripts,
due to an excessive amount of material for publication. I should think
that this condensation could well be made in your study by reducing the
length of your discussion and trimming up descriptions in places where elaboration of drug action is perhaps not necessary, as such information may well
be available in current pharmacological literature.
also that you consider alternative hypotheIt is recommended
modes
and
of action. Reference to the work by Aird,
other
possible
see;
on Cerebro-vascular Permeability, to be found in the Archives of 1956, the
Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease of 1956, the Archives of 1958 and the
Journal of Neurosurgery of 1952 might be worthwhile. Your synaptic theory
would be stronger if it was not over-emphasized and made clear that it is
only a tentative hypotheses throughout, perhaps particularly in the conclusions where it should be quite clear that your statements are hypothetical
rather than proven, since the relationship between the EEG patterns and
synaptic activity is a very tenuous one and may, at times be inverted.
We also would like to have some legends for your illustrations
make
them
to
clear and independent of the text.

Official organ of the International Federation of Societies for Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Inc.

�ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY

Editor—in-Chief
HERBERT H. JASPER

Montreal Neurological Institute
3801 University Street
Montreal 2. Canada

R. S. SCHWAB
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston 14. Mass.. U.S.A.

AND

C LI N I C A L

Editorial Assistant

H. FISCHGOLD

NEUROPHYSIOLOGY

PIERRE GLOOR

Montreal Neurological Institute
3801 University Street
Montreal 2. Canada

H. W. SHIPTON

THE EEG. JOURNAL

Division of Medical Electronics
College of Medicine
Iowa City, Iowa. U.S.A.
F. BUCHTHAL
Universitetets Neurofysiologiske Institut
Copenhagen. Denmark

3801 University Street.
Montreal 2, Canada

Index and Review of Literature

EurOpean Office
Managing Editors
OTTO MAGNUS

Afd. Electro-Neurologie
Academisch Ziekenhuis
Leiden, Holland.

1 rue Lu Cases
Paris VII. France

Technical Notes

An International Iournal

W. STORM VAN LEEUWEN

Associate Editors
Clinical and Laboratory Notes

C. E. HENRY
Institute of Living
200 Retreat Avenue
Hartford, Conn.. U.S.A.

_ 2 _

to your illustrations, we compliment you on their clarity and
clean presentation; but there is some question as to whether they are all
needed to make your points. If you can find some way of reducing their
number to enable further condensation of your presentation, it would be adWith regard

visable.

sorry to cause you this extra trouble with your manusa splendid piece of work; but we feel that due
to our own publication problems, and for the benefit of the clarity and
conciseness of your presentation, the above alterations would be advisable.

cript,

which

I

am

is obviously

Yours

sincerely,

/ Wt

Herbert

H.

Ja

Editor-in-Ch'

f

e

rmrx

HHJ/nb

Official organ of the International Federation of Societies for Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Inc.

�lurch 9, 1959.
the Editor,
EEG Journal,
3801 University Street,
Hentranl, 2, Clnldl.
Dear Dr. Jasper:

I :1 enclosing a copy of a report entitled
Effect of Anticholinargic Compounds on PostOonvulaivc EEG tad Behavior of Psychiatric Patients“
for your consideration for publication in the EEG
Journal.
Ran: thanks for yam: consideratiun.
“The

Sincortly yours,

m Junk,

31:33

14.».

�Hay 20, 1959.

Dr. Herbert H.
The EEG

3801

Jasper, Editorain-Chier,
Journal,

University Street,

Montreal, 2, censda.

Re: as 981

Jasper:
I as pleased.to return the enclosed manuscript
which has been edited according to your suggestions. I
found your comments and reoosnendatiens helpful and have
been able to condense the manuscript oonsidersbly. I
trust that it will still read intelligibly.
Dear Dr.

by
I have reduced the nnnber of illustrations
1958
the
since
the
tee
diethasine
deleting
cots,
report
has adequate pictures. I have also taken out one each
or the piperidylbensilate and atropine figures, leasing
but six figures for the final manuscript. Legends for
each of the illustrations are eppended after the rersr~
CBCOEe

I had seas difficulty in encespassing the
obsersetiens or iird in this report, since he has not
attempted a generalisation of nenrophyeiologic change and
behavior. As I interpret his studies, he has observed
changes in distribution of large molecules in spinal fluid
after convulsive therapy. This observation say or say not
be consistent with changes in cholinergic, adrenerxio
or synaptic relationships but in no wise excludes the
concoaitsnt changes suggested by our studies. In any
case, I have screed that the synaptic theory has been
rather strongly pot and have modified the language
considerably, including what I believe is a relevant
reference to iird's studies. Except for the hypotheses
suggested by Roth and Blett, which I believe are consistent
with the suggestions or this report I know or no other
systeaatio atteapt to relate nenrophysiologic and behavior
changes after convulsive therapy. I would be pleased to
include such studies.

�Dr. Earhart H.

and

Jaipur, (Contd)

#2

I an grateful for your vary kind caaoidcratioa
nest £hut¢htrul criticism. I stunt that this copy

a: the unnuseript

any aunt with your approv:1.

Sincoruly yours,

an

aran

Fink,

rm.

�Anticholinergic Hellucinogene and Post Convaleive'
EEG

From

and Behavior

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hoepitel,

Glen Oaks,

L.I., N.I.

Aided, in part, by grant M~927 and HY~2092 of the National Institute
of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 0.8. Public Health

Service.

Read

at the

VII: 1/59 -

American
EEG

EEG

Society, Atlantic City, June, 1958.

�Anticholinergic Hellucinogens and Post Convuleive

EEG

and Behavior

In 1956

Ulett

and Johnson

(

)

reported that atropine and

scopolanine blocked the eppesranee ot the high voltege

activity usually induced

by convulsive

therapy.

that the dose of atropine necessary to affect the

They

EEG

delta

also noted

EEG was

such es

to be associated with unpleasant systemic effects. Reports by
Jenkner
compound

&amp;

Lechner

(

)

describing diethaeine es en enticholinergio

with potent neurologic but minimal systemic effects led

us to undertake studies

using this compound

(

similar to those of Ulett

and Johnson

); and these observations, in turn, led

to an investigation of other experimental anticholinergic agents.

It is

the purpose of this report to describe clinical and electro-

encephalographic observations incident to the intravenous administrao

tion of various anticholinergic agents in psychiatric patients at
verious stages of convulsive therapy and to relate these observations
to hypotheses concerning the node of action of convulsive therapy
(

)

and of exogenous

hellucinogene

(

).

�-2SUBJECTS AND METHOD:

subjects were consecutive referrals for convulsive

Our

therapy in an open ward volunhry psychiatric hospital.

While

varying numbers of subjects have been studied for each compound,

subjects in 106 experiments have been essayed.

88

Iron

18

Agesranged

to 67 years, and diagnoses include schizophrenic reactions,

manioudepressive and involutional depressive psychoses.

Patients have been studied at various stages of the treatnent
process.
EEG

The

observations were

laboratory, using

a

made

standard

8

in acute experiments in the

channel

EEG

recorder and needle

electrodes applied in 17 lead placements following Strauss 33_5l
(

). In each experiment, the

compound

under study was administered

intravenously at a set rate per minute, until clinical behavioral
or electrographic changes were observed.
have been

atropine.

diethasine,
Each

is

a

Win~22§9,

The compounds

studied

benactysine, JB-318, JB-336, and

potent enticholinergic agent in vitro.

Diethasine (diethylaminoethylwxwdibensoparathiazine), for example,
induces nydriasis end hypotension, suppresses salivation and blocks
the bradycardia, salivation and seizures of acetylcholine and

�-3fluorophclphntc

).

(

win-2299 (2-diethylnninoethyl cyclopcnty1-2,

thienyl-glycolnte) end benactysine (2-diethy1nninocthy1 benzilnte)
are synthetic nnticholinergic agents with potent central neurologic

effects

nininal peripheral systemic effects

and

cnd JB~336

two

). Diethazine
175-250

ninnte for

).

JBnBlB

2

to

of a recent series of synthetic antichclinergic

central potency

compounds or high

total of

,

(N-ethyl-3~piporidy1benzilatc, X-nethy1o3~piperidy1~

bennilcto) are

(

(

was

mgm;

and high

administered at

hallucinogenic activity

25 mgm.

Win-2299 and benactyzine

5 mgm.; and

per minute for a

at 0.5

mgm.

JB-318, JB~336, and atropine

:31. per minute for 1.2 to h.0

mgm.

at

per
O.h

�OBSERVATIONS:

(a) Diethaeine:

As

previously reported

administration of diethacine in

15

), the

(

patiente prior to convulsive

therapy resulted in a decrease in voltages and a deaynchronisation
of

all frequencies. Prevailing

prominent.

instances, symmetric

In some

activity appeared,
temporal leede.

rhythmic patterns beoane leee

most prominent in the

The

low

voltage 6;? cps

frontal

and

anterior

alpha frequency ﬁes not altered, but the

build-up in voltage and the slower frequencies induced by hyper-

ventilation vere blocked (Fig. 1).
-Q-‘-Fig. 1

UUUUU

Q-ﬂO-u-n--In 25 patients during convulsive therapy, with varying
degrees of induced high voltage delta activity

significant decrease both in voltage
slow wave
hSﬁ

neon

activity.

From an

and in

20%.

)

there

was a

per cent time of

average per cent tine delta of

in the {route-occipital leads, there
per cent time or

(

was a

Both random and

reduction to a

burst delta

�-5-

activity diminished
became prominent.

slow wave

activity

increase in per cent time and voltage of

The
on

voltage alpha and beta frequencies

hyperventilation

was no

longer apparent.

clectrographic effects appeared during drug administration

These

persisted for

and

and low

one to

five hours (Fig. 2).

‘ﬂ’--“---yig. 2
ﬁ‘-‘~“---Concurrent with those electrographic effects,

distinctive systemic
effect

was an

and

S

The

observed

initial

systemic

episode of coughing and the occasional spontaneous

complaint of dry mouth.
by

behavioral changes.

we

to 10 per cent.

Skin remained dry and-heart

This increase was

rate increased

rarely associated

by pron

cordial awareness. Baring the period of observation pupils

were

not altered, and responded pronptly to light and near vision.
were

There

occasional complaints of abdominal griping. These effects,

however, were generally

or behavioral.

less prominent than the electrographic

�-6.
Beheviorelly, patients became more irritable and restless.
They became

tense end excited, end

it use

difficult to neintein

eyelid closure. They complained of feelings of unreslity and of
dysthesias of the extremities. Visual illusory phenomena and
delusional thoughts about their illness, the setting or the test
procedure or the examiner's identity were also reported.
were

cherecteristic

in behavior.

chenges in lenguege

There

sssocieted with this change

Syntectic language patterns

(

altered in

) were

1

fashion opposite to that previously described for amobarbitel
(

) so

node and

that verbal denial, minimization, cliches, third person
past tense

became

less prominent.

nese of speech, measured by dyadic

TTR,

The

degree of repetitive-

decreased

)whieh

(

eltered opposite to that described for convulsive therapy
(b) Win-2299: Reports by Pennes

enticholinergic
men

(

)

compound, Uin~2299, induced

led to this next study.

0n

that

an

is

(

en

).

eXperinentel

excitetory states in

intravenous edninistretion of

2—5

n3n., both elsctrogrephic end behavioral effects similar to
diethesine were observed.

In

five petients without

EEG

slow were

�-7-

ectivity, deeynohroniaetion of frequencies

and a decrease

in

voltages were noted in four (Fig. 3).

-‘h‘-----‘
‘-0-----~~
In 11

patients with high voltage delta activity there

wee a

decrease in amplitude and per cent time or slow wave activity
with an increase in alpha and beta frequencies.

The noun

cent tine delta activity dropped from

(Fig. h).

50%

to

23%

per

‘—-~..—“--‘

Fig.

h

-~--~-~-“Associated with these electrographie effects were minimal
systemic effects but prominent clinical patterns of restlessness
and

excitement. Patients became fearful and tense. Visual

eeneetione were reported and in three subjects, delusional

eleboretiene about their hoepitel experience were prominent.
These beheviorel chengee Appeared during drug administration or

within ten ninetel, end disappeered, at theee doeege levels,
within two to three hours.

�-8Reports that beneetyzine induced

Benectzzine:

(C)

deeynchronizeticn

(

and

)

EEG

its structural similarity both to

diethanine end Win-2299 led to our testing of this compound.
Intrevenoue adminiatretion in 12 subjects elicited similar

clinical

end

electrogrephic patterns. Both in the well modulated

alpha record and in the recerd with high voltage delta activity,
deeynchronieetion wee prompt. Delta activity decreased from a

teen per cent time of

39%

to

16%

in

subjects (Figs. 5, 6).

8

n--ﬁ-¢-----Figs. 5,

6

”0.“--“u-ﬁ'ﬂﬁu-

These

electrcgraphic patterns were again accompanied by

clinical restlessness, irritability
tree recording

wee

here

difficult.

delusional thoughte seen with the
noted et these dceege levels.

orienteticn
(

wee an

excitement. Artifact-

The

illusory eeneeticne

initiel

compounds were

and

not

In patients with nenifeet die-

end language changes

), however, there

end

associated with convulsive therepy

alerting

petterne, as noted with diethezine.

and a

reversal cf the language

�-9(d) Piperioylbensilstesz Following recent reports by Abood
(

)

that verious piperidylbensilates both manifested cnticholinerzic

activity
tested

and induced

two of

hallucinations in psychiatric subjects,

these, JB-318

end JB~336 in 2h

subjects.

we

The

electrographic patterns were identical to these other experimental
Onset of desynchronizetion was during

coupounds;

injection or

within 15 minutes and persisted for one to four hours (Fig. 7, 8).

.n...‘..“...
Figs. 7,

8

---0------uIn each instance in which desynchronizetion was observed,

restlessness

and

clinical

excitement, illusory and hallucinatory activity

iwere noted, and were concurrent with the electrogrsphic changes.
In two instances the beheviorel chenges were halted by the subsequent

intravenous edninistretion of chlorpronesine.
(e) itrogine: Continuing our study of enticholinergic
compounds,

we

administered atropine intravenously inlh subjects,

in doseges of 0.8 to h.0 ngn.

Systemic

effects

were prominent

during the iniection with increased respiratory rate, pellor, dry
skin end dry mouth, precordiel complaints and nerked techycerdie

�-10-

(Pig. 9). Subjects became restless and fearful and recording
became
and the

difficult.

Within ten minutes these symptoms subsided

subjects became drowsy and relaxed.

In six subjects without delta activity} no change in

pattern

was seen

during drug administration
or for

minutes thereafter.

During the period of

voltages and ninisal desynchronisetion
was no

was

EEG

10—20

lassitnde, decreased
observed, but there

significant difference in per cent tine delta.
Fig.

9

-ﬁ.--‘.&amp;
In subjects with

delta activity, there

was an apparent

initial

decrease in voltage and per cent time of such activity during
the

first

ten minutes after administration, followed by a return

to original values during the period of quietude.
period were the changes significant (Fig. 10).

“-~-“---~

In

neither

�-11DISGUSSIOH:

Various experinentel compounds with measurable enti—

cholinergie activity have thus been

shown

to have similar

electrographic and behavioral effects. Electrogrephicslly,
each agent induces a desynchronizstion of frequencies and s

in

decrease Ind voltages, which is most prominent in subjects
with delta activity following therapeutically induced convulsions.

Beheviorally, these electrogrsphic patterns are associated
with stimulating, excitstory, illusory and hallucinatory

ectivity.

To

e

lesser degree, nininsl systemic

heart rate, sslivetion, sweating

letter systenic effects ere

and

changes in

ptpil are noted.

more prominent in

These

patients given

intravenous atropine under sinilsr experimental conditions.
These observstinns can be

relsted to theories of the

node

of action of convulsive therapy and the basis for the induced
slow were

activity; to concepts of the besis of experimentally

induced hallucinations; and to the conflicting reports of the

effects of atropine

on

nervous ectivity.

�-12-

(a) Convnlsive therapyuprocees: In earlier studies we
indicated that the develcpnent of high voltage slow wave
activity was the neurophysiologic correlate of behavioral
change in convulsive therapy, and a necessary, though not
eufficient, condition for clinical improvement ( ). During
the past ten years, numerous authors including Bernstein,
Tower and chachern, Ward, Sachs and Huge have reported
similarities in the biochenical changes of the central
nervous system in convulsive therapy to that seen in crania—
cerebral trauna ( ). They observed an increase in cholinergic
activity, nanirested by an elevation of free acetylcholine and
pseudocholineaterase in the spinal fluid, and associated with
high voltage slow wave activity. Sinilar high voltage slow
wave activity has been reported after the administration of
the cholinesterase blocking agent (di-isoprcpylfluorophoephate),I
with attendant increase in cholinergic activity. In addition,
the increase in central nervous system cholitergic activity
by topical administration of acetylcholine induces high voltage
~

bursts

and spike

activity

(

).

blocking of the behavioral and electrographic effects
of convulsive therapy by the antichelinergic actiyity of atropine
and scopolanine (Ulett and Johnson) are replicated by these
observations on diethazine, Win-2299, benactyzine and the
piperidylbensilates. The potent anticholinergic activity or
The

cent!!!

each of these compounds (with apparent predominant

locus or activity in the central nervous system) supports the

�suggestions that the biochenioal basis for the induced

activity of convulsive therapy results

slow wave

from an

increased level of central acetylcholine~cholinestereos

activity;
While these observations demonstrate

that

anti—

choliuergic compounds are effective in reducing slow

activity, reports

of other compounds with

have also appeared.
(

), nescaline

similar effects

Agents such as anphetanine (Bensedrine)

), lysergic Acid diethylanide“

(

wave

and diphenhydrasine (Benedryl)

convulsive slow wave ectivity.

(

)

(

)

also reduce poet~

These compounds

are primarily

synpathoniuetio and antihistaminic in pharmacologio aytivity,
yet each has excitstory and stimulating effects
(

and

,

,

,

).

The

on

behavior

relations of these various anticholinergic

synpathoninetic agents say be related within constructs of

synaptic activity.
observations have been confirmed in this laboratory.
Intravenous adainistration of So~1oo genus LSD in subjects
withoutldelta activity induced EEG desynchronisation one to
two hours after administration. In subjects with delta activity
there is a marked reduction of delta with the re-essertion of
proainont, high voltage alpha frequencies.
These

�~1h-

In a study or the effects or various agents on
the

EEG

and

the behavior of unaneethetised cats with chronic

implanted electrodes, Bradley and llkes

(

)

postulsted the

existence of two, or possibly three, types of interacting
chenoreeponsive receptors within the central nervous system:

cholinergie, nonucholinergic susceptible to anphetaeine,
nonucholinergic susceptible to

Harassi and Hart
pathways in the
on evoked

(

)

LSD

eXplondng

and

tryptaminie derivatives.

intercortical (transcellosal)

cat, described the effects of various

potentials

on

end

oonpounds

direct electrical stinulation.

They

postulated the presence or two chenoreceptive potentialities
of the synapse - cholinergic and edrenergic - with opposing

stimulatory and inhibitory ectien.
been described by Hoolley
(

Similar constructs have

), Evarts

(

(

)

and Sherwood

). According to these models, the administration of

snticholinerzic agents, or of sympathoninetic agents, results
in equivalent synaptic electrical effects, and nresnnebly,

similar electrogrsphic

and

snpethnine, nescaline end

behavioral effects.
LSD

Thus

adrenaline,

inhibit the level of electrical

�-15-

activity at synapses as effectively as the blocking or
inactivation of acetylcholine

by

atropine end other enti~

cholinergic compounds.
In the light of these scggesticns, the present
eXperinents permit a mere specific hypothesis regarding the

phernacclcgic basis cf the convulsive therapy process.
Repeated induced convulsions lead to an increase in the

synaptic

or xyxplttl cholinergic activity
which

voltage slow

wave

activity.;

electrical activity

(and of

is reflected in surface electrodes

level
)

as angnented high

Administration at anticholinergic

agents reduces the level of synaptic activity, resulting in a
decrease in the manifest cortical electrical activity to precenvulsive levels.
may

also achieve the

Administration or synpathcmisetic agents
same

electrical effects, not

by

eltering

the level of cholinergic activity but, by increasing the level
of adrenergic activity.

The

nsnirest

slow wave

prominent and so persistent in the waking

state

(

)

nay thus be viewed as a

EEG

activity,

so

or the pcst~seisure

persistent alteretion in

synaptic transmission activity or large numbers of cells of the

�central nervous system.

is

seen in the ready

(

)

and

The

delicate nature or this balance

reversibility with alerting

(

), tine

the wide variety of pharmacologic agents noted here.

Repeated induced convulsions may thus be described as a device

to create biochemical changes in the brain for their resulting
behavioral effects.
view

a

Such/formulation

that convulsive therapy is

process

(

a

is consistent

with the

nonuspecifio therapeutic

).
the

initial

suggestion

(

)

basis for the convulsive therapy process

that the pharaaeologio
may

lie in

an

alteration

in acetylcholine-oholinesterase relationshipsban thus be focused
on

the alteration in the level of synaptic activity.

In

this

regard, the observation that diphenhydranine, primarily an

anti-histaminic agent, also reduces slow
induced convulsions

(

),

and the

wave

activity of

observations by Sachs

(

)

that increased amounts or serotinin appear in the spinal fluid

after convulsions suggest that this

image

in convulsive therapy is oversimplified.
’

0; synaptie activity
Further studies or

the effects or various drugs on the postcseiaure electrical

‘

�activity are warranted.
(b) Iearophyeiolggy or hallucinogenic
These
EEG

activity;

observations of anticholinergic compounds

delta activity also

related to concepts of eXperinental

may be

hallucinogenic activity.

Each of

these compounds induced

excitatory behavior including illusory

and

Here, too, synaptic models

phenomena.*

on

hallucinatory

may be

applicable.

Synpathoninetic egents, ae mesoaline, LSD, and amphetamine,
and

anticholinergic agents as those described here, are equally

potent hallucinogens.

i

necrophareacologic basis for such

behavior nay be characterised as an alteration in the level of

synaptic activity in the direction of increased inhibition
(decreased transmission) of stimuli.
The

clinical efficacy

hallucinatory activity
biochemical level.

ester:

(

The

may

of convulcite therapy in modifying

thus

In the doses used,

higher dosage

(

A

in alterations at this

effects or hallucinogenic blocking agents

), as chlorpronarine

for benactysine.

lie

and

reserpine,

on EEG

electrical

hallucinatory phenomena were not observed
report of such activity was reported at

).

�~18~

ectivity are consistent with
EEG

hypersynchrony in non

effects of
LSD

end

LSD

and

such a View.

), block the

(

nesculine

),

(

and

Both compounds induce
EEG

desynchronizetion

in animal studies, block

neeceline behavioral and electrographic effects

);

(

Chlorpronaoine was found equally potent in abutting the excitatory

activity

of these experimental

anticholinergics in these studies.

(c) Relation to atropine:
Comparison of

the oystenic and central effects or these

experimental anticholinergic conponnda with atropine reveals

significant differences. Extensive experience with atropine at
physiologic end toxic levels in

men

indicate that the predominant

Initial

effects are focused at peripheral nervous structures.

bradycnrdia, followed by marked tachycardia, loss of sweating
and

salivation, papillary dilation, intestinal relaxation

and

decreased motility are amongst the effects at physiologic (O.2~l.2)
dodagee.

At

higher dosages (2-5 mg), the central nervous

irritability, disorientation,

oyeton effects of ataxia,

delirinn
(

may be

observed

(

), anonnta ranging Iron

). In the atropine
32

to

212

some

end

studies

33:. injected intra-

�.19nuacularly into psychiatric petiente resulted in the following
(

sequence

)t

”There

is

an

induction period or 15 to

minutes

20

after adninietretion characterised by restlessness, occasionally
mild exoitenent, confusion, and

at times nausea

and vomiting.

This proceeds, smoothly and predictably, to muscular inooordinetion,

ataxia, weakness, vertigo

and

difficulty in articulation.

An

acute brain syndrome with memory disturbance, disorientation,
elouded consciousness, illusions and most frequently visual

hallucinations vergee into delirium
come...

'

Thus

and

rapidly proceeds to

central nervous system effects are preoedodhnd

accompanied by marked

peripheral effects.

In contrast, these experimental enticholinergic agents,
in equivalent dosage ranges, manifest
and

lurked central.

The

are observed early and

effecto

may

on

little

peripheral effects

the central nervous system

continue for extensive periods and

in higher dosages with minimal peripheral nervous effects.

It ie

within this context of central tarsus peripheral

predominant sets or activity that the apparent discrepant

EEG

observations of the etteete of atropine (in inducing elow

wave

�.20-

activity)

these experimental enticholinergic compounds

and

be reconciled.

The

variable

EEG

effects, like the verieble

behavioral effects are dose related.
adminietering l~3

mg/Kg

may

Weeeae

exist 33‘3l

(

)

atropine in curarized cats and monkeys
using O.h to 1.2 mg/kg in curerized

and Funderburk and Case (

)

cats, produced high voltage

slow wave

activity.

Wikler

(

)

reported that 7.2 mg/kg atropine in unanosthetized, ancnrarized

patterns strikingly similar to

dogs produced "epindle slow wave"

sleep. 'Rinaldi

and Himwioh

(

)

reported that atropine in doeee

of 0.5 to 2.0'mg/kg in cnrarized rabbits exaggerated

patterns

and

inhibited the electing of the

EEG

EEG

sleep

to various

peripheral stimuli. _Sinilar observations have been observed by
Bradley and Bikes

(

)

in the conscious oat. In each instance

the dosage of atropine varied from 0.5 g

3

mg/kg- a range roughly

comparable to the massive dosages need in atropine coma therapy.
Yet what of the electrographie

eitects in lower

In our observations, the

EEG

effects of

dosage?
low dosages of

intravenous atropine (006‘ .06 ng/kg) were minimal. Similar
obeervatione have been reported by Danielopelie, Guirgee end Drooen

�021-:

(

)

who

specifically releted the

effects to dosage level.

EEG

with high doeeges of atropine (h-B ng/kg) in rabbits einiler
high voltage nixed slow and feet (21-30 ope) activity was
observed, while with low deeegee (2h~.8 ng/kg) the original

rapid rhythms remained unehenged.

These

authors thus suggested

!

ﬂat atropinegs effects were multiple end doee determined, and

related the

observations to similar findings with regerd to

EEG

heart rate. Denielopelu
atropine slow

down

(

(

observed that small doses of

cardiac rhythm nine while larger doses cenee

eexeklteiien acceleration.
been confirmed

)

These

obeervetiene have recently

).

Thus, while oonsidereble speculation as to

central

neurophysiology he: been related to observations with atropine,

these observations provide e special case of atropine effects.
The

entiohelinergic activity,

so prominently

established in

observations in vitroI end in the peripheral nervoue system,
may

not be the effective physiologic activity in the large doses

neeeeee y to reach central structure.

It is

poeeible that the

experimentel entichelinergic compounds used in the present studies

�-22protﬁe more suitable experimental tools fer the elucidation of

central neurophysiologic nativity than atropine.
In part, these differences may be related to difference-

in etrnctnrel chemistry. Each of these experimental cenponnde
contain a tertiary canine linkage, while atropine (and ecopolemine)
quaternary
centnin a qxxtx:xznx linkage. Such differences may be clearly
observed in the structure~ectivity relationships or the piperidyl-

bennilatee

).

(

While

Hwnethyl-B-piperidylbenzilete and Nsethyla

3-piperidxlbeneilate have potent enticholinergic

and

hallucinogenic

potency, Hedinethyl~3~piperidylbeneilete - the quaternary conpennd

- has considerable in vitro anticholinergic activity, and no
hallucinogenic property.

The

significance of tertiary

amine

linkage for central neurophysiolcgic effect: he: been repeatedly
affirmed by numerous observers, and neat recently by Pennel
Denber;

(

),
Theee

e

Hake

(

)

and Plodnerk

(

).

structure~aetivity relations lend theneelves to

re-eveluation or studies or creniccerebrel trenne

Ward's

(

)

(

and

epilepsy.

reports orﬁthe efficacy of high doses of etrepine

in altering the clinical manifestations of head trauma indicated

),

�-23-

that effective dose: brought with
Thu

them severe systemic

effects.

failure of the oxtohaive studies a: the efficacy or atropinc

and soopalunine

in epilepsy

(

)

any be

related to

: failure

of these quaternary compounds to reach the central nervous syntax
in adequate quantity.

It

would noun

advisable, therefore, to,

ropoat those studies utilizing such more potent, more centrally

specific, antieholinorgic canpaunds as used in the eXporixonts
reported here.

�lj

MS

981

W

Mel

3;..."

EFFECT OF ANTICHOLINERGIC COMPOUNDS
EEG AND BEHAVIOR OF

Max

(Received

ON

POST CONVULSIVE

PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS

Fink M.D.

for publication:

march 11, 1959)

v
v-u-u.

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,

L.I.,

Glen Oaks,

Aided, in

Institute

N.Y.

M-927 and MY-2092 of the National
Health, National Institutes of Health,

by grants
part,
Mental

of

U.S. Public Health Service.
Read

at the

American

W-EEG

3§5357k?

EEG

Society, Atlantic City, June, 1958.

�MS

981

ANTICHOLINERGIC COMPOUNDS AND POST CONVULSIVE EEG

�Effect of Anticholinergic
EEG

and Behavior of

Compounds on

Post Convulsive

Psychiatric Patients

Mcsfl—vsﬂswﬁ kg 76.:

gagiﬁsignificance of high voltage EEG delta activity
in the convulsive therapy process (Roth gt_gl, 1951, 1957;

report that this delta activity
was blocked by the administration of-eniiehnlinersic
ealﬁiﬁiaa atropine and scopolamine (Ulett and Johnson, 1957)
provided the basis for these studies. As there were attendant
unpleasant systemic effects with the administration of these
agents, reports describing diethazine as an anticholinergic
Fink and Kahn, 1957) and the

with potent neurologic but minimal systemic
effects (Jenkner and Lechner, 1955; Lechner, 1956) led us
to undertake studies similar to those of Ulett and Johnson
using this compound (Fink, 1958). “@bservations with
compound

diethazine led to the investigation of other experimental
anticholinergic agents.
This report describes clinical and electroencephalographic observations incident to the intravenous administration of various anticholinergic agents in psychiatric
patients at various stages of convulsive therapy and relates
the observations to hypotheses concerning the mode of action
of convulsive therapy and of hallucinogens.

�SUBJECTS AND METHOD:

subjects were ninety psychiatric patients
referred for convulsive therapy. Ages ranged from 18 to
67 years, and diagnoses included amcaai-t!=s£ schizophrenic
The

reactions‘

and manic-depressive and involutional—depressive

varied number of subjects were studied for
each compound for a total of 107 observations.
Patients have been observed at various stages of
the treatment process. The observations were made in the
EEG laboratory, using a standard 8 channel EEG recorder
and needle electrodes applied in 17 lead placements following Strauss gt_§l (1952). In each trial, the compound
under study was administered intravenously at a set rate
per minute until clinical behavior or electrographic
changes were observed
«a
-'w
‘M
psychoses.

Www'”

mam.

"4”,...“

A."

A

Hm ,

‘5

was”“My HM

A

r-m

new

M, -J:,M-,_.m,..\.

"was...

“A...“ i, ,1“.

The

ine, JB3l8 JB~336, and atrOpine.{ Each is a potent “p'
a: icholinergic agent in vitro. Diethazine (lgﬂgéwdaetﬁyl-

\\ ‘H‘benact

v. __~

‘

(2-diethylamipdéthyl ﬁgnzilate) are synthetic anticholinergic
'-

3‘ .h

u

k‘

‘

‘

�W
[M

ﬁW/émgw (m w

1,?de
//h)1
(Maw
(WW. a
/¢‘¢¢)

’

f

ﬂux-322.497“

f

E

(W

.

7’6’33“

wit/4&amp;4,

xiJ'C)
7

I

(W ﬁg?) 17”} M

.7313”:

W

�agents with potent neurologic effects and minimal peripheral
P’w

‘nwV""'

systemic effects
W
JB- 318 and JB~336(N~et§gl~3ﬂwiperidylbenzilafe N-methyl-~3two of a new series of syntﬁébiq
piperidylbenzilataﬂ
(Pennes and Hocn%wl9§7?“§:c9bson, 1955)
"""

‘m‘,’

anticholiHErgic compounds w'th

a»?

éﬁmm‘

distinct hallucinogenic

1958).
et
a1,
g
Diethazine
administered at

_activity
__

’

total

(Abood

was

mac?“

25 mg

per minute for

2.5-5.0 mg/kg); Win-2299 and
mg per minute for 2 to 5 mg (0.020.15 mg/kg); and JB-318, JB-336, and atropine at O.h mg
per minute for 1.2 to h.o mg (0.0l~0.10 mg/kg).
of 175-250
benactyzine at 0.5

a

mg (

�OBSERVATIONS:

administration of diethazine
in fifteen patients prior to convulsive therapy resulted
in a decrease in EEG voltages and a desynchronization of
all frequencies,€¥$§3;=;$§8%. Prevailing rhythmic
(a) Diethazine:

patterns

became

The

less pronounced. In

symmetric low voltage 6-? cps
most apparent in

W

frontal

and

some

activity appeared

and was

_

(F3416
anterior temporal leads.
ammmmmwmmm~.w

fequencyas not send,
”Mm“

Thz“‘;“i”;“n.

instances,

,,

.1. &gt;u-L—‘7‘?

mm»-

,....

.14.“ mm“.

We they”;

In twenty~five patients with varying degrees of
induced high voltage delta activity during convulsive
therapy (Fink and Kahn, 1957), there was a significant
decrease in voltage and in per cent time of slow wave
activity. From an average-pal—Icnt-ttne delta of h5% in
the front-occipital leads, there was a reduction to a mean
uggzggntntine of 20%. Both random and burst delta activity

voltage alpha and beta frequencies became
more prominent. The usual increase in per cent time and in
voltage of slow wave activity with hyperventilation sans-no
diminished.

Low

51,

\}

"it;

2’

lfJ?e&gt;»

�-5longer apparent. These electrographic effects appeared
during drug administration and persisted for one to five
hours

Mﬁﬂ

(Fun/t} xqs’f)

Concurrent with these electrographic effects, we
observed distinctive systemic and behavioral changes. The

initial

systemic effects were episodes of coughing and
complaints of dryness of the mouth. Skin remained dry
and the heart rate increased by S to 10 per cent. This
increase was rarely noted by the subject, and was not

accompanied by

,n»

precordial distress.

-9ar&amp;ng—tho—peried~e£w-

,

Gems/haﬂhv

observationnﬁhere was no change in pupillary size, and their
response to light was prompt. There were occasional
complaints of abdominal griping. Ihﬁégweffects were generally less prominent than the electrographic or behavioral.

Behaviorally, patients became irritable, restless,
tense and excited, and it was difficult to maintain eyelid
closure. They complained of feelings of unreality and of

tingling, weakness and heaviness of the extremities.
Complaints that colors were pale or more intense, halos
about lights and changing shadows were accompanied by
delusional thoughts about their illness, the setting of
the test procedure or the examiner's identity.4p

.

AM

�-7(b) Win-2299: The report by Pennes and Koch (1957)

that Win-2299r—aaother_axparamoatalwaatieholinergée~eempound1
induced illusory and hallucinatory states in man, led to
this next study. 0n intravenous administration of Win-2299,
both electrographic and behavioral effects similar to
diethazine were observed. In five patients without EEG
slow wave

activity, desynchronization of frequencies

a decrease in

and

voltages were noted in four;éi§igggg; {Vfgf

/ ),

In eleven patients with high voltage delta activity there
was a decrease in amplitude and per cent time of slow wave
activity with an increase in the per cent time of alpha
and

beta frequencies.

dropped from

50%

to

23%

The mean pea—eoat—tine

(Fig.1;3.

Fig.3

delta activity

3"

Associated with these electrographic effects were
clinical patterns of restlessness and excitement, and

effects. Patients became fearful and
tense. Visual illusory sensations were reported and were

minimal systemic

associated in these subjects with delusional elaborations

�-3about their hospital experience. Excitement was accompanied
by ideas of reference, and in two subjects, intravenous
chlorpromazine was administered to halt this process.
These behavioral changes appeared during drug administration
or within ten minutes, and disappeared within two to three
hours.

effects were slight. There were neither
cough nor respiratory distress. Heart rate was
unaffected except in patients who became overtly excited
Systemic

fearful, in

and

whom

excitement period.
on

'

tachycardia appeared during this
Dryness of the mouth was reported only

direct inquiry.

(c) Benactyzine: Reports that benactyzine induced
EEG desynchronization (Coady and Jewesbury, 1956), its
anticholinergic nature, and the structural similarity to
diethazine and to Win-2299 led to our testing of this
compound. Intravenous administration in 12 subjects elicited
similar clinical and electrographic patterns. Both in the
well modulated alpha record and in the record with high
voltage delta activity, desynchronization was prompt. Delta

activity decreased
in

8

subjects

from a mean pti—OUI$ time of

Wﬁﬁ/d}

39%

to

16%

�-9These

electrographic patterns were again accompanied

clinical restlessness, irritability and excitement.
Artifact-free recording was more difficult. The illusory
by

sensations and delusional thoughts seen with the initial
compounds were not noted at these dosage levels. Systemic
effects were similar to Win-2299.
(d) Piperidylbenzilates: Following recent reports
by Abcod et a1 (1958) that various piperidylbenzilates
with measurable anticholinergic activity induced hallucina-

tions in paychiatric subjects, we tested JB-318 and JB-336
in 2h subjects. The electrographic patterns were identical
with the other experimental anticholinergic compounds. —¥he—
ur ng e njection or
Wafﬂes ync hroniza ti onA? ?- duufdtvthhfhﬂ
within 15 minutes and persisted for one to four hours
(Fig. 5: t).
‘

,

Figs.

5f

In each instance in which desynchronization was

observed, clinical restlessness, excitement, illusory and
hallucinatory activity were noted, and were concurrent with
the electrographic changes. In two instances the behavioral
changes were halted by the intravenous administration of
chlorpromazine.

�-10Considering the numerous reports

(e) Atropine:
that atropine induced EEG slow wave activity and clinical
somnolence, we administered this anticholinergic agent
intravenously in 15 subjects, in dosages of 0.8 to h.0
In six subjects without EEG delta
mg (.01-.10 mg/kg).
activity, there were no changes in EEG pattern during
drug administration nor for 10-20 minutes thereafter.
During a period of lassitude, decreased voltages, minimal
desynchronization, and an increase in per cent time delta
were noted.

In subjects with

delta activity, there

was an

apparent

initial

decrease in voltage and per cent time of such
activity during the first ten minutes after administration,
followed by a return to original values during the period
of quietude.

was»

In

neither period

(@3925)

were

the changes significanta

�-11-

Systemic

effects

were prominent during the

injection with increased respiratory rate, pallor, dry
skin and dry mouth, precordial complaints and an increase
in heart rate up to 100%. Subjects became restless and
recording became difficult. Within ten minutes these
symptoms subsided and the subjects became drowsy and
relaxed.

�-12-

arious experimental compounds with measurable

anticholinergic activity have been observed to

have

similar

electrographic and behavioral effectsignmthnsematudiOOVM
Electrographically, each agent induced a desynchronization
of frecuencies and a decrease in voltages, which was most
prominent in subjects with delta activity following
convulsive therapy. Behaviorally, these electrographic
patterns were associated with stimulating, excitatory,

lesser degree,
minimal systemic changes in heart rate, salivation and
sweating were noted. These latter systemic effects were
more prominent in patients given intravenous atropine under
similar experimental conditions.
These observations can be related to theories of the
mode of action of convulsive therapy;and-oﬁrthevastS“fvr'

illusory

and

hallucinatory activity.

‘thauaadnoedﬁaiew—wamowaewévttyj

To a

to concepts of the basis

of experimentally induced hallucinations; and to.thv reports
of the effects of atropine on EEG patterns.

(a) Convulsive therapy process: Earlier studies
indicated that the development of high voltage slow wave
activity was 4:; neurophysiologic correlate of behavioral
change in convulsive therapy, and a necessary, though not
sufficient, condition for clinical improvement (Fink and
Kahn, 1957). In summarizing the observations of numerous

�-13the relation of acetylcholine metabolism to 1;”
4o
$vuuna
andAconvulsions (Fink,
central nervous system
Ckxcxnurnsd'éjf
5L
biochemical
bootseinn the
the
1958) it was suggested that
induced EEG slow wave activity lay-ﬁn an increased level
of acetylcholine-cholinesterase activity of the central

authors

on

nervous system.

in the slow wave

1?

present observations of tin alterations_
activity of convulsive therapy by these

The

experimental anticholinergic compounds are consistent with

this suggestion.
is indicated by
reports of compounds with other biochemical activity also
affecting slow wave activity in a similar fashion. Amphetamine
That the problemis more complex

gt_§l, 1951), mescaline (Merlis and Hunter, 1955;
‘Ib (Bente gt_§1,
%§?b§i$ 1955), lysergic acid diethylamide
”iuuéig,snd diphenhydramine (Diaz-Guerrero et a1,1956) also
reduced post-convulsive slow wave activity. In these reports,
such a reduction was accompanied by excitatory and stimulating
effects on behavior. These compounds, however, are primarily
sympathomimetic and antihistaminic in pharmacologic activity
and not anticholinergic. The similar effects of these
diverse biochemical agents on electrographic patterns and
amuauibusﬁ
be
behavior
may
rat-ind within theoretic
on clinical
(Lennox

«K2~Kssrsr'6247
‘ﬁtﬁix “ﬁ’
constructs of synaptic activity;r—
mm w
The existence oftwo, or possibly three, Mypee cf interact~

'AQ/

1.

m.“-

ing chemo~re§poﬁsive receptors withinthd‘central ner::gg,system

�/

(I

W24:

L

M7?
5

,7

v

M/

’46; MW

w- M} Arm/a;

Ail/”M

Wag

.-

f

�“Jamal-un-

h

awmh'auu: gnaw“WWW WU“we

'

lead to a change in synaptic cholinergic activityywhésh—és—
reflected:h11llhsurface electrodes as augusntsd high
voltage slow wave activity. Administration of anticholinergic agenggijltenﬂ'synaptic activity, resulting in a
decrease in the manifest cortical electrical activity to
preconvulsive levels. Administration of sympathomimetic
agents 3f-lg-‘Leja-‘ﬁieve/ the same electrical effectsr-s-s-t-by—ns4tssang—tha—1saol—sfrehoiénsrgss—sstinitanbat by increasing
the level of adrenergic activity.

The

manifest slow

wave

A

activity, so prominent and so persistent in thsfﬁ::;ng£§;:&amp;
-ss«the—pust-setzure-statej may thus be viewed as tho resulttnf
persistent alteration in the synaptic tssssméssésn
activity of large numbers of cells of the central nervous
system. The delicate nature of this balance is seen in the
ready reversibility with alerting, time, and the wide

~qﬂra

variety of pharmacologic agents.nntsdwhaner-m~m~"~"“
’jiﬁ/ér\:;&gt;
The consistent nature of these neurophysiologic
observations all. makes an exclusively psychologic explanation of the mode of action of convulsive therapy less tenable.
These studies are consistent, however, with the neurophysiologic-adaptive view of the convulsive therapy process
which suggests

that neurophysiOlogic chanazMs
provide the

substrate for alterations in all aspects of cligical behavior}

fg’h"

�Ma

.

,W‘

w,

.M Won/7w AC

,W W

hyLWM MWMWM'W“

W
5

I414}

2‘5

Maxwu 4;
’

:73?

(/ija;

Z; W Wag

a,

WM7£ ILL-«44.1“

04”),

MLIMK

W; ”W MW;

“4344: a'

WM
W
I a;

a.

L

«

�-17-

we,

of~the—oabaeetp"{ﬂn type of behavioral alteration ts ﬁsvwig
dependent upon the type and degree of neurOphysiologic
change, the personality of the subject and the expectations
and

tolerance of the milieu (Weinstein and Kahn, 1955;

Fink and Kahn, 1957; Fink, 1957).

(b) Neurophysiology of hallucinogenic activity: The
effects of anticholinergic compounds on EEG and behavior
may also be related to the understanding of experimental
hallucinogenic activity. Each of these/tzzgfunds induced

illusory
excitatory behavior, including
4L

phenomena.

m

Here, too,

the synaptic

and

hallucinatory

model]

may be

applicable. Sympathomimetic agents, as mescaline, LSD and
described
amphetamine, and anticholinergic agents as those
here, are 01-‘3iv potent hallucinogens. A neuropharmacologic
basis for such behavior may be characterized as an alteration
in the level of synaptic activity in the direction of
increased inhibition (decreased transmission) of stimuli.
‘The clinical efficacy of convulsive therapy in
modifying hallucinatory activity may lie in alterations at

this neurophysiologic level.
.

The

effects of such hallucino-

genic blocking agents as chlorpromazine and reserpine on
EEG electrical activity are consistent with such a view.
Both compounds induce EEG hypersynchrony in man (Bente and
Itil, 19Sh, 1958) and block the EEG desynchronization
effects of LSD and mescaline (Schwarz et al, 1955).

�-19Chlorpromazine was found equally potent in aborting the

excitatory activity of the experimental anticholinergic
compounds in these studies.
(0) Relation to atropine: Comparison of the systemic
and neurologic effects of eXperimental anticholinergic
with atropine reveals signi£ieaat differences.«av ax/Aaf
compounds
{pH/95
s:%bé§i£3§§§§2::ence with atropine at physiologic and toxic
levels in man indicate that the predominant effects are
focused at peripheral nervous structures. Initial bradycardia,
followed,by tachycardia, loss of sweating and salivation,
pupillary dilation, intestinal relaxation and decreased
motility are amongst the effects at low (0.2-1.2 mg)
dosages. At higher dosages (2-5 mg), the neurologic effects
and delirium are
of ataxia, irritability, disorientation, Mgr...“
observed (Goodman and Gilman, 1955). In atrop' e coma therapy,
7amounts ranging from 32 to 212 g injected int amuscularly
into psychiat ic patients resul s in the fell wing sequence
(Forrer and Miller, 1958): "Th re is an induc ion period of
15 to 20 minufes after adminis ration charactkrized by
V

mm:Wm..-

!

2

I

.
Jonfusion, and
.
restlessnessg ceaselonally mil excitement,
at times naufca and rarely vo ting. This p oceeds, smoothly
and predictably, to muscular
coordination, ataxia, weakness,
vertigo and ifficulty in artffulation. An cute brain
syndrome wit. memory dis turbanhe, disorienta ion, clouded
illusions and mtst frequently kisual hallucinaconsciousnesf,
tions mergesa into delirium and§.:;rapid1y proceehs to coma. ..."
I

‘

I

’

;

�-20..

Thus/central nervous system effects arevprecededwwv
accompanied by marked

peripheral effects?”

contrast, the experimental anticholinergic agents
in dosages sufficient for central nervous system effects
manifest little peripheral activity. The central effects
are observed early and may continue for extensive periods
without gastrointestinal, cardiac or pupillary changes.
It is within the context of the focus of activity and w.
-din relation to dosage that the apparent discrepant EEG
observations of the effects of atropine (in inducing slow
wave activity) and these experimental anticholinergic
In

reconciled. Wescoe gt_al (l9h8) administering 1.0 to 3.0 mg/kg atropine in curarized cats and monkeys
and Funderburk and Case (1951) using O.h to 1.2 mg/kg in
curarized cats, observed high voltage EEG slow wave activity.
Wikler (1952, 1957) reported that 7.2 mg/kg atropine on
unanesthetized, uncurarized dogs produced "spindle slow wave"
patterns at-ihiugiy similar to sleep. Rinaldi and Himwich
(1955a, b) reported that atropine in doses of 0.5 to 2.0
mg/kg in curarized rabbits exaggerated EEG sleep patterns
and inhibited the alerting of the EEG to unit-l: peripheral
stimuli. Similar observations have been reported by
compounds may be

Bradley and Elkes (1953) in the conscious cat. In each
instance the dosage of atropine varied from 0.5 to 7 mg/kg
- a range roughly comparable to the dosages used in atropine
(me'w‘ Md: We’rfrfg.

“ma therapy!

�:

M 4% 1mg,»

Jyyzmw f)”;
r

gag“;

m mﬂﬂ/w

1:; @c‘jf jaw/(4,4,2...

W

a;

351,,

fgﬂzﬂ,

�-21'éoueraduuage?
Auéf

In thelzn;tudies, the
‘g’

ﬂﬁmal

EEG

effects of

low dosages of

intravenous
atropine (0.01 to 0.10 mg/kg) were minimalaasﬁ
CMMHKM éﬁ,
iﬁkbﬁ
iconfirming similar observations by Verdeaux anglﬂgrﬁzw
(195h) and by Danielopolu et al (1955)., Danielopolu et a1”
Wmmwﬂwawmqum
specifically related the EEG effects to dosage levelvfw”
ith high dosages of atropine in rabbits ( h to ﬂfﬁg/kg)
.

W

wa‘ianMu-‘rm‘m.

-W«m««uw~w ~w-wwmw~wmmw .; m

W.

..,..-..g.,

,

m

,u

.

swan-bani" .twmi-mc”1;

~11.»-

.

man.

;

they observed similar high voltage mixed sloﬁfand fast
activity, while with low dosage (.Zh t9 id mg/kg) the
original apid rhythms remained hgphanged. These authors It fy~”'
thus sugges d that atropinetg effects were multiple and“

related the EEG ob rvationgxtg similar
findings with rega dﬁtﬁ heart rate. Danie
ported earlier that s 11 doses of atropinesloqed cardiac
rhythms while/larger dose caused acceleration. These
dose determine

’

and

cardiac observations have recentlyxbeen confirmed (Morton

232;;
‘

Thus, while considerable speculation as to central
neurophysiology has been based on studies with atropine,

té§LL———

special case of anticholinergic
effects. The anticholinergic activity,—eo—pnonéaeatky
established in observations in vitro and in the peripheral
nervous system, may not be the effective physiologic
activity in the large doses necessary to affect central
such observations provide a

�.. 2 2 -

Th3’2xperimental compounds z:::=zm—the~preeontm
the ﬂﬂﬁgw
provide more

structures.
s-‘bu-d‘éoo

ﬂow/M)“:

udtuoédubéon of

suitablewe} Wfor

central neurophysiologic (anticholinergic)

patterns than atropine] M, #AMcuu/eml AM»
In part, these physiologic differences may be re
to differences in structural chemistry. Each of the
experimental compounds contains a tertiary amine linka e,

while atropine contains a quaternary linkage. The e fect
of structure on in vivo pharmacology may be clea y observed
in the structure-activity relationships of e piperidyl-

benzilates (Abood 22.21:.1953)' While -methyl-3-piperidylbenzilate and N-ethyl-B-piperidy enzilate have potent anticholinergic and hallucinoge \c-potency, N—dimethyl-B-piperidylbenzilate - the quate ary compound - has considerable in vitro
anticholinergic tivity but no hallucinogenic property.

nd Hoch (1957), Denber (1958), Naka (1958) and Flodmark
i

(1958).

f_

_-‘_

,

f
-

.

in.a re-evaluation 05‘studies

,_”4

,

1

7

,.

_éwr

of craniocerebral trauma and
epilepsy. Ward's (1950) reports of the efficacy of high
doses of atropine in altering the clinical manifestations
of head trauma indicated that effective doses brought with

�-23-

effects. The failure of atropine
to affect epilepsy may be related to the

them severe systemic
and scopolamine

inability of these quota-unis

compounds

to reach the

central nervous system in adequate quantity. It would
seem advisable, therefore, to repeat these studies utilizing
ardﬁuf
such mere-paten%7~more centrally speeésée..anticholinergic
,

compounds as used in

the experiments reported here.

�'Zh'
SUMMARY:

1.

EXperimental

anticholinergic

compounds

(diethazine,

Win-2299, benactyzine, JB-318 and JB—336), administered to

psychiatric patients at various stages of convulsive therapy,
were

associated with:
(a) desynchronization of EEG rhythms with a
blocking of post-convulsive delta activity;
(b) alerting, excitatory behavioral reaponse
with illusory, delusional and hallucinatory

ideation; and,
(c) systemic effects of muscular weakness,
dryness of the mouth, dry skin and tachycardia.
electrographic behavioral and systemic effects were

The

concurrent.

that
an

ﬂ;

2.

observations are consistent with the suggestion
“faxmufaui

These

We!)

thug,”
”

'

of convulsive

therapy'iilllllr.4ﬂ

increase in central nervous system cholinergic activity.
3.

Observations that

LSD,

amphetamine, mescaline and

diphenhydramine - synpathomimetic and

also induce

desynchronization, blocking of post convulsive

EEG

delta activity

antihistaminic agents -

and

clinical excitatory activity support the

suggestion that bUth-hhu behavioral and electrographic
based on alterations in synaptic activity,, sis
Patterns
Increased synaptic activity (cholinergic, sympatholytic effects)

we

,4

�-25-

hypersynchronization, and clinical
sedation and euphoria; while decreased synaptic activity
(anticholinergic, sympathomimetic) is associated with EEG
desynchronization and clinical excitatory and hallucinogenic

is associated with

EEG

states.
Discrepant observations with the-entéehottnergiﬁ
agent? atropine are related to significant differences inrﬁéfvﬁfygw’
h.

.thawnantzalMnenuensmsaatanmaiﬂactsmoﬁmhighudeaagamainapineﬂ

Re-assessment
in_man_maxanataha4nninanil¥_anaiahnlinargis.
of the role of anticholinergic agents in head trauma and

seizure states is suggested.
5. These observations amplify the neurophysiologicadaptive hypothesis of the mode of action of convulsive
therapy and of experimental hallucinogenic states.

�ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

I
Hannah

{Eﬂ

grateful for the technical assistance of Mrs.
Mosquera in EEG recording and analyses; and—to—
am

Supplies of the various pharmaceuticals were made freely
available by Lakeside Laboratories (JB-318 and JB-336),
Merck Sharpe &amp; Dohme (benactyzine), Sandoz Pharmaceuticals
(LSD-25), Sterling—Winthrop (Win-2299) and Smith, Kline
&amp;

French Laboratories

(diethazine, chlorpromazine)

�:f/ébétp/g

04M¢MW71M£04¢

W, 2: wow
f/éétdi./g.7

JAM/47

7249.;

’9‘”

M MW «044ml.

W,- m;

{fJZ/

E.-

37I-370‘

�-27Abood, L.G.,

W4}
“E:ZLE:D

Ostfeld,

A.M. and

Biel, J.

new group of

A

psychotomimetic agents. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol.
Med., 1958’ 21: hq'é‘h86o
Bente, D. and Itil, T. Zﬁr Wirkung des Phenothiazinkorpers
Megaphen auf dasuMehschliche Hirnstrombild.

Arzneimittelforsch§:“l95h, Z: h18-h23.
Bente, D. and Itil, T. A comparison of the action of
various phenothiazine compounds on the human EEG.
Trans. Int. Cong. of NeurgpsychOpharm., 1958,

(in press).

Itil,

Electroencephalographic
studies concerning the action of LSD-25. EEG Clin.

Bente, D.,

T. and Schmid, E.E.

Neuroghysiol., 1957, 2:
Bente, D.,

Itil,

359

(abst.).

T. and Schmid, E. E.

Elektroencephalon

graphische Studien zur Wirkungsweise des LSD-25.
Psychiat. et Neurol., 1958, $25: 273-28h.
Bradley, P.B. and Elkes, J. The effect of atropine,
hyoscyamine, physostigmine and neostigmine on the

electrical activity of the brain of the conscious
cat. J.

thsiol.,

1953, lﬁg: 1h_-15;
Bradley, P.B. and Elkes, J. The effects of some drugs on the
electrical activity of the brain. Brain, 1957, g9:
77-117.
Coady, A. and Jewesbury, E.C.

A

clinical trial

of

benactyzine hydro&lt;3hlcride ("Suavitil") as a‘physical

relaxant. Brit.

Med.

Jour., 1956,

l:

h85-h87.

�-2&amp;-

Danielopolu, D., Giurgea, C. and Drocon, G. Electroencephalographic study of the non specific pharmacodynamics of the stimulatory effect of atropine on the

cerebral cortex.

”

Fiziologicheskiy Zhurnal

SSSR, 1955,

El: 60l~611.
Denber, H.C.B. Studies on mescaline: III. Action in epileptics.
Psychiat. Quart., 1955, 32: h33-u38.
9.,see;4a;é:§;fs;ag"inasced stgtgg”.gsembiagg“..tur.11y
occuring MW
psychoses,‘mgM

~jrbpicDrugs. Elseviar,

/

r

Amsterdam. 1957, 263S
Diaz-Guerrero, R., Feinstein, R. and Gottlieb, J. S. EEG
findings following intravenous injection of diphenhydramine hydrochloride (Benadrylr). EEG Clin Neuro—
‘

7

Evarts, E.V. Neurophysiological correlates of pharmacologically induced behavioral disturbances. Res. Publ.
Ass. Nerv. Ment.

Evarts, E.V.

Dis., 1958, 2§:3b7-380.

Chemical bases for psychoses.

Concepts of Psychoses.
1958,

Fink,

M.

A

Chemical

McDowell, Oblensky

Inc.,

N.Y.

hl-62.
unified theory of the action of physiodynamic

therapies. J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, g: 197-206.
Fink, M. Effect of anticholinergic agent, diethazine, on
behavior: Significance for theory of convulsive
therapy. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 1958,

EEG

and

29: 380-387;

M Wﬂiﬁ‘f‘féy

A2u&amp;“x dad Akhaiﬁn,

za37.,/ff4:

£1.J./Ita4u/t-W‘Wﬁ

ﬁﬁ¢’{7¢£

�-29Fink,

Relation of electroencephalographic
delta activity to behavioral response in electroshock.

M.

and Kahn, R.L.

A.M.A. Arch.

Fink,mu. and

Neurol.

Jarre, J.

&amp;

Psychiat., 1957,

Drug induced changes

1Q: 516-525.

in interviEW“‘

patterns.iiconf”“onoFsychodynamic Aspects of Neuro-

leptic

‘‘‘‘‘‘

)

FloemargE S.

,aﬁines

ed. J. Sarwer-Foner (in press).
effect of some tertiary andwgnatornary

QEggs,
The

EEG Clin. Neuro~
activity.
“MM“MW
753 (abst. ). WNW WM
1958,10:
mag;

on a3”rww¢

m“

at“

M“

Forrer,

fik

and.Miller, J.J. Atropine coma: A somatic
therapy in psychiatry. Am. J. Psychiat., 1958, 115:
G.

h55~h58.

rFunderburk, W.H. and Case, T.J.

cortical potentials.

EEG

The

effect of atropine

on

Clin. Neurophysiol. 1951,

2: 213'2230
Goodman,

L.S. and Gilman, A.

Pharmacological Basis of

Therapeutics. Macmillan, N.Y. 1955.
Heymans, C., Estable, J.J. and de Bonneveaux, S.C. Sur la
pharmacologie de la phenothiazinyl~ethy1diethylamine

P.).

Arch.

Int. Pharmacodyn..l9h9,

79:

123-138.

Jacobson, E.

Suavitil, et nyt stof

pa centralnervesystemet.
Egg: 11b7-1151.

med

specifik virkning

Ugeskrift for Laeger, 1955,

\
“1v,

.

1..

...

WWW»-.-

�-30.

Jaffe, J.

An

%

.5

.1...WW...

objectiveeWudy6f communication 1npsychiatric
.

E

A.

WM...

J

H11151de Hosp., 1957, 6: 207- 215.
L_wwﬂwaéminterviews.;
Jenkner, F. L. and Lechner, H. The effect of diparcol on

i

A...“

(
3

_5/

the electroencephalogram 1n the normal subject
and in those with cerebral trauma. EEG Clin.

Neuroghzsiol., 1955, 1: 303-305.
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E. A. Relation of
amobarbita1.test to clinical.&amp;mprovement in electroshock.Wégégfkeﬁrch. Neurol. &amp;szchiat., 1956, 76:
#‘YMW

n

Maren
Kahn,
W»

A:
,F1nk, M.
RL.and

shock. Ps
WM““‘0

Changes in language
"‘"'

Ann/n"
.3!" w».

déy;gf Communication. Grune

c

/’”’“MFStratton, NY.

MHA./

danng“éIectro-

f

&amp;

1958, 126- 139.

Lechner, H. 0n the influence of anticholinergic drugs on
the EEG of recent closed craniocerebral injuries.
EEG

Clin. Neurophysiol., 1956, 8: 71h-715.
The

Lennox, M.A., Ruch, T.C. and Guterman, B.

benzedrine on the post-electroshock

effect of

EEG.

EEG

Clin.

Neurophysiol., 1951, 2: 63-69.
Marazzi, A.S. Some indications of cerebral humeral mechanisms.
Science, 1953, 118: 367-370.
-Marazzi, A-S. Effects of psychotomimetic drugs on cerebral
synapses.
I

t .,.«-~,«....

Psrchotropic Drugs.

Amsterdam, 1957, 283-286.
u

s.

Elsevier,

“.11Relationship gflhAIEucfﬁéééns
mun-qua-

a.

M.

z
._

may,

13;:w365-367.

2

'

aAd Hart E. E.
Marauai,A
“NW 5%”to adrenergic cerebraineurohumors. Science, 1955,

w.“c.m,,

”“Vmw~emn

f
.1

�-31-

Studies on mescaline: II.
Electroencephalogram in schizophrenics. Pszchiat.

Merlis, S. and Hunter,

W.

Quart., 1955, 29: u3o-h32.

W
Morton, H. J.
-

WM...wr-i“

mm“wv'wm‘

and Thomas,

r

E T.

,..

MW~;:-a‘

ST

MW

own—VT“

mam»Warmest“ “:

“NM“

2,1958 13131315

HIM-~14“

humumwnhaartwrat? emfancet
Naka,

u.
Effect
of atropineon thew if

,

..:. ¢~w

m«w.

v,;&lt;w~1»~ww-..
Aﬂoé:§€ﬁ?bpgychopharm., 1958,
wammwa

Pennes, H.E. and Koch, P.H.

,1

I";

anununnwwnmsu ”N;

.

Trans. Int. Cong.
wunme:::;::ZZZZZZZw

(in press)

Psychotomimetics, clinical

theoretical considerations: Harmine,
Nalline. Amer. J. Pszghiat., 1957, 112:
and

Win-2299 and

887-892.

Rinaldi, F. and Himwich, H.E. Alerting responses and
actions of atropine and cholinergic drugs. ﬁ;ﬂ;§.
Arch. Neurol. and

Psychiat., 1955, 12: 387-395.

Rinaldi, F. and Himwich, H.E. Cholinergic mechanism
involved in function of mesodiencephalic activating
system. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat., 1955, 12:

396-h02.
Roth,

the EEG under barbiturate anesthesia
produced by electro-convulsive treatment and their
significance for the theory of ECT action. §§§_
Clin. Neurophzsiol., 1951, 2: 261-280.

M.

Changes in

Roth, M., Kay, D.W.K., Shaw,

J.

and Green,

J. Prognosis

pentothal induced electroencephalographic changes
in electroconvulsive treatment. EEG Clin. Neuro-

and

�-32Schwarz, R.E., Bickford, R.G. and Rome, H.P.

Reversibility

of induced psychosis with chlorpromazine.
Mega

2522.

Clin., 1955, 29: h07-h17.

Central cerebral chemicals and their
relation to psychoses. Chemical Concepts of

Sherwood, S.L.

Pszchosis. McDowell, Oblensky, N.Y., 1958,v268-276.
Strauss, H., Ostow, M. and Greenstein, L. Diagnostic
Electroencephalography, prune

Ulett,

Stratton, N.Y., 1952.

&amp;

Effect of atropine and
scopolamine upon electroencephalographic changes
induced by electroconvulsive therapy. EEG Clin.

G. A. and

Johnson,

M.W.

Neurophzsiol., 1957, 2: 217-22h.
Verdeaux,

G. and

gramme de
_4kum..u“W"

clinique.

WhamWmmw uwm “my

echovsky, M.

Marty, R.

Action sur l'electroencephalo-

substances pharmacodynamiques
Rev.
A

d'interet

Neurol., l95h, 91: hOS-h27.

psych031s caused

intoxicgtlonwWwAgggBayohiat

by benactyzine
Wmmwaw

'et

www.mo.‘w:_mh‘”w mu...

W

NW. grams

”KM—i

““"C;L;ww
”w

Mes-mm

Neurol. Scand.

M

ﬁ,‘

"”§2}&amp;, A. Atropine in the treatment of closed head injury.
J. Neurosurg., 1950, 1: 398-h02.
Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.

Denial of Illness:

Symbolic and physiological aspects.
Springfield, 111., 1955.

C. Thomas,

R.E., McNamara, B.P. and Krop, S.
influence of atropine and scopolamine on the

Wescoe, W.C., Green,
The

central effects of
63-72.

DFP.

J. Pharmacol., l9h8, 22:

�-33.

dissociation of behavior and
EEG "sleep patterns" in «iogs: morphine, N-allylnormorphine and atropine. Proc. Soc. Exper.

Wikler; A.

Pharmacologic

Biol. Med., 1952, 12: 261—265.
Wikler, A. The Relation of szghiatry to Pharmacologz.
Wilkins, Baltimore, 1957.
Woolley, D.W. Serotonin in mental disorders. Res. Publ.
Ass. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1958, 2g: 381-h00.
Wm.

�On this sheet please prepare for publication in BIOLOGICAL ABSTRACTS a typewritten (double spaced)
abstract of your paper and attach it to your corrected proof. Since proof cannot be furnished, check your abstract
critically—especially the citation, scientiﬁc names, formulas, chemicals, and technical terms.
An abstract should be an informative digest of the signiﬁcant content and conclusions of the paper, not a mere
description. It should be intelligible in itself, without reference to the original, but is not intended to substitute
for it. It should be brief (preferably less than 3% of the original), written in whole sentences, not telegraphic

phrases.

For directions, please see the reverse.

Sample Citation:

DOE, JOHN J. (U. Commonwealth, Capitol City), and RICHARD ROE. Metabolism of phosphorus in rats.
Jour. Pest Control Res. 37(4): 152-165. 1957.

Detach here and return lower portion only

�A GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF ABSTRACTS
CONTENT—Include:
1. Name of organism, and objective of the study.
2. Materials, manner of use, or route of administration,
principal ﬁndings, and results.
3. New techniques, their uses and qualities.
4. New apparatus, its intended use, and if commercially
available, name and address of its manufacturer.
5. New or veriﬁed data of permanent value, e.g., absorption spectra, chromosome numbers, constants, mathematical or chemical formulae.
6. New genera of animals/ plants, new classiﬁcations, new
distribution records. (For systematic data, see below.)
,7. New theories, new interpretations, evaluations, if possible; if not, reference to them.
‘

-Omit:

Information contained in the title.
2. Additions, corrections, or any information not contained
in the original published paper.
1.

FOR SYSTEMATIC PAPERS—Additional instructions.
FORM: 1. Write the name of a subgenus, genus, or any supergeneric taxon, if old, in small letters with a capital initial;
if new, all in capitals. The name of a species, subspecies,
variety, or form is never capitalized.
2. Alwa rs underline the name of a genus, subgenus, s ecies, su species, variety, and form: with a straight ' e
if old, with a wavy line if new. No other group name is
ever underlined. Write the name of a new combination
of a species from one genus to another)
transfer
‘
(e5:
a straight line under the old and a wavy line under
the new or shifted part, followed by the basonym and its
author in parentheses.
CONTENT: Be alert to information other than the formal,
strictly taxonomic and nomenclatural. Summarize or men—
tion new data in any biologic ﬁeld—life history, morphology, biogeography, cytology, ecolo , evolution. (Nontaxonomists welcome such information.
NEW TAXA. Omit detailed descriptions, long synonymies and

~

�DEC 7'5 3.959

m, x. (mm. Hume-1. mm m, a. 1.). mm or MWo

W
m m.
W
on

Wu

But

EEG

mum-

and

101.

mm

mummrm mm (cu-mum. win-2299‘.
administer“ to mum-'10 patent-

ﬂung, are «minted

with n blocking

Wtua Fatima.

.

JB~318 and 38-1336).

Wu

of

of.

with!

It various

«mutation a:

mm,
than at

EEG

rhythm

pelt—amid” delta wtivity; darting, mum-y

illusory. donning: and mnucinatory mum; and
attacks of Ins-mm mimosa, drynosa of the mouth, dry akin md
can—
halyard“. The cloemgraphic, behaviml and manic offsets

behavioral

We

mt.The“

mom. with

m

'

Mmtiam

suggest. that. a

«mimosa:

ﬁlm is an 1mm in mtml mama “timers

What at convulsive

dim

Mastic” that LSD, «momma, 30mm and
aynpumm and awakening agomm -. also mam EEG deaymhnoniuum,
blocking of post

«mun delta activity and clinical Quinton? nativity

support. the suggestion

hand

on

that behavioral

and

durum in mm scum“

mug activity

ehctmgnphie panama any be

It is suggest“ that. increased
(ahelinorzia, mamas atom) 1: associated mm EEG
and cumin}. mum and euphoria while Mmud

Widen,

�‘_

W",

.

”-77

.V

.

,.

.

.

,,

..

..

w.

.

..‘Vr._.wum“.mmm————__——_q‘_

02¢

mm activity (autumn-31¢, metie) is associated ﬁlth Em
WWﬁan and clinical .33th and WWW: cum.
Wampum; observations with atropine are

round to significant

hmmmnt a: the role of mtichonmme agents
in head tram md «ism auto-n in mggaltad.
no” chain-tum mpnfy the mmyhyaiologimﬁnptin Wham at the
m or motion of cmlsiv. thorny and of ”puma hallucinogenic out».
Mfume” in

damage.

�HS 981

33130? 0!

ANTIGBOLINERGIG GOHPGUIDS OI P03? GOHVULSIVE

EEG AID BEHAVIOR OF PSIGEIATRIG PATIENTS

nux Fink H.D.

(Rocoivod

for publication: larch 11, 1959)

Iron tho Departnont of Exporinonttl Psychiatry, Hillaid. Ronpitnl,

Glon Oaks,

L.I., 3.1.

purt, by grant. H-927 and 31-2092 at the Nationtl
Mental Hotlth, lutionul Institutes of Health, 3.8.
Public Konlth Serviel.
Icad at tho Alcricun EEG ﬁocioty, Atlantic City, June, 1958.

Aided, 1n

Institute of

11: 5/59

�HS 981

AlfialﬂLIlElGIG

GOHPOUIDS AID POST GOIVULSIVE EEG

�Ettact or Anticholinargie Compounds on Post Convulaiva
EEG and Bohavior at Psychiatric Patients

BIG

Daaanatrationa or the aignificanea or high voltage
dolta activity in the gonvulsive therapy procaaa (Roth

w,
this delta activity

report that
was blocked by the adniniatration or
atropina and acopolanina (Ulatt and Johnaon, 1957) provided
the basis for than. studioa. A: there were attendant
nnplaaaant ayatoaic effects with the adniniatration of
than: agents, report: describing diethalina as an antiehalin~
crgic compound with potent neurologic but minimal systolic
affects (Janknor and Lcehnar, 19553 Laehnar, 1956) led an
to undartaka studio: similar to those of Blott and Johuaon
using this coapound (link, 1958). aboarvationa with diathasine
lad to the invaatigation of othar experimental anticholinargic
1951, 1957; Fink and Kahn, 1957) and thc

agonta.

report daaeribac clinical and olactrooncaphalo»
graphiu observations ineidant to the intravenous adniniatration
at various anticholinarzie agent: in psychiatric patients at
various stage: of convulsive therapy and relates the obaarvationa
Thia

to hypotheaaa eonaerning tho and. or action a! canvulaivc
therapy and of hallucinogcna.

�SEBJEGTS LIE KETKODi

subjects were ninety psychiatric patients
referred for convulsive theraoy. ages ranged from 18 to
67 years, and diagnoeee included schizophrenia reactions
end nanio-deoroeaive end involutiona1~depreaeive peyohoeeo.
a varied number of eubjeote were etudied for eaoh oonpoond
for a total of 107 observations.
Patients have been obeerved at variooe etagea or the
treatment prooeee. The obeervatione were made in the EEG
laboratory, using a standard 8 channel EEG recorder and
noodle oleotrodee applied in 17 lead placements following
Streuee £t_2; (1952). In eeoh trial, the compound under
study we: administered intravenously at a set rato per uinnte
until clinical behavior or electrogrephio changes were
The

obeerved.
The compounds

et a1, 19h9),

studied have been diethezine (Reynane

Win-2299 (Pennee and Hooh, 1957), benactyoine

(Jacobeon, 1955). JB~318 end JB~336 (Abood ££_5;, 1958) end
atropine. Diethaoine was administered at 25 mg per minute

for

a

total

or 175-250

I: (3.5-5.9 nelkg);

w1n~2299 and

bonaotyeine at 0.5 mg per ainute for 2 to 5 e3 (0.02~0.15
eg/kg)3 and JB~318, JB~336, and atropine et O.h mg per
minute

for 1.2 to h.0

mg

(0.01~0.10 mg/kg).

�OBSERVATIOHSa-

(a) Diethaeine:

administration of diethaeine
in fifteen patients prior to convulsive therapy reaultea in
a decrease in EEG voltages and a deeynchronieaticn of all
trequenciee. Prevailing rhythmic patterne becane leee pro»
nuanced. In acne inatanoee, symmetric low voltage 6-7 epa
activity appeared and wee aoet apparent in frontal and
anterior temporal leade (gink, 1958).
In twentyative patiente with varying degreee of
induced high voltage delta activity during convulsive therapy
(rink and Kahn, 1957), there was a significant decreaae in
voltage and in per cent tine of aloe wave activity. Iron an
average delta or hSS in the trontnoeeipital leade, there was
a reduction to a mean of 201. Both render and beret delta
activity dininiehed. Low voltage alpha and beta frequencies
became more prominent. The usual increase in per cent tine
and in voltage or slow wave activity with hyperventilation
was no'lenger apparent. Theee electrographic effects appeared
during drug administration and pereieted for one to five
houra (link, 1958).

The

.

Concurrent.vi}h these electregraphic effecte, we
cbeerved dietinctive eyetemic and behavioral changes. The
initial eyetenie effects were episodes of coughing and
complaints of dryneee of the mouth. Skin reaained dry and
the heart rate increased by 5 to 10 per cent. this increase

�-5-

rarely noted by the
preoordial'dietraea.

not aoconpahied
There was no change in papillary
by
sine, and constriction in response to light wan prompt. There
were occasional oozplainte or abdominal griping. Such effects
were generally less prominent than the electrographio or
behavioral.

was

eubja

ot,

and was

lehaviorally, patients hooano irritable, restless,
tense and excited, and it was difficult to maintain eyelid
closure. they oonplained or feelings of unreality and or
tingling, weakneee and heavineea or the extremities. Oonplainte
that color: were pale or more intenea, halos about lights and
changing shadows were accompanied by delusional thoughts about

their illness, the setting of the test procedure or the axaainer'e
identity.
(h)

that

Win—2229:

Win-2299 induced

The

report

illusory

by Pennee and Hoch (1957)

hallucinatory states in
intravenone aaniniatration

and

led to this next etudy. 0n
o: win-2299. both electrographic and behavioral attests einilar
to diethaeine were obaerved. In five patients without EEG
aloe wave activity, deeynohronisatien of frequencies and a
deoreaee in voltagee were noted in four (Fig.1).
“QC“.-.‘--

man,

fig.

1

In eleven patiohto with high voltage delta activity there
was a decrease in amplitude and per oent time of slow wave
activity with an increase in the par cent tine of alpha and

�.5beta trequcnciee.
tc 235 (Fig. 2).

The neen

delte ectivity dropped tron

Fig.

50$

2

,ieeccietcd with these clectrcgrephic effecte were
clinicel patterns of reetlceeceee end excitement, end minimal
eyetcuic effecte. Petiente becene teertul end tense. Vieuel
illuecry eeueeticne were reported end were ececcieted in theee
eubjecte with deleeicnel elebcreticne about their hospital
experience. Excitenent yea ecccnpenied by ideas of reference,
end in two chjecte, intrevencue chlcrprcnesine wee edainietered
to halt this process. Theee behevicrel chengee eppeered during
drug eduinietreticn or within ten minutes, end disappeared
within two to three hcnre.
systenic effects were alight. there were neither cough
nor rcepiretcry dietrccc. Scert rete wee unettected except
in petieate who becene overtly excited and teertcl, in vhcn
techycerdie eppeered during thie excitement peried; Dryneee
cf the ecuth wee repcrted only on direct inquiry.
(c) Benectieine: Reports that bonectyeine induced EEG
deeynchrcniseticn (Ccedy end Jeweebury, 1956), its enti~
chclinerzic nature, end the etrccturel cinilerity to dietheeine
and to Win-2299 led to our touting ct thin ccnpcund. Intrevencne
edninietreticn in 12 subjects elicited similar clinical and
electrcgrephic petterne. Bath in the well ncduleted elphe
record and in the reccrd with high vcltege delte ectivity,
deeynchrcnieeticn wee prompt. Dclte ectivity decreased trcn

-

�.5a mean time of 391 to 165 in

8

Fig-t,
These electroxraphic
by

subjects (Fig. 3, h).
3, h~

patterns

were ngnin acconpuniod

clinical roctlenlneol, irrittbility

and oxeitcmont.

Artifactwrree recording was nor; difficult.. the illusory
sensitionl ind dblunional thoughts a¢en with the initinl
aénpounds were hot notad at then. dongs. luvtla. Syatcnie

effects

wore

niuilar to

Win-229?.

‘

(d) Piparigylbanzilatoa: Following racont reports by
Ahead 33_§; (1958) that various pipcridylbcnailatca with
nynaurxblo antichoiincrgie activity induced hallucinations

in psyehintrie subjects, we taut-d JB~318 and JB~336 in 2h
vubjoets. Thu olectrogrnphic'pntterns wort identical with
the other experihonttl antiehulinorgia compounds. Dosynchrenination of troquancios wan noted during the injectian or
within 15-minute: and pornistod tar due tp {our hanrs (Pig. 5).
O’Qﬂﬂﬁﬂw

Fig.

5

In each inataneq in whieh duaynchronixation was obaarvad,‘

ainicnl restlolancau, excitcnont, illunary and hallucinatory
activity were acted, and were eonuurrant with the nloetrographie
changes. In two inatuneoa the behaviornl changoa wore haltcd
by tho intravonoua administration or chlerprenasino.

,

�-7-(c) Atronins: Considering the numerous reports
that atropine_indnced EEG elow wave activity and clinical
eonnolence,

we

adninistered this anticholinergic agent

intravenously in 15 aanecte, in dosages of 0.8 to h.0 as
(.01~.1o ng/kg). In six snbjecte without EEG delta activity,
there were no changes in EEG pattern during drug administration
nor for 10-20 minutes theratter.. During a period of laseitude,
decreased voltages, minimal desynchronication, and an increase

in per cent tine'delta were noted.
In subjects with delta activity, there nae an
apparent initial decrease in voltage and per cent tine or
each activity during the first ten ninutes after adainistration,
followed by a return to original values during the period
of quietode. In neither period were the changes significant,:
(31:. 6).
ﬁ

Fig.

6

systemic effects were prominent during the injection
with increased respiratory rate, pallor, dry skin and dry

precordial complaints

increase in heart rate
up to 10oz. Subjects became restless and recording became
difficult. Within ten ninntes these symptoms subsided and
the subjects became drowey and relaxed.

mouth,

and an

�-8DESGU$SION3

In those studies, varione experimental compounds
with neaenrable anticholinorgic activity have been obeerved

to have similar electrosrephic and behavioral effecte.'

Electrographically, each agent induced a doeynchronination of
frequencies and a decrease in voltages, which was most prominent
in cubjocte with delta activity following convulsive therapy.
Behaviorally, theee electrographic patterns were aceociated
with stimulating, excitatcry, illusory and hallucinatory
activity. To a leeeer degree, ainiaal oysteaic changes in
heart rate, eelivetion and eweating were noted. Theeo latter
eyeteaic cffccte were lore prominent in patiente given
intravenous atropine under einilar experimental conditione.
Thceo obecrvatione can be related to theories of the
node of action of convnleive therapy; to concepts of the
basic of experimentally induced hallucinatione; and to roporte
of tho effocte of atropine on EEG patterns.
(a) Convaleivo thcrggy process: Earlier etndieo
indicated that the development of high voltage slow wave
activity wee a nenrophyeiologic correlate of behavioral
changc in convulsive therapy, and a necessary, though not
sufficient, condition for clinical improvement (Pink and Kuhn,
1957). In enanarieing the obeervationc of nuaerone authors
on the relation of acetylchcline metabolic: to trauma of the
central nervous eycten and to convnleione (Pink, 1958) it wee
enggeeted that a biocheaical concoaitant of the induced EEG

�.9.
alov wove ootivity to. an increased level or acotyicholinoo‘
oholinootorooo activity of tho central nervous system. Tho

.

pro-ant oboorvations of altorotiono 1n the slow wave activity
at oonvnloivo thorapy by that. oxporiuontal antioholinorgic
compounds or. oonaiatont with this suggestion.
That tho problon 13 not. complex is indicated by
reports or oonpoundn with other biochemical activity alto
ottocting clot wave nativity in o aililor faahion. Alphotnnino
(Lonoox‘:1_g;, 1951), nonoalioo (Karlia and Router. 19553
Dunbar, 1955), lyoorgio acid diothylonido (Dante gg_g;, 1957
a,b) and diphonhydranino (Bios-Guerrero £3;=;, 1956) olso
reduced post-convulsive slow wave activity. In these reports,
such a reduction vac aooonpnniod by excitntory nod stinuloting
effects on bohtvior. Those conponndo, hovovor, are prinarily
oynpathoninotio and antihistoninio in pharﬁaoologio activity
and not

antioholinorgie;

81n113r_oftocto of those divoroo bioohomical
ngontt on olootrographio patterns and on cliniool behavior may
be oonoidorod within thoorotio oooatruota of the relation of
synaptic ootivity to behavior on oxproauod by Harolsi (1953,
1957), Brndloy and Blkool(1957), Evarts (1958 .,b), Sherwood
Tho

thono author: nnzgoot thot tvo
ohonoroopon-ivo roooptorl oxiot within

(1958) and Hoolloy (1958).

typos or interootiog
the nervous oyston which or. Iolootively roopoouivo to
oholioorgio or to udrenorgio agonto. whore ouch rocoptorl

oxilt, they oxort

oppoaiog

ntinolotory or inhibitory ootioo.

�-10Thus, repeeted induced oeuvuleione mey lead to e
choose in eyneptio eholiaergio activity, reflected in surface
electrodes on high voltage slew wove activity. Administration

or enticholinergio egente may alter eyneptie nativity, resulting
in e decrease in the manifest aortioel electrioel eotivity to
preoenvuleivo levels. Adeinietretion of eyupethoeinetio egente
eey eohievo the gene electrical effects by inoreeeing the level
of edrenergie activity.

The

neoiteet elov

weve

activity,

so

proninent end so pereietent in the poet~eeisure 328, any thne
be vieved ee resulting from n persistent elteretion in the
synaptic activity of large hunters of cello of the control
rnervone eyeten. The delicate netnre or this balance is seen
in the reedy reversibility with alerting, tine, and the wide
variety of phernnoologio agents noted here.
While an alteretion in synaptic activity may underlie
the behavioral changes in coovulsive therapy, the neoheniel

elteration is developed or eueteinod is uncleer.
The obeervation by iird gt~gl‘(l956 e,b, 1958), that an
inoreeee in permeability of the blood brain barrier followed‘

by which such

repeeted indooed convulsion: euggeeta one

sz in

which synoptic

ehengee eey be mediated.

coneietent neture or these neurophysiolozio
observation: nekee en exclusively payehologic explenetion
e: the node or action of convulsive therapy lees teneble.
These etudiee ere ooneietent, however, with the neurunxmyeiologio~‘
adoptive view or the convulsive therepy preoeee whioh eugzeete
The

�«11 an

that nenrcphyeielcgic chengee provide the enbetrate for
alterations in all aepecte cf the enbject'e clinical behavior;
the type or behavieral eitereticn being dependent upon the
type and degree of neurophyeiclcgic change, the personality
or the eubject and the expectations and tolerance of the
milieu (Weinetein and Kahn, 1955) link and Kahn, 1957; Pink,
1957).
(b) leurcphyeialegy c: hallucinczenic activity: The
effects of antichelinergic ccnpcnnde on EEG and behavior nay
alec be related to the underetandinz or experinental hellucin»

ct theee experinental ccnpcunde induced
excitatery behavior, including illneery and hallucinatory
phenomena. Here, tee, a synaptic nedel any be applicable.
cgenic activity.

Each

sympathceinetic agente, ae neecaline, LSD and anphetanine,
and anticheiinergic agente ea thcee described here, are alee

potent hallucinogene.

i necropharnacelcgic basis

for each
behavior nay be characterised ae an alteration in the level or
eynaptic activity in the direction of increased inhibition
(decreeeed tranenieeicn) or etincli.
The clinical efficacy of ccnvnleive therapy in modifying
hallucinatcry activity nay lie in alterations at thie nenro~
physiologic level, The effects or ench hallucinogenic blocking
agents ae chlcrprenacine and rceerpine on EEG electricl activity
are ccneietent with each a View. Both ccnponnde induce EEG
hypereynchreny in nan (Bente and
339

deaynchrcnicaticn effects of

1955). Chlorpromazine was

Itil,

195k. 1958} and b10¢k thd

neeceline (Schware gt_3;,
found equally potent in aborting the
LSD

and

�-12.
exoitatory activity of the experimental anticholinergic
coupouoda in these etudiea.
(c) Relation to atropine: Goapariaon or the eyetenic
land neurologio effects of experimental anticholioergie compounds
with atropine reveals ditterencea in initial focus of action,
Exoerienco with atropine at physiologic and toxic levela in
nan indicate that the prodoainant effects are :ocuaed at
peripheral nervooe ctroctnroa. Initial bradycardia, followed
by tachycardia, lose or creating and ealivaticn, papillary
dilation, intestinal relaxation and decreased motility are.
aaonget the effects at low (0.2-1.2'ug) dooagoa. At higher
doaagea (ans :3), the neurolggic effects of ataxia, irritability,

disorientation,

and

delirium are observed (Goodlla and Gilnan,

1955).

‘

In contrast, the experimental anticholinergic agents in
doaegoo sufficient for central nervous system effects manifest

little

peripheral activity. The central effects are observed
early and may continue for exteneive periods without gaetro~
intentinal, cardiac or pupillery changes.
It ie within the context of the tocue or activity in
relation to dosage that the apparent discrepant EEG observations
or the effects or atropine (in inducing aloe wave activity) and
the-e experimental antioholinergic coapounda nay be reconciled.
I

weecee 33_g; (19h8) administering 1.0 to 3.0 ag/kg atropine in
curariadd cata and monkeys and funderbuzk and Ceae (1951) using

0.h to 1.2 ag/kg in curarised cata, observed high voltage

EEG

�.13..

aloe wave activity. Hitler (1952, 1957) reported that 7;!
Ig/kg atropine on unaneethetiaed, uncurarieed deg: produced
"spindle slow wave” patterns eiuilar t6 sleep.) Rinaldi and
'Hinwich (1955a, b) reported that atropine in doses of 0.5 to
2.0 mg/kg in curarized rabbits exaggerated EEG sleep patterns
and inhibited the alerting or the EEG to peripheral stimuli.
Sinilar observations have been reported by Bradley and Elkee
(1953) in the cenecione cat. In each instance the doeage at
atrepine varied tree 0.5 ta 7 ng/kg . a range roughly eoeparable
te the deaagea need in atropine coma therapy (Ferret and Miller,
; 1958).

In the present etudiee, the

EEG

effects at

low deeagee

of intravenous atropine (6.01 to 0.10 mg/kg) were minimal and
systemic éfteete censiderable,cenriraing einilar observations
by Verdeaux and

Hartylfl95h) and by Danielepalu g§_3; (1955).

the slow wave activify an prominent in animals and man at high
doeazea at atropine, may not be a manifestation of the initial
or direct effects at atropine, but a reflection of a more
widespread alteration in body yhieialogy. Thee, while eeneiderable

epeeulatien aa ta central neurophysiology has been based on
studiee with atreyine, each abeervatione provide a epecial'caee
at anticholinergic affects. the anticholinergic activity
eetabliehed in observation: in vitro and in the peripheral
nervous eyitee, may net be the effective physiologic activity
in the large deaea necessary to affect centraldr‘cturee,
rhe experimental cenpounde, however, provide mere euitahle

�“15-

for thu study of cantrnl nturaphysiologic (tnticholinargic) patterns thnn stropine, as, for oxunplc, 1a a
ra~ovu1uut1an or the studio: at ertnieeorcbral trauaa :nd
dpilcpay. Wtrd'l (1950)'r¢p¢rtl or the otticney a: high
do... of atrepino in altering the clinical n‘n1£0ltatienl
of hoad trnuau indicutod that effective dose: brought with
than Invor¢ systolic ortoctl. the tntluro of ntgopino and
scopolnninc to affect cpilcpny any be rolatod to th; inability
agontn

that.

to rcgah thu cintral norvoua system in
tdnquato quanlty. It would stun ndviugblo, thoroforo, to
rcpuat that. Studio: utilising inch ﬁorc ccntrnlly active
of

eoupounda

anticholinargic
hora.

compound; 18 used

in the oxporimonta rapartud

�-15SUHNARI:
_

1. Experinontsl natiohclincrgic compounds (dicthntinc,
.Win«2299. bannctysino, JB~318 and JB~336), adainintorcd to
paychiutric patients nt variant stcgcs c: convulsive therapy,
wcro aascciated tith:
(a) dcnynchrcniunticn of EEG rhythm: with a
blocking of paltnccnvulcivo delta activity!
(b) alurtina, cxcitatcry bahtvicral rolpcnao
with illnlcry, delusional and hallucinatory
idonticng and,
(c) systemic Ottocts of muscular Icahn-cs,
dryncun of thc month, dry skin cad tcchycardia.
2h. oltctrcgraphic bohavicral and systemic nrfncts were ccn~

current.
2. Thou. obscrvnticna are consist-at with tho auggonticn
thut a nourcphysiclczic ccnconitant or convulsive therapy is
ca incroulo in

contral norvcul Iynton cholinorgic activity.

Obscrvctionn that LSD, anphotuninc, nouculinc and
diphonhydranino - tynpnthouinctic tad antihiatnninic agents .
31:0 induco BEG dcnynchrcniuaticn, blocking of part convullivc
3.

doltn activity an; clinicsl cxcitntcry activity cuppcrt‘thc
luggcsticn thut behavioral and clectrographic patterns may be
bclud on altcrcticns in syntptic activity. )It is nuggclt that
incrca-od synaptic activity (cholinorgic, aynpnthclytic ctructa)
in calccintod with EEG hypornynchrcnisaticn, Aka clinicul

�~16~

Itdgtion and ourhoria; whilo dtcrtasod synaptic activity
(untieholinorgie, uynpathoninottc) is associated with EEG
doayuchronization and clinical Ixeitatory and hulluainocanic

stutou.
nascrcpunt obscrvatiana with gtropinu art rulattd
ta significant difroruncca 1n doaagc. Ronaasoaununt or tub
h.

rain or anticholinorcic taunts

state:

1n

hild truunt

3nd noisurn

luggoatod.
5. These obaurvations amplify the neurophysioloxtcw
tdaptivo hypothonia a: the and. at tcticn or convulsive
thcrupy and of experinontnl hallucinogenic Itaton.
18

�-17“
AGKEOULBDG§§§§ga

I u: gr‘totul far the tcchnicul auuiutanee of Bra.
Etnnnh ﬁbuquorn in

recording and nnulyaoa.
Supplici ot‘tho various pharnncauticals were and.
froely availtblc by Lake-1d. Laboratories (JD-318 and JB-336),
Herck sharps &amp; Donna (bounctyzinc); Sand»: Pharnnconticaln
(nan-25). Sturlingwmthrup (win-2299) sud Smith, x11"
und Preach Lnboratorica (ditthnsino, chlarpronastna).
EEG

�-18REFEREIOEB

Ahead,

L.G., Oottuld, A.H. and 31.1, J. A now group of psyohotominutic agonta. Proc. Soc. Expor. Biol. 804., 1958,
21: h83~h86.

11rd, 3.3. c11.1..1 oorrolnton o: clootroahook thorapy. 5:5:5:
Arch.

laurel.

&amp;

quohiat.,

1958, 12; 633-639.

Lira, 3.8., Strait, L.A., Puoc, J.W., Hronott, 3.x. and Bowditch,
8. Neurophysiologic ottootn of olootrioolly induood
convulsions. A.n.;. Aroh. lourol. &amp; Pglghiot., 1956,
15: 371-»3'28.
Dante;

D.

and

Itil,

T.

Zur Hirknng do: Phonothiuninkorporo

out do: Honaohlicho Hirnatronbild.
Arsnoinittoltoroogg, 195k, 1} h18~h23.
Bantu, D. and Itila I. A conporilon of tho action of various
nogaphon

phonothhsino compounds on tho human EEG. Trans. Int.
Gong. of Houroagycggzyarm., 1958, (in gross).

lonto, 9.,

1%11,

I.

and Schnid,

3.3..

Eloctrouncophalographtc

atndioo ooncorning the action or LSD-25.

lourozhzliol.,
Bonto, D.,
I

Itil, !.

EEG

Olin.

1957, 2} 359 (ubo£.)

and Schnid,

3.x. Eloktrooncopholoo

graphilcho studion our Wirkungauoiuo do: L8D~25.
ggyohiut. at louro1., 1958, £25: 273~28h.
Bradloy, P.B. and Bikes, J. the ottoct of atropine, hyosoynnine,
phyooottgnino and noosttguino on the oleotriool ontivity
of tho broin of the conscious cutoo J. thl1o1., 1953,
ggga 1h~15.

�‘19Bradley, P.B. and Bikes, J.

effects of

drugs on the
electricel activity of the brain. gggég, 1957, ﬁg:'
The

some

*

77~117.

3.0. A clinical trial of benectysine
hydrochloride ('8uev1t11') as e phyeiael relexent. gggg.

andy, 1.

end Jewesbnby,

Hed.

‘Ben1e10pelu,

Jean,

1956,

y

1.85—1.87.

9., Giurgee, c. end Brocan, G. Eleotroencephele~
grephic study at the,non~epoeitic phernecedynenice
of the etimnlnigry effect at etrnpine on ths corebrel

cortex. Iiiieégggcheekly Zhurnel 8858,'1955. g5: 601~611.
Deﬁber, 3.6.3. Stud1ee on neecelinec III. letien 1n epileptice.

3933.,1955, 29: h33~h38.
mm.
Die.2~auerrero, R.,

re1nete1n, R. and eettlieb, J. a. EEG
finding: following intrevenoue injection of d1phenhydramine hydrachloride (Benadrylr). Ema. Olin. Beure»
2n;.1.1., 1956, g; 299-306.
Everte, E.V. Heurophysiologicel correlates of pherueeologicelly
induced behavioral disturbencee. Ree. Publ. lee. xerv.
.uent. 91... 1958, 29: 3h7-38o.
Everte, 3.7. Chemical bases for peyohoeee. Chenicel Conceggg
e! Pezphoeee. XuBovell, Dbleneky Inc., H.!. 1958, k1~62.
link, a. A unified theery of the ection or phyeiodyuenic
y

therapies. J. Hilleide leep.. 1957. g; 197-206.
l1nk, K. Efreet e: entichelinergic egent, dietheeine, an EEG and
behevier: 81¢n1t1cence for theory at convulsive therapy.
I

1.3.1.

laurel. a Peyehiet., 1958, 80: 380~3873 end
Biologicel Peyvhiet_z, ed. J. neeeernen, Grune &amp; Stretton

I. 3.,

Arch.

1959’ 1811*19he

�-20-

rink,

Rnlation or olectrocncophnlogrqphic
delta activity ta bohuvioral rulponao in aloctrolheck.

H. and Kuhn, R.L.

A.H.A. Arch.

tartar, a.

lourol.

and 3111:»,

J.J.

&amp;

szuhint.,

1957, 13} 516~525.

Atropiuo cont: A‘Ionatic therapy

in psychiatry. Lu. J. quehint., 1958, $35; h55~£58.
rundcrburk, w.n. 1nd Onto, !.J. rho affect of ntropino an
cortical pot-ntiuln. EEG Olin. lburophlniel. 1951,

g: 213~223.
L.8. and Gilnnn, A. Pharmacolqlgcll Basin of
Thorazcntieu. Kacxillan, I.!. 1955.
Hoynans,.c., Establo, J.J. and dc Bonncvnanx, 3.6. sir 1:

Boodnan,

I

-

pharmacologio d0 11 phonothiaz1ny1-oth71d10thylnninc
(2987 R.P.). Arch. Int. Pharmacoﬁzg; 19h9, 12; 123-138.

Ito: ltd spacitik virkning p:
contruluorvoayltonot. g‘plkritt far Lqugg, 1955, 3E2:

Jacobson, E. Susvitil, at nyt
'

11h7~1151.

Jonknor, 1.2. tad Lochnor, a. Th0 offset or diparoel on tho
olcctrooncophnlogran in tho nnrnul Inhaoct und in than.
with corobral iguana. BEG Olin. lenrophyniol., 1955. 1;
'

303-305.
Lochnor,

the influence or naticholinorgic drugs on the
EEG Clin.
EEG at rcchnt OIOIId crtniccrobral injuries.
lourenhyliol., 1956, g. 71h'71§.'

a.

0n

Lonnox, H.A., Ruck,

1.0. :nd Gutornnn,

B.

The

the postuoloctroshock
lourozhza1a1., 1951, g: 63~69.

boas-aria.

on

oft-ct

EEG.

EEG

of
0113.

�-21.

'Hereeei, A.$.-

Sene

indicetiene e: oerebrel hnnerel necheniene.

science, 1953, 1;81 367-370.
lereeei, A.8. Etteete ;;“peycheten1eet1c druxe
eynepeee. Egyehotrepie Bragg.

on

cerebrel

Eleevier, Aneterden,

1957, 283~28h.

Herlie, 3. end Hunter, 7. Studies en eeecelinee II. Electra.
eneephelegren in echieephreniee. fezghiet. 93ert.,
1955,
Pennee,

8.3.

mum”.

end neck, P.H. Peychetonimetice,

clinicel

end

theoretical eeneideretiene: Hernine, w1n~2299 end
leiline. Amer. J. Pelehiet., 1957, ;;3: 887~892.
Rineldi, 7. end ninwich, 3.3. Alerting repeneee end ectione
or etrepine end chelinergic drnge. A.H.A. Areh. Neural.
end

Rineldi,

I.

Pezehiet., 1955, 12: 387-395.

Cholinergie nechenien involved
in functien of neeodieneephelic ectiveting eyeten.
ena ninwieh, H.E.

leurel. e Peychiet., 1955. 1;: 396-h02.
3. Chengee 1n the nu unau- bubttnrete mu...“
produced by electroaeonvuleive treetnent end their
significance fer the theory or E0! eetien. BEG clin.
leureghzeiel., 1951, 3: 261-280.
A.H.A. Arch.

Roth,

30th,

l.,

D.W.l., Sher, J. end Green, J.‘ Pregneeie end
pentethel induced.electroencephelegrephie changes in
Key,

electreeenvemlve treeteent. E36 6113. leereggzg}el.
1957, 2: 225-237.

�a22-

3.2., Bicktord, 3.0.

Schwarn,

and Rona, H.P.

inducod psycho-it with ohlorpronasino.
1955. 2Q; h07oh17.
Bhorvood,

3.x. Contrul oorohrol ohoniools

dud

Rovoroihility or
Proc. Hiya Clin..

their rolation to

paychonol. chonioal Gonoopto or £329hoaiu. xenowoll,
Oblonlky, 3.2., 1958, 268~276.

Btrnuol, 3., Ootov, H. and are-nutoin, L. Diagnostic Electroonccpholggrtphz, Gruno &amp; Strntton, R.I., 1952.
Vlott, 6.1. and Johanna, u.w. Ettoct o! ntropino and acopolonino
upon alootrooncophalogrnphio changos induced by olootroconvulaivo thorapy. EEG Olin. lonrophzgiol., 1957,‘2:
217-22h.

a. and Harty, R.‘ Action our l'oloctroonoopholocronno
do ouhstancol phnrnacodynauiquoo d'intorot cliniquo.

Vordoaux,

Rev.
Word, A.

lourol.,

195k, 2;:‘hosuh27.

Atropino in the troatnont of cloood hood injury.

J. lourouur‘., 1950,‘ls

398-h02.

Uninstoin, 3.A. ond Kuhn, R.L. Doniol of Illness: aznholie
and_phyoio1o§ict1 oqpooto. c. rhonal, Springfield, 111.,
1955.
Roscoe,

nonunora, B.P. and Krop, 8. Tho
influonco of atropine and aeopolonino on tho control
ottooto of 91?. J. Phnrnaeo1., 19h8, 23: 63~72.

w.c.,

Groom, E.B.

Uiklor, A. Pharnocologic dissociation of behavior and EEG
”sloop pattorns' in dogs: morphine, l'nllylnornorphino and
atropine. Ptoc. Soc. up». 31.31. 14“., 1952, 12: 261-265.

�«~23.

the 1.1915593 or P£Ich1utrl to thaaoLg‘z.
Wu. Wilkins, Bathe", 1957.
Woollcy, BAY. Scrotum”: in maul disorders. Ru. Pub]...

Hitler,

A.

A". new.

Hunt. 913., 1953,

29

381-4400.

�aasaaaa

'13.

1a

Effiﬂt or :1 313.1299. was. anuyuchraaiiattua a!
troqucaatnu nXtur 3.! 3:. (Fig.1.. 88' kl).
11:. 3.
Efrhet at 1'
Reward

satin

31n~2299 an pottueoavu131Vt
2h hoard

dulta :ettvtiy:

artor aouvulsiau #8. ﬂat.

dauznchrinilatioa at tvcguuueaou and yursiniana. nttor
2.0 is. ("l‘l’ﬁ ago 51).
‘

attooz a: It nuuuutwtaaot uni. perutntaut apero¢ac 1n
rol‘agu: and duawachviatnntsaa art-r 1.5 It. (Filtllg

“. 3’4).

Ettoct at 1V aunuotrtﬁn- an yaatuoauvulatvo.doltt
nottvaty. accord tokua 2£ hctru arch: cauvuzntau I7.
lot. tetrachruntnttton or {toquuuclco urtor 1.5 ug.
(tumult. It! 3)).

9“.

5.

.

Rttcat

I:

Jimﬂlﬁ an yout~¢¢uvulliau

Rigord takun

2%

hour:

¢¢I%&amp;

tttnr cunrulttan

#9.

nativity:

lat.

duarunhroattttiua a: Irvquuuotnn, ﬁneronagd rulingslttar !.h It. eur‘taa vita 330'! 101 tuartalt.

(vaunlo. ago :7). 5&amp;l11lr run-van thwarted math £I~336.

�’1‘. 6.

”net or «$11 «Inn 62 I? “up“. an ”anemia"
«In «an». nun mm: 2!; hour. um amass.»
#6. 30%: man an.“ an delta “tint: and ”min“

menu. in heart an, with partition“. (mo. :3.
“mam . 2.0 In. «025 Int/u).

18.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2654">
                <text>Effect of antichlolinergic compounds on post convulsive electroencephalogram and behavior of psychiatric patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1960 May; 12:359-69.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2655">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2656">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-34b-013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2657">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2658">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2659">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2660">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2661">
                <text>6 items. 1: Reprint from Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology JournalVol. 12, No.2, May 1960. 2: Letters. 3: [preprint]. 4: [Post print?]. 5: Publication submission info. 6: Drafts. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2662">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2663">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74468">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81029">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87590">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94151">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="267" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/86dcc852ef57150af5b9234a4c32a667.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0ab52ac497e61e2b06bc38b78babd96f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100684">
                    <text>EFFECTS OF DIFFUSE ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION
ON PERCEPTION
BY

MAX FINK, ROBERT L. KAHN

and

HYMAN KORIN

( Hillside Hospital, New York)
PROBLEM

Recent studies of the relation of perceptual alteration following brain
damage have emphasized the role of focal damage. To determine the
patterns Of perceptual changes with diffuse alterations in brain function,
the following studies were undertaken.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD

Consecutive subjects in a psychiatric hospital referred for electroshock
therapy were studied. Alteration in brain function was induced by varying
the frequency, number and severity of the induced convulsions. The following tests were applied before treatment, at weekly intervals during, and
two weeks after treatment terminated.
A) Measures of altered brain function: Two quantitative indices were
used to determine the degree of altered cerebral function:
1) the per cent time, amplitude and lowest frequency of the induced
delta response in serial electroencephalograms;
2) changes in orientation and in language following the administration
of intravenous amobarbital sodium.
B) Perceptual Tests:
1) Tactile: Threshold perception (100 ‘X, point) of
square wave electrical
stimuli was determined for different body areas. Stimuli were then applied
simultaneously to two body areas, with interspersed single stimuli in random
fashion, and the subject was asked to report where he felt the stimulation.
2) Visual:
a) Figure—Ground: Using embedded ﬁgures (Gottschaldt) of increasing
complexity, subjects were requested to identify a simple geometric
ﬁgure in a complex background.
b) Tachistoscopic recognition: paired words were presented at rapid
exposures to subjects. The words were matched according to tables of
frequency in common usage, and were of two groups: relating to illness
or to the body, and those not relating to illness. Words were matched
\
randomly.
‘

�2

THEME 9

RESULTS

With increasing degrees of altered brain function, there were increasing errors in reporting the simultaneous tactile stimuli. There was a
concomitant rise in the threshold of perception. With high degrees of
cerebral dysfunction, mislocalization of responses appeared, in addition
to the persistent failure to report one of the stimuli.
2) The ability to isolate embedded ﬁgures was impaired in direct relation
to the severity of the alteration in brain function.
3) Threshold for the perception of words increased and subjects were
unable to identify two words with increasing degrees of cerebral dysfunction.
4) Changes in perception were highly correlated with other behavioral
changes, indicative of an altered interaction with the environment.
1)

CONCLUSION

Diffuse alteration in brain function, as measured by electroencephalographic delta and orientation tests after amobarbital, results in
alteration of perceptual patterns marked by an increase in threshold,
impaired discrimination of stimuli, of which the ability to discriminate a
ﬁgure from a complex background is a special example.
2) Alteration in perception represents one aspect of an altered behavioral
interaction with the environment, rather than a speciﬁc physiological
defect. This factor should be considered in perceptual studies in focal brain
lesions as well.
1)

ape. Inf.

(Dong.

ﬂieﬁoa

E

.-

/f57

- gVH-SJa/S

�3mm of Emma

Altered Brain

mum on Pomepticm

m Fink, 11.13., mm; L. Kuhn, Bun. md than Karin, 31.33.

mm gt the

IV

International

Wrens of

Psycholow, annuals,

My 30,

3.957.

�m

at

mm» Alton! Brain mum on Pauptian

m of this study at alteration in Won fol-loving Mg» in

«abut; mum ha been devoted to ram Mom

u in nus-31m imam,

dials

1!:

head’

m

md brain tumor. Litﬂn emphasis

usually placed an the

We effects of such hum on the pommml prom».
In tha acme of

this

:tudiu in

1:ka

therapy, we charred that

may 13th aanaidonble neutral 0: the down at induce-d alteration

of brain

mum.

In these studies we ware impressed with the wide variability

in the behavioral and nmphyaiologie response 91‘ our subjects to apparent
‘

aquivalent mailbox-n of convulnima.

madam

We

have Max:815? reported the

a! the belaviaral napmsaa and the

W:

inter-

dew of apparent new

Widow-c
manna-grandma mortistodowribgpomoptualchanmmrm
conditions cf differing
determine the

down of diffuse alum brain

relatiwahtp of the

function, and

150

136th We to the indueed amm-

physiologie change.
I

Three perceptual

M113
Visual
Visual

mm mm utilised:

perception of Gamma“

mm wave electriwl

1.3QO or mad gamma

stimuli

figure;

:04»th of tachistooaopdcally

presumed wows.

�_...___.1

em:

subjects were

2310

53

meetive hospitalized patients,

rerun-ed

fer

electroshock. Brain mention was altered by meaning remitted grand m1

cemuleim under penteﬁml pmdicetim.
a rmqwncy of three time per week.

The convulsions were given

For a control group, randomly eelected

therapy; with equivalent umber of

patients received eubeomalsivo

Wimtim at pontothnl but with web»

eonvuleive doses of electric current. All weluetiwe and
same

as in the experimental gmup

at

~ and

the type or

each subject was not known to any of the

tests

were the

thetmt in we fer

investigator: until the experiment

we ended.
We

Wmmgic indie“ were used. mameMz-ama, taken

at weekly intervale an a day after an indueed maveleian, and mﬁtetively
measured for the degree of incheed delta activity; and mobarbital taste

for main disease. In this test, the language responses on a etenéandiled
interview, are ”use“! after intravenous mobarbital. Mammal,

1W
altered eembral fxemtice.

denial, disorientation, and eyntuetieel
as an 1nd!“ of

Both

changes have been

enema

these tests erem applied

lure-armament and during the 2nd, are and 5th week: of treatment.
The technique

ef etch of the three pemeptual tasks will be doaeribad

with the eomspmding results. For

mm: a! thin mamtetien,

the

m mm to the quantitative «pacts only, and aa them is
a wide variability in mangle response, we idu meant group data for
obamatim

apex-junta). and control groups

wording

to»

the dogma at

ﬁrst;

mum

ded-

than

were

physiologic change.

the observation:

�__.____1

_.

In this talk, isolated square

WWW

1mm

ma emu-ital

atimuli were 81ml»

We mmugh attnclwd 1 on .. dine electrodes.

delivemd to two body

point.) valwa were doteminod :or «ﬁx my part
and $11“th the tasting, random single stimuli were interspersed to
Meme errors due to ﬂuctuatien ef threshold. Subjects were whed to
threshold

(100%

_

localim the npplieﬁ atimli.
Slide 1 deem-1b“ the

mean number

of errors

mtreament,

and

at the

Widogic effect, which is manly after the 12th
tram-b. The mzbeouvulsiw (mtml) group shes: a drop in the number of
errors, the Mod pmotioa effect.» This canvulsivo group, tamer, Ihm
height a? the induced

&amp;

Meant increase in errors.

patients
with a

who had

first

The

immune in we: were

_

manna. Pn-tmtnent,the

In Slide 2, the group differences are

diffemce in the

number

of

more in

the treatment course the difference:
In Slide 3. the

ineWimt,

because

ml. of the induced

In the firm; section, the subjects

in than

Waive, and later m—tmtad

been treated by a

Waive course of thumpy.

marked

but at the height

on?

significant

mum We is “tossed.

who have had two

new

or

thus positive

to those with either no
uobcrbitn tests during tmtmt are
panties new. or only am. The number of errors: are higher in patients
with mom positive moberbital responses.

diffemnee
101'

rm the pmmtmatmnt score,

the group with the greater
601%!

the

Mm m aignificantlv different

Wiologie avenge.

In the second section, the
encephalograpme

Furthomom, in comparing the

me melts

response; and in

physiologic inclines are oompared.

ﬁlm

are noted for the electro-

third motion, the

two

new

�«hm

Errors in the

5:9er

of

ammo“ tactile mm 1mm

with increasing degree: at altered brain function.

3: Bamegtim ‘01

W

FM,

3:

In true task, goo-atria figma embedded in a. complex dasigmd
field are premtod «ml the subject is asked to tame the 9112913 figm.
The

slide

14

shown

and subcmvulaive

minim or
Bath

ﬁeld.

simple figure is: simultaneously pmmted above thh complex

the man manor

warm».

'i'ha

91‘

art-era before and

anhconvﬂaivo or control group, with

no mnmphyaiologio change, thaws a drop

Waive

gramme show

utter eumulaiva

in the amber of

an increase in true tugboa- or

W

mm.

«mm.

compared
aide 5, the aubeomulaiw and Gamma”
m
bath befm am} mg the 5th week of treatment. man mamas, m
difi'amwe in the who: of arrow is acted. It the height of tha cleara—

In

shock

effact, the convulsive

Wits
We

group makes aigzrii‘iomxtly more

Change.

the

group.
(31163
6) .
visualized
next
tha
in
than
calmly
new
am
are divided warding to than degree of

effect in

Here, the

Mrs than

W
a: the mutual to“,

W

Magic

the oluctmonaaphnlngm, and tha

mama

data, there is a simficant diffemca in the mmbar of mm undo. Patients
with higher dame: cf hummimgic chums mks ﬁn mt errant

”100th for their equivalence in fmmncy in mush
matched, was mounted at rm. diffemnt speed: of mum

Pairad words,
usage and

:3de

taming from m to 250 rimmmdu
2130
of
for
a
total
mm.
mum
13311607, the

The

mm

m puma

tn

u wen-act

morainewhgmupmpwmteﬁ. Harem, thumb-

Wimt

eonvulsive or control gmup ohm a
amp in the number of
while the
group sham a much smaller practice effect.

minim

emu,

�.59
In the

are

mud

M 313.60 (8), the proutmtmat. and post-treatmnt «com
The groups

urination 1n the

are 11611

More,

untamed

number of. arrears with alters-d

and

in both there is a

brain function, Mt, the

is greater than the convulsive. Thou
are mt simifiaant.

reduction in the aubconwlaive groups

differences are and}. and

In Slide 9, the role of neurophysinlagic change

is

again assess'eﬂ.

toe, as in the wading slide,» them in a deem it: the pmtiae
This is clearly
effect with the greater the change in carebml
now in tha canwlaxva Wagon seem, uhomtha patients with mm but
Waugh Mags show a decrease in armra, while theme with the mam“.

Hero,

tam.

Mainlogio change show a small umber of arrears.
Ia this tank, in mtmat to the two pmeding on», the effect of
altered 13min functim is not manifest in an increase in the umber or
errors, but is seen only

when

the enacted immanent in performance fails

WW1?

mm thou-gum in «row mum In: m NM in psychiatric

patients by the remand 92mm“). induction at grand m1
control

Win
emu

perceptual

in

and experimental

to chanson in degree

when perceptual tasks,

portion to the dogma er
«smut-a1

cmlsim.

in

emu“ mp9, the mammalian) at

on?

«tubal

ﬁguration hm baen obsozvod.

increasing arrow" in pemaptian in pro-

mm dwmﬁm in muréphyaiologic. indie”

at

mum m be observed.

In addition to these pomeptual

ml:

changes,

humor, there

arm

commmt altamtim in behavior, language. ariontatien, attitude and
mad, and these am: highly Mama Mending upon individual 612mm“:
1n the subject“.

”the panorama).

altemtima ducrihco’ here

:3me but

�we

upset at tbs clung» in the

Mom: 111th

Farmer studiuﬁ cf this

in ”spouse to mmbral lesions are

mm

hater

in pmgrcsa.

91' tam.

at”

organism.

indium mmw

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2664">
                <text>Effects of diffuse altered brain function on perception. In Proc. XV Int. Congr. Psychol. North Holland, Amsterdam: 1959:15: 238-239. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2665">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2666">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-35-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2667">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2668">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.; Korin, Hyman</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2669">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2670">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2671">
                <text>[preprint] and a publication copy. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2672">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2673">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74469">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81030">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87591">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94152">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="268" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/8d591c235c58b9d455d7cbdd43d00916.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ebb607fbcf115668ef8fa3c0792cd5b3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100685">
                    <text>PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUAL
DIFFERENCES IN BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE
TO CONVULSIVE THERAPY

MAX FINK, M.D., ROBERT L. KAHN, PHD. AND MAX POLLACK, PHD.

Reprinted from THE JOURNAL or NERVOUS
Volume 128, N0. 3, March
Printed in U.S.A.

AND MENTAL DIBEABE
1959

�JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
Volume 128, No. 3, March 1959

Reprinted from THE

Printed in U.S.A.

PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUAL
DIFFERENCES IN BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE
TO CONVULSIVE THERAPY1
MAX FINK, MD.,2 ROBERT L. KAHN, PHD. AND MAX POLLACK, PHD.
INTRODUCTION

While convulsive therapy is generally
considered speciﬁc for the symptomatic re—
lief of depression and agitation, and for the
relief of such “illnesses” as manic-depressive
and involutional psychotic reactions, the
behavioral response to such therapy is
highly variable. In initial attempts at understanding this behavioral variability, differences in physiologic response were sought.
Neurophysiologic change was measured in
various ways (4). The quantitative measures of induced EEG delta activity (1) and
changes in language after amobarbital (3,
7) provided the best indices. Considerable
variability in these indices among patients
with equivalent numbers of treatment was
observed. We concluded that the development of an alteration in brain function, as
measured by a high degree of EEG delta activity (1) and positive amobarbital tests
(7) was a prerequisite to behavioral change
in convulsive therapy. It was apparent, however, that such changes, although necessary,
were not sufﬁcient for improvement (2).
Indeed, among patients with maximal neu—
rophysiologic change, all patterns of behavioral adaptation were manifest, and
ratings of improvement ranged from “re—
covered” to “unimproved” and “worse.”
Equating segments of the observed popu—
lation according to nosologic or sympto—
matic categories also failed to explain the
variability in behavioral response. While
among patients in the manic-depressive and
1Aided in part by Grants M-927 and MY-2092
National Institute of Mental Health, US. Public
Health Service. Read at the Section of Convulsive
Disorders and Brain Function, American Psychiatric Association, San Francisco, May, 1958.
EThe Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, New
York.

involutional depressive groups a higher inci—
dence of hypomanic and euphoric modes of
adaptation were observed, and thus ratings
of “recovered” and “much improved” were
more frequent, there still were many subjects in these groups who manifested paranoid and somatization modes, and were
rated “unimproved.”
In the investigations of convulsive therapy, various tests of perceptual organization and indices of sociologic background
have been studied which reﬂect the individual differences in the subjects. Of these,
some measures correlated highly with the
behavioral response to convulsive therapy.
The psychological measures employed have
been Rorschach responses (11), “explicit
verbal denial” tendencies as measured in
structured interviews with family members
(12), and scores on the California F Scale
(8, 10). The sociologic variables have been
chronologic age, years of education and
place of birth. It is the purpose of this report to summarize the observations of the
relationship between these indices and the
variability of the behavioral response to
convulsive therapy as reﬂected in evalua—
tions of improvement.
METHODS

The population has been consecutive referrals for convulsive therapy in a voluntary, non-proﬁt, urban psychiatric hospital.
Patients were generally Jewish, of low and
middle socio-economic classes with a mean
educational level of 10.5 years. Ages ranged
from 16 to 67 with a mean of 41 years.
Diagnoses included schizophrenia, manicdepressive, psychoneurotic and involutional
depressive reactions. As segments of the
population were studied by various procedures at different times, the tables reﬂect
243

�244

FINK, KAHN AND POLLACK

the different numbers of subjects that were
included in each procedure.
All patients received electroconvulsive
therapy three times a week, using either
unidirectional or alternating current instruments. The various psychological tests were
administered Within the week prior to treat—
ment.
We have previously described the be—
havioral changes in convulsive therapy as
variations of ﬁve modes of adaptation (euphoric, hypomanic, somatization, paranoid
withdrawal and panic), and emphasized that
the evaluations of “improvement” in convulsive therapy are value judgments of the
induced behavioral changes (2). Patients
who manifest euphoric and hypomanic
adaptive modes are those generally rated
as “much improved” and “recovered” by
therapists and administrator, while those
who manifest paranoid-withdrawal, somatization or panic modes are generally regarded
as “unimproved” or “worse.” For this report, evaluations of the patient’s behavior
and ratings of improvement were made
either two to three weeks after termination
of treatment (Tables 1, 2, 3) or at the time
of discharge from the hospital (Table 4).
TABLE 1
Relation of Rorschach Factors to Clinical
Response in Convulsive Therapy
Much
Improved

N

Moderately
Improved
and
Unimproved

Movement

39 11

(28%) 28

(72%)

No Human Movement

48 28

(58%) 20

(42%)

Human
(M)

x2

= 676* p &lt;

Form Color (FC)
No Form Color

34 7
53 32

Both M and FC
Either M or F0
Neither M nor FC

24 4
25 10
38 25

(21%) 27 (79%)
(60%) 21 (40%)
x2 = 11.57* p &lt; .001
I

X2
*

.01

(17%) 20
(40%) 15
(66%) 13
= 14.83 p &lt;

(83%)
(60%)
(34%)

.001

With Yates’ correction for discontinuity

OBSERVATIONS
RORSCHACH TEST PATTERNS

The Rorschach tests were administered
in conventional fashion and scored according to established criteria (13) for speciﬁc
factors as number and type of movement,
color, form, shading and total number of
whole responses. For each of these factors,
signiﬁcant differences were observed be—
tween the group of patients rated as “much
improved” and the combined groups of those
patients evaluated as “moderately improved” and “unimproved.” Subjects with
human movement responses were evaluated
as “much improved” signiﬁcantly less often
than subjects without such responses. The
presence of form color responses was signiﬁcantly correlated with lack of improvement, and when this factor was combined
with human movement, the ratings were
signiﬁcantly poorer than when neither form
color nor human movement were reported
(Table 1). Similarly, patients rated “much
improved” gave fewer total responses, fewer
total movement responses and fewer content categories; but the per cent whole,
popular and form responses were signiﬁ—
cantly greater than in the groups rated as
“unimproved” and “moderately improved”
(Table 2).
“DENIAL PERSONALITY” SCORE

In their study of denial of illness, Weinstein and Kahn (14, 16) described the characteristics of an “explicit verbal denial”
personality type.3 In an initial group of
convulsive therapy patients, the hypothesis
was tested that those patients who most
closely approximated this personality type
would be most likely to be rated as “much
improved.” “Denial personality” scores were
3“They were people with compulsive drives, a
great need for prestige and the esteem of others,
and a record of always having denied felt inadequacies. ...Life experiences had been valued not
for their intrinsic satisfactions but as a means of
maintaining prestige and “security.” (14).

�245

PERSONALITY ASPECTS OF CONVULSIVE THERAPY

established pretreatment in independent
structured family interviews. Fifteen spe—
ciﬁc areas of behavior were assessed and
scores of 0, 1, and 2 were assigned for each
of these areas according to whether the
subject least, moderately or most approximated the characteristics of the “explicit
verbal denial” personality type. In interviews with relatives of 47 patients, scores
ranged from zero to twenty-ﬁve, with a
median of eleven. Subjects with scores above
eleven were classed into a high denial group,
while those with scores below, into a low
denial group.
Patients with high denial personality
scores were most likely to be rated as “much
improved,” with only one patient rated as
“unimproved.” Of patients with low denial
scores, clinical ratings occurred on a chance
basis in each evaluation category (Table
3). The difference in the denial scores be—
tween the much and moderately improved
patients, when compared to the unimproved
patients, is statistically signiﬁcant at the
one per cent level (12).
In a further elaboration of these personality types, studies of the total in—patient
population were undertaken. Certain sociologic and psychological factors were studied
in all patients in residence on March 7, 1957.
These included the California F Scale, age,
years of education and place of birth (8).

TABLE 2
Relation of Rorschach Factors to Clinical
Response in Convulsive Therapy
Dif—

N Mean S. D. ference

Number of Responses
Much Improved
3813.00 6.7
Moderate, Unimproved 48 19.5 12.8

52 ' 7*...

6

Per Cent Whole Responses
38 37.6 21.013
Much Improved
' 23 ' 0*...
Moderate,Unimproved 4824.4 18.2
Per Cent Popular Responses
Much Improved

Moderate,Unimproved
Number Movement
sponses
Much Improved

38 37.7 21.6 11 1 2 8**
'
'
48 26.6 14.3

Re-

Moderate,Unimproved

38 2.3
48 4.9

Number Content Categories
38 3.8
Much Improved

Moderate, Unimproved

Per Cent Form Responses
Much Improved
Moderate,Unimproved

4.9

48

2.7
5

1

2.2
2.3

2 ' 62 ' 7,“.

1

'

12 ' 1*

38 71.8 19.0
9 ' 92 ' 2*
48 61.9 21.4

Signiﬁcant at .01 level
Signiﬁcant at .05 level

**
*

TABLE 3
Relation of Denial Personality Scores to
Clinical Response in Electroshock
Mod-

N

CALIFORNIA F SCALE

The California F Scale consists of a series
of extreme or stereotyped statements con—
cerning social and personal attitudes. The
subject reads each statement and then reports the extent of his agreement or disagreement. Originally presented as a guide
to a subject’s capacity for ethnocentrism
and authoritarianism, the method has recently been explored as a measure of stereotypy and rigidity in communication (8, 10).
The test was presented to all patients prior
to treatment and scored on a scale of ten to
seventy. The ﬁgures represent maximal dis-

t

Personality Score
High Denial—(11—25)
Low Denial—(040)

24
23

NEE] erately ImImproved proved proved

14
7

9
9

l-|

7

agreement (low score) and maximal agree—
ment (high score) with the statements.
There was a signiﬁcant relationship (p &lt;
.05) between the pretreatment test scores
and evaluations of the clinical response to
convulsive therapy (Table 4). For patients
rated as “recovered,” the mean F score was
53.1, while for those rated as “unimproved”

�246

FINK, KAHN AND POLLACK

TABLE 4
Relation of Social Factors to Discharge
Ratings in Convulsive Therapy
N

Recovered
Much Improved
Improved and
proved

Unim—

8
26
23

$3

“*3

a
‘3

&gt;§ E5

2

2

2

a.

&amp;°

53.151.6 9.4 50
41.843.810.6 35
39.732.312.3 17

the score was 39.7, reﬂecting greater degrees
of agreement with the stereotyped statements of the test for the “recovered” group.
SOCIOLOGIC FACTORS

When analyses were made of the relation
between improvement ratings in convulsive
therapy and age, years of education and
place of birth, signiﬁcant relationships were
observed for each of these variables. The
“recovered” patients were signiﬁcantly older
(p &lt; .001) and had signiﬁcantly fewer years
of schooling (p &lt; .05) than the “unimproved” group. While a larger percentage
of the “recovered” patients than the “unimproved” patients was foreign-born (50
per cent vs. 17 per cent), the differences were
not signiﬁcant. In each category, the “much
improved” subjects fell in between (Table
4).
DISCUSSION

We have noted that measures of perceptual organization, personality traits and
sociologic data are related to the degree of
improvement shown by subjects with cone
vulsive therapy. These observations pr0v
vide an understanding of the individual
variability in the behavioral response to
convulsive therapy under conditions of ap~
parently equivalent degrees of altered brain
function.
In their studies of patients with brain
disease, Weinstein and Kahn described be—
havioral patterns as ludic behavior (15),
increased smiling and laughter, denial of
illness, minimization and displacement of

symptoms, and altered sexual behavior
achieving prominence in the milieu of a1—
tered brain function. They suggested that
the manifestation of these behavioral patterns also provided the basis for the evaluation of improvement in convulsive therapy
(16). In these studies of patients in con—
vulsive therapy the same patterns of laughing and smiling, denial, displacement, minimization and altered sexual activity do
indeed occur in the milieu of the induced
altered orientation and discrimination (2).
It is the patients demonstrating these altered behavior patterns who are rated as
“recovered” or “much improved”; while
those patients failing to show these patterns or doing so transiently are evaluated
as “unimproved” or “improved.”
Recent studies of changes in language
with convulsive therapy have further ampliﬁed an understanding of these behavioral
responses. Alteration in syntactic aspects of
language has been related to clinical ratings
(9). Patients evaluated as “recovered” and
“much improved” demonstrated signiﬁcantly greater use of the past or future tense
and the third person mode with qualiﬁca—
tion, evasion, denial, displacement, clichés,
and cryptic and stereotyped expressions
during treatment than did “unimproved”
patients. More recently, Jaffe et al. (6) reported that formal speech patterns also were
characteristically altered. In dyadic interactive speech analyses (5), increased repetitiveness and stereotypy were associated
with syntactic language changes during convulsive therapy.
In the studies reported here, aspects of
personality organization have been deﬁned
which are related to the type of behavioral
response incident to convulsive therapy.
The Rorschach patterns of the more favorably rated group are generally associated
with greater degrees of conventionality and
stereotypy, and little introspectiveness, imagination, empathy and creativity. Similarly, the higher F scores of the more favorably rated group is consistent with greater

�PERSONALITY ASPECTS OF CONVULSIVE THERAPY

degrees of ethnocentrism, authoritarianism,
rigidity and conventionality. In present day
urban culture older patients generally have
less formal education and a greater number
are foreign born than younger patients.
These sociologic factors are also associated
with greater adherence to conformist ideologies and ethnocentric identiﬁcation. We
may conclude that those patients who ap—
proximate the “explicit verbal denial” personality type, and who are non—empathic,
non-introspective, stereotyped, rigid and
conventional are most likely to manifest
the euphoric and hypomanic modes of behavior under the conditions of altered brain
function induced by repeated convulsions.
Such patients also rely primarily on nonverbal patterns of communication, and with
treatment evince increasing use of the lan—
guage patterns of repetitiveness, denial, displacement and third person. These changes
in language and behavior are the cues to
which psychiatrists and administrators respond in their evaluations, and thus provide
the basis for the clinical ratings of “re—
covered” and “much improved” (9).
In contrast, those subjects who are em—
pathic and introspective, who are not rigid,
conventional or stereotyped, and who rely
primarily on verbal patterns of communica—
tion are less likely to manifest the ludic
behavioral modes of euphoria and hypomania. With the induced alteration in brain
function they manifest increased somatiza—
tion, withdrawal, projection, anxiety, panic
and intellectualization. Their speech is pre—
dominantly in the present tense and in the
ﬁrst person mode without displacement,
denial or clichés. Clinically, such patients
are rated as “unimproved” or “worse.”
Thus, while altered brain function is essential for a behavioral change in convulsive
therapy, individual differences in personality organization provide the basis for the
variability in the types of behavioral
changes and in the clinical ratings of improvement. In another report (12) it was
suggested that the personality attributes

247

which provide the background for improve—
ment with convulsive therapy also provide
the basis for the depressive adaptation ini—
tially. It was noted that numerous authors
had described a characteristic pre-depressive personality type, with a prominence of
the features of perfectionism, rigidity, con—
scientiousness, and stereotypy. The social
factors, Rorschach and F scale patterns described here also support such a suggestion.
Ludic patterns of depression and mania are
more prominent in older, less educated sub—
jects. The conventionality, rigidity and
stereotypy associated with the ﬁndings on
the F scale and the Rorschach test are also
prominent in depressive illnesses. It is probable that the depressive psychotic reaction
and the euphoric-hypomanic behavioral re—
sponse in convulsive therapy may be as—
pects under different neurophysiologic con—
ditions of an adaptive pattern in subjects
with a personality organization marked by
stereotypy, rigidity, conventionality and
poor capacity for introspection and em-

pathy.

CONCLUSION

In studies of convulsive therapy, differences in personality organization and sociologic aspects of history have been related to
differences in behavioral response. Persons
who are stereotyped, rigid, non-empathic
and non-introspective, as deﬁned by explicit
criteria in Rorschach, F Scale and structured

family interviews, and who are less edu—
cated, older and foreign born are more likely
to manifest behavioral modes of euphoria
and hypomania and to be evaluated as “recovered” and “much improved.” Patients
who are introspective, empathic, non-stereotyped, native born, better educated and
young are more likely to manifest somatiza—
tion, paranoid—withdrawal and panic modes
of behavior with convulsive therapy, and to
be rated as “unimproved” or “worse.”
While an induced alteration in brain func—
tion is necessary for behavioral change in
the convulsive therapy process, personality

�248

FINK, KAHN AND POLLACK

organization and sociologic factors are de—
terminants of the type of behavioral change,
and of the clinical ratings of degree of improvement.
1.

REFERENCES
FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Relation of EEG
delta activity to behavioral response in
electroshock: quantitative serial studies.
A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat, 78: 516—

525, 1957.
2. FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Behavioral patterns
of induced states of altered brain function.

Presented at the NY. Divisional Meeting
A.P.A., Nov. 1957.
3. FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. AND GREEN, M. A. Experimental studies of the electroshock proc—
ess. Dis. Nerv. System, 19: 113—118, 1958.
4. FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. AND KORIN, H. Relation
of tests of altered brain function to behavioral change following induced convulsions.
In Proceedings I nternat. Congress N eurologic
Sciences, Brussels, 1958 (In press).
5. JAFFE, J. Language of the dyad. Psychiatry,

21:

249—258,1958.
6. JAFFE, J., KAHN, R. L.

7.

AND

.

216—228, 1957.

.

KAHN, R. L.

AND

FINK, M. Changes in lan-

guage during electroshock therapy. In Psychopathology of Communication, Hoch, P.
and Zubin, J., eds. Grune &amp; Stratton, New
York, 1958.
10. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. The relation of F
score to behavioral and physiologic response
with altered brain function. Presented at
Eastern Psychological Assoc, Phila., April,
1958.
11. KAHN, R. L.

12.
13.
14.

FINK, M. Com-

munication patterns with altered brain function. Presented at Eastern Psychological Assoc., Phila., April, 1958.
KAHN, R. L., FINK, M. AND WEINSTEIN, E. A.
Relation of amobarbital test to clinical im—

provement in electroshock. A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat, 76: 23—29, 1956.
KAHN, R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M. Social factors in selection of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. J. Hillside Hosp., 6:

15.
16.

M. Prognostic application of psychological techniques in convulsive therapy. Dis. Nerv. System (In
press).
KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Personality factors
in behavioral response to electroshock therapy. Conf. Neurol. (In press).
KLOPFER, B. AND KELLEY, D. The Rorschach
Technique. World Book Co., New York, 1942.
WEINSTEIN, E. A. AND KAHN, R. L. Personality
factors in denial of illness. A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 69: 355—367, 1953.
WEINSTEIN, E. A. AND KAHN, R. L. Ludic behavior in patients with brain disease. J.
Hillside Hosp., 3: 98—106, 1954.
WEINSTEIN, E. A. AND KAHN, R. L. Denial of
Illness. C. C. Thomas, Springﬁeld, Ill., 1955.
AND POLLACK,

��m.v..ww..

_._’—_w

L.

����unma‘mww
”WNW.
mwmmmmmmem

M'Wt

Wmemwmmg
mmmmmm a
.‘

Wmimﬁmxmtmmwwu

mummmammmmhum
MWWFW(%M}§

mwmmm
mwmmatmmmmum. mum

umwamm‘

‘

“at“

-

��wmmmwummumtmm
Wm»m:mwwm,m,rm
WWWMrotmm. mmdmu
ﬂuMWu’MWWWaWWM
«in»
'

m

W

“W“
mwmmmmmvmmm
mm

w

«-

and

“mmuwmawmmmuWa-m

WMWMMmemuImeW
(ma). mm,mummww”tw
mmmwwcmm.

mm

‘

��ms

s:

3

{8

a
5 M

3.5::

flat?

8.2.

h!

Mam

11.:

M

m“
m

W”

���������mmmuwmmmmn
Maw
Wmaim. nan-mm W; 1»ng

�mmummnm.mmmg

"

'MWMWWMMWM“

mmwwg WMmW
mmmmrmmwmmm,

wwwmammwwmm
~

gunman-mm

mmmmmmummmmm
Mn m Wruﬁ:
and

a!“

W.Mhumume*

~

'

MWWmqumww
WW;MMWWW£WM""
"'

"

��W WW

9*

my W M m. ﬁgt

”9‘

W; JurMEWW.
at rm MW 3”:
m MM m. an m
Wﬁﬁc nmmmmm mm

‘

in;

.g

'

'

W: m” mM: wwmmma
‘

"

:

Mammals,

�rtrthiias££»tariihlti an; litfﬁgh’yiglitig ﬁtﬁﬁﬂssirity
in

III

ﬁaavuisirn-rkarayy
fink £.a., sabnri L. xxx; ?h*ﬁ., at: Ftllaek $3.9a;
Eria 71.? ﬁts. uni ﬁaargt Iriiihtmcr rﬁmﬁ.

Etaai£t$£ﬁw wit'uw

2,

igr-mautxitivc thnragy'aurt siuiisé

hy'a rariuty'ai pixahaltgiz usattras tataru tsiaiasat, mm; by‘
citairuianiphalggrtna priir in :35 at stat}: sntarvilt irrin:
trﬁitnﬁiﬁa litawittan: in train fixttiau, ii ritiagtnd h: ahanaaa
1i‘£!§Qn¢§Q3, Iﬂilltﬁﬁﬁiw ytiﬁuxg iaﬁ I3323iidt-at
it; gzaatatu

sir: ﬂittinﬁé'iﬁ #111333: t. thata tartnilini In:
ta-tuhuvttrni ¢hangn-uu% a sxtaiaul rating
at tnyrnvanaat a:

:neuyhnzucrin

titsinaﬁzaa Qf'ﬁrititaat.

against mattuMﬁ

(mg;

iltmic if inﬁnatd ﬁliﬁiV_'vff_i£
triatutut.rurin§3¢tt
{I}
‘3}

(t;

{é‘

him an
m cm
it: tailasﬁa;

akinga~auﬁ

Edttgtittul liﬂii
.“raahnth étttwniaant a: sawisaat
aiaﬁtr'af rnsgguauu

ﬁnipdaca ftgirCi
£293: tiﬂtx

ﬁiit

prum

£31

unlar, and

1
rdhtﬁosﬂtip liti'iﬁitﬁﬁd hciniia
fana%iun is nnﬁsgrud hr t§$=¢iiri§'ﬁf agitatittrstinu
as'htatuSixtifiiint
is tht 5:3 ngd ixtntunnt 1néﬁﬂﬁi htharSQaii «hauggﬁ aativit:
£btai~tltiQiﬁ
pctttrnc g: bchsvﬂtr.r¢$né n: tltni¢¢3 ingrartxtat vyrt «tutiagatt
at: as}; uyca hash ingrts «cita-asxitiﬁy ﬁat ‘13» ﬁgs: prttrtttrwat

ysﬁﬁczas, snaialagia atatua
:ggzyalagie
3.,
.-

utiuttt in anuwulstrt

iii caviruauinttl

axycetta

tasrtwwa htknvitria ﬁhﬁﬁgt it
ya rasraghi£ akga¢§.til:
titan; of tﬁyrﬂfiﬁtut it
ndagtsnnalzy anytudnat xyau a sanrttiXItiin~¢£ incinwyuxtiaiazia
{tetart. inurtivgr, aaaragixtiszatic ﬁnsgunttriir/{rntt a: daggni
changa} te.iaisa££V¢§nr%1:iuus nag':;:¢ ht signxxiaaatxx rillﬁiﬁ
it
to praﬁrin$uwat wazwhniycis tnriuklta;
ﬁﬁﬁﬁ

‘. -.}3

&amp;

strain: a: tk: rglatiau ni Iicatasgriabis ﬁhﬂﬁlt tn
tokuvitrti thilﬁi in £¥I¥I1§i¥i tiarapy'hata
giglana.a¢itead£¢tnay
Tﬁlit vuritziutx in gs$athn nay bﬁ-ﬁuﬂ ﬁ¢~dittarinass
rtatits..
in thc ﬁﬁﬂiltility ﬁhirtﬁttriiiici of tin pnpszntisna a$a§$¢i. stag:
n.¢1a~p¢y¢hn1ag£¢ yuittrnn tam: raissaﬁ I¢%
in tha $1§§ nut
auruiinn it in$ugté htknrtnwai ahanga. hut tacal:
it. taunt: a: alaetrtw
cruphta ghaagn as will.
thy yxatuut raanlts igﬁictza ihct univxriata asalytts 5: ngnrew
Iiiﬂiﬂﬂi§~inﬁ.§iiﬂiiﬁfli miiatianiﬁﬁpt it an liﬂiﬁf tinguctc it
pﬁzwh£1$rr, txé it» nyyliatiiin ir‘xithnﬁ:
its yrlhxaut at txyttiillfﬁl
‘xgugitistrittaugunlytis in rttnxnttﬁtd.
$raa'$hi ﬁ¢g¢rinknt a: Emyirin¢a£81 vtyzhjuiry, aillxiﬁc lbxpiﬁti,
3’2“ Q‘k‘g 11:39, tits:
“3 in,“ “a: £3.
Punt

_

�Psychologic Variables and Neurophysiologic Reaponsivity

In Convulsive Therapy
Max

Fink 14.13., Robert L. Kahn Ph. 13.,

PollacK Ph.D.,

Max

Eric Karp B.A. and George Krauthamer Ph.D.

/ MiConsecutive

referrals for convulsive therapy

of psychologic

were studied by a

measures prior to treatment, and by

variety;

electro-

encephalogram prior to and at weekly intervals during treatment. Alterations

in brain function, as reflected

Wm
and amplitude were examined

EEG

frequency, modulation, pattern

variables’W

in relation to these

and

improvement on

in

by changes

to behavioral change and a clinical gating of

teminatMtreafmren‘t

.

Significant relationships ”if”; were observed

induced

change and the following pre-treatment variables:

EEG

(W
m
W

(a) Educational level

&gt;

‘

between the degree of

-”M(b)

.

i5- Rorschach criteria
'

(c)

‘

(d)

.

0}

.

Mnemr, 8.4,, M Ma...

{@3/apmaw
{magmg /,~:.,W2M7/5,,+.

-

«1'

Jul

deft“ WW

4%

significant relationship ia-legiesee existed between alteration of brain
function and treatmet induced behavioral change.
degree
Metfffrﬁfiﬁfrtmm_.._.a,._m.,...,hz:€.5...»
7‘»
«9 a'
“W”
'
delta a
~- . A clinical
rating of improve“be!”
0
,mx fwﬂ’
A

h

#5.»

da
»

-

QC

.

(Hréy
50’4”“? “ﬂaw
mentm‘honever, was contingent” upon high degree delta
activity4ude pretreatment

psychologic

pattem‘W) , sociologic status and environmental

'-

“)2,

«Km

,

expectationxr.

Conclusions: ﬁ’ehavioral change was related to electrographic
change. while—a—

rating of "improved"
socio—psychologic

0b

Iivz'taa-additionally dependent upon a

factors.

Mor-eover, neurophysiologic

(rate ﬁgme of change) to induced convulsions
\
pretreatment psychologic variables.
,1'

,

'

constillation
responsivity

of

46“
significantly related to

’4'

�l'

“

s

—2-

W

.. Past studies of the relation of electrographic change to behavioral change
M
have yielded con radictony results. These variations in outcome may be due to

differences in the personality characteristics of the populatioz%tudied since
L...
patternsm
related not only to the type and duration of
socio-pscyhologic
induced behavioral change but to the degree of electrographic change as well.
)
,

present results underline the fact that a univariate analysis of
neurophysiologic and. behavioral relationships is no lonser adeouate to the
problems of experimental psychiatry, and the application
methods of
The

multivariate analysis is

From

/

recommended.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital

Glen Uaks,
_

of”

L.I.,

3/31/60
1,12
‘W'o

Am.

N.Y.

EEG

�Peychologic Verieblee end Heurephyeielogic neeponeivity
In Convaleive Therepy
H.D., Robert L. Kehn Pb. B., Hex Polleek Ph. 9.,
Eric Kerp 8.1. end Gear‘s Kreuthemer Ph. D.

Hex Fink

caneecutive reterrele for convulsive therepy were etudied
by e

veriety of psycholcgic neeeuree prier to treetnent, end

by

electreeneephelogrene priortc end et weekly intervals during treat»

sent. Alterations in brein funetian, ee reflected
EEG

by changes

in

frequency, modulation, pattern and emplitude were exemined in

relation ta these verieblee,
retinx of impraveuent

an

and

to behavioral chense and e elinieel

termination at treatment.

aignificent relationship: (ch12)
degree otinduced

EEG

change end the

were cheerved between the

tellewin; pro-treatment verieblee:

/

(e) Educetianel level

(b) Borechack criterie at Movenent, cola: end number at
reepanaee
Embedded
figures tent
5c)
d) Alphe index
A

eignificent reletionnhip also existed between ulteretien

of brain functien and treatment induceé behavioral change.

a: behavioral chenge

clinicel retina

wee

The

releted to the degree at doth activity.

degree
A

of improvement an the ether hand, wee contingent net

only upan high degree delta activity but 1139 upen pretreatment

�-2psycholozic puttcrna, acciolugic atatuu and :nvironmontal czpoetu»

tians.
In convulsiva thornpy, bchuvieral china. 1:

concluaianl:

rolntnd tn oloctrojruphic ahango.

ally doplndont

upon n

A

rgtin; at

"iaprovod" is udditienu

conttullutien of nocia-puychalogic fucters.

Haruovor, nourophyniologie

rolponnivity (rate or dogrco or chug.)

to induced convulntian any :13» be ainnitiauntly rulgtod to prttrtat~
meat 0! p'ycholugic

itriabloa.

Putt studio: at tn. rclution or uloctroxrnphic chums. to
bchnvieral chancc 1n aonvnlaivo thar¢py hgvo yieldod contradietery

results.

Thoad

variations in outeon.

may be due

to dirtcraneca in

the per-antlity ehnrtgtoristtel at the papulntinns atadiad sine.
aocio~puychelogic pattorno may be relatud act only ta

th.

type tad

durntion of induced behavioral chang¢,but to the dagrue a! cloetron
graphic chance as well.
The

proutnt ralultu undarlino tho

itct that

a

univtriato unllyais

or nouraphyaiologic and bah;vioru1 rolatianahipa is no lengur aduqutto

to the prablonl a! prorinonttl psychiatry, und the npplication or
methods or
From

rocommandad.

the Dopnrtuqnt of Exporinontnl Psychiatry, Hillaido Hospital

Glon Oaks,

1v:

nultivaridn analysis in

h/l/éc

3.1.
L.I.,
Am. 320

�‘

,é?"

/'

/

(o
1/,

"y

.4

Psychologic Variables and Neurophysiologic Responsivity
In Convulsive Therapy
Max

Fink M.D., Robert L. Kahn Ph. D.,

Max

Pollack Ph. D.,

Eric Karp B.A. and George Krauthamer Ph.

D.

Consecutive referrals for convulsive therapy were studied

ﬁg: a.

variety of psychologic measures préer—te treatment,

by a

and by

electroencephalograms priogﬂb and at weekly intervals during treatment.

Alterations in brain function, as reflected
91/

~EEG

“ﬁg; r5313r

«35? a».

in

affﬂzf‘ﬂgﬁ" Qi’e‘u

frequency, modulation, pattern and amplitudeﬂwere examined in

relation to these variables,
rating

of improvement on

and to

behavioral change and

degree ofinduced
a
ébg:

m

Educationa

Rorschacﬁ

e

\.of

reaponses
Embedded figures test
Alpha index

0

"d
A

and the

25%

a

clinical

termination of treatment.

Significant relationships (chizi
xi,
3F
5.3,“,change

of

2‘33;

by changes

were observed between the

following

pre— treatment

variables:

A,

ovement,A color, and number of

significant relationship also existed between alteration

brain function Aand treatment induced behavioral change

imbald£££§§WW,

WW C56Mamet,
(Wheg
“Mbehaxlnnalxchangemuas.relaxed.tewthedegreeofwdglﬁ33%;:gﬁrw
£17MM4/sgéf

“3...:

W
clanaeelwrati“g“cﬁmimprgyementan“:

an s:

{:Lﬂﬂu

49;

‘odZEfMM,4

9%

only upon high degree

3%”;ng

Clzbwi ,1? W4
'Mcthermnaﬁdwwwas
My»:

delta activity but also

upon

y

A

'x

contingent not

pretreatment

�\

-2psychologic patterns, sociologic status and environmental expectae

tions.
Conclusions:

In convulsive therapy, behavioral change is
i

related to electrographic change.
ally dependent

upon a

A

'
is addition—
rating of aou:;;:::ew3‘

constgllation of socio—psychologic factors.

Moreover, neurophysiologic

responsivity (rate or degree of chage)

to induced convul€2§0n§may also be significantly related to pretreat—
ment

,/

psychologic variables.
Past studies of the relation of electrographic change to

behavioral change in convulsive therapy have yielded contradictory

results. 'These variations in

outcome may be due to

differences in

the personality characteristics of the populations studied)since
socio—psychologic

Kﬂwaaah

patterns

meynbe

related not only to the type

and

duration of induced behavioral change,but to the degree of electro—
graphic change as well.
dwadﬁfffﬂ

present results mad-niIl-Iib-iﬂiit thatdﬂ‘univariate analysis
or
ngﬁsﬂb
4o
of neurophysiologic and behavioral relationships gﬁkno longerﬁadequate
The

\

tojthe problems of experimental psychiatry,
’

and the

.

application of

1

methods of multivarian analysis is recommended.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Glen Oaks, L. I.
1v: h/1/60 Am.

N. Y.

EEG

Hillside HOSpital

-

�01:?
////’

m

'

Individual Differences in Neurophysiologic Responsivity
to Convulsive Therapy

Previous studies indicated that an alteration in brain

function was requisite to/tkéfbehavioral change and ratings of
improvement in convulsive therapy.
has been

The

type of behavioral change

related to various perceptual,psychologic,

and

social

aspects of the individual's history and behavior.The present
study demonstrates significant relationships between the degree
of

037'

-convulsive neurophysiolegic change

and amobarbital

test

(EEG

slow wave

activity

response) and pro-treatment perceptual{MW‘

4,

,

'

personality functioning (educational level, Rorschach, figure5

\

.

{A

1‘

1

groun
While

Mylo “W“; ’/
f
relationshipeztsﬁuu'n neurophysiolegic

“a. 3mm

meeewneﬁ

a-dL

J3
”(a[7w //
,3

5‘

1%?!”

”Z

personality measures have generally not been-establisheéi these
observations indiate that the rate and degree of change] in
neurophysiologic

.m
(mm/Me

may

indeed be related to personality

cognitive

Illﬂlllﬂr(perceptualenillI-Ig style).

AM; ,3.
ﬁzz/)4!

%x Fly

if! ﬂ/s’éx. 6mg“!

KC

A9- 3.

(buff ﬂags/.4

,4”?
’7 g/Qt MM 6“

My

1501 6:1

’-

/

1L ,‘ I/I/ff

SM 3191” 739/5

I

Wm?

/ £421 /9’
-

er,

4.! 4452;;

J).

/Vé(fm'«£ﬁ AV/f’S-Qi?

�Iu¢$viéun1 attrarnuaés in laurgzhywtaivgtc acupuaatvitr
w. Eﬂwftliﬁfi trip:
Sadiugtaa thlt an ultawutiaa in brain
to-hohavﬁawtl altar: «at rﬁtlﬁli a:
1x 'fﬁ'ﬁi
ﬁﬂﬁVQIﬂ$ti tharnrr. ran try. it hnhuvioral
atgnga in: ﬁtlh vclntid ‘Q,Vﬁiﬁtﬂ£ paranptuul, payuhaxactc,
and.a¢uiul maptatn #1
taaivtdial': htttﬁ 3nd hakartor.
prtuwut atudy «cannatmutua niauitianai t! ﬁicaahtpa
htiuuou tau dﬂlvtu ut’pwctucauvuluavu usurnphywitisxin
thlﬁtt (35$ glam invﬂ tnttvaty Ina unuhmrbttal gait rntycnu¢3
Ind ﬁrmwtﬁuniuunt-§ortwptau1~wur*6mtlitr tunatttuﬁnc (a:

traritus atndxnu
at: 1nragtisitn

txantayn
‘

it:

it.

»

aduuutiaut&amp;,10111,‘luriuhnah puttarm, taguVwaraunA
ﬁtﬂ‘rtﬂiﬁi$1ﬁﬁ)t
wail: studxgn u: Ringlt ampuuta or nttrtvhrmzcanggu
IS‘ rtrtunllt hﬂﬁﬂ‘rﬂi but. annurallr Raﬁ tntnbitshnd
tisuttinaut to .ttiuﬁhtpa, than: Qiuutvutlaaa tnﬂieuﬁﬁ that
$hn vain nnd iuarug ﬁt ah:act an xuurtpaauitlngis ratptuaﬁ
uzritgdand ht rtInSaa ta yﬁﬁiﬂnﬂltiw§(ptt‘i’ﬁtﬂlﬁﬁlcttﬁtwﬁ
_

7

.

: y n\.

‘I‘ﬁﬂii!

inn

fiat, ”.36.

rrwn

tn: btpartnuut u:

.111

11/59

ﬁlms Wilt, ﬂute:

5“.

1.1;

‘R4 nﬁbﬁft

Ly

i333, ?h§na

inp§r$mmnta1 Payuhxatry,

3%.}; ’Ufﬂht

tillntén

ﬂuupiﬁnl.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2674">
                <text>Psychological factors affecting individual differences in behavioral response to convulsive therapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1959 Mar;128(3):243-8.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2675">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2676">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-36-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2677">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2678">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2679">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2680">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2681">
                <text>3 items. 1: Reprint from THE JOURNAL or NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE Volume 128, N0. 3, March 1959. 2: [preprint]. 3: 2 drafts and one abstract.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2682">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2683">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74470">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81031">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87592">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94153">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="269" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="60">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c02d31143a5f498973505a8a964ce076.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b8c3ce2c33d87b8f3f28b4f66c1d2afb</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100686">
                    <text>Reprinted from Neuro-Psychopharrnacology

EEG AND BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS
OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIC AGENTS*
M.

FINK

Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,
Long Island, N. Y. (U.S.A.)

Recent studies have presented data supporting a neurophysiologic—adaptive View of
the convulsive therapy process“: 15. This hypothesis holds that the clinical efﬁcacy of
repeated induced convulsions is dependent upon the induction of a persistent alteration in cerebral function, which provides the milieu for changes in the subject’s inter—
action with the environment. In these studies the best index of neurophysiologic
change has been those aspects of cerebral function reﬂected by 8 activity in the
electroencephalogramS—lo.
The efﬁcacy of newer psychopharmaceuticals in altering psychotic behavior
patterns led to the suggestion of a similar hypothesis for the mode of action of these
agents“, and to studies of the relationship and speciﬁcity of altered behavioral patterns
to neurophysiologic change as reﬂected in electroencephalography. This report
summarizes some of the experimental data observed in on—going tests of this hypo—

thesis.

‘

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We have studied consecutive patients, suffering from depressive psychoses, agitated
and excited schizophrenic states and severe psychoneurotic disorders, referred for
physiodynamic therapies (convulsive, psychotropic drug, insulin coma) in a voluntary,
open—ward, psychiatric hospital. Serial electroencephalograms were taken prior to,
Aided, in part, by grants M-927 and MY—2092, National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U.S.P.H.S., and Bristol, Wyeth and Smith, Kline and French Laboratories.
*

References p. 446 .

�M. FINK

442

during and after the course of therapy. In addition, at various stages of the treatment
As
done.
convulsive
both
studies
chlorand
were
acute
experimental
program
promazine therapies elicit varying degrees of EEG slow wave activity, these acute
observations have been made in two groups of subjects: those without slow wave
activity, and those with diffuse slow wave (HSD, LSD) or burst and slow wave
(BSD) activity”.

Observations have been made in the EEG laboratory. Following a routine
bipolar EEG recording, an unstructured psychiatric interview was tape—recorded.
Under continuous EEG recording, medication was administered intravenously at a
set rate until EEG or behavioral effects were observed. Following the injection the
interview was repeated and recorded. Periods of EEG recording and interview recording were alternated for the duration of the drug activity.
Behavioral evaluations have been based both on clinical descriptions by the
participants (subject, physician and technician) and analyses of changes in language
patterns12:14. Electroencephalograms were measured for shifts in dominant frequencies, and changes in voltage, modulation, and per cent time of or, {3 and 8 frequency bands.
The psychopharmacologic agents were administered orally for extended periods
in clinical trials, and intravenously in the acute experimental trials (Table I). Dosage
for each compound varied, but in each instance sufﬁcient medication has been given
to achieve clinical behavioral effects.
TABLE I
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIC AGENTS STUDIED

(Oral and intravenous)

Chlorpromazine
Prom azine
Triﬂupromazine
Perphenazine
*
Reserpine

Iproniazid
**
Deanola

**

Amobarbital
**
Thiopental

Atropine
Diethazine

Amphetamine
Methamphetamine
Meprobamate

*

**

LSD—2 5b
**
Win—22996
**
J B—3 I 8d

J B-336e

**

Benactyzine

Dimethylaminoethanoll".
b Lysergic acid diethylamide.
0 2-Diethylaminoethyl cyclopentyl (2-thieny1) glycolatel“.
d N—Ethyl—3-piperidy1 benzilatel.
e N-Methy1-3—piperidyl benzilatel.
a

*

Oral only.

H Intravenous only.
OBSERVATIONS

(a) Electroencephalographic

Four broad types of EEG patterns may be identiﬁed according to the characteristics of frequency shift and synchronization‘l:
References

35.

446.

�443

INVESTIGATONS IN NORMAL HUMAN SUBJECTS

I) Increase in slow wave activity and in synchrony;

Increase in synchrony without frequency shift;
3) Increase in fast wave activity and in synchrony;
4) Desynchronization and frequency irregularity.
Examples of each are seen in Figs. 1—4.
During convulsive therapy, an increase in slow wave activity and synchrony is
manifests. With drug administration similar changes in frequency spectrum and in
synchrony can be observed. Such changes include an augmentation of the slow wave
activity8 or a marked decrease in such activity with desynchronization of frequencies?
.Of the psychopharmaceuticals tested in acute experiments an increase in synchrony With or Without an increase in slow Wave activity has been observed for
chlorpromazine, promazine, and triﬂupromazine. Barbiturates regularly induce an
increase in fast activity With an increase in synchrony, While amphetamine and
2)

W
W
W
MW
W
WWW
WWW
|600

PER DAY
3 MONTHS

IZOO MG PER DAY
2 MONTHS

PRE-DRUG

LAT—LF

MG

WWW/WWW
,

LPT-LO

‘

0-0

RPT-RO

JWVWWMMNMM
it 2049 HH

4*

2143

HH

2l95

50M—
ISEC

HH

Fig. I. Chlorpromazine, oral (male, age I 5).
800

-

PRE-DRUG

MG
|

‘WWW
'

PER DAY

MONTH

wwwwvwwwmmwm

LAT'LF

AFTER

350

MG

LAT-LF

RAT-RF

RAT-RF

\

LF-RF

’

LF-RF

W

LPT‘LO

LPT-LO

NWWMMWM

WWWNWWWWMWWVI

o-o

“MIN/WWW
.

MAM/WM
wmwm
|9|5
# |962
SOle—l
RPT-RO
a:

W
W W
W

mm
PRE-DRUG

HH

-

SEC

HH

Fig. 2. Chlorpromazine, oral (female, age 34).

www—ﬁu

o-o

M‘WVWM

WWW

,

Ill/WWW
RPT-RO

5°VV‘—_|SEC

#0

2'51

HH

Fig. 3. Amobarbital, intravenous (male, age 31).

methamphetamine increase fast activity Without increased synchrony. Desynchronization of frequencies is prominent after diethazine, LSD-25, Win-2299, JB-3I8,
JB-336, and benactyzine.
Refeyences p. 446.

�M. FINK

444

In subjects with post—convulsive 3 activity, acute administration of chlorpromazine, promazine, triﬂupromazine, amobarbital and pentothal increased the per

W
W
,W W W»

PRE-bRUG
LF-LO

WWW
_

MIN

+ 80

MIN

wWWM-NMWNM

Rf-RO

LAT-LP

+ 40

AFTER 3.2 mg

..

RAT-RF

LPT-LO

.
I

0-0
“WW“M‘M‘WW“
RPT-RO

WWWW
WW
WW
|

SEC

#ZOISIHH

Fig. 4. Win-2299, intravenous (female, age 41).

cent time and voltage of slow wave activity. Decrease in voltage and per cent time of
slow wave activity is seen with LSD-25, benactyzine, Win—2299, JB-3I8, JB-336 and
diethazine5’ 6.

Similar electrographic patterns are noted in chronic oral administration of these
compounds. Chlorpromazine, promazine, high doses of reserpine and occasionally
perphenazine elicit increased synchronization and a shift of frequencies to the 8 range.
Increased synchronization without frequency shift is occasionally observed with
iproniazid. Increased high voltage fast activity is observed with meprobamate and
barbiturates. Oral administration of LSD-25 and benactyzine induces EEG desynchronization with an increase in fast frequencies.
(6)

Behavioral

Initial studies of convulsive therapy noted that behavioral change was dependent
upon the development of synchronous slow wave activitys. Prominent among the
associated behavioral effects were sedation, tranquillization and euphoria in agitated,
depressed subjects, and a decrease in somatization, paranoid ideation, hallucinations
and delusions in schizophrenic and excited subjects. Increasing agitation, paranoid
ideation and panic were observed in less than IO 0/0 of the subjects.
Similar behavioral relationships were prominent with these psychopharmacologic agents. In acute experiments, administration of chlorpromazine, promazine
and triﬂupromazine was associated with increasing sedation, drowsiness, denial and
euphoria, decreasing agitation, panic, excitement and delusional and hallucinatory
activity, and minimization and displacement of symptoms. Sedation, euphoria,
denial and minimization were similarly associated with amobarbital.
Administration of amphetamine and methamphetamine resulted in behavioral
alerting, hypomania, excitement, and increased motor activity. Similar increased
alerting, excitement, tension and panic were observed after benactyzine. In addition to these patterns, illusory sensations and hallucinatory, delusional and
paranoid ideation were observed with diethazine, LSD-25, Win-2299, JB—3I8, and

J 13-336-

References

{3.

446.

�INVESTIGATIONS IN NORMAL HUMAN SUBJECTS

445

Equally prominent with the behavioral changes were alterations in patterns of
language. Previous studies of convulsive therapy had indicated that speciﬁc syntactic
language patterns (as in the use of the third person mode, past and future tense, dis—
placement, minimization, denial, clichés, and cryptic remarks) increased with increasing neurophysiologic change”. These language patterns were further exaggerated by intravenous amobarbita114’15. In the present studies, chlorpromazine, triﬂupromazine and iproniazid increased these language patterns. Diethazine, LSD—25,
Win-2299, and benactyzine decreased and reversed these language patterns, increasing
the use of the present tense, ﬁrst person mode, and somatization7.
Relation of behavioral and electrographic observations
The electrographic patterns Were consistently altered concurrently with behavioral
changes both in the acute and chronic administration studies. Tranquillization,
euphoria, sedation and minimization of symptoms were commonly associated with
increased EEG synchronization and shift of frequencies to the delta range. Agitation,
tension, panic, excitement, illusions and hallucinations were associated with a desynchronization of frequencies.
Similar patterns were demonstrated in subjects with prior 8 activity. Agents
that tended to synchronize frequencies, as chlorpromazine and barbiturates, augmented the per cent time 8 activity and enhanced clinical patterns, while agents that
desynchronized frequencies, as diethane, LSD—25 and benactyzine, minimized the
clinical effects ascribed to repeated convulsions5-7.
(0)}

DISCUSSION

These observations are consistent with the neurophysiologic—adaptive hypothesis of
the mode of action of the newer psychopharmaceuticals“. This hypothesis states that
the clinical efﬁcacy of psychotropic drugs is dependent upon the induction of a per—
sistent alteration in cerebral function which provides the milieu for changes in the
subjects’ interaction with the environment. The variety of neurophysiologic patterns
induced by these agents is in contrast to the limited patterns resulting from convulsive
therapy and thus provides ampliﬁcation of the original hypothesis. It is evident from
these studies that the type of neurophysiologic alteration induced, as reﬂected in
EEG synchrony and frequency patterns, is related to speciﬁc types of behavioral
adaptation. With increasing synchrony and a shift to the 8 frequency spectrum,
tranquillization, sedation and decreased agitation become prominent, while desynchronization and a shift to [3 frequencies are associated with excitement, illusions
and delusional ideation.
These studies are also consistent with numerous reports of the neurophysiologic
effects of these compoundsm’ll’ 13:19:21, and speciﬁcally support and amplify those of
WIKLER who concluded, in his studies of morphine and mescaline, that “regardless
of the nature of the drug administered, shifts in the pattern of the electroencephalogram in the direction of desynchronization occurred in association with anxiety,
hallucinations, fantasies, illusions or tremors, and in the direction of synchronization
with euphoria, relaxation or drowsiness”2°.
This hypothesis, and the electrographic measure of neurophysiologic change,
lends itself to application in the assay of new psychotropic drugs“, the rational
References p. 446.

�446

M. FINK

application of pharmacotherapy7, and as a basis for further experimental study of
neurophysiologic—behaviora1 relationships in psychiatry.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful for the cooperation of the following laboratories who made supplies
of the various psychopharmaceuticals freely available: Ciba Pharmaceutical Prods.
(reserpine), Lakeside Laboratories (JB—318, 336), Eli Lilly &amp; Co. (amobarbital),
Merck, Sharpe &amp; Dohme (benactyzine), Riker Laboratories (deanol), Roche Laboratories (iproniazid), Sandoz Pharmaceuticals (LSD-25), Schering Corp. (perphenazine),
Smith, Kline &amp; French Laboratories (chlorpromazine, diethazine), E. R. Squibb &amp;
Sons (triﬂupromazine), Winthrop Laboratories (Win—2299), Wyeth Laboratories
(promazine, meprobamate) .
REFERENCES
1 L. G. ABOOD, A. M. OSTFELD AND
J. BIEL, Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 97 (1958) 483.
2

3
4

5
6
7

K. ANDERMANN, Med. ]. Australia, 2 (1957) 1.
P. B. BRADLEY AND J. ELKES, Brain, 80 (1957) 77.

M. FINK, ]. Hillside Hosp, 6 (1957) 197.
M. FINK, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 80 (1958) 380.
M. FINK, Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., IO (1958) 776.
M. F INK, J. JAFFE AND R. L. KAHN, Drug—induced changes in interview patterns: linguistic and
neurophysiologic indices, in J. SARWER-FONER, The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy,

Springﬁeld, Ill.
8 M. FINK AND R. L. KAHN, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 78 (1957) 516.
9 M. FINK, R. L. KAHN AND M. A. GREEN, Diseases of Nervous System, 19 (1958)
113.
10 M. FINK, R. L. KAHN AND H. KORIN, Proc. Intern. Congr. Neurol. Sci,
1957, Brussels, in the
press.
11 S. GARATTINI AND V. GHETTI,
Psychotropic Drugs, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1957.
12
J. JAFFE, ]. Hillside Hosp, 6 (1957) 207.
13 R. S. JORGENSEN AND M. H. WULFF, Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., 10 (1958) 325.
14 R. L. KAHN AND M. FINK, in P. HOCH AND
J. ZUBIN, Psychopathology of Communication,
Grune &amp; Stratton, New York, 1958, p. 126.
15 R. L. KAHN, M. FINK AND E. A. WEINSTEIN, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 76 (1956) 23.
13 H. PENNES AND P. HOCH, Am.
Psychiat., 113 (1957) 887.
].
17 C. C. PFEIFFER et al., Science, 126 (1957) 610.
13 H. STRAUSS, M. OSTOW AND L. GREENSTEIN, Diagnostic Electroencephalography, Grune &amp;
Stratton, New York, 1952.
19 G. VERDEAUX AND R. MARTY, Rev. neurol.,
91 (1954) 405.
20 A. WIKLER,
Nervous Mental Disease, 120 (1954) 157.
].
21 D. L. WINFIELD AND G. H. AIVAZIAN, Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., 10 (1958) 575.
C. C. THOMAS,

Printed in The Netherlands

�EEG

and Behavioral Effects of Psychopharmacologic Agents

Max

From

Fink

MOD.

the Department of Ekperimental Psychiatry, Hillside Heapital,

Glen Oaks,

L010, NIY.

Institute of Mental
in part, by grants III-927 and MY—2092 , National
Health, National Institutes of Health, U.S.P.H.S., and Bristol, Smith, Kline

Aided,

French and Wyeth Laboratories.
Read

at the Collegian Internationale Neuro-Psychophamacologicum,

September 12, 1958.
IV:9-3-53

Rune,

and

�EEG

and Behavioral Effects of ggzchophgrmacologic Aggnts

Recent studies have presented data supporting a neurophysiologica

adaptive view of the convulsive therapy process (1, 2). This hypothesis
holds that the clinical efficacy of repeated induced convulsions is
dependent upon the induction of a

persistent alteration in cerebral

function, which provides the milieu for changes in the subject's interaction
with the environment. In these studies the best index of neuroplnrsiologic
change has been those aspects of cerebral function reﬂected by delta

activity in the electroencephalogram (3 ,h,5).
efficacy of newer psychopharmaceuticals in altering psychotic
behavior patterns led to the suggestion of a similar hypothesis for the
mode of action of these agents (2), and to studies of the relationship
The

and

specificity of altered behavioral patterns to neurophysiologjc

as reflected in electroencephalogram.
experimental data observed in ongoing
SUBJECTS AND
We

change

This report smunarizes some of the

tests

of

this hypothesis.

MODS:

patients, suffering from depressive
excited schizophrenic states and severe psycho-

have studied consecutive

psychoses, agitated and

neurotic disorders, referred for physiodynamic therapies (convulsive,
psychotropic drug, insulin coma) in a voluntary, open-wand, psychiatric

hospital. Serial electroencephalograms were taken prior to, during and
sitar the course of therapy. In addition, at various stages of the treatment
and
program acute experimental studies were done. As both convulsive
chlorpromazine therapies elicit varying degrees of EEG slow wave activity,

�.2these acute observations have been

made

in

without slow wave activity, and those with diffuse s1

or burst

EEG

w

wave (HSD, LSD)

activity (6).

and leW'WaVB (BSD)

Observations have been

bipolar

of subjects: those

two groups

in the

made

laboratory. Following a routine

EEG

recording, an unstructured psychiatric interview

recorded. Under continuous

EE‘3

intravenously at a set rate

until

was

recording, medication was administered
EEG

or behavioral effects

were observed.

Following the injection the interview was repeated and recorded.
EEG

drug

tape-

Periods of

recording and interview recording were alternated for the duration of

activity.
Behavioral evaluations have been based both on clinical descriptions

by the

participants (subject, physician

changes in language patterns

and

technician)

and analyses of

(7,8). Electroencephalograms were measured

for shifts in dominant frequencies,

and changes

in voltage, modulation,

and

per cent time of alpha, beta and delta frequency bands.
The psychopharmacologic agents were administered

periods in clinical

trials

(Table

I).

trials,
Dosage

and intravenously

for each

compound

orally for extended

in the acute experimental

varied, but in each instance

sufficient medication has been given to achieve clinical behavioral effects.

�I

TABLE

PSYCHOPHARMAGOIDGIC AGENTS STUDIED

(Oral and Intravenous)
chlorpromazine

amobarbital

atropine **

promazine

thiopenzal **

diethazine **
LSD-25

triflupromazine

(b)

"

perphenazine

amphetamine

Win~2299

reserpine*

methamphetamine

JB-318

(c)
(d) **

JB—336

(e)

iproniazid
deanol (a)

meprobamate
**

*

benactyzine

a. dimethylaminoethanol (9 )
b.

lysergic acid diethylamide

c. 2-d1ethylaminoethyl cyclopentyl (2-thieny1) glycolate (10)
d.

n~ethyl-3~p1peridy1benzilate (11)

e.

n-methyl—B—p1peridy1benzilate

(11)

* oral only
** intravenous only

**

�OBSERVATIONS:

(a) Electroencephalographic:

patterns, observed on acute drug
be identifieci according to the characteristics

Four broad types of

administration,
of frequency

may

shift

EEG

and synchronization

(2):

activity

in synchrony;

1)

Increase in slow

2)

Increase in synchrony without frequency shift;

3)

Increase in

wave

fast wave activity

and

and

h) Desynchronization and frequency
Examples of each are seen

in figures l-h.

-0-

---”-“-U- u --

Fig. 1, 2, 3,

,4

in synchrony;

irregularity.

�-5
During convulsive therapy, an increase in slow wave
synchrony

is manifest. (Fig.5) ‘iith

Fig.

activity

and

drug administration similar changes

5

-------in frequency spectrum

and

in synchrony are observed (Figs. 6, 7).
Figs.

6 7

0f the psychophnrmaceuticals tested in acute experiments
in synchrony with Sr without an increase in
observed

for chlorpromazine, promazine

regularly induced

an increase

and

slow wave

triflupromazine.

in fast activity with

an

prominent

after diethazine,

increase

activity has been
Barbiturates

increase in

synchrony, while amphetamine and methamphetamine increased

without increased synchrony.

an

fast activity

Desynchronization of frequencies was
LSD-25, Win-2299, JB-BlB, JB-336 and benactyzine.

In subjects with post-convulsive delta activity, acute administration
of chlorpromazine, promazine, triflupromazine, amobarbital and pentothal
increased the per cent time and voltage of slow wave activity. Decrease

in voltage and per cent time of slow

wave

activity

was seen with LSD-25,

benactysine, Win-2299, JB-318, JB~336, and diethazine (12-13).

Similar electrographic patterns
administration of these

compounds.

were noted

in chronic oral

Chlorpromazine, promazine, high

do$s of reserpine and occasionally perphenazine elicited increased
synchronization and a

shift of frequencies

to the delta range.

Increased

�.6synchronization without frequency shift was occasionally observed with
iproniazid. Increased high voltage fast activity was observed with
meprobamate and

barbiturates.

benactyzine induced

EEG

Oral administration of

LSD-25 and

desynchronization with an increase in

fast

frequencies.
(b2 Behavioral:

Initial studies

of convulsive therapy noted that behavioral

change was dependent upon the development of synchronous slow wave

(3). Prominent

among

tranquillization

activity

the associated behavioral effects were sedation,

and euphoria

in agitated, depressed subjects, and a

decrease in somatization, paranoid ideation, hallucinations and delusions

in schizophrenic
ideation

and

excited subjects. Increasing agitation, paranoid

and panic were observed

in less than

Similar behavioral relationships
pharmacologic agents.

10%

of the subjects.

were prominent with these psycho~

In acute experiments, administration of chlorpromazine,

promazine and triflupromazine was associated with increasing sedation,

drowsiness, denial and euphoria, decreasing agitation, panic, excitement
and

delusional

and

hallucinatory activity, and minimization

and displacement

of symptoms. Sedation, euphoria, denial and minimization were similarly

associated with amobarbital.
Administration of amphetamine and methamphetamine resulted in
behavioral alerting, hypomania, excitement, and increased motor activity.
Similar increased alerting, excitement, tension and panic were observed

after benactyzine. In addition to these patterns, illusory sensations
and

hallucinatory, delusional

diethazine,

and paranoid

ideation

LSD-25, Win-2299, JB-318 and JB—336.

were observed with

�-7Equally prominent with the behavioral changes were alterations in

patterns of language. Previous studies of convulsive therapy had
indicated that specific syntactic language patterns (as in the use of
the third person mode, past and future tense, displacement, minimization,
denial, cliches, and cryptic remarks) increased with increasing neurophysiologic change (7). These language patterns were further exaggerated
by intravenous amobarbital

(l,

7). In the present studies, chlorpromazine,

triflupromazine and iproniazid increased these language patterns.
Diethazine, LSD-25, Win-2299, and benactyzine decreased and reversed

these language patterns, increasing the use of the present tense,

first

person mode, and somatization (1h).

(0) Relation of Behavioral
The

and Electrqgraphic Observations:

electrographic patterns were consistently altered

concurrently with behavioral changes both in the acute and chronic

administration studies. Tranquillization, euphoria, sedation.and
minimization of

symptoms were commonly

synchronization and

associated with increased

EEG

shift of frequencies to the delta range. Agitation,

tension, panic, excitement, illusions

and

hallucinations were associated

with a desynchronization of frequencies.
Similar patterns were demonstrated in subjects with prior delta

activity. Agents that tended to synchronize frequencies, as chlorpromazine
and barbiturates, augmented the per cent time delta activity and enhanced
clinical patterns, while agents that desynchroniaed frequencies, as
diethazine, LSD-2S and benactyzine, minimized the clinical effects ascribed
to repeated convulsions (12, 13, 1h).

�-8DISCUSSION:

These observations are consistent with the neurophysiologic-adaptive

hypothesis of the

mode

of action of the newer psychopharmaceuticals (2).

is

This hypothesis states that the clinical efficacy of psychotropic drugs

persistent/alteration in cerebral function
which provides the milieu for changes in the subjects' interaction with the
dependent upon the induction of a

variety of neurophysiologic patterns induced by these
agents is in contrast to the limited patterns resulting from convulsive
therapy and thus provide amplification of the original hypothesis. It is

environment.

The

evident from these studies that the type of neurophysiologic alteration
induced, as reflected in

EEG

synchrony and frequency

to specific types of behavioral adaptation.
a

With

patterns, is related

increasing synchrony

shift to the delta frequency spectrum, tranquillization, sedation

and

and

decreased agitation become prominent, while desynchronization and a shift to
beta frequencies are associated with excitement, illusions and delusional
'

ideation.
These studies are also consistent with numerous reports of the neuroand
physiologic effects of these compounds (15-20), and specifically support
amplify those of Wikler who concluded, in his studies of morphine and

mescaline, that "regardless of the nature of the drug administered, shifts
in the pattern of the electroencephalogram in the direction of desynchroniza-

tion occurred in association with anxiety, hallucinations, fantasies,
illusions or tremors, and in the direction of synchronization with euphoria,
relaxation or drowsiness" (21).
This hypothesis, and the electrographic measure of neurophysiologic
change, lends

itself to application in

the assay of

the rational application of pharmacotherapy

(lb),

new

psychotropic drugs

and as a

(2%

basis for further

experimental study of neurophysiologic-behavioral relationships in psychiatry.

�SUMMKRI AND CONCLUSIONS:

The

relation between electroencephalographic

change and behavioral

response was determined on acute and chronic administration of a variety
of psychopharmacologic agents in voluntary, openoward, psychiatric

patients.
EEG

patterns were classed according to effects

on synchrony and

frequency patterns. Behavioral and language pattern changes were noted
as concurrent with
Agents

EEG

response.

that induced

an

alteration in neurophysiology manifest as

increased synchrony and frequency slowing in

EEG

were associated with

behavioral sedation, tranquillity, and minimization of symptoms. Increased
synchrony and increased frequency were associated with sedation, euphoria,
hypomania and decreased somatization.

Desynchronization of frequencies was accompanied by increasing

agitation, excitement, somatization, illusory phenomena
and

and

hallucinatory

delusional ideation.
The

neurophysiologiccadaptive hypothesis of the

psychotropic drugs

is supported;

mode

of action of

and the value of electroencephalography

in the behavioral assay of these agents is suggested.

�-10REFERENCES

and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Improvement in Electrashack, A.M.A. Arch.
Neural. &amp; Psychiat. 1Q: 23-29, 1956.

l.

Kahn, R.L. , Fink,

2.

Fink,

3.

Fink,

h.

Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Green, M.A.: Experimental Studies of the
Electroshock Process, Dis. Nerv.
. 12: 113-118, 1958.

M.: A

M.

Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies,

J. Hillside

Hosp.

é: 197-206, 1957.

Balatian of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral
Response in ElectraShock: Quantitative Serial Studies, A.M.A.
Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat. 1.8.: 516-525, 1957.
M.

and Kahn, R.L.:

a

Fink,

, Kahn, R.L. and Karin, H.: Relation of Tests of Altered
Brain Function to Behavioral Change Following Induced Convulsions,
Prac. Int. Cong. Neural. Sci,, 1957, Brussels, (in press).
M.

Strauss,

, Ostaw,
ography, Grune
H.

Kahn, R.L. and

M.
&amp;

and Greenstein, L.: Diagnostic Electroencephal-

Stratton, N.Y., 1952.
Fink, M. : Changes in Language During Electroshock
and

Therapy, in Psychopathalgg of Comunication eds. Hoch, P.
Zubin, J., Grune &amp; Stratton, NJ. 1958, 33-139.

Jai‘fe, J .:

An

J. Hillside Hosp. é: 207-215, 1957.
- Pfeiffer, C.C. et a1.: Stimulant Effect of 2 - dimethylaminoethanal
_12__§: 610-611,
views,

9.
10.

Objective Study of Communication in Psychiatric Inter-

Precursor of Brain Acetylcholine, Science
Pogsible
19 7.

Pennes, H. and Hach, P.: Psychatomimetics, Clinical and Theoretical
Considerations, Amer. J. Psychiatn 113: 887-892, 1957.
Abaod, L.G., Osti‘ield, A.M. and

Biel,

J.:

mimetic Agents, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol.

A New

Group of Psychoto-

Med. 21: h83-h86, 1958.

Effect of Anti-Cholinergic Agent, Diethazine,

on ER} and

12.

Fink,

13.

Fink, M.: Effect of Anti-Cholinergic Compounds an Post-convulsive
EEG and Behavior, EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. (in press).

14.:

Behavior: Significance for Theory of Convulsive Therapy, A.M.A.
Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat; (in press).

�-11..

REFERENCES

Fink,

M.

and

Jaffe, J.:

Drug Induced Changes in Interview Patterns:
and Neurophysiologic Indices, in Conference on
amic A ects of Neurole tic D
3, ed. 3. Sarwer-

Linguistic

P

chc

oner

in press

.

150

Verdeaux, G. and Marty, R.: Action sur L'Electroencephalogramme de
Substances Pharmacodynamiques D'interet Clinique, Rev. Neurol.
............._..
2;: 1.05-4.27, 195a.

16.

Andermann, K.: Electroencephalographic Evidence of Personality
Change Produced by Ataractic Drugs in Mentally Disturbed

17.

Bradley, P.B. and Elkes,

J.:

The

Effects of

Some Drugs on

Electrical Activity of the Brain, Brain, g9: 77-117,

the

1957.

18.

Garattini, S.

19.

Jorgensen, R.S. and wulff, M.H.: The Effect of Orally Administered
Chlorpromazine on the Electroencephalogram of Man, EEG. Clin.

'

and Ghetti, V.,
Amsterdam, .1957.

eds.: Psychotropic Drugs, Elsevier,

Neuroghysiol. 39: 325-329, 1958.

20.

Winfield, D.L. and Aivazian, G.H.: EEG. Changes Associated with
Sparine Therapy, EEG. Clin Neurophysiol. $9: 575,
Inégnsive
19
.

Wikler, A.: Clinical and Electroencephalographic Studies on the
Effects of Mescaline, N-allynormorphine and.Morphine inLMan,
J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 120: 157-175, 19Sh.

�-12..

FIGURES

1.

Chlorpromazine, oral (male, age 15).

2.

Chlorpromazine, oral (female, age 3b).

3.

Amobarbital, intravenous (male, age 31).
Win-2299, intravenous (female, age

bl).

ﬂectroconmllsive Therapy (female,

age 55).

Amobarbital, intravenous (female, age 36).
Win-2299, intravenous (female, age 51).

�ACKNOWEDGEMENT

are grateful for the cooperation of the following
laboratories who made supplies of the various psychopharmaceuticals
We

fully available: Ciba Pharmaceutical Prods. (reserpine), Lakeside
Laboratories (JB—318, 336), Eli Lilly 8: Co. (amobarbital), Merck
Sharpe

8c

Dohme

(benactyzine), Riker Laboratories (Deanol),

Roche

Laboratories (iproniazid), Sandoz Pharmaceuticals (LSD-25),
Schering Corp. (perphenazine), Smith, Kline 8: French Laboratories
(chlorpromazine, diethazine), E.R. Squibb

&amp;

Sons (triflupromazine),

Winthrop Laboratories (Win-2299) and Wyeth Laboratories (promazine,
meprobamate ) .

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2684">
                <text>EEG and behavioral effects of psychopharmacologic agents. In P. B. Bradley, P. Deniker, and C. Radouco-Thomas (eds.), Neuro-Psychopharmacology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1959, 1: 441-46.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2685">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2686">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-37b-003</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2687">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2688">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2689">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2690">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2691">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprint from Neuro-Psychopharrnacology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2692">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2693">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74471">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81032">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87593">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94154">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="270" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="61">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e014a6afb9c7514b91c71748685499ca.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9f4aefec5e8c130c970f3538c3603299</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100687">
                    <text>ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC AND
BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF TOFRANIL

Max Fink, M.D.

Reprinted from

“CANADIAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION JOURNAL”
Volume 4
Special Supplement, 1959

McGill University Conference on Depression
and Allied States, Montreal, March 19-21, 1959

�ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC AND BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS
OF TOFRKNIL
MAX FINK*

With the rapid increase in the number of potential psychopharmaceuticals,
the need for screening technics has become more acute. In studies of the electro—
graphic patterns of convulsive therapy, the hypothesis evolved that behavioral
changes induced by new compounds could be related to their neurophysiologic
effects as reﬂected by the type and degree of electrographic change (1, 2). This
suggestion followed a similar one by Wikler (3) who stated that “regardless of the
nature of the drug administered, shifts in the pattern of the electroencephalogram
in the direction ofdesynchronization occurred in association with anxiety, hallucina—
tions, fantasies, illusions or tremors, and in the direction of synchronization with
euphoria, relaxation or drowsiness.” Studies with various psychotropics (4) and
anticholinergic hallucinogens (5, 6) supported such a relationship. It is the purpose
of this preliminary report to describe initial behavioral and electrographic observa—
tions with Tofranil'l, a new psychopharmaceutical, and to relate these observations
to the neurophysiologic—adaptive hypothesis of the mode of action of physiodynamic
therapies (1).
Methods
Two types of studies were undertaken in an open—ward, voluntary hospitalized
population. In 28 acute experiments, consecutive patients referred for physiodynamic therapies were tested in the EEG laboratory at various stages of treat—
ment. Tofranil solution (10 mg/ml) was administered intravenously at a set rate
(1 ml/4O sec.) until electrographic or behavioral changes became prominent, for a
total of 40—125 mg (0.5—mg/kg). Behavioral observation and electrographic record—
ing continued for one to three hours.
A second group of 16 patients manifesting depressive, withdrawn or retarded
behavior were referred by their therapists for pharmacotherapy. The patients
received daily oral Tofranil, 75—250 mg. Behavioral observations and EEG recordings were made prior to and during treatment. Patients ranged in age from 17
to 58, and were diagnosed as suffering from schizophrenia, manic-depressive and
involutional depressive psychoses, and psychoneuroses.
'

Observations
I. dcute Studies: On acute administration, there was an initial restlessness,
associated with dizziness, dry mouth, “faintness,” nausea, and on four occasions,
vomiting. These symptoms persisted for 10—20 minutes, and were accompanied by
lassitude, heaviness of the extremities and eventual drowsiness. Heart rate was un—
changed or slowed. Subsequently, subjects were relaxed, quiet and disinclined to
activity, even when returned to their ward.
The electrographic patterns accompanying these behavioral changes were
initiated by a gradual decrease in voltages during the injection. By ten minutes,
the per cent time alpha and mean alpha voltage had been halved. In four patients
with moderate amounts of beta activity, such activity increased in voltage and
low
behavioral
with
association
lassitude,
time.
minutes,
By
in
cent
twenty
per
voltage (to 50 microvolts) random theta frequencies (5-7 cps) appeared (Figures
1 and 2).
*Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y. Aided in part by grants M-927
and MY-2092 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service;
and by a grant from Geigy Pharmaceuticals. The technical assistance of Mrs. Hannah Mosquera in EEG recording
is gratefully acknowledged.
’rTrade Mark.

�Special Supplement
pre-d rug

WWW
WWW

LF-LO

8167

DEPRESSION AND ALLIED STATES

W
W

after 75 mg

after 30 minutes

WNW

RF-RO

wWWv«w¢wanMV‘

I‘VWW

LAT-LF

RAT-RF

k/\_Jl/L,Ah/L

JL/\,JA/A,_JL/\,

=72

#2638Hh

WW

W

WWW
HR

after 45 minutes

HR

50

Mv|—_l
SEC.

=74

HR

=72

1

Fig.

1

Effect of intravenous Tofrinil on EEG delta
(female, aged 46)

pre—drug
LF-LO

«wwNWVHMWwNmN
RF-RO

WWW
LAT-LF

W
W
after 100 mg

after 30 minutes

hv

after 30 minutes

“NV“WJWWWWVVV¢

UWMerVkmeV4

WWW

WWW

RAT-RF

LF-RF

LPT-LO

0-0

EKG

plvltul
HR=84

#2138HH

W
MymMA/VW-WVN

MWVWVWMN‘

HR=108

50/.1vl—__J
1

Fig. 2

HR=84

SEC.

Effect of intravenous Tofrinil on EEG delta
(male, aged 37)

HR=9O

�8168

Vol. 4, 1959

CANADIAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION JOURNAL

In six records with post—convulsive delta activity, there was a marked decrease
in voltages and per cent time of slow wave activity. These electrographic patterns
persisted for half—an-hour to two hours (Figure 3).
There was considerable individual variability in the EEG response. In patients
who received 100 mg or more of Tofranil, EEG and behavioral changes were
Observed in all but three. In six patients, dosage Of Tofranil less than 50 mg were
not associated with either EEG or behavioral changes.
2. Chronic ﬂdministmtion Studies: Sixteen patients, manifesting depressive
symptoms with varying degrees of insomnia, anorexia, withdrawal, and agitation,
have received Tofranil medication for four weeks or longer. Medication was given
in oral divided doses of 100—250 mg per day. Behavioral changes generally appeared
during the second and were maximal during the third week of treatment.
LF-lO

after 100 mg

pre-drug

W W WW
W
W
WWW

RF-RO

RAT-RF

LF-RF

.

LPT-LO

0-0

#2348

after 30 minutes

after 15 minutes

iv

HR=86

HR=84

,_~,\_M,

amw

HR=75
50 uv

HR=72

l_
1

__
SEC.

_J

Fig. 3
Effect Of Tofranil on EEG delta
(female, aged 41: 24 hours post convulsion no. 7)

The most prominent behavioral adaptation was euphoric denial, which was
noted in eight patients. The depressive attitude was nO longer apparent. They
participated more fully in ward activities, complained less of somatic symptoms,
and denied, minimized or displaced their illness on inquiry. Agitation decreased,
and complaints of insomnia became less. It became increasingly difﬁcult to discuss
signiﬁcant life relationships as the patients pressed for an early discharge from the
hospital.
In three patients somatization and restlessness increased, and depressive affect
persisted. In two of these, restlessness, insomnia and vomiting led to cessation of
therapy. Sweating increased in most patients, but became a focus of attention in
these subjects.
NO change in symptoms were noted in ﬁve patients after four weeks of therapy.
While no serious complications of therapy were noted, nausea, increased sweating, vomiting, dryness Of the mouth, restlessness and excitement, and increasing

�Special Supplement

DEPRESSION AND ALLIED STATES

$169

insomnia were reported. These were prominent early in therapy, and except for
the vomiting and restlessness, did not limit the treatment. In three subjects medica—
tion was initially administered parenterally without untoward effects. Abnormal
motor patterns and seizures were not noted in these patients at these dosages.
Electrographic studies on chronic administration showed minimal changes.
Voltages became lower and record modulation became poorer. Well—defined fast
activity became more prominent, and in four subjects low-voltage theta (5—7 cps)
activity was noted.

Discussion
These observations indicate that Tofranil is an active central nervous system
agent in man, both on oral and intravenous administration. The neurophysiologic
effects are manifest electrographically as desynchronization of rhythms and a
shift-in frequency spectrum to the slower range. In depressed retarded subjects,
Tofrinil administration is associated with such behavioral changes as decreased
depressive affect with increased participation in ward activities, increased use of
denial patterns (7) and occasional excitement.
In comparison to our previous experience with other physiodynamic therapies,
the behavioral and electrographic patterns of Tofranil are most like those seen with
central anticholinergic agents. We observed desynchronization of frequencies, with
an increase in theta activity, to be prominent with experimental anticholinergic
compounds such as diethazine and benactyzine* (5, 6). In those studies, electro—
graphic desynchronization was associated with behavioral alerting, excitement and
illusory and hallucinatory activity. On Tofranil administration, similar electrographic patterns of desynchronization were observed, accompanied by euphoria
and increased ward participation. While we have not observed hallucinatory
activity at our dosage ranges, Lehmann (it a]. (9) have reported hallucinations and
hypomanic excitement in 7 of 84 patients receiving Tofra‘mil.
In earlier reports, Wikler (3, 10) suggested that the electrographic patterns of
synchronization and desynchronization reﬂected neuron systems distinct from those
neuron systems subserving such functions as ‘sensation,’ ‘ideation’ and ‘level of
awareness.’ While these systems were frequently interlocked, dissociation between
EEG pattern and behavior was observable under a variety of drug—induced states.
In our earlier studies we were impressed that the electrographic and behavioral
patterns seen after induced convulsions, anticholinergic compounds and phreno—
tropic agents were directly related. On acute administration of Tofranil, however,
electrographic desynchronization was associated with clinical sedation. These
studies are consistent with Wikler’s suggestion.
These observations permit the classification of the neuropharmacologic activity
of Tofrinil in the central nervous system as predominantly anticholinergic. However, we have noted aspects of the electrographic and behavioral patterns reminis—
cent of increased cholinergic activity. These include the electrographic shift to
slower frequencies and sedative, euphoriant behavioral effects. Such observations
suggest that there may also be an effective degree of central cholinergic activity.

Summary
Intravenous administration of Tofranil in 28 voluntary, open—ward psychiatric
patients elicited electrographic patterns of desynchronization and an increase of
theta rhythms, associated with behavioral alerting, relaxation and lassitude.
Chronic administration of oral Tofrinil in 16 depressed and retarded psychiatric subjects elicited behavioral adaptations of euphoric denial in eight, restlessness
'A recent report by Abood and Meduna

(8) relates the behavioral. improvement in depressed patients with

a new central anticholinergic agent which has Similar electrographic patterns.

J B-329,

H
”

�8170

CANADIAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION JOURNAL

Vol.4,1959

and somatization in three and no change in ﬁve. During the ﬁfth week of adminis—
tration, electrographic desynchronization was manifest.
It is concluded that Tofranil is an active central nervous system agent, with a
Spectrum of activity most like experimental anticholinergic hallucinogens. The
theoretic signiﬁcance for neurophysiologic-behavioral constructs is brieﬂy discussed.

Résumé
Nous avons étudié la relation existant entre les eﬁets du Tofrinil sur le com—
portement et sur le tracé électrographique, chez des patients atteints de psychoses
aigués ou chroniques.
Mét/zode

Cas aigus: les patients retenus étaient examinés avant le traitement physioin—
celui—ci.
Tofranil
Le
de
administré
était
stades
divers
ainsi
en
qu’a
dynamique,
jections intraveineuses d’une solution a 10 mg/ml, jusqu’a un total de 40—125 mg
(0,5_2,5 mg/kg), concurremment avec des examens électro—encé—phalographiques.
Cas chroniques: des patients présentant de la depression et un ralentissement
du comportement étaient mis a la dose de 75—250 mg de Tofrz'mil par jour. Les
examens encéphalographiques et du comportement étaient effectués avant le début
du traitement, et a intervalles d’une semaine au cours de celui—ci.
Observations
1° Cas aigus
a) Comportement: au cours de l’administration du medicament, sur 28 cas,
nous avons noté des nausées, des vertiges et de la faiblesse. Quatre fois des vomissements sont survenus. Le rythme cardiaque est demeuré inchangé, ou s’est ralenti.
En 10 minutes ces symptOmes diminuaient d’intensité et les patients se détendaient.
b) Electro-mcéphalogmmme: pendant le traitement, il y a eu une diminution
du voltage dans toutes les fréquences. En 10 minutes le pourcentage de temps
alpha baissait et les voltages tombaient a la moitié de leurs valeurs initiales. Chez
les sujets a activité béta (4 cas), celle—ci devenait plus importante. Au bout de 20
5—7
de
lentes
ondes
des
minutes,
cps, atteignant 50 microvolts, apparaissaient ici
et la. Dans les enregistrements avec activité delta postconvulsive (6 cas) nous avons
noté une baisse marquee des voltages et des pourcentages de temps danS l’activité
des ondes lentes. Ces tracés électrographiques persistaient pendant M-Z heures.
2° Cas chroniques
a) Comporz‘emem: seize sujets ont été observes a ce jour. Les effets~initiaux
de la medication furent des nausées, deS vomissements, de l’agitation et de l’excita—
tion, une exagération de l’insomnie et une transpiration tres augmentée dont se
plaignaient les malades. Le traitement a été interrompu dans deux cas avec agita—
tion. Des 13 autres sujets, 6 ont vu leurs symptOmeS de depression S’amender et
ont pu reprendre une plus grande activité; ils ont pu étre renvoyés chez euX, ou ont
été prévus pour un prochain licenciement. Les autres n’ont guere présenté de chan—
a
la
soumis
été
n’ont
leurs
thérapeutique que pendant
dans
symptOmes,
ou
gements
un temps trop court.
&amp;) Electra—encéphdlogmmme: Les enregistrements obtenus pendant 1e traite—
ment n’ont montré que peu de modiﬁcations. Leur modulation était appauvrie
et leurs voltages abaissés. Une activité rapide bien caractérisée a pris de l’impor—
5—7
de
a
bas
activité
noté
voltage
4
malades
chez
une
cps.
nous avons
tance;
Conclusion:
1° Chez les psychopathes, les effets electrographiques du Tofrinil sont une
Ces
a
tracés
has
lentes
d’ondes
activité
voltage.
suivie
une
désynchronisation,
par
a
alors
ressemblent
les
traités,
et
dans
chroniques
moins
cas
prédominants
sont
ceux que l’on Obtient avec la benactyzine.
'

�Special Supplement

DEPRESSION AND ALLIED STATES

2° En ce qui concerne le comportement, nous constatons une

$171

augmentation

de la motilité, un changement dans l’humeur et un malade plus éveillé.
3° Ces observations concordent avec les hypotheses neuro—physiologico—adaptatives expliquant 1e mode d’action des traitements physiodynamiques des psychoses.

References
1.

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Fink, M.: Hillside Hosp. J. 6:197, 1957.
Fink, M.: Alteration of brain function in therapy, in Kline, N. S.: Psychopharmacology frontiers,
Boston, Little, Brown, 1959, pp. 325-333.
Wilder, A.: J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 120:157, 1954.
Fink, M.: EEG and behavioral effects of psychopharmacologic agents. Read at 1st International
Congress of Neuro—psycho—pharmacology, Rome, September 1958. In press.
Fink, M.: A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. 8: Psychiat. 80:380, 1958.
Fink, M.: Electroencephalog. 8t Clin. Neurophysiol. 10:776, 1958.
Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Denial of illness: symbolic and physiological aspects, Springﬁeld,
111., C. C. Thomas, 1955.
'Abood, L. G., and Meduna, L. J.: J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 127:546, 1958.
Lehmann, H., Cahn, C. H., and de Verteuil, R.: Canad. Psychiat. A. J. 3:155, 1958.
Wikler, A.: Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. &amp; Med. 79:26], 1952.

General discussion from the ﬂoor (summarized)
The question was asked whether administration of a large dose of Tofranil once a day would not be
as effective as multiple dosage. This would of course be a tremendous saving in the time of the nurses
involved. In answer it was stated that Tofrénil is best given not in one large daily dose but in a series of
small doses such as 2 tablets t.i.d. It was also brought out that Tofranil has a tremendous inﬂuence on

transference phenomena and that these can be analyzed in dreams and symbolisms. While such observa—
tions have been made, deﬁnitive results must await an extensive study.
Another discussant asked what is the difference between the effect of barbiturates and anticholin—
ergic drugs on the EEG.
One discussant felt that the EEG was a poor tool, since it could be modiﬁed in only two ways,
synchronization or desynchronization, and ﬁrm conclusions should not be drawn from such changes.
He therefore felt that analogies between diethazine and Tofrénil were dubious and that nausea was not
a specific effect of Tofranil. He wondered if EEG changes would always exist in the absence of nausea,
and felt it important to correlate EEG changes with clinical changes.
In replying to these comments, Dr. Fink stated that he considered Tofrﬁnil an anticholinergic drug
because of its similarity to other anticholinergic drugs in regard to its EEG patterns. Dr. Fink recalled
that Dr. Sigg’s paper had also indicated that Tofrﬁnil was an anticholinergic drug. Many anticholinergic
compounds appear to have rather speciﬁc central effects, and some are also experimental hallucinogens.
In his experience, barbiturates produce not desynchronization, but rather synchronization. This becomes
clear if the factors of dosage and time are considered. Thus the initial effect is hypersynchronization; if
the drug is continued, sleep is of course produced and the initial effect disappears.
The author replied to the criticism of his use of EEG. He agreed that it is a poor tool in many
respects, but that it is possible to analyze EEG records for synchronization, desynchronization and
fre uency shifts. One obtains different patterns with different agents even in the same patient. Dr. Fink
explained that he was making a long—term study, and hoped that more conclusive data could be offered
at a later time.

��’*”

EEG

uni nahtviernl

striat: .2

nu nah,

Torranil

3...». *

2h: rulltion hotvtcu thc ﬁlcetragrcphie and behaviortl «Itcctt at
retranil in velunthry paychintrie pationtt wan datarnincd in taut. and

thrsnic ntudioa.

_

Kathodnr

latto:

Ganaaeutiva patiants rcturrod for phytiodynunic thtrupiol
ttntod
not:
prior to and at yariatu itngal Of therapy. With 330 rocordinc,
retruail nelution (10 ng/oc) was adminintorud intruvanouuly for I total of
h0~125 I; (0.S~2.5 ng/ks).
chronic: Pttiontp annitslting duprctuivo tad rotnrdod bchlvior aura
plnoud an rogiucua o: 7S~2oe lg renunil daily. EEG oxnniuntionn and
hchuyiornl obsothtiaus war. and. prior to and It weekly int-yttla during
troutncnt.
Oblarvntianus

1. Acute Stadielt

a. Buhﬁyiora Baring drug zduiniltrutiou in 25 albjoata,
3.13033, EIuIIncoo in! Ionknoan wort rcpcrtud. Viniting ocearrcd an
tour oecaaicnc. ﬁctrt rgto was Inshtngod, tr nluvcd. In 1&amp;3 Iinutca,
th... aynptoun were 103:, und puticnta war. roluxod.
b. EEG: During ndninistrttion thtrc was a dccruuuc in yoltagc
a: all trcquonans. By tan minuttu, thc par cant tint alpha ducronsed,
lad valtngea were halt at thc initial values. In pationts with sodurnto
anonntn of but. uctiyity (h), auch activity hocuno morc yroxincnt. ﬂy
taunty mintha, slow It?! nativity of k-7 apt, up to 50 uiarovclta upponrnd,
rundouly. In roenrd: with poat~eenvulaiva daltg activity (6), thert in a
nurkcd docrotio in voltngcn and in par tent tin. of claw wave nativity.
tutu: electraartphic pattcrn: pcraictcd far
2.

Chrunia

I

studioat

_Bchnvi¢rn

i.

rittouu patient: hay.

2

hours.\

boon under

ebccrvutiou to

data. -Iai -n a van a at nodicntian inaludod nanaou (a) vaulting (a),
roatlouuuocn lad axaitantnt (2), insomnin oxaggorntod (35, And aonplainta
o: oxacstivo uwiating (11). In tha tun pationtn with roitlsasnoal, nedic;~.
tit» at: diaoontinund. a: the thirtaon pntionts, nix Innitcttni In 3110'iatiun or symptoms a: doprnulion with incronnad pnrtiaipation in activitics,

Ind hava Bean dilahargad or rccaunoudcd tar diuehnrga. Th: rcaaiuing
buy. nhaun littlc engage in a tan. (3) at thcrapy ht! baan
patitntl
udniniltorud for too thort a ptriod (hgfp

3:. mm: In neat-d. «ht-sin“ during hottmnt, tiniaul change:
taro obIcrvoa. ﬁeduiation a: rucordu was poortr with lcwor yoltncct.
H011 dutinod rant activity bee... not. proninont; tad in tour subject. 10v

waltago 5~7 cps activity VI! noted.

conclusion.
Ll Sloetrozrtphic extactn o: Totrunil in payehiutriu patiuntc are
thus: of duayuehroniantion, tullowod by law voltngo slaw wtva nativity.
* Iron thc Duplrtuant at magazinpnttl Payehintry, nilluidc Rhapital,

glig ggk"

L010 301%

�.2th¢to pattorna arc 1.0: proninnnt an chrcnie udntnintrntiau, tad

rononblo

that.

or bnunctynin0¢

2) Dihtviornl offset: arc that; of alurtiuc, Iced ch¢n¢a and
inurilnnd motility.

«autistant with ﬁha nauraphyszolagtau
:Athivu hypathuntu at :h: act. at action or physiodyuania thcrupion
3) Thnss abaorvution¢ nae

of paychoucu.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2694">
                <text>Electroencephalographic and behavioral effects of tofranil. Can Psychiatr Assoc J. 1959;4(Suppl):166-71.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2695">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2696">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-38a-004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2697">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2698">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2699">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2700">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2701">
                <text>Reprint from CANADIAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION JOURNAL Volume 4 Special Supplement, 1959 McGill University Conference on Depression and Allied States, Montreal, March 19-21, 1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2702">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2703">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74472">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81033">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87594">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94155">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="271" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="62">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/261abbc7e46388bc86f6597be731bd1c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0134e8d9c4e023061da7cfc3c500f0f0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100688">
                    <text>t

Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function to Behavioral
Change Following Induced Convulsions

Max

Fink,

McDo

Robert L. Kahn Ph.D.
and
Hyman

From

Korin Ph.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,N.Y.

Institute of Mental Health, National
Health Service.
United
Public
States
of
Health,
Institutes

Aided by Grant M-927 of the National

(in part) at the Divisional Meeting A.P.A., Montreal, November, 1956, and
International Congress of Neurological Sciences, Brussels, July, 1957.
the
at

Read

12-3-57

“W5, $9;

WW7

A“!

�Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function to Behavioral
Change Following Induced Convulsions
Numerous

studies have been.reported assessing the type, duration

and significance of mental changes following electroshock. These reports

vary widely in their descriptions and
meaningful conclusion regarding the

it is difficult to arrive at a

relation of such mental changes to

clinical response. Basic to these differences in observation are the
vexing problems of the definition and the ways of measurement of organictype reactions;

the time relation of the measurements to the treatment

process; and the definition of improvement following therapy. Each of
these factors bears an integral relationship to the final definition of
the problem.

In the present study, various

tests of brain function were

applied serially to patients in mhom‘behavicr was altered by repeated
inductions of grand mal convulsions (Electroshock).

The

data comparing

the serial changes in these indices are presented.
METHOD:

Definition of "organic mental changes":

conventional conception

The

of organic mental changes includes such behavioral changes as impairment

of

memory and of

the discrimination of differences on perceptual tasks;

disorientation for time, date, or place; errors

tractibility

and

inability to handle

perserveration in speech

on

more than one

and behavior; emotional

calculation tests; dis-

situation at a time;

lability;

and

loss of

interest in one's appearance and in the environment. Most studies assess
the relationship of memory loss or clinically manifest disorientation to
improvement following

by

tests of

simple

electroshock.

The memory

loss is usually measured

recall, information, personal events, digit

memory span,

�~2r

etc.: while disorientation is
place, date,

determined by questions

the examiner, 323,

name of

Such

tests of

relating to present
memory and

of

orientation, however, discriminate primarily only severe degrees of dysF

function.
In the present studies, cognizant of the difficulties inherent in

clinical assessments, we measured changes in brain function by four
different measures, hoping thereby to determine varying degrees, or even,
simple

types of dysfunction.

The

four'measures selected as being sensitive to

varying aspects and degrees of cerebral dysfunction.were:
a) The degree of delta activity in the electroencephalogram (1).

b)

in language and orientation following the administration
of amobarbital sodium - the "amytal test" for organic brain

Changes

disease (2, 3).
c) Alteration in perception of multiple simultaneous
d)

Changes

in tests of recall of

the interpolation of reading
Time

of Testing:

A

common

lists

tactile stimuli (h).

words, both with and without

of nonsense syllables (5).

second factor to be considered

is the

time of

application of these tests in relation to the treatment program.
Observers have reported the development of organic changes in the

Numerous

few

minutes of recovery following each treatment. Others noted the appearance

of mental changes during the course of treatment, and reported that treatments

at periods more frequent than the conventional three times per week induced
earlier and more severe changes. The transient nature of the changes are
frequently noted, so that by the second or third

at pretreatment levels,
orientation is re-instituted.

course of therapy the electroencephalogram is
memory changes have

disappeared and

week following an extensive

�-BIn the present studies, the electroshock treatment schedule was main-

tained at three times per week with
Reiter electroshock, during the

all

patients receiving conventional

initial three weeks.

In the fourth week,

treatment frequency was occasionally reduced to two times per week. All

patients received a
out

at

weekly

minimmn

intervals

of twelve treatments. All

on a day following a

tests were carried

treatment during the course

of therapy. Following termination: of therapy, weekly testing was continued

until the tests returned to their initial level.
third factor crucial to a study relating the
significance of organic mental changes to electroshock results is the
definition and evaluation of "improvement." The evaluation of clinical
Behavior Ratings:

response to therapy

A

is

a subjective value judgment by the therapist or

adninistrator which reflects a divergence of goals, judgments, and compromises. Significant variables in the evaluation of "improvement" are
the type, severity and duration of the pets“. ent' s illness, his premcrbid
personality, the sociologic (family) constellation to which he will return,
and the expectations (both conscious and unconscious) of the

institution, of the patient and of the family.
of the evaluation of the treannent result is also a

the

therapist, of

Furthermore , the time
most

sigaificant

variable.
The

parameters of evaluation have not been satisfactorily delineated.

In this study, the following

compromises have been made.

All evaluations

qualified psychiatrist who has no responsibility
for the selection of subjects or application of the treatments. Patients
are

made by an independent

are seen weekly

and conferences are

held with the therapist to assess the

�.Ll.

therapeutic goals before treatment and the therapist‘s estimate of the
respOnse

after treatment.

The

finai evaluation used here is the

clinical state of the patient during the second and third weeks following
the last treatment, and describe only changes in clinical behavior.
we have used a

three-fold classification of

improved" and "uninmuoved," with the
and "unimproved"

"much improved," "moderately

intent that the

categories respectively

"much improved"

would describe

patients at

the extremes of the response continuum.
The

patients rated as

those

"much improved" were

showed the symptoms which brought them.to the

who no

longer

hospital, their physicians

believed them to be better, and the nurses' notes confirmed such aspects
as being able to sleep without medication, better appetite and improved

capacity to participate in hospital activities.
The "unimproved"

patients were those

noticeable change in behavior

who

manifested no clearly

or'Who became worse.

The "moderately improved" patients showed some change

but continued to manifest signs of'mental illness.
some symptomatic

relief,

which was

transient.

They

in behavior,
typically showed

�.5.
RESULTS :

Twenty-four consecutive electroshock patients were studied.

these, eleven
and

were

Of

"much improved," seven as "unimproved,"

rated as

six as "nmderately improved."
(a) Electroencephalogrems: EEG records, using conventional leads,

were measured for the average per cent time

delta activity,

and

highest

per cent time delta in any one lead; the Slowest frequency in the record;
and the duration and amplitude of delta burst activity (1). Using these
measurements, the 180 records in the series were placed in rank order
according to the degree of delta activity.

The upper

1/3 of the records

were described as "high delta activity" and the lowest 1/3 as "low

delta

activity."
pretreatment records showed delta activity. During the course of
electroshock delta activity appeared in all records to varying degrees. It
No

was apparent within the
on the

third

with high

first

week following

EEG

week of treatment and

the

7~9

treatments.

The

usually reached a peak

results for those

delta activity are seen in Table I.
TABLE
EEG

-

%

I

High Delta

Activity
1-3

h—é

7-9

10-12

25

80

91

88

Moderately Improved (6)

0

16

50

ho

unimproved (7)

o

o

o

20

Treatment Period:
much Improved (11)

�~6(b) AmObarbital Test: In these

tests (2,

3) the patients are asked

series of questions relating to their illness and to orientation.
Sodium amytal is administered intravenously until nystagmus and slurred
speech are observed. The questions are then repeated. Changes in
a

orientation

and awareness

of illness are scored as "positive" amytal

response, reflecting a change in brain function ascribed to “organic

brain disease" (2).

The

results are noted in the next table.
TABLE

II

Amvtal Test -.%

Positive

Treatment Period: 1-3

11-6

7-9

10-12

13-15

Much Improved (11)

us

61;

100

89

100

Moderately Improved (6)

20

33

67

20

25

Unimproved (7)

1h

16

16

33

o

The

data of Tables

The congruence

I

and

II

have been graphically portrayed in Figure

of the observations of the degree of

delta activity

EEG

l.

and

test responses is demonstrated. (Fig. 1)
Tests: In this test (5) a list of three letter common

the per cent positive amytal
(c)

Memos!

words were presented

for

10

to patients by flash cards.

trials. After this, lists

interpolated.

The

of 3

recall of the first

The

cards were presented

letter nonsense syllables

list

were

of'wordStmas.then tested, and

the number of words recalled in each session was scored.
An

impairment

in recall function

decrement was maximal

in the second

was apparent
and

third

in all subjects. This

weeks of

sustained as long as treatments were administered

treatment,

3 times a week.

and was

�-7The

decrease in ability to recall the word

list is

noted

in the next

table o
TABLE

III

anaiment in Recall -

Marked Decrement

%

Treatment Period

1-3

1456

7-9

10-12

Improved (9)

o

11

33

o

Moderately Improved (h)

0

SO

SO

0

Unimproved (7)

0

1h

0

0

Much

the scores are compared with the mprovement rating, there is
no significant difference between groups. The rapid return of recall
ability to pretreatment levels when treatment frequency was reduced to
When

two times per week

indicates that this

more severe degrees

test is

a measure of only the

of cerebral dysfmction.

tests the patient is touched
by the examiner simultaneously on the cheek and the hand, and asked to
localize the stimuli. The tests are repeated for 10 trials using varying
combinations of cheek, hand, shoulder and thigh. Persistent failure to
(d) Tactile Perceptual Tests: In these

report

the stimuli or to mislocalize a stimulus beyond the tenth
indicative, in adults, of altered cerebral function (h).

one of

trial is
In all subjects, this test

was negative before

patients. In nine patients, two
observed, and of these, six were in the much

responses were observed in 19 of the
consecutive responses were
improved and three

treatment. Positive

21;

in the moderately improved groups.

�In the next table the positive responses were charted with relation

to the treatment period

and

of positive regaonses is to

the clinical evaluation.
be noted

in the first

A

high incidence

two groups, and many

fewer such responses in the unimproved group.
TABLE

Face Hand Test

IV

- % Positive
1-3

h-6

7-9

10-12

13-15

Much Improved (11)

16

no

in

h3

60

Moderately Improved (6)

60

1:3

2:3

30

o

o

16

12

11

o

Treatment Period

Unimproved (7)

�DISCUSSION:

Three aspects of these observations warrant elaboration.

sensitivity
and the

and

stability

The

of these indices of altered brain function

significance for a definition of altered cerebral function;

the relation of these indices during and

evaluation;

and

after treatment to the clinical

the relation of these observations for the theory of

electroshock action.
All

tests

showed changes during electroshock therapy,

indicating

that a state of altered cerebral function'was induced. Certain tests,
as the

EEG

and the amytal

test,

were altered

after a

few convulsions

persistently positive for one to three weeks fOIIOWing
treatment. In this regard the electroencephalogram manifested the
earliest and the most sustained changes. The recall and tactile perceptual tests also showed changes but these appeared late (in the 2nd
and remained

week of treatment) and disappeared

rapidly

when treatment frequency

was reduced.

Tests of recall function and

tactile perceptual tests, therefore,

are less sensitive indicators of the state of cerebral function. In
any evaluation

of the relation of an induced

to another‘variable,

it is important,

the operation (or

test)

and the

Because these

tests

have varying

change

in brain function

therefore, to clearly define both

sensitivity of the operation which forms
the basis for the estimation of altered cerebral function.

sensitivities, the frequency of

treatment and the duration of the treatment regimen become important

variables in any assessment.

EEG

changes are maintained by infrequent

�~10-

treatment, while changes in recall function and simultaneous tactile
perception are rapidly
0f the

function,

clinical

lost,

when treatment frequency

reduced.

correlations possible with these tests of brain

many

we have

selected the relation of these test results to the

improvement

rating.

‘With

the

EEG-and amytal

relationships between the appearance of test changes
improvement are

is

clearly observed. In the

positive amytal tests

and high degree

were more marked, and were sustained

EEG

tests significant
and

much improved

clinical
patients,

abnormality appeared early,

for longer periods (on the

treatment regimen) than in the unimproved patients.

The

same

moderately

improved patients were in between.

relation between altered brain function and clinical response

This

is noted only with the data obtained during the course of therapy.
There is no correlation of improvement ratings with post-ptreatment test
results. This divergence is related to the timing of test applications,
in the conclusions of other studies

and may explain the discrepancies

of this prdblem.
These Observations can also be
mode of

action of electrochock.

related to an understanding of the

In 1952,'Weinstein, Linn and

Kahn

(6)

postulated that the function of electroshock therapy was to "initiate
the production of a state of altered brain function in which the patient

his problems." These observations support the first part of
this hypothesis. namely, that a state of altered cerebral function is
can deny

induced by electroshock. Also, in patients who.improved, the altered

state is

more prominent, appears

earlier and is

more

persistent than in

�,

those

who

fail to

improve.

Of

the eleven

positive amytal tests (while
positive test); and ten had high

had

one of the unimproved

.11.much improved

patients, all

5 of the 7 unimproved never had a
EEG

abnormality records, while only

patients had such a record.

It is

our condlusion

significant degrees of altered cerebral
function are a prerequisite - a necessary, though not a sufficient
requirement - for improvement in electroshock therapy.

that early? sustained

and

�4.2;»

W:

In a study of the relation of tests of altered brain function

to improvement in electroshock,
of change

it

was observed

that while indicators

in brain function vary in sensitivity, all tests indicate

the development of organic mental changes during electroshock therapy.
The

reason for the conflicting results reported by others can be

accounted

for by the variations in the tests used, the time of study

difficulties in evaluating improvement.
It is our conclusion that clinical improvement in electroshock is

and the

dependent on
and

early, sustained

that electroshock therapy

and marked changes
may be

in mental function;

described as the non-Specific,

traumatic induction of states of altered cerebral function in which
the subject reacts with

new

patterns of adaptation.

�REFERENCES

1- Fink,

M. and Kahn, R.L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to
Behavioral Response in Electroshock: Quantitative
Serial Studies, A.M.A. Arch. Neural. &amp; chhiatﬂﬁ:

516.525, 1957.

_

Kahn, R.L. and Malitz, 3.: Serial Administration
Test"
for Brain Disease. Its Diagnostic and
of "Anvtal
Prognostic Value, A.M.A. Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat.
217-226, 1951;.

2. Weinstein, E.A,,

_’_?_I_:

3.

Kahn, R.L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock, A.M,A.

Arch. jieurol.

8c

Psychiat" Zé: 23-29, 1956.

and Bender, M.B.: The Face-Hand Test as a
Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome, NeurologX, _2_:

h. Fink, M., Green, ILA.
h6—58. 1952.

H. , Fink, M. and Kwalwasser, 8.:
Memory and Learning to Improvement
Neuron-o, $6.: 88'96’ 1956.

5. Karin,

Relation of Changes in
in Electroshock, Conf.

Weinstein, E.A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy,
Am.

J. Psychiat., 109: 22-26,

1952’.

�--- .. anEu’mlJ-Jﬁal
from
,
“T'he FLSL
, ,.. -n
Congress of Neur-ofogical
’, Brussels, 1.;7. Vol. III.
EEG, Clinical Neurophysiology
ces
-pllepsy. Pergamon Press; London, New York &amp; Paris 1959

"Emmi

,

RELATION OF TESTS OF ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION TO
BEHAVIORAL CHANGE FOLLOWING INDUCED CONVULSIONS
DANS
CEREBRALE
FONCTIONNELLE
ALTERATION
D'UNE
ROLE
LE CHANGEMENT DE COMPORTEMENT SUCCEDANT A DES
CONVULSIONS PROVOQUEES
MAX FINK, ROBERT L.KAHN and HYMAN KORIN

New York, U.S.A.

Numerous studies have been reported assessing the type, duration and
significance of mental changes following electroshock. These reports vary
widely in their descriptions and it is difficult to arrive at a meaningful
conclusion regarding the relation of such mental changes to clinical
the
in
vexing
observation
differences
to
are
these
Basic
response.
problems of the definition and the ways of measurement of organic—type
reactions; the time relation of the measurements to the treatment process;
and the definition of improvement following therapy. Each of these factors
bears an integral relationship to the final definitiOn of the problem. In the
to
function
of
applied
serially
brain
were
various
tests
present study,
of
inductions
grand
altered
whom
behaviour
by
in
repeated
was
patients
mal convulsions (Electro shock). The data comparing the serial changes in
these indices are presented.
MET HOD

Definition of 'organic mental changes'
The conventional conception of organic mental changes includes such
of
of
discrimination
the
and
of
behavioural changes as impairment memory
differences on perceptual tasks; disorientation for time, date, or place;
handle
to
and
more
inability
caICulation
0n
distractibility
tests;
errors
than one situation at a time; per serveration in speech and behaviour;
emotional lability; and loss of interest in one‘s appearance and in the
environment. Most studies assess the relationship of memory loss or
clinically manifest disorientation to improvement following electroshock.
The memory loss is usually measured by tests of simple recall, informa: while disorientation is
etc.
tion, personal events, digit memory span,
determined by questions relating to present place, date, name of the
examiner, etc. Such tests of memory and of orientation, however,
discriminate primarily only severe degrees of dysfunction.
In the present studies, cognizant of the difficulties inherent in simple
clinical assessments, we measured changes in brain function by four
different measures, hoping thereby to determine varying degrees, or even,
to
sensitive
selected
four
being
The
as
of
measures
types dysfunction.
varying aspects and degrees of cerebral dysfunction were:
(a) The degree of delta activity in the electroencephalogram (l).
(b) Changes in language and orientation following the administration
of amobarbital sodium - the 'amytal test' for organic brain
disease (2, 3).
613

‘

�614

M. FINK, R.L.KAHN and H.KORIN

(c) Alteration in perception of multiple simultaneous tactile stimuli
((1)

(4).

Changes in tests of recall of common words, both with and without the interpolation of reading lists of nonsense syllables (5).

Time of Testing
A second factor to be considered is the time of application of these
tests in relation to the treatment program. Numerous observers have
reported the development of organic changes in the few minutes of recovery
following each treatment. Others noted the appearance of mental changes
during the course of treatment, and reported that treatments at periods
more frequent than the conventional three times per week induced earlier
and more severe changes. The transient nature of the changes are
frequently noted, so that by the second or third week following an extensive
course of therapy the electroencephalogram is at pretreatment levels,
memory changes have disappeared and orientation is re-instituted.
In the present studies, the electroshock treatment schedule was
maintained at three times per week with all patients receiving conventional
Reiter electroshock, during the initial three weeks. In the fourth week,
treatment frequency was occasionally reduced to two times per week. All
patients received a minimum of tWelve treatments. All tests were carried
out at weekly intervals on a day following a treatment during the course of
therapy. Following termination of therapy, weekly testing was c0ntinued
until the tests returned to their initial level.
Behavior Ratings
A third factor crucial to a study relating the significance of organic
mental changes to electroshock results is the definitiOn and evaluation
of 'improvement‘. The evaluation of clinical response to therapy is a
subjective value judgment by the therapist or administrator which reﬂects
a divergence of goals, judgments , and compromises. Significant variables
in the evaluation of 'improvement' are the type, severity and duration of
the patient's illness, his premorbid personality, the sociologic (family)
constellation to which he will return, and the expectatious (both conscious
and unconscious) of the therapist, of the institution, of the patient and of
the family. Furthermore, the time of the evaluation of the treatment
result is also a most significant variable.
The parameters of evaluation have not been satisfactOrily delineated.
In this study, the following compromises have been made. All evaluations
are made by an independent qualified psychiatrist who has no responsibility
for the selection of ‘subjects or application of the treatments. Patients are
seen weekly and conferences are held with the therapist to assess the
therapeutic goals before treatment and the therapist's estimate of the
response after treatment. The final evaluation used here is the clinical
state of the patient during the second and third weeks following the last
treatment, and describe only changes in clinical behaviour. We have used
a three-fold classification of 'much improved' , 'moderately improved' and
'unimproved' , with the intent that the 'much improved' and 'unimproved'
categories respectively would describe patients at the extremes of the
response continuum.
The patients rated as 'much improved' were those who no longer
showed the symptoms which brought them to the hospital, their physicians
'

�Relation of tests of altered brain ﬁmction to behavioral change

615

believed them to be better, and the nurses' notes confirmed such aspects
as being able to sleep without medication, better appetite and improved
capacity to participate in hospital activities.
The 'unimproved' patients were those who manifested no clearly
noticeable change in behaviour or who became worse.
The 'moderately improved' patients showed some change in behaviour,
but continued to manifest signs of mental illness. They typically showed
some symptomatic relief, which was transient.
RESULTS

Twenty-four consecutive electroshock patients were studied. Of these,
eleven were rated as 'much improved', seven as 'unimproved', and six
as 'moderately improved'.
(a) Electro enc ephalogr am s
EEG

records, using conventional leads, were measured for the

average per cent time delta activity, and highest per cent time delta in any
one lead; the slowest frequency in the record; and the duration and
amplitude of delta bur st activity (1). Using these measurements, the 180
records in the series were placed in rank order according to the degree
of delta activity. The upper 1/3 of the records were described as 'high
delta activity' and the lowest 1/3 as 'low delta activity'.
No pretreatment records showed delta activity. During the course of
electroshock delta activity appeared in all records to varying degrees. It
was apparent within the first week of treatment and usually reached a peak
on the third week following the 7-9 treatments. The results for those with
high EEG delta activity are seen in Table I.
TABLE I
EEG -

%

High Delta Activity

Treatment Period:
Much Improved (11)

Moderately Improved (6)
Unimproved (7)
(b)
'W

.....'-.——-—-

a
.-

1-3

4-6

7-9

25

80

91
50

10-12

—-——————__.____—_~__
0
0

16

0

0

88
40
20

Amobarbital Te st

In these tests (2, 3) the patients are asked a series of questiOns
relating to their illness and to orientation. Sodium amytal is administered
intravenously until nystagmus and slurred speech are observed. The
questions are then repeated. Changes in orientation and awareness of
illness are scored as 'positive' amytal response, reflecting a change in
brain function ascribed to 'organic brain disease' (2.). The reSults are
noted in the next table.

�616

M. FINK, R.L.KAHN and H.KORIN

TAB—Ly;

Arnytal Test -

%

Positive

Treatment Period
Much Improved

(ll)

1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12
45
20

Moderately Improved (6)
Unimproved (7)

64 100
33 67

14

16

16

89
20
33

13-15
100
25
0

(c) Memory Tests:

In this test (5) a list of three letter common words were presented to
patients by ﬂash cards. The cards were presented for 10 trials. After
this, lists of 3 letter nonsense syllables were interpolated. The recall of
the first list of words was then tested, and the number of words recalled
in each session was scored.
An impairment in recall function was apparent in all subjects. This
decrement was maximal in the second and third weeks of treatment, and
was sustained as long as treatments were administered 3 times a week.
The decrease in ability to recall the word list is noted in the next table.

TABLE III

Impairment in Recall -

%

Marked Decrement

Treatment Period
Much Improved (9)

Moderately Improved (4)
Unimproved (7)

1-3

4-6

7-9

10—12

0
0
0

ll

33
50

0

50

l4

0

O

0

are compared with the improvement rating, there
is no significant difference between groups. The rapid return of recall
ability to pretreatment levels when treatment frequency was reduced to two
times per week indicates that this test is a measure of only the more
severe degrees of cerebral dysfunction.
(d) Tactile Perceptual Tests
In these tests the patient is touched by the examiner simultaneously
on the cheek and the hand, and asked to localise the stimuli. The tests are
repeated for 10 trials using varying combinations of cheek, hand, shoulder
and thigh. Persistent failure to report one of the stimuli or to mislocalise
a stimulus beyond the tenth trial is indicative, in adults, of altered
cerebral function (4).
In all subjects, this test was negative before treatment. Positive
When the scores

�Relation of tests of altered brain ﬁmction to behavioral change

61 7

responses were observed in 19 of the 24 patients. In nine patients, two
consecutive responses were observed, and of these, six were in the much
improved and three in the moderately improved groups.
In the next table the positive responses were charted with relation
to the treatment period and the clinical evaluation. A high incidence of
positive responses is to be noted in the first two groups, and many fewer
such responses in the unimproved group.

w

Face Hand Test - % Positive
Treatment Period 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15
Much Improved (11)

16

Moderately Improved (6)
Unimproved (7)

60
O

4o
43
16

47
43
12

43

3O

ll

60
0

0

DISCUSSION

Three aspects of these observations warrant elaboration. The
sensitivity and stability of these indices of altered brain function and the
significance for a definition of altered cerebral function; the relation Of
these indices during and after treatment to the clinical evaluation; and the
relation of these observations for the theory of electroshock action.
All tests showed changes during electroshock therapy, indicating
that a state of altered cerebral function was induced. Certain tests, as
the EEG and the amytal test, were altered after a few convulsions and
remained persistently positive for one to three weeks following treatment.
In this regard the electroencephalogram manifested the earliest and the
most sustained changes. The recall and tactile perceptual tests also
showed changesbut these appeared late (in the 2nd week of treatment) and
disappeared rapidly when treatment frequency was reduced.
Tests of recall function and tactile perceptual tests, therefore, are
less sensitive indicators of the state of cerebral function. In any evaluation
of the relation of an induced change in brain function to another variable, it
is important, therefore, to clearly define both the operation (or test) and
the sensitivity of the operatiOn which forms the basis for the estimation of
altered cerebral function.
Because these tests have varying sensitivities, the frequency of
treatment and the duration of the treatment regimen become important
variables in any assessment. EEG changes are maintained by infrequent
treatment, while changes in recall function and simultaneous tactile
perception are rapidly lost, when treatment frequency is reduced.
Of the many correlations possible with these tests of brain function,
we have selected the relation of these test results to the clinical improvement rating. With the EEG and amytal tests significant relationships
between the appearance of test changes and clinical improvement are
clearly observed. In the much improved patients, positive amytal tests

�618

M. FINK, R.L.KAHN and H.KORIN

and high degree EEG abnormality appeared early, were more marked, and
were sustained for longer periods (on the same treatment‘regimen) than in
the unimproved patients. The moderately improved patients were in

between.
This relation between altered brain function and clinical response is
noted only with the data obtained during the course of therapy. There is
no correlation of improvement ratings with post-treatment test results.
This divergence is related to the timing of test applications, and may
explain the discrepancies in the conclusions of other studies of this
problem.
These observations can also be related to an understanding of the
mode of action of electroshock. In 1952, Weinstein, Linn and Kahn (6)
postulated that the function of electroshock therapy was to 'initiate the
production of a state of altered brain function in which the patient can deny
his problems'. These observations Support the first part of this hypothesis,
namely, that a state of altered cerebral function is induced by electroshock. Also, in patients who improved, the altered state is more prominent, appears earlier and is more persistent than in those who fail to
improve. Of the eleven much improved patients, all had positive amytal
tests (while 5 of the 7 unimproved never had a positive test); and ten had
high EEG abnormality records, while only one of the unimproved patients
had such a record. It is our conclusion that early, sustained and significant degrees of altered cerebral function are a prerequisite - a necessary,
though not a sufficient requirement - for improvement in electroshock
therapy.
'

SUMMARY

In a study of the relation of tests of altered brain function to improvement in electroshock, it was observed that while indicators of change in
brain function vary in sensitivity, all tests indicate the development of

organic mental changes during electroshock therapy.
The reason for the conflicting results reported by others can be
accounted for by the variations in the tests used, the time of study and
the difficulties in evaluating improvement.
It is our conclusion that clinical improvement in electroshock is
dependent on early, sustained and marked changes in mental function;
and that electroshock therapy may be described as the non— specific,
traumatic induction of states of altered cerebral function in which the
subject reacts with new patterns of adaptation.
REFERENCES

l.
2.
3.

Fink, M. and Kahn, R.L. Relation of EEG delta activity to
behavioral response in electroschock: quantitative serial studies.
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat. , 1957, 78: 516-525.
Weinstein, E.A. , Kahn, R.L. and Malitz, S. Serial administration
of 'Amytal Test' for brain disease. Its diagnostic and prognostic
value. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat. , 195.4, 71: 217-226.
Kahn, R.L. , Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A. Relation of amobarbital
test to clinical improvement in electroshock. A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. and Psychiat. , 1956, 76: 23-29.

�Relation of tests of altered brain function to behavioral change

619

Fink, M. , Green, M.A. and Bender, M.B. The face-hand test as
a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome. Neurology, 1952,
2: 46-58.
Korin, H. , Fink, M. and Kwalwasser, S. Relation of changes in
memory and learning to improvement in electroshock. Conf.
Neurol. , 1956, 16: 88-96.
Weinstein, E.A. , Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L. Psychosis during electro‘
shock therapy: its relation to the theory of shock therapy. Am. J.
Psychiat. , 1952, 109: 22-26.

Dept. of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hosp-ital,
Glen Oaks, N. Y. , U.S.A.
‘

��Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function to Behavioral
Change Following Induced Convulsions

Max

Fink,

Rebert L.

IIOD c

Kahn Ph.D.

and
Hyman

From

Karin Fh.D.

the Department of Experimental Peychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,N.Y.

Aided by Grant M~927 of the National

Institute of Mental Health, National

Institutes of Health, United States Pablic Health Service.

(in ,art) at the Divisional Meeting A. P .A., Montreal, November, 1956, and
at the International Congress oi Neurological Sciences, Brussels, July, 1957.
Read

12—3-57

�Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function to Behavioral
Change Following Induced Convulsions
Numerous
and

studies have been reported assessing the type, duration

significance of mental changes following electroshock.

vary widely in their descriptions and
meaningful conclusion regarding the

it is difficult

These

reports

to arrive at a

relation cf such mental changes to

clinical response. Basic to these differences in observation are the
vexing problems of the definition and the ways of measurement of organic;
type reactions;

the time relation of the measurements to the treatment

process; and the definition of improvement following therapy. Each of
these factors bears an integral relationship to the final definition of
the problem.

In the present study, various

applied serially to patients in

whom

tests of brain function were

behavior was altered by repeated

inductions of grand mal convulsions (Electroshock).

The

data comparing

the serial changes in these indices are presented.
.

METHOD:

Definition of “organic mental changes":

conventional conception

The

of organic mental changes includes sudh behavioral changes as impairment

of

memory and of

the discrimination of differences on perceptual tasks;

disorientation for time, date, or place; errors

tractibility

and

inability to handle

perserveration in speech

on

more than one

and behavior; emotional

calculation tests; dis-

situation at a time;

lability;

interest in one's appearance and in his environment.
the relationship of

memory

tests of

simple

loss of

studies assess

loss or clinically manifest disorientation to

improvement following electroshock. The memory loss
by

Most

and

is usually measured

recall, information, personal events, digit

memory span,

�«2-

etc.: while disorientation is
place, date,

name of

determined by questions

the examiner, etc,

Such

tests of

relating.to present
memory and

of

orientation, however, discriminate primarily only severe degrees of dysfunction.
In the present studies, cognizant of the difficulties inherent in
simple clinical assessments, we measured changes in brain function by four

different measures, hoping thereby to determine varying degrees, or even,
types of dysfunction.

The

four measures selected as being sensitive to

varyinD aspects and degrees of cerebral dysfunction were:

delta activity in the electroencephalogram (1).
b) Changes in language and orientation following the administration
of amobarbital sodium - the "amytal test" for organic brain
a)

The degree of

disease (2, 3).
c)

Alteration in perception of multiple simultaneous tactile stimuli (h).

d)

Changes

in tests of recall of

the interpolation of reading
Time of

Testing:

A

common

lists

words, both with and without

of nonsense syllables (5).

second factor to be considered

is the

time of

application of these tests in relation to the treatment program.
observers have reported the development of organic changes in the

Numerous

few

minutes of recovery following each treatment. Others noted the appearance
of mental changes during the course of treatment, and reported

that treatments

at periods more frequent than the conventional three times per week induced
earlier and more severe changes. The transient nature of the changes are
frequently noted, so that

by

the second or third

is at pretreatment levels,
orientation is re-instituted.

course of therapy the electroencephalogram
memory changes have

disappeared and

week following an extensive

�.3In the present studies, the electroshock treatment schedule was main-

tained at three times per

all patients receiving conventional
initial three weeks. In the fourth week,

week with

Reiter electroshock, during the

treatment frequency was occasionally reduced to two times per week. All

patients received a
out

at

weekly

minimum

intervals

of twelve treatments. All

on a day following a

tests

were carried

treatment during the course

of therapy. Following termination of therapy, weekly testing was continued

until the tests returned to their initial level.
Behavior Ratings:

A

third factor crucial to a study relating the

significance of organic mental changes to electroshock results is the
definition and evaluation of "improvement." The evaluation of clinical

is a subjective value
administrator which reflects a divergence
response to therapy

judgment by the

therapist or

of goals, judgments, and com-

promises. Significant variables in the evaluation of "improvement” are
the type, severity and duration of the

patient's illness, his

premorbid

personality, the sociologic (family) constellation to which he will return,
and the

expectations (both conscious and unconscious) of the therapist, of

the institution, of the patient and of the family. Furthermore, the time
of the evaluation of the treatment

result is also a

most

significant

variable.
The

parameters of evaluation have not been satisfactoriLy delineated.

In this study, the following compromises have been made. All evaluations
are

made by an

independent qualified psychiatrist

who has no

responsibility

for the selection of subjects or application of the treatments. Patients
are seen weekly and conferences are held with the therapist to assess the

�.44..

therapeutic goals before treatment

and

the therapist‘s estimate of the

final evaluation used here is the
clinical state of the patient during the second and third weeks following
the last treatment, and describe only changes in clinical behavior.

reaponse

after treatment.

we have used a

The

three-fold classification of

improved" and "unimproved," with the

"much improved," "moderately

intent that the

"much improved"

and "unimproved" categories respectively would describe patients

at

the extremes of the response continuum.
The

patients rated as

"much improved" were

showed the symptoms which brought them

those

who no

longer

to the hospital, their physicians

believed them to be better, and the nurses' notes confirmed such aspects
as being able to sleep without medication,

better appetite

and improved

capacity to participate in hospital activities.
The "unimproved"

patients were those

noticeable change in behavior or
The

who became

"moderately improved" patients

manifested no clearly

Who

worse.

showed some change

but continued to manifest signs of'mental illness.
some symptomatic

relief,

which was

transient.

They

in behavior,

typically

showed

�-5RESULTS :

Twenty-four consecutive electroshock patients were studied.

"much improved," seven as "unimproved,"

these, eleven were rated as
and

Of

six as "moderately improved."
(a) Electroencephalograns:

EEG

records, using conventional leads,

highest
lead; the Slowest frequency in the record;

were measured for the average per cent time

delta activity,

and

per cent time delta in any one
and the duration and amplitude of delta burst activity (1). Using these
measurements, the 180 records in the series were placed in rank order
according to the degree of delta activity.
were described as "high delta

activity"

and

The upper

1/3 of the records

the lowest 1/3 as "low delta

activity.”
No

electroshock delta activity appeared in
was apparent within the
on the

activity.

pretreatment records showed delta

third

with high

first

week following

EEG

all

records to varying degrees.

week of treatment and

the 7-9 treatments.

delta activity are seen in Table
TABLE
EEG

.

%

During the course of

The

usually reached a peak

results for those

I.

I

Hiqh Delta

Activity

Treatment Period:

10-12

1-3

h—é

7—9

25

80

91

88

Moderately Improved (6)

o

16

so

ho

Unimproved (7)

o

o

o

20

ﬁnch Improved

(ll)

It

�a

(b)

~6-

Amobarbital Test; In these

tests (2,

3) the patients are asked

series of questions relating to their illness and to orientation.
Sodium amytal is administered intravenously until nystagmus and slurred
speech are observed. The questions are then repeated. Changes in

a

orientation

and awareness of

illness are scored as "positive" amytal

reSponse, reflecting a change in brain function ascribed to "organic
brain disease" (2). The results are noted in the next table.
TABLE

Amytal Test

-

II
%

Positive

Treatment Period:

1-3

h-6

7-9

10-12

13-15

Much Improved (11)

£15

61;

100

89

100

Moderately Improved (6)

20

33

67

20

25

Unimproved (7)

1h

16

16

33

o

The

data of Tables

The congruence of

I

and

II

have been graphically portrayed in Figure 1.

the observations of the degree of

EEG

delta activity

and

the per cent positive amytal test reSponses is demonstrated. (Fig. I)
(0) Memory Tests: In this test (5) a list of three letter common
words were presented to patients by flash cards. The cards were presented

for

10

trials. After this, lists

interpolated.

The

of

3

recall of the first

letter

list

nonsense syllables were

of words wens then

tested,

and

the number of words recalled in each session was scored.
An

impairment

in recall function

was apparent

in all subjects. This

decrement was maximal in the second and third weeks of treatment, and was
sustained as long as treatments were administered 3 times a week.

�.’

~7The

decrease in ability to recall the word

list is

noted

in the next

table.
TABLE

Impairment in Recall

III
-

%

Marked Decrement

1-3

Treatment Period
Mnch Improved (9)

Moderately Improved (h)

'

Unimproved (7)
When

h-é

7-9

10-12

O

11

33

O

0

SO

SO

0

0

1h

0

0

the scores are compared with the improvement rating, there

is

significant difference between groups. The rapid return of recall
ability to pretreatment levels when treatment frequency was reduced to
two times per week indicates that this test is a measure of only the

no

more severe degrees

of cerebral dysfunction.

tests the patient is touched
the cheek and the hand, and asked to

(6) Tactile Perceptual Tests: In these
by the examiner simultaneously on

localize the stimuli.

The

tests are repeated for

combinations of cheek, hand, shoulder and thigh.

report

one

10

trials

using varying

Persistent failure to

of the stimuli or to mislocalize a stimulus beyond the tenth

trial is indicative, in adults, of altered cerebral function (h).
In all subjects, this test was negative before treatment. Positive
two
responses were observed in 19 of the 2h patients. In nine patients,
consecutive responses were observed, and of these, six were in the much

improved and three

in the moderately improved groups.

�In the next table the positive responses were charted.with relation

to the treatment period
of positive responses

and

is to

the dlinical evaluation.
be noted

in the first

A

high incidence

two groups, and many

fewer such responses in the unimproved group.
TABLE

Face Hand Test

IV

-

%

Positive

Treatment Period
Much Improéed (11)

.
a

Moderately Improved (6)
Unimproved (7)

~

1-3

h-6

7-9

10-12

13-15

16

ho

h7

h3

60

60

h3

AB

30

O

0-

16

12

11

O

�DISCUSSION:

Three aspects of these observations warrant elaboration.

sensitivity

and

stability

The

of these indices of altered brain function

significance for a definition of altered cerebral function;
the relation of these indices during and after treatment to the clinical

and the

evaluation;

and

the relation of these observations for the theory of

electroshock action.
All

tests

showed changes during electroshock therapy,

indicating

that a state of altered cerebral function.was induced. Certain tests,
as the

EEG

and the amytal

test,

were

altered after a

few convulsions

persistently positive for cne to three weeks following
treatment. In this regard the electroencephalogram manifested the
earliest and the most sustained changes. The recall and tactile perand remained

ceptual tests also

showed changes but

week of treatment) and disappeared

.

was reduced.

Tests of recall function and

these appeared late (in the

rapidly

when

2nd

treatment frequency

tactile perceptual tests, therefore,

are less sensitive indicators of the state of cerebral function. In
any evaluation

of the relation of an induced

to another variable,
the operation (or

it is

test)

change

in brain function

important, therefore, to clearly define both

and the

sensitivity of the operation which forms

the basis for the estimation of altered cerebral function.
Because these

tests

have varying

sensitivities, the frequency of

treatment and the duration of the treatment regimen become important

variables in any assessment.

EEG

changes are maintained by infrequent

�{-10-

treatment, while changes in recall function and simultaneous tactile
perception are rapidly lost, when treatment frequency is reduced.
Of the many correlations possible with these tests of brain
function,

we have

selected the relation of these test results to the

clinical improvement rating. With the

EEG

and

clinical

much improved

patients,

relationships between the appearance of test changes
improvement are

clearly observed. In the

positive amytal tests

and high degree

EEG

tests significant

and amytal

abnormality appeared early,

were more marked, and were sustained for longer periods (on the same

treatment regimen) than in the unimproved patients.

The

moderately

improved patients were in between.

relation between altered brain function and clinical response

This

only with the data obtained during the course of therapy.

is noted
There is
results.

no

correlation of

This divergence

improvement

is related to the timing

of

test applications,

in the conclusions of other studies

and may explain the discrepancies

of

ratings with post-treatment test

this prdblem.
These observations can also be

mode of

related to an understanding of the

action of electroshock. In

postulated that the function

1952, Weinstein, Linn and Kahn (6)

of electroshock therapy was

to ”initiate

the production of a state of altered brain function in which the patient
can deny his problems." These observations support the first part of

this hypothesis, namely, that a state of altered cerebral function is
induced by electroshock. Also, in patients who.improved, the altered

state is

more prominent, appears

earlier

and

is

more

persistent than in

�.11..

those
had

who

fail to

improve.

Of

the eleven

positive amytal tests (while

positive test);

5 of

the

much improved
7

patients, all

unimproved never had a

and ten had high EEG abnormality records, while only

one of the unimproved

patients

had such a

record.

It is

our conclusion

significant degrees of altered cerebral
function are a prerequisite - a necessary, though not a sufficient
requirement - for improvement in electroshock therapy.

that early, sustained

and

�SUMMARY:

In a study of the relation of tests of altered brain function

to improvement in electroShock,
of change in brain function vary

it

was observed

that while indicators

in sensitivity, all tests indicate

the development of organic mental changes during electroshock therapy.
reason for the conflicting results reported by others can be
accounted for by the variations in the tests used, the time of study
The

difficulties in evaluating improvement.
It is our conclusion that clinical improvement in electroshock is

and the

dependent on

early, sustained

and marked changes

in mental function;

that electroshock therapy may be described as the non-specific,
traumatic induction of states of altered cerebral function in'which

and

the subject reacts with

new

patterns of adaptation.

�REFERENCES

l.

Fink,

Relation of EEG Delta Activity to
Behavioral Response in Electroshock: Quantitative
Serial Studies, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; PsychiatJﬁ:
M. and Kahn, R.L.:

516‘5251 1957.

Kahn, R.L. and Malitz, 5.: Serial Administration
of "Amytal Test" for Brain Disease. Its Diagnostic and
Prognostic Value, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 23;:

2. Heinstein, E.A.,

&lt;3».

217-226, 19st.

3.

Kahn, R.L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Improvement in Electro shock, A.I'I.A.

Arch. Neurol. a Psychiat., 19: 23-29, 1956.

h. Pink,

Grren, HA. and Bender, H.B.: The Face-Hand Test as a
Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome, Neurolo ﬂ. , _2_:
116—58, 1952.
1-1.,

H. , Fink, 1'1. and Kwalwasser, 8.:
Memory and Learning to Improvement

5. Korin,

I‘Ieinstein,

13.A., Linn, L. and Kahn,

shock Therapv:

Relation of Changes in
in Electroshock, Conf.

R.L.: Psychosis During Electro-

Its Relation to the

Theory of Shock Therapy,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2704">
                <text>Relation of tests of altered brain function to behavioral change following induced convulsions. In L. van Bogaert and J. Radermecker (eds.), First International Congress of Neurological Sciences. Pergamon Press, London, 1959, 3:613-619.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2705">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2706">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-39-005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2707">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2708">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.; Korin, Hyman</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2709">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2710">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2711">
                <text>Two [preprints] and one reprint. Reprint from The First International Congress of Neurological Sciences, Brussels, 1957, Vol. III EEG, Clinical Neurophysiology and Epilepsy. Peramon Press; London, New York &amp; Paris, 1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2712">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2713">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74473">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81034">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87595">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94156">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="272" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="63">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/0a74924969c48b97fad064f4d827441c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e33e0604bf1a53d201e8e551507b5084</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100689">
                    <text>Founded in 1887 by G. STANuIY HALL

OFFPRINTED FROM

THE AMERICAN
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
EDITED BY

KARL M. DALLENBACH
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
AND

M. E. BITTERMAN

BRYN MAWR COLLEGE

E. B. NEWMAN

HARVARD UNIVERSITY

WITH THE COOPERATION OF
E. G. BORING, Harvard University; W. K. ESTES, Indiana University; J. P.
GUILFORD, University of Southern California; HARRY HBLSON, University of
Texas; E. R. HILGARD, Stanford University; FRANCIS W. IRWIN, University
of Pennsylvania; G. L. KREEZER, Washington University; D. G. MARQUIS,
Social Science Research Council; GEORGE A. MILLER, Harvard University;
W. B. PILLSBURY, University of Michigan; LEO PosTMAN, University of
California; W. C. H. PRENTICE, Swarthmore College; T. A. RYAN, Cornell
University.

THE ROLE OF SET IN THE PERCEPTION OF
‘SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI

By HYMAN KORIN and MAX FINK, Glenn Oaks, Long Island

September, 1959, Vol. LXXII
pp. 384—392

Published b The American Journal of Psychology. Department of
sychology, University of Texas, Austin. Tex.

�Founded in 1887 by G. STANLEY HALL

OFFPRINTED FROM

THE AMERICAN
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
EDITED BY

KARL M. DALLENBACH
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
AND

M. E. BITTERMAN

BRYN MAWR COLLEGE

E. B.

NEWMAN

HARVARD UNIVERSITY

WITH THE COOPERATION OF
E. G. BORING, Harvard University; W. K. ESTES, Indiana
University;

j.

P.

University of Southern California; HARRY HELSON, University of
Texas; E. R. HILGARD, Stanford University; FRANCIS W. IRWIN, University
of Pennsylvania; G. L. KREEZER, Washington University; D. G. MARQUIS,
Social Science Research Council; GEORGE A. MILLER, Harvard
University;
W. B. PILLSBURY, University of Michigan; LEO POSTMAN, University of
California; W. C. H. PRENTICE, Swarthmore College; T. A. RYAN, Cornell
University.
GUILFORD,

THE ROLE OF SET IN THE PERCEPTION OF
SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI

By HYMAN KORIN and MAX FINK, Glenn Oaks, Long Island

September, 1959, Vol. LXXII
pp. 384-392

Published by The American Journal of Psychology, Department of
Psychology. University of Texas, Austin, Tex.

�THE ROLE OF SET IN THE PERCEPTION OF
SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI
By HYMAN KORIN and MAX FINK,

Glenn Oaks, Long Island

The inﬂuential role of ‘mental set’ in determining a subject’s response
to a perceptual task has been well documented.] In studies of the perception of simultaneous, tactile stimuli, various patterns of response have
been observed which seemed to be the result of a set induced by suggestion. This investigation was undertaken to determine the relation between
different conditions of ‘set’ and the frequency and type of perceptual error
elicited in tests with simultaneous, tactile stimuli.
Recently the advantages of the simultaneous stimulation of different
body-parts in tests of tactile perception have been stressed.2 Simultaneous
stimulation may elicit perceptual errors under conditions in which successive single stimulations are correctly perceived. When two stimuli are
applied to body-parts at the same time, only one stimulus may be reported
—an error referred to as 'extinction’; or one stimulus may be perceived
correctly and the other mislocalized—an error called 'displacement.’
Occasionally, if a single stimulus is interspersed in the testing-sequence,
it may be reported correctly, but an additional, extraneous stimulus may
also be reported—an error of ‘confabulation.’ Such errors of extinction,
displacement, and confabulation are signiﬁcantly increased in patients with
brain dysfunction.
When errors of extinction and displacement occur, they are elicited in
a consistent pattern. Thus, on stimulation of the hand and face, the
stimulus to the face is usually reported correctly, while that to the hand
is mislocalized or not reported. By testing various combinations of bodyparts, an ‘order of dominance’ may be determined in which stimuli to the
face and genital areas are most often perceived and those to the hand are
for publication September 23, 1958. From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glenn Oaks, Long Island, New York and aided
in part by Grant M-927, National Institute of Health, US. Public Health Service.
1]. J. Gibson, A critical review of the concept of set in contemporary experimental psychology, Pryc/aol. 32111., 38, 1941, 781—817; Robert Leeper, Cognitive processes, in S. S. Stevens (ed), Handbook of Evperimeoto] Psychology, 1951, 730-757.
2M. B. Bender, Disorder: in Perception, 1952; M. B. Bender, M. A. Green, and
Max Fink, Patterns of perceptual organization with simultaneous stimuli, A.M.A.
Arc/a. Neural. é Put/riot, 72, 1954, 233-255; Fink, Green and Bender, The facehand test as a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome, Neurol., 2, 1952, 46-58.
* Received

384

�SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI

385

least often perceived. Between these extremes, stimuli to the shoulder, foot,
buttock, breast, back, thigh and abdomen are perceived in a gradient.3
Theories involving factors of rostral dominance,‘ maturation,“ inattention,6 and
inherent body-image,7 have been advanced to explain the organization of these
perceptual patterns, but no one theory has adequately explained all the facts. We
have ascribed signiﬁcance to the relative intensity of the stimuli and the thresholdvalue in the frequency and the pattern of the 'extinction’ error, when electrical
stimuli are applied at threshold and suprathreshold intensities.8

The present study was undertaken to assess the relation between ‘set’
induced by suggestion and errors of 'confabulation’ and 'displacement.’
The speciﬁc problem studied is whether an 'inquiry’ into the testing pro—
cedure is signiﬁcantly related to the frequency and type of these errors.
Since these errors are most prominent in $5 with cerebral dysfunction,
patients undergoing convulsive and subconvulsive therapies were studied.
Subjects. The 55 were 61 consecutive psychotic patients referred for electroconvulsive therapy. Their ages ranged between 21—67 yr., mean age being 46 yr. Thirtyseven of them received convulsive therapy; 14 ﬁrst received subconvulsive therapy
and then convulsive therapy; and 10 received subconvulsive therapy alone. The 55
were selected for convulsive or subconvulsive treatment on a random basis by the
supervising psychiatrist.

Procedure. Two model S-4B Grass square-wave stimulators were synchronized to
deliver either single or simultaneous electrical stimuli. An isolation unit was connected with each stimulator to eliminate artifacts and the Output was visually monitored by an oscilloscope. A switch-box was inserted in the circuit to permit independent selection of the various parts of the body. The active and indifferent electrodes for each part were small 3ﬁg-in. steel disks, placed l-in. apart and secured
with tape. Bentonite electrode paste was rubbed into the skin of each area before
the electrodes were applied.
The patient was placed on a couch in a relaxed and supine position. To alleviate
undue anxiety, the nature of the testing was described. It was emphasized that a
slight tap-like sensation would be felt. The electrodes were then placed on (a) the
dorsum of the hands, (b) the mandibular area of both cheeks, and (c) the medial
aspect of the calves of the legs.

aBender, Green, and Fink, op. .cit., 253-255.
4R. Cohn, On certain aspects of the sensory organization of the human brain: I.
A study in rostral dominance as determined by ipsilateral simultaneous stimulation,
]. new. mem‘. Dis., 113, 1951, 471-484; II. A study in rostral dominance in chil1, 1951, 110-122.
Neurol.,
dren,
5
Louis Linn, Some developmental aspects of the body image, Int. ]. Pryc/ooanol.,
36, 1955, 1-7.

6Macdonald Critchley, The phenomenon of tactile inattention with speciﬁc references to pariental lesions, Brain, 72, 1949, 538-561.
7Bender, op. cit., 77-88.
8
Hyman Korin and Max Fink, Role of stimulus intensity in perception of simultaneous electrical cutaneous stimuli, I. Hillside H0511, 6, 1957, 241-250

�386

KORIN AND FINK

Thresholds for the various body-parts were ﬁrst determined. At a frequency of
0.3 cycles per sec. and a pulse-duration of 50 m.sec., the voltage was increased in
uniform increments of 5 v. to the hands and 1 v. to the cheeks every 6.7 sec. (2
pulses) until 5 perceived 100% of the stimulations. After a 10-sec. interval, voltages were decreased until the sensation was no longer reported. After another 10sec. interval, voltages were increased by 1 v. every 6 sec. until the patient again
reported 100% of the stimulations. This reading was considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold-sensation.
After thresholds were determined, testing with a random series of 4 single and
6 double simultaneous stimulations followed. The body parts tested were the right
hand and left cheek (heterologous stimulation) and the right cheek and the left
cheek (homologous stimulation). Stimuli were applied either simultaneously or to
one part singly, in a mixed order, for 10 trials. The order of presentation of the
heterologous and homologous stimulation was alternated.
Failure to report the interspersed single stimuli served as an index that the perceptual threshold had changed. At such times the threshold was again determined,
and the 10 test-trials were repeated. Threshold changes, however, occurred infrequently during testing.
The patients were tested in two groups: an ‘inquiry' group and a 'no-inqury’
group. The ‘inquiry’ group, consisting of 24 convulsive and 9 subconvulsive 55,
was asked the question ”anywhere else?" after each response to a stimulation. No
question was asked of the 'no-inquiry’ group, which consisted of 27 convulsive and
15 subconvulsive $5. (The total number of Ss exceeds 61, since 1 S in the 'inquiry’
group and 13 Ss in the ‘no-inquiry’ group were included both in the convulsive and
the subconvulsive series.)
Electroencephalograms were obtained weekly, on a day following a treatment.
These records were quantitatively measured for the degree of induced slow-wave
(delta) activity.9 Both the convulsive and the subconvulsive treatments were administered three times weekly on alternative days.

Remltr: (1) Errors of confabulation. A response was scored as a confabulation if two stimuli were reported when only a single stimulus was
applied. The observations are noted in Table I.
In the 'inquiry’ group, confabulatory errors were elicted before treatment from both types of Ss—convulsive and subconvulsive. During treatment, the mean error increased from 0.08 to 0.72 among the ‘convulsive’
Ss and from 0.22 to 0.70 among the ‘subconvulsive’ ones. After treatment, the mean number of confabulations persisted in the ‘subconvulsive’
55 (1.00) but declined in the ‘convulsive’ ones (0.10); the difference
0.90 being signiﬁcant at better than the 5% level.10 In the 'no-inquiry’
9Max Fink and R. L. Kahn, Relation of EEG delta activity to behavioral response in electroshock: Quantitative serial studies, A.M.A. Arc/9. Neural. &lt;5 Psytbidt., 78, 1957, 516-525.
1”
The Mann-Whitney ‘U'-test was used to test the signiﬁcance of these data and
those that follow as the scores were not drawn from a normally distributed population.
Since the 'U'-test is based on rank-order of the scores, the differences between
means are only grossly related to level of signiﬁcance.

�387

SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI

group, few confabulations occurred at any interval of testing for either
the convulsive or the subconvulsive 55.
Before treatment, the subconvulsive, ‘inquiry’ 55 made signiﬁcantly more
confabulatory errors than the subconvulsive, ‘no-inquiry’ 55. In a comparison of the ‘inquiry and ‘no-inquiry’ procedures during treatment, the
differences were signiﬁcant both in the convulsive and subconvulsive
groups of $5. The differences during treatment are based on the substantial
increase in the number of confabulations of the ‘inquiry’ group. After
treatment, the confabulations of the convulsive, ‘inquiry’ group decreased
to the pretreatment level, and the differences between the convulsive,
'inquiry’ and ‘no-inquiry’ groups were not signiﬁcant. Though the mean
TABLE I
MEAN NUMBER ERRORS 0P CONFABULATION

No inquiry

Inquiry
Period

convul’ subr
convul.
sive

(N: 24)
Pretreatment
Treatment
Post’treatment
*

p&lt;o.os;

.08
.72
.

10

(N= 9)
.

22

.70
I .oo

Tp&lt;o.o3;

———————
convul’ subr
convul.
sive

(N: 27) (N: 15)
o
.11
. 06

o

.05
—-—

Diff. between
inquiry and no!

——
inquiry

convul’ subr
sive convul.
.08
.22:
.61]L

. o4

.65T
—

Diff. between

convulsive and
subconvulsive

——
inquiry
n0r

inquiry

.

14

.02
.

90*

0

.06
—

Ip&lt;o.01.

number of errors of the subconvulsive, 'inquiry’ 55 increased after treatment, a comparison between the ‘inquiry’ and 'no-inquiry’ subconvulsive
55 could not be made. Data were not obtained after treatment from the
subconvulsive ‘no-inquiry’ 55 because they were transferred to convulsive
treatment and were not available for testing.
(2) Error; of dirplacement. A response was scored as a displacement if the
locus of one of two stimuli was reported correctly and the other incorrectly.
Displacements were rarely elicited from the Ss in any of the groups (Table
II). The mean number of displacements tended to increase during treatment for the convulsive 55, but the differences from the pretreatment
period lack signiﬁcance.
( 3 ) Error: of extinction. An error was scored as an extinction if only one
of two simultaneously applied stimuli was reported. The difference in the
number of errors of extinction between the ‘inquiry’ and ‘no-inquiry’
groups was not signiﬁcant at any period during the course of therapy both
for the convulsive and subconvulsive 55 (Table III). During treatment,
the mean number of extinctions decreased in all groups. At this period,

�388

KORIN AND FINK

the difference between the convulsive and subconvulsive, 'inquiry’ 55 was
signiﬁcant. After treatment the errors of all the groups decreased further.
(-4) Errors of confaémlatz'on and change: in EEG. An analysis was made
of the number of confabulatory errors elicited in convulsive Ss in relation
to the degree of electroencephalographic change. ‘Inquiry’ $3 with high
degrees of delta activity made significantly more confabulatory errors than
inquiry patients with moderate and low degrees of delta activity (Table
IV), while few errors were reported by the ‘no-inquiry’ Ss regardless of
the change in the EEG. The mean scores of the moderate and low EEG
among the ‘inquiry’ 55 was similar to the mean scores of the ‘no-inquiry'
ones.

N0 EEG slow-wave activity or low degrees of such activity occurred in
TABLE II
MEAN NUMBER ERRORS

Post—treatment

*

DISPLACEMENT

Convulsive

Period*

Pretreatment
Treatment

or

inquiry
. o6
. 09
. 08

Subconvulsive

no’inquiry
-

.

07

.

IO

.

02

inquiry
o

.02
. 06

nOrinquiry
0
.01
o

Inter! and intrargroup differences are not signiﬁcant at any period.

the subconvulsive 55. As had been indicated, however, the number of
confabulatory errors of the subconvulsive group increased signiﬁcantly during and after treatment. This increase resulted from increasing confabulatory errors in four of the nine patients.
Dircmrz'on. Errors of displacement, confabulation, and extinction are
elicited when sequences of multiple and single tactile stimuli are applied
to various parts of the body. In clinical tests with touch stimulation, these
errors are most prominent in patients with cerebral disease.11 Theories
which have been advanced to account for the occurrence of such errors
have therefore emphasized endogenous factors involving the central nervous system. Numerous studies of the role of set in perception indicate,
nevertheless, that the frequency and type of response to a perceptual task
may be markedly altered by the immediate aspects of a situation.12 In this
study the stimulus-situation has been varied to bring about differing conditions of mental set. The endogenous factors have not, however, been
11Pink, Green, and Bender, op. cit., 46-58.
12Leeper, op. cit, 752-757; Max Pollack, W. S. Battersby, and M. B. Bender,
Tachistoscopic identiﬁcation of contours in patients with brain damage, I. romp.
playriol. Pry/301., 50, 1957, 220-227.

�389

SIMULTANEO US TACTILE STIMULI

neglected and the relation between the effects of diﬂerent degrees of brain
dysfunction has also been determined.
In the course of convulsive therapy a marked increase in the number
of confabulatory errors is brought about by the ES query: “anywhere
else?” which followed every stimulation. Of the convulsive 55 who were
asked this question, confabulations were elicited primarily in the group
with high degrees of EEG slow-wave activity (marked cerebral dysfuncTABLE III
MEAN NUMBER ERRORS 0F EXTINCTION

Period

Inquiry
———————-———

convul—

sive

Pretreatment
Treatment
Postvtreatment
*

subr
convul.

(N: 24) (N: 9)
I6
2.03
1.37

I . 67
1.14

2.

.89

Diff. between

No inquiry

—————
convulv
sive

(N= 27)
2. 76
1.71
1.44

sub
convul.

(N: 15')

inquiry and
n0vinquiry

-——-—~—convulr subv
vulsive convul.

2. 37
1.27
——

.60
.32
.07

.70

\

.13
—

Diff. between

convulsive and
subconvulsive

N0
inquiry
.49
.39
.89*
.44
—
.48

inquiry

p&lt;o.os.
TABLE IV
RELATION BETWEEN

EEG DELTA ACTIVITY

AND MEAN NUMBER OF CONFABULATORY
ERRORS

Degree of Delta activity

Group
inquiry
no inquiry

.81
.10

high

moderatealow

Diff.

Signif.

(N= 9)
(N=2I)

.19 (N= 10)
.07 (N: 6)

.62
.03

p&lt;0.05
N.S.

tion) and not in the group with low and moderate degrees (minimal
cerebral dysfunction). The importance of the inquiry is emphasized by the
consideration that, regardless of changes in the EEG, there was little
tendency for confabulatory errors to occur among the convulsive 55 when
no inquiry was made. Thus both inquiry and high degrees of EEG delta
activity provided the milieu favorable to evoking confabulatory errors in
the c0nvulsive therapy 55.
Subconvulsive 35 present a different picture. Although virtually no delta
activity is induced by subconvulsive therapy, the number of confabulatory
errors of four of the nine subconvulsive Ss queried increased substantially
during the treatment. Furthermore, while the confabulatory errors of
these four subconvulsive Ss persisted and even increased following the
course of therapy, the errors of the convulsive Ss queried, in contrast, decreased to the pretreatment level. Patterns of reversible error manifested

�390

KORIN AND FINK

by convulsive 55 have been reported in the various studies of the effects

of electroshock on different types of mental functioning.13 It was expected,
however, that confabulations would not be elicited in subconvulsive $5 at
is
cerebral
that
earlier
observations
of
view
dysfunction
in
period,
any
not induced in these patients.14
An explanation for the differences between the ‘convulsive’ and subc0nvulsive ‘inquiry’ 55 is that their therapies had differing effects on the
factor of practice. In 'convulsive’ 55, treatment diminished the practiceeffect, including those both with low and high degrees of slow-wave EEG
activity. For each test-interval, it was as if the ‘convulsive’ 55 were starting
anew. Under these conditions, only $5 with high EEG delta activity manifested a confabulatory set within a single test-period. After the course of
therapy, with the disappearance of the delta activity, convulsive 35 were
performing at the pretreatment-level. In the ‘subconvulsive’ $5, the set established in the pretreatment-interval was reinforced during each test-period
during treatment. Thus the subconvulsive S 5 made even more confabulatory
errors after treatment.
The results for the subconvulsive group of 55 indicate that certain of them
Such
brain-function.
of
alteration
without
make
an
errors
confabulatory
may
53 are apparently inﬂuenced by the E and may be described as being suggestible or acquiescent. The failure of the convulsive $5 to establish a set which
persisted for prolonged intervals of time, as did the subconvulsive SS, sugS’s
If
convulsive
from
effect
derived
for
the
basis
therapy.
a
therapeutic
gests
such
mental
set,
an interpretation
as
a
pathological,
regarded
are
symptoms
is particularly appropriate. From the point of view of concepts of mental
set, the effect of induced convulsions is to bring about a disruption of
maladaptive patterns of behavior.
The number of displacement-errors remained the same regardless of
whether an inquiry was made. These errors occurred much less frequently
than confabulations. During treatment, approximately 30% of the convulsive $5 of both the ‘inquiry’ and ‘no inquiry’ groups responded with at
least one displacement. This ﬁnding compares closely with the results of
33% with displacements obtained in a study of a similar population of
Hyman Korin, Max Fink, and S. Kwalwasser, Relation of changes in memory
and learning to improvement in electroshock. Conf. Neurol., 16, 1956, 88-96; Max
Fink, R. L. Kahn. and Hyman Korin, Effects of diffuse altered brain function on
XV C(mf. of Pryc/ool. Proceed, 1958, 238—239.
perception.
1“
Fink, Kahn, and Green, Experimental studies of the electroshock process, Dir.
New. $315., 19, 1958, 113-118.
’3

�SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI

391

electroshock Ss in which touch-stimuli were applied by the clinical method.
Errors of displacement are not a prominent type of error in an electroshock population.
With regard to errors of extinction, differences were not signiﬁcant
between the ‘inquiry’ and ‘no inquiry’ groups. The high number of errors
of extinction before treatment and the subsequent decrease in errors during
treatment, noted in this study, is in contrast to the results obtained with
clinical tactile techniques. If clinical methods are used, few errors of
extinction are elicited before treatment and there is a marked increase in
error during treatment. The results obtained in this study are probably
related to the initial diﬂiculty experienced by Ss in perceiving electrical
stimuli at threshold and the rapid adaptation to the technique in further
testing. These factors play a greater role than the changes induced by the
treatment.
In initial studies with threshold electrical stimuli, it was believed that a
more sensitive test of changes in brain-function than the clinical tactile
method could be devised.15 For clinical purposes, however, the perceptual
patterns obtained with electrical stimulation lack sufﬁcient discriminability
as indices of brain dysfunction. In part, the deficiencies of the method may
be ascribed to the necessity for using ﬁxed electrodes and limitations in
switching arrangements at threshold. For clinical testing, therefore, simultaneous tactile stimuli applied rapidly in a varied sequence remains the
best index of altered brain function.1‘6
Summary and conclmiom. This study of the perception of simultaneously
applied tactile stimuli was undertaken to determine the relation between
the frequency of perceptual errors to the inquiry made by E. The relations
among inquiry, perceptual response, and the degree of brain dysfunction
were also considered.

In the test-procedure, the threshold (100% point) for square-wave
electrical stimuli applied to the hand and cheek of 61 psychiatric patients
was determined. Sequences of two simultaneous and single stimuli were
applied in a mixed order for the hand and cheek (heterologous stimulation) and both cheeks (homologous stimulation). Heterologous and homologous trials were alternated for each patient. For one group, an inquiry
was made following each response to a stimulation, while in a second
15
16

217.

Fink, Green, and Bender, op. (13., 46-58.
Green and Fink, Standardization of the face-hand test, Neurology, 4, 1954, 211-

�392

KORIN AND FINK

convulsive
55
treated
either
made.
or
The
by
were
was
no
inquiry
group,
subconvulsive courses of therapy, at three times a week for 12—20 applications.
There was a signiﬁcant relationship between the frequency of confabulatory errors and the inquiry (suggestion-induced set’) in both convulsive and subconvulsive patients. The confabulatory tendencies of these
patients, however, differed greatly. Although the errors for both increased
during treatment, errors decreased after treatment for the convulsive
differfurther.
increased
The
subconvulsive
but
in
the
errors
group
group,
ences between 'inquiry’ and 'no inquiry’ groups with regard to errors of
extinction or displacement were insigniﬁcant. In 'convulsive-inquiry’ 55,
the confabulatory errors of those with high degrees of EEG slow-wave
activity were signiﬁcantly more frequent than those with a low or moderate
degrees of slow wave activity.
The results of this study lead to the following conclusions:
(1) In tests with simultaneous electrical tactile stimuli the number of
confabulatory errors is related to an induced set suggested by ES inquiry.
(2 ) The number of confabultory errors is increased in $5 with braindysfunction in relation to an inquiry, but may also be induced in patients
without brain-dysfunction who are acquiescent and susceptible to suggestion.
(3) The frequency of errors of displacement or extinction is not related
to the ‘inquiry’ procedure.

��”era

Role of Stimulus Intensity

in Perception

of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli

Hyman

Karin,

H!» on.

and
max

From
ELY.

ﬁnk,

MOD.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Aided by

Institute
10-9 ’57

of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
of Health, 11.5. Public Health Service.

grant

M—927

.M/J- I
44/ f7

�III:
Role of Stimulus

10/9/57

Intensity in Perception

of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli
and his coIn the course of the extensive investigations by Bender
stimuli,
workers (1, 2, 3,) into the perception of multiple simultaneous

of two stimuli
the pattern of failure of subjects to accurately report one
Since
led to a concept of an "order of dominance" in cutaneous perception.
dominance to biologic and
then, the relationShip of the observed pattern of
been the subject of
psychiatric concepts of body image and body scheme has

considerable speculation (h, 7, 8, 1h).
The

interrelationship of

body areas was

initially clearly

demonstrated

was noted
in simultaneous tactile tests of face and hand (2) in which it
that the stimuli to the hand were frequently not reported or mislocalized.
inference
These phenomena of "extinction" and "displacement“ led to the

that cheek area stimuli were "dominant" to
reports, Bender, Pink
inance for

and Green (3, 10,

tactile stimuli in

ll,

fell

stimuli.

In subsequent

12) described a

pattern of

dom-

which the face and the primary genital areas

were the most perceptive or dominant body

dominant; and the shoulder,

hand

areas; the

hand was the

foot, buttock, breast, back, thigh,

between these extremes in a mild gradient.

least

and abdomen

These observations were made

were most
in normal adults and children and psychiatric patients, but
the major portion
clearly discerned in patients with brain disease. Indeed,

of the data

relates to a

group of

patients with severe diffuse brain dys-

function under observation in a general psychiatric hospital.
Bender,
The basis for these phenomena is unclear. In their review,
Green and Fink

(3), after considering hypotheses ascribing significance to

and neurophysiologic
anatomic, psychophysiologic, genetic, environmental

�i

"no one theory‘adequately explains the organization

factors, conclude that
of

.2-

this pattern. Learning and maturation are probably factors, but

appears to be mostly inherent."

brain disease

and normal young

it

(h, 5), in studies of patients with

Cohn

children, emphasized the rostral order of

significance to "an ontogenetic or phylogenetic
thalamic residue in the sensory organization of the human brain." He noted
specifically, also, that this pattern was primarily associated with "the

dominance and ascribed

over-all sentient function of the brain."
A

elaboration of a maturational

more extensive

and developmental

explanation of the order of dominance was proposed by Linn (1h). Taking
the infantile patterns of sucking and feeding as a model, Linn ascribes
primitiveness in the development of the body image;
the dominant role of the genital area to the intensity of pleasurable sensation that the infant elicits from masturbation; and the subordinate position

face dominance to

role as an exploring and tension-relieving appendage
holds second place in awareness to its stimulation of the more

of the hand to

it

wherein

exciting
A

its

its

mouth and

genitalia.

neurophysiologic view was advanced by Critchley (6, 7),

who

after

expressing a preference for the term "tactile inattention" instead of
"extinction," emphasized the rostral order of dominance. He stated that
"strong stimulation of the healthy side suppresses the attentuated sensations
on the impaired

side,"

patients is probably

no more than an

which may be demonstrated

besides the

tactile -

that "tactile inattention in parietal

and concluded

instance of local neglect or disregard,

at times in

many

other spheres of consciousness

whether motor, visual or

spatial."

�.3...
A

psychophysiologic explanation

workers (10, 11), who found no

tactile threshold for

was eschewed by Bender and

relation between the order of

touch or pin prick.

(8), however, insisted that these patterns
an

overcome by

were only apparent when
They

hand stimulus by a stimulus

four stimuli to the hand.

dominance and

Denny-Brown, Meyer and Horenstein

alteration or loss of two-point discrimination.

that the extinction of the

his co-

The dominance

there

was

further demonstrated

to the leg could be

of the cheek to the hand

could not, however, be altered by ten stimuli to the hand.

following data further emphasizes psychophysiologic factors. These

The

studies represent the

initial report

of the technic of simultaneous

hand of

tactile stimulation tests to the

alteration in brain function induced

measurment of the

In the course of

of an investigation into the application
problem of

by electroshock therapy.

this study electrical stimuli were applied to the cheek and

psychiatric patients. Stimuli

were

either at threshold or supra-

threshold levels.
Two

(a)

aspects of the data are presented:
The

effect of alteration of relative strength of stimulus in the

order of dominance
(b)
:3va JECTS

The

on

face-hand tests; and

Relation of perceptual thresholds to the order of dominance.

ms

I-‘IETHOD:

subjects were

electroshock therapy.
mean age was

3h

consecutive psychiatric patients referred for

The range of

their ages

was between 21 and 65 and the

h5. Eleven patients were diagnosed as involutional melancholia,

thirteen as manic-depressive, depressed, eight as schizophrenia,and

two as

psychoneurosis mixed type. All testing was done prior to a course of electro-

�.11..

shock therapy and no patient had

clinical or

EEG

evidence of altered

brain function.
Two

model

S—hB

Grass squareswave stimulators were synchronized to

deliver either single or
unit

was connected

was monitored

two simultaneous

electrical stimuli.

to each stimulator to eliminate artifacts

visually by an oscilloscope.

A

An

isolation

and the output

switch bdx inserted in the

circuit permitted independent selection of the various body parts. An active
and an indifferent electrode required for each body part were small 3/8"
steel discs placed

1"

apart

and secured with

tape. Bentonite electrode

paste (Medcraft) was rubbed into the skin of each area before the electrodes
were applied.

patient was placed on a couch in a relaxed and supine pbsiticn..
To alleviate undue anxiety the nature of the testing was described.
It was
emphasized that only a slight tap-like sensation would be felt. The electrodes
The

were then placed on (1) the dorsum of the hands, (2) the mandibular area of

both cheeks and (3) the medial calf area of the legs.
In the

testing procedure, thresholds for the various

first determined. At
50

body

parts

were

a frequency of .3 cycles/second, and a pulse duration of

milliseconds, the voltage

was increased

in uniform time increments of .67

seconds (2 pulses) monitored from the oscilloscope,

ceived 100 percent of the stimuli. Increments of
hand and increments of 1

5

until the subject pervolts were applied to the

volt to the cheeks. After a ten second interval,

until sensation disappeared.' After another ten
second interval, the voltage was gradually increased by 1 volt each 6 seconds
until the patient reported 100 percent of the stimuli again. This reading was
the voltage was decreased

considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold sensation.

�-5-

and

After the thresholds were determined, testing with a series of single
double simultaneous stimuli followed. The body parts tested were the

right
and

hand and

left

left

cheek (heterologous stimulation) and the

cheek homologous stimulation).

taneously or

one

part singly in a

Both

mixed order

parts

right cheek

were stimulated simul-

for ten trials for each of

the iollowing conditions:(l) threshold (2) suprathreshold (10 percent above
the threshold), (3) one body part at suprathreshold and the other at threshold
and (h) the reverse

(3).

The

order of presentation of conditions (1) and (2)

for conditions (3)

was

alternated for different subjects

and

(h). Similarly the order of presentation of the heterologous

logous stimulation was

and the same was done

and homo-

alternated.

Single stimuli were introduced as a control. Failure to report the
single stimulus indicated that the threshold had changed.
occurred, stimulation was increased until a
and 10

new

threshold

When

this change

was determined

trails were started anew.

RESULTS:

A.

Threshold Values.

The

threshold stimulation for perception

cheeks and legs. (Table

for the hands,

was determined

I).
TABLE

Mean Thresholds and

I

Standard Deviations

of Body Parts
Right

Hand

Hand

Left

Right

Left

7.85

29.25

22.35

2h.50

19.52

h.86

1h.88

'13.60

13.99

Left

Cheek

Cheek

Threshold (volts)

6.76

Standard Deviation

h.h7

Mean

Right

Leg

Leg

'

13.6h

�~6The

threshold values for the hands and legs are

3

to

h times higher than

the thresholds for the cheeks. While the threshold values in the legs are

less than in the hands, these differences lack statistical significance.
Variability of the threshold is considerably greater in the hands and legs,
than in the cheeks. There

is virtually

no overlapping of

thresholds,

however, where the cheeks and the hands are concerned.
B.

Extinction Patterns:

difference between the

The

or the

left

number of

extinctions of the right

cheek on stimulation of both parts with

hand

either threshold or

suprathreshold stimuli was not significant (Table II). Also, when both
cheeks were stimulated with either threshold or suprathreshold stimuli,
there were no differences in the number of extinctionszhzeach cheek .
(Table

III).

In contrast to these observations, stimulating one body part with a

suprathreshold stimulus and the other

at threshold, resulted in

a significant

increase in the failure to report the body part stimulated at threshold.
Thus the cheek was dominant over the hand, or the hand was dominant over
the cheek depending on the body part to which the stronger stimulus was

applied (Table

II). Altering the relative strength

of the stimuli applied

to the cheeks resulted in a similar predictable change in the pattern of
dominance (Table

III).

Further analysis of the data in Table

II indicates that the

hand was

dominant over the cheek with greater mean frequency (2.08) than the cheek
was dominant over the hand (1.0h)

for the threshold - suprathreshold

condition. This tendency is also evident

at suprathreshold.

If

it is

considereﬁ

when both

that the

parts were stimulated

mean

threshold for the hands

�mua

mama

mmbn

mmma
nwmmw

eUHmmwowa
mmeOWmmw

ma

mmuo

m&amp;

ma

mcwuwdwwmmwowa

mﬁ

mum

mum

oﬁmmw

oummw

ﬁn

pa

mcmumwuwmmuowm

mcvumdunmmuowa

eﬁﬂmmUowa
awnmmwowa

Kama

counudwoum

ow
.wm

m.wo

H.0m

zwmb

H.ww

nummw
mxdwunawoum

ow
mxaqudMosm

aﬁammwowo

om

saws

ow
H.wm

.mm

.mm

abwbm

mum

H.mm

cummw

-mma

mmuo

HH

madusodwoum

mun

mcwwpdwummwowa

mmum

mow

v.0:

m.om

.m4

.OH
&lt;muwwnm
dwwwmwmuom

mwwe:Hdeou

z.m.
wAAuow

vAnuow

2.m.

mwmswwwombom

�Emma

abomw

Hmwﬁ

wear

wumue

wows

avummuowm

drummvown

ma

mcwuwawuwmwowm

mchm&amp;UHmmwowm

owmmw

oﬁmmw
numGWm

owwmwm

ma

ma

QUGmW

mum

mw

ma

ma

grammwowa

meU&amp;

mum

mcvum:
awnmmuowm

on
.om

.wm

.Hm

.ww

saws

nonmwdHOUm

Hmwd
mxwucnduoam

Kama

Qummw

ow
mxauuodwoum

awwmmwowm

on

ow
3mm:
avwbm

H.mm

.H#

.w4

.rw

mum
mumwﬁ

.

mxwwannwoum

md
woaw.nwmme

owmmw

mcwumauammUowo

won

&lt;muewum

H.mm

.mm

.Hm

.om

wanmuwuom

mdwstwmawou

u‘AmoH

v_Auom

z.m.

z.m.
mumsuwwnmbnm

HHH

-

�-7-

is approximately 30 volts, while for the
the difference

in incidence of extinction

stimulation was set at ten percent

may

be explained.

above the threshold

stimulus was therefore increased by

3

is

cheeks the threshold

volts

7

volts,

Suprathreshold

value.

The hand

and the face stimulus by only

increase, although proportionately
equivalent, appears to have given greater relative strength to the hand

1

volt

above the threshold value.

Such an

stimulus.
C.

Incidence of Extinction:
Regardless of pattern, the

mean

total of the

number of

extinctions

heterologous body parts were stimulated at threshold than
when these parts were stimulated with suprathreshold stimuli (Table IV).
For these same conditions of stimulation the differences between the mean

was

greater

number of

when

extinctions obtained

on homologous

stimulation of the cheeks lack

statistical significance but the results are in the direction
that a greater

number

of extinctions occur

when two body

which indicate

parts are stimulated

at threshold (Table IV). The failure to obtain a significant difference in
the latter instance is partly due to the fact that relatively few extinctions
are elicited

total

when homologous

number of

parts are stimulated.

These findings on the

extinctions are in agreement with previous observations (2).

�2.
TABLE

Mean

IV

of Combined Number of extinctions

For Varying Conditions of Threshold
and Suprathreshold

Both

Parts at

Threshold

A

-

Cheek

B

—

Band

A

- Left

B

- Right

%

Cheek
Cheek

Both Parts

SuprathreShold

3.11

1.63

.85

.56

Differences between the

at

mean number of

%

Stimuli

A
B

- SuprathreShold
- Threshold

A
B

1.68

1.31

extinctions at threshold

- Threshold
—

2oh3

1.10

and

the other three conditions of stimulation are significant for the
cheek and hand but are insignificant for both cheeks.

SupraThreshold

�-8DISCUSSION:

pattern of extinction following stimulation.with threshold and
suprathreshold stimuli has been determined. In contrast to the findings
The

of Bender, link and Green (2), face stimuli were not reported more frequently
than hand stimuli when either simultaneous threShold or suprathreshold

stimuli were applied.

Under these

conditions, neverthless,

it is

clear that

the pattern.of extinction for any the body parts can be readily altered by
stimulus
varying the relative strength of the stimuli. Thus,a suprathreshold
applied to the hand tends to obscure a threshold stimulus applied to the
cheek and when these stimuli

intensities are reversed, the cheek tends to

obscure the hand.

Theories which hold that dominance of the cheek over the hand

is

due

to an inherent factor, perceived body image, rostral dominance, developmental
principle, or a learned factor, are not supported by these observations. If
any of these

been

elicited

factors were involved, a pattern of face
when

dominance should have

the hand and cheek were stimulated with equivalent

stimuli at threshold

and suprathreshold

intensities.

Although, more recently, Bender (3) has advanced an inherent factor

theory, he previously attributed the extinction phenomenon to differences
in the thresholds of the various body parts and to the intensity of the

stimulation used (1),
strength of the

The

finding. in this study, that differences in the

simu taneous

stimuli

can

supports a stimulus intensity hypothesis.

alter the pattern
By

of extinction

inference, differences in

threshold also play a significant role.
That an intense stimulus elsewhere could raise the pain threshold as
This
much as 35% has been denonstrated by Hardy, Wolf and Goodell (13).

�-9:-

effect of a relatively intense stimulus

on the

threshold of another

stimulus has also been found by investigators using other stimuli (8, 9).
The problem

still

remains, however, how

it

is that

a

pattern of dominance,

particularly of the hierarchy determined by Bender and his coworkers, may
be elicited when presumably equivalent stimuli are applied by touch of hand.
The results of this study suggest an explanation. Stimuli of differing
intensities are required to elicit a threshold sensation for various body
parts.

’Uhen

these stimuli are increased 10 percent, the resultant stimuli

are proportional and are perceived as equivalent. In contrast, in clinically
touching two body parts, the stimuli are disproportionate relative to the
threshold value although approximately of equal intensity in their application.

differences in threShold for the hand and cheek, the tactile
to the cheek
stimulus/is proportionately more above the threshold than the stimulus to the
hand. Thus the cheek is perceived more frequently than the hand stimulus and

Because of the

has been considered "dominant."
A

threshold hypothesis was rejected (3)

on

the basis that the thresholds

for pressure and pain do not strictly corre5pond
to the dominance order elicited by the double simultaneous stimulation tests.
Most difficult to reconcile is Von Frey's finding that the pressure threshold
obtained by

Von Frey (16)

of the glans penis, which

is

second in dominance rank only to the cheek in

tested, is 111 grams per square millimeter; While
the hand, whichzislll least dominant, is only 12 grams per

a group of ten body parts

the threshold of

square millimeter.

Unfortunately, thresholds in the genital area for male and female have
seldom been determined. Von Frey's list of thresholds (16) is based on a

single subject.

His more

detailed observations (17), however, indicate that

�.10-

is virtually

there

no pressure sense

the perception of pain, warmth, and

in the glans penis or clitoris, although
cold is well developed. It is quite

with touch
possible that the punctate pressure threshold does not correlate
there the genital area is concerned but that instead some other sense or
combination of senses
Thresholds
and

is involved.

for the

dorsum

of the

hand and the cheek obtained by Von Frey

other investigators indicate that the cheek

is

considerably more sensitive

in agreement with the thresholds obtained
in this study. In a recent study of thresholds at various body sites Sigel
than the hand. These findings are

dorsum of the
(15) reported that "leg areas including thigh and ankle, also

definite tendency for higher thresholds. Scalp,
The anterior chest
temple, forehead and face tended to have lower thresholds.
lower thresholds.
arm and anterior wrist areas showed a tendency for
and

hands and the palm showed a

upper

Neck

areas,

ment

there

Bender and

abdomen and upper back showed no

is

no disagreement with

definite trend." In this state-

the order of

dominance as determined by

his coworkers.

the experimental results obtained here, it is proposed that the
may
dominance hierarchy elicited under the conditions of simultaneous testing
of the
be explained in rational terms on the basis of the relative strength
From

stimuli

and the area stimulus

theoretic constructs:n

threshold, without the invocation of other

�-llSUM-JURY:

Using square wave
the hands, cheeks, and

electrical stimuli, the threshold for perception in
calves were detennined in 3h psychiatric patients.

Simultaneous stimuli were applied in random sequence to combinations of
cheek and hand and both cheeks,

at threshold, suprathreshold

and combinations

of threshold and suprathreshold intensities.

MWSmmmmwsmmwdmcrﬁmhwmwswmmmwddmmmwwm
the differences between the number of extinctions in either part were NOT
significant. With stimuli of unequal intensity, however, (one stimulus at
threshold and one suprathreshold) there

was a

significant increase in the

failure to report the threshold stimulus.
The total number of extinctions is greater with threshold, than with
suprathreshold stimuli; ans greater in heterologous than in homologous

patterns of stimulation.
LOPELEQ-‘Pist

The

tests

may

clinically observed order of

dominance

in simultaneous tactile

he explained by psychophysiological phenomena without

resort

to theoretic constructs. Differences in the hireshold of perception in
various body parts provide the basis for the observed pattern of errors on
simultaneous

tactile tests at suprathreshold levels,

�Biblio ranhv
1.

W“

Bender, M;B. (1952): Disorders in Perception Sprin
Bender, HgB., Fink,

M;

and Green, M.A. (1951): Patterns in Perception

Tests of Face

on Simultaneous

field, Illinois.

and Hand, A.M.A: Arch.

Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat. éé} 355-362.
3.

Bender, H.B., Green, H.A. and Fink,

M.

(l95h): Patterns of Perceptual

Organization with Simultaneous Stimuli,
EgyChiat.,

Neurol. n

lg: 233-255.

Cohn, R. (1951): On Certain Aspects of
Human

A.M.A. Arch.

Brain:

A

the Sensory Organization of the

Study in Rostral Dominance as Determined by

Ipsilateral Simultaneous Stimulation, J. Nerv:

Ment. Dis. 113:

h71~h8h.

S.

Cohn, R. (1951):

On

Certain Aspects of Sensory Organization of the

Brain:

II

—

Human

A

Study

in Rostral

Dominance

in Children,

Neuroloav, 1; 119-122.

Critchley, n. (1953):
Critchley,

M.

The

Parietal Lobes,

a

Go.

(19h9): Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special

Reference to Earietal Lesions.
Denny-Brown,

London: Edward Arnold

3.,

Meyer,

J.S:

grain, 12: 538-561.

and Horenstein, S. (1952): The Significance

of Perceptual Rivalry Resulting from Parietal Lesion, grain, 15;
h33~h7la

9.

Dunoker, K. (1937): Some Preliminary Exneriments on the Mutual Influence

of Seine, Psychpl. Forsdh, g1: 311-326.

10.

Fink,

M.

and Bender, H.E. (1953): Perception of Simultaneous

Stimuli in Normal ChilCren, 1-Ieurologq,

;:

27~3h.

Tactile

�Bibliograghv
11. Fink, H., Green,

M.A. and Bender, M.D. (1953):

Perception of Simultaneous

Tactile Stimuli

by Mentally Defective Subjects,

gig. , Q1:

.

LLB-449

12. Fink, M., Green,

M.A. and Bender, M.B.

J.

Merv.

&amp;

Ment.

(l952):The Face-Hand Test as a

Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental 85ndrome, Neurologz, g; hé-SB.
13.

Haroy, J.D., wolf, H.S. and Goodall, H. (19h0): Studies on Pain.
New

Method

for measuring Pain Threshold: Observations

Summation of Pain,

J. Clin. Invest., l2:

on

A

Spatial

6&amp;9-658.

Linn, L. (1955): Some Developmental Aspects of the Body Image, 223!

J. Eszchoana1., 2g; 1-7.

Sigel,

H. (1952): Cutaneous Sensory Threshold

Frequency Squareédave Current:

Site

II. -

The

Stimulation with High
Relationship of

and Skin Diseases to the Seesory Threshold,

Body

J. Invest. Derm.,

lg: hh7-h51.
16. Von Frey, E. (189M): Beitrage zur Physiologie des Schmerzinns, Egg.

Sachs. Ges.
17.

diss.,

Von Frey, M. (1895):

gé: 185-196 and 283-296.

Beitrege znr sinnephysiologie Haut, Ber. Sachs.

99g. ‘L;iss., £2: 166-18u.

�Karin: Amer. J. Psychol.
VI: 8-12-58

Role of Suggestion-Induced Set

in the Perception of

Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli

Hyman

Korin.fh.D.
and

max Fink M.D.

From the Department of Experimental Paychiatry,

Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks,

L.I.,

(in part) by grant 14-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service.
Read at the Eastern PSydhological AsSOCiation, Philadelphia, April 11, 1958.

Aided

N.Y.

�Role of Suggestion-Induced Set

in the Perception of

Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli

influential role of "mental set" in determining subject response
to a perceptual task has been well documented (1). In studies of the
The

perception of simultaneous

tactile stimuli, various patterns of response

were observed which seemed

to

be

the result of "suggestion-induced set."

This investigation was undertaken, to determine the

different conditions of "set"

relation between

and the frequency and type

of perceptual

error elicited in tests with simultaneous stimuli.
Recently the advantages of the simultaneous stimulation of body parts

in tactile perceptual tests has been stressed (2).
simultaneous stimulation may

elicit

The

technique of

perceptual errors under conditions in

which successive single stimuli are correctly perceived.

'are applied to

body

parts at the

same

time, for example, only

may be

reported -

may be

perceived correctly and the other'mislocalized

an

error referred to as "extinction"; or

"displacement." Uccasionally,

if

testing sequence, these stimuli

-

stimuli

two

stimulus

one

one stimulus

error called
single stimuli are interspersed in the

may be

an

correctly reported, but an additional,

extraneous stimulus, (referred to as a "confabulation")
Such

‘When

errors of extinction, displacement,

may

also

and confabulation are

be

reported.

significantly

increased in patients with brain dysfunction.

1.

R. Leeper, Cognitive processes, in 5.5. Stevens,
Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 1951.

2.

M.

B. Bender, Disorders

in Perception,

1952; Bender,

Patterns of perceptual organization
with simultaneous stimuli; A.M.A. Arch. Neurgl. &amp; Psychiat.
M.A. Green and M. Fink,

1g: 195h, 233-255; Fink, Green and Bender. The face hand
test as a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome, Neurcl.
g: 1952, h6—58.

�.2errors of extinction and diaplacement occur, they are elicited in
a consistent pattern. Thus, on stimulation of the hand and face, the
stimulus to the face is usually reported correctly while that to the hand
When

is mislocalized or not reported.
parts, an "order of
and

testing various combinations of

dominance" may be described

genital areas are

often perceived.

By

in

which

body

stimuli to the face

most often perceived and those to the hand are

least

stimuli to the shoulder, foot,
are perceived in a gradient (3).

Between these extremes,

buttock, breast, back, thigh and abdomen

Theories inyolving factors of rostral dominance (h), maturation (S),

inattention (6),

and

inherent

body image (7) have been advanced

to explain

the organization of these perceptual patterns, but no one theory has adequately
explained

all

the facts.

Previously (8)

we

have ascribed

significance to the

relative intensity of the stimuli and the threshold value in the frequency
and the pattern of the "extinction" error, when electrical stimuli are applied
3. Bender,

h.

Green and Fink, 02.

cit.,

233-255.

certain aspects of the sensory organization of
the
brain. I: A study in rostral dominance as
determined by ipsilateral simultaneous stimulation, g,
Nerv. Ment. Dis. Eli: 1951, h7l-h8h; II: A study in rostral
dominance in children, 32339;. I, 1951, 110-122.
R. Cohn, On
human

S. Linn, Louis: Some developnental aspects of the body images,
Int. Jour. Psychoanal. 2gp 1955, 1-7.

6.

Critchley, The phenomena of tactile inattention with
specific references to parietal lesions, Brain 1;, l9h9, 538-561.

M.

_

7. Rnder,
8.

Op.

Cite, 77-88.

Fink, Role of stimulus intensity in perception
of simultaneous electrical cutaneous stimuli, J. Hillside Hosp.

H. Korin and M.
Q,

1957, 2&amp;1-250.

�.3threshold and suprathreshold intensities. The present study was undertaken
to assess the-relation between "suggestion-induced set" and errors of
confaoulaticn and diSplacement.

The

Specific problem studied

is

whether

in the testing procedure is significantly related to the
frequency and type of these errors. Since these errors are most prominent
an "inquiry"

in Subjects with cerebral dysfunction, patients undergoing convulsive and
subconvulsive therapies were studied.

Subjects:
The

subjects

were 61 consecutive psychotic

electroconvulsive therapy.

patients referred for

Their ages ranged between

21 and 67 and

the

ho. Thirty-seven patients received convulsive therapy, While
fourteen first received subconvulsive therapy and then were transferred to

mean age was

convulsive therapy.

Ten

patients were treated with subconvulsive therapy

only. Patients were selected for the convulsive or subconvulsive treatment
on a random

basis by the supervising psychiatrist.

�Procedure:
Two

model S-hB Grass squaredwave

stimulators

were synchronized to

deliver either single or simultaneous electrical stimuli. An isolation
unit was connected with each stimulator to eliminate artifacts and the
output was visually monitored by an oscilloscope.

A

switch box was inserted

in the circuit to permit independent selection of the various body parts.
The active and indifferent electrodes for each body part were small 3/8"
steel discs, placed 1" apart and secured with tape. Bentonite electrode
paste was rubbed into the skin of each area before the electrodes were

applied.
The

patient

was placed on a couch

in a relaxed

and supine

position.

alleviate undue anxiety the nature of the testing was described. It
was emphasized that a slight tap-like sensation.would be felt. The electrodes
To

were then placed on (a) the dorsum of the hands, (b) the mandibular area of

both cheeks and (c) the medial aspect of the calves of the legs.
Thresholds

for the various

body

parts were

first

determined. At a

frequency of .3 cycles per second and a pulse duration of
the voltage was increased

in

SO

millbeccnds,

uniform increments of five volts to the hands

volt to the cheeks every 6.7 seconds (2 pulses) until the subject
perceived 100 per cent of the stimuli. After a ten second interval, voltages
and One

were decreased
second

until the sensation

was no longer

interval, voltages were increased

patient again reported

100

by 1

reported. After another ten

volt every

6 seconds

per cent of the stimuli. This reading

until the

was

considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold sensation.

After thresholds
h

single

were

were determined,

and 6 double simultaneous

the right hand

and

left

testing with a

random

stimuli followed. In

body

series of

parts tested

cheek (heterologous stimulation) and the

right

�-scheek and

left

cheek (homologous stimulation).

Stimuli were applied
either simultaneously or to one part singly, in a mixed order for ten

trials

(Table

homologous

I).

The

order of presentation of the heterologous and

stimulation was alternated.
TABLE

I

Failure to report the interSpersed single stimuli served as an index

that the perceptual threshold had changed. Such a change occurred infrequently, and at these times the threShold was again determined, and the
10

testing trials

were

repeated.

patients

were

tested in

The

"no-inquiry" group.

The

and nine'subconvulsive

two groups: an "inquiry" group and a

"inquiry“ group, consisting of 2h convulsive

subjects,

was asked the question-"anywhere

after each responseto a stimulation.

No

question

"no-inquiry" group, which consisted of

27

convulsive and

was asked

else"

of the

15 suboonvulsive

patients. This total exceeds 61, since one patient in the inquiry group
and thirteen in the no-inquiry group were included both in the convulsive
and the subconvulsive

series.

Electroencephalograms were obtained
day following a

treatment.

in each patient weekly

These records were

quantitatively

for the degree of induced leW'wave (delta) activity (9).

on the

meaSured

Both

the

convulsive and the subconvulsive treatments were administered three times
weekly on alternate days.

9.

Pink and R.L. Kahn, Relation of EEG delta activity
to behavioral reSponse in electroshock: Quantitative
serial studies, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 78

M.

1957: 516‘525 o

�TABLE

I

Order of Presentation of Stimuli

Right Hand

Left

Cheek

Right Cheek

Left

Cheek

'Right hand-Left cheek

Right cheek

Right hand

Right cheekéLeft cheek

Left cheek

Left cheek

Right hand-Left cheek

Right cheek

Right hand-Left cheek

Right cheek-Left cheek

Left cheek

Right cheek-Left cheek

Right hand-Left cheek

Left cheek

Right hand

Right cheek-Left cheek

Right hand-Left cheek

Right cheek

Right hand-Left cheek

Right cheek-Left cheek

�“HW1

Results:
A.
two

Confabulation Error:

stimuli were reported

A

reaponse was scored as a confabulation

when only a

single stimulus

was

applied.

if

The

II.

observations are noted in Table

TmBLE

Convulsive vs Subconvulsive:

II
Confabulatory errors were elicited

pretreatment both in the convulsive and the subconvulsive patients. During
treatment the errors increased with approximately the same frequency. The

in the convulsive treated patients and
from .22 to .70 in the subconvulsive treated patients. Post-treatment,

mean

error increased from .08 to

.72

however, the mean number of confabuLations persisted in the subconvulsive

patients (1.00) but declined in the convulsive patients (.10). The difference
in number of errors between the convulsive and subconvulsive groups is

significant post-treatment, but not in either the pretreatment or treatment
periods.
In the no-inquiry group few confabulations occurred at

any

interval

of testing for either the convulsive or the subccnvulsive patients.
Inquiry vs No-Inquiry:

While the differences

in the

mean number

of errors reported by the subconvulsive and the convulsive patients lacks

'significance pretreatment, that between the subconvulsive inquiry differed
significantly from the subconvulsive no-inquiry patients. During treatment
the number df confabulations increased, and this difference

in a comparison of the inquiry

and

is significant

the no-inquiry procedures, both in the

convulsive and subconvulsive groups. These differences during the treatment

interval are based

on the

of the inquiry group.

substantial increase in the

number of confabulations

�Hangs».
Wmdgmgmﬁ

womduagmggd

Ex»

%
dwm

awm

mmdm

*

.1.

6

u

w

.8.

.8.

.8

A

A

km

.8

Zn»:

conqspmw&lt;m

A
Huncwnw

Foo

mum

mumswwwomsom.

.8

moouwm.

.8

.mm

.E

o

2%
mucoouaﬁwmw&lt;w

3M55L23H¢3m%

duo

awm
mm¢m

ac:

.8

swwow

zaps

zug
oon&lt;deH&lt;m

mwwwmwmsomm

domd

zusvoa

zongncwuw
mowwoz.

AHNV

n

cwwtmmu

swm

.om

0

ow

zuwm

Hpmnm
mscoonqswmw&lt;m

Iml
mwbnm

HH
smmsm

mvuPHmm

oouwmcspmdwob

awn

muw

ad: we

onww

.8

wome

.3

.0m

Hunmwuq.
oouaﬁwqum

ZonHunnMHw

Upwwmwmbom

«ama

wuwowm

.3.
wm

mou

mwommpw

%
dmmma

u

.0m

.3

Hupswﬂw.
ZouHunswww

dwawmuobom

mzwoqachqum
mwmbwmwombom

HmHmdma

on

5.

is

Hmbw

ac
wow
enamw
Hm4mH

.8
*

éwmmm

ow

om

.8

.E

Hunzwaw

wawmambom
mayooudcpmw&lt;m

oon&lt;¢wqumu

mguooudcwqum

oos&lt;sHmH4m.

-

u

.oo

o

zoquncwuw

uwwmmambnm

�-9After the course of therapy, the confabulations of the convulsive
inquiry patients decreased to the pretreatment level,
between the convulsive inquiry and no-inquiry groups

not significant. In contrast, the

mean number

and

differences

at this time

were

of errors of the subconvulsive

inquiry patients increased. Data for the post-treatment subconvulsive

no-inquiry group was not available as these patients
to convulsive treatment
A

and were not

were

usually transferred

available for post-treatment tests.

comparison between the inquiry and no-inquiry subconvulsive patients

post-treatment cannot be made.
B.

Displacement Error:

one of two

stimuli

was reported

A

reSponse was scored as a displacement

correctly

and the

other

was

if

mislocalized.

rarely elicited in any of the greups (Table III).
of displacements tended to be greater, however, during

Displacements were
The mean number

treatment for the convulsive patients but the differences from the pretreatment interval lack significance.

�—10‘TABLE

mean Number

III

of Digplacement Errors
Convulsive
No-Inqyiry

Inquiry

Subconvulsive
No-Inquiry

Inquiry

Pretreatment

.06

.07

0

Treatment

.09

.10

.02

.01

Post-Treatment

.08

.02

.06

0

Inter

and

intra

group differences are not significant

0

at any interval.

�-llC.

Extinction Error:

An

error

one of two simultaneously applied

stimuli

extinction error between the inquiry

at

any

scored as an "extinction"

was

reported.

was

if

only

difference in

The

and no-inquiry groups was not

significant

interval during the course of therapy both for the convulsive and

subconvulsive patients (Table IV). During treatment, the mean number of

extinctions decreased in all groups.

this interval, the difference

At

between the convulsive and subconvulsive inquiry patients was

Postetreatment the errors of
D. Confabulation
number

Error

all
and

significant.

the groups decreased further.
EEG

Change; An

analysis

was made of the

of confabulation errors elicited in convulsive patients in relation
Inquiry patients with high

to the degree of encephalographic change.
degrees of delta activity

made

significantly more confabulation errors

than inquiry patients with moderate and low degrees of delta activity.
(Table V), while few errors were reported in the no-inquiry patients

regardless of the degree of
and low EEG

inquiry groups

EEG

was

change.

The mean

similar to the

score of the moderate

mean

scores of the no-inquiry
‘

patients.
No EEG

slow wave

subconvulsive

activity or

patients.

number of confabulation

significantly during

low degrees of such

occurred

activity/in the

However, as had previously been

indicated, the

errors of the subconvulsive group increased

and

after treatment.

increasing confabulation errors in four

This increase resulted from

of the nine

Pqu-u-u-Iu-o-O-u ‘-

patients.

�eaﬂsma
Wmﬁmﬁﬁa
womdlawmmdsmuw

H.w&lt;

PS

who

2n»:

ooudswmwdm

.x.

annwnw

6A.
.mw

FE

”7%

zuw
mﬁdaobdspmwdo

00“

:wms

H.rr

fﬁ

mid
Zamq
ZdSUmH

oosagHmH&lt;m

ow
zoquncHHw

wabm

I

VB

PS

spun
mdeHOdHob

zuHm
mscoos&lt;¢wmw&lt;w

H&lt;

muaoum

.ON

.3

.8

Huncwuwu

oon&lt;cwmw&lt;m

ZOIHsnsHHw

mHHmmHmbnm

ZOIHSQsHHwHsnzwnw.

t

.S

.3

wawmnmuom

mcvaon&lt;cwmw&lt;m

.

bHHonmbom
mzvooudcwmw&lt;m

.rw

.mw

.5

oosdswquou

Hangwaq

*

I

.E

.3

uwmwmwmbow
mcvoob&lt;¢wmw&lt;m

zongnsqu

aoadcwmwdm.

�.13..
TABLE V

Relation Between Degree of EEG-Delta Activity and
Number of Confabulation Errors

Mean

Degree of Delta Activity
High
Mean Number

Confabulation
Errors

)
)
)

Inquiry
No

Inquiry

.81

(N.=9)

.10 (N=21)

Mederete-Low

Difference

.19 (Halo)

.62

.07 (N=b)

.03

Significance
p

4 .05
N.S.

�Discussion:

elicited

Displacement, confabulation and extinction errors are
sequences of multiple and single

tactile stimuli are applied to

tests with touch stimulation, these errors are

In clinical

when

body

parts.

most prominent

in patients with cerebral disease (10). Theories Which have been advanced
to account for the occurrence of such errors have therefore emphasized
endogenous

factors involving the central nervous system.

That

the fre-

quency and type of response to a perceptual task may be markedly altered
by the immediate aspects of a

situation is indicated

by the numerous

studies of the role of set in perception (11). In this study the stimulus
situation has been varied to bring about differing conditions of mental set.

factors have not been neglected, and the relation
between the effects of different degrees of brain dysfunction has also been
However, the endogenous

determined.
In the course of convulsive therapy a marked increase in the number
of confabulation errors is brought about by the examiner's query of "anywhere
else?" following each stimulation. of the convulsive patients

who were asked

the question, confabulations were elicited primarily inthe group with high
degrees of

EEG

81

w

wave

activity

(marked

cerebral dysfunction)

and not

in

the group with low and moderate degrees (minimal cerebral dysfunction).
The importance

of the inquiry

is thus

enphasized by the consideration that

activity, there was little tendency for
confabulation errors to occur in convulsive patients when no inquiry was
regardless of changes in

EEG

10. Fink, Green and Bender, op.
11. Leeper, op.
M. Pollack,

cit., -

cit. ,

146-58.

.
.S. Battersby and M.B.Bender, Tachistoscopic
identification of contours in patients with brain damage,
J. Comp. Physiol. Bszghol. g9, 1957, 220-227.

made.

�.15Thus both

inquiry

and high degrees of EEG

delta activity provided the

milieu faVOrable to evoking confabulatory errors.

patients present a different picture. Although, virtually
delta activity is induced by subconvulsive therapy, the number of
Subconvulsive

no

confabulation errors of four of the nine subconvulsive patients queried
increased substantially during the treatment. Furthermore, While the
confabulation errors of these subconvulsive patients persisted and even
increased following the course of ﬂierapy, those of the convulsive patients
queried, in contrast, decreased to the pretreatment level. Patterns of
reversible decrement manifested by convulsive patients has been reported

WW

studies of the effects of electroShock

in the

of mental functioning (12). However,

it was

on

different types

expected that confabulations

elicited in subconvulsive patients at any interval, in.view
of earlier observations that cerebral dysfunction is not induced in these

would

not

be

patients (13).
An

explanation for the differences between the convulsive and

convulsive inquiry patients

is that their therapies

had differing

sub—

effects-

the practice factor. In convulsive patients, treatment diminished the
practice effect in all subjects, including those both with low and high
on

degrees of slow wave activity. Fbr each test interval, it was as if the
12. H.Korin, M. Fink and S. Kwalwasser, Relation of changes

in

memory and

learning to

ercts

improvement

in electroshock,

lg, 1956, 88-96; M. Fink, R.L. Kahn andon
of diffuse altered brain function
of Psychol. Proceed., 1958, 238-239.
EE’Conf.
perception,
Conf. Neural.

13.

Fink, R.L. Kahn and M.A. Green, Experimental Studies
of the electroshock process, Dis. Nerv. 528. 12, 1958,

M.

113-118.

�-16convulsive patients were starting anew.

patients with high

EEG

Under these conditions only

delta activity manifested a confabulatory set

within a single test period. After the course of therapy, with the
disappearance of the delta activity, convulsive patients were performing

at the pretreatment level. In the subconvulsive patients, the set
established in the pretreatment interval

test period during treatment.
more confebulatory
The
may make

Such

was re-enforced during each

Thus the subconvulsive

patients

made even

errors post-treatment.

results for the subconvulsive

group

indicate that certain patients

confabulation errors without an alteration of brain function.

patients are apparently influenced

as being suggestible or acquiescent.

by the examiner and may be described

The

failure of the convulsive patients

.to establish a set which persisted for prolonged intervals of time as did
the subconvulsive patients suggests a basis for the therapeutic effect
derived from convulsive therapy.

‘If the symptoms of the

patient are

interpretation is particularly
appropriate. From the point of view of concepts of mental set, the effect
of induced convulsions is to bring about a disruption of maladaptive patterns
regarded as a pathologic mental

set,

such an

of behavior.
The number

of displacement errors remained the

whether an inquiry was made.

than confabulations.

same

regardless of

errors occurred

much

During treatment approximately

30%

patients of both the inquiry

These

less frequently
of the convulsive

and no-inquiry groups responded with

one diaplacement. This finding compares

at least

closely with the results of

33%

with displacements obtained in a study of a similar population of electroshock patients in which touch stimuli were applied by the
1h.

M.

Fink, unpublished data.

clinical

method (1h)

�Displacement errors are not a prominent type of error

in an electroShock

pepulation.
With regard to the

extinction error, differences

were not

significant

between inquiry and no-inquiry groups. The high number of extinction errors

pretreatment and the subsequent decrease in errors during treatment, in this
study,

is in contrast

If clinical-tactile

to the results obtained with clinical

tactile techniques.

extinction errors are elicited
increase in error during treatment. The

methods are used, few

is a marked
results obtained in this Study are probably related to the initial difficulty
experienced by the patient in perceiving electrical stimuli at threshold
pretreatment and there

the rapid adaptation to the technique in further testing.
play a greater role than the changes induced by the treatment.
and

In

that a

initial studies
Bore

with threShold electrical stimuli,

it

These

factors

was believed

sensitive test of changes in brain function than the clinical-

for clinical purposes the
perceptual patterns obtained with electrical stimulation lack sufficient

tactile

method (15) could be devised.

however,

discriminability as indices of brain dysfunction. In part, the deficiences
of the method may be ascribed to the necessity for using fixed electrodes
and limitations in switching arrangements at threshold. For clinical
.

testing, therefore, simultaneous tactile stimuli applied rapidly in varied
sequence remains the best index= of altered brain function (16).
15.

Fink, Green.and Bender, gghgit,, h6-58

16.

M.

Green and M. Fink, Standardization of the face-hand

test,

Neurology,

h

l95h, 211-217.

�-18..
Summary:

tactile

This study of the perception of simultaneously applied

stimuli

was undertaken to determine the

relation

between the frequency

of perceptual errors to the inquiry made by the examiner.

The

relation

between inquiry, perceptual response and the degree of brain dysfunction
was

also considered.
In the test procedure, the threshold (100 per cent point) for square

wave

electrical stimuli, applied to the

patients

was applied
and

in a

mixed order

to both cheeks

trials
made

determined. Sequences of

was

two simultaneous and

for the hand

(homologous

were alternated

hand and cheek of 61

psychiatric
single stimuli

and cheek (heterogenous stimulation)

stimulation) Heterologous and

for each patient. For

one group, an

homologous

inquiry was

following each reSponse to a stimulation, while in a second group,

Patients were treated either-by convulsive or subconvulsive courses of therapy, at three times per-week for 12-20 applications.

no inquiry was made.

There

errors

significant relationdhip between the frequency of confabulation
the inquiry ("suggestion-induced set") in both convulsive and

Was

and

subconVulsive

a

patients.v However, the confabulatory tendencies of these

patients differed. Although the errors for both increased during treatment,
errors decreased post-treatment for the convulsive group, but in the
subconvulsive group errors increased

inquiry
errors

further.

differences

between

and no-inquiry groups with regard to

were

extinction or displacement
insignificant. £:;.convulsive-inquiry patients, the confabulatory

errors of patients with high degrees of
more frequent than those of
wave

The

activity.

slow-wave

patients with a

low

activity

were

significantly

or moderate degrees of slow

�.19-

Conclusions:

tests with simultaneous electrical tactile stimuli the number
of Confabulatory errors is related to an induced set suggested uy the
In

examiner' s inquiry.
The number

of confabulatory errors is increased in patients with

brain dysfunction in relation to

an

inquiry, but

may

also

in patientS'without brain dysfunction.who are acquiescent

be induced
and

susceptible

to suggestion.
The

frequency of displacement or extinction errors

to the inquiry procedure.

is not related

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2714">
                <text>The Role of set in the perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli. Amer J Psychol. 72:384-392.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2715">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2716">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-40-006</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2717">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2718">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2719">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2720">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2721">
                <text>[Preprint] and offprint. OFFPRINT FROM THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2722">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2723">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74474">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81035">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87596">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94157">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="273" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="64">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/cd19f1b46d47e649344f387e918358a2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>402d7d717080af9c10d773a24db00fb9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100690">
                    <text>Reprinted from Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. I, No.

1,

Sept-Oct. 1959.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to
Electroshock Therapy
ROBERT L. KAHN,

PH.D., and MAX FINK, M.D.

In previous studies”,7 we found that patients who were most likely to improve from
electroshock treatment exhibited persistent
and relatively marked degrees of altered
brain function, as measured by the electroencephalogram and the amobarbital test for
brain disease.10 We reported, furthermore,7
that patients who improved with electroshock treatment had developed a language
pattern similar to- that previously described
by Weinstein and Kahn}3 in their studies of
neurological patients with cerebral dysfunction. Weinstein and Kahn described a language pattern which they called “language
of denial” and demonstrated the relationship
of this language pattern to the premorbid
personality of the patient.
On the basis of these observations, we assumed that the patients most likely to beneﬁt from electroshock treatment would be
those who most closely approximated the
“explicit verbal denial” personality.11
To test this hypothesis, we studied 63 consecutive patients referred for electroshock
therapy. The selection of patients for treatment was made by the psychiatric staff, independent of the judgment of the authors.
Thepatients ranged in age from 20 to 66,
with a mean of 47, and included 21 men and
42 women. Prior to and during treatment
each patient was evaluated according to the
following methods:
1. Structured Family Interviews: Personality was evaluated in interviews with members of the patient’s family. At the opening of the interview, the relative was asked
to describe, in his own words, the patient’s
usual interests and attitudes. The relatives
were encouraged to talk about any aspect
they wished, and the interviewer followed
the trend of their talk, rather than proceedFrom the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.
Aided by grant M-927 of the National Institute of
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, United
States Public Health Service.
Presented at a meeting of Electroshock Research
Association, Chicago, 1957.

ing in a serial fashion. The interviewer
asked questions, however, to obtain information in 15 speciﬁc areas which have been
described as characteristic of the “explicit
verbal denial” personality. The number and;
type of questions required'with each relative
varied according to the degree of spontaneous production and the informant’s capacity to comprehend and communicate. The informant was encouraged to give concrete:
examples of all statements.
The patients were evaluated as to the pres
ence and extent of the following character
istics: whether they (1) stressed verbal
symbols such as resolutions, homilies, cliches-and rationalization; (2) were prestige and;
security conscious, and did not enjoy the in;
trinsic beneﬁts of health, work, leisure
money and property; (3) regarded illnéSs:
as an imperfection or disgrace, keeping it an; ,
secret from family and neighbors, and were
reluctant to seek medical care; (4) tended)
to “shake off” their own troubles and to be)
regarded as practical persons who advise,
others; (5) possessed much drive and coma
pulsive energy and felt guilty or uneasy if
not occupied; (6) were conscientious, with a
high sense of duty and responsibility; (7)
were sensitive to criticism, regarding it as
an attack on their integrity; (8) were proud
and tended to avoid help from others; (9)
were reserved rather than openly affectionate or emotional; (10) emphasized being correct; (11) lacked imaginativeness and creativity; (12) were not considered by their
relatives as dependent; (13) did not discuss
sex openly; (14) did not have temper outbursts; and (15) were not “ludic”—a term
taken from Piaget8 and used by Weinstein”
and Kahn12 to denote comic, tragic or melodramatic behavior.
After the interview, each item was rated
on a scale of O, 1 or 2. A score of O was
given if the aspect was noted to a minimal
degree; a score of 1 indicated that the characteristic was moderately present; while a
score of 2 indicated the deﬁnite and marked

,»

.

,

'

'

�'

presence of the pattern. The scores for each
item were added and, the resultant score
termed the “denial personality score.”
2. Clinical Evaluation: Each patient was
interviewed prior to treatment and at weekly
intervals during and following the course of
treatment. The clinical evaluation was determined by the patient’s behavior in the
few weeks following the end of the course of
treatment, and was based on the evaluation
of the patient’s therapist, the therapist’s supervising psychiatrist and the supervising
psychiatrist in charge of the electroshock
treatment unit. Patients were classed into
three groups: much improved, moderately
improved, or unimproved, following the criteria outlined previouslyf‘
3. Language Study: In addition to. the

clinical interviews, each patient was examined with a standardized series of questions
directed at determining his attitude toward
his illness. Two of the questions asked were
“What is your main trouble?” and “If you
had one wish, what would you wish for?”
The patients were tested before and during
treatment, and the verbatim responses were
analyzed for changes in language, according
to the method previously described.7
Treatment for all patients consisted of
grand mal electroshock, using a Reiter elec—
trostimulator or a Medcraft alternating-current instrument, on a schedule of three treatments per week.
Of the 63 patients, we were able to- interview the relatives of 47; and the present
study refers to this group. The denial personality scores ranged from 0 to 25, with a
median of 11. For statistical comparison
the patients were divided into two groups.
Patients with scores ranging from 11 to 25
were considered the “high denial” group,
while those with scores from 0 to 10 were
classed as low in denial tendencies.
Personality Score and Clinical Response:
Patients with high denial personality scores
in these family interviews were most likely
to be rated as much improved, and only one
case was considered unimproved (Table I).
In patients with low scores, however, the
clinical response rating occurred on a chance
basis, with 30% of the patients being regarded as unimproved.
')
.«

TABLE I
Relation of Denial Personality Scores to
Clinical Response to Electroshoclc
Denial

Much

Personality Improved
Score
11 - 25
0 - 25

14

Total

Moderately
Improved Unimproved

Total

7

9
9

1
7

24
23

21

18

8

47

The difference in the denial scores between
the much and moderately improved patients,
when compared to the unimproved patients,
is statistically signiﬁcant (at 1% level of
conﬁdence by Mann-Whitney U Test). Although the much improved patients have a
higher mean score than the moderately improved group, this difference is not signiﬁcant.

Qualitative Observations: Although there
is a relationship between high personality
scores and the clinical rating, 30 per cent of
the patients with low denial scores were also
evaluated as showing a marked improvement.
While the group of seven patients is a small
one, certain common characteristics can be
described. Although these subjects lack the
competitive drive, prestige and security
needs of the high denial subjects, they show
a similar lack of creative or imaginative capacity or ability to think critically of their
own or others’ feelings. They relate to the
environment primarily by nonverbal forms
of communication. They are described by
their families as laughing or crying excessively and as showing anger by muteness—
“going into a shell,” “walking out of the
room in a huff”——or by violent tempers with
table-pounding, throwing objects or direct
physical assault.
Personality Score and Changes in Language: By means of the technique of language analysis described in a previous
study,7 the changes in language in clinical
interviews ~were compared with the denial
personality scores. Nine patterns of language change, such as explicit denial of illness or symptoms, displacement, qualiﬁcation, etc., have been described as characteristically occurring after electroshock. As in
the previous study, each patient was classiﬁed according to the dichotomy of whether

�.

qr nothe showed three or more explicit language changes. Patients with high denial
personality scores showed a greater number
of language changes than those with low
denial personality scores (Table II). The
coefﬁcient of correlation between the personality scores and the number of language
changes is +.71, signiﬁcant at better than
the 1% level of conﬁdence.
TABLE II
Relation of Denial Personality Scores to
Clinical Language Changes Daring Treatment
Denial
Personality Scores
11 - 25 (20)
0 - 10 (20)

N 0. Language Changes
0

—

2

3

or more

.................................. 8
.................................. 17

12

Total ........................................ 25

15

3

Illustrative Cases
Case 1. High Denial Personality Score: A 61-yearold housewife was admitted to the hospital with a
15—month history of insomnia, abdominal. pain and
fear of cancer. On admission she was depressed,
retarded and seclusive, evincing little interest in

her surroundings and wandering aimlessly about
the ward.
The patient was described by her husband as a
conscientious, dependable, responsible person with
much integrity. She had no hobbies or outside interests, and was unable to relax; as a consequence,
she busied herself with chores at home. She was
“mortally afraid” of doctors, minimized her illnesses and concealed ailments even from her husband. Very restrained, she showed no affection or
emotion, never discussed sex and rarely lost her
temper. She had “a long memory for little things
if she felt that she was wronged,” a “streak of stubbornness,” and would “just as soon hold another
person responsible for her mistakes.” She was proud
and would “rather go- without food” than borrow
or take money from others.
According to the denial criteria, her score was 20.
After 20 electroshock treatments, she became euphoric, took an interest in her personal appearance and participated in hospital activities. Her doctor called her a “model” patient who, “while reluctant to discuss her personal feelings, asserted
that she had no difﬁculties at home, had a wonderful husband who was very good to her, considered herself lucky and eagerly anticipated her discharge.” She was discharged with a rating of

“much improved.”
Case 2. Low Dental Personality Score: A 41year-old housewife was admitted to the hospital
with a two-year history of depression following the
birth of her fourth child. She cried frequently, lost
interest in social activities, found it increasingly
difﬁcult to take care of her baby and had suicidal

thoughts. On admission it was noted that the patient paid little attention to her personal appearance, cried readily, showed psychomotor retardation and was circumstantial in speech.
The patient was described by her husband as a
“negative personality” with whom it was not easy
to get along because she was opinionated and argumentative. He regarded her as “completely impractical, with no common sense.” She was a poor
housekeeper, constantly demanding help from other
people, although not the kind of person who would
put herself out for others. An excessively talkative
person, she liked to engage in long, intellectual, pretentious conversations. When angry, however, she
Would become either completely mute or “very
nasty, implying you just don’t know any better.”
Although considered a “cold” person, she was able
to talk freely about sex. She frequently complained of physical ailments and went to physicians
readily. She was “naive” and “unrealistic,” believing, for example, that she had a ﬂair for writing
although others considered her amateurish.
Her personality score was rated as 4.
The patient received 18 electroshock treatments,
which were terminated at her own insistence because she was too frightened to take any more. At
the time of her discharge her doctor noted her as
“quite depressed,” but felt it was doubtful that she
could beneﬁt from further treatment at the hospital.
She was discharged with the recommendation for
continued psychotherapy.

Discussion
The structured family interview was designed to test the Specific hypothesis derived from earlier observations that patients
with the “explicit verbal denial” personality
are most likely, with electroshock therapy,
to show both the language and behavioral
changes which are rated as much improved
by the examiner. The data support this hypothesis and are also consistent with the
theory of the mode of action of electroshock
therapy advanced by Weinstein, Linn and
Kahn in 1952.9 They suggest tha “. . . the
therapeutic eﬂicacy of electroconvulsive therapy . . . derives from the production of a.
state of brain function in which the mechanism of denial is facilitated in characterologically disposed individuals.”
The degree of explicit verbal denial is,
however, only one personality aspect affecting the behavioral response to treatment. On
the basis of the present data and methods of
analysis, a broader View of’ personality patterns in relation to improvement with EST
is now possible. Those patients who are
rated as clinically improved are character-

'

�8va

—

_

,r-Pff-‘wu

‘:_‘_":':'*'r‘-n-€"L

,V"-~.'

-:
&lt;

,2

ized as: (a) nonempathic—unable to think
critically or sensitively about the needs, feelings or communications of others; (b) nonintrospective—unable to think critically
about their own feelings or needs, or to
achieve insight even with the collaboration
of others in the psychotherapeutic relationship; (0) relying heavily on nonverbal communication—even when they are talkative
there is little referential communication, the
words being clichéd, stereotyped or representative of feelings and emotions rather than
transmitters of information; and (d) highly
conventional—without imaginative or creative capacity, and with few resources to deal
with stressful or new situations.
With this pattern as the common background, two classes of patients who respond
to treatment can be deﬁned: the driving, conscientious, independent, successful, emotionally controlled person who can be characterized as the “explicit verbal denial” personality type; and the chronically inadequate, affectively labile and ludic, dependent person, coming from an impoverished
sociocultural background. While both types
are rated as improved in their short-term
response to electroshock, preliminary followup observations indicate that the “explicit
verbal denial” personality type is more likely
to sustain the clinical response, while the
ludic group is likely to relapse quickly.
Consistent with our previous studies we
have found that altered brain function is a
necessary condition for behavioral change
with electroshock therapy. The kinds of behavioral change shown with altered brain
function, however, vary markedly in different patients. Some show mood changes and
denial or displacement of symptoms, and are
rated as improved. Others develop paranoid
agitated states, become withdrawn or show
additional somatic or memory complaints,
and are rated as unimproved. In this study
we have stressed the personality factors in
those cases whose behavioral response was
rated as improved. We have not considered the patients who were rated as only
moderately improved or unimproved. If the
basic hypothesis is correct, we should also
ﬁnd a relationship between personality and
the behavioral response in patients who are
rated as unimproved. Present information
4.:

in this regard is minimal, as this problem
has not been approached with a speciﬁc hy-“
pothesis.
These observations raise questions concerning the relation of personality to type
of mental illness and choice of therapy. Clinical observations support the concept of a
characteristic premorbid personality. Abraham1 noted that states of depression occur
in obsessional persons. Arnot2 described depressed patients as being overconscientious
and perfectionistic. Hamilton and Mann,5
reporting various aspects of the personality
in involutional depression, included such features as “followed a rigid pattern of behavior . . . displayed a lack of imagination . . .
narrow range of interest . . . thorough, conscientious, meticulous devotion to duty . . .
lack of feeling for point of view of others
. . . hard, uncompromising drivers . . . oversensitive . . reserved.” Cohen et al.,3 in
an intensive study of manic-depressive psychosis, reported their patients as being
highly prestige conscious; little concerned
with problems of interpersonal relatedness;
stereotyped; conventional; having little capacity for communicative interchange; and
unaware of other persons’ feelings toward
them or of their feelings toward others. They
emphasized the patients’ inability to communicate verbally and suggested that the therapeutic relationship should be in nonverbal
terms rather than emphasizing the intellectual content of the exchange,
These studies of the personality background of depression show a pattern that
is most similar to those personality aspects
which have been described as the “explicit
verbal denial” personality. The factor of
personality could thus explain the fact that
depression is the condition that responds
best to electroshock treatment. The same
personality factors which make a person
susceptible to a depressive reaction are those
which make him responsive to nonverbal
forms of therapy. These factors enable him
to respond, under the conditions of altered
brain function, with those language and
other behavioral changes which are evaluated as improved. Thus, the same stereotypy, conventionality, perfectionism and
prestige consciousness which produce a cat-

'

&gt;

�.'

respOnse in the individual faced
astrophic
7
With the loss, of a partner, job, business or
u'loiv‘ed one permit the development of denial,
minimization and displacement under the
conditions of altered brain function and are
deemed “improved” by the family and the
therapist.

Summary and Conclusions
To summarize, we believe that our results
show that aspects of personality can be differentiated, which are signiﬁcantly related
to the response to treatment. The basic personality pattern of the patients Who respond
best to electroshock treatment can be characterized as (a) nonempathic, (b) nonintrospective, (c) communicating nonverbally
and ((1) highly conventional and stereotyped, with little imaginative or creative capacity. Within the context of this common
care, there are two main subdivisions of improved patients. One group is comparable
with the “explicit verbal denial” personality,
showing such features as drive, conscientiousness, independence and emotional control. The other group consists of persons
apt to be chronically inadequate and dependent, coming from deprived sociocultural
backgrounds, who are affectively labile and
ludic. The same personality factors which
contribute to a depressive reaction contribute to a behavioral change, under the conditions of altered brain function following
electroshock therapy, which is evaluated as
improvement.

.
.
.

REFERENCES
Abraham, K.: Selected Papers on Psychoanalysis. (The Hogarth Press Ltd., London, 1949.)
Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality. Arch.
Neural. (G Psychiat, 76:617-618 (1956).
Cohen, M. B., et al.: An Intensive Study of
Twelve Cases of Manic—Depressive Psychosis.
Psychiatry, 17 :103-137 (1954).
Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG
Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in Electroshock. Arch. Neural. c6 Psychiat, 78:516-525,
1957.

10.

11.

12.

13.

Hamilton, D. M., and Mann, W. A.: The Hospital Treatment of Involutional Psychoses, in
Hoch, P., and Zubin, J. (eds.), Depression, pp.
199-209 (Grune d2 Strattan, New York, 1954).
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock. Arch. Neural. c6 Psychiat.,
76:23-29 (1956).
Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy, in Hoch,
P., and Zubin, J. (eds), Psychopathology of
Communication, pp. 126.
Piaget, J .: Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood (W. W. N ortau, New York, 1951).
Weinstein, E. A., Linn, L., and Kahn, R. L.:
Psychosis During Electroshock Therapy: Its
Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy. Am.
J. Psychiat, 109:22-26 (1952).
Weinstein, E. A., et al.: Diagnostic Use of Amo—
barbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Organic
Brain Disease. Am. J. Psychiat, 112:889-894
(1953).
Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Personality
Factors in Denial of Illness. Arch. Neurol. (Q
Psychiat, 69:355-367 (1953).
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Sugarman,
L. A.: Ludic Behavior in Patients with Brain
Disease. J. Hillside H08p., 3:98-106 (1954).
Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Denial of
Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects.
(Charles 0'. Thomas, Springﬁeld, Ill., 1955.)

'

��March 1957

£471.“.

Personality Factors in Behavioral

Response

to ElectroShock Therapy

Robert L. Kahn, Ph. D. and.Max Fink,

From
New

WW.

M.

D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,
York.

Aided by

M—92? of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
of Health, United States Public Health Service.

grant

Institutes

Presented to the Electroshock Research Association, Chicago,

l.

,

l,

,

,

gnu-H‘SVAmh-ﬁy,

May

1957.

�INTRODUCTION

The

behavioral response of patients receiving electroshock therapy

variable.
noted

In previous studies of the factors related to

that patients

who showed

is

this variability

early, persistent and relatively

we

marked degrees

of altered brain function, as meaSured by the electroencephalogram and the

amobarbital

test for brain disease (10),

were most

response which was rated as improved (h) (6) (7).

likely to
The

show a

clinical

present study is an

investigation of the role of personality in the behavioral response.

explicit hypothesis concerning this relationship has been derived

An

from previous

studies of the patterns of behavioral

change occurring with EST.

In an analysis of language changes

after electroshock (7),

patients

patterns as explicit denial of illness;

who develop such language

we

reported that

personal, Spatial and temporal displacement of symptoms; and qualification,
evasion and minimization are rated as improved. These language patterns are

similar to those previously described

by Weinstein and Kahn (13)

studies of neurological patients with cerebral dysfunction.

in their

They characteru

ized this behavior as the "language of denial" and demonstrated a relationship
to personality. In particular they described the characteristics of the "ex-

plicit verbal denial" personality (11).
the hypothesis was advanced

On

the basis of these Observations,

that those patients

this "explicit verbal denial" personality type
the behavioral changes
The purpose

after EST

who most

closely approximated

would be more

likely to

Show

which are rated as improved.

of the present study, therefore,

was

to determine:

1) whether personality characteristics related to the behavioral
reSponse to electroshock therapy can be differentiated; and
2) whether patients with greater "denial" tendencies are more likeLy

to

show

proved.

behavioral changes

after electroshock therapy

which are

rated as

imp

�~2~
POPULATION

Sixty-three consecutive patients referred for electroshock therapy were
studied. The selection of patients for treatment was made by the psychiatric

staff,

independent of the judgment of the authors. The patients ranged in age

from 20 to 66 with a mean of h7, and included 21 men and h2 women.
METHOD

Prior to treatment each patient

was evaluated according

to the following

methods:

1. Structured Family Interviews: Personality was evaluated in interviews with members of the patient's family. At the opening of the interview,
the relative was asked to describe, in his

interests

and

attitudes..

The

relatives

patient's usual
encouraged to talk about any

own

were

words, the

aSpect they wished, and the interviewer followed the trend of

rather than proceeding in a serial fashion.

The

their talk,

interviewer asked questions,

however, to obtain information in 15 Specific areas which have been described

as characteristic of the "explicit verbal denial" personality.
and type of questions required with each

The number

relative varied according to the de-

gree of spontaneous production and the informant's capacity to comprehend and
communicate. The informant was encouraged to give concrete examples of

all

statements.
The

basic items included the presence

features: 1) stress verbal

symbols such as

rationalization; 2) are prestige

and

and

extent of each of the following

resolutions, homilies, cliches

security conscious,

intrinsic benefits of health, work, leisure,

money and

it a

and

and do not enjoy the

property; 3) regard

secret from family

and

neighbors,-and are reluctant to seek medical care; h) "shake off" their

own

illness as

an imperfection or

disgrace, keeping

�-3troubles and are considered practical persons

who

advise others; 5) have

drive and compulsive energy, and are guilty or uneasy

if not

much

occupied; 6) are

conscientious with a high sense of duty and responsibility; 7) are sensitive

it

to criticism, regarding

as an attack on

their integrity;

8) are proud and

avoid help from others; 9) are reserved rather than openly affectionate or
emotional; 10) emphasize being correct; 11) are not imaginative or creative;
12) are not seen as dependent by

their relatives;

13) do not discuss sex

openly; 1h) do not have temper outbursts; 15) and are not ludic (25)

After the interview, each item was rated
score of

O

was given

if

on a

scale of

O, 1

or 2.

A

the aspect was noted to a minimal degree; a score of

1

indicated that the characteristic was moderately present; while a score of

2

indicated the definite

and marked presence of the

each item were added and the resultant score

pattern.

The

scores for

is termed the "denial personal-

ity score".
2. Clinical Evaluation: Each patient was interviewed prior to and at
weekly intervals during and following the course of treatment. The

evaluation

was determined by

clinical

the patient's behavior in the few weeks follow-

ing the end of the course of treatment and was based

on

the evaluation of the

patient's therapist, the therapist's supervising psychiatrist and the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the electroshock treatment unit. Patients
were classed

into three groups:

proved, following the

much improved, moderately improved,

or unimp

criteria outlined previously (6).

3. lgnguagg §t_gy: In addition to the clinical interviews, each patient
was examined

toward his

with a standardized series of questions determining his attitude

illness.

Two

of the questions asked were,

"What

is your

main

trouble?" and ”If you had one wish, what would you wish for?" The patients
were

tested before

and during treatment and the verbatim reSponses were

anal-

ized for changes in language according to the method previously described (7).

�V

«hRESULTS

The

relatives of

scores ranged from

h?

patients

were interviewed.

to 25, with a

O

O

denial personality

statistical

comparison

Patients with scores ranging

from

25 were consiRered the "high denial" group, while those with scores from

to
to

For

median of 11.

the patients were divided into two groups.
11

The

10 were classed as low

in denial tendencies.
Patients with high denial

1. Personality score and clinical reSponse:

personality scores in these family interviews were most likely to

be

as much improved, and only one case was considered unimproved (Table

patients with
a chance

30%

I). In

clinical reSponse rating occurred

low scores, however, the

basis, with

rated
on

of the patients being regarded as unimproved.

I

TAJLE

Relation of Denial Personality Scores to Clinical Response to Electroshock
Moderately

Much

Unimproved

Total

9

1

2h

9

7

23

18

8

h?

Improved

Improved

Personality Score

-

25

1h

0 ~ 10

7

11

Total

.

21
The

proved

difference in the cenial scores between the

patients,

significant.

%

when compared

to the

unimproved

much and moderately im-

patients is statistically

Although the much improves patients have a higher mean score

than the moderately improved group, this Jifference is not significant.
2. Qualitative observations:

Although there

is a relationship between

high denial personality scores she the clinical rating,
low

denial scores

* Significant at
‘1

30%

of patients with

were also evaluated as showing a marked improvement. 'Hhile
1%

.0 '
level of coniidence

by HannAWhitney

U

Test.

�-5the group of seven patients
be described.
and

security

is

a small one,

certain

common

characteristics

can

Although these Subjects lack the competitive drive, prestige
ne ds of the high

denial subjects, they

show a

similar lack of

creative or imaginative capacity or ability to think critically of their own
or other's feelings» They relate to the environment primarily by non-verbal
forms of communication. They are described by

their families as laughing or

crying excessively; and as showing anger by muteness, "go into a shell," "walk
out of the room in a huff," or bv violent tempers with table-pounding, throwing

objects or direct physical assault.

patients are "ludic," - a term used

These

by Heinstein and Kahn (12) to denote comic,

tragic, or melodramatic behavior.*

3.

Personality score and changes in language: Applying the technic of
language analysis described in a previous study (7), the changes in language
in clinical interviews

were compared with

the denial personality scores.

patterns of language change, such as explicit denial of illness or

Nine

symptoms,

displacement, qualification, 323' have been described as characteristically
occurring after electroshock.

As

in the previous study, each patient

was

classified according to the dichotomy of whether or not he showed three or
more explicit language changes. Patients with high denial personality scores
showed a

greater

ality scores
ality scores

number of language changes, than those with low

(Table

II).

The

denial persen-

coefficient of correlation between the person-

and the number of language Chan es

is

+

.71, significant at better

than the 15 level of confidence.

* This terizwas taken from Piaget
behavior of young children (8).

who

pplied

it

to the play

and

imitative

�-6-

II

TABLE

Relation of Denial Personality Dcores to Clinical Language Changes During
Treatment
Number Language Changes

-

0

2

3

or more

Personality Scores
11-25

(20)

8

12

0-10

(20)

17

3

Total

25

15

h. Illustrative Cases:
Case 1.
A

month

High Denial

Personality Score:

élayear-old houswife

was

history of insomnia, abdominal nain

admitted to the hospital with a 15
and

fear of cancer.

she was depressed, retarded, and seclusive, evincing

On

admission

little interest

in her

surroundin s, and uaneering aimlessly about the ward.
The

patient was described

responsible person with
and was unable to
home.

She was

much

relax.

by her husband as a conscientious, dependable,

integrity.

She had no

As a conseguence, she

hobbies, outside interests,

busiee herself with chores

at

"mortallv afraid" of doctors, minimized her illnesses and con-

cealed ailments, even from her husband. Very restrained, she onenly showed
no

affection or emotion, never 6iscusse€ sex

had "a long memory

for

little

"streak of stubborness,"
sible for her mistakes."
than borrow or take

things

and would

if

she

and

felt that

According to the denial

She

she was wronged," a

"just as soon hold another person

She was proud ane would

money from

rarely lost her temper.

"rather

go

reSponu

without food"

others.

criteria, hrr score was

20.

After 20 electroshock treatments, she became euphoric, took an interest
in her personal appearance and participated in hospital

activities.

Her doctor

�-7called her a

"model"

patient

feelings, asserted that
band who was very good

her discharge."

who, "while

reluctant to discuss her personal

difficulties at home, had a wonderful husto her, considered herself lucky and eagerly anticipated
she had no

She was discharged with a

Case 2.

Low

"much improved."

Denial Personality Score:

hl-year-old housewife

A

rating of

was

admitted to the hOSpital with a two

year history of depression following the birth of her fourth child. She cried

frequently, lost interest in social activities, found it increasingly difficult
to take care of her baby and had suicidal thoughts. On admission the patient
was

showed

attention to her personal appearance, cried readily,
psychomotor retardation and was circumstantial in speech.

The
whom
He

little

noted to pay

patient

it was

was described by

her husband as a "negative personality" with

not easy to get along because she was opinionated and argumentative.

regarded her as "completely impractical, with no

common

sense."

She was a

poor housekeeper, constantly demanding help from other people, although not

the kind of person

who would

ative person, she liked to
sations.

When

put herself out for others.

engage

An

excessively talk-

in long, intellectual, pretentious converu

angry, however, she would become either completely mute, or

"very nasty, implying you just don‘t
"cold" person, she was able to

know any

better." Although considered a

talk freely about sex.

She

frequently complained

of physical ailments and went to physicians readily. She was "naive" and "un-

realistic," believing, for

example,

that she had a flair for writing although

others considered her amateurish.

rated as h.

Her

personality score

The

patient received eighteen electroshock treatments, which were term»

inated at her

was

frightened to take any more,,
At the time of her discharge her doctor noted her as "quite depressed," but felt

that

ital.

it was

own

insistence because she

was too

doubtful that she could benefit from further treatment at the hosp-

She was discharged with

the recommendation for continued psychotherapy.

�-8-

.

DISCUSSION

The

structured family interview

was designed

to test the specific

hypo—

thesis derived from earlier observations that patients with the "explicit
verbal denial" personality are most likely to
havioral

Changes

the examiner.

show

both the language and be-

to electroshock therapy which are rated as

The

data supports this hypothesis

and

much improved by

is also consistent with

the theory of the mode of action of electroshock therapy advanced by'Weinstein,

that "....the therapeutic efficacy of
electroconvulsive therapy....derives from the production of a state of brain

Linn and Kahn in 1952 (9).

They suggest

function in which the mechanism of denial

is facilitated in characterologically

disposed individuals."
The degree of

explicit verbal denial is, however, only

aspect affecting the behavioral reaponse to treatment.

one

personality

the basis of the

On

present data and methods of analysis a broader view of personality patterns
in relation to improvement with

rated as clinically
empathic

-

~

improved are

unable to think

EST

is

now

possible.

Those

own

who

are

characterized by such features as: 1) non-

critically or sensitively

about the needs,

ings, or communications of others; 2) non-intrOSpective

critically about their

patients

-

—

feel-

unable to think

feelings or needs; unable to achieve insight even

with the collaboration of others in the psychotherapeutic relationship; 3) rely
heavily on nondverbal Communication

little referential

--

even.when they are

communication, the words being cliched, stereotyped, or

.representative of feelings

and emotions

action and h) highly conventional .. ..

rather than transmitters of informp

withoutimaginative or creativecapacity,

y'and,with few resources to deal with stressful or
With

talkative there is

this pattern as the

common

new

situations.

background, two classes of patients who

"‘respond to treatment can.be-defined: a) the driving,.conscientious, independent,

�.9can be

successful, emotionally-controlled person who

plicit verbal denial" personality type;

b) the chronically inadequate,
coming from an impoverished

ively labile and ludic, dependent person,
cultural background.

characterized as the "ex-

'While both types are

rated as

improved

affectsocio-

in their short

term reSponse to electroshock, preliminary follow-up observations indicate

that the "explicit verbal denial" personality type is more likely to sustain
the clinical reSponse, while the ludic group is likely to relapse quickly.
Consistent with our previous studies

we

have found that altered brain

function is a necessary condition for behavioral change'with electroshock
therapy.

The

kinds of behavioral change

shown with

however, vary marcedly in

different patients.

denial or diSplacement of

symptoms and

paranoid agitated states,

become withdrawn,

altered brain function,

Some show mood

changes and

are rated as improved. Others develop
or

show

ory complaints, and are rated as unimproved. In

additional somatic or

memp

this study we have stressed

the personality factors in those cases whose behavioral reSponse was rated as
improved. We have not considered the patients who were rated as only moder-

ately improved or unimproved. If the basic hypothesis is correct, we should
also find a relationship between personality and the behavioral response in
patients who are rated as unimproved. Present information in this regard is
minimal, as
These

this problem has not been approached with a specific hypothesis.
observations raise questions concerning the relation of personality

to type of mental illness

and choice of therapy.

Clinical observations support

the concept of a characteristic predepressed personality. Abraham (1) noted
of depression occurred in obsessional persons. Arnot (2) describes
that

states

depressions as being overly Conscientious and perfectionistic. Hamilton and
Mann (5), reporting various aSpects of the personality in involutional depress-

ion, include such features as "followed a rigid pattern of behavior....dis~
played a lack of imagination...narrou range of interestS..thorough, conscientious,

�.10..
meticulous devotion to duty...1ack of feeling for point of view of
others...
hard, uncompromising drivers...oversensitive...reserved." Cohen, §t_§l'(3)

in an intensive study of manic-depressive psychosis, reported their patients
as being highly prestige-conscious; little concerned with problems of interpersonal relatedness; stereotyped; conventional; having
communicative interchange; and unaware of

self or of his feelings toward others.
to
be

little

capacity for

other persons' feelings toward him-

They emphasized the

patients' inability

that the therapeutic relationship should
in non-verbal terms rather than emphasizing the intellectual contents of
communicate

verbally

and Suggested

the exchange.

studies of the personality background of depression Show a pattern
that is most similar to those personality aspects whidh have been described
These

as the "explicit verbal denial" personality. The factor of personality could
thus explain the fact that depression is the condition which responds best
to electroshock treatment. The same personality factors which make a
person
susceptible to a depressive reaction are those which make him responsive to
non-verbal forms of therapy.

These

factors enable

him

to reSpond, under the

conditions of altered brain function, with those language and other behavioral
changes which are evaluated as improved. Thus, the same stereotypy, convention-

ality, perfectionism,

and

prestige-consciousness, which produce a catastrophic
response in the individual faced by the loss of a partner, job, business, or

loved one permit the development of denial, minimization and displacement
under the conditions of altered brain function and are deemed "improved" by

the family and the therapist.

�.11SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

1.

Personality factors in

63

consecutive patients referred for e1ectro~

shock therapy were studied by means of a structured family interview.

2.
which are

3.
be

The

results

show

that aspects of personality can be differentiated

significantly related to the reaponse to treatment.
The

basic personality pattern of the patients

who respond

characterized as a) non-empathic, b) non-introspective, c)

non-verbally, and d) highly conventional and stereotyped, with

best can

communicate

little imagin-

ative or creative capacity.
h.

‘Within the context of

of improved

personality,

patients.

One

showing such

and emotional

control.

ically inadequate
grounds, uho are

this

group

is

core, there are two main subdivisions
comparable to the "explicit verbal denial"

common

features as drive, conscientiousness, independence

The oﬂaer group

and dependent, coming

consists of persons apt to be chron—
from deprived Socio-cultural back-

effectively labile and ludic.

5. The relationship between these personality patterns and descriptions
of the personality of depressed perSOns

is noted.

The same

personality factors

which contribute to a depressive reaction, contribute to a behavioral change
under the conditions of
which

altered brain function following electroshock therapy

is evaluated as improvement.

�.12..
FERENCES

1. Abraham, K.: Selected Papers on Psychoanalysis. London:
Press Ltd., 19h9.
Arnot, R.:

The

chiat.,

3. Cohen,

h. Fink,

Predepressed Personality,

Zé: 617—618, 1956.

A.M.A. Arch.

The Hogarth

Neurol.

&amp;

Psy-

B., Baker, G., Cohen, R. A., FrommpReichmann, F. and Ueigert,
An Intensive Study of Twelve Cases of Manic-Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiat., 11: 103-137, l95h.
H.

E. V.:
M.

and Kahn, R. L.:

Quantitative Studies of Slow wave Activity
EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., Q; 158, 1956.

Following Electroshock,

Hamilton, D. M. and Mann, W. A.: The Hospital Treatment of Involutional
Psychosos, in Depression (Hoch, P. and Zubin, J., eds.), New York:
Grune &amp; Stratton, 199-209, 1952.

L., Fink, M. and weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

Kahn, R.

7.

Language During Electroshock
Communication
(Hock, P. and Zubin,
Psychopathology of

Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M.:

Therapy, in

Changes

in

Eds.) in press.

Piaget, J.: Play,

Norton, 19 51.

Dreams and

Imitation in Childhood.

New

J.,

York: N. W.

9. Weinstein, E. A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R. L.: Psychosis During Electroshock
Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy, Am. J. Pey-

chiat.,

193; 22-26, 1952.

10. ‘Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A. and Linn, L.: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium ("Amytal Sodium") in Organic Brain Disease, Am. J. Psychiat., 11g} 889-89h, 1953.
11.

E. A. and Kahn, R. L.:
Arch. Neurol. &amp;
A.M.A.
ness,

neinstein,

Personality Factors in Denizl of
Psychiat., éﬁ: 355-367, 1953.

Ill-

12. Ueinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L. and Sugarman, L. A.: Ludic Behavior in
Patients with Brain Disease, J. Hillside Hosp., 2; 98-106, l95h.
13. Ueinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.:

Denial of

siological Aspects. Springfield,

Ill.:

Illness: Symbolic and Phy-

Charles C. Thomas, 1955.

�--.f\

._

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D. and

From

Max

Fink,

M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside

Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.
Aided by grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental
Health, National Institutes of Health, United States Public
Health Service.
Presented to the Electroshock Research Association, Chicago,
May

5/59

195”.

�INTRODUCTION

.The behavioral response of patients receiving electro—
shock therapy is variable. In previous studies of the

factors related to this variability we noted that patients
who showed early, persistent and relatively marked degrees
of altered brain function, as measured by the electroencephalogram and the amobarbital
most

likely to

show a

test for brain disease (10),

clinical response

were

rated as
investigation

which was

present study is an
of the role of personality in the behavioral response.
An eXplicit hypothesis concerning this relationship has
been derived from previous studies of the patterns of
behavioral change occurring with EST. In an analysis of
language changes after electroshock (7), we reported that

improved (h) (6) (7).

The

develop such language patterns as explicit
denial of illness; personal, spatial and temporal displacement
of symptoms; and qualification, evasion and minimization
are rated as improved. These language patterns are similar
to those previously described by Weinstein and Kahn (13)
in their studies of neurological patients with cerebral
dysfunction. They characterized this behavior as the

patients

who

"language of denial" and demonstrated a relationship to
personality. In particular they described the characteristics
of the "explicit verbal denial" personality (11). On the

basis of these observations, the hypothesis

was advanced

that

�-2-

closely approximated this "explicit
verbal denial" personality type would be more likely to
those patients
show

who most

the behavioral changes after

EST

which are rated as

improved.

purpose of the present study, therefore, was to
determine:
The

-

1) whether personality characteristics related to the
behavioral response to electroshock therapy can be differ-

entiated;

and

2) whether

patients with greater "denial" tendencies

are more likely to show behavioral changes after electroshock
therapy which are rated as improved.
EQPULATION:

Sixty-three consecutive patients referred for electroshock therapy were studied. The selection of patients for
treatment was made by the psychiatric staff, independent
of the judgment of the authors. The patients ranged in age
from 20 to 66 with a mean of h7, and included 21 men and h2
women.
METHOD

Prior to treatment each patient

was

evaluated according

to the following methods:

Structured Family Interviews: Personality was
evaluated in interviews with members of the patient's
family. At the opening of the interview, the relative was
1.

�-3asked to describe, in his

interests

and

attitudes.

own

words, the

The

relatives

patient's usual
were encouraged

to

aspect they wished, and the interviewer
followed the trend of their talk, rather than proceeding
in a serial fashion. The interviewer asked questions,
however, to obtain information in 15 specific areas which
have been described as characteristic of the "eXplicit
verbal denial" personality. The number and type of questions
required with each relative varied according to the degree
of spontaneous production and the informant's capacity to

talk about

any

comprehend and communicate.

The

informant was encouraged to

give concrete examples of all statements.
The basic items included the presence and extent of
1) stress verbal symbols
each of the following features:

resolutions, homilies, cliches and rationalization;
2) are prestige and security conscious, and do not enjoy the
intrinsic benefits of health, work, leisure, money and
such as

regard illness as an imperfection or disgrace,
keeping it a secret from family and neighbors, and are
reluctant to seek medical care; h) "shake off" their own
troubles and are considered practical persons who advise
5) have much drive and compulsive energy,.and are
others;
guilty or uneasy if not occupied; 6) are conscientious

property;

3)

with a high sense of duty and responsibility; 7) are
sensitive to criticism, regarding it as an attack on their

�-u-

integrity; 8) are

proud and avoid help from others;

9) are

reserved rather than openly.af£ectionate or emotuonal;
10) emphasize being

correct; 11) are not imaginative or

creative; 12) are not seen as dependent

by

their relatives;

not discuss sex openly; 1h) do not have temper
outbursts; 15) and are not ludic (25).
After the interview, each item was rated on a scale of
0, 1 or 2. A score of O was given if the aspect was noted

13)

do

to a minimal degree; a score of 1 indicated that the characteristic was moderately present; while a score of 2 indicated
the definite and marked presence of the pattern. The scores

for each item were added and the resultant scoretns termed
the "denial personality score".
2. Clinical Evaluation: Each patient was interviewed
prior to and at weekly intervals during and following the
course of treatment. The clinical evaluation was determined
by the

patient's behavior in the

few weeks following the end

of the course of treatment and was based on the evaluation
of the patient's therapist, the therapist’s supervising
psychiatrist and the supervising psychiatrist in charge of
the electroshock treatment unit.

into three groups:

much improved,

unimproved, following the

Patients

were

classed

moderately improved, or

criteria outlined previously (6).

Study; In addition to the clinical inter~
views, each patient was examined with a standardized series
3. Language

�-5of questions determining his attitude toward his illness.
Two of the questions asked were, "What is your main trouble?"

"If you had one wish, what would you wish for?" The
patients were tested before and during treatment and the
verbatim responses were analyzed for changes in language
and

according to the method previously described (7).

�-6RESULTS

relatives of

interviewed. The
denial personality scores ranged from O to 25, with a median
of 11. For statistical comparison the patients were divided
into two groups. Patients with scores ranging from 11 to 25
were considered the "high denial" group, while those with
scores from O to 10 were classed as low in denial tendencies.
1. Personality score and clinical response: Patients
with high denial personality scores in these family interviews
The

likely to

were most

patients

h?

rated as

be

were

only one
case was considered unimproved (Table I). In patients with
low scores, however, the clinical response rating occurred
on a chance basis, with 30% of the patients being regarded as
much improved, and

unimproved.
TABLE

I

Relation of Denial Personality to Clinical Response
to Electroshock

Much

Moderately

25

1h

9

1

2h

to 10
Total

7

9

7

23

21

18

8

h?

Improved

Improved

Total

Unimproved

Personality Score
11
0

to

The

difference in the denial scores between the

and moderately improved

unimproved
*

patients,

when compared

much

to the

patients is statistically significant.* Although

Significant at

1%

level of confidence

by Mann-Whitney

U

Test.

�-7the much improved patients have a higher mean score than
the moderately improved group, this difference is not

significant.
Qualitative observations: Although there is a
relationship between high denial personality scores and the
clinical rating, 30% of patients with low denial scores were
also evaluated as showing a marked improvement. While the
2.

group of seven

patients is

characteristics

a small one,

can be described.

certain

common

Although these subjects

lack the competitive drive, prestige and security needs of
the high denial subjects, they show a similar lack of
creative or imaginative capacity or ability to think critically
of their own or other's feelings. They relate to the environment

primarily

by non-verbal forms of communication.

They

are described by their families as laughing or crying
excessively; and as showing anger by muteness, "go into a
shell," "walk out of the room in a huff," or by violent
tempers with table—pounding, throwing objects or direct

physical assault.

These

patients are "ludic," -

by Weinstein and Kahn (12)

a term used

to denote comic, tragic, or

melodramatic behavior.*
3.

Personality score

and changes in language:

Applying

the technic of language analysis described in a previous study
(7), the changes in language in clinical interviews were

the denial personality scores. Nine patterns
of language change, such as explicit denial of illness or

compared with

* This

and

term was taken from Piaget

imitative behavior of

young

applied it to the play
children (8).

who

�-8displacement, qualification, 323. have been
described as characterically occurring after electroshock.
As in the previous study, each patient was classified
according to the dichotomy of whether or not he showed three
or more explicit language changes. Patients with high denial
symptoms,

personality scores

showed a

greater number of language changes,

personality scores (Table II).
The coefficient of correlation between the personality scores
and the number of language changes is + .71, significant at
better than the 1% level of confidence.
than those with low denial

TABLE

II

Relation of Denial Personality Scores to Clinical
Language Changes During Treatment

Number Language Changes
0 - 2

Personality Scores
11-25
0-10

(20)
(20)

'

Total
h.

Illustrative

3

or more

8

12

1?

3

25

15

Cases:

gigh Denial Personality Score;
A 61-year-old housewife was admitted to the
hospital with a 15 month history of insomnia, abdominal pain
and fear of cancer. On admission she was depressed, retarded,
and seclusive, evincing little interest in her surroundings,
Case 1.

aimlessly about the ward.
The patient was described by her husband as a
conscientious, dependable, responsible person with

and wandering

much

�-9-

integrity.

hobbies, outside interests, and was
a consequence, she busied herself with

She had no

unable to relax. As
chores at home. She was “mortally afraid" of doctors,
minimized her illnesses and concealed ailments, even from
her husband.

Very

restrained,

she openly showed no

affection

rarely lost her temper. She
had "a long memory for little things if she felt that she was
wronged," a "streak of stubborness," and would "just as soon hold
or emotion, never discussed sex and

another person reaponsible for her mistakes." She was proud and
would "rather go without food" than borrow or take money from

others.
According to the denial

criteria,

her score was 20.

electroshock treatments, she became euphoric,
took an interest in her personal appearance and participated in
hospital activities. Her doctor called her a "model" patient
who, "while reluctant to discuss her personal feelings, asserted
After

that she

20

had no

difficulties at

home, had a

wonderful husband

very good to her, considered herself lucky and eagerly
anticipated her discharge." She was discharged with a rating

who was

of "much improved."

Denial Personality Score:
A hl-year—old housewife was admitted to the hospital
with a two year history of depression following the birth of
her fourth child. She cried frequently, lost interest in social
aetivities, found it increasingly difficult to take care of her
Case 2.

Low

suicidal thoughts. On admission the patient was
noted to pay little attention to her personal appearance, cried
baby and had

�readily,

showed psychomotor

retardation

and was

circumstantial

in speech.

patient was described by her husband as a "negative
personality" with whom it was not easy to get along because
The

she was

opinionated and argumentative.

He

regarded her as

"completely impractical, with no common sense." She was a
poor housekeeper, constantly demanding help from other people,
although not the kind of person who would put herself out for

others.

excessively talkative person, she liked to engage
in long, intellectual, pretentious conversations. When angry,
An

either completely mute, or "very
Just don't know any better." Although

however, she would become

nasty, implying you

considered a "cold" person, she was able to talk freely about
sex. She frequently complained of physical ailments and went
to physicians readily. She was "naive" and "unrealistic,"
believing, for example, that she had a flair for writing although
others considered her amateurish.

personality score was rated as h.
The patient received eighteen electroshock treatments,
which were terminated at her own insistence because she was
Her

too frightened to take any more. At the time of her discharge
her doctor noted her as "quite depressed," but felt that it

doubtful that she could benefit from further treatment at
the hospital. She was discharged with the recommendation for

was

continued psychotherapy.

�-11-

Elialﬁilgli

structured family interview was designed to test
the specific hypothesis derived from earlier observations
that patients with the "explicit verbal denial" personality
The

are most likely to show both the language and behavioral
changeswﬁﬂxelectroshock therapy which are rated as much

data supports this hypothesis
and is also consistent with the theory of the mode of action
of electroshock therapy advanced by Weinstein, Linn and Kahn
in 1952 (9). They suggest that "....the therapeutic efficacy
of electroconvulsive therapy....derives from the production
of a state of brain function in which the mechanism of denial
improved by the examiner.

The

is facilitated in characterologically disposed individuals."
degree of eXplicit verbal denial is, however,
only one personality aspect affecting the behavioral response
to treatment. 0n the basis of the present data and methods
The

of analysis a broader view of personality patterns in relation
to improvement with EST is now possible. These patients who
are rated as clinically improved are characterized by such
features as: l) non-empathic - - unable to think critically
or sensitively about the needs, feelings, or communications
of others; 2) non-introspective ~ - unable to think critically
about their own feelings or needs; unable to achieve insight
even with the collaboration of others in the psychotherapeutic

rely heavily on non-verbal communication they are talkative there is little referential

relationship;
even when

3)

-

�-12communication, the words being cliched, stereotyped, or

representative of feelings and emotions rather than transmitters of information and h) highly conventional - - without
imaginative or creative capacity, and with few resources to
deal with stressful or
With

new

situations.

this pattern as the

common

background, two classes

patients who respond to treatment can be defined: a) the
driving, conscientious, independent, successful, emotionallycontrolled person who can be characterized as the "explicit
verbal denial" personality type; b) the chronically
inadequate, effectively labile and ludic, dependent person,
coming from an impoverished sociocultural background. While
both types are rated as improved in their short term response
to electroshock, preliminary follow-up observations indicate
that the "explicit verbal denial" personality type is more
likely to sustain the clinical response, while the ludic group
is likely to relapse quickly.
of

Consistent with our previous studies we have found that
altered brain function is a necessary condition for behavioral
change with electroshock therapy. The kinds of behavioral change
slacwn with altered brain function, however, vary markedly in
different patients. Some show mood changes and denial or
displacement of symptoms and are rated as improved. Others
develop paranoid

agitated states,

withdrawn, or show
additional somatic or memory complaints, and are rated as
unimproved. In this study we have stressed the personality
become

�-13-

factors in those cases
as improved.

We

whose

behavioral response

have not considered the

patients

was

rated

who were

rated as only moderately improved or unimproved. If the
basic hypothesis is correct, we should also find a relation~
ship between personality and the behavioral reSponse in
patients who are rated as unimproved. Present information in

this regard is

minimal, as

this

problem has not been approached

with a specific hypothesis.

observations raise questions concerning the relation
of personality to type of mental illness and choice of therapy.
Clinical observations support the concept of a characteristic
These

predepressed personality. Abraham (I) noted that states of
depression occurred in obsessional persons. Arnot (2)
describes depressions as being overly conscientious and perfectionistic. Hamilton and Mann (5), reporting various aspects
of the personality in involutional depression, include such

features as "followed a rigid pattern of behavior.... diaplayed
a lack of imagination... narrow range of interests.. thorough,
conscientious, meticulous devotion to duty...lack of feeling
for point of view of others...hard, uncompromising drivers...

intensive
study of manic-depressive psychosis, reported their patients

oversensitive...reserved."

Cohen, sﬂngg (3) in an

as being highly prestige-conscious;
problems of

little

concerned with

interpersonal relatedness; stereotyped; conventional;

little

capacity for communicative interchange; and
unaware of other persons’ feelings toward himself or of his

having

�~1h-

feelings toward others;

They emphasized the

inability to

verbally

communicate

therapeutic relationship should

be

patients'

that the
in non-verbal terms rather

and suggested

than emphasizing the intellectual contents of the exchange.
These studies of the personality background of depression
show a pattern that is most similar to those personality

"explicit verbal
personality. The factor of personality could thus
the fact that depression is the condition which responds
electroshock treatment. The same personality factors
which make a person susceptible to a depressive reaction are
aspects
denial"
explain
best to

which have been described as the

those which make him responsive to non-verbal forms of therapy.
These factors enable him to respond, under the conditions of
altered brain function, with those language and other behavioral
changes which are evaluated as improved. Thus, the same

stereotypy, conventionality, perfectionism, and prestigeconsciousness, which produce a catastrOphic response in the
individual faced by the loss of a partner, job, business, or
loved one permit the development of denial, minimization and
displacement under the conditions of altered brain function
and are deemed "improved" by the family and the therapist.

�-15SQMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

1. Personality factors in 63 consecutive patients
referred for electroshock therapy were studied by means of
a structured family interview.
2. The results show that aspects of personality can be
differentiated which are significantly related to the reSponse
.

to treatment.

basic personality pattern of the patients who
respond best can be characterized as a) non-empathic,
b) non-introspective, c) communicate non-verbally, and
d) highly conventional and stereotyped, with little imaginative
or creative capacity.
h. Within the context of this common core, there are
two main subdivisions of improved patients. One group is
comparable to the Wkplicit verbal denial" personality, showing
such features as drive, conscientiousness, independence and
emotional control. The other group consists of persons apt to
3.

The

chronically inadequate and dependent, coming from deprived
sociocultural backgrounds, who are effectively labile and Indie.
5. The relationship between these personality patterns and
descriptions of the personality of depressed persons is noted.
The same personality factors which contribute to a depressive
reaction, contribute to a behavioral change under the conditions
of altered brain function following electroshock therapy which
is evaluated as improvement.
be

�116REFERENCES

1.

Abraham, K.: SelecteguPaﬁers on
The Hogarth Press Ltd.,‘l9h9.

2.

Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.
and Psychiat., 1g: 617f618, 1956.
Cohen, M.B., Baker, 6., Cohen, R.A., Fromm-Reichmann, F.
and Weigert, E.V.: Antintensive Study of Twelve Cases
Psychosis, Psychiat., 11: 103-137,
1ofsﬁanic-Depressive
9

3.

Psychoanalysis. London:

5

o

R.L.: Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave
Activity Following Elastroshock, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol.,
g: 158, 1956.

Fink,

M.

Hamilton,

and Kahn,

The_Hospita1 Treatment of

D.M. and Mann, W.A.:

Involutional Ps choseg, in Depression (Hash,

J.,
6.

933.5,

New

Stratton,

FT and

Zubin,

199-209, 1952.

and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of
Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock,

Kahn, R.L., Fink,
A.M.A. Arch.

7.

York: Grune E
M.

Neurol.

&amp;

Egychiat., lé‘ 23-29, 1956.

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electro—
shock Therapy, in Psychopathology of Communication (Hoch,
Zubin, J., eds.) New York: Grune &amp; Stratton, 1958,
P.6and
12 ~139.
ﬁ

J.: Play)
York: W.W.

Piaget,
9.

Norton,

l9Sl.

Imitation in Childhood.

New

Weinstein, E.A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During
Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of
Shock Therapy,

10.

Dreams and

Am.

J. Psychiat., 109: 22-26, 1952.

Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L., Sugarman, L.A. and Linn, L.:
Diagnostic Use of Amobarbitai Sodium ("Amytal Sodium")
Am.
inSOrganic Brain Disease, ""‘ J. Psychiat., 112: 889-89h,
19 3.

11;

Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.:’Personality Factors in
Denial of Illness, A.M.A. ArCh. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., £2:
355-367, 1953.

12:

Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L. and Sugarman, L.A.* Ludic
Behavior in Patients with Brain Disease, J. Hillside Hosp.
2: 98-106, 195h.
Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic
and Physiological Aspects. Springfiél’, 111.: Charles
i

13.

UT

Thomas, 1955.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2724">
                <text>Personality factors in behavioral response to electroshock therapy. J Neuropsychiatr. 1959 Sep-Oct; 1:45-9.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2725">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2726">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-41-007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2727">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2728">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2729">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2730">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2731">
                <text>Two [preprints] and one reprint. Reprint fromJournal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol.I, No.1, Sept-Oct. 1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2732">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2733">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74475">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81036">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87597">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94158">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="274" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="65">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/b97c9ed1045d743c104ef57163e90f61.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cca8258a1cb2c00bbe3baaafbd7ccf91</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100691">
                    <text>Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization. Qis‘éttarge Ratings. and Diagnosis

ROBERT L. KAHN. P|1.D.; MAX POLLACK. Ph.D..
AND

J’

MAX FINKI M.D.
GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

�Reprinted from the A. ill. .4. Archives of General Psychiatry
December 1959, Vol. 1. pp. 565—574
Copyright 1959, by American .llca’ical Association

Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings, and Diagnosis
ROBERT L. KAI-IN,

Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK, Ph.D.,

and

The increasing studies of the sociopsy—
chological aspects of psychiatric treatment
in recent years have primarily been concerned with treatment patterns in the community}? private practice,29 and outpatient
clinics.24’2" In the studies reported by
Hollingshead, Redlich, and their co—workers “'27 it was found that social class was
a major determinant of the type of psy—
chiatric treatment in the New Haven com—
munity. Patients from the upper classes
were more frequently treated with psycho—
therapy, while somatic or custodial care was
commoner among the lower classes. They
summarized their results by noting: “It was
found that treatment does not depend on
psychological and medical determinants
alone, but on the status position of the pa—
tient as well.” 27 Weinstock,29 reporting the
results of a poll of the American Psycho—
analytic Association, observed that the pa—
tients being treated by their members in
private practice came disproportionately
from the better—educated, high—income pop—
ulation.
Similar ﬁndings have been noted in
studies of outpatient facilities. Myers and
Schaffer 24 showed that the higher a per—
son’s social class the more likely he was to
be accepted for psychotherapy, treated by
more highly trained personnel, and treated
intensively over a long period of time. In
another study Rosenthal and Frank 28
Submitted for publication April 16, 1959.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by Grants M-927 and MY—2092,
National Institute of Mental Health, National 1n—
stitutes of Health, US. Public Health Service.

MAX PINK, M.D., Glen Oaks, N.Y.

found almost a linear relationship, between
educational level and frequency of referral
for psychotherapy.
A more critical test of the importance
of sociopsychologic factors in relation to
psychiatric treatment would be in a setting
where the same therapeutic techniques and
services were equally available to all patients. This requirement is met at Hillside
Hospital, which is a nonproﬁt institution for
the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable symptoms,” 11 who are
admitted regardless of their ability to pay.
One of the main criteria for accepting pa—
tients is their “ability to participate proﬁt11
in
ably
Individual
psychotherapy.”
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is
regarded as the primary method of treatment, with physiodynamic therapies available when needed. The average length of
hospital stay is seven months, although
some patients stay for more than a year.
In a previous study of the Hillside Hos—
pital population,14 it was shown that the
factors of age, education, place of birth,
and degree of stereotypy, as measured by
the California F Scale,1 were related to the
selection of therapy. Those patients who
were older, had less education, were
foreign—born, and had high scores on the F
Scale were more likely to receive convulsive
therapy. In contrast, patients who were
younger, better—educated, and native—born
and obtained low scores on the F Scale re—
ceived psychotherapy as their sole form of
treatment.
The purpose of the present study was to
determine the relation of sociopsychological
27/565

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

factors to (1) the duration of hospitaliza—
tion, (2) the clinical evaluations at time of
discharge, and (3) the ﬁnal diagnosis.

Method
Population—The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside Hospital on March 7, 1957, was
studied. This consisted of 171 patients, 57 male and
114 female, ranging in age from 16 to 68 years,

'

i

with a mean of 35 years.
Procedure.——The patients were divided according
to the duration of hospitalization, clinical response
to treatment, and diagnosis. The duration was de—
termined by the number of complete months in the
hospital. The clinical response and the diagnosis
were determined by the medical director at a staff
evaluation conference, usually held just prior to the
patient’s discharge. Each patient was rated as
recovered, much improved, improved, or unim—
proved on the basis of the reports of the therapist,
supervising psychiatrist, and milieu staff. The
discharge diagnoses were divided into four major
groups: involutional psychosis, manic—depressive
psychosis, schizophrenia, and psychoneurosis. These
diagnostic categories included all but three patients
in the population.
Each patient was tested with a 10-item modi—
ﬁcation of the California F Scale.” The F
Scale is a questionnaire which has been related to
such factors as authoritarianism, acquiescence,
ethnocentrism, and rigidity.1 The subject reads 10
statements and indicates to what extent he agrees
or disagrees with each, i.e., “a little,” “pretty
much," or “very much.” The score for each item
1 to 7, and the total score
from
range is
ranges
10 to 70. High scores indicate greater agreement
with the statements. These are extreme, uncritical,
or stereotyped expressions. For example, one statement is this: “If people would talk less and work
more, everybody would be better off.”

1.

Results
Length of Hospitalization—In this

population the duration of hospitalization
ranged from 1 to 16 months, with a median
of 7 months. For the purpose of analysis,
the population was divided into three
groups: 49 patients Who were hospitalized
for 1 to 5 months; 64, for 6 to 9 months,
and 58 for 10 or more months.
The relation of sociopsychological factors
to the length of hospitalization is shown in
Table l. The group of patients who were
hospitalized for the shortest period had
28/566

of Hospitalization: Total
Population

TABLE 1.——Dnrati0n

Months in
Hospilal
to
to

1

6

No.

5
S)

or more

1.0

49
64
58

l
6

to 51‘s. ﬁlo?)
to 5 vs. 10 or
more
to 9 vs. 10 or
more

Education.
Mean
ForeignYr.
Born

F Score.
Mean

Mean
Yr.

43.9
31.0

45.5
32.5
27.9

10.0
11.9
12.8

Mean

M can

Diﬂ'e-

Mean
Differ-

ences

ences

13.0

§

1.9

T

§

40.1

Diﬁ: reneos
1

Age,

3.4
12.9

§

17.6

§

2.8

9.5

§

4.6

*

0.9

41%
19%
10%
x ’=15.0 I

P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.

*

1‘

the highest mean F scores, were oldest, and
had the least education and the largest per—
centage of foreign—born. Conversely, the
group in the hospital for 10 months or more
had the lowest F scores, were youngest, and
had the most education and the smallest
percentage of foreign births. Patients who
were hospitalized for an intermediate period
fell in be;ween these two groups for each
of the factors.
When the data for those patients who re—
ceived convulsive therapy (Table 2) and
those who received psychotherapy (Table
3) as their only form of treatment were
analyzed separately, similar relationships
between sociopsychological factors and
length of hospitalization were found within
each group.
In the psychotherapy group there was an
increase in mean years of education with
greater months of hospitalization, but the
differences fail of signiﬁcance. It may be
noted, however, that many of the patients
who were in the hospital for 10 months or
more were under 19 years of age and were
thus unable to achieve more than a limited
number of years of schooling.
These same relationships of sociopsychological factors to length of hospitalization
were found when the patients were classi—
Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE

2,—Dnration of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving C onvnlswe Therapy
F Score,
N0. Mean

Months in
Hospital
to 5
6 to 9
10 or more

15

1

17
25

58.2
45.6
34.9

ences

to 5 vs.
1 to 5 v8.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
*
T

1
§

to 9
10 or

12.61

6

Differences
9.5

Education,
Mean
ForeignYr.

*

‘

Months 1”
Hospital

Born

67%
24%
16%
x2= 12.0

6.5
12.3
13.2

Mean

or

1 '50

§

19.6

§

*

10.1

1

t

to 5 vs.
to 5 vs.
more
to 9173.
more

1

§

0.9

Education,
Mean
Yr.

ForeignBorn

11-4
11-7
12.4

29-1
24-8

30%
16%
8%
x2=5.4

istic of patients hospitalized for the longest
periods. As a group, patients diagnosed
as schizophrenic were the most homoge—
neous in relation to time in the hospital,
showing major differences only in the F
score, without a consistent trend for the
factors of education or place of birth.
2. Results of Treatment—The relation
of sociopsychological factors to evaluation
on discharge is shown in Table 5. There

to 9
10 or
6

1.6
12.4

10

ences

*

Mean

Differences

141*

0.3

*

1,0

18.4

or
10.8

4.3

0.7

a deﬁnite, almost linear, relationship be—
tween the ratings of improvement and these
factors. Patients in the recovered group
had the highest F scores, were oldest, least
educated, and showed the highest incidence
of foreign birth. In contrast, patients in
the unimproved group had the lowest F
scores, were younger, better educated, and
were mostly native—born. Because of the
Wide variability within each group, however,
only the factor of age reached a level of
statistical signiﬁcance. Education also sig—
niﬁcantly differentiated the groups when
dichotomized according to- those who had
less than eight years of education and those
who had eight years or more. Of the re—
covered patients, 29% had less than eight
IS

ﬁed according to four major diagnostic
groups (Table 4). For each diagnostic
class, the lowest F scores, youngest mean
ages, most years of education, and least
percentages of foreign—born were character—

Mean
Diﬁer-

P=0.001.

.

-

.

.

.

4.—Duration 0f Hospitalization in Patients Classiﬁed According to Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Involutional psychosis ___________________

Manic-depressive psychosis

..............

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
Mean

1-5
6-9

58.2
150.9

10+
1—5

6-9

10+

...........................

1-5
6-9

10+

............................

1-5

10+

Kahn et al.

432

Differences

*

Psychoneurosis

40-2
38-6
27-8

Mean

OHCES

6.7

Mean
Yr.

26

Mean
Diﬂer5.8

F Score,
Mean

33
43

5

Age,

1

P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
P&lt;0.01.
P&lt;0.001.

TABLE

N 0-

to 9
or more

6
10

6

10.7

Schizophrenia

of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Psychotherapy Only

1

23.3
10

Mean
Yr.
51.7
42.2
32.1

Mean
Diﬁer1

Age,

TABLE 3.———Dnration

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

35.0

58.8
54.5
52.3

16.0

40.0
46.1
33.1

46.8
39.1
35.5

11.0
11.7
12.3

39%
23%

40.1
36.6
36.1

41.0
27.1

8.7
12.5

27.1

12.5

50%
19%
13%

36.3
38.5
27.6

27.8
27.8
24.1

13.3
12.3
12.9

7.1

9.6

57%
43%
0

0

10%

8%
12%

39/567

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
TABLE

5.—Discharge Evaluation

No.

Evaluation

...............................
..........................
................................
.............................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved
Unimproved

17

'

82
63
9

F Score,
Mean

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

42.9
39.0
36.1
31.1

44.5
35.6
31.2
31.1

10.7
11.2
11.2
13.2

Mean

Mean
Differences

M ean

Differences

Recovered vs. Much Improved _____________________________
Recovered vs. Improved
Recovered vs. Unimproved
Much Improved vs. Improved
Much Improved vs. Unimproved
Improved vs. Uni mproved

3.9
6.8
11.8
2.9
7.9
5.0

....................................
.................................
.............................
...........................
.................................

Age,

8.9
13.3

*

13.4

*

4.4
4.5
0.1

T

Foreign-Born
41%
22%
16%
11%
x2=6.1

Differences

I

0.5
0.5
2.5
0.0
2.0
2.0

‘ P&lt;0.05.

t P&lt;0.02.
3

P&lt;0.01.

years’ education, while all of the unimproved
patients had more than eight years’ educa—
tion; the much improved and improved pa—
tients were in between. By x2—analysis
these results were signiﬁcant at the 5%
level of conﬁdence.
When the data were analyzed for the
patients treated with convulsive therapy, the
trends noted for the population as a whole
were intensiﬁed (Table 6). Analysis of the
patients who received psychotherapy as
their only form of treatment (Table 7),
however, failed to show any statistically
signiﬁcant pattern. The recovered patients
were oldest and had the highest percentage
of foreign births, but education and F score
did not show any clear trend.
TABLE

relation of sociopsychological factors to diagnosis is shown in
Table 8. Those patients classiﬁed as show—
ing involutional reactions had the highest
F scores, the oldest mean age, the least
years of education, and the highest inci—
dence of foreign birth. In contrast, pa—
tients classiﬁed as schizophrenic had the
lowest F scores, the youngest mean age, the
most years of education, and the least num—
ber of foreign—born. Patients classed in
manic—depressive psychosis and psycho—
neurosis categories were in between with
regard to these social factors.
3. Diagnosis.‘—The

Comment
The present study has demonstrated that

sociopsychological factors, in addition to

6.—Discharge Evaluation in Patients Receiving C onvnlsive Therapy

Evaluation

No.

F Score,
Mean

Recovered _______________________________
Much improved __________________________
Improved and unimproved _______________

8
26
23

53.1
41.8
39.7

Foreign-Born

51.6
43.8
32.3

9.4
10.6
12.3

50%
35%
17%

x '=3.5

Mean
Differences

Recovered vs. much improved ______________________________
Recovered ”8. improved and unimproved ____________________
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved _____________

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Age,

11.3
13.4 "
2.1

Mean

Mean
Differences

7.8
19.3 I
11.5 T

1.2
2.9
1.7

Differences

*

‘ P&lt;0.05.

P&lt;0.02.
1 P&lt;0.001.
1

30/568

Vat. 1, Dee, 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE

7.—Discharge Evaluation in Patients Receiving Psychotherapy Only
N0.

Evaluation

...............................
..........................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved and unimproved ...............

9

54
39

F Score,
Mean
32-6
38.1
33.5

Mean
Diﬂerences

..............................
...................
.............

Recovered vs. much improved
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved

5.5
0.9
4.6

their previously determined importance in
the selection of treatment, are also signiﬁ—
cantly related to the duration of treatment,
the evaluation of the results of treatment,
and the psychiatric diagnosis. If such re—
sults were obtained in a survey of private
practitioners, as in the Weinstock report?9
it could be concluded that the limitation of
the number of practitioners and the expense
of treatment served to select preferred persons from the upper social classes who
could afford the treatment in terms of time
and money. The present results, however,
were obtained in an institution where the
various kinds of treatment were equally
available to all patients and where the ability
to pay was not a factor in the management
of the patient. We postulate, therefore, that
TABLE

Diagnosis

N 0.

Involutional psychosis ___________________
Manic-Depressive psychosis ______________
Psychoneurosis ___________________________
Schizophrenia ____________________________

24

39
37
68

..................

ForeigmBorn

38.2
32.2
31.9

12.3
12.0
12.2

33%
15%
18%

Mean
Differences
6.0
6.3
0.3

x '= 1.8

Mean
Diﬁerences
0.3
0.1
0.2

the observed relationships are not due
merely to mechanically selective aspects,
such as income or the prestige status of the
patient. Social factors are important be—
cause they are also related to psychological
processes, such as the habitual patterns of
communication, modes of expression, and
symbolic values. We shall attempt to
evaluate these processes and their effect on
the psychiatric relationships studied in
terms of the inﬂuence of sociopsychological
factors on the attitude and behavior of the
therapist, the patient, and the therapist—pa—
tient interaction.
Current data both from this laboratory 14
and from others 19'24'27'28 have demon—
strated that psychotherapy is most likely
to be sustained with those persons who most

8.—Diagnosis
F Score,
Mean

Mean Yr.

52.3
40.8
36.9
32.8

56.7
41.9
29.4
26.1

Mean

Mean

Differences

Involutional vs. Manic-depressive psychosis ________________
Involutional psychosis vs. psychoneurosis
Involutional vs. schizophrenia ______________________________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. psychoneurosis _____________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. schizophrenia _______________
Psychoneurosis us. schizophrenia___________________________

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Age,

11.5
15.4
19.5

3.9
8.0
4.1

I

i
§

’r

Age,

Education,
Mean Yr.
8.9
11.5
11.9
12.7

Differences

14.8
27.3
30.6
12.5
15.8
3.1

2.0 ‘
3.0 I
4.5 §
0.4
1.6
0.8

§
§
§
§

46%
26%
22%
10%
x==14,2 r

Mean

Differences
§

Foreign-Born

P&lt;0.05.
T P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

K ahn et al

31/569

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

closely resemble the therapists with regard
to cultural background, systems of value,
and communication patterns. With stress at
Hillside Hospital on psychoanalytically
oriented psychotherapy, it is consistent that
those patients who are most like the
therapists with regard to these factors would
be kept in the, hospital for the longest
period. This was true for patients receiving
convulsive therapy or psychotherapy and
for all diagnostic groups.
The length of time a patient remains in
a psychiatric facility is related to the particular function and philosophy of the insti—
tution. In studies of outpatient clinics
'
Which have a psychoanalytic orientation 2438
it has been observed that persons from the
higher social classes, determined by education' or income, are treated for a longer
period. In contrast, in state mental hos—
pitals, patients with/the least education are
kept longer and form a higher proportion
of the chronically hospitalized group‘.6'17"23
The state—hospital therapist, Viewing the in—
Stitution primarily as a custodial facility,12
is evidently oriented toward the more rapid
discharge of those patients “who come from
a background most like his own.
The observation of the relation between
sociopsycholo-gical factdrs and improvement
rating, particularly in those patients receiv—
ing convulsive therapy, may also be related
to differences in communication patterns
between therapist and patient that result in
referral for convulsive therapy. The
therapist may set different criteria for im—
provement for the;older, lesseducated pa—
tients than he does for the younger, more
sophisticated ones. In the patient with littlr
education and with modes of expression
different fromhis own, he may regard, for
example, the manifestation of denial or
minimization of symptoms as improvement.15 But in patients culturally like him—
self, the expression of denial is regarded
as a defensive operation, and the patient is
considered unimproved.
Ratings of improvement are also related
to the base line of premorbid functioning.
_

32/570

Thus, the rating of recovered is deﬁned at
Hillside Hospital as “the reasonable expectation that the patient will be able to
return to his community and function as
well, or better, than he did before he became
ill.” 11 The therapist’s perception of the
patient’s premorbid functioning may be influenced by the distance between his value
system and that of the patient’s. The greater
the social distance between therapist and
patient the less rigorous the requirements
for behavioral change may be. For example, for older, lower—class patients the
ability to resume work may be the major
criterion of improvement. For bettereducated patients work adjustment may be
one of many criteria, including such intangible aspects of behavior as insight, work
gratiﬁcation, and ease of sociability. The
patient’s expectancy not only of the type
of psychiatric treatment but of improvement is also dependent upon social back—

ground.12

While the same trends were shown in the
psychotherapy patients, the results did not
reach the level of statistical signiﬁcance.
This may have been due to the greater
homogeneity of these patients for the
factors studied, in contrast to the convulsive group. The outpatient study by
Rosenthal and Frank 28 also failed to ﬁnd a
relation between social factors and improvement rating in the patients who received
psychotherapy. This observation, also,
was obtained in a population that was more
homogeneous after the initial admission
selection process and after the spontaneous
screening effected by the patient’s willingness to attend treatment after he had been
accepted.

The marked relationship between socio~
psychological factors and diagnosis is not
surprising. Certainly, the relationship of
age and diagnosis is an established concept
in clinical psychiatry. In the involutional
disorders and in dementia precox the names
themselves have a chronological connotation. Landis and Page,19 in 1938, stated that
age was the “most important single deterVol. 1, Dec., 19.59

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

mining factor that we can know about men—
tal disease.” They asserted that, given the
age distribution of a group of patients, they
could accurately predict the number in each
diagnostic group, as well as the probable
outcome with respect to recovery and the
length of hospital residence. More recently,
Frumkin,8 reporting the median ages of ﬁrst
admissions to a mental hospital in Ohio,
observed data similar to our own with re—
gard to the ages for the various diagnostic
groups.
In the present study, however, we have
also shown that education, place of birth,
and F score signiﬁcantly differentiate the
major diagnostic groups in the hospital. In
view of these ﬁndings, we have postulated
that a psychiatric diagnosis is not just a
one—to—one reﬂection of a speciﬁc type of
behavior pattern but is also a value judg—
ment in terms of social interaction. Thus,
both in our own studies and in the work of
others 12 it has been noted that patients
with similar symptoms will receive different
diagnoses, depending on their social background.
An additional hypothesis relating sociopsychologic factors to diagnosis may be
based on the concept that persons from dif—
ferent social backgrounds acquire different
habitual modes of adaptation, communica—
tion, and expression. Accordingly, under
conditions of stress, altered brain function,
or states associated with the onset of mental
illness, a person will show those behavior
patterns or symptoms which are similar to
his habitual patterns. Thus, persons from a
lower—class social background are more apt
to communicate in nonverbal, physical
terms, while upper—class people are more
likely to do so in ideational and verbal
modes. Thus, anger may be expressed by
lower—class people by physical violence,
while persons from the upper classes are
more likely to resort to exhortation or argument.
Opler and Singer,25 studying schizo—
phrenic Irish and Italian patients in a
Veteran’s facility, found signiﬁcant difKahn et al.

ferences in the types of symptoms related
to cultural differences in the family backgrounds. Patients from Irish families in
which the active expression of emotions
were frowned upon and who had dominant,
overprotective mothers, were passive, com—
pliant, and withdrawn, and were fearful of
anything which might separate them from
the protection of the hospital. Patients with
Italian family backgrounds that encouraged
free expression of emotion and who were
ruled by a dominant father, showed as—
saultive and destructive behavior, were difﬁ—
cult to manage, and were rebellious against
authority.
In a comparable study, Miller and Swan—
'22
noted that hospitalized schizophrenic
son
patients exhibited signiﬁcant social-class
difference in symptomatology. Lower—class
patients showed a predominance of “mo—
toric themes,” while middle—class patients
exhibited “conceptual or r u m i n a t i v e
themes.”
Hollingshead and Redlich 12 found a
marked difference in the type of neuroses
shown by persons from different social
classes. While hysterical reactions were
found predominantly at the lowest social
levels, obsessive—compulsive patterns were
characteristic of the upper classes. They
felt that the lower—class patient expresses
his neurosis by acting out, whereas the
upper—class neurotic shows his symptoms
in ideational dissatisfaction with himself.
According to our hypothesis, then, we
should expect that persons from lower
social levels would show symptoms that are
nonverbal, and are expressed predominantly
in sensory or motor patterns. Among such
types of symptoms would be psychomotor
retardation, anorexia, catatonic stupor,
muteness, hysterical blindness, and paral—
ysis. In this connection it is noteworthy
that both hysteria and manic—depressive
psychosis have been reported on the wane
in the general population."-”4'8'10 This de—
crease, in our View, is related to the general
increase in educational level of the country
as a whole. One cannot, of course, ascribe
33/571

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

the decrease in hysteria to a greater freedom
in sexual matters; hysteria is commonest in
more poorly educated people, who are least
2‘6
has reported
inhibited sexually.”6 Rees
that those British soldiers who had hysteri—
cal symptoms in World War II were mainly
the mental defectives. He noted that
hysterical symptoms were related to intelli—
7
indi—
has
education.
and
Freyhan
gence
cated not only that the present clinical
patterns of hysteria are different from those
shown at the turn of the century but that
such schizophrenic manifestations as “cata—
leptic stupors, stereotypical motor peculiar—
ities, grandiose excitement, and violent
behavior” are difﬁcult to ﬁnd today. These
observations suggest that a sociopsycho—
logical framework can lead to the prediction
of future patterns of mental illness.
In our investigations of persons with depressive psychoses, we have frequently
noted a pattern of premorbid behavior char—
acterized by lack of imagination, creativity,
and introspective capacity, and by conven—
tionality and general rigidity.13 Similar
patterns have been reported by other
.authors.3’5"”'21 We believe that a deprived
cultural background, such as that involving
little or no education, with the early years
spent in an illiterate environment with
meager cultural resources, is conducive to
the development of such a personality pat—
tern. When mentally disordered, such per—
sons react with the repertoire of behavior
patterns that we term “depression.”
It is important to keep in mind that While
the relationship between social factors and
the psychiatric aspects described is probably
applicable as a general principle, the speciﬁc
ﬁndings may vary in different settings or
institutions. For example, Hollingshead and
Redlich12 found that schizophrenia was a
diagnosis proportionately commoner among
the lower than among the upper classes,
while at Hillside Hospital the schizophrenic
patients had the highest education. This
discrepancy may be related to differences
in composition of the two populations, the
Hillside patients being drawn largely from
34/572

the middle—class groups, with relatively few
from the upper or lower social classes. In
Hillside Hospital the diagnosis of schizo—
phrenia may indicate an “interesting” pa—
tient, while in a state hospital population the
same diagnosis may represent a patient who
is “hopeless.”
From the perspectives developed in this
report, observations which are commonly
explained in motivational and “dynamic”
terms may also be understood in other
ways. Thus, some situations where a pa~'
tient is said to be “hostile” or “resisting
psychotherapy” may reﬂect a problem in
communication between patient and ther—
apist, related to their differences in social
background.
It also is apparent that the social back—
ground of the majority of the mentally ill
paients is such as to make the current prac—
tice of universally employing a verbal, in—
sightful—oriented therapeutic approach a
difﬁcult, if not inappropriate, procedure.
The answer to the problem of how to treat
the vast number of mentally ill may be
not to train more and more psychother—
apists, but, rather, to develop therapeutic
techniques more suitable to the patient’s
own systems of value and communication.

Summary and Conclusions
Signiﬁcant relationships were found be—
tween sociopsychological factors and dura—
tion of hospitalization, discharge evaluation,
and diagnosis in a voluntary mental hos—
pital.
Patients hospitalized for the shortest
period were oldest, had the least education,
were most likely to have been foreign—born,
and had the highest scores on the California
F Scale. Younger, native—born, more educated, and lower F—score patients were hos—
pitalized the longest.
The same relationship of these factors
to length of hospitalization was found
when analyses were made according to type
of treatment (convulsive therapy or psycho—
therapy) and diagnosis.
Discharge evaluations of improvement
were signiﬁcantly related to age, the older
Vol. 1,

Dec, 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

.

patients having the more favorable ratings.
Analysis of the data by type of treatment
demonstrated that patients rated as recovered or much improved after convulsive
therapy had the highest F scores, the least
education, and were most likely to be
foreign-born.
Diagnoses of schizophrenia or psycho—
neurosis were associated with lower F
scores, younger ages, more education, and
native birth. The older, less educated,
foreign—born, high-F-score patients were
most frequently classiﬁed under involu—
tional or manic-depressive psychosis.
It is postulated that these relationships
reﬂect the inﬂuence of social background on
psychological processes, such as the habitual
patterns of communication, modes of eXpression, and symbolic values. These not
only contribute to the pattern of mental ill—
ness but affect all aspects of the patient—
therapist interaction.
Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263d St. (Dr. Fink).

REFERENCES
Adorno, T. W.; Frenkel—Brunswik, E.;
Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.: The
Authoritarian Personality, New York, Harper &amp;
Brothers, 1950.
2. Arieti, S.: The Decline of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis: Its Signiﬁcance in the Light of Dynamic and Social Psychiatry, paper read at 113th
Annual Meeting of American Psychiatric Association, Chicago, 1957.
3. Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality,
AMA. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 762617—618,
1.

1956.
4. Chodoff,

P.: A Re-examination of Some

Aspects of Conversion Hysteria, Psychiatry 17:
75-81, 1954.

E;

Baker, R; Cohen, R. A.;
Fromm-Reichmann, F., and Weigert, E.: An In—
tensive Study of 12 Cases of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiatry 17:103-137, 1954.
6. Dunham, H. W., and Meltzer, B. N.:
Predicting Length of Hospitalization of Mental
Patients, Am. J. Sociol. 52:123—131, 1946.
7. Freyhan, F. A.: The Impact of Somatic
Therapies on Course and Clinical Proﬁle of the
Schizophrenias, J. Clin. &amp; Exper. Psychopath. 19:
5.

Cohen, M.

195-201, 1958.

Frumkin, R. M.: Occupation and Major
Mental Disorders, in Mental Health and Mental
8.

Kalm et al.

Disorder, prepared by a committee of the Society
for Study of Social Problems, edited by A. M.
Rose, New York, W. W. Norton &amp; Company,

Inc., 1955, pp. 136-160.

Hamilton, D. M., and Mann, W. A.: The
Hospital Treatment of Involutional Psychoses, in
Depression, Proceeding 42d Annual Meeting of
American Psychopathological Association, edited
by P. H. Hoch and J. Zubin, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952, pp. 199-209.
10. Harvey, W. A.: Changing Syndrome and
Culture: Recent Studies in Comparative Psychiatry,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat. 2:165—171, 1956.
11. Hillside Hospital: Twenty—Ninth Annual Report, 1956.
12. Hollingshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C.:
Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community
Study, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
13. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.:
Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, J. N europsychiatry, to be published.
14. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and
Fink, M.:
Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a.
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
9.

216-228, 1957.

Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
Psychopathology of Communication, Proceedings
of 46th Annual Meeting of American Psychopathological Association, edited by P. H. Hoch and
J. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1958.
16. Kinsey, A. C.; Pomeroy, W. B., and
Martin,
C. 13.: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,
Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company, 1948.
17. Kramer, M.; Goldstein, H.; Israel, R. H.,
and JohnsonpN. A.: A Historical Study of the
Disposition of First Admissions to a State Mental
Hospital, Public Health Monograph No. 32,
Government Printing Ofﬁce, 1955.
18. Kramer, K.; Pollack, E. S., and Redick,
R. W.: Studies of Incidence and Prevalence of
Hospitalized Mental Disorders in the United
States: Current Status and Future Goals, paper
read at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American
Psychopathological Association, New York, 1959.
19. Landis, C., and Page, I. D.: Modern
Society and Mental Disease, New York, Farrar &amp;
Rinehart, Inc., 1938.
20. Gallagher, E. B.; Levinson, D. J., and
Erlich, I.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics
of Patients and Their Relevance for Psychiatric
Treatment, in The Patient and the Mental Hos—
pital, edited by M. Greenblatt, D. I. Levinson, and
R. H. Williams, Chicago, Free Press, 1957.
21. Malamud, W.; Sands, S. L., and Malamud,
I.: The Involutional Psychoses: A Socio—Psy—
chiatric Study, Psychosom. Med. 3:410-426, 1941.
22. Miller, D. R., and Swanson, (3.: Defense
Against Conﬂict and Social Background, paper
15.

35/573

V

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

read as part of a symposium at the meeting of the
American Psychological Association, September,
1953.
23. Morgan, N. C., and Johnson, N.

Disorder, New York, Milbank Memorial Fund,

1950, pp. 51-52.
27. Robinson,

H.

A.; Redlich, F. C., and
Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric
Treatment, Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 24:307-316,

A.: Failures
in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient, Am.
J. Psychiat. 113 :824-830, 1957.
24. Myers, J. K., and Schaffer, L.: Social
Stratiﬁcation and Psychiatric Practice: A Study
of an Out-Patient Clinic, Am. Sociol. Rev. 19:

Frank, J. D.: The Fate
of Psychiatric Clinic Outpatients Assigned to
Psychotherapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 127:330—

L.: Ethnic

I.: Report of the Central

307-310, 1954.
25. Opler, M. K., and Singer, J.

Differences
Internat. J.
26. Rees,
Gruenberg,

36/574

in Behavior and Psychopathology,
Soc. Psychiat 2:11—22, 1956.
J. R.: in discussion on paper by
E. M., in Epidemiology of Mental

Printed and Published

1954.
28. Rosenthal, D., and

343, 1958.
29. Weinstock, H.

Committee of the American
Psychoanalytic Association, paper read at the 48th
Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathologi—
cal Association, New York, 1958.
Fact—Gathering

in the United States of

Amerm

�a.

"—1

“‘1

Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

__..1

Fl

l

I
J2

P
]

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in

Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

L.I.

Oaks,

New

York, 1959—1962.

The cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial

Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.

'

"

Aided, in part, by grants My-2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the

Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
.Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street,

York

MIP

10467.

New

York,

New

**

Present Address:

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of
Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139

***

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,

2/1/65

Bethesda, Maryland

�their studies of the

psychiatric patient popsignificant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
.and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2)9 The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excludedo
ulation,

In

New

Haven

Hollingshead and Redlich have reported

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including in—

dividual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to paya In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birtho These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratings. In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingso
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i429, greater stereotypy, were often fOund in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recoveredg

it was suggested that differencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospitala To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the procedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions
Hillside
In the survey reported here,

—w

F. Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Hospital, the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston, These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
C.

equally available, yet served patients of different social classeso

Each provided short—term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial careo Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psycho-

analytically—oriented psychotherapyo

This study was designed to determine the population characterof the three institutions with respect to social class, age,
education and F score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutions,

istics

�METHOD

A

census of

institutions

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

in January, 1959. While Menninger and
patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizophrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
status. The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
the

was undertaken

Hillside Hospitals

had voluntary

day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2-factor index a weighted score of education and occupation - was used (3,4,7). The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
The study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between

institutions.

These comparisons were

difficult however, because of

various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intra—hospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the

differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trends. These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
Sizes.

�RESULTS

A. Methodological Problems
When

of the hospital

reporting studies

tioned briefly.

from one institution, the structure
be taken for granted and either ignored or men—
In gathering comparable data from multiple institu—

may

tions, however, the

many

differences between institutions are accen-

tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific dif—
ferences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome.
1. Designation of Type of Treatment:

designating that
the

institutions,

a

The

criteria for

patient received "psychotherapy" differed

making comparisons

difficult.

among

Hospital psychotherapy was designated as
treatment administered on a prescription basis by a staff psychia—
trist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.
At Menninger

At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicians. No additional fees were charged.
At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy
designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students.
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident responsible for each case.

was

Individual institutional diagnostic styles
At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric
Association, while both Hillside and MMHC followed different unitary
systems. Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
2. Diagnosis:

made comparisons

source of

difficult.

distortion.

�Table I

30 Discharge Ratings of Improvement:
Ratings of imw
provement at the three hOSpitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global

ratings.making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II), For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other

institutions,

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
lo Sociopsycholqgical Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
among the three institutions

education and California F Scale score
is presented in Table III.

Table

III

.

a) Social Class: The anticipated difference in social
class composition of the three institutions was observedo At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age distribution

in the institutional populationso

�populations also differed in edu_”
more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduateo
c) Education:

The

cational attainment, with patients having

d) F Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty—one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight perm
cent with scores of 50 or above -— the higher F scores being assoc—

iated with higher degrees of stereotypy, In contrast, at Hillside
thirty—one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at

MMHC

only twenty per cent were below

309

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainment and performance on the F Scale were observed. These differences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables

among

these institutions.

2. Psychiatric Treatment Variables
a) Selection of Treatment:

Among

the

institutions,

significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received
somatic therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV)c
b) Duration of Hospitalization: The three insti~
tutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)o
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two—thirds of the
patients were discharged within six months of hospitalizatione

MMHC
1,——

c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV), At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved” and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"a The highest
percentage of "recovered" or "much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachu—

patients

setts Mental Health Centera
d)

nostic groupings

Diagnosis: For statistical analysis three diagwere made: schizophrenia, affective disorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV)» The diag~
nostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one~quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty perucent of the

populationo

Table

Co

IV

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital comparisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier studyg Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillsideo
Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals the younger patients remaining for the longest periodso
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year,
The

—

Table

V

�-7DISCUSSION

The patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter-institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment var~
duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
iables
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7),
Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmed, The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutions“
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower preportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,
——

It is

our impression that these differences in psymore to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populations, The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data. While these styl~
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow
a pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged.

chiatric treatment are related

Such population and treatment variable relationships
interactive
are
processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presente Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, i£§,, where objective criteria defining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disordersw Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution,
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residenceo Significant differences did occur, however, in

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications among the
three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the

examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical
evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one insti—
tution to anothero Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results.
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment results,
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutionso
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi-

atric characteristics.

In our initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social background° It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—

ployed° This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
"developing insight," or "working through one's problems."
While these investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
difficult
it
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapieso The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationsc
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other labor—
atories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the original hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
resultsa Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist—patient interaction,
be

�-10_

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
and F score, were related to treatment variables
education
age,
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in~
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluationo Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distri—
bution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
a-Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the Shorter periods cf hospitalization, lower proportions of
The

institutions

were

psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,

These variations in psychiatric practices followed a
with the social class differences among the inconsistent
pattern
and
are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
stitutions
Such differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric popula-

tions is

emphasizedo

�REFERENCES

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.

J.

and

Sanford, R. N. The Authoritarian Personality. Harper and
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

.

and Redlich, F. C. Social Class and
Community Study. John Wiley and Sons,
Illness:
New York, 1958, 442 pp.

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

A. B.
A

.

Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216—228.

.

Kahn, R. L., Pollack,

and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and
Diagnosis. Arch, Gen Psychiat., 1959, 15 565—574.
M.

Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Attitude (Ca1—
ifornia F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J4_Akuabhlkuugkjlui.,
1960, lﬁQ: 187—192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. Amari_Jm_EﬁxnhiaL., 1959, 116: 127-132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality

Alcoholism, Chronic

Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality
Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile.Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical
Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much

Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�III

TABLE

InterhospitaI

Comparisons

for Sociopsychological Variables

Menninger

Hillside

N

(87)

(133)

1

31%

7%

Hospital

Social

Class

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

Hospital

(72)

3%

11

51

20

28

III

17

34

13

,

1v

1

34

28

v

0

5

28

x2 = 121.5; df=8: p:&lt;.001

Age

N

(100)

(173)

”(95)

&lt; 20

19%

19%

15%

20—39

59

‘58

52

40 +

22

23

33

:

x2 =

=~

32%

41%

12-15

54

51

49

16+

23

17

10

7

=

(91)

9.7; df=4; p&lt;.05

(92)

(163)

(7%)

10-29

51%

33%

20%

30—49

41

50

38

8

17

42

N

s °°re

“——

23%

x2

F

—=

(173)

-&lt;12

Education

-——'———“:=;=

(100)

N

Years of

3.9; df=4; p=n.s.

50—70

1

x2 =

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE

IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
iMenninger

Hillside

(100)

(173)

Hospital

N

Type of

Psychotherapy

Treatment Somatic
Other
X2 =

Duration
0?

Hospital—

lzat1°n

Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Health
Center
(89)

21%

36%

24%

43

64

68

36

—-

8

82.8; df=4; p(.001

N

(100),

(173)

(95)

*7 months

22%

27%

67%

13

42

27

65

31

5

7—11

months

511 months

Xzf 90.6; df=4' p&lt;.001
N

Recovered,

Much

Improved

Discharge

Evaluation Improved
Unimproved
XZ'=
N

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and

Personality Disorder
x2 =

(99)

(172)

(88)

1%

23%

28%

80

62

61

19

15

10

29.3; df=4; p&lt;.001
(95)

(171)

4185)

43%

52%

54%

5

22

17

52

26

29

23.8; df=4; p&lt;.001

�Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age.

Menninger

Hillside

81

42

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

3O

40—49

30

20

50+

36

Below 20

MMHC

l4

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2734">
                <text>Sociopsychologic aspects of psychiatric treatment in a voluntary mental hospital: duration of hospitalization, discharge ratings, and diagnosis. AMA Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1959 Dec;1:565-74.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2735">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2736">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-42-008</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2737">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2738">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2739">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2740">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2741">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of General Psychiatry December 1959, Vol. 1. pp. 565—574</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2742">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2743">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74476">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81037">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87598">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94159">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="275" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="66">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/718a29ec15d25cbb6a477d3556be0fdd.pdf</src>
        <authentication>da7a7236e5d976ec8ac1cfd95b801264</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100692">
                    <text>EFFICACY OF DIVIDED AND SINGLE DOSE SCHEDULES
IN INSULIN COMA THERAPY
ARNOLD G. BLUMBERG, M.D., PETER LADERMAN, M.D.,
AND MAX FINK, M.D.1

[Reprinted from THE

AMERICAN JOURNAL

or

Vol. 116, No. 9, March, 1960]

PSYCHIATRY,

�1960

]

CLINICAL NOTES

839

EFFICACY OF DIVIDED AND SINGLE DOSE SCHEDULES
IN INSULIN COMA THERAPY
ARNOLD G. BLUMBERG, M.D., PETER LADEBMAN, M.D.,
AND MAX FINK, M.D.1

While many technics for the administration of insulin in insulin coma therapy
have been advocated(3), recent reports(4)
have assessed multiple divided doses as
more effective and safer than other methods. Previous studies indicated that the
production of coma was directly related to
the level of hypoglycemia and its duration
(1) and that deep coma for sustained periods was essential to the treatment result
in insulin therapy(2, 3). It seemed reasonable to test the suggestion of increase-d
efﬁcacy for a modiﬁed insulin administration by comparing the length and depth of
coma and the blood sugar levels in patients
treated both by single and divided insulin
dose methods. If the divided dose schedule
were more effective, it would be expected
that the induced coma would be equal or
greater in depth and duration; that the
time for onset would be equal or shorter;
and the blood sugar levels lower for divided
dosage than single administration.

the dose was increased in 10 unit incre—
ments. At the time when coma was produced, a single dose equivalent to the 3
doses was given on the succeeding day.
For each treatment, coma depth and the
time of onset was determined. Coma was
deﬁned as the loss of consciousness (failure
to respond meaningfully to verbal signals),
associated with the appearance of the Babinski reﬂex, and the loss of the lid reﬂex.
An adequate coma treatment was deﬁned
as the persistence of this depth of coma, or
deeper (loss of pupillary or corneal reﬂexes) for at least one hour.
At half-hour intervals true blood sugar
levels were serially determined by the
Somogyi method. The resulting blood sugar
curves and their level at the time of onset
of coma, were compared for each subject
with the blood sugar curve and coma data
obtained on a single administration of an
equivalent dose.

METHOD

The blood sugar levels at various intervals after the administration of divided
doses of insulin compared with a single
dose of insulin in one patient is presented
in Figure 1. This pattern has been reproduced in each of the patients studied. For
each, the blood sugar curve drops rapidly
in the ﬁrst hour without respect to the initial dose, and ﬂattens at progressively
lower levels as the total dosage of insulin
increases. Coma characteristically is reported in subjects in whom the blood sugar
curve is below 21 mg.% for an extended
period of time(1).
The time of onset of coma and the blood
sugar level at coma in each of the patients
is presented in Table 1. In ﬁve of the 6

Consecutive patients referred for insulin
coma therapy were given daily increasing
amounts of insulin in 3 divided doses until
a coma level was achieved. The same total
dosage was then given in one injection.
Six patients were studied in this manner.
Each patient was started on the following
insulin dose schedule : ﬁrst day—10 units;
second day—10 units and 2 doses of 5 units
each at intervals of one half hour; third
day—3 doses of 10 units at half hour intervals ; and fourth day—20 units followed by
2 doses of 10 units. On each successive day
From the Departments of Internal Medicine and
Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,
L. 1., N. Y.
1

[Reprinted from THE

OBSERVATIONS

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY,

Vol. 116, No. 9, March, 1960]

�'

'n'

9

Ir"

:

840

CLINICAL NOTES

[

March

I

%

TRUE BLOOD SUGAR LEVELS FOLLOWING ADMINISTRATION OF INSULIN
IN DIVIDED AND SINGLE DOSE SCHEDULES

9

9°

~7‘

9;

8°

3
O

\\
.- _

\\
I \

7o \.\

as

INSULIN DOSAGE IN UNITS

20.20.20...
—---— 10.70.70...
.......... 90.90.90“.
———-—

...q’

\
\\
'\

———-

AT auo MINJNYEuRVALS
“
"
“

I20,I20.I20u."

—'-— 360u.

IN

"
"

"

SINGLE DOSE

E
K
&lt;1

0D

U)

D

oo
_J

with divided doses in 4 of the 6 cases. It
was identical in one and lower with the
divided dose in one.
As there was no evidence in these studies
that the divided dose method was more
effective in the production of insulin coma
than the single dose method, the divided
dose technic was discontinued.

m

CONCLUSIONS

MI

3
a:
[—

O

60

90

IZO
I50
TIME IN MINUTES AFTER ADMINISTRATION

30

IBO

ZIO

OF INITIAL DOSE

240

cases, there was no difference in the time
required to induce coma by either the
single or the divided dose methods. In one
subject (Sc) coma was observed in 132’)
hours with a single dose as compared with
3 hours with divided doses.
TABLE

1

ONSET OF COMA AND BLOOD SUGAR WITH
DIVIDED AND SINGLE DOSAGE SCHEDULES

PT

D

G

H
c
So
V

Time for Coma Blood Sugar Value
(minutes)
(mg. %)
Insulin Divided Single Divided Single
U nit:
Dore
Dore
Dose
Dose

330
360
270
390
360
210

210
210
210
180
210
135

190

210
210
90
210
150

4
14

15
12
12
8

0
4
15
7
8
20

The average blood sugar at the time of
coma was lower with the single doses than

The coma produced with the divided insulin doses did not occur earlier and was
not deeper than that produced by the single
dose. The increased effort in divided dose
schedules is justiﬁed neither by increased
safety nor by increased depth or duration
of the induced hypoglycemia.
There was no, evidence that the initial
dose of insulin sensitized the subject so
that subsequent doses produced a greater
hypoglycemic effect. The total hypoglycemic effect of divided doses appears to be less,
if anything, than the effect of a single dose.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Blumberg, A. G., Cohen, L., Croghan, J.,

and Kelsey, D.: J. Hillside Hospital,

5:

41,

1956.
2. Fink, M.: J. Hillside Hospital, 6: 197,
1957.
3. Kalinowsky, L., and Hoch, P.: Shock

Treatments, Psychosurgery and Other Treatments in Psychiatry. New York: Crune &amp;
Stratton, 1952.
4. Laqueur, H. P., and LaBurt, H. A.:
Proc. Annual Meeting, American Psychiatric
Association, Phila., 1959.

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2744">
                <text>Efficacy of divided and single dose schedules in insulin coma therapy. Am J Psychiatry. 1960 Mar; 116:839-40.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2745">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2746">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-43-009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2747">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2748">
                <text>Blumberg, Arnold G.; Laderman, Peter; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2749">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2750">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2751">
                <text>Reprint from THE AMERICAN JOURNAL of PSYCHIATRY, Vol. 116, No. 9, March, 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2752">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2753">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74477">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81038">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87599">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94160">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="276" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="67">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/0a04fd8af8c99e319cfc9e14d05f3ffd.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d38bf0d44fbbfe5439d4cca003bd77b2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100693">
                    <text>CHANGES IN VERBAL TRANSACTIONS WITH
INDUCED ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION

JOSEPH JAFFE, M.D., MAX FINK, MD.

Reprinted from Tm: JOURNAL or

AND

ROBERT L. KAHN, PHJ).

NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
130, No. 3, March 1960

Volume
Printed in U.S.A.

�Reprinted from THE

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
Volume 130, No. 3, March 1960

Printed in U.S.A.

CHANGES IN VERBAL TRANSACTIONS WITH
INDUCED ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION
JOSEPH JAFFE, M.D.,1 MAX FINK, MD.

Repeated interviews with patients under—
going convulsive therapy reveal progressive
changes in the interpersonal relationship,
which are referable to verbal and non-verbal transactions. While non-verbal aspects
of communication are difﬁcult to quantify,
techniques are available for the measure—
ment of verbal behavior. Using such lin—
guistic methods, we have observed systematic alterations in language patterns during
convulsive therapy, which were related to
independent evaluations of behavioral
change and to improvement. The description
of these language patterns has provided a
useful quantitative method for understand—
ing interpersonal changes which occur during therapy.
In a syntactic—content analysis of recorded interviews during convulsive therapy
(6), such changes as denial (negation),
qualiﬁcation (subjunctive and .adverbial
modiﬁers), displacement (person and tense),
and cryptic and clichéd remarks were
scored. An increased incidence of these
changes in the patients’ speech was related
both to the degree of induced altered brain
function and to the evaluation of therapeutic response.
It has been clinically observed that when
the language of the patient is affected by
neurologic dysfunction, modiﬁcation of the
interviewer’s speech patterns occur. In the
syntactic-content analyses, in which a structured interview was used, the examiner’s
participation was restricted to statements in
the questionnaire. This two-person inter—
1Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, New York.
This study was aided by grants 56-151, Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry, and M-927
of the National Institute of Mental Health, U. S.
Public Health Service. The technical assistance of
Mrs. Jean Kolodny and Mrs. Ann Horowitz is
gratefully acknowledged.
235

AND

ROBERT L. KAHN, PHD.

view group (or dyad) therefore assumed
special characteristics. Interactive effects
were minimized. The constraint of the questionnaire interrupted the reciprocal modiﬁcation of the examiner’s speech. In such a
dyad, scoring of the patient’s responses
alone constituted an adequate description
of changes in the verbal transactions of the
two-person communication system.
Judgements as to mental status are usually arrived at in less structured conversa—
tions between doctor and patient. It was
suggested that measurable changes in language patterns would occur even in con~
ventional clinical interviews, and furthermore that such changes would be related to
those observed in structured interviews.
The methods of dyadic analysis were developed (3—5) to permit a quantitative
description of verbal transactions in unstructured interviews (diagnostic, psycho—
therapeutic). In this analysis, the speech of
doctor and patient is considered as one continuous behavior, and the measurements
are performed on consecutive units, irrespective of speaker. The verbal ﬂow of the
interview is thus considered as a single out—
put, irrespective of speaker. The justiﬁcation for this maneuver rests ultimately on
the correlation of dyadic speech patterns
with those obtained by other methods, and
is an aim of the present study.
These scoring measures of unstructured
interviews have been applied to weekly interviews with patients undergoing convul—
sive therapy. It is the purpose of this report
to 1) determine the pattern of change in
dyadic language measures with convulsive
therapy; 2) study the relation of these
measures to the degree of induced altered
cerebral function; and 3) relate the dyadic
scores to syntactic language measures ob-

�236

JAFFE, FINK AND KAHN

tained concurrently in structured inter-

repetitive the interaction. For these studies,
both the mean and standard deviation of
views.
the TTR distribution of each interview sam—
SUBJECTS AND METHOD
ple was obtained.
For the syntactic speech analyses the paTwenty-seven consecutive referrals for
convulsive therapy in a voluntary mental tient was seen by another examiner during
hospital were studied. On a random basis, the same intervals. This interview consisted
ten patients were assigned to a control group of a standardized questionnaire composed
and the remaining seventeen constituted the of speciﬁc items concerning the major comexperimental group. Both groups were com— plaint, reasons for coming to the hospital,
parable for age and education; the convul- and temporal and spatial orientation (9).
sive group had a mean age of 47 and 11.7 The verbatim responses were analyzed for
mean years of education, while the mean the presence of syntactic language changes
age of the subconvulsive group was 47.8, previously described as occurring with inwith a mean of 10.5 years of education. The duced cerebral dysfunction (6).
Prior to, and at weekly intervals during
investigators had no part in the treatment
process, and did not know which cases treatment, an electroencephalogram was reserved as controls until data collection was corded in each patient. These records were
measured for the per cent time of induced
completed.
The experimental (convulsive) group was slow wave activity (1).
In the dyadic TTR analyses, experimengiven grand mal electro-convulsive therapy
three times weekly, under pentothal pre- tal (convulsive) and control (subconvulmedication for a minimum of 12 treatments. sive) groups were compared. In relating
The control subjects were treated in identi— dyadic TTR changes to induced slow wave
cal fashion except that they received sub- activity and to syntactic language analyses,
convulsive electrostimulation while under the mode of treatment was disregarded, all
pentothal premedication.
patients being considered as a single group.
All patients were interviewed prior to
RESULTS
treatment, and in the week of the 12th
1. Dyadic TTR: A consistent change was
treatment. An unstructured clinical diagnostic interview technique was used centered observed in the TTR patterns of the experiabout the patient’s symptoms and life prob- mental group. Scores for consecutive 25
lems. The patient was encouraged to talk word units of interaction in 500 word samfreely, with occasional guiding interventions ples were plotted before and during the
by the interviewer. Long silences resulted treatment course (end of the fourth week).
in increased interviewer activity. All inter- Figure 1 shows a graph of the TTR patviews were tape—recorded.
terns for one patient. Next to each graph is
For the formal dyadic analyses (3, 5), the frequency distribution of the 20 consecu—
the ﬁrst 500 words of each interview were tive scores shown. The change in the distranscribed in temporal sequence without tribution for this case was a decrease in the
regard to the speaker. This sample of dyadic mean and an increase in the standard deviaspeech was divided into consecutive 25 word tion of the dyadic TTR. This pattern of
units. The type-token ratio (TTR) was cal- change was characteristic of the expericulated for each unit. The type—token ratio mental group.
is the number of different words (types)
Table 1 shows changes in the group mean
divided by the total number of words (to- T TR score during treatment. Although there
kens). Thus, the lower the TTR the more was a decrease in both groups, the change

�237

LANGUAGE CHANGES WITH BRAIN DYSFUNCTION

was signiﬁcant (p &lt; .01) only in the convulsive group and not in the control (sub—
convulsive) group.
Table 2 shows the changes in standard
deviation of the group TTR scores during
treatment. There was a signiﬁcant increase
in standard deviation (p &lt; .01) in the
convulsive group. In the control (subcon—
vulsivc) group the standard deviation was
decreased during treatment. The change,
however, did not reach statistical signiﬁ—
cance.
2. Relation of Dyadic TTR to EEG
changes: The changes in dyadic TTR scores
were related to changes in brain function
as reﬂected in measurements of the amount
of slow wave activity on the electroencephalogram. For this purpose, the per cent time
delta activity in the EEG record obtained
in the same week as the interview was used.
While almost all members of the experimental group developed prominent amounts
of EEG delta activity during treatment,
none of the control group demonstrated
such changes. Using the method of rank
order correlation, the change in standard,
deviation of the dyadic TTR correlated
+65 with the per cent time of delta activity

TABLE 1
Change in Mean TTR with Electroshock

Subconvulsive
Convulsive

.92

j
.xv-rp/w.

p.
l—

.76

.

/.

-

-

with Electroshoclc

Subconvulsive
Convulsive

,5
3

83
°

.5660

,0
.92

El

e4

...76
.68

.60

.

.68

D—URING
TREATMENT

/

f

.76

T”

text).

.92

Lo

55

5“
83
m

Ea

/\T

I

.56/6068

.76

TTR

FIG. 1.

.84

ﬂ—I

6

0

10
17

During Difference
treatment treatment

8.6

8.1

76

9.2

—0.5

+1.6*

*Signiﬁcant at 0.01 level, using Wilcoxon’s
method of paired replicates.
TABLE 3
Relation of Syntactic and Dyadic TTR
Language ZWeasnres

Dyadic Analysis:
Syntactic Analysis

N

Change in

Mean

Fewer
than
two changes
Two or more
changes

Change in

Standard

Dev1at10n

15

—0.8

—0.1

12

—3.0**

+1.4*

&lt; .01). The greater increase in variability in the language measure was thus associated With the greater degrees of altered
brain function. Changes in the mean T TR,
however, were not signiﬁcantly related to
the changes in brain function (r = +19).
3. Relation of Dyadic TTR to Syntactic
Language Changes: A comparison of dyadic
TTR scores with syntactic aspects of the
patient’s speech obtained in independent
structured interviews was made. The patients were divided into those who showed
two or more syntactic language changes,
and those who showed fewer than two such
changes, regardless of the type of treatment (Table 3). For the patients showing
(19

0

N

Group

Pre—

Signiﬁcant at 0.02 level.
** Signiﬁcant at 0.01 level.

0’)

.

—0.8
—2.4*

TABLE 2
Change in Standard Deviation of TTR

25 WORD UNITS)

E2

80.3
79.2

*

————“‘7
/'

17

81.1
81.6

Signiﬁcant at 0.02 level, using Wilcoxon’s
method of paired replicates.

PRE-TREATMENT

1.0

10

treaItirient tiggfﬁiltegnt Difference

*

DYADIC TTR PATTERN
(CONSECUTIVE

N

Group

.84

.92

LIO

Plot of TTR patterns for one patient (see

�238

JAFFE, FINK AND KAHN

two or more syntactic changes, both dyadic
indices showed a signiﬁcant change during
treatment. There were no signiﬁcant altera—
tions in TTR indices for the group showing
fewer than two syntactic changes.
DISCUSSION

These observations indicate a signiﬁcant
difference in dyadic transactions in the experimental (convulsive) and control (subconvulsive) groups—a difference which is
referable to a consistent change in the subjects receiving convulsive therapy. The ﬁnd:
ings are consistent with those reported by
Weinstein and Kahn (9) in their studies of
patients with altered brain function. They
observed increased use of the second and
third person, non-aphasic misnaming, cli—
chés, stereotyped expressions, condensations
and neologisms. These language patterns
were termed the “language of denial” and
were regarded as symbolic adaptations.
Kahn and Fink (6) noted similar language
changes in patients with brain function al—
tered by convulsive therapy. The present
observations indicate that verbal transactions during altered brain function are not
only more stereotyped qualitatively, as in
the use of clichés, but are also more stereotyped quantitatively as in the increased
repetition of words. Thus, analyses of the
more formal aspects of speech parallel
analyses of content.
Alteration in brain function was also related to changes in the dyadic indices. The
low, but signiﬁcant correlation between the
dyadic scores and EEG delta activity suggests that the two-person communication
system as a whole may reﬂect neurophysio—
logical alteration in one of its participants.
The low correlation is consistent with previous observations that the dyadic TTR pattern is sensitive to factors other than al—
tered brain function (5).
Other studies of the dyadic TTR and syntactic language measures during drug administration (2) are consistent with the
present ﬁndings. Administration of agents

which produce EEG hypersynchrony similar to that of convulsive therapy was associated with changes in both language measures in the direction of increased stereotypy
and repetitiveness. Agents which produced
EEG desynchronization, however, were associated with decreased repetitiveness and
a decreased number of syntactic alterations.
These observations, though limited to acute
drug interviews, indicate that similar
changes in language patterns can be antici—
pated in subjects following the chronic administration of psychotropic compounds. We
anticipate that alteration in patterns of lan—
guage may provide cues for the evaluation
of behavioral change in drug therapies as
well as in convulsive therapy.
It is of signiﬁcance that changes in dyadic
speech are measurable when the neurophysiological status of only one of the participants is altered. This observation is consistent with concepts of verbal behavior as
a two-person phenomenon, inseparable from
its interpersonal context (7, 8, 10). The
method and ﬁndings also demonstrate that
neurophysiologic effects can be investigated
in unstructured interviews and that the results may be related directly to those obtained under more structured experimental
conditions. Thus, the measurement of formal aspects of language in clinical interviews may be viewed as another tool of
neurophysiologic investigation.
CONCLUSION

Formal language measures in unstruc—
tured clinical interviews were undertaken
in the course of a study of convulsive and
subconvulsive therapies in a hospitalized
psychiatric population.
Dyadic TTR (Type—Token-Ratio) measures showed a signiﬁcant decrease in the
mean and an increase in the standard deviation in the subjects receiving convulsive
therapy, but no differences in those receiv—
ing subconvulsive therapy. The degree of
change in dyadic indices was related both
to the degree of induced delta activity on

�LANGUAGE CHANGES WITH BRAIN DYSFUNCTION

the electroencephalogram, and to changes
in syntactic language patterns obtained in
independent structured interviews.
Theoretic implications for the understanding of language changes during altered
brain function were discussed.
1.

REFERENCES
FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Relation of EEG
delta activity to behavioral response in electroshock. AMA. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.,
78: 516—525, 1957.

J. AND KAI-IN, R. L. Drug induced changes in interview patterns: Linguistic and neurophysiologic indices. In The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy, SarwerFoner, G., ed. C. C Thomas, Springﬁeld, Ill.

2. FINK, M., JAFFE,

3.

In press.
JAFFE, J. An objective study of communication
in psychiatric interviews. J. Hillside Hosp.,
6: 207—215,1957.

239

J. Dyadic analysis of two psychoanalytic
interviews. Presented in Symposium on Psycholinguistic Analysis of the Psychiatric Interview, Divisional Meeting of A.P.A., New
York City, November 28, 1959.
JAFFE, J. Language of the dyad. Psychiatry, 21:

4. JAFFE,

.

249—258, 1958.

.

.

KAHN, R. L.

AND

FINK, M. Changes in language

during electroshock. In Psychopathology of
Communication, Hoch, P. and Zubin, J ., eds.,
Grune &amp; Stratton, New York, 1958.
SAPIR, E. Language: An Introduction to the
Study of Speech. Harcourt-Brace, New York,
1949.

.SKINNER, B. F. Verbal Behavior. Appleton—
Century-Crofts, New York, 1957.
. WEINSTEIN, E. A. AND KAHN, R. L. Denial of
10.

Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects.
C. C Thomas, Springﬁeld, Ill., 1955.
ZIPF, G. K. Human Behavior and the Principle
of Least Eﬁort. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge,
Mass, 1949.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2754">
                <text>Changes in verbal transactions with induced altered brain function. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1960 Mar; 130:235-9.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2755">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2756">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-44-010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2757">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2758">
                <text>Jaffe, Joseph; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2759">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2760">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2761">
                <text>Reprinted from The JOURNAL of NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE Volume 130, No. 3, March 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2762">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2763">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74478">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81039">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87600">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94161">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="277" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="68">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/d22bf8e1eaccf5f9a01c426789665f0e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7c6234b95a1768fbfe1c37f8a9076215</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100694">
                    <text>Reprinted from

THE DYNAMICS OF PSYCHIATRIC DRUG THERAPY
Edited by G. J. Sarwer-Foner, M.D.
CHARLES C THOMAS

°

PUBLISHER

0

Springﬁeld ' Illinois ' U.S.A.
W

DRUG INDUCED CHANGES IN INTERVIEW
PATTERNS: LINGUISTIC AND
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIC INDICES
By MAX FINK, M.D., JOSEPH JAFFE, M.D., and
ROBERT L. KAHN, PHD.

In

studies of the effects of newer psychopharmacologic
agents on behavior, we are inclined to emphasize their effects
on the patient. The newer compounds do, indeed, have specific
physiologic effects, and we propose to review some of the induced
neurophysiologic changes. But psychopharmacologic agents affect more than the patient alone—and it is the interactive effects
that are the focus of this conference.
I am reminded in this regard of the story told at a similar
conference by Dr. David Rioch about a psychopharmacologic
his
that
the
On
of
earlier
days
an
amphetamine.
era,
agent
patients took amphetamine, Dr. Rioch reported, they seemed
much better. However, on the day when he took the medication, the patients also were considerably improved! How can
such changes in human interaction be measured? Of the many
aspects of behavior that are altered by the new agents—and it is
clear that all aspects of behavior, as perception, ideation,
motor activity, mood and judgment are altered—verbal behavior has numerous attributes that make it suitable for the evaluation of changes in interpersonal relations. Verbal behavior is
easily recorded, is readily quantified as it is already in units
(words, phrases and sentences) and can be recorded and measured without the introduction of artificial sets, equipment, tests
or instructions. Furthermore, speech is the core of psychotherreflect
in
of
and
measurement
language
changes
may
patterns
apy
changes in the ongoing relationship. For these reasons, we have
Aided by Grants M-927 and MY-2092, National Institute of Mental Health, US.
P.H.S., and Grant 56-151 of the Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry.

29

�The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy

30

undertaken studies of language patterns—of the patient and of
the therapist—as influenced by the newer psychopharmacologic
agents.

The groundwork for this report was laid in a study by R. L.

Kahn of the language changes following convulsive therapy (1) .
Under the conditions of the alteration in brain function induced
by repeated convulsions, changes in syntactical aspects of language were observed which were related to the degree of cerebral
dysfunction and to clinical ratings of improvement. Prior to
treatment patients expressed their problems and their aspirations in the present tense and first person, without denial, evasion or cliche’s. During treatment, however, they increasingly
utilized the past or future tense and the third person mode with
qualification, evasion, denial, displacement, cliches and cryptic
responses. Such language patterns on the part of the patient
resulted in an alteration in the language patterns of the thera—
pists. They, too, found interpretive statements in the present
tense less communicative, and increasing use of the future tense,
displacement, and minimization of symptoms as aspects of a reassuring attitude became prominent (2, 3).
Syntactic analyses are essentially grammatic content analyses,
and are dependent upon interpretations by the observer of the
subject’s communication. More recently, the dyadic TTR, another
measure of language change, has been applied to this problem
by J. Jaffe (4, 5). The two person group, or dyad, comprising
the interview is treated as a unitary system. The language measure involves the pooling of the verbal behavior of both participants—the patient and the therapist in psychotherapy. In these
studies, the tape recorded interview is transcribed in temporal
sequence without regard to the speaker of the words, and then
divided into consecutive 25 word units of intereaction. TTR, or
type-token-ratio, is an established psychological index of language
diversity. The ratio reflects the number of different words
(the types) to the total number of words (the tokens) in the
sample. The TTR is calculated for each 25 word unit and the
pattern of consecutive scores is studied.
In patients undergoing convulsive therapy, there was a

�The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy

3]

consistent decrease in the mean TTR and an increase in variability (standard deviation) about the mean. These changes reflect greater stereotypy and repetitiveness in the interaction. In
a control group of subjects, without induced brain dysfunction,
there was neither a change in mean TTR nor in the degree of
variability, although there was a tendency for the variability to
decrease (6).
When these two language measures—one a grammatic content analysis and the second, a formal diversification score—were
compared, a decrease in the mean and an increase in variability
of the TTR patterns were observed in the subjects who evinced
two or more syntactic language changes. Conversely, in those
with less than two syntactic language changes, no significant difference in the mean or standard deviation of TTR was observed.
These observations indicate that with increased syntactical language changes, there is also a decrease in language diversity with
greater stereotypy and repetitiveness.
Furthermore, when analyses of each language measure were
made with the degree of induced neurophysiologic change, as
reflected in the degree of delta activity in the electroencephalogram, significant differences were shown only by the subjects
with high degrees of delta activity.
In the earlier studies of convulsive therapy, a neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis of the mode of action of this form of
therapy was expressed (7). In this hypothesis, the therapeutic
process is ascribed to a persistent alteration in cerebral function,
which provides the milieu for a change in interaction of the
subject with his environment. Recently, this hypothesis has been
applied to the newer tranquilizing agents (8) and validating
studies are now in progress. The studies of verbal behavior are
one part of the investigation. We would like to describe our
present experimental techniques, report the data from the neurophysiologic and language studies for a number of compounds,
and discuss the significance of language measures as indices of
change in the ongoing interpersonal behavior of therapist and
patient.

�The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy

32

METHODS

At present, all observations are made in the EEG laboratory.
Following a routine EEG recording, an unstructured psychiatric
interview, with short periods of structured inquiry, is taperecorded. With EEG running, an intravenous injection is then
given at a slow rate. When specific EEG or clinical changes
are induced, EEG recording is stopped and the interview repeated. Periods of EEG recording and verbal interaction
recording are alternated for the duration of the period of
observation.
The EEG is measured for changes in synchronization, shifts
in dominant frequencies, and per cent time of slow wave (9) ,
alpha or beta frequencies.
The tape recordings are transcribed and measured for the
diversification of consecutive 25 word samples of dyadic speech
(4, 5) and syntactical changes (1). The dyadic analyses have
been described. In the syntactic analyses, the response to three
standard questions is evaluated as to changes in grammar and
content: “What is your main troubleP”; “Why did you come to
this place?”; and “What do you wish for more than anything
else?” Changes in syntactical use of person, alteration in tense,
evasion (as answering a question with a question or “I don’t
disof
the
the
subjunctive,
use
as
by
know”), qualification,
placement or verbal denial of symptoms, increased use of stereotyped expressions or clichés, cryptic responses or withdrawal and
silence were scored as changes in the communication pattern.
Consecutive patients referred for drug or convulsive therapies in a voluntary psychiatric hospital were seen prior to, and at
various intervals during, treatment. To date, the following agents
have been studied by these methods: amobarbital, benactyzine,
chlorpromazine, diethazine, iproniazid, lysergic-acid diethylamide
and Win-2299 (2-diethy1aminoethy1 cyclopentyl—Z-thienyl—
glycolate)
.

�The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy

33

OBSERVATIONS

l. Electroencephalogram
In a previous study (8), it was observed that agents that
increase EEG synchronization or induce a shift in EEG frequencies to the slow range generally induce behavioral changes of
sedation and tranquilization. Agents that desynchronize the record, however, or induce irregular fast activity, are associated with
hallucinatory, excitatory or illusory activity.
Of the first group of agents, we have tested amobarbital
and chlorpromazine. Amobarbital regularly induces high voltage, well synchronized, fast activity, at 20-24 cps. The regularity
of the appearance of this increased synchronized fast activity
has become the basis for the “sedation threshold” (10). Chlorpromazine has a variety of effects, depending upon the pre-injection record. In subjects with well defined alpha activity, both
alpha voltages and the percent time alpha activity increase (1 l)
With poorly modulated, low voltage, fast records, the per cent
time alpha increases. In patients with low degrees of slow wave
activity, voltages of slow wave activity increase, and the per cent
time of both delta and alpha increase.
Diethazine, benactyzine, LSD, and Win-2299 are examples
of the second group of compounds. In tests of diethazine (12),
in subjects with well modulated high per cent time alpha records, there is a decrease in voltage and per cent time of alpha
activity and irregular low voltage fast activity appears. In records
with high voltage slow wave activity, decrease in voltage and per
cent time of slow wave activity is prominent and is associated
with irregular fast activity. Similar patterns have been observed
for benactyzine, Win-2299 and LSD.
.

2. Language Analyses
Changes in language occur with these induced changes in

brain function (Table I). With chlorpromazine and amobarbital (Class I) there is a decrease in the mean TTR and an
increase in variability (standard deviations) of consecutive scores.
These changes are similar to the changes noted earlier for elec—
tro convulsive therapy (6) . In contrast, diethazine, benactyzine,

�34

The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy

LSD and Win-2299 (Class II) induce an increase in mean
and a decrease in variability.

TTR

TABLE I

TTR
Class I
Class II

CHANGE WITH DRUG ADMINISTRATION

(N223)
(N227)
Difference
Class

Mean

Standard Deviation

—0.78

+0.44

+1.42*

—l.00“

220‘

1.44“

I

“

Class

II

Diethazine
Benactyzine

Amobarbital (l3)
Chlorpromazine (10)

LSD-25

Win-2299

p

&gt;

.02

(9)
(5)
(3)
(10)

We have not, as yet, applied syntactic methods of analysis to
these recordings. Syntactic analyses were done, however, in the
earlier studies of the effects of amobarbital and diethazine in
patients with varying amounts of slow wave activity after convulsive therapy. Amobarbital amplified, and diethazine reversed,
the syntactic patterns produced by convulsive therapy. With
amobarbital, denial, displacement, minimization, and use of third
person and future and past tense increased significantly (1),
while after diethazine, there was a significant decrease (l2)
.

DISCUSSION

We have observed consistent relationships between the neurophysiologic effects of various drugs and changes in two measures of verbal interaction. We have not underscored, although
we have consistently observed, that both the behavioral changes
and the clinical ratings of improvement are dependent upon the
induction of persistent neurophysiologic changes. We have sug—
gested, therefore, that the language changes constitute an important segment of the cues upon which the evaluations of “improvement” are based (1) . These language measures provide an operational basis for studies of changes in interpersonal relations without resort to hypothetic energic or topographic constructs.

�The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy

35

Also important for our discussion is the demonstration that
different patterns of verbal behavior may be related to the different neurophysiologic effects of various therapies. Language
analyses provide another means of investigating and measuring
neurophysiologic effects. Weinstein and Kahn’s (13) demonstrations that language patterns of orientation, confabulation and
denial in structured interviews were valuable indices of brain
disease, heralded such applications. The demonstration here of
consistent changes in dyadic TTR scores suggests that unstructured verbal interviews may also be used successfully in neurophysiologic analyses.
The measures described here are crude, and the data preliminary. The consistent nature of the findings as we have
investigated each new agent has been striking. Other language
measures have been suggested, including changes in rate of speech,
tense, and relative amount of verbalization by each participant.
Further analyses with other psychopharmacologic agents, and
other measures of language analyses are in progress.
How can we relate these observations to the problems of
this conference? First, generalizations about the psychologic or
psychodynamic effects of psychopharmacologic agents are probably untenable unless the varied neurophysiologic and language
behavioral effects are encompassed in the hypothesis. While
introspective analyses provide some measure of drug effects, more
objective data are needed, and these may be provided by language analyses. For example, the successful use of chlorpromazine in the management of hallucinatory and excited states has
been well-documented. In such states, high diversification of
language, reflective of diffuse associative processes is prominent.

This diversity

clinically manifest in tangential, incoherent and
neologistic speech, with rapidly shifting frames of reference (5) .
With chlorpromazine therapy (and the induced alteration in
brain function) there is a decrease in the diversification of the
verbal interaction, with a decrease in the use of present tense and
first person speech. These language patterns may provide the
basis for the change in interaction between therapist and patient.
Conversely, in apathetic, redundant, blocked or withdrawn pais

�36

The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy

tients, the administration of LSD (14) or mescaline (15) have
been suggested. These agents induce an increase in associative
is
reflecdiversification
a
increased
which
of
language
processes
tion. These agents also increase the use of first person and
of
facilitate
thus
and
tense
speech
survey
may
patterns,
present
the paﬁents premnn:atdtudes and feehngs “ﬁnch the therapbt
is interested in exploring.
In summary, we have indicated that concurrent neurophysiologic (EEG) and language behavior (syntactic and dyadic diversification) measures are techniques for the operational analyses of
the effects of psychopharmacologic agents, in the two-person system of doctor and patient. Further exploration of language
measures are suggested as a rational basis for the understanding
of the psychologic effects of these new therapies.

REFERENCES
Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock
Therapy, in Psychopathology of Communication, Hoch, P. and Zubin,
J. eds. New York, Grune 8c Stratton, 1958, pp. 126—139.
2. Esecover, H., Jaffe, J., and Kahn, R. L.: Psychotherapeutic techniques
with electroshock patients. J. Hillside Hosp, 7: 17-25, 1958.
3. Jaffe, J., Esecover, H., Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Modification of psychotherapeutic and supervisory relationships by altered brain function.
1.

In preparation.
4. Jaffe, J. An Objective Study of communication in psychiatric inter—
views. ]. Hillside Hosp, 6:207-215, 1957.
5. Jaffe, J. Language of the Dyad. Psychiatry, 21:249-258, 1958.
6. Jaffe, J., Kahn, R. L., and Fink. M.: Communication patterns with altered brain function. Read at Eastern Psychologic Assoc, April 1958.
7. Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.: Relation between altered
brain function and denial in electroshock therapy. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. dy' Psychiat., 76:23-29, 1956.
8. Fink, M.: A unified theory of the action of physiodynamic therapies. ].
Hillside Hosp, 6:197—206, 1957.
9. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG delta activity to behavioral
63'
Arch.
A.M.A.
Neurol.
electroshock.
in
Psychiat., 78:516response

525, 1957.
10. Shagass, C.:

The sedation threshold. A method for estimating tension in
psychiatric patients. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol, 6:221-233, 1954.

���at
3:2»

W
mu
mm. W
WWW

“a“
M I.
3.,

and

mm mm
mm
and It 3.1%., April 12,
mum,
11.:

8.1:»:

at.

1958.

mF?“

'1'?

,

immummdw
mama» was: Wm,
mmmumwuwam
mu: m).
3,:

...

9

w_

gs 191.206. 1991.

�Drug Indueod Ghana-l

in

Imam“ know:

man ma Hwophylielogie
XII

Indiana

’m 11.9.,

Jawb- JII‘. xi)... ma
Rabat In Kuhn PILD.

mmm
quoal' ﬁnd for Rani-eh in Fayehutry.

PM the Ewart-mt a!
Puemtry, Wain 3mm, Elan om, Jul. , 3.1.
Aided by ﬁrm“ “2? and name, trident]. Inﬂux“ of Kmtal Ktllth, 6.83.8.3” and
Grant 56451
the:
a!

new at. tho ‘Goatamno an Payahodynuie, hyahomnlytm ma Meleaie Aspect: at tho
Hmloptie Drum 11: Myehintry, neutral, April 11.13, 1953.

III: 980-53 (3.“)

�Drug .Indueod Ghana”

Linguistic

and

in

Imam“ Patter-nu

Imhyuolagic indie»

nmr pumphammlo‘sie wants an
mun: saw «that: an the paumt.

In studies at the extant: at

who
bmﬂw, m m incline! to
am amend: d9, induce}, has maniac play-1910310 £190“, and we propel.
a! the induced mmmiologm changes. But paehophumlmo
to ruins:
want: aﬂoat more than the patiant «lam - and it in the murmur. «but:

m

m the term a: thin wafermca.
I a 2mm in this regard a: the ﬁery told at. a similar ”afﬁrm:
by Dr. David Mach that : wahwphmloxia «out at m. mun an,
that

Wotan-m.

an the day: m1; his: patient: took

Mainline,

Dr. Bloch

mud Inch button ﬁmr, an the day than 93 tack 1:11:
"Gianna, the mum“ Ilia ware Worth}: Mme“ 3w m we}: MI}!
in hm interwtim b: WM? 9: the um ”poet: at mum:- thut we
wiper-Bod, thaw

dim-0d by the aw

lama

u peraeptim, mama,

mbljl banner hat

"ﬂatten at

in ﬁlm that all upset. at hauler,
~
mm- nativity, um ma
m
m: the:
”trim" that ask. 12.
.. and M.

.1th aw

was

mm.

3.11%.!»me relations. Verbal bmmr is “silly
roam-M, in rudﬂy quantitiod u it it LII-way in ma (warm, phrmn
chanson 1n

ma lawman) and can bc rammed and momma

artificial um,

mimt, test: or mmmm. Whom“,

the mm at pvchoﬂmrnpy and
any

”that

dthmt the mmemm

change: in

tha‘

Wt

much is

a! change: in manna. patum

mom; ralﬁiamm.

Fur

thou roman,

ms... of 1W0 patterns .. at than putt-at. and or the
n Mum by the am:- pvthmalogin agents.
the mum}: for than mart m laid in t study by 3.1» Xahn
undertaken

1W0

of

amass following convulsive therapy (1). under

than

n has

therapist a: the

awaiting: at

��tar «ch

25 ward "unit and

the pottorn at aomcutivo were:

is studied.

m

In patients “adorning «mulling thorapy, thoro
o eanoiotont
docrouo in tho noon
and on maroon in Mobility (otondord deviation)

m

man who» chanson afloat gmtor otorootwy and ropotitivonou
in the intonatien. In a wastrel zraup a! unbjoeto, without manned brain
dynftmetion, then no author o. «homo 1n noon m 201‘ in tho dogroo 01‘
variability, olthwgh thou no a tow-aw for tho variability to docs-one
cheat tho

(6).
and

m thou
tho

in tho

two

1mm“

mm, o renal

noon and on

molar-n

'—

woo gramme wntont mouth

divoroﬂiutim were ‘- mro emuod, o doarmo
inerouo in Mobility at tho m pottomo wore ohnﬂod

in tho «Mott: the "have! two er mro mtoetie longme amazon.
ﬂannrooly, in than with loco than to» mastic: unsung. changes, .no
signiﬁcant wromm in tho moon or standard doﬂotien at m m chum.

rum obmtihm indium thot with harmed
thoro 1o aloe o doerouo’ in

Montana”.

Vat-attics}.

lmogo

thong“,

1mm: divoroity with motor otoroetypy and
1

Mom", whoa only!” a! «eh image ammo. me am with tho

a: ”alum. nmwwaoluie about; on roﬂoctod in the char» 9!
delta. oeti-vttw in tho oieatreoncophaagrm, ”without micron”: mo ohm
by the subject: yith high dogma or dolto aetivity only.
In tho earlier otudioo of Batman.“ thoropy, o neuropwnoloﬂcnodoptin
hypathooio of tho ”do a: oetian or this for: a: thoropy
m unwound (7) .
In this Martha“, the timer-youth prawn ‘1: ”embed ta 0. poroiotont
I

dogma

antral :mmn, whieh prev-moo the million for a Mo in
interactian at tho “that with his omitaxmt. Roemtly, this: impathooio
altorotinn

hoo boon

1n

own“! to the am:- tranquilning agents (8)

and

"random

studio!»

�.11...

in warm. 'fhga ark-adieu a: verbal bender arc am part at tha
inwatixntion. in Wild 11k: to duaribe m parent experimental techniquu,

an

new

rope-rt um «um

a:

wands,

rm the: ammhyuelme and unsung.

and

studios far a num-

dim ‘tha simian”. at human W6. n main: ‘0!

chm. in the swing tannin-wan]. baud” at mama.“

am!

patimt.

prount, all abnrnﬁom m m. in thi m Watery. taunting
a maﬁa. m. manna, an
pmhiﬁric interview, with Ibex-t
para-.06: at mama inquiry, is tapwnmrdcd. With m running, an
or
intmmm Mention is then given at a. (law fats. Whoa specific
At.

mum:

dining).

«changes

are

mm,- m mm it “mud and m intoniw

mum. Purim at m rmrding and tarball intent-mum awarding an
atmted m- thc durum or the poriad or mmm‘.
Tho m 1! measured tar shaman 1n Waintim, shirts in delirium

trauma”, and per «at time a: 3101! min (9) ,
“the

up.

rewarding;

at magenta"

25 1mm

alpha. or

but: Romancing.

‘

m Weapon-3.1)“ and Wad tor the Munitimm

ml” at dyadic much (1;, 5). 3nd ”nautical chm“

(l) . ihe Qua“ may.» Mn hm donrihud. In

thu

mmua audit”,

3mm amnion: in «alum u to mung“ in arm
and mun-u mm 1;. year ma mama; Why m
m m w, Wynn?”

the

mama to

throat

far not. than wishing ant." changes in manual
a“ at pwm, .almatian in We, «aim {a wing In quantum 131% s.
quantum: er *1 mm. W), aminutim, u, by the an at tho mama",
and "What ac yam wish

dimlnmt a: mu
“prawns er mm“,
max-ed 5.:

gm» in than

of

Wm, ism-cued an a: gamma

mam» 9r withdrawal
Mention put-Mm.

cryptie

ma I111!!!“ mo

�cmumn patient:

Marx-3d

fer

drug or

mam” therapist; in

"rim: mural:
duh, [the tailgating agonu hum bun “mm by thou

«laminar psyehiatrm hospital wart «on prior to, and
durmg, manhunt
methods:

To

0.15

mammal, bmctytine, chlurpremim, damning,

Wuemia

a.

dimmlmido and “11.229? ( adiomlminmthyl

.a—mml ~ simulate)-

ipmninMd,

Mam-1

-«

��2;

W:

indueﬁd change-

in brain

(810.3: 1)

mbarbijbal
are

aililar tn the

mama

than in

«annuity ( Maud

m

811mg“

at

with than
W
With ehlﬁrprmiina and

in language

(Tibia

I).

them» in the man

m

mm) at magnum" 'mr‘ea.

and an

incraue

mm nhangu

Met mud mun In: ﬁﬁnvultiw therapy (6).

In

_

ﬁﬁntrm, diathisim, bmacmmc,’ L813 ind Win-vim (Glut II) induce am
11mm in man an uni a. dderauﬁ in variability.

m hm
“warnings.

m, u yot,

81138431318

appliﬁd 'mmtia

mi. mm to than
91'

malarua 'mc dang, 11mm, in the earlier

Me:

at the aﬂoat: a! LMbarhital and diothalim in paﬁionts with vagina amt!
of slow inn nativity an» eonmlaiw thﬁrayy mom-81m amplified, and
I

manic pattern: prﬁduﬁﬁd by mullahs max-aw.
With anabarbital, dﬁnial, dimlaﬁmnt, W131“, and m of third person
mm mm" and m' mu incrﬁuod madam (1.), while after dicthuine,
diethuino

than

m

round,

‘a

the

Wimt

donut.“ (12).

i

�Hun
w

.1.

61m

x

ﬁlm

as: (ll-27,)

(at-23)

.

:

,

«Mk

43.78

.

.

Meme;

standard amnion

mai’

$1.00“
,

$.25

* p

chat

1.35315“

~

V

&gt;

.§.

now-mm

(13)

chlammuino (10)

I

231mm.

(9)

swmm

(‘5)

1.313%

(3}

Him-«2299

(10')

.02

�We

hi." abut-70d Mutant minimum: batman ﬂu mbysialogia

extents of variant
We

Mg.

mt nudmaorod,

have

sham» in

and

althaugh

the botanical engage: and the
awn ,the

m mum: at verbal intormtinn.

we have

consistently ohumd, that bath

Med new: at inprnvmnt are depmdmt

mam at persistent nunreplvtiologia changes.

Wt ham:

mt

muted,

a: the
in. languag- ahmgu Giannini. tn Wax-tam
can npan tibial; in: «ﬁlament at "impremmt' m hand (1). Elam
language
gravid. an aperitiml hail tar “We: of chug“ in
int-warm}. ”litmus uithant rmrt ta momma margin or West-whit:
“attracts.
A1,» Want tar our anemic»: 1-! than ammunition tint differ-uni
tharot‘aro, am.

We.

yum: of 10er heavier w b: related to the elitist-ant nonraplv‘aialogie
aﬂoat: at minus thumping.

Language

may”: pmvidc miner mm

mating and mm; nwwama mucus.

(13)

immanent

(mm in “mint-ad imam-vim
herald“ man mutations»

M: m soar“ Wu

and anon-um in
21»

m

wanna

wminmt nature a! the finding:
bun “rifting. Other 1W0

other

new”

n2

(imam-Man bars 01‘ ”mum. changes in
urinal intarvim m :1» ha
that

neat-«physiologic

“an,
M,
participant. Furthcr

wetnmin and mu...

The

Indy-u.

W! gamma hm no nude,

in rite of

a:

oricntatian, ”uranium and
valuable inéicu at brain dine»,

that language 133%ch

and

a w ham:

Wamt

relative

wt «to. p
imntignhd nah m ngont

and

have been

»

Muted including

at wrbaliutian

by

_

has

aka/mg”

nah

malaria with ethor pummelegic manta, and
of lawn: analyses we in pram".

�*3 a...

hmwmmmwmmﬂmunt’mh

mmwtmmmwwwwmmmwu

WWWmMWuL-umm

WMWWﬂmmWM
.mmmm mmwnmmmmmmu

Mmmmummmmehm
WWW term-,mmmamm

mmmmacmmmmmrmm'mmmmm'

mm nmmwummam.mcuw
«mmmunmmum
mamwum;
‘mxmh
m Wm. «a 2mm
W,
mutmctmmts}. mammw¢wm

m
mamumummmmuxmumammm

«mwummuaamml'Mmdymm-u

mwmmmmwmmmmm
maummmmwm
w,uwm.
NWuammmmmumM)
w‘nmmw3-MNMW' mmmamu
_'

Mumamwwammu‘
Mum mmmmmmaﬂmwm3

‘

Mmmmm,mww:mmmam

thwawmrwmmwunm
MW

hm,muwmmmmmm(m)
MW¢W(WmmﬂMMWm

�tum” for tho apex-gum]. may”: at the «feat: at mcmhac

agents, in tho

Mm mm a: “Mr
a

and

patient. Further

mention

Imus: mm“ m :33ng u mum but: far the underﬂmdinc
of the whim «that: 0: than an tharnpiu.
at

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2764">
                <text>Drug induced changes in interview patterns: linguistic and neurophysiologic indices. In G.J. Sarwer-Foner (ed.), The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy. C.C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1960: 29-44.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2765">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2766">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-45-011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2767">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2768">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Jaffe, Joseph; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2769">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2770">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2771">
                <text>Reprint, [preprint] and outline. Reprint from THE DYNAMICS OF PSYCHIATRIC DRUG THERAPY</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2772">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2773">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74479">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81040">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87601">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94162">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="278" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="69">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/d30b69ef69a8cf00c194481df0db03be.pdf</src>
        <authentication>468179c0544d033b07449c4407b71b92</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100695">
                    <text>Reprinted from THE

JOURNAL OF

Volume

130,

NERvots

AND MENTAL

DIsEAsE

No. 3, March 1960

Printed in (ISA.

SOCIAL ATTITUDE (CALIFORNIA F SCALE)
AND CONVULSIVE THERAPY
ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,1 MAX POLLACK, PH.D.

.

,\—

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.

improved was most likely in those who were

Studies of the mode of action of convulsive
therapy in altering behavior have been under
investigation by a variety of experimental
methods in our laboratory for several years.
Early studies demonstrated a relationship
between clinical evaluations of improvement
and the degree of altered brain function as
measured by the amobarbital test (15) and
the electroencephalogram (5). Personality
patterns related to a favorable therapeutic
outcome have been deﬁned by family interviews (13) and projective techniques (14).
Behavioral changes have been measured by
complex visual and tactile perceptual tasks
(6) and by analyses of changes in syntactical
aspects of language (12).
More recently we have become increasingly aware of the relation of sociopsycho—
logical factors to differences in both referral
for, and response to, convulsive therapy. In
a study of the entire adult iii-patient population of Hillside Hospital it was found that
those patients referred for convulsive therapy were signiﬁcantly older, more likely to
have been foreign-born, had less education
and higher scores on the California F Scale
than those patients who received psychotherapy alone (17). Of those patients receiving convulsive therapy, a favorable therapeutic evaluation of recovered or much

older, more poorly educated, foreign—born
and with higher F scores (18).
The aim of the present investigations was
to study the convulsive therapy process further by the use of the California F Scale (1).
Although promulgated in a setting where
interest was focused on prejudice and au—
thoritarianism, the F Scale was designed to
evaluate psychological aspects, such as con—
ventionalism, rigidity and stereotypy, related to the manifestation of these social

attitudes.

It was our

speciﬁc purpose to determine:
1) what the F Scale measures in a psychiatric
population, and 2) how response to the F
Scale varies with change in brain function.
METHOD

Population: These studies have been conducted at Hillside Hospital, a private, nonproﬁt 200-bed psychiatric hospital in New
York City admitting voluntary patients with
“early and curable mental illness.” Psychoanalytically—oriented psychotherapy is the
treatment of choice for all patients, with
somatic therapies (convulsive, insulin coma
and drug therapies) regarded as ancillary,
but available when needed. The in—patient
population consists mainly of middle-class
Jewish patients, with a high school education. between the ages of 18 and 40. Most
patients are classiﬁed into the diagnostic
categories of schizophrenia, psychoneurosis,
manic-depressive and involutional psychosis.
In these studies we have used a ten-item
modiﬁcation of the standard F Scale (8).

Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, New York.
This investigation was supported in part by grants
M-927 and MYw2092 from the National Institute of
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, U. S.
Public Health Service. This paper derives from a
presentation given at the Annual Meeting of the
Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia,
1

April, 1958.

187

�188

KAHN, POLLACK AND FINK

TABLE 1
Scores on Conventional and “Reverse” F Scales
Dichoto—

(grilled
I‘OU p S

M

chzi:

iN

Cpnv erll—
iona
Scale

hi3:

‘Reverse”'

_

Diff.

t

51.5
48.1

+25.2
+0.7

20.3*

:
Scale

I

10—37
38—70
*

79'
Signiﬁcanti
_

at

.001

0.6

level

The procedure consists of having the subject
read ten statements and indicating to what
extent he agrees or disagrees with each, i.e.
a little, pretty much, or very much. The
score for each item ranges from one to seven,
and the total score range is 10 to 70, with
high scores indicating greater agreement
with the statements. The statements are
extreme, uncritical or stereotyped expres—
sions, such as: “No sane, normal, decent
person would ever think of hurting a close
friend or relative” and “If people would talk
less and work more, everybody would be
better off.”
RESULTS

ment with the statements. In contrast, the
patients who made high scores initially
showed little change on retesting, indicating
that they agreed with the statements to the
same extent even when their meanings were
reversed.
Change in F Score with convulsive therapy.
In a second study, 69 consecutive hospitalized patients referred for convulsive therapy
were given the F Scale in the week prior to
treatment, on the day following the 12th
treatment, and two weeks after the termination of treatment. These patients were divided into two groups; an experimental
group of 59, and a control group of ten patients randomly selected from the referrals.
In the experimental group all patients received grand mal convulsive therapy, while
the control group received subconvulsive
electro-stimulation only. All patients were
treated three times a week, for a minimum
of 12 treatments.
The degree of physiologic change during
treatment was determined by quantitative
analyses of delta activity in the EEG, using
techniques previously described (5). EEG
records were obtained weekly and the records taken nearest the 12th treatment were
measured for the degree of induced slow
wave activity (the per cent time occupied by
waves of 6 cps or slower for 66 seconds of
recording from the anterior temporal—vertex
leads).
The changes in F score during convulsive
treatment are shown in Table 2. There was
a mean increase of +5.7 in F score during

What the F Scale measures in this population: the “reverse” F Scale. In this study the
entire in-patient population was ﬁrst tested
with the conventional scale, then retested
one month later with a “reverse” scale (2).
In the “reverse” scale the same items are
used, but stated in opposite terms to the
original. Thus, the ﬁrst example cited above
is changed to read, “A sane, normal, decent
person might have to hurt a close friend or
relative.” The “reverse” scale is scored in
the same manner as the regular scale, with
TABLE 2
Eﬁect of Convulsive Treatment on F Score
high scores reflecting greater agreement.
The relation of the scores on the convenMean F Score
tional to the “reverse” scales is shown in
N
PreTable 1. The patients were divided into two
Mean
During
t
Treatment
Difference
22:?
the
to
median
groups according
score on the
conventional scale. Those patients who made
Convulsive 59 45.3
51.0
2.02*
+5.7
low scores initially, indicating predominant
Group
10
48.7
disagreement with the statements, showed a Control
49.2
+0.5 0.02
Group
signiﬁcant increase in score on the “reverse”
*
scale, indicating that they were now in agreeSigniﬁcant at .05 level

�189

SOCIAL ATTITUDE AND ECT

treatment, a difference signiﬁcant at the ﬁve
the
of
conﬁdence.
In
level
cent
contrast,
per
control group showed a statistically insigniﬁcant change during the same period.
The effect of convulsive therapy on the F
score was further demonstrated by an analysis of seven patients, originally in the control group, who were subsequently placed on
a regular course of convulsive therapy. On
retest after 12 control treatments their scores
were unchanged, with a mean difference
from the pretreatment score of +0.1. After
12 convulsive treatments, however, these
patients showed a signiﬁcant mean increase
of +9.1.
Adequate EEG records at the time of the
12th treatment were obtained for 54 patients. For this analysis the records were
divided into two groups according to the
degree of slow wave activity: a high delta
index group in whom slow wave activity
appeared in 40 per cent or more of the
selected leads, and a low delta index group
in whom the slow wave activity was less than
40 per cent. Changes in F scores during treat—
ment for the two groups are shown in Table
3.

TABLE 3
Change in F Score and Degree of Induced Cerebral
Dysfunction
Mean
Treatment Treatment Difference
Pre-

During

27

43.9

52.5

+8.6

23*

27

45.6

49.0

+3.4

0.8

Degree of Slow
Wave Activity

High Delta
Index

Low Delta

Index
*

15

Signiﬁcant at .05 level

The patients with high degrees of slow
wave activity had a mean increase in F score
of +8.6, signiﬁcant at the ﬁve per cent level
of conﬁdence. Those patients with low delta
indices showed a relatively small increase of
+3.4. While the increase in scores in the
low delta activity group was statistically
insigniﬁcant, it was greater than that of the
control group (Table 2).

TABLE 4
Pre-Treatment and Post—Treatment F Scores
Pre—

Post—

21

42.2

40.6

—1.6

0.4

16

42.6

42.1

—0.5

0.1

N

High Delta
Index

Low Delta

Index

.Mean
Treatment Treatment Diﬂerence

I

F scores were obtained in 44 patients two
weeks after the last treatment (Table 4).
The mean difference between pre— and posttreatment scores was statistically insigniﬁcant. Furthermore, the same pattern of a
small decrease in score was found for both
the high and low delta activity groups.
DISCUSSION

These observations demonstrate the relevance of the F Scale to the convulsive ther—
of
these
An
understanding
apy process.
relationships requires examination of the psychological factors reﬂected by the F Scale in
our population.
The observations on the “reverse” F Scale
indicate that those patients who disagreed
with the original statements (low F score)
were responding to the content of the state—
ments. This was shown by the high degree
of agreement with the reverse statements.
Those patients who agreed with the original
statements (high F score), however, continued to agree when the statements were
reversed. Evidently, these patients were not
responding to the content of the statements,
but demonstrated a more generalized reac—
tion.
There have been several studies on non—
psychiatric populations using a “reverse” F
Scale, with conﬂicting results. Thus, Chris—
tie, Havel and Seidenberg (3) have found a
consistent response to content in original and
reverse scales, e.g., agreeing to one and disagreeing with the other, while Jackson, Messick and Solley (10) report a positive correlation between agreement on the two scales.
In part, these differences may be accounted
for by differences in the form of the reversed

�190

KAHN, POLLACK AND FINK

scale. Jackson and Messick (9) indicated
that Christie ct al. (3) modiﬁed the language
form of the original scale and reversed the
content, while Jackson et al. (10) retained
the extreme, cliché—ridden style of the origi—
nal scale. Jackson and Messick indicate that
the response pattern to the F Scale may be
interpreted in terms of response style rather
than speciﬁc item content. On the basis of
the data from our population there is a
difference between the high and low scorers

with respect to the extent that cognitive
style affects their response. The high scorers
who agree with both forms of the scale show
a consistent style of response acquiescence,
overgeneralization and conforming to so—
cially desirable standards. Those who scored
low on the original scale, however, did not
show the converse—a consistent pattern of
negativism or social non-conformity. Rather,
they altered their style to agree with the con—
tent when the statements were reversed.
Thus, low F score patients were characteristically more critical and discriminating
persons, While those with high F scores were
more undifferentiating and stereotyped in
their reactions.
With this conception of the F Scale, the
ﬁndings in convulsive therapy may be considered. In the selection of treatment in this
institution, those patients receiving convul—
sive therapy had signiﬁcantly higher scores
than those receiving psychotherapy only
(17). That this observation is not simply a
reflection of diagnosis is seen in the differentiation by the F score of the selection of
treatment even among those patients classi—
ﬁed as psychotic depression. The selection of
treatment thus seems related to psycho—
logical processes reflected in the F Scale.
Subjects with high F scores, with stereotypy
of thinking and difﬁculty in introspection,
often present a behavioral pattern incompatible with the establishment of the type of
interpersonal relationships required in psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy.
The favorable evaluations of therapeutic

response to convulsive therapy in patients
with high F scores may be related to personality attributes. The psychological processes reﬂected in the F Scale are similar to
those personality factors previously found
to be related to a favorable response to such
treatment. In structured family interviews
it was observed that the favorably rated
patients had personality patterns characterized as nonempathic, nonintrospective,
nonverbally communicative, and highly conventional and stereotyped, with little imagi—
native or creative capacity (13). Consistent
patterns have been shown in Rorschach
studies indicating that good prognosis is re—
lated to a small number of responses, absence
of human movement and little diversiﬁcation
of content (7, 14).
The F score increases signiﬁcantly with
convulsive therapy with the extent of in—
crease related to the degree of altered brain
function, as measured by the degree of induced EEG slow wave activity. This relation
of change in behavior to physiological change
is an observation that has been consistently
noted in convulsive therapy patients (5).
The increase in F score during treatment
may have been even more marked than
actually observed. Several patients of foreign
birth and little education had maximum or
near maximum scores prior to treatment,
thus eliminating or reducing the possibility
of an increase on retesting.
The change in score with altered brain
function is consistent with previous observations on the behavioral effects of convulsive
therapy. In accord with our conceptual
framework, greater agreement with F Scale
items during treatment is related to increased stereotypy and difﬁculty in discrimination, as well as to increased acquiescence.
This is part of a general process which has
been noted in linguistic, perceptual and
clinical behavioral measures. In their language, convulsive therapy patients show
increased denial, evasion, qualiﬁcation and
use of clichés and stereotyped expressions

�SOCIAL ATTITUDE AND ECT

(12). They also manifest increased repetitiveness of words (11), difﬁculty in complex
visual and tactile perception (6) and ﬁgureground discrimination (16). Clinically, they
are characteristically more compliant and
acquiescent and try to please the examiner
(4).
SUMMARY

A measure of social attitude, the California
F Scale, has been utilized in studies of the

convulsive therapy process. In a voluntary
psychiatric hospital it was noted that patients referred for convulsive therapy had
signiﬁcantly higher F scores than those re—
ceiving psychotherapy only. Among the patients receiving convulsive therapy, those
with the higher initial F scores were evalu—
ated as showing the best clinical results.
With treatment there was a signiﬁcant increase in F score, with the increase related to
the degree of altered brain function. Follow—
ing treatment the scores returned to their
original level.
Comparison of results with a conventional
and “reverse” F Scale demonstrated that
patients with low F scores respond to the
content of the questionnaire, while those
with high F scores showed a generalized
of
the con—
of
independent
agreement
pattern
tent.
These results are interpreted in terms of
the psychological processes measured by the
F Scale. High—scoring patients are considered
to be stereotyped in their thinking and to
have difﬁculty in introspection—behavior
which is incompatible with psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy, rendering
them more liable to referral for convulsive
therapy. With treatment, such patients are
also more likely to develop the language
patterns of denial and use of clichés which
are the cues for evaluations of clinical improvement. The increase in F score with
treatment is comparable to other types of
behavioral change, such as increased acquiesin
ﬁgure-ground
increased
difﬁculty
cence,

191

discrimination, and increased stereotypy of
language.
REFERENCES
1. ADORNO, T. W. ET AL. The Authoritarian Personality. Harper, New York, 1950.
2. BAss, B. M. Authoritarianism or acquiescence?
J. Abnorm. &amp; Social Psychol., 51: 611—623,
1955.
3. CHRISTIE,

R., HAVEL, J. AND SEIDENBERG, B.
Is the F Scale irreversible? J. Abnorm. &amp;
Social Psychol., 56: 143—159, 1958.
4. FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Behavioral patterns
in induced states of altered brain function.
Paper read at Divisional Meeting, Am. Psychiat. Ass., New York, November, 1957.
5. FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Relation of EEG
delta activity to behavioral response in electroshock: quantitative serial studies. AMA
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 78: 516—525, 1957.

M., KAHN, R. L. AND KORIN, H. Effects
of diffuse altered brain function on perception. Internat. Congr. Psychol, Proc., 15:

6. FINK,

238—239, 1959.

7. FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. AND POLLACK, M.

Psychological factors affecting individual
differences in behavioral response to con—
vulsive therapy. J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis, 128:

243—248, 1959.

J. AND ERLICH, I. Some sociopsychological characteristics of patients and their relevance for
psychiatric treatment. In The Patient and the
Mental Hospital, Greenblatt, M., Levinson,
D. J. and Williams, R. H., eds., pp. 357—379.
Free Press, Glencoe, 111., 1957.
9. JACKSON, D. N. AND MEssroK, S. J. Content
and style in personality assessment. Psychol.
Bull., 55: 243—252, 1958.
10. JACKSON, D. N., MESSICK, S. J. AND SOLLEY,
C. M. How “rigid” is the authoritarian? J.
Abnorm. &amp; Social Psychol., 54: 137—140,
8. GALLAGHER, E. B., LEVINSON, D.

1957.

J., FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Com—
munication patterns with altered brain function. J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis., 130: 235—239,

11. JAFFE,

1960.
12. KAHN,

R. L. AND FINK, M. Changes in language during electroshock therapy. In Psy—
chopathology of Communication, Hoch, P. and
Zubin, J., eds., pp. 126—319. Grune &amp; Strat—
ton, New York, 1958.
13. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Personality factors
in behavioral response to electroshock therapy. J. Neuropsychiat., 1: 45—49, 1959.
14. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Prognostic value of
Rorschach criteria in clinical response to
convulsive therapy. J. Neuropsychiat. In
press.
15. KAHN, R. L., FINK, M. AND WEINSTEIN, E. A.
Relation of amobarbital test to clinical im-

�192

KAHN, POLLACK AND FINK

provement in electroshock. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 76: 23—29, 1956.

16. KAHN,

R. L., POLLACK, M.

AND

ure—ground discrimination

FINK, M.

Fig—

after induced altered brain function. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.
In press.

17. KAHN,

R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M. Social

factors in the selection of therapy in a vol—
untary mental hospital. J. Hillside Hosp, 6:

216—228, 1957.

18. KAHN, R.

L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M.
Sociopsychological aspects of psychiatric
treatment. A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,
1: 565—574, 1959.

,

�Social Attitude (Californin

3

Scale) and convulsivo

Ihornpy
Robort L.Kahn Ph.n., Kn: Polluek Ph.D.
and
ﬂux

rink

H.D.

Dcpurtnont a! Experimentnl Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
61"! 0.1(3' litre, 3.1.
~

IX;

11/10/59

�mu. 1: part, at t» mun run-hum. tannins“.
nuuczym, April, ”58.
3*91‘1
1»
try
at
“.2092
«a
put.
at
um,
an”
“tuna menu» a: mm mu. “an“ Inﬂux“:
of Inn“. was. ”In.“ mm: aunt“.

�3.3111 Attitude and E0!

�Boeial Attitude (Galifornia

I

Scale) and Convnleive

Therapy

Studies of the node of action of convulsive therapy in
altering behavior have been under investigation by a variety
of experimental methods in our laboratory for several years.
Early studies demonstrated a relationship between clinical
evaluations of inproveaent and the degree of altered brain
function as measured by the aaobarbital test (12) and the
electroencephalogram (h). Personality patterns related to a
favorable therapeutic outeone have been defined by fanily
interviews (13) and projective techniques (15). Behavioral
changes have been neasured by eeaplex visual and tactile
perceptual tasks (6) and by analyses of changes in syntactical
aspects of language (16).

recently we have become increasingly aware of the
relation of seeiopsyehelegieal factors to differences in both
referral for, and response to, convulsive therapy. In a
study of the entire adult in-patient population of Hillside
hospital it was found that these patients referred for convulsive
therapy were significantly older, more likely to have been
foreign-born, had less education and higher scores on the
Californi I Scale than these patients who received psychotherapy
alone (17). Of those patients receiving convulsive therapy,
a favorable therapeutic evaluation of recovered er much iapreved
was nest likely in those who were older, aore poorly educated,
foreign-born and with higher 7 scores (18).
Here

�1h. 31: 0: ts. pr.nunt tavcnttanttonl.wun to turtle:
'utniy tho convulntvo thorny: pronoun h: £3. at. or «p.
6.113.231: r Saul. (1). Althotgh prcanllt‘nd 1: a cutting
white tn‘iroat at: located an prtandicc tad luthnrttnrtanxln,
tho I Ital. wt: d-utgnod to it‘lxuto paychcloginnl napocto, such

a: convontilnlltun, rigidity and Itarcnﬁyyy, rclutcd to thy
n;nt£cn#n$t¢n a: tin:- :0aiul attitudes.

I

It wan

OI! apuctltc ptrpnna to

how
und
2)
pnychtatrta
poyuzntiou,
t
acaln 1.210: with Chllg! in brain function.

83:19 acanurul 13

rtiptnao

$0

it. I

naturist. 1) tint tho

�KBIEOD:

Pepnlationt These studies have been conducted at
hillside Hospital, a private, nanoprerit 200 bed psychiatric
hospital in New York City adaitting relentary patients with
Iearly and enrahle aental illness". rPsyeheanalytiosllyu
oriented psychotherapy is the treatment of choice for all
(convulsive,
with
senatie
therapies
patients,
insulin cans
and drug therapies) regarded as ancillary, but available when
needed. The in-patient populatien epneiste mainly of niddleclass Jewish patients, with a high school education, between
the ages of 18 and ho. Most patients are classified into the
diagnostic categories of schieophrenia, psychonenrosis, manicdepressive and invelntienal psychosis.
In these studies we have need a ten its: aeditieation
e! the standard scale (8). The procedure consists of having
the subject read ten stateaents and indicating te‘Whet extent
he agrees or disagrees with each, i.e. a little, pretty each,
or very such. The score for each item ranges tron one to
seven, and the tetal sears range is 10 to 70, with high scores
indicating greater asreenent with the otatenents. The statenente
are extreme, uncritical er stereotyped expressions, such as:
"No sane,neraal, deeent person would ever think or hurting a
close friend or relative‘ and "If people would talk less and
work acre, everybody would be better air.”

�RESELISs

the 1 Scale Heaenree in our Po nlatione The i'ne'nn-ae'“ F Scale
In this stat: the entire in-patient population was tiret
tested with the contentional eeale, then reteeted one nenth
later with a 'reveree' eeib (2). 'In the "reverse" scale the
sane items were need, but stated in opposite terms to the
original. Thus the liret example cited above was ohanged to
read, ”A aane, normal, decent person night have to hurt a
The
close friend or relative."
9reverse'eea1e was scored in
the eane manner as the regular scale, with high score: reflecting
What

greater agreement.
the relation of the eeoree on the conventional to the
“reverse“ eealee 1e ehovn in table I. The patienta were divided
into two group: according to the nedian aoore en the conventional
eeele. Those patiente who node low eeeree initially, indicating
predoninant dieagraeaent with the etatenente, ehoved a significant
innfeaae in score on the 'reveree“ scale, indicating that they
were not in agreement with the statements. In contrast, the
patients who aade high eeoree initially showed little change
on retenting, indieating that they agreed with the etatenente
to the sane extent even when their meanings were reversed.
-u-abﬁooogqﬁ‘mmn—tun‘m

Table I about here
Dun-Qn-uueembebuuﬁua-Oepn.

�TABLE

I

Scar-a on Conventional and 'Rovorao'

Dichotonisod
Graugs

Kcan Scorn

conventional
Soul.
~!_

I ﬁction

noun Score

“levcrao'
Se&amp;lo

Dirt.

.£_
20.3‘

10-37

76

26.3

51.5

+25. 2

36.70

79

h7.h

h8.1

+

”Signitietnt at .001 luvol

0.7

0.6

�.5-

I

score with cenvuleive theregz.
In e eeoond etody, 69 eoneeoutive heepitelieed petiente
referred for eonvnleive therepy were given the r seele in
the week prior-to treetwent, on the dey following the 12th
treetwent, end two weeke etter the terninetion er treeteent.
Theee pdiente were divided into two groupe,en experimentel
group of 59, end I control group or ten petiente tenderly
selected from the reterrelea In the experieentel group e11
petiente reeeived greed eel oeuvuleive therepy, while the
control group received enbeonvuleive electro-etieuletien only.
All petiente were treeted three tieee e week, for e nininne
Change

e1 12

in

treeteente.

,

physiologic ohenge during ‘lreetnent wee
deterrined by queutitetive enelyeee of delta eotivity in the
EEG, neing teehniquee previoneh deeerihed (h). EEG reoorde
were ebteined weekly end the reeerde token neereet the 12th
treetnent were neeeered for the degree of induced elow were
6
wevee
o:
by
cent
ocoopied
ope or
(the
tine
eetivity
per
elewer for 66 eeeonde of recording from the enterior tenperelvertex leede).
The ehengee in r eeore during oonvuleive treetnent ere
ehewn in Tehb 2. There wee e ween increeee of +5.? in r
eeore during treetwent, e difference eignificent et the 55
level of confidence. In contreet, the control group ehowed
e etetietieelly iheighitioent chenge during the eeee period.
The degree of

�.6.

it.

attics if

nouvnlntvt thorny, an in. r atnvn vat
tnrihur dcnouatraﬁua by a: ina1ruaa if aovoa pattcltug'
originallyjtn the nautrll crux», vi. wart t‘§u¢.u¢ut11 plant:
fﬂtﬁﬁﬁ
33%.:
an
«mutilatvu
of
neuron
$hurtyy.
rcculur
a
a:
13 anntral trunthaut: that: Iqurca utrn tuuhauucu. ‘1‘» a
mans ditftruuao :tcn tut protrcatunut tutti Q3 «9.1 errorn.
Altar 12 nnuvulntvo trtatlcuta, ﬁauuvur, than. ptiiia‘t unavod
:1mm». a: 09.1 anew.

“want u»

tibla

5h

but.

it. its. at

tin 12th irontntat
pﬂttﬂt‘ﬂ. In! $htt tnnlyttn tho Instant

Adogua§a BIB roaorda

var. ubtntnoa tor

a about
3%

Itvtdndjin£o tut nauupo'nno.r¢ina ‘9 it. 1.33%. at Ilia
var. ntilvltyu a high dixﬁc 13am: group‘tn ulna slaw unvrunttvtty Ip’cntod 1n ho: or nor. 0: ti. stlcutod Ionic. Qua
a lll‘lfl‘ﬁ ludax (ran; 1: that th. III! II'. naﬁlvtty u:Xcal than 801. Gianna. in I liﬁvﬂﬂ ﬂ!rtll $2¢usnoat fur
ﬁt. in. groups .9. shut: in rabid 3.

warn

‘

.C'OOUMﬁOWQ‘ﬁQD‘OOO‘

Inhla 3 thont but.
ﬂ. “’.*“*Q*&amp;.*QOOQQU

In. ytﬁiunta with high 4.3!!!! a:

axon any!

aattvity

had n

o: «8.é. significanﬁ tt tho 5! 10'01
at conttdtnnc. than. putianta with 10v 401‘: iadlceu uhluud

lama

ilerillt

1a 9 t¢¢ru

�TABLE 2

Effect of Convulsivo Treatnent

on

r

Score

Raga P Saute

1

Pre~

treatnont

During
Treatment

Convuluive Group

59

h5.3

51.0

control Group

10

h8.7

h9.2

‘ Significant at

.05 lovcl

noun

Difference 3
+ 5.7
2.02*
+

0.5

0.02

�TABLE 3

Chan 0

in

r

Scare and

chroo or
31.u Huvc ctivit

De

roe o: Induood Cor-bral
Pro»

‘g

During

front-out rroatnont

D

stunctioa

noun

Differenco

t

ligh molt. Index

27

h3.9

52.5

+8.6

2.3“

Lov'nolta Indox

27

h§.6

h9.0

+3.h

0.8

G

Significnnt 1t .05 level

�-1-

relatively small inereuso of +3.h. Hhilo the increase
in scores in the low delta nativity group was stutiatioally
insignificant, it ran grout-r thtn that or the control

a

(table 2).
1 score: were abtainod in hh patient: two racks utter
the 1tat troatnnnt (T‘ble h). The noun ditfcrnnec botvccn
pro~ tad ponttruatncnt scorcs ﬁll statistically insignifictnt.
Furthermore, tho 5.30 puttsrn or a 3:111 door-nae 1n acor$gw
found
1nd
both
the
for
high
delta totittty group:
v:a
graup

.--Q-‘-~-"-..-ﬂﬁﬁ-..
Table h thout hora

.‘..--*-‘Cﬂ-‘-‘-~‘-ﬂ‘

�an:
t

Index

Low

Delta

Indox

ttrontncnt

1

Score:

Prc~

Pout—

Kean

Trautnent

Trontnent

Difference

21

h2.2

h0.6

16

h2.6

h2.1

3|

High Delta

h

~1.6

«0.5

0.1

�DISGU8SION:

These observations demonstrate the relevance of tho

to the oonvnleivo therapy proooea. in understanding
of theeo relationships requiroe oxanination of the payoholegioal
factors reflected by the 7 Scale in our population.
The obeorvationa on the reverse F scale indicatee that
those pationte who diaagroed with the original etatonente
(low r eoore) were responding to the content or the otatonente.
Thie nae shown by the high degree or agreement with the rarer-o
statoaente. However, thoee patiente who agreed with the
original etatononto (high I eoere) continued to agree when
the etatenente were revereed. Evidently, these patient:
were not reephnding to the oontent e! the atatonente, but
deaenatrated a noro generalised reaction.
There have been several otudioo on nenpeyohiatrio
populations neing a reverse I soelo, with conflicting reenlte.
Thno, Christie, ﬂoral and Seidonberg (3) have found a coneiatont
roeponeo to content in original and rovoreo ooaloe, o. .,
agreeing to one and disagreeing with the other, while Jackson,
Heeeiok and Selley (9) retort a positive correlation between
agreement on the two eoalee. In part, theoe dittoronooe nay
be accounted for by difference: in the tern of the rovoreod
eoalo. Jackson and Heeeiok (10) indicated that Chrietie gt
3;. (3) modified the language fora of the original scale
and reversed the content, while Jaokeon et a1. (9) retained
the extreao, olioho1ridden etyle e: the original eoalo.
Jackson and noeeick indicate that the reeponoo pattern to
7 Scale

�«91-

the 1 Scale nsy be interpreted in terne of response style
rsther then specific item content. 0n the besis or the
dots from our popnlsticn there is s difference between the
high end low scores with respect to the extent thst cognitive
style effects their response. the high scorers who egree
with both ferns or the sonic lion s consistent style of

response ecqniescsnoe, evergenerelisetien end contorning
to secislly desireble stendsrds. Those who scored low on
the originsi sosie, however, did not shoe the converse -.

s consistent psttern or negotivisn or sociel nenvcentornity.
they eltered their style to egree with the content when the
ststononts were reversed. ‘Thns, low I score petients were

cherscteristicsily nore critical snd.decrildnsting persons,
while these with high I scores were norc nndittcrontieting
end stereotyped in their resctione.
With this conception of the r Seth, the findings in

convulsive thorspy may be considered. In the selection or
trectnent in this institntion, those psticnts receiving
convulsive therapy had significantly higher scores then
those recciving psychotherapy only (17). That this observs~
tion is not Just e reflection of diagnosis is seen in the
dittorsntietion by the F score of the selection of trestnent
oven snong those pstients clsssitied es psychotic depression.
The selection of treatment than scone related to poyohologicsl

processes reflected in the

r

Scale.

Subjects with high

I

�-10.
scores, with etereetypy of thinking end difficulty in
introepectien, often preeent a behavioral pattern incompatible
with the eatebliehaent of the type of interpereenal reletien~
ehipe required in peycheanalytically-eriented psychotherapy.
The favorable evaluatiene of therapetic reopenee to
eonvulaive therapy in patienta with high I acoree nay be
related to pereenality attributee. The psychological prov
eeeaee reflected in the I Scale are similar to those
pereonality factors previeuely related to a favorable rcepenae
to each treatment. In structured family intervieea it vat
observed that the faverabl! rated patients had personality
patterns characterised as neuenpathic, conintrespectivc,
nenverbally eeamenicative, and highly conventional and
stereotyped, with little nonnative or creative capacity
(13). Genaistent patterns have been aheen in Rcrachaeh
etudiee indielting that good prognosis in related to a small
number of reepeneee, absence of human movement and little
divereifieatien of content (15; 7).
The F acere increecee significantly with cenvuleive
therapy with the extent of increase related to the degree of
altered brain function, as measured by the degree of induced
EEG slow wave activity.
This relation of change in behavior
to physiological change is an observation that has been
coneietently noted in cenvulaive therapy patients (h).
The increaee in I accre during treataent may have been even

�nere marked than eetnelly observed. Severel patients of
tereignobirth and little edneetion hed retina: er nee:
nexinnn eeeree print to treatment, thne elinineting or
reducing the peeeibility er en increeee en retenting.
The ehenge in eeere with altered brein function is
eeneietent with previous obeervetiene on the behevierel
effects 0: convulsive therapy. In eeeerd with our oeueeptnel
trenewerk, greater egreenent with I Scele items during treete
tent in related to inereeeed etereetypy and difficulty in
dieerininetien, ll velx ee increeeed eeqeieeeenee. rue 1e
preeeee
whieh hee been noted 1n‘11ngn1et1e,
e
e!
general
pert
neeeuree.
and
In their
behavierel
clinieel
perceptual
language, cenvnleive therepy patient: shew inereeeed deniel,
cliche:
end etereetyped
end
er
use
eve-inn, qualification
expreeeiene (16). They elee nenifeet increased repetitiveneee
of words (11), difficulty in aenplex Vienel end tectile per—
eeptien (6) end figureggreund discriminetien (1h). Clinieelly,
eke
they
chereeterieticelly here oeup}1ent end ecqnieecent
and try to pleeee the exeniner (S).

�-12-

annular:
neaenre

e: social attitude, the California 1 Scale,
has been utilised in etadiee o! the convulsive therapy proceee.
In a voluntary psychiatric hoepital it wee noted that patients
referred for oonvnlaive therapy had eigniticantly higher I
A

aoorea than theee receiving psychotherapy only. Anon; the
patiente receiving convulsive therapy, theee with the higher

initial 7 ecoree were evaluated ae showing the beet clinical
reellta. With treatment there waa a significant increase in
r ecore, with the ineroaae related to the degree or altered brain
function. Following treataent the ecoree returned to their;
original level.
comparison of reenlte with a conventional and "reverne'l
r eoale concentrated that low I acore patiente respond to the
content or the questionnaire, while these with high I eoeree
ahowed a generalized pattern or agreement independent of the
content.
There results are interpreted in tern: of the psychological
proceeeee neaenred by the F Scale. High 1 score patients are
coneidered to be aterectyped in their thinking and to have
ditticnlty in introspection ~- behavior whih is incompatible
with peychoanalytioally-oriented psychotherapy, rendering than
acre liable to referral for convnleive therapy. With treatnent,
enoh patients are aleo acre likely to develop the language
patterna of denial and nee o: cliche} which are the one: for
evalnatione or clinical improvement. the inoreaae in I score
with treataont is conparahle to the other types of behavioral

�ohnnxo, such

:-

1n figure—around

of lungntga.

inerouocd noqniouconcc, increased

ditticnlty

disarininntign, tad incroalod stereotypy

�Reference-

1. Aderno, !.H., Frankel—Brunswick, 3., Levin-on, D.J. and
Sanford, 1.3. The Antheritarian Pereonalitz.
Harper, low rerk, 1950.
2. ‘Baee, B. n. Antheritarianion or aeqniooeenoe? J. Abnern.
&amp; scan Pezeho1.,
5;. 611~623, 1955.
3. chriotie, 3., Havel, 3., and Beidenberg, I. II the P
Scale irreversible? J. Abnorn. ﬂee. Pezche1., ﬁg:
I

1h3~1§9, 1958.

Fink, H. and Kahn, R.L. Reletion of EEG delta activity
to behavioral reeponee in electroshock: quantitative
eerial etndiee. 1.x.i. Arch. Henrol. &amp; Po ehiat.,
1Q; 516-525, 1957.

3.2.
and
3ehaviora1 patterno in induced
Kahn,
n.
Iink,
etetee or altered brain function. Paper read at
Diviaional Meeting, Aner. Peyohiat. Lee., low York,
levenber, 1957.
6. Fink, H., Iahn, R.L. and Kevin, 3. Effects of diffuse
eltered brain tnnntien en perception. Proc. 1? Int.
sonar. szohel. Anatordans Northelolland Pnb1.,
V

pp. 238-239, 1959.

Fink, x., Kahn, R.L. and Pollack,

Psychological
factors attenting individual ditteronoee in
behavioral response to convuleive therapy.

J. lorv.

&amp;

lent. Dio.,

M.

128: 2h3~2h8, 1959.

�-2Referancoa

Gallagher, E.B., Ltviason, D.J. and Erlich, I. Some
sociopsycholcgical chaructoriatics of patiants and
their rclavuneo tor paychintric treatnont. In

Groonblntt, 9.5. Lovinlon und 3.x. Williams (Edl.)
The Pttiont und the Hpntnl iosgittl. The Pro. Prosl,
H.

alencoo, 111. pp. 357-379, 195?.
Jack-on, 3.3., Herrick S.J., and Bailey, c.n. 30v “rigid“
is the autharitnrinn? J. Abnorm. soc. Pnzchol. ﬁg:
137~1h0, 1957.

10.

Junk-tn, 9.1. and Herrick, 5.3. content and style in
personality anion-none. Patchol. 3‘11., 2;: 2&amp;3-252,
1958.

11.

antic, 3., Fiat,

R.L. Communication pattorns
with ulterod brain function. J. Harv. &amp; Rent. 313.,
H. and Kuhn,

in prons.
12.

8.1., link, E. 3nd WeinttOin, E.A. Relation of
anobarhital tent to clinical inprovonont in oloctro¢

Kuhn,

shook. A.H.A. Arch. Konrol. Pazchint., 1g. 23»29,
1956.
13.

Inna, 1.1. ind link, x. Personality factor: in bohuvior¢1
response to olootraahook thornpy. J. learn I ehiut.,
l3 h5-h9, 1959.
Inna, R.L., Pellaek, l. £34 rink, H. Figaro-ground
dinorininaticn after indueod ultcrod brain inaction.
A.H.A. Arch.

louroi.,ﬁiu pron:

�15.

rink, H. Prague-tie value at hereohaeh
criteria in clinical response to convulsive therapy.

Kuhn, R.L. and

Paper read

at Bleetreeheck

Reaeareh Aee., san

Francisco, 1958.
16.

Iahn, R.L. and link, H. changes in language during
oleetroeheck therapy. In P. ﬂesh and J. Znhin (Ede.),
Pazehegatholegz et columnieatien. Grune and stratten,

l.‘

Yorke ppe 126‘139e 1958a

R.L., Pellaek, H. and link, H. social tactora 1n
the selection at therapy in a veluntary mental
helpital. J. Hill-1h Hung. Q: nos-:20, 1957.
18. Iahn, n.L., rellaek, H. and rink, u. seexepeyehelexieal
aepeete at ﬁeyehiatrie treatleut. Arch. Gen.
Pezchiat., in press.
17.

Kahn,

�Social Attitude Questionnaire (F Scale)*
Below are a number of‘statements. For each statement we
want you to give us your personal opinion of'whether you agree
or disagree, and how much.

.3

g

5
8

&gt;3

am

:&gt;

o
(I)

:4

ﬁ
g

&gt;&gt;
+3

43
m

a
{34

m

(D

M

m

r1

9
+2

'H

H
c6

w

0)

3
3

vi
H

8

E

g

5’

S

pm

(D

((3

Q1

L"

w

m
a)

m
a)

m

m

p
’

0
h

w
(6

m

aw

£6

m

better
When

talk less

ho
w

no

a

-H

"-4

rd

0

F1

Pi

F4

F4

F1

+4

H

U

U

...................

and work more, everybody would be

offOOCOICOOOOOQ. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
.

think about

it,

it is

best for him not to
but to keep busy with more cheerful things .......

a person has a problem or worry,

the youth needs most is strict discipline, rugged determination, and the will to work and fight for family and country ......

What

I

different kinds of people mix together
to protect himself especially carefully
infection or disease from them ...............

Nowadays when so many
so much, a person has

against catching an

crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse.......
.
Sex

................... .....................

best teacher or boss is the one who tells us exactly what
is to be done and how to go about it. ...... .

The

.....................

people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow up
they ought to get over them and settle down

Young

People can be divided into two

the strong.... ..... ...
*From

......................

distinct classes: the

weak and

.................. ........................
.

Gallagher, Levinson and Erlich (1957).

Scoring:

I agree very much ....... +7
I agree pretty much.....+6
I agree a little ........ +5

I can't say ............

I disagree very much ....... +1
I disagree pretty much ..... +2
I disagree a little
+3

+h

43

ho
w

.......................................

people would

h

aw

m
-H

5-4

Science has its place, but there are many important things
that must always be beyond human understanding

If

h
a

$4

sane, normal decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation..

No

8

........

$3

as

�Appendix

Social Attitude Questionnaire (F Scale)*
Felow are a number of statements. For each statement we want you
to give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree.
Answer each statement according to one of the following:

I

AGREE A LITTLE

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

I

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY MUCH

1.

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation.
No

2. Science has its place, but there are many important things
must always be beyond human understanding.
3.

If

better off.

that

people would talk less and work more, everybody would be

a person has a problem or worry, it is best for him not to
think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

tion,

A.

When

5.

What

and the

the youth needs most is

will to

strict discipline,

rugged determina—

fight for family and country.
6. Nowadays when so many different kinds of people mix together
much, a person has to protect himself especially carefully against
catching an infection or disease from them.
work and

so

7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicaly whipped, or

worse.

is

8. The best teacher or boss
to be done and how to go about

is the

it.

one who

tells

us exactly what

people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow
up they ought to get over them and settle down.
9.

10.

Young

PeOple can be divided

the strong.

into

two

distinct classes: the

weak and

-————————————.__.__—_—______
*

Gallagher, Levinson and Erlich (1957).
Scoring: Agreement is scored as +7 (agree very much), +6 (agree pretty much),
and +5 (agree a little); +h for no response or uncertain; +3
(disagree a little), +2 (disagree pretty much), and +1 (disagree
very much). The ten items are summed for a single F—Scale Score.
From

�CONVULSIVE THERAPY PROJECT

—

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, INC.

§gpia1 Attitude Questionnaire

{F

ScaIe)

aha a numbed 05 Atatemcnia. Fox each Ataiemeni we
want you to give uA gout geaéonaﬁ Opinion 05 whethea you agaee
Beﬁow

on

disagree, and

.C.‘

0

how much.

g

much

m

G)

very

H
94

muc

3

&gt;5

JJ
U

little

-

much

4-)

a

H
1—!

pretty

very

CE!

cisagree

agree

say

t
can

I

I

sane, normal decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation. ..... ‘u.......... .....

No

Science has

its place,

.............,...

but there are many important things

that must always be beyond

human

understanding................

If people would talk less and work more, everybody would be
better off....................................................
I

‘

then a person has a problem or worry, it is best for him not to
think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things....

I

If
I

the youth needs most is strict discipline, rugged determina—
tion, and the will to work and fight for family and country...

What

different kinds of people mix together
to protect himself especially carefully
infection or disease from them ..... .......

Nowadays when so many
so much, a person has

against catching an

I

crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse...................
..
Sex

I

......... ...............
.

The

best teacher or boss is the one

is to

be done and

hOW

tells

us exactly what
to‘go about ituu'oonltocconcoct-cocooooowho

Young people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow
up they ought to get over them and settle down................

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak

and the strongOIOOIIOOIOOQOOOOOCOOIIOIOOIOIICOOCIOIOOCOOIIOICI

I

“"“'{'
I

i,

i

'

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2774">
                <text>Social attitude (California F Scale) and convulsive therapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1960 Mar; 130:187-92.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2775">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2776">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-46-012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2777">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2778">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2779">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2780">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2781">
                <text>[Preprint] with questionaire and reprint. Reprint from THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE Volume 130, No .3, March 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2782">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2783">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74480">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81041">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87602">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94163">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="279" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="70">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/bf0b6905f6c2b44054f0b8c530666cd5.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b11f5eee6a69d331f4c3c98cd7961516</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100696">
                    <text>Reprinted from the :1. M. :1. Archives of Neurology
May 1960, Vol. 2, pp. 547—551
Copyright 1960, by Aerircm Medical Association

F igure-Ground Discrimination After Induced Altered

Brain Function
ROBERT l.. KAHN, Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK, Ph.D.,

and

Studies of complex visual perception with
altered brain function in man have not always yielded clear or consistent results. The
disagreements may be due to many factors,
such as differences in population studied,
types of procedures employed, and difﬁculties in evaluating the degree of alteration in
brain function. Electroconvulsive therapy
(ECT), however, provides a unique op
portunity for studying the effects of cere—
bral dysfunction in that more accurate
control can be maintained over the degree of
induced cerebral dysfunction and its measurement.
While most investigations of brain—injured
populations have focused on the role of the
locus of the lesion on behavior, current
studies of ECT have emphasized individual
differences. Marked variability has been
shown for perceptual}2 behavorial,7 and
physiologic 5'8 responses to ECT. Various
personality 6'11 and social factors 9'10 have
also been related to differences in response
to treatment.
In the course of an investigation of the
perceptual and behavorial changes with
ECT, a convulsive—subconvulsive control
study was undertaken. In this report, the
performance on complex visual tasks is pre—
sented. Speciﬁcally, the aim was to deter—
mine whether perceptual change induced
by ECT is related to the degree of altered
brain function and clinical behavioral
‘

Accepted for publication Jan. 18, 1960.
From The Department of Experimental Psy—
chiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Presented at the American Psychological Association, New York, August, 1957.
Aided by Grants M-927 and MY-2092 of the
National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, US. Public Health Service.

MAX FINK, M.D., Glen

Oaks, New York

change, and Whether the pretreatment perceptual pattern is related to physiologic
changes with treatment.
The method used in the study was the
perception of embedded geometric ﬁgures——
a technique which has been employed in recent years in studies of perceptual change
in head trauma and brain tumor pa-

tients.1'“"'14

Method
Population—Fifty-three consecutive patients
referred for ECT were studied. These included 16
men and 37 women, the ages ranging from 22 to
66 years, with a median of 49 years. The patients
were divided at random into two groups. A convulsive group, of 29 patients, received grand mal
electrotherapy with thiopental (Pentothal) premedication three times a week, using either a
Medcraft alternating-current instrument or a.
Reiter C-47 electrostimulator. A minimum of 12
treatments was given. The total number of treat—
1.

ments was determined by the supervising psychia—
trist in charge of the treatment unit on the basis
of clinical criteria. A subconvulsive group, of 24
patients, was treated in similar fashion except that
only subconvulsive stimulation was given after the
thiopental. Fourteen of the subjects in the 'subconvulsive group were subsequently given a regular
course of convulsive therapy.
2. Perceptual Task—In the week prior to treat—
ment and on the day following the 12th treatment
each patient was tested with a modiﬁcation of the
Gottschaldt hidden—ﬁgure test developed by Bat—
tersby et al.1 The subject is presented with a page
containing two forms—a simple geometric ﬁgure,
and below it a complex ﬁgure in which the simple
ﬁgure is embedded (Figure). The patient is
asked to trace a speciﬁc geometric ﬁgure from the
background by outlining it with a colored pencil.
The discriminations range in complexity from
relatively simple to more complex. There are 25
such discriminations. A maximum of two minutes
is allowed for each. Performance is scored in
terms of total number of errors. To minimize
a practice effect, two equivalent forms of the
test were used. The forms were alternated with

77/547

�A.M.A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
Comparisons for Number
of Errorr Before and During EC T

TABLE 1.———Intragr0up

Type of
Treatment
Subconvulsivo
Convulsive

Before
No.
24

43

ECT

During

Differ—

ECT

once

1’

7.7
11.8

~2.3
+2.3

&lt;0.02

10.0
9.5

*

(0.02

Intragroup analyses in this and in subsequent tables are
based on Wilcoxon’s method of paired replicates.
*

Results

\VAVI
‘7"7V
'AL A AL‘
Figures in hidden-ﬁgures test. The preliminary
sample used to acquaint the subjects with the
task is shown in a; b and c are examples of test
ﬁgures. In (1 the task is complicated by having the
subject determine which of the two single ﬁgures
can be found in the complex ﬁgure.
successive patients in pretreatment testing. During
treatment the patient was reexamined with the
form different from that given initially.
3. Evaluation of Physiologic Change. Two
measures of brain function——the electroencephalo—
gram and the amobarbital test15—were given to
each patient prio1 to and at weekly intervals during treatment. The electroencephalogram was
evaluated as to the degree of induced slow-wave
activity according to criteria previously published.5
The amobarbital test was noted as positive or
negative for brain dysfunction according to
standardized criteria}5 The results of these tests
during the second, third, and fourth weeks of
treatment furnished the criteria for physiologic
change. A combined physiologic index was obtained by ascribing to each high—degree slow—wave
EEG record and each positive amobarbital test
a score of one. The range of physiologic altera—
tion thus ranged from 0 to 6.
4. Behavior Ratings.—Each patient’s behavior
was evaluated at weekly intervals. After the 12th
treatment, a rating for the degree of behavioral
change was made according to four classes:
marked, moderate, minimal, or none. These ratings
of change were not value judgments as to the
quality of change but, rather, quantitative estimates
of differences in behavior patterns under similar
conditions of observation. Thus, such behavior
patterns as euphoria, paranoia, and withdrawal
might all be rated as equivalent for degree of
quantitative change, although the implications of.
each for the qualitative evaluation of improvement
may be diﬁ'erent.

78/548

The pretreatment and treatment scores
and the mean change in the number of er—
rors with treatment are shown for each
group in Table 1. Intragroup analysis shows
that the subconvulsive group made signiﬁ—
cantly fewer errors during treatment,
whereas the convulsive patients made sig—
niﬁcantly more.
Prior to treatment, subconvulsive patients
made approximately the same number of
errors as those in the convulsive group, a
mean difference of 0.5 error. During treatment, however, the difference between these
bet—
at
signiﬁcant
(4.1
errors)
was
groups
ter than the 1'% level of conﬁdence. When
the data are analyzed with respect to physiologic change, signiﬁcant increases in errors
are found only for those patients with great—
er degrees of physiologic change. This re—
lationship is present in the analysis of the
amobarbital test and the EEG as separate
2,—1ntragroup Comparisons for Number of
Errors Before and After EC T in Relation to
Degree of Physiologic Change

TABLE

3

Mean
Difference
in No. of
Errors
During
Treatment

Physiological Index

N

Amobarbital Test
None or one positive

13

—0.2

Two or three positive
Electroencephalogram
None or one high delta

28

+3.7

23

+1.7

Two or three high delta
Combined Physiologic
0 t0 3

18

+3.3

21

+1.0

20

+3.9

4

to 6

1’

Not
significant
&lt;0.01

Not
signiﬁcant
&lt;0.05

Not
signiﬁcant
&lt;0.01

V 01. 2, May, 1960

�FIGURE-GROUND DISCRIMINATION
3,—Intragronp Comparisons for Number of
Errors Before and During ECT in Relation
to Degree of Behavioral Change

4.—Relation of Pretreatment Errors to
Eventnal Degree of Physiologic Change

TABLE

Degree of
Behavioral Change

Marked
Moderate
Minimal or none

N

Treatment

14
5

——0.4

Physiologic
Change

1’

0
3
5

&lt;0.01

Not signiﬁcant
Not signiﬁcant

indices, and when the two tests are
bined (Table 2).

to 2
and

N
16

4

and 6

19
8

Mean N o. of
Errors

Pretreatment
7.9
11.2
13.3

logic change had frequent difﬁculty following instructions. They would trace the lines

com—

The relationship between the degree of
behavioral change and the change in num—
ber of errors during treatment is shown in
Table 3. Those patients with minimal or
moderate behavior changes did not show
an appreciable difference in number of er—
rors. Those with marked behavior changes,
however, made signiﬁcantly more errors
during treatment.
Analysis of the pretreatment error scores
in relation to the degree of physiologic
change is shown in Table 4. A signiﬁcant
relationship is shown between the pretreatment error scores and the degree of physio—
logic change during treatment. Patients
with minimal physiologic change during
convulsive therapy had a mean pretreat—
ment score of 7.9 errors, while those who
developed marked physiologic effects had a
mean pretreatment score of 13.2. The triserial correlation of pretreatment score and
physiologic change is +0.34, signiﬁcant at
the 0.05 level of conﬁdence.
Qualitative Data—Alterations in size of
ﬁgure or in minor aspects of form were
common types of error during both testing
periods. Certain qualitative patterns were
frequently noted during treatment, which
occurred only rarely in the pretreatment
period. It was common for patients to
make no attempt to trace the more complex
ﬁgures. This failure was often associated
with a generalized withdrawal reaction in
which theipatient was unresponsive to any
stimulus or procedure. Others became hos—
tile and negativistic toward the testing.
Patients with the greatest amount of physio—
Kalm ,et al.

During Treatment

Mean Difference
for Number of
Errors During
+3.6
+1.0

24

TABLE

indiscriminately, without regard for the
speciﬁc ﬁgure to be traced, repeat a previous
ﬁgure despite changes in the test ﬁgure,
draw lines where none actually existed, and
attempt to trace the stimulus ﬁgure while
ignoring the more complex test ﬁgure. Such
patients were likely to respond quickly and
impulsively, and showed little concern about
making an error even when spontaneously
commenting, “I know that’s not right.”

Comment
This study demonstrates a relationship
between the degree of cerebral dysfunction
and the degree of perceptual alteration as
measured by errors on the embedded-ﬁgures
test. Patients with subconvulsive stimulation
made fewer errors on retesting. Patients
receiving convulsive therapy, in whom only

minimal physiologic changes were recorded,
manifested slight increase or no change in
errors. The convulsive patients, however,
with the more marked physiologic altera—
tions, showed a signiﬁcant increase in

‘

errors. This interrelationship of brain func—
tion and perception may be related both to
the perceptual patterns with neurologic dis—
orders and t0 the mode of action of con—
vulsive therapy.
It is evident that perceptual responses
systematically vary with the degree of dif—
fuse cerebral dysfunction. In relating these
patterns to concepts of localized pathology,
the role of generalized, nonspeciﬁc cerebral
dysfunction must be considered. For ex—
ample, unilateral spatial “inattention,” fre—
quently attributed to parietal lobe lesions
alone?!4 has been reported with a variety
79/ 549

�AM. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
of lesions provided there was a somato—
sensory defect and an associated generalized
mental impairment."""16 Teuber and Wein—
stein 1“ found that performance on an em—
bedded—ﬁgures test was unrelated to locus
of lesion in cases with penetrating brain
wounds, but that aphasic patients made
signiﬁcantly more errors than a nonaphasic
group. Pollack et al.,13 using a test identical
with that in this study, reported no rela—
tionship between errors and the location of
lesion in tumor patients. They noted, instead, that the number of errors was related to the severity of general mental
changes, manifested as disorientation for
time and place. The present observation
that perception of embedded ﬁgures is re—
lated to the degree of diffuse brain dys—
function is in accord with these studies of
patients with head injuries and brain tu—
mors.
In previous investigations of the mode
of action of convulsive therapy, we have
shown that clinical behavioral change is
related to the degree of altered brain func—
tion.5'7'8 The present study reinforces this
observation, the objective criterion of per—
ceptual errors being used as an index of
behavioral change. As a group, the patients
who showed the greatest increase in errors
with treatment were those who also showed
the most pronounced change in clinical behavior, as assessed by conventional psychiatric evaluation.
There appeared to be considerable comparability in the type, as well as the degree,
of clinical behavioral change and the quali—
tative aspects of performance on the em—
bedded-ﬁgures test. Failure to attempt the
task characteristically accompanied with—
drawal or paranoid hostility. A lack of con—
cern in correcting errors was associated
with clinical euphoria or hypomania. From
these behavioral observations, the increases
in errors may be attributed to a change in
attitude toward the task or examiner, as
well as to a speciﬁc defect. The altered
brain function modiﬁed the total pattern of
interaction with the environment, of which
80/550

the performance on a complex perceptual
task is just one aspect.
Previous studies have shown that there
is a relationship between the clinical response
to convulsive therapy and aspects of personality, deﬁned as the habitual or characteristic
modes of response and adaptation.“v1°'11 In
this study it has been shown that the pretreatment perceptual performance is related
to the physiological response during treatment. This ﬁnding suggests that the indi—
vidual differences in the development of
physiologic change may also be related, in
part, to personality factors.

Summary and Conclusion
Fifty—three consecutive patients referred

for electrotherapy were studied before and
after treatment on their ability to perceive
embedded geometric ﬁgures. An experimental group of 29 patients received a
course of grand mal therapy with thiopental
(Pentothal) premedication. A control group
of 24 patients received submnvulsive stimu—
lation with thiopental premedication only.
The experimental group made signiﬁcant—
ly more errors after treatment than did the
controls.
Within the experimental group there was
considerable variability. Increase in errors
was signiﬁcantly related to the degree of
altered brain function and to the degree of
behavioral change.
Qualitative aspects of perceptual behavior mirrored the pattern of behavioral change
observed clinically.
Pretreatment error scores were signiﬁ—
cantly related to the degree of altered brain
function developed during treatment. The
signiﬁcance of this observation in terms of
personality factors is indicated.
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
Hospital.

REFERENCES
l. Battersby, W. S.; Krieger, H. P.; Pollack,
M., and Bender, M. B.: Figure-Ground Discrimi—
nation and the Abstract Attitude in Patients with
Cerebral Neoplasms, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 76 2369, 1956.
Vol. 2, May, 1960

�FIGURE-GROUND DISCRIMINA TION
Battersby, W. S.; Bender, M. B.; Pollack,
M., and Kahn, R. L.: Unilateral Spatial Agnosia
(Inattention) in Patients with Cerebral Lesions,
Brain 79:68, 1956.
3. Critchley, MacD.: The Parietal Lobes, Baltimore, Williams &amp; Wilkins Company, 1953.
4. Cobb, S.: Amnesia for the Left Limbs De—
veloping into Anosognosia, Bull. Los Angeles
Neurol. Soc. 12:48, 1947.
5. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of
Electroencephalographic Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in Electroshock: Quantitative
Serial Studies, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.
2.

78:516, 1957.

Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L., and Pollack, M.:
Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differ—
ences in Behavioral Response to Convulsive
Therapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 1282243, 1959.
7. Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L., and Green, M. A.:
Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process,
Dis. Nerv. System 19:1, 1958.
8. Kahn, R. L.; Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.:
Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improve—
ment in Electroshock, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 76:23, 1956.
9. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
6.

216, 1957.

Kalm cl 0].

Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital, A.M.A. Arch.
Gen. Psychiat. 1:565, 1959.
11. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, J. Neuropsychiat. 1:45, 1959.
12. Landis, C.; Dillon, D., and Leopold, 8.:
Changes in Flicker-Fusion Threshold and in
Choice Reaction Time Induced by Electroconvul—
sive Therapy, J. Psychol. 41:61, 1956.
13. Pollack, M.; Battersby, W. S., and Bender,
M. B.: Figure—Ground Discrimination in Patients
with Cerebral Tumor, read at Eastern Psychological Association, 1957.
14. Teuber, H. L., and Weinstein, 5.: Ability
to Discover Hidden Figures After Cerebral
Lesions, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 76:
10.

369, 1956.

Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L.; Sugarman,
L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic Use of Amo—
barbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Brain
Disease, Am. J. Psychiat. 112 2889. 1953.
16. Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L., and Slote,
W. H.: Withdrawal, Inattention, and Pain Asymbolia, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 74:235,
15.

1955.

rrmccu’ and l’ublinhed in the United State: 0] America

81/551

��liguruwaruuua ntncrtainn‘aau Artur Induaod
Alsorud Irwin luuat£an

"M‘

In

”I.

than. m ,“1333' "on.
II‘
“‘3 'Ilk Kc”.

$ at Savorinnuinl Payuhaitry. Islanido Ilqpitul.
tron ti.
‘3... 0th, 31$. '0!ttdod I: (933‘! 3‘91? and uz-noya .8 1h: rattanal Igs¢tiutn at
lialﬁh
’ublta
v.3.
Inuﬁttntoa
at
laulth,
Intlnall
Innath,
laatal
Iorvtao.
’rnacutod a! nastiest fartholuntaul inuuctn‘aon. l.!.. luau-S 195?
‘

Vt: 10-59

�11¢."de

nun-mints.” in mt

�Iaaurtocrilnd Dinertllnntiaa Attor~xu¢n¢¢d
llturnd Drain Flaottlu

at

«unplax $111.1 yﬁvucytaau with altartd brain
:buattnn.£n man have lat ulnar: yiuldad Bill! or couuautaut
rsIuZtu. an. dtn‘groanautn
to at. to stay Inn‘oru, than
ﬁtnuxgu

I! dirtbrcncoa

It:

1a populutluu s‘ua1ca, $39.:

a: tools :34

pranocnrna unplayud. and a1:ttou1t1.a In 01.1;‘t13: ﬁlo d:¢vao

a: Iltlritltt 1g bruit minuttaa. llaitrOOOBthttvo thnrupr
(ref). houuvur, prcvs$un u uaaqnt oppurﬁuuaty for 1%‘431nc

it:

vitamin u: ctrubrnl irntinataan in ‘htﬁ no». acouruho
.oltvol tan b. untacntnoa trot tin Cairo. at tndnata corubrul
drutunntaau and its gonnur'nunt.
will. invautiguttann at ﬁrstnntuanrud pdpnIntitnn hnvu
ttauucod 10! it. loot part on ﬁat til. at loéittal‘of logttl
on ht$aviur. nurroat ltultan at an! hurt taphutitad its
manna
rum- .3 manna:
a»

«mm...
mun“:
ton aim-n m- unupm; (a), “man: (h). and pmwmun
(2.5) vtnpauttu ‘0 not. In Iﬁdl‘iia, Virii‘l portounlity (3)
and loclal luster: (6.?) ﬂat. bat: rolntud ﬁoldtttortasau 1n
rtuponno $0 ‘rcntuunt.
In it. «attic a: la invautttgtSOI at ‘3. yorunptnnl :36

tchavtavuz thungca with Int. n.Iauvulotvo~osboouvnlutvo
unailwz .5343 cat Indurtaktg. In ‘hiu roport. sh: partorunuca
an outwit: vtnunl Qtakt it praaautud. splattaually, tho .1:
83' to ﬁattrnino utnﬁhnr purcoytlnl thing. iﬂdlﬂid up new it
um suntan
or
an
behavioral «minute and uhtilnr it; pvctrttﬁlnnt yarotpinul
pttiurn is roxaind ﬁt plytitltciu chance: with troatannt.

“um u

«m;

nuns um “um:

�4".

m ”and uni

1a

a.

menu “mun “mu

and; m
«-

a

Mini:

m ”In"!!! at
which

bu tun

unity“ a mum you: 1: than 0: ”run“: WI
a: um ”um «I be“: Wu:- nﬁnh (1, 0. 16).

�m:

1) gagglggﬁggo rttﬁy-£hrcc coal-cuttvc putt-mt. martyred
for In! rare s‘n4114. 230.0 includcd 16 no: and 37 Human.
I1¢h n30: ranging tram 1! to 66 utth a Isltil at £9 rinru.
A
«111604
tun
rauduu
gronyn.
I!» patttutc var.
at
tat.
can'tzntvo grin: or I? pntlnuta too-:vud [kind In: olonﬁrnu
'

thorlpy'vttb ponto‘hnl pronndsuattln ﬂhrco'ttnna a aver.
tutu; utﬁhar a lcdnrttﬁ t1tarna$¢u¢ entrant tustrllnnﬁ or u
A
e-hv
olcc‘ruotSunlntar.
mitt-I: at 1! ‘tOﬂﬁlII‘l
lattir
IaturIAnoa
nmahar
so$a1
troutnoi‘n
c:
given.
III
It:
rut.
by

it.

any-twining

,lrahlutvtlt

an churxo

at

‘ho truntncu‘

A
01
nubcaavnlltv:
owls-via.
01:110.;
basis
unit 9» ti.
(was: a: th patients van truttcd 1: nihilnr t‘nhina, uxcapi

that only unbcouvuloivc a‘tln1n§1¢u van given following $30
polbthal. rbnrtctn of thy lubaoatavtn tho InbouthI-iva grin;
wort cuinnq13ntly':1vun a rcgnlnr coura- ot couvulatvn tharupy.
itch prior ﬁo-‘roctutut and
I) £2:ggg§3g§_§gg§u In

it.

it.

any tullantnc ‘5. 12‘3
ﬁction vtﬁh a nultttatttaa of

nu

tritiuunt can) pa‘taut an:

hiddun
£1113!
oottaohnll‘
it.
to.‘ dovulopo‘ by Itt‘orlby'3§_g§,(1). III Ittjltt is
prouontod with I page containing two torn. ¢ a usual. cut-n$rtnl
which
QIH’XQI
and
in
holov
1‘
in. atlulc ticuro
a
tantru,
Illlft
an ouhcdnod (11;. 1). tbs passlnt :- .akod ‘0 ﬁrst. I apoottio
goo-attic ttxuro tram tin inchcrcund by outlining 1t vl‘h t
col-rut 903.11. It: altars-tuition: range in noupluxaty :90.
—-.‘q--_

313. 1
Cunﬁoodu

�~h~

such
:5
tr.
diucrtuiautioun. a .311!!! at tun uluuton 1. ullnuod tor
onah. Portarnnaco as :¢¢rud in turn: 0: ﬁnial lllbir a: aurora.
lb i181l1‘¢ a prautttn Itruct $ro tqslvaloaﬁ lawn. a: $3. iau£
any: unod. 2h. torn: var. nltaruntut vi‘h Inactnuav. yuttcu‘n

ttlnttvaly ainplt ta hart couplux. that:

“prawn-u ”um. mm: What a. ”unﬁt m ”umuu an» m an autumt tun um um mum”.
3)

_

.

.NMV

.

,Jﬂ

,7

run Inalurol

at

ﬁrst: Stuntiou . tun cluatrnoacaphnlogrna and st. nasbattxtil
taut (11) '0'. ctvuu in itih puttnnt grist in. uni at vigil:
‘1uﬁcrvu1n airing tronﬂnnut. 13. n1..tuuunaophn1&amp;¢run In:
tvdlnntid .- to th: dsxtno ct tutucod delta activity tcgor¢1nu
to ctttcrtt prcvtoully publishud (s). Thu nuabarbttal tout
nogn%1vu
brain
utt¢¢
for
or
pouttivc
lycttnatiuu
a.
It.
uncaritng t. ntsudnr¢1Qid critoria (11). it. rattlta u: this.

during sh. sonata. third tad rourtb itch; of ironing»:
turntlhod tho critcrin tar phwutolocacal litill. A «onhiuad
'Bhrlltltxtﬁil $34.: was obtntnud by usarihtn; to oath high
inure. Salt. Ila UQIOIC nut 05:! poattiv. anotnrhttal tnnﬁ a
lanai a: nut. 1h. rang. at phwitaloatcnl a1&amp;nrat1nn thuu

test:

ruagnd tron
h)

atra'io nix.

la

tr

*1:

It

Bash pctaauﬁ's hchnvtor

In.

cvnlnatud 3‘ wtokly intarvals. Artur ‘3: 12th trcn‘uant, a

rtttal for it.

dugvnu

a: bnhtvinral thing.

It:

and. ¢os.vdll¢

ta tan! clnsucut unwind, nod¢rnto. Iantunl or menu. Th...
rating: at «hang. vura ant VIII. audgnnnutu ta ta tho unaatty

�.5.

u “than“

in“ “my «unaba- uuntu‘
in boinvtov pu‘tnrau unit: tintlar mandatsana at uhocrv.‘10u¢
than. tuch‘bolnvtur psi$urua nu «upharsa, viruautn or withdrawn: usgl‘ .11 ha astod as aqutvnlcnt to: ‘OCIOI u:
an minute“ or out
chum.
thy qunlt£nttvu cvnluutsna a: tlprcwuuuat um; to dartornut.

at

than,

wanna“

am»

in

�mu»

nud-truatnoét
ae¢r¢t uni tic luau
:3. pretrtatuaut
¢hanzc in *5. 31:30! at or!.ra I1$h trnntutnt Ara uncut {ﬁr
caah group in 1.31. X. Intrusrtur‘uaalyaas that: thus tho
,Ititotvalaiva crazy aqdn utgnitivnntly tenor ovroro aartn;
tru¢tnunt, whili thc.uguvultavu pn$1¢atu nun. stun:tt¢n&amp;t11

.

'3’“!
naucc&amp;ao§~

um I

vriur to tvattunat, subconvulnzvu pattout: Inn. upprcun
alnﬁnlr ﬁts can. nuuhur 0: cart»: 1: than: in tho annvula:v&amp;.
autumn of «1:05. Wing trauma
{my vi“ a
hatunda
tiott gran»: (h.1 cfrorn)
«aircrunnn
hosuvwr, t3.

an

m untrumt a

«an: «m an

1::

1m:

or

wanna“.

Intlywod tit) racpoe‘ to phyiiclazit cunnsc,
utsutrlnuut xgcrtnuoa in error. art taunt out: ta than. pittnntu
ut‘h 31.3%.! diurnal at plrltuloxin ohnagt. 2&amp;1: rwluisunuhtp
anabnrbttll taat and the
it pvuuta‘ tn $hc analyttt or
:36 ﬁt ¢:partta latte... 331 was: tit $20 tact: urn «unbluoi
ﬂﬁnu

tn. data 1:

it.

(Quilt 1!).

“.‘.‘.*..mm it:

fun raltttaauhtp intact: tn. 1032*. 01 bahnv1:rnl chant.
a:&amp;
chtago ta nulkor of «pants dnrtng imattuant-ta inﬂux

ti:
or
a...
an:
«an
m.
”man
“am want.
a

�at?“

bchlviar changcu £1: acﬁ than an uppgoainbio difiaruaeo
untied
bchnwilr chanson,
In author a: Qtfl?Io Shag: with
Errata-It.
«trans
uaAc
crvarn
nuratcnttiolatly
lavorur,
&gt;

tn‘woum
143%! 111

rnlnﬁtou
tin
arctroa‘I'It atttr
1:11:31. at
1n
17.
thunk
chango
ta
tail!
of
phauanlaciuul
in tin ducts.
roloﬁtkunhtp
hetuuuu
tin
prothan
uttnttlaaaﬁ
a
result.
it:

00.9..

$3

phyat;lo¢tou1
change
or
incrno
‘roaﬁlcut crror
chanco
physiological
with
Itatnnl
Pa‘iantu
during trons-ou‘.
a:
had
prntrhﬁﬁnalﬂ
intro
u
than
convulclvu
‘hnrnyy
‘ﬁfll'
anrhad
uh»
phyniulogtoal
duvclaycd
‘30:.
1.! aurora, tail.
ﬁrst-21.1
13.3.
1:.
at
htd
acct.
protr:ntuunt
a
nut:
trtoa$u,
in
rhyrt01131¢nl
«hang:
and
corral-ﬁat. at protvan‘nunt tear.
*33, ttgustaoaut t$ ‘ho .05 lcvul a: canttdtnoo.
”nan-unufllﬁl I?
IOOIOI and 1h»

W

Altamitlcnn In a1:- 01 (aggro or in unit: unpuu‘: of
ha‘h
sot£1n¢
partoiac
taping
arrow
at
annual
typo.
no».
(at:
ear‘atn qualiﬁn‘tvo patiorua turn troqn.ntly'nuta¢ «‘21:;
inuniuaat ho-Ivnt, which oacurrtd our rarely a: to I lancer
alﬁon‘ 1: tin prttrultlun‘ portcd. It vat gonna: for putataﬂu

�mu.
I:
m»:
“I
rum man. m
m

at

1'10th

sun-mun”

mu»
‘

3

auto" m:

mm: :6!

mum“

a
1’.

2B

19.0

.7»?

*2“!

.0!

h)

9.5

11.8

«.3

-.ea

'

my“:
1“"!er
811mm now 0: mm "plant“.

in this and aubuqunt

“nu

band

on

�.

Iu‘rnctunp cuuparlaonn
,1331nataauaa Iran:
Aaszsthéaa!_z:£&amp;
lung or on.

,-

In: lI-bav It Izrnra nut-rt

I Inc:

Bittbrcnoo 1-

13

06.!

,‘Ci‘l’i

:8

‘30?

loan or at.
high «01‘.

23

01.7

pauzttv.
9!. or thrto

turn.
or401%.
ﬁt.
high

3’

Us

and

'IleI

p

Int tinnittaon‘
001

lat lttuttloant

,

'

10

.3.)

33

*1.o

:3

‘30,

.05

lat attaittcunt
.

001

�-W

and
having
Safari
o:
strata
cunpurtllnu
tor_IIuh¢r
In‘rnur1up

angrvo O! lohnvacrnl ﬁlingt
.

litttd

”liturunconilnbﬁr a:
03.6
01.0
~0.h

Eh

lb

locnrato

hiatus: or that

R¢1u$ton

I lat:

x

W
t:

at Pritv‘nﬁnunt tutor.

p

x...

.ﬂl
lot aaanlftcaat

Int atctitlnant

xv'utunx 20;?!0 or rhrltolscidax
72353;; agggg‘ zggggggg
,

W!
9 $0 2
3

'3‘ ‘

I
1‘

70’

I,

11.1

�«a.
to ink: I6 nttcnpt tn tvtau ﬁt. hora cunplcx figures. was.
v.1poncc uga ottou unnaaiatud lith I gsnarnltacd r1tbdrauu1
rcdctlun in witch ‘ha paticnt was unruuponniva $0 an: attnula:
u! pracodura. ethnra b.3335 hua‘tlo and uncuttviuilu touted
it. tasting. ratauntu with th- groaﬁu-t tumult or phytiologtanl
thing. it‘an had ditticllty I‘llivtas tantruc%a.ag. 13¢:
it‘ld in... ‘IC 113.. stalwartntn.tolr I1th¢:§ rognra 1.:
it. #9001113 tigurt‘ic it uttlsutd; rtpousod a pruvitun
txatr‘ doapitc august. 1: ti. #0:: figurn; draw 11:». uhnro
aunt uc$nully Oxiiﬁad; and aﬁtnnutcd to trlcc tbs tttunluc

tinny: Ital-'1cuorlig 1h: Into couplcx toot»:1:url.
patleuﬁn

VOID

and uhuvud

it.) might

11kuly

ltttlu

ﬁuah

it rcupaud quickly and tawlzclvuxr.

o-annvu about making an arrow

0":

«tan

apantanoiutly dounont, '1 luau $hst'n unt rich€.'

�W!

.9,

bdiuuon
$|o d.:run
ruln‘ionnhip
fit:
Ot'ﬁi’ibrll‘ﬁyiflllﬁtlt and $ha aggro. u! parnuptual :Itcrn31ln
taut.
unbuddui
PI‘tcutt
eh.
nunpurod
on
figiruu
an
h: crrurn
‘utth aubcolvnlsxvu uttlslntton-Iika shunt aurora an rotuattua.
A ultghs dgcrauss or unwahanul tn Ottawa octurrnd in that.
who
riogtvzaz
ahnitd
cuntulitvo
ally'haallnl
thirty:
pattlatt
thing‘s.
in. aunvulsivu pittcatl, houivor, ut‘t
pkg-Intogtcul

atudr‘luunlatrlitu

-

&amp;

68. unit anvkud phamaglcgtcux altsruttnn, Ihnvtd a ctxuttlnnat
tn¢r0330 1n number at strewn. 1‘4: lntorrnlntaoauhAp at bruit
£una££un aha porcupiiuu or caboddcd tsguvuu is in actard wi‘t
atudtnn of pu$tnutu with altarud tibia rua¢ttiu an. to htad

wutaatoia
u
(10)
uppaytng
fwuﬁtr
tad
taunt.
taint:
ul-ilur inuhuta 1n QISI&amp; with pauotrattng brain unuadt, tutu
alldud that ycrrurllnan Inn_uarnln&amp;ua to lien. or lonlua
but ihat uphuuic pntttnto and. nixaittcnntly'unru arvnra thtu
&amp; unaunphnnlc bruinwtnjirol group.
Pollack g§_g§, (9). 1113‘
ruporﬁod
Qltc
SI
an
taxation-t1,
an
taut
atuty.
tauntttul
tit
httuuul attain and ‘h. laaation a: 10010: &amp;n tutor patsoutt.
ﬁts
rnlutol
author
at
that
rwporﬁad.
tuntnnd,
in:
Irrort
it!)
to it: stvurtty o: amok unut¢1 changes an dzuaritatntiau.
1‘ should be yuanint o‘t «hat the total prc‘roatunnt
than atom. tow I11 pntlcnt- r‘larraa lav upnvulntvo thnruyy
ﬁn
sauna
hy
saunt1¢a1
10.5
n
linou‘
nun».
tat!
ctrurn.
at.
and brain

nxmk

21.5%: (9) an

um: man

tw

pltluu“. an”

‘

use

populations It. auuparublc 3: turn: .1 a£hnr pntnntﬁura
£11or1u1u.~
xvuund
In
$3.
and
lattata
figurt
ceuautiwa.
a: as.

two

�‘16“

iii! oaunct

in rugurﬁud an rntlntttvc o: notnhrtl 43:9inotaou
an an inalnﬁad out$£y tbairna‘od (It. ﬁt. t¢tn11my at hchavtur.
hasn‘t ‘hll beta; :- 3.0Io in tin rolatloatth, your parttvuuaau
tn aunt inthu any be due to it: internation a: Ina: tn:$«rn.
mu 117thth um. an); an. my “on m
nu.»watt nation cnrnbrcl din... uh» lit! fi'tf hit!!! an $ht- iatk
than ocntrul llhltt‘l viﬁh tn§n¢t turtbrnl tunataun. In in.
prbouaﬁ otudy It. rtugc at altturoacou lull: $hn pattunﬁ: prior
‘0 ‘lﬂﬂildli nun cruator than thnﬁ uhintlud cvua‘ux‘h atrium:
phyasalartall chlacu. “’11. patlaut in thy nahnoavnlatva
group wish I high author at prutvtnilaut «trorn at: ants a
yrlattcn attics In ritcnttn; watt a ruita£1on in crrtra, hit
nbnulutc arrow near: :nr still bu hixhnr tits shut it n puiinnﬁ
ronutvilu tournlntvn ‘hnaunr_uh¢ had Irv protv*ainnnt erurn
0“ I:s alum: auurtaacd dattxaulsy with trociunnt. than.
obnnrvatioan tuccuuﬁ thtt isttanulty 1| ptrtotvtnc cnhaadad
(tutti. ta tainted to acrintu ’Oviiilltiw unpocti tn v.11 n:
it ﬁrst. ttwthnstailu Galituﬁalt with talc aanulptiou. ﬂttita
(1!, 13) but thiod tha‘ ﬁt. Hurlid thtividi&amp;1 dillnrwunua in
tin porttptaoa-c: haddnu tautrla nuns; 0011.10 otudoatn If.
rtlnﬁci to purnounIAtr tun$oro.
its rvlatlllnhip or parucpintl altnruticn to bohavtornl
1.:
clearly
during
u: u group an
than
haunt
,puiauntc at. thalud Qt. cystitis snaruutu in autumn during
trouﬁuant viii than. vi. .130 lhlﬂtl tun swat yruaouncod ah$a¢u

m

t

manna.

�«11¢

mucmd mm puma:

cult“: team”.
may“. Wt... “mum. «aunt-ta a
a:
to
“we“
m
mum m“ m mutt"
on a» mom: tutu an mm tun-Int. ham to
may

1n

or

mu.

pm»

«at»
«um
tut
m
um‘
WW
1»
in
Inﬁnity
um
"mum
u
t
pm.“
at
«ml
mu,
“ton.

A

or raw-

to an

um

In!

of

mm

in

wanna: "mm at non-um

claim ”its!“ c: mm“
1:.
mun“ :- «W. m «$81th

with

«d

mu.
than”

m.

tho

”that“!
to
arr
an.»
«aim
an
n
m
mi:
num.
a.
a
0:
0: m uuutm 1: tutu mum. am... a
can
N
on
mum.“
u Mutt“
an omit: ﬂﬂmm tut
with
or
a
m ammt.
u it. ”won “and“:
u

W

mmum

to 0
in

in

rim

.

am
nun“
:0:m 3m1¢1u1031 mum. in “an.“ manual» m
In
at
no“
c:
a «an “null". that». WI1:
mm an
3m
um
I
m
mm“
cm“
«mitnm
a
Manna.”
ﬂu

at ﬂu

t ”can.” «alum

for

at Ma pron-«mat

mum M3.

mulch. mm
man»- that m
in

a» mum! wanna».- mover.
at
of
a
dam.
mun-«u:
“an
a
4mm“ ma
M
at
much
"nut
”nanny.
u
m an
(a, 5).

to

”an":

�all;

taxman. manna ”than ”1‘qu hr
in
mm.
m an: What
“tummy an um;
A:
4“
ms: an“: man «ma mm. that...
0:
gm,
a
0:
I!
united
min-um
”an“
mu mi
1.

m

mm:
i
It“
mum:
Man...n-mu‘m with ”nun-a
My
nun” ”ulna «hum. m

In:
a: It

pmmutm my.
I. a. madman
“110'“; What

M

'

'

in»:
an
an
“Mina:
m

“I!

«am...

ram as manual no» mu m tﬂlﬂﬂ'ﬂth
in»
tun-nu
"nanny.
mm an imminent” mum u
‘

'

'

3.

mumuotnwmmunmumnmnu
“but!“ “use.

p

um um: mo autumn:
of
bran
alum
m
«gm
tutu“ amino!
mm u
In

run-«hunt

W
Mm at ”nanny («my
tmhmt.

I'M

1.th
mint“.

“ﬂute!!!“ at “It!
in

.1
psi-«pm
W10:
mu“:
“than
chum: «1mm».
no puns-u or human:
5.

m

M

am

�mm:

M.

1|"le

11133th a: hut (ulna. m
1.:
In.“
ma:
man
ﬂu
u mutt as also.“
m1.
"by
9.:
Wk
mug-ma um m an.“
u 3. n g m
an: m tn um» Hm. «I: u “I“ an
at“
m was “we.

W

m

�«1 3a

References

I. Inttarahy, w.s.. traccnr. x.r., reliant,

n. and nundlr.
3.3.: figuruogrcmnd ¢£unr£uannt1nu and the abatrtut
uttitncn 1n putatuta with narchrax neayltnna. 5,555,
‘4 xi,
'_'_, gaig.~;k;w., 19; 369, 195$.
2. rink. I. and Kuhn, Into: leln‘ttn Qt ita ﬁcltl anivtty
‘a behavioral raapouao an electrouhaaks quantitnﬁivn
'

sorts: utiliaa,

ewe

.'o 1!?

a

516. 1951.

J. rink.

h.

m.

I.t.

tucturc
vayuhnlnnzaal
l.u
rlmllsh,
l..
Ittecttng individual attrcrlacus In hohtvanrtl filviiii
Kata.

and

a. «man mm. mg... m: m. 1939.
m. rm, M... and arm. ma... Mora-um mm.

'

0! the alaotveuhaek prune... Egg, leggg 51p., l2! 1.
1958.

5. mm. 2.3... rm, 1:. mt manna, 1m... lemma .3
Innhtrbttaa tout to altﬁiﬁll inprrvoann‘ in cleatrclhatk,
1.mt.,‘1§I 83. 1956.
6. Kuhn, 3.3.. Pollnel, ﬂ. and tint, n.a auutul flatari 1n ‘ho
taxonﬁauu at thtvlwy ta 3 valuntear ninth: hanpttal.
,.

7.

.ﬁ

_.

,

uI.

go :16”. 1997.

Iain, I.L., Pulltnk,

and

risk, 3.: atatapuylhaluuto

ﬁrtntlnut an I reinstary ninth!
haspt‘tl. 5.x.n. trot. ﬂan. Payer. (In preto).
I. tenets, 6.. 3111‘», a. and beeper; 8.! damage: 3: little:lliinn thrtlhﬁld and in until. vtnnﬁtlu $1.! Indtotd
1956.
by
61.
that-pr.
a:
magenta ‘3 paguhtttrso

“wanna“

W...

�...L 1.1.23.1...LL

hunt.

I...

ground

tuna”.

10.

rum, Id.

I).

8.3.:

W

and

'nnna

W
M.
‘

5.:
woman.
attu-

{W

“any
hunt,
mm
1;.»- m. 1m.
to

hunch, 3a.. uh.

IJ...‘ Guam.

ammo m a
a man“ in“ than.
1953.

1!.

mm.

Wumm
M,
1‘va
mu“
mm:

11.

ma. m4

itltrﬁntnlttui in pttllut: itth carthvll
at
Panama“). Amati“.

m. m

1957.

‘

mm.

3.4.1.

“It.

in:

m:

889.

on

«an (Inn: want)

’

.

«mm».

8.5.:

.1 unhaido‘ tiguruu, g, rugg..

in

£23

«u

a!

1, 1936.

swam mm»:
um Wu 3.9M.
um.
1M.
pot-«yam.
a
a:
W"
LA...

um

.1

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2784">
                <text>Figure-ground discrimination after induced altered brain function. Arch Neurol. (Chic.) 1960 May; 2:547-51</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2785">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2786">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-47-013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2787">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2788">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2789">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2790">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2791">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprinted from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology May 1960, Vol. 2, pp. 547—551</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2792">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2793">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74481">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81042">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87603">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94164">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="280" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="71">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/fdd65cffa7365ba9ca6ade8a0f3f6e8b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>60ce7c5bb093bf1402d25c650f359a34</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100697">
                    <text>PROCNOSTIC VALUE OF RORSCHACH CRITERIA IN CLINICAL
RESPONSE TO CONVULSIVE THERAPY
ROBERT

L. KAHN, PH.D., and MAX FINK, MD.
ABSTRACT

In this study of the relationship between premorbid personality factors
and clinical responses to convulsive therapy, the Rorschach test was admin—
istered to 87 unselected patients prior to the beginning of EC T. A favorable
clinical response to ECT was observed in subjects whose Rorschach records
revealed a basically conventional and unimaginative personality, generally
lacking in empathy, introspectiveness or facility of verbal communication.
Post-treatment records (of 41 patients) showed no signiﬁcant changes. It is
therefore concluded that Rorschach patterns reﬂect basic personality rather
than prevailing mood or type of illness. These results indicate that Rorschach
patterns can be useful adjuncts in the selection of patients for convulsive
therapy.

In a series of studies of convulsive therapy
we have observed marked individual differences in behavioral response. It has been
shown that the induction of a behavioral
change is related to the presence of altered
brain function;5 Yet, among those with
equivalent degrees of physiologic change,
there are still differences in the clinical patterns of behavior. While some patients become hypomanic, others show paranoid reactions, withdrawal, increased somatization or

expressions of fear.3
We have postulated that personality is one
of the signiﬁcant factors affecting this variability. This hypothesis was tested in a previous study,6 in which each patient’s premorbid personality was evaluated by means of
structured interviews with members of his
family and with the patient himself. We

found that the patients who were rated as
recovered or much improved after electroshock treatment were those with the follow-

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., New York.
'This study was supported in part by Research
Grant M—927 from the National Institute of Mental
Health, US. Public Health Service.
Presented at meeting of the Electroshock Research
Association, San Francisco, May 11, 1958.

ing personality pattern: they were generally
nonempathic, nonintrospective, verbally noncommunicative, highly conventional and
stereotyped, with little imagination or creative capacity.
The concepts derived from these observations lend themselves to study by other methods. In the present study the Rorschach test,
another measure of personality, was used. The
Rorschach technique has particular advantages in that it is both an instrument for testing the patient directly and, at the same time,
a standardized procedure providing data
which can be veriﬁed by others.
The speciﬁc purpose of the present study
was to determine: (1) the relationship between Rorschach ﬁndings and personality aspects previOusly fOund to be signiﬁcant in
family interviews; and (2) the applicability
of Rorschach criteria in the prognosis of the
clinical response to convulsive therapy.
METHOD

The population consisted of 87 consecutive,
unselected patients referred for convulsive
therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. All
patients received electroconvulsive therapy
(with either unidirectional or alternating-current instruments) three times a week. A mini242

Reprinted from Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. I, No. 5, May—June, 1960

�l

960

mum Of 12 treatments was given, with the
staff psychiatrist in charge of the treatment
determining the ﬁnal number on the basis of
clinical criteria. The improvement evaluation,
made by the staff psychiatrist, was based on
the patient’s behavior in the hospital setting
during the period of two to four weeks following termination of treatment. In this manner each patient was rated as either much improved, moderately improved Or unimproved.
As previously described,5 patients were
rated “much improved” if they no longer
showed the symptoms which had brought
them into the hospital; if, in addition, their
doctors felt they were better; and if the
nurses’ notes conﬁrmed such aspects as ability
to sleep without medication, better appetite,
and improved capacity to get along with other
patients and participate in hospital activities.

“Moderately improved” patients typically
showed some symptomatic relief (i.e., acute
depressive features might be gone), but not
the dramatic changes so evident in the ﬁrst
group. Each of these patients continued to
show some noticeable disturbance such as
obsessional thinking, paranoid ideas or somatic preoccupation. In the “unimproved”
patients, change was either not clearly noticeable or only equivocal or transient. Some
showed ﬂuctuations in behavior, at times appearing somewhat improved; but the change
was not sustained, so that by the end of treatment they appeared much the same as before.
The Rorschach test was given to each patient prior to the beginning of electroconvulsive therapy and, in 41 cases, two weeks
after electroconvulsive therapy. The Ror—
schach records were scored according to the
criteria of Klopfer and Kelley.9 Only those
common components were studied, however,
which could be analyzed quantitatively.
These included:
Total number of responses.
2. Per cent whole responses (responses in
which a subject uses all of a card for the formation of a concept).
3. Per cent form responses (responses in
which the shape of the blot is the sole determinant in the concept formation).
1.

243

JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY

Number of content categories included
in the responses.
5. Number of movement responses (references to any action or movement).
6. Per cent popular responses (responses
statistically given most frequently to a particular blot area).
7. Presence or absence of shading responses (responses in which a subject incorporates the darker and lighter aspects of a
blot into his description).
8. Type of movement responses (e.g., human movement, animal movement, etc.).
9. Type of color responses (responses in
which the color in a blot plays a recognizable
role in the concept formation; when form and
color are both signiﬁcant, color-form [CF] or
form-color [FC] is scored, depending on the
predominant inﬂuence).
4.

RESULTS

The relation of the various Rorschach factors to clinical changes following ECT is
shown in Tables I-IV.
In Table I, comparison is made between
those patients who were rated as having a
good clinical response and those whose response was moderate or poor. The much improved patients had signiﬁcantly fewer total
number of responses, and signiﬁcantly more
per cent whole and form responses.
TABLE I
RELATION OF RORSCHACH FACTORS TO CLINICAL
RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(NUMBER, PER CENT WHOLE, PER CENT FORM
RESPONSES)

Number of Responses
Much Improved (38)

Mean

S.D.

13.0

6.7

Moderate or
Unimproved
(48) 19.5 12.8
Per Cent Whole Responses
Much Improved (38) 87.6 21.0

Moderate or
Unimproved
(48)
Per Cent Form Responses
Much Improved (38)
Moderate or
Unimproved

(48)

Signiﬁcant at .05 level
** Signiﬁcant at .01 level
*

24.4

18.2

71.8

19.0

61.9

21.4

Diff.

t,

6.5

2.7 *"

13.

3.0 H

9.9

2.2

*

�244

JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY

An analysis of content categories, move-

ment responses and popular responses (presented in Table II) reveals that there were
signiﬁcantly fewer content categories and
movement responses, and a greater per cent
of popular responses in the Rorschach records
of the much improved patients, as compared
with the records of the unimproved and mod—
erately improved groups.
As shown in Table III, the much improved
patients were also less likely to have any kind
of shading response. This table also presents
an analysis of the different types Of movement
and color responses. Those patients who gave
human~movement (M) responses had the
TABLE II
RELATION OF RORSCHACH FACTORS To CLINICAL
RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(CONTENT CATEGORIES, MOVEMENT AND PER CENT
POPULAR RESPONSES)
t.
Mean
Diff.
SD.

Number of Content Categories
Much Improved (38)
3.8
Moderate or
Unimproved
4.9
(48)
Number of Movement Responses
Much Improved (38)
2.3
Moderate or
Unimproved
4.9
(48)
Per Cent Popular Responses
Much Improved (38) 37.7
Moderate or
Unimproved

(48)

26.6

2.2

2.7
5.1

21.6

poorest clinical responses (28% much improved), while those with no movement of
any kind had the best clinical results (63%
much improved). Patients with animal-movement (FM) or inanimate-movement (In) responses were rated better than those with
human movement but not as well as those
with no movement at all. With respect to
color, those patients with form-color (FC) responses had the poorest results; those with no
color at all, the best—although patients with
CF or C responses did almost as well.
In Table IV the patients are grouped according to combinations of human-movement
(M) and form-color (FC) responses. Of
those who had both M and FC, only 17% were
rated as much improved; 25% were considered
unimproved. In contrast, of those with neither
M nor FC, 66% were much improved and only
3% were unimproved. The
ratings of the group
with one or the other of these determinants
(M or F C) fell in between.
As

2.3

11.1

2.8

14.3

*

Signiﬁcant at .05 level
"* Signiﬁcant at .01 level

MAY-JUNE

mentioned, post-treatment records

were obtained from 41 patients. Comparison
of the pre—treatment and post-treatment records of these patients revealed little change
in the types of responses found. With respect
to human movement (M), for example, 34 of
the records showed no change. In four cases
patients with M responses prior to treatment
H showed none afterward; three other patients
with no M response had such response following treatment. These small changes could be
expected on a chance basis.

TABLE III
RELATION OF RORSCHACH FACTORS TO CLINICAL RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(SHADING, MOVEMENT AND COLOR)
Total No.
Much Improved
Moderately Improved
Un improved
Shading
46
15 (33%)
20 (43%)
11
(24%)
No Shading
40
23 (58%)
15 (38%)
2 ( 5%)

x2

= 8.12

p&lt;.02

Human Movement (M)
Animal Movement (FM)
and/or Inanimate
Movement (In)

39

11

(28%)

19

(49%)

9

(23%)

29

16

(55%)

9

(31%)

4

No Movement

(14%)

19

12

(63%)

FOrm-Color (FC)

7

(37%)

X2

=

10.49

p&lt;.05

Color-Form (CF)
and/or Pure
Color (C)

34

7

(21%)

18

(53%)

9

(26%)

27

16

(59%)

8

(30%)

3

No Color

(11%)

26

16

(62%)

.

(35%)

1

(

.

_

&gt;

x2

= 14.98

p&lt;.01

4%)

�JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY

I960
TABLE IV

RELATION 0F RORSCHACH FACTORS To CLINICAL
RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(HUMAN MOVEMENT AND FORM-COLOR)
Much
Total
Moderately
Human

Improved Unimproved

Movement
(M) and
Form-Color

No.

Improved

(FC)

24
25

4 (17%)
10 (40%)

14 (58%)
9 (36%)

6 (25%)
6 (20%)

38

25 (66%)

12 (32%)

1

FC
Neither M
nor FC

M or

M

and FC vs. M or FC vs. Neither M nor F0:

M

and

X2

WC

vs. Neither M nor FR:

.‘(1’

=

-:

17.82
12.26

(

3%)

p&lt;.01
p&lt;.00]

EPICBISIS

The results of this study conﬁrm the findings previously reported concerning the relationship of personality to clinical response
after convulsive therapy. Patients who had a
good clinical result showed Rorschach records
characterized by few responses and little variety of content, no shading or movement or
color responses, and a high percentage of
whole, form and popular responses. This kind
of record indicates a personality pattern
which is nonempathic, nonintrospective, verbally noncommunicative, highly conventiOnal
and stereotyped and with little manifestation
of imagination or creative capacity. These
characteristics are identical with those described in the previous study based on interviews with family members.6
The prognostic value of the Rorschach as a
clinical instrument is demonstrated by these
data. While there are a number of studies in
the literature on the prognostic value of the
Rorschach in somatic therapy, the results have
not been consistent. Rabin,13 for example,
states that “single Rorschach factors cannot
serve . . . as predictors of improvement.” On
the other hand, Piotrowski12 describes specific prognostic criteria. It is likely that the
difference in point of view, as well as in the
varying criteria offered, reﬂects differences in
the type of population and the variety of somatic treatment observed. Despite these problems, however, those studies 12’ 14 with the
largest series of patients have obtained results
similar to those of the present study. For ex—
ample, their data show that the absence of

245

human movement (M) is more often associated with a favorable clinical response, and
that patients with form-color (FC) responses
are more likely to have a poor result.14
The signiﬁcance of our findings might be
questioned on the basis that we have demonstrated a relationship merely between clinical
response and type of illness, rather than between clinical response and personality pattern. This objection would appear to be sup1“
4’10'1‘1
the
studies
ported by
numerous
which have reported that depressed patients.
the most likely candidates for convulsive
therapy, show no human-movement or color
responses. Our observations, however, substantiated by other studies,1’7!8’“’ Show a
constancy of the Rorschach before and after
treatment, and indicate that the response pattern reﬂects aspects of the basic personality
rather than transient features such as the prevailing mood or type of illness.
REFERENCES

l. Beck,

S. J.: Arch. Neurol. &amp;

1943.
2. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.:

3.
4.
5.

6.

7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.

Psychiat. 50:483.

AMA. Arch. Neurol.

i7 Psychiat, 78:516-525, 1957.
Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: paper presented at
meeting of A.P.A., New York, 1957.
Cuirdham, A.: Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 16:130—
145, 1936.
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.:
AMA. Arch. Neurol. b Psychiat, 76:23—29.
1956.
Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: I. Neurop.sychiat., 1:
45-50, 1959.
Kelley, D. M., Margolis, H., and Barbera, S. E.:
Rorsch. Res. Exch., 5:35-43, 1941.
Kisker, C. W.: I. Aim. (J Soc. Psychol., 37:120—
124, 1942.
Klopfer, B., and Kelley, D.: The Rorschach
Technique, World Book Co., New York, 1942.
Levy, D. M., and Beck, S. J.: Am. J. Orthopsy—
chiat., 4:31—42, 1934.
Pacella, B. L., Piotrowski, Z., and Lewis, N. I).
G: Am. J. Psychiat., 104:83-91, 1947.
Piotrowski, Z.: Psychiat. Quart, 14:267-273.
1940; 15:807—822, 1941.
Rabin, A. 1.: Am. Psychol., 2:284, 1947.
Rees, W. L., and Jones, A. M.: J. Ment. Sc., 97:
681-689, 1951.

H.: Psychodiagnostics, Crune &amp;
Stratton, New York, 1942.
16. Varvel, W. A.: Bull. Menninger Clin., 5:5-12,

15. Rorschach,

1941.

�Pragmatic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical
Beeponse

to Convulsive 'Iherapy

Robert L. Kahn Ph.D. and

From

Max

Fink M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

L.I., NJ.
Aided, in part,

by grant

Public Health Service.

M

927, National

Institute of

Mental Health, U.S.

Presented at the Electroshock Research Association, San Francisco,
May 11, 1958.
5-5-58

�Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Glynical
Response
RObert L.

to Convulsive Therapy

W

Phone and Max Fink

In a series of studies of convulsive therapy

MOD.

we have

observed marked

individual differences in behavioral response. It has been shown that the
induction of a behavioral change is related to the presence of altered
brain function (2, 5). Yet, among those with equivalent degrees of
physiologic change, there are

still

differences in the clinical patterns

of behavior. While some patients became hypcmanic, others show paranoid

reactions, withdrawal, increased somatization or expressions of fear (3).
we have

postulated that personality is one of the significant factors

affecting this variability. This hypothesis has been tested in a previous
study using structured interviews with members of the patient's family (6).

It

was

reported that patients

who were

rated as recovered or

much improved

following treatment were generally non-empathic, non-introspective, non-

verbally communicative, highly conventional and stereotyped, with
imagination or creative capacity.
The concepts

derived from these observations lend themselves to study

by other methods.

used

little

in this study.

The Rorschach

test, another

The Rorschach

measure of

personality,

technique had the advantages both of

testing the patient directly and of being a standardized procedure
providing data which could be verified by otherS.
The

specific purpose of the present study

was

to determine:

1) the relationship between Rorschach findings and personality

aspects previously found to be significant in family

interviews, and

was

�.2.2) the application of Rorschach

criteria in the prognosis of

the clinical response to convulsive therapy.
METHOD:

The

population consisted of 86 consecutive, unselected patients

referred for convulsive therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. All patients
received electrocommlsive therapy three times a week, using either

midirectional or alternating current instruments.

A

minimmn

of 12

treatments was given, with the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the

treatment determining the final number

on the

The improvement exraluation was made by

basis of clinical criteria.

the supervising psychiatrist

the patient's behavior in the hospital setting in a period
to four weeks following the termination of treatment. In this

and was based on

of two

patient

manner each

was

rated as either

much improved,

moderately improved

criteria previously described (5).
Each patient was given the Rorschach test in the standard mnner in
the week prior to treatment. This data constituted the main focus of this

or unimproved, using

study.

To

determine

however, the

of treatment.

test

was

stability

of the Rorschach pattern with treatment,

readministered two weeks following the termination

�RESULTS :

A.

Relatim of Rorschach Factors to Clinical
The Rorschach

records were scored according to the criteria

of Klopfer and Kelley (9). (July these
however, which could be analyzed

total

Change:

common components were

studied,

quantitatively. These included

of responses, 2) per cent whole reSponses, 3) Per
cent form responses, )4) number of content categories included in the

1)

number

responseS,

5) number of movement responses,

6) per cent popular

responses, 7) presence or absence of shading responses,
movement reaponses, and

8) type of

9) type of color responses.

In Table I the comparison is

made between

those patients

who were

clinical response and those whose reSponse was
moderate or poor. The much improved patients had significantly fewer
number of responses, and significantly more per cent whole and form
rated as having a

responses .

good

�TABLE

I

Relation of Rorschach Factors to Clinical Response in Convulaive Therapy:
Number, Per Cent Whole, Per Cent Form Responses

Number

Mean

§_:_D_o

(38)

13.0

6.7

(h8)

19.5

12.8

of Resmnses

Much Improved

Moderate or
UnimProved

Diff.
6.5

L
2.7

*‘hL

Per Cent Whole Resmnse
Much Improved

(38)

37.6

21.0

Moderate or
Unimproved

(ha)

2h.h

18.2

(38)

71.8

19.0

(ha)

61.9

21 .h

13 .2

3.00

*4:"

Per Cent Form Resoonse
Much

anrorved

Moderate or
Unmproved

9.9

2.2 *

as

Significant at .05 level

*"‘

Significant at .01 level

�-5significantly fewer content categories in the Rorschach
records in the much improved patients. (TableJI). They also demonstrated
There were

fewer movement and a greater per cent of popular responses, than the
unimproved and moderately improved groups.

TABIEII

of
have
kind
to
less
any
likely
patients
shading responses, as shown in Table III. In this table the comparison is
also shown for the different types of movement and. color responses. Those
patients who had human movement responses (M) had the poorest clinical
were also

The much improved

had the best

results

inanimate movement
movement

improved), while those with no movement of any kind

(28% much

reaponses

(63% much

(m)

improved). Patients with animal

(FM)

or

reaponses were rated better than those with human

but not as well as those without any movement at

all.

With

respect to color, those patients with form color (F0) reaponses had the
poorest results, “those with no color at all the best, although patients
with

CF

or

C

responses did almost as well.
TABLE

III

�.6.
TABLEII

Relation of Rorschach Factors to Ciinical Response in Convulsive ’Iherapy:
Content Categories, Movement and Per Cent Poplgar Responses

Number

$.13.

(38)

3.8

2.2

(he)

h.9

2.3

Diff.

of Content Categories

Much Improved
Mod

Mean

erate or

Unimproved

iﬂ,

1.1

2.1

2.6

**
2.7

11.1

*

Number of Moveme‘ot Responses
Much Improved

(38)

2.3

2.7

Moderate or
Unimproved

(hi3)

h.9

5.1

(38)

37.7

21.6

(h8)

26.6

1h.3

Per Cent Pomar Responses
Much Improved

Moderate, or
Unimproved

* Significant
**

2.8

V.

at .05 level

Signiﬁcant at .01 level

�$3

g

3

35
N

8.V.

$8

335

m

a

m

$8

o
menu;H

m

Amaav

305

m

H

SVQ

”ummnony

wmbommﬁH

NH.w

32

n

n

0

«N

«x

NM

QQOJH

mmeazpaoo

gs
ca
Nampwhmcos

$5

€09

“Rm:

N.

3

a

m

Ammmv

Ammov

Amawv

Ammmv

HH

ma

NH

N

0H

RS

Amwv

8d

Amos

ﬁg:

“many

3.5

ma

3

m

383

Rammv

,mH

mu

$5

85

8

noaoo
omcbmmmm

HHH

cam
[chlmnm¢ﬂ
Hmowawao

unmsmboz

on

\xﬁmmmV
cabommgH

Awmev

myopowm

ﬁnﬁm

sou:

ma

nomnomnom

mo

mbwpmamm

I!

RE

AEhv

Aumv

upmaﬁuu¢m

pumsmboz

Amuv

ASV
chum

303%:

on

such
pamembnx

gamma
pmoswboz

wﬁuﬂm

02

g

noaoo

hoaoo_suom

n0\unm

noxnnm
amewq&lt;

noaoo

hoaoo

oz

oz

�-8In Table IV the patients were grouped according to combinations
of

H

and

rated as

FC

responses.

01‘

those

who had both

much improved and 25% were

of those with neither

M

nor

M

and

PC

only

1775

were

considered mimproved. In contrast,

EC, 66% were much improved and

only

3%

were

improved. The ratings of the group with one or the other of these

deteminants

fell in

between.

unnuumm
TABLES

IV

W...‘.
B. chnErison of Pre- and Posttreatment Records

Posttreatment records were obtained from hl patients. These
showed

little

difference from the types of responses found prior to

treatment. .fith respect to

human movement (M),

for example,

recorﬂs shared no change. In four cases patients with
none afterwards;
follow-ring

three other patients with no

treatment.

M

M

3h of the

responses showed

response had such response

�«a.
TABLE IV

Relation of Rorschach Factors to Clinical Response in Convulsive Therapy:
Human Movement SM) and Form

Color

$130)

Rorschach
___N__

M

and

M

or

FC

F0

Neither

M

M

nor

FC

and FC/Neither Mmr

Much Improved

(21:)

h

(25)

10

(ho%)

(38)

25

(6655

FC

(17%)

Moderateg ImEroved

W
6

(25%)

(36%)

6

(20%)

(32%)

1

(3%)

1h

(58%)

9
12

x2

=

x2

- 12.26

17.82

p

&lt;

p.&lt;;

.01
.001

�.10..
DISCUSSION:

this study confirm the ﬁndings previously reported
concerning the relationship of personality to clinical response after
convulsive therapy. Patients who had a good clinical result showed
The

results

of

Rorschach records characterized by few responses and

content, no shading or

movement or

little variety

of

color reaponse, and a high percentage

of whole, form and popular reSponses.

This pattern indicates a personality

pattern which i s non-empathic, non-introspective, non-verbally cormunicative,
highly conventional and stereotyped and with little manifestation of
imagination or creative capacity. These aspects are identical with these
described in the previous study based on interviews with family members (6).
The

prognostic value of the Rorschach as a clinical instrument is

demonstrated by

this data. ifhile there are a

number

of studies in the

literature on the prognostic value of the Rorschach in somatic therapy,
the results have not been consistent. T:Jhile Rabin (3), for example, has
stated that "single Rorschach factors cannot serve ... as predictors of
improvement ," Piotrowski has described specific prognostic criteria (12).
It is likely that the difference in point of view, as well as in the
varying criteria offered, reflects differences in the type of population
and the varieties of somatic treatment observed. Despite these problerns,
however, the results of those studies with the largest series of patients
report similar observations to those in the present study. For
example, their data shows that the absence of human movement (M) is more
(12,

114)

often associated with a favorable clinical response, and that patients

�.uwith

F0

responses are more likely to have a poor result (1h).

The

that

significance of these results might

be

questioned on the basis

clinical response and
type of illness rather than ﬂue personality pattern. In this regard
numerous studies have reported that depressed patients, the most likely
candidates for convulsive therapy, show no human movement or color
we

have demonstrated a

reSponses (h, 10, 15, 16).
by other

relationship

Our

studies (1, 7, 8, 11),

after treatment,

between

observations, however, substantiated
show a constancy

of the Rorschach before

indicate that the reSponse pattern reflects
aspects of the basic personality rather than transient features as the

and

prevailing

mood

and

or type of illness.

�SUMMARY.AND CONCLUSION:

1. Eighty-seven unselected cases referred for convulsive therapy
were administered a Rorschach

test prior to,

and two weeks following,

treatment.

2.

A

favorable clinical response was observed in subjects with

pretreatment records characterized by few responses, a small number of
content categories, absence of shading, movement and color responses

(particularly lack of

human movement and form

color), and a high percentage

of whole, form and popular reSponses.
This data confirms previous observations on the

3.

personality factors to clinical

outcome

relation of

in convulsive ﬂierapy.

favorable evaluation is most likely in patients

who

A

are predominantly

non-empathic, non-introSpective, nonaverbally communicative, highly

conventional and stereotyped, with

little

imagination or creative capacity.

significant

change

in Rorschach records obtained

There was no

A.

It is

that pretreatment Rorschach patterns
in this population reflect the basic personality rather than the prevailing

following treatment.
mood

concluded

or type of illness.
5.

can be

patterns, by providing a set of prognostic criteria,
useful adjuncts in the selection of patients for convulsive

therapy.

Rorschach

�.13-

2.‘

Fink,

3.

and Katm, R.L.: Relation of
Electroencephalographic Delta
Activity to Behavioral Response in Ele ctroshoclc, A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. 8: P_s,zchiat., IQ: 516-525 (1957).

A

M.

Behavioral Patterns with Induced States of
tered Brain Function, Div. Meeting A.P.A. (New York 1957).
:

14.

Guirdham, A.: Diagnosis of Depression by
Med. Psycho . _1_§: 130-115 (1936).

5.

Kahn,

the Rorschach Test, Brit. J.

R.L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Bnprovement in Electroshock, A.M.A.
Arch.
Neurol.
and Psychiat. 1g: 23-29 (1956).

,: Personality

7.
8.

9.
10.
11.
12.

Factors in Behavioral Reaponse to
Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neural. (in press)
Kelley, D.M., Margolis, H. and Barbara, S.E.:
of
the
Stability
Rorschach Method as Demonstrated in Electric Comrulsive
Therapy
Cases, Rorsch. Res. Exch., 5: 35-143 (19M).
Kisker, G.W.: A Projective Approach to Personality Patterns
During
Insulin-Shock and Metrazol-Convulsive Therapy, J. Abn. &amp;
Soc.
21: 120“12)4 (19112).

mo:

Klopfer, B. and Kelley, D.: The Rorschach Technigue. (World Book
Co. , New York 19h2).

levy,

D.M. and Beck

Psychosis,

Am.

S.J.:

Rorschach Test in Manic-Depressive
J. Orthops‘gchiat” ll: 314:2 (19311).
The

Pacella, B.L., Piotrowski, Z. and Lewis, N.D.C.: The Effects of
Electric Convulsive Therapy on Certain Personality Traits
in
Psychiatric Patients, Am. J. Psvchiat. 1011: 83—91 (19M).

Piotrwski, Z.:

A

Simple Experimental Device

for the Prediction

Quart., lg: 267-273 (1910);
Aid in the Insulin Shock Treatment of
Schizophrenia,
Psychiat.
Quart. 15: 807—822 (19141).

�REFERENCES

13. Rabin, A.I: Effects of Electric Shock Treatment upon Some Aspects
of Personality and Intellect, Am. PsEhol. g: 281; (1911?).

lb.

Rees, W.L. and Jenes, A.M.: An Evaluation of the Rorschach Test as
a Prognostic Aid in the Treatment of Schizophrenia by Insulin
Coma Therapy, Electronarcosis, Electroconvulsive Therapy and
Leucotomy, J. Ment. Sci. 97: 681-689 (1951).

15. Rorschach, H.: Psydhodiagnostics (Grune

Stratton,

The Rorschach Test in Psychotic and
Manninger 01111., S: 5'12 (19,41)-

16. Varvel, MtA.:

Bull.

&amp;

New

York, 19h2).

Neurotic Depressions,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2794">
                <text>Prognostic value of Rorschach criteria in clinical response to convulsive therapy. J Neuropsychiatr. 1960 May-Jun; 1:242-5.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2795">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2796">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-48-014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2797">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2798">
                <text>Kahn, Robert; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2799">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2800">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2801">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprint from Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. I, No. 5, May—June, 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2802">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2803">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74482">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81043">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87604">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94165">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="281" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="72">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/1e8c795fb4f587faa06c7827a2d53d1f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8dbcc77f9a018fd443642f4f0191daf3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100698">
                    <text>\Lz.

MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS BY ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION

J.

JAFFE, M.D., H. ESECOVER, M.D., R. L. KAHN,
and M., FINK, M.D.
Glen Oaks, N. Y.

PHD.

This report is derived from a supervisory seminar in which the
effects of convulsive treatment upon psychotherapeutic transactions
were studied. The therapist’s observations have been described in
a previous publication (1) . The present paper describes the process
from the frame of reference of the supervisor and supervisory group.
It is intended as a complementary set of observations of this combined therapy. In addition, concurrent neurophysiologic data are
included, of which both therapist and supervisor were unaware.
This additional frame of reference may broaden the understanding
of certain phenomena in the patient-therapist, and therapist-supervisor interactions. Our purpose is to demonstrate that the introduction of a measurable physiologic variable is a useful method for the
investigation of the psychotherapeutic process.
The histories of the patients under study were given in the
above-mentioned publication (1). In the following report, a detailed analysis of one of the cases" discussed in that paper is presented as most illustrative of the modiﬁcation of interpersonal
transactions by altered brain function. The patient, a 44—year-old
widow and mother of a 12-year-old son, had been admitted to the
hospital with symptoms of depression, anxiety, anorexia, varied
physical complaints, and feelings of unreality and isolation. In
her psychotherapeutic sessions she would reiterate her difﬁculties
in a complaining pattern, repetitiously illustrating her inadequacy.
During a three-month-period no improvement occurred and a course
of electroshock therapy was recommended. At this juncture the
patient was included in the present study.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by the Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry (56151) and grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service.
The assistance of Miss Esther Sanders and Mrs. Anita Bellow, who participated actively in the seminars, is gratefully acknowledged.
:

*

Case

#3, G.

C.

46

Reprinted from

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY, Vol.
pages 46—55. January, 1961.

XV, No. 1,

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

47

The setting was a weekly multi-disciplinary supervisory conference. Included in the group were: (a) the therapist (H.E.),
(at the time a senior resident in psychiatry), who presented the case
material; (b) a social worker who reported the response of the
patient’s family; (c) a psychoanalyst (J .J .), Who dealt mainly
with the didactic aspects of psychotherapeutic technique; (d) a
psychologist (R.K.), who studied the cases independently; and (e)
a neuropsychiatrist (M.F.), who coordinated the discussion. The
last two members were aware of the concomitant changes in physiologic measures, and although this information inﬂuenced their
questions, the data were not introduced at these conferences. The
actual somatic treatment was performed by a physician who was
not a participant at the meetings.
The procedure was informal, with the therapist taking the lead
in presenting his verbatim notes of the psychotherapeutic sessions.
The order of the case reports and the amount of time devoted to
each was not prescribed. Following the spontaneous case presentation, more directive questioning was introduced, aimed at clarifying and relating the information presented by therapist and social
worker.
Observations made during the period of somatic therapy are depicted in the accompanying chart. During the 94 days of supervision, two different forms of somatic treatment were utilized. This
procedure was part of a hospital-wide convulsive-subconvulsive control study then in progress, in which therapists were unaware of the
introduction of subconvulsive phases of treatment.
.
For the ﬁrst treatment period (27 days) the patient received
subconvulsive electro-stimulation with pentothal premedication.
Twelve such treatments were given at the rate of three per week.
No changes in the quantitative measures of EEG slow wave activity
(2) were manifest during this time. This period served to establish a baseline for the behavioral observations and the expectancies
of the staff.
In the second treatment period (29th to 59th day), grand mal
convulsions were induced three times weekly for a total of 14 treatments. In that period, minimal degrees of EEG change were recorded on the 37th day, and moderate degrees were shown on three
subsequent recordings. Twelve days after the termination of convulsive therapy, EEG slow wave activity was considerably diminished. This information was not available tothe therapist or the
supervisor until after the conclusion of the study.

�‘

arr-ﬁr».

48

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
EFFECT OF CHANGING BRAIN FUNCTION
ON PSYCHOTHERAPY
SUPERVISORS
REPORT OF

DISCOURAGEMEHT.

AVOIDINCE

FRUSTRATION.
EXHORTATION

APlST'S ATTITUDE
TNEFMPIST'S REPORT

'SLIGNT

CHANGE'

(MINIMIZEDI

DEPRESSED. couPanmG.
SELF—REPROACHFUL,

OF FATIENT'S

A" ITUDE

HELPLESS,

HEW COMPLAINTS
PARTICIPATION IN

ACTIVITIES

I I

mnznlon
}
DEPRESSION

I

I

"ORE COMFORTABLE,
EASIER TO RELATE.
POSITIVE FEELINGS

CAUTIOUS,
SOLICITOUS

CHEERFUL, PRIMPING,

SELF-

CONVERSATIONALJRUSTING.
AFFECTIONATE. ADULATING

I
I

I

I

“APPRAISAL.
SUPPORTIVE,
DETACHED

ASSERTIVE.
OBJECTIVE. INDEPENDENT;
ANXIOUS

I I

ANXIOUS

.. .—

I __

__

20~
PAGES

nous
Unaware
5553101:

m

10'

0

WW

.........

26EE 6

". nu: nun)
scum

TREATMENT

°"""°°""‘
I-COWULSIVE

n'0-

:—

-

_-..

B_|—|_I____J__J_l—J_L_'.l—L—L——L—J—-l——I—-—J___
85 70 75 80
55

0

5

DAYS

l0

[5

20

FROM

60
40 45 50
ONSET OF SOMATIC THERAPY
25

30

35

The patient was seen in psychotherapeutic sessions three times
weekly throughout her hospitalization. While the therapist was
he
somatic
was unaware that
of
treatment,
the
concurrent
aware
subconvulsive stimulation was given initially, and of the change to
convulsive therapy on the 29th day.
Changes in the patient-therapist relationship as reported in the
supervisory meetings are summarized in the chart and are detailed
below.

Supervisors’ Notes
Ist to 19th day: During the ﬁrst three weeks the therapist did
not discuss this patient in the supervisory group. Other patients
occupied the allotted time, in spite of a resolution to consider each
patient weekly.
In retrospect, the failure to report this patient’s progress canstituted a pattern of avoidance. Somatic therapy had not modified
the patient ’3 ward behavior or the doctor-patient relationship. Both
were the same as in the initial months of hospitalization. The neurophysiologic indices were unchanged.
20th to 33rd day: The case history was ﬁrst presented in the
meeting on the 20th day. The therapist reported no alteration in

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

4:9

the patient ’3 clinging, whining, helpless attitude throughout the
preceding three months. Efforts to explore her problems in living
were blocked by physical complaints and by recitals of guilt, selfreproach, and feelings of failure. He was left little opening for
comment.

In the three supervisory meetings during this period the group

atmosphere was one of discouragement whenever this case was presented. The therapist reported impulses to exhort the patient to
participate in ward activities, and reacted to her professions of helplessness with the feeling that “she wasn’t trying.”
The family reported that the patient considered her doctor “too
young,” reﬂecting her attitude of reproach toward those who were
unable to help her. He, in turn, felt that she was “throwing up
her hands and giving up.”
The therapeutic impasse was empathically communicated to the
group by the case report. The transactions during this period were
typically those leading to referral of depressed patients for somatic
(i.e., nan-verbal) treatment. They may be characterized as follows.
Verbal methods of therapy are incompatible with the affective mode
of communication adopted by such patients (3'). The doctor’s
efforts to help are not met by a collaborative response, and he feels
frustrated. The insatiable quality of the patient’s demands also
calls forth defensive reactions in the therapist.
During this period the mode of somatic treatment was changed
from subconvulsive to convulsive. The clinical status and therapeutic relationship, however, continued unaltered. Perhaps the lack
of the expected response of somatic treatment contributed to the
therapist’s discouragement. He assumed that convulsions had been
induced from the outset, and his past experience had led him to
anticipate a clinical response by the fourth week of treatment (2).
34th to 42nd day: In the meeting that took place on the 38th
day, a “slight change” was reported. Although the patient was
still “crying, ranting, raving” in therapy sessions, it was also noted
that “she participates in activities a little bit more, but not much.”
The therapist and the group discounted this change in social relationships. The ﬁrst spontaneous complaint of memory difﬁculty
was also reported.
The ﬁrst evidence of neurophysiologic change appeared at this
time. The EEG taken the day prior to this meeting showed a signiﬁcant increase in slow wave activity.

�50

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY

43rd to 63rd day: In the meeting on the 45th day the therapist
reported a full psychotherapeutic session for the ﬁrst time. He described the patient as “brighter,” “with a little more rouge and
lipstick” and “smiling.” Two days later her mood was noted as
“euphoric.” Physical complaints ceased and were replaced by complaints of forgetting. The therapist described this as a “cessation
of complaining.” Concomitantly, the affective mode of expression
was replace-d by a more intellectualized pattern. Instead of stating
“I have to cling to my mother,” the patient said “I’m dependent
on my mother for many things.” This was described as “talking
about her dependency in a different way.” Another change in
communication pattern evoked ‘ ‘uncanny’ ’ feelings in the therapist.
He stated that the patient “mentions things we had talked about as
if it were new information.” With these changes, there was a concomitant increase in the patient ’s sociability and participation in
hospital activities, and a diminution of her clinging to the family
and therapist. The supervisory group atmosphere also changed—
from one of hopelessness to well-being, with increased joking, smiling, and animated participation.
On the 52nd day the therapist reported that the patient dressed
seductively and applied fresh make-up for her sessions. She expressed feelings of trust and enjoyment of the meetings. The doctor
experienced similar emotions, and was eager to report the progress
of this patient. She was now “upset” because she couldn’t recall
her problems, and the therapist noted that he was inclined to a
directive “remembering” role. She complained of memory loss and
attempted to relate in a friendly, realistically gratifying way to
prevent further psychologic exploration.
A greater detachment from her family was expressed. Social improvement continued. The family stated that she no longer considered the doctor “too young,” but rather a “guiding angel.”
The abrupt, gross change in the clinical picture paralleled the
development of maximum physiologic change. The three EEG- records during this period showed a moderate degree of slow- wave
activity. The advent of positive feelings elicited reciprocal emotions in the therapist which were cammunicated in the supervisory
sessions. The aﬂect was empathically reﬂected in members of the
conference group. (The clinical picture resembled that of a “transference cure.” )
It is of interest that a change from “ physical” to “memory”

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

51

complaints was described as a “cessation of complaining.” Perhaps
the memory deﬁcit, an expected concomitant of convulsive therapy,
is more acceptable to the staff because it is understandable. They
feel a responsibility for this symptom and can authoritatively reassure the patient that it will be transient. An aﬁectionate dependency may also be more tolerable than a hostile one, especially when
accompanied by gratifying social improvement. The language
changes are indicative of a more detached, intellectualized cammunication of familiar content (4). The patient now “talked about”
rather than emoting or “acting out.” This new language pattern
was more in keeping with her background of college education, and
the therapist’s implicit expectations (5‘). In contrast to her prior
mode of communication it seemed to be more compatible with a psychoanalytioally-oriented approach. The concomitant development
of memory diﬁiculty, however, perpetuated the essentially non-insightful therapeutic situation.
64th to 72nd day: This period followed the termination of somatic treatment. The patient reported a “sudden feeling of selfawareness.” Euphoria and memory difﬁculty were no longer Observed, and an anxious state supervened. Psychotherapeutic sessions were characterized by more critical appraisal of her life
situation. For the ﬁrst time the doctor gave the patient extra time
in the sessions. The group voiced some concern that she was “slipping back.” When the patient occasionally talked positively about
career, emancipation from mother, and so forth, the therapist felt
called upon to respond optimistically, rather than to explore. There
was a revival of Old complaints.
At this point, the supervisor and therapist reviewed a tape-res
corded therapy session. A recurrence of the earlier verbal patterns
could indeed be identiﬁed. However, these occurred in circumscribed fashion rather than throughout the interview. The events
antecedent tO such periods were examined and the adaptive nature
of the recurrent affective patterns became apparent.
The EEG record during this period showed a considerable decrease in slow wave activity. There was a concomitant reestablishment of some of the communication patterns which preceded the
period of altered brain function. The conference group responded
with anxiety, reﬂected in the solicitousness of the therapist in prolonging the sessions.
The phenomenon observed in the supervisory group, for lack of

�52

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY

Statedependency.”
“electroshock
be
called
better
term, may
a
ments were made in the meeting such as “she’s slipping back,”
“needs more treatments” and “improvement not holding up.’
These statements imply that the hostile- dependent pattern was being
rather
depression,”
“a
nosologic
entity,
as
a
thought of primarily
than a mode of human relatedness. Perhaps because behavioral
it
now
alone,
means
psychologic
been
by
effected
had
not
change
seemed totally dependent upon the alteration in cerebral function.
The change in interaction was conceptualized as the result of the
brain syndrome, and not as a function of the doctor-patient relationship. Hence the group’s uneasiness on the sporadic reappearance of preconvulsive patterns. The detailed examination of a taperecorded session revealed the adaptive function of this more circumscribed occurrence of the complaints, and the phenomenon of
“electroshock dependency” was not observed in subsequent group
meetings.
73rd to 94th day: During this period a more stable psychotheraindebecame
The
more
patient
apparent.
was
relationship
peutic
assertiveselfand
of
compliance
discussed
problems
and
pendent
ness. Although her attitude remained positive and collaborative,
her adulation of the therapist diminished. In one session she said
She
was
at
you.”
I
unless
won’t
better
get
I
angry
get
“Maybe
less elated. She moved from the closed ward to an open cottage,
and began to work in the hospital library. Occasional episodes of
overt disturbance were treated by the therapist without solicitude.
His attitude was one of interest, support and detachment. They
discussed plans for discharge and outpatient treatment.
Subsidence of the changes in brain function resulting from convulsive therapy permitted a new integration of the doctor-patient
relationship. The pattern of a conventional psychotherapeutic
situation appeared, which differed both from the original negative
and the artiﬁcially induced positive relationships.

Therapist’s Notes as an Index of Relatedness
Following the conclusion of the study, another index of the psydescribed
Rioch
has
investigated.
was
relationship
chotherapeutic
staﬁof
index
notes
staff
of
as
an
volume
of
the
the use
progress
in
his
notes
a
had
The
kept
therapist
interaction
(6).
patient
standard stenographic notebook throughout the treatment. A gross
count of the number of pages of notes per session was made, and

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

53

is represented graphically on the chart. No written notes were
taken during occasional tape-recorded sessions, and these are omitted
from the chart. The change in the relationship is apparent from

the abrupt and persistent increase in note-taking from the 44th
day. This coincided with the ﬁrst gross change in the electroencephalogram. The notes taken by the two other psychiatrists in
the supervisory meetings followed a similar pattern (not illustrated), although with peaks of note-taking at the onset and again
at the waning of induced neurophysiologic change.
DISCUSSION

This report describes an investigation of psychotherapy when
somatic therapy is introduced as an adjunctive procedure. One
difﬁculty in the objective study of psychotherapeutic transactions
is the absence of a quantiﬁable and controllable variable. Adjunctive therapies, somatic and pharmacologic, provide such a variable.
They produce alteration in behavior as well as measurable neurophysiologic changes (2, 7). This opportunity has been utilized in
the present project. For example, one mode of adaptation to
altered brain function is a euphoric type of relatedness (8). The
occurrence of the phenomenon in this case permitted us to observe
how induced alternation of positive and negative attitudes call forth
similar attitudes in therapist and supervisor. Another illustration
was the discounting of the earliest clinical change during the 34th to
42nd day of treatment. The electroencephalogram indicated the
signiﬁcance of this beginning change in the relationship. The fact
that it was minimized demonstrates the obscuring effects of stalf expectancies. Finally, the alteration of brain function was accompanied by a change in complaint pattern, that is, from physical
symptoms to memory difﬁculty. This resulted in a new form of
the dependency relationship (43rd to 63rd day) which was experienced differently by the supervisory staff, with resultant change in
their feelings about the patient. This effect was also observed in
the patient ’s family group.
The observations also illustrate a phenomenon peculiar to supervision in group settings. We have called attention to the emotional
atmosphere of the group, which seemed to ﬂuctuate in accordance
with the therapeutic relationship being described. Hora (9) suggests that the supervisee may communicate the affective aspects of
his experience with the patient non-verbally in the supervisory meet-

�54

AMERICAN JOURNAL

or

PSYCHOTHERAPY

ing. His formulation is that “The supervisee unconsciously identiﬁes with the patient and involuntarily behaves in such a manner
as to elicit in the supervisor those very emotions which he himself
experiences while working with the patient, but was unable to convey verbally.” He also describes the diﬂusion of this affect in the
other participants of a supervisory seminar. Thus he reports that
“This observation has been subjected to repeated tests in seminars
where it was possible to verify the supervisor’s emotional perceptions by matching them with the emotional reactions of the other
participants present.” Our work supports such observations and
suggests the potential fruitfulness of studies of group dynamics
in supervisory seminars.
We have noted one change in relatedness resulting from the
somatic therapy that had a disjunctive effect upon the relationship
(45th day). The patient mentioned familiar topics “as if it were
new information.” The “uncanny” quality produced in the therapist and supervisor resulted from the temporary feeling that the
therapeutic relationship had no history. Rapport in intensive psychotherapy depends to a great extent upon an accumulated body of
shared information. Both doctor and patient take this for granted,
and the inability to rely upon it may affect rapport adversely.
Other patients in the study, not discussed in this paper, showed
different patterns of response. These included transient paranoid
episodes, hyperactivity, erotic, exhibitionistic, and other forms of
“acting-out” which were disruptive to the concurrent psychotherapy. In each case the induced behavioral change was related
to the personality of the individual patient and occurred at the
time of changing brain function (2). Also in each case there were
concomitant changes in behavior in the supervisory group.
Our experience also highlights some of the diﬂiculties that may
develop when the two modes of treatment are used concurrently.
Intensive psychotherapy is based upon the conviction of the eﬂicacy
of verbal communication for improvement of the patient ’s adaptation. In the case reported, a trial period of psychotherapy had been
ineffective in altering clinical behavior. The introduction of somatic treatment represented a decision against exclusive reliance
upon interpersonal communication as the therapeutic instrument.
When cerebral change was maximal, a “social recovery” occurred,
apparently unrelated to interpretation of psychodynamic factors.
When the induced neurophysiologic changes subsided, a recurrence

�[MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

'

55

of earlier communication patterns led the therapist to doubt that
the improvement could be perpetuated by interpersonal means
alone. To some extent this phenomenon was an expression of differing conceptual and linguistic systems inherent in the two modes
of therapy. It is related to the philosophical dichotomy described
by Hollingshead and Redlich (10) between practitioners using
somatic and analytically-oriented therapies.
SUMMARY

A study of concurrent somatic therapy and psychotherapy is
reported, in which simultaneous observations of serial changes in
brain function, the psychotherapeutic relationship and social adaptations were made. The observations in a group supervisory seminar reﬂected the pattern of neurophysiologic alteration.
It is concluded that the introduction of a measurable physiologic
variable is a useful method for investigation of interpersonal relationships.
1.
2.

3.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Eseeover, H., Jaffe, J. and Kahn, R. L.: Psychotherapeutic Techniques
with Electroshock Patients. J. Hillside Hosp, 7: 17, 1958.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral
Resp0nse in Electroshock. Quantitative Serial Studies. A.M.A.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 78: 516, 1957.
Cohen, M. 8., Baker, G., Cohen, R. A., Fromm-Reichmann, F., and Weigert,
E.: An Intensive Study of Twelve Cases of Manic-Depressive Psychosis. Psychiatry, 17: 103, 1954.
Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock
Therapy. In Psychopathology of Communication, P. Hoch and J.
Zubin, Eds., Grune &amp; Stratton, 1958.
Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital. A.M.A. Arch.
Gen. Psychiat, 1: 565, 1959.
Rioch, D. McK.: Research in Psychiatry: Certain Problems and Developments in Multi-Disciplinary Studies. T. W. Salmon Lecture, New York
'

4.

5.

6.

Academy of Medicine, 1957.
7. Fink, M.: A Uniﬁed Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies.
J. Hillside Hosp, 6: 197, 1957.
8. Fink, M., Kahn, R. L. and Green, M.: Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. Dis Nero. Sys., 19: 113, 1958.
9. Hora, T.: Phenomenology of the Supervisory Process. Am. J. Psychother.,
11: 769, 1957.
10. Hollingshead, A. B. and Redlich, F. 0.: Social Class and Mental Illness.
J. Wiley &amp; Son, New York, 1958.

��Modification of Psychotherapeutic and Supervisory
Relationships by Altered Brain Function

J. Jaffe,

M.D., B. Esecover, M.D.
R.L. Kahn, Ph.D. a M. Fink, M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.
From

Aided, in part, by the Foundations' Fund for Research in
Psychiatry (56-151) and grant M-927 of the National Institute of
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health

Service.

assistance of Miss Esther Sanders and Mrs. Anita Bellow,
caseworkers in the Department of Social Services, who participated
actively in the seminars, is gratefully acknowledged.
The

VII: 11-15-58

�Modification of Psychotherapeutic and Supervisory
Relationships by Altered Brain Function
seminar
from
a
supervisory
derived
is
psychotreatment
upon
convulsive
of
which
the
effects
in
The
studied.
therapist's
were
communication
therapeutic
observations have been described in a previous publication
(2), and are based mainly upon his personal experiences
with the patients. The present paper describes the process
intended
as
is
of
frame
reference.
It
from the supervisor;s
combined
complex
of
this
observations
of
a complementary set
data
is
neurophysiologic
concurrent
In
addition,
therapy.
unaware.
were
and
supervisor
both
which
of
therapist
included,
This additional level of observation seems to account for
and
the
in
patient-therapist,
certain clinical phenomena
This report

therapist-supervisor interactions.
Our purpose is to demonstrate that the introduction
method
a
useful
is
variables
of measurable physiological
for the investigation of the psychotherapy process.

�METHOD:

setting was a weekly multi-disciplinary conference
composed of five people, and thus departed from the conventional
supervisory situation. The group included: a) the therapist
(H.E.), at the time a senior resident in psychiatry, who
presented the case material; b) a social worker assigned to
The

the cases selected for study, who reported the on-going
response of the patient's family; c) a psychoanalyst (J.J.),
who dealt mainly with the didactic aspects of psychotherapeutic
technique; d) a psychologist (R.L.K.), who had studied the
cases independently; and e) a neuropsychiatrist (M.F.), who
coordinated the discussion. The last two members were aware
of concomitant changes in the physiologic measures, and although

this information influenced their questions, the data was not
introduced at these conferences. The actual somatic treatment
was performed by a physician who was not a participant at the
meetings.
procedure was informal. The therapist took the lead
in presenting verbatim notes of his psychotherapy sessions
with five patients receiving combined therapy. The order of
The

the case presentations and the amount of time devoted to each
was not prescribed. Following the spontaneous case reports,

directive questioning was introduced, aimed at clarifying
and relating the information presented by the therapist and the
social worker. Although roles were defined, the atmosphere was
one of inquiry in which no participant claimed a definitive
answer to the problem under investigation.
more

.

�m

SUBJECT:

case histories of the subjects of this study were
In
a
this
(2).
report
in
a
publication
previous
reported
most
#3
as
Case
clearly
of
is
presented
detailed analysis
illustrative of the modification of interpersonal transactions
The

widow
old
year
by
patient,
and mother of a 12 year old son, had been admitted to the
hospital because of depression, anxiety, anorexia, multiple
somatic complaints, and feelings of being "unreal" and isolated.
In therapeutic sessions she would reiterate her difficulties
'in a persistent complaining pattern, as illustrations of her

altered brain function.

This

a hh

After a three month period of
psychotherapy without alteration in the clinical condition it
was decided co utilize a course of electroshock therapy. At
this time the patient was included in the present project.
More detailed description of the psychotherapy sessions is
included under "Observations" below.

failures

and inadequacies.

SOMATIC THERAPY:

during the intercurrent somatic
therapy are depicted in the accompanying chart. During the
9b days of supervision two different forms of somatic treatment

'Serial observations

made

This procedure was part of a convulsivesubconvulsive control study then in progress, in which the
therqmd.was unaware of the introduction of the subconvulsive

were

utilized.

phase of treatment.

�-hFor the

first

period the patient received subconvulsive
electrostimulation with pentothal premedicaticn. Twelve such
treatments were given at the rate of three per week. No
manifest changes in quantitative analyses of the degree of
the
EEG (3) were observed during this time:
in
delta activity
This period established a baseline for the behavioral observations and the staff eXpectancies.
Grand mal convulsions were induced from the 29th to the
59th days of somatic treatment, also at a rate of three per
week for a total of 1h treatments. In this convulsive period,
minimal degrees of electroencephalographic delta activity
appeared on the 37th day, and moderate degrees were shown on
three subsequent recordings. On a follow-up record 12 days
after the termination of convulsive therapy the delta activity
had decreased considerably. This information was not available
to the therapist or the supervisor until after the conclusion
of the study.
The patient was seen in psychotherapy sessions three times
a week throughout her hospitalization. While the therapist
was aware of the concurrent somatic treatment, he was unaware
of the fact that subconvulsive stimulation was given initially,
and of the change to convulsive therapy on the 29th day.
The changes in patient-therapist relationship as reported
in the supervisory meetings is summarized in the chart and
is detailed in the following observations.
-~‘ -------Figure I
27 day

�OBSERVATIONS:

let to

19th day:
During the first three weeks of somatic treatment
the therapist did not discuss this patient in the supervisory
in
the
time,
allotted
occupied
Other
all
patients
group.
the
in
about
hear
to
patient
every
of
resolution
our
spite

study each week. The case histories presented during this
time were those of patients undergoing gross day-to-day
changes in clinical behavior.
Comment:

retrospect, we consider the omitted presentation
A
communication.
pattenlof avoidance
to be a significant
characterized this period. The neurophysiologic
indices during this time were unchanged. Similarly,
the patient's clinical status and the doctor-patient
months
the
three
in
same
the
as
were
relationship
In

preceding somatic treatment.
20th to 33rd day:
The case history was first presented in the meeting on
the 20th day. Over a three month period the psychotherapeutic
unable
to
the
being
been
had
unchanged,
therapist
relationship
discern any alteration in the patient's clinging, whining,
in
her
living
problems
to
explore
Efforts
attitude.
helpless
of
and
by
long
recitals
complaints
blocked
by
were
physical
In
three
the
of
and
failure.
feelings
self—reproach,
guilt,

supervisory meetings during this period the group atmosphere

�-6was one of discouragement when

this case

presented. The
therapist reported impulses to exhort the patient to
participate in ward activities, and reacted to her professions
of helplessness with the subjective feeling that "she was'nt
trying." The reproach against those who were unable to help
her was reflected in the family's report that the patient
considered her therapist "too young."
was

Comment:

therapeutic impasse was empathically
communicated to the group by the therapist's report.
The interaction during this period may be characterized as follows: After prolonged, unsuccessful
efforts at verbal communication the psychotherapist
is realistically frustrated (I). The affective mode
The

patient rendered
essentially verbal techniques useless. The doctor's
efforts to help were not met by a collaborative
response, while the insatiable quality of the patient's
demands may also have called forth defensive
reactions in the therapist. Such interactions are
typically those that lead to the referral of psychotically depressed patients for somatic, 3,3. nonof communication adopted by the

verbal forms of therapy.
During this period the mode of somatic treatment
was changed from subconvulsive to convulsive. The

clinical status

and

therapeutic relationship however,

�-7continued unaltered. Perhaps lack of the expected
response to somatic treatment contributed to the
therapist's discouragement. He assumed that
convulsive therapy had begun at the outset, and
his past experience had led him to anticipate a
clinical response by the fourth week of treatment (3).
Bhth to h2nd day:
In the meeting that took place on the 38th day, a

"slight change"

reported. Although the patient was
described as still "crying, ranting, and raving“ in therapy
sessions, it was reported that "she participates in activities
a

little bit

was

more, but not much."

The

therapist

and the

tended
to minimize the social improvement. The first
group
spontaneous complaint of memory difficulty was also reported
in this meeting.
Comment:

retrospect, the first evidence of neurophysiologic change had appeared at this time. The
electroencephalogram on the day prior to this meeting
showed a significant increase in delta activity. The
In

group discounted the concomitant observation of

clinical

change in view of a

persistent hostile-

dependent transference, and negative counter-

transference feelings.

�23rd to 63rd day:
In the meeting on the hSth day the

therapist

spontaneously reported a full verbatim psychotherapy session
for the first time. The patient was described as "brighter,"
"with a little more rouge and lipstick," and "smiling."
Within the next two days he described her mood as ”euphoric.”
Physical complaints ceased and were replaced by complaints

of forgetting. The therapist, however, described this change
as a cessation of "complaining." There was a change in the
form of verbal expression although the content remained the
same. Her affective mode of expression was replaced by an

intellectualized pattern.

For example, instead of complaining
mother" the patient said, "I'm

"I have to cling to my
dependent on my mother for many things." The therapist
described this change as "talking about her dependency in a
different way." Another of his observations, however, was
reported with "uncanny" feelings which were shared by the
supervisor. He stated that the patient "mentions things we
had talked about as if it were new information."
With these changes, there was a concomitant increase in her

sociability

participation in hospital activities, and a
diminution of her overt dependency upon family and therapist.
The supervisory group atmosphere at this time changed from one
of discouragement to a feeling of well-being, with increased
Joking, smiling and animated participation.
and

�-9the 52nd day the therapist reported that the
patient dressed seductively and applied fresh make-up for her
therapy meetings. She expressed feelings of trust and enjoyment
of the sessions. The doctor experienced similar emotions, and
was eager to report the progress of this case. The patient
was now "upset" because she could'nt remember her problems,
and the therapist noted that he was being continually led into
a directive "remembering" role. He felt the patient used her
memory loss as a defense against further psychologic exploration,
and that she preferred to maintain the relationship on a
0n

friendly, realistically gratifying level.
A greater detachment from her family was also expressed.
Indicaﬁma of social improvement were prominent. The family'
stated that she no longer considered the doctor "too young,"
but rather a "guiding angel."
Comment:

abrupt and gross change in the clinical
picture paralleled the development of maximum
physiological change in this case. The three
electroencephalograms during this period showed
a moderate degree of delta activity.
The advent of markedly positive feelings
elicited reciprocal emotions in the therapist.
These were communicated in the supervisory sessions,
and were empathically reflected in members of the
conference group. The clinical pattern resembled
that of a "transference cure."
The

�-10-

It is

of

interest that

change from "physical"

to "memory" complaints was described as an overall
"decrease in complaining." Perhaps a memory deficit,

expected concomitant of convulsive therapy, was
;MOre acceptable to the staff because it was understandable. They felt some responsibility for this
Syphon and could authoritatively reassure the
patient that it would be transient. It is also
probable that an affectionate dependency is more
tolerable than a hostile dependency, especially
when accompanied by obvious and gratifying social
an

improvement.
The language changes were

indicative of a more
detached, intellectualized'communication of familiar
content (8). The patient at this time "talked
about“ rather than emoting or "acting out." These
new language patterns were consistent with her
college education and, in contrast to her prior
mode

of communication, appeared to be more compatible

with a psychoanalytically-oriented approach. However,
there was the concomitant development of memory
difficulty, exemplified by her introduction of
previously discussed topics as new information.
The

ne.t effect

thus a non-communicative
situation with regard to interpretive insight
therapy.
was

�-116hth to 72nd day:
This period followed the termination of somatic

treatment. The patient reported a "sudden feeling of selfmemory
The
awareness."
euphoria and
difficulty were no
longer observed, and an anxious state supervened. The content
of the psychotherapy sessions changed to a more critical
appraisal of her life situation. For the first time the
therapist gave the patient extra time in the sessions. The
group voiced some concern that she'was "slipping back." When
the patient occasionally talked positively about such problems
as her emancipation from mother, the therapist was inclined
to respond optimistically, rather than to explore. She reacted
to this with a revival of old complaints.
At this point, supervisor and therapist reviewed a tape
recorded therapy session. A recurrence of the earlier pattern
could indeed be identified, although in circumscribed fashion
rather than throughout the interview. It was possible to
examine the antecedent events in the session and to clarify
the pattern as an adaptive response to stressful content.
Comment:

electroencephalogram during this period
showed a considerable decrease in slow wave activity.
There was a concomitant reestablishment of some of
the communication patterns which preceded the
The

period of altered cerebral function.
group responded with uneasiness which

The

supervisory

was

reflected

�.12in the solicitousness of the therapist in
prolonging the sessions.
At this point a phenomenon was observed in
the supervisory group which, for lack of a better
term, may be called "electroshock dependency."
Statements were made in the meeting such as,
"she's slipping back," "needs more treatments,"
and "improvement not holding up." These statements
imply that the hostile-dependent pattern constituted
a nosologic entity - ”a depression" - rather than

relatedness. Perhaps because
therapeutic change could not be a effected by
interpersonal means alone, its persistence seemed
dependent upon the alteration in cerebral function.
The change in interaction was thus being conceptuala mode of human

ized as the result of the brain syndrome, and not as
a function of the doctor-patient relationship.
Hence the group's uneasiness on the sporadic
reappearance of the pre-convulsive interaction
pattern. The detailed examination of a tape-recorded
session revealed the adaptive function of this more
circumscribed occurrence of the complaints, and the
phenomenon of "electroshock dependency" was not
observed in subsequent group meetings.

�-13.
23rd to 9hth daz:

During

relaionship

this period

stable psychotherapeutic
patient became more independent

a more

apparent. The
and discussed problems of compliance and self-assertiveness.
Although her attitude remained positive and collaborative,
her gross adulation of the therapist diminished. In one
session she said, "Maybe I won't get better unless I get
angry

was

at you.“

She was

less elated.

She moved from a

closed

ward to an open

cottage, and began to work in the hospital
library. Occasional episodes of overt disturbance were
handled by the therapist without solicitude. His attitude
was one of interest, support and detachment. Patient and
therapist discussed plans for discharge and outpatient treatment.
The patient was discharged six weeks later.
Comment:

Subsidence of the changes in brain function
resulting from convulsive therapy permitted a new

integration of the doctor-patient relationship.
The pattern of a conventional psychotherapeutic
situation appeared. This differed both from the
original negative and the artificially induced
positive transference relationships.

�WW
Therapist's notes as

an index of

relatedness:

Following the conclusion of the study, another index
of the psychotherapeutic relationship was investigated.

Rioch (9) has described the use of the volume of

staff

progress notes as an index of staff-patient interaction.
The therapist had kept his notes in a standard stenographic
notebook throughout the treatment. A gross count of the
number of pages of notes per session could be made. This
is represented graphically on the chart. As no written notes
were taken during the occasional tape-recorded sessions,
these were omitted from the chart. The change in the
therapeutic relationship is apparent from the abrupt and
sustained increase in note-taking from the hhth day on.
This coincided with the first gross change in the electroencephalogram. The notes taken by the two other psychiatrists
in the supervisory meetings followed a similar pattern,
although with peaks of note-taking at the onset and again
at the waning of induced neurophysiologic change.

�DISCUSSION:

primary purpose of this report is to demonstrate the
value of a detailed investigation of psychotherapy when
somatic therapies are temporarily introduced as adjunctive
procedures. One of the difficulties in the objective study
of transference and countertransference phenomena is the
The

absence of a quantifiable and controllable variable. Adjunctive
therapies, somatic or pharmacological, provide such a variable.
They produce

alteration in behavior as well as concomitant,

measurable neurophysiologic changes (3, h). This opportunity
has been utilized in the present project. For example, one
of adaptation to altered brain function is a euphoric
type of relatedness (5). The occurrence of the phenomenon
in this case permitted us to observe how the induction of

mode

positive and negative transferences called forth similar
countertransference attitudes in therapist and supervisor.
Another illustration of this technique was our discounting
of the

earliest clinical

change during the Bhth to h2nd day

of somatic treatment. The electroencephalogram gave evidence
in favor of the significance of this beginning change in the

relationship. The fact that it was minimized demonstrates the
obscuring effects of staff expectancies. Finally, the alteration
of brain function in this course of psychotherapy was accompanied
by a change of the pattern of complaints i;g. from physical
symptoms to memory difficulty. This resulted in a modification

�-16..

of the dependency relationship (h3rd to 63rd day). The new
form of the relationship was experienced differently by the
staff, with resultant change in their feelings about the
patient. This effect was observed in the patient's family
group as well as in the supervisory group.

observations illustrate several other phenomena of
interest. One is peculiar to supervision in group settings.
We have called attention to the emotional
atmosphere of the
group, which seemed to fluctuate in accordance with the
therapeutic relationship being described. Hora (7) believes
that the supervises may communicate the affective aspects
of his experience with a patient by non-verbal means. His
formulation is that "the supervises unconsciously identifies
with the patient and involuntarily behaves in such a manner
as to elicit in the supervisor those very emotions which he
himself experiences while working with the patient, but was
unable to convey verbally." He also describes the diffusion of
this effect in the other participants of a supervisory seminar.
Thus he reports that, "This observation has been subjected to
repeated tests in seminars where it was possible to verify
the supervisor's emotional perceptions by matching them with
the emotional reactions of the other participants present."
Our work supports such observations and suggests the potential
fruitfulness of studies of group dynamics in supervisory
seminars.
We have noted one change in
relatedness resulting from
the somatic therapy that had a disjunctive effect upon the
The

�-17-

relationship (hSth day). The patient mentioned familiar
topics "as if it were new information." The "uncanny" quality
produced in the therapist and supervisor resulted from the
temporary feeling that the therapeutic relationship had no
history. Rapport in intensive psychotherapy depends to a
great extent upon an accumulated body of shared information.
Both doctor and patient take this for granted, and the inability
to rely upon it may affect rapport adversely.
Other patients in the study,nct discussed in this paper,
showed different patterns of response. These included
transient paranoid episodes, hyperactivity, erotic, exhibitionistic and other forms of "acting-out," which were disruptive
to the concurrent psychotherapy. In each case the induced
behavioral change was related to the personality of the
individual patient and occurred at the time of changing brain
function (3). Also, in each case, there were concomitant
changes in behavior in the supervisory group.
The limited scope of this study does not warrant general
conclusions as to the efficacy of concurrent somatic treatment
and psychotherapy. We have confined the discussion, therefore,
to the presentation of methodology and description of the
types of observations that can be made in such interdisciplinary
approaches.
Our experience does highlight, however, some of the
difficulties that may develop when the two modes of treatment
are used concurrently. Intensive psychotherapy is based upon

�-18a conviction as to the
the improvement of the

efficacy of verbal communication for
patient's adaptation. In the case
reported a trial period of psychotherapy had been ineffective
in altering clinical behavior. The introduction of somatic
treatment represented a decision against exclusive reliance
upon interpersonal communication as the therapeutic instrument.
When cerebral change was maximal a "social recovery" occurred.
This was apparently unrelated to interpretation of psychodynamic
factors. No increase in awareness of psychological relationships
was verbalised. When the induced neurophysiologic changes
subsided, there was a partial recurrence of earlier communication
patterns. This was accompanied by a brief period of doubt that
the modification of behavior could be perpetuated by interpersonal
means alone. To some extent this phenomenon was an expression
of the different conceptual and linguistic systems inherent
in the two modes of therapy. It is related to the philosophical
dichotomy described by Hollingshead and Redlich (6) between

practitioners using somatic and analytically-oriented therapies.
These considerations also arise in the use of psychopharmacologic
agents during the course of psychotherapy (h).

�SUMMARY:

study of the effects of concurrent somatic
therapy on psychotherapy is reported, in which
simultaneous observations of serial changes in brain
function, the psychotherapeutic relationship, and social
A

adaptation were made. The observations in a group
supervisory seminar reflected the pattern of neurophysiolcgical alteration.
It is concluded that the introduction of a measurable
physiological variable is a useful method for investigation
of the psychotherapy process.

�REFERENCES

l.

Cohen, M.B., Baker, 6., Cohen, R.A., Fromm-Reichman,
F., and Weigert, E.: An Intensive Study of Twelve
Cases of Manic—Depressive Psychosis, Psychiatry $1:
103, 195k.

2.

Esecover, 8., Jaffe, J. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychotherapeutie
Techniques with Electroshock Patients, J. Hillside
Hosp. 1: 17, 1958.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R.L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity
to Behavioral Response in Electroshock:Quantitative
Serial Studies,A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 1Q:
516, 1957.

3.

Fink, M.: A Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic
Therapies, J. Hillside Hosp.g: 197, 1957.
Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Green, M.: Experimental
Studies of the Electroshock Process, Dis. Nerv. 81 .
$2: 113, 1958.
Hollingshead, A.B. and Redlich, F.C.: Social Class and
Mental

Illness, J. Wiley

&amp;

Son, N.Y. T953.

Hora, T.: Phenomenology of the Supervisory Process,
Am. J. Psychother. $1: 769, 1957.
Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During
Electroshock Therapy, in Pa cho atholo of
ZuSEn,
P.
3. §§3., Grune
and
Communication, Hoch,
&amp;

Stratton, 1958.

Rioch, D. McK.: Research in Psychiatry: Certain
Problems and Developments in Multi-Disciplinary

Studies, T.W. Salmon Lectures,
1957 (in press).

N.Y. Acad. Med.

�noditiaation at Pnynhothornputtta frannaettonu
By

tltnrod

Drain Junction

"tt‘,

H.B.. E. 3.00.7.7, K.D.,
R. L. “hn, Phonu ‘ﬁd ﬂ. link, 8.D.
‘0

Iron thy aspartulnt a: Bxportuonsal Psychiatry, £111.16. loupttal,
61.“ O‘k.’ L.I., ‘1’.
Aided. in part, by tho Foundationn' thud tar Research in Puyehiutry
(SénlSl) and grant 3-927 of the rational Inu‘itutc o: nuntnl
lualth, laticntl Inutitﬂna of nculth, v.5. Public loalth aarvtoo.
Tho aunt-tango or 31:: 83th.: sander: :nd Hrs. Anita DCIIOI, who
participated auttvoly in tho tcatnnra, 1. gratitully acknavludgod.

III 10/30/59

�this rlport ta darivnd from a luporvinory suntan:
in which thn affect. at convultivc trontncnt upon p;y¢ho~
thornptut1e trananotxanu war. studiud. rho thornpist'u
abrcrvntinnl havo boon douoribod in u previous publicattou
(2). in: proaoat pups: accorthcu thn pronoun tr.u tho
franc at ratcrcaco at tho atporvisor and ouporvinory
group. It 1! intondod an n aonplonontnry hot or
obaorVItioua at thin nonbinud therapy. In addition,
ouncurront neurophyulalogia ant: arc includad, of vhich
both thornpiat and supervisor var. unnuuro. this udditiouul
tram. of xutorenoo may broaden the underutnndiug or eurtnin
phonononu 1n the pattcnt-thcrapint, and therapiltulnparvitcr

tatcraottona.
to don-natratt that the intraduction
a: a unanurablo phyuiologiaul variablo 1: a ncctul Itthod
for the turoatixatinn a: tho payehothcrapy pronoun.
Our purpaao 13

�xxggan:

tho ootttag too o uookhr oulttodiooaplioory
ooporvtoovy oontorouoo. Ioalndod in tho group rotor o) tho
thoroptot (3.8.), (at tho ttno o senior rootdont in poynhiotrr),
who proooutod tho enoo uotortol;
h) o ooatol worhor who
roportod tho rooponoo at tho yotiont'o fonily; a) o poyoho~

onolyot (3.5.), who doolt mainly with tho d1doct1e oopocto
of psychothoropoutte toohniquo; d) o poychologiot (3.3.).
who studiod tho eoooo indopondontly3 and
o) o nonrepoyohiotrtot (8.!t). who coordinotod tho diocuooion. rho

loot tot nooboro wart ovoro of tho connooitont chouxoo 1:
phyoioloxtc honouroo, one olthough thlo intorlotton infloouood
thotr quoottouo, tho doto woo not introdtcod ot thooo toaforonooo.
rho octuol oo-otlo trootoout woo porforood by o phyoioion who

not o porticipont ot tho nootingo.
Tho pronodoro woo intoruol, with tho thoroptot toktnx
tho lood 1a prooonttnx hto vorbotto uotoo of tho poyohothoropy
Tho
ooootoao.
ordor of tho aooo roporto and tho ooount o:
tiuo dovotod to oath woo not prooorihod. Iolloring tho
opoutohoouo oooo pronoutotion, morn dironttvo quootiouiag
II! Introdoood, otood ot choritytnx and rolottns tho intoraotioa
proooutod by thoroptot ond ootiol vortor.
woo

�803130?!

the hintertee e! the enhaeate at thte study were
reported in e previeee publication (2). In thie report e
detailed enelyeie of Gate #3 (0.0.) 1- presented es meet
illustretive or the nodixieation of interpereomel trenaeetiene
by extered hrein function. This petieut, e hh your old vitae
end nether of e 12 yeer old eon, bed been ednitted to the
hoepxtel with eyaptone of depreeeion, enxiety, enorexie,
varied phyeicel complaints, end feelings é: unreelity end
isoletien. In psychotherapy eeeeione she would reiterete
her difficultiee in e cenpleining pattern, repetitiouely
illustretinx her inedequecy. During e three nonth period
an ilpreveaent occurred end A couree at electroehoek therepy
wee reeoeeended. At thte Junotute the patient wee included
in the preeent study.
vsg§;!:c_rnxnarr:
cheervetiene eede dertn; the period of eenetxe therepy
ere depleted in the euconpenying ehert. During the 9k deye
of supervision tee different levee e: eoeetie treetleut were
utilieed. This procedure wee pert e: e heepitel-wide
eonvuleiveoeubeeavuleive control etedy then in progreee, in
which therepiete were enewere at the introduction or enheonvuleive pheeee e: treetnent.
Fer the tit-t treeteent period (21 deye) the patient
received eebeenvuleive electra-etlaeletiou with pentethel

�‘h.
pronodiootiou. roolvo oooh trootnonto ooro givon ot tho
roto or throo por rook. lo ohonxoo in tho ooohtitotivo
looooroo o: 336 olov oovo ootivity (3) woro monitoot during
thio tins. fhio poriod oorvod to ootobiioh o booolino for
tho hohoviorol oboorvotiooo and tho oxpootonoioo of tho

otott.
In tho oooond trootnoht porioo (29th to 59th doyo),
grand nol oonvoloiono uoro ihduood thrioo wookly for o totol
o: 1h trootnonto. In thio ported, nioiaol dogrooo of EEG
ohongo ooro rooordod on tho 37th doy, ond uodoroto dogrooo.
woro shown on throo oohooqoont rooordingo. foolvo doyo
ottor tho toroiootino o: oonvuloivo thoropy, EEG slow wovo

ootivity

ooooidorohly dioioiohoo. this intoruhtioo woo
not ovoilohlo to tho thoropiot or tho ooporvioor until ottor
tho ooholuoioa of tho otooy.
woo

-ﬁ.‘.‘....‘..0ﬂd.ﬂ.
Pic.

1

about horo

-DO“-....‘..O-....
rho potioot woo ooon in poyohothoropy ooooiono throo
tiloo vookly throughout hor hoopitoliootion. Hhilo tho thoropiot
II! ovoro of tho ooooorront oonotio trootnoot, ho woo nnovoro

that oohoohvoloivo oti-olotion

woo

givon

initiolly,

ohd of tho

ohonso to convoloivo thoropy on tho 29th doy.

thongoo in tho potiont—thoropiot rolotionohip oo

roportod in tho ouporvioory lootiogo oro oonnorisod in tho ohort
ond oro dotoilod in tho following ohoorvotiooo.

�0188371

;tt

,IS!

2: 12th dgz;

firot throo

vookl tho thoropiot did not
dioeuoo thio potiont in tho ooporvioory group. othor potionto
oooupiod tho allottod tino, in opito o: o rooolutioa to
‘

Daring tho

conoidor oaoh potiont vookly.
Gounonts

In totroppoot, tho toiluro to roport
this potiont 'o pragrooo coaotitutod o
pottoru or ovoidoneo. sonotiu thoropy hod'
not Iodiriod tho potiont'o word bohovior or
tho doctor-potiont rolotioaohip. Both voro
tho onto to in tho initiol Iontho a: hospital-

iootion.
rho nonrophyoiologio indieoo voro
unohonxod.

20th to 22:4 dog:
rho oooo history

firot

prooontod in tho looting on
tho 20th doy. rho thoropiot roportod no oltorotion in tho
potiont'o clinging, whining, holplooo ottitudo throughout tho
proooding throo uontho. Errorto to oxplorovhor problouo in
1171:; uoro blookod by phyoieol oonplointo and by rocitolo of
woo

Ho
woo loft
of
toiluro.
tooling:
guilt, oolt-roprooch,
littlo oponiag £0» counont.
In tho throo ouporvioory nootingo during thio poriod
tho group otnoophoro woo ono of diluenrogonoat thou thio eooo
too prooontod. the thoropiot roportod inpulooo to oxhort tho

oud

�.6patient to participate in ward activitiee, and reacted to
her prereeeieue e: helpleeeneae with the feeling that *ehe
eaan't trying.‘
eoneidered
The taniiy reported that the patient
her
doctor "tee reung,' retleetiac he: attitede e: repreaoh toearde
theee who were unable to help her. He, in turn, felt that
eke wee 'threeiuc up he: hende and giving up.“
I

gelnenta

the therapeutic iayaeee eae eapathieaiiy oeuaenicated to the creep by the
cane repert. The transactiene during thie
peried were typically theee leading to
referral of depreeeed patiente for eeaetia
(i.e. noncverbel) treataent. they nay be
toileee.
Verbal nethede
ee
eharaeterieed
er therapy are inceepatible with the affective
made at cannunieetien adapted by each patiente
(1). The deetor'e atterte to help are not eat
by a eellaheretive reepenee, and he feels
treetratea. the ineatieble qeaiiﬁy er the
patient“ dean“ a1" «11. berth deteueive
veeetiene in the therapiet.
Baring thin period the node or eeaatie
treetaent wee chanced tree eaheenveieive to
eeaﬁleive. The elinieal etatne and therapeutic
relatienehip, hetever, eentiaaed unaltered.
Perhaps the lack of the expeated reapenee to

�.7.
eenetie treetnent eentributed te the

thereptet'e dieeeuregeuene. le eeee-ed
thet cenvuleteue nee been induced from
the euteet, end hie peet experienee bed
led hie te entteipete e elinieel reepenee
by the fourth week e: teeetlent (3).
to ytnd 63!.
In the aeetinx thet teak pleee en the 38th day, e
“alight chenlef wee reverted; Although the,pet1ent tee etill
revinxi
1n therepy eeeeiene, it wee elee
renting,
'eryinc,
neted thet 'ehe pertteipetee 1a eetivlttee e 11$t1e bit note,
but net naeh.’ {he therepiet end the group discounted ehie
ehenge an eeeiel relet30nehtpe. the tiret eyeateueoee oonpleint
at eeeery dittieelty'vee elee reported.
«age:

cennent:
the

Sir-t

evidenee er eeurephyetelegte
eheuge ep’eered et thie tine. the 3E6 teken
the any prter ‘0 thin leetlng eheued e

Wm

eixuitteent inereeee in slew

wave

eettvxty.

In the neeting en the hSth day ﬁne therepiet reyerted
e full perehetherepy eeeelee fer the rivet tine. Re deeertbed
the pettent ee 'brighter,’ ”with e little eere reuse end
lipetteh' end 'eetltng.‘ rue deye leﬁer her need wee meted
ee 'eupheric.‘ Phyeteel eonpleinte eeeeed end were replaced
by aenpleinte of forgetting. The therepiet deeeribed thie
ee e *oeeeetteu e: ceapleintng.‘ concomitantly, the effective

�.8.
expreeeien
wee repleeed by e eere intelleeteelieed
e:
pettern. Ineteed e: etetiux “I here to cling to I: nether“
the petieet eeid '1': dependent en ey nether ter may thus"
Thie eee deeerihed ee 'telhina ehent her dependency in e
different eey.‘ Another cheese in eeneenioetion pettern
eveked 'enoenny‘ reeliuge in the therepiet. ﬁe eteted that
the petient 'eentiene things we hed telhed ebout ee it it
were nee in:ereetien.'
With theee ehenzee,there wee e ceneeeitent iaereeee
in the petient'e eeeiehility end perthipetien in heepitel
eetiritiee, end e dieieetien er her clinging to the teeily
end therepiet. whe euporrieory group etueephere eleo changed free one e: hepeleeeneee te well-being, with increeeed aching,
eniling end enineted participation.
0n the 52nd dey the therapist reported thet the
petient are-led seductively end epplied treeh rehe-up for
eede

l

V

her eeeeiene. She expreeeed toelinge or treat end enjoyment
e! the neetinge. the doctor experienced einiler eeetiene,
end ere eexer to repert the pregreee of this oeee. fhe patient
wee new 'upeet' beeeaee ehe couldn‘t resell her prehlene, end
the therapiet noted that he wee inclined to e directive “re-ether.
He
end
she
of
leee
coupleined
memory
role.
ettenpted
felt
in:'
to relete in e triendly, reelieticelly gratifying we: to prevent
further peyuhologie exploration.
A greater deteehlent from her family wee expreeeed.
Seeiel ilpreve-eet continued. the felily eteted thet ehe no
'

�.9.
long-r onunidorud the doctur 'tao 1033;,” but rnihor a
'guiding nasal.“
Gunnontt

Eh: ubrupt,

groi-

ahnngo in tho

picturu parnnllud tn. duvolopttnt
or anxiaun physiological change. The

61131031

rayorda during this poriod uhovcd
u nodcratl ducts. of slaw wavo activity.
Tho udvunt or pcn1tsvo tooling: olicitod
-ruciprocnl elation: in thn thordpist which
1n
thu supervinery cautions.
caununicntad
utrt
tho attoat was alpsthic:11y rotluctod in
nonbiru at the conxcrcuoo group. (rho clinical
pioturc roaonbltd that at a 'trtunforonac auro.')
throo

EEO

It

10

.! iattraut

that I chant. tron

"physical“ to *nnncry’ eonplnintt was dolarlbea
1: I ‘uoaustton at oonpluiulnx.’ Pcrhupa the
notary dottctt, an expootnd oonconittnt or
oonvulntvc thurnpy, 1. nova acacptablo to the
lint: becauau 1t 1- underatundablo. Thu: £001
a rnaponaibility for this tynptoa tad nun
tuthorttativoly r033Iuro thu putlatt that it
will be transiant. in lifteticnuta dapcndoncy
any .100 be more tolorah1c thin a hastilt out,
when
ucconpnniod bi erutifyinz oaeinl
oupccinlly
improvonant.

Tho langungo

change:

3:. indicative

of a nor. deﬁnah‘d, intqlleotnnltacd ooununicntioa

�~10»

of taniltar content (8). Th. patinat nor
”talked abaut' ruthor thnn cunting or “acting
out.“ This nav 1:33:33. patttrn can nor. in
kooping with hat background or oulloau uduaataoa,
and the thcrtyint's inplioit unpoetutions (9).
In contrast to her prior node of cuuuuntcntton
1t canned ta to nor. noipgtiblo with a purchaauulytically-oriontcd approach. The concomitant
dovslopnant of honor: difficulty, howovur,
perpetuated thc cantnttully nonninalghtrul
thorapuutic nitnnticn.
65th to 12nd gig!
than ported followod tho termination a: sciatic
trontannt. fhe patiout Inverted a ”auddoa £90115: ’1 3011‘
cvnrouuuo.“ Euphorta and gentry attticulty wit! a. 19:10:
tbscrvud, tad an amnion. ltlt. :uportcnod. Payohothortpy
toutinnu worn nhnrtctor1s¢d by morn crittcal appruisal at
hot 11:. uitunttnn. tar tho first txun tho doctor 3:10 tho
Thu
tho
in
auctions.
tine
group voiced ton.
txtra
pattont
unacorn that aha wt. "olippiuc back.9 thn thd patient.
.ccactoually talkud positivolr nbout euro-r, cutncipttiou
tron lather, 333., the tharnpist tolt called upon to rospond
optiniutically, rather thug to explore. Thurs vs; I rtvivul
or old canplnintn.
At thin paint, tha supervilar tad thortpist roviovod
A
nuonion.
recurrence of tho ourltor
a tnruvroeordcd thtrupy

�vorbal putt-run could indeed be tdcntitiod. nauuvur, than.
coourrod 1n airuuunoribad fashion ruthor than throughout $30
intervinv. The «wont: nutcccdunt to Inch parlodn worn
attainad Ind tha adaptivh nature at the racnrront n£tocttvo
pnttornu haunt. apparant.
coununt:

tundra during this patina
showed a considorlbla duoranau in slow
The EEG

activity.

tn:

:

cauconitant
rocntabllihnant at IOII of tho connunieutlon
pattorna which pracedod tau period or altered
brain function. Th0 coutarsnco group responded
with nnxtoty rotlootod in the solicitouunnul
of tho thortpiat in pralongtnz in: sonoi¢ns.
the phononunan obsorvoa ta ta. nnpcrvitory
stain, for luck at a bottnr turn, may be callcd
'alcetronhack dupcndoaoy.‘ statoncntn were
lid. in tha matting such us 'cho'u slipping buck,”
"no.4. ucr- troutnonts* and ”taprovanont not
holding up.“ In... Itatcnonts inyly that the
hoitilcodcycndaat panama mm being thought a:
primarily as a nonalcgie ﬂntity, ”a dopraauiun,‘
rtthor than a node or Bantu ralatodnunn. Porhapa
hcuuuac hohuviorul chnngo had not boon attcctod
by psychologic Incas a1930, it new conned tottlly
dopondout upon thc alteration in acrcbrul function.
yaw.

Thurs

�1-1

a.

rha chins. 1n intoraction was «Qneoptltltibd
as th: roanlt of the brain syndroan, ﬁnd not
an a function of tho doatcrupntiont relation.
Edna.
tho graup'h «acacia... on 6h.
ahip.

sporadic rcappcaranco or praeouvrloivc
puttornt. Thu dotatlcd oxnuinattou of I
t‘po~racordud caution rqvualod ti. ndqﬁtvo
functtun or this not. circumacribod occurrcnon
of the canvlaiatt, tad the phnnancnon of
“electroshock dupnndunay' Vt! not obnorvod
in Inblcqucnt group nactinga.
12rd to 25th 4:13
baring this ported a not. stubln yuyvhothorupcntxc
rtlatitnlhip was upparont. the ptticnt boots. nor. tndcpnndcnt
and d£lcnalad prohlcno a! euupltauoo and uolt~aalurtavoucla.
Although hot at$1tudo rousinod petitivo and eollnborutivo, hi!
tdlllttin a: the thcrapiat diniutuhod. In on. 3.3.1.: ch.
:31! *luyho I vantt xnt buttor union. I get that: at run.“
an. ant lens olntad. 5h. ncvcd troy eh. cloned ward so an
upon 00:113., and bugnn *u Ibrk_1a the hospittl library.
Occulionll Ipinodul of ownrt disturbance war. ‘run‘cd by tho
thcrapiut washout salinituda. n1- attitude us: an: of intorant,
tappart sud datuchnont. 1a.: dtnouusod plan: tar dischargo
and

.u‘pntlunt ‘ruutnnnt.

�-13.
Gemnentz

Suhaidanaa

at tha chances in brain

fanation raaulting tron_cénvulaiva thorapy
permittad a not iatagration or the doatnrﬁ
patiant ralationahip. Thu pattern or a
céhvanttanal paychotharapaatic attuatiau
appeared, which airfarad both fro: the
crazinal negative and the artificially
induced poaitiva relatianahipa.
rharantat'a nataa an an ands: a: relatedness:
Following tha cancluaian of tho study, anathar 1ndax
at tho payehotharapautie ralattouahip was invaatigatad. ﬂinch
baa daaaribad the use of tha volume or stat: pragraaa nataa aa
an 134a: at ata£t«patxant intavactian (10). Tha thorapiat
had kapt ht. natal in a standard atanoxraphic notahoak thranzho
out tha troatnant. 1 grant count or the aunbar of vagaa or
nataa par tau-ion vaa maﬁa, and in rapraaantcé graphically an
aha chart. lo written meta. vara takan daring occasional
tapa¢raaardad aaaaioaa, and thaaa ara anittad from tho chart.
Tho chance in tha ralatienahip is apparant from tha abrupt
and paratatant incraaaa ﬁnnota taking from tho hhth day.
this aoiuuadad with tha tirat groan changa in tha alaatraanoaphalogran. Tho nut-a takon by aha two ethar psychiatriata
in tho unparviaory naatinga rallauad a aiuilar pattorn (not
illuatratad), although with peaks 6! actoatakinz at tha onaat
and again at the waning or inducad naurophwrialagta changa.

�.1h.
Iscusa I!hso vaport dasnrlbts an tnvonttgatian at vlrrhat&amp;orapy
adjunc$1vu
procuauru.
an
intracuucd
as
to
aauugio
thcrupy
than
and dtftiuulty in ﬁho fbj.¢$1V! Itudy of puyuhotharupcuttc
centrallﬁblu
ana
traanaatttaa it tho abnsncn a: I quanttraablt
pharnnool¢gtanl.
Ind
tauntia
thurapton.
variablo. ,gdduncttvo
bohuvior
in
altorgtioa
product
gravid. tank 1 varinblo. racy
was.
h).
(3.
change:
tn wall I! uniqurablu naurophyaiolauic
prudent.
«#111334
an.
in
hula
In
pnunt
urw‘utty
1.
tunntluu
brain
altcrud
ta
Ixtnpln, oat Iona a! tduyta‘ion
tho
Eh.
at
coaurrauco
(5).
r.1ato¢ncsu
0t
typo
tuphurio
I
haw
%o
inducud
obicrv.
an
phﬁnanouun in this 0:30 purai‘tcd
9511
forth
uttiﬂudto
‘nd
accltivo
altnrantioi .1 pontttv.
Anetta:
5nd
uupcrviuor.
‘hcruplut
tn
llnilnr uttitudca
011n1¢:1
unrlxunt
0:
tho
discounting
ti.
alluatrnﬁtoa wt;
The
Ilcutroa
hand
or
truntlnut.
ﬁhth
«:1
to
ahnauo during thi
beginning
this
.1
an.
:tgnatteuueu
instantad
ouctphnllarun
miniutsud
1t
thut
Th.
tau!
ﬁll
13
tho
ralnttonuhip.
chnng.
dcnnunﬁrt‘oo tho intestine «(Stats 0: uttxt .xpcotancicc.
by
«coup-uni“
um
mum.»
brain
of
”3.111,”:
from
uyaptcns
phywicul
1n
ﬁulplaznt
5¢3,,
puttarn.
oh‘nxt
:
the
of
3
tern
Thin
in
ruaultcd
ant
t0 nounxydtstiauzty.
which
oxportonocd
was
63rd
day)
to
(hjrd
dcp¢n¢¢u¢y rtlatlonahlp
shuns.
rcuul‘nnt
with
tun
supervinary
otatt,
atttortntly hr
nine
was
rhtu
0:3:ct
thy
p&amp;t1ant.
ubant
in thoir :nolinsa

w

unﬁt“:

�pstient'e resily group.
The oheervstions else illnetrete e phenoeeaeh
supervieion
we
heve celled
in
to
settings.
greep
peculiar
sttention to the emotional steoephere or the are up, which
seemed to fleateste in eoeerdenue with the therepeetie rea
Here
the
(7)
described.
thst
suggests
being
istieaehip
observed in the

supervises say eoanunisete the effective sepsete or his
experience with the pstient nenaverhsliy in the eupervisevy
nesting. his ternaletien is thet *The supervises unconsciously
identities with the petient end invelentsriiy hehevee in such
s esnner es te elicit in the supervisor theee very esstiens
which he himself experiences ehile working sith the petieat,
but use unehle to convey verbally.” He elso describes the
diffusion at this extent in the other psrtioipenta or e
supervisory sesiner. thus he reports that 'rhis ehservetien
hse been suhaeeted to repented tests in eeniners where it use
possible to vsrit’ the euyervieor'e enetiohel perceptions by
sstehinx thee with the eeotiehsl resctiens or the other
psrtieipents present.” Our work supports such observetiene
sud suggests the patentiel truitrhlnees or studies or group
dynsnies in supervisory eeeiuers.
we he's noted one ehenss in reletednese resulting
tree the seentie therspy that hsd e disasuetive effect upon
the rsletiehship (age dsy). the petieet mentioned teeilier
tepiee ”es it it were new infatuation.” the 'nnoenny‘ queiity
predeeed in the therepiet end supervisor resulted from the

�.16.
had
no
the
relationship
that
therapeutic
temporary feeling
history. Rapport in intensive psychotherapy depends to a
great extent upon an accuaulated body of shared inforaatien.
loth doctor and patient take this for granted, and the inability
to rely upon it nay affect rapport adversely.
Other patients in the study, not discussed in this
paper, showed different patterns of response. These included
transient paranoid episodes, hyperactivity, erotic, exhibitionistic and other forns of 'acting-out' which were disruptive
1

to the concurrent psychotherapy. In each case the induced
the
behavioral change was related to
personality of the
individual patient end occurred at the time of changing brain
function (3). Also in each case there were conconitant changes
in behavior in the supervisory group.
Our experience also highlights some of the difficulties
that nay develop when the two nodes of treatment are used
concurrently. Intensive psychotherapy is based upon the
conviction as to the efficacy of verbal communication for
iaproveaent of the patient's adaptation. In the case reported
a trial period of psychotherapy had been ineffective in altering
clinical behavior. The introduction of somatic treatment
represented a decision against exclusive reliance upon interWhen
communication
the
instrunent.
as
therapeutic
personal
cerebral change was aaxinal a “social recovery“ occurred,
apparentlr unrelated to interpretation of psychedynanic factors.
When the induced neurophysiologic changes subsided, a recurrence
of earlier oonnnnication patterns led the therapist to doubt
‘

,

�.17-

that in. iapravaaant oeuid ha parpatuatad by intarparaoual
aaana aloha. to can. extant thin phanauanan was an
expraaaioa a: diﬂlrint aancaptual and linguiatic ayataaa
ink-rant in in. two node: a: thorapy. It in ralatad to tho
philaaaphiaal dichotomy daacriboi by Haliiaxahaad and nadlieh
(6) batwaan practitionara using aoaatic and analyticallyariaatad Sharapiaa.
I

8931‘!!!

i

atady a: concurrant aquatic and payohatharapiaa ia
taperiad, in which ainnitanaoua obnorvationa of atrial
”in.
brain
in
function,
omgu
paychothanpaatio ralatiouahip
and social adaptation var. Iada. rho ohaarvationa in a
afonp aaparviaory salinar ratlaatad tha yattarn or natty;
phyaiologia altaratiou.
It ia canciudad that tho introduction or a aaaaarabia
phyaialosio variable in a aaatul aathod for investigation

at intarparaonai ralaiionahipa.

�-13.
BEIEREIGES

1.

count, 1.1., frusn~801¢hn&amp;un,
3iklf,
0.,
x.n.,
and Roigzrt, 3.: A: latch-ido‘stugy c§£r:01vo
1.,
cases .1 Han ouncprunl vs Pay: as a, Ila a g;
103' 1951‘

cohon,

u,

o

queovor, 3., Jntfo, J. and

Kuhn, R.L.¢ Payehnthcrnpoutic

foehniquoo with Eloctroahook Pattontl,
logz.‘1u 17.&gt;1958.

3.

rink,

J, Hill-1d.

l:hn, R.L.a Relation a: nun bolt: Activity
Quantitativo
to Inhaviorti Responao in Electronhoak.
Soraul stadium, A.H.A. Arch. laurel. &amp; Pnzchtat.lgu
H. and

516, 1957.

h. rink,

Emailed Theory of the nation or Phystodynaaic
l
l.:
ibtrnpiuﬁ, J, Hillside 30.2. g; 197. 1957.

5. Pink, l.‘hxnhn, R.L. and aroon, H.c Bxporinnntnl Studio:
of I nloctroahoek Fractal, Bin. Not. all. 32:
113, 1958.
6. lalliaglhand, 1.]. and lodlieh, 1.0.: Social Olunl tad
ﬂinttl Illnuln, J. U110: &amp; Son, . .,
.
7. Kora, 2.: Phononsnology 0! ‘ho Supurvisory Precast,

“O J. chhothor. E" 769, 1957.
8. tuba, 8.L. and rink, x.s chanson 1n Lungnngo During
Eltatronhock rhor‘py, 1n Palahgfathologi or
connnnieatl n, Inch, P. an I a, . o 3., Gran.
E 3!:35‘33, I956.
(aha, 3.1.. Polltck, H. and rink, K.: sociopuycholocic
Aspects a: Psychiatric rroatnnnt 1a a Volunttry
xcntal noupital, 1.3.5. Arch. Gen. Pazehiu . (1n

proul).

10.

Hal-I ROI-arch 1n Pcyuhiutryt curtain Prohlonu
sud Dovclepncntn in Hulttuﬁiaaiplinary studion,
2.8. Stlnon zocturor, l.!. laud. lad., 1957.

kiosk,

D.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2804">
                <text>Modification of psychotherapeutic transactions by altered brain function. Am J Psychother. 1961 Jan; 15:46-55.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2805">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2806">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-49-015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2807">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2808">
                <text>Jaffe J.; Esecover, H., Kahn, R. L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2809">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2810">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2811">
                <text>Reprint and two [preprints]. Reprint from AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY, Vol. XV, No. 1, pages 46—55. January, 1961.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2812">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2813">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74483">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81044">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87605">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94166">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="282" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="73">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/6ae8392f9c68d3b213edf8358a9597ac.pdf</src>
        <authentication>bdf1e6bcabb4c1d8c82905940f4f07c2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100699">
                    <text>REPRINTED FROM
E. ROTHLIN
(Editor)

NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
VOL. 2 (1961)
Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting
of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum
IBasle 1960

ELSEVIERPUBLISHINGCOMPANY
AMSTERDAM

�Reprinted from: E. ROTHLIN (Editor), Neuro-Psychopharmacology, V01. 2 (1961),
Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale
Ne'uro-Psychopharmacologicum, Basle 1960
‘

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIC RESPONSE PATTERNS OF
SOME PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS
MAX POLLACK, ERIC KARP, GEORGE KRAUTHAMER,
DONALD F. KLEIN AND MAX FINK
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N. Y. (U.S.A.)

PROBLEM

This study of the mode of action of some of the newer psychotropic agents was formulated within the framework of a neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesisl. The concept,
derived from earlier work on convulsive therapiesz, views clinical behavioral change as
a resultant of the interaction of alterations in brain function and the personality of
the subject. The present study emphasizes the question of pattern speciﬁcity of drug
action and its relation to individual differences in behavioral response. The particular
drugs utilized, chlorpromazine3 and imipramine“, were selected on the basis of pilot
studies in this institution in which their effectiveness in altering physiologic and
behavioral patterns had been demonstrated.
This presentation is an interim report of a study currently in progress.
METHOD

Consecutive referrals for drug administration in a voluntary psychiatric hospital were
assigned at random to one of the three drug regimens: (I) chlorpromazine with 1.2%
procyclidine added, (2) imipramine, and a (3) placebo. Medication was administered
in liquid vehicle in a ﬁxed dosage schedule, to a maximum in four weeks. Chlorproma—
zine was begun at 300 mg and increased to 1200 mg daily and imipramine from 75 to
300 mg. Patients continued to be seen three times weekly in individual psychotherapeutic interviews during the period of drug treatment.
Analysis of the data is limited to the ﬁrst 48 cases. These patients are not chronically ill—the majority being admitted for their ﬁrst hospitalization from the community, and a smaller percentage rehospitalized for a recurrence of their illness. Their mean
age was 35.5 years, and years of schooling was 11.9 years. Approximately 57% were
diagnosed in the group of schizophrenias, 28% as affective psychoses and I 5 0/5 psycho—
neuroses and character disorders.
Patients were examined in a four day period prior to drug administration on a
ﬁxed schedule of physiological and psychological procedures which was repeated

during the sixth week of drug treatment.

RESULTS

Group changes in some of the measures with drug treatments are shown in Table I.
The EEG patterns measured quantitatively through electronic frequency analysis5
References

1).

384.

�382

M. POLLACK et

al.

show that imipramine and chlorpromazine differ signiﬁcantly from the control group
and from each other. There was a signiﬁcant reduction in the total electrical activity
in the imipramine group, while there was an increase both in the amount of slow-wave
activity and the slow to fast activity ratios in the chlorpromazine group.
TABLE I
GROUP CHANGES WITH DRUG TREATMENT

EEG
Slow/fast ratio
Total activity
Delta ratio

Control

I rmpramme

Chlarpromazine
w it h Procyc l {dine

0

0

co

0|

++
0
++

Perceptual
Critical ﬂicker fusion 0
Motor
Pursuit—rotor
Tapping speed
Hand steadiness

Intellectual
WechslerBellevue IQ

O
O

++

05
01

——

+

O

O

O

+

o

o

Behavorial rating
Symptom complaint —
0
Depression

+ Increase p.
+ + Increase p.

o

—-

—

o No change

— Decrease
—— Decrease

P
P

0.05
0.01

The reduction in the critical ﬂicker—fusion (CFF) threshold is noted only for the
chlorpromazine group. This test correlated with the increase in EEG slow-wave
activity.The motor tests also reﬂect a differential drug effect with unsteadiness increased by the two drugs, tapping rate unaltered, and pursuit rotor improved only by
the imipramine group. The greatest change in intellectual functioning was scored by
the no-drug group, present to a lesser degree in the imipramine group and absent in
the chlorpromazine group. The lack of equivalent changes for the drug groups may
reﬂect an inhibition of the expected practice effect.
In clinical behavior, all groups showed a reduction in complaints on self-rating
as measured by the Johns Hopkins Scale, with the reduction being greater for the
drug groups. In the Clyde Mood Scale, a Q—sort behavioralrating, there was a quantitative reduction in both the patient’s and the doctor’s ratings of “depression” in the
drug group but not for the control group.
While these data indicate a pattern that suggests differential drug activity, there
was marked heterogeneity within each group on each measure. Table II shows the
changes in CFF for each subject. The number within each box refers to the evaluation
of a change in behavior, rated on a four—point scale by the evaluating psychiatrist.
These are global changes in behavior ratings, and are not necessarily equivalent to
References p. 384.

�NEUROPSYCHOLOGIC RESPONSE PATTERNS

383

ratings of improvement. (Note that the ratings of behavioral change “3” and “4”
were most often associated with changes in CFF of more than one cycle.)
Although the difference in mean CFF score between imipramine and the control
group was not signiﬁcant, the difference in variability (F ratio) was signiﬁcant (P =
0.05). The control group showed a narrow range of change, varying from +1 to ——2
cycles. In contrast, the imipramine group ranged from +2 to ——5 cycles, and chlorpromazine from zero to ——6 cycles. The chlorpromazine group change was in the downward direction only. The individual differences in the alterations of CFF threshold
II

TABLE

CHANGE IN FLICKER FUSION THRESHOLD WITH DRUG TREATMENT
Contrél

+2
+1

o
—1

—2
__3

Imipmmine

2 2 I

4 4 2
I
3 3 1
3 1 1
3
‘

2 2 2 I I
3 I I

1

1

3

1

4 2
4 2

——4

—5
—6

Mean diﬂ.
Change in C.P.S.

Chlorpromazine Behavorial
with Procyclidine
change

2

1

4
4
4
4

4
3 2
3

4
4 3
2

——o.6

——o.4

TABLE

None
Mild
3 Moderate
4 Marked
I
2

——3.1

III

‘CHANGE IN EEG (SLOW/FAST/RATIO) WITH DRUG TREATMENT

1mm
—.4
——.3
——.2

—.1
o

+.1

+.2
+.3

+4
+5

2
2
I
2

1

I

4
I 1
3 2

11
1

443111

3 2

322
4

4 3

4 1 3
4 4 3
4

1

1

1

3

3

1

3:22:22“

INone

2
3

Mild

Moderate
4 Marked

4

+.6

+-7

4
4

&gt;+-7
Mean diff.
Change in slow/fast ratio

firearm

+.026

+.or4

+.401

are also observable in the electroencephalographic indices. Table III shows the changes
in the slow to fast EEG activity ratio demonstrating a wide range in changes for the
controls, a similar pattern for the imipramine group, but a change in only one direc—
tion—that of increased slowing for the chlorpromazine group. The mean increase in
slow-wave activity for the chlorpromazine group was more than I5 times that of the
References p. 384.

�384

M. POLLACK et

al.

control and imipramine groups. There was also a signiﬁcant relation between the increase in slow-wave activity and increasing age with chlorpromazine—older patients
being more susceptible to maximum change.
DISCUSSION

The psychological and EEG ﬁndings show that the agents studied affect these random—
ly selected subjects differentially, producing drug—speciﬁc spectrums of change scores.
This demonstration of drug speciﬁc proﬁles based on multiple tests supports previous
statements by such workers as WIKLER“, LEHMANN7, and KLERMAN et al.8. It should
be noted, however, that these test score proﬁles are contingent on population characteristics and not solely on the biochemical properties of the agents tested. While no
adequate delineation of salient population characteristics is available, two general
schemata are in use—the diagnostic nomenclature, and the concept of ”target symp—
toms”. Neither scheme adequately reﬂects population characteristics, and further
studies of multivariate behavioral, physiologic and psychologic characteristics are
necessary for such delineation. It is thus imperative that drug studies utilize more
detailed analyses of pretreatment physiological and psychological functioning. In the
absence of such methodological reﬁnements, the present confusing and contradictory
data about “drug effects”, “paradoxical reactions”, and imputed speciﬁcities will
continue.
CONCLUSION

I. Pattern speciﬁcities in various tasks can be identiﬁed for group data.
2. Within various groups, individual differences may be great, leading to failure
for some group data to achieve signiﬁcant differences. Further exploration of pattern
speciﬁties for subjects is warranted, using some of the more recent statistical techniques of multivariate analysis.
3. Such pattern speciﬁcities for clusters of subjects may be a more meaningful way
of ordering psychiatric subjects for evaluative studies than conventional nosological
methods.
4. Group data for EEG, CFF and behavior are consistent with neurophysiologic—
adaptive views of drug therapeutic efﬁcacy.
REFERENCES
1

3

3
7

M. FINK, A uniﬁed theory of the action of physiodynamic therapies. ]. Hillside Hosp, 6 (1957)
197.
M. FINK, Effect of anticholinergic compounds on post-convulsive EEG and behavior of psychiatric patients. Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., 12 (1960) 359.
M. FINK, R. SHAW, G. GROSS AND F. S. COLEMAN, Comparative study of chlorpromazine and
insulin coma in the therapy of psychosis. ]. Am. Med. Assoc., 166 (1958) 1846.
M. FINK, Electroencephalographic and behavioral effects of Tofranil. Cari. Psychiat. Assoc. f.,
4 (I959) 166 SG. A. ULET’I‘ AND R. G. LOEFFEL, A new resonator-integrator unit for the automatic brain wave
analyser. Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., 5 (1953) 113.
A. WIKLER, The Relation of Psychiatry to Pharmacology, Williams &amp; Wilkins, Baltimore, 1957.
H. E. LEHMANN AND J. CSANK, Differential screening of phrenotropic agents in man. J. Clin.
Exptl. Psychopathol., 18 (1957) 222.
G. L. KLERMAN, A. DIMASCIO, M. GREENBLATT AND M. RINKEL, The inﬂuence of speciﬁc per—
sonality patterns on the effects of phrenotropic agents. In Biological Psychiatry, Grune &amp; Stratton, New York, 1959, pp. 224—239.

Printed in The Netherlands

��IWEGPSIGIGLMIB RESPGISB

'

“runs

at

sons rsrczonorzc nuns

Ha: Fullnek Ph.D., Erie Earp 3.1.
George Krauthunor

Ph.n., Donald 1. Klein

Cad HI! Pink

H.D.

Ht”.

Iran the Dapartnent or Exporinentnl Psychiutry, Hillside Helpital,
Glcn Oaks, 3.1., U.I.
Prouontod at the Second Meeting of the Gdllogiuu Internationale Houro~
Payehophnrnacologicun, Basal, July 1960.

1?: 7/60

�Probles:

_ihis study or the node of action at soae er the never
psychotropic agents was teraulated within the tranework of a
neurophysielogie—adaptive hypothesis (1). The concept, derived
from earlier work on oonvulsive therapies (2), views clinical
behavioral change as a resultant of the interaction of alterations
in brain function and the personality of the subject. the
,present study enphasises the question or pattern specificity
of drug action and its relation to individual differences in
behavioral response. The partieelar drugs utilised, ehler»
proaasine (3) and iaipranine (h), were selected on the basis
of pilot studies in this institution in which their ettectiveu
nose in altering physiologic and behavioral patterns had been
demonstrated.

this preeentatien is
currently in progress.

an

interil report

of a study

�hethed:
VIGonseestiye

referrals for

drug

adninistratien in a

voluntary psychiatric hospital were assigned at render to
one of the three drug regimens - (1) ohlorpronasine with
1.21 preoyelidine added, (2) inipraaine, and a (3) plaeebo.
Hedioatien vas adainietered in liquid vehicle in a fixed
dosage schedule, to a saxiaua in tour weeks. chlorproaasine was
begun at 300 as. and increased to 1200 :3. daily and iaipraaine
tree 75 to 300 as. Patients continued to be seen three times
weekly in individual payohotherapeatio interviews during the
period of drug treataent.
Analysis of the data is liaited to the first us cases.
These patients are notohrenioally ill - the majority being
adaitted for their first hospitalisation free the ooaaenity,
and a saaller percentage rehoepitalised for a recurrence or their
illness. Their mean age was 35.5 years, and yeare of schooling
was 11.9 years. Apprexiaetel! 575 were diagnosed in the group
or sohisophrenias, 281 as affective psychoses and 15S psyche‘
neuroses and eharaoter disorders.
Patients were exaained in a four day period prior to drug
adainistration on a fixed schedule or physiological and psyche—
legieal prooederee which was repeated iering the sixth week of
drug

treataent.

�Results:
in cone of the aeaeoree with drug treataente
in the figure I. the EEG patterns aeaeored

Group changes

are

shown

--~----~--“-.
FIGURE I

..—..'.....u.

quantitatively through electronic frequency analyeie (5) show
that inipranine and ohloryronaeine differ significantly from
the control group and from each other. There was a eignificant
reduction in the total electrical activity in the inipranine
group, while there wee an increase both in the amount of slow
ahd
wave activity
the slow to test activity ratio: in the
chlorpronaeine group.
-Thc reduction in the critical flickerotueien (CPI) threehold
ie noted only for the chlorproxaaine group. Thin test
correlated with the increase in EEG elow wave activity. The
rotor tests also reflect a differential drug effect with
uneteadieeee increased by the two drugs, ﬁapping rate unaltered,
and pursuit rotor inproved only by the igipranine group. The
the
greatest change in intellectual functionihg rae scored by
no-drug group, preeeut to a leeeer degree in the iaipraaine
group and absent in the chlorprenaeine group. the lack of
equivalent changes for the drug grounsnay reflect an inhibition
of the expected practice effect.
In clinical behavior, all groups showed a reduction in
coupleinte on self-rating ae measured by the Johne napkins
Scale, with the reduction being greater for the drug groups.

�.h’
611d.
In the
load 80:10, 3 Q-Iort bohuviornl rttilg, that.
an. a qunatitt‘ivo iodnction in both tho pntaoat'n and tho

dﬁﬂttr'. 2:11:33 a: 'dcprocttun' in

tn. contrcl

ﬁhc drug grvup but

‘ot (tr

group.
#311. than. du$t indicatc s ptttorn thnt angg-ata
dittorontiul drug tcttvlﬁy, ‘horo w‘u narkad ho‘crogonuity
within tuck grvup an Oneh nonairo. Fitlrc 2 pluts at. ohnngca

------”--‘
FIGURE 2

ouudunouca

in ctr tar itch aubaoe‘. rho nunbtr within Ouch ban rotort. the 07:1tatton o: n «inn;- tn bahnviur, rated on t tour-point
.031. by sh. ovnlnuting pnynhtutrtnt. it... ‘20 glohnl ch18...
13 bchuvior ratiuga, and gr. not uncocaarily‘oquavglnnt #0
rating. it ingrQVCIdnt. (lot. that £ho ratttan c: habnvtorul

'3' tld 'h' IIII

aunt often ussoctutcd with ehnngnl 1n
err-o: uni. than on. cycle)
Althodgh tbs d1£t¢rcnoo in 3033 err near. botviun
'tltpruutno and tho «Chiral group van tot signitiegnt, 6h:
atttorcnco 1: vartthtltﬁy (1 ratio) III utgnizicgnt (p .o;).
admiral
It.
gran; unused u narruv r.n¢c at chgngo, vnryiu;
chaago

Iran
tron

to n! 31:10:. In contrast; tut Slipranlno xrtup :;n¢od
+2 tn -5 grains, and chlarpzalnsinn (ran not. to -6 cyclan.
Ina chlorprunalinn stump chang- vas a: Shh downward atroction
only. the 1nd£v1dnu1 dittorono¢n ta thn t1¢irtiiill If G?!
tarantula 1:. .13d ohaorvahln 13 thn olaotro.ncopha10¢raph1¢
«an... run:- 3 an: tho clung“ 1a a. :1» u
no «any;
+1

an

�-5...

ﬁ.‘ﬂ---‘ﬂ“.119333 3

O‘ﬂumnabndou

ratio demonstrating a wide range in changes fer the controls,
a eiailar pattern tor the 1a1praaine group, but a change in
enly one direction that of increaaed slewing fer the chlorpreaaaina sweep. The teen increase in elev wave activity
for the ehlorpreaaaine group was more than 15 tines that or
—

the central and 1a1praaine groupe. there was also a
aignifieant relation between the increaee in aloe wave
activity and increasing age with chlorpreaaaine - elder

patiente being late eneceptible te naxinna change.

�Dieeeeeion:

psychological and £36 findings ehoe that the
agente etudied affect theee randomly eeleoted eubjecte
differentially, producing drug-epocitio epoctroae or change
eooree. This deeonotration or drug epocitic profiles
based on multiple tests supports previoue statements by ouch
The

(7), and Klenaan et al (8).
It ehould be noted, however, that theee toot ecore profiles
are contingent on population ohareoterietioa and not eolely
on the biochemical propertiee e: the agente tested. While
no adeqoete delineation of eelient population oheraoterietice
ie available, two general eohenata are in nee ~ the diagnoetio
neaenclatore, and the concept or I"tax-got eynpteae'. leither
ooheee adequately retleete population oharaoterietioe, and
further otudiee of multivariate behavioral, phyeiologio end
peyohelogio oharaoterietioe are neeeeeary for each delineation.
It in thee imperative that drug etodiee utilise more detailed
analyses or pretreataent psychological and physiological
toentioning. In the abeenoe or euoh aethodological refinements,
the present confueing and contradictory data about ”drug
effects", "paradoxical reactions“, and iapeted epeoiiicitiee
will continue.
workere ao Wikler

(6),

Lohmann

�Conclueieﬁ:
(1) ~Psttern

speeifieities
identified for group dsts.

1n

vsrieus tasks can be

differencss
individusl
various
Within
groups,
(2)
to
dsts
sons
for
group
to
failure
be
lesding
great,
as:
of
Further
explorstien
differences.
sehisve signifiesnt
some
using
usrrsntsd,
is
for
subjects
psttsra speeitities
of the nets recent ststistiesl techniques at nultivsrists
snslysis.
or
clusters
for
Bush
(3)
pattern speeitieities
of
psychistrie
ordering
he
nssniugful
we:
nsre
s
nsy
sabjsets
nsselegiesl
eenventiensl
thsa
studies
evaluative
for
subjects

methods.

.

(h) ﬁreup dsts fer use, err and behsvier sre eensistent
with nearephysielsgie-sdspt1ts views 9! drug therspeutic

etilesey.

�‘8REFEREHGES

tho
Action
or
of
Thoory
Enitiod
Physiodynonic
i
Thoropioo. J. Hillaido IOIE. é; 197~206, 1957.
2. link, H: Effect of Anticholinorgio Gonpoundo on Poot~
convulsivo BEG ond Behavior of Psychiatric Potionto.
E30 6113. lcurophyoiol. $3: 359-369, 1960
3. Pink, H., Show, 3., Grout, G. and Calcium, 1.8.
Corporativo Study of chlorprouojino onc Insulin Geno in
the therapy or Poychoéis. J. inor. nod. Aoooc. ;§gs
18h6~18§0, i958.
h. rink, H: Electroencephalographic and Behavioral
Effects of Torronil. Gonna. Pczch. Assoc. J. g. 166$~1718,

1. rink,

K:

1959.

Blott, G.A., Ind Lootfcl, 3.6. A new resonator1ntogrotor unit for the antarctic brain wave onolyaor.
Clio. Houroghzaiol., g} 113-115, 1953.
6. Viklor, A.: 2&amp;0 Relation of Pazchiotrz to Phornocologz,
an. a Wilkins, Boltinoro, 1957.
Lohnonn, B.E. and Crank, 3.: Bittorontioi scrocning or
Phronotropic Agents in Hon. J. Olin. Razor. Pczchogothol.
EEG

lg:

222—235, 1957.

Klornan, 0.1., Dixaccio, L., ﬁrocnblott, K. and Rinkol, H:
the Influence of Specific Personality Pottcrnc on the

Effects of Phrcnotropio Agents. Biological Pazchiotrz,
Gruno

&amp;

Strottcn,

New

York, 22h-239, 1959.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2814">
                <text>Neuropsychologic response patterns of some psychotropic drugs. In E. Rothlin (ed.), Neuro-psychopharmacology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1961, 2:381-4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2815">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2816">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-50-016</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2817">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2818">
                <text>Pollack, Max; Karp, Eric; Krauthamer; Klein, Donald F.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2819">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2820">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2821">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. REPRINTED FROM E.ROTHLIN (Editor) NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY VOL. 2 (1961). Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum Basle 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2822">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2823">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74484">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81045">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87606">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94167">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="283" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="74">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/2c170ecde2c5784e8f07a062c10eb68d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5609f5c2406d7b6449fb5af08c8f4105</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100700">
                    <text>Reprinted from: E. ROTHLIN (Editor), Neuro-Psychopharmacology, Vol. 2 (1961),
Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale
Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum, Basle 1960
From the Discussion to the First Symposium:
THE PROBLEM OF ANTAGONISTS TO PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS

MAX FINK
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, N. Y. (U.S.A.)
’

It has been

a privilege and a pleasure to read and to listen to the reports by Drs.

and DENBER. These authors have approached the problem of antagonists
to psychotropic drugs from different vantage points: Dr. GADDUM that of the pharma—
cologist — theoretician, assessing general issues; and Dr. DENBER, the experimental
clinician with a speciﬁc problem exemplifying a theoretic principle.
Dr. GADDUM essayed a broad classiﬁcation of drug antagonisms
emphasizing
c0mpetitive inhibition. While studies of this concept have a likelihood of clarifying our
GADDUM

References p. 32.

�DISCUSSION

31

knowledge of drug action, there was little that could be speciﬁed at present. This View,
founded on extensive experience, suggests that a critical appraisal is necessary of the
and
of
relation
theories
serotonin,
fanciful
the
5—hydroxytryptophan
recent
on
many
amine oxidases, amongst others, to human psychoses. If I interpret Dr. GADDUM’s
review correctly, he is describing basic postulates which must be satisfied before drug
antagonisms are established, and such establishment is requisite to the determination
of the site of action of such interactions. Dr. GADDUM notes, that for the determination
of competitive inhibition, four considerations must be fulﬁlled, i.e.:
I. control drugs are not inhibited;
2. antagonistic actions are demonstrable at several sites or systems;
3. dose relationships are systematic; and
4. agents have a common chemical grouping.
To these I would also add, that for such determinations of competitive inhibition
to have signiﬁcance for human psycho—pharmacology, the antagonisms should
not be based on work limited to a single animal species, but should be demonstrated in man.
Dr. DENBER has approached the problem from a speciﬁc experiment — the meas—
urement of changes in various blood chemical elements and gross clinical behavior in
chronic relapsing psychotic subjects. These patients were studied before and after
intravenous mescaline followed by a variety of phenothiazine agents administered as
“antagonists”. Dr. DENBER conﬁrmed his earlier studies that various phenothiazine
derivatives, excepting diethazine, are effective in modifying mescaline clinical affects;
and that such effects are related to the halogenation of the chemical ring structure.
Parenthetically, we can conﬁrm the observation that diethazine is not an antagonist
for hallucinogens, for in our studies diethazine induced illusory states and EEG
desynchronization in psychiatric patients, similar to mescalinel.
The biochemical data indicates the wide range of behaviors altered by these
broad acting agents. Like his earlier studies on the changes in the EEG, and the observations from others of the blocking of induced psychotomimetic effects as measured in
frame—
theoretic
from
be
this
data
must
a
analyzed
etc.,
mood,
perception,
language,
work of the relevance, or imputed causal relations, of such observations to clinical
behavior. No such framework is given and the assumed connection between these
blood changes and clinical behavior is obscure. Indeed, Dr. DENBER concludes that:
“In all probability, the reactions observed represent part of a total body response
to a stress-. .
Assuming this conclusion is a reasonable working hypothesis, we are taxed by the
problem of critical experiments to elucidate the body response to psychotomimetic
and psychotropic agents. In this task we are faced by a number of monumental
problems, and it is here that Dr. GADDUM’S principles and Dr. DENBER’S experiments
approach a common base, albeit tenuous. For what Dr. GADDUM fails to indicate in
his principles are the signiﬁcant behaviors to be studied; while Dr. DENBER selects
be—
interactive
clinical
of
and
—~that
blood
of
behavior
global
chemistry
two aspects
havior — as dependent variables.
It is the selection of signiﬁcant experimental variables and their quantiﬁcation
that represents a central problem of human psychopharmacologic research today.
Assuming that the laws of human interpersonal behavior are the goals of our studies,
and that psychopharmacology represents one aspect of the modiﬁcation of human
References

12.

32.

�FIRST SYMPOSIUM

32

interpersonal behavior, what evidence is there that any single aspect of task behavior
is correlated with changes in interpersonal behavior induced by drugs?
I am troubled by the fact that innumerable investigations have selected a single
or few variables on the biochemical level and correlated these with a single or few
variables on the behavioral level, the selection of which is not designed to elucidate a
theoretic framework but rather based on a vague personal notion. Thus, investigator
after investigator selects pole climbing, bar pressing, conditioned avoidance, jiggle
cage movement, etc. as single variables in a wide range of animal studies; and rating
scales, self—ratings, psychomotor tasks, EEG, blood pressure, and many others in
human studies as single signiﬁcant variables. Few studies assess the relevance of these
tasks for the prediction of the direction or efﬁcacy of drug effects on interpersonal
behavior.
Other signiﬁcant problems include that of generalizing from non—psychopathic
populations to our understanding of disordered human behavior. A sub—aspect of this
problem is the generalization from one psychopathic population to another without
fully taking into account such population factors as genetic predisposition, early
organic traumata, varying acculturation processess and sociologic status upon population characteristics. These aspects may so alter the observations obtained with a
speciﬁc pharmacologic agent as to give varying, and occasionally opposite results when
similar studies are done in different settings.
Some years ago, Dr. ABRAHAM WIKLER outlined the problem facing experimental
psychopharmacologistsZ. In assessing the relation of psychopharmacology to experimental psychiatry, he recommended:
“In psychiatry we need more properly controlled studies on the comparative
effects of a variety of drugs, on the behavior of varied, but selected, homogeneous
groups of subjects, under varied but standardized experimental conditions, and with
varied but speciﬁed activities of the observer.”
In this I concur and commend it to the Collegium as the most logical beginning
to the resolution of the problems of antagonists to psychotropic agents.
REFERENCES
1
2

M. FINK, Effect of anticholinergic agent, Diethazine on EEG and behavior: signiﬁcance for
theory of convulsive therapy. A .M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat, 80 (1958) 380.
A. WIKLER, The Relation of Psychiatry to Pharmacology, Williams &amp; Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.,
I957-

Printed

in‘

The Netherlands

�‘

w33;;
érn‘msmﬁ‘

’1angmgemam: $§i~wgﬂ

.91»:

~'

‘iWMem 423d mmhm: maximmmvmﬁ

.:

{Err thwxsﬁsw
9mm:
ﬁm téﬁm,
,

.

.

1

.

Mamiew.

&gt;

�D

First

I

I

S C U 3 8

Synponiun

TH! PROBLBH'OF ANTAGOHISTS

lax 713k,

~

0

l

0.1.H.P.

TO PSYCKOTROPIC DRUGS

H.D.

Pro. tho Depart-ant o! Bxporinontal Psychintry,
Billlido Hoapitnl, clan Oaks l.!.
July hth, 1960, 3:310, Switaorland

�It
listen

has been a privilege and a pleasure to read and to
to the reports by Drs. Gaddun and Denber. These

authors have approached the problem or antagonists to
psychotropic drugs from different vantage points Dr. Gaddna that or the pharmacologist - theoretician, assess~
ing general issues; and Dr. Denber, the experimental-clinician
with a specific problen exeaplitying a theoretic principle.
—

Dr. Gaddnn essayed a breed

classification of drug antagonisns emphasising conpetitive inhibition. While studies of
this concept have a likelihood of clarifying our knowledge of
drug action, there was little that could be specified at
present.
This view, founded on extensive experience, suggests that a
critical
appraisal is necessary d’the nany recent fanciful theories on
the relation of serotonin, S—hydroxytryptephan and anine
oxidases,

alongst others, to huaan psychoses. It I interpret Dr. Gaddun's
review correctly, he is describing basic postulates which must
be satisfied before drug antagonisns are
established, and such
establishnent is requisite to the deternination of the site of
action or such interactions. Dr. Oaddna notes, that for the
determination of competitive inhibition, four considerations
nuet be fulfilled:

i.e.:

(1) control drugs are not inhibited;
(2) antagonistic actions sre demonstrable at several
sites or systems;

�To

(3) dose rslaticnships are systoaaticg and
(h) agonts hsvs a con-on cboaical grouping.
that
would
for ouch dotorsinatioos of
thoss I
also add,

coapotitivo inhibition to have significance for huaan psycho~
pharmacology, tho antagodsus should not be basod on work
bo
doaonstrablo
should
but
aniacl
a
to
spacios,
single
liaitod
in san.
Dr. Donbor has approacbad tho probloa Iron a spocitic
oxpariaont - tho aoasursaont of changoa in various blood ohsaical
closonta and gross clinical behavior in chronic rolapsiog psychotic
and
intravonous
botoro
Thoso
studiod
attor
scro
patioots
subjects.
aoscalino followed by a varicty of phonothiasino agonts adaioistorod so *antsgonists'. Dr. Donbor contirsod his oarlior studios
that various phonothiosino dorivativos, oxcspting diothasino, aro
ottoctivo in soditying aoscalins clinical atrocts; and that such
ottocts arc rolatod to tho halogonation of tho choaical ring
structuro. Paronthotically, so can contira tho cbsorvation that
diothasino is not an antagonist for hallucinogons, for in our
studios diotbasino iodacod illusory stats: and EEG dosynchronisatioc in psychiatric potiouts, aioilar to aoscalino (1).
Tbs biochoaicsl data indicatos tho aids songs of bohaviors
altorod by thoso broad acting scouts. Liko his oarlior studios?
on tho changos in tho EEG, and tho cbsorvations from othors of
tho blocking of indccod psychctoaiaotic ottocts as Ioascrod in
bo
snot
data
analysod
this
languago, aood, porcopticc, otc.,

�-3Iron a theoretic fraaevork of the relevance, or iapcted cancel
relatione, of anch obeervationa to clinical behaviour. No Inch
fraaevork ia given and the aeauaed connection between these
blood changee and clinical behavior in ebecnre. Indeed, Dr. Denber

that:
"In all probability, the reactione obaerved repreeent
part or a total body reaponee to a atreaa- ...'
leenaing thie conclnaion ie a reaeonable working hypo-»
theeie, we are taxed by the problea of critical experiaente
concludee

to elucidate the body reeponee to peyohotoaiaetic and paychetropic agent. In thia teak we are faced by a nnaber of
aonnaental probleae, and it ie here that Dr. Gaddna'e principlee
and Dr. Denber’a experiaenta approach a coaeon baae, albeit
tennoce. For what Dr. Gaddna taile to indicate in hie principlee
are the eignificant behaviore to be atodied; while Dr. Denber
eelecte two aapecta of behavior - that of blood cheaietry and
global clinical interactive behavior - aa dependent variables.
It in the eelection or significant experiaental variablee
and their quantification that repreeente a central problea o:
hnaan peyohopharaacologic reeearch today. ieanaing that the
lava o: hnaan interpereonal behavior are the goale or our etndiee,
and that paychopharnacology repreeenta one aepect of the aodification or hnaan interperaonal behavior, what evidence ie there
that any single aepect of teak behavior is correlated with ehangee
in interpereonal behavior induced by drugs?

�-1...

I on troubled by the tent thet innnnereble investicetione
heve eelected e eingle or ten veriehlee on the bieeheeioel level
end correleted theee with e eincle or ten verieblee on the
behevierel level, the eelectien or which ie not deeigncd to
elncidete e theoretic freeeeork but rether beeed on e vogue
pereenel notion. Thne, inveetigetor efter inveetigetor eelecte
pole cliebing, her preeeing, conditioned evoidence, Jigcle cege
leveeent, etc. ee eingle veriehlee in e wide reuse of enieel
etndiee; end retina ecelec, eelt-retinge, peyohoeotor teeke,
EEO, blood preeenre, end eeny othere in hneen etndiee ee single
eixnificent verieblee. rev etndiee eeeeee the relevence of these
teeke tor the prediction of the direction or etficecy o8 drug
ettecte on interpereonel behevior.
Other eigniticent prohleee include thet o: generelieing
tree non-peyohopethio populetione to our underetending of
dieordered hneen behevior. e eobaeepect of this problee is the
generelieetien free one peychopethic populetion to enother without
ench
eccount
into
populetion rectore ee genetic
teking
telly
prediepoeition, eerly orgenic tredeete, verying eccnlturetion
proceeeee end eociologio etetne upon popnletion cherecterietice.»
Theee eepeote eey eo elter the oheervetione chteined with e epecifio
phereeoologic egeet ee to give verying, end oceeeionelly opposite
reenlte when eieiler etndiee ere done in different settings.

�-5Solo yoara ago, Dr. Ahrahaa Hiklor ootlinod tho prohloa
In
aoooooiog
(2).
paychopharacologiato
oxporiaontal
facing

tho relation of poyohopharoacology to oxporioontal psychiatry,
ho roconaondods
'Iu poychiatry Io nood noro properly controllod
otndioo on tho oooparativo ottocto of a variety of drogo,
on tho behavior of variod, hot ooloctod, hologonoooo
groups or ouhaooto, undor variod hot otandardiaod

oxporiaontal conditiono, and with variod but opocitiod
activitioa of tho oboorvor.’
In this I concur, and connond it to tho collogiuo an the
aoot logical hoaiuning to tho roaolution of tho prohloao of
antagoniota to psychotropic agonto.

�1.

link, n: Effect at Antieholinergic Agent, Dietheeine3on
EEG end Behavior:
Significance fer Theory of
Convaleive Therapy.
.§_o_

2.

"‘

AHA

Arch. ﬁgural. a Pezehiet.

380‘387, 1958.

Hitler, A: The Relation of Pezphiatrz to Phernecologzl
In. Wilkins, Beltinere, 1957.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2824">
                <text>Problems of antagonists to psychotropic drugs, 30-2 (Discussion, Neuropsychologic response patterns of some psychotropic drugs).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2825">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2826">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-51-017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2827">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2828">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2829">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2830">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2831">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprint from: E.ROTHLIN (Editor), Neuro-Psychopharmacology, Vol. 2 (1961), Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum, Basle 1960 From the Discussion to the First Symposium: THE PROBLEM OF ANTAGONISTS TO PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2832">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2833">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74485">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81046">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87607">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94168">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="284" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="75">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/0a85dc880c126770a2f4471ab91c4072.pdf</src>
        <authentication>44a73db773213930685e535c3d7c50a0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100701">
                    <text>Inhalant—lnduced Convulsions
MAX FINK, M.D.: ROBERT L. KAHN. Ph.D.: ERIC KARP. B.A.
MAX POLLACK. Ph.D.; MARTIN A. GREEN. M.D.: BARRE ALAN, MD.
AND

HENRY J. LEFKOWITS. M.D.
GLEN OAKS. LONG ISLAND, N.Y.

�Reprinted from the Archives of General Psychiatry
March 1961, Vol. 4, pp. 259— 266
Copyright 1961, by American Medical Association

llHllllllll|llllllllllllllllll||llllllllll||llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

MAX FINK, M.D.

ROBERT L. KAHN, Ph.D.

Inhalant—Induced

Convulsions
Signiﬁcance for the Theory of the
C onvulsive Therapy Process

Despite many years of investigation of
the convulsive therapy process, there is still
much controversy concerning the importance
of the seizure itself. Most studies have
concluded that the convulsion is a necessary index of cerebral change essential to
clinical behavioral change.9'1°'1‘53?"39 Some
investigators, nevertheless, have assigned
signiﬁcance not to the seizure but to such
factors as the psychological meaning of the
treatment to the patient, feelings of fear,
and the repeated loss of consciousness.3'4'28
The early studies of Kalinowsky et a1.24
and Pacella et al.,3‘0 demonstrating both
clinical and electrographic differences be—
Submitted for publication Aug. 26, 1960.
From the Department of Experimental Psy—
chiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Aided by grants MY-2092 and M—927 of the
National Institute of Mental Health, US. Public
Health Service.

g

ERIC KARP, B.A.
MAX POLLACK, Ph.D.

MARTIN A. GREEN, M.D.
BARRE ALAN, M.D.
AND

HENRY J. LEFKOWITS, M.D.
GLEN OAKS, LONG ISLAND, N.Y

tween grand mal and petit mal treatments
indicated the signiﬁcant role of the seizure.
The various studies comparing convulsive
with subconvulsive treatment demonstrated
that techniques culminating in a convulsion
were uniformly associated with measurable
degrees of neurophysiologic and behavioral
change, while subconvulsive techniques were
not.1‘5'1’7"°’3‘40 In
recent studies from this
laboratory, similar differences in the 2
treatment types were observed for such
aspects of behavior as EEG slow-wave ac—
tivity,8’10 language changes after amobar—
bital,19"21 and perceptual tasks. 1'3 22 25
A second aspect to the problem of under—
standing convulsive therapy concerns the
relation of the method of inducing the
seizure to the therapeutic outcome. Seizure
duration, type of current, and electrode
placemerit are
among the variables that have
65/259

�ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
been studied. While the investigations
indicate that changes in behavioral and neurophysiologic indices are related to these
parameters, the differences reported for the
various seizure—producing methods are small
and statistically insigniﬁcant. Major differ—
ences, however, are observed between seizure
and nonseizure groups. For example, in a
recent monograph, Ottosson reported an
increase in the duration of unmodiﬁed
electrically induced seizures compared with
those modiﬁed by premedication with lido—

Although the lidocaine—treated pa—
tients showed less change in indices of
anxiety, retardation, and global behavior
than patients treated with unmodiﬁed
seizures, the differences were not signiﬁcant.
In our studies, while seizure duration 17
and type of current 11 have been related to
the degree of behavioral and neurophysio—
logic change, there were no differences with
relation to therapeutic outcome. Thus, while
parameters of the seizure method may bear
some relation to therapeutic efﬁcacy, the
differences are slight among the techniques,
provided that grand mal seizures have been
induced.
Further exploration of the importance of
the seizure was made possible by recent
experimental interest in seizures induced
by inhalant (hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether, Indoklon,7), and intravenous (PM—10906)
agents. This study was undertaken to com—
pare the electrical and inhalant seizure—pro—
ducing methods with regard to effects on
clinical behavior, interseizure electroenceph—
alogram, and psychologic test performance
in order to clarify the role of the mode of
seizure induction in the convulsive therapy
process.
caine.’29

‘

In a voluntary psychiatric hospital 27 consecutive
unselected patients referred for convulsive therapy
were randomly divided into 2 groups using a
Gellerman order.16 In 12 patients, convulsions were
induced by a Medcraft alternating current in—
strument using suprathreshold currents, and in 15
others by inhalation of hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether,
following the method of Esquibel et al." Premedication in all cases was limited to sublingual atropine
(1.0 mg). Treatments were administered 3 times
per week for 10 to 24 applications, the total num-

66/260

her being determined by the clinical judgment of
the staff psychiatrist.
Ages ranged from 19 to 58, with a mean age of
38.5 years in the electric convulsive therapy (ECT)
group; and 19 to 49, with a mean age of 35.5
years in the hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether group. The
mean years of education were 11.5 years (ECT)
and 12.6 years (hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether). Of the
27 subjects, 12 were classiﬁed as depressive psy—
choses, 8 as schizophrenia, mixed type, and 7 as
schizophrenia, paranoid type. The distribution of
diagnoses, age range and years of education within
the 2 samples, did not differ signiﬁcantly.
Behavioral change was evaluated weekly in interviews by the patient’s therapist and by the staff
psychiatrist. Such aspects as mood, ideation,
memory, sleep, appetite, speech patterns, participation in group activities, and relation to staff and
to other patients were recorded and changes
assessed qualitatively.
Electroencephalograms were done prior to treatment, weekly during the treatment course on a day
after a convulsion, and 2 weeks after the last
treatment. Records were measured for the amount
of induced slowing (6 cps and slower) in anterior
temporal-vertex leads, in 66 second samples.8
Various psychologic procedures were administered prior to treatment, during the fourth week
(10—12 treatment period), and 2 weeks after the
last treatment. The measures included Wechsler—
Bellevue subtests (information, digit span, object
assembly, and digit symbol) ; Gottschaldt type embedded geometric ﬁgures”; perceptions of pseudo—
isochromatic embedded colored ﬁgures at high-speed
tachistoscopic exposure,31 and a modiﬁed California

F

Scale.28

In addition, spine x-ray studies were done prior
to and at the end of the treatment course.

Observations
Clinical Behavior.—The inhalation of
hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether regularly resulted in
a grand mal convulsion, similar to that
induced electrically. For the hexafluorodiethyl ether group, induction was slower
and the initial cry and opisthotonic posturing were often omitted. In clonic and tonic
manifestations, postseizure apnea, and post—
seizure behavior, the groups resembled each
other closely.
In short term evaluations of clinical be—
havioral change, the types of behavior manifested were similar in the two groups.
Patterns of denial, hypomania, withdrawal,
somatization, paranoid excitement, and confusional—memory loss were observed in both
1.

Vol. 4, March, 1961

�INHALANT—INDUCED CONVULSIONS
TABLE

l.—Beham'0ral Patterns

TABLE

No. of Subjects

Recovered
Much
Improved

_—A_.
,_._
Indoklon *
ETC

Eupho;ia, denial, hypomania
Somatization, withdrawal
Severe confusion, memory loss

6
6
3

7

2
3

Improved

Unimproved

Indoklon

7

.5

E C ’1‘

3

6

5

1

x2
*

2,—Discharge Evaluations

&lt;

1.0,

not signiﬁcant.

Hexaﬂuorodiethyi other.

populations with approximately equal frequency (Table 1).
Complication rates were similar. While
patients tolerated the inhalation procedure,
there were frequent episodes of breath
holding and leakage about the mask, making
this induction less reliable. Fractures were
observed radiographically in 3 patients
treated with hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether and in

during ECT.
Administrative evaluations of clinical improvement at the time of discharge from
the hospital were equivalent (Table 2).
Ratings of recovered and much improved
were recorded for approximately half of
each group.
2. Electroencephalography.—Interseizure
serial electroencephalograms, both qualita—
tively and quantitatively were similar in the
2 groups. Progressive symmetric slowing of
dominant frequencies and an increase in
voltages were apparent in all leads, with
frontal and anterior—temporal preponderance. Burst and occasional spike formations
were noted in both. Quantitative measures
of induced slow—wave activity during each
week of treatment were not signiﬁcantly
different (Table 3), although the maximum
EEG change appeared earlier in the hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether group than in the ECT
group.
3

TABLE

N o.

3.

Psychologic Measures.—Intergroup
analyses (Mann Whitney U Test) of the
observations for each of the psychological
tasks revealed no difference prior to treat—
ment, during the fourth week, and 2 weeks
after treatment for the 2 treatment groups.
Intragroup analyses, however, showed con—
sistent changes in various measures from
pretreatment to the fourth week; and from
the fourth week to 2 weeks after treatment
(Table 4), both in the hexaﬂuorodiethyl
ether and in the ECT groups.
In the Wechsler—Bellevue subtests, group
means showed a signiﬁcant decrease in
scores (poorer performance) for each sub—
test during treatment, and a return to pre«
treatment levels in the post-treatment period.
One subtest, object assembly, demonstrated
signiﬁcantly increased scores after treatment.
Similar patterns were observed for the
tachistoscopic measures and the F scores.
While increased errors on the embedded
ﬁgure tests were observed during treatment,
the difference was not signiﬁcant. After
treatment, the errors in this test decreased
signiﬁcantly from pretreatment scores. On
the F scale there was an increase in scores
with treatment, and a decrease following
treatment. For each of these measures, both
treatment groups reﬂected a similar pattern
of change.

3.—Postconvulsive EEG Slow-Wave Activity
(Average % Time)
Pretreatment

4-6

Rx

7-9

Rx

Wk. After
Last Treatment
2

10-12

Rx

Indokl'm

15

6.0

29.4

50.3

51.2

16.8

E CT

12

4.0

29.8

39.2

47.5

18.0

Fin/a et al.

67/261

�ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
TABLE 4.———Eﬂect

of Hexaﬂnorodieth'yl Ether and Electrically Induced Seizures
on Psychologic Test Performances
(Scores Expressed as Mean Differences)
Pretreatment
and Fourth Week

1.

Wechsler-Bellevue (weighted subtcst score)
((1) Information
(b)
(c)
((1)

2.

3.
4.

Digit span

Ind
ECT
Ind
Ind

ECT

Ind

Digit symbol

ECT

Ind

Tachistoscopy (errors)

Ind
ECT
Ind
ECT

F scale

+1.5 1
+1.7 T
+2.7 T
+2.3 1
+4.1 *
+4.81
+3.3 1
+2.3 1

—1.3
—2.4

*

+0.2

T

-—0.7

—l.9

*

+0.8

.

—0.4

+2.7 ‘
+3.5
+0.8

1‘

—0.1
—6.5
—4.9

+9.7 *
+8.2 *
+2.0
+3.3
+7.7 1
+5.2 1

ECT

Embedded ﬁgures (errors)

Fourth Week and
Post-Treatment

—2.7 ’
—1.4
—1.3
—2.5 ’r
—2.4 I

EC‘I‘

Object assembly

Pretreatment
and Post-Treatment

—16.2
—13.1

i

——4.1 1

——2.1

——2.6

t

‘

—-—5.9

I

--11.6 I

—3.9

+1.2

——4.0

T

Ind = Indoklon (hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether).
Using Wilcoxon’s T for paired replicates:

*

p &lt; 0.02'

’r

p &lt; 0.05.

EEG Correlations.
The changes in performance on the psy—
chologic tasks from the pretreatment to the
fourth week testing period were signiﬁcant—
ly related to the degree of induced EEG
slow—wave activity for both groups (Table
5). Rank order correlations demonstrated
that decrements in performance on the
4. Test Performance:

Wechsler-Bellevue digit span and object as—
sembly subtests, tachistoscopy, and em—
bedded ﬁgures tasks were signiﬁcantly
related to the amount of electrographic
change. Similarly, an increase in F score
was associated with increased EEG slowing.
When the observations in the hexaﬂu—
orodiethyl ether and ECT groups were
individually analyzed, signiﬁcant correla—
tions were noted for various tasks. In the
hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether group, the deerement
TABLE

~

Indoklon
ECT
Indoklon and ECT
‘

p &lt;
in &lt;

68/262

:0

&lt;

0.01.

in the Wechsler—Bellevue information and
digit span subtests and in tachistoscOpy was
related to the degree of EEG slowing. In
the ECT group, similar relations were noted
for tachistoscopy, Wechsler-Bellevue digit
span, and object assembly subtests and the

F score.

Comment
Mode of I ndnction.——The inhalant and
the electrically induced seizure groups were
indistinguishable on the various measures
of behavior at each stage of the treatment
process. Since the factor common to both
treatments was the induction of seizures
and not the method of induction, we may
conclude that the method of induction is
not a signiﬁcant variable in the therapy
be—
in
the
Speciﬁcally,
changes
process.
1.

5.—Change in Task Performance and Degree of EEG S low—Wave Activity
(Pretreatment vs. Fourth Week; Rank Order Correlations)
Wechsler-Bellevue Form

,

I

1

Information

Digit
Span

Object
Assembly

Symbol

0.73 "
0.28
0.25

0.54 i
0.72 i
0.61 ‘

0.31
0.60
0.46

0.38
0.34
0.31

1‘

T

Digit

Tachistoscopy
0.62
0.80
0.67

T

*
*

Embedded
Figures
0.13
0.37
0.43

T

F Scale
0.12
0.66
0.38

’r
’r

0.01
0.05

Vol. 4, March, 1961

�INHALANT—INDUCED CONVULSIONS

_

havioral and neurophysiologic indices are sider these results
as reﬂecting differences
dependent upon the induction of seizures, both in population samples and in methods
and not dependent on any single property of scoring behavioral
change. While acute
of the electrical or the inhalant mode of illness and
affective-depressive reactions are
induction.
described for the majority of subjects in
Kurland et a1.26 and Chatrian and Peter— the positive studies,1‘°'27'38
70% of the sub
sen5 have also compared electrical and jects in one
4
negative and 100% in another 28
inhalant seizures. Kurland and his co-work- were classed
as having schizophrenic re—
ers assigned convulsive therapy referrals actions. The facilities in these
investigations
alternately to hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether and serve chronically ill populations, and
prior
ECT groups. They reported that behavioral courses of convulsive
therapy were recorded
ratings, complication rates, psychologic test for nearly half the subjects in
one group4
performances, and cardiovascular reactions and 90% in the other.” The failure to obwere similar in the 2 samples. Chatrian and tain signiﬁcant differences
may also lie in
Petersen, studying schizophrenic subjects the small samples used to test the null
with implanted intracerebral electrodes, re— hypothesis.
ported identical electrographic patterns dur—
Changes in behavior are observed in all
ing seizures and at various postseizure subjects receiving
a course of convulsive
periods for hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether, pen- therapy,1052930533,38 but those
changes evaltylenetetrazol (Metrazol), and electrical uated as clinical
improvement occur only
techniques.
in some. While induced convulsions are a
In studies of seizures induced by various sufﬁcient condition for
behavioral change,
electrical means, equivalent behavioral, psy— they
are only a necessary condition for
chologic, and electrographic effects have improvement.
Thus, measures of behavioral
been reported.3’11’29v39 While these studies
change, such as memory,25 language,19'21
equate the effects of different convulsive and perception 1332 readily demonstrate
sig—
techniques, various nonconvulsive methods niﬁcant differences between
convulsive and
such as subconvulsive, brief stimulus, uni— subconvulsive
techniques within the individ—
directional stimulating, monopolar stimu- ual differences in
personality organization
lating, and focal “convulsive” techniques of the subjects.
Ratings of “improvement,"
have been described, and each in turn however,
with the personality organ-vary
discarded in routine therapy as ineffec— ization of the
subject
in adap—
as
expressed
tive.1‘°"27'39'4‘° For example,
Bergman,2 in tive patterns and ﬂexibility for change;
describing the electrographic effects of the with such environmental variables
ther—
as
“focal—seizure” technique noted that 75%
apist, staff, and family expectations and
of patients had normal records after 15 tolerance for the
elicited adaptive behavior.
such applications, while 70% had “abnor— and with the
duration and degree of induced
mal” records after grand mal seizures. Ulett
neurophysiologic changes. In global esti—
et al.39 have reported differences in the im- mates of “improvement”
the environmental
provement rates of patients receiving con— variables become prepotent. The failure
to
vulsive treatments (60%—80%) and those observe
signiﬁcant differences in improve—
receiving subconvulsive (33%), or controls ment ratings in convulsive and
noncon1‘0
(38%). Our own studies
also demon— vulsive groups may be related as much
to
strate signiﬁcantly greater degrees of these environmental variables
and the perbehavioral and physiologic change for con—
sonality characteristics of the subjects as
vulsive than for subconvulsive treatments. to the induced
physiologic changes.
A number of investigators, however, have
2. Signiﬁcance of the Convulsion.——The
failed to observe differences in improvement evidence indicates
that convulsions are, or
rates for patients treated by convulsive and reﬂect, the signiﬁcant
physiologic events
subconvulsive means?”8 We would con— which
are basic for the therapeutic efﬁcacy
Fink ct al.

69/263

�ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

of convulsive therapies. The speciﬁc role of
the seizure is, however, not clear. That
neither the motor aspects of the seizure
nor the accompanying psychologic factors

are determining variables is demonstrated
by the efﬁcacy of treatments under condi—
tions of muscle paralysis and anesthesia?"2
That the loss of consciousness, itself, is
not the signiﬁcant variable is seen in the
relative inefﬁcacy of repeated administrations of thiopental (Pentothal) or noncon—
vulsive techniques under thiopental.1°'2'7’39
Although the means by which various
agents achieve such changes are not speci—
ﬁed, it is probable that the seizure is but
one expression of a diffuse alteration in
cerebral functioning?” It is this alteration
in brain function which provides the neces—
sary conditions for the behavioral changes
of convulsive therapy.14»2°v40 Among the behavioral changes we would include the im—
mediate alteration in consciousness, recall,
motor patterns, and breathing; and the more
persistent psychologic, perceptual, vegeta—
tive, physiologic, and hormonal patterns,
characteristically described in convulsive
therapy.
Alterations in brain function are reﬂected
in neurochemical changes as the acetylcho—
line and cholinesterasef"7 transaminase,36
and serotonin '34 content of the spinal ﬂuid.
They are also observed in such neurophysi—
ologic measures as increased delta and theta
1‘8
decreased
and
beta
in
activity8
activity
electroencephalograms, and in altered elec—
33735
20"21’4‘0
behavioral
re—
and
trographic
sponsivity to intravenous barbiturates and
to anticholinergic and sympathomimetic
agents"!12 The correlations between the
degree of neurophysiologic change and
changes in perceptual test performance re—
ported here are a reﬂection of these central
changes, as are the perceptualf‘ovl‘?”22 lin—
guisticf‘w1 and clinical behavioral 10,20
changes described in earlier studies.
In a recent review'9 the signiﬁcance of
the acetylcholine—cholinesterase system in
these neurochemical alterations was dis—
cussed. Observations With various anti—
70/264

cholinergic agents and reports of similar
patterns with antihistaminic and sympatho—
mimetic agents indicate the necessity for a
broadly based View of biochemical and brain
function relations, with emphasis on synaptic models.” A suggestive mechanism for
the prolonged alterations in brain function
is seen in the blood—brain barrier studies
of Aird,1 who noted persistent changes in
cerebrovascular permeability following in—
duced convulsions. He related these to the
seizure and not to the passage of electric
currents, and suggested that these changes
may be the enduring physiologic basis for
the induced behavioral change.
Thus, we would conclude that the convulsion, per se, is not a necessary condition
for behavioral change, but neurochemical
change, of which the convulsion is the im—
mediate reﬂection, is prerequisite. Indeed,
were persistent neurochemical and neuro—
physiologic effects induced as readily by
other means, “convulsive” methods would
no longer be necessary. In this regard, the
nonspeciﬁc nature of the convulsive therapy
process has been repeatedly emphasized.14v4‘°

Summary and Conclusions
Consecutive patients referred for convulsive therapy were randomly assigned to
treatment courses by an inhalant (hexa—
ﬂuorodiethyl ether, Indoklon) or electrical

inducing agent.
There were no differences in the two
groups on behavioral, electrographic, or
psychological measures prior to, during, or
2 weeks after treatment. Hospital discharge
ratings were equivalent. Intragroup test dif—
ferences were noted on all measures in both
groups during treatment. These differences
were related to the degree of induced neuro—
physiologic change and the pattern of such
changes were similar in both treatment
methods.
It is concluded that the observed alterations in, brain function are equivalent to
seizures induced by inhalant or electrical
means. The nonspeciﬁcity of convulsions
induced by hexaﬂuorodiethyl ether and the
greater difﬁculty of administration are con—
Vol. 4, March, 1961

�INHALANT—INDUCED CONVULS‘IONS

sidered as deterrents to the continued clin—
ical use of this treatment.
The mode of induction of seizures is an
insigniﬁcant factor in the convulsive therapy
process. Seizures are viewed as one index
of the persistent neurochemical alterations
which are requisite to the behavioral changes
of convulsive therapy.
These observations are discussed within
the framework of the neurophysiologic—
adaptive model of the mode of action of
somatic therapies in psychiatry.
_

The cooperation of Smith Kline &amp; French
Laboratories in providing the hexaﬂuorodiethyl
ether (Indoklon) used in these studies is grate—
fully acknowledged.
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Long Island, N.Y.

REFERENCES
Aird, R. B.: Clinical Correlates of Electroshock Therapy, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.
1.

79:633—639, 1958.

Bergman, P. S.; Impastato, D. J.; Berg,
S., and Feinstein, R.: Electroencephalographic
Changes Following Electrically Induced Focal
Seizures, Conﬁnia neurol. 13:271-277, 1953.
3. Brill, N. Q; Crumpton, E; Eiduson, S.;
Grayson, H. M.; Hellman, L. 1.; Richards, R. A.;
Strassman, H. D., and Unger, A. A.: Investiga—
tion of the Therapeutic Components and Various
Factors Associated with Improvement with Elec—
troconvulsive Treatment: A Preliminary Report,
Am. J. Psychiat. 113:997-1008, 1957.
4. Brill, N. Q; Crumpton, E; Eiduson, S.;
Grayson, H. M.; Hellman, L. I., and Richards,
R. A.: Relative Effectiveness of Various Com—
ponents of Electroconvulsive Therapy, A.M.A.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 81:627—635, 1959.
5. Chatrian, C. E, and Petersen, M. C.: The
Convulsive Patterns Provoked by Indoklon, Metra—
201, and Electro—Shock: Some Depth Electro—
graphic Observations in Human Patients, EEG
Clin. &amp; Neurophysiol. 12:715-725, 1960.
6. Edwalds, R. M.; Experimental Studies with
PM—1090, Int. Rec. Med. &amp; G P Clin. 169 :469—
2.

472, 1956.

Esquibel, A.; Krantz, J. C.; Truitt, E. B.;
Ling, A. S. C., and Kurland, A. A.: Hexafluoro—
diethyl Ether (Indoklon) : Its Use as a Convulsant
in Psychiatric Treatment, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis.
7.

126:530—534, 1958.

Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of
EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in
Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies, A.M.A.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 78:516-525, 1957.
8.

Pink

61‘

al.

Fink, M.; Effect of Anticholinergic Agent,
Diethazine, on EEG and Behavior: Signiﬁcance
for Theory of Convulsive Therapy, A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 80:380—387, 1958.
10. Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L., and Green, M.;
Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process,
Dis. Nerv. System 192113—118, 1958.
11. Fink, M., and Green, M.; Electroencephalographic Correlates of the Electroshock Process,
Dis. Nerv. System 19227, 1958.
12. Fink, M.; Effect of Anticholinergic Com—
pounds on Post-Convulsive EEG and Behavior,
EEG Clin. &amp; Neurophysiol. 12:359—369, 1960.
13. Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L., and Korin, H.;
Effects of Diffuse Altered Brain Function on Per—
ception, in Proceedings of the 15th International
Congress of Psychology, Amsterdam, North—
Holland Publishing Company, 1959, pp. 238-239.
14. Fink, M.; Alterations in Brain Function in
Therapy, in Psychopharmacology Frontiers, edited
by N. S. Kline, Boston, Little, Brown &amp; Company,
9.

1959, pp. 325-332.
15. Fleming, T.

C.: An Inquiry into the Mechanism of Action of Electric Shock Treatments,
J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 124 :440-450, 1956.
16. Gellerman, L. W.: Chance Orders of Alternating Stimuli in Visual Discrimination Ex—
periments, J. Genet. Psychol. 42 2207-208, 1933.
17. Green, M. A.: Relation Between Threshold
and Duration of Seizures and Electrographic
Change During Convulsive Therapy, J. Nerv. &amp;

Ment. Dis. 131:117—120, 1960.
l8.Hoag1and, H.; Malamud, W.; Kaufman,
I. C., and Pincus, G.: Changes in Electroenceph—
alogram and in the Excretion of l7—Ketosteroids
Accompanying Electroshock Therapy of Agitated
Depression, Psychosom. Med. 8:246-251, 1946.
19. Jaffe, J.; Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.:
Changes in Verbal Transactions with Induced
Altered Brain Function, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis.
130:235-239, 1960.
20. Kahn, R. L.;

Fink, M., and Weinstein,
E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical
Improvement in Electroshock, Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 76:23-29, 1956.
21. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.; Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in Psy—
chopathology of Communication, edited by P.
Hoch, and J. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton,
Inc., 1958, pp. 126—139.
22. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.;
Figure-Ground Discrimination After Induced Al—
tered Brain Function, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 2 :547551, 1960.
23. Kahn, R.

L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.;
Social Attitude (California F Scale) and Con-

vulsive Therapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 130:187192, 1960.
24. Kalinowsky,

L.; Barrera, E. S., and Horwitz, W. A.: The “Petit Mal” Response in Elec71/265

�ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
tric Shock Therapy, Am. J. Psychiat. 98:708-711,

Succinylcholine, Dis. Nerv. System 16:237-242,

1942.
25.

1955.

Korin, H.; Fink, M., and Kwalwasser, 5.:
Relation of Changes in Memory and Learning to
Improvement in Electroshock, Conﬁnia neurol.
16:88-96, 1956.

Kurland, A. A.; Hanlong, T. E.; Esquibel,
A. J.; Krantz, J. C., and Sheets, C. S: A Comparative Study .of Hexaﬂuorodiethyl Ether (In—
doklon) and Electroconvulsive Therapy, J Nerv.
&amp; Ment. Dis. 129:95-98, 1959.
27. Lancaster, H. P.; Steinert, R. R., and Frost,
I.: Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy, J. Ment.
26.

Sc. 104:221-227, 1958.
28. Miller, D. H.; Clancy, J., and Cummings,

E.:

A Comparison Between Unidirectional Current
Non-Convulsive Electrical Stimulation Given with
Reiter’s Machine, Standard Alternating Current
Electroshock and Pentothal in Chronic Schizo—
phrenia, Am. J. Psychiat. 109 2617—620, 1953.
29. Ottosson, J. 0.: Experimental Studies of
the Mode of Action of Electroconvulsive Therapy,
Acta psychiat. &amp; neurol. scandinav. Supp. 145,
3521—141, 1960.

Barrera, E. S., and Kalinowsky, L.: Variations in the Electroencephalogram
Associated with Electric Shock Therapy in Patients with Mental Disorders, Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 47 2367-384, 1942.
31. Pollack, M.; Battersby, W. S., and Bender,
M. B.: Tachistoscopic Identiﬁcation of Contour
in Patients with Brain Damage, J. Comp. &amp;
30. Pacella, B. L.

;

Physiol. Psychol. 50:220—227, 1957.
32. Reitman, H. J., and Delgado, E.: Technique for the Modiﬁcation of Electroshock with

72/266

M.; Kay, D. W. E.; Shaw, J., and
Green, J.: Prognosis and Pentothal Induced Electroencephalographic Changes in Electroconvulsive
Treatment, EEG &amp; Clin. Neurophysiol. 9:225-237,
33. Roth,

1957.

E:

Acetylcholine and Serotonin in
the Spinal Fluid, J. Neurosurg. 14 222-27, 1957.
35. Shagass, C.; Mihalik, J., and Jones, A. L.:
Clinical Psychiatric Studies Using the Sedation
Threshold, J. Psychosom. Res. 2:45-55, 1957.
36. Stevens, J. D.; Majka, F. A., and Humoller,
F. L.: Transaminase Activity in the Spinal Fluid
in Neuropsychiatric Conditions, Dis. Nerv. System 20 :460-465, 1959.
37. Tower, D. B., and McEachern, D.: The
Content and Characterization of Cholinesterases
in Human Spinal Fluids, Canad. J. Research 27:
34. Sachs,

132-145, 1949.

Ulett, G. A.; Gleser, G. C.; Caldwell, B. M.,
and Smith, K.: The Use of Matched Groups in
the Evaluation of Convulsive and Subconvulsive
Photoshock, Bull. Menninger Clin. 18:138-146,
38.

1954.

39. Ulett, G.

A.; Smith, K., and Gleser, G. C.:

Evaluation of Convulsive Shock Therapies Utiliz—
ing a Control Group, Am. J. Psychiat. 1121795802, 1956.

40. Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R.

L.: Denial

of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects,
Springﬁeld, 111., Charles C Thomas, Publisher,
1955.

Printed and Published in the United States of America

��A-4t

-

signattscunt at Iuhultnt Inna-ad Guuvulttoun to: thrhucrr at ‘8: canvalnavu rhuranr Pronun-

MI". IN; “.8.
“It;
4‘.
'0”.
’0‘...
”03.,
In
It“ m.
M“ m.
,“h“.
MO ‘1‘“; “an“ m
WM“. '0”.
tho
nuihud
tn
tndncanc
cotstrc
at
at
stunstxnanoc
t8.
it.
In:

in

”09.;

m

nzoc‘rncouvu1ISVI ﬁhnruyy an. tuvcsttsuﬁod ﬁr culpartn. tn
Ila.
ilhllﬂl‘. hllatincradilihrlothur (IndOkIOI), with

it.

ciuvunﬁtnnsi ozaatrical staining tnahatqun. fvuntgbnovuu

can-mun Mamas“ mum‘wiu ”an" we and“ um
GU» randunxV atticnld irtttlsni gringo. fruuunoaﬁ van Id3131ltnru¢
at
to
m
m:
than
mi:
anus-um.
y»
mu
Thiri ﬁll at datturnann xu sun in. stein! in.bohav10ra1.
aloatrlanaophnlggrnyhzu I? Firthilaﬂtﬁtl‘litiIril prior ‘0.
durstu, qr in. tank: attic ironintu‘. Eaﬁpi‘tl dicohtrgt rntzuci

at
var. cqutvulnn‘.
1!
tnduntanl
at
and.
Intuit:
II inliulatiuun‘
it
it.
110‘s: 1: ‘3. tamrulaiva ‘haruar yruaann. tht nouatpoitttcttr at
Inactinausluvulnzaun and ¢ht crottur dzftanulﬂr or adntaittrutaon
§ho
that
trnutncat.
dotorrtnﬁu
altnannl
‘0
at
it.
It.
inpwovuuant

.

’ruu $39 Dupnrinuat at Zapariaonsul Plrahit‘tr, Hill-ta: nbcpttnl.

“1" MI;

L010’

'3!-

tor publication in
16/69.

it.

An; tvoh1v¢u

a: Pursuintry

�atsatrtennca o: tuhnlnnt Inﬂaeud Ocuvnlniqml :0:
Qatar: «1 the convulg£vi thaws»: Frugal.

In: r333, 3.3., unstrt

L. Kain,

ti.

ra.n.

Htrtil A. arocn, 3.9.
1.3., tad leary'J. Lark-vitl, 5.9.

Bria tarp. B.A., ﬂax rallnck, Ph.9.,

isrrc

A133,

Iran tho Dupartunnt a: lqurtlna‘nl Pcyuhtntty, 31111140 lonptttl,
61“ MC, 3...!” ”or.
Aided by grant» nr»aoya and ﬂ~921 a: th- ll‘10BQI Ianitﬁuto at
lon‘nl Baulﬁh, U... riblto inclth Barvseu.
xx: 10/60

�Signitiatncu ct Inhtlnnt Induccd convulsion. tar $3!hoory

if in.

canvulltvo thurupy Prtcoas

ct tnvaa%1¢¢t£an at ‘3. cathlaavo
thnrapy pronoun, thnra 1. ntt11.:u¢h can‘t-v.91: eouuurniua tho
importanco o: $ho 3.11.30 1%:011. 300% t‘!‘$!l haw. coacludca
that thc coavnlnicu :- I ntcnlunry index a: it. coruhral outta.
01131031
bohnvintnl absuga (9,19,15,33,:9). 80:.
ta
illtlttil
involttun‘ora, navurthaluli, have unlisted Itcntttcauau not it
tho
huﬁ
inch
matting
tactarn
pnynh§logtou1
aatilra
t;
it
ti.
0: tan trtatlnnt to tho put303t. 2&amp;311330 at tact. and tn. :0—
ycntad I’ll at con-stouunnal (3.3.28).
30-91%. 13.1 ynurt

tho-curly i‘ldltl it lultnivaky.3345;&amp;, (2h) lid Paonllu
ind
algctroumtphtc
«ltulcul
(30),
butt
da-anntrntln;
g;_3..
dittortnnoo butane: grand 3:1 and pcttt :31 ﬁttntuontu,
inﬂicutad tun Ittnttiﬂ‘nt r01. 0: tin acxturo. 2h. Vitiﬂil.
3tudann acuparinc convuluirt with oibeouvulsivo trc‘tncat
Sanctutr§God that ‘iGhliﬁiO. eumnlnu‘ing in a couvulntou warn
anttarlly associttud wl‘h utuawrublu ﬂagrant or neuraphyutologic
una bohnvaoral chtuco, whilo auboonvulntvu toehntquon ugro nit
(15,27,25,39.h0). In racon$ Itiéiul tram that laberticrr.
sisalnr ditttrouaou 1n the tug trcttuaat typos war. abunrv.d
tor ouch aspacic at bohtvanr nu BIO :10» :11. actavt‘r (8,10),
IAIIII‘O changto titlt anoblrbt‘nl (19,20,21) and paraaptnul
talk! (13.22.25).

�can.

littal

aspcat ta tbs prtblau at unaorataadtaa enuvulnivo
thcrgpy aincgrnl ‘ho rolttsun It tho ntthod ﬁt tudualn: tho
ﬁctsara t. tho thorupoutla ouﬁcann. Stature 6.1.3101, twp.
at currunt lad olsttrodo pInGUIauﬁ 3r: anon; tho vnrttblou
that hat. boon atudlod. 33:10 it. zuvcltixattuna indicatc
shit chanson in b¢hnvlorsl cad uturophyniolwcie 11415.: it.
rclattd £0 £8... paranotorl, th§ dittoruncul rcyortad to: thl
various icinuro trodunln; lathoda Arc anal}, tad ntutatttn‘lly
tn:£¢nittesn£. lajtr d$£fﬂr¢nc$l, hivcvor, tr- ahltrvtd
bntwunn totuurc and non*teisuru groups. For .xnuylu. in u
raounﬁ nancarqph. 0t‘anaon roplrtad 5n incrcanu 1a tbu aurntioa
it ‘nuadtticd oluctrtaal indugcd antitru: campsrud with thou.
unattaod by prtnodicuﬁiun with lidocnlnt (29). Althcuah tho
1:60:1130 ﬁriatcd pttacutl ahtwtd Ital Ghana. 1: indict! of
anxiety, retardaticn Old [105:1 behavinr than pttisnta truntta
with anuadttxcd Itisurgs. tun datzcrtncoo worn not Iacuttxeunt.
In nut attains, chili tutunro dur;t10n (17) and typf at current
(11) huvc b... ttlatnd t: thu dogruc a: huhnviural gnd unit.»
phyltclogic ahsnco, taut. v¢ru no ditturonccs with rolctztu to
thorupoutic nutounq. this, wail. ptranttcri a: £hu saith».
nu‘hod may hot: sun. rnlntion ta thnrgpo:%1a efficacy. tbs
dittorcncon arc clichﬁ nians {ht tcahntguso, yrovidad that
grand uni a¢tsurut havc hO$n 13¢ucod.
rlrthur taplcrttsaa it thu taptrtaneo of ﬁn. IoisurQ wt:
and. poautblu hr ruetst txpartutntal tntcrant 1n Itiﬁﬁrﬁl
induct! by Anna»
(1) ). and tau-“roam (911-1090, (6)
1

than“,

)

�as)»

am».
n3
an

“um“:
4»
with
um" My“. ”a“: "cm am»

am. and: um

«mum

50

«mm m

Wt
um»: “um. tum-utm- alumnmmum In

an ”rim“ «m u clarity an m.
o! m m. of alum “(um a a. mum» them:
"maul-n

mun.

an

�Klflﬁb:
triatwutovun cantooutavu ‘sntluctnd puttanti in u
vaiuatary plyehintraa hcapttal ruttrrnd tar canvu1n1Vt ﬁhcrapy
Hurt rtadonlr dividtd tat. ti. gram». aging n allarn¢u ordor
(16). In twlavu pattonta, convulltans utro indusod by a
H¢dcrnt% alturuating entrant tanQrtnnut antic nupruthroahuld
narrtntcs und in (txtton Othtrn. by inhnlntiou mt htxutlunrtw
dio‘hylothnr (Inﬂation), following tn: nothcd a: Sunnibol ggﬂgm.
(1). Prunodicttsou in :11 euro; vat 11311.6 to unbltnal¢1
atropaum (1.0 :3). Srcuiuantn u‘ro adniuistarcd thr¢c tint.
pow v.0: tut 10 ta 2h npyllcatiin! with tan ‘otnl lllhlr
ao‘arn£aod by in: clinical Judxuncut it uh: It!!! p1y¢h&amp;ntr1at.
13¢: rtlcud iron 19 ta 58, with a rota ‘3. or 38.5 1“!au in. 3c: group; and 19 ﬁt by. with a noun ‘3. at 35.5 rust:
in thc tnﬁoklun (rump. tn: Ina: what: If aducttinn nut. 11.5
yncra (83?) and 13.6 (Indaklan). 01 tho tvcntronovun libaoots,
tuolvc worn «13.113106 in daprtaltvo parohnnct, light at
aehsnophrnuit, 11:16 ﬁwpu. and lovnn :3 schascphr.u1a, partatid
twat. Tit dil‘ributiou it diaclanol, a‘. rang. and yuar: o:
tduoatloa watts» ta. tug unuplta, did not ditto: ut:ut£1u&amp;nt1y.
Ichnvisral eight. wt. tvnluaiod rockly in tattrviuun by
th- pacxuat'u thgrnpiu$ aha by an. stat: piratintriut. Such
nnpoctn as hand, tdantton, :anorr. $1.0», aypotitn, tycoon
puttutna, participatiua in :ronp nativiﬁtua. and rclattta 8.
rucnrdod
$0
0950?
and ¢h3n301 SIIOIIQG
p£tianta wurc
utttf tad

quulttativoly.

�lloctrocncophxlagraun var. Geno print ‘u ‘r¢ntnuat.
wtokly during in: ‘ruatntut «guru: in a any ut$ar a ounvnlniau,
Rocgrdn
acunnrod
1.3%
troatnon‘.
stﬁcr
sh.
taro
‘8.
llé
I'lkl
6
(
inﬂated
or
uuiuat
tinting
‘8.
up: and cluwor) in ;ut0210r
(at
66
0.0.34 tIIy1:I (a).
in
Icadt,
tauptrtI-vurtax
erliﬂﬂ plylhblnaie proooduruu var. n¢u133¢arud prtor
‘9 tritiunnt, during tan tourth your (16.12 tron‘naus pawiud).
tad tun v¢¢ka uttcr tin Ina! tronilnat. 2h: unapurql xuolndtd
wichalor-Iollcvun‘nib‘aa‘c (anttrnntaoa. digit tutu, 083.3%
a:ncnbly and digit urah¢1)s Oottnohaxd‘ my». udhcddod guanotrla

tigvron (22); parceptinnl yr ptunﬁotcachranatac Inboéd:d
c.1ur‘d figure: at high Ip§ad"ueh11talatpta :xpouur: (31);
and I nodal“! 6.113% I 80.11.: (23).
In ﬁddltitl, lpino tori; Utmdtus «are Gnu. prior ‘c tad
In than «a a: “a
am”.
‘

tutu”

�it. inhalatIQa

ﬁt tn‘nﬂitu Insularlr ranaztua in
a grand all douvulttln, 91:11:! it taut taimuut clottrinnllyu
fur inc tuﬂntlou grimy, intuition «an alarm: an; the intitdl
try and «patchytanto pnuturin; Hurt ﬁf‘iﬁ ouittci. In tldttc
tad tonic nunttoatntisun, ycst atsnaro taunt, uni goat Intuit.
botanist, in. sunny: rattnhltl ulna oﬁhtr «103.12.
In chart Guru tvnltutiaun it 12in£¢d1 bahnvsural «huuxu.
it. ﬁght: it buhnvltr nﬁutttaﬁud aura nilmlnr 1: tin tut urcupl.
rnsttrua a: dautul. tryonnas:, uﬁﬁh‘rarax, tunntttatxnu. paranata
tzuitnntut sud iontuntdniX—Innary 10:. air! htilrvﬁl in it‘s
populu‘inuu watt uvpvumﬂlattly'tqnal trltittﬁr (tail. 2).

I

campaiaa$10n

rates

Etna! I
“ﬁamnauau
wore

statics. viii. patluntn ‘oxcrutna

the Inhalation priﬂlllri. Chart '0'. Iroquﬁuﬁ Upilodii a!
hroathwhnltias nut lamina. Ihﬁﬁ§ tin muck, naktng ‘hin inttctiia
1:1: :vlhhlc. fruwt‘rta new. obntthd radiogrupttcgllr 1: £lrvc
Indolian irattod pciﬁuﬁtn and in throw during 36!.
Adminaatrattvu tVIlnnﬁiaaa a: cizuiaul ingravanaut u. £30

an at “an". :m a. was”: an msnzus "an. t).

a: Itcnwnrtd and anon tnyravcd
nypruxinutvly half at taah ﬁrst».
Inﬁdnsu

first

a

warn rucordui

fur

�inturitasuvu aiﬁina tianrocuunyhaloxruun, town
qualtiai$vuiy and qumttttuttvoxy, aura aluilur in the two
gvﬂtyic Frucrncnsvu arunntrtn attains ct inhinant trucuuucxtp
and an tactvuuc tn Vil‘icil 1;: I’pllih‘ in :11 lnatu. with
trintnl in! naiovttrmtaupiwul yruyduiarunaa. lava: and

«human

an. swam m «m u an. Mann”

antt¢tey tutti; tilt such it
ivcnI-lnt warn Ilﬁ Iaanltiauliay isttcrwut {tibia 3). taﬁhntgh
tan anti!!! III stanza uypntrai «stilt: in ﬁt. thiuklnu trim!
than 1: it. In! grin}.

nuanurwn OI indsaud ulna Hutu

tiltt

3

“~w«.*...u~

mm:
1:1er
uhtorvattvau tut tack
tic poyvtalociaux twat:

(in. man” has
It

t:

or ﬂu

rmvuulad

a.

dattbruaca yriir t9 iroutulnt, ﬂaring tho lihrih unnk, and
it! itch: ptntattcutnmnt for ﬁtt it! tsua$naat grﬁ‘ps. Iatrtm
hiiivnr,
iatlynoa,
li‘l!‘ Gduttttcut ataugul in vurtuuu
grit:
allltfit (was pruutrautuaut it $ha tutti! tuck; and tron ti:
Sturﬁh 9“! £3 two that. titty trtatnnat (luﬁli £3, bush in
tho Intttiiu sat in tha IQ! grunpo.

....*.....um:

I:

�an,»

x: it: waohalirulililvng tuhsotts, grit; lﬂﬁtﬂ unasud
a ﬁllhificnﬁt «ontnama an wcortt (y‘awcr yuvlorannct) tn!
Cunt .3h‘nct iuriaa irtgiunnﬁﬁ and u v-ﬁurn t. yruatrnttunut
10'!!! 3: sh: poabwtvcn‘nnut yurtod. 03¢ Ithioxt, «33.6%
Inatuﬁlr, dtntastrntui tlzntrlscatar~inuvouocd Ct0r00«’ditv

‘iﬂdilil‘¢

stntltr pattern: 0": oha¢rvud fur thy tnotxutoacapiu
unusarca use it. I «tints. will. incrcnund arrow: as ch»
«abaddﬁd tight. tutti warn uhtuvvud daring ﬁvtutunas, t3:
dt!£:roano an. naﬁ alaniriaﬁut. Paatutrautuunt, tin arrays
in its: tunﬁ itartlnca signattcnutlr from prontrouﬂuaat no.9...

an tha 1

anti. that; an;

incrutso in isﬂrit utth trottunnt,
and a Guavaauv tullduan; ‘runinust. in: each at that. unnausol.

tic

un

clmamtl 13&gt;psr£bmnmn¢a an £ha ynruhnaagta tucks
tram tun prumﬁroniuuuﬁ
riirtt itch tnttinu pnrild warn

t. ti:

uttnllltauttr rulttad ﬁt til angst. orstuiuuud 3!! 310' all.
activity to: tutu urtupa (inhia 5). Isak grant inrcllﬁiun:

inunnctvaﬁod thgi attriunuSn in porttruuntu on the'wlnluicvu
Inlluvu¢ atgit cyan and thattt unocth: aubtttta; tuthiutnueupy

tat

rtsaruu stat; wart gignitiacntlr rtlutti to ‘ho
anniat .1 oltatxagruphlc ahlnst. stuxxnrly, an innrquac in
? utcrn It! ssndaiatod hath 1nﬂriittﬂ £13 tilting.
anh¢¢d¢d

-a..*.....,
till! 5

�mmmumummzummm
amalgam mt
mama»

mm. immt
m
W
tum-mummy.
mewmmm.
ml
was
it.
mm“...
umwmnm
«at
a
mmmuummmmnumum‘mu
at: 31m.
m m m. umm nun-m an and
hr Wm, mnmnm in“ m at out“
numb}, mm m m min-m

W

2-.

l‘

�1.

W!h:

crimp. wuro
behaviar

tt

aloctrioul tudnncd iatxlra
£n¢£tttnguinhahlt tn ﬁn. variant statur¢t a:
etch ttuxo at tun ‘RUtiliﬂt proocsl. 813:: in:
1nh&amp;1:nt and tho

taatar ens-tn ‘0 bath trOainuntu vns tn. induction st
natuurit tad not thg unthnd a: inauotian, u. may Gﬂﬂﬁlud.
thu$ it. netted or 1nduet1¢n 33 has a signtttctnt variihlc

in th. £h¢rnpy arsenal. apceatie¢lly, chanson in tho
bah:v10rn1 and attraphyiitlnsic inﬂicts ;ro dupcudant tutu
the induction 0: taiinrtu, Ind not dapaudout nu nay '1ng1c
property or the tluntrieul it tho inhtltnt nod. of induction.
Klrland.g§J;;. (26) lad Chutriau and P¢taraoa (5)
bath alto conpnrad ¢1natrtea1 ind tahnluut '013Irt3. Karinue
and ht: agowurkcru niutgnnd convulylvn thnrapy ruttrraln tltcrw
uttoly to Induklua and so: trontnamt cranps. :huy rapcwttd
£hnt b¢havtural rataagl, acnyIScutiou rut-a. payehalagia
tclt portaru£aeta and aardithluulur roaa‘itun var. 11:11::
in tho tun £3.91... ¢ha%riu| uud itnrn¢a, Itudying schano~
phrcala tahstata with anplantnd inttncurohral altatrodon,
ropqrtnd 14¢:Q1aai ultc‘raarsphi¢ pttsoran durzng ncxnurna
ind uﬁ vurtonn puttwltialrt psrzcﬂn It: Instilon, untrtlua
and tlaatrtnsl tuchniauat.
In studtu‘ it :dburan inaun¢d by varituu
dlcutr1c¢1.n¢tal, Ignivnloa‘ bﬁhnviorll. ynyahtlogia and

�.11.
olootrocrophio ortooto hovo boon rovorﬁod (3,11,29,39).
Vhtlo thooo otudtoo oqnoto tho otroeto or ditforons convuloivo
‘oehaiquoo, voriouo nonooonvuloivo nothodo ouch oo oubconvalotvo,
hriot otinuluo. unidiroetlonol otionlotinx, oonopolor otiouu
Intang, and tonal *oouvu1311o* toehniquoo hovo boon dooorlbod,
and ooch in turn, diocordod in routino thorny: oo inotroctivo
(10,27.39,h0). For oxouplo, Borgnon (2), 1n doocrthinu tho
olootroarophio ottonto of tho '1ooo1-oo1:nro* touhntquo uotod
that 751 o: potionto bod noraol rocordo ortor tlftoon ouoh
opplicottooo, whtlo 703 had 'obaornol' records alto: aroma moi
ooiauroo. Blott ggﬂg;&amp; (39) hovo roportod diftoronaoo in tho
taprovoaont rotoo at potiouto roooiviag oouvulotvo trootuonto
(69.301) sad thooo roooiviag oubconvuloivo (33$), or «outrolo
(385). Our own otudioo (10) also dononotroto oignirioontly
groooor dogrooo of bohoviorol ond phyoioloaio ohonco zor.eon~
vnloivo than onbaonvuloivoVtrootoonto.
A author or inventigotoru, hooovor. hovo toilod to oboorvo
dittoroneoo 1n loprcvonout rotoo for potionto trootoa by.
convuloivo ond subconvuloave noono (3,h,28). Ho would conoldor
thooo rooulta to rolloctiag d;:£oronooo both in popuiotion
oonploo and 1a oothodo or ocartng bohovtarol ohonco. whtlo
oonto illuooo and orroetivo-dogroooivo rooottono oro
doooribod for tho nojority or oubjocto to sho poolttvo otudioo
(10.27.38) 70: at tho “Moots 1:. mo
and! (h) and
100! 1a anothor (28) voro elooood oo schizophronio rooctiono.
rho rootlitioo in thooo 1nvoot1gottono oorvo ohrontoolly 111
‘

"an“

�~12.

populottooo, ond prior oouvooo or ooovuloivo thoropy voro
rooordod-tor hourly halt tho oobaooto 1n ouo group (h) and
901 in tho othor (28). 73o toiluro to obtoiu oiguttlolat
dittoronooo on: oloo 11o 1n tbo atoll oooploo mood to.toot
tho null hypothooto.
Chongoo 1n hohovlor oro oboorvod 1a o1! onbaooto roootvio:
o oouroo or oonvuloivo thoropy (lo,t9,30,33.38), but thooo
chongoo ovoluotoo oo oltntool thyrovooont, occur oaly 1o oooo.
whilo induood oonvuloiono oro o ooftiolont condition for
hohovtorol chango, tho: oro only o noooooory condition for
inprovooont. Thoo, nooouroo or bohovioro1 ohoago, cook to
monory (25), longuogo (19,21) ood porooption (13,22) roodtly
doooaotroto signittoont d1xtoronooo hotwoon ooavolotvo ono
ouboonvuloivo toohniqooo within tho 1nd1vtdoo1 dittorooooo to
poroouolity ergoniootlon of tho oohaooto. Iotlago of
”1-provonont', howovor, vary with tho poroonoltty orgootootloo
of tho oubaoot oo oxprooood 1n odoptivo yottorno and Iloxibility
for ohoogo; with ouch onviroaooutol vortobloo oo thoroptot.
ototf and tonily oxpootottono ono toloronoo for tho o11o1tod
odopttvo bohoibrg and tho ﬂotation ood dogroo of indoood
nourophyoiologio ohougoo. In globol ootiuotoo of “inprovo-ont'
tho onvtroa-ontol vortotloo booooo propotont. rho totloro
to oboorvo significant dittoronooo 1n taprovolout voting. to
rolotod
on lock
oonvoloivo and noo~oonvu1otvo zroopo no: to
to thooo ooviroonontol voriobloo and tho yoroonoltty ohooootorlotion of tho oobaooto, oo to tho indoooo phyotolocio ohoagoo.

�.13.
2. Signirtaeuee at the convulsion.
The evadenee indicates thet eenvnlaiene ere, er

retleet, the eigniticent phyeiolegic event: thigh ere beets
tor the therepeuttc ettteeoy e: convuleive therapies. the
epeeitie rele e: the eeleure 1:, however, net olenr. Thet
nelther the note: eepeete e: the eeteure new the eeceepeuyiux
peychelegie fectere ere determining veriehlee 1e deleuetreted
by the etrioeey et treeteente under eeudltleue er neeele
perelymte end eneetheeie (3!). rhet the leee or ceneeteueueee,
iteelf, in net the etzuitteent veriehle 1e seen in the relative
luettteeer e: repeated esuintetretiene e: peatethel or not.
eenvuletve teehniquee under pentethel (10,2?,39). Without
epecityinx the neeae by which verieue egente eohieve eueh
oheaxee, it to vrebeble thet the eeieure 1e but one expreeeien
e: e dittuee alteration in oerebrel functioning (9.13). It
in this elteretien in brain fluetien which prewidee the
neeeeeery canditiene for the hehevierel eheasee at oeuvuletve
therapy (1h.2o,50). teen: the behevterel chengee we would
include the innedzlh exteretten 1a eeueeteueueee, reoell,

leter petterne,

breethiaa; end the eere pereietent
peyehelegie, perceptual, vegetative, phylielacto end heeeenel
petterne, characteristically deeerthed in oenvulexve theeepy.
titeretieue 1n hretn :enattea ere retleeted in heaven
chee1ee1 chengee ee the eeetyleheline end oheltneetereee (3?),
trenemueee (36), end "retain (3h) «intent of the epinel
fluid. They are elee eheerved in each neurophyeielecle
eeeeuree ee inereeeed delta had theta eetivitr (8) end
end

�«1h.

outtvtty (18)

out
oltorod olootrocrophtc (33.35) and bohovtorol (20,21.h0)
rooponotitty to introvououo borbttorotoo sad to outtoholtnorglo
and oyspothoolootio ouonto (?,12). rho oorrolotiono botoooa
tho dogrno or nooroyhgotologlc choos- ond changoo 1o porooptuol
toot portorlouoo roportod how. oro o rotlocﬁiou of thooo coastal
chongoo. oo oro tho porcoptool (10.13.22) linguiotto (19,91)
ond sliniool hohovtorol (10,20) ohoagoo éoooribod an oorlior
doorooood boto

1o oloctroouooyhologrooo;

studios.
In o roaont roviou (9), tho oicattioonoo of tho
oootylnholiuéaholxnootorooo oyotoo in thooo nouroohontool

sltoéotiono woo «ioouoood. Oboorvoticno with vortono
onticholsoorglo ozonto out roporto or oioslor pottorao with
antibiotoointc and oynpothoolnsttc ooooto. indieotoo tho
noooooity for o broodly boood vtoo or hioohooiool one broth
tunotton rolottoao, with oophooto on oyuoptte Iodolo (12).
A oocgoot‘vo ooohoaio: so? tho prolougod oltorotioao in broin

tnaotlou :- ooon in tho blood~bro1u borrior otodtoo a: Alva
(1) who uotod poroiotont «honaoo 1a oorohrovooonlor porooobillty
tollovinx induood couvulotouo. ﬁo rolotod thooo to tho ooiluro
and not to tho pooooxo of noon-to cox-routs. out! ounootod
that tho-o chongoo ooy ho tho enduring phyo1olo¢1¢ booio for
indueod
tho
bohoviorol chongo.

Thus, to would concludo thot tho ounvuloion.

or no. to
not o nocoooory condition for bohoviorol ehoogo, but nonro~
choliool ohongo, of which tho oouvuloion to tho ionodioto

"nation,

1o

pronoun“.

Indood, won

pox-noun noun.

�015 a

aha-10.1 3nd nauraphyalolosie attoeto image-d a: roadily by
bu
unthodn
Ivnld
no
loncnr
uooonlary.
'convuluivoﬁ
other manna,
In thin rogurd, tho noun-poclxta nature or «a. couvulatvo
therapy proocuu has he’s ropcncndly ouphantuad (lh,h0).

�an
I
mg.

cg.mm

s,

conuauuttva put£¢n£u rotnrrid

1.!

5.3131317. therapy

var. tunic-1: assign-i to trtutncut tour...
(Ind-klcn) or ulnatrtaal inducing tgcnt.

by an

inhalant

Thor. were no dittoroucau in tho two group. on bohavlnrﬁi,
cloatregruphio or psycholcgioul natsuroa prior to, dnrtng. tr

lotyttal dicohtrzc rnttnuu var.
oqutvalont. tutti-group taat dirt-rtucls unto notad on 311
tun wtcka artor treatunnt.

unnanrau in both granps during trnatnont. In... dittuvouaﬁl
var. rclutcd to tho dcgrto a: indueod nourophyaioloxie «hang.

pattern at such chanzaa not. similar in both troutlau‘

and tho

I. th“‘

0

It is

concluded thut tho abhorvod nltarntioul in br‘in
function :r. quivnlont with nature: inane“! by inhnlnut
or alootrtctl Hanan. rho nououpceitietty of Indaklauconvulnionn and tho ctoattr difficulty of aduintatruston
continued
the
aonnidorod
to
«ctorrunta
clinical at.
3a
if.

or th£a trtatuant.
The nod. or induction or nuisuroa 1: In tuntgnitic.nt
(cater in tho convulsivo thornpy process. $e1uutoo tr.
“and u on. two: of the ponistont autumnal").
eaavulsiio
bchnvicrnl
ﬁnance: a:
uhioh
rcquiaito to tho

durum-

er

tharupy.

Th... abuortn£ion| at. discus-ad within the tranoutrk

at tho nourophyu1olozie-Idupt1vo nude! or thu
of abnttic

Vﬁhcr.p1nn 1n payohintry.

node of

action

�0’17.

the oo¢90rntion 0! Smith £113. a French
Lahcra%orsco in providing the hazarluovodiothyiathar
(Indcklon) It’d 1n tho-u atudioo 1n gratefully
toknoviodgud.

�.15.
1. 11rd, 3.3. clinical Gerrsllﬁta at Electroshaok Thnrapy,
Pazphittg lg: 633n639, 1958.
2. larguan, P.8., rapt-tutu, 9.6., Bars, 3. and foinntoiu, a.
ﬁloetrounonyhalocraphic changes talluving olqctrioll
induced £0331 a-lunrca. cant. laurel. $3, 971-277, 1953.
3. lrtll, 3.0., Ornlp‘el, 8.. Iiduncu, 3., Gray-on. 3.8.. ﬂollnnn,
L.I., Richards, 3.4., stra;tnan, 3.9., and Unsor. 1.1.
Invuatigntioa a: sh. thorapouﬁto coupounnta and variant
raetcrl .saoctatnd with tlpruvousut with olectro~
convulsive trontaontt A preliminary vapors. An, J,
Ag; Arch, Huurol.

&amp;

3&amp;2, 997e1008, 1957.

Ptzghint.
h. Drill, 1.0., cr‘upton, 3., atducon, 3., arnyaou, 3.I.. lilllll.
1.1.. and Richarda, R.L. Balattvn eruct$vonaao of
tartan: coupon-at: a: oloctrcaonvnlotvo thurapy.
nu non. lmal. a "paint. 9;, 627.535, 1959.
chattiln, 6.3.. and Itoruun, u.a. Thu convuloivo paﬁt-rnc
provokad by Indcklen, Hotrauol and slcetraouheck.
Solo dopth clootroxruphio obscrvuticnl in hunnu
patiautu. BIO Olin. lturoghzgiol. 33: 715-?!5. 1960.
ldvaldn, 1.x. Bxportlnntal utudtoo with Pnn109o. Int. Rue. nod.
1- cm».
a
g
32;: 1:69-4:79, 1956.
7. lsquthnl, 1., lrants, J.0., tru1t£, 3.3.. Linc. ;.s.c..
tad lurltnd, 1.1. loxntluorodtothyl nth-r gindnklaa)
~ It: us. as a oonvuluant 1n psyuhtctrto trau‘ucat.
'

J. larv.

ﬂout.

nil.

33$: SJO-SJh. 1958.

�.19“
EEG
end
delee activity to
of
B.L.
Kenn,
3.
Ieletien
link,
behesierel reepeaee an electreeheck: Geeetttettve
eeriel etudiee. Ant arch. leerel. e Pezehtet, E!)
snsasas. 1957.
9. link, I. street of enticheItnercie egent, nietheere. ea
:30 eud behevteru atsntrieenee for ﬁheery er aenvuleive
theeepy. A5; trek, leurg;. e Pezghte . £21 380~387. 1958.
10- tier, I., Kenn, 3.3. ens Green, I. lapettleetel etedtee e: the
eleatreeheek preoeee. Die. lerv. 813, £23 113.118, 1958.
11. r1nk, I. end oreen, n. sleetreeueepheleerephte eerreletee er
‘

the electrocheek preoeee. Die. [eyes a; . g2; 11?, 1958.
12. rink, 8. street e: entteheXLaerste eeepeunde on peetaeeaveleiee
230 end behavior. 380 clin. leergghzetel. 33: 359o369, 1960.
13. fink, ﬂ., Kenn, R.L. end Kevin, 3. Erteete or dattnee eltered
brein funciieu en perception. ?ree. 1' Int. Cong. vgzphel.
p. 238-239, lerth lullead Pub1., teeterden, 1959.
15. Flat, n. Alteretiune 1n bre1n reaction in therepy. Pezghe~
ghereeeolegz zgenttere, [113e, I.. ed., p. 325~332,
1959c»
39.,
”.tCB,
‘1‘”., ”M
Fleetng, r.c. An annuity into the lecheniee o: ectzou of
electric eheek treeteente. J. lerv. lent. Die. 12h.

k

hho~h50, 1956.

elteruettnc etienli 1n
dieerininetien experieeute. I: eeuet. Patchegg

16. cellereen, L.V.
v1eue1

chance orders e!

g5, 207-208, 1933.
17. Green, H.A. Reletien between threshold end duretten e!
eeienree end electregrephio ehenge during ooeveletve
therepy. a.n.n.n. (in preee).

�.2918. nugzlsnd, l.. nultnud, w.. xguruan, 1.9. and Finest, a.
chant-u 1n aluotroauaophtlogrnu and in £h¢ excretion
of 1? - kutorctaraoida aceonpnnyiug aluotroshook
thcrnpy or agttntud doproallou. razohouon. and. g.
'

ab6~251, 19h6.

19.

1n
vorb:1
Ghanaoa
an!
Kuhn,
3.3.
u.
Jattc, J.. tint,
trunlaataono with inducod :ltorcd hrtiu function.

1960.
23$~239,
52g:
91a,
nunt:
Icav:
J.
90. Kuhn, I.L.. tint, a. and wuinutotu, E.A. lolntton of
anubnrhttal 1.1% to clinical inprovcuont 1n oloctraé
thank. Arch. laurel: and Puzohint.‘1gs 23-39. 1956.
21. Kuhn, 3.1. an: Pink, H. change. in language during electroshock
thorupy. ?: who Ithola' at Communicatian, noun, P. and
&amp;
Bruno
126~139,
Struttou, N.Y.. 1958.
Zubiu, 3., tau., 9.
22. tuba, n.L.. Pollack, I. tad rink, n. figuro~gronnd diaerintuutian
ARA
arch. laurel.
inéaood
tnnotiua.
brain
sitarad
arts:
3,: Sim-551. 1960.

R.L.. Pollack. n. and link, a. soc1;1 attitudo
(California I Saul.) and convnlcivo thornpy,
1960.
187-192,
ggg,
J,l,l,3.
25. laltuovuky. L., Darrora, 8.8. and lorvits, v.1. The “Potst unl'
roaponst in olnctrtc shook thcrtpy. Al. J. Pszchiut., 2;.
708-711, 19kt.
25. Kevin, 3., link, I. cad Kwalwnuuor. 3. Relation of ehtnxtu
in aviary and luarnlns to inprovununt 1n aloctrouhaek.
Gout. 303301. gg; 88-96. 1956.
26. Karinnd, 1.1.. Ibuloug, 1.3., Enquibﬁl, A.J., Kr¢ntn, 3.6.
and Shoots, 6.5. A coupsratlvu utudy of hoxntlnoro~
dicthyl Rthc1 (Indoklon) and cloetraconvulaivo therapy.
19590
”‘WQ
95"”,
21
ﬁght.
1:
I‘m.

23.

Kuhn,

�.21.
97.

Lnnouatqr, H.P.,

stcincrt, 3.3..

nan

trout, I. ﬁntlltornl

oluetroconvulstvt thcrtpy. J. Hunt.

3&amp;1. 323: 221-997,

1958.
28.

Killer, 3.8., 61:30:, J.

conpnriocu
between unidiroétioanl entrant nou~oanvnllivc olcatricul
uttnulntaon ngon 31th nuttarta nuoh1ao. standard
and cunninga, B.

A

ultornntaa; carraat electroshock and pontothtl in
chronic uahtsophronta. An. 3. ?Izghint. £92: 617—620, 1953.
29. citation, 4.0. Exportuontll stndIGI or ‘hn node at nation at
clootrooonvull1vo thnrtpy. tot; Pazghtat. &amp; lturol.
86:34. 8322. ;§2,‘§£, 1960.
30. Pnoolla, 3.1.. Darrcra, 8.8.. Illinovlky, L. Varitttono
in the oloctrocuecphnlograu unuoota‘od with aloctriu
shook therapy in patiga‘a with nuutgl diaurdorn.
19h2.
367~38h.
31,
laurel. szohtnt.
31. Pollack, n., Butt-ruby, v.8. and Sander, H.B. rashictosoopio
identitiotttnu of content in putzcutu with brain
dalnxo. J. Gagg. ’El'3°1° Pczphol. £9: 220~t27. 1957.
32. Boitnnn, !.J. and 3013140. I. technique for tho Iodxtlcatlon
or cloutroshook with nuccinyloholinu. Bin. UOIV. szp.
3g: 237«2h2, 1955.
33. Roth, H., x§y, D.H.l., shat, 3., 3nd Brocn. J. Prague-1n
:ad poatothal induced olcctvocncuphnlozrnphic changes
in olcctroeonvulatvo trontucnt. £36 c113. luncgghzytcl,

Arch.

Q

2; 925.237. 1951.
3h. agent, a. tootaioholtau and lavaton1u
J. louroourg. Akp 2t-21. 1951.

1n

the spinal fluid.

�.22.
35.

Shaun... 6., ﬂxh‘lik, 4., tad Jouco, l.L. cltnxcal pirahiutrie
aging tn. nodntaon thrcthuld. J, Patchoaoag a...
g; h5~55. 1957.
atovoaa, 4.9.. naakn, r.1. and I‘IOIIOP, I.L. Tflﬁltltutﬂl
in
activity 1: ﬁt. spinal fluid neuropuyehiutric
EGO-hﬁs.
1959.
condtttonl. 91a. Harv. gin, g2;

attest.

36.

37.
I

taunt, 9.3.,
o: choliuottcrason

and Bazacharn, B.

It:

1n hung»

nontnnt and chartuaorluattoa

spinal 31:16.. Bahia, g,

31.03roh, 31: 132-1h5. 19h9.
38.

331th;
and
0.A.,
x.
3.x.
caldvoll,
aloaor.
o.c..
Blctt,
The to. or natchod group: in thc ova1u§t1¢n at
ooavulaivu and Iubeonvulttvo photo-hook. 3311. Inna.
czan, 18: 138-1h6, 195k.

I.

6.6. Evaluation 0: convultivo
thank thoroptcn utilising a control group. £5&amp;4£g
195$.
795-802,
;;ga
rgzchtlt.
ho. walnutotn, 1.5. sad Kuhn, l.&amp;. Dania: of zllgclns ango;1c
and ggzltolo‘tual nggusi. 0.6. than... sprin3t101d,
111., 19550
39.

Ulc‘t, 6.1., saith,

and 61.00:,

�'Ws.

mum,

um
«Mum, W In:

macaw».
3mm

Wu,

'

6

T

4

a

3

3

�am:
as. 0

W
haunt“

nun-n
Electrical

7

6

iv

,

an:

mm:
5
S

:8 &lt; 1,9,

mm
1

wt “mm-is

�W

last-convulstvu Ila slow ﬂuv- antavt‘r
$51.33;. ’ggggggt gins}

:“Cu“

until"!

lo.

1".

15

6.6

”ah

50.3

51.!

1‘03

1!

30°

fl.”

”o!

5705

1‘10

had

I:

7*! In 10ml!

I: fit Vick: A£$or

�£A!§£.h
331.0%

of :ntchloa an: Ilooiracllly Ialhltﬁ satsnroa
an Puyulalagtn 133‘ tortﬁrlnncca
(aiitil Bxprsantd us Iran 3:110:03...)

MWW
Prtotvnntunnt Pruntrncinnnt
ﬁnd
an!

1. 30.331.2«In110vun
(witgltnd littcut scorn)

t.

III-rustic!

Inc

'

‘1

new

t“

’1‘“ ant.‘

(l""')

m
I“
:32

3. libiddod iaulrul

13d

to

h.

'"“C“‘C”"

'

(l"'*I&gt;
‘.‘1.

lush; Ullucacu'u

!
-

H’.7*‘
“10‘
~1.3

1“

‘..”h1’

‘

&lt;

. ‘t?’

4

¢ﬂ.h

1.1:
*inﬁ‘ﬁi

.’Q'”

9 ‘11“
o htlndﬁ

03.5%

¢

_.

,0,“
§ 1.)...

“'9‘”.

W58
“901

’

.907”

”6.5,

”'1‘"...

oo.:~u
c1.o

¢3.:

1"

.'.T.
’5!”

£0! puaruﬁ rcpltt.tun
ﬁ ’ 4 .03
(L Q“
’

ﬂ

‘0’?
#9.:

0 1.90

“’0"

net

“I

00.!

”'oh"
~;.9*o

Ind
36!

and

w-

~1.J&amp;O

m

h. 31.1% [3.3

.0 ”3.3“

u

fours! v.0!

«h.9

.g,;

~a.6no

ﬁ,.’
.10.

~13.1*0i
“

-

h.1ii0

$.90uu

““0“.

“'

It.“

�«all»
31653333

g
§§u§~3m§i§g§h5§:§3nﬁ

4..

basin-«gm

gov

it:

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2834">
                <text>Inhalant-induced convulsions. Significance for the theory of the convulsive therapy process. Arch Gen Psychiat. 1961 Mar; 4:259-66.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2835">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2836">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-52-018</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2837">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2838">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.; Karp, Eric; Pollack, Max; Green, Martin A.; Barre, Alan; Lefkowits, Henry J.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2839">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2840">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2841">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprinted from the Archives of General Psychiatry March 1961, Vol. 4, pp. 259—266</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2842">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2843">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74486">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81047">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87608">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94169">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="285" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="76">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/12764b529d79f1eb96174bc90f2534b6.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ca3411637648ce13d529a98dea9e5b2f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100702">
                    <text>Behavioral Patterns in Convulsive Therapy
MAX FINK. MD.
AND

ROBERT L. KAHN. Ph.D.
GLEN OAKS. L. |.. N. Y.

�Reprinted flow the Archives of General Psychiatry
July 1961, Vol 5, [71). 30— 36
Copyright 1961,]1y Agzeiican Zl/[edical Association

Individual differences in the behavioral
response to convulsive therapy are marked.
In psychiatric practice, patients with similar
psychopathologic syndromes, and of similar
sex and age, show a variety of clinical responses: Some improve and sustain such
change; some improve, only to relapse
quickly; and some fail to improve. These
differences have been related to the degree
and duration of induced neurophysiological
change?“6 premorbid patterns of personal—
ity,""11'15 sociopsychological characteristics,13'
15
and psychotherapeutic approaches.1 While
these studies have emphasized ratings of improvement, the derivative nature of this
evaluation and its dependence on staff attitudes, expectations, and family tolerance have
been stressed.2""5'8
The manifest behavioral patterns provide
the basis for the evaluations of clinical response. It is the purpose of this report to
describe behavioral patterns in patients
undergoing convulsive therapy and to relate
these to problems of the evaluation of improvement and to an understanding of the
convulsive therapy process.

Behavioral
Patterns in
Convulsive

Therapy

Of consecutive patients referred for electroshock therapy during 1956-1957, seventy-three patients were subjects of the analyses described here.
The patients were selected for treatment by the
resident therapist and the supervising psychiatrist
-——the investigators playing
no role in their selection. These observations were made during a

lllll|llllll|Illllllllllllllllllllllll|lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll|lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllll|lllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

MAX FINK, MD.
AND

ROBERT L. KAHN, Ph.D.
GLEN OAKS, L.I., N.Y.

convulsive-subconvulsive electroshock study in
which subjects referred for therapy were randomly assigned to courses of subconvulsive or con—
vulsive treatments.
Electroshock was administered 3 times weekly
under thiopental sodium (Pentothal) premedica—
tion, using either a Reiter unidirectional or a
Medcraft alternating current instrument. Grand
mal or subconvulsive treatments were administered
by altering the strength of current. Neither

Submitted for publication Jan.6, 1961.
From the Department of Experimental Psy—
chiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Present Address: Division of Psychiatry, Monteﬁore Hospital, Bronx, N. Y. (Dr. Kahn).
Read in part, at the New York Divisional Meet—
ing, American Psychiatric Association, November,
1957.

Aided by Grant M- 927 of the National Institute
of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health,
U. S. Public Health Service
52

�CONVULSIVE THERAPY

31

ﬂecting the patient’s adaptation 2 to 4 weeks fol~
lowing the last treatment.

patient, therapist, nor evaluating physicians was
aware which course of therapy each patient received until after the evaluation period.
Changes in brain function were measured at
weekly intervals by tests of language patterns
both clinically and after amobarbital and by the
degree of slow-wave activity in electroencephalograms. The intercorrelation of these indices and
their relation to behavioral changes have been
reported previously?”
The manifest symptom patterns of the referred
patients were variable and included suicidal preoccupation, retardation, disturbances of mood and
affect, excitement, agitation, panic and tension,
delusions, ideas of reference, negativism, withdrawal, and somatic complaints. The clinical diagnoses were depressive psychoses of manic-depressive, involutional and reactive varieties, and schizophrenic psychoses of paranoid, mixed, catatonic,
and pseudoneurotic types.
Clinical behavior was assessed in weekly psychi—
atric interviews, structured perceptual task situa—
tions,“'15 and by conferences with the patient’s
therapist. In these observations, the evaluation of
improvement along the continuum of “recoveredunimproved” appeared inadequate and was supplemented by a rating of the degree of behavioral
change.
The degree of change in clinical and ward
behavior was rated on a 4-point scale of “marked,”
“moderate,” “minimal,” or “no change. H These
evaluations were not value judgments as to the
quality of the change, but rather quantitative es—
timates of differences in behavioral patterns under
similar conditions of observation. The assigned
rating was based on changes observed during the
treatment period and for 2 weeks post treatment.
Evaluations of improvement response were made
on the 4—point scale of “recovered,” “much im—
proved,” “improved,” and “unimproved or worse.”
These evaluations were value judgments, based
upon the behavior of the patient, the therapist’s
expectations, the tolerance by therapist and patient
of those aspects of behavior often called “side—
elfects of the treatment,” and the therapist’s judg—
ment as to the family’s attitudes to the patient’s
behavior. These evaluations were short—term, re-

Observations
A. Behavioral Change and Improvement.

A comparison of the behavioral ratings
and the improvement evaluations is presented in Table 1. That ratings of recovered
and much improved were associated with
high or moderate degrees of behavioral
change is an expected observation. Similarly,
that patients with minimal or no change in
behavior were evaluated as unimproved or
improved, is also expected. The signiﬁcant
relationship, however, lies in the patients
showing high and moderate degrees of behavioral change and still rated as showing a
poor clinical response. Of the 30 patients
observed with high degrees of behavioral
change, 17 were evaluated as recovered and
much improved, and 13 as improved or un—
improved.
B. Modes of Adaptation—Analyses of the
behavioral patterns of the subjects during
and following treatment permitted the description of various modes of adaptation.
For illustrative purposes we have described
4 behavioral patterns under the titles of
euphoric—hypomanic, somatization, paranoidvuithdrawal, and panic modes.
Euphoric-Hypomanic Mode: These subj ects appeared pleasant, affable, and friendly.
They dressed neatly, spoke quietly, and participated in ward activities with increased
interest. Occasionally they dressed gaudily
and smiled and giggled excessively. Pretreatment symptoms were not manifest, and
premorbid attitudes and behavior were again
prominent.

0f Evaluations of Behavioral Change and Clinical Improvement
(Convulsive and Subconvulsive Therapies)

TABLE l.——C0mparison

Improvement Rating
Ichavioral Change
High degree change
Moderate degree change
Minimal degree change
No change

F ink—K ahn

Recovered
(30)
(17)
(10)
(16)

Much
Improved
9
6
0
0

8
3

0
L?

53

Improved

Unimproved
and Worse

8
6

2

5

5

1

15

5

�32

-

In their psychotherapeutic interviews they
described their illness in a detached manner,
emphasizing “it” (illness) as having “dis—
appeared.” They denied having been ill and
facetiously suggested they were at the hos—
pital for a rest, or that the institution was
not a hospital, but a resort or a school.
Symptoms were described in the past tense,
and the quality of having been a different
person during the illness was reiterated.
Speech was marked by denial, displacement,
evasion, qualiﬁcation, and cliches.“ The
third person mode was frequently used, as
in such statements “the doctor
says I am
ill” or “my wife should have come here.”
Gross changes in memory were either not
apparent, or were described for the treat—
ment period only. The patients expected and
accepted these deﬁcits, and neither connection with treatment nor apprehension was
expressed.
They looked forward to home visits and
made realistic discharge plans. While conﬂicts with family members were described,
these were minimized and expressed mainly
in the past tense. Referential questions were
answered in a referential manner and with—
out an arousal of affect. For the more hypo—
manic subjects, questions about home
planning were responded to nonreferentially,
with marked use of inappropriate clichés.
When pressed with referential inquiries,
they quickly exhibited anxiety and discom—
fort, minimized their feelings, and changed
the focus of the session.
Such adaptations were sustained throughout the discharge planning period. The more
hypomanic features were rarely sustained
and within a few weeks were replaced by
a more stable euphoric or somatization type
of adaptation.
Somatization Mode: In these subjects, in—
cessant complaints about bodily symptoms
and loss of memory, demands for reassur—
ance and relief, and preoccupation with feel—
ings of unreality and confusion dominated
behavior. They remained unkempt and their
rooms were untidy. When such an adapta—
tion appeared early in therapy, further
treatment was refused.

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
Speech was principally in the present
tense and in the ﬁrst person, with few third
person references and a minimal use of
clichés, denial, or qualiﬁcations. In psycho—
therapy sessions, they were demanding and
hostile, reporting their problems in terms
similar to those used prior to therapy. They
complained that the treatment caused addi—
tional and more incapacitating difﬁculties.
To referential questions, answers were gen—
eraly correct, but associated with complaints
of memory impairment.
They described their family relations in
pretreatment terms, with an occasional “I
don’t remember” in response to experiential
inquiries. Discharge planning was difﬁcult,
since they insisted that their new symptoms
prevented any home adaptation.
On the ward, their hostile demands for
attention and relief of symptoms increased
with treatment. Participation in group ac—
tivities increased, however, for those sub—
jects who had previously been withdrawn
and seclusive.
Memory complaints were preeminent. Pa—
tients demanded reassurance that their
memory would return and repeatedly asked
if treatment would be harmful. They de—
scribed feelings of derealization and con—
fusion. Events, bodily feelings, and relations
to friends and relatives seemed strange,
fuzzy, unclear, and out of focus. While they
complained chieﬂy of memory impairment,
they also complained of back pain, headache,
tingling of ﬁngers and toes, nausea and
weakness, and ascribed these to the treatment.
At the end of treatment, the symptoms
for which hospitalization had occurred were
no longer present, and although complaints
were many, their relation to the treatment
and their transience was so universally ac—
cepted by both the staff and the patients,
that the results were evaluated as beneﬁcial.
This adaptive mode was sustained into the
postdischarge period.
Paranoid and Withdrawal Mode: Another
pattern was the appearance of paranoid
ideation, suspiciousness, hostility, ideas of
reference, and delusions. These patients
Vol. 5, July, 1961

�CONVULSIVE THERAPY

failed to care for themselves and remained
unkempt in their dress. Their rooms, in
which they remained much of the day, were
untidy. Speech was sparse and not spontane—
ous. When questioned about their illness,
they were hostile and demanded to know
why they were questioned. They refused
to answer inquiries or categorically denied
or agreed to all speciﬁc questions. Experi—
ential questions were answered referentially. When inquiry was insistent, they denied
illness and minimized the symptoms which
had resulted in their admission.
They refused or avoided sessions with
their therapist and insisted convulsive ther—
apy be ended because it was harming them.
When treatments were continued, they demanded release from the hospital, or pre—
cipitated discharge by elopement, suicide
attempts, or aggressive and destructive out—
bursts. They were unable to discuss their
relations with family or friends and focused
on demands for either release or relief from
somatic symptoms. Hostility was overt and
engendered a fearfulness in the staff. On the
ward, when coaxed out of seclusion, they
were loud, aggressive, and demanding. They
were suspicious of attempts at friendliness
and expressed thoughts that others wished
to harm them or talked about them.
While insisting on discharge, no realistic
discharge planning was achieved. Their View
of the environment was grossly distorted and
self—centered, preventing adequate care.
In testing, they were uncooperative, and
voiced angry suggestions of being experi—
mented upon or abused. Complaints of
memory impairment were infrequent and
occasionally denied even when clinically
manifest. On such occasions, they were en—
raged at the implied deﬁcit.
Panic Mode: These patients became increasingly anxious, agitated, restless, sleep—
less, and anorexic. In their dress, they were
neat and cared for themselves. Speech pat—
terns were unchanged and continued with
emphasis on ﬁrst person and present tense
modes. Symptoms were distressing and
prominently voiced. When asked about pre—
treatment symptoms, these were expressed
.

Fink—Kuhn

33

in the same terms as those used earlier,

with the complaint that treatment had made
everything worse.
Patients feared treatment and hid on
treatment days, or pleaded with the staff
to forego further applications. They threatened elopement and if this failed, submitted
administrative requests for discharge.
On the ward, they continued their pretreatment patterns of minimal participation.
On treatment days, they were withdrawn,
sullen, and negativistic, and cooperation was
poor. They demanded to see their therapists
and on such occasions insisted that treatment be discontinued. They were unable to
discuss family situations or their attitudes
to others, being preoccupied with their feelings of fear. In discussing their home, they
insisted on immediate discharge, while
stating they were severely frightened,
anxious, depressed, and unwell.
Ideation was unchanged with fearfulness
as the principal affect. Fears of damage
to the brain or mind was expressed, accompanied by the awareness that memory
impairment may be a Sign of such damage.
Complaints of memory impairment were
infrequent and when present, were ex—
pressed as a speciﬁc reason for discontinuation of treatment.
Patients were uncooperative and fearful
of testing and participated only if encour—
aged that such tests may be helpful in the
therapist’s decision about further treatment.
Occasionally, when treatment was discon~
tinued, a more stable adaptation of relief,
acquiescence, and denial appeared.
C. Adaptive Mode and Improvement
Ratings—Thus, for the various adaptive
behavioral patterns, a range of short—term
evaluations was observed. Those subjects
who developed and sustained the euphoric—
hypomanic modes were generally rated as
recovered or much improved. Patients with
somatization and panic modes were oc—
casionally rated as improved, although unimproved ratings were frequent. The
paranoid—withdrawal mode was evaluated as
unimproved or worse, as were patients exhibiting the panic modes. The relation be—

�34

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
TABLE 2.—Adapti7/e

Mode and Improvement
Improvement Rating

Modes

Euphoric-Hypomanic
Somatlzatlon
Paranoid-Withdrawal
Panic
No adaptive change‘
‘ Includes subconvulsive

(36)
(10)
7)
( 7)
(13)
(

Recovered

Much
Improved

11

14

0
0
0
0

l

10
5

0
0
0

2
2
l

Improved

Unimproved,
Worse
l
4

5

5
12

treated subjects Without second course of ECT.

tween adaptive modes and ratings
improvement is summarized in Table 2.

of

Studies relating physiological or psychological aspects of convulsive therapy to
clinical outcome have reported inconsistent
results}6 Thus, it has been reported that
depressed patients respond favorably to convulsive therapy while schizophrenic or neu—
rotic subjects do not; while other observers
indicate that neurotic depressive patients re—
spond badly, and that some schizophrenic
subjects do have favorable outcomes. Vari—
ous measures have been suggested as predic—
tors of improvement, only to fail on more
extensive testing. In such instances, the
differences in results and discrepancies in
convulsion can be related to the utilization
of a variety of global estimates of improve—
ment as the criterion of behavioral change,
without adequate speciﬁcation of the standards used in the evaluation.
Such standards differ widely, depending
on institutional populations and staff attitudinal factors. Varying attitudes toward
“side-effects,” the use of global rating scales,
and varying psychosocial attitudes affecting
goals of treatment have each served to make
results from different laboratories incom—
patible. Thus, in our evaluations of con—
vulsive therapy, the development of changes
in memory, recall, and orientation have been
considered as temporary manifestations of
therapy and disregarded in the clinical eval—
uations.3'19 Patients developing the euphoric
or hypomanic modes, despite concomitant
memory loss, have been rated as much im—
proved.
In a comparable study by Johnson et al.,10
the Lorr global ratings of behavioral change
were utilized. In this type of evaluation the
changes in memory and orientation are in—

Comment
These observations emphasize the variety
of behavioral adaptations that occur during
convulsive therapy and relate short—term
evaluations of improvement to the type of
behavioral change. Earlier observers of con—
vulsive therapy have described a range of
behavioral patterns, ascribing the changes
to ego adaptive responses, to the trauma
of the treatment, organic brain changes, or
psychologic signiﬁcance of the treatment.7'
9'21 These observations that
subjects with
similar psychopathologic syndromes receiv—
ing similar treatment may exhibit discordant
behavioral adaptations and be variously
rated as recovered or unimproved, are of
signiﬁcance for an understanding of the
convulsive therapy process.
In earlier studies, the conclusion was
reached that persistent alterations in brain
function were a necessary condition for

behavioral change in convulsive ther:«ipy.2""6
With changes in brain function, all aspects
of behavior undergo modiﬁcation. Percep—
tion, mood, affect, judgment, attitude, mem—
ory and recall are altered, and with these,
the subject’s adaptation in the environment.
Not all behavioral changes are viewed as
improvement, however. Improvement ap—
pears to be a special type of behavioral
response, being the subjective estimate by
an observer that the patient is “better.” It
is based, not only on the patient’s behavior,
but also on such nonspeciﬁc aspects as the
observer’s expectations, and tolerances, and
those of the family and environment.

56

Vol. 5,

lily,

1961

�CONVULSIVE THERAPY

cluded as negative scores in the improvement
scoring, so that a high number of subjects
were reported as “unimproved or worse.”
Besides population differences, this single
factor is sufﬁciently potent to alter the rela—
tionships between the 2 studies and justiﬁes
the discrepant observations.
The use of global estimates of behavioral
change in evaluating therapy has other signiﬁcant deﬁciencies. Psychiatric therapies
are rarely focused, or effective in modifying
a single symptom. The induced changes
affect a spectrum of behaviors, with varying
rates of change for different aspects. Global
estimates tend to lose differences in individual elements within the medial designations
necessary to deﬁne the whole response. In
such situations changes in behavior which
may be prominent, though not pervasive nor
enduring, may dominate the evaluation as to
overshadow other, potentially more signif—
icant changes. Thus, alterations in memory
and recall, or increased somatization or in—
creasing withdrawal may dominate unim—
proved evaluations; while explicit verbal
denial, clichés, and euphoria may lead to
recovered or much improved designations.
The use of improvement ratings may be
empirically justiﬁed as an early approxima—
tion in studies of a new therapeutic meas—
ure, but further analyses of the behavioral

‘

observations are required for understanding
and adequately applying the treatment. The
typologies described in this report are one
approach—one that has been helpful in our
understanding of the convulsive therapy
process and one that is now being tested in
studies of psychopharmacologic agents.
In addition to the differences in improve—
ment evaluations occasioned by attitudes to
“side—effects” and the use of global ratings,
there are differences due to the attitudes of
therapists toward various sociocultural pop—
ulations. The adaptation of explicit verbal
denial in a lower class patient in a community institution is welcomed by therapists
and family, but the same adaptation in an
upper class professional in a psychothera—
peutic hospital is considered poor or psy—
chotic. The display of rationalization.
Fin k—K01m

35

minimization and displacement, even when
accompanied by a return to premorbid work
levels, is considered marked improvement
in one setting, but is viewed as a lack of
improvement in another if goals of insight
had been set by the therapist. Interference
with memory and recall may be disregarded
by therapists for one sociocultural group,
but arouse empathic solicitude for patients
of another social class. Such factors affect
not only institutional attitudes, but within
an institution, therapists of different thera—
peutic orientations may have differing atti—
tudes towards evaluations and therapies. The
many recent sociocultural studies of thera—
pists, and their attitudes towards selection
of therapies, are indicative of these attitudinal differences.13'17-18'20'22
It is our impression, therefore, that im—
provement ratings are no longer useful devices in evaluating psychiatric therapies. For
the symptomatic therapies extant today,
which are seemingly not directed toward
the alteration of an etiologic factor, typologic
descriptions have a greater applicability and
empiric justiﬁcation. Typologies based on
concepts of diagnosis, target symptoms, or
on dynamic—structural formulations have
attempted to structure the pretreatment clusters in which therapies may be effective.
Treatment and post—treatment symptom improvement scales have been used with utility.
These are limited approximations, however,
and there is a need for a broader approach
to both the pretreatment and the treatment
behavior, and a phenotypic, adaptive be—
havioral typology, using multivariate tech—
niques of data analysis, seems worthy of
assessment.

Summary
An analysis of the variety of behavioral

adaptations of 73 voluntary psychiatric pa—
tients undergoing convulsive therapy resulted
in the description of 4 major patterns.
These are described as euphoric-hypomanic,
somatization, paranoid—withdrawal, and pan—
ic modes.
The relation of these modes to clinical
ratings of improvement is described. The

�36

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

derivative and generally nonoperational
nature of improvement ratings is empha—
sized. The difﬁculties in a communicative
deﬁnition of this variable is seen as a major
factor in the discrepant studies of indices
predictive of improvement in convulsive
therapy and in understanding the processes
of somatic therapies in psychiatry.

Therapy (With and W'ithout Atropine), Arch.
Gen. Psychiat. 2:324-336, 1960.
11. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in Psychopathology of Communication, edited by P.
Hoch and J. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton,

Inc., 1958, pp. 126-139.
12. Kahn, R. L.; Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.:
Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 76 :23-29, 1956.
13. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in A Voluntary Mental Hospital: Duration
of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings, and Diagnosis, A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 1:565-574,

Max Fink, M.D., Department of Experimental
Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, 75—59 263rd St.,
Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.

REFERENCES

H

Esecover, H.; Jaﬁe, J., and Kahn, R. L.:
Psychotherapeutic Techniques with Electroshock
Patients, J. Hillside Hosp. 7:17-25, 1958.
2. Fink, M.: A Uniﬁed Theory of the Action of
Physiodynamic Therapies, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
1.

1959.
14.

Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
F igure-Ground Discrimination After Induced
Altered Brain Function, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

2:547-551, 1960.
15. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
Social Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 130:187—192,

197-206, 1957.

Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG
Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in Electro—
shock: Quantitative Serial Studies, A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. Psychiat. 78:516-525, 1957.
4. Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L., and Green, M.: Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process,
Dis. Nerv. Syst. 19:113~118, 1958.
5. Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L., and Pollack, M.:
Psychological Factors Aﬂ'ecting Individual Differences in Behavioral Response to Convulsive
Therapy, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 128 :243-248, 1959.
6. Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L.; Karp, E.; Pollack,
M.; Green, M.; Alan, B., and Lef‘kowits, H. J.:
Signiﬁcance of Inhalant Induced Convulsions for
the Theory of the Convulsive Therapy Process,
Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 4:259-266, 1961.
7. Frosch, J., and Impastat, D.: The Effects of
Shock Treatment on the Ego, Psychoanal. Quart.
3.

1960.
16.

Kalinowsky, L., and Hoch, P.: Shock Treatments, Psychosurgery and other Somatic Treatments in Psychiatry, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton,

Inc., 1952.
17. Kaplan, A. 1., and Lefkowits, H. J.: Inﬂu—
ence of Staff Attitudes and Environmental Factors
on Treatment Selection, J. Hillside Hosp. 1961,
to be published.
18. Klerman, G. L.; Sharaf, M.; Holzman, M.,
and Levinson, D. J.: Sociopsychological Charac-

teristics of Resident Psychiatrists and their Use
of Drug Therapy, Amer. J. Psychiat. 117:111-117,
1960.

Korin, H.; Fink, M., and Kwalwasser, 5.:
Relation of Changes in Memory and Learning to
Improvement in Electroshock, Conﬁn. Neurol. 16:
19..

88-96, 1956.
20. McIver, J. and Redlich, F. C.:

17:226-239, 1948.
8. Frosch, J.;

Impastato, D.; Ottenheimer, L.,
and Wortis, S. B.: Some Reactions Seen After
Electric Shock Treatment, Amer. J. Psychiat. 102

Patterns of

Psychiatric Practice, Amer. J. Psychiat. 115:692-

311—315, 1945.

697, 1959.
21. Millet, J. A.

Glueck, B. C.: Psychopathologic Reactions
and Electric-Shock Therapy, New York J. Med.
42:1553-1557, 1942.
10. Johnson, L. C.; Ulett, G. A.; Johnson, M.;
Smith, K., and Sines, J. 0.: Electroconvulsive

Psychosom. Med. 6:226-237, 1944.
22. Pasamanick, B.; Dinitz, S., and Lefton, M.:
Psychiatric Orientation and Its Relation to Diag—
nosis and Treatment in a Mental Hospital, Amer.
J. Psychiat. 116:127-132, 1959.

:

P., and Morse, E.: On Certain
Psychological Aspects of Electroshock Therapy,

9.

58

Printed and Published in the United States of America

��Putt-ran at Bohgvioral chant. and Inprorcnnnt
1n canvullivo rhcrapy

In: Pink, x.n.

and nobcrt L. Kuhn, Ph.D.*

from the Dapartncnt or Expnrinontnl Psychiatry,

ulna oakn,

L.I., n.x.

Hillside noupitsl,

gratt K~927 of tho lattcnal Initituta a: nontal noulth,
lutional Institutua a: Hatlth, United Status Puhlie Hualth survzoo.
Reta in part, gt th.".!. 91'1319311 looting, American Payehintric
Aidod by

Association Northbor, 1951.
: Btvﬂiomit o: Psych-try. Mutation 30-91%“.
*Pruont
Bronx, 1.1.
VII: 1/61

“an"

�Individuol ﬂittoroncoo in tho bohoviorol roopouoo to
oonvoloivo thoropy oro oorkod. In poyohiotric proctico,
potionto with oanslor poyohopotholoxtc oyudroaoo, one or

oililor

varioty or olinieol rosponooo: oooo
toprovo old ouotoin ouch chongo; oooo 1-provo, only to rolopoo
quickly; ond oooo toil to taprovo. rhooo dittorooeoo hovo boon
rolotod to tho dogroo ond duration or indoood nourophyoiolociool
ehongo (3,6) prooorbtd pottorno or poroonoltty (5,11,15),
ooulopoyeholoctool chorootoriotioo (13,15) and porehothoropontto
opprooehoo (1). Vh11o thooo otudioo hovo onphooiood voting: 0:
taprovooont, tho dorivotivo unturo or thin ovoluotion ond 1t:
dopondonco on otort ottttudoo, oxpoctotiono ond tooily toloronco
oox ond ago, ohow o

has boon strooood

(2,h,5,8).

rho oonttoot bohoviorol pottorno provido tho boots tor tho
ovo$uot1ono of clinical rooponoo. It 1o tho purpooo o: thto

roport to doocriborbohovtorol pottorno 1n pottonto nndoraoinz
oonvolsivo thoropy, ond to roloto tho-o to problooo of tho
ovolootioo of taprovooont and to on ondorotondinx o2 tho coo-

vuloivo thoronyIProcooo.

�gethod:
or consecutive pe$$en$e reterred for electreehoek therepy
63:13; 1956—57. teveatybthree pettente were subjecte e: the
eaelyeee eeeeribed here. the patients were selected tor treeto
sent by the reeident therepiet end the aupervteiuc peyohietrteﬁ -

the inveetzceterp playing no role in their selection. These
convulsive—euhcenvulaSve
electroc
3
during
were
III.
obeervettene
eheok study a; whieh subject. referred tar enereyy were rendenly
unsigned to entrees e: cuboenvuletve er convulsive treetnente.
Electroeheek wee edginietered three tines weekly under
pentethel preunedieetiea, using either e letter unidirectional
er e xederett alternating entrent inattenent. arena eel or
enbeenvnleive treetnente were eduin1utered by titering the
etrongth of current. leither patient, therapist not eveluetinx
phyeiaiene tee evere which entree e1 therapy each pétient
received until titer the evaluation period.
weeiiy
intervals
cheese: in urea: tunetion were neeeered at
by test: of leagues. petterne both 011336.11: eta etter
eneberbitel, and by the degree e: 310: were activity in
electroencephelegrene. 2he interoerreletien e: theee indieee
3

�.3cooplointl. rho alinicol dioxnoooo woro doproootvo
of nonio—doproooivo, involutioaol ond rooetivo

and ooaotic
poyuhoooo

voriotioo; one oohioophrontc poyehoooo or poronoid, aixod,
oototonto and pooudonourotie typoo.
clinical bohovior woo oooooood in vookly poyuhiotric
intorviovo, otrootorod porooptuol took oituotiono (1h,15) and
with
contorouooo
tho potiont'o thoropiot. II thooo ohoorvo~
by
tiono, tho ovolootion of :Iprovouont along tho continual of
'rooovorod-untnprovod' oppooroa inoaoquoto, and woo topplonontod
by o roting of tho dogroo of bohoviorol ohongo.
rho dogroo of chonzo 1n olinieol tad word hohovior woo
totod on o four point ocolo or 'norkod', “nodoroto', 'nininol'
or'ho chango'. Thooo ovoluotiono woro not voluo Judznonto no
to tho quality of tho ohonxo, but rothor, quontitotivo ootinotoo
o: ditforouooo in hohoriorol pottorno undo: oinilor condition:

at otoorvotion. rho oooigood voting

woo hoood on ohongoo

oboorvod during tho trootnont poriod and

for too

vooko poot~

trootaont.
lvolootiono or ingrovonont roopoaoo woro undo on tho four
point ocolo or 'rocovorod', 'nuoh taprovod', ﬁtnprovod', and
“nailprovod or onroo'. rhooo ovolootaono ooro voluo Judgnouto,
hoood upon tho bohovior of tho patient, tho thoroptot'o oxpoctotiono, tho toloronoo by thoropiot and potiont of thooo oopoeto of
bohovior otton oollod *oido-orroeto of tho trootnont’, and tho
thoropiot'o Judgnont on to tho tonily'o ottitudoo to the potioat'o
hohovtor. fhooo ovolnotiono ooro abort-torn, rotlocting tho
potiont'o odoptotion two to tour wool“ following the lost troutnOHto

�gbaorvationo:
(a) Donatioral chango and Ingrovonont
coaparioon at tho bahavioral ratingo and tho
iaprovoaont ovaluationo 1o proooatod in tabla I. that ratings
at rocovorod and nuch iaptovod woro aaaociatod with high or
moderate dogrooa at bohavioral change it an oxpoctod obaorvation.
similarly, that patioato with ainiaal or no chango in behavior
taro avalaotod ao uni-proved or iaprovod, io aloe oxpootod. tho
aixaitioant rolatianahip, hovovor, lioa in tho patianta ohooing
high and oodorato dogrooo or bohavioral ohoazo and atill ratod
ao ohaoiaz a poor oliniaal roopoaao. at tho thirty patioato
obaorvad with high dogrooa or hohaviaral ohango, aovontoon voro
ovaluatod aa raeavorod and much iaprovod, and thirtoon ao
inprovod or aainprovod.

l

.. --.. .
ZLBLI

(b) undo:

at Adaptation

I

-“ﬂ--.

o: the bohavioral pattorna at tho oobaocto
daring and tailoring traataont poraittod tho description or
variauo today of adaptation. For illoatrativo purpoooa vo havo
doaoribod tour bohoriorol pattorna undo: tho titloa a:
oaghorie-hzgoaanio, oaaatiaation. garanoid-withdraoa; and
Analyooo

Rania nodoo.

Bughorio-lzzoaanie Roda: Thooo oubjocta appoarod
plaaaant, atrablo and friaudly. they are-sod neatly, opako
quiotly, and participated in word activitioo with ineroaaod

�Zlﬂﬁﬁ

I

atnpgrtann 0t Evaluationl Qt nohavttrnl change
and clinical Inpruvcnont
(c0uvu1317c and subconvnlutru 1h0r&amp;pico)

ﬁtting

XIErOVOIORt

locovorod
»

_

Itch

Inprdvod ﬁninpruvod and
Ingrovod
39:30

Bahaviorll Ghangc
nigh dogroo change (39)
ﬁ
lodorato
(17)

8

9

8

5

3

6

6

2

Juana

(‘10)

o

a

5

S

(16)

o

0

1

15

I.

change

'
'

I'

�.

~5-.

interest. 'oeeeeieeelly they dreeeed aeadily,

end exiled end

giggled excessively. Pre-treeteent eyepteee were net eenifeet
end preeerbid ettitudee end hehevier were egeie prenieeet.
In their peyohetherepeetie interviews they deecrihed their

illueee in e deteched leaner, eepheeieieg ”it“ (illneee)

ee

they denied having-been ill end
feeetieeely eeggeeted they were et the heepitel fer e reet; er
thet the inetitutiee wee net e heepitel, but e reeert er e
eeheel. Syeyteee were deeeribed in the pert teeee, end the
geelity of keying been e different pereen during the illeeee
hevins “dieeppeered’.

reitereted. Speeeh wee eerked by deeiel,.diepleeeeeet,
ereeiee, quelitieetiee end eliehee (11). the third pereen

wee

'

eede wee frequently need, ee in eeeh eteteeeete
the doctor
eeye 1 en 111' er *ey wife eheeld here eeee here.II
Greee ehenzee in neeery were either not eppereat, or were

deeeribed fer the treeteeet period only. the petieete expected end
eeeepted theee defieite, end neither eeeeectiee with treeteeet her
eppreheneien were expreeeed.
they looked forward te here wieite end eede reelietie
dieeherge pleee. While conflicts with feeily eenbere were
deeeribed, theee were eieieieed end expreeeed neiely in the peet
tenee. heferentiel qeeetieee were eeewered in e referential

nearer end without en ereeeel of effect. for the mere hypeeeeie
eebaeete, queetiene eheet here planning were reepended te nearefereetielly, with marked nee of inepprepriete eliehee. When
preeeed with referentiel inquiries, they quickly exhibited

�.5anxiety and dieeeatort, aiuiaieed their feelings and changed
the teeua.e£ the eeeeien.
Seek adaptatiene were euetained throughout the discharge
planning period. The mere hypeaaaie features were rarely
suetained, and within a for weeks were replaced by a mere
etable euphoric er aenatizatien types of adaptation.
,8enatizetien Hades In theee_enbdeete, incessant eeaplainte
about bodily eyaptene and lees e: eatery, deaands fer reaeeurenee
and relief; and preoccupation with feelings of nnreality and
eeeteeion doainated behavior. Ehey retained unkempt and their
When
each an adaptatien appeared early in
were
untidy.
reels
therapy, further treatment wee refused.
speech nae printiptlly in the present teaee and in the
first pereen, eith fee third peraen references and a ainiaai
use at clichea, denial er qualifications. In peyohetherapy
eeeeiene, they vere-deaandies and hostile, repertihg their
prehieae in terae eiailar to these need prier to therapy. !hey
eeaplained that the treatment eaaeed additieeel and mere incapacitating difficulties. re referential queatiens, answers were
generally correct, but associated with eenplainte of aeaery

inpairaent.
they deeeribed their taaily relations in yreotreatneet
terns, with en oecaaional '1 den't reaenber' in reepenee to
experiential inquiriee. Discharge planning eaa dittiealt, as
they insisted that their new eynptene prevented any home adaptation.

their heetile demands for attentien and relief
at eyupteas increased with treetaent. Participation in creep
activities inereaaed, however, tar these eabaeete who had
an the ward,

�-7.
previeaely been withdrawn and eeoleeive.
Heaory eeaplainte were pre-eaiuent. ratioate deaanded
reaaaaranee that their aeaery would return, and repeatedly
asked if treatment would he hararul. they deeoribod feelinge
of derealiaation and confusion. Erenta, bodily feelinge and
relatiena to friends and relativee eeeaed etrange, teeny,
unclear, and out of :oeue. While they oonplained ehietly e:
book
of
alao
ceaplained
pain, headache,
they
iarairnent,
aeaory
tingling o: tinsera and teee, aaaaea and roakaoee, and
aeorihed there to the troetaent.
which
end
symptom:
the
for
the
at
treatment,
heepitalit
iaatioa had occurred were no longer present, and although
and
to
the
treatment
were
relation
their
their
aany,
eoaploiate
transieaoe eae eo univoreally aeeepted by both the start and
the patients, that the rooalte rare evaluated or beneficial.
!hie adaptive node wee eeetained into the peat-dieoharge period.
Paranoid and Withdrawal lode: Another pattern tea the
appearance or paranoid ideation, euepicieuaneea, hostility,
ideae of reference and deleaiene. These patients failed to
care for theaaolvee, and roaained unkeapt in their dress. Their
reeaq.in which they reaained each or the day, were untidy.
Speech eaa eparee and not epontaneeaa. when questioned about
their illneae, they were hostile and demanded to know why they
were queetiened. they retaeed to anewer inquiriee er categorieally denied or agreed to all epecixio queetiene. Experiential
caeetiena were anewerod roterantially. When inquiry was
ioeietoat, they doeidd illneea and ainiaieed tho ayaptena which

�~8-

resulted 3: their ednieeien.
they retueed er eveided eeeeieee with their therepiet,
end ineieted eenvuledve therepy he ended beeeeee iteee herningy
then. When treeteente rere continued, they demanded releeee
free the_hoepite1, or precipiteted dieeherge by elepeneut,
euietde ettelpte er eczreeeive end deetreetdve outberete. They
were uneble to diecuee their reletiens with relily or triende,
and teeeeed either en deaende fer releeee or relief tree
resette eynptoee. Ieettlity wee overt, end engendered e
teertelneee 1n the etett. an the nerd, rhea eeexed out of see»
Ineien, they were lend, eggreeetve end deeend1ng. They were
eeepieieee e: etteepte at friendlteeee, end expreeeed theeghte
thet other: edehed to here the: or talked ebeﬁt then.
while ineieting en dteeherge, no reelietie dieeherge
pleating wee eehseved. their View er the envirtneent wee
creeely distorted end eelreeeutered, preventing'edeqnete care.
In testing, they were uneeeperetive, end rained angry
eeggeetiene a! being experirented ugen or ebueed. Complaints
at nenery impairment were intrequent, and occeeienelly denied
when
even
clinicelly meniteet. on such occasione, they were
eareged et the inplied deficit.
Peale Bede: Theee'pettﬂate beeene increeeingly enzione,
eglteted, reetleee, eleepleee end enorexie. In their dreee,
they were neet end eered ror themselves. Speech patterns
hed

were unehegged end eontinued with eepheeie on tiret pereon
and preeent tenee nodes. .synpteme were dietreee1ng end

prentuentiy voiced.

When

asked about preetreetment eynptore,

�.9.
theee were expreeaed in the aaae terae ae theee need earlier,
with the eaaplaint that treataent had aade everything weree.
Patienta reared treat-eat and hid an treataent daye, er
pleaded with the etatt to forage farther applications. they
threatened elepeaent and it thie tailed, enhaitted administrative
reqaeata fer discharge.
an the ward, they continued their preatreataent patterns

at

participatien. 0n treataent daye, they were withdrawn,
aalien and negativietie, and cooperation wae peer. they
deaanded te aee their therapiete and on each eceeeiene ineieted
that treataant be discontinued. they were unable to diecnee
{anily eitaatiene er their attitudee to ethere, being preo
eeeayied with their feeling: at tear. In dieeaeaieg their
minimal

heaa, they inaiated en iaaediate dieeharge, while atating they
were aewerely trightened, anxieaa, depreeeed and unwell.
’Ideatien was unchanged with tearfulneae ae the principal
.

affect. reare

te the brain er aied wae expreeeed,
aeeeapaaied by the awareaeee that aeaory iapairaeet may be a
sign at each damage. ceaplainta at aeaery inpairaent were in~
ex daaage

frequent and when present, were expressed ae a apeeitie reason
(or dieeeatinaatiea of treatment.
Patiente were uncooperative and fearful at testing, and

participated only

it

encouraged that such
decision about further

tests may be helpful
treataent. occasion.

in the therapist's
ally, when treatment wae diacentinued, a more stable adaptation
of relier, aeqaieeeenee and denial appeared.

�'

(3)

29:9"

tivo H96. and

rovunoat n;¢1 3
Thus, fo:_th¢ var1oua_gdaptivq bohnvitrnl ptttornl,
a runs; or ihort term evaluations were obsorvad. thus: subjects
aha devolaped and sustained the euphoric-hyponanie nodou were
generally ratoﬁ us rocaverod or nueh inpravod. Patients uith
ponatizatian gnd panic modes were ocgusiantlly rated as improved,
nithgugh uninprevod ratings were frequent. The paranoid-with.
ﬁgural node was evaluated as unimprGVad or worse, as were
model.
The relation batucon
the
panic
pn§;ontl czhibiting
adaptive node and ratings or improvonent are Ialnnrilod in
'

d‘

fable 1!.
1133!

II

-‘C- “CC-

�tivo.ﬂndc 3nd

Ada

rovonoat
Ingrovcnont Rating

Rtoovered

3.4..

anh

Improved Inprovcd ﬁninpravod,

Horn.

Euphoricvﬂyponanic

(36)

11

1h

10

1

Selatinttion
tiranotdniithdrauul

(10)

o

1

5

h

(

7)

0

o

2

5

Psntc

(

7)

o

o

2

5

ndaptivo ohtngoi (13)

0

0

1

12

I.

alnoludas snbcenvulsivo
trcntod unbaoctu without
cocond course 01 not,

�Bieeoeeien:
fheee ebeervatiene eaphaeiee the variety of behavioral
adaptatiene that-occur daring eonvaleive therapy, and relate

abort tern evaluatieee or iapreveaeot to the type of behavioral
change. larlier obeervere at oooveleive therapy have deeoribed
a range of behavioral patterns, aeoribing the ehaogee to age
adaptive reepenaee,to the traaaa of the treataent, organio brain
changes, or peyehologio oigoifioanoe of the treataeot (7,8,9,21).
These ebeervatione that subjects with eiailar peyohopethelegio
eyndreaee receiving aiailar treatment aay exhibit dieoordaot
behavioral adaptatiene, and be varioaely rated aa recovered or
aaiaproved, ie o! eigoirieanoe for an onderetahding e: the eonvnlaive therapy prooeee.
In earlier studies, the ooholoaioo val reached that
pereietené alteratioea in brain tanotioo were a neoeeeary eonditieo to; behavioral change in oonvaloive therapy (2,h,6). With
changes it brain tuaotioo, all aepeote of behavior undergo
modification. Perception, need, affect, Jadgaent, attitude,
aeaery and recall are altered, and with theee, the eabaeot'e
adaptation in the environment. let all behavioral ebaegee are
viewed aa iapreveaeot, however. Improvement appeare to be a
special type oi behavioral reepooee, being the eobjeotive
eetiaate by an obeorver that the patient ie 'hotter’. It ie
baled, not only on the patieot'e behavior, but also on each
oeo-apeoitie aepeeta aa the obeerver'a expeotatione, and
toleraooee, and these at the taaily and eovirenaent.
Studies relating physiological or peyehologioal aepeote

�-12or oonvnloivo therapy to

clinical

inreported that deproeeed

ontoone have reported

been
hae
Thne,
(16).
it
ooneietont roanlte
eohiaowhile
oonvnleivo
therapy
to
patients reopond favorably
oheorvore
other
while
do
not;
oabjoota
nonrotio
phrenio or
and
badly,
reepond
patiente
dopreeeive
neurotic
that
indioate
ontooaoe.
do
favorable
have
enhaeota
that ooae aohiaophronio
of
inprovoaa
predictora
been
enggeeted
have
Various noaanroe
each
inetanoea,
In
extensive
tootinx.
on
aoro
to
lent, only tail
can
eonolneion
in
and
diaoropanoioo
in
results
the dittorenooe
or
oetiaatoe
of
global
of
a variety
be related to the utilization
vithoot
behavioral
change,
of
the
criterion
ilproveaent an
evaluation.
the
need
in
etandarde
of
the
adequate epooitioation
Snoh etandarde differ videly, depending on institutional

atatt attitadinal taotore. Varying attitudeand
eoaloe
of
rating
global
the
nae
toaard 'aide-otteota',

popelatione and

o:
treataent
goale
afteoting
attitndee
varying peyohoeooial
have baoh eorved to lake reenlte tron different laboratorioe

oonvnloivo
therapy,
o:
ovalaationa
in
our
fhne,
inooapatiblo.
and
orientation
recall
in
ohangee
neaozy
o:
devolepaont
the
,
and
of
therapy
aanitoetatione
have been considered ae teaperary
dieregardod in the olinioal ovalaatione (3,19). Patients
oonoonitant
doepito
aodea,
hypeaanio
the
euphoric
or
developing
anon
been
on
ieproved.
have
rated
neaory loee,
In a ooaparable etndy by John-on gngg, (lo), the Lorr global
of
In
type
thie
utilized.“
were
change
rating! of behavioral
inolndod
and
orientation
are
in
ohanxee
the
neaory
evaluation

�-13-

negative oeoroa in the inprovenent nearing, no that a high
nnaher or enhaooto were reported an 'aninproved or nerao.‘
Booidoe population ditterenoee, thia einglo factor in
eattioiently potent to alter the relationehipe between the
two etadios, and Justitieo the diooropant eboervationa.
the nae or global eetinatea or behavioral change in
evaluating therapy hae other significant detieieneiee.
Psychiatric therapiea are rarely toenaed, or effective in
modifying a single eyaptea. the induced ohanxoo affect a
opeetrna oi hehaviera, with varying ratoa of change for ditterent aepoote. Global aetinateo tend to loae differenooe in
individual ole-onto within the nedial deoignatione neeoeaany to
define the whole reeponee. In oneh oitnationa ohangee in hehavier which nay he preninont, though not pervaaive nor enduring
nay doninate the evaluation an to overehadoe other, potentially
nore aignitioant ehanzee. than, alterationo in aenory and recall, or increaeed eonatination or inereaaing tithdrawal nay
daninato nninproved evaluations; while explicit verbal denial,
olieheo and euphoria nay lead to recovered or each iaproved
designations. the nae o: inprevenent ratings nay he enpirioelly
Jaatiried an an early approxiaation in studies of a new thorapeutio aoaonre, but inrthor analyoea o: the behavioral eboorva~
tiona are required for anderatanding and adequately applying the
treatnent. rho typologiea deooribod in this report are one
approaeh - one that hoe heon helptal in our nnderatanding or the
oonvaloive therapy prooeea, and one that in non being teatod in
etadiee o: payohepharaaeoloxie agento.
on

�ulhIn sddltlen to the differences in leprevesent evelestlens
eeessieeed by attitudes to 'elde-effeets' end the use ef glebel
due
to the ettitedes ef thereplsts
differences
there
ere
retinls,
tersrd rsrlees seeleesltsrsl peeeletiens. The edeptetien of
explicit verbsl denial in s lever clues pstient in e eennenlty
lestitntlee is welcomed by therspiste and really, but the seas
sdsptstleu in en upper elese professional in e peyehethsrspeetle
The
displsy ef
or
psychotic.
is
hospital
considered peer
when
and
even
nintnisstlen
displscenent,
retlensllsstien,
eeeenpenied by s return to preeerbid work levels, is eensidered
nsrked leprevenent in ens setting, but is viewed as e leek ef
inpreveneet is enether if ceels of insight hsd been set by the
thersplet. Interference with memory end reeell say he disregsrded
by therspists fer ene seeieeeltnrel group, but sreese espethle
eeliettede fer petlente ef endkher seeiel eless. Seek feetere
effect not enly institutienel,%tt1tedee, but riteln en 1nst1ts~
tion, therapists of different therepeutie erlestétlees sey here
evglestieae
nsny
thersples.
towards
sad
the
differing ettltedee
recent seeiecnlterel studies ef therspists, end their sttitedes
tevsrds eelsetion ef thersples, sre indiestive of these sttitndinsl
differences (13,17,18,2o.22).
It is our impression, therefore, thet inprevenent rstlngs
are no longer useful devices in evslusting psyrhietrie therepies.
For the eynptometie therapies extent today, which ere seemingly
net direeted tewerd the slteretien ef en etiologic fecter,
typelegte deecriptiens have s greeter spplleebility sud enpirie

�-15.

Justification. typologies haaad on concepts at diaxaaaia,
targat aynpaaaa or on dyaaaio-atractaral formulations harattaaptad to atructara tho pra-traataaat clusters in witch
thoraptaa nay be attaativa. fraatnant and paat—troatnant
ayaytan impravaaant acalaa have haan used with

utility.

Thaao

ara linitad approxinatiaaa, howavar, and thara 1a a naad far a
broader approach to bath tho pra-traataant and traatnant bahaviara, and a phanotypio, adaptiva bahaviaral typolacy, aaing
aaltivariata taohniqnaa at data analysis, aoana worthy a:
aaaaaaaant.

�w

in enelyeie_er the veriety e1 beheviorelvudeptetiene
or 73 velnntery peychietric petiente undergoing convulsive
therepy reeulted in the description er tear nejor patterne.
These are deecribed ee eupheric-hypenenic, eenetizetien,

paranoid-withdrawal end penie nedee.
the reletien er the-e nedee te clinical retinge e:
ieprevenelt ie deecribed. the derivative end generally
neu-eperetienel unture e: ieyrevenent retinge in enpheeieed.
the difficulties in e cennunieetive detinitien e: thie
veriehle ie eeen ee_e nejer teeter in the dieerepent etudiee
et indieee predictive e: inprevenelt in cenveleive therapy,
end in underetendinc the preeeeeee e: ee-etic therepiee in
peywhietry.

�-17-

W'

1. Ieeeever, 1., latte, J. and Iain, R.L.: Peyehetherepeetie
rechaiqaee with lieetreeheek Patiente. J. lilieide

.3332..1; 17~2§, 1958.
link, 1.: i ﬁaified theory of the ietiea e: Phyeiedyuanie
rherapiee. J. lilleide legg. é; 197-206, 1957.
BIG
and
of
Delta Activity te
telatien
1.5.:
lake,
link, I.
lehavierel leepenee in lleetreeheek: Quantitative serial
Stadiee. A.!.i. ireh. laurel. &amp; Pezdhiat. 19: 516-525,
1257.

n.: prerinental Studiee or
«a. lleetreeheek Preeeee. Die. lerv. slat. 11: 113-119,
and
3.1.
Pellaek, a.a Payehelegieal rector.
take,
3.,
tier,

rant,§a.. lane, 1.1.

and Green,

1958.

Affecting Individual Differences in Behavioral Reapenee
to canvaleive Therapy. J.l,!.B. 13g. 2k3-2h8, 1959.
6. Fiat, u., Kenn, 3.5., tarp, 3., Pollack, 1., Green, H.,
Alan, B. and Lei‘kewite, LL: Significance of Inhalant
Induced neural-ion: tor the Theory er the convulsive
Therapy Preeeee. L.H.i. Arch. Gen. Pezehiat. (in press).
Preach, J. and Iepaetate, 9.: the Effects of shock Treataent
on the 3:0. Pezgheenal. Quart. l1: 226-239, 19h8.
Ireeeh, 6., Inpaeteto, 9., attenheiner, L. and Wartie, 8.3.:
Some Reactions Seen After Electric Sheet Treatment.
Amer. J. Pezghiat. 1021 311-315, 19h5.

�.13-

3.0.: reyehepethelegie Reactiene end Bleetrie-Sheek
Therapy.‘ 1.1: State J. led. g3. 1553-1557. 19h2.
10. Jehneen, L.c., Ulett, G.L., Jehneen, H., Snith, I. end
Sines, 3.6.: Electreoeavuleive therapy (with end
9. alueek,

Hithaut Atropine). Arch. Gen. Pazghie . g; 32h-336, 1966.
11. Kenn, 1.1. end Pink, l.c change: in Language Bering
Elactroahock therapy. re ehe‘ethelo er colnunioetien,
Ed. Roch, P. and Zubin,

3., Stuns e Stratten 126-139,

1958.

12.

R.L., link, x. end Weinetetn, B.A.i Reletien of
tnoberbitel rest to Clinical Inprevenent in Electroehock.
Arch. neural. e rezehiet. lg: 23-29,'1956.
13. Kuhn, R.L., Pollack, H. end flag, 3.: Seeiepeyeheloxie
Aspect; a: Peyehiatric Ireetnent in A Velentery Mental
Hospital: Duretien or Hoepitelixetiea, Discharge
hating: end Biegaeeie. 1.x.1. Arch. Gen. Pezehiet. ;}
Kehn,

565-57h, 1959.

1k. Iehn, R.L., rolleck, H. end rink, H.a Figure-around Discriminetien After Induced Altered Brein Functien.
A.H.L. Arch. lea-oi. g: 5&amp;7-551, 1966.
15. Kuhn, R.L., Pollack, I. end tint, H.c Sociel Attitude

(alliternie

W

? Scale) end Convulaive Therepy.
gig: 187~192, 1960.

J.I.H.D.

16. lelileweky, L. and Heck, 2.: Shack trout-eats, Peychoeurgery
end eﬁher Betetie Ireetnente 1n Peyehintry. Grtne end
___________._________________________.____

strn‘t.n. 3.1. ,

1952e

�lethed:
9t eeneecetire petiente referred fer eleetreeheek therepy
during 1956-57, eeveety-three petiente were eebjeete of the
ehelyeee deeerihed here. the pettente were selected fer treetnent by the reetdeut therepiet end the eupervieies peyehietriet the inveettsetere pleying he rele in their eeleetten. theee
eheervetieee were nede during e eeeveletve-eeheeevuletve eleetreeheek etedy in which euhaeete referred for therepy were rendeely
eeeirned to eeereee e1 eeheenveletre er eenreletve treeteente.
Bleetreeheek eee edeiaietered three tinee weekly under
pentethel pre-nedteetien, eeing either e letter unidireetienel
or e heeerett elternetieg eerrent instreeeet. Greed eel or
enheenvuleive treeteente were edninietered by eltering the
etreexth a: current. [either petieht, therepiet her evelueting
phyeieiene tee ewere which eeeree e: therepy eeeh pitieet
received until etter the ewelnetiee period.
eheugee in hreie tenetiee were neeeered et weekly intervele
by teete e: leexeece petteree heth alerteelly end etter
eeeberhttel, end by the degree e: elew eewe eetivity in
electroencephelexrene. the intereerreletien e: theee indieee
end their reletien te heherterel eheagee here been reperted
prewieeely (3,1g).
the senateet eyeptee petteree e: the referred pttiente
were reriehle, end included euteidel preeeeepetien, reterdetieu,
dieterheneee e: need end erreet, exeiteneat, egitetien, penie
end teneaen, deleeiene, ideee et reference, hegettrien, rithdrewel
1

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2844">
                <text>Behavioral patterns in convulsive therapy. Arch Gen Psychiat. 1961 Jul; 5:30-6.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2845">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2846">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-53-019</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2847">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2848">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2849">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2850">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2851">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprinted from the Archives of General Psychiatry July 1961, Vol 5, pp. 30—36.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2852">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2853">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74487">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81048">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87609">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94170">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="286" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="77">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/0f6719a23fdc7ec86b84e3ad0121dcb7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2c174223139f67b6ca449ef570bd2067</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100703">
                    <text>SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WHO
REFUSE CONVULSIVE THERAPY

K

MAX POLLACK, PH.D.

Reprinted from THE

Vol. 132, N0.
L

2

Copyright ©

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE

by The Williams
Printed in U.S.A.

1961

&amp;

February,

Wilkins C0.

1961

�JOURNAL or NERVOUS AND MENTAL DIsEAsE
Volume 132, No. 2, February 1961

Reprinted from THE

Printed in U.S.A.

SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WHO
REFUSE CONVULSIVE THERAPY
MAX POLLACK, PH.D.1

The growing recognition of the relation of
social factors to referral for and response to
somatotherapy in psychiatric treatment has
stimulated increased study of “drop-outs”—
patients who refuse to start or to continue
treatment. Although the problem of “dropouts” is a major one in somatotherapy, it
has received little attention. In convulsive
therapy it is considered one of the most fre—
quent “complications” of treatment (1) yet
it is infrequently discussed (3, 7) and no
systematic studies have been devoted to it.
Systematic studies of “drop-outs” have
been limited for the most part to patients in
psychotherapy in out—patient facilities (4, 5,
9, 19, 20). These studies have consistently
shown marked differences in social and psychological characteristics of patients who remain in psychotherapy and those who fail to
continue. Those patients who remain in
therapy have more years of education and
who
those
class
social
than
of
higher
are
leave. In addition, their social attitudes, as
measured by the California F Scale, show
“less so—called conventionalism, stereotypy
and less of an uncompromising insistence
that ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ can be distinguished” (20).
In sociopsychologic studies of the patient
population of Hillside Hospital (12, 13) age,
education, place of birth and degree of
stereotypy, as measured by the F Scale, were
related to selection for, and response to,
convulsive therapy. Those patients who
were older, had fewer years of education,
were foreign-born and who manifested high
scores on the F Scale were most likely to receive convulsive therapy, be hospitalized for
Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., New York.
1

and MY—2715, National
Institute of Mental Health, U. S. Public Health
Service.
Aided by grants

MY—2092

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.

a shorter period, and be rated as improved at
time of discharge. In contrast, patients who
were younger, better educated, native-born
and who obtained low scores on the F Scale,
most often received psychotherapy as their
sole form of treatment, were hospitalized for
a longer time, and were more likely to be
discharged with a rating of unimproved.
Thus, the determination of psychiatric treatment was viewed as an interactive process,
and related to the background, cultural
values and communicative pattern of both
therapist and patient.
In view of this relation of psychosocial
factors to selection for and response to treat—
ment, it was postulated that in a psychotherapeutically—oriented hospital patients who
refuse or fail to complete convulsive therapy
would be signiﬁcantly younger, better educated, and be less stereotyped and conventional than patients who completed a course
of therapy. This study was undertaken to
test this hypothesis.
PROCEDURE

The seventy-ﬁve consecutive iii-patients
(27 males and 48 females) referred for con—
vulsive therapy at Hillside Hospital during
the one year period from October 1, 1957 to
September 30, 1958 were included in this
study. Hillside Hospital is a non-proﬁt
institution for the treatment of voluntary
patients. Psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy is regarded as the primary
method of treatment, with various somatotherapies available when necessary. All pa—
tients are seen for individual psychotherapy
three times a week, with psychotherapy
continuing when other treatment, 6.9., convulsive therapy, is administered.
Three social (age, education and nativity)
and one psychological measure (the Cali153

�154

POLLACK A ND FINK

fornia F Scale), were employed. A ten-item
modiﬁcation of the F Scale (6, 14) was administered to 53 referrals prior to treatment.
In this task, the subject reads 10 statements
and indicates whether he agrees or disagrees
with each statement, and to what extent.
The score given for each item ranges from
one to seven and the range of total scores is
ten to seventy. The greater the subject’s
agreement, with the statement, the higher
the score obtained. The statements themselves are extreme, conventional and stereotyped expressions. lr‘or example, one statement is, “If people would talk less and work
more, everybody would be better off.”
Patients were referred for convulsive therapy by the psychiatric resident with the ap—
proval, frequently at the suggestion, of his
supervisor. The referral form requesting
treatment was sent to the psychiatrist in
charge of the convulsive therapy unit for
medical examination and the institution of
treatment. Thus, it was possible to determine those patients who were referred for
treatment but who refused to start. Convulsive therapy was generally administered
three times a week, and grand mal convulsions were induced with the standard Medcraft alternating current instrument.
RESULTS

Of the 75 referrals for convulsive therapy,
13 refused treatment. Of these, seven failed
to start and six refused to continue treatment. In the latter group, the number of

treatments ranged from three to eight—
short of the generally prescribed course of at
least twelve treatments.
TABLE 1
Mean Age, Education and F Score by Group
N

Group

'

Acceptance
Refusal
Mean Difference
(One—tailed t
p&lt;

test)

62
13

(ﬁgs)

Educa-

0:325)

40.3 11.6
29.7 13.7
— 10.6 +2.1
2.5
1.9
.01

.025

F Score

48.7
37.7
— 10.0

2.2

.025

Social and Psychologic Factors: The group
of patients who accepted a full course of
convulsive therapy was signiﬁcantly older,
less educated and manifested a higher mean
F score than the group that refused treat—

ment (Table 1). Furthermore, 37 per cent of
the acceptance group were foreign-born as
compared to eight per cent of the refusal
group. While there was considerable overlap
between groups with respect to these factors,
the refusal group was more homogeneous
than the acceptance group. Thus, there were
no patients in the refusal group who had less
than ten years of education (69 per cent of
the group had attended college) and none
were over ﬁfty years of age. In contrast, 27
per cent of the acceptance group never went
beyond grade school (eight years or less)
and 31 per cent were ﬁfty years or older.
Differences in occupation between groups
paralleled the differences in education. Thus,
none of the patients in the refusal group were
unskilled or manual workers. They were in
clerical, professional and business vocations,
Whereas ten subjects in the acceptance
group were unskilled workers. Housewives
were excluded from this tabulation.
Relation to Diagnosis: The discharge diagnoses of seventy-three patients fell into four
major categories: psychoneurosis, schizophrenia, manic-depressive, or involutional
psychoses. Two patients were classiﬁed as
“psychotic depression” without further
speciﬁcation. Although there was no statistically signiﬁcant difference in diagnostic
composition between the group accepting
and those refusing treatment, the groups
were dissimilar with respect to the incidence
of the involutional psychoses (Table 2). No
patient in the refusal group was discharged
with a diagnosis of involutional psychosis,
whereas 24 per cent of the acceptance group
were so diagnosed. There was also a high
positive correlation between this diagnosis
and the sociopsychological factors studied.
Thus, the mean age (56.7 years) and F score
(61.4) were higher while the years of educa-

�155

REFUSAL OF CONVULSIVE THERAPY

tion (9.2 years) was lower than that for the
total refusal group (Table 1).
Relation to Improvement Ratings: At the
discharge conference held by the Medical
Director each patient is assigned one of four
improvement ratings: recovered, much improved, improved or unimproved. The incidence of recovered and much improved
ratings was signiﬁcantly lower in the refusal
group (Table 3). Six patients, all in the ac—
ceptance group, were rated as recovered.
The hospital discharges were more closely
associated with refusal or discontinuation of
treatment in the refusal group.
DISCUSSION

The present study conﬁrms and extends
previous ﬁndings in this laboratory (2, 12,
13) in demonstrating the importance of social
factors and their psychological correlates in
the selection for and response to psychiatric
treatment. It supports the hypothesis that in
a psychoanalytically-oriented hospital patients who refuse convulsive therapy would
more closely resemble those who remain in
psychotherapy and differ from those who
are selected for and treated with convulsive
therapy.
The lower 1“ scores in the refusal group
than in the acceptance group are correlated
with a less compliant attitude toward authority and a more analytic approach in interpersonal activities. Review of the patients’ hospital records revealed that negativism, belligerence, uncooperativeness and
attempts to manipulate the staff were more
common in the refusal group. For example,
38 per cent of the refusal group as compared
with only 17 per cent of the acceptance group
formally petitioned the Medical Director for
discharge from the hospital. (Almost all
these patients withdrew their request for
discharge shortly after the initial request).
Referral for convulsive treatment was more
often associated with problems of management, e.g., disturbing the ward or eloping
from the hospital, than for depressive or
confused thinking. In contrast, a higher

TABLE 2
Discharge Diagnosis by Group
Group

Manic.
Depressrve
Psychosis

Schizo.
-

Psychoneurosls

phrenla

Acceptance7 (11%)25 (40%)
2 (15%) 7 (54%)
Refusal
X2

13
4

Involu.
tlonal
Psychosis

(21%) 15 (24%)
(31%) 0 (0)

= 2.28, p = n.s.
TABLE

3

Discharge Improvement Ratings by Group
Group

Acceptance
Refusal
X2

Recoveredﬁ
Much

Improved

34 (55%)
3

(23%)

Improved

Unimproved

(31%)
5 (38%)

(15%)
5 (38%)

19

9

= 6.41, p = .05

percentage of the acceptance group were
referred for convulsive therapy for alleviation of depressive symptoms.
There is increasing evidence that accept—
ance or rejection of psychiatric treatment is
related to learned attitudes toward treatment by both patients and therapist (8, 9,
16, 17, 21). Most often these attitudes which
correlate with socio-economic status are
formed far in advance of treatment, and are
most likely an intrinsic part of the person’s
repertoire of behavior. Thus, patients from
lower class backgrounds more frequently
view psychiatric treatment as nonverbal and
in physical terms whereas typically “the
middle class patient is predisposed toward
the acceptance of psychotherapy even before he arrives at the clinic” (9).
In the sample studied there were many
expressions of a negative attitude toward
convulsive therapy long before the referral
for convulsive therapy had been made. One
patient, in treatment for several years prior
to her current hospital admission, terminated
treatment and transferred to another psy—
chiatrist on each occasion when convulsive
therapy was recommended. Another patient
asked to sign the voluntary certiﬁcation
form on admission, appended the following
note. “P.S., If I am given shock treatment

�156

POLLACK AND FINK

I’ll either kill myself or leave the hospital.”
Other patients, particularly those who have
been in individual psychotherapy prior to

hospital admission, state that their previous
therapists instructed them not to submit to
convulsive therapy in that it would be harm-

ful.

Perhaps more important than either attitude of the patient or the psychiatrist is the
factor of consistency of attitudes. Klerman
et al., (17) have reported that young resident
psychiatrists with psychoanalytic orientations frequently have unfavorable attitudes
toward somatic therapy and are ambivalent
about prescribing such treatment. In the
present study there were many indications
that referral for convulsive therapy was not
the “free” choice of the resident physician
but was made only after considerable pressure by administrative and nursing person-

nel.

A recent study by Kaplan and Lefkowits
(15) of staff and environmental factors

associated with referral for drug therapy in
this hospital demonstrated that the psychiatrist’s tolerance for disturbed behavior
was much higher than that of nurses and
other personnel. Frequently the resident
physician placed a premium on helping the
patient modify his behavior without resort
to somatotherapy. A similar observation was
made by Sabshin and Ramot (21) and by
Klerman (17) who found that “psychiatrists
treating a patient with psychotherapy were
unusually reluctant to add drug therapy.”
Such attitudes may be conveyed to patients
either overtly or covertly. Such observations
reinforce the ﬁndings of Pasamanick, Dinitz
and Lefton (18) that “despite protestations
by clinicians that their reference is always
the individual patient, clinicians, in fact
may be so overly committed to a particular
psychiatric school of thought, that the pa—
tient’s diagnosis and treatment is largely
predetermined.”
The studies here would suggest that the
psychiatrist’s ambivalent attitude toward

treatment is not a general attitude but is
related to the “social distance” of the patient
to himself. The psychiatric resident frequently has less difﬁculty in recommending
somatotherapy for a lower class patient but
is indecisive when it comes to making a
similar treatment referral for a patient who
is culturally more like himself.
The ﬁndings that objectors to convulsive
therapy were more often discharged from
the hospital as clinically unimproved is
consistent with previous observations (7).
Gordon (7) classiﬁed objectors into two
categories—poorly oriented catatonic subjects who offered resistance to the treatment
and responded with clinical improvement;
and a better oriented group who objected to
treatment on an attitudinal basis claiming
they were “not in need of them.” This latter
group were refractory to the clinical beneﬁts
of the treatment. Almost all of the patients
in the refusal group of the present study
could be classiﬁed in the latter group.
It is of interest that most of the patients
who refused convulsive treatment were
prognostically poor selectees for convulsive
treatment. In previous studies (2, 10, 11)
we have shown that the incidence of ratings
of improvement at discharge in young, welleducated, low F score patients was signiﬁeantly lower than in the older, less educated,
more stereotyped patients. The refusal group
is part of that group of patients who are
neither “ideal” patients for convulsive
treatment nor are they very responsive to
milieu treatment and psychotherapy.
While referral for convulsive therapy in
this and other hospitals has been markedly
reduced within the past few years, the problems associated with attitude toward treatment, of which treatment refusal is but one
aspect, are of persistent importance. In the
absence of speciﬁc therapies for the majority
of psychiatric disorders the further study of
decision-making in psychiatric treatment
may help delineate the forces associated with
selection of therapy.

�157

REFUSAL OF CONVULSIVE THERAPY
SUMMARY

8. HAEFNER, D. 1’., SACKs,

REFERENCES
Treatment of Mental Disorder,
p. 223. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1953.
2. FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. AND POLLACK, M.
Psychological factors affecting individual
differences in behavioral response to convulsive therapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 128: 243—
1. ALEXANDER, L.

248, 1959.
3. FLESCHER, J. The “discharging

function” of
electric shock and the anxiety problem.
Psychoanal. Rev., 37: 277-280, 1960.
4. FRANK, J. D., GLIEDMAN, L. H., IMBER, S. 1).,
NASH, E. H., JR. AND STONE, A. R. Why
patients leave psychotherapy. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. Psychiat., 77: 283—299, 1957.
5. FREEDMAN, N., ENGELHARDT, D. M., HAN—
KOFF, L. B., GLICK, B. S., KAYE, H., BUCHWALD, J. AND STARK, P. Drop-out from outpatient psychiatric treatment. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. Psychiat., 80: 657—666, 1958.
6. GALLAGER, E. B., LEVINSON, D. J. AND ERLICH, I. Some sociopsychological charac—
teristics of patients and their relevance for
psychiatric treatment. In Greenblatt, M.,
Levinson, D. J. and Williams, R. W., eds.
The Patient and the Mental Hospital, pp.
263—285. Free Press, Glencoe, Ill., 1957.
7. GoRDON, H. L. ()bjectors to electric shock
treatment are refractory to its therapy.
New York J. Med., 46: 407—410, 1946.

AND

MAsoN,

A. S. Physicians’ attitudes toward chemotherapy as a factor in psychiatric patients’

As part of a continuing investigation of
the relation of sociopsychological factors to

psychiatric treatment, the present study
was concerned with the sociopsychological
characteristics of patients who refused to
start or to continue convulsive therapy.
Thirteen of the 75 consecutive voluntary patients referred for convulsive therapy refused treatment during a one year period in
a psychoanalytically-oriented institution.
These patients were younger, better edu—
cated and had lower scores on the CaliforniaF Scale than the group that accepted convulsive therapy. The diagnosis of involutional psychosis was absent in the refusal
group, and patients in the refusal group were
more often discharged as unimproved.
The acceptance or rejection of psychiatric
treatment is discussed in terms of learned
attitudes toward psychiatric treatment by
both patient and doctor.

J. M.

.

responses to medication. J. Nerv. Ment.
Dis., 131: 64—69, 1960.
IMBER, S. D., FRANK, J. 1)., (,iLIEl)MAN, L. H
NASH, E. H. AND SToNE, A. R. Suggesti—
bility, social class and the acceptance of
psychotherapy. J. Clin. Psychol., 12: 341—

344, 1956.
10. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Personality factors

in behavioral response to electroshock

11.

therapy. J. Neuropsychiat., 1: 45—49, 1959.
KAHN, R. L. AND POLLACK, M. Prognostic
application of psychological techniques in
convulsive therapy. Dis. Nerv. Syst., supp.

20, pp. 180—184, 1959.
12. KAHN, R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M. Social
factors in the selection of therapy in a

voluntary mental hospital. J. Hillside Hosp,
6: 216—228, 1957.

R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M.
Sociopsychologic aspects of psychiatric
treatment. A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,

13. KAHN,

1: 565—574, 1959.

L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M.
Social attitude (California F Scale) and
convulsive therapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.,

14. KAHN, R.

130: 187—192, 1960.
15. KAPLAN, A. AND LEFKOWITS, H. J. Inﬂuence
of staff attitudes and environmental factors

on treatment selection. J. Hillside Hosp.

In press.

Staff attitudes, decisionmaking and the use of drug therapy in the
mental hospital. In Denber, H. C. B. Research Conference on the Therapeutic Community, pp. 191—214. Thomas, Springﬁeld,

16. KLERMAN, G. L.

111., 1959.

17. KLERMAN, G. L., SHARAF,
AND LEVINSON, D. J.

M., HOLZMAN, M.
Sociopsychological
characteristics of resident psychiatrists and
their use of drug therapy. Amer. J. Psy-

chiat., 117:

111—117, 1960.

B., DINITZ, S. AND LEFTON, M.
Psychiatric orientation and its relation to
diagnosis and treatment in a mental hospital. Amer. J. Psychiat., 116: 127—132, 1959.
19. ROSENTHAL, D. AND FRANK, J. D. The fate
of psychiatric clinic out-patients assigned
to psychotherapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 127:
18. PASAMANICK,

330—343, 1958.

20. RUBENSTEIN, E. A. AND LORR, M. A. A com-

parison of terminators and remainers in
outpatient psychotherapy. J. Clin. Psychol.,
12: 345—348, 1956.

J. Pharmacotherapeutic evaluation and the psychiatric
setting. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.,

21. SABSHIN, M. AND RAMROT,

75: 362—370, 1956.

��We.

lama-b.1031“!

at

tutu. cantata norm

In:

rum

rum. and

“no“. at.

In rm IJ.

no What a: mum»: manna-y ' mum mum '
In.
v.1.
at...
at...
a»
18-1715.
”-10,!
of In“:
an
lulu-.1
mu
it
Intuit.
put
'0’.
M“. ma. M“

a“...

11: 9/60

�Iantipcyohnlnctosl chnruc‘arttttna at ratsenta

taint.

tit.
Q0

thirty:

eouvnlatvu

it.

cuoicz
rolaﬁton
tautlro
at
it.
and rdtpCIlc $0 Ions$0$tnrapr in porthtatrtt

staring ructun‘tsnn at

rclarv¢1

(It

mm. m sum-umainr£
M trout-nus. Althtlch
mu tauttuao

yutatasl

it: ratio. .3

i!

a: Fawn“

to

.-

«- ymm a "an-mm" u a mu m s. mutt-rm. u

1%
1a
couwnlltvu
In
$503.37
III ricolvli littlo tiluﬁitn.
oou§idorti CI. n! it: un¢$ troqunnt 'nlnpxtac‘lonc' If ﬁrutﬁn
aunt (1) 13¢ ££ in antvocnoutlr dinuutaod (3,1) and no ayutunn:&amp;c
ain‘t-u lava tutu duvntod it it.

Int-nun

am: a

“drip-MI“

have

In»

mm

tu-

m not m a nun» u gunman" 1: out-”um
«was.»
(magnum)
than
um mummy
suntan
..

adotnl
3nd pnrhhuloutaul charac‘nrw
dittouuuaol
tn
than: atrial
1:11.. at ptt4:a$u it: tannin tn pirutothornlr uni ti... It.
£111 to caustlnn.
tannin t: thattpy-tnvn Int:
paiaauat
who
oduunﬁtnn
and
than
30.1.1
013::
at
at
hialcr
sh...
art
gust:
U:
1“”. In «mu...
mu:
Baltturuxn I lgalo, than “low. manualzsd couvnntSontltnu. Icgr¢o~
twp; ‘3‘ 1.3. a: II Inuau’rCIttsu: titansonct ‘hnt 'rtchﬁ’ an:
‘arcuc‘ tun bu ‘10‘algutlhnd' (to).
In socioplrthologtc itnlsoi it ﬁt: yntanut )aytlntlau ct
(12.13) no.
Ian-u.
pm. at
10:20. or otartoiwpy. an na‘iurud by it: I 8.519, Utr- tilti.‘ to
tclucttou tit. and roupauna to. can'tlusvo shortly. than. p¢‘10nsa

it...

W

mam

it.

int“,

man,

n ma“

m

um m

�-2...

m m. am. in am run 0: mm. mo tau-om
than all In Mum huh um. a m I an. an no»

In
“an”.
t
Win
mum
awm mu. m N am a ups-mi u «a “ «um.
mm;

‘0

"not“

I: mun».

be

”an“ m m m». bum uuum. nun

mmvhctWMImu-Iﬁolluu. and“.
rmtwl yam-Wm at am «to m at “has. my
non-1mm: sham-run. mmw. mans-u

M. M 4m“.
If par-mutt “an.“ m um :- u «mm.» mu,
um «um to in
«1m
«4
mm;
mm.
Watt"
and
a
yum m mm ”no“.
I: van a an ”10“.!“
run" a
«noun a: m rm» “Inna-at. u m mans-d
that
urn-um
pmlmlpﬂﬂum
mm: aunt: m
can
5.
mm»
mu
a
a
sauna-u:
mm mm
m. mm «mm.
and
an
at
n
autumn «mumz
mm.
than ”an“ m
a
this
emu
”my
a
mm.
mm
an mm to an m: Wu.
«mug:

with a

nut;

01‘

Ill-proud.

”um

tan a»

�W:
m nasty-nu

In»
us than) ”tuna at can ulsive “can,“ nun“.
1951
‘0
1.
the
am
"in
you
wt“ mu:
but“! dull.
1953
1111““
1:
3%
OM.
till
mum
Cum
m
a:
In
nun-Mn
I
“mung a. mm“
but“: u
«um-«aw

“quanta

and

(2‘!

«mum "um. yummy-.usum pmmhum
with
9.! rum“ to it. ”an"
a tum-cu, mam
am£711.10}.
In. matey. u: putat“inmate.
um
a
ummm
not.
um “! mum ”um-arm

m

W
m
m

pm
What,
M
”hi?!
«um
9mm
u.

my.

u

«on: (m.

«an-nun an wars»)

and

on ”you.

may“.
“an:
(m§mum
3
{6.15)
manna-i
at
m sun
m mama
mam
In
M
[$3.00.
5)
M!
Morn!uul'
mm».
h
my».

M.

10

1'

auto), mo

1

Inn-ut- m mmm MW in an.»

nu- man

“than, at

1»

or

slum-a

mt «mi. m um. um m:

Mtuwnnmulmummnusuumnma

”in

to
m am”. no
‘50
.‘IUIIIII‘.
m mm
m

to

no

man“:

a»
Wt.
a. sum

W.
mouth...
at
m
mum:
m1”; m.
3W
”n
Hummu‘ut
mummy.“ mam
mm)...
Im

mum. mums-mm

m“.

�«uh»

am
”mm. mm

W
It
a.
mm

”(am
in mint”
an
with

an

approval.

by

m

I“ Wm. I'll mm (m twang
of
tho
«3:aura
“and m an a m
and
smut-tum
"can
to
un”. “any a“
mum
10'
11’
”MI-t!
H
MIN».
m
m.
“W‘- m.
manual.

01'

,0”th

“W
«mm»
up
mun-0mm wm‘mmrm

Win
m.mmmmutmmmmaumw
mm “mm mm tum.
an
My

Wu
ammo!
my
M1:

�mm.»

mm mm” Wm. ma.

u» 75
mutant. “than.
M

809

1.)

mun.“ NCMMaunm”

mun-hum. :amutmm,mmumn-

mmummumu-Mnmgmnunw
urn“ «on. at loan mm
a

tram“.

A

n.

punt:
a
m

m
ﬂWmﬂ.’
mu!"
My
«w
10”
m. mimmmuuwummmrtmm
(M10 1).

m

a

an

an
m rm

can can» at

nub-M

MW,

31

mm‘u'm.
mun-u
can",
mmmmun

mmmtmmmmmcm.
Mmunumummmmmmm
m,

mmunmuuﬂimm£ﬂmmmum

«moulmmmmmn‘m.

luv-awn

"moutammommmmm
«m (“an ”unwindmjlmmﬁMMnuc
arm.

sumac“- a:

.W
”1.1th

’

m

”mum mm m: ”"1qu m

m.mumnumum
twimmmmladumlmh Mm“
tutu-nonhuman...

�~6-

m

m
«and. “mum. mm mum.
muzm
man“! u a. mum“
mun.
m
“to
mu!“
«man.
m.
m
Wm
and

m

W
«um. W a mwnm
MW! mom-cu «Mum.

hunt“: a

m

naut- m:

am {m nun
madam-awn.

3-

u mzmcux 9mm. in "an“
clan-um
with“
‘mum
a
man"
m
”unsung. nth-uh m. m a manually umuu‘
an.
1mm" a damn. maﬁa him no» «upta!” an than mm ”min“. a.
an mint!”
It“ my.“ to “a mm. It a. Mutual mm»
sh
1).
(mu
I. mum a
m “noun“ a»
15
:1
: «mu Mutual W13, Wm m can a:
“cu-"um
Mmcuonhm
untoti!
it“
m
mitt” mu.Wt!
unhamm mun 1W. m. m m “C (“.1 ma)

W

M
m: m

m\mum.

m

(u.h)vmmmzcmmnumsuu
“lam

(9.2m)mlmtmmttwmm1muum
(mu

1).

can a M m

-.................

Inuit“ M hum“ Inna”
At “a
an hr no Mu!
to
of
«a mum ”an“ m 1m
nun"

«am
W.

Wt.

”at.

�-7roaovurud, Inch xnyrcvcd, anyrnvué or unimpravod. 2h.
tunidou#u a: roauvorod and tuck suyrovud :ntaugu It. a1;ntltc:ntly

rttusni ‘roup (2‘31. 3). _81: pnt1¢ntu, ‘11 in ‘hu
uncapﬁtnnt grin», war. ratod a. r¢iivttlda 2h; Inaptt‘l $13»
luwnr in tpu

ghargas curt guru clonal: unnaaintid with rttunnl 0r ataecnu

tinn:tstn ct truaﬁntut 1: ﬁt: tif‘lﬂl gran».
,

tibia

3

about hora

”oaanwnochoou In”- a-

�o.-

W:man um «an»

m.

mm ”cum
(8.13.13)
1:
mn mm
mus-nu m was“
at «cm tum w W mum“: swans/u in m
«MCI hr at In,” ‘0 ”am“: What. It
«no»: «o W” a» u a Wumanm
man: ”an” no "in. man" than M“ m
01ml: mu. m m "an 1- mm»: and am»
nu

and

‘

tun Chou n. :9: «mm In «4 WM nu- main"

Mm.

"jmmrmummmmum
tuning!
In:
a
an
mm“ “am.
«mm m
:3
at
many“.
WV
“Wm:
W
W
am...
m nunu' mun: run-u am»:
“an“...
it“ mum. Wot, Wham: at um
“Wumumrmmomummlm.
_

3

a
or

Mmmﬁdthntmtmumuth
only
a:
no
«m
m
«mm. am (”my ”MW
nu haul mm to» «awn rnn m mum. (that
:11 than
Mun-010.
11

tar
to”
am» an.“ union.
a. mum. must). maul for main”

gnu-ut-

3W m

W

with.“ m an at“: «comm an ”on.” at
hat. my tutu-hm a. M It 0mm in: the inﬂux.
«tar
making.
a
I:
oats-uh
apnea”
m
mm ”mm. at m «apt-nu M m Mm“ ta

W

�.,.
o-t
for
mun!” “arm unman- Willi."

W.
immune «am.
«mm "sun“
a mum: ”about! mm W “and“
”an” m “uni“
Md trams
In“ «m that «um run want. it“ mun-mu
cum on tonal in “ms my an an
”can“:
rip-ﬂout
m
man.
a
am.
than to

in

that
to

0,9,16,17,31).

by ham

nutty

as:

in
part

or

«If

and

at

tnn
um
In»
em
nun“
m,
um“- tram”:

m:

a:
at:
pint“:
mu
u
mm
_muauy '1» m1: mm pun-m u ﬁrm-pond
a» mum: of pun-Wm m Mm to tutu.
at um am." (9):
3
c:
“up“
m
n
an:
mania;
m
imam
103
an
WC
”In.
m1” ”um
My
W1”
Morn). In Win than” m m It“. On nut”,
1: What for am). ”an mu- 1». but
mull
«a
tun-tum
mu». an mm m wan-tum «mu
magma «at «mm m 0W1" than” «3
and
it an m ”lam:
”nut
mm“. 1mon
a» £01m m,
«rattan.- an Main,
“158., I: 1 an aim am WM‘ :‘u um um man
an luv. u. mum".
than
mania-1:
nun".
why In” ion in
in
mam: 9mm.” pm mm:
“noun, mu u“
Mm mun

ﬂ.“ ”amino

m:
W

mt

um

m
m
mm
Mu$uumtumnhtumumssttmldh

M11.

�«~10!-

Pnrhapa

yntitnﬂ

It

Into important than atthgr tiiitada or tun

the

partltttrint

in in» (tutor ct conuiltonuy

a: attitudou. _Klavuau g§_g;.. (17) hit. rayur‘id thtt yuuus
rOltdtlﬁ puynhtttrtltl wi‘h yuywhcunnlrttannrzinﬂation.
£r¢q303ilr hurt IBIBVIrthl. ttiiiudtu tuunrd :cnntto tiarapy
tud at: unhtvultn‘ dbauﬁ proucrihtn: such trtn‘uint. In tn:
patient study that. Hurt Ina: indiou‘tonu ﬁhnt rotcrrnl tor
tonvu1t$v3 tiara»: In: not ‘3. irao"ahotaa at the r¢n1dout
phynactnu but in. and. gnlr.tt‘cr conaidwrublo prasuurc by
:éutntuﬁruttvu and nursing ptrnonuul.
A raetut atndy hr 1.31:: and Lntuavtta (15) a: uﬁatt‘
‘36 ﬁuvironasnttl tna£ura I‘lﬁtiﬂﬁcd with rut-tral for drug
iburuyy 1: thin hmupltal doncmaﬁrntnd 1ht$ ti. pnyuhtiﬁrtlt's
tolurnntc {at dilﬁurhod buhavior nun ﬁlth htthﬂr tbs: thu‘ a:
unrsau gal athor pornonnal. Iroquautzr $ho rasidont pirttutun
placid : prontuu an htlpiu¢ tum patAnnt nadir: hit uninviur
without rciart ta InimittIGrtyr. L ttnilcr ahltrvttton wt.
and. by aubthaa and lanai (21) gun by xlawaau (17) ch. fauna

an 'p-mmtruu was“;

:-

mums

nu mummy.”

tutu unusually rcluatnut to ada awn; shmrnpr'. Such ;tt1tuIOI
:11 ha away-:Id ta F‘ﬁiiﬂtl cashor ovurtly If sartrtly. aneh
ahanrvlﬁtomn rntntnrat tbs tiadtnas w: Pnannnnlck. 91u1$: and
Litiln (18) that ‘duaptso prostticisanu by clsnlaina; thtt
that: maturtsco 1n tinny: til tndtvidunl pnﬁitut. clanaatnnl,
t; tact at; b. I. crawl: nannitﬁad in a pnr‘taulnr psywhtntrio

�«v11.»

rental at $halnht, thu‘ tbs pl‘SOQt'o «instant: tad troutucnt an Itrguly prudotorntn¢d.‘
2h. 'tnltut hat. would nuggnnt that tn. paychtntrstt'u
3:51thtat attitudo Qoward ‘rantnout 10 not . caunrul n‘titado
but. :- "um to th- ‘uew. dunno" a: tu ”no“ u

hinuult. 1h. pnyuhtn$tgc roatdant Iroquuutlr ha: 1:1: dittitulty
.1: newt-gang Imumtwy tu- n In“ «In: M that. It“
in tudoalatvo than at sing: it ﬂlkiil 3 51-31.: trustncnt
roturral £0? a putiant who 1. cultnrtlxr unr- 1130 hxnuult.
1h. finding: taut ub3n¢£oru to cauvnlnlvt titrnpy sure
gown otttn ditchnrgod tron in. h¢0p1¢I1 g. clintg‘lzy untupruvga 1n countltou‘ with privioul thnarvnﬁloul (1). ccwdou
(7) eluutttcc objector: int. tun untoxorioo . pcorly orxau‘cd
c‘tatunte nubjoctu who uttarod raatatunao to it. tra:tn¢nt
tud rucpaniud wi‘h elintanl ll,fﬂ?lﬂiu%3 lad a tottor ariastoi
group vb. dbjcetnd $0 troutnont on ta uftt‘udtanl hula:
e131u$u¢ §hu7 '1’. ‘not in lﬁbd it than“. Ibis lttinr group

rutrtctnry to £30 Glitteal bnncltta at tho tr0&amp;ﬁuont.
Alntc‘ :11 at the patient: in thc rnrtlnl urcnp of tha prtuuut
t‘udy ecnld ho alcnaittud tn :5. l‘tior crimp.
n. in “mug ﬁhﬁ wu$ .1 tin nation“ who to!!!“
ccnvulaivu traninult v.9. praguou‘ﬁoally pour acluatsut It!
eonvnlulvu tr::iu¢nt. In yrtvio‘l-utndaol (2.10.11) v. hnvo
than: this tho incident. at ruttugs a! 1nprovuucu$ :t
dilthnrg. in runn3, vulluoducutnd, luv 3 0:01. pattuats van
wort

l

�smut-mu:

1.“
ma
m
In»,
u
«and.
mm

tu-nmmumdmy
aWnuu-u.
of
for
'mn‘

”an”
m WMSmmMmmpmsnuuun‘
Wu
plant: m «0 mm

at 9mm.
mm
«My
«I
In
mu mm: m1” Mm u «u
nu
in 1m: max: round 1mm a.

main

”u

ma. a» "051m “mm It“ amt!“ W ”and.”
at
m...
u m m mun. m mum:
u
but.”

m:
amomunumcmumxum

w.
muxmm

«am» a! punt-m: mm. m mm an: a:
In

3.70.1..th Win-It W his «1mm-

». 3m macaw an «man u .mm.

’

'

�m:u

m

at a

mum immun- a

:4»:me

trauma

W.

m

‘

"nun

u wanna train»
“My
“I
nutnmhﬁqlul
it“
m
mm
um
to
at
at
m
h
"in“
“at
ammu» “an”
75
at
m
mulls"
1mm“
mm
"1W7 ”um mm a: ”mun" that” "(not
wan-nu mm a m in: mm x: a pmmWth-r
«mm mums“.
Ma nun“, m mu. hm» mm m m
1
um um- ” u- «mm In“ m: ﬂu m an
0:
no
lmhuml
«mm mun"- Mm._
”who“ m “m! u m
m
u
”nun
m.
n» mm
alumni u nun-m.
m. m
ht «mum a mom... a: mantra mm 1:
of
attitudinI.
“an!“ m 1m“
”3mm.
W
and
by
“but m ”in“ law.
at

‘

th-

m

mu

m
m

um

‘

�um:
Inn: 13:. lingaﬁaau
Asttptanaa
ﬁctuaul

t!

to.)

13

19.1

II¢I ﬁlttlralu.
(ﬂunuinalnd

3 M)

p

‘10.!

:.s
'

and

«‘1

I’aonr:

¢
.

Ur Irony

11.6
13.7

83.1
37.1

8.:

«10.9

1.9

1.2

am

.015

�ﬁll-III

3mm» nag-nu h In“

3m
Wm Imam:
tutu-not

W

1

um

a

(151)

(R6)

13

t (m)

h

15

I: It“; ,
"‘

"'

‘1...

(w)

(an

15

o

(M)
(o)

�1’ " ‘*‘13

P

"‘

~05

�1.
“1-,.

a.
3.
‘0

5.

6.

nu, I"

.“um. ‘ﬁ’.
mm. 3-1..

m0, M! m,

M‘;

‘95,.

W13
My
.W.

ﬂ“.mg 3.:

”M,
1.3.“:
m “on,
3:30;

at um, la

1.3.1”; 1m;
m.
3.1.,
mm, 1., hum“.

W,

".1

11‘

£0.15,

mm»

Wu
m.

W.

.inﬁp

1’5“;

m‘g 'o't,‘fog

W

mm, 1.3.. on... 3.3..

2.:
am.
um
1950.
551.6“.
3;
3.3. m an», x... can
mm, 3.3.,
cam-paramount). ¢Wmiﬁit a: ”an” m
“on ”hum he ”nun”. ars-inn. 1:: Wk“.
’03.. N “am. ’0'. (“'o). m
'.g
.

m,

:-

..

0mm m...

W;3;!”

“‘13 6h.

m,
1.8.:
am.

’¢

m;

16.

Mg

1”.

wax:
m;

30,-;

'05.;

up”:

1939.

’5'. C“ In“. ‘o'cl

3‘1!

1”:

m. a:

W”
8.9"

M m, '0!

'0’
M
"1“.»
"“
m;

m. m 1,5,.

M

in. ma-

‘G'I.

In“, ‘0'. I“
Shh)“. 1!“.

7

4

*

*

W4,

g.
m.

�at.
11.

m,

3.3...

hawk.

It.

10 816, 195?.

nu.

m m, 3.:

m
.

Wm.

w.
M.

an run, In
,1:
“S.
to”.
mm...
2.2;...
'11.:
In...
«a
I.
«mot,
rug.
1!“.
m: I”,
3.3.: Mm. at can mum»
mm. a. «a
1.1...

hunk.

m
mu,“can a train“ «W.

ma
m.
mm.
Km.
and

u.‘

17.

1..
1!.

3;.

n
0.33.! "at: “um“, twain-nun and m
must.
mcmwummm
hm.

W”

um, um.
mm... 3.3.:
111,
m:
an.” 19“.
a.
1..
1.:
m
mm,
mu.
Wk,

tam-u. 5.3.;

m:

I...

1".- 1,5,.
woman, n. on mu. 3.»...

w.
W,

m..
“W.
IO.
1.1.
was... m kn. Ian
”5‘38’j 1,5‘0
m”...
a. mm
mu»
3”.

'

In.

1:!

m,

1’s‘a

I.

and

M...

m:

g:

“WW

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2854">
                <text>Sociopsychological characteristics of patients who refuse convulsive therapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1961 Feb; 132:153-7.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2855">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2856">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-54-020</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2857">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2858">
                <text>Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2859">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2860">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2861">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprint from THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE Vol. 132, N0. 2 February, 1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2862">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2863">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74488">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81049">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87610">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94171">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="287" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="78">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c1a1aa6de811d0a1630b2188051d512d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a467aa19b75ccf3c7353e27cd875e8ef</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100704">
                    <text>M. FINK
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital

7

Glen Oaks (N. Y.)

Meeting on the Techniques for the Study of Psychotropic Drugs
Bologna 1960
DISCUSSION OF THE REPORT OF Prof. MARCEL MONNIER

Reprinted from the:

of

Acta of the International Meeting on the Techniques for the Study
Psychotropic Drugs» - Bologna June 26-27th 1960
«

MODENA —&gt;SOCIETA TIPOGRAFICA MODENESE

�Dr. Monnier‘s excellent review presents a vivid picture of neurophysiologic techniques in the study of drug effects. From monosyna‘ptic and poly—
synaptic to organismic patterns the methods of study appear rich in promise.
One phase of these studies, that of cortical EEG analysis, has been of considerable interest to our laboratory, Changes in EEG patterns induced by pharmacologic agents are generally considered to be poorly related to changes in
clinical behavior. Yet, from the extensive experience with anesthetics, alcohol. sedatives and convulsants, and the theoretical views ascribing to brain
function a central role in conscious behavior we would expect that psychotropic drugs may also have signiﬁcant electrographic behavioral relations.
The difﬁculties in such studies lie in inter—species differences in physiologic
response, the range of inter-individual and intra—individual variability in
both neurophysiologic and behavioral parameters, and the wide variety of
events which must be measured to obtain a reasonable image of mammalian
interactive behavior. A further difﬁculty has been a lack of reasonable theo—
retic models of brain function-behavioral interrelations. Recent suggestions,
however, may be helpful, including the synaptic models of Marrazz‘i (l)
amongst others; the brain stem models of Magoun, as elaborated by Hi‘mwich
(2): and the general neuro‘physiovloglic~adaptive views of Wlikler (3), Weinstein (4‘) and our laboratory (5).
In 1954. Wikler (6) stated that drugs that alter human behavior in the
direction of EEG desynchronization are associated with behavioral excite—
ment. alertness, illusory sensations, and hallucinations; while drugs which
induce EEG synchronization, with or without increased slowing, are associa—
ted with sedation. tranquillization and decreased excitement. In our studies in
psychiatric patients, this hypothesis has been substantiated. The following compounds administered in physiologic dosage ranges have been shown to decrease synchronization of the EEG: mescaline, LSD—25, amphetamine; anticholinergics as diethazine, benactyzine. JB—318, JB-336; and local anesthe—
tics as cocaine, procaine, and lidocaine. The following agents increase synchronization of the EEG: barbiturates, chlorpromazine and similar pheno—
thiazines. meprobamate, and anesthetics as ether, chloroform. etc. In addi—
—

tion, various compounds without signiﬁcant clinical behavioral eﬁ'ects have
been studied, including phenyltoloxamine, WY-3149 and deanol - and these
have inconsistent or indeﬁnable EEG effects.
In these studies we have observed. however, that the continuum of synchronization-desynchronization is an oversimpliﬁed generalization. In our present view, two other EE‘G pattern changes have assumed considerable prominence. One is a shift of dominant frequencies either to the slow (theta or
delta) or the fast (beta) ranges; and the second, the presence of such ﬁgures
.as burts, spikes or spindling. These latter two patterns were signiﬁcant in

�2

describing the EEG behavioral relations of imipramine (7). Examples of
these paterns may he found in publications from this laboratory and elsewhere (8. 9, 10, 11).
It is our impression, therefore_ that further EEG analyses of new compounds in man is indeed warranted. We would suggest that the number of
quantiﬁcation procedures be extended to include, in addition to frequency
analysis, the techniques of topographic analysis, chronologic analysis - and
these techniques may be augmented by computer techniques of summating
evoked potentials.
In studies of drug effects. not only is it important to deﬁne neurophysiologic parameters, but the behavioral parameters are equally signiﬁcant. The
equation of change in rates of animal pole-climbing. bar pressing or jiggleand
is
inaccurate
and
excitation
human
with
tranquillization
movement
cage
inappropriate. There is no evidence that such tasks in experimental animals
and
of
to
interaction
physicians
human
in
signiﬁcance
related
to
changes
are
psychologists. Indeed, if one impression dominates the session today, it is
that the behaviors studied by pharmacologists are not the behaviors of inte—
rest to the clinicians. Further study of the relations between the laboratory
tasks highlighted today and human behavioral measures are needed. In this
regard multivariate pattern analyses of behavior and the newer applied psycholinguistic techniques may be helpful in deﬁning the changes in human
behavior patterns.
In conclusions. I wish to reenforce Dr. Monnier’s review, and indicate
that increased attention to EEG analyses may be proﬁtable in understanding
the mode of action and the signiﬁcant differences and similarities in psycho—
pharmacologic agents.

REFERENCES
1)

2)

3)
4)
5)

6)
7)
8)

Marrazzi A. S., Science 118, 367 (1953).
Himwich 11., Rinaldi F., Brain Mechanism and Drug Action, 115-44 C. C. Thomas,
Springﬁeld, 1957.
Wikler A., The Relation of Psychiatry to Pharmacology. Wm. Wilkins, Baltimore, 1957.
Weinstein E. A., and Kahn R. L., Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological
Aspects. C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill. 1955.
Fink M., A Uniﬁed Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies. J. Hillside
Hospital 6, 197 (1957)
Wikler A., J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 120, 157 (1954).
Fink M., Canad. Psych. Assoc. J. 4, 1668 (1959).
Fink M., Neuro-Psychopharmacology, ed. Bradley, P., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 441446,
1960.

9) Kink M., EEG. Clin. Neurophysicl. 12, 359 (1960).
110) Verdeaux G., Marty R., Rev. Neurol., 91, 405 (1954).
11) Bradley P. D., Elkes J., Brain. 80, 77 (1957).

���</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2864">
                <text>EEG techniques in study of psychotropic drugs. Acta of the International Meeting on the Techniques for the Study of Psychotropic Drugs, Bologna, 1960. Societa Tipografica Modenese, Modena, 1961: 3pp.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2865">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2866">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-55-021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2867">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2868">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2869">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2870">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2871">
                <text>DISCUSSION OF THE REPORT OF Prof. MARCEL MONNIER. Reprinted from the: Acta of the International Meeting on the Techniques for the Study of Psychotropic Drugs, Bologna June 26-27th 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2872">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2873">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74489">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81050">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87611">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94172">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="288" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="79">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f9143989b4f022343ed9672f34b2d359.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1500dfbcc8282737a3c8c3677182eaf9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100705">
                    <text>WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUATION
1
OF IMIPBAMINE THERAPY
JOHN C. KRAMER, M.D.,2 DONALD F. KLEIN, M.D.,3
AND MAX FINK, M.D.‘

[Reprinted from THE

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY,

V0]. 118, No. 6, December, 1961]

�,

.

0

i

~
I

I‘NG- DISCONTIN'UATION

OFIMIPRAMINE THERAPY

1

.

V

IOHN

_'.-KHAMEH,
M.D;,2
c:

DONALD “E KLE‘I‘NQMD.)

mMAXFIN‘K, Mgn.4
r

v

I

'

�1961

1

CLINICAL NOTES

549

WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUATION
1
OF IMIPRAMINE THERAPY
JOHN C. KRAMER, M.D.,2 DONALD F. KLEIN, M.D.,3
AND MAX FINK, M.D.4

On discontinuation of imipramine 5 treatment some psychiatric patients reported
nausea, vomiting, dizziness, coryza, muscuAided, in part, by grant MY—2715 of National
Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of
Health, USPHS.
2 Post Doctoral Research Fellow, USPHS, 19601

1961.

Mental Health Career Investigator, USPHS.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L. I., N. Y.
5 The cooperation and assistance of Ceigy
Pharmaceuticals is gratefully acknowledged.
3
4

lar pains and malaise. The symptoms were
ﬁrst regarded as conversion phenomena, but
after several repetitions were considered
due to physiological withdrawal.
Of the patients treated with imipramine
45 had been observed within the hospital
during withdrawal of medication. Treatment was instituted with oral doses of 75
mg. daily and usually increased each week
in 75 mg. steps. The daily maintenance dose
was 300 mg./day in 34 patients, more than
300 mg./day in 3 patients, and less than

�550

CLINICAL NOTES

300 mg./day in 8 patients.

We reviewed our interview records and
the daily nursing notes, noting reports of
withdrawal symptoms within 48 hours of
cessation of medication in 25 of the 45 patients. Most prominent were nausea with or
without vomiting—16 subjects, headache—
10, giddiness—lO, coryza—8, chills—6, weakness and fatigue—5, and musculoskeletal
pain—4.
Twenty—two of 26 patients treated for 2

months or longer reported withdrawal
symptoms, while only 3 of 19 patients
treated less than 2 months reported similar
symptoms (p&lt; .001).
The 25 patients who had been treated
for more than 2 months were rated for
severity of symptomatology. The reaction
was scored as “marked” if subjects reported
more than 2 different symptoms with signiﬁcant distress and as “minimal” if they
reported fewer than 2 symptoms causing
minor distress, or no symptoms. Of 13 patients with a medication tapering and termination period of less than 2 weeks, 8 had
marked withdrawal symptoms and 5 mini—
mal. Of 12 with a medication termination
period longer than 2 weeks, only 2 subjects
demonstrated marked withdrawal symptoms

(p:.05).

These results are in keeping with the
general experience that the intensity of
physiological withdrawal symptoms is directly proportional to the duration of drug
administration and the abruptness of withdrawal. We could not relate the withdrawal
syndrome to the size of the maintenance
dose, since our range was too small. However, our modal schedule of 300 mg. per day
is larger than the usual clinical schedule of
100 to 150 mg. per day and may account
for the inconspicuousness of this phenomenon in other studies.
We observed that allowing a period of
2-4 weeks for withdrawal was prophylactically effective. When symptoms on imipramine discontinuation occurred they
could readily be treated by resuming imipramine at 50 mg. daily and gradually decreasing over a 1-week period.

[

December

DISCUSSION

A physiological withdrawal syndrome
following the termination of treatment with

opiates, demerol, barbiturates, glutethimide,
alcohol, chlorpromazine and meprobamate
is well known. Recently withdrawal symptoms with methaminodiazepoxide(2), nialamide(1) and alpha-ethyltryptamine(5)
have been reported. Kuhn( 3) and Mann
and Macpherson(4) have also reported
symptoms on abrupt imipramine withdrawa1.

Until recently the physiological withdrawal syndrome was considered restricted
to CNS “depressants” such as opiates, barbiturates and alcohol. This was conﬁrmed
by the absence of such a syndrome with
“stimulant” drugs such as cocaine, d-amphetamine, marijuana, mescaline and LSD. The
occurrence of such a syndrome with imipramine, nialamide, and alpha-ethyltryptamine is of considerable interest, therefore,
since these drugs have been loosely referred
to as “psychic energizers” with energetic
effects similar to “stimulant” drugs. It is
apparent that a simple depression—stimulation dimension is inadequate to describe the
complexity of drug effect both physiologically and behaviorally.
The withdrawal syndrome complicates
the evaluation of patients after drug discontinuation since both patients and physicians often interpret the onset of symptoms
as an upsurge of “anxiety” related to incipient relapse, and resume treatment with
the gratifying subsidence of the “anxiety.”
This may cause both patients and physicians
to overvalue the importance of the medication to the patient’s stability.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Hollister, L. E., Motzenbecker, F. P., and
Prusmack, J. J. : J. Clin. Exp. Psychopath., 21 :
212, 1960.
2. Hollister, L. E., Motzenbecker, F. P., and
Degan, R. 0.: Psychopharmacologia, 2: 63,
1961.
3. Kuhn, R: Schweizerische Medizinische
Wochenschrift, 87: 1135, 1957.
4. Mann, A., and Macpherson, A. : Canad.
Psychiat. Assoc. J., 4: 38, 1959.
5. Turner, W. I., and Merlis, S. : J. Neuropsychiat., 2 : 1961.

��Htth¢r¢wnl Symptonu ralluvtnz

Discontinuation at In1pran1uo fhurtpy

{can 6.

{rt-st,

H.D.#, nonald
and

r.

Kissn, x.n.u‘

In: link, 3.9.

from tho Departnont of Exporincntal rayohigtry,
3:110:40 lalpltal, Olen 00kt, 5.1., [.1.

ﬂoatorll Raconrch fallow, 88,38, 1960~1961.
oqnontnl lunlth euro-r Iavuatagutor, ssrus.
Aided, in part, by grant l1~2715 or Intionul Institute
01 Hantnl Health, Int1¢n¢1 Iu|t1tutoa at laulth, yarns.
the caoportttou and aauiutanoo ot_6.1¢y Pharancauttcal:

O

P98?

52.301111: nekuuvlcdaod.
VI: 6/29/61
13

�discontinuation of iliprsniss trsstnsnt sons
pstissts, ands: obssrvssisa ts: s vsristy a: psychistric
sysdrssss, rsportsd nsssss, vssiting, dissinsss, ssryss,
ssscslsr psins sad Islsiss. Ens sysptsss ssrs first
rsgsrdsd ss osmvsrsisa phsnousns, but stisr ssvsrsl
rspstitisns vs sonsidsrsd thsss to be dss to physiological withdrsssl sad an sttolpt vss nsds to dotsrsins
their trsqusaoy sad varisty.
o: the pstisats trsstsd with isiprssins during sn
sightoon nsnth psriod, forty-11's hsd bssn observed
within the hospitsl sstting during withdrawal of ssdissties. In thsss subsects trsstnsnt was instituted with
arsi dosss st 75 s; dsiiy sad ssnsliy issrssssd sssh
sssk in 75 as stsps. Ins dsiiy‘ssistsnsaes dsss ass
zoo aglsay in thirty-tour puss-ntsg loss than 300 ltldly
in tires pstisass; and loss thin 300 Is/dsy in sight
0n

pstisats.
rsvisssd our intsrviss rssords and ﬁts dsily
ssrsiac notss, noting rspsrss o: uithdrsssl symptoms
within k8 hours of ssssstisa or sodiostion in 25 of
tho h! pstisnts. (rsbls I)
Vs

n“.-.IABLE

I

-D.-”-

�2.510

I

aynptonl Within an Intro 01 cunna$1on or Iniprnnino therapy’

Pnttontl conning theft?!
Patients reporting Iynptonu

hS

25

azggtons

l:unou (and/or vomiting)

16

Houdnoho

10

GiddinOII

.

10

Darya:

chill:
taintnuuu
HIIoqu-Ikolotsl pain
Hoaknosu or

rmma

�.29

ovidoat

whoa
tho aurorolottonohip
otguitioont
ttoo o: trootlont and tho oppooroaoo of orlptono oro oomporod. (Toblo I!) toasty-too of tvonty-otx patients
trootod for two ooutho or longor roportod withdruvol
oyuptono, whilo only throo of ntnotoon potionto trootod
loo: than too nontho roportod otnilor oynptono.

1o

A

II
O
.‘O--..

fAILB

to dotornino tho rolotion of tho obouptaooo ot
nodiootton withdrovol to indoood oyuptouo, tho twentyrtvovpottonto who bod boon trootod for noro thou two
ooutho ooro rotod to: oovortty o: oynptoootoloay. rho
rooottoo woo ooorod oo 'norkod' 1: lobaooto roportod
ooro thou two dittoroot oynptono with otgaitioont diotrooo and to "minimal“ at tho: roportod towor than two
oyoptono oonoins lino: atotrooo, or no symptolo. Too
groupo ooro doriaod according to otothor tho poriod or
Iod1oot1on rodootton woo looo thou too rook: or too uooko
t or longoo. (foblo III)

“-Qﬂ‘..-.
TABLS

III

�Ink}: 1!
nurution of Iniprnltno Therapy
w1%hdr¢vn1
Symptoms

It

Withdrawal
Symptonu

(lubaootl)

(subjects)

in. isn‘t.

I

16

fun South: or hangar

22

h

Lon. thin

x9 .- 23.91.
P &lt;

.001

2gblo £51

rurtod or 3:3: Gestation In Patients
rruatcd st Lcnlt fro abnthn
Withdrawal 8232t¢nl

lurked

.

Lon. than rug

minimal

VIDEO

6

5

fun with: or Long.»

a

10

p ~ .05

(Fisher) (h)

�~3-

!haaa raaalta art in kaaping vita ﬁha can-val
asparianaa ihat tho iataaaity a: phyaiolocical
withdrawal aylptoua is directly proportional in tho
duration at drug adaiaiatration and tha abruptaaaa
at viﬁhdraaal. Va scald not ralata tha appaaranaa of
at: withdrawal ayndroao to tho aiaa o: tho aaiatauanea
doaa, ainoa our ranaa uaa too shall. ﬂovavar. our
natal aahadala a! 300 I; ha: day in largo: than tho
aaaal clinical aahadala a: 100 ta 150 a. par day and
nay account for an. inaauapioaaaaaaaa a: thin
phaaaaaaaa in Qatar atadiaa. It Iaat ha aataa that
withdrawal aylpiaaa was. unvaried by aaa patiaat aha

III traataa la: tua lantha at
75 In; par «7.

a marina. daaa

at

abaarvad that alluviag a parted at 3-h wacktar withdrawal ran prayhylaatiaally attaetiva. ihan
ayaptaaa an iaipraaiaa diaeoatinaatiaa acaurrad they
coal! readily be treated by raaaaing iaipraaiaa at
Ha

,

56

a; daily aid gradually aaaraaains era: a

parted.

one tack

�9h. accurrcauc a: a vhf-1010:1931 utthdrnnal
lyndronc tollcrtlg the tor-tnutton o: troninoat with
optntcl, duu.rol, burhtiurltcn. all$othilado and 1100301
1! wall kntln¢ looantly withdrlvul Irlgten- attachlsrptonnsaao (2), Isthnatnodinuapcxtlo {1). nialnuldo
(5}, alpha-oihyittyp‘anlno (9) and nuptniiluto (1,3,6)
lav. icon rcporﬁod. tan: (8) ha; ciao obstrvod lyuyton‘
on abrupt znlprnltno withdraanlo
Until riotatly it. phytiologteal iithdruu:1
cyadrono was coalidtroi routrtetcd to 618 'dcpréunsatn'
Inch OI splat... barblﬁurnsos and alcohol. this was
contirnod 57 Sh. tbacnco of such a cyndruno with
“stannlsnt‘ drugs tank .3 cocgtno, d-tlphotanino,
unhealino
and £39. In. accurronoc at such
antisulan,
a syndrcnn with tulprlltnu,43131anldn, and alpha.ihrltryptaazno 1- or etalldnrahll Satori-t, ‘horutorc.
can-o thus. drug: havn baa: 1.90.17 rtrorrcd to a:
'payuhao 0303:1302.“ 11$) unaruo‘tc o£1¢ctn 01-11::
'

human

an

to
u .1»:am... It 1.- .pnmt
Canto-liaa-stxlnlatioa dincnulun 1: tnnlcquat. to
donoribu tho.¢olploxtty or drug effect hath phyuso«
logically and behaviorully.

in.

at

withdrawal 9:362:30 conpl1oatbn tho avnlunttou
pcttcutn utter drug dicooutsnuatton, both oltniually

.

�hoth
and
patina“
an”
maximum,
punch:um 1“.»er tn ant a mu», (mans, to.
u a: spur" a: ‘uuaotyﬂ "1am to menu“ "up“.
and hum a mum ”amt an m ”any“.
«bum» a: a. 'mtoty'. m. any at!" ”a
and
plantain: to ova-van tho moral» of a.
plum“
noun“... to tho grunt“ gummy.
and

�m

1. no

taunts-u at «1pm»

”um“

product. phyutoIocto-l withdruwnl uynptonu, which
arc rolutod to luasth of ‘rontnaut and abruptuocn o:
withdrivui. aylptonn may also be rolntad to douaco
luv-1o

I.

H1thdrar¢1 lyyptons any h. militia-d qr
oltntuutod by running ﬁtchuaquol.
I

it.

aneurraaac of : withdranul syndrong
lath tnlprgnluo to porttnoaﬁ ta tn. coucoptunltus$1.: or its paynhowhnrnaaolocical notiviﬂr, and to

3.

prabltna

I: clinical

Isaac-hunt.

�1.

mu,

3.1., at.

an... Ida

W.

’-

33.3,.

1.

1023, 1955.

Inch.
3-.»

9.3.:

Mac, 3.3.

and

833. 1958.

lulu,

1.3.:

m:

a,

J,

931. 1959.

'mnﬁ:

MI

801301,
id.
8..
vgumMe
autumn,
m
ncﬁrtI-ltll, It! tort, 1956, 96.
5. lanai", In!” ”summer”, hr. and Pam-suck, 3.3.:
3 lmhﬂnﬁh, 3;: 212, 1960.
g, nun: L“
6- lolltltor, L.R. and ﬂlcsanar, !.8.s £3!3§22§£££££2¥3‘§2&amp;
196°.
3”,
;.
7. amour, In!” Runabout», LP. and Baa, the”

It.

”that, BA”

in

W
a

W.

I. ma. M

2-

‘3: 1951.

1135, 1957.

9.

Mar,

m1.

ad

lit-r110,

373, 1961 (app)... 1)

8.1 J,

Inn-3mg;

. g:

9.1:

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2874">
                <text>Withdrawal symptoms following discontinuation of Imipramine therapy. Amer J Psychiat, 118:549-50.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2875">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2876">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-56-022</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2877">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2878">
                <text>Kramer, John C.; Klein, Donald F.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2879">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2880">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2881">
                <text>Reprint (Clinical notes) and [preprint]. Reprint from THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, V0L. 118, No. 6, December, 1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2882">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2883">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74490">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81051">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87612">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94173">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="289" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="80">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/07a3d1b2eec1cf62891da3ff4c4049c8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f5bf70eb575371f639319602e2837d97</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100706">
                    <text>EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
AT HILLSIDE
Review and Prospect
MAX FINK, M.D.

Reprinted from
JOURNAL OF THE
HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
Volume X ° Nos. 3-4 ° July-Oct. 1961

�EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
AT HILLSIDE
Review and Prospect
MAX FINK,

MD.

The dedication of Hillside Hospital as a Research Institute
has been a dream of many of its students—a dream that may
achieve realization in this decade. Dr. Tarachow was an early
proponent of this view; and both in his sponsorship of the Journal, and in his encouragement of research studies, he presaged
this development. He was also the inadvertent sire of the research studies in experimental psychiatry. While I was a resident in psychiatry in 1952, we collaborated in a study of the
relation of the early separation of child from a parent to the
adult choice of neurosis. Reviewing the hospital records of ﬁve
previous years we concluded that there was, indeed, a relation——
neurotic patients with obsessional neuroses had a signiﬁcantly,
greater incidence of separation than patients with hysterical
neuroses (2). This report was the beginning of the patient population studies described here.
Since 1954 the various programs in experimental psychiatry have
been devoted to an understanding of the mode of action of the psy-

chiatric therapies of the hospital. The techniques have been adapted
from descriptive and dynamic psychiatry, neuropsychology, electroencephalography, linguistics, pharmacology, and sociology. This report reviews these studies and presents support for the creation of
a Research Institute at Hillside.
PAST STUDIES

In our early studies of convulsive therapy, instituted with the
1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

The studies reported here have been aided by the Board of Directors Research

Fund; the National Institute of Mental Health (Grants M-927; MY-2092,-27l5,
-4798; MF-12,033); Foundations Fund for Research in Psychiatry (FFRP 56-151);
Kaufmann, and Dazian Foundations; and numerous pharmaceutical concerns including Geigy, Bristol, Wyeth and Smith, Kline 8c French Laboratories.
159

�160

MAX FINK

aid of a grant award of the National Institute of Mental Health,
evaluations of patient improvement were shown to be dependent
both on changes in brain function and on psychological factors. As
our understanding of convulsive therapy developed, a general neurophysiologic-adaptive view of somatic therapies emerged (6).
A change in brain function was seen as a necessary condition for
behavioral change, with the type of change varying, depending upon
psychological and sociological characteristics of the subject (22, 25).
Thus, the mode of action was not seen as either “organic” or “psychological” but rather as the interaction of neurophysiological
changes and individual patterns of response and behavior.
This hypothesis was sustained in studies of convulsive and in
sulin coma therapies (21, 22); and the mode of action of the new
psychotropic agents was expressed within this hypothesis. It was suggested that psychotropic drugs would be effective to the extent that
persistent changes in brain function were induced; and that the type
of behavioral response would be related to the type of brain change,
and to individual premorbid psychologic (personality) patterns (6,
28, 40).

Convulsive Therapy Process: Seeking a measure of altered
neurophysiological change that was sensitive and suitable for repeated retests, various measures were studied including changes in
the face-hand test (1, 10, 13, 35), memory tests (17, 35), amount of
slow-wave activity in the EEG (16, 23) and confabulatory and denial
language patterns after amobarbital (3, 15). The latter two, EEG
and amobarbital tests, were the most sensitive indices of change in
convulsive therapy subjects. In one experiment, clinical ratings of
improvement were correlated with high degrees of change in these
indices (15, 16).
These observations were tested in a double-blind study in which
patients referred for electroshock were randomly assigned to either
convulsive or subconvulsive therapy. High degrees of electrographic
slow-wave activity and positive amobarbital tests were observed only
in the convulsive group; improvement rates were signiﬁcantly higher
in this group, and when subconvulsive subjects were retreated by
convulsive applications, the improvement rate was similar to the
convulsive group (22).
In subconvulsive applications, considerable electric current passes
between the electrodes. It was postulated that the therapeutic agent
was not the total electrical current per se, but the “all or none”
quality manifested by the grand-ma] seizure (9, 23, 42). The signiﬁ1.

�EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH

16]

cance of the grand-mal seizure was examined in a comparative study
of the inhalant convulsant, hexaﬂuorodiethylether (Indoklon), and
electrically induced seizures. Similar degrees of electrographic change,
improvement rates, types of behavioral adaptations, and changes in
neuropsychological task behavior were observed in both the inhalant
and in the electrically treated groups (49).
However, not all subjects manifesting high degrees of physiological change were evaluated as “improved.” In a descriptive typologic
study, ﬁve adaptive modes were described, empirically termed “eu—

phoric,” “hypomanic,” “somatization,” “paranoid-withdrawal," and
“panic.” While the ﬁrst two patterns were rated as “much improved,”
the latter two were seen as “unimproved" or “worse” (50).
In studies of psychological variables, it was reported that patients
rated “much improved” and “recovered” frequently manifested personality patterns akin to the explicit verbal denial personality type
(37). These patients expressed the “language of denial” more frequently than unimproved subjects, exhibiting such aspects as explicit.
denial, minimization, displacement and clichés (27). Other psychological indices also related to favorable outcome included high F
Scale score (42), Rorschach determinants of color, absent movement
and absent form-color (30, 45), and low educational achievement and
foreign birth (31).
2. Anticholinergz'c Compounds and Convulsive Therapy: Seek-ing a way to augment the degree of postconvulsive EEG slow-waveactivity, an anticholinergic compound diethazine, was given intravenously at various stages of the convulsive therapy process (20, 24)..
Unexpectedly, diethazine caused an immediate and sustained de-crease in EEG slowing, which was associated with marked changes.
in language and mood. In patients with denial language patterns.
(27), these could no longer be elicited. Instead of euphoria and wellbeing, the subjects became irritable, anxious, and complaining. In‘
subjects prior to convulsive or drug therapy, diethazine induced, ex-citement, tension, anxiety, and illusory sensations.
Subsequent studies with other central anticholinergic compounds"
and sympathomimetic hallucinogens showed behavior and electrographic patterns similar to diethazine. These observations led to the
suggestion that an increase in the cholinergic activity of the central
nervous system was the biochemical basis for the convulsive therapy

process (38).

Psychotropic Drugs and EEG: Following these studies, the:
neurophysiological changes induced by drugs were testedwithinan.
3.

�162

MAX FINK

acute experimental-EEG setting. It was observed that phenothiazines
induced EEG synchronization and a shifting of the frequency spectrum to the slow frequencies; meprobamate and barbiturates, an
increased synchronization and a shift of the spectrum to fast frequencies; reserpine, an increased slowing with synchronization at low
dosages, and desynchronization at higher levels (18, 26, 28, 40). Imipramine induced desynchronization with a shift of frequencies to
the slow bands (33, 34). Each active psychotropic compound was thus
shown to have a characteristic frequency pattern.
Various other experimental compounds were also tested, and for
these no consistent electrographic pattern was recorded. These compounds have since been shown to have either no or very limited clinical psychotropic activity. The absence of behavioral change with these
compounds lent further support to the assumption that brain change
is a necessary condition for the action of psychotropic drugs.
These observations suggested that psychopharmacological agents
provide a means for eliciting various types of altered brain function
in contrast to the single pattern following convulsive therapy. Furthermore, the type of neurophysiological alteration, as reﬂected in
EEG synchrony and frequency patterns, was found to be related to
speciﬁed types of behavioral adaptation. The advantage of EEG techniques for the assay of new psychotropic agents and the technical
merits of electronic frequency analysis were assayed and described
(47, 52).
4. Insulin Coma Therapy:

In our insulin coma studies we con-

ﬁrmed earlier observations that persistent alterations of brain function were related to prolonged coma and spontaneous seizures; and
saw in this relationship support for a neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis. With the availability of the new psychotropic agent chlorpromazine, a controlled chlorpromazine-insulin coma study was undertaken in September, 1955. As patients were referred for insulin coma
they were randomly assigned to courses of either oral chlorpromazine
for at least three months in doses adjusted to fall short of toxicity;
or insulin coma, induced by a standard technique at least ﬁfty times
in each patient. While a number of minor differences were noted
in comparing the two therapies, the results at time of discharge
showed no statistical difference in the effectiveness of both treatments.
Neither treatment seemed to affect the basic schizophrenic process,
but chlorpromazine had the advantage of being safer, easier to administer, and better suited to long-term management (21). Concurrently, following the suggestion by the Creedmoor workers that

�EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH

163

divided insulin doses were superior to single insulin doses, Blumberg
and Laderman (39) essayed this problem and demonstrated no significant merit to the multiple-dose technique. (In 1958, following the
general conﬁrmation of these observations, insulin coma therapy was
discontinued at Hillside).
5. Neuropsychology: Various psychophysical tests were adapted
from neuropsychology, where their signiﬁcance in brain-damaged
subjects had been demonstrated. The early studies assessed these tasks
as indices of altered brain function (35), and measured the range of
performances of psychiatric patients, who are generally assumed not
to be brain-damaged. Thus, memory function was assessed on immediate recall, after various interpolated learning tasks (17, 35),
as well as during convulsive therapy (17). Tactile perceptual tasks
were ﬁrst examined in the clinical population (1). Later, with more
sensitive electrical tactile stimuli, Korin (10) observed the range of
thresholds in different body parts, the changes with altered brain
function (10), and the inﬂuence of set (instruction) on performance
(36). We also studied the perception of embedded geometric ﬁgures
(43), tachistoscopic presentation of embedded color ﬁgures (55), perception of the visual upright (55), critical ﬂicker frequency (49), and
interference in reading time by delayed auditory feedback (55). For
each task, the degree of decrement in task performance was found to
be positively correlated with the amount of EEG slowing. Following
treatment completion, with the return of physiological indices to pretreatment levels, performance in these psychological tasks also returned to pretreatment levels, or higher—a betterment of performance ascribed to practice effect.
Concurrently, assessment of various psychological measures as
indices predictive of behavioral change during convulsive and drug
therapies led to studies of the Rorschach determinants (30, 45), California F Scale scores (30, 42), language patterns after amobarbital
(27), denial scores on interview (37), and the perception of the visual
upright and auditory feedback (55).
6. Psycholinguistics: Concurrent with the syntactic language
studies (27), analyses of other language patterns were undertaken,
both in a search for more objective indices of behavioral change and
to gain experience in the technical problems of tape analysis for psychotherapy research. An index of variability in the vocabulary of
speech, the type-token ratio (TTR) of consecutive samples of dyadic
speech, was extensively studied (7,41, 44, 46, 56, 57).
In convulsive therapy patients, signiﬁcant changes in TTR mean

�164

MAX FINK

and standard deviations were related both to the degree of induced
EEG slow-wave activity and to syntactic language patterns obtained
in independent structured interviews. It was noted that speech became more repetitive (lowered mean TTR) and more variable in
consecutive samples (41). In interviews before and after the intravenous administration of centrally active agents, similar changes were
observed. Agents which produced predominant synchronization patterns on the EEG were related to a decrease in mean TTR and an
increase in the standard deviation of scores, while desynchronizing
compounds elicited greater variability in speech patterns and decrease in variability of consecutive scores (44).
Other language measures studied included distress-relief quotients,
self-reference, and alterations in tense and person. It was suggested
that these psycholinguistic measures are useful techniques for the
operational analyses of physiological and psychological effects of
psychopharmacological agents (44, 46).
7. Brain Damage and Schizophrenia: Following his studies at
Ittleson Center, Pollack reviewed the relationship between age of
hospitalization, intellectual functioning and prognosis in schizophrenic children and adults. He noted that initial hospitalization in
childhood and adolescence was related to I. Q. scores in the subnor—
mal range, deviant performance on psychomotor tasks, and more frequent ratings of “unimproved” at hospital discharge than was initial
hospitalization as an adult. The early and insidious onset of the behavioral syndrome “schizophrenia” was thus related to brain dysfunction (54). Findings suggest that different subgroups of schizophrenia may be classiﬁed on the basis of neuropsychological deviancy.
8. Sociological Studies: Considerable interest in the family organization to which discharged patients were returning, the relation
of social factors to choice and results of psychiatric treatment, and the
speciﬁc problem of the relation of these factors to treatment referral
patterns led to a series of population studies. In one study (8), education, age, place of birth, and score on the California F Scale were
signiﬁcantly related to the type of therapy received and the utilization of adjunctive hospital services. In a second study (3]), duration
of hospitalization, discharge evaluation, and diagnosis were related
to the same social factors, while in a study of patient refusal of ECT,
similar relationships were observed (51).
These observations suggested a comparative interinstitution study,
and among three hospitals the relationships between social class and
other demographic variables (age, sex, education) to the clinical

�EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH

165

variables of patient classiﬁcation (diagnosis), duration of hospitalization, selection of therapy, and discharge evaluation have been assessed.
Three teaching institutions were selected in which all therapies are
equally available to all patients—Menninger Foundation Hospital
(upper-class, Protestant), Massachusetts Mental Health Center (lowerclass, Catholic), and Hillside Hospital (middle-class, Jewish). In such
a comparison we have found the differences in designations of treatment, diagnosis, and discharge evaluation so marked as to make comparisons difﬁcult. While many relationships between social variables
and clinical variables were observed in each hospital, no social variable was found related to the clinical variables in every hospital
(53).

In an outpatient department study, sex, age, and marital status
were found to be related to the acceptance and rejection of patients
and failure to complete the application process (55).
These observations in population samples led to concurrent
studies of staff attitudes in the selection of therapy (ll, 12). In a
series of ward observation studies, Kaplan and Lefkowits indicated
the signiﬁcant role of staff attitudes (especially nursing personnel)
in the referral for subjects for somatic therapies, and in the transfer
of patients from one ward to another. (To study the inﬂuence of
staﬁ attitude on patient selection for drug therapy, we requested one
ward be designated as a “no-movement” unit. This was adopted in
September, 1959 and shortly thereafter by the whole hospital.)
PRESENT STUDIES

During the period of the convulsive therapy studies, many new
psychotropic compounds were assessed clinically (5, 21), electrographically (34, 40, 48), and psychophysically (48). The present psychopharmacology evaluation program, based on these studies, was
designed to answer the following questions:
1.

Is there a relation between measurable alteration in brain

function and behavioral change with psychotropic drugs on
chronic administration?
2. Are there pretreatment clusters of psychiatric, physiological,
and psychological variables which are related to the type of
behavioral adaptation?
3. Are such clusters related to the type and degree of physiologi-

cal change?

As an initial approximation, a double-blind, ﬁxed dosage, ran-

�166

MAX FINK

dom assignment drug study was undertaken. Based on our clinical
experiences three types of compounds were selected on the basis of
their EEG patterns. In this study, 203 subjects were referred, and 149
have completed the testing program, from October, 1959 to July,
1961.

l. Behavioral Change: In a survey of the behavioral adaptations
of patients receiving various psychotropic compounds during 195859, a behavioral typology based on the treatment response and on
pretreatment psychiatric proﬁles was developed (55). In the present study, the typologies are being tested, and various measures of
behavioral change studied, including therapist ratings, self-ratings,
and various ward observation scales.
2. Neuropsychology: Psychological tasks have been viewed both
as indices of behavioral change and as predictive guides in convulsive
therapy. Each of these tasks and a selected group of motor tasks are
now being assessed for both their capacity to reveal change with
various drugs and their capacity to predict change with the drugs
in. this program (48).
3. Electroencephalography: In the convulsive therapy studies,
the degree of EEG slowing was measured by counting the consecutive
waves in selected samples (16). When the more subtle changes of
drug effects are studied, it is necessary to apply less tedious techniques
(48), and electronic frequency analysis was introduced in August,
1959. By measurement of the pen deflection for various frequencies
from 3 to 33 cps in ten-second epochs, rapid measurement of apparently small changes in total activity and frequency spectra are
obtained (52).
Other physiological variables studied in this program include the
response of EEG to intravenous chlorpromazine, blood pressure response to mecholyl, the EKG, radioactive iodine uptake, and analyses
of various blood and urine elements.
4. Data Analysis: To analyze the data generated in this study,
we have sought the aid of complex statistical methods and computational facilities. Analyses of covariance, correlation matrices, factor
analyses, and discriminant function analyses are computations now
in progress with these data at the NIMH Psychopharmacology Service Center’s Biometric Laboratory in Washington.
THE NEXT

STEPS

Favored by a national research climate and a cooperative hospital
staff, these studies have proceeded vigorously. The assets for research
in this setting have been great—a selected, intelligent patient popula-

�EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH

167

tion resident from six to twelve months, without individual economic
limitation of hospital stay; a sophisticated administration tolerant of
controlled studies; and approval of a Board of Directors who desire
“research” as an institutional function.
As Dr. Lewis Robbins noted in his ﬁrst hospital report in 1959,
a specialty hospital can make little impact on the mental illness
problems of the community by treatment alone. The successful treatment of 350 patients a year is but little comfort to the 40,000 resident
patients in the state hospitals of Long Island. Nor will the annual
training of twenty or thirty physicians in the arts of psychotherapy
do much to help these unfortunates or the many thousands of ambulatory mentally ill resident in the nation. No, a therapeutic goal
alone is salutary but inadequate to our needs. As he proposed, the
answer may lie in the dedication of a “research hospital,” as it is
here that a specialty hospital can truly excel.
The charter has been written in the Board’s assertion of research
as a hospital goal. With the assets of an exemplary therapeutic facility,
such rededication can provide the stimulus for the continuous study
of the cause of mental illness and of methods of therapy.
Such dedication would provide the stimulus for comparative and
controlled assessments of different therapeutic techniques. Continued
study is urgently required of the selection of patients for various therapies; the application and mode of action of the therapies; and the
role of social and milieu factors in supporting the effects of our ther-

apies.
Assessments require a meaningful classiﬁcation of subjects. The
behavioral variables alone, which are the basis of our present diagnostic schemata, are unsatisfactory. Study is urgently required of the applicability of social and demographic variables; psychological task
performance proﬁles; typologies based on behavioral response to deﬁned stresses or drugs; and physiological reactivity measures. Such
classiﬁcations are also essential for any biochemical, physiological,
or evaluative study to provide homogeneous samples and comparable
controls.
Assessments also require meaningful indices of evaluating change.

Present global “improvement” ratings and socialization measures are
inadequate. Whether the intervening variable be milieu therapy,
psychotherapy, drug therapy, or time, the criteria of behavioral
change require deﬁnition. The applicability of rating scales, language
tasks, self-ratings, psychophysical change scores, family assessments,
etc., require study and evaluation.
Recent studies of psychotic subjects have provided the suggestion

�MAX FINK

168

that there is a neurologic factor in a group of the schizophrenias.
The high incidence of electrographic and neurologic dysfunction, the
lack of behavioral response to all therapies, and the relentless course
of the illness suggest an “organic” involvement in this cluster. Such
a substrate must be clearly sought by the application of biochemical,
neurophysiological, and epidemiological techniques to various clus-

ters of young psychotic subjects.
These are broader views of some of the questions studied in the
programs in experimental psychiatry of the past seven years. These

programs, and the contemporary projects in biochemistry and in
medicine, provide models of bootstrap studies undertaken with
limited support. A dedication of Hillside Hospital as a Research
Institute will provide the needed focus and impetus for the scientiﬁc
and humanitarian forces of the community to join in a common endeavor to resolve the problems of the mentally ill.
Acknowledgment: Participants in these programs include the
present members of the Department of Experimental Psychiatry:
Ira Belmont, Martin A. Green, Abraham Kaplan, Eric Karp, Donald F. Klein, John C. Kramer, Max Pollack, and Arthur Willner.
Former associates included Karl Andermann, Joseph Jaffe, Robert
L. Kahn, Hyman Korin, George Krauthamer, Nathaniel Siegel;
and Research Fellows Barre Alan, Fred Coleman, Harold Esecover,
Stanley Friedman, Henry J. Lefkowits, and Robert Shaw. The
cooperation of Arnold G. Blumberg of the Department of Medicine in the present program is gratefully acknowledged. The reports listed here are the result of the collaboration of these workers
and the professional staffs of the hospital who gave unstintingly of
their time and their good-will.
REFERENCES'
(1)

This Journal, 1:21, 1952; (2) ibid., 2:67, 1953; (3) ibid., 4:3, 1955; (4)
ibid., 4:134, 1955; (5) ibid., 5:67, 1956; (6) ibid., 6:197, 1957; (7) ibid.,
6:207, 1957; (8) ibid., 6:216, 1957; (9) ibid., 6:229, 1957; (10) ibid., 6:241,
1957.

This Journal, 10:84, 1961; (12) ibid., 10:97, 1961; (13) Neurology, 4:211,
1954; (14) Arch. Neurol., Psychiat., 72:233, 1954; (15) ibid., 76:23, 1956;
(16) ibid.‘, 78:516, 1957; (17) Conf. Neurol., 16:88, 1956; (18) EEG Clin.
Neurophysiol.,9:180, 1957; (19) ibid., 10:162. 1958; (20) ibid., 10:207, 1958.
(21) J. Am. Med. Assn., 166:1846, 1958; (22) Dis. Nero. Sys., 19:113, 1958; (23)
ibid., 19:227, 1958; (24) Arch. Neurol., Psychiat., 80:380, 1958; (25) ibid.,
80:73, 1958; (26) Neurology, 8:682, 1958; (27) Psychopathology of Commum'cation, New York: Grune 8c Stratton, 126, 1958; (28) Psychopharmacology Frontiers, New York: Little, Brown, 325, 1959; (29) Proc. XV Int. Cong.
Psychol., North Holland Publ., 238, 1959; (30) J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1281243,
(11)

1959.

(31)

Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 1:565, 1959;

(32) EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 11:398,

�EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH

(41)

(51)

169

1959; (33) ibid., 12:243, 1960; (34) Canad. Psychiat. Assn. 1., 4:166S, 1959;
(35) Proc. Int. Cong. Neurol. Sci., Pergamon, 613, 1959; (36) Am. J. Psychol., 72:384. 1959; (37) J. Neuropsychiat., 1:45, 1959; (38) EEG Clin.
Neurophysiol., 12:359, 1960; (39) Am. J. Psychiat., 116:839, 1960; (40)
Neuro-Psychopharmacol., 1:441, Elsevier, 1960.
J. Nerv. Ment. Dis, 130:235, 1960; (42) ibid., 130:187, 1960; (43) Arch.
Neurol., 2:547, 1960; (44) Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy, Springﬁeld: Thomas, 29, 1960; (45) ]. Neuropsychiat., 1:242, 1960; (46) Am. J.
Psychother., 15:46, 1961; (47) Neuro-Psychopharmacol., 2:30, Elsevier, 1961 ;
(48) ibid., 2:381, 1961; (49) Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 4:259, 1961; (50) ibid.,
5:30, 1961.
J. New. Ment. Dis., 132:153, 1961 ; (52) Medicina Experimentalis (in press);
(54) Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,
(53) VA Conf. Psychopharmacology (in press);
2:652, 1960;
(55) Unpublished manuscript; (56) Psychiatry, 21:249, 1958;
(57) Comparative Psycholinguistic Analysis of Two Psychotherapeutic Interviews. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1961.

' Due to the length of this Bibliography, it

is presented in

an abbreviated form.

��IIPRIIIBIIAL PBIGIIATEIO 13831303 A! IILLBIBI
noiiow and Proapoct

HI: Pink, 3.9.

Iron tho Dopsriuont of Export-cutnl Psychin$ry, 31113160
Hospittl, clan Oaks, L.I., 1.!.
2h. Itud1ﬁl roportod hart hi1. baa: ntdud hr tho Board
Dir-ctoro Research Fund; thc lttiannl Instituto or
I:
Honttl nutlth (Grants l-927; I!-2092,-2715,-h7983 nr~12,033);
POIndationl Fund for honoureh 1: Psychiatry (373? 56-151);
xuutnan§, tad Dalian fantastical; and lustrou- pharnao
ooutionl cost-rap tncIudinx 60131, Briatbl, Wrath and
Snith, K1130 a Iroach Lnboratorioa.

1': 10/1/61

�Exporinontol Poyohtotrio Rooooroh ot Htlloido
lovtov ood Proopoot

tho dodtoottou of 3111-14. Boopttol oo o
Rooooreh Inotttoto boo boon o drooo o! nony or
1to otudooto - o drool that nay oohiovo rooliootion in thin dooodo.&lt; Dr. 3. toroohov woo on
oorly propoooot of thio vtow, ood both in hto
oponoorohip of tho Joorool, ond to his onooorozonont or rooooreh otldtoo, ho prooosod thio
dovolopuoot. no woo oloo tho toodvortoot oiro
at tho rooooroh otodtoo 1n oxporioontol
poyohtotry. “halo 1 woo o rootdoot 1n poyohtotry
to 1952, no oolloborotod in o otudy or tho ro~
lotion of tho oorlr ooporotsoo of child tron o
ohotoo
tho
poroot to
odolt
of uoorooto. notion13¢ tho hoopttol rooordo o: ttvo proviomoyyooro
no oonolodod thot thoro woo, todood, o rolotioo nourotto pottooto with otooooionol oouroooo hod

oigoitxoootly xrootor tooxdoooo o: ooporotioo
thou potiooto with hyotoriool oonroooo (a).
rhto roport woo tho boctooinc of tho potioot popolottoo otodxoo dooorabod horo.
stnoo 19Sh tho vortooo progrooo 1o exportoontol poyohiotry hooo boon dovotod to on ondorotoodtog of tho undo o:
o

U

�.2.-

antioo of tho poyehiatric thoropioo of tho hoopitol. rho
tochniquoo hovo boon odoptod tron doooriptivo ood dylooio
payohiotry, oouropoyoholou, olootroonoopholonophy,
linguiotiuo, phoroooology, ood sociology. Ihio roport
roviowo thooo otudioo ond prooooto support for tho erootion
or o nooooroh lootitoto ot lilloido.
PIS! SIFDIBS
In our early ttudioo or oonvoloivo thoropy, inotitotod
with tho oid o: o grout oword of tho Iotionol Institoto

o: nontoi Roolth, ovoluotioal o: potioot iaprovonont woro
ohown to to dopoodont both on choocoo in broio function
ond on poyoholociool tootoro. AI our Indorotondioz of
oonvoloivo thoropy dovolopod, o gonorol nooropnyoioloxio~

odoptivo viow'o: ooIotio thoropioo ooorgod (6).

i

cholgo in brain function woo oooo oo o noooooory
condition for hohoviorol ohonuo, with tho typo or chooco,
houovor, voryiu; dogoadin; upon poyoholocicol oud oooio—

logiool chorooto'iotioo ox tho outjoot (22,25). thou,
tho oodo o: ootioo woo not too: oo oithor “orgooie' or
”prlyoholouinl' but rotbor oo tho iotoroction or non-ophyoiologiool chooaoo nod individual pottoroo o: rooponoo
oud bohovior.

fhio hynothooio

'

woo

oootoiood in otodioo or convulsivo

old insulin oono thoropioo (21,22); and tho oodo or action
of tho now psychotropic oconto woo ozprooood within thin

�.3.
payohoiropic'drugn
that
It
would bu urinativo to tho uxtnn‘ thu‘ pcrllutcnt ehgugon
k.—
ﬁypo
or
tho
tad
induncd;
that
brain
Inuation
ugro
in
hnvtoral reopens. would bu rolntcd to tn. iypo o: br¢1a
hypothosta.

wan unggun‘od

chnnga, and to individual pro-norb1d psychologie

(par-caulitr) vtttnrns (6,28,ho).
consu1;1v3 thcrngz Draco-s: Soaking a noncaro
of gltorcd nourOphgstoleglogl «hangs that w:- annuitivo
1.

tnitnblo for rcpol#od rutolta, various nan-urns wort
studigd inpludinx chanson in tho ts¢o~hand tout (1,10,13,35),
nanory tout; (17,35), anoant .1 slow utvn activity 1» tit
:30 (16,23) tld contnbulatory and duaial languago pﬁt‘Orll
attur nuebarbitul (3,15). an. llttor two, EBB und unubnrbittl touts, Hit. tbs nest oonlttlvo indie.- o: chaulc
1a convulnivo thgrtpy subjects. In on. uxpcrincnt,
clinical rating: a: taprcvcﬁont var. carrolatod wi‘h high
6.320.! of chungo in than. indicol (15,16).
2)... oblcrvutlon: wore touted 1n n doublo-bltnd
study in which p;titntl tutorrod tor oloctroahock worn
rindauly ‘3313306 to oithor convulsivo cr anhconvnlsivu
and

.

therapy. nigh dour-on o£_oltetrogrnphic Ilcw wave :otivity
and pastﬁivg nnﬁbarbttnl tout: warn obsorvod only 13 the
convulaivc group3~1nprovcutnt titan were algntticuntly
highQr in this group, and whnn subconvn1I1Vt aubjccto
var. retransod by convulnsvo applications, (he tnprovogout rat. way 31:31.: to tho ooarulstvo ureup (22).

�.3.
In sibeonvuluivo applications, nousidornblo oloatric
current pgaau: botwugn the cleatrudou. It wan pontulntod
that tho ihcrapoustc tguut was nut tin $Otl1 olootrt¢:1
current, r so, but_thu ":11 or nonn' quali$7 llhiftl‘td
by tho crana 331 Ittluro (9,23,h2). 2h. Itcniriounao o:
tut [rand 3:1 .oisuro was «an-$306 in n ounparuttv. study
of sh. 13ha1:nt oonvulutut, lnxaflnnrodiothylathnr
(Indckloa), :nd clnotrtotlly inducad soituroa. 81:11::
dour... ct olcatrtcrnphao chango, improvuuunt rat‘s, typo.
or bohnviornl ndtptntionn, Ind ohnnxcn in Inuropcychnltgiotl
talk hchavior war. ohocrvod 1n bush tho inhalant And in tho
alcctraa;117 tronﬁod crouy: (k9).
Kuvonr, not ‘11 Iibaootl auntie-ting high dccroo:
or phyttolbgiaal thugs. var. avnluttcd .3 “improved“.
I: n doncrtp‘tvo typologia Iﬁndy,_£1vo .dnptivn aldol war.
dusoribod, cupirxcslly torund “ouphorto', ”hypunnaic‘,

"nmuuuon', 'mmnld-wtthdravnl',
Vial. ‘h. strut tun pattcrnn

ltttcr

worn

ratcd

and

”pan“ .

an 'uuoh

inprovnd',

var. loan as 'undnpruvod' or “war-0' (So).
In utudloa at plynholoaicnl varinblou, it was ruportod
that pationtn ratod “much inpravcd’ $36 'rocovorod' troquently nanitultnd parloatlttw pattern: :kin t. tho
explicit vurbal dcntnl parnonnlity type (37). 2h...
pattoutn cxproslod tho ”innauago a: 6.3151“ nor. troguontly
than uninprov‘d aubjoctl, antibiting such asp-oil a:
tho

two

�-5-

explicit deeiel, einieieetiee, dieyleeeeeet

eed oliehee

(27). Other perchelexieel indieee else releted te fevereble eeteeee included high I ﬂeele eeere (ha). nereeheeh
deternieente ex eeler, ebeent eeveeeet eed ebeeet rereneier (30,h5), eed lee edueetieael eehieveeent eed rereice
birth (31).
2. Aetiohelieer ie cenmeuede end Geeveleive There
seeking e we: te enceeet the degree at peet-eeevuleive EEG
e10? were eetivity, en eetiehelieergie deepened dietheeine,
wee given intreveueeely e. verioue etegee or the ceavuleive
therepy preeeee (20,2h)Q Unexpectedly, dietheeiee eeeeed
en ieeediete end eeeteined deareeee in EEG elewiec, ehieh
wee eeeeeieted with eerked cheagee in lengeeae end need.
In petieete with deeiel leeteege petterne (21), theee
oeuid no longer be elicited. Ineteed e! eupherie eed well
'heing, the subjects beoeee'irriteble, enxieus end coepleiuinn. In eebjeote prior to convulsive or drug therepy,
dietheeine induced exeiteeent, teeeiee, eexidty end illeeery
eeeeetieee.
Subeeqeeet-etediee with ether centrel entiehelinergie cenpeeede end eyepethenieetie helleeieegeee ehewed
behevier end electregrephic petteree eieiler to dietheeiee.
the-e ebeervetieee led te the eeaxeetien thet ee ieereeee
ie the ehelieergic eetivity at the eentrel eerveee eyetee
wee the bieoheeieel beeie to: the eenveleive therepy preceee
(38).

�-6Iad‘ﬁlat Fallowing thtli
Itudiou, tn. neurophyliolosic‘l august: induond by drugwar! touted within a. acito oxporiadnt.1 EEG Iotttng. It
run obitrvod Butt phnuothinuianu induced BIG synchronxuuticn and a Ihittlnc at tun Iroqunncy spectrum to tbs slew
Iroqunuotons taprobannﬁc and barbituratoa, tn agar-1:04
lynchruatagsgon ;nd a ahttt of thy spectrum to tact troquaauiau; rosorptnu, an iuaruatod slowing with uynohrcn3.

?a

tutttoa at

chair: is ,r

law dontgua, gnd doqynohronitasion

IIVOII (18,26,28,ho).

at hiahur

Iazprnliao induced douynchronination
with a sun .1 trauma to the now bud: (33,310.
Each ‘otivu psychotrnpia compound wgu #hu: about to ant.
a charactnriatic trnqnoacy patturn.
Vtriouo 9th.: axpcrtncaﬁsl coipounda wort also
tantad and tar than.. no noaﬁistcnt ulcotrogruphic pattart
was rooordod. In... ounpuinds bl?! Gino. boon nhawa to have
dittor no ¢r vary limitad clinical psychotropic :ctivity.
rho .bIOﬂei of bahaviurul chins. with than. coupoundo loot
turthor uupport Sc tho anlunptton that 32.1: chnnco is a
accosstry condition far the neﬁion of puyehntrOptc drugs.
2h... obncrvnﬁsons auccoattd thnt psychophgrnncou
10310.1 tannin provide a noun: icr niioitin; vnriou- typgs
or altarod brain function in coltrnst to tho $13319 pattcrn
following canvalniva tharupy. furthermora, tn. type a:
luurophrliolocionl altorution, an rallcotod in EEG Iyuohrcay

�.1and traqucncy patﬁorns, val round rcln‘cd to 0’0011106

a: bohnvicrul adaptation. 2h: ndvnntazu 0: £80
toohnancs to: tho ‘Icay at new psychotrOpic taunt. sad

types
ﬁhy

toohntcnl

tarts: or aloo‘rontu

Iroquanoy

tally-t-

«or. unnarcd and dolcrihod (£7.52).
h. Insulin can: fhnragz: In our inluliu can: studies we
ocuttrnod anrlaor observations that porutntout alﬁorntiona
or brain tunottom were taint-d to prolonsud «one and
upcntanaonu nuilnrou; and tau in this rolntioanhtp suppert
for n nitroplyltologtc~ndapttvo hwpothontl. With thc grailnbtlitr 01 ‘h. ncv psychotropic asant chlnrprunasinn, a
ountrollod?chlorprunaltao Insult: can; atudy was undartnkon
in Sop‘anbgr 1955‘ AI patiaata war. rotorrod for insulin
aim: tun: get: rundonly unsignod ﬁn couraos or nithor oral
chlorprcualino for at IQlIt 3 months in dosoa adJuIt-d #0
1111 short of toxicity; or'tnnultn cans, induoud by s
uuhmd «chateau at last» so was 1: «ch pattont.
Vh110 a uI-bur or ulnar distoroncou worn noted in comparing
the two thgrnpigs, thn results at tile or dicohtrac chewed
no stutilﬁtonl ditrorcnco in tho offsettVQBQnI at both
traatncntl. loithnr troutunat £00.06 to affect tn. bantc
nonsquhrcnto procons, but chlorpro-asino had tn. advantagot boing 3:202, tacit: to adniniator, lad hotter suited so
long torn unnnzunont (21). concurrontly, following the
0“goutton by £ha Or-odnoqr worker. thtt dividod insulin

�.3.
doooa woro aoﬁorior

to olaglo insulin doooo, Bloabor; and
Ladoroao oooayod thin probloo and donorotratod no significant
oorit to tho oulttplo dooo toohoiquo (19). (lo 1958.
£91
ral courtroa too at hooo oboorvotiono
tho
a

,

5.

ﬂoor

woro adaptod

oho

:'

Various poychaphyoloal tooto

tron oooropoyoholozy,

whoro

thoir signitioaooo

to brain da-agod onbdocto had boon dononotratod. 1h. oarly
otodioo aooooood thooo took: on lodlcoo a: altorod brain
rotation (35), aod ooaaurod tho ranzo of portornaocoo or
poyohtotrlc patiooto, who oro conorally aooonad not to to
brolo dana‘od. Into, looory function woo aooooood on
inoodiato roooll, artor vorlouo tutorpolatod loorninc
tooko (11,35), aa roll ao aorta: coorulolvo thorapy (1?).
rootilo porooptoal tooko voro tirot oxaninod to tho clioioal
population (1). Lator, with ooro oonoitivo eloctrioal

tootilo otlaoli, Karin oboorvod tho raaﬁo o1 throoholdo
1a dittoroot body parto (10), tho ohaogoo with altorod
.

brain function (10) and tho inflooooo or oot (inotrootloo)
on porforaanoo (36). Ho also studied tho porooption o:
ooboddod gooootrio figuroo (h3), toohiotoooopio prooootatloo
o1 ooboddod color rigoroo (55), porooptloo of tho vzoual
oprlsht (55). orltlool illokor froqaoocr (h?) and 1ntor~
toroooo 1n roadtag tioo by dolayod auditory toodbaok (55).
For oooh took, tho dogroo of dooroaoat 1» took portoroaooo

�-9-

gastttvaly oarralatad with tha anoint at
386 aldwtas. Folluuina troatnoat couplattan, with an.
rota»: at partialoatoal tadtaaa ta pre-traatlaat lavala,
partaraauoa in thaaa paychalagioal tanks also rataraad
to prautraataant lavala, or tight: -.a battaraanﬁ a:
partoraaaoa aacribad to practiaa afract.
waa

found $0 be

concurrautly, aaaaaanant or varioua payoholaxtcal
aaaauraa an indicaa pradictiva or behavioral «hang. daring
convulsive and drug tharaptaa lad to studiaa of the
Rorschach datarninanta (30,h5). calitornia F Seala nonra(30;h2), languaco pattern. attar atobarbital (21), daatal
acarae an antarviaw (3:) and tha paroapttan of tho visual
upright and auditory taadback (55).
6. razehalég‘uiattoa: concurrant with an: syntactic

studio:
languaua
(27), analyaaa of othar languaga pattaraa
warn andartakan, boat 1: a aaarch tor aura objective xadiaaa
a: bahavtaral chaaua and to gain oxparianca in the taehnioal
pwablana of tapa aaalyaia tar payahatharapy research. La
.

inﬂux of

variability in the vocabulary of apaaoh, tha typo-

tokaa-ratio (if!) of eonaacuﬁavo Iaaplaa of dyadic apaaoh,
wu “unholy atudiod (1,h1,hh.h6,56).
In convulsiv. aharapy patxanta, aigaiftoant chanson
1n TIE naan hué standard daviationa war. ralatnd boﬁh to
the dagraa or iadaaad 280 slow wave activity and to ayniactic

�~10-

lcnlicsc puitarnl abicincd in indcpcndcnt tircotnrcd
intnrvicvn. It was cocoa that uptick bola-o norrepetitive (lav-rod not: III) an! acre varinblo in colaocntiVb cunplc: (kl). In intnrviowl infur- nnd cttor
tho intravenous administration or ccntrclly active agents.
ainiIcr chanson war. ohlcrvcd. input: which produced
prcdo-iaact synchronisation pattorun on tho EEO ware
rclctod to a docrctso in «can 1!! cad an incronno in
ﬂu: smdcrd duration or ...m. while «synchronising
ccapcuada clicitod groatcr variability in cpccch pcticruc
and dccrocnc in variabiliﬁr at consecutivu acorn: (hh).
0thcr 1:33:53. Iltlﬂrlﬂ atndicd included
diatrclc~rclict quoticntc, colt-rotoroncc, and altar:ticnc in till. cad patina. It VIC snag-ntod that than.
paychcliuguictic accsuro- arc usctnl techniqnoc for thc
operational caclyscl c: phyniolcgical and psychological
uttcctc or psychopharnncclcgiccl cgcnta (hh,h6).
7. ling; B‘llli gud Schinaghrcgil: rollcwiug his

'

Itudicl at Ittlsccn Ccntnr, PoIlnck ruvicwod th. rclcticnu
chip bctwcon can 9! hospitaliscﬁicn, intollcctucl tunationils
and prognosis in cchincphrcnic childron ind

nttad that

initiil bagpitalilltica

cdclta.

H:

in childhood cad Idoloaccncc was rclatcd to I.Q. secret in tko cubncrncl
tango, dcvicnt pcrxcrnancc on psychanctcr ttlkﬂ, and nor.

�.11;
troqasat ratings or 'uaiaprsvsd” ai hospital discharge
than was initial haspihaliaaiioa as as adult. rho aarly
sad insidious sasst st iha hahsvisral syndrsss “sohissphrsaia‘ was ihas rslatsd to brain dysfunction (5?).
Findings saggsai that

say ha olsssitiod on
davianoy.

diffsrsat suhrroaoo s: aohisophrsoia
tho basis at asarspsyohslogioal

in
Considarahlo
iotorssi
Studios:
aooiols‘ioal
tho family organisation to vhioh disohargsd patisnhs
ohoios‘
wars rotsraing, tho ralatioa a: social factors to
sad rssults o: pevohiatrio irsaiaaat, and ihs spaoifio
prohlaa of tho ralatioa at thasa factors to irsatasot
rorsrral paiisras lad to a ssrisa of population studios.
Ia oas study (8), soaoatiao, ago, plaoa at birth and soars
on tho California I seals wars significantly rslaisd to
tho hypo or thorapy rsasirsd ass tho utilisation of
adaaaotivs hospiial ssrviosa. In a ascend study (31),
darstioa or hospitalisation, dischargs avaluaiioo and
diagnosis wars rslatsd to tho sans social factors, whila
in a study of patisht rafuaal of BOT, sitilar relationships wars ohsarvad (51).
Thass ohssrvations suggastad a_conparativs
and
tho
three
among
hospitals
study,
min-institution
batwssn
othsr
demographic
social class and
rslationahips
8.

‘

variables (ago, sax, sdooatioo) to tho clinical variablos

�.12.

at patanat cltulixtcttscn (ataanonal), auruttoa o: inapttuln
tuttton. soloctiqn or thornpy and dtuohnrgu uvaluntion
5.1. 3.0: unlocuod. Into. touching tuntttuttolu were
:11 thortptcc arc oqaa11y avatlnblo to
I11 pntiontl, - nonnincor Foundation Hospital (uppor-clusc,
.Protoctant), uttsaohuontta ncntnl lualth Contor (loverclnll, Cathnlic) ind £111.16. Boaptttl (niddlo-claul,
Jow1ah). In hack a canytrtton w. turn round tho dittorcaoul
1n duotgnntiona of trontnnnt, diagnoliu tad dtuehargo
cvnluatton so dafforbnt an to ugh. nonpartnean difficult.
Vhtla III: rolttionnhtpu tatvton Iodill varinblon 1nd
91131c31 Virilbltl var. oblarvad in each heapitnl, to
1001.1 variablo was fauna rclstcd to thc clinical variablo.
1- "01-7 hospital (53?.
In an Out-Pattont Departnont utndy, sex, 8‘. 3nd
narttallatata: var. found to ho rc1atod to tho acceptancand roawetion at patttuts tad fuilnr. to couplcto tho
upplionttuu pIOGOII (5h),
that. abatrvnt1¢nl 1; population Ianploa 10d ta coa—
current Itmdios or start attituia: 1: tin Iolootion at
thorapy (11,12). In a aortas o: ward obnorvation studiol;
Kaplun and Lotkawttn indientsd tho significant :01. or
otntt attitudes (oupocta11y turning porcannol) in thc
rerorrgl tor lubaostn for lunatic thtrcp1on, and in tho
tranutcr at pztiontl tron out ward to unothur. It stud.

Icloctod

'

1n whaen

�-13.

ﬁt. tn£1u ca .1 :ﬁnxt attitndo

t1§n$ soloattoa for
drag thorngz, w. g33u03$nd can ward be dontgagtnd an a
"ago-avnusas' unit. 2):! van ndagtad in 8:233:34: 1259
and

an

shor‘lz ﬁhornuttqr 3: the whole hangatul.)

mum 8E1“

buriug *ho parioa at the convullivc thsrupy studios,
man: nun psychotropic 00:90:36: were attained clinically
(5,21) alootrographzgally (3h,h0,h8) ‘ﬁd psychophrttcnllr
.(aa). rho pro-ant payehophntuncology cvaluattoa progrta,
b;sod on ‘hoao u§udion, was designed in gnaw-r tbs follow-

ing'qunltions:

I

1. ﬁber.

;

rclntion botvooa
COIII9I§XI &amp;lt.rlttga in brcin function
tad bahaviurnl Chtﬂﬂﬂ with psychotrOpic
drug: on circuic :d-intstrntton?
Ar. that. prb-troatnoat cluttcrl
of plyohtatric, phy1101031ca1 and psycho-

logiotl variablnl which are rolatod to
‘ho ﬂypc at bohnvtoral adaptation?
Arc ouch olultcro rclntad to thy
typo and dogroo or physiolextcll chango?
LI an

iatt1;1

upprqxin&amp;t19n, a doubln-blznd, fixed
detach, vandal aunt‘s-ant drug study was undartakcn. Blood
on our c1131ca1 cxporicaenl throo tIpCI a: compound: var.

�Du.
oolootod on tho boots o: thotr EEO pottoroo. 1: thin
otody, 293 onhjooto woro rotoirod old 1&amp;9 hovo oonplotod
tho touting progron, tron ootohor 1959 to July 1951.

1. lohoviorol Chog‘oa In o ourvoy of tho bohoviorol
Adoptotioao o: potiouto roooivin; voraoao poyohotropto
compounds during 1958-59, o bohoviorol typology boood on tho
arootnont rooponoo one on pro-trootnont poyohiotrto protiloo
dovolopod (55).

In tho pro-out otndy,tho typoloatoo
oro botng tootod, old various oooouroo of bohoviorol choogo
otodtod, inolnd1n‘ thoropiot ratings, coll-ratingo old
various word ohoorvotaoo oooloo.
woo

2. ggnr o cholo : Psychological tooko hnvo boon
viovod both on indiooo of bohoviorol chonuo and on prodietivo goidoo to convulntvo thoropy. Koch o: thooo tooko
and o oolootod group or uotor tooko oro now bozo; oooooood
for both thoir oopoaity to rovool ohongo with voriouo drug: ood
thotr oopooity to prodiot ohongo with tho drugs to this
-pro.ron (hB).
3. Blootrooooogholg‘goggln In tho ooovuloivo thoropy
'

otodiot, tho dogroo of

slowing woo loooorod by counting
tho oonoooutivo wovoo in oolootod oonploo (16). whoa tho
noro oubtlo ohongoo or drug ottooto are studied,
1a
noooooory to opplr loot todiouo tochniquoo (ha), ond
EEG

it

olootronio froquonoy ontlyoio woo introdocod in August,
1959. I: nooourouont of tho pon dotlootioo for voriouo

�.15-

'

sooosd
is_ton
opoois, ropid

trsqssssiss tron to
nosslrsnsat or oppsrsstly sssll ohsncss is total activity
and trout-soy upsets: or. sttsisod.(52).
ethos physiological vsristlos stadiod in this
3

33 bps

yrogron include tho rooponso of 830 to istrsvsnoos chloru
~pro-suns, blood prosaoro rospouso to nooholyl, tho EKG,

radioactive iodine optsko, and saslysss or various blood
tad urine olsnsnta.
h. hots Ansgzgisx rs onslrso tho dots goosrotsd
in this otndy, as hsvs sovxtt tho aid or complex ststisti-

colon-thud: and computational tsuilitios. Analyses or
notorious, osaj‘rslstioo ”trio", factor analyses and
disorisintst function onslrsoo ore connotations new in
prouross with this dots at tho III? Psychophsrnsoology
aortic. contsr's Biolstris Laboratory in Washington.

Ill-l!!!

STEPS

Favorsd by s notional rososroh

'

clissto

and

s ooopor-

stivo hospital staff, thsso studio; hows proooodod
vigorously. Rho ssssts for rososroh is.this sotting hi7.
toss arsst ~— s solsctsd, intslligont pstisst popnlstiou
rssinsnt from six to twolvo months, without individual
economic linitstios of hospital stay; a sophistiostsd
sdninistrstioa tolorsst or controlled studios; sud spprovsl
o: s 30:26 or Birootors who dosirs 'rssosroh' as on

institutional function.

�~16-

eeted 1n hie tiret heepitel
repert 1a 1959, e epeetelty heepitel eee eeke little tepeet
en the eeetel illeeee prehieee er the seeeehtty by treet—
eent elehe. the eeeeeeetel treeteent e: 350 petteate e
contort
to the h0,000 reeident petteete
in
but
little
yeer
1n the etrte heepzltele a: La; Ieleed. I» will the eeeeel
treieie. or twenty er thirty phveieieee in the erte e:
peyehetherepy do exeh to help theee untertnnetee or the
reeident
111
theeeende
of
in the
mentally
enbnletery
nee:
eetiee. he, e therepeetle [eel eleee 1e eelutﬁry bet
teedeqeete to ear neede. he he prepeeed, the eeewer eey
lie in the deeieetiee or 'reeeereh heepttel”, ee it 1e
here thet e epeeielty heepttel eee truly excel.
the eherter hee been written in the neerd'e eeeertlee
er reeeereh ee e heepttel ceel. with the eeeete or en
exeeplery therepeette teeility, each rededteetlee eee
previde the etieelee tor the centieeeue ether 9! the
eeeeee er mental zlheeee end at eethode e1 therepy.
Seek dedicatiee ueeld provide the etteulee tor cenperetive and controlled eeeeeeeeete e: dittereet therepeette teehniquee. Centteeed etudy 1e urgently required
of the eeleettee e: petseete ter verieee therepiee; the
epplieeteee end eede er eetlee e: the therepiee; end the
role of eeetel end ntltee :eetere in euppertte; the exteete
Le Dr. Levin hehhtee

&amp;

�.17-

o: oar tharaptol.

tubjoctl. the hohavioral Vtrtnblou OIOII, which are tin
halt: a: on: proﬁont ditcznltso Ichtnstn, arc taunts-raotcry. at:dy is urgtntly requirod at tho upyltonbtlltr
a! aootnl tad dulnarnphtc i:riab1¢a; paybholoutcal t:§k
pcrfornancu protilun; twpologinc bnaod ca b-havxoral
response to dozinnd Itroaaun or drug.; and physiologicall
roactivity measures. such olaantticatioan arc also

oniéntial for any biochemical, phyainlogioal or tvnlunttvo

study to pravado ha-nzonous 33:91.! and campgrablo

outrun.

‘

Alloa§nantu tlnd requsro moaningtul indtcoo of
evaluating 05833.. Pros-at global 'tnpro.uncnt“

rating:

tad loeaalitttton noctur-n arﬁ inadequate. Whathor tho
'iatorvuuing variablo bu nilihn thnrnpy, psychothnrapy,

sino,‘§héleri£irii at bohhvioril chant.
max... «anti-.1»; in.” 3592;131:1511”: a: rung-«1n,
drug therapy 0r

'

ladguaao #:028, idlt€r££1n3n,wpsyohéphyatéal"ch:n¢cVaéufca.

.

family CUIOIIIO§$I5I2E2- raqniru study :33 cviilatién;
Roount attains of p¢y§hottc hubjoeta has proiidcdv
tho succession thit thﬁrs in a notrolosic factor 1a.:
group a: eh: ichisophroainn. The h1¢h tacidoneo er citatro"graphic and aauroloxie éysiunetian, the 153k or behavioral
Vidnﬁculc to all thoripiol, and tut
rclontlcna

course a:

�-18 o

illncts nascent:

involvontut in thin
clustcr. Such a substrate aunt bo-olourly sought by tho
app11egt19n of biochemical, nourophyniolegioal and opia
daiiologionl toehuiquu to Vitus elation or you;
pcyohutio hubgccta.
5:
Eh. quontiona
broador
or
110:.
than. arc
son.
Ittdiud in thc prosrtlz in cxyurimontul psychiatry ot-tho
pant aovan yéura. than. programs, and the cantonporury
projaots-in hiaahuniatry and in medicino, providc nod-1s
It hootuatrgp studios andor;lkon with linitod uupport. ‘A
dodieltion at lilllidOIHinitll as a ncaonrch Institutc
I111 providc tho neodca £96“. and impetus for tha
Iciontltia and hunnnitcriun forces at the oonnnntty to
Join in a connea endeavor to roaclva the problems or
the tantally £11.
ﬁho

1n “orznn1¢*

�LGRROUIOG‘OIIi‘

Participanﬁl in than. procraua inalndo thprouont ac-bcru a: ﬁh- Dopartnnnt or Expnrtnoutnl
tuyohiatry: Its lalnoat, acrtln A. Orton, thrthna Iaplnu,
Brio Karp, Beunld 1. £1.13, Joha 0. truncr. an: Pollack
and Arthur 33113.3. turner associntad includod Kurl tuner-nun,
Joseph 4:230, lobart L. Kahn, Hyman Koran, Goircu Kruathunor,
ln£h3n101 81.3.1; and angry J. Lorkauats, untold Intonvur,
lid ntrrc Alan. It. couporn$1on 0! Arnold a. Blunborc ot~
Bopartaont of Hodictnn in the protont program in srqtntully

the ropor‘s liltod horn are the roault at
tun collnboratian of this. tartar. and ﬁt. prutoastonll
atQtta a: $h| h0upita1.vha an?! unnttnttnxly or tuttr tin.

acknuwlodgnd.

and

that:

nooduw111.

�W

J. innum- mug. 3:21,

1.

was,
67, 1956; 6.

1953;

3.

3.

1955;

ha

1952;

93.59201,

My
1951;

10.

£535.21.»

aggmh,

man,
53339229,
33539216.
7.

1957;

9.

1951;

wgaév.

2.

1951;

1955;

5.

19575

gnu“

12.
1961;
and 35;:
33:81:,
J.
gag.
13. ”surﬁng, £3211, 195k; 1!... Arch. Home)...
16.
1956;
15.
195!“
33311923,
353
3:233,

11.
91, 1961:
and.

”an“.

13.516, 1951;

can. gut. . 33:88,

11.

human-.101. 3:180. 1957! 19.
10:207, 1958;
21.
22. 91!.
21;. Arch.

and.

Im.
haul.

733, 19583

'

Jon. “or.

M

Ann.

1956;

18.

no

011:.

32:162. 1953; 20.3113
}_6_§:18h6, 1958;

23. 3333.21221, 1958;
25.
1958;
and £9:
£33380,
.
cg ’E‘L‘E
26. Iowa. 33682, 1958; 21. Pazohoutholqz

323. 323113. 1958;

w.

at Gal-Inna», Brno &amp; Suntan, 126, 1958; 28. PatchesGo.
1959;
325,
a
Iron
Luna,
,
zbnrnuohg nation,
29. Pros. xv 139. can. Pulp»)... lath ﬁoluud Pthln 238,
1959: 30.
3921.3, 1959.
31. Arch. 00:. PI:«but. $3565, 1959; 32. Egg

cm. lam-gm“

.

M
531668. 1959: 35- Pros.

33:398. 1959; 33.

6256. Porch. Luna. .1.
0.3.. Install. 501., Forum, 613,

31;.

Plzchn . 133381;, 19595

31.

J.

1959;

300911011.

35.2w.

36.

1960.:

I“.

nor. J.

11155, 1959-;

�38.

Ila

3113. "‘£32Ez.1.13 $30359, 1969; 39. Aunt. J.
Plzdhzut. ;;§t839, 19601 ho. lonro~rozghgzhurnneologzll:
n(‘)

kl. Jeur.

Harv. Rant. 31-. $§91235, 1960; ha. ibid
$293187, 1960) h}. Arch. H.353 . 3.5h7. 1960; bk. nganien
or Puyuhintrio Brag rhorugl, $9, 0.8. rhonnl, 19603
£5. 3. retrogjzoh. $3252, 1960; hé. 130:. J. Pazchuthor. $3;

h7. Intro-tszghaghuguncolagz‘gc30, Elsovicr, 19613
hB. than 3:381, 1961: M9. Azeh Gan. rqzuhil . 5:259, 1961; 50.
thid 2130, 1961.

56, 19611
'

orv. Rant. 91.. £2gn153, 19613 52. 535:,
taint Eggorinontalcs (in prosl)£ 53. '5 can :wggvahogharuneo »
(1n
5h.
890111
pro-I):
2‘;
Inn‘s; (in prose); SS. Bupub~
lishoa §anulcript3 56. Pszohiltrz 3;:2h9, IQSB; 5?. Arch Gen.
Paychiat. 23652, 1960.
51. Jour.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2884">
                <text>Experimental psychiatric research at Hillside: review and prospect. J Hillside Hosp. 10:15969.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2885">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2886">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-57-023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2887">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2888">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2889">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2890">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2891">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprint from JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL Volume X Nos. 3-4 July-Oct. 1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2892">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2893">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74491">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81052">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87613">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94174">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="290" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="81">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/dcb2d198f268393b586365e8e34503d8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f1412cf3717181597ffc25684c3fe518</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100707">
                    <text>PREDICTION OF INDIVIDUAL PATIENT RESPONSE TO CONVULSIVE'THERAPY
1/

e

i
-

i
e

'

.

&lt;--

Max Fink, M. D.

l

-

E
-ku'xs‘b

The prediction of response to treatment is a necessary daily task of medical
practitioners, who, after a process of clustering the symptoms and signs of illness of a patient,
select a treatment regimen most likely to effect a salutary change in the patient. Where
the classification of the disease is established by definitive criteria
in syphilis. diabeas
tes or malaria - the physician's problem is simplified. Where classification is not based
on definitive criteria, as in heart disease, or mental disease - the physician's
is
problem
complex. for he must resort to the recognition of pattern based on his individual
experiSuch
classification is not readily validated, and in the absence of specified external
ence.
criteria, errors in grouping for therapeutic purposes are frequent.

'
wv'h"'"

‘

'

In the instanCes where

remedies are established by their effectiveness. as in syphilis, or bacterial infections, or avitaminosis - treatment selection is readily defined.
Where remedies are non-specific, as in the treatment of mental illness by environmental
manipulation, psychotherapy and various physiodynamic therapies, the problem is complicatcd, not only by the non-specificity of treatment but by the probability that potentially
effective therapies are applied to potentially responding and potentially
nonresponding pop-

-...-....'..-.-....-..—”.y—--—-

,..

ulations.

The problem is further complicated b y a lack of evaluative criteria of
salutary
Various
change.
approximations are in use, as symptom rating scales, social adaptational
measures, patient self-ratings, and changes in target symptoms. These indices are gencrally too broad, too inclusive and too non-specific to be useful. For example, in the
target symptom approach, the assumption that anxiety in neurotic phobic, neurotic
depressed,
or paranoid schizophrenic subjects are equivalent processes is not valid.
in
Depression
various subjects is no more the same phenomenon than is the fever in t
mania or lung abscess.
c

.

'

There are, therefore, three aspects to the problem of predicting individual patient
response to therapy: the specification of populations (patient selection); the selection of
therapy; and the specification and evaluation of behavioral change. These
will
be
aspects
described with reference to the convulsive therapy evaluation
of the Hillside
programs
Hospital as studied during .the past seven years. Hillside Hospital is a
voluntary,
nonprofit, community supported institution in New York City. In these studies, the
patients
were referred specifically for convulsive therapy by staff psychiatrists to the
special somatic treatment unit which was responsible for all somatic
treatments at the hospital.

..

'

I

I
mvvv’

!

.
'

;

~&lt;~u

.‘-~v-

“tn“

a.

'

,,..~..‘..-....

i

Observing the usual mixed group of subjects referred for convulsive thera
py, we recorded a variety of behavioral adaptive patterns at the times when
subjects had received
the number of treatments sufficient to i nduce
neurophysiological
The
changes.
patterns ineluded euphoria, hypomania, denial, and minimization;
loss
and
increased
memory
complaining; increased fearfulness, agitation and excitement; and withdrawal,
paranoid and
delusional ideation. In assessing these patterns, that of euphoria,
denial
hypomania.
and
minimization was prominently associated with clinical ratings of much improved and
recovered. We termed this adaptive mode "euphoric-hypomanic" and set this
as the criteria
for the behavioral change which we would like to
predict (l).

\r
I

N. Y.

..~:

“

Since treatment selection was defined by the institution, our studies
focused
initially
the definition of parameters of change.

1/ From the De partment of Experimental
‘-

aw.-

'V.¢§“-.~

Methods
on

...._.-.,-..-,',.-»--—s.-

Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I a.

Aided, in part, by grants M-927 and MY¥Z715 of the National Institute of Mental
Health,
U.S. Public Health Service.

317

__W_

-_..

”_.u'

‘U

.—:r..

U..-

‘

�(and
be
therefore
this
show
adaptive
pattern
to
To determine the population prone
terms
usual
diagnostic
or
the
eschewed
symp.
we
recovered)
and
rated as much improved
these
studies
behavior.
During
of
We
measurable
aspects
more
and
sought
tom check list.
the
termed
which
we
neuroconvulsive-therapy
process
the
of
had develOped a concept
a device to
as
convulsions
seen
are
repeated
view.
In
this
(2).
view
physiologic-adaptive
behavioral
function
brain
adap.
altered
of
such
conditions
the
Under
alter brain function.
attitudinal
and
factors.
sociocultural
Thus,
individual
personality,
based
on
tations emerge
indices.
attitude
and
predictive
as
personality
we sought measures of pre-treatment
defined
that
the
we
studies
these
had
completed
we
after
it
was
For the most part,
of
"much
clinical
ratings
the
earlier
tables
these
on
that
"euphoric-denial" pattern, so
with
this
be
to
equated
be.
View.
in
and
our
reported
are,
improved" and "recovered" are
havioral pattern.
Results
Earlier
of
language
patterns.
was
assessment
Our
first
3. Lan ua e measures.
with
brain
dysfunction
that
patients
demonstrated
had
(3)
Kah
and
n
Weinstein
studies by
after
confabulation
and
intra.
disorientation
of
denial,
changes
had characteristic language
language
these
that
same
observed
we
study
electroshock
In
one
venous amobarbital.
those
that
noted
We
patient.
also
of
treatments.
numbers
with
increasing
changes occurred
those
not
while
recovered,
evaluated
as
the
ones
showing these language changes were
content
A
analysis
linguistic
unimproved.
rated
as
generally
exhibiting the changes were
disminimization.
denial.
be
to
explicit
the
in
study
showed the language patterns rated
of
tense,
of
change
third
use
comments,
person,
cryptic
cliches,
evasion,
placement,
(4).
with
question
a
and
responding
withdrawal, qualification,
elecafter
showed
these
who
patterns
language
the
subjects
It seemed probable that
treatment
before
such
to
.
using
patterns
who
have
propensity
a
the
be
ones
troshock would
tested
therefore.
We.
test.
provocative
some
by
changes
if we could elicit the language
adinterview,
structured
short
in
a
questions
each patient before electroshock by asking
then
and
repeated
and
nystagmus.
slurred
speech
until
was
there
amobarbital
ministered
after
amoof
changes
number
language
the
for
the
We
scored
answers
the questions (3).
barbital (4).
We noted a relation between the number of pretreatment language pattern changesthe
during
manifested
clinically
of
changes
number
language
the
to
following amobarbital
between,
also
relationship
a
there
was
1').
Furthermore.
(Table
of
treatment
week
fourth
imof
much
clinical
ratings
and
term
short
changes
the number of pre-treatment language
proved and recovered (Table 2).

TABLE

1

TO
RESPONSE
LANGUAGE
PRETREATMENT
BETWEEN
RELATION
AND
CHANGES
CLINICAL
AND
SODIUM
AMOBARBITAL
WITHDRAWAL DURING TREATMENT

Three or more
clinical language patterns“.

Pretreatment
response to amobarbital sodium
pretreatment
response to amobarbital sodium

No

*x2
+x2
318

4. 26; p&lt; . 05.
6. as; p&lt; . 01.

Withdrawal reactions to amobarbital sodium:

The scorn

denial

sc&lt;

We

1

cal rating

score

and

�TABLE 2
“""“

RELATION OF PRETREATMENT LANGUAGE CHANGES WITH AMOBARBITAL
SODIUM TO EVENTUAL CLINICAL RESPONSE

V:

«vs

Change with
amobarbital sodium‘I
Much Improved

19

-~..-,..’.

68%

.-.~.e.

..

Moderately
Improved

_,_

‘91-

_

Unimproved

*x2- 10. 30; P

&lt; .01

y-a-M-...‘;N

-——vr--

b. Famil Interviews. Our second assessment was a denial personality
As
inventory.
patients were referred for convulsive therapy, we interviewed a relative in an unstruc-

exploratory interview. The questions were designed to determine the degree to
which the patient approximated the explicit verbal
described
personality
type
Weinstein
by
and Kahn (3). On fifteen items, patients were scored on
three
a
scale
of
l
point
and
2.
0,
The scores were ranked and divided in half - those in the
half
termed
were
upper
"high
denial score" and those in the lower half, as "low denial score" (5).
tured,

vvvu—n-

.vw-

.

.
w».-

w—

v

.AW

observed a significant relationship between the denial score and short term clinical ratings (Table 3), In addition. there was a
significant
between
relationship
the
denial
score and the number of clinical language changes during treatment (Table 4).
We

.
-pv

TABLE

.-

3

..1..—.

RELATION OF DENIAL PERSONALITY TO CLINICAL RESPONSE
TO ELECTROSHOCK

'Much
Improved

Personality Score

-

,ewv.

.w-vv-

Moderately
Improved

,V,

l4
s

7

u-....r.»-v

21
T,-..,'.«..ﬂ_~.

—.s.-—.—

.--.-..

TABLE 4
RELATION OF DENIAL PERSONALITY SCORES TO CLINICAL
LANGUAGE CHANGES DURING TREATMENT

Personality Scores
11-25 (2.0)
0-10 (20)

Number Language Changes
8

l7

‘

12
3

*

.

319

�We
the
did
Rorschach.
was
task
Another
not
essayed
Determinants.
Rorschach
c.
look upon this test in the usual interpretive manner. but scored the number and patterns of
Rorschach determinants following the schemata of Klopfcr and Kelley (6).
It was observed that ratings of much improved and recovered were associated with
the following Rorschach criteria; absent human movement (M). absent form color (PC).
few responses, high form percentage (F ). presence of color (C) and color form (GP) or
absence of all color. and low shading response. One schedule is reproduced in Figure l

(7)-

FIGURE

1

RELATION OF RORSCHACH PATTERN TO

CLINICAL RESPONSE TO EST

°/°

NO M,

no c

M,CF AND

[3

MUCH

IMPROVED

NO M,

a\
MODERATELY
IMPROVED

AND

no M,.cF/c

M, NO

c

F6 AND M, FC

UNIMPROVED.

d. California F Scale. Still another attitudinal task is the California F Scale. This
is
the
which
to
10
subject
statements
of
global
of
uncritical,’
series
consists
a
task
simple
asked to express the extent of his agreement or disagreement. High scores reﬂect high
agreement, and low scores, high disagreement (8).

There was a significant correlation between high F scores and favorable clinical
and
(9,10)
studies
factors
social
out
realso
carried
In
we
addition,
5).
(Table
ratings
ported that favorable outcome was associated with few years of education. foreign'birth.
and older age.
'

»

TABLE

5

RELATION OF SOCIAL FACTORS TO DISCHARGE
RATINGS IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
.

Recovered
Much Improved
Improved and
Unimproved
320

Mean F

Score
53.1

Mean
Age

Mean Years
Education

7-

50

9. 4

/ 10.6
12. 3

Foreign
Born

‘

35
17

�Conclusion

summary, we have observed that a variety of pre-treatment measurable aspects
of behavior, usually described as personality variables, are associated with the develop—
ment of the euphoric-hypomanic adaptive pattern in convulsive therapy and are rated as
much improved or recovered in our setting. These variables have been defined in language
patterns, denial scores on family interviews, perceptual style reflected in the Rorschach.
California F Scale measure of attitude, and the social variables of age, educational level,
and birthplace.
These personality and social variables provide the perceptual and attitudinal bases
for the adaptive changes which occur under the conditions of altered brain function induced
by repeated convulsions. Absence of these personality traits, in the presence ,of equivalent
degrees of brain function leads to other adaptive patterns, usually rated as "improved" or
"unimproved. " and not to the euphoric-hypomanic mode.
In

The same theoretical model of the neurophysiologic - adaptive interactional hypothesis
is applicable to drug therapy (2, ll). We would suggest that different agents are psychopharmaceutically useful to the extent that brain function is altered systematically. These
can be measured by the electroencephalogram, although not exclusively. Under the conditions of persistent altered brain function, changes in adaptation will occur, dependent on
pre-treatment personality variables. These can be specified, and studies now in progress
at Hillside Hospital are assessing this model for various psychotropic agents.

References
(1)

Pink. M. and Kahn, R. L. : Patterns of Behavioral Change and Improvement in Convulsive Therapy. AMA Arch. Gen. Psychiat. (in press).

(2)

Fink, M. : A Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies". J. Hillside

(3)

Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R. L. : Denial of Illness: Smbolic and Physiological Aspects, Springfield, Ill. C. C. Thomas, 1955.

(4)

Kahn, R. L. and Fink. M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy. Psycho atholo of Communication, Ed. Hoch. P. and Zubin. J., Grune &amp; Stratton
1958, pp. l26-139.

(5)

Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M. : Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock Therapy. J. Neuropsych. 545-49. 1959.

(6)

Klopfer.

(7)

Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M. : Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical Response to Convulsive Therapy. J. Neuropsych. _1_: 242-245, 1960.

(8)

Kahn, R. L. , Pollack, M. , and Fink, M. : Social Attitude (California F Scale) and
Convulsive Therapy. Jour. Nerv. Ment. Dis. L351: 187-192, 1960.

(9)

Kahn, R. L. , Pollack, M. and Fink. M. : Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital. J. Hillside Hosp. 2: Zl6-228. I957.

(10)

Kahn, R. L. , Pollack, M. and Fink, M. : Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric
Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization. Discharge
Ratings and Diagnosis. AMA Arch. Gen. Psychia . l_: 565-574. 1959.

1942.

(ll) Fink,

B._

and Kelley, D.: The Rorschach Technique. New York, World Book Co. .

EEG and Behavioral Effects of Psychopharmacologic Agents. NeuroPsychopharmacology. ed. Bradley. P. . Elsevier, Amsterdam, 441-446. 1960.
M.

:

DR. LASKY:
.,-

Thank you Dr. Fink. Do members of the panel have any questions or comments?

'r~

r-

”‘5

|

321

”.“wnpm‘.

�DR. KLERMAN:

I

Max, you presented with a fair amount of specificity, the personality and social fac.
tors which characterize the patient. Iwas disappointed in that the other half of your
neuro-adaptive scheme was left unspecified. Namely, is there any specificity in the alter.
ation of brain function that is as predictive as these specific social and persouality factors?

‘

.

patien1

adapta
to tree
will nc

brain
are co
convul
nnl, tt
that hi

.

DR. PINK:

answer to that is that we do have considerable specificity for the various
treatments that we use. If I might have Figure 2. This Figure will show that we did use
electroencephalographic measures. We were rating the EEG changes according to criteria
which we called high degree-slow wave activity. This index could be specified and quantified. After determining which records were "high degree" slow wave activity, we were
able to go back and look at the patients who had shown the much improved category, the
moderately improved and the unimproved. It is apparent that of the patients who were in
the much improved group, about 90% of the records of that group had shown high degrees
of EEG change during the third. and fourth weeks of treatment. It is also clear that the pa.
tient's who were "unimproved" did not show the high degrees of EEG change. We interpret
these data to indicate that unless a patient has a high degree of EEG change he will not
.show behavioral change. It is necessary to have changes in brain function and it is under
the conditions of the brain change that adaptive change will ocdur. The type of adaptive
change depends on these personality variables. In drug therapy we have other EEG patterns which can also be specified.
I think the

change

'shock.

-

DR ' L

I
schalk
comm
much
crude
with tl
'

DR. F

FIGURE 2

I

.
h.

r

.

&gt;‘

,._

o—MUCH IMPROVED (u)

E

..... moo IMPRovsom

g

S

3O

‘

-

DR.

7

_

umumoveom

(3

spe cif
tional
being

.
‘

has

s‘c

UJ
LL]

as

0
0
$

DR. F

LL!

I

reflec

know \

“I":

atric

6
5

u

these
more
our e1
ber of

E:

we do
much
eupho:
being:

2%

if
‘

'

4'6

7'9

“242

NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

statin:

.

behavj
which

.

.

DR. KLERMAN.

Is one difference between this kind of physiologic measure and the other measures in
that they occupy different type predictive factor? Would you say here that unless the patient has this characteristic, EEG changes, he will not subsequently develop behavior and
adaptive changes but can you predict before the treatment in any physiologic way whether
or not a given patient will manifest these characteristic delta wave changes 7 In other
words there is a difference between a predictive variable that you described as existing or ..
characteristic with the patient prior to his exposure to the treatment and a predictive variable that says he must experience a certain kind of change under the inﬂuence of the so-

matic therapy.

322

:

‘

-

this a‘
$323:

-

ation
This i

‘

:ﬁfhﬁ

hospit

e ducai

�PINK:
I think what you are asking is whether we can predict the physiologic response of the
patient. I think we can, although this is much more difficult than predicting the behavioral
adaptation. We still do not know what the determinants are or how to measure them prior
to treatment, to predict whether a person will or will not show a drug response or will or
will not show a physiologic response. The question is not one of a sequence, where altered
brain function comes first and then the subjects involuntarily adapt to it. These processess
arc concurrent. At the time that brain function is changing under the influence of repeated
convulsions or under the influence of repeated doses of drugs, the perceptual, the attitudinal, the conceptual and all the other aspects of patient behavior are undergoing change so
that his whole view of life and his response to his environment is changed. The kind of
change he shows depends on his pretreatment propensities, as we tried to show on electroshock.
DR.

‘\

x

v

w

-«

~

.rv-w--.

"a...

mv‘vo—‘w

“

o...—

DR. LASKY:

01--

-

Dr. Fink, we'll ask another question or two. They are short ones. think Dr. Gottschalk and I have something rather similar in mind. Now, the one I had was--Could you
comment On your criterion. You used a three level over-all clinical rating of recovery,
much improved and improved. Now the question that comes to my mind is why use such a
crude criterion when you are using rather quantitative measures as predicters and ties in
with that, of course, what (ices this criterion mean that a man is "improved" 7
I

DR.

”on

mu

w-wﬁnwvr'Vb-‘M

FINK:

Dr. Gottschalk, do you want to ask something ?

w-vﬁmnmm

DR. GOTTSCHALK:

Well, I had a somewhat similar question, but I have focused on something a bit more
specific than that--As whether Dr. Fink had any idea why those people with lower educational levels tended to have more improvement, was this possibly because of the goals
being less as compared say to persons with higher educational levels, then of course this
has some relationship to the question about the criterion for improvement.

'r-v-q—vruwm.“

-

‘
a

‘

Wm

DR.

‘w

FINK:

.5
we‘rv

..

think that both these questions are crucial ones.. I tried to indicate that our slides
reflect early aspects of our studies. At the time that we did these first studies, we did not
know what we were using as the eventual criterion of behavioral change. We used psychiatric ratings much as everybody else. This criterion was fairly effective. In the course of
these studies, we learned that there were different behavioral modes, and these seem a
more meaningful criterion. We are now in the process of assessing patients going through
our electroshock program, trying to predict these various modes. Unfortunately, the number of patients referred for electroshock in 1960-61 has dropped off precipitously, so that
we do not have a large enough sample. But, the statement of the slides on recovered and
much improved reflects, ‘as we look back in our data, those patients who showed the
euphoric-hypomanic adaptation. That adaptation can be characterized by a feeling of wellbeing; an attitude on the ward of being fine; dressing up, and participating; and on inquiry
stating they are no longer sick or depressed and that there is nothing wrong with me. Such"
behavioral changes are the ones that psychiatrists rate as much improved. In our hospital,
which is psychodynamically oriented, there are a number of psychiatrists who have seen
this adaptation and have said that this is not improvement, but explicit denial is a psy—
chotic adaptation. There is, therefore, a problem of evaluating what we mean by much
improvedor unimproved. The question about educational level is also related. The evaluation of "much improved" is dependent on the psychiatrist's or the evaluater's attitude.
This is one of the reasons why the use of much improved characterizations across hospitals is almost impossible. We tried to show this yesterday in Dr. Pollack's report of our
tri-hospital study where discharge ratings did not have the same meaning in the various
hospitals. The educational level is important because. there is something about being well
educated in the American culture which does not lend itself to the use of the, gross denial
I

,

r‘tV‘W‘WW'

mq—

v'fT'V-a

run-"Vera

nrw—

m.

u~—WWWW—w—wm~n»

l—"r'"

le‘fp

”r"

«-

-m

.»

1‘

i

l
t

i
l

i
V

‘323

i

i
i
i

�\Q

institution
is
this
in
and
reour
them,
we
see
as
cultures
ive
The
more primit
response.
who
have
and
in
may
Europe
who
born
were
flected in the people in the older age group
the
adaptation
use
or
such
can
people
that
in
Europe,
life
sustained their early
processes
American
Our
younger.
intelligent,
denial.
more
verbal
do use the adaptation of explicit
born girls and boys just don't use gross denial.
the
for
I
on
use
apologize
must
and.
is
poor
very
The use of improved categorization
The
next
studies.
started
our
the
we
is
that
way
the slides, but Ihad to use it because
reflect
will
but
an
have
not
will
that.
two
hence,
series of slides, hopefully a year or that
have teased
think
we
which
we
predictors
the"
hope
we
Then
adaptive mode typology.
differences.
those
in
demonstrating
effective
be
will
out using improving categories

in ap

procedure

by investi;

In or

pharmacol
lucidly, tc
jsctive es;
of familia:
able dosa;
'age level
not associ
experimer
pipradr‘ol
tect: 47 ju
:

DR. LASKY:
who
A.
'Gottschalk.
Louis
Dr.
is
next
Our
speaker
Fink.
Thank you very much, Dr.
Cinof
Psychiatry.
the
Department
at
Coordinator
Research
and
is Associate Professor
to
Individual
Pay.
Response
is
"Measuring
his
of
title
The
paper
cinnati General Hospital.
Free-Associative)
Behavior
(or
Verbal
and
Method
a
Introspective
an
choactive Drugs by
Method. " Dr. Gottschalk.

Fron

the indivic
a seconda:
by pipradz
themselve
able to wo
one thing
themselve
duced stin
1

AN
BY
DRUGS
PSYCHOACTIVE
TO
RESPONSES
INDIVIDUAL
MEASURING
INTROSPECTIVE METHOD AND A VERBAL BEHAVIOR
(0R F REE-ASSOCIATIVE) METHOD 1]

of accomp]

,

‘

Louis A. Gottschalk, M. D.
Introduction
is
a
redrugs
to
psychoactive
and
individual
idiosyncratic
responses
the
Measuring
of
study
and
The
systematic
serious
search area of increasing interest to investigators. the fact that the collective effect of
such phenomena is made difficult and compounded by
and
the
unique
that
time
the
at
same
the psychoactive drug has to be accurately measured
for
accounted
plausibly
whenever
possible,
and,
observed
individual effect is being validly
at some level of organization.
individual
the
for
and
accounting
of
measuring,
Approaches to this problem detecting, and
methof
the
Some
principal
ingenious.
been
have
many
drugs
to
psychoactive
response
different
with
major
of
to
of
patients
a
drug
administration
groups
The
ods have been: l)
suband
of
behavioral
different
for
patterns
psychiatric nosological syndromes and looking
psychoneuroschizophrenia,
the
,
category,
to
diagnostic
e.g.
jective reactions according
1929;
1953;
Bensheim,
and
1952
and
Pennes,
sis, etc., (Beringer, 1927; Hoch, Cattell,
of
of
the
relationship
Z)
determination
The
1960).
Weinstein, 1953 and 1954; Kornetsky,
beor
profiles
with
different
personality
associated
to
a drug
varying individual reSponses
by
measured
etc.
--as
hysteria,
depression,
extraversion,
havioral patterns--such as,
and
(Kornetsky
evaluations
clinical
psychiatric
various psychologic inventories or tests or
individof
the
The
3)
1958).
assessment
a1.
1955;
Laverty.
,
Humphries, 1957; Lasagna, et
of
defear
such
a
conflict,
as,
with
psychodynamic
a
ual reactions to a drug associated
different
The
investigation'of
4)
1957).
pendence (Gottschalk, et a1. , 1956; Sarwer-Foner,
Kurland.
1955;
and
1950
1956;
et
a1.,
Wolf,
and
1955
a1.
et
.
reactions to placebos (Beecher,
the
hence
and
effect
placebo
sometime
of
powerful
the
1960), which provide an indication
individual placebo component of the reaction to a drug.
of
Medicine.
of
College
Cincinnati,
of
University
the
Department Psychiatry.
1/ From
from
(MY-1055)
research
in
grant
a
by
These investigations have been supported part
and
Welfare.
Education
of
Health.
Mental
of
Health,
Department
the National Institute
324

The i
the individ
about the i
very devia
ple and 1e:
tive drugs

character

cannot, ho

rically

we]

drug addic
individual

major psy¢

The
pharmacol

I

assessing

1960,

1961‘

measuring

perimenta
situation
subject to
1

investigatl
The verba
the only 1':
of ‘speech
The relia’:
the scales

eral or ty:

been devel
s chizophr

‘

�lfiﬁlt$1ll at Indxvtiaaz Pattau$

nutpunua $0 etuvuzntvu rhnrtpy

Ill! Flak, Raﬁ.

.: Impurinuntnl Payuhattry,

fvun tho nlylr§ncnﬁ
#10! MC. ‘31., 'gta

tad-i, 1: port,

Hillttan Ibupitnl.

0: tin luttcuul
Ilnl%h aurvict.

by graaﬁn uaytv nai 31.:115

Instittﬁo of Haiti} Icalth. v.3. PuBISa
Proaoatnd gt ti: 6%; annual V.A. lcuoaroh atatcrtutc,

1': 8/13/61

�rouponio
1n
n nonalu
ﬁvtatuunt
to
prudxutlaa
o;
it:
IOdIOIl yrsctatxynorn, at». 31%.: a
vary «£517 ttak
arupttat ind stuns o: illnoua o:
grants. 0: alxnﬁurtug

::

ti.

a putatut, atlact I trtttuon‘ raglan: moat likely $0 otttcﬁ
was».
tho
tho
in
‘8ango
clanuitlcttioa
unlutnry
pntiunt.
:
of it: ‘13.... :- estabISshcd by antlnitavc 091%.r1a an in
typhtlis, 61:50:03 or malaria th¢=phyutotua'u vrohlcn in
usnplitatd. whit. clacnttiaa‘taa 1: not b!!!‘ on definittvu

.

~
disoutc
Inutul
thGlittil, tr
phynictun's yrobluu 1. uonvlex, tar ha aunt raaovt tn the
raeocaittca or pattcrn bssod on his 1361114311 cxyurtanao.
Inch olunutrteu‘lon 1. act readily *alldntcd, and in the
thuunc- at apccttlsd axtorunl oritoria, 09?!!! in grouwinu
to: thsrtpcutta pnrpoaon urc trcqncut.
In it. anatanoon Ihlfi rI-caion at. iatubliahod by
thuir artistIVInoal, a: in nyphtllo, at hscturzgl tntnottoaa,
0r nvttuasaontu - £rnutncnt 0.100%10n 1: ro&amp;4117 tortacd.
what. raunélun up! una~:poottta; n: in the tralCanat if
uantnl 311:... by .nvirulnnuttl nuntpulttiun, pnyuhcthurnpy
nae vnrlcun phyvluayuuntc thcrapioo, ta. problan 1: Gain
placntod, an: only by tun unwoupoattlctty Qt trcntnnuﬁ
Eat 37 the probability that pntuutiilly'urtccttvo thornpiou
and
to
mapltsd
pct¢at13113 nun.
ratpauﬁllg
petuntltlly
Ir.
r.upond£ag populttiouo.
the problnu :- further ocuylioutcd by a Ina! or
cvaltatavc crasorsu or aslutnrr «bingo. Variou- uppromintu
$1.». 33¢ in a... nu uyuptan tutti: uculni. 3001.1

ari‘«r£s,

an

1: heart

�.m,

Idtp‘ltttnil atannrnt, putiant ¢¢It~rntiu¢a, sud ihtﬁﬂl!
in strait nynptonu. $31.: 13d1¢¢5 art :cnurllly tlu
b?ill. to. incluntvt Out to. non-nyueitzo t; h. utctil.

for CIIIDIO, in it. tar¢1t I’lptdn apprauoh, tn; anaunp‘lun
that anxiety 1n noaroﬁlt phattc, uﬁuro£1n daprcscod, a:
paranoid naiinoyhruuiu lthtItﬂ at. ugutvnloat arousaaOI
1: nit valid. napvtasinn In various «ataoota a: nu I02¢
tan tuna phanoncnuu thug a. ‘3. first in ﬁukcratlonis,

ynluuoatt

tr its: drastic.

nipacto
to tin protlou
this! nra. thuruttrc, ﬂirt.
of proiitilu: inltvadaﬁl pattant rtuponac to thcrt’yg it.
upocsttctttun it purulgtxlu- (pataoat '01-.tAcu); tan
talotttuu at ﬁhnrayyy and tho Ipuuartaatioa and cvgllatiua
o: bohnvlurul :Inugo. That. guy-etc Itll bu actortbod
with rttarcaua in the cauvulalvu thavuyy tvnlnation prvcrtun
a! ﬁt. tillaldt laivitdl an ctudtid during thc pnu$ IUVUI
gusts. 111131;. Ritalin: it a thgntary, nonwprutxt.
eon-natty anppcrtod 1ac$1tatzon 1n luv ﬂirt 63". In that.

tuanatomy
"no
Mum
mu
gum. a. nun»

vulutvu thirty: by aﬁnt! pnythsstrtuts to the 19001.1
nu-nﬁto trastnnat :318 tits) at; roapaanthlu tor all

tauntic sysataaut: at tic httpstul.

mm:

513:. trantntnt coluctsca

our cﬁmdaou
or changn.

initially

tbcgacq

III

it

datinod by thy Incitinttou.

ﬁt. dofiuttilm at

ynvunatnvc

�n53.»

antarctic 5h: tunul atatd group a! Iuhstétu rcfttrﬁﬁ
um
tOOIrdId a itriuty at iuhiriaral
ounvnlntvo
tharnpy,
it:
udapttva pgtturnu 3t tho ‘tnnn when nuhsacto had roeoivtd
.thc 383509 of troltnnntu Initiatont t0 induct naurtphyiiolocicul antagoa. 1h. pattarun 13011614 cughnriu, hypauuuit.
X00.
and tauranuad couwltiaw
lnﬁ
scumry
aiuiniaatsan;
atrial,
1am; inoraAI-d tourtulncuo, ugitutian and clattancnt; and
withdrawn}, ptranatd and dnluntuual iauattau. In nsnassing
than: unitarul, that at nuphartt. hyvonuuat. dupini and
3131315551.» van aroniutntly agitaatiod 81th clinical rattan:
01 Inch inprtvnd uni rnoovcrud. Ha tarnnd this snaptavo
and. 'Ilphnriauhapouunxc' as! not ﬁts. as $8. ariﬁoraa (or
tic hohtviornl Ihlnli thick at until 11:. ‘0 prodlat (I).
in ﬁatarnino ‘hc p¢pultﬁtln 9:03. to that thin
tdqptlvc puttura (and thorotura by ritad II 3:33 iuprcvui
and r'covurcd) an uaahauud ﬁn; Ic‘ul dingaantnu torn: or
taught unrc honourabla anyocta at
activiuw. Duran; thou. utuaica v. had dcvtlupad a stucopt
or in. convultlvu-thornpy'praaist think an tarnnd tin
nouruphrsiaiocismudapttva vita (a). In thin vicu, rnpoatad
«intuitions urn lCﬁn a: u dgvtat to alto: brain truatiuug
Undur it. atadttann: or tank lliﬁriﬁ brush taxation h¢hsv1tva1
uasptttionn nuwtga tuned on indivtautl partuntltty, lactacultural and attitudtuul rin$pra. raga. an tomcat unalarna
at prcatruasnnut pavnannltty «a: attitndn an pradtttlvu
symptoa chock

tadiait.

liut,

mad

�.4...

It: ﬁt: unit part, It ran nttnr u. ind

uolpldtud
this. siuasot tint um cosine! tau ‘U‘Qhﬁtiﬁhltﬁlil’
pgttaru. :0 ihtﬁ on than. tahlnu ﬁt: ourltnr «lininal
ratings 0: 'umuh auyrwvoaﬁ and *rwcvvared' urn 20903104
and cit. in car vicw, it b: tqnztnd witk than bohmvtnrcl

gust-ru-

I

a

;

u:

A.

Ina-11w

Langﬁaga nannuran

at: tarst gurus-nan! was of imaging. patt‘rnu.
and“: by minute» and mm (3) m cum-tuna

that pl‘tlﬂ‘l with basin dyml‘acttQI had churaatortatit
lancuucu chanson u: tout-1. diaovtuntttlun and cuatnbulntsou

it‘.’ iatruvuacnn
an

OhOOrVIO

tint

tnnbnrblﬁax. In an. c1¢¢Qr9Ihntk study
thcnu a... ltuculcc chtngns uacurrna It‘s

1302.531»; nuubnr3

at ﬁata‘luu‘a.

Ho

Ill. ﬁtted tint that.

ya‘toatu ohiuttgl‘hosc luncu;go chanson war. in. and.
ovalultci an vucovnrtd, title than. nut annihitlag the
.chnlgta tutu guncrully tutti an unimprovaa. A lingutnttc
soatalt‘iathatu ahavud tbs languagu pntﬁarna rntca in
:3. Iiiﬂy in he uxpllett £03131, Ianilisn£t¢u, dtuplacuutnﬁ,
CVttiuu, clichcu, crypttu ocuanutc, II. of ttlrd purcun,
lhlnxt or tonne, withdrtuul. qunlltiaatiun, :nd roupondxug
with 3 citation (h).
Xi aaauct probahzu that $3: Iuhsuotc It. august
thin. Inusutcu puttcrnc utter aluo‘rcchuok vuuld be the fill
any but! u prnpauatty to I‘tﬂg itch 9I$itlil burst. truatHOQt

�.5g'

II
tait.

12

00:13

olacit sh. laacuago «haunt.

by nous prcvcau£1vo

no, uhurgtovo. tou‘od 0:0h putanut tutors ulnaﬁrcshank by acting qncstloan in t abort a‘rtttnrla intOtvtiu,
Idntaiaﬁartd unohnrbtﬁal uu‘xl that: In: Ilnrr-d apo¢ah
lad ayatngnnn, and #305 rtpuated tho quca‘iout (3). we
luarcd tbs Innunrn {pr tho u‘ubur at luagulgc chanson altar

mu»! alﬁcd
0:).

at

u

rolatlln butv.uu the ntnbgr or

pru~

$I¢utuuai language puttnru chi-go: following :noharbttul
ta £hn mutate a: luugnnao chtngcs Ianttuu£ad 311310311:
during tn. fourth rock 0: tran‘nout (Tunic I). Furtharnnro,
that. can :13. $ rolationohxp httﬂlﬂn tn. nuibcr or protrottlout linguoco chanson and about torn clinics: rating:
ﬁnd
rtcovorod (tabla 11).
or Inch ingrowcd
ﬁ‘-‘ .. O“ 40“ ‘

rabltu I, I!

3. ltully Iatorvituw

: dautnl p¢raoa31tty
rotorrcd it: touvulttvo thnrnpy,

Our accond aunnolnnat

at;

savvniory. In patients worn
no tltnrvinuod a ruxttlvu an an uanructurod, caploratorr
£n$orvicu. fun qunatton: var! 60313306 ta actarline the
vhtci
303:3. to
tic pat10u% .pariualutcd tbs axpllost
vvrbul plrsonnlity typc duccribol I7 “biacttin Ind tab»
(3). an titties itnna, patients were t£09¢4 on &amp; throa
point tall. at o, 1 ‘nd 2. 1h. IIOFDI nur- rgnkod and

�.75.

dividcd in half . thlil in tho app»: htlt cur. taruod
'hxzh Junta: tact.“ and thtst an ‘3. lava: h:1!, us '10!

innit! it!!!“ (5).

aigaittulut rulutleulhip butauon tin
short torn eliutcul rating: (table 111).

no abacrvoa a

dcnial ntoru and
In aﬁdation. chart was a siguztiuuut rulntsonshiy untrue»
‘hn «tutu! IOOIO and it. illhlr or clinical langunso GICIIOI
daring £routunu$ (tabla It).

D--“m““--‘

215190 121, IV

..¢..~........

c. lartchnah nutcruanuntu
Anothur task cunnyue In: in: lornchtch. 80 did
u.% look uyou that tout in thc It!!! inturprctivo nuancr,
hat scarce tho IIIbCf and pattcrnt a: Iorlchloh eatcruauv
unﬁt following in. unhonstn 0! 110990: ﬁnd tollty (6).

It III

Obaorvcd ﬁhnt vstinga or tank improvud

and rucovurad wort tauoain£od with the

tailoring Inraohaoh

crituric; thaini lunan havonunt (I), ubuuat for: 001.:
(re), tut raupauuua. high for: ptroautnco (30), proscuco
at atlor (6) Ind 0010: turn (or) if «haunt. a: .11 oolnr,
10' thuﬂiug rulpcntt. can Iahudulo 1: rugrodtco‘
Inblo 1 {7).’
and

fihlo

V

-Wd

1n

�.7.
a. culitoruia I aetistill anoint! attitudinal tint in tho caiitoruin
r 80.1.. this ailpln tank eon-int: at n 0:21.: at 10
unoriiiaai, global sintonnntc to which in. Inbaoct in
Ilkod to otprocl the cairn: of his agrcoaont or dinnarcosemi. list .3090. rotioct high tarocnnnt, and low amoroa,
hick iiungrtclant (a).
that. VII I liguiticuni curt-iniita hair... high
r snort. and taverahio clinical rutinga (tail. '1). In
addiiion, u. .1:- curriod out toainl factor. Italian
(9.10) and roperiod ihai tavorahlo antenna val aaaociuicd
with for yuaro or adiaution. tor-inn birth, und .16.: ago.

-‘....”

Tﬁblt VI
GQlCEVSIOls

In Cilllfy, no but. oboorvcd this a varinty of pr.trottnaat lauuurabia aspect: at b-havior, unually douoribod
.3 porooanlitw varinﬁina, it. nauociniad with tho devoIOpr
nant at tho ouphorieahypolnnio aduptivo pittcrn in unavainivo ihcrnpy and Ir. rated in luck inprcvod u: r-oovorod
in our uniting. in... variuklou havo boon auxin-d in
language pittorna, Gemini 30.9.. on 2:311: int-trio's,
puroapiuni styl- rotlooicd in the nor-chuck, culitorain
Sonia nannurn or nttitudc, and in. social variabiao 0:
:30, educational 10701, and hirihvluca.

r

�“as

this: permanality and utoitl vurtuhlnu yravtdu tha
ptrauptutl and attitudinal bacon tar tug tdnptiva cunngon
whiwh oaaur undur thn unuﬁttitag a: Alcarsd Evita function
induced a7 rnpcttnd canvulqtoan. tsunami of that. paracn~
alt$y truits. in th. pvncwuua a: aqu£V§lont duct... at
Evita lunettun Illdl to 0th.: udtpsivn yu‘turna. attally
an
to
m
“mm-4'«ass-9W»,
a»
am
a. maman
’

hypluunic luau.
the Inn. tha0r0£1oil natal a! tin acurnphyuialouic ¢
IdlpttVI znt¢ra¢tinnn1 hypcahc-is 1: nppliauqu ‘0 drug
Gillan-at ig'n‘l
ihcrnpy (2.11). "b woula sugguut
at. yaynhupharnucnatsaally~1:0!!! tn tho extant that brain
tuucslon In Il‘trﬁd ayataunttenklr. Yucca can bu nonsurud
By tin olnatraanoaphulogrnn. althangh ant axalautvqu.
Ulnar eh. eundttaouu at pcrnlntent n1£arn¢ hrgia run¢£1ou,
ohtugua in aiuptntauu V111 ﬁcaur, dcycnauut 0n prnutruutnwut

tht

pgrioanltty vurinhlus. 3!... «an h. apouttiaa, tad attitaa
piogrunt
law in
ut lilllidt.‘0.vti¢1 av: nanotling thin
nodal :0: variant ya:who$ropio Iz¢ntu.

�1a

iiuk;

l.

and tab». 3.3.2 rattcruu at iwhuvturtl nhnsun and
Improvunous in auavu111Vt fhnrlpy. 5g; arch. 633:

_!gzgg;gt. (in prnsu).
a. tint, 5.: 1 Iaitsod fhnory at tho ﬁction 0! thytisdynnnta
$303351... 2. la;§¢§da gang. g; 197*206, 1957.
J. Unina£¢$a, 3.1. Ind Kuhn, 1.x.u 9593:; at ;;;ngtug

8M..;
4,“,
¢.c. rkants, 1955.
laka, 3.5. and link, n.v' Ghatgct in
»

-

‘

s

.

l.

A

;

Satanic“, In.

$nngungc During

llocirauhuck Ihavtpy. r
Ed. au¢n, 9. an: zubgn, a., Eran. s acrnttaa 1955,
pp. 126-139.
Ital, 3.1. tut rink. 3.: ruraouniity ructora 1a Behavinrtl
laupnnio to Exactruahock Ikurayy. 3. xtnrgggzgh. 53
.

&amp;5«u9, 1959.

tlnytar, a.

raahtnh itchns nu.
It! Ibrk, khrld Beak $6., lﬁha.
labs, B.L. and Fink, n.: Prsgnautit 731:: at Rartehnuh
aritarAa in altuical lacyumau t0 cruvulsiwc thorapy.
and £01101, 9.3.

2524“, 196a.
$d§1ﬂ1
an‘
Attattdo
Pallusk,
2.:
link,
3.1.,
u.,
Illa,
{Bularornsu r sail.) ané euavultivv fhcrupy; gaggz_gggzg
n¢n3, 23;, 329; xsr~191, late.
3.?
una
Social raatnra in
lain, I.&amp;., rilluck, x.
rant,
galactiua at Therapy in u Vtiuu‘nry lcnttl lbtpttll.
a, :zzxsasg 5352, g; 21£~2¢a, 1957.
1, trauma”.

9»

-ho 8

0

A:

�13..

mm. 3.3...

Mink,

“put:

0: Psychiatric

huugs

and

amt.»

n.

Mutton a:

91mm“.

565-515., 195’.

In as an
mu “on”.

ﬂak,

8.: Boominholuie

tht
banana“...

it. and rank.

is: a

m

alumina).

Arch.

“In-nun mm

Mums.

M: g mthat, y

taut; a: antenna”.

$3me
Slum”, mum, mama, 1960.

Mnualuz, «I.

11%

.

III-why,

h,

�153;! I

Relatian Dotuvou Prttruatnnat Lﬁuutnso

Ambuhitnl

Sodium and

Withdrawal

Io.

ROIpOIuo

clinical chant”

atria:

to

an"?

Truatuont

then. or nor.

aliniasl ltn-

Hithdrawul rauc$103. ta that 2A».

“A w.»

Protrcstlcnt
rnaponno to unotarbstll India:

39

EB

60

protrontncnt
I.roapouoa
to tits
bnrbtt;1 nodttn

)5

11

31

“x2
$12

.

'

13.26]

’

6‘88,

P &lt; G91

&lt;

.05

.

pct 00“

21

10

12

3h

..

m.

per coat

�153;; I!

nun-n

Mm.

or Protruhmnt
chann- Huh
Sou“ to ﬁght). 61131311

may;
m:
nut Input“
Hodn‘tolr
”mi
Uni-pm“
«:2

-

10.30:

52:

r

«at.

Q

_

I with

”an“

m

:8

19

68

22

8

3‘

15

3

to

.01

1

put out.

«1m

�mm

lolattoa or again: rationality to eliuitnl
g. tinctggghnak
Rich

thnrutclr

gagrlrgd gggruvud

Porlanggttz Swag.
11 to 25
0 $0 10

total

icspmuac

33§EEI¢V0¢

rota!

15

9

1

2h

-II

‘0

NI

23

11

13

0

h?

�null-non

mg

If Maul res-nudity “on: to c1121”:
Lluggagu Change. During treatment
lumbar ,

a

—

2

3 Or

zutuong;gtz acgggu
11-25 (20)
0-19 (20)

lutal

B

12

11

3

25

15

not.

�IA

‘

T

Rolatton or Rorschach rusty»: ta clinical
Icggoaau 1n cuuvuzuiva

I

Ind-rutaly
Ilprcvvd
tad

lull

taprovod

Egagigggti

novounat

39

11

(283)

28

(72!)

laugh lwvununﬁ

58

28

(58$)

29

(hit)

ﬂu?;;

I.

rattan;

:9
0 10: to )
For:tor:
001::
lo

3b
53

.

6.16.
7

32

p

21$
£601;

:3 - 11.570
Both a and

re
re

”
lotthor I nor ’6
num- a

h
10
25

21:

25
38

xa

awa‘h Xi‘an'

'

4.01

p

3.”

{mi
661
“on,

P

uorrtuttuu {tr diocoatxnut‘r.

2?
21
&lt;2

79%

éheﬁ;

.001
20

15
13

C4001

(83%

$60!;
3h!

�m1;
Illntton at 8.31:1 rattorc to Discharge
gg£iagl 1n convnlutvo lhurgzz

I

Iu‘n 1 833a

8

53.1

Itch turret-d

26

Inprcvod an!
Uninptcvcd

23

Inc-vurod

,0

abnn that:
3 CV‘ I

1

retail!
3

9.h
10.6

so

h1,8

51.6
h3.8

39;?

3!.)

11.3

17

35

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2894">
                <text>Prediction of individual patient response to convulsive therapy. VA Cooperative Chemotherapy Studies in Psychiatry, 6:317-24.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2895">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2896">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-58-024</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2897">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2898">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2899">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2900">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2901">
                <text>Photocopy of publication with Q &amp; A and [preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2902">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2903">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74492">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81053">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87614">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94175">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="291" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6564">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/aaac38fc36161269f14f4617b6ef620f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>09f64ba46dc2ab1bcb50e506d78ad27a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107168">
                    <text>v._,

SOCIAL ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT IN THREE HOSPITALS:
METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS 1/

«-

hoWCV‘

in

Max Pollack, Ph. D. , Nathaniel Siegel, Ph. D.
Robert L. Kahn, Ph. D. , and Max Fink,_M. D.

-

inst

logic P
hospit‘
same }
scitiﬂg

The generalization of findings from one population to another is basic to any science.
Psychiatry. perhaps more than other medical specialties. is plagued with controversies
concerning the non-reproducibility of results. One factor responsible for this state is the
failure of investigators to adequately describe their populations and methods. The organ.
ization of multiple hospital studies makes possible the detection and clarification of the"
methodological difficulties. We would like to describe some of the problems we encountered in a recent tri-hospital study. with reference to the variables of type of treatment,
discharge diagnosis, ratings of clinical improvement at time of. discharge and length of

knoWiE

tal dis

A

routin(
at MM

-ga.

would
hoapiti

hospital stay.

pang!

Various social psychiatric studies of community and hospital psychiatric populations
(1, Z, 6) have established the importance of sociopsychological factors in the type and incidence of mental disorder. the selection and maintenance of treatment and therapeutic
evaluations. In these previous studies such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the extent and type of available treatment facilities may have been more signi.
ficant in the observed results than the social variables studied. A more critical test of the
role of soda-psychological factors in treatment would be a study in a setting where the
same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients, regardless of their
ability to pay. This requirement is met at Hillside Hospital, and in 1957, we embarked out
a program of assaying the relation of sociopsychological factors to the treatment of hospi.
talized psychiatric patients (3. 4). Each patient receives individual psychotherapy and by
request of his physician, somatotherapy (convulsive or psychopharmacological therapy).
Our method of investigation was a census-type survey of all in-patients on a given
day (3). In addition a brief modified California F Scale test (2, 5) was administered to all
patients. We observed that age, education, sex, foreign-birth. and performance on the
California I? Scale were significantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hospitalization, clinical discharge ratings and to clinical diagnosis.

order to test the reliability of these findings, we repeated this study at Hillside
Hospital in 1958, employing the same procedures and, concurrently extended it to two
other institutions. the C. F. Menninger Memorial Hospital and the Massachusetts Mental
Health Center (MMHC). These institutions are similar to Hillside Hospital in that both
psychoanalytically - oriented psychotherapy and somatic therapies are available. They
were selected for the additional reason that one serves predominately socioeconomic
Class I and II patients (Menninger Hosp.) and the other. predominately Class IV and V.

L

soclat'
the let
that tr
psychc
of noti
chothe

basis'

with tl
tient c
psycht

chiatr
reside

I

ciplin'

.wn-w

gists.

view

$

In

(MMHC).

Observations

Dia n

that tl
behav
the sa
sent 5
charg

classi
these

Hospital Structure

ducin;

reporting data from ones own institution. the structure of the hospital is taken
for granted. and either ignored or briefly mentioned. When approaching a new institution._
.When

distox
Note

the department of Experimental Psychiatry,
l/ N.From
Y.

Hillside Hospital Glen Oaks,

1... I. .

Aided. in part, by grant MY-Z715 of the National Institute of Mental Health; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.
The cooperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C. F.
'
Menninger Memorial Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
.

202

‘

and a
five-f
comp

rion

(

Disc}:

the c:
prove

�r,

7'

attempting to gather comparable data one is made aware of the differences
institutions and the nature of the hospital organization is seen as one of the methodoBoth the MMHC and Menninger institutions have day
logic problems affecting treatment.
physician can care for the
hospital units.and Hillside does not. At the MMHC the treating
clinic. In such a
in
the
and
after-care
in
the
hospital,
day
in-patient,
an
”me patient as
the
at
from
an earlier date,
hospital
,ctting’ the treating doctor can dischargeforthe‘patient
in
Hillside Hospiwhereas
his
patient's
care;
be
he
still
responsible
will
that
Mowing
of
the
relationship.
termination
patient-doctor
ux discharge means
towcvcr- and
in

.
"ru‘

~1uwv1

different research programs. affecting clinical
survey, approximately 20 percent of the patients
been
had
and
ill
hospitalized for many years. Such a group
at MMHC were chronically
state
would not normally have been in this hospital but they were transferred from another
hospital for special study purposes.
Designation of Type of Treatment
In our assessments of specific variables, we encountered a variety of problems associated with the content of hospital records. For example, it was difficult to determine
of time spent in
the length of stay prior to referral for a somatic treatment, or the length
that treatment. However, a major problem was to learn which patients were receiving
psychotherapy. Our task was not to define psychotherapy, but the much simpler problem
of noting Which patients were designated by the hospital as having been treated with psy- ‘
chotherapy. At Menninger Hosptial, psychotherapy was administered on a prescription
basis by a staff psychiatrist for which the patient was charged an additional fee. Sessions
with the psychiatric resident physician were considered part of routine administrative patient care and were not recorded as psychotherapy. At Hillside Hospital the definition of
psypsychotherapy was limited to treatment sessions with the psychiatric resident. Staff the
chiatrists did not treat patients directly, but restricted their activity to supervising
Another problem was the presence of
routincs- For example. at the time of the

.....

.
a.

“syn

a

-w~a.u.r--

M

-.M——-.—

5"

t

V_

.

.
,.

v.71
_

.I-uv-n-

‘-.p..o-i.m

‘W,

runny-.9.

-l

residents.

‘4,"V‘OQ‘M'A'ﬁ

In contrast, at the MMHC psychotherapy was designated as a function of many disciplines - psychiatric residents, nurses. medical students, social workers and psychologists. To ascertain whether or not a patient was receiving psychotherapy we had to inter-

view

the resident physician in charge of the case.

‘71-'Nuo-nyap

..._...,.

,—

—-—
-vw“

Diagnosis

-\»
,...

a...

assessment of diagnosis was another problem area. It is not surprising
that there are institutional diagnostic “styles which reflect staff orientations rather than the
behavior of the patient. Pasamanick and his associates (7) has shown that diagnoses within
the same institution are vulnerable to individual differences among examiners. In our present study. there were differences in the terminology of the discharge diagnosis. Discharge diagnoses at Menninger Hospital were more descriptive and employed a multiple
classification system. Table I illustrates several examples and shows how we converted
these into more generic categories that could be applicable to all three institutions. In reducing multiple diagnoses to single generic ones, we were aware that we were introducing
distortions through this maneuver.
Table II illustrates the distribution of diagnostic categories within each institution.
Note that at the Menninger Hospital there was a lower incidence of diagnosed schizophrenia
and affective psychoses. while the diagnosis of personality disorder exceeds by three and
five-fold that found in the other two hospitals.- We would emphasize that cross hospital
comparisons of populations basedpn diagnosis as the single or the most important criterion does not insure comparability of populations.
The

.i-u.v.-.‘Mdh&amp;

M

u--.

,

~

~m.va-».....
P...

wv"

4

r
..

R."

s

~.

,
.

—w

.

n—‘w—w-vw-

\*_sm,~,-.w...—mp--

'

7

”avcuuuft

Discharge Ratings of Improvement

.-

Similar problems exist for the equivalence of global ratings of improvement. As in
the case of diagnosis, Menninger Hospital had the most elaborate discharge ratings of improvement and Hillside Hospital. the simplest.
.

1

~

A

.w»

wo-ﬁ-‘v.

-

w-

2

203

l
':

l

.
.

T
1’

�TYPES OF DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS

Patient Discharge Rating
1. Depression Reaction
Narcissistic Personality
2. Anxiety Reaction
Narcissistic Personality
3. Narcissistic Personality
4. Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism Chronic
Infantile Personality
5. Passive Aggressive
Personality
Alcoholism
6. Infantile Personality
Schizophrenic Reaction
Schizo-Affective Type

Classification Rating
Psychoneurosis
Psychoneurosis
Personality Trait Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
'

‘

Sociopathic Personality

Disturbance

Schizophrenic Psychosis

TABLE II
DISTRIBUTION OF DIAGNOSIS (PERCENTAGE)
Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

Schizophrenia

41

52

52

Personalitybisorders

33

6

Psychoneuroses
Affective Psychoses
Organic Psychoses
Transient Personality
Disorder

14

18

8

21

16

5

l

5

2

2

6

100

173

N:

13

,

93
‘

As shown in Table, III the discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite and a
separate rating given for social, characterological and syndrome changes. Hillside and
MMHC had similar global ratings and it is difficult to state how much weight was given to
each of the three factors incorporated in the Menninger system. Such differences in systems makes it difficult to compare treatment results of hospitalization.

Hospitalization
Length of hospitalization for most illnesses, including psychiatric disorders, commonly denotes both severity of illness and response to treatment. As such. it is frequently
used as an index for interhospital comparison. Table IV compares length of hospitalization
by age at the time of the study. There was an observable relation between length of stay
and age within each institution, with age being inversely related to length of hospitalization.
Yet. among these three hospitals there were marked differences.
When diagnosis is employed a similar pattern is obtained. At Menninger Hospital the
over one
percentage of patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia who were hospitalised
'
year was 91%. at Hillside Hospital 35% and at MMHC. 77o.
204

We

11:

'

factor not
generalizir

,

methodolog

There
single diag

sociopsych
difficulty.

5‘

‘

Studiii:

birth, edui

nificantly 1.
improvemc:
choanalyti&lt;-

tures - one
the other.

‘

�TABLE III
‘

RATINGS OF CLINICAL CONDITION AT TIME
OF HOSPITAL DISCHARGE

Hillside

Menninger

Improved
Unimproved
r.

MMHC

“'““”i“"‘

,-

«a..——q

SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT

,

"VT'~M-»

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

a.

waw

9.9.
«an::r:r;t?.'ﬁ~'"'ﬁ'f”“

o“

.

Improved

CHARACTER STRUCTURE

Moderately Improved
Slightly Improved '
‘

Unimproved

Improved
Unimproved

.

.v-‘n.

1

.

Unimproved

’

~

~VWT~I

Regression

SYNDROME

..
V

'

Complete Remission

””"1"

Improved

Unchanged (or worse)
a'v‘r‘.':'§l':"t'.“"""""""‘

TABLE IV

.

HOSPITAL STAY BY AGE
PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP
STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

A~-;

_-

Inf.)

.
.,i

~-

-‘

.a-.&lt;__.

u-

.,.I

Age

Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

Below 20
20-29
30-39
40-49

81

42

14

73

36

6

61

30

6

30

20

0

50+

-_.-..-&lt;

vm

r
,

36

0

,

““*‘".'"‘-'-«rvm-AﬁuvnrcM-mvr“

V"

'

'

0

u‘

"rm-J'W-

V

12219122192
ﬂ."

j
J.“

~..

4....

We have indicated that the philosophy and organization of institutions is an essential
{actor not to be ignored in assessing observations and reports. Faced with the problem of

generalizing our findings, how do we overcome these institutional
methodological stumbling blocks to scientific activity?

‘.r‘a-..—..,._

differences that are the

«4“le

.-,...

a...

5“

-....

5hérv~naVvu

.--

a

.-.4

..

“4‘...

«a;

.v”

..

.

There is an urgent need for objective techniques to describe populations. The use of
diagnostic terms is obviously inadequate. It is likely that detailed behavioral and
sociopsychological descriptions of patients may be the best technique for overcoming this
single

«M-M~—,t...y.-.r,

difficulty.

Summary
Studies of the in-patient population of Hillside Hospital indicated that age, foreignbirth. education and stereotypic attitudes as measured by the California F Scale were significantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hospitalization. discharge ratings of
improvement and diagnosis. We have extended this study to other institutions offering psychoanalytically-orientedpsychotherapy and somatic therapies with different social structures - one the Massachusetts Mental Health Center. serving "lower-class" patients and
the other, the C. F. Menninger Memorial Hospital. serving "upper-class" patients.
.

‘vvw-WOv—u-wm-Mvr-

.
ws—vt‘v-~.o-‘-

.-,.
'&lt;

'

205

u

r
~-.

.
.-

”4...”.-.

�,rm

We have encountered a variety of problems in this comparison. including difference.
in l) the type of hospital organization; 2) the definition of the treatment as in the designstion of which patients were receiving psychotherapy; 3) discharge rating systems of clinical
improvement; and 4) diagnostic "styles” employed.

.....

~.

a

.w»-._.r

..x

a

The importance of these methodological problems in current psychiatric research are
discussed.
References
(l) Hollingshead, A. B. , and Redlich, F. C.: Social Class and Mental Illness: A Commun.
ity Study. New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons. Inc. . l958.

a...»

.'

(Z)

Gallagher, E. B. : Levinson. D. J. , and Erlich, 1.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics of Patients and Their Relevance for Psychiatric Treatment, in The Patient
and the Mental Hospital. edited by M. Greenblatt, D.J. Levinson, and R. H. Williams,
Chicago. Free Press. 1957.

, Pollack, M. and Fink. M. : Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital. J. Hillside Hospital 6: 216-228, 1957.

(3) Kahn, R. L.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric
Treatment in A Voluntary Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge
Ratings. and Diagnosis. A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 1: 565-574. 1959.
(5) Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J. Neu. Ment. Dis.‘ 130: 189-192, 1960.
(4) Kahn, R.

(6)

Myers, J. K. , and Schaffer. L. : Social Stratification and Psychiatric Practice: AStudy
of an Out-Patient Clinic, Am. Sociol. Rev.l 19:307-310. 1954.

(7)

Pasamanick. B. , Dinitz. S. and Lefton. M. : Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to
Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental Hospital. Amer. J. Psychiat. . l_l_6_: 127-132. 1959.
DISCUSSION

DR. KLERMAN:

One of the ways to overcome the biasing factors related to length of stay is to calculate the mean stay for each hospital. In this way interhospital comparisons of the effect
of such variables as age on length of stay could be compared in terms of quartiles.

.
r

.4

g

DR. POLLACK:

.9101.

..

;v

That's a good suggestion, however it still doesn't overcome the problem of differences in hospital structure. e. g. , the presence or absence of a day hospital facilities. in
inﬂuencing length of hospital stay.

«2'

‘Z

uhwﬁﬁl'nl

DR. OPPENHEIM:

The finding that younger patients tended to stay longer at the hospital seemed to be at
variance with experience at VA Hospitals. I ask what was it about the therapeutic programs at the three hospitals that led to these findings? What are the theoretical implications of these findings ?

“AL.

in
\:A
9;.-

.41:

...,

s

——....-.-A..—

.-..~u-....v-l-~

.e...

“4...-..“

-.‘_......-c

DR. POLLACK:

The length of time a patient is hospitalized in a psychiatric facility is related to the
particular function and philosophy of the institution. In those hospitals that stress psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy, patients who are most like the therapists with regard
to sociopsychological factors are kept in treatment for the longest period.
In studies of
out-patient clinics with a psychoanalytic orientation, it has been found that persons from
higher social levels. as determined by education and income, are treated longer. In contrast. in state hospitals the results are quite different. Thus, it has been shown that state
hospital patients with the least education will be institutionalized longer and are more
likely to become the chronic patients. Consistent with the concept of state hospitals as
largely providing long-term custodial care for lower class patients, the state hospital
psychiatrist may be oriented toward a comparatively more'rapid discharge of those
patients who come from a background most like his own.

206

v"

.va

—v

:

��Social Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in Three Hospitals:
Methodological Problems

Max

Pollack, Ph.D., Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D., and

Max

Fink, M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.
ﬁos
Presented at the Sixth Annual Veterans Administration Research
Conference, March 28, 1961, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Aided, in part, by grant MY~2715 of the National Institute of
From

Mental Health; and the Nassau County Mental Health Board.
The cooperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts Mental Health
Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital is gratefully
acknowledged.
IV:

h/17/6l

�Social ASpects of Psychiatric Treatment in Three Hospitals:
Methodological Problems

generalization of findings from one population to
another is basic to any science. Psychiatry, perhaps more
than other medical specialties, is plagued with controversies
concerning the non-reproducibility of results. One factor
responsible for this state is the failure of investigators to
adequately describe their populations and methods. The advent
The

of simultaneous multiple hOSpital studies makes possible the

detection and clarification of these methodological difficulties. We would like to describe some of the problems we
encountered in a recent tri-hospital study, and will consider
the variables of type of treatment, discharge diagnosis,

ratings of clinical improvement at time of discharge and
length of hospital stay.
Various social psychiatric studies of community and
heapital psychiatric populations (1, 2, 6) had established
the importance of sociopsychological factors in the type
and incidence of mental disorder, the selection and mainten—
ance of treatment and therapeutic evaluations.
previous studies such selective factors as the

In these

patient's

extent and type of available
treatment facilities may have been more significant in the
observed results than the social variables studied. A more

financial resources

or the

�-2-

critical test

sociopsychological factors in
treatment would be a study in a setting where the same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients,
regardless of their ability to pay. This requirement is not
at Hillside Hospital, and in 1957, we embarked on a program
of assaying the relation of sociopsychological factors to
the treatment of hospitalized psychiatric patients (3, h).
Each patient receives individual psychotherapy and by request
of his physician, somatotherapy (convulsive or psychopharmacological therapy). Almost all patients are non-chronic, as
their admission to the hospital is associated either with
first hospitalization or a recurrence of illness after a long
period of remission. The case load is small, with at most
ten patients to one resident physician.
Our method of

all

in—patients on
modified California

all patients.
birth,

role

of the

We

of

investigation was a census«type survey of
a given day (3). In addition a brief
F

Scale

observed

test

(2, 5) was administered to

that age, education, sex, foreign-

California F Scale were significantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hOSpitalization, clinical discharge ratings and to clinical diagnosis.
In order to test the reliability of these findings, we
repeated this study at Hillside Hospital in 1958, employing
the same procedures and, concurrently extended it to two
other institutions, the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital and
and performance on the

�-3the Massachusetts Mental Health Center

(MMHC).

These

insti-

tutions are similar to Hillside Hospital in that both
psychoanalytically - oriented psychotherapy and somatic
therapies are available. They were selected for the additional reason that one serves predominately socialogical Class I
and

II patients

and the

other, predominately Class

IV and V.

�-hOBSERVATIONS

Hospital Structure:
When

reporting data

from ones own

institution, the

structure of the hOSpital is taken for granted,

and

either

ignored or briefly mentioned. However, when approaching a
strange institution and attempting to gather comparable data
one is made aware of the differences in institutions and the
nature of the hospital organization is seen as one of the
methodologic problems affecting treatment. .Both the
Menninger
does

institutions

not. At the

MMHC

MMHC

and

hospital units, and Hillside
the treating physician can care for

have day

the same patient as an in-patient, in the day hOSpital, and
in the after-care clinic. In such a setting, the treating
doctor can discharge the patient from the hospital at an

earlier date, knowing that he will still be reSponsible for
his patient's care; whereas in Hillside Hospital discharge
termination of the patient—doctor relationship.
Another problem was the presence of different research
programs, affecting clinical routines. For example, at the
time of the survey, approximately twenty percent of the
patients at MMHC were chronically ill and had been hOSpitalized
for many years. Such a group would not normally have been in

means

this hospital but they

were

transferred

hOSpital for Special study purposes.

from another

state

�-5Designation of Type of Treatment:
In our assessments of specific variables, we encountered
a variety of problems associated with the content of hoSpital
records. For example, it was difficult to determine the
length of stay prior to referral for a somatic treatment, or
the length of time spent in that treatment. However, a
major problem was to learn which patients were receiving
psychotherapy. Our task was not to define psychotherapy,
but the much simpler problem of noting which patients were
designated by the hospital as having been treated with psychotherapy. At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy was administered
on a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist for which the

patient was charged an additional fee. Sessions with the
psychiatric resident physician were considered part of routine
administrative patient care. At Hillside Hospital the definition of psychotherapy was limited to treatment sessions with
the psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not treat
patients directly, but restricted their activity to supervising the residents.
In contrast, at the MMHC psychotherapy was designated as
a function of many disciplines - psychiatric residents, nurses,
medical students, social workers and psychologists. To
ascertain whether or not a patient was receiving psychotherapy
we had to interview the resident physician in charge of the
case.

�Diagnosis:
The assessment of diagnosis was another problem area.

It

is not surprising that there are institutional diagnostic styles
which reflect staff orientations rather than the behavior of
the patient. Pasamanick and his associates (7) have shown that
diagnoses within the same institution are vulnerable to individual differences among examiners. In our present study,
there were differences in the terminology of the discharge
diagnosis. Discharge diagnoses at Menninger Hospital were
more descriptive and employed a multiple classification system.
Table I illustrates several examples and shows how we converted
these into more generic categories that could be applicable
to all three institutions. In reducing multiple diagnoses to
single generic ones, we are aware that we are introducing

distortions through this maneuver.

II illustrates the distribution of diagnositic
categories within each institution. Note that at the
Table

Menninger Hospital there was a lower incidence of diagnosed

schizophrenia and affective psychoses, while the diagnosis of
personality disorder exceeds by three and five-fold that found
in the other two hospitals.

�We

would emphasize

tions based

that cross hospital comparisons of popula-

diagnosis as the single or the most important
criterion does not insure comparability of populations.
on

Discharge Ratings of Improvement:

Similar problems exist for the equivalence of global
ratings of improvement. As in the case of diagnosis,
Menninger HOSpital had the most elaborate discharge ratings
of improvement and Hillside Hospital, the simplest.
As shown in Table III the discharge rating at Menninger
Hospital was tripartite and a separate rating given for social,

characterological
had

and syndrome changes.

weight was

and

MMHC

it

is difficult to state how
given to each of the three factors incorpora-

similar global ratings and

much

Hillside

ted in the Menninger system. Such differences in systems
makes it difficult to compare treatment results of hospitaliza-

tion.

Hospitalization:
Length of hosPitalization for most illnesses, including
psychiatric disorders, commonly denotes both severity of

�-8-

illness

and response to

treatment.

As

such,

it

is frequently

interhospital comparison. Table IV
length of hospitalization by age at the time of the

used as an index for
compares

study. There was an observable relation between length of
stay and age within each institution, with age being inversely
related to length of hospitalization. Yet, among these three
hospitals there were marked differences.

diagnosis is employed a similar pattern is obtained.
At Menninger Hospital the percentage of patients with the
diagnosis of schizophrenia who were hospitalized over one
When

year was

91%,

at Hillside Hospital

35%

and

at

MMHC,

7%.

DISCUSSION

indicated that the philosophy and organization
of institutions is a factor not to be ignored in assessing
observations and reports. Faced with the problem of generalizing our findings, how do we overcome these institutional
differences that are the methodological stumbling blocks to
We

have

scientific activity?
is

for objective techniques to
describe populations. The use of single diagnostic terms is
obviously inadequate. It is possible that detailed behavioral
There

an urgent need

�-9sociopsychological descriptions of patients
best technique for overcoming this difficulty.
and

may be

the

�-10SUMMARY

Studies of the in~patient population of Hillside Hospital
indicated that age, foreign-birth, education and stereotypic
attitudes as measured by the California F Scale were signifi-

cantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hoSpitalization, discharge ratings of improvement and diagnosis. The
same therapeutic facilities were equally available to all
patients, predominantly middle-class, and ability to pay was
not a factor in treatment. We have extended this study to
Other institutions offering psychoanalytically-oriented
psychotherapy and somatic therapies with different social

structures -

one the Massachusetts Mental Health Center,

serving "lower-class" patients and the other, the C.F.
Menninger Memorial Hospital, serving "upper-class" patients.
We have encountered a variety of problems in this
comparison, including differences in: l) the type of
hospital organization; 2) the definition of the treatment
as in the designation of which patients were receiving
psychotherapy; 3) discharge rating systems of clinical
improvement; and h) diagnostic
The

"styles" employed.

importance of these methodological problems in

current psychiatric research are discussed.

�TABLE

I

TYPES OF DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS

PATIENT DISCHARGE RATING

CLASSIFICATION RATING

1. Depression Reaction

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

\2. Anxiety Reaction

Narcissistic Personality
3. Narcissistic Personality
h. Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism Chronic
Infantile Personality
5. Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism
6.

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction

Schizo-Affective

Type

Psychoneurosis

Personality Trait Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

DISTRIBUTION OF DIAGNOSIS (PERCENTAGE)

Menninger

Hillside

MEEE

Schizophrenia
Personality Disorders

hl

52

S2

33

6

13

Psychoneuroses

1h

18

8

Affective Psychoses

5

21

16

Organic Psychoses

S

l

5

Transient Personality

2

2

6

100

173

93

Disorder

N =

�TABLE

III

RATINGS OF CLINICAL CONDITION AT TIME
OF

HOSPITAL DISCHARGE

Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved
Unimproved
CHARACTER

STRUCTURE

Improved
Unimproved
SYNDROME

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Improved

Unimproved

Regression

�TABLE IV

HOSPITAL STAY BY AGE
PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Menninger

Hillside

yﬁﬁg

Below 20

81

h2

lb

20-29

73

36

6

30-39

61

30

6

ho-h9

3o

20

0

50+

36

0

0

ggg_

�REFERENCES

Hollingshead, A.B., and Redlich, F.C.: Social Class and Mental
Illness: A Community Study, New York, Joha Wiley &amp; Sons,

Inc.,

1958.

Gallagher, E.B.: Levinson, D.J., and Erlich, Y.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics of Patients and Their
Relevance for Psychiatric Treatment, in Ehe Patient and the
Mental Hospital, edited by M. Greenblatt, D.J. Levinson,
and R.H. Williams, Chicago, Free Press, 1957.
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Factors in
Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Heepital.
J. Hillside Hospital é: 216-228, 1957.
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis.
A.M.A. Arch. Gen.

Psychiat.

l:

565-57h, 1959.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Attitude
(California F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J. Nerv. Ment.

Kahn,

2i§.,

Egg: 189-192, 1960.

J.K., and Schaffer, L.: Social Stratification and
Psychiatric Practice: A Study of an Out-Patient Clinic,

Myers,

Sociol. Rev., 19: 307-310, 19Sh.
Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lofton, M.: Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a
Mental Hospital. Amer. J. Psychiat., 116: 127-132, 1959.
Am.

��Mmunattm of Patton Populations:
Catapult-ability of 5mm 2!: Evaluating Thmpiu Mam Mutation!
The

Mam Fink. M.

From
A

the

D.

Miami Its-mat. of Ptycmuy at 8:.

Loans

sum Hospital. 8t.

Loni:

hand an and“. madman: at tho mum. nuptial. New York in
ramwith
Du. R. I... Kuhn. N. 310901 and M. Pollack, and tar be puhmhod

«Remnant

'smmyohtﬂoqtal Aspects at madman Truman m m mammary Hospitals“
uin 1863.

�Recent community studies have demonstrated a
between social factors and psychiatric treatment.

relationship
In their study

psychiatric patient population, Hollingshead and
Redlich reported significant relationships between an individual's
position in the social class structure and the prevalence of treated
of the

New Haven

illness, types

of diagnosed disorders and kinds and duration of

psychiatric treatment administered (3). The influence of patient
economic status upon the availability of treating personnel, however,
was not excluded in these studies. To test the role of social
factors in the treatment of hospitalized patients independent of

patient's finances

and

availability of treatments,

undertaken at Hillside Hospital in 1957.

variety of treatment

In

a

survey was

this hospital,

a

including individual psychotherapy and
organic therapies are available to all patients regardless of their
ability to pay.
In the Hillside studies (h,5) it was observed that patients
hospitalized for the shortest period were the oldest, had the least
education and were most likely to have been foreign born. The older,
modes,

less educated patients were predominantly treated

by convulsive

therapy and received the more favorable discharge ratings. Younger,
native born and more educated patients were hospitalized the longest,

treated primarily

generally received the poorer
discharge ratings. The clinical factors were also related to a
measure of stereotypy, the California F Scale (1,6). Higher F
scores, i.e., greater stereotypy, were often found in patients
by psychotherapy and

�-2diagnosed as involutional psychosis

who were

referred for somatic

therapy, hospitalized for a shorter period, and more often were
rated as much improved or recovered.
Another hypothesis developed at this time was that differences
in various aSpects of psychiatric treatment among hospitals should
show the same relationship to social factors as noted within Hillside
Hospital. To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the
procedures of the 195? Hillside study in three institutions ~—

Hillside HOSpital, the C.F. Menninger

Memorial

Hospital of Topeka

the Massachusetts Mental Health Center of Boston. These institutions were selected with the expectation that they served patients
of different social classes. It was anticipated that in these
hospitals there would be a similarity in attitude towards treatment

and

and education.

is a teaching hospital with a full time superactive research departments. They emphasize

Each

visory staff and
psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy but provide other treatments such as somatic therapies and active programs of milieu therapy.
Each stresses short-term treatment of voluntary patients and does
not provide custodial care.
The specific aims of this study were to determine the population
characteristics of the three institutions with respect to social
class, age, education and F score: and to relate these characteristics
to the treatment variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and discharge evaluation among the institutions.

�-3METHOD

A

census of

institutions

all voluntary, adult patients in residence

in these

undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside Hospitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of
those at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned
by the courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic
was

schizophrenic state hospital group transferred for a Specific
research project. These patients were excluded from the study
because of their non-voluntary status.

given the
California F scale on the census day. Eighteen months later the
records of discharged patients were examined to determine the social
and psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure of social class,
the Hollingshead 2~factor index - a weighted score of education and
occupation - was used (2). The study population consisted of 173

patients at Hillside,

100

at Menninger

Each

patient

and 95

was

at the Massachusetts

Mental Health Center.
The

study included examination of the relations of the social

to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as
between

institutions.

These comparisons were

difficult

however,

because of various methodological differences discussed below. These
difficulties were most marked in the intrahospital comparisons, and

accordingly, in the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will
be placed on the differences between institutions with citation of
intrainstitutional trends. These difficulties also led to missing
information for some data, which is reflected in the varying
population sample sizes in the tables.

�4,.
RESULTS

A.

Inter-hospital Comparisons

l.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from a home institution, the
structure of the hospital is taken for granted and either ignored
or mentioned briefly. However, in studying a strange institution
and attempting to gather comparable data one is made aware of the
many differences between institutions. While we selected these
institutions as comparable in teaching, research and treatment programs, we found that they were unlike structurally in ways which
influenced the data of the study. Specific problems were noted in
the designation of type of treatment, diagnostic classes and the
evaluation of treatment outcome.
3) Designation of Type of Treatment: The criteria for designating that a patient received "psychotherapy" differed among the
institutions, making uniformity in classification difficult.
At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy was designated as treatment
administered on a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist for
which the patient was charged a fee. Sessions with the psychiatric
resident were considered part of routine administrative patient care.
At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with the psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did
not treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising
the resident physicians. No additional fees were charged.
When

�-5the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy was
designated as a function of many disciplines -- psychiatric residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students.
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident in charge of each case.
b) Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles made
comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed the
multiple evaluative data scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric Association while both Hillside and MMHC followed unitary
At

systems. Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed
in Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable
to that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortion.

Ratings of improvement at
the three hospitals varied in format and detail. The discharge
rating at Menninger HoSpital Was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes. Hillside
Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global ratings
making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor of the
c) Discharge Ratings of Improvement:

Menninger system (Table

II).

For

this study the Menninger

syndrome

�~6—

rating

was compared

to the global ratings of the other institutions.

----- ------Table

II

Sociopsychological Variables
The distribution of the variables of social class, age,
Jacation and California F Scale score among the three institutions
2.

is presented in Table III.

------------a) Social Class:

There was a marked difference in the

social

class composition of the three institutions. At Menninger Hospital
the population was predominantly upper class; at Hillside Hospital,

class;
lower class.

middle

b) age:

and

at Massachusetts Mental Health Center, predominantly

There were no differences in age

distribution in the

institutional populations.
c) Education: The populations differed in educational attain~
ment, with patients having more years of education at Menninger

Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center. While bl per
cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high school, only 32
per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger did not graduate.
d) F Score: Significant differences in the distribution of
scores on the California F Scale were observed. Fifty-one per cent

�-7of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per cent
with scores of 50 or above -- the higher F scores being associated
with higher degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside thirtyone per

cent

of

the patients had

F

scores below 30 while at

MMHC

only twenty per cent were below 30.
Thus, the anticipated differences in the social class of the
populations were observed, as well as significant differences in
educational attainment and performance on the F Scale. These differences permit testing the hypothesis concerning the relation of

sociopsychological factors to the treatment variables

among

the insti-

tutions.
3.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables
a) Selection of Treatment:

Among

institutions, significant-

ly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (h3%) received somatic therapy
than at Hillside (6h%) or MMHC (68%) as shown in Table IV.
b) Duration of Hospitalization: The three institutions differed
markedly with respect to

patient's length

of stay (Table IV).

Hospital patients were hospitalized longest, with 65% of
patients remaining for twelve months or more, uumynugd to 31 per baht
of the Hillside patients and only 5 per cent of those at the
Massachusetts Mental Health center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two-thirds of the
MMHC patients were discharged within six months of hospitalization.
c) Discharge Evaluation: In each hospital, most patients were
evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved" (Table IV). At
Menninger

�-9-

either none or fewer than five cases, thus not permitting a satisfactory intrahospital test of the hypothesis.
2. Intra-Hospital Comparison
With this methodological limitation some trends similar to
that found in the earlier study were observed, although few were of
statistical significance. With regard to selection of treatment,
for example, age and F score were found related at Menninger Hospital
(older and higher F score patients more frequently receiving somatic
therapy), and F score alone at Hillside.
Length of hospitalization and chronological age were related at
both the Menninger and Hillside Hospitals - the younger patients
remaining for the longest period. While such relationships were
significant in these two hospitals, a similar trend was noted at the
MMHC (Table V) where no
patients over ho, but lh% of patients under
the age of 20 remained longer than a year.
Table

V

-----------

�-10DISCUSSION

this

comparison of three voluntary

psychiatric hospitals we
have observed significant interinstitutional differences of patients
in the social variables of years of education and social class, but
not age: in distribution of California F Scale scores: and in each of
the treatment variables -- duration of hoSpitalization, selection of
treatments and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations.
The expectation that the institution serving upper class patients
In

the longest duration of stay,

higher proportion of
psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, lower
proportion of patients receiving organic forms of therapy, and poor-

would have

a

est discharge ratings were each confirmed. Similarly, the institution
serving lower class patients evinced shorter periods of hospitaliza—
tion, low proportions of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and better dis—
V

charge evaluations.

It is

our impression

that these differences in psychiatric

treatment are more related to differences in staff attitudes than to
differences in population samples. The contrasts between institutions in duration of hospitalization are great, as are the complexity
of diagnostic formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of
psychotherapy, and the details and amount of recorded data. These
.stylistic differences cannot be dismissed as merely idiosyncratic
since they follow a pattern related to social differences consistent
with previous

findings.

�-11-

population and treatment variable relationships appear to
be interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff as by the constellation of
Such

history which

patient may present. Such relationships
will be most marked in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, 343., where the objective criteria
symptoms or

a

defining diseases of known organic impairment are absent, as in
schizophrenia, psychoneurosis and personality and behavior disorders.
Under conditions of perceptual or situational ambiguity the observer's
attitudes and expectations become the basis for perception and classi~
fication. This view was clearly demonstrated by Pasamanick, Dinitz
and Lefton (7) in their study of variations in diagnosis within a
single institution. They observed that patients randomly assigned
to different wards did not differ in type of admission, marital
status, education, age or residence. Significant differences did
occur, however, in diagnoses among the three wards and among three
administrators on one ward. As it is highly unlikely that these
differences were inherent in the population, we believe they are
largely reflections of the attitudes of the examiners.
It is clear that many of the present psychiatric concepts of
diagnosis or clinical evaluation have relatively little meaning when
transferred from one institution to another. If these concepts are
taken literally the results become paradoxical. For example,
Menninger Hospital has the most highly trained personnel conducting
treatment, keeps its patients for the longest time and has fewest

�-12-

patients diagnosed as schizophrenia. And yet, despite these resources
and favorable factors, it reports the poorest treatment results. At
MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a therapist,
which keeps patients for the shortest periods, and which has a higher
proportion of the population classed asschizophrenia, the reported
treatment results are the best.

It is

probable that this study does not reflect the relative
therapeutic efficacy of the institutions. Our data furnishes no
independent criteria for determining which heapital provides the

better care; nor for assessing the comparability of the population
in the degree of

institution's

own

illness.

Since the evaluations are based on the
ratings, we believe that the differences reflect

variations in the criteria used for evaluation of improvement rather
than any intrinsic psychiatric characteristics.
In our initial Hillside study (5) it was postulated that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons of different
social background. It was suggested that the higher the person's
social background the more complex the criteria employed. This has

literally confirmed in the present study, with Menninger's using
tripartite rating compared to the global rating of the other two

been
a

institutions.

considering the syndrome rating on which our
comparative statistical analysis were based, it is our contention
that for lower class persons we are apt to assess improvement in
relation to symptom relief or the patient's capacity to resume work,
while for upper class persbns the criteria stress such complex
Even

�~13-

intangibles as "developing insight", or "working through one's problems."
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the role of
social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been considerably
impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational leader-

ship and the expectation that the recorded variables would be clearly
defined. But the differences in institutional style making it difficult to obtain comparable data are important cues to the problem of
the conventional use of comparative statistics, especially in the

evaluation of psychiatric therapies. The use of discharge ratings,
diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria
in therapeutic evaluations or the identification of comparable
populations are subject to considerable error unless the institutions
are clearly matched for social class patterns in patient population
and for staff attitudes and style. These difficulties may also extend
to the

failures of scientists to

confirm observations made in other

laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may be as much a reflection
of differences in populations and psychiatric criteria as to errors in
the original hypotheses. The widespread use of such terms as "schizo—
phrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore the changes in psychological
or biological features with mental illness has led to a science
burdened by negative

results.

Even were a

valid observation to be

reported from one laboratory, we do not have methods available to
describe populations adequately to provide a sound confirmation.

�-111-

Increased attention must be paid to the methodological problems of
classifying subjects by "objective" criteria rather than the present
methods which appear to be so highly dependent on institutional and
observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the thera-

pist-patient interaction.

�-15..

SUMMARY

and

CONCLUSION

In three psychotherapeutic-oriented teaching hospitals,
population characteristics were related to treatment variables.
1.

Populations were defined by social class, age, education and F score,
and were related to type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,
diagnosis and discharge evaluation.

Significant interinstitutional differences were observed in
characteristics of patient social class, years of education and
distribution of California F scores, but not age.
3. The variations in treatment characteristics among institutions were found to be significantly different in the predicted
direction.
h. These variations in psychiatric practices follow a pattern
consistent with social class differences among institutions and are
not regarded as being idiosyncratic.
S. The differences in institutional style make comparisons of
diagnoses, duration of hospitalization, and treatment results between
2.

institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more objective
criteria of classification of populations is emphasized.

�REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,

R.N.:

Authoritarian Personality,

The

New

York, Harper

&amp;

Brothers,

1950.

Hollingshead, A.B.:
graphed

Two-Factor Index of Social Position, mimeo-

publication.

Hollingshead, A.B. and Redlich, F.C.:

Illness:

A

Community

Study,

New

Social Class and Mental

York, John Wiley

&amp;

Sons,

Inc.,

1958.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Factors in the
Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside
£332., 9: 216-228, 1957.
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
Kahn,

Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis,
Arch. Gen.

Psychiat.,

l:

S65-57h, 1959.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis.,

Kahn,

130: 187-192, 1960.

Psychiatric Orienta—
tion and Its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital, Amer. J. Psychiat., 116: 127-132, 1959.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M.:

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification
Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality

Alcoholism, Chronic

Infantile Personality

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Sociopathic Personality

Alcoholism

Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo-Affective

Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of
At Time of

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome
Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Clinical Condition

Hospital Discharge

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

1;;

InterhOSpital Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Hillside

Menninger

Hospital

Social

Class

'v“

N

(87)

(133)

I

31%

7%

(72)

3%

20

28

III

17

3h

13

IV

1

3h

28

v

o

5

28

x2=121.5; df=8z p&lt;.001
'N

(100)

(173)

(95)

19%

19%

15%

20-39

59

58

52

ho

22

23

33

+

x3=3.9; df=h; p=n.s.
(100)
(173)

&lt;12

Education

Center

'

51

N

Years of

Mental Health

I

II

&lt;20
Age

Hospital

Massachusetts

i

(91)

23%

32%

h1%

12-15

Sh

51

h9

16

23

17

10

+

v3=9.7; df=h; p&lt;.os
(92)

(163)

(76)

10~29

51%

33%

20%

30-h9

hl

50

50-70

8

N

F

Score

17

L

i
2

I

y3=39.2; df=hi p&lt;.001

38

h2

.

�TABLE IV

InterhOSpital Differences in Treatment Variables
‘Menninger

Hospital
(100)

N

Type

of

Treatment

Hillside Massachusetts

Hospital Mental Health
(173)

Center
(89)

Psychotherapy

21%

36%

2b%

Somatic

h3

6h

68

Other

36

~-

8

1

e

a

_

_u

,

xi:82.8: df=h: p&lt;.001

N

Duration of

Hospitali—

zation

&lt;7

months

7-11 months

:il

months

(100)

(173)

(95)

22%

27%

67%

13

h?

27

65

31

S

a

’

X2=9o.6; df=h§ p&lt;.001‘
N

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation
.

Much

(99)

(172)

(88)

1%

23%

28%

Improved

80

62

61

Unimproved

19

15

10

lvwwy2=29.3; df=h; p&lt;.001

m“

N

Schizophrenia
Discharge
Diagnosis

”

Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder

(95)

(171)

(85)

h3%

52%

5h%

5

22

17

52

26

29

,

X2=23-83 df=h; p&lt;.001

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization BX,A§2

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

£53

Menninger

Hillside

mag

Below 20

81

h2

1h

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

h0-h9

30

20

50+

36

�A?

9/7

.

THE AMERICAN PSYCHOANALYTIC ASSOCIATION
SUMMARY AND FINAL REPORT

OF
THE CENTRAL FACT-GATHERING COMMITTEE

/f"

’4-4-‘"?;"é

/L\

W2}

The Central Fact—Gathering Committee was established by this Association
in 1952 and charged with the responsibility Of setting up a method for pooling :the significant data of psychoanalytic practice. Starting modestly and testing a procedure
that ensured professional secrecy, it was hoped that increasingly valid, meaningful
data might be accumulated. However, the long-recognized difficulties -- diagnosis,
nomenclature and measure of effectiveness -- all have led to increasing resistance
and a resultant falling-Off in the number of completed questionnaires. Scarcely
any
reports are now being received.

Therefore, it was recommended at the last meeting of the Association that
this Committee be discharged and its materiel stored until such time as further developments warrant confidence in the use of the statistical method in psychoanalytic
validation.

\7

This summary of the material is being sent to you for your study and files.
Although some members of the Committee thought otherwise, the Committee as a
whole, the Executive Council and the membership at the last Business Meeting of
the Association in December, 1957 approved the opinion that none of this material be
published. It is not that the figures can be used to prove analytic therapy to be effective or ineffective, but that the material on which either opinion may be based is
inadequately established, and controversial publicity on such material cannot be of
benefit in any way. We trust that all will agree and will limit discussion of this

‘

material to those professionally qualified to recognize its serious limitations.

is divided into two sections: Part I, the summary of the material from the Initial Questionnaires, and Part II, of the material from the Final Questionnaires.
This summary

‘

PART I

We received a total Of about 10, 000 Initial Questionnaires and 3, 000 Final
Questionnaires, from about 800 participants. Of the 800, about 350 were members of
the then total membership of 530, and 450 were senior candidates of the then total
600 senior

candidates.

SUMMARY OF DATA FROM INITIAL QUESTIONNAIRES

1. Sex:

Male: 48%.

2. Race:

v“ "114’

or

i'TéIIW?“IMI—TNT

315' 51;; g L);
(“lgﬂﬂIPV
iﬂfﬂ uuunwﬂkz
”v,
jQihﬁjﬁyrf
HaAll. n F.
F7!

:~

,

,LCJHJE:
.

[2‘3

,_
rf'
355:3
_ ,

White: 99%.

Female: 52%.

(U.S. Census: White: 89%. Colored: 11%.)

�3.

Age 9;

patients:

Percentage of total

Up to 12 years:

2
2

13-18

14
48
27

19—25

26-35
36-45

‘

46 and over:

8

4. Highest educational level: 60% of all patients are at least college graduates.
(25% college graduates, 8% attended graduate school, and 27% more completed
(U.S.Census: 6% are college graduates.)
graduate schooll)
.

:

5. income:
1—5

.

%
%

‘
1

in analysis:
in psychotherapy:

22
35

U.S.Census:

71

6-10
25

(In thousands)

11-15

28

16
13

23

6

'

16-20

21-40

8

9

'

1

16

13

41.69
4
2

Over

560,303
3
Z

(over $10,000)

6. Previous treatment:
Regardless of type of diagnosis, about 1/ 6 or 1/7 of all patients had had previous
analysis. 1/3 of the cases of neuroses and 1/2 of the cases of psychoses had had
previous psychotherapy. Some had had both. About half of the cases of psychoses
had had previous psychiatric hospitalization, as did 1/10 of the cases of neurotic
reactions and character neuroses.

cases being re-analyzed (i.e. , 1/6 of all), only about 1/6 of them
are being re.analyzed by the previous analyst. The other 5/6 chose another
analyst .
Of the group of.

7. Present treatment:
54% Of all cases in treatment are listed as being in analysis, and 46% in psycho.
therapy. The percentage runs from 60-65% in analysis in the neuroses, to 40% in
analysis in the borderline cases, and 20% in the schiZOphrenias,

8. Place of treatment:
Private oﬁice: 94%. Out-patient clinics:
9

4%.

Psychiatric &amp; general hospital: 1%.

. {reguency of treatment:
%
%

in analysis:

in psychotherapy:

Per week:
1

2

3

4

5

1

6

29

41

20

7

42

33

13

3

6

or more

&lt; 2'
Q1

10. use of psychological projective tests:
The tests are reported as being carried out in approximately 25% of the cases. In
75% of the cases given psychological tests, the clinical diagnosis was in agree.
ment with the tests .

�II.

-3...

213929§§§

Initial diagnoses: The following diagnostic listings are presented with full appreciation of and emphasis on their inadequacy, invalidity, uncertainty and probable
insignificance. It reminds one of Freud's remarks when chided about the lack of
statistics in psychoanalysis, in 1913:
"To compile

statistics is at present impossible.

To begin with, we work with much

smaller numbers than most other doctors who devote so much less time to individuals. Then, the necessary uniformity is lacking which alone can form a basis of
any statistics. Should we really count together apples, peas, nuts? What do we

call a severe case? Moreover, technique changes and what about the numerous
partially analyzed cases and those whose treatment had to be discontinued for external reasons? "
ORDER OF FREQUENCY OF GROUPS OF DISORDERS

Psychoneuroses
Personality trait disturbances (character neuroses)
Per sonality pattern di sturba nce s (borderlines)
Psychotic reactions
Perversions
Addictions
All others
Psychosomatic disorders co-exi stent in:

_

Percent of total

.

39

33
1

l

9
5
2
1

11

'

ORDER OF FREQUENCY OF SPECIFIC DISORDERS

Pas sive-aggres sive personality
Compulsive personality, &amp; Anxiety reaction (each)

16
14

Depressive reaction

SchiZOphrenias
Phobic reaction, Obsessive-compulsive reaction,
personality (each)

Perversions
Conversion reaction,

9
7
&amp;

Schizoid

Emotionally unstable personality (each)
Dissociative reaction, Inadequate personality, Cyclothymic personality,
Paranoid personality, &amp; Addictions (each)
Paranoia, &amp; Manic—depressive reactions (each)
&amp;

Psychosomatic disorders co-existent in:
Some additional data: Of the neurotic

6
5
3
2
1

11

reactions, dissociative, conversion,

de—

pressive and phobic reactions were much more frequent to times more) in
females than in males . Obsessive-compulsive reactions were somewhat more
frequent in males than in females. The diagnosis of anxiety reaction was made
equally in males and females.
(2

3

diagnosis of borderline disorders, "schizoid", "paranoid", etc. , and of
schizophrenia was equally distributed between males and females. Homosexuality
was diagnosed two to three times as frequent in males as in females, as were the
other reported sexual deviations.
The

�We have received about 3, 000 Final Reports. These were on cases that had
been in treatment at the time the CFC- program began, or that began treatment thereafter. As it became increasingly evident that significant figures could not be obtained
because of the previous mentioned lack of uniformity, we confined our study 110 a more
intensive investigation of the neurotic reactions that had ”completed" treatment. We
cannot say what happened to all of the cases that were in treatment during this program,
because only about 1/3 to 1/4 of the cases were terminated during this period. The
following information from the Final Reports may be of interest.

sis,

We found that out of 595 cases of neurotic reactions which undertook analy-

306 were reported

as having been "completely analyzed”, that is, approximately
years. (W ere this study to be continued, this
figure might be higher, as there might be a larger percentage of longer analyses. However, it would not be lower.) Follow—up questionnaires were sent to the participants
who had sent in these 308 " completely analyzed" reports. We received a return of 210
replies, that is 70%. Below is a summary of the supplementary information on the
above Final Reports of "completely analyzed" cases of neurotic reactions:
50%, and the average duration was 3~4

Is there any doubt in your mind regarding the diagnosis?
Did you think there was an underlying psychosis at any time?
Had the patient been in analysis previously?
Was the patient in standard, or classical, analysis?
Of

28%
25%
18%

90%

these

"cured" cases.

45

Yes:
Yes:
Yes:
Yes:

210 supplementary questionnaires received, 80 were listed as
In 35 of these, all of the symptoms were reported as "cured", and in

residual symptoms remained.

In the 130 questionnaires received on "improved"

was moderate in

74

cases, great in 46, and slight in 10.

From the above, one might draw the conclusion

cases, the improvement

that about

97% of

patients

who undertake analysis for neurotic reactions and "complete" it, are "cured" or "improved" . Of the 50% who do not complete their analyses in this group of disorders,
about half discontinue apparently because they were improved. The other half discontinue for "external" reasons primarily, because they did not improve, or were consid—
ered untreatable, transferred to other analysts, or required hospitalization. The most
frequent reason given for discontinuing, apart from being improved, was " external

reasons".

�-5RESULTS IN COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF N EUROTIC REACTIONS

Final

In
Analysis
Reports Analysis Completed Cured Improved Unimproved

Anxiety reaction

-

‘

1,120 cases

335

183

90

35

52

3

70

38

26

11

15

0

cases

85

46

23

11

11

1

Phobic reaction
000-X04 - 500 cases

200

104

61

17

42

2

170

108

43

14

28

1

250

116

63

29

34

0

14110

595

306

117

182

7

50

37

6O

3

OOO-XOl

Dissociative reaction
OOO-XOZ - 175 cases
Conversion reaction
GOO-X03

-

250

Obsessive-compulsive

reaction

OOO-XOS

-

500

cases

Depressive reaction
000—X06

-

700

cases

TOTAL

Average Per Cent:

REPORTED RESULTS IN

Depressive Reactions
Total Final Reports:
In analysis:
Cured
Improved
Unimproved

000-X06

Compl‘d
29

34

Discont'd
30
7
4

Untreatable
Transferred
Hospitalized
External reasons
TOTAL

250
116

Anxiety Reactions
OOO-XOl

Phobic Reactions
000—X04

335
183

200
104

Compl'd Discont'd Compl'd Discont'd
35
52

43

42

12

3

9

2

4

1

7

5

2

7

1O

29

2
1

2
1

63

53

90

93

12

61

43

�-5REPORTED RESULTS IN

Obsessive-Compulsive
Total Final Reports
In analysis
Cured
Improved
Unimproved

Untreatable
Transferred
Hospitalized
External reasons
TOTAL

Reactions,

Compl'd
14
28

OOO-XOS

170
108

Disoont‘d

Cured
Improved
Unimproved

1

441
232

Disoont'd

31

72

0
5
8

2

22

Compulsive PersonalityJ 000-X53
365
237

Compl'd Discont'd
29
77

62

3

l7

4

4

10

10

2

37
135

11

43

65

OOO-XZI

Compl'd

X29

—

234
42

97

Schizoid Personality
000-X42

Disoont'd

4
3
2

*

Compl 'd
5

8
6
3
5

28

Homosexuality
000—X63

82

Disoont'd

l3
9

1

7
i

33

1

34

128

101

4
9

35

109

185

HOSpitalized
TOTAL

Compl'd

OOO-XSZ

6O

1

Untreatable
Transferred

External reasons

Personality,

23

Schiz0phrenia
Total Final Reports
In analysis

Passive—Aggressive

65

CompchL Disoont'd
8

13
1

1

6

10

4

3

3

5

2
8

9

48

22

43

Inall these eight reported cures of homosexuality, follow-up communications indicated assumption of full heterosexual roles and functioning.
*

Thinking it might be of some interest to gather the opinions and general experience of the membership on the expectation of results, the following questionnaire was submitted to the membership about a year ago:

"Given a young person, whom one could analyze four years or more, with
all conditions favorable, what would be your expectancy of result, in percentage, of cure, improvement and failure" -- for a list of neuroses, char—
acter disorders, schiZOphrenia, schizoid personality and homosexuality.
were the opinions:

We received 120 replies from the membership of about 650. These

�-71. 45% expected no cure in any of the conditions.
2. 35% expected a 50-100% cure in the neuroses, less in the character
3.

disorders, psychoses and perversions.
expected a 5~40% cure in the neuroses, less in the other con-

20%

ditions

.

those that expected no cure or a low percentage of cure, 50% expected moderate improvement, 45% great improvement, and 5% slight improvement. Of
those that expected some cures in the various condtions, the average expectancy of
cure was:
Of

. 50% in

anxiety, conversion and phobic reactions.
in dissociation, obsessional and depressive reactions.
in schizophrenia.
4. 20% in homosexuality.
1

2.
3.

33%
10%

If these figures are combined with the reports of those expecting
the
no cures,
percentage of cure would be about half, i.e. , 25% in anxiety cases and
phobias, 15% in dissociation, obsessional and depressive reactions, 5% in schizo—
phrenia, and

10%

in homosexuality.

Our "findings" suggest a higher percentage of ”cures" than the

above opinions. (Please note quotation marks!)

All of the foregoing have been presented before

closed meetings

of the Association and to a number of the societies. Details are available to those
members who request them. As Chairman of the Committee, I should like to thank the
members of the Committee, the membership, and the participating candidates for their
cooperation, advice and criticism.

Respectfully submitted,

HIW:as

1/5/58

Harry I. Weinstock, M.D.
Chairman
Central Fact—Gathering Committee

different times during the past five years the Committee has included: Drs. Leo H.'
Bartemeier, Roy R. Grinker, David Kairys, Lawrence C. Kolb, Lawrence S. Kubie,
Alfred O. Ludwig, Milton L. Miller, Milton Rosenbaum, and George W . Wilson, and
our consulting Statistician, Jack B. Chassan, Ph.D.
At

�Janusry 15; 19590
é

:9: Br. n. rink

art.

R.£. Kuhn and H. 51:111
sunancrs ﬁneiul Payehidtrxa study gt manningcr reuadntien,
3.3“,’ 5‘10. 1959‘

yuan:

arrived in rapuka rhmrudc ‘evnning, atnuary 7, ;nd
ut
tn. Paundttian nsrly t a nuxt sarning. Dr. Irving
rupcrtud
Kurt“: ta. Biractor of tho ﬁ.¥. Xanainqur Munorial Baupital,
.1 panel: zraaious and eaoparativa 1n urtry way. Eu bud
Ill
proyurod the stat: tad patients hatarahand in untiakput1an'at
var visit. 8t:f£ coapsrﬁtion at :11 1:101: wt: oxealltnt.
rhnrn In: guaninc intsrcst in car :tudy and us had intnrusl
Wu

dincuaaiana with maths»: of tho

stati.

Br. Kurtuu Int us ans hi! 05:13: us

air

handgunrtcra In&amp;

and. nrrnnaauunﬂs tnr um kt lﬁﬁﬁrﬁ :11 nppoin$n¢ntc and obtain
‘11 rouardn ind ropcrtn that I: ﬁliirtdu Przar ta «at again;
had tskud a: ta pruvidc him with ma iuiaruﬁtion uncut
I.
indinntin: I11 tun rocord data uttdiﬁ for nut thudy. the
nonienl runawaulibrtrinn and he: auatntuat Iptnt fair 6‘}!
conp1¢$1ng taut. turn: ta dotnil. siuau sat: a! thin inturuatian
was net raudtly avuiltblu in tho ehtrﬁs, ﬁr. xtrtnu aunt t for:
to all t». stat: «twist. in ob$u1n thin inxﬁrnnticn chart noqdnd.
It w¢n1a havc takuu a: pnrh¢pl two nugka ta obtain :11.thu rneard

intornﬁttan aurlclv¢t.

ways.

Thu

a»

“

the patiunts It! caninotud in two
Iatull tasting of
60
worn aollantaé 1n the
tharaday ubaut
pttiantt
$ha
on
and

t¢utod an aging.
:yuanuinn
rlnuinlng attiﬁutu
Pridny,
tautcd indiviaunlly in thtir
reams. baring the Friday tcnting
tart
a uﬂgtr nurt¢ nacnuytuiod at 3% all tinnt.ha that as short the
various putauuta warn locatad and ta intradusu us ts Glah puticnt.
Br. Kartun yartiaipatad in tha udniniutraﬁioa at thg test an the
dinturhad ward and gran It?! 1% ta a to: pittantn himself.
Arrangancntu atrn undo tar tho raeaxﬂulihwnriun ta sand
an tau disahnrxc data can: a manta during ﬁhu next ynnr.
an sgtarday neruxng, priar ta war dapnrturq, a: disuuaaod
with m. 031‘an Murphy, Br. allay Gardner
”lurch
tad Br. Rahart wallontttan. In tddi$1mn, aw dinunnnad garnet:
z! ta: «linieal prusrnn with Dru. Rorbnrt auhlguingcr and Philip

“that”

“lﬁ‘ﬁnn

or our Viuit thanks
ortry objectiva
to tha oxtrauraxntry eaaporttion a: tan manningar atntt,
partinnlnrly Br. x;rtns. tun ltr¢et0r at tho huipxtnl and Eva.
tauntu, thc modicul ruacrau 13hrnr1an. Ehuy war. ‘11 nuts
xraaiaully httpitnblc and and. “a I‘ll-vulcanu and ut hunt.
In unitary

V0

uehiovod

,

3&amp;1143

�7‘,

-.

nay-u

JIRU‘VV

1%:
FRQH:

Br. a. link

art.

svnaxata

ﬁ¢L. Kuhn and

I.

15; 1959;

5103:!

antatl Ptrahiuhria study

Jlnuury 5‘10; 1959*

uﬁ

nhnninsar-rvunégtiqn.

a. arrivad in Tapaku Ehnrtdu atoning, January 7, and
rqpurttd ut tau runndnttun curly' a ncxt attains. Br. Irving
Itrtus ta: Biruetar of ﬁn. 6.3. thningar Hanurinl Balpitnl,
was cx%rnmu1y grngiuuu mad weapcrntivn in OVQ?’ may. 30 haﬂ
yrtynrtd sh: stuff gnu pat$nnt¢ butarokund an tnttaipntian ct
an? vilit. ﬁturt aunyaratiaa at I11 Ivvalu in» axaalloat.
tag». it: cnnutne inturast in an: Iﬁuty luﬂ a: hlﬂ tatarnal
dinausttvnn with unabcrn o: tha staff.
ﬁr. Kurtu: Int an nﬁo h1¢ oxttac I! an: hundquartorl aha
and. arraugnnnnsa In: up %n tantra n11 uppaintncnts and abiain
:11 rtearéu and ropnrtn that u: dusivgd.. trig? ta but G§I$ﬁ8
ha had ankud.uu tn pruvidn bin with an iniurnntiun nhutt
inﬁiotting n11 tun rianvd alt: uoaéod tar mar ntndy. 2h:
uptuﬁ :01: any:
nudietl racirdnlibrnrinu and haw aasiat3nt
«unwitting thcua turn: in datnil. $1300 can: 0: this information
was nut ra:d£1y artil‘blc in sh. ahsrtc, nr‘ Rattan goat u tar:
£9 :11 thc atatt dactarn ta abtuan than internatiun want. aci¢ad.
I$~Vﬂﬂlﬁ hava ﬁakan 1‘ yarhupa tun wash: to obtain all tho roaord
information ourscvaaa
the aatual tuttinc at thu‘pnticntc wan gnuaucttd an in:
nnyu. an fluvial: ukout 60 pntacntn vars eelltutaé in th.
gylanpiun tag tpntoa gm amass. .an rrtany, «a; rcxnining'puttaatu
thy wridty touting
var. tantné ludtvadunlly in that: ragga. ﬂaring
saaw
$0
no they. in:
taunt
ﬁt
neuonpnaicﬁ
as
all
I uttti aura.
variant patiuutl wart lﬁﬂltid qua to intraduau as to naah patient.
Br. tartan partiaipntgd in Eh. téuiniatrution at thp tun! an tbs
diatarbod ward and gran ggvc at ta a In: pntiantl hinant.
Arringauantt wart ugd¢ tor tho rgeerdtlihrnritn ta 30nd
In the dinahlrxa data «an: a lauth ﬁuring thu nmxt ymar.
on antardny-morniux. print ta gar d¢purtnrc nu digcuuand
rtactr¢b nativitlna with nr.0%x§mma'nurphy, Br. £11.: euranar
aaa 9r. iﬂhltt waxlumataia. In .dditiau, I. dinuuaaca anptati
giltho ulinietl procran with Dru. Earhart achltaiagtr tad ﬁhilip
‘ﬁﬂﬂﬂa

In summary it anhicvnd_tvury ahagat1Vt or an: viast thunk:
ta th: axtrtorainury anuparatgan g: tho Hunnincsr utatt,
and Era.
pnrtioulurly Br. Knrﬁmt. in: ﬂirtator a! :5. hospital moa£
$3:
wart
rhuy
nodisul-rnaorﬁs
all
librartua.
xntntu,
[racinuuly hatyttgblt and and. In Incl tblaﬂlﬁ and at boat.
ILK:JB

��wwwmgunm
ﬁummﬁmmmhmmhwbmlw
mswm‘mwmmmwwwmnwmw

2mm

“WgLoW

numm

�Jun! 17’ 1959;

Dr. Hilton Graanblatt,

Haosachusetta Hontal Health Cantor,
72-7h Fonsood Road,
Boston, 15, lane.
Dear

Kilt:

I want to take thio opportunity to
parsonally thank you and your Staff for the
excellont cooperation shown the Billoide workers
during their racont visit. They returned laden
with considerable data and enthusiastic about
the spirit and onthuaiasa manifested by your
Staff. I an aoot grateful for your oooporation.

/

sincerely yours,
,

,.

éox Fink, H.D.

foJB

�����Q4:

mmmnwm:mun.nm:mmw
mamas
'

"

wMMummuanmmu
_gm“, Mm.

uuuwuﬁumnmuumazr-

hunt“.

"

“mama. 7pm.; mm
«m,
a gm mm m mm:
'

V»4,.ﬁ,_,§.,..r*

3.

Age" A

tu

Miamiwnuanhmmummumh‘

��1/”
[W
W
J7

fké,

fax»:

.7

.2

=_7

adv/O

gala; ,Afuuzs

a CH“;

;

NV/
g
xY/

A

A3

/

‘3~*‘~/7::¢4

-

ls-

925“
'0’?

4a

9

09%

W [W751

13.9140

4

dew/9,567

)

M42

ﬂF/ﬁf.

J adeN‘

&gt;

.7

Fm”.

MM
5% F

A?”

ﬂu—

ﬁnk. fut.

#mmduiui’

Fay: Q.

�APR 5

I!!!
HOSPITAL

1. nillnidt
2. nonningar
3. Hnn¢* nautil

2,3,k.

PATIENT HUMBER

5.

SE:

6,7.

AGE

Ectlth

1. Kilo
a. Funnio

--,
on.

Exact

no

Ago
,

intnrn;ti¢n

RAGE

1. Whit.

Euro
0th.:0. la inrornntien
2.

3.

RILIGIGH

1. Pratauttnt
2. c;thalie
3. J¢ n
09. in“ r nu inxorattion

10.

szArua‘

KARIYAL

1. Bingld
2. marriud
3. separated
h. Divorecd
5. Widow‘d
6.

la intaruttioa

anueArIol
1. l¢n¢
2. 1~6 yuarn
3. 7

h, .

a

s 9’11

‘

o

6 . 12
7t

13-15

a . 16

9 . 17*

e . nu

internatiaa

uma

�«.2...

12.

PLACE

1.

2.

0! 31313

USA

reroitn tern: lagliah Bpatking

'
'

3.
h.
5.
6.
7.
8.

o.
13.

21‘38

1.
2.

3c
.
gammy

‘

‘
9‘-

F‘

O
C‘

U
amrunwb

4t

O

.
“”6

o‘

u

90

0.

15,/9

n

*

'

"

I

u
*

*

ﬁ

:
x

H

I

t
I
1

countricl

Girntnia &amp; Scandiuu
tvinn
Ittly
Prune. &amp; aplin
slavie natiaun
Latin Ancriet
ethnr
In internation

I! 9.5.A.

lativv beta
Lap: thua
1*h

1

S~9

10~19

29.29
30+

30

infatuation

69

at

79»?!
89-69

1...

90~99
16¢~199
110~119
120~12y

1 0‘13?
1 0*

Ia intarmation

163 A? FIRE! PSYCHIATRIC 363156!
-.. lxaet Ag.

inrornltion
PATIEIT'S sachL CLASS
1. 61:” 1
2. class 2
00“ He

3o

01".

h. 81:”
§.v 91:0: 5
9. 5113301“!
IBHIIR

:

OF PRIOR HOﬁPITALIﬁATIONB
«a

murmur-i

9.
0.

«I

8*

Ho

intomuntion

�.3...
TOTAL PERIOD OF PRIOR

xxrxnxxxczs
Lola than 1 nonth
1-5 not.
6’11 ‘0. t

HOﬁPITAL

1.
2.
3.

h.
5.
6.
7.

‘Ow

0.

12~17

not.

1%-23 “58¢

2h~35 non.
36-h? mac.
h3~59 ”0‘.
5+

No

year:
internation

COHDITION A? DISCHARGE

2.
3.

Hueh‘inprovod; rocovarod
Inprovod
Unchangod or Ilightly wort.

o.

Ho

1.

a.

Docctncd

informatien

913081861

OR

DIAGH0313

l.
2.

ESTABLISHED

Psyahauis: Schiaephrcnic reaction
Paychenia: Afroetiva rotations

3. Payeheniﬁz

Dynamic

h. Paychonnurotie Bisordcr
5. Pornonulity Dinardnr

6‘ Transient Situational Peranality
ls
0 Ha inlermatian
General
Paychothornpy
30?

TREATMEHT:

+3
no

internatian

TREtTEEﬁTT
IRELTHEBT:

1.
2.

easia#¢——

Psychotherapy
Payeheanulyais
Paychethnrapy: ”.9.
Psychethortpyc 0th.:
Gran; Thcrnpy

Unlpoaiticd
Ho

psy¢hethorapy

lo infatuatien

�“aTREATMENT:

1.

2.

Hoprob., dopral, oqunnil

h.

1 + 2
1 + 3
2 + 3
1 + 2 + 3

3.

S.

6.
7.

8.

29/

ORGANIG

Phonothyaninou (OP,P,Tr11

9

C

O

O

Tafranil

Gthor

organic trcatunnt

Ne

intermatian

Ho

LENGTH 6F HOSPITALIZATION
BEFORE GRGAHIC TREATMENT

Lo:a than

t‘
11- 2

M?“

weeks

menths

k'

5:6

78
9-10

omwmmru

1 waak

u

"
"

11 + months

No

25.

infcrmation

LE GTE OF CURRENT HOSPITALIZATIE
Under 1 menth
t
v-

t
o
wmwmmrwmwu

I

2
3

manths

months
h-S manths
6 months
7~8 months

9-11 month:
12 month:

(1‘.

2?, 2-

.

.‘

13+ months

No

informtticn

"F"

SCORE
—-. a exact

00.

~

Ha

scorn

information

)

�0

\, $550014’o

s 0%
'P

~_/”‘

A

§

PA-

N A M H

G H

‘1”

a

f

‘64,

.

,
'_

«a

V

’4L Raﬁ»

Psychiatric

Group

Association for

Health
Insurance Inc.

Mental Health

Association

PROJECT SPRINO7-6000. Ext. 399

RESEARCH
22' FOURTH AVNUE.

NEW VORK3N.V-

(Invettigation Into the Insumbility 0f Pch/aiatric Treatments)

Helen H. Avnet, Proiect Director

November 28,

ADVISORY COMMITTEE

l 960

Harvey J. Tompkins, M.D.
CHAIRMAN

lea

Perlis
VICE-CHAIRMAN

A. Oakley Brooks
Martin Cherkasky, MD.
John M. Cotton, M.D.
Jack Elinson, Ph.D.
Sylvan s. Furman
David Goldstein, MD.
Clarkson Hill
Paul H_ ”och, M.D.
William A. Horwitz, M.D.
Lothar B. Kalinowsky, M.D.
Mack Lipkin, M.D.
Henry B. Makover, M.D.
Martin E. Segal
Leo Srole, Ph.D.

Partic£9ating PSYChiatri-Sts

FROM:

Harvey
P

J.

Tompkins ,

M. D.

and John

M.

Cotton,

1...;

Participating

Psychiatrists, the Project, covering a sample group
Of 76’ 000 Persons’ has been
operating satiSfaCtorll-y
Since July 1,1959

HarrYl.Weinstock,M.D.
Bernard Wortis,M.D.

Attached

msma

is

a

report

pating psychiatrists,

REPRESENTATIVE COMMITTEE

Int erest 1‘18-

MANHATTAN:

John M. Cotton, M.D.
CHAIRMAN

An

on our survey of particithink you will find

Which we

address recently

made by

ArthurHH. Harlow, Jr.

PrESident of Group Health Insurance, Inc., on the first,
year' 5 experience under the Project, will be summarized
in the December issue of the Bulletin of the New York
State District Branches of the American Psychiatric

KINGS:

Morton H. Hand, M.D.

BRONX,

Jacobo. S-Jaeger,M.D.

QUEENS:

ArthurW.Schappe|l,M.D.

Association.

NASSAU:

Irving Chipkin, M.D.

If

SUFFOLK:

Robert Wagner, M.D.
WESTCHESTER:

Miltiades Zaphiropoulos, MD.

write us
r equ est.

you would like additional information please
and we will be happy to comply with your

NEw JERSEY:
David Flicker, M.D.

DEPARTMENT
EXPERiﬁ'l {ﬁlial

or

”ii

PSYEW

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS.N

NOVZ 31960

M. D.

sycuratric Research Pro;. ect

Thanks to the cooperation of our

S.

APA

T02

SUBJECT ..

.

.

National

American

I

1

ulna! Illness (3

Me

Financed by National Institute of Mental Health and Group Health Insurance, Inc.

�QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF PARTICIPAIING PSYCHIATRISTS

possible aid in the eventual evaluation of results of treating Project
professional qualifications and customs of
participating psychiatrists.
As a

cases, a survey was conducted on the

age, sex, and

for

participants,

returned questionnaires. In addition, data on
qualifications were obtained from the latest medical directories
of the non-reSpondents.

Of 1150

many

1008

In order to encourage the broadest possible response, the questionnaire was
limited to one page with a dozen questions in all, mostly check-offs, and with
space provided for comments.

are:

From

the Project's point of View, the most important findings of the survey

(1) The great majority of participating psychiatrists are well
qualified, judging by accepted standards in the field.
(2) Over three-quarters of participants regard themselves as
primarily analytically and psychologically oriented in their approach
to treatment.

‘

é‘EX, AGE;.,L9.CATION

- (Tables

1

- 3)

More than half the participants are between 35 and 49
years of age. About
every tenth participant is a woman. The majority practice in Manhattan, although
the suburbs are fairly well represented.
TABLE 1

—

SEX OFﬂgAgILQIPATING

PSYCHIATR;§1§#

Male
Female
TABLE 2

-

AGE

1001 (88 per
138 (12 per

cent)
cent)

Dl§IgIBUTION
Age Group‘

Egmbgr

28-34

187
204
144
224
168
99

35-39
40-44

45~49

50-54
55-59
65

60-64
and over

Total
*excludes those who have resigned or

in Group

71

42

1139*
who

have died

ger Cent of Total
16.4
17.9
12.6
19.7
14.8
8.7

6.2
3.7

100.0

�Page 2.
- AREA OF PRACTICE

TABLE 3

Number

Area
Manhattan
Brooklyn

in Area

Per Cent of Total
57.0

649
98

8.6
5.2
1.9

59

Queens
Bronx

22

Staten Island
New Jersey

.4

5

6.4

73

7.0

79

Nassau

Suffolk

4.3
5.8

49

Westchester

66
16

Rockland

Other

Total

~23

1.4
2.0

1139

100.0

TYPE OF PRACTICE

participants confine their practice to hosPital work. The majority
Forty-three per cent treat only in the
treat
office, referring their hospital cases to colleagues.
Seven out of ten answering this question (1000) report that they also do
out-patient clinic work.
Only 17

both office and hospital patients.

QUALIFICATIONS

Of 1096

either

participants for

whom

information is available,

cent are

85 per

Diplomates of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology or are ”Board

per cent are qualified as psychiatrists, with an ”SI"
rating, under the New York State Workmen's Compensation law. 0f the remaining
13 per cent, 6 per cent are accredited as psychiatrists by the New York State
Department of Mental Hygiet e, with the "QP" rating, and 7 per cent meet the quali—
fications for membership in the American Psychiatric Association.

eligible." Another

Table 4 shows
TABLE

two

this over-all distribution,

and Table

5

breaks

it

down by age:

4 - QUALIFICATIONS

DPN*
DPN

‘

.

Number

Per Cent

Cumulative Per Cent

585

53. 4
31. 8
2.1

53.4
85.2
87.3

7.1

100.0

eligibility only* 349
23
SI rating only**
61
QP rating only***
78
APA membership only
Total

Known

1096

5.6

9239

100.0

*Diplomate, American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology
**Qualified as psychiatrist under New York State Workmen' 3 Compensation Law
"
"
***
by New York State Department of Mental Hygiene
-

�TABLE 5

- QUALIFICATIONS

Page 3.

AND AGE

Per Cent of Age Group with
Boards or Eligibility SI Rating Only

Age Group

28-34

90

40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59

89
-

60-64
65 and over

'All Groups (Total Reporting1096)

*less than

1

*
*

80

35—39

2

87
90

3

86

2

71

68

8
10

85

2

*

per cent

ORIENTATION

invitations to participate in the Project were issued, reasons for nonparticipation were also solicited. Most refusals were based on the practitioner's
analytic orientation: The 15 sessions provided by the Project were felt to be far
from adequate in terms of the respondent's usual ”A-P” (analytic and psychological)
When

approach to treatment.

Since the "D-0" (directive—organic) and eclectic practitioners were more apt
to be optimistic about the effectiveness of short-term therapy, there seemed a
possibility that enrollment from these groups might dominate the list of participants.
This theory was effectively demolished by the survey. Of over 1000 respondents, 77 per cent checked ”analytical and psychological” as their primary orientation, 10 per cent checked "directive and organic,” and 13 per cent checked "other",
usually specifying "both” or a combination of the other two such as "organic and

psychological.”

Although the majority with the primary A-P orientation exists at every age
level, it becomes less of a majority with each age increment, so that what starts
out as a 92 per cent A-P orientation, in the youngest group, comes down to a 53
per cent A-P orientation in the over-60 group, as shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6

-

PRIMARY ORIENTATION AND AGE

.

Age Group

Per Cent of Each Age Group with Specified Primary Orientation
Other
A-P
D-O
Combination

28-34
35~39

92
89

2

3

40-44

85

3.

50-54
55-59
60 and over

76
61

10
21

45~49

All Groups(Total
Reporting 1002)

6
8
12

53

25

14
18
23
22

77%

10%

13%

59

18

�Page 4.
A primary orientation toward one approach does not of course mean that an
individual will always use that approach. A psychiatrist who is primarily A—P
oriented may use organic approaches on occasion, as shown below.

ATTITUDES

TOWARD

DRUGS,gSHOCK THERAPY, GROUP THERAPY

Drugs appear to be almost a

universal tool

among

psychiatrists

(98

per cent).

0n shock therapy and group therapy, there were far fewer answers, and it is
impossible to evaluate whether a non-response indicates a negative attitude or an
oversight. But a comparison of the number responding to each question may in itself
be indicative to some extent of the degree of acceptance achieved by each method of
treatment. The total responses and the percentage of affirmative answers follow:

Total

QEEEEEQE
Do

"
H

you
"

drugs?
prescribe
”

I!

Per Cent Affirmative
98

952
693

shock therapy?
group therapy?

H

Number of Answers

75

51

69".

A cross-tabulation of the answers to these questions with the primary practice
orientation of the respondent shows that the use of drugs and shock treatment is not
a distinguishing characteristic of any group, although the non-A-P's are much more

apt to

recommend shock

therapy than their colleagues.

- PERCENTAGE OF REPORTING PSYCHIATRISTS

TABLE 7

AND GROUP

WHO PRESCRIBE SHOCK THERAPY, DRUGS,
THERAPY, BY PRACTICE ORIENTATION

Per Cent of Each Orientation Who Prescribe -

Practice Orientation

Shock Therapy
68

A—P

D-O

92
90

Combination

Drugs

Group Therapy

100
100

50

54
34

97

There appears to be no dearth of personnel ready to administer shock therapy
this) or to conduct group therapy (208 checked this).

(247 checked
FEES
A

question was asked as to differentiation between fees for initial consultatior
Of 981 respondents, 45 per cent do differentiate, 55 per cent do not.

and treatment.
The

question as to the respondent's usual fee for a private office session

brought 987 responses, of which 789 were explicit, 198 stated a range. In other
words, 20 per cent of the respondents do not have a set fee. For most of these, the
range indicated was either $15-$20 or $20-$25, but there were instances of a twentydollar spread in the usual fee - e.g.,"$lS-$35" or"$30—$50".
For those

stating

a

definite usual fee, the distribution is as follows:

Usual Fee

$15
$20
$25
$30 or more

Per Cent Charging
11

49
36
4

�Addendum:
PSYCHIATRISTS

AND THE OPERATION

OF THE PROJECT

Because of the enthusiastic response of psychiatrists to the Project, one of the
disappointments of the first year's Operations was the relatively small number who
actually saw a Project patient - fewer than a third of the participating psychiatrists.
This includes cases treated by more than one psychiatrist, and multiple cases in the
same family (usually treated by the same psychiatrist). The number of psychiatrists
and patients* seen by each was as follows:
Number of

Psychiatrists

Number of

201

1

Each

1

63
21
15
8

4

Patients
2

3

4
5
6

each

7 ,8,9,10,11

*Excluding cases having hospital care only.

Psychiatrists having a
in relatively short supply.

number of

cases are usually child psychiatrists,

who

are

all participating psychiatrists, the psychiatrists who treated
on the whole somewhat better qualified (91% vs 87% having Boards
eligibility) and somewhat less primarily A~P oriented (67% vs 77%). The

Compared with
Project cases were

or Board

treatment. they rendered was mostly individual office psychotherapy. Four per cent
of the cases were hospitalized; seven per cent received shock therapy (including
hos—
pital cases); three per cent received group therapy; seven per cent received psychological testing. Ig_thi£ty-five per cent of the office
drugs were prescribed
at one time or another during the course of treatment. cases,
0n the basis of the few (36) Project cases treated by two or more doctors, it
would appear that psychiatrists are rarely in exact
agreement about the diagnosis of
a particular case. In 12 cases there was a basic difference as to the severity of the
condition, with one doctor calling it a psychosis, the other something less severe.
In four additional cases there was a difference as to major category (usually neurosis
or personality disorder). In another six, there was a partial
difference as to major
category, with one doctor calling it a mixed diagnosis; and in another 9, there was

agreement as to major category but differences appeared in the sub-categories.
cases there were identical diagnoses in 5.

36

Out of

Another demonstration of the individuality of
psychiatrists emerged during
attempts to classify frequency of treatment under the Project. Although six specific
classifications were available for coding purposes, 42 per cent of the cases fell into
the ”other” or non-classifiable category. Pursuit of this led to a fascinating variety of frequencies of individual office visits, each adding up to exactly 15 visits
(the Project limit). There are combinations extending from two months (6 visits one
month, 9 the next), to seven months (4,1,2,2,2,3,1; or
and in between
come all sorts of combinations spreading the visits overl,5,4,2,l,1,1),
3 or 4 or 5 or 6 months.

far as is

to the Project administration, there has been a negligible
unfair advantage of the
Certain difficulties inevitably arise with thbse who do not read their mail orplan.
and there
instructions,
are occasional misunderstandings resulting from patients belatedly identifying them—
selves as Project-eligible. As far as can be determined, broken appointments are not
a serious source of difficulty. In general, the Project has generated the enthusiasm
and cooperation which sometimes characterize pioneering ventures.
So

known

amount of abuse, or attempts to take

GHI’APA—NAMH RESEARCH PROJECT

(for the period 7/1/59~6/30/60)

�I:

12/26/60

Social Glaxo, Diognooio, ond Irootnoht
In Throo Psychiotrio Hospital:
In 1958, Bolliugohood and Rodlioh pahliohod on

influontiol voloto, (1); in
ohipn botvoon

mat

it

tho: roportOd roiotion-

social class) diognooio, tad tho troot-

or loan]. dioordon.

and Pink (2)

which

During 1958, Kohn, Pout ok

roportod studill

tt

not lhOﬂn that who: oduootioh

or oooiol slain,

Hilllido Hoopitol vhoro
woo

it It! roiotod to

toad

who

on

to iodox

on: rotorrod for

convulsivo thoropy, one to tho thoropoutic rouponto to

this trootnont inotrunont.
Tho

Bollinglhood ohd Rodlioh study

It:

oorriod out

bororo tho oo-oullod 'tronquili:inz“ drugs oohiovod wido

populority.
thoropy
ooooo

oloo

demo

Tho Kohn,

at a facility,

woo

hood.

roportod, for CSﬂIplﬂg thot drug

tho prinéipol thoropy in only b.31 of tho

tho: otudiod.;

thoropy
won

it:

It won

whoro

Pollock o rink study

woo

ot tho tino, oonvultivo

tho major organic thorlpoutio dovioo which

�i3Tvvor the heepitele were well
The

third

was

the research hospital of a state hospital

system etteohed to e

its ﬁetiente

private facilities.

known

university medical center. Heat of

were voluntary ednieeionl.

Each of

the

heepitele were peyohoenelytieelly oriented

and each

institution maintained affiliations with

local analytic

institute.

The

hospitals

were

loceted reepectively in the

aid-West. Riddle Atlantic, and
The

queetioee

we

e

New

England.

wished to answer in

relation to

social classes for the different hospital settings were:
(1) What is the relation of patient social class to

(a) diagnosis, (b) treatment, and (o) length of
he

(2)

hospitalisation.
For these varieties, are there differences between

heepitele vhioh treat different

model

close groups?

Pppuletion a Hethodolegy:
During the Winter 1958~1959, e research team
each of the three

hospitals.

population of each hoapitﬂ.

The
who

visited

total adult in~petient

were

hospitalized

on

�~11»

voluntary cartitieatan
day.

Each

patient

word

was then

at hi: hospitalizatien

on

studied in a given viaitatioh
followed through the course

and information

regarding his

treatmant, langth of hospitalization and discharge status
was

appended

xjﬁlxiai to tha data ahaata for each patient studiad.

All patients discharged tron this hoapital within aightaan
months

after the study

began, were indluded in the sample.

This included approximately minty per cent of the

originally studied. Eollingahead
position
and

was emphasised which

aducational scores.

farred to

it

two

factor index of social

utilizes

Data for each

Eollingshead cards to

weighted occupational

patient

I? and

V.

trans~

on

thc

p

u‘i.05 laval.

Class Diatributian within Hogﬁitala:

In Hospital "A“; 311 or the

classes I

was

facilitata statistical

analyaas. Significanccs were computed
Results:

patiaata

and

II,

12$ to Class

In Haapital

Claaaes I and

II,

3&amp;5

'3',

III,

271

in Class

patients

warn aaaignad

ta

and 571 to 615330:

at the patients ware in

III,

and

39%

in Clauses

IV and

I.

�-5-

'0',

In Hospital

III,

Glass
modion

82%

and 1‘ in Class IV.

class

patients

have

I and II,

worn in Classes

of

Viowod

17%

in

in turns of the

its pationts, Hospital

the highest status (Rd: Cleo:

A's

II), Hospital

G's, the lowest (Ed: Close 1!) and Hospital B's petionts

fall

between tho two, (Nd: Cleo: 1119.10r purpuo of olooo~

ifiontion

we

visualize Hospital

A

no

treating primarily

upper close groups of patients, Hospital

close group, and Hospital 0,

a lower

B,

a middle

class group.

Hospital and Diggnosis:
Comparing the

proportion of

its patients

which ouch

hospital diagnosed as oithor psychotic or non-psychotic,
we

found

oigniticnnt diagnostic differences between institu-

tiono (:2 - 12.73; df- 2;
tended to

treat

p4

.01). In the hospital which

predominantly lower close petionto, 75 For

cont of-ull the patients were considered psychotic; in-tho

hoopitol treating predominantly the middle class group,
7h! per cent were diognoood as psychotic, while in tin

hospital trusting predominlily the oppor class grow),
par cont wore oollod psychotic.

53

�.5.
Social Glace and Dielgceiea

It

in interesting to note some of the diagnoetic

differences in hoepitele,

when

In Classes I and

constant.

II

the class factor
we

found

patients were called neurotic, in Class
neurotic, and in classes

IV and V, 20%

36%

or the

III,

29%

wc-e

kept

was

were

neurotic.

The

direction of these statistics tanded to support the
observation of Hollinguhcad and Redlich but for the

hospitalized patients never theleaa, did not reach
significance
(12

- 5.99,

p

on

.

the 15 level (12

' 5.77; df - 2;

p e

3.8.)

.05).

Hospitals and Treatment:
We

found

differences in the

employment of organic

therapies, 1.0., the peychotrcpic coupenndc
therepiee
p

1n

u.; .01).

and convulsive

the three institutions (12 - 12.12, a:
In the

clue: patients;

hSS

facility

which tended to

at the petiente received

tract
some

-

2,

upper

torn or

organic treatment; in the institution treating middle clues

petiente, abs;
clean pattente,

and in the

th

hoepitnl treating prinerily lover

received crgenic therapy.

�.7Social Clan, Dugout:

ndtrutnnt:

In combined pooulntions or the three hoapitulo, thoro

are differences between the major forms of troahncnt that
psychotic and neurotic patients experience (12
d: - 2;

p

~$.001).

compared with 205 of

In

It!

115$

of the neurotic

were administered to

tho psychotic cacao.

32%

tho

go

Organic thcaapios

of the nourotica and

Patients

or psychotherapy, constituted
1nd kg of

can:

the psychotic tacos, psychotherapy

the dominant trcatmont modality.

wag

' 69-7;

the paychotic cocoa.

who
23%

It

I!

76%

of

received neither organic
of tho neurotic cocoa
has been shown

thot within

hospital settings studied, organic forms of therapy

worn

frequently given to psychotic than nourotic patients.

morc

In touting tho hypothocoa that a higher proportion of lower

class than uppor class patients rocoivo organic forms of
trootnont,

we

round the hyyothosia not to be supported

for

oithor the neurotic or psychotic groups. Within each oocial

clot: group, psychotic patients received organic trootnont
more
was

frequently than uon—poychotic patients but social class

not aigniticantly rclntod to whether or not potionta

�-3...
who

were

either psychotic or noorotio

would

receive organic

thorooy.

Social Class and Length of Hospitalizotion:
When no combined

hospitals,

we

for Class I

&amp;

found

the populttions from the three

that tho

II potionto

hospitalization period

aoan

III

9.2 months, Class

was

and Class IV and V, 7.2 months.

We

found no

9.8 months,

statistical

difference between the lungth of hospitalization or Class

I, II

III patients (t- 1.66,

and

div 196, p - H.S.) but found

significant differences botvoon Class I, II and
patients (t - 7.69, df- 221, ptmm)

IV and

V

.

ggopitalo and Length of Treatment:
The

figures are rotlootod in the different

hospitalization periods that
hospitals.
patients

were found in the

three

In Hospital A, the upper class hospital,

were

hospitalized for

in Hospital 8, the middle class

an

average of

ll

institution, for

montha, and in Hospital C, the lower

S.k months.

mean

months,

8.9

class facility, for

�“9-

Rocapitnlation and Conclusion:
The

primary purooao or this ctudy ha: been to study

the rolationahio of social class and psychiatric diagnosis
and

treatment in hospitals which have available conparablo

facilities.

troutmont

differences, class
which have

We

know

members may

that

baoauso of «coconic

gravitate toward institutions

available different kind: of therapy,

have selected three

hospitals which

and thus we

employ comparable

ranges of therapy and which tend to treat nonbors or different
socioeconomic groups.
“what

In affect, what

is the hospital experience of

oocioocononic groups where

all

we

are thus asking is:

members of

different

forms of thorapy are equally

available?"
Within the

social class

was

hospital cutting described,

we

found

not related to whothcr a person

diagnosed as psychotic or nonvpsyohotio.

Ho

that

was

also found

aooial class to be unrelated to the employment of ergonio
therapy.

We

believe that the relatively wide use that

�-10psychotropic ooopoundo

now

enjoy nay toad to blur tho

sharper diotinotiono whihh oxiotod non. yours ogo than
organic treatment was identified with the shook tad con:

therapies.
We

that lower class position

found

length of time
doooribod.Lowo;

o

was

related to tho

patient spent in the hospital settings
class patients (Glaoaos

IV

&amp;

V) were

hospitalized for anoruﬁormas a: time than Class I, II 0r

III patients.
Major
The

difroronoeo were found between the throo hospitals.

hospital treating upper class patients tended to diognooo

the higher proportion of

its patients

as non-psychotic,

tended to employ a lower comporativo percentage of organic
thoropy, and

left its patients

period oz time.

in treatment for the longest

In contrast, the hospital which tended to

treat patients primarily from the

lower portion of tho ocononio

ooootrnu had the highest proportion of psychotically diagnosod

patients,

onyloyod organic treatment more often than the

other hoopitalo describod, and tort patients in treatmont

for the shortest period of tins.

�.11.
In an

tar

us tau thrac

hospitals studind arc construed,

300131 61188 woulé appear to ho

lass intimataly rclutad to

dingnosis and trantuent than scald the naturu at th. hospitzl itatltg
and the

sacinl gruup tauhieh

it

tddraascs

itself.

�1: 1/3/61
.

soaihl 61:13, DiIIROIil
whrct Paychtatrto

und

trtaincnt 1;

Ht‘pit‘lﬁ

IITRODUCTXOHa

Iva hundrtd and ninety patients in $hr¢a uoau

cuetadinl aetivu trcntiunt ptyehiatria haupitnln,
which

ortcrad multipln tharnpicn, primarily ta typur,

niddlo a: lawn: clnta ﬁcraoul var. Iﬁndaud during
1959*60.

Questions utudicd were whothnr naninl clans £¢r

haspitaltnad paticnta
ﬁypm

It:

ralntod to (a) dingntsil,

a: tr¢ntnen$, aha langﬁh at trautaunt tnd

rahttamhtp at

yum:

suntan-nu»

Cb)

a nun “away",

’miﬁdla', and “tuner” «inns hospitals ta dznauuain,
type a: treatment and longth a: traatnaat.

W!

Volautnurily udaittcd paticnta 1n thrtn

kncvn xucxraphtnclly

47W“.

u/Cc.

f“

V:

atpur:tc httntttll

w¢11~

which

itiﬂrlé

�nan-

: rung. if

thnrup¢ut1¢ prnxruan.

that. putioutu aura

prtnnritr rdprutoutattv. at

$§ﬁ§upptr, 3:831. at

lunar ulnauoa, turn atudiud

t!

s.aluu d:y in thy wintsr,

n! a 311.3 heapittl

19$8~1959

tuilunod thruushaut tacit suntan
and

if

a

Putiontl vcro

hospitalitutsnu

detail: caacorninc that: buneruund, truutuant

nud dtusnunin wart rncurdcd*
33831.93:

Seats}. 6183! was

tau“ ta

ha

r-alaud to lung“:

at notivu truatnnn‘ within tha hotpitnl aettingn.
015': I? and

charm

Y

putt¢nta rtlainad 1n truntnsnt for

pox-ands

a:

an. than. an"

x.

I:

or

m

paticntu. Signittctnt rolutanuuhipc bctwnun 1031‘;
clans, diaguoail ana trtntucut

warn mat uhaarvcd.

sacniticnut rol‘ticnathn war. found bntwu.n
p;t1§nt néubtrthip an upytr,xmiédla and Instr 01‘3t

�inﬂux: and dams“, “aunt. and has“ at
hupiuluutom the nut» in tutwuomu
mum at m "mun, "guitar at Vhﬂhtr a

an: nutwumu
m, that mm mm: tho "My“ ma M man.“
u magma-tun; mu rams." wan-am than”,
and ”mi '56 Mpiullw tu- t!“ lmut yaw-1M at
patio“ m I mum at

‘1‘. a

a

�1: 1/3/61

anuttl Gitul. nzlgntnia ;nd fruuﬁncat 1a
Ebro. Puyuhtatric notpxt;1:
111302301103:

tin

hundrtd nut ninnﬁr patlnusc in thran nth.

custodial ac‘iis trca‘lnnt'ptrchtaﬁrtu knupttnll,
arrdrtd uvlﬁiplo thnrnpioa, ﬁrtaartlr ta appur,

which

gladlo or Inuit «1‘3: pirlﬁﬂl 2‘3. atudand during
‘

19$9~60.

Quautsnas tindiod war. whithar 300151 31.0:
hsnv1%nliutﬁ pntlcntu

it: rnlntad in

(I) din¢n¢nts.

at trausnunt

«:90 a! ircatunat, 3nd 1¢Ig§h

raln‘aonshgp a: Fttitn£ llﬂhirihip a:

and Inngth

$34

th...

‘ntddlc'. ‘ud ”lower“ cln¢a hmlpttnIu-to
ﬂirt or £ruatnant

tar
(3)

'nppcr'.

dianumwzt,

a: trnatunnt.

930039332:

Valuntslrily adsttttd pgtiunta
knuwn

geographiaally Iapnrttc

1n

thr¢t wail-

haipittll which uttarvd

�.2.
3

ring. a! thnrtptutis

progruun, Vhﬂri plttﬁuﬁi warn

prtnlrlly roprcatntaﬁavu a: iﬁiEnppor, ngdéau er
lowcr alumnus, aura Uti‘iid an at n ctvuu hmapitui

«call:

any

in tht‘wiuﬁtr.

tallauod thmaushtu‘

thttt

and 6.13113 unncnrnxug
and

diltnllil

l9$8~1959
BQIrlﬁ

¢

if

Pnttonia var:

hampttnlatuttuu

that! h$ak¢round, trunﬁnnu‘

mutt ruocrﬁad.

Ilﬂﬁlg§x
Benin: ulna: vat fauna to ht rulatcd to langth

at asttro trcntnnnt wt‘han «a; hompttal Ittﬁinsl.
015.: IV and

V

pattan‘u ruuutacd Ln trcntuont {or

thurtar 9.3104: at téuo tuna clan!

pttlthtl. Signifiauat

I, I: at

r¢1m§¢nanhapu

01:33, ﬂtlﬂﬂﬁﬂil nut tr‘aiuomt

lira

:11

bitwcun.taotn1
ﬁat dblorvnd.

aacntttcant rolnﬁiaalhtpa new: round bntugnn
patsaat nadburahip an uyptr, 31441. and luau: «13;:

�human

and

«awn; ”Miami and loan» at

h§Ip1£u1tsatioaa 2h. srnttnr

it: uaataaiaonuntc

Ituiua a: the hanpiQal, rug&amp;raluns a: whither a
puticut

any n ninbnr

gmaup, aha mart

a:

a aiv¢n aacauuaacnumia

11ktly the pat1.n¢ wanié h: diaznaaed

gs nanwpnychoﬁin, wauln rgaeivv neawurgania therapy,
and would be hunpitnliangQr the
$130.

inngsst patina of

�II:

1/10/61

Social Clean, Diegnoeie end Treetnent

in Three Psychiatric Hoepitele
INTRODUCTIOH:

Recent etudiee have indiceted e reletionehip between

eociel clean end peychietric diegnoeie end treatment.
preeent etudy

wee

The

designed to study whether social cleee

for hospitalised patients

wee

releted to diegnoeie, type

of treatment end length of treatment, in three institutions

vith differing eociel cleee

membership of the

patient

populetione.
PROCEDURE:

Two

hundred end ninety

voluntarily admitted patients

to the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital, Hilleide Hoepitel
end the Heeeechneette Hentel Health Center were etudied ea

or e given hoepitel cenene day in the Winter, l958~1959.

Petiente were followed by-e reeeerch teen throughout their
course of hoepitelieeticn end deteile concerning their
beckground, treatment end diegnceie were recorded.

�.2RESULTS:

Sooisl clsss was found to bs mars significant in
coup-risans bstwssn hospitals than in intsr-institutisn

analysis. Within institutions socisl class

was

saluted to lsngth at hospitalisstian snly; class

signiﬁicsntly
IV and

V

patients rsnsinsd in trustmsnt tar shorter psriods thsn

III.

those in clsssss

I, II

hespitsls

significant rslstienships bstvssn social

showsd

sud

Csnpsrison bstwssn

class and disgussis sud trustusnt ss vsll ss lsngth of

hospitslisstion.

The

higher tbs class status of tbs hospitsl,

ths morn likely tho pstisnt would be diagnossd as nonpsychotic, vauld not rsssivs samstic thsrspy and would bs

hospitslissd for s longsr psriod.
hospital

was mars

Tho

class status or ths

importsnt than tbs inﬂividusl patisnt's

clsss msnbsrship in dotsrmining thoss rslstionships.
liIIIUQ

�Junntry 10, 1961.
Dr. Gurdnzr Kurphy,

Diroctor of Research,

Hunningcr Foundition Hoapitnl,
Topeka, Kansas.
Dear Dr. Murphy:

stat:

In 1959, Dru. Siogcl, Kuhn and Pollack at thin
arranzod with Dr. Ksrtuu, ta undarttkc a

canpnrativa population staple study at the in-putiontu
Haulaahulitta Hunts! Hunlth
Hospitals. Tho dtta colltction
ph‘l. at this atudy VII conplotod in Soptunbor, and
V. have prone-sad a large part or the atntiaticn and
and. Ian. prolininary audguonts.
It in our dosiro tn proscnt a comptrativc
stnicuont a: the "Social Class. Dingnoui- ind Trontuant
in Thruu Paychittric Hanpitalt ta tho incriesn Sociolozianl Sacicty in Augnat. rho dutu bl! bath intlysod
according ta hypothcucn undtr otudy in tho in-pationt
sorvico at Hillido Hospital in 1957 and 1958. An
abutrnct or this initial roport in enclosed for your
Honninger Hoapital,
It
Cbntur and Hilllidu

internatian.

urn plonuod ta credit the cooparatinu of tho
ill thrto institution: in enabling this utndy
to bo incomplilhud. I: that. it :ny additional connunicntion
W.

atattu or
noogatngy
new
as

for thc prancntntiou or this data,

Du; Robbins

and hipyy

ycar.

Join: us in withing you

a

Sine-roly yourc,
Enel.

HFsJB

m iInE H05.

would you

lot

anccoasrul

�Social Class, Diagnosis and Treatment

Jar/a
‘

in Three Psychiatric
Heepitals
9s
[4 N
p as,
"Axum If “lips: his
62%;};

s

.

d/mAM ,/

I

INTRODUCTION:

as

g

fag / AL»; 4 Kata, Xvi/5k.
we

,4

A

.

_,

Recent studies have

.1

/

”wk

indicated/a'relationshiﬁ between

social class l and psychiatric diagnosis

MW“'

treatment.I\

and

The

designed to study whether social class
aunt
for hOSpitalized patients was related to diagnosis, A type

present study

was

oi—taeotment and length of treatment, in three

institutions

Withhdiffering social class membership,e£_:h¢_9a;§en¢_.
popaiebfﬁﬁs.
PROCEDURE:
Two

voluntarily admitted patients

hundred and ninety

to the C.F. Menninger Memorial HoSpital, Hillside Hospital

the Massachusetts Mental Health Center were studied as

and

of a given

Patients

hospital census

day in

the Winter, 1958-1959.

research team throughout their

were followed by a

course of hOSpitalization and details concerning their
background, treatment and diagnosis were recorded.
71.9.3th

)7

5/2,

”mg

r [£1
44M”
‘2

I

(’-

’3

1,1,4";

at. &amp;

“4.4140,,51‘:
,

2:3;

f.a.Aﬁ/_
1.14931.

3

,

j&gt;gﬂ(‘""4" I)

MM! 14.0741;

5&amp;4:

4‘

I ”my
1:“

2'33;

4»

fall’g’ffrf (4“

{W4

/

"w
a? “3‘

”

.

M

was f.
a a, ,x.
aw Wm,
f‘zl/“ié ”*Muwwt‘
.-'

7

“A,“

I

‘5

’

1,»

.

«min

ad.“

an»

g9 252‘.
.6‘
-

I J,

£354

{V _

an

,

'

.

�-k’

RESULTS:

a

.

Social class

was found

comparisons between

WM

if

”54/

to be‘more significantnin

hospitals than in inter—institution

analysis. Within institutions social class

was

related to length of hospitalization only; class

signiﬁicantly
IV and

V

patients remained in treatment for shorter periods than
1132.?

those in classes

I,\II

hospitals

showed

significant relationships between social

class

diagnosis and treatment as well as length of

and

hospitalization.

The

and

Comparison between

higher the class status of the hospital,

the more likely the patient would be diagnosed as non-

psychotic, would not receive somatic therapy and would be

hospitalized for
hospital

was more

a

longer period.

The

class status of the

important than the individual patient's

class membership in determining these relationships.

M

�Mary

16, 1961.

Dr. Hilton Greenbhtt,
manhunt“ Rental Kuhn Center,
72-76 rammed Road,

Bolton, Hen.
Dear

mm

It In good talking to you in Wuhington. I think the
meetings went very well and I eapociauy liked Shep Roma's
raport

location

the

VA,

pnuont-paumt intonation.

on

also quite
an
Xurlmd and

is little

The

many nit-moon
in
studios. more

ammo

good. bringing out the
drug

Comm oomtin
and for phoebo control! now in

and comparative efficacy tasks

on

saluting
be

who’s Mom

to

Encloud in our inltial abstract much
to the Andean Sociological Society.

we

My

best. regards.

Sincerely you”,

an: inn: mﬁ.

Baal.

HF: JB

new drugs

in order.

am sending

-

�1.

3...

W
.‘

M753
.

2,3,8.

z

m»

5;.

in.

5.

7

8
7.

4/44:
m7
IAA/c

M, m
M4
n

n

""

If?

’é

a

,

fl.

"0
5
.

.__n

22...}

.JL

A

~

MI

Ag~nhﬁ

‘

13.

m.

In"
M ta man
mum
at

“4.”. I. mmm ms
WW!!!”

m...“

“,.".“.

-WA

�at»

mamount:
”a“ m
I!

1:

'u‘n‘m

5. 19:19
6. 19-”
300

,_

15.

N»?!

0M!

3.

5.a

{@099

Ya

1'0‘1!’

#.

’1

a.
16.

u km

6!

..

‘

”-1”

Rod”
'9‘.

h tumum

Q‘tumﬂ
sans.
ems
:1.
1
’1

an.

3m. 5

"m
m it ms mmum mm
ii

s

g.

11,13.

316/”);
I

“a M‘. “O

“1mm
a
A6311!
as.

1’.”.

ruemnn manna“
rm:is!
”I M‘
m.
I. 13mm:

mun

9i!

mm WPHHJMW

amruu‘wﬁ

O

9. Q

'0.

no

‘.

turns-nun

4.

._.

..
A

.‘..‘L_'A___...L.HA

L.“

A

Mo-A_#*;W¥L~_JIAAL

�4-

mm
III:

mm mm It men,
mum.
34

“I
5:;

I

I

93.

I

,

\

III.
l'“!’
13ﬁt3 "II
“‘4.

I: II IIIII
IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII It IIIIIIIII
I. IIII IIIIIIII: IIIIIIIII
IIPW II IIIIIIII'IIIII
J. IIIIIIIII
5*

\

IIIIIIII

'3.

IIIIIIIII IIIIIISIIII
IIIIIIIII II
II IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
-I. IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII
3. IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII
II IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I. IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I.
IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII III.
I. II IIIIIIIIIII
I'lﬂtﬁﬂllfiﬁtlilll If IIIIIIIIIRD
Biliﬂﬂliﬁt
'

~

IS.

IIII II. II IIIII

1I‘mh
II IIIIIIIIIII
3.
I

,.
6.
1.

I.

II

IIII
II
I,
39
,.

.

a;

m

dz..u.__._4-_‘_#_l

“1*
I4..&lt;_;&lt;A’....._._A

IIIIIIIII
IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIII
II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
II. II IIIII III
IIIII IIIIIIIIII, IIIII
IIIII IIIIIIIIII, II IIIII
IIIII IIIIIIIIII, I II
IIrIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
:gzuIIIIIIIl IIIIIIIIII

W“

.._..__‘__‘_._..__

A

7

-

.4,

_.

.4...

A

_

l. IIUIIIIIII1IIIIII

A

.__A

meMLJnmIAuig.

"u

�.5.

III: II. II IIIII *1“
,5
IIIIMum-m
I
III; ,
3‘ IIIIIIIIIIIIIII €£II1J¢I.)
k4 VIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
I.
6. 6IIIIII_IIIII IIIIIIII. IIIIII.
,‘I I”; am
a. II «umauguuu
!I!
IIII III. II
:1.3%!“
3. IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I. PIIIII IIIIIIII
I. IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I. Dita:
I.
I. II IIWIIIIIIIIII

w

’m“

xi”

fiéﬂ/M/k

h“.

“OILIIW'S'
IIIIIIIIIII
ammo 1.I.3. PIIIIIIIIII‘IIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII

W
W

16.

I. IIIIIII 6liﬂ’ﬁil IIIIIIIII
Q‘hﬂ

III. II IIIII “6’
IIIIII IIIIIIII
IIIII
II. IIIII IIIIIIIIII: IIIIIIII
I IIIII IIIIIIII It IIIIIIIII
:.
lilﬂﬂﬁ‘rlﬁl‘ﬁli It IIIIIIIIIII
‘.
I.
IISIIIIIII IIIIIIII II III. IIII
’I
II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I. ”If
IIII III. II IIIII ‘6'
I. II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IugtIgillz.‘:IIIIII
m
III
3Iml
1 I I /
I.
VIII

1.

'

m

I
1»

.

5151*"

33%;
MI

3*

3'

i'
..

:

I.

‘:

‘..

.

,‘

&gt;

_,: \_

‘

k

A.

J
...

.‘A.

Kuwr

S‘

.
A

Jam-.1

I‘m-Hana;

�4"

man“: Fer-Chm:

#7.

M

“in

3..1.

mu
ﬁrm My

aa. aw‘33”:
h «mm
Q

J

m

W

i
1

I

-

MW‘
:1

Mill‘

W‘“;:J”*”'
4"
N
m3w
x95?

W
a ..

W

a.

a..

s.

g.

;

’

..

la

1

,1”

77W

3

a

9’

t

1

t.

595'?

,‘é/W

.

3

«r

‘

3

”:3“ m

.

ﬂ/M/L

13% :

£5

OI.

V

man nasuumm
.. h 5 mm
6 min
7. ’41 mm:
mu:
9% 13‘ mm

1.33893

1

at

,.

:,

=

18;. 151

'

-

1

.
a

‘

m.
so

31,,

1

a. St Mutation
1'" sea:
*‘N 3
ea. I. intonation

.Mm

IW
TM

ill/M
a

'

'

LEW.

'
:~

1
44

�W
ﬁﬁﬁB

6913:;
1.

r 1953,
1. 1:1 Iﬂtyltll'5%lé195?.
2. Billaidt stuay,
1966.

Its:

138.

3333?

_

xearltAL
'2. Kenninzur

3. East. ﬁcatanIQA1th
S. 3:113:53, 195?
6‘ niilsidc, 1969

2,3’hc

£121!!! lﬁﬁiﬁl

5.

831

6,1.

an:

8.

axe:

iii:

1.

2. Ytntle
Extst 3:.

~~.

It

99.
15

infatuatiau

Wits

E. xogrc

am:
a. San: or
3.

9.

10.

nu

iaiaruatioa

nxaxaxan

1. yrotOtttnt

2. Gathcli¢
3* 3‘?in
6. I: or an iatnratttou
ﬁtaltth atagaa
1. single
2. ﬁsrrzcd
3 3 .F”‘§Qd
h. Biraretd
5. ﬁiéavcd
4b

a. la iatirnntzan

11,12.

naaatrzes
-~. Years at aduottita
seas tar colylattd years
-~.99. lo internatian

13.

rnacx a! 31323

1.

331

2. Farciga Barn: Englinh spanking
Sanatrics&amp;
*
: Gorxanie Scandina
3.
avian
.‘ i
ho
I Irina: &amp; Spain
5.
‘
: alnvie ﬂattens
.
t Lﬁtiﬁ ﬁltriaﬂ
7.

5.

a.

'
''
''

“

-

it“,

-

'“

x

stag:
In

infatuation

�«2..

13‘33 1! 3.3.A.

1h.

1. Iativo bars
2. L11: thtn 1
3: 1‘3

h.
3.
6*
7.
9.

I.ﬂ.

15.

1.

5*?
16~19

”“29
36*
Is iatnrutticn

a: 1:3:

69

2. 79.15
3- ag’e9

ha 9a~99

5. 1a0~1a9

?. 129-129
at I39“139
9. aha¢

e..la
16.

informatiaa

Pirillfiﬁ

1. 613:.

.

2. Glass
3. 611::

$661££ gangs
1
2

3

’. Gina: h
5. Glass 5

e.
17,15.
19,2ﬁ.

.

£93

ﬁﬁknoua

I? r123: vstaxxtraxc carrier

~«. Sxact

:3.

30. Re infatuation
gas-tr 112s! rsxcnzsrxxc nesrxrnzxzxrzex

ea. In infatnntian
$1.

333383

1.01

6! P3103 £G$F1t1313511915

z
3

k
6! 5
6
7

a 1».

nolinturnxtian

�’3.”
221

fail}

9? FﬁIﬁi

FIRIQF

Ian:

195F121§ EIP£IIBICEB

1.11 1113 1 unath
2‘5 “84»
6~11

Ina.

“5.
I...»
213-335 ”in
35‘h?

1%“1?

18*33

”it
h. :aars
in intsrnttiun
23.

66331118! 12 31363533;

2h.

61363116! 63 £32133ISIEB ”11536613
?arch¢r1s: ﬁch11uphranza rotatiaa

1. link Ilprct'd) larkadar 3:1.3 Inoammnd
3. Ingratud; ﬁbéqrxtozy lag.) Slightly it
ﬁnahaagia
t11ghtl: svrco; Shiny.
h. 311.1111 tr
6. to intarnltioa
Pcyahasiu: tituct1vu rigstions
nguhsaiu: #151111
Psyuhcauuru$1c.31uar¢ur

?arﬁuntlity nitgriur

7,?raaziiu1
attugt1satl retaintlity 31:.
‘Ho 1n£§rintiyn
25.

saacaasszrzsnztars at 1321311353»
311636315:
Etta 691 2% 101:1 81:
1. ﬁtlplt
Ebhsphrouie
.ﬁatatanic
7

Purlnoid

Lent: unéifftrsntiﬁtcé
Ghranic ind1££utentittcd
7

S¢hise~a££ectivo
childhaad

9th.:

ﬁn

ﬁabelaasifiaatica

60.
thnKtnia

.

2h

atﬂad

'2’

dsprataivt, Innis

3:11: daprcaa1vc, dtprcstiru
£3311 dnprcia1vu, athtr
Paychatic depraaaivt rttetion
- Intaias1aaul dﬁﬁf'tliV'
911::

subalass1tieatina
I

no

�aﬁt‘zh Gﬁdla *3.

disardtra
4nata'brtin
4560““?

(niltpgy)
(and.
:«ﬂanmwhﬂu
an}

Ew’lr.‘

_

.

'Vntaaltr
truagntig
erratic Evil: diacratr. ﬁﬂ‘t‘tb
93$, MIMI?
lo subalnulit1e3$1aa
301*

:3

ﬁﬁdﬂd “h“

Antag$y roamtiﬂa
EausqalatiVH rnuutioa

raunttna
absaauivn aﬁuvultivc r‘natiaa

,

ﬁnmvarczan

Pttii¢ ratatiun

ntprasaivi rauatﬁﬁa

attsr
tubcllﬂltticttiin

,

no

.

$01. 2k ﬁﬁﬁﬂd *5!

Peruaanlity ptttcrn diutarbnuao
Purnoutlaty trait dﬁtturhtaao

,

.

.

ﬁﬁaigpnthln ﬁcraanality dintnrhuncu
ﬁpOGttl ayxmtnu

ﬁthur

reuetttns
'

no nubazganixientiﬁa

6.1;

,

ah ﬁﬂdﬁd ”6*

strata rutctiqu
arts:
Aduiﬁ uttutﬁitngl runotign
xdjnstnant ratctitu a: «hilahtad
Aﬁauatnunt rauctaan a: tillllﬁinni
¢djuataaut rnaattan a: Int. 11:.
.

athur

It

stb¢1¢saitt¢ati¢n

whgn 601. 2h
531*

ﬁﬁu

«04:4

'6’

in Inhalgtnzt&amp;eatinn

txaarnaxxs

numeral

Payahsthlxtyy

2; new; Inﬁtklna
3 Q ﬁrms.
1*!
3

3
6‘ 9 9 3
2?: 1 o 2 4 3
3* iﬁac
I;

3w

Q

{

no in£arua£$au

�17¢

g,

*

1.

m Ptﬂi’hﬁ‘thlmy

runaway“

1. {ayahithtripyw
3; rmyuhathnmapya
h. axon, ﬁhtrﬂyy

£13.
9111:

S. ﬁn¢p¢¢1£1Id
6‘ a. ptyuhothurnpy

a.

1310:3111”
11:1!uﬁﬂtu arxnnia
lid

1. Phanuthyustucm (er, Frintlini,
13:911111,

:24.

1:11 )

layman, «purl, «numb

thnruatut,

mm.

ovzaain tttitnnut
it 1a£arntt1an

ya
11 $0

13.

133623 0? 198111111311133
133311 9111116 21312K131
.1»

81
3a

&amp;0

Wt
11:: ﬂhﬂn 1 ltﬂk
1“ a!“
1‘2 Hﬁﬁﬁ;i
naathI
1
‘
?*8

5» 311

6. Sub
7c

5: 9*10

9. 11

64
291

HQ

3

truths

4

iniawnntltn

1331? ew-avnnxuz 80511211111116!

1. tan than

2‘”
‘t

13st
nanth:
7~8

*1
3 I 22222

E. 6

30 day:

101111

7: 9111 noaﬁha

89.

a.
39,31.

12

again;

£1

zurnruntitn

13¢~u¢atha

12* $3613

11. a
90‘ I

littiyiﬂﬂfﬁ
1R£Vvuattoa

It

�33.:
'

aaazxs Aa:aamuxir
1* Ilwruvné
3. unimprtvnd

a. ﬁt tutmrunttun
33.

ﬁltﬂtﬁﬁln swinging:
1»

Maw“!

e¢

In iﬁtﬁrlﬁtiﬁm

2. Eutnpravod

3h.

axlanama.

Guaylatn rauiauiwn
Ingrtvaa
t.3. ﬁnahnatad
{1: watt.)

1»

a. a. inttrantiiu
35.

xvgxuarxax «an!
1» ahsaktd {vat}
3:. ﬁnish-”kw (at)

36.

axnavnszmnans #3 nxaaxanan
lmrrrcltnunﬁ eunmlntgd

2. any

hatpitil

Plrahuthﬁrtpy hat:
k. l¢tpttgllnat&amp;aa alauuhtwo
5g‘?‘1§hﬂ§§ﬂﬂﬁﬁ¥ alacwhtra
6. In infatuatiin
3w

,

7!! anti. unutui inaath avatar ark!
32-

1..ﬁ§‘rt ﬁts;

a. ﬂat Frnaﬁiﬁ

Gnu:

���~3—

_

gum-qwmmcummmumﬁapmmmmmmor
gm Wham“ Mm u an... and; WW6 W_M
Milan.

1:.

m palm-d mt, ta! mid; tutliﬁuowm mutton m

Iuwummmmuanng-motmmm
wwwzmummmmw

m‘La-u.

Iﬁm’W.M%
wommummmgmmmwmmkdwmammwu

mm» mxm,

W

pmmmwm.

m a»

mum mmum

M

pmmmwmmwmmmmwmmm

mmmtmmmmmwmmmmmmumamwu

mmmumm.lm.tWWuu-W,MW
umzemmmmmim. tummmmn-Wmimm
mmmmmmmtm). m,mmmmmmw

mmmmmnpmmmmmmmm

Wmmm Wmmtwmadﬂtmmtmm
ammm,mammmgmmwmwwm.
mummmpmenmmhm,mmmmumm,

gmmmmmsmmxmaw.wumm mama

w

���r——————,——————
*6.
&gt;

‘mmnumwmwmmmu‘mmorm
_

discipline

..

mm mm, W, Mimi

“what...

$06131

mm m
5,"

.

'pmhnmwytamWQrmtupmmtmmvmWW
V

mmmmwmwmmmmwamM.

W’
&gt;

'

I

mwummmmmm 1&amp;1!th

thmmmmioWMMmtmmmmm

wmmumpmm. memumwimwsmmt
'Wamgnemmmmmmmwuwwmnwtmm

W1. .Iu'Mpm-mtowgmmwmmtmmmdm
mm W. £11»an «W Minimum: mun
«mgmmummumm. mxmmmmm
“thaw“.ammtbancgmmmetmb-‘mmu
mmmMmum. rammimupum‘mmmnnm.a

mthmmm-w

»:

Wmmtmm.

�ummmww,mmamwmmtmamm
mmwwmmmwm.muw
“Murmnmmrmnnwmxﬁmmmm
i

mammuumnmmm.mmwmw.
mum-hammﬂmmmu wmsmmum ml:

mm‘nmmuwhu‘mmrm www.mm

mmmmmmmamewmmmgmu“
M1311

������“Wmmmmmmmmwmw

mum (m

W
m

171.

mu, mm).

“mum.mummummmuummnm
somtmmwmwmmmm,mmmmmu
‘

V
I

(man).

thmmm:mmmmmmmumrm

“mgum'ammmammmuwmrm,mmmmu

“Ww‘WMqumuummrmm (1mm).
mammanmna-mwnummm gws.
mm
W. mm WM
mm
1%?”

with-high

1’

M

in tum-1w?

mummmnmummwthmsmmmwnmrm
mu.

�m... .an—

-w—-——.—.»w.««p—

.muq“.

w.“

ﬁt,murmur

. ,._......,,_

w“,

,_.‘,..._W

gm 52.1%!

w‘

DINm BIAMIS

Wm Pmuy

WHIGAI‘IOR

mm

1. Ema-Mum mutton

Pmmmoaia

2.

Medina Pmmﬂity

Parchment.

3.

Mathias

Pennant: Trait Bitten-blues

Pmonanty

h. Naminittiu Pmmlity

ammo
When“
Inﬂam-

Pwmlity

5.

6.

Putin Ingram“

Mmliw
WWII

aociopathia

1’»:th
nwholiu

Soaiopathic Pertaining
Disturbance

Maul. Pawn-.111:

Sehisophk-ouie

Behiwphnnio inaction

Somsmuctiw

Typo

thoni-

�mm"

n‘w—w—w‘

m— Irwmww-

"~-

mn-

Wamm
”Wm

�w,

._w._.....-—»—.——7

“my“. .

*w‘Iw—wm—

..w..,,,.-mm~—v

m
‘

‘

'
'

m

x

5?“:th

n

1y:

I?

~87

$1

17

1.

1‘33-

20

3k

3k

5’

12

23

29

28

w
rm

m

8.1m

x

'

.

m

=

9

L,

.

MM?”

W7M

;

i

.

“(wa

’

v:

“:7:

‘

�———..——-...

rum

m
ﬂ
19
§

33

19

ps

:5

11*

-

.

M
5-9

22
23

53

33

�warm-c- ,. “mm, .‘VJW

100

w—m..-.v.q—.. m...

2,,

173‘

17
119

10

.~ .

‘

my;

�1463

�"mm mm”.

W--—»;

'7

,

,-.n.wv—.v--u-— mm...“mp-w

.m ......—

'“uvt 74v

'Mv-m-“'F‘.--'-

-

«sow—n” u:

mumm-

173
89

2h

68

v.krw' ﬂaw-n.

—,..., :

_—.

——wr

"erv‘va—u“ w.»

�,cw—wm._

100
173
95

67

2?

-

“win-l1

mm,—

11*!

w. y»...

,V.

"an.“

W 'W‘

‘

1‘

.

�“Irv-CV

gm
85

29

-TW

�mm

1..

him. mm... In:

3am:

03ml.

hunk,

913.13.

Plum.

amt'

m m,

In:

”.13.

8111.“.
mam-y,
Mama
61.“
‘01.,
'0’.
MI,
Wt”,
tit-2099.
by
tho
grunt
at
hum-1
mu
pm
uh»,
or
mm
3.3.
m1.»
rune
mm.
5mm
2: m tum ems: than), mu W.
the emu-um o: a. “I“: o: u-aha-«hunt. mum
an.
out.
data:
in!“
Burnt).
m
mam
1: mm: «momma.
Buumnt a: yacht-My ' ﬂoatation
“an.“
”an“
manual,
an.
111‘

1m.

m.
7/26/61

or upon ”a“.

W

�value“

«an» a: ‘m‘y

popﬁlnﬁicnt 33v. establishnd
rhotovu oouaorntat

in.

and“

Mann. ”graham.

9.01:1
tin import-no. or

type and tncidnncu ot-Iontnz d1a~

order and ﬁn. ctlta$1on a: troltaont; ﬂoat notabln,ot

thin! 1th$t$¢$$10nl has hit! that
Vltdllch

(

) who stndaad

duﬁgnntrn‘od n

it.

3:!

it

801113338036 and

Karen pcgglation uaa

rclntltashlp bctunsn 1:61;: 31:33 can

such puyuhtutrte aspect:

a. tap. a! iroatnun‘ Ind

Stu: thaw ttﬂid £baﬁ 1:!!! 01:0. pitiolta

Ir.

61l3n0I18c

nor. lituly

to in «13:30:96 as satisophvunia and rooctv. 0:23:19 or
custodial trua‘nnnt than

ti... fro: higher 300131 ltvolu.

flynhothcrayy, particularlynnnrehounalytil. In: restric‘od

to ‘ho uppor clasuos.
#341. $ho bactc-tlpovtnnca

aria-at, turthtr tuttlttlt$too1
taut th:

omp11¢1%

at

such studio.

nro 3.3.33.9: to

1'
actor.

{Intern or pruco§a¢a¢that undovlio 5:383

rolnﬁloa:h:ys. an. Inch tent: in; institntod at

81113115"

�.3;-

”“1113”?- Mummmmd.um.u

mtmnuanmzmmuuumuum
out mum-u: «mun sum

as the

nun-v.

Mlmnmnmtmwuwumt
tutu“... MIMI. m “Milt“.

A.

3111.“.

it.

mwmmmmmmmu
umumu.nmmawmuwum.

hmtﬁvaWQwII-aumunuam

umwnwoCmumummo-a
chum.

«mmnmmmummmm

WWW. hmﬁum.mun.
«I «a “no at tun m twat-u: manual
.0

m

01’

Whit» mm

04'

mum“...

onwmummuumumu(

).

am. In" your” «and; Wynn-u m

mtmlyumctn‘mmw:wmmnm

�«’4.

mummwamtmmum.mnmu

anwumouno,mmum

mammm5umumumm

WMWMMM. nmwuumm

m, ”mm,

nun-bun mu- m» m can

thammuuu.amuu
wum.'mums'm01m«1

W
"WWW.

”.mmmummumu
mmummuwhmm;
Mom

CM“

iv

mm

$3.1

tho

”in"!

u'mummmrsunr

a
am

nu

a

W
mt

it I!!!“

a:

1:qu

than

In!

h
01'

It“
mun

Mm.“

man.

”at“: It. m‘mt

awmuum‘uuumwu.m
ﬂu

m mm m mm Mm; m human-u

��.y.

nmmwuummum‘m
“manna-yum. taxman-0W

unmtﬁvaw.udmiwkumduh

W

M O“ tﬂﬁhﬁm, m 0.1. ﬂow-SI”! luau!
In“). In!“ MW
loath]. M “I

W).

W
man.
M

swam m than Mu.

mm.-

m
”mmmm’h
Walk-mm
W:
m
«up

a

man-um 0:

mm m“

”In.
mmmmtm.

”out gunman or m

he muhm

“1.. I)

M

be!”

«a

m as» not Input u

1)

I «am

WM, Wain

.m3)muumammamuumu
vm 1mm in
an
mum. am mm mm

um.muauuwmuunnw.

�do

m
wmm‘mumtw.
m Mu mu.
Mt.
W
mum m. “unﬁt
"I
”In“!
no

1)

«mm mm

m hospital ma
m

mus-nun

a

a

mm“.

W

"at.

nth

of

t" mmmmawmmmwm.
m Wm'l um a militant Mun mutuIum ti. an“ ”my; ummuuumx Mum.
1!)

muumMmmu-aumzmus.u

m ‘19:“. mm on» own-tun a: an "a.“
um
W'm
can
mm m
mu...
and}...
in“:
luau.
nun“,
mm
Ill" amt-.mmmwugammvum
can” (0» m1. 112).

um

m

m

�d}.

m

”inﬁll“ hWhMMQﬂIM”

auumuhulmlﬁlmum.
“luth' luau!- I“ ”1w ”mu
mm.

W
almamllmnihﬂOa‘mmW‘m
and

”alum.
m
“I
mum WW
mm
tun-it.
mind“
m
M. ”an“ m
M. M
1»

mutt“ mum
too 1»

1'!)

in!!!“

”with!“
mm

mum

on

human-do

a:

If

mm

1"

93

min

a‘.

nxum Ronni.

manna
at m
at
on

m «comm an.

ammum,wmuuumu

means mm. 1mm ”assignment.
ma
dun-a1 min“... «4
of

W“
Wu
mum. MWW“W¢M,M
).
and
“1111’“ um m m
(

�W
m
an
m
mm
run

0W.

at“:
m

In“ a ﬂu

In
”on
“up“.
“in
“Wu-m
In
:“can an

mum-M Minn” III

a. «tuna «a "mum at

3mm.
m «a. I: w «amt. a: smut. mm. In
«cum-rid «aw c: pram- macaw rub a.
0!
mu“ mp1»: um. “my. “a.
meow
a.

m
min am in. a “mum: mm.
dmuuﬂuu m ”-qu

may...
th‘

m

on

a

«to not min a m

dawn“: “www.muo mm.

mum-mumsmm»u
Hu I: am ”an“ m locum ”Win.

m
m

thou-unl-

mkmutummnnmghﬁmm

a»

�~9-

mmuamammuummwm
”mmuuzummwmnamm.

W
“mus-amaammnww.
mum

A‘

«at:

WW

II! a

dam.“

W

am
pan-Is
m
m
at»
WW»
80!. mm “amp-unam-

“mm

mt
Wmamummmuum
“It
m

mm“ a» mum wt mun
Winn-m you.“ m. u nmm Ilium
(Ind)

WW

d”

mm
mm.
muuuumuunmtnmuwnmm

km.

MiG-at

In! 1‘

aw Wmummmm. um.

“.muwmuuuuuuwmm
an mun.

nmm.umt.m

mummaumummmmu
mm:
m1.
3min.
mm.
We“ mm.

�1-10-

W“.
mmrumkmmummmam

at
amino
run“
an
m:

wrkﬂw and

awummrmuummmnmumu

m
mum
inn

m mun-0 mm a

,Wn

I! “who It in

tantrum).

at

”I.“

wt
item.

mus

in ma.

mt
m mm:

nu ﬂu

it“ ﬂit.
than

am“ a rm

aw muum “In: in: its mum at ﬁll mum.
on
sum aha-Mum an w mm a:
m macaw m as him than an
um

W
W

sauna“ 8“ man to mm;
Wm an;
QM

um

in a»
aim, than mu
a m manna
at 30W huh-1 m u“ &lt;1”on «a
s «an,» gnu-amm- mm. mm.

In our

Why

Wu
"mu

m. MW

w.» mm

m

�«‘11-»

u

inn-1m

an
was.

WM.

mm

mm

mm m

MI. 1 “mm“. 0M1 mm
m that but than um mm “mm in” m

M

«harm Win W M ““hMg
or
m
mast-3.:
as ”mm;
mu diam”.
«mammain

Mh I
1‘:.,u.z...c.4.,1;8

ems.»

”In.

“um: um W‘. n It“
bid
we
mﬁ
01M!“
mm, Mm mm
n:

_m¢. 1:

WIthan

min-um a: must. manna.

A:

Ch

ambit.

a ml- :1. m Mum. mm a

WWW»: mmnuuamu

W!
WW
W. mmmmmsmarammnu

mum. in

nasal,

and

�nun

mmtuouummmmmumumu

wmmwmum.wmm.

Intactumummmuumuﬁum
“0 ”ﬁlm "an. ”31%“.
OI’

at
W
In"
«an
mung

m

mutant. (mu

“mm-nuns“), tmﬁym
mmuuuummmw.uuunm.um
”muucm1uu.mmnuutu¢Wﬂ.
MmhIhu'. unmmm»m..uuu

m).

OWWMMUM‘WWMﬂmwnw-ﬂ!

ummmnm’umn.

Atm.mmw1w

�«na-

ammglitmmt)m£~uum
"ﬂibmﬂﬂlhlﬂﬁlrwmmm
M5

Mmummmumx

mutual(”to”).
mumummm

ﬂMﬂMWWM“WV-mwmﬁkc

Warm. 'mmmumomom

mautwmmumm

W
mﬁwmmumumumm
mamaammngm

muwmmwmmmmu

hmwmw.mmiuuwmmumm
(mun).

mhzmmnmnmnm

uwmuummummwm.m
mmwawstwmuummm

munmnwmm.

�db-

mmummmu
Immmtmhu). “inhuman
Lma

mm.nwmumwmm

*MW'MW”.NWI§QMII§
manna-hm.

“mun“.anyu

”mmnmﬂaamtm,auuwm

”mutton-an. mama-mama.

mmurmmumm
”.msemhv.
mmeuI-auu

«mmmmumum
magma-autumn. um.m

mwmmuwmwrsm.

mmmwummmaamm

�.15.

mum.

m.

Mam-I &amp; mi. that

mmumm:mmu
MmumuHM-mumumu'

mm

m m an“ «nanny

Wuﬁm-ﬂmmmf
mums-Wwamnmt
'mmmmmwmum

).

mumummmw

.mmmatmsmmw.

”Mummmwnw
mmnvudnammmuunamu

stoma-mum. ttﬁimﬂﬂtw

W" «W
.

=

'*

a
umwmm
~

WWW. ”QWthwm

�mwmwuum.mummm:

”mummwpnmm

nmumnmmmwmumm
mummmummmtm
:mumwtammnwmm
uwumm.uummmram

“Mm‘mquanuw

Mfmﬁmw‘.mlmtmhhﬂm
“RMCMJAMJAW.
Mime
mmm.~

nmmummmumim.wmu

�Q1,”

“Initial “It I rim with a um I «an an
m»muuyumwmum. MG

puinh‘MIom.umm-vvw.u

but niobium" mmwumm'n

mauwammmm.

«mam

m.uamuunlml tum. Sen-nub.”

W

W's.
Wmmnmmmmuum
but 1m» to WI.“

at

unmtummmuuuuummum
mum {Mk II). at “Imam

w

an“

m.mm.uuwwmtumum

mumuuuummmmtunmw
m.munmmuuanmmmum

ammuwswmtumuw.
“swam“,mmmmnmrmn
m

�.48..

m.

W

aux.

WM“ mmwmumm

d ”Hm“...
mm «at manna-u m m m:
m: and: “um u
a mus-nun»
mm
In a. Wt
yam
Md. timzmmm.mum
with“ mm mm

”W

W

m

m

W

W. W,
mmlwmmnmﬂ “4“an
Inﬂux rating!

m um-

A.
In
an
.mm
n
10.3,“
lacuna-u
«- am an

hr :2 mm a m n tho
a minus" m

pm

W:

mum“:
u
w.
m

tin-m

am

in ”mm a: mum“... or
.1- am. in sum xx. in
mm“
a
”new
Wu
mm um.“
m. m, catamaran.
and
a!
minimal Win: mm, main:
Mini. m1. W m «um um: Mm:

um

�A:-

WWNnMWWth
mutmnmmw.m‘m
mamuamuunmwm.
w-

nmuummmnwwtmm

mimmWﬂhﬂth.ﬂﬁ
mommuwrmnmm‘mawhu
“wumnuumm. Mﬂkﬂiimm
mum-hm. stWWMﬂIIlnﬂut

nuutmIMMathkkh¢Wu
u Wat-I” w 'mw mm“. m: an
mmrmatmumhunumm

amn$mu
Wu'mm’.
Minivan. “Mnmmﬁarmdm.

�om

WHMIRM!‘WWWW

uWth-“mmm',
mmnmu'mw'. um.
uws.ﬂmmﬂmmm_muq
H

.l.,“,.Vl

1'5

mm»

stamina-mum
mtaummummmmtuwuum

n‘wuuammu’w‘. vu‘uw

W.W.nmtw'ummmt

WW“W“M“O”WWamw

asmuuw-amtmumw.

At

mmmammwmww,uas«m
qmmun.mmmtmmumm

www.mmuutmuww.
mummmummmmu

m1“.

Asnmmmmeut-umm

�~21»

cmumuuummmmm.
wwmhmskWIWtW'“
“W'umWa
thm).
mum.uwmmwomuuu

*m

W.

��«so

unmet-mum“. um,umt.

mumsmmmunwum
mmmamw;mw.mm

wammdawmwm.
mwm‘mummm
mmw:mmmm~m

Mummnmmuum.
wan-am
mum
mm
mm
Wt
).
at

2.2

«mtwwc
mum'ap'ﬁhu‘ an mun-attain.

m’WM-m

an:

unﬁt-Wlmdnutumm. Mm‘cmu
mam”.

”mummmm',m.

It. mt

Win; it”.

me

WW

�"35*

mnunm

u Mum mm

mm
«is: :W

M
w
Imam”
m
t
a M
3m:
than
was
Mam u mad: mung: aunt's
manna. MWWmﬂhﬁﬂWFn/nua

m
W
WﬁﬂWbWMﬂl-de
www.momzymmmu
m
Mm

mMW‘fa

a. mu»

MWhhM‘WWan

NuWWW.
MW. “.mguummm
nu

WthuMW-mw.

minim!»

uwwmumtmmmmwm

umwmmhawumw
“WmmumuMMMu

��1.

I.

Wynn mmw

W

mat-tic Personality

awoken“: ”in

rmmmaa

Eta-mu” W5

3mm

8.01m this, Fungal:V
'

Mambm

‘.

m

Saginaw Pursuant:

Far-a:

misty

Madam“ int

mow-

WW

�I:
CW,

15833
and»

itiﬂili 9i ﬁﬁlﬂiﬁﬂisﬁﬁiﬂlﬂiﬂiaﬁi

IZﬁE

ﬂcxrtagiou

�Wrww’

W
”mm

m

_.DEP.' RTMENT

f“

GLEN

0M3:

N. 1-

-

W

w

w— m" F’ .ma,,

-

0!

WEHRLHOSPITAL
HILLS‘DE

a a» -- rm

,

A

fag—«m

V

‘

‘

U

_

"

�DEF'RTMENT OF

'

‘

.jy

[mam-1231.1 Psvcﬂllm
HgLleoE HOSPITAL

.

1'be
,

ﬁg“

-

,_

¥

./'I

/1AW

‘3

I

/

/

ff"? ”'"ZA

1

1

/

.’

I

/

LzlsA/L.
/
/

\

/

I

(

/

,I

s./\_

(

/r"—/lw*&lt;’ ’

i

.—

I!

V

“MM/t
‘

‘

I

,4

g.” x_/,- i“
;/‘_

‘1

I

‘

fA

/

/

j

"j

:J“;¢L.p
(Lx/VL

I

‘

‘

��’

(

.~

4,

�_.%:&amp;: —3

2w

2m_.o%

.

_
m

6‘

3‘5

��r—r-mv—I-

humility but

mum

MW:
Wt:
mm

lemme many

mum

We

33mm

�‘

(a
v

mun
Ramswmmmmmmm
’”

«mmmmm.
311nm

nomad

W
W

mm

W

W

Inward

My W

Waxy Mme.
Slightly

1mm

�”w.” .-,,--a-wvrv~w“7 w—z-‘wv ammwwwvmrmmg~

‘

:memum

�w-mun—um wNW~l www-n-wn

cm

m—WAI'WV-vrwwu

A,.m~mmtrv-mlw-wmvﬂ.wn-memW-¢

"‘xﬁ'rlr¢MrW.m-wywﬂ“~va 4”

..

vn'

(&gt;2

�v

‘nwv—cu. ""v-

'n’“ .

wv— &gt;vIFNIV‘W-ﬂ‘1-My—vlm uwrm.

mW'IUF-ww.i' Ir-vw'I"-¥v‘~1www z;

mm

m—wﬂnmmJ—Fvw’ﬂarxﬂv -uww:vml,m mlx.‘ mW'naM‘s-ﬂreﬁurvv-Iw-‘fwarwmrxlv-Iwumvw

av»-

.,

~rv-

.

��awn-n. "-WYN/E'

; cum—n .1 nu-men—w

- m-v—w

mimmmmv

-..~ w

mnnwm

lg
m.

arr

Wm!

:w

":N..iv-"

.

Wm 'w‘mnw'pmw Wm

at frat-nut

Interinstitutional Differences in

23

aim

Pom-mt

�.mmuw—v m MY

1

“Wu.W, .«nv

.,

r“ ass-rw-mw—w
-

.

W

wmmfn‘w

2?
75

33

100

&lt;20

57

20-39

20
28

79

���n

:v

Vw-“Vu ,v

-_. .y

v

,y.

A“.

”w

—

wwwww~mwwruw :vmimn:

rm:

mrrwmw

Wmmmwwm

mm

.

ﬁrm-row mar—rm“,mwlmrmm‘“

Aw

8mm
.i
xﬂ

62
82

55

35

89

37

29
35

me

-.

37

65

����‘74.?
5634

7r.o

�E

53

65

10.29

3049
i

30

20

80

�79.6

9/

1&amp;7

V?

1

4L

43m

ax?
737

«&lt;97

7;

_

.

?7

I)!

v}.3
fo.o

up
2L

���._

“Nu-u": n- vuw—n-anmwasw“):-.a~—m:wwvwmmwwwmqWn.r:wﬂ-wauwmwmvw-xmv-uwnwnmwuu

‘,

t

i

v

x- 20.

mura-

gown—WW

.n

19

'0

o

11

ﬁg

17

1h

69

28

36

3h

,.

.

11:

71

:u.

ha

60

33

'

20-39

59

.

20-39

5.
'

&lt;20

E

'

20-39

,

5

van-1 ‘w-n— our

man

�wwmmemI

TABLE

Munich

V

XIV

and Duration

of

no

v

.mmtm

am» in awaits].

,rw—mqw

gPu-‘cantz

‘

vamww

Manon
&lt;

W."

12

3

~11

12*

A

23

13

a

87

’

w.~h.‘.w-,

12-15

51

20

22

£5

254

35

8

..

12

21

5h

25

12-15

19

13

33

164‘

9

21

21

w: 12

7h

17

9

may

57

39

h

,

’

“Wm—r

«gV\_..n..w_u_l_...

w.”

_._.._w

MC

16*,

c

���Wm.vwvlp.~ .-

TABIE
1'

.

1'

Score

141'

H

'

30449

33

10-29
30-119

50-70,

m0

10-29

304:9
’0» 0

Nation of

1mm
&lt;

in. Ho

Mimam

ta; Paula
7.11

12+

17

57

V

1“?
0-70

Score and

IV

m
33

‘

26
21

7

5

47h

4f:

1/

1*: Ma?
#3

29
15
33
17

69

6h
77

15

no

38

28

9
31
32

2

5
d4!

4

5!" g 93
US

214

O

h

o

V
4
df

7?
Or
y‘
Y
05

���"

3

.
.

u

r." ~w-wm-aw‘m ' —L~"K'.uuhll a

'V'wlm

m‘wmww.‘

-wmwmm

��M.
+MI
o

I821.

LC]

81.?

K

o

72.7

= 2.

x"

=/.-IO

/:~s

20.9]
22.5
31.0

HH.
55%.

“‘3
$8.6

=4

=5£7

X

P

=

N5

MMHC
ZED

49.4

25.3
22.2.

6!.0

w
=3?
x
/

=/VS

44.7

�������W“!-

Aft-5

p&lt;

.061

N'- wmmm"

‘m'W-mmn“mm rum.

V":I’ﬁwmﬂlﬂhm

1». ::-..

r u'&lt;

����‘18.?

35’]

59,2.
(0.0

.

IA’. ‘2’

O

54,7.

52.7
9’51?

MM (4C.

39%
X’V
5/:

/
1 r.

P ‘

77.0

91.8"

13.5’
39,5-

(47.3

53.8

9,/

.

9.7
7.7

‘

.56
N3
‘

V53

����f

70

2

lé

HEN”

/.. /

{’1’

141.4

'

$29

2

~-

32-

é

.5"

�’&lt;ZZ

_

.

7"
1

I7

'

7

'22

7

HS’

5/

_______2__
.

39

‘

‘

FINN

&lt;7

o

7-—

6

.

__

0

"

3

I

11+
M?! [IQ

5‘

€=N3

5

33

4

7-"

/$‘

‘2.

[If

5'

O

g

I?

a

\\ NS

��W6’m

3

m

mtmGoLﬁ.
REE.
26.

macalo 26.

mam.

mthnnhhmoﬂaimdmtommiw’mo'

Hamnﬂquind,m'mw&amp;m
mu'nm.1,mtmmmwmca1.1.,nc.

lawman
analysis, the «en
Gel.

bum
wmmm.29.
11m col. 29/
will b-

mum-following

1,2,;th
29/6,?3 691.22/3 9.’ cal-dim“ 29/0 1111 m ho m.
5. ma far 29f]...2,3, ,5; 29/63; 29/5,? m and com «:3 an
601. 23 and 601. 26.
aud-u

Inmmamthath.
mum‘s-um.

WW

11:91»th

Bogart-ant at
Lunar Psychiatry,
amino‘nybomm
um,
61m
Oaks, I. I.
nmm. Rommel,
1: than. my difficulties um: um. any“, I my 3:. roach-d a mm.
3—7”, Monica 235.

this

mm,
My“.

to: Dr.

shun}: yum-I.
nth-ma. '3. mp1, mm.

�iua1apuruhoxnclcnt Aspu¢1n or

311.21 L. Kain. rn.n.*,
ﬂhﬁﬁauAul

Ptrtiaitriu trcaﬁnautle

In: rulxauu, r119.

51.5.1, ra.n.

tad
ﬁlm yank,

«a. Buymrtntut a:
r:«. 01¢:

8.3.

Expurmsaneax Purch1a$ry, 3111116.

cult, 1.1., I.!.
AAdnt 11 putt. h; ‘11:! 31.209: at tug Iattsutx Ianiisato
acuith.
and 150 1.3113
Pabltc Buntth

innpitnt.

v.5
8.5115 lonrd.

at 3.11:1

strvincz

”unﬁt!
Unna¢uhurot§n
$113!:
Innis:
the
unaporuﬁitn-ox
if
It:
ti.
Icalth 6.31:: :31 1h. c.r. uonniusar ﬁaaorstl aaapatux 1:
¢9m313

cratnthllr

aukunmloduuﬁ1

; it ’I&amp;

31v1u1on
Srozgatﬁtgdrutts

13

2/63

.

at Ptyuhtntry, nontuttaro ﬂcnpltal,

�In innit liuﬁr or sun luv
pupuxmtttn, Rtlltacthmnd 5a!

83";

ynxuhzutrta patient

ildlilh rtpnrtaa atnatttc£ut

rolntioulhtpo bitumen In innavzdnaz‘a yactt£¢a in tha tuuinl
clams Itrusﬁura 3nd tan yrgv:13aan

at trantnd illausu.

typun

or dilﬁﬁﬁltd aka-rduru Inn kind. and ﬂurutiau a: puruhtntvxt

trvutunut aﬁstuxstgwod

(

).

Char indimutté,

tar txuupla,

tht§l‘hig§ur vruyirttiu «f 1¢§nr alutn puﬁtinto in troutnunt
wart alanattata
yumitnma

at

It

purnhntaa

uppur 91:5:

nae pcvtunnzity

will. attairteuntzr high.»

pmn¢

patiuuit Viv. eluaattioa at nauto‘ic

etuurdtra. Far all vatltnts, psyahqﬁharupy

no: Ippitid 1n dalyriyoriiunutqu htnh itarnqa ta twp.» «Int.

pattua‘a. within «tan

dimgnﬁat&amp;e granﬁ, yqyuhatharnpy was

apylzcd unﬁt-afﬁne in npm§r ulna. yaiicmﬁa tad urinate

ﬁhtrtptnn tn lunar ulna: nuha‘ntn‘ ﬁiaimmr

It.

ligaxr1canuu

at ¢uinanic fantara

at traitius paruannal dgtaralaiag thn

and

availability

abnorvgd disrurauman

tiuld at! ht uxtludaﬁ in $301: Iﬁudiii. to tutu

ﬁho #010

u!

�-2.
ﬂﬁﬂihl

fact!!! in tap $r¢ttuaa£ at hutpttniistd patinuti

nadir noadition: axnluaing sh. ruutara a: p¢ti¢nt'n rtuinata
Ind

availability 0! trcltnuatn,

an: «adtriakta

it

a

yaticnt can‘t: try: aurvay

3111114. unnpitul in 1957*

yitti. t Viritty at triatntut awn...
ind Irzouio thortpiua

at.

1st. at thﬁlr ability

$9 pay.

In

inglndinn pszuhothtrtpy

available to

«11

pgtiautn r.¢nrd~

an abachtd $hut nan. odnaatsﬁn and 913:.

a:¢n£t1u:utly aaluciutod ﬁith ﬁbﬁiﬁ.

Quin hog.

#3

at htrth

tran‘naut, duratiun

a! unﬂatt:11nnii¢a, altnzaul datahlrgc IvalunQiun
daggnunta (

i. 91n¢r, iar'tgnwbara patiantu

tarsal uduaattca

wurn mart

warn

with

ﬁnd {a

lit‘lu

Itkolr tn ruccsv. qu‘tiu thurtpy.

var. kupt in tha hnspital for nhurtar pcrioda at tint,
aura titan rttaa .0 rancvurgd «r

gawk

Saerth

And

an ditchurga.

In nanié;at. tho rsuncar, buttot uduoltud and n.ttvc born
paﬁtonta

airs

at ertsuunt,

stimn raeatvud puy¢hothurtpy an

wot; haapituiisad

it.

001: turn

tar tong.» parioas tad rancivud

�.3.
t3: yearc: cliniuul diauharcu rutinut.
Show: obsorvitivna

attrautypr :culitarnin

3

rarlactoﬁ
ﬁnal.

C

v.3.
1n

£139

raintud to noniurau or

lubjnet': roaponaea to

). Bichar

F

a nadiriad

asorau wart unloointcd

with ditgnaicu at 1nv¢1utianal payahnlis, uhartnr parioda or

hanpitaliuutiun. and»:
tharnpy (

It

).

who

h$shmr

inoiélubc a: roturrul tar nouutia

canclndod

thtt the atroets

patterﬁa
trulﬁmant
at aauiua algal (us dutinud

my

an ysyahiutria

Halliaatho£a

tad analluh). tau, advantiaa birthplncn and dogreo at statue»
ﬁypy

«tru

33%

u

result «I aconontc itcigtl or tvuiluhilitr a:

uuagilttan
an:
«luau.
trnitpsnt

wan

tha$ the oblervntionu

taﬁptutiou.
rtrttcﬁioa at ditturunt naagl a:

8.2.

:

tian

and uxpruntian.

It

conuu31¢5w

u:a poztnlatai that anhsucta cf 108a:

would
ROI.
313th
:ud
uduaattau
1001::
fortian
Ioninl ulucunl,

in
maker
nou~varhu1,
ar
mangory
lynptunu
ninirunt
trcqututly
puttnrnas while uyper 015a: subjunts vauld
of .xprnulion.

utiliip

vurhal :¢nnt

�.3...
A

n¢e§nd

titaa to

ﬂho

intirprttatlon, navthr, rc1:tnd th:
tratinaat philauophicn

tntiauul luadura

and

It wan

anﬁ paraoanal.

lantiiutioau what: ynyuhathhrapr

Wﬁﬁ

absurvuu

;ttitudu¢ at 13:81“
nuggsstod that in

ilxhly vstund, uypcr

Ginsu iudﬁvidunln wauld rauntvu inordinatu ruprtlcnta$$¢n in

ski! ﬁhtrnyy. ﬁanilnrly, dinahara. ovtluntiouu ¢ad duration

at hanyattlxaatioa ﬁtnld

bu

aflostté

195?

«tat:

at dittcring anciul ain‘t.

unpnatntionn for individutln

to twat this

by nitraronaan in

uu¢¢nd aucg¢utiou w. doaiicd

Hillaido Iiﬂdy; to naplvy

¢h¢

to rtpcat uh.

It». lrotudurnig

Ind uon*

¢h§arvati¢na
«ataad
the
to
ta ta: oth¢r iantitntiont,
currently
shn

0.). nannincur Ronarinl Boupttul a:

laaaachaaatta Manta: noalth

Tupakt tad tho

Conﬁar 0: Boston.

In theta thlﬁt

hauptinlu, inlﬁitutiaunl ptraonnvl nfxuot similar ttﬁitadus

in trsatuuut tad education. Eaah

I fall tin:

Inpurwinory

stat:

1a a $¢¢ohins

hasxital with

uni tutivu rtnnureh dapurtneat.

thuy amphaaiaa yaychnnng13t1enXXynarianttd glychntharaﬁy but

�m5.u

yrovide uﬁhor traataantn 1nolud1ng nonttxu ﬁhortpiea «ad

aetivp pragrlnt of utiiuu thurnyy.

Bach

’trosuos chart-

terﬁ traatmant of voluntary watiuuta, data

tedial aura

39%

provide gun»

ta arav their paﬁiont papulntian Ira:

and tend:

aimilur an; graupa, excluding ehtldrun and thy aunilc ug.d.
ﬂﬁjar inatiuuhznual dxtrcronaun 3:! gain in thoir cantata
or iinnnaial anppart, airfarent institutional policies rnnnrd~
Sag

lanath at stay

ﬁnd

ntﬁur¢¢tru. rho Huanuohuanttu Rental

Health neuter (Mﬁﬁc) in a publin

Itﬁﬁt tundu: Killstdc Hospital

institutien suppartud

(RR)

1: a nan~pvot£t veluntary

hospitui with a ns3ar partinn of its incanc durlvnd
and other aonmunity funds; tad Kanningur

pr1v¢ta inntitutiun.

taliuntiﬁn, «5:1.
more

Hﬁ

at

33

tic: nit;

nanpital (HIE) in a

ha; I 90 day limit for haapiw

I flotiblo on. yaar retina;

kaharal attatuda. At urn $nd

@ntpntiunt ulxaia urn

while

Thu Hana

by

maﬁa

trail: trailnhla

t

and HIE,

I

dty hospital and

to all vatznntag

thdrela no 43a heapital and I uhopt tutu, limitld

�45.

tttovenrw proevnu is availabla to
2h: printry ruaaun

I

tun patinnts.

far ouloettng tun tattitutaonu,

havov¢r, lay in thy axpnctutiou thnt thuy vauld murvu pattants

of differing acuinl alumnus {nae £5) lad that differuneui in

this dtutaiicn vauld

bu roxlnatad

ta.

ta

trau$nnnt wurinblaa.

rho speeifiu purpato cﬂ tutu stuﬂy wt: ta dotcraina papilla

t1en dittnrcnaas betuuan tun ﬁbrin mustttnttant with raaptct

to anclnl alman, :39, education and

F

utorc,

na&amp;

to rolutn

thaaa pttiunt chlraatcrtatica to sho trnntnnnt Ouvtnblun of
type at treatmant, durntian or hospi$a111nt1an, diagnonau
diuehawg. twilvatinn.

Qua

�.1.
REEBOB

A11

:

pattoatn in rcaidcnco ia‘th¢un tnaﬁiﬁutiana

givun dutu in January 1959 aura utuétod.

R8

had

mane

on

whiz. urn tan

auuhar
thoaa
a
at
at
duly,
stall
patients
veluntlry

Vtrt sultanua by an: uaurt: ta thu institutioa tor

puynhiutria ovuluutian, or a chranis aahiuophrqula granp
udn1t$¢¢

:nat.

fro.

in...

a

ottto hospitll for a Ip‘oific roaanrah pro-

putisuta wit: oxuludud tron thy viva: bocauuc

at thiir nan~vo1unttry ataxia.
ntltnd a:
350h

putt-nil ﬁt an,

113

patient

wan givun

The

100

study popu1¢tloa cou-

at urn tad

1h. culitnrnSn

P

cauln

95

It

(

nuns.

) on

the

agatgnntaa dtxt. Paticntt' roeovdn aura analyutd ﬁtter a

ported at 15 nontha. which was the out~o££ vaint far the

analyai: a! hut trontm¢nt vnrzuhloa. tor the dntcrninnuiau
of

toaitl clans, tau nailingthuad 2~ta¢tor

inaux

wua uncd (

).

�1. nutheaolegle Aaggata

it ﬁt:

tuna uhlurvod thtﬁ thc vary tautor: an var:

inturcltoa in studying afroatﬁd thi aollcotiou tad organizt~
tin-u o!

tn

dun. Via-tutu” in “iguana“: a:

tarp: of

trantmant and axprausiens auad far dtuguoaia and trottuant
awnluatann, mad: aanlyauu

attriault,

tnﬁ rcguirad ooastdsrublu

sanrtion for unitarnity.
I}

1'-

at

u

ut_!r, taint:

Among

thy tast1§u~

had
a
tha
that
the
dtslgnataon
pattnnt
for
crituria
tionn,

rocuivcd 'gnyahothurtpy' aiztavad narkndly. asking autturuity

in cluas1rieat1nn difficult.

At nrﬁ‘ﬁaychatherapy win dot1g¢

nttad ta trautaunt udn1n1;tar04

atnfr paychsatrtst, tar
additional

i...

on a

which tha

proaariptian basis by a

puttont

was obtreod

tn

acasinnu with tbs psyahittric rwsia-nt wart

cansiﬁarud part at routina adninintrative pati-nt earn. At
an psywhath¢rtpy Vt! dcfiaﬁd

at trcatncnt anatiana with

psychiﬁtria rcaiaﬁnt. 8‘33: puywhiatraat: do not treat

#hn

�.9.
rationia dircotly, but ruatrlntud that! activitius to uup'ru
ﬁtting the reticent th.rnpia$s. At the naac,

1n

centrtat,

paychotherapy Ina designatcd as a function at many diaciyliuua

.

payohiutric rustduuta, nurses, lidl¢§1 atudent¢, 3601.1 uorkorn
3nd

piyuhalag1atu. Formal rueards at sneh nonstona warn ”Gt

ruutﬁnc inaludgd in tun patannt': rauerd and to accurtttn
watch

patiynts were ranazving puynhethorapy,

v1.3 the r-uadcnt in ohnrgo or each

ta intcrw

stat.

Thor: aura individual

b} migﬁuouia:

we hmd

institutional

aestza 18:10:, uhzah and. nonpartaans dirtianlt.

dinu~

At urn

ata¢hnrgo diagnoaaa unployid tn: multiglq clanuificntian

rsynhiﬁtrin
Asaouantian whila both an tad
nyittn.at tho shaving»
nanc rallawad unitary indiganoua nywtims.

at diagno¢ua tron urn
goaﬁad convuruiona

it.

savcrul ax‘mplas

Itutud in tabla , with *3: angu

inté catcgoriaa campartble ta tn. athar tun

inatitutiom, providing,

how/var, an muvoidnbu sound: or

d:stortian.. @iuilnr abaarvuﬁiona hit» bton rapartad
and

hit asaacintas

(

) who

h&amp;v&amp;

by Paanntniak

chain thnt diaganac: within

�411“

saniax aluau unngupition at thi karma institution: (Enhlt

kt urn tho ycyulatioa

artdoninantty‘uppar c1;ln with

wan

par cant of pntiuntn in annaea I at

all»: 7. I»:

«luau xv, and man. in
5% HR

82

i:

uni! can viticut

maﬁa!» «Inna

praauuinttcd

31th acct patients in clnauan XII ind xv (éﬁ par cent}.

At-HHHG,

57

It,

).

pctianta «are «htafir from tha luwur a1u3;aa with

pix eont la olnsans
b) 532:

Rhurc

uué v.

XV

at:

an

ailturnaat in tan inutitatianal

papnlnﬁioan in mg: diatribntxan. a rung: afloat fiﬁh sh»

putiuutn an». undur the :3: at twnnty and on: quarter warn

:orty

yunru

at oldgr.

a} manuatagg:

was

populations éitrared 1n adunnﬁianal

nttainnunt, with patienga at

tiau
gt

ﬁhsn thguc

3x36

it

KFH

having worn yanra

cﬂucau

«use. Whit: k1 gar cunt at tho patiunﬁu

ruilod ta camylcto high auhacl, only

an and 23 ptra¢nt

a:

at

Krﬁ

did

sat graduxta.

32 par aunt

at

aux» Sanding

in.

cauuxntunt with the anciul clan: diffnraugt, claws the ceaiul

�113 8

Intur:uut1tu%1onat countriinu. for aeasnplrahalosiaul
Viritb1¢a

m

512.

2.

51

an

23

3.
h.

17

3h

13

1

3h

29

5.

0

5

28

19%

19

22

1.

anti-1
G1!!!

26

Q

315

7%

”we
3%

.

I

9-.001

‘

59

58

333

22

23

33

23

32

bl

um
m.

2.2.15

51:

51

a9

16 *

23

1?

1o

radorn

to«29

51

33

20

Sowhﬁ

hi

90

38

Sa~7a

&amp;

18

a:

Ag.

a “121 5
d£~8

39.39
he *
4.12
&gt;

12-3.9
d£*h

phn'ﬂ'i

,2,

mi

.1

n~-0§

$g9.2
;~.aox

�.1a.
alas» unnauru 1;, in part, buncﬂ an t6uani&amp;§n.
a)

P

Squat: 91:2.»¢ue¢¢ in tha diatrihution u:

warn ubaurvc&amp;‘

Fixiyuaun put

buluw 30. and chi?

It

In cautraat.

I aaala,
A: ax

tight par

«an%

at urn pntanutu

fifty pi!

want of the

had accrua

watiaatl

9:!"

ma

an“:

a:

50

at mart.

hna ? acorns in the

hwe

in: diaign «I an: study includad
within stab

r supra.

sunk wath snarot mf an ar abuva.

tad rurtyutwo par «ant

"hum:

had

aunc tvauﬁy gar cunt uura halww 30 on tha

31461: runga bntwaaa 30 «ad

tho

r Ewart;

m

nxnuinntion at

m myohutric an» 1.:

inititntiaa, ta wall

as butacun

inatiiutioat.

tutu uiupuriteaa pruvua difficult, in putt buaauuo a! difrtrw
aueid in thy dotinitiun a: ﬁn: paychiatrac variabluu, ﬁnﬁ,

in part, huaauau shins variables ranged so widuxy that

«gnu

paraﬁln answer: arxtﬁria anmlé «at b: autdrniuad. Far
umnmpla,

‘o-conpart tautitutican tn relatimn tu Innath a:

�«13‘-

htlpitnl atty, vuriout eut~¢t£ poriaal any: triod‘but nan:
sllnuut tar

at

165
At
than
luau
«.11
3150:.
urn,
cqulvslout

putiauta audﬁr ho yuan: ringinnd 15.0

thin

7

non‘hi.

At sane, 70! of All

Ind 39$ aura than 12 unathi.

runnintd 1.3: than ? ninth». ﬁnd 63 mar. thtn

patilnti

12 manthn.

Aauarﬂiugly, amphuaxa will bu pluaad on 1h; dirtcrunaul
btawcan

institutiana, with cttatiau

wt rolcvnat intruuinuttw

tatloatl rolntianthiyn.
g)

saw

pnt1«nta

439

at xru

i

m:

“autumn raw

yuanivnd aauutiu thlrnpy than &amp;t tan nthsr

tau insﬁltutaani.
Manning.»

'

Gauaurrintly a twnllor parcuntasu of

patiautc warn attuned a: rac¢ivla¢ payuhothurnyy,

with 3 lawn; aunts: (36 vcr want) r-euivtng niltnu turn. a:

trtntaaut.
an

At

KR

that. antiautt

Hamid

hut: bo:a «Inluitiud

ﬁtting rgenived payahatyarupyﬁ x: can cuntruata tun pita

owning. or

338
aamatac
knurayy,
reoniving
patient:

ahwvu

oxanttieuntly lass than wither at tho ﬁthur tun inatztntiano.

�.11..

niltvu
,

(13 Ethics

yarsittin:

a «catwalk

Wﬁthxu wank

it

and plyﬂhﬂthlvariiﬂ wwrc cauhtuié.

a: aunntlu :né

taltituiion.

trontaant at urn

and F

?ut&amp;unta why unto yuan:

at

pny¢h01¢¢1¢a1 thuruyivn.)

nan wan waistla to nu10¢t£ua

near: as xru

$nd

ER

(Tablo

).

uhnwa F a%oru VI! low rc¢c$v¢d

pnyuhothurnyy with srcutnr trﬂqutaay $han gataouti who Vdra

olétr

or vha haé high F acoraa.

Enua;t1¢nn1 achiavcnoa‘ and

innit} eiaxn ﬁia not nigniticantlr atfcct soltutxan at
’30::

it any

hauyéhnix

Ana»: ﬁhn yuyohtatrxc Ulrimblmt, within naah

aitgnasia

twia%*

wax

inttitut&amp;cn,

higﬁly
tun want
rulatvd varinhlo ta aaltetxon

at itcn%annt.

91l¢hl¥3ﬁ ovuluntiaa

honpltuliuutana at 33

ﬁnd name

it

urn and aur‘tiaa u:

“are :13. rolatcd

ﬂu

saloation

at troatucnﬁ. than, aanataa truntaint an: :ataataﬁ for
pa‘iiuﬁa clataiiicd nu sanitaphrania and attaativa dincrdlr

hart nttna

ﬁhnn

urn;
pafahaaanrntia.
Lt
that. «littnd an

puﬁlunia rccaivtnc

lattiiﬁ arnatntnt

(prudnninaatly that:

�’15.
alaauid an nahisuyhrtntu) rililwﬂﬁ dalnhnrsc rating: at
minus.
pmyuhnﬁhcruny
rn¢a1v1nc
p¢i$¢nsa
than
ngtuprovoé
With

hyapaﬁnlu
acupztuzx:xta¢n,
ptticuta
dtrtﬁiﬁﬂ
tn
a:
rtcnrd

ﬁnnﬁ

tar langcr ptrlldi
b)

wtrn

that: rtcuivtn: nunutie thcrﬁgy.
eoaniwtrnb1u dittortunau

g'

vurﬁ #huwn bﬁtwnan

«a. ﬁbrin inuttﬁatﬁvna with waapaat so

paxatuﬁ‘a lungth a!

stir

3;

(rahlw

31a pasiuaﬁa VI?! han-

ta§a¢wt,
with 65$ 0: puﬁ¢¢atﬂ runniniag
pi‘nxasud
naathn 0r aura, «savanna

tud-unly

5

it

31

9a: aunt

that: ut

gut auu$ a!

H336.

93

it!

tar

twmlvu

the 33 patinaﬁa
aqua} uﬁny

Inuit:

at

thy

while twawthirat

EB

nxuvun
and
batuuua
savtn
ﬁﬁ!
stony

a:

win
within
éiﬂﬁhﬂraﬁﬁ
warn
3836
tan
watasnta

munQKa

a:

heapiﬁaliautiong
urn uaﬂ
ﬁn

I! at.

wan

its

luadh 9t haupi§altﬁtﬁ$¢n

for tha 1nugust veriad. At

sauznl tunttr unit alumni: rtlaadd
~~

yauutcr yatxcuﬁn rmmniutns

Ovary :50

1Ith,

hawavcr,

that:

�.16..

nt

RIB rammiuud

lanai:

£hnn

at

an

at

Indand, an:

mane.

intnriuntihutiaanl diffuranous voru :9 grant that

: putttat

in the oldest as. group an: no». ltkniy to ho bospittlisud

far trait. nanth: or
yuanguat tau stony

mart

at

tt

Hana.

urn thin war. pntinnta in an.
At urn tad an

tier.

wan

tile t

aignificnnt relations batwenn durutiau a! honpitnlisutinn and
F

acara, tho lave: r uaora being atoneit‘od with lanai: in.»

pitil atty.
a) gigggniggu
1: thaw;

t1.

1n

rtblo

2h. diutribntion at diaehurgc attsnotnu
.

tar atatisttecl analysis three diagnaln

ﬁery
undue uabtsophranin, n£rautivv ditardﬁru 3nd
grvnpiugn

psyvh¢nouroaaa Iﬂﬂ ynrsonultty «Quaraorn.

portiona warn similar for the an and
tha

HFK

muse

rho é:ngnoci§a prou

povulnttons, but

pt%1cata warn rngurdoé as having raver urinativa and

Iahiaophrania éiuordcrs, but

I larger haiku:

or paymhanoutotia

or ehnrtatar dixardaro.

Intrttnetxtationul analyntn

chauoa

this at as both as.

�.1?.
and 3

suort ”ﬁr. rwlntnd to diﬁgnoaiu: at 3:3 as. clan: of

tan sonata tgntart In: volataa to dinauouing whiz: at
nuns

a: tha senial variablnu war.

trig

vurinblgs, dingnoaaa can signifia&amp;ntly

so rolntcd.

haupitnl ta unleatioa or trottmcnt

&amp;nd

or

maﬁa

its

rolttcd

payouts-

1%

«.mn

durution at haapittilo

nation; Ina val: at an tn aiaahtrgt ovuluutioa (gag:

£££E£)~

a) 91353:: 0 Evuiuatiunt In sack heapital, nest patiouta

‘fi urtlnttud It
A?

the time a! disnharga as ”ingrovodﬁ (Tabl.

).

338. hatovnr, a higher ptreuatuga (19%) at patisntu warn

ratad g. *uninprav¢d* and only I ainala puticnt wt: callud
'rucovnrod* er “hunk impru§ad'. rho highant porcantago at
*rccovaro¢*

at "Inch impruvod' rutxnga

(28%) and

thy lu‘nt

haunt! at ”unimprovaéﬁ (165) wort $9334 at ”386.
Anulyann within uaoh

it

an and

Mann

thqrt

vitae haiku: than
1117

institution

ﬁne a teuéancy

ahavad vuriuhln

rliﬁltl.

for clan: pationta ta

ywungcr ones, but thc

b0

reunita urn Itntiatiaw

significunt only at an. At a!“ that. run

nu

appositu

trand, vita 014.! putxautt'uara liknly ta b. rutcd unimprovti.

�__._._.._

u—mmmW__—m

��j
w
-

49:25

{0‘70

W

“i

a7

-31

2

5“

”iii—“T-

7

'5

_

��f
".
’qg"

A

comparactu

a:

Parahantwio truntnuut

ta

rant: Ybiuntary ntipstull

nan-t

an.

an,

Plum", nu mums, rum.
lathgaxnl 81‘301. ?h.n.
mu

m:

’bwu

Buapitul.

nu, ma.

Dmrtnoa‘ a:
ta.
#103

6th., L.I.,

znpnrtnnntux Plynhiuiry. laliuido

l.!.

II~2992
thy
Inttunal
Inntt‘utu
grant
a:
by
u.a. rublxu ﬁnnlth survtc.; &amp;ad tho liuuau
mﬁuilth
at Xantul
ﬁuuaiy nuns:1 ﬂutlth 30:96.

a$ntt$ at tho lansnahsnntts luatnx
I:
it.
‘3‘ 0.3. Hummingur ﬁbuuriul ﬂutpiﬁnl 1n

In. comptruiatn

ﬁnalth Busty: an!

gratutully ntkuaulodx¢d.

Aﬁdraau:
rrtltat
3.1. $7. 1.1.

*

'VI:

3/5!

niviuion a: rayuhautnr. Hau‘utinrc Bouptttl.

�tn thoir 331$: at

ﬁhw

It»

ﬁavuu

ptrﬁhtatrau patilnt

ﬂailingahund
and anilinh rapovtla Itgntttnaui
populnilon,

valuisuauhipn baiwaun in xsdaviaumx‘: position in ﬁn.

tilill

$ti§tad
alum: ptruoturc Ina £3. pravuluu¢t at
illnaua.

twycu

of attsuaaud atturamru and kinds and duratica.¢r payahAatrtc

truutnuat :anantuiarad ( ). tkgr thattntna. for umaupla.

that

;

hiahor prupowﬁann a: ions: aliin patient. in tvaatncat

were alnncixtua Il~pl¥¢hﬁ§ﬁi whaln‘uignzrinnutlr

hithi? ptﬁ~

.purttons a: uppar ulna: p;t1¢nth var: alanuaxand an nuuraiio
and

puritanlitr dailrdora. It! all

at:

inpldrmﬁ

is ﬂiuyrnportaau:sity

pnthonﬁu. acyuhutharupy

high

ditrtli with at:

ugyuw ¢1§Is

pnyuhoni
ouch
within
«inunnutat Iran»,
gutiyutaa

thirty?

tduxnzut.r¢d

um.

its;

Otitn ﬁt uppur exist p;t$amtt

tad otntatu thnrupmuu in lunar 01a:- uabacatu.
who

cianiti‘nnst or iﬂiﬂﬁliﬂ tnc‘uvu

at Granting
«avid nah

pavuunnnl dutaruinluc

b. txaludod

1a

and

uvtilabaltiy

it. obntrttd altxaruucau

taunt iﬁudaua. In tact tau rﬁlu a:

�.1.
watts: raster! in tin trontuntt u: hutpitalssd&amp; vutiantc
'udur otndttllai quludtnl tut (natty; at pustanﬁ‘a £1uauuei
and

availability at trttﬁuautly

an! auditinknn

t

pISai.

patlunﬁ acnaun sip: auvvqy

at lillntdu niuptint

1a 1957.

in $38: b0!»

vnriuty a! ﬁrnntucut nudcu, Snalu¢1n¢ ptyﬁhmshuruyr

or;¥nsc
aha
thnrwpiom

irt

a: ﬁhutr ability ta

§u¢u

u

wt dbauruud

availahiu ka

all

patauntu rustedn

why.

that use, Odiatilin

and 911a;

uf‘birth acre

’atgatritaﬁtmy automiftid with «intau «I trtutuon£. duration

at hospitalautttua,

arts:

(

)a

ultu1u¢x ninthnrtu cvnltatiom taa «luau

furnauﬁubnru
nanny.

pattcn‘. with

littlu

Input!

giauttiaa war. at». minim: ta rucuavu taunts: taartpy, viva
taps in

in. hatpattl it»

churﬁar yariod. ﬂ! $aun, and new.

nt‘uu ﬂirt vital in BIDUVIIid

aw

unit tuprtvcd on.d&amp;nuh¢rtc.

In Ionﬁrnta, tau yuuasur, buttur cﬁnuutod and natavm burn
pasiunsa at»:

titan ria¢1th

purchaihurupy :3 tan saxo town

a! trau*uou§. aura h¢3p£i511tvd 1hr teaser piriodi and tuuuivad

�.3.
ﬁhc‘poovur

ciiniail

dinuﬁuran rﬁtingg.

Ehita uthrvnﬁttun turn 31:. ruxattd ﬁo'nauturat a:
tiawnatrvy a: rurllctnd in nubaoais' vacuum... to a uyda~
{10¢ Gnltforuta

I Butt.

(

).

Haghnr 2

gotta: war: aasoaann

tad v1$h ¢$uau0unl at tuvulutttaul psychouta. thawing purtoau

a: htuyitnltl¢tian.

and

I

highnr Lnuidcacu at votnrral 2i!

aquatic thtrnpr ( ). 1t nun nanola¢u§ thnt thu uttuuta a:
aoat‘z class. :31 Udllltilﬂ, biuhpinau and dcaroo at clarcaw
Sway an

purchaatrtc ﬁruuinnat patturuc war. not a rouuit

t:

ataaautn :Iu‘¢ru or awnainbilitw a: trunungut ilﬂnic 9a:
dbﬁurvutiuna
war.
3:3:tnttan val thus thg

iudtviaunl astrircnnnl in
and

«uprtslian.

X‘

month

&amp;

ratlcutiou ax

a: Iiuytutaon.

nununaaaattan

uni pcotulatcd that uwh3.¢tu

t: taunt

cocinl #Iﬁllﬂﬂ, lacinr‘wduuatiaa uaa turuttu birth wtuld
aura trtquuutlr nanatalt lympiduu in nanwvorbul. tanner: a»

II“? yt‘turuu,
nﬁtn:

whtlo upvav alas.

If «upruisitnv

Itbsattl wall uttiiiu varbnl

�“a...

t

aanaud

Lnturpritutiaa, huuuvor. ruluiud in; ubturutw

taunt tn tht ﬁrnnﬁusnﬁ philaaaphiul tad xsfttada; ct talttm
tnsaaunl lucdaml and yawnunnul.

tilt:

audzv1d3313 nudﬂ runnivo

It Uta

aaacaﬁtod

that Ipptr

inardiautn vupr.uwntahi¢n in

psrahnthcrupr in 1a:t&amp;%autoan what. yaymhntharanr vat highly
vuluca. ataxitrly. ﬂiﬁlhtrtﬁ.§VIlﬁiﬁiﬁnﬂ and durailau a:
knapitnlintﬁxan Imuld ha i33cttud
u!pn¢$nt1¢nn tum Sﬂﬂ1VSdn§11
20 tons

195?

allllléi

my

ditturaunh: in Ital!

a: disrurtn; social «la...

that scannd augguutioa an anulaad to ragga: the
ntnay unplmrin: uh.

u&amp;nc

pvuaaﬂuria ind nan»

aurr.nslr t0 «stand it» ohnurvut1¢na to
tun 6.3. naauaugim armorial Hatpataz

at

sun oﬁhur
Ebpaku and

inatttn‘ltuu.
tha

untanahucnttl nausnl Hﬂ‘lﬁh cuntlr a: vastnn. In that. ﬁhrao

haupitnln,

initttutianll piraunuol stitch :intlur tttttudai

13 trauﬁnunt and udusntxon.

a

full

llth

13 a

itaahta: haupttal with

twig auplrvilory nt¢££ ﬁnd aetiva tumansh dvvarinont.

rhuy lﬂphﬁtiﬁt purehtanalrtaﬁallywtrltntnd pnyuhnihurnpr but

�«6m

H35Iﬂﬁ

111

vulnatarr. nanlt paﬁa-ntn tn rnitdauou in than.

inntituianuu an a civun dt£a in Jtuutry

ﬂail: urn lad

it

than.

it

1959

vurt ntuditd.

an had volum$arr-patxtatn only, a

R836

wart tcnigund hr

It‘ll

unnbur

in. ataxia tar yuyuhittrtc

avihnitin. or wurt sawhnrt at I otwouiu anhinwyhrunac ntntu
haugi‘sl Iraﬁg ﬁrtnliurrnd to! I sycatriu riannrth prajutt.
that¢.paidnn&amp;a war. umoluand tram thn aiudr hanuvn.

a: that:

nanwvulnniary abutat.

2h: study pnpuln$1un-etnnlctud at 113

p‘ttnuan uﬁ an, 190 at

K18

titan

satin

£ha

ﬁnittaruia

F

In!
C

9E

at maﬁa.

) an tho

zach pa‘tau‘

8t!

datttugtta aatg.

lithtnon Illihl taint in. knit-utn‘ rauurdn var: nualriad.
Jar an. dutarutnataoa at :cetul exams, «an Hullsngahaua
ﬂoatatar iadax

may

ntnd (

).

�“a.
Autthur tritium

of
the prtlnnoc

it:

atrtur'nt ruataruh

1‘
tan
itau
rcutzaau.
alaninit
altacttu:
grnuraut,

sh.

¢£

nuns
ﬁx:
at
pavaunt
vutiantn
at
tucaty
upgrauanutaxr
aurrny.

wart ah:9a1u.lly 111 tad use Eta: hunptiuliﬁad far ulny
Sﬁtﬁ a uwtap uuula «at annualir hnwu hunt

inst tiny

had Esau tranbturrnd tram

yturt.

in this hecpitu!

inothtv skats.1uut1tu~

taou.tuw a Ip¢aiul uindr.

rung.

it

vat anon apparant that £ht Vim: finiﬂfi

war. inturauiod an Isndyiua ntrtcind thy atllua‘aon

at

nnﬁ

in
unite
we».
prdhlann
ﬂat
éxtn.
spaaarie
urgiutswtiaa 9!

st.

varin‘xouu an ﬁnnigan*xnua a: twp: a: troatuuat and exprnualcaa

qud tar diuguonin

trantn-ut uvnlun‘iau watch aunt .n:1:~

W!

at. disfiault
3)

and

dualguuﬁtn:

and viqntrid caaiiéovnblu wxorttau

it‘s a puttuat

than; sh: institutiouu,

tut

uni»

m "um:

for

riuutv.d "unrahoth¢rupy* dittlrud

making untSQrISty

in clu:u$ti¢¢t$nn

�.9.

ditttailt.

as an.par¢hoth¢rupr

was

davicuuttd nu trus‘uunt

atlzulctornd on a yrnaurlyiton basis by

tar thigh sh.

A

aunt: raruhtatrilt,

pgﬁicut nu: churned an additional (cu.

with tho ptyahtgtrle retidant were uonntﬂursd part

at rﬁutiuu

ti 3! wuywhn‘hornpy ill

ulntntntrgttva pntxant oarc¢
to triatuont nunaionn with

Station.

ﬁha

dart‘ud

psychiatric rtnidcut. stuff

paywhintritta did not tract pgtiunts diraetly, but raitrtutod

thair sativitiom ta aapurviatns tau roaidouﬁ phywialnnn.
Sb. lﬂﬁﬁ parehatharupr

Wtﬁ

a.t1gngz¢a g: a function

Aluethiuoi-a~ parohtntrzu roatdouta. pmynholagittu.
andauui
xtudnnta. Formal
workura. nuracu and

station‘ war: not vau91noly ineiudod
and ﬁn unaariaiu which
v0 and to
‘b)

1n

at uni,
«#6131

rieard. a: tank

tau paeicut'n roger!

patients wart rucotviag puythvthqripy,

tutorviov $30 ruttdun‘ in chart. or 'uah oats.
&lt;

Itylaa his»

5%

“atlas Individu31 ialtitutionnl diuunontla
mud: uomparioanu

atrxicult.

At $13 dinuhnrgs

dtgtnvuua anplaymd tha mulﬁapln awniuuﬁtve data lﬁhlﬂﬁ

�.19.
ruccnuundol by

it.

Annrtcnn Payuhtntrzo Attestation uhtlo

tellauad unitary syatcun. 5.1.9:: nuanplou

boﬁa an :nd luau

at ﬁtnznalun Iron ark 3:. liutad in Tani. I, with

our sug-

gIatId uouvorniGnn into cathccrie: «caparablt to th. athar
tua tuctztntlnna. 1h... canvosataau prcvido, hnwavur. an
unuvotdahlt Iﬁﬂtﬁ. a: dis#¢rt1¢n. (sinilgr obgorvutian: htva

erortud

boon

’allntntok

by

and

dioata thus itaananuu within

us: anneaiuucd

$hn «an;

(

) who

in-

taut1tut1¢u arc 3130

vulatruhln to individunl dittornuaas nuang nxgntntra.;

‘ “U ”G“ .v."~.-ﬁ
fabll I
’

In

a)

Hunt vnracd

:13 an:

,

tin

'

a: I

rovunnn

I

Rating: at zupravon

in forum: ;nd actual. in. dischargc 1:113:

tripattita

with n tapnrgtc urulugtian

churicturolocxual and axudrcn: chuncsa.
global rbtluca 13 vital

txihutlnn of ciah

it

tacit:

HR

it

tar snaial.

and Kane had

In! dittiuult to saunas tan anu-

0! ‘ho Runniastr 3:06am

(rail: 1!).

�.11.

tar tux;

lwu&amp;y

sh: Hiuningar

ta ta. slahnl raﬁiugt or

rating at: ealwnrad

syndrome

an and 3533.

it. “a. .”‘*¢ *‘U’

Tiblt I!

maﬁmﬂbﬁdhaou.

that. in:
391131 013.0

a narkcd dittcrunoo in tho

tanpoci‘ton or an; $hrt¢ tuntatutaoua (tab). :31).

it. povnluttdn nun prgdauinuutly*uppar sluts uiﬁh

At urn

pa! «tut O: pitiunin in dintucs

3

«lat:

1‘ an

IV. :36 non. 1a «1‘0; v.

rare in «1:539: 11!
uavu'iu alannou
ﬁ) 53;:

and

IV nnd

XV.

whzle

a:

9r 1!, only one paﬁitnt 1:

3%

68

par onnt of patttat:

$330 57 pcr aunt or

pltisntt

9‘

rhura nut. no ﬂixxartuot. 1n

.3. distribution

:3 sh» annt1$uiioual panulgtiaan. an. firth tug paﬁiunta

at»: this! tan use at tuuuty

and one

quart.» tor.

tort: runrn

or oldtr.
e)

;:;i

fan population: dittowad tn udlaatlaaul

�Cwmf Mﬂ
2%}
maxi?"

”an
m“
19$

54cm

59

may

£0

a?“

:-

2:

_:

'

19s
53

a:

2‘33
3

13
33

,

a:-

ﬁ

1:25;;

«

�.1}.
tﬁﬁalllmnt,
$1». ihnu

putttutn at a?! haviag nmri

v&amp;§h

that. iﬁ Illa.

as

Ilia 1.11.!

In

ca&amp;

$0 camplcia

a) pat «out at

0inlxutunt

while ht par aunt

rat! in:

a:

%&amp;0

a:

ﬁﬁuﬂiﬂ

pt£1tuta

blah iChOOI, tax: 33 par ctn‘

III as: at:

u¢oaa1

IUIF£

nﬁ

graauut¢. thin finding

:-

alga. dittorauua, :lnaa tho aoainl

clan: nitsuru in, in putt, husta

an education.

a) g;§§gggs nirruroueon in the dictrabutiou at hoards
«a

th‘ salitavngn r Seal: an». ohuurvud. Pittyvonc par a¢a$

at

mra

patitnts kid

with taunt: G! 59

i

«mart: htluw J0, uud aux:

at short

..

an. Eight:

r

tith‘

pur aaa$

aeorta buing ntmun

tinted with hiahav agaruuu a: uturuetypy. In ountraat.
$336 ﬂunnty par

91v oonﬁ

ﬁt.

h.¢

«iii

sworwa

putaan$u has

t

var: hclnu 30 an

at

50 or wars.

ta.

At an

9

it

Quilt, and tartrwtua

titty pt:

aunt at

1009:: in tho maﬁa}. rung» botuaan 30 nna

E9.

3.

Wag
It:

Vggbxq

candy inclnﬁad .xauiautinn

admin: ‘9 ﬁn.

a! th¢ rulutioua at 1!.

ylythidttiﬂ vﬁrinhlnn within

nauh

inatiauﬁioa,

�~13-

I3 v.11 an Butane: inatituﬁannu. Thwli noupnrilonn provud

dixricult hangar. or dirtortnain in tho attiuitioa
rtynhiatriq

1§v1nh1un.

tn.

*urxahlnu rung.d

01 th*

tidal:

@

and achw

parnhlc wutaoxt ovltarin eeulﬁ an: by a¢t§r333td. and varying

itarcta or ulsaingdntt. .rar'uaaupza, ta canparc tnoﬁltmﬁiani
in ralntian an xgugﬁh at hatp1%‘l stay, variant cutuott p¢rtodi
auto triqd but man. allowed
33%.

:5: aqutv¢1¢at «.11 11:...

At

an. gatrtaa of tha patituts ranatnad fawn: tug: 3".»

nau‘hs. and sleuthzrﬁu “‘3. than twozsa‘aonthu.

aeutt$nt,

70$

at .11

aha auly d! any. ﬁh;a

#13:. thus:

wax

pa$iuuﬁo runninad

1...

at

mass. 13

thin atvun Ioniht,

twilia annthu. In ﬁttuvuiutug social

informatxan nvailnhlu

far

292

a:

371

patioaﬁﬁ.

unalannitiahla at!!! at». ﬂﬁlt otian ﬂair! thu nduaatsuu at
tbs knahnnd at in. {athar at a haaaowtxn

«w

ntnor

wag nwt

rnaﬁrde¢¢

aonarainxzy, in the antiwaau cf ysywhzntrﬁc variable:
euphaaaa H111 ha plmoad on the ditfmroueun botv~¢u

inattﬁutanls.

�.15..

with citattun

at vii-want tutruutut‘ituttonnl ralntannthipa

(!Ih1c IV).'
a) ﬁgggggggg_gg~gzgg!§gggs tutu: lnltltntianu, tawﬁr

patatnsa

it

xx: r§a¢1v04 Inuitao ﬁharnpy

ﬁhnn

tun instituﬁsvuu (2:31. 1). canenrrantxy

3:: or launsngur plﬁilnta
instant,

8193

&amp;

anallnr parcau‘»

act. allllid at rcaaavias

paruhau

lurta aunts: (as pursuit) raooavtu; allitu

turn: at trautaoaﬁ.

I:

t

at $3. uthnr

tt

a 9:13.17 ﬁruntnon‘

an patiunts r¢ciivanx then: ‘htr:ptua

It!

claaaltioﬁ to raaciving psyuhau

thavupy utn¢u unuh 1- conventﬁauttr again:

taint. If on: ann‘rnat

ﬁhu

aanuﬁau thgrupy. urn about

t

rniidals pnyuhtn-

paranutlsa a: pt‘ltﬂtﬂ vttalvln;

atauattuuuttr loan ‘83: 01th.: at

tho 038:: in» institutinnu.

tibia
ﬂtthsu

V

uncut harn

ouuh xnu$1t1t&amp;on, ‘30

I‘i

ralntud ﬁa=a¢1aat1uu

�.15.

a: trautunn‘ ut urn
(I: Ihtln

1V,

mitt-I

and

r taut. at both urn «ad I! (tibln If),

and plynhnthurtptun aura semiautd, para

hittsac a awntrnut u! inattaa
Putatuta
KFﬁ

who W0?!

yuan;

it

thtftpitﬂ.)

ané puyuhclostnsl

urn hr who‘s

r nuara was

19:

it

or 33 ruoetvnd plychothnrxpy 91th sveltar rrnquanay than

pattonil

who

var. altar or ihﬁ hid task

achAQvunan£ and cua$u1

r ttﬁtti.

Eduagtiannl

alas: did not axgntxluanﬂly artist

culucticn at tromﬁuautlut nay huupit¢1.

luau; in: plyuhittriu vurlablau within ﬁlah inntitnttuu,
iigsnuuta ﬁgs

ﬁha

unit highly rnlattﬂ variabzo

$e

sultatioa

a: traaﬁnnkt. aquatic trot‘nnat wt: natcutud tar p‘tiuntn
clunoittod

t:

auhtuoyhrauiu ind nttqctavo diaardur mare

than the-y utttoud

I! purchonn§r¢tl¢. Bituhtrﬁa avuiugtton

n5 urn and aurgtioa

at hanyitgliuat$uu at an

rathid s.

at trtntuant.

ulna

titan

culmntion

At

and annc wow.

MPH,

p:t1natn

rceoivtac anun$¢c trnnwn¢nt (pradunlnnntxy that. «lann§é as

�“17.
hnucvur. than. nt :33 rcnuluua lencur ihnu ﬁt as
Iudnnd.

‘3. 1nt¢rtunc1tut1au§1 dalxnruaupt

n pataaaﬁ

ta ta. «lanai .2:

pitalistd tar chIVd
1a the

ytuncclt

.3.

at

to :rtaﬁ taut

an: airy 112.1:

cramp

aonthn or new.
group

worn

at

at

lHRGQ

$0 ha

ha».

£18 than wuru paﬁiuutl

Hana.

ﬂuwtmﬁnuudaﬁma «tr-bun an '-

Emﬁlc v thwut

hath

a) Diuggggzgz 3h. d$a%ributtou o: dtnchuraa titanium!

1:

shown $u

lﬁblu VII. Fur ututtutionl uuuiyail three diugv

rustic grasping:

warn undo:

nahtiuphvania, attactlvn attoraara,

aaa yirﬁhﬁh¢VFIi5§ and ysrioualtty ﬁtuordarn. 1k: diuunuutiu
pvupovitoaa nur‘

ttntlnr for in. El tat

popuxntiona, but

H330

sh: urn pa‘imatd warn rncnrﬁad at having f$WIr tttnattva and
unhatuphrunit diavrdaru and a luvs.» nuuh‘r

a: ptrahununrwtla

a: pgrnannlity datnrdors.

Intriinliitntiiuui
and 3

unuiyuts

nhnmnd

near. cur. allitad ta «13:30.10:

that

it

:t

an bath mat

urn us. glow: of

�.18..

it.

aaaaal tuuﬁuru «at ruiatad to atununoiug

non;

a: ‘h; I'd!!! VtrtlbIQi

have

ckintrta vaviabltu. diagnnuil
tutu hmnpital ‘0 atlcoﬁtoa
pitalahntawn; and duty

it.
is

um,

r:%ad

It

at

ham»,

it.
4;

picniltuuntty rtln‘uﬂ at

711

tr

huna

(via.

In ouch knupttul. rant pttttnts

”mm.

um

“ingrovnd' (ink). VIII).

(195) 9:

”an“

'tniupruvtd' lad calr a taunt. pltwtus

’rauovawad‘

at

ihtut barn

tau. at diuahurgi

mum-v

dwra‘lun

£0 «Inuhnruv ovtlunﬁaon

d) gigggg;§g_§ggggg3§ggs

¢1tluutnﬂ

u. rdlutcdt or ‘ha para

a: $rotiuan$ Ian

1% H8

1:51:

who

that: at lure

“math tupanvud'.

mu

van c.1125

the highest para-ntata a:

”rtcuvurad” at “unit isprovna' rating: (255) and

tht luwaut

(10;)
with sauna at muse.
prupawstcu a: "unimpruvwd‘
Antlynau vi‘han Utah anlﬁtﬁuttan

giant: varinhlb rulnlil.

�.19”
At 8! and Inna

that: III

C

sinncuay tgr

cldir putluaﬁt if b.

rutnd butt.» tan: ytuatar «uni. hut tut renal.»

illr lilnitiﬂiai

Quty-ut us. At awn

trend, with ulnar

pttituti

intrt

an!» lxkuly

tr.

atatxnttuu

vat tn upwtsitu

is h.

ruﬁud unimpravnd.

�~29»

m mum
In ibis unvpar‘ntn at ihro¢ vuluutary garuhittric

httpitala

Vt havu-abttrVad

sartoransua q:
cannttlun and

uninitiuaat tutarxnstituttounl

varaubloa
3.61:1
tho
in
at yuavs a:
pt‘itnti

tutti:

Illﬂi, but

00$

u¢.; ta diutriiustou a:

ﬁulttuvniu I‘Eaalu trawli; and in unﬁt of tun triniulnt wart»
$51.0

ditivtbxttnn a: aansuauuu sud dinohnrgu tvnlnaﬁtana. In

and

quxinal atlltlai

‘33

in

..

dnrnﬁatn a! havpitaltsutzan. tdiauistn or transnaaia

it:

§1r£oraacou
naapxtnl diner tbs «Enutha

alyahtairac vtrlannu rut. nuarthnd ta airinruuaul an

sunuclﬁiud
and
wins:
the
nacial

ttctarn at causatiun Ina utavio~

iapy n‘ raxlo¢tta in ya. v mourn. In
ﬁhn

trimhgapttux

atair,

tntnrtautatattausl-aﬁnyaritanu a: the pirahtttrta Vitib

«big:

I!!!

thaw

uiguitiannt sixtaruuogu, and §h§na rulluw

nupuatsa «attributiaa
thﬁ

its.

tars

a: ﬁt!&amp;l1_.1ﬂll, aduuntaaa

tinnisiodnﬁ Vast at

tat hryathutis 1a:

inaﬁitut&amp;nua1 caapuriaaat, wharc

it um:

and
1a

Oh!

r naorng

in.

iaﬂvuu

tutiaiputgd {ant iocttl

�.21”
wartu
in
puythtu§r10
bu
valntad
ulna
ulna: ditturtucau vault

cvuravlltng
uh:
1n
;ty1an.
dxusnaaitu
But
vuranttdna
whiuu.
in3$1ﬁut£¢ua1 varlnttnnt

1n

cud
hamytiuiiuatxtu
duratinu at

Affautad
anﬂ
«unvaritau:
thaiu
vatautad
diuchsvgu rattan:

tho signatscun¢¢

0%

tbs inturhinuittutianil.aunpnrisauu 3!

ﬁn

iﬁliiﬁﬂiiiﬂl'ﬂ¢*
aaltcttun
at
tracing:
It?

idlﬂﬂiid taint

ﬁhru: institution: a: bqing aduparuhid in

“‘11;

Int,

acaaamta,

rotuntitie

nué th¢rap¢utia

aﬁ$aa£pattus
rigor.

printiynt ditttruntui

ninth
nampaaisAou
await}
in the

thair putaaaﬁa. run:

were

atrtaruni in whatnl alts! puttivni

prﬁhiana
aathaﬂuiuczcal
thu
bu‘ nest Itriktus sure
Vida dinsrdp;ua10u

a:

mm

in:

in tha atrialﬁtuus a! tha plvuhtttrla

wiriuhloa.
can aaa¢1usian qoalé be

that t§c dh‘nrvnd difzurauacc

in purahiatric Viridhlut uqrﬁ

littln act.

1dianyasr:a1n¢. wt: «untrant ta

in
hnapihglxsod
urn
ptttuatt

ta;

than aéninxntr‘iﬁon

laughs ¢t tam: taut

33% 3nd name

in an arm‘s,

�n22»

havuvir th¢$.1$ in $53 1£k01?‘§h be a raiiccﬁiou a: mixturiuaui

ta 5h: ﬂip:
in

it

«nah aduluiu§rut1va

:avquﬁtiuu

tanturcu an noupluniﬁy u: diachiutta

hnﬁ dtuahurnu

avalaataon, tinny a: tharipiti

lVI11£31l uni thy énfiaitlou
and sauna

“kink

::

fin atttarnncut

quuttﬁy or uaatnl niiarahr.

airiiuiaa

at

garchothurany are arcat

dsxturunaoc £«11nu n gntturn.

canttstant vath.9ruvioun randinxn

A

-.

yatturu

and hypuuhunal on

tan rataﬁann.at toaiai :actaxi $9 pxyuhst‘rzu «a»; at hampxiﬁln

tlid ﬁttinntt. It is palsahtu taan, that tau
oabﬁky

a!

ﬁn

inatitution in

aawivnd

ta

t

trauﬁnnnt

putt.

stuntsiatnt uxtint

sociajmyahalmaintl
tautuvna ﬁt in» pliiunﬁ
Ivan thn prcdoutnant
popnlntxan partly in rolatinn in the proatpticun, uttiﬁudcu.

identificatian
rulatian to
darivud

and asparntsaas

{ha nxpcatationa

thcir nuainl

a: tha ntnrf

and

pnrtly

0: tbs patient: and that!

1n

fililiti

buekground.

rhino nothﬁdalagical dittieultiou «nu the ntgnxtiaant

arrant or gdmsniptrnﬁivc and stat: uttttndua

on

pnyuhtatrto

�.93”

vuraiblcn «r. vuluvnni

it

She cauvunﬁtaaal was

itVt utntavtacg. ugpa¢iu117
thuvapius. The rrtqnaut

in:

1a

may

a:

avu1§;ﬁ$nn

or aaup¢rn~

at ynynhtstrda

4£I¢hargQ vuiinga, diuwaantic

algaanu or I-agth a! heaptttlixntioa us

arisiria o: $h¢rtpvutlc

valuua ar computability or aubzacts and pﬁﬁﬂlltiaui
3.3%

ta .xailutvo arrnr unlit:

ugtahoé
sawing

It:

ﬁn:

at.

inatitttaena are olanrly

aauini¢trattvc philoncphy uni l9¢1l1 «1:0:

a! papulntiua

nut variablgt

..

ta nﬁutznn 9:1:

at that study.

ruiluvt in naeiuat to:

thilt

litnral tatirprctution of

Thu

saﬁw

ﬁne

in.

paraéexiaal

mast 91.13:.

altar. at :

variablus is in bu

Cut abanrvatioa

nonpu«

noun

1: a

at that atuiy. 1h.

tub
hawk highly trutand reactant! «and!¢t1as tyeaiuaut
ﬁ?!‘htn
an
or
iiunx
puriod:
(unlinitcd)
shiah is appliud tar aptiutl

pepulntians with in: luau: prapcrtint alaguusnﬁ in In untuv¢r*
uh1¢ pragnautic gravy (cdhisephruuiu)

item

a: ttvaruhls trvnﬁuaut fﬂltl‘.

.-

and

sat, «a. proparv

it iho pomrtct. it Hand,

in cantraci, «hat: tug 1¢nst trusuta tharnpiutt 13:1: trnntuauﬁo

�u’hu

to:

tho

attrt¢r periods, to

a yapulutita with a higher pam-

pnrtann daugucuta nchxsopkvautn (v‘po¢r yrngnosua 1) tau
pvuportiou or ttvurt§10 Jiaahlxca rttiaga 1a

artuturl ahibualr. thtta obturvutltan

an

act

uizutfitaatlr

rail-It

thy

itarapuuttc hfftcacr a: th¢au tantatntainu. but indiuutun

tn.

dartbwuat
1&amp;1:

critarta a: inprwvcnaat.

Inc! or «barity in diagnostic unhona‘a sud incompar~

ability at paychtntrto trantnuat variation Ital: pants to
:tttlwtud calpurattvu

«$3613: or paywhigtric thavapiun.

Iii

I!»

txanpla, thu vacant failure: by wiricua kaolactcnl natuut1¢ta
to confirm ubuartatiana 3:66 in ether laburntlvan: hay'bu
an much a

raxluotian a! diffuranaiaa in populations, pavuﬁtu

atria «attoriu, 233.
rha'waéaayraad asa

at

an £311u¢1oa 1n the
numb

original hypnthaucu.

turn: ‘3 “Inhinophrantuﬁ an

'9»:ahou¢na¢sau* to unplaro eh. uhancot 1n payuhologsenl

a:

bialagiatl roaturca with anntnl illnouu h;n 1.4 ta a scaled.
burdcnad by acautivc

result: (3.11:3). hast u;rkaa rauuutly

�.3...
an

in. tantztnting railing at

tn.

rnacc a: «taunts

cud paywhulngatul

a unrun ruvtav an cﬁhiiaphrnatn:

fit in. whiz:

thnripitu or

ﬁne

transnatarinn

if

aauaatu

inuuqruvakxltty.ot Git

phywznzaganaz *~ huhnriuraz corvulattnun an aunt an

(Fuuktnat§zn) and tadattan thruahala ﬁaaks¢

Erna

it. uuaholrl

«art

:

vaxtd

ﬁbulrvusiua in hi rtvurtad traa tug alxntt, do w: hhva nuthtd!
avn$lub1n $9 «uteri»; yepalntﬁaus.aduquataiy

sauna num£Xraation? .Wu.ha11¢vu not,

mad

ta gravid:

a

nunnludo tron ﬁhnﬁi

«bairvatiuuu that incruuugd attuatiua aunt bu ynxd ta tha
suathodnluwiani yrnblnud

mm“, mm

a:

alunuzﬁyias nubauaia by “ubgnaﬁavu‘

ma. um mum: mama

no hﬁahly ﬁuyaudunt on

inatiﬁntianal and

and tau zun£ap¢y¢hu1nainal tapuwtx

which

«was: to to

«bauwwir att1$aﬁula

at in. ﬁhurtpiahmyntimuﬁ

intirauatmng
what aw tha ralmilan

at again: ﬂlﬁiﬁ

t¢»psyeh1x%r1a

trantnunﬁ an t§aﬂa pdyulutiamx? aﬁgnzfitant dittiraaaaa

it

trcutwant anttavn taint betwoun thaau anntatu$aans, nné thqr

‘

�~26»

ds-auﬂdr ﬁg dilrgmnuﬂ moat: Inuiul attuvam,

utthﬁdalauiaal limitliauan umtlinaﬂ
wan-no gruuﬁar a dcﬁawninuni

hit with!»

ﬁhc

ilviitv, iaﬁinl atuti

pirkhtnﬁvia
Sh!
Vittthiun

if

«athin any inititutznu than «or: aha «ﬂan» varidblam‘ ﬁn

«nuns «may.
hauuvur,

that

m:

away” 1»

ﬂay ianaiduraiaun

«him

«a.

m we

a: vctturna or

at in.

may,

&amp;&amp;:¢nosin and

ﬂitting.

tharimx unnuaﬁ

laniri

I! it

that-in that! haupxtalu, patiunt twain! tiara

graﬁmhau

thn phitnaqphy

twcuﬁnua%

as an intruahaapisal thutar. 11 Ian: tutanttatr malttnd tn

diigniﬂxl «nu try: bf ﬁruiinuuﬁ than int naturt a:
vﬁduti hﬁnpiial uni uh» iﬂﬂill canny
aaaraaanu

tum iaaim

it wh£th it‘prtalriir

:t-azr.

an: paraaunbl a: mazxnaaa lbuyiiil, tantra», likb thmt

a: in: sunningar‘ﬁhnaraal

awn: mm“

mm

unsp1$a1 wad ﬁn. laxtauhuutttu

m: WIN:
a

In institution: with 31f£¢v¢ni

ﬁxmmm

trt‘tntut iriunﬁatiﬁnu.

pntaibta taut eitrarint witntiuhu

hutw&amp;ua

it in

theta vurtibtni

�wa?ﬁ

any ”a

‘h“r“‘i

In hntpitnli. gar ixuaplé.

whﬁwl

trnutnant

n‘=‘¢£&amp;Iru¢ urn pvﬁnarilr auutnatuz or «um-tic, or «hurt

nut: nuns” mun anagum m
inﬂiviauui tacit} alas»

it in: in:$itt$&amp;uu

may

auﬁ xxx

cm

Win-mat

awn,

diiiﬁngﬁiah‘ﬁrtihﬁtni grwapte x$

azatt uua aﬁministwuiivt attitgdat

urn a ﬁriﬁiﬁl Vﬂrzabla in auﬁarnintae tan pa‘iani‘n dinnnnitl;

irauﬁnuut, qua tiawtk at haupiaaligaﬁica.

�culpartnoa a: Suctopuyuhaloglcgl Virtublos nan
Psychiatric frnniuunt 1n rite. 'blult‘ry laopltalu
A

ru.».‘; In:

Rdbart L. xnhn.

ramnnsk,

rn.n.

la‘hautcl 311.01. 95.9.
and

In:

Iris

113k,

8.3.

tho nontriuont or lxportncltnl Paychtntry,

ltllaido

loupatnl, Glen Oaks, 3.1., 1.2.
£1404 in part, by grant nxuaoyz u: tho lhtlounl Innt1$u60
or lontal ﬁatl‘h, 8.8. P3511. Health survlco; and the luau.»
county ﬂoutnl Ioal‘h Basra.
tho oooporaﬁtoa at tho stutto «t tho Intiuchuaotta ﬂau$a1
lonlth Gout-r and tho c.r. loaning-r nunartul loapi‘nl 1o

stat-fully

:

acknoulodcod.

Division
or
Hvutcfloro
Psychiatry,
ﬁnnpttnt.
;;U:;ut'tgdruaas
!
’ I
C

v11:

Q

3/62

�I: that:

at in.

law lav¢u psychiatriu put10n%
populutauu, lollinxphcaa and iodlxch r-porﬁud Iicn1ttonut

utuﬁy

rotatloanhlpc hair‘s: nu individua1’u pantttou in tho tacit!
01:3: struottro :34 tn. provalanoc It treat-d 111-03., £ypcn

at diagnouod dalorduru and usual 03¢ duratxan a: puyahttﬁvtu
trcntucut ndntatu‘orod ( ). tiny indicatod that proportionntoly nor. 10rd: 0130. pasxnutu in stout-cut vow. clalilfitd
an psych-‘10 whtiu ‘ppar clas- pattcu‘a vow. Iﬂfllttil ulna-1ttod an noarotto nud parannnltir disordcra. n-unrdloll at
digglouiu, plyuhciharupy was Inplcv.d 1a diaproyorttoaa$cly
high 4.:rooa with tho uppor at... pntloutu. and annual.
thtrnpto: with lcvcr clans subjects.
1h. Stilt-no. or cacnunio Iﬁnt‘u :34 the availability
§0I1d
or ﬁroa‘iug POIIOIIII
not in cauludcd 1n £hou¢ t‘Idlﬁl.
to tout the 901. or noctll_tnctoru 1: tin trcsiacut :1 ho:pitalxnod puﬁaon‘a indopusdoat a: plutont's tinnncuu and
:vuilubxllty at tro:tnon$u. n yntlca‘ turvoy val undtrtakuu
1951.,x: u:at nan-u.
a «rut:
:of treatment nod... including ildavsdual paychothnrapy ans
orgnuau ‘hnrnpiou ‘90 nvnilnbln ta :11 ptt1ant: rccnrdlcsn

mun:

ct ‘htir ablli‘r

maul,

t. guy.

In ﬁhnﬁ tauplo. 33s. tduuutton and plant or birth var.
otgnsrinnntlr luuoutntod with chain. ot.‘rautnont, durataoa

at hilplﬁtllll‘illg allutnal discharge ivuluatiou

‘30

�lllﬁntlii

(

).

it. gltatcul factor: war. 11-. ralltod

to

a non-Ira a: utorootrpy. tho calttorntu 1 Seal. ( ). ltxhcr
r acoran tor. turn ur‘on round in pilliatl dauguoaoi a: tuvolntaouul parlhnlzl rctqrrod for sciatic thirty: and hours.

taliiod to: a shortcr yuriod ( ).
It It. concluded that ti. extant. a: postal altar, uno.
ldi'ttiol. htrthplaaa and dagrco a: atarnotrpy on psyohtu‘ric
ﬁrtatnca‘ pnt‘uvnu VII. uoﬁ a roault at cannanta tno‘orn at
availgbtlttr of troutlunt .10... On. tugxon‘iun was that
3001.1 :hcﬁ'rl tuIquu-od diagnouin :ad tronsncat by atrociing the varbsl and avg-vnrsnl nynptc- pattarnl at pats-It
behavior. It was puntnla‘cd tha‘ nubauo£l at lcvor lusts!
all-sou. Inna-r oduot‘tua :34 £03.13. Birth vault nartroqnontly'unuttcnt lynptuun

non-Vtrbal. IOBIOPI or IOtO!
pnttnruq cud
«avast phyolonl noﬁsa or thurapy. Huger
ulna. subject. will! utiltic Vtrhal non-n at gunman-10:,
and patintputn paycholngioal turn: at troninun‘.
A non-ad xn‘crprctataon rilnﬁod plynh11$r1¢
trnutnont
‘0 tho philosophinn and uttxﬁnduu or individutl payuhtatrints
and hatptttl ntat! nttttudou. II 1&amp;3‘1‘n‘10ll what. patch.»
thartpy Ill hluhlr vulucd. typo: 011-0 pnttunin vculd b.
‘rontod dispruyorttountcly with ptyuhath'rnpr. ataxllrly.
dischargc ovuluattonn tad durut1on a: honpttalltntaon U'lld
1n

it'll

be uttcctcd by

itttaroncol :u o‘ttt unpootutioau tor individlu
all or distortu; noctal «13.3.

�.3.
In

to“ m. «and menu“ I. «cum: u up.“ $0

lillaldo (ll) :tudy

unploytns tin can. proctdurcl :ud
tons-trout}: to attend thu diacrquIGnl to in. 0th.: taut:tu‘tonl. ‘hu 0.1. leanings! nuuurtnl inapltll at tarot.
(If!) and tho llaunoinncttc lautal lcnlth cantor a: loaton
tultt‘uﬁtann worn loloaﬁod in tho Impoo‘nttan
(ulna).
‘In$ tiny servo putt-at: .8 ditrursux 30.1.1 clunuou and
1951

It...

thnt ditfcrOIcoc an ‘hta dinanatuu uculd ho rofinotod in
tho trnatucnt vurtdblou. In that. houulnlu $huro 10 a minim
lnrlty 1n attitudo £OUIrdI ‘rcntnaut aad oduna‘tou. Inch
1: a ‘oaoltug haapt‘ox with n {:11 $hlo Inpcrvtaorr utntt
and out£v0 research dapar€n0a$. tiny 0:93.013. plythae
t-nlrttcalxy-orlontod payohttharupr but gravid. 0‘30: trcnt~
lint. inslnlan; taunts. thcrcptou and activ. prosrnss or
I111ﬁl £harnpy. Each :troinlt Ihlrtutarl troutnont or
valuntnrr puttautl, does an‘ gravid. cuuﬁodial car. and
toads t. d!!! 1‘: pu‘aont pcpnla‘tou trim 01:11:: as. groups.
It. Ipouttio till a! £hxl study var. ﬁt duttrntna popu13‘103 airfares-Ia toﬁvccu th- thrlc lun‘tﬁltioan with roupcct
to social 01..., a... cantatlol und 1 learn, and to roln$a
‘hunc patient attractorta‘tcn to tho trouﬁuca‘ variables c:
twp. o: ‘rauinout. durut1on or hanpitaltua‘ton, ligament:
Ind iililltta uvnlnniitu.

�.5.

am
vuluntnry. adul‘ putiuntn 1n rustic... In ‘htll
tuntttuttanl on a 31v.- dn‘c ta Ignutrr 1959 new. studiod.
“£11. Ill and as had vnllntary 9a‘1cn‘l only. 3 0:311 nuniar
a: ‘Inuc It also not. nultlnad by tho court: tor paychtntrtc
ovulittton. or war. numb-r. a: a chronic achtsnphroatc utt‘o
holpttul group transforrud for u upocltlo ranoarnh p30500‘.
than. pataousn aura «natal-d tram tin Itudy b¢¢uulo of tuna:
Ian-vnlunﬁcry status. !Ia I‘I‘V population nountntnd a: 113
patinata at II, 100 a‘ Its sad 9S ut ulna. tutu pattcu‘ III
¢1vcn sh. calitorntn r 00.1: ( ) on tin doatgnntod data.
Bastian: mouth: taint the paﬁtcntl’ rccurda war. anulynod
(hr Oh: variant social and payshinﬁrl: taster. If sh. titty.
1hr tho daﬁuruinatton a! social claua. t5. lulltngshaad
autuc‘ar luau: was hand ( ). rho utudr thalidod ulnnxan‘aon
a: the rolntacua or ﬁhn 0001.1 to it; payahtaﬁrtc vurtublot
within tack tau.atu‘lon. .3 3.11 a: tutu-on tnuti‘attonl.
otnpurtnonl pravnd dttttcnlt basin-o at littoral... 1:
the dutinttton at the paychtnﬁric vurinbloa. ‘Io variabloa
ranged #11017 lad cnnparnhlo cutout: orttarta 00:16 30‘ to
d0$urnanua, and varying dour-on at 31:31:. 41“. lb: uuunplo,
to acnpnru tnctatuttonl in rola‘son to length of haupltnl
u.ny. Vlrlitl ouﬁoott potion. wore ‘raod but I... IIIIIOG
for gilpurnbln dtnttlbuianun. At III, on. Q‘nrtnr or the
pattuata tonuilcd raw-r this cart: nouths. tad wwvo‘hlrdo
L11

it...

�.5“
than twtivu nan‘hn. A: Illa. :3 contract. 701 at :11
61
only
Inca
‘htu
rauntnad
nor.
00"! nath:. I.‘
pitiilil
that ﬁnalv. mantra. I: inturututug coats: 01:1. ‘haro vac

IGIO

08
89!
for
uVIilabll
lltlrlaﬁtul

union accurrad what. thy 06‘3ct10n

wit.

.r in. tn‘hnr at I ulnar

Pittoatl. Incluluttinhlo‘
of tho hm:hand of a not...

371

not ruccrdod.
Anacrdtus, 1n ﬁho auolyann or payuhaasrto variation
ouphunia will be glucod on tho asst-runaun botvacu sastzﬁutlouu.
with ostnttuu a! rutnvnnt antrn-tnttstnttaunl roln‘ioashtpa.
was

�~6-

3mm:

I.

tn no
Whoa riparian; Itndtal 3:1: I hano’inlsatuttou, £30
ltruttlro if it. hanpt‘nl 1| takcu for nrnntod, and ui‘h-r
ilﬂﬁf04 I? 8.ﬁ*1‘ild brinrly. luvtvur. 1n atnaytuc a
cuupnrabia
Gut:
13¢
gather
nttaupttag
Itransn tlntitutian
t.
1::51tn-V
butt-an
tho
differ-nae:
many
1at
tﬂhrd
3.4:
II.
$103.. It. hosp1§a1 organisatsun a: a datnruianat a: grantnout in on: nothndolocie prohlcu. Far oxnnplo. bu‘h £h.
mane and III havu dny houpttal unttc, while an doc. 39‘.
A. name the ﬁeottias phwuxciun can our. tar a patioat an In
Qho
and
an
sitar-taro
any
tbs
in
hacpt‘ul.
tacpattuut,
clinic. II Inch a ustttnn, ha 0‘! Ital tree t0 «tachnrgo
the pntlont tron tho Ioupital at tn curlxsr «sit. kl¢V1lﬂ
that he v11: still bu ranycnsitil £09 hi: pntxont's c;rn;
what-an at In, dischargd lint! tnwuinnﬁiou «I shut putiost-

1.

I

rclttionlhtp.
tu-thar probluu an: cu. princnea «I dittoront ruuourch
the
.2
‘15.
routines.
¢1$i10a1
ti.
attoctin:
it
progra-u.
the
91810.1. at
a:
porcont
tunity
upprcutnatnly
IIIVQI.
sane acre chroszaally 111 and had but: haupl‘nlttoa for
hnvo
ban:
in
unrn:XIr
u
such
act
that!
zrc‘p
nan: y-arl.
thin honpttnl hit tiny and icon trtatturrﬁd Iran anathur
donﬁer

Ittt-

Anntttl§£un for

That,

it.

t lytiill silty.

vary tactqrn to war. tut-routed in Itn£rin¢

�.7“

situated ‘ho coll-ataoa and arguaisa‘:¢a .: tit dttn.
ap.o::1- grails-l var. noted :- do.1¢ua.1¢an 0: try: a:
trout-tut, (sag-nattc torn. and actlnntlouwor troutucnt

outta...

.)

naggiggtigg at 3:23 2; rrggﬁucntc 2h. crttorit tor
looignntlng that I past-It r¢ouivud 'parohothornyy' dirtorod
anon; tun tastttntioul, waking unitarnltr in olntlttscatsuu

difficult.
At

Iii p:yohothcrnpy

tru;;nant
34.1.II
‘ stat: paychintrtat,

was dal13n1§od

tttoroa on a pronurtpttoa banxl by
lb: uhxch tin patiunt was citrate a ton.

sonbaaan with

the payohia‘rio rnnidoa‘ v.20 countdnrod part a! rcutxao
nintnlutrattvv yaﬁinnt Giro.
At In plythothcrtpy Ill dcttnod at trtntnqnt caution.
vith ‘ho plyohto‘rtu raaiduat. Stat! payohattrtn‘o dtc not
trgut pl‘ltuﬁl. but rootrlcsad that: cctavt:aos to cupcrva-tag
tho téﬂlﬂOi‘ phylacxaao.
At tho lune pnythc‘hornpy val dalxcnasud an a (tactic;
of Ian: diocipltaca ~~ pnyshtu‘rio rusadoatu, psychololiatu.
Iactal Iurkorn, strata and nodical students. III-n1 accords
at such stations vow. n9$ routtnoxy taclndoa 1n the pntlonﬁ'u
rouurd and to :lcurtain thigh pu‘iontu roociv¢d piytho§lurapy,
tn. rouidnn‘ tn charge at oath a... van lu‘trviovtd.
h) Diagnaaaus ludividUll 1::‘1tn‘10na1 dtugnoittc
atria. ﬁll. and. ocupcrisnnn litticult. At K!B din-barn.

�diagnouol nuptqycd tut nultipin cvnlnn‘ivn dn‘n sch-no
raculncadod hr thy tntrtouu Paychlu‘rtl 1.00:11‘1uu whilc
both in .36 male rolllvod unt‘ury ayutana. anvural 11:191..

at

IJI arc

iihlo I, vl‘h our in:sootcd convurliona tutu catuturica eunyurthlo to tho 0th.:
11.130000 tru—

ltuﬁod in

fags; convvrizoas provtdc, havcvar, tn
unavnidabla taste: .3 diutartioa. (31:11:: aboarvntluau havb-nn roperﬁnd by Pas-Inuit: and him tauoetstad ( ) wha
indicat. that dilzuntaa Within tho tine tantitutloa Ira db.
vulnnrnhlo to individunl titraruacua Ilia: examaacraa
ﬁve lunﬁiﬁuﬁlouu.

u--O-“.““.
{thin I
”’W‘.ﬂ u...
c) gtlobnrlg Ragggln a: Ingggvcmcut: Rating: 0: invrQVOo
aunt wart-é 1n (splat and dotall. It. discharge rating at
nil was $r1purt$£o with a inparu§a cvaIunilun tor soatal.
ottrac‘urololttal and Irndrona canteen. RI and tune End
clubs: ratings in which 1‘ VII difficult ta attain the can.
‘rtbuﬁton at such tuct¢~ n: tn: 1!! Iyltuu (rnhic 11). Fur
than ntuiy gt. 3!! lyndrawc rating van unwanted to it: global
rgttuc' a: an and line.
C-” t .“G‘”.
Q

Tibia

XI

”“ﬂ“Q‘O”
a. Booicgtzphologgggl Virgabloc

�‘9.
Scotti amp-u; that. at: a ngrkad dixttrcuuu ta ta.
.0013} alas! count-$Qton at ‘bn tire. annta$nttonl (tibia 111).
g}

at.

.t

as
praduninnutly “pvt? 0130!;
nxddlc .1333; and at mane, produatnauttr loan! 01‘33.
h) ﬁgs: Thar. war. no daltcroiaul in 01' itl‘cihltina
in tho tus£1sntiounl popula‘aonﬁ.
o) pdn¢uﬁgggc The nopuln%toas dittarod in oduaataounl
attstauant, with pniitu£l at If! havtuu not. glut: a: sinustiou than than: at 3:36. ﬁhlin k1 per aunt of ‘hl pusiunﬁl
3‘ Hana tutled to aauplotn high cahool. only 32 par canﬁ at
an tud 23 par cant aﬁ urn did not grndutta.
d) r Sacra: natturuuaaa 3. tin ata‘rlbnslcn a: metro.
an tau calitnruiu ! 3131. war. oblorvcd. Itrth-oao pot ennﬁ
at urn pattaaﬁa had I soar-n hcldv 30, and eat: ctgh‘ not «out
wi‘h start. 0! 50 or thaw. ~~ tn. highnr ? neuron 3.1:; .8..egatnd with higher 6.3!... at sgurcoiypy. In coa‘raut, at
unnc tumuﬁy par ccnﬁ var. halo! 30 at tho 2 30.10, .Id fortytuo par cant hnd intro. 9: 50 or more. At an titty par coat
0! it. patiuatu hnd r an.rua in £hu utddln rgagc botutoa 30
and £9.
3. szph§ggg$g Vutiuhlgt
In‘rnainutttuttunnl oonparinoau urn counotidatod 1:
tabla 1', while tutaroinlt1£u§10nal unitartitul It. prancu‘od
indiviﬁnullr 1n llih not$tcn. In ttbl. IV, ntlbu and payohou
thcrnptoo var. cnnbtnad, parntﬁtana I oontract a: 30-311: uni
At 81! the population

�pcycholcglaal tharaplnu.
3) 8.1.0.1.: or troatunu‘: ‘80:; inn$1tu.1ona, lunar
6%
fOOOSVDd
ulna,
$hat
naught.
or
thornny
I!
I?!
at
yl‘iontu
(iuhlo V). OOIOIBIOC‘IV suallcr various... at tho urn
pu‘tontl taro 31:35.6 :3 rootivis¢ paynhoﬁhorapy, with u
largo tank.» (36 putt-at) ratotvxna 31110: torso at ‘roa‘o
tout. 1t an patsonta rocotvtn. nilxou thnrnptou at. Clﬂliltic¢ an raoniviu: plyluothoragy no i yrs-3:1 Iroatnuut ItIQO
sank pattnntil cantonxtanily 3.01:; 3 3.014033 ply-htnsrict.
003331.
or
rnuctvtnx
tho
plﬁtuu‘a
pcrnonﬁtnc
ion‘ruct
on:
I:
thornpy, urn ﬂhl'. nighttlctntly loo- thlu intact 02 .3.
o‘htr tun anlﬂ1£itaona.

.

”U“.

d.-.”ﬁ-‘.”.’..~”

£311. 1 abuu‘ barn
ao¢1a1«paynholoui¢a1
P
Old
acorn
nun
Alon;
fuotlro,
nannisieantly rolatad tn sraawnout nsloc‘ioa (0160» and highsr

r Basra

patzom‘a

at ups;

and 9

ant. froqucntlr'vccosvtna somatic therapy)
8.0:. can tainted to troaincnt ooloo‘ton n‘ 33.

athar taa‘ora utrc Itgnaticauﬁ. Ian. of ti. '001n1psychological factor: II. rclntta ta try. at trottaon‘ at
nuns (tabla IV).
Luau. ﬁn. purchx‘tric vurtabios vi‘hin ouch inntttutiou.
diagnosit at: ntgnitso:ntzy‘rolntod 1a '11 tutu. hospital-x
discharge ovaluntton ‘t I?! only. had dura$1an or hocyt‘nltunttoa

I.

�.11.:

it

an and nano. sonata. troaanan‘ nun aolaotol for pattunta

clnnuittud

nu ochisnphr-nta

titan that

$hoa¢ cluaaod

tad attactivu diacrdar “or.

a; paychgnnlzotio at oath htartt;1.

urn. pataanﬁ: roootvinu acnatxn truaﬁuont (prudnnilaatly
that. tlaa¢ad as Ichanophrontn) raeulvcd ditahnrso rattncu
at Iniupruvud nor: artua than pntianta rnnttvini payohoth-rspy
At

nlonn.
b) BI!&amp;I&amp;I! a: BIG 1it11 'zttat 1k. fir-c 11¢t1$ut1¢ul
dittorod with roaptot to pnticu“: ltauth at utly (2‘51. 71).

”an“

was mat-nu: 19‘s.", um 65$ at gaunt.
taunt-1n. tar traits «oath. .r usrc, compare: ta 31 par cnn£ at
‘ta 1! puttonta and only 5 par aunt 0! than. at nuns“ 2h.

an

andul aﬁﬁy st ‘30 In group it: bctvnoa save: and nl¢vnn
noatha I311. tau-thirac at the anus pattun‘n var. diach§r¢od
within '1! uoathl a: houpttnlinnﬁtou. 8.01.1 oinnu and
3 $3020 we». utt rnlutod id aurution at nay tultltutiou.

ti. psy¢h1n£rio vurinblua. III! 613330.13 coula ht rtlntod .
ﬁg ﬁhnao diuanantd ll achtsorhrouia utro bnlpttalaucd tar
inncor puriaﬂi .t each instii‘tscn. at «vary .3. 1.7.1, it...
a:

at urn ran-incd loagar

tuna Qt 38 av Hana. Iadctd. tun lituriantieutiontl dirrcronuon turn a. gruat that a yattcnt in

m clan-tn an» m m. lit-11 u be mutant“ “r
tulovt manta: or

more

ut urn thug war. putaautn in

ﬁne

"II‘II‘ ts. Irv!) at x386.
Within initiﬁatﬁnns.

as.

andauducu‘1oa

at

xxx tad an

�a“.
war: wizntad ‘0 lsucht a: honpitnliﬁatzuu -« runagir tad 1.0:
olucutnd pstanntn rinninits for tho linxca‘ porioi

tail. 1!

dsdnt

atrt

a) Qgggggggg_gzg;33§;gga In ough hacpitnl. Kilt patient.
.32
um
um mum“ u. ”wwma" (ran.
are cnlutoé u.
(19%)
1;
a"
var.
peanut
panamWW.
Ultli nu ”uninprovaa" and 0&amp;1: ‘ 31331: patient Hus antlua
'rcgovnrod” or .Iﬁﬁh taprovid‘. tum highcat pareaataec at
'rotovur-d“ a» ”tank inprovud' 31:13:: (20:) :51 an. tenant
propurtion a: ”Ininyruvvd’ {101) «0:. Stand at aunc.
Lnalyuua within such auntttnaioa uhcutn vurtnbln rouulto.
A‘ an and nunc thsrc an: n tandungy IQ! )Iaar putauntn to ho
Iltcd hctﬁor ‘3‘: yolaanr anal, but ‘kc ratnita tr: l‘a.1|$1t~
was
m.
ma
on
than
n.
may
aimltisaant
awn”.
um
rm‘cd
to
5!
with
Iatupruvlla
oléar
likely
an».
pstinntu
trend,
tut ‘hia did not aahsava a‘sttltlcni tignittaanno.

n m,

an.

mm

a

“‘3'“ :9.“‘ﬂl”..”rhbgo VII
wa-oonhwﬁcumahha

d) btgsnnuila

Fur

u‘atiattnul analytic

$hrnn dinsnontal

l¢h38iphliu1¢, arxostavc dsnurdaro.
and poyzh¢ncnron15 and tﬂrlﬂnllltr ditirdlrt ($351. '11:).
nuns
and
31-11::
ﬁt:
I!
disgn¢at1¢
proyorticnn
It!
It!»
It.

groupcinsu Ina. 544::

�.13.
pcptlnttonn. but it. Ill ’iﬁiﬁlﬁﬂ «or. rcunrdod an invanu
and
and
a 13:30:
Iahtuophrcntc
nttacttvo
1130:4023
tart:
nn-pur a: purchanouroﬁtc or per-duality dilornora.
Intrailltitutlnutl ntalrlta Ibiuid that tt I! tot! l1.
tad r loot. wore rolstad to It‘sntuan; 1‘ III an. at... a:
£h. nacitl tltttrr was rolntca to dsnxnootng null. as 1386
iii? I! it. 30:13! vuradbla¢ war. no ralatod. at tho p31»
Ohllttll var1thlos, it‘snoata val nignitiaantly rtlstnl gt
enth hoiyital te tg1:¢tica 01 trnuitcnt llﬁ durati¢n of
sad
only at IE to diauh‘wxo artlaatiau.
hanpt‘nltuation;
.ﬂuﬂwﬁ Q. .DI.C“M”O“
flhla V111 dbaut hart

U-“OD‘““Om--.ﬁ-“”“~.-

�.15.
n

.

10!

In this courtrtaon It ﬁhroa vutun$nrr paychintriu
houpa‘alt a. hat. dbuorvud tisaatlonat tn‘orinutitntionnl
atttuvuunol I! rattantl 1. ‘ho noctnl vurtlblta a: rtura
at oduca‘ioa and 1.01:1 slant, but not ugu; :- distribution
at cnlstorutu r acalovan¢rnsy ‘nd 1: oath of tin truntnmat
durntaon a: knapst:11uatton. ccluctton o:
vurtlbluu

trdut-c-tl

and

atltrtbutton at 1113.0...

and danuhnrct

ovuluattlua. It. tilt-routs: in ‘rontncnt variable. butt-nu
£ho Lia‘stuttuns nay roc‘l‘ Iron man: flitlrl. including
£ho 30.1.1 aspoo$o highlightod 13 an! tntﬁstl ain‘t-t. 2'
dttinc tho r01: a: sedan! tho‘oro taro olonvly, vb IIICIiotk tho 1n£r‘~$nlttttt1¢nu1 nulparinOIt. Iron into. aﬁulyioa.
ﬁt» :gok a: cnlutltcnt ralaGloashtpu land: dent: n: in tho
v.1. at putlcut nottal tuaiars u‘ priallpil actorntnnnta 1a
£routnal£ vtlhln than. tittin... It via an‘tcipatud that
wi‘hin ouch tusﬁltnttoa. pnﬁlonin at hichur 00.1.1 clays,
turn: r not». ans hat‘ar causation, would to croutud prcrcru
tg‘luXXV by pcrthntb¢V£vrg clnsnttiod as nourotio, tuna:tnr shorter partodl and r:¢¢1v. botﬁ-r danchargo rats-an.
wl‘hxn in. :uli1iut10n, an irrtstlnr unsootnﬁloa bc‘vtta tn.

1;).
(ram.
mun-u «I
wan. no sauna-n.
it. Illa. not. at tin Inuit: $323.51.. var. rotatod tn any

cum

at: at. tacit! alga: Itliilttc;117 rotataa to 3:: trontnomt vnrlubln at otshcr I! or 313. o: a

ﬁrouﬁuout turtnblus

�$3313

3

___,

by
nun-qutuuml
”hunch”.
Manta“

on Sam.

”I - haunt aoluﬂ“

' '- mun O: thuuﬂl
' - Duncan

11“ch suit-nun
mutton . man or
Inﬂuuuuu
I an" - ”can“ sun“."
. Mam”
"

ii‘lﬁ

3;:

-

n. I. “nun-up
in- ti mo.

m
«I»

4»

am...» he mu: am0

u

r:

.05

p&lt; .0).

on W

.001

�.15.
pcccthlc he rclccaccchtpc hchucch ccctcl ccc trcctccnt
vhrachlcc, clcvcn crc chctﬁcttcclly nightttocat.
fhc dirtcrcnccc 1c tho an cud It! dctc ucy hc a»
rctlcchlcc ct thcir pcpclclhdch atttcrcccccu thc rclccicu
at 13c cc d1cchcr;c cvclccttcn, ccd r cccrc tc 41c¢nccic
at an rctlccticcihc htchcr prcpcrticn c: dcprcccivc illccccccp
uhtlc hhc rclcctcc ct cuc cc hrcchucct cclccticn cc urn
rctlccttcs choir highcr prcpcwttcc c: {cc-t pcrcccc clccciw
tic! pcychcncurcclc cud chcrcchcr itccrdcr. rho ctnilcrthtcc
:- I! and Ill much In: rctlcct ctnilcr trcchccut philcccphtcc,
which crc littcrcct rrcn thct ct Illa. ccudtttcac c: clcchivc trcchucht ccd clccttvc dcrctxcn ct hccpitclxcchlch catch
ct ll cud HIE. and th may hc thin tlcllhtlihy thch pcrcttc
tho inhcrccticc ct tho cccicl vcrtchlcc. 1% lane, hcvcvcr.
tho lththcd cccy cud cccd tcr rcpid trcctccch rcculhc ta h
tctlcrc hc dchchctrchc cc 1ctcrcch1cc ct cccicl vcrichlcc
vtch tho trcchhhct prccccccc.
Similarly. thc rclchtcc ct cccihl clccc vcrichlcc hc
trcchhcht varichlcc 1c hhc lcllxccchccd ccd nclltuh ctndicc
Icy rctlcct hhctr dctc cclcchtca, vhtch vac cvcr thc hrccd
rccxc ct c11 ccnuhcatw :cctltctcc cud cll trccthcah portcdc.
within thcsahcttcnc, hcvcvcr, thccc cccthl thctcrc cppccr
lccc «Incl-.111" ct trcchcct ruichlcc. accusing): cvmcvcrcd
by tctrcccrcl cdhtctccrcttvc ct {sunsctcl ccccccthtcc. 1c
hhc ccrltcr Iillctdc lccpthcl chcdacc ( ) thc rclcttcc ct

�~16-

vnrtubloc
trooinant
‘0
thtad
cit-atlas
0: u... r 3019:,
13 u rdlnation of the krona ndnantn‘rativu 1a£1ta¢ua avntlnhlo
defined
broadly
lrtnﬁnout.
var.
tans.
that
a‘
tn pnﬁlnu‘ car.
with cengﬁtc, nzltou :34 paychoﬁhurnpautto undo. annuity
‘vniznhlo. ”III‘SOQ Ir Incpt‘nlinotton an. broadly duttnod
Anni-lion
policy
1
raga-atod.
19:31:
or
to
up
i:
your,
at
was {113151. and thh taught and purntt‘od tun Ianxslaon or
paﬁtuu‘n ‘1‘» a I10. 933;. a: pcylhlatrxa laouraorc.
the proacnt an Isudy than: (out: locial-trantnont'rctn‘tono
con-ﬁr‘o‘ttn
195?
a
parka»:
‘ha
rollocttuc
than
s‘uay.
nit»!
Lu avgilabiliﬁy a! trcaﬁuont :hoiooa. ta popu1t£1on 33¢ a
uniturn us‘cnnton-cl ditl‘lil at heapttcllulttoa. lit.
new
ad-tntn‘rnliﬁh
a
can‘nlyorcsoouslr
thatlsltad
pitta...
with
closer
no
narkud
a
Granting
axillarity
in
clonal:
$10.,
the Mt! nodal. Such administruttvo discus-10:. arc iosu no
prtutcpal dctorntnlltl or tn. Clorﬂlllﬂ or dist-lutton a:
social vurinbloa, n. ltl‘lrl ta tho trantncnt prostlu.
A lacuna aspect at that. I‘udtoo an: tun Icthodoloctoul
problems In 6011.13: tho ‘roatnon‘ Vtrtnbloo. That. last:tltSOan wort toloctod to: that: cantattouni loudnruhtp and
be
vanld
roomrd¢d
£ho
vurtuono
01¢:rly
tha‘
clygctattoa
it.
uglinod. OI: dirttcultzao in arriving at comparable Asia
oouvuattonnl
at
a:
$ht-prdblnn
to
one!
in.
tupcrtant
tit
at.
OOIplrﬁﬁiyi it;$ia£ion. 0330015117 1- £3. ovulustton a:
psychiatric therapiou. rho trnquun‘ nu. at dilahnrco ratings,

�-17-

dtncnolttc .11.... or Iongth at houpisaltnatton an ortturta
or thorlpputic vnluou at conpnrubtltty or nuts-ct: and poppItttona urn Iibaoct £0 can-031v. array pal... tho inuttﬁnctono
puraduxtn
naschnd
adulatutrntivo
patparuu.
tar
clourly
It.
It.
cal uupuro at a :atluru ts anounat for this vurinhlo 1- to be
6511
dbucrvnﬁtoa
‘hc
of
a
in
tutprprctataon
lttcrnl
t:
Iii!
cindy. an. urn hi! it: most highly train! per-canal oondutttnu
troainunt think is applxud for indivicunlly tottaoﬁ,¢ptxan1
portods o: ‘llis it populations with it. 1...‘ propurtion
danunouod 1p nu unfavorabls

pritlll‘it

group (achilophronin)

-

1.
uncultl
(cvorlblo
tracing-t
a:
rot.
th. pOOIOIt. At Illa, 1n contranﬁ, tilt. in: lonat traluod
shtruptacﬁ apply transient. for nu adutntutrativnly llutsnd
patina, ‘0 t papnlattou ‘1‘! a tight! prcportlon dtnuuoacd
Ichisophrpnia. tho proportten or tnvorablo itscharxt rating:
in lixutticnutlr grouper: It 1- prubsblo thnt thun- ohlcrvuu
£303: a. sop rutloc£ thy tharapcusac atticppy 0: photo snap:1n
inﬁtcatodb
ortsorta o: tuprvvo~
attics-loan
tu‘ttul, 3"
~- tad

tho proportion

uonﬁ.

this lack a: alsritv in «tacuautta achcunﬁ¢ and lacunpnrtbiltﬁy or psychiatric trou‘upnt variably. all. landpallc to th. t‘tcnptnd acuparupivc studio: or payohtntria
thorpptca. Pb: asunplo. tho rank at rooont failurns or
biolcgtcal Ioaonticsu to Courtru ubacrvutioan Ill. 1: «that
labor-tartan rip he I: unch a rutloctinn 0: 11:10:03... In

�.18.
popnlnﬁsoul. paynhaatrin orssortu,lggg. an tullaniou it tho
or131ua1 hip-thus... tin vtdnspmoad no. or tank turns :-

”Ichzscphroaiu' or "plynh'aamtoaiu' to unplarc £hn shuns-n
13 pnyubutagtoal or biological toninraa with nouﬁaz ilincsc
has 106 it a Icioaea burdonod by ungattvu rctaign (Iellak),
nont narkod rocuntly 1n tho nontliettng studio: at I tdrll
false: in auhaauphroutn, :3d the tact-pur‘btltty or the
yhyutologtoul -. hohnvtorcl corrcluttnn: scan in tun u0choly1
(Fulton-toau) and sedatiau thr¢lholﬁ tnakt. Esta nor. 3
valzd abourvn‘tou to be ropuriod :rcu on. clinic, dc a. havo'
nothtdi available ‘0 deliriho poputlilonl manqua‘nzy £0
providc ‘ sound nontlrnatlon? w. haltovu hat, and nonoludc
from thugs dbnurvuttcls that incranacd attention unst be
paid to she uathodolaaaaal prnblun: o: alttsityina uuhjocta
hy 'vb:oot&amp;vo“ cratcriu, rather than ﬁns prosoat untied!
whack appear to b: a. hichiy dopoadont a: institutionnl ;ad
otuarvar nttittana. In: the oouiopaychological 339.0%. .2

‘3. thﬂllptltupl§103‘ tltcrtctiou.

�IleI I
can? a nu

at Bil:

WW
1. nnprunaav‘ rouctson
Surciaozntlo Puruonnlitr

1: no:

WM“
1 61-1-

“mm

Payohcncnrostl

2. Auxtuty Roaution
larttnntutia Parlounlaﬁr

Payohnaonrootl

3. larcttsiutia ?urlcan11my

tartan-11::
$

h. lurcatﬂiutlc Par-annlstr.
Alcohcttun chronic
Intintilo PartinIISty

I acuiuputhic
Put-onaltty
Btuturhusoo

S. Pausivn Augrcuuive
P¢rsoun1$ﬁy
Alcoholiun

Suctcpcthic Purcoanllty
Disturhllco

6. Inthn‘iln rarncnnlzty
Schauophrtntu Ronltton

StuttOphronlo vaychoail

,

Suhiﬁl-Aflloﬁ1Vi*2¥pl

frtit
31I£I§bnnio

�TAELE

c

1

5‘

1
of
I: on
g; gaggs‘nl aacahnrgo

8a.:

tin.

Ii

u

,

Illa
ﬂoats: tgguai-ant

Ruusvuroi

luouvavud

Inpmuvod

Bach Inprvv‘d

unrkodly InprQV'I

Untaprovvd

Invrdvnd

lodurntolr Improvul

alllprcvod

81133‘17 Inprovod

Hltnprcvud

couplate Ronanaign
2aprov.d
v‘ahnugcd (u: wits.)

�ans-$3

:33»!
.

i:

on

.,

w

W

M

.

-

V.

ma

w,

,-.M
,

u.

x

n
Ha

‘ a
WE

w

m

V

m

Vino

W4

m

.w

Vacs.

gm

H1

II

”Sup-32a

a

I'_I"II

3.33..

V

mﬁuﬁﬁﬁm

.63.

I;
Eu.

as

PH.

no

in

�EQELE V

:2!

an

kl

173

we
v’-82.8;

39

dtwhx

p¢.061.

’

21

h:

36

36

6h

0

ah

68

a

! principalxr lilies thsrtplio

�me

95

x'.?0.6; “'1” V5.09!

�331.8

quttt‘u

I

an
g!

m

‘

’

Rum“,
rum

n

'1;

«huand
d

1

c ﬁ

Imprond

ﬂux-yam!

99

1

an

1.9

17:

23

6:

15

as

61

10

mc-

x*-29.3; «rub; p«.oat.

�Y

Ilstttntaau

.

V

I

WM).

l

achtgophrtnia

Puyuhonguronia
and
E'
7

ml
m1

male

171

.

85

t"13.8h1 43-h; pﬁoanl.‘

far-onaliﬁy

O;

!'

J££o¢ttvo

33

$2

5

52

26

:92

SL

29

16

�A

Couporioon o: sooioplyoholoaiool Voriobloo and

Poyohlotrlo trootnout 1o Throo Voluntary Hoopitolo

Robort L. Kuhn, Ph.D.', no: Pollock, Ph.D.

lothoniol Siogol, Ph.D.
oud

m ﬂak,

um.

tron tho noportuont of Suporinootol Poyohiotry, Hilloido
Hoopitol, ﬁlo: Oaks, L.I., 5.1.
Aidod, in port, by grout HI-ZOQI of tho lotionol Inotituto
o: Kontol Koolth, 0.8. Publio BooIth Sorvloos ond tho loooou
County Kontol Hoolth Hoard.

tho cooperation of tho ototto of tho Hooooohuootto Montol
Hoolth Contor and tho 0.1. Hoaninlor Houoriol Hoopitol 1o
lrototuily ooknovlodcod.
o Prooont Addrooo: Divioion o: Poyohiotry, Houtottoro noopttol,
I.!. 67, 3.2.
VII: 3/62

�In thair atndy a: tha lav lavas payahiatria patiaat
populatiaa. lailingahaad and Badliah rapariad aignitiaant
raiaiiouahipa batwaan an individuai'a paaitian in tha aohial
aliaa airuatura and tha pravaianaa a: traatad iilaaaa, typaa
at diaguaaad diaardara ind kinda and duration at payahiatria
traatnaat adniaiaiarad ( ). Thay indiaaiad that prapartian~
ataiy aura lava: aiaaa paiiaata in traataant vara aiaaaitiad
aa payahatia whiia uppar alaaa patianta vara naraattan alauaitiad aa naaratia and paraaaality diaordara. ﬁagardiaaa at
diagnaaia, payahatharapy waa anplayad in diaprapartianataly
high dagraaa with iha uppar alaaa patianta, and urgauia
iharapiaa with iavar alaaa aahjaata.
W”
Tha intiuanaa at aaanaaia atatua
tha availability
aau‘gviat
lﬁkaualndad in thaaa atudiaa.
at traating paraanual
fa iaat tha raia at aaeiai taatara in tha traatnant at hoaa finanaagfaui
iadapaudani
at
patiant
patiant'
pitaliaad
M“:
JJ’availabilityat iraataauta;a patiant aarvay vaa undertakaa
at Biliaida laapiial in 1951. In thia haapitai, a variaty
at traatlant nodal, inailding individual payohatharapy and
organic tharapiaa at. availabia to .11 patianta ragardlaaa

3”“

at thair ability to pay.
In that ....!G. aga, adnaatian and piaca at birth var.
aignitiaauiiy aaaaoiatad viih ahaiaa at traatuaai, duratiau
at haapiiaiiaatian, aliniaal diaaharga avaiuatian and

�.2diecneeie ( ). The elinieel teetere were elee releted to
e eeeenre e: etereetypy, the celiternie F snele ( ). Higher
r eeeree eere nere etten round in petiente diegneeed en invelntienel peyeheeie referred for eeuetie therepy end heepi~

telieed fer e eherter peried ( ).i
11..., mﬁﬂﬂ‘iv W”
It eee eenelnded thet the elGIItI-et eeeiel eleee, ege,
education, birthpleee end degree or etegzgggpy en peyohietrie
i:3§::§:7gi
eeeienie
treeteent petterne were not
teetere er
eveilebility er treeteent eleee. One eezgeetien wee thet
eeeiel teetnre influenced dieueeeie end treeteent by etteetin: the verhel end nen-verhel eynpten petterne e: petient
behevier. It wee peeteleted thet eehjeete et lever eoniel
eleeeee, lee-er edneetien end tereicn hirth would eere
frequently eeniteet eyepteee in nen-verbel, eeneery or enter
pettnrne end would expeet phyeieel eedee e: therepy. Upper
eleee eehjeete eenld etiliee verhel neene e: expreeeien,
end eetieipete peyehelegieel teree er treeteent.
A eeeend interpretetien releted
peyehietrie treeteeet
to the phileeephiee end ettitedee at individnel peyehietriete
end heeyitel etet: ettitedee. In inetitntiene where peyehetherepy wee highly velned, upper eleee petiente would he
treeted dieprepertienetely with peyehetherepy. Sieilerly,
dieeherge eveleetiene end deretiee e: heepitelieetien weeld
he etteeted by dittereneee in etet: expeetetiene for individuele of differing eeeiel eleee.
”Sikhs/W!

�toot thio ooooad hypothuio no dooidod to "put to
Hilloido (an) otody ouployinx tho Iona prooodoroo out
l'o

1957

oonoorroatly to oxtoud tho oboorvotiono to two othor institutions, tho 0.}. nounio‘or Honoriol loopitol of fopoko
(HIE) ond tho looooohoootto Hootol ﬂoolth Cantor of Bolton
(ulna). rhooo inotitntiooo not. oolootoo in tho oxpoototioo
that they oorvo potionto o! ditroriag oooiol olooooo and
that ditrorooooo in thin di-oooiou would ho rotlootod in
tho trootnont variation. In thooo hooptolo thoro in o oinia
lority in ottitndo souordo trootooot and oduootiou. Each
in o tooohinc hoopitol with a toll tin. ooporvioory ototr
and ootivo rooooroh doportooot. rho: onphooino poyohoonolytioolly-oriontod porohothoropy but provido othor trottuonto including oonotio thoropioo ond ootivo procro-o o:
nilioo thoropy. Book otrooooo chart-torn trootoont o:
voluntary potionto, dooo not provido oootodiol ooro and
tonde to draw ito potiont populotioo tron oinilor ozo croopo.
tho opooitio tin; of this study voro to dotornino population dittoroaooo botwoou tho throo institution: with roopoot
to oooiol olooo, ago, oduootion too I oooro, nod to roloto
tho-o potioot ohorootoriotioo to tho trootnont voriooloo or
typo or trootnoot, duration or hoopitolilotiou, diagnooio
and dioohorxo ovoluotioo.

�Uh.
HEIIOD

valaatary, adult pattanaa 1a validaaaa in thaaa
taattauttaaa an a titan data in January 1959 wara aaad£ad.
whsla 8!! and El had valaatary paataata only, a aaall nuabar
a: thaaa at zinc vara aaatsaad by aha eaarta tar payahiatrta
avalaaataa, at wara aanbara at a abrania aahtaaphraaio ataaa
hospital group tranatarrad for a apaattia raaaarah proJaat.
Thaaa patlanaa vara aaa}gaa§mgaan tho atudy baaauaa at that:
aaa-valaaﬁary atataa. fha laud: popu1;‘1.§“;;hai§£;§”;g:§i3
tag-“ice at m and 95 at me. nub
van
W~_MM' W._~.»M~_~-w
gtvan tha calitarnia I aaala ( ) an aha daaigaatad aaaa.
is 0!“ ”Univ;
MM
Eightaaa aoutha later tha-paﬁtaata' raaar ‘Awara aaaiyaad.
to. MMML
and
tho
aha
variaua
aaatal
taatara
at
payahtatria
atady.
)far
a£3~3:::::2:;tton
tar
at aaazal alaaa, tho Ballingahaad
2-taatar tad-x was aaad ( ,). Tho atady inaladad aaaatnaaiaa
at tha ralatiana of tha aacial ta tha payahiatrta variablaa
within aaah inaattatian, as wall aa batwaaa inattantiana.
‘rhaaa aaaparlaana provad difficult baaauaa at airfaranaaa in
tha dattataian of tha paychiatrta variahlaa, aha variablaa
L11

mung";

pl;;t

cut-at: aritaria could not ha
dataraiuad, and varying dagraaa at ataatag data. Far axaapla,
ta aaapara inatitutiana in ralatiaa to laacth a! haapital

raucad widaly and camparahla

atay. variaaa nag-or: pariada vara ariad but aana allowad
rat aaaparahla diatributtaaa. At Hyﬁ, ana quartar a: an.
pattaata raaaiaad ravar thaa aavan aaatha. aad awa-ahlrda
a

�.5.
Into tuna twclvo acuthu. At ulna, in contract, 701 at .11
pation‘t rcnntnod 1... than IOVOI noaths. tad onzy 61 not.
than 3201?. angina. In actor-intng 0.01:1 .1... that. van
tarnrnnttou availnbll for 292 of 371 patiouta. Unclaucitxablo
Ctlll accurrtd whoro tn. educ‘tion or the unaband or a honouwtto If the tathnr or a liner VII nut rouordod.
Loonrdinu, 1n $ho nutty... a: paychiatrio vnrinblot
inphllll V111 bu plaacd on tho dittcrcncoo botvoou tuititu‘lonn,
with c1t:txon or rolovnnt tnttu-inatltnttonal rolntaonnhtpa.

�Katharina“! “no.“
what! "parts.“
tn:
hatun
I
tnutuuou,
“at”
11
and
“icon
for
of
tho
“that
hospital
crust“,
"not”.

1.
4*“

2y“

1,:

,7)

§

)3

§

Pg
«
§

3

studying
in
brieﬂy.
“attend
ﬂavour,
{LR $ Q
1:”er
77W
', 0”]
M
and
author Guplrlbli d».
44W
stunting
inﬂation
3:.
ﬁg
.W'
3'.
M”
batvua
tho
undo
1at
q
dirt-rue”
luuumm.
any
m\
an
3N
M
”1:1” (Md “on. ﬂu hospital. org-nuts.» u a dour-tun at twat-x § Q1: 9.
3*
”3%:
both
sh.
pr-Obltl.
03mph,
)W
tumultuous
hr
no“
Q‘s
an
u
‘
Mﬂg
3
3g
an
do“ not.
7“ MM 1mm and am In" in: lupin]. nun, while
(ft; Q
3‘
mfg?” At me the trotting phynuua u: can for a pttuu u a ‘E Q“k
and
tho
as
1n
é
day
the
utter-nu
hospital,
W‘ﬁjw Min-pun“,
x
i
to
In
tool
1%
In
;.1. 1,,
no):
a
auburn
«a
in.
“tuna.
cunts.
w
k“
g
M";
knowing
tho
at
hoopla!
the
«run“to,
patient in:
”ﬁle/:4 ,
a
WV 15%”,
11111
ha
hi:
tar
patint'u
to
ruponltblo
«to;
um
can
%
1;.
'bj’whuuﬁ
up»)
gt an, “sour” nun urination or “at puunA” MW
auto:relation“?W M” Jr
1M
Vb 5
0:
the
Authcr
$4,
III
pubic:
51/”
“than
prune.
running m. {Lu
u}
NM
5”” w”
M.
use
tbs
.2
_..,
011““).
an.
"nun“.
‘y prurun, “tuna:
W”
w
g‘éﬂm
w
tho
at
approximately
pan-nu
“any para."
u
«may,
W
{
to:111
had
and
bun
chronically
hospitals!“
mo var.
“wwizof rb
Mara
would
not
normally
1:
luv.
bun
Sun
group
I
yuan.
any
ﬁg
Wu;
MW"
thin nuptial bit they had bun trmtornd tron author

m

O
|

9'

1,.

.

|.

“0:

ax-

.

in

8
v

8

”L

e

,

A

_

.

Mk

M

‘

3

‘35

’

3

\
g

,

.

x

‘

W”

,5

l

i

'

W"

.

l

at.“ human“ for a ”001.1 ““1.
Thu, tho vary not." no In" int-tutu

/

in studying

,4"ch

‘

�~80

diagnssol unpluynd tho unltipIo avnl‘ativu d.ta Ichuuo
rootuaondod by tin Anortcna Psychiatric LIIOOIQ‘itl will.
both an and nuns rollovod Iaiﬁary nyuﬁunl. 8.7.!!! uxanploo
a: dllﬂlllll tram I)! are liatod 1n Idblo I, with on: on;goutod oonvoruioaa into ottngoricn coaparablo so the cthor
two institutiona. {hone aonvorlioul provide, horcvcr, an
unavaidnblc neuron of dfstartaon. (31-11nr ebonrvntinln havban rap-rut! by Pun-nut and his uuetntoj ( ) who
indicts. th.t diagnoous riﬁhin the can. tantikutiou arc die
valuarnblo to individual ditturoncoc anon; anguinnr-J
-“--I‘-----QTtblu I
c) Dilahsr 0 anti 3 at In rovcm¢n%: Ratings at inpravc:ont varind in (grant and detail. the dischargo rating It
KPH In: triparti‘o with a liptruto cvalustion for
social,

attractorcloliual

and cyndrouo Chlnloto

an and Kane had

glob-1 ratings in which it was dirtiault to .0303: the con—
trtbution or cash factor at th: urn tyntan (rubl- II). For
this Itudy the urn urndrono rating VII compared to tho glqbll
ratings of an and mane.

T‘bla
2. Socioglzeholoitcal Variable.

II

�-9“

a) Socitl Gina-z that. val I narkod dittoronoc in tho
lociil ulna: oonpouition of tho thro- iuttitttions (Table 111).
3%
an
BEE
01:00;
tho
produninaltly
population
uppar
In.
it
niddia olaun; tad at axle. pradcninaatly lava: Ola-u.
b) 5.3: Thor. turn as dittaruncun in In. dilirihutiou
in the institutional popuiitiano.
0) Education: Tho populitionl dirtorod in cduantioual
1%
HIE
with
having nor. yoirl or adieupaticatt
utttinncni,
tion than that. it HERO. While kl p02 aunt of tho pttiontl
HERO ttilod to cosploto high annual, only 32 par cent at
it
KPH
UK and 23 par cont
it did ant ‘raduntc.
d) F Sacra: Dittoruncon in the diuiribuiion of scar-I
on tho Gilitornia r 80.1. not. obsorvod. ritth~ono par coat
or urn paticntl had P score: below 30, cad only eight var cent
with IBOrCI or 50 or abuvo -- the higher P acorns being O0..cintod with high-r dugrtul o: sturuotypy. In contrast, at
3336 tittty per cont not. Euler 30 on the F 30.1., and tort Knigz;::;pnr—ttnt
$0
two per scat and IBOIII at
or nova. it
bb¢”»130 chad eﬁnuau~ P&amp;c&amp;¢r véu&lt;_z
or the pntiuntl hid F 3002.: ia—ihn—nidd%¢arcntu-huﬁwuuu—3O

'0'”?ch

My

Sowua «Jan, 50m
0

3. Pozohiatric Variablu:

Intrgoinutitutionnl «satirinonl urn connoiidatod in
Tabla IV, wail. iuicr-inutituiional ounparinont are proacntad
iadividquly in tack auction. In tibia IV, nirhu uni psychotherapi.a act. conhiuod, parlitting p «cairn-t or countie ind

�.11.

at an and rune. 3.3.310 two‘s-ant uni uolootna for pattea‘u
clan-itlcd an achisaphroain and atfcotivo disorder not.
titan than than. Illlﬂid an paychonuurmszo u$ Illh hoapitll.
At HFH, pattou‘a rocolvtll unantio troaiannt (prodcninautly
than. 01.8.06 an nthiaoyhrania) rocnlvod dinohsrso ratingot uninprevnd nor. ofton thus putiuata roooivina psychathcrapy
alone.
b) Duration of Boagitaliuttiona 23. turn. instituticua
agitated with roapott t0 ptticnt'o longth of ctny (Tabla VI).
MPH patients VII. haupitnliscd
leascls, with 65$ of pat1¢atl
runtiniag t0: twelvo lanth- or torn. cenpatua ‘0 31 par cont 0:

patioutl and 0:1: 5 par coat a: that. it nuns. rho
3.4.1 ttay .1 it. i3 group was hottocn IIVOI and «lurch
nonthn Hull. twenthirén of tho XHHC patioata wort diachuracd
within six 393th: at hoapttnlisatton. 3031.1 «1::- and
F acorn worn 30‘ rnlutod té dira‘ion at any institutian.
or tea psyghiatrio variabloa, only diazuoaia 00‘1d b. taint-d -

in.

HE

as tho». diagnonod a. achinaphron1n war. hospttnlaund to:
longer porlodn It sunk inutttution. At avury at. 10701, that.
at RFE rouninaé $0.30: th¢a It 33 or Mlle. Ind-oi, tho in‘cr-

institutionul ditturonotl rat. to grant ‘hat 3 pttiont in
th- oldut go pup nu It" 11h): up In lac-punts“ :cr
tvlov. tenths cw not. at KPH ‘htl war. pntioats in tho
yonncont as. graup at HXKO.
Within

ill‘iilt10nl..‘IO

nudmodnoatton As xv: and an

�-12u

honpttnltnatiaa ~- youaxnr lid 10!:
oducatod putt-at! rinutntng for tho lingolt period

worn roln‘od to lunght of

Q-.-“-O-QC“-- .O-”--.
rabzo V1 abuut her.

-U.---'...--’--Q-ﬁ--.~
a) Diuoharlc Evaluation: In cash helpitnl, ants patiouta
are ovnluatnd ut th. time o: disaharto :&amp; "taprovcd" (Tabl. VII).
9: pattnntl worn
a IIQEI. p¢t1¢nt who call-d

At KPH, hoV¢vnr, u high-r porountaun (19$)

rntud a: ”unimprovcd” and «317
”gooovorad" or ”much improvad”. Tho hiahu:£ purncntago or
”roeovorod" or ”such 13336706" r;:1nsa (28$) :ud tha lowcat
NHEC.
(10%)
"unimprvved”
{tuna
a:
ct
war.
proportian
Analya¢a within «ash institution Chalid Ttriiblﬂ roanltc.
At an tad H336 thorn was t tondonay far 9140: puticuta to ho
ratcd hatter than youaanr onus, but uh. results arc ut:ttlt1¢33.
Aﬁ
H33
thorn wan II OppOlt$O
anly
at
aixnirieant
all?
trund, with older pationta nor. ltkoly to ho rctcd nutupruvod;
but this 616 net aahiove ntatiuticaI signiftclnao.
-ﬂ‘----‘-ﬁ-“ﬂﬂﬂ’.9351: VII

-O.--’.-‘-.ﬁ-¢--.
d) Diauneais: Fer neltiutiaal annlyulu thrco diltnﬁi‘lt
groupfingc were mudo: achisophrouit, tffottivo aiaordcru.
disardora (Tublt VIII).
Th. alcgnontie propertians «or. similar for tho an tad Hana

und puychoneurcsin anﬁ pnr¢¢aa11ty

�.13.
purulntaonu, but it. It! patluuta wort tiﬂlrdol s. h:v1:¢
tow-r atttattvo ate oohasophrcnto 1100:4013 and n.13rxcr
author a: plyohcnonrotic or port's-11:; disordatl.
Intrainatitutianal nnulylis abound that at RH both as.
tad F 000:. not. rclatcd to ditcntats; &amp;% HER use alone at
thu nociul factorx uni ralstad to diaguoais; while at EMHG
hﬁﬁﬁ 0f ﬁle social varigbloa were so related. 0f ha payohzattiu variables, diagnoatl wan significantly rulnhad at
Ollh hospital to solootion or tdnatnant aha auratian of
and(§ging:iélta
diucharge ev‘luttien.
haspitalinttioag

"'----’“-”-ﬂ”. u-~u~q~a25310 VIII about barn
u---~-‘n---—-h-~n”ca—umu—Mﬂn

�~1hDISCUSSION

In this comparison of throo voluntary psychiatric
hospitals as havo obsorvod significant intorinstitntional
dirtoroncos of pationts in tho social varioblos of yoars
o: oducaticn and social class, but not ago; in distribution
or California F Scalo scoros; and in oach of tho troatnont
variablos -- duration of hospitalisation, soloction of
troatnonts and distribution of diagncsos and dischargo
ovaluatinns. pTho littoroncos in troatnont variablos botwoon
tho institutions nay rosnlt from many factors, including
tho social aspocts highlighted in our initial studios. To
,.__ Ar
7-“,
dotino tho rols of social factors noro cloarly, no nndortook tho intra-institttional comparisons. Fron thoso analysos,
tho lack of oonsistont rolationships londs doubt as to tho
rclo o: pationt social factors as principal dotorninants in
troatnont within thsso sottinss. It was anticipatod that
within oach institution, pationts or highor social class,
lowor F sccro and hottor oducaticn, would ho trootod proton-4
ontially by psychothorapy, classitiod as nourotic, romain
for shortor poriods and roscivo bottor disshargo ratings.
Within tho institution, an irro ular association botwoon tho
(Tablo:;§;).
variablos was obsorvod
Within ono institution,
tho HHHC, ncns of tho social variablos woro rolatod to any
...--

v

troatnont variablo; nor was social class statistically ro~
latod to any troatnont variablo at sithor KB or MFR. Of a

�-15-

’51,

&gt;

possible h8 relationships between social and treatment
variables, eleven are statistically significant.
The differences in the HE and NPR data nay be at
reflection of their popnlaltion differences: the relation
of age to discharge evaluation, and Fiscore to diagnosis
at hH reflectingthe higher proportion of depressive illnesses;
while the relation of age to treatment selection at MIR
reflecting their higher proportion of young persons classified psychoneurosis and character disorder. The similarities,
in HR and HFH uata may reflect similar treatment philosophies,
which are different from that at MHHC. Conditions of elective treatment and elective duration of hospitalisation exist
at HE and MPH, and it may be this flexibility that pernits
the interaction of the social variables. it HHHC, however,
the limited stay and need for rapid treatment results in a
failure to denonstrate an interaction of social variables
with the treatment processes.
Similarly, the relation of social class variables to
treatnent variables in the Hollingshead and Rellioh studies
may reflect their data selection, which was over the broad
range of all community facilities and all treatment periods.
Within institutions, however, these social factors appear
less determining of treatment rariahles, seemingly overpowered
by intramural edninistrative or financial necessities. In
the earlier Hillside Hospital studies ( ) the relation of

�.16.
svoru, an: cducataul tn tin ‘routnnu‘ Vtrtttloc
in t valuation a: ﬁt. brand adntala‘ruﬁtvo latitudes tvntlnhlo
£011.04
broadly
ltoutnon‘o
not.
tans.
tn plttcnt 0.20 t‘ that
with nonattu, natto‘ cad puythoﬁlnrupuut1n Ind-I aquaixy
i'ISXIUIGo Duro§aou at hingt‘ultsattou was tread}: tuttnod
gs up ‘u 1 1I¢r, If longs: at rotunl$nd. hints-1's p.131:
tun
.1
and
udnislttu
and
bath
IOIIk$
par-titan
(Icntblo
II.
dtnordorn.
at
var'hlasrto
vtth
runs.
'1‘.
I
pattian
f01§$$OI~
socxnlutronincn£
(out:
In
titan
In: prtnott I‘l‘!
constructxon
a
1951
rotlac£1nl
parity.
Itndr.
aha»: its: than tvusluhtlitr a: urinal-at ch¢1¢¢l. in pavulnttun and a
intturu cu‘auliou at d§ru610| at hocrtttitlutxol. this
with
nan
:dn:nlttracultauporaacauslr
tuttxiutcd
:
prion-I.
itﬁt
clout:
marina
a
Itntlnraty
070.11.:
at
tics. is nio-zlr
adutaautruﬁivo
daucasaioua
as
Buck
III!
Iodci.
8!!
It.
tn.
it.
dinuolutltn
at
or
Itﬁcrnxnnnta
thoracic.
tr
yrtnzcvll
0061.1 Vilil‘ltig ca titttri 1: tin trolmnont prcacal.
A loalnd tlpoot c: that. Ituiica 3:3 tin nathodcloctonl
prdﬁloun In dottnln; tun traits-at vurtﬁbioa. Thai. tact:ﬁuﬁaous var. Iclootoa it! ‘hoir causatisngl ltuanrahty and
‘ho capacﬁa‘ton that tbs rooardul variable! wouId ho altar}:
dofiutd. OI: dirttauiticc in Ittlvtts as Odlibrtilirdtil
$h¢
cauvcatlosal'uno a:
anon
at
‘0
sh.
gratin:
.r. tap-rtaut
cuuparntagu o‘ttintlnu. alpuntuIXI 1: ﬁt. ovuluu£1oa a:
purch3n%rlc thornpxnu. it: truancnt II. It diachnzao ratings.

.3 ago.

D

�-17ae
or
criteria
hoapiteliaation
length
diaguoetio cleaner/or
of therapeutic valnee or oouparability or aubjeeta and populationa are subject to oxeeeoive error unless the inatitutione
The
paredoxipa+torna.
adninietrativo
notched
for
are clearly
'7
be
to
ie
oal nature of a failure to aooouht
aeon in a literal interpretation of the observation or this
HFH
conducting
boo
personnel
The
highly
the
traini
loot
etudy.
treatment which ie applied for individually defined,eptina1
periods or tine; in populatione with the least proportion
diagnoeod in an unfavorable prognoa io group (aohiaophronia) ie
roenlte
treatment
and
the
proportion
yet,
-o5\£avorabla
the poorest. At HMKG, in contrast, where the laaet trained
therapioot apply trootnente for an adniniotrativaly limited
period, to a population with a higher proportion diagnosed
eohioophrenia, the proportion of favorable discharge ratings
in eignifioantly greater! It is probable that thoaa observationo do not reflect tho therapeutic ottioaoy or theoo inotitutiona, but indieataﬂi dittoronoee in criteria of improve-

for@

Iont.
Thie laok of

clarity in diagnostic

aohomata and incom-

lendo
a1ae
variables
treatnont
e:
payohiatrio
peribility
pauae to the attempted comparative etudioa of psychiatric
t ranioe. For example, tho raeh of roeont failure: 0!
made
confirm
other
in
to
aoientiate
‘/h(c£jﬁau!§iolozioal
obaorvettfno
laboratories may be as each a reflection of dittoronooa in

�-18..

fallooioo in tho
on
such
torus
of
The
use
widospzood
hypothoaoo.
original
“oohioophronio” or "poyohononrooio" to oxploro tho chongoo
in poyohologiool or biological rooturos with nontol illnooo
hos lod to o ooionoo burdonod by negotivo rooulta (Bollok),
noat marked roosntly in the conflicting studios of o serum
factor in schizophronio, and tho inconporobility of the
tho
nooholyl
in
soon
oorrolotions
hohovioral
physiological -(Funkonstoin) and sodation throohold tasks. Even were a
havo'
do
wo
from
ono
be
clinic,
roportod
valid oblorvotion to
nothodo available to doooribo populations odoquately to
ooncludo
Ho
and
holiovo
sound
confirmation?
not,
a
provide
from thaso obaorvotiona that increased ottontion nuot ho
paid to hho nothodologiool problono of olooolfying aubjooto
mothodo
tho
than
presont
rathor
"ohjootlvo"
by
criteria,
which oppoor to bo so highly dopondont on institutional and
ohoorvor ottitndoo, and tho oooiopayohologiool oopooto of
tho therapist-pationt intoraotion.

populations, poyohiotrio oritorio, 323.

Uﬁﬁ})*l

1"

t

no

�”ﬂu“
Wing

mun.

nupwum: 1V.

Beneﬁt.»

Mun“. rmuw

AnzacQV

mm“

3.

magnum: Puumu‘y

rum-nut.
running mu

h.

l'mmuty
mus-u:
nub-1m em.

f 8001me

Imus)... Formula”

S.

6.

I'm“.
Farm

“mun

in

tau-nu rwmuw
Batu”

nun-pm.
Baum-ulna" W

-

1’me
“than”

Winn
rumba“

Pmbmuw

annual-n1. Ply-haul

�z§gLs g;

W
W

Ithovod

Inst Inprovud
Untnvrnvud

coupluia nonalciao
Ihwruvud

Btuhtngad (or aura.)

�am

1

M9

m.
m

“mu
on mm

'

i

‘

h).

sa

5

want“ In"..

cm

W

33

3:

mm“ an m

�am
um:

0)

U)

a

g

a:

g

.

H

auton,ann

.

.m.m

So.

E?

So.

0&amp;5»

an

a

llllll'llglllllllll
in
CO

E3

nonansao&gt;m

a“.

o

H‘ad

.m.m

Mina-«n

can»

an

m
“no
no.

3E

Hand

pm

a

.

an

n
8.

—:o«a~uwnu¢«.uom

and.
guaoﬂanncm

.8.
we

ncvd.lomcuhnaH

nodunuvm

«uncanny

.

am

«a

So.“

ma

mo.

«nonvooua

M.
no.

mm

.

nauaeadcm

3.

mu

.

.

«6

nuddo

“;o«anu«n¢aumuom

mouoauﬁahm

aoaaanuun

Queen

n«uo:uu«n

ouudaunun
newcauun

“Canon

a:

h

�m1

.

u“

m

�‘

*

M1” .4

m

H

m

.

a:

It
3?
,

67

Innsh

OM: $.00),

'

13

$5

a

’1

an

s

�ms
X"2’a3i

‘

as

«mush:

mum.

u

a:

10

�Inattﬁuttau

I

schlnophr-ntt

rayuhtuanrosiu
it};

m

n
me

‘

171

-

as

x'-8)~3h1 ﬁrth; p¢.60m.

Pursuant:

and

8 .1. ..
1*

_

5’

5’

53

35

51;

V

art-1‘11.

.99

s

&gt;

22

1‘

�ms]:
Mutts-ant

awn-«um: human
on

stun

m" haunt
01'
lap-11.13““!!9mm
.
ant-cum

-

"

-

W1-

mum xumm
at
man
mm
"ﬁnalising
"

..

~

1

8m mud»
"
.

n:

-

W

5.10.“..-

uts-«mug
W ti m.

n-

w

m
u
m

E
‘0'

M

0"
'3'

m

a

a

a

00

IWmﬁ tar man a...
a

94.

.05

H

vs:

.01

�IAﬂLE

G0

vnasxox 0!

333313033 BISCRARGﬂ BIAGEEﬂES
1-

n¢prota1v¢ raaatinn

ﬂarciiatatic Portannlity

2. Anxioﬁy Rotation

6.

I

IﬁCﬁARGE E AﬂBBSEB

GEIIRSL CL‘ﬁﬁIFICAT

.

?nyohanaaraa15

narcissistic Forv¢aa11ty

Plyahounurccﬁw

Hareienistzc rattannlity

Faruuaultty fruit Diuﬁurbcuc.

Strainalutia rtrlantlity
Alcahaltsn 0hrnu1¢
Infantile Pattonalihr;

Sﬂﬂiﬁﬁn$h1¢

Paaaiva Aggrnaaivc
Parsonllity
Aleeholian

ﬂociopnzh1¢ Parawnnlity

.

Infantila Pernanality

schisephrenio ﬁnaniion
s¢h$ao~1££¢ut1vo typo

Parsannlity
Disturhiuua

Diuturbanca

schizophrenia Payabalin

�IABLE

‘Gnﬂraattlvz
8311308 0? OLIRIGAL ﬁDRBITIﬁﬂ
oa-

Rauniugor
39¢IAL ADJEEIEEYT

7

it

QIKB

3 3a

Killeida

ﬁﬂﬁﬁ

Raaavnrﬁé

atauvartd

Inprnvad

narxodly Inpravud

Improvwﬁ

Rumh

ﬁninpravwﬁ

Imyruvnd

nodnrntuly Inpruvul

ﬂainprovod

slightly Inpretnﬂ

‘~

stancruax

Imarnvad

Uniaproved
agggaena.
¢auwlnﬁn Rtmianinu

:upmuvsa

ﬂuthuaaud (yr werua)

Uninprovid

�Iutnrinatitutiuuul ntfturauea in Solaatiuu at
Iggltmnng

.

-

.wt_ _m1e
.

w.

m

21

h:

:5

I!

33

6h

6

mm

as

53

a

x2 «52.3

a:

”guru

9

.1,

�taggg

Inﬁorinstatution’l Ditrcrnneil
(5 o!

1n

itiliilti

Duratiuu of not

thjuatu)
month: in gougital

natitutian

x?

7*11

1? 0

aka

22

13

65

”K

27

h?

31

unac

6?

2?

5

:90.6

a: -k

n

�taggg

Intarinatttutional Birrnrcnuau in

Dinahargu Ditgnaoin

Dingnaatte ﬁatcgarius (Par agnt)

Iantitutlou

ﬂ

at;

me

:3 '23.8h

a:

sh

ﬁ { t 001

Payahoncnroaia
aha Purtunuiity
Disardvr

Atrsuttru

b3

52

s

952
‘

an

schitophronis

171:
85

V

‘

52

as

22

Sh

29

16

�ﬁtgﬁﬁ

Inttrinotiﬁntiennl Ditruranuts

X

1n

niachar a Evaluattan

niacharga Evaluatiau {?ar cunt)

Institution

W

RIB

ﬁﬂﬂﬁ

x2 «29.3

df 'h
p,§.001

linororeé,

Inpravgd

Buinpruvod

1

80

19

:3

62

15

nnd

Each 1 srgvod

�.

I.

.

,2

'

‘1‘

’

,

.

'

‘

..

'

‘

‘

v

I

6)
z

'u

m
1&amp;1

tum-au&lt;

2"

‘

�WW“
m m,

rum.
tuna,
m
my» my.

Int-m 1.. mm, mm»,

“I

3.9.

mmwwww

maxim,

“My
m,
hM;WMﬂ~mdﬁ-meam
mammals-nun;
m,
mmmmmmam.
lulu .10

mwammamwmmam
ume.r.wmwmumw
am.» am Palm
mm,
W
‘w

W
T
01’

n.’

:

4‘bv

at

1.2.

�MWWMuM“WMW¢(Mm

mmmﬂ)mmmnmmmm

nmmammmmmmmm,
wmaummnmmmmumm
umw,mwwmnummm
“Mama-mm“). ummmam
mnmwxmwm wthatwm‘w

Wmmwwmmu

ammmum. hmmmmmwortm
mummmwwmumwuw.

hmmswdmnnmmmmzmmm*

«.me

mwmm mu

�“w-

'ml‘tvﬂivamu

«mtmummmtmwm

mawwm‘mmmmm
I.
“mummumummum.

mmwuumummwmmu

umumwmummmm,w'
¢J.rwmmmwm.u'mmm
mummmnummmmm
mmW-umummmammcm
nmwmummmmum
mm
smwummmwmmm. mu.

mmmuunwmmmumw

mmmwwm
m,mmmmmumwn~mm

.am‘m.

”mmmammm “.mummm

mmummmmuammumm,
m,mm3m,mummmwmruuu

’ummmuwaw,mamm

mtmmmum-m. mama-rum

�mmmmmummmmm
(an
ummmmmmamm.
mamm,mwmmmmm.
mm~Wmemmalm,mu

::*:W~*”M1m*~”
“WW

MWWW:WWW,W3W
«mmm‘umwm madam-Worm
,I.

W W,um.mmummmm

�mam-.nmmmmmumm.

wmmmumuwum,
t.)

W

;_

:' 'm

”A

a

m “1% M

W

mmwummt
ammmmmmum
.

.

«mumu‘m mum-«mm

maﬁa-Wum‘ mmmumm
mm,mmmmmmumm
«WWWWMxm-uuwmm

Wuamuwmmmm,
maummmmumutm
mmmummmwmm'mu
‘

E§~

�lvmmm.—v m- n.

5)

mm mmmmmmmmmm

ummmmwmm
mmmmmmmmmmw.
meta-am.

mmammwmmumuvm
ww_mmwmwutnam
mmmﬂm. MWWummm
«um.
nun-mm
mm'mumowmnmum.

uwmnmmmmuumuwlmmm.
mummuaamw. mamumum
mummammlmmmwumammmmt
ummmmwamdmmwmmmmm

mmmwmrmmmmm
«mmmummrmmm.
(1mm.

WI!

mmammamm,m,m

�,

mwrm—W“

W"

mmrsuummmmmumum
gammy.

W:

Mm‘mﬂﬂmuthmiu
maximammmmm. mwmmm
I»)

Wm'mumam;nmunmm

Mgumwummum,mwm.
a: mumummummmuw
s)

m:
m,uummnwmmmmmormm
mum-m
umammmum
ummmnmmmwww,maﬂmm
mmmmmuW-mmm

a)

'

nummammnwmmm.(ma: (1)9393
.
”gm: awdmnmumm
mma‘mWIMMW. mini-muse:
mmmr'mwnatwmprmuu
masoummmmrmcnummmnmm‘
“tn-“aw hm,anpx-mtd
wmmmrmwwmnmm-Mmum
mm”!
m,m&gt;mwmmmmmuenu
mmumm,uwnu¢mmmmmum
1

mummmmmrm. WWW“

'msmmmwummormmm

�mwmmwmumm
mammal WQMMiWMWM“

wmmmmmmmmum
m, ma—mwwmmnmmmmm‘
mummmuu‘mmmmwu
mmmm,mwmm.
mmmwmm,mmwm“

mummm-Wmm,mmnmmw
ummgmmmaomwwm.
'ummumuw, mm,murm

mwmuwmm(mwm
rmmwwmﬁmmmxrm

«mummnw,uapnwmp
WWW
hummus.anme
Wit:Mwumwmmmamum
MM?
Mawuﬁamﬁ
#mée
twat HS?

MMWWWQ
WWQM

Wﬁﬂﬂﬂ

9W“.

�MI
‘

.

o‘lo'u

mammmmummammm

vamwmu-Wnamhuwum

WW,‘WM1§WIIW{WUMMW
www.mm-ammmmmmwm;m.
W?

m
mummammmm
mummmmmmmmmmm

mum

y‘

ammmmmummmmsm. mm
mwmmmmmm,mmwmmuw

mmmmewmuw,ummm

�WW

#

mustmwmumunutmormnw.
mmnzaurwmuumumummuua,
“snowman-Man. mmmumnmutum
Wqummxmot-ounmuumuuu
o:
than
'wmm.m
Willi-Ind
mam,
um mum
m
toners,
It
mthmnhtmumutmlmttmm
M

m,mmmmamxuutmuhrzmmu
the
of
exam
mid.
new
swam M, mm
mswhmnmmwmsm'smm,emm,
mmm‘m,um,m.,mwwmmu,mm
tnmwmmmumumummmo:
ﬂu mam mm tom of W new new.

th;

13

.mwumanmummmumrmmth-thum‘mmmmmmm
“Wummmmnmmmuuutm

mew,mmmmmwwmmu

unmummmmwmmmtua
wuawmumuummmmmmmw
If
utmmm-mumnmmutwmmmr.

mwmmuummmummmm
mam,mmmmwmtma
mm.

WQMtMW,h-mttmmmmmm

�gm.

anmuquw.
Mmumwntmmmwm
nm,umm,mnmmmﬁmmuum.
um,uuuu

MMWMtwnmmm,dmahusm

deMW‘Iﬁ-Wamum
m,mmmmm~mm«m
mnmummtm Mmmumu

mmmmmnnmmmmmm,n
mmnw.m¢mmmmumm. hwmw

tin-mmmmmmmmmuwm
gamma
mmmwmmm

mmmumwa
mummw
mmm,uuwmmtmmummm ma

“stumwmmm'wammnmmw
ammuuxmmaw'm‘ammmmw

WWMH‘WW,‘WWWWK

�”V

1

“.17..

—-m_

—

mmmmummmmum-

-Wamwwmmm gunman

-w—rv-v-rvv

a.

7—WWVVWWW_W—.__.

ummnmmmm ”.mumww,‘

mmwwwwuwmm

7m

"—

WWW—v

N

.

0w

_

“A

.W

..,_,.mw_.—....,.r,.,.-

ww-v.

”u'mm*w
“Mwumw
(M‘m‘
m
W‘i
”thawum W
mmmnmmwm,mwwmmm

mmamnmmmammm

mmmmmmummmw
«mnwammmm,m~wmm
awmmm,m,mmum
“at
mmm,mmmmmumm

J

t;

"

�",wwww

w

.7"-

wry—«W...

..”___,__,

»

«-

.w‘

3...;

Amwmmmnmmwm,

umamwmmmmnmm

www‘wvwa

WW

«p—w‘wmmvw—WW

mmammm,mmmum

WWW-w

”.7“

~
.—

WW.

�TABLE

I
-

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

r

.

.m.

._...-

in...

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

1. Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

&amp;

reaction
Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait

2. Anxiety

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism Chronic
Infantile Personality
Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Disturbance

'

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction
Schizo-Affectige Type

~

"

Schizophrenic Psychosis

*4

.

r

.,

.

'

~

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge
MENNINGER HOSPITAL

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

'

Social

Ad

ustment

Recovered
‘1’

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Improved

Much

Unimproved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved

Character Structure

ﬁproved

Markedly Improved

Improved
Unimproved

Unimproved

Szgdrome'

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged

(or worse)

�TABLE

III

InterhosEital Comparisons for
Sociogsychological Variables

Hillside Massachusetts

Menninger

Hospital Mental Health

Hospital

Center

7%

20

Social

’=121.S

df=8
p&lt;. 001

3h

Class

3b
5

1970

:

.

‘

_

-

Age

58

_

_

S2

Y3=3o 9

dfuh

p- n.s.

12—15X2'9
&lt;12

Years of

Education

16

”

32%

df-h

+

p&lt;.

51%

F

7

OS

X"3
2
df-h9

‘

WWW

Score

hl

SO

p&lt;. 001

8

-‘

-

--‘”

~

~

-~ .. x “hm-ave
-

x-r'

row-'t-t'r.

«ma-Iv: «cr-r\+:w.-:.wv-'--vvwz- ~‘rwrwg

,..\IQ‘W~("" w

my

3‘"5‘WM»WMP

�TABLE IV

Intel-hospital Differences in Treatment Variables
Heminger
Hospital

Psychotherapy
Treatment

Duration of

Hospitalization

Sanatic

-(-19—
21%

Hillside

Hospital

-ﬂl)-

Husachnsetts

Mental Health

Center

—(-D

36%

h3

6h

36

--

7-11 months

27

11 months

Discharge

Evaluatim

Improved
Improved

80

62

Unimproved

19

15

Affective Psychosis
Diagnosis

28%

Psycheneurosis and
Personality Disorder

61

10

�:5”

HOSPITAL STAY
K

ONE YEAR

;P.sTA¥ING,OVER

‘Pﬁ

8‘1

.

20329

I

~

6

36'

“

‘

M

M

-

73

A_

w

Hillside

Menhinger

-‘

.

,

'61

in
I

'

BY AGE

j

:‘35

~7f

6

I

I

‘

3,0

2.5,;

-

.

2’0

,

0

.

.

,

0

0

�7142b,

’-

”‘7‘;

aceiopsyuhelogieal 13:11:00 of
Pnyuhintric Trontnoat in fire. Voluntary loupttuls

Robert L.

Iain,

P&amp;.D.ﬁ,

in: Pollack,

Ph.D.

lathauxol stag-1, Ph.D.
and

an: Pink, 3.5.

tho Bcpartlont of InpurtHOItal fuybhtntry, lillutdn
fro. 61¢:
Oaks. L.I., 3.1.
loapttnl,
Atdud, in parﬁ. by 29.3% lt-IOOI or the latiounl InItStn‘c’
of labial It‘l‘h. 8.8. ,ublic Inllth aorticag and tho Iguasu
County Keats: Bealth Beard.

the cacpcrntion of tho stuff. a: the nan-nonalctta mantel
Italth Ccntar and the C.?. Hanninacr Nauorial ﬂospital 13

grutctully nokaculodcod.
irresant Address: Rivision of Paynhiatry, Haatofioro Hoapital.

l.!.

67, l.!.
7!!!! h/62

�In pruvioua coat-payohologionl s‘udioa or

leapitcl papulntion a.

obncrvcd

educatiou,plutu of birth
aenlu

rut. Iignitiountly

01 galact1on

and

th‘t

scar.

ﬁt. 3:11.1do

tuck a-pccta an :30,
on

the calitoruiu

I

Pointed ‘0 tbs trcntncut variation

or trontumut. «11:10.1 disuse-1.. dura‘iou o:

hacpitaliuatton gut treatment cytltation.

It

was

ltggoutad

at thut tins that tho can. influenco or noelal variation
on

the treat-cut process Inuit b. observed upon: institutions.

to tact this auggontion a: wall as to roylieuto the stud:
within inntitutiona, tho prusont study of three hoapitell

val undattakta.
In

a.

their study or

ﬂu

Baron

panhin‘ric mutant

populsticu. Holliaguhoad and Budlizh rapertud alanifiiaat

rtlntlonthlyu button»

smut”

an

individual'a vanities

1n thu 0001.1

pmduu tented 111”". two:
at amend uurdcra a: nu- ma «nu-n or pay-untu-

duo

troatnont cdnintutarod
economic

status

or

and tho

(

upon tho

).

fl.

influoaeo o: patton‘

availability or trcnt1ag peruouuol

�.-9.
van nut ﬁxalndod in this. :tudlua. 1b tact the :01. of
coats: factors in tho triatunnt.or hoapttaltaod patients
inﬂaptnddnt or puticnt'l tibiae-a 3nd dvcalnbillty of
trnatacnta, I patiout burv.y In: undortakcn It lillolda
1§§7.
in
Ia thza‘hcapita\. a variaty’ct ﬁrockuuut
Ibmyiﬁtl
ptychoéhnrnpy
and organic
Ind-n, including individual
thorupiua are attllahlo to all pattints rlgardlosu or
tags: abilzhy ﬁe pay.
In in. tillaido study. Ian. canonﬁton and 31-00 at
birth cur. utgnttlnuaﬁly nouontatcd ut‘h chain. of trudaaont,
duration at honpatglicntaan. alsuxeul diachnrxo aval‘ntiou Ind
diagnonlt ( ). It Ill ohncvvod that patiuntn hounltnliuod
for th- Ihortnus plrild aura the oldest, had tn. loant cane.»
tic: :36 «are taut liktly to bats hut: foreign hnvu. The:
wit. prudoulnnntly £rc-ﬁnd by ouuvulutvo ‘horipy and rocuivnd
it. not. fuvauahla diachnrsn ratinga. Ibnngur. unttv. horn
and not. sdnaatcd paticnza.uuro hospitalinod ﬁho lenzuce.
puyahoﬁhcrnéy
and goaorallr roaotvod
trantnd prilntlly ﬁr
it: 90020! dischargo rattaga. it. 011310.: (Inter: 0‘3.
51:0 rtluted ta n I.nauru of starcatrpy, tn. culttornia r
80.1. ( ). lxahar I canton Int. tor. o:%ca tound an
pu$1onts diagnccod an invalullannl pagthcutn, ruturrua far
nonntto shorapy. and hasvttaltaad :91 unartor parted, and
nor- Qtttu Uﬂfi vitae as much Anymovod or roger-rod.
it in. 6.01301 to tupont tin 195? .111016. study uuployiug
tha nan. procaaursu nnd nongurrtntly ta axteué who obstrvutaona
I

_

.

�.3lnatitnttenu vtth roopact to social alsas. 33o. oduottioa
and

I

to tho

scorn. ﬁnd to relate than. pats-at charactorlttica

trtct-ont variahlqs of type if troutsont. duration

at hospitalisation, diagnosis

A

and Ginsburg. evaluation.

m

enact: a! :11 voluntary. .dult patient. in roatdoaco

in than. tuititattona

was nadortakou

in January 1959. ﬂh$10

lcln1n¢¢r and Hillatdo Hospitals hnd ‘luatary pationta aalr.

t

3:311 avatar

at tho-e at

Danton were anntguod by tho

tor psychiatric avalnntton, or war. nc-bcta at
aohisophroaxe

stat.

hounttql group tralalorrod

3

can’t-

annual.

ter a optoitia

ruloarch product. Thane pationta war. cxoludad from the
study banana. at tacit non-vuluntcry ntntun. Inch pnttent

III

:17.» th- cglitoraiu

ligation

tutti: lctar

r 39.1.

(

) on

the OOBIII any.

the rooordo or dilohnrgod patient-

voro untlyucd to dotorninu tho c.0131 and psychiatric factor-

ar the otudy. For a mutant. of $03111 glass, the ﬁclliucahoud

�.‘5-

2-tuetor ind-x

was 3.06 t

of 173 putllatn

at

).

Thu

81113140. zoo

study population consisted

at lbaalncor

and 95

at

ti. rnlationu

or

Untouchuootta Haltnl ﬂcalth cantor (nuns).
Tho

study inelndcd «lamination a:

in.

social to th- paychlutrtu wart-hlcu within each institution,

2h...

as wall as butunua inaﬁltatlons.

difficult,

hcunvor, boon-no

fora-con discunncd below.

comparisons were

at variouqnnthodologlenl d1:-

9h... difficulttca var.

nosQ

Infkﬂd 1n the iatrnhaupitnl anupnrasean, and accordingly,

in tin unnlynou a: p-yuhlntpta varinhloc emphasis will be

lantttutiana, with citation

plannd on tho daft-ronaus §atvoen

or

lb. intra-tnotltutiannl tronde.

Whoa

tho otruotnru

rcportlnc studs-u fro! a lone institution,

at tho houpltul 1-

%ahoa

tar grunt-d.

and

01th::

ignored or Icnttunud briefly. Houwvur, in studying a atranco

�a.
institutien

I“. “at
will.

I.

and

author
t6
:ttcuptias
canaarablo ant: ya. in

of tho my

allot-«cu but.” “autumn.

tclcotod than. tuttituttont an eolpurablo in

‘bnchlag, rtaoarch, and troatunut pryxruuu, we

tinc that tho:

are unalika atrnct‘rolly in v.11 think influanca tn. data

at the study. specific prohlona

were notcd 1n dastgnatioul

or type a: trnstu-nt, diaguont1a turns and avuluatiau or

trontnnnt outcono.
a) 90:1 ation a!

a

at

cntlant:

Th-

critorin for

danagatting that a paticut raceiv'd 'pcychotharupy' dirt-90¢
along

an natiwtulu, Idling “Remus: «uniﬁcation

aux-nun.
At ﬂoaningcr Hospital puyuhothurtpy use designated

a trogtnaat qdninictcrod an a pro-criytiou

ball:

by a

stat!

pcyvhiaﬁriat, for which th- pattont via chtrgud a too.
ﬁenatone with tho ptynhintrta rnnidunt were considered

or routine unaiaiutrattva pationt aura.

part

.0

�.j.

it Hillside lsspiisl psyshsthsrspy was

astinsd ss

viih
tho psychistrio rssidsnt. star!
trsstasut ssssioas
psychiatrisss.¢id not

trssii patisuts,

but rsstristsd thsir

activities to supervising tbs residsnt physicians.

it
was

ths Massachusetts xsntsl ﬁsslth csntsr payohothsrspy

assignstsd ss s functiea or

many

disoiplinss -- psyuhu

istris rssidsnts, psychologists. socisi

worksrs. nurses sad

msdiasi studsats. Portal records a: sash ssssions wars nos

routinely insiuded in the patisnﬁ's rscorﬁ and to ssesrisin
which

pstisnts rseoivsd psychotherapy.

it was

nocsssnrr for

this study toss to intorviss tbs reaidsuis in churns

washers of

o: ssch cssa.
b) n

'

asis: individual institutionsl disguostic

stylus slso Isds soupsrissns difficult.

it

lbsnisgsr lsspitsl

disgussss supisysd ths sultipis svslustss ﬁsts caucus
asses-sadsd by ths Aussiosn Psychisiric Association

hsih Hillsids sad asstsu

sun-piss

sails

toil-Ila usicsry systsss. assorsl

st discussss tron lsssiussr sss listsd in 2:51. I,

�-3with our ausgaatad aonvarazana into catacortaa nonparabla

to that of tha nth-r tan inatttationa. Thaaa convaratona

at.

an unavoidahla aaaraa of

distortion. (statlar abaarva-

taona hava baan rapartad by Paaaaaatak and hia aaaocxataa
(

) who

indicata that diagnoaaa within tho aaaa inatitatiaa

ara alao valnarabla to individual dixtaraacaa anon: ataxiaara).
Tabla I

ﬁ---“3) ntgoggg‘a gating; of Igggovaaaatn

gravalant varied

1n

Iattnga a:

1n—

foraat and datatl. rho diauharga rating

at nanninaar loapxtal aaa tripartite with a aaparata avaluattaa
for social aharaatarolaalaal and ayndraaa ahanaaa. I111a1da
&gt;

Raapttal and ﬂaaaaahnaatta aantal Iaalth cantor had aloha:

ntiuga I! in

at

aaeh

which

it "a

difficult to aaaaaa the ontﬁbatton

taetcr of tha Haaaiaxar ayutaa (Tabla II). for

this atudy tho Iaaningar

ayudraua

rating aaa couparad to tha

global ratinaa of tha athar iaatltattana.

�.9.

fibl. I!
2.

aootgzgzggologiog; Vagiablaa
Ina diatrtbattan

at the variation of aooial 01a...

aga, adacattoa and calttornia

institution: in praaautad

1n

r

saala scar: along tha taro.

tabla III.

a) ﬁgg§.;_g;§ggn tiara uaa a Iarkad dittaranaa in
tho aaaial clans coup-attic:

at tho thraa inatttattona.

Nautilus: loapttal tha reputation

was

At

pradantnantly app-r

class; at Hillatda laapttal Itddla alas-3

and

at laaaaahuaatta

lantal Baalth cantar, pvadaainantly 101a: alaaa.
h) 553:

that. war. as airfaronaaa in

ago

«attribu-

patulattaao.
tion in tho institutional
a) Eduggtions

rho populatzoaa dxttarad 1:

tanta-

ttaaal attatnlaat, 11th pattaata at naauiagar leapital having
not. yaara at educattou than than. at Baa-annuaatta lautal

laalth Cantat.

33110

kl ya: want at tho pattanta at also

�-19-

ha: aat couplutad high ottool, only
and 23 per cent

32

par cont at Hillsidt

nt loaningur did not graduate.

Bittﬂrcnccs
é) {nggggy
in ‘3. distributtcu or

can

on tho

annoy-nu I 80.1.. mo obs-nu. titty-cu
V

9.: can: or

lbnnancor puttautn had

only night par cont

I
In

coor¢n below 30, gnu

scorn. of 50 or show. ~- thn higher

accrue 5.13: associated with highor dcgruos or stereotypy.

eaatraat, gt

I Inuit,
At

'1‘!

I

Boston

trout: 9.! coat unto hula:

and forty-two par 3.9% had scores

Hillside thirtybonc

paw

at

30 on tho

50 or nor¢.

south! the vationta had I uaorol

bolaw 30 sad otzhtatn por goat ubOVt 50.

In nun-cry,
.09131 class
'

its

a: the ptpllatiun val oblorvcd :3

uncut arr-nun
on

anticipatod dittorouetu in prudaninalt

ﬁt. r 30:10. 2h.

1a

ago

mutual

dtutrlhatioa

d1£rtrcnoon thus par-1t tho

the institationa.

hum-cat
«14 not

I011 on cigo

an:

mum“

11:20:. Then.

stair a: troutncut variables

along

�sum

Wm

ﬁeduaigﬂgtion a; D§ge§gggg gag‘noggs

M" an mmm

nuproncivo reaction
I. ﬂnrczsaiatic
Foraonality

Payehanuaroniu

8. Anxiety reaction

larezsalatto Personality

3. lavas-oistto Personality
#-

latoisoaltac Puruonaltty
tlaoholiuu Chronic
Infantilo Portolnlity

S. Fusttvc Asgruacivc
’oroonality
Alaaholxaa

6. Infantila Personality
Sohiuophrunsc Ioaotaun

antitanltfucttg. typo

Psynhalturoais
'

Poruouulity fruit
niatnrhanco

sociopathic Paraanality
niuﬁlrbunoo

Seatapnthio Pirwnxrllﬁy
ﬁiaturbanao

achisnphrauic Flywheels

�aggzggattvo ﬁgttugg gt glgngog; geudition

IIIIIHGII

BOSPIZIL

33218132 HOSPITAL

ﬁllﬂlﬁﬂﬂalfiﬂ
gg‘bfﬁ

CENTRE

locovurnd

loaovorod

Each lproved

Eark¢d1y Improved

Ingrovod

Hadnratoly Inprovod

Unznprevod

slightly Inprovcd
Enimproved

60I§10to admission

Ilprlvud
Fuehnnged {or were.)

HEHYIL

�ammonia). muggy»souguzcholoﬁut

1'3;

Yuan“

Hanna. ’nuluhmutn
Ear-pun luau). Rum:

liming"
30-pin).

Gum

31$

75

3%

'

Saul
c1».

.

Au

51

20

as

1?

35

13

1

3h

28

0

S

28

19$

19!
se

59
22

,

p-n.l.

23

at
Ian
“mutton

33-9.?

-

'

5.0!.

W005

X..3909

did:

9‘ a 001

�m

m.

_

.

i

typo of

'1'th

Psychotherapy

W
mum

t

£10,111th

manhunt:-

mmani

215

Sal-nu

1:3

mm»

36

H1111“.

Baum.

’

;

my. mm

36%

21a:

63;

68

-

.

B

�.113.

7:23;;gt510 frogtysnt Vagiuhlog
a) Soloetton or front-onto than: tultltucionn, taunt

yattoutn 3‘ Ian-13:0: uoapttal rucctvcd sciatic thornpr
than n$ ﬂail-14. or "Ric, (fable

2').

caucnrron£1y a cnnllur

parenting. or the nuaatuucr patttnia vita 013.004 to rocctvlng
payche‘horupyp with a 132:. author (36

Iilica tor-- of treats-at.
was an

£111.14.

lotpttnl - that.

spacial doutcuataon tor Itliou therapies sud pationtn

are 01:13:21.6

:-

rocolvtuc payoho‘hcrapy

Iont also. Iaﬁh pattbnt

psychiatrist for at
nook.

1%

pit cant) rteotving

:-

10.1%

II

n

priusry trout-

tohcdnlod to so. u valid-mt

tar...

ouoohalt hour session: per

2h; pcrooaﬁacc 0: pa‘tou‘o rocotvtnu lunatic thorupy,

at louatuscr natpltnl (3h!) 1. Isgntttcan‘ly 1-3: than n‘
ot‘hor at tho 0th.! in. houpttalu.
lﬁbﬂt patient. ulnacad

II

cahtxophrcntn. thnr. was no

atrrurunoo along houpltalo. for 10.30; a: such pationt' at
each

hospital recoivod notatio for.» of troatnont during

�-13.

It.

hpnplltllsnﬁlon.
1: hated

on $ho

thé
altroroaogu anon:
laltlﬁutloua

dittorlng attitude. lounrdo gallant;

oloacltlod a. puyohonourotlo, bahavlor diaordor sad dcprocnlvn payohoaln.

its turn. llotltutlonl

b)‘a3glgggg_g‘_lglg;§.;§g§§§ggs

«11:09.4 with racy-ct lo pullout'n lcnuth 0:

its:

(2331. IV).

loaning-r Hospital patlualo v.9. hocpltalluod least-t. with
653

a! pntlnnta rounlnlln for witlvu mouth. or loan. cou-

‘1
93304 to 31 par cant
lb. 8111.140 pattcntl and only

5

91-:

cast or £30.. Qt the lhcauohnnottn lontal loalth Ooutnr.
ﬂi- Iodd any of tho
clovgn tenth:

lull-id.

group

II but»: urea

will. two-thirds of the

diachgrsod within

Boston

and

valiant: cor.

.1: tenth: of hoayllalllatlaa.
In cash hospital. tout pntlanta

arc ovqltatod

uﬁ tho

tan. or discharuu ca 'lnprovcd* (tnblo 11).

ll lounlugar loopttal.

havuvur. a blunt: poroautnco (l9!) 0:

pttluutn turn rated II 'Inluprovud* and only a tingle psﬁluat

�.13.
woo

oollod 'sosovosod' or 'sooh ispsovod'. rho hishost

possontoso or “rooovosod' or “soon iopsovod' sstinas (881)
sod tho ioooot provostioo

st

at ‘osiopsovod' (10$)

ooso (bond

Boston.
d) ggg‘ggggg; For

otstistissl ossiysis

throo diogaostis

groupings soso nods: sohioophrouis, ottostivo disosdoss,
sad poyohonoorosis sud porosasiity disssdoss (roblo IV).
tho diocoostio proportions of pstiosts within thoso groups

loss sinilss tor lilisido sad lostoo in that slightly ovor
holt discussod as sshisophssnio sad oppsouiootoiy oso-qoostor
os psychooonrosio or ottootivo disordos.

In sootssst ot

Housings: loopitoi, poyoholsosooio sad possouslity dioosdor

to:

oooooatod

.

ovos

n

1. lo

titty pot
O

0 o

i

coat of tho popslstion.

1

Probl

Vsriols nothodoiosieol problsss vitistod intro-hospital

ototi'otisol sou-potions. lost pro-issue. on tho has of
loosinxtul out-or! ssitorio for subdivision or populstions.

�-m-

ft:

oxaaplc. in ecuparo instituiioau in rpiniiou to Inacth

or hospital Iiay, vuriouu eat-ct: varied: var. iriod uni n03.

it lanaiacar lonvisui.

Clio-04 for coupIr-blo distributioao.

oat-quarto: at tho pationto runaiaod turn:
Ina SII~thrdl taro than tunivo Inathu.

its:

auto: suntan,

it Insoashtlottn

ncnini laaiih easier, in couttuot. 70! at :11 paiioatu ro-

ttinod 103!

ill:

ncvca months, and only 6’

:99. than tapivc

Ionian.
Anothtr aspect

III

tho oouatriotica of tutoroconoity

or the population sulpic. In in. Boston group, tho crucial
rooturoh patient. and th- uonrt roturrais sure hath dnlotod.

in contra-tins tho_1957 and 1959

xiii-id. papuiutioa, II

ob-orvad n uicaitieant accr.ano in

it.

an. o: oomvuinivo ihorapy

its

and an

at pniiulia under tho :3. o: to.

II.

number

a: cit-r patiouta,

inure... in the

coupurnhiiiiy a: as.

group: in tho turn. halpitulo in this I‘Id’ lakes

ihat similar pron-cunt lay

lattes

rumba!

have oocarrod in

it 113.17

in. ﬁre-cat

and lonuiacor populatioan. than ducrcioina

tn. rang.

�.13.,

e: ﬁle diecueetie, treatment
In

verieblee.

end ecneetieuel

elnttleu, Iteeiug tutorletlea

eeelel oleee

an

leﬁerntuetaeqlee e teeter in vitietlng £ntre-heep1te1 eelperteeae with sate variable.
In deteretetux eeetel eleee enere wee tater-eeiee

W
eveileble for 29! e!

petieute. thleeetrteble eeeee

371

occurred where the edncetlen o: the huebend e! e heueea

site

Or

the tether e: e miner

wee

ne‘ reeorded.

alibi: these letheeelegteel ltnttettene.

e number 0:

the latte-heepltel eelperleele rare of eizatfleenee. With

recerd to selection or treetleut. age end

I

eeere were

significantly releted et Healteger Ieepltel (elder
higher

r aom pan-nu

therapy) end 1 Score

wee

were frequently

end

unsung eon“.

releted te zreetnen‘ eeleetion et

I111e14e.
In “eaten-u evaluation.

t. ere an e teatime: tor older

petten‘e te be re‘ed better then younger euee et lilletde'
end Benton; but

at leantncer there

wee en

eppeette trend.

�-15...

with oldcr ptttoato nor. likely $0 be rated tninprovud;

finial: 0: .3.

Loasth n: haupttalllnzttn and tho

causation

III.

loup¢tols

.

rolutod

st

.ai Itll-tdo

tho youugur IB“XCOI oduoatod putts-ta riulntu;

tar tin luacont parted.
that.

dunonatrntod In

in Danica (13b1pa$1sa$s Ind-r

rilntionahipn
1%

bo‘h tho Honnlatcr

un‘

V)

Whiz- such ruluttoanhtpn

two

hoart‘nla,

riot. a. vnttcatl

I

01:11::

it.

trail

070: be. but

13 noted

1&amp;1

a:

as. to taunt: loucor than/n 70.2. 31.11::

It.

for education, and for diacuousl.

30%04

abusinzor noupttcl the poroautaco at pationtn with ﬁho

dinxnoain at ouhtaophrausu.uho wore hoapttalinod ova: an.

yin:

II.

911.

at ltlllld. [capital

laltal luulth cantor 7!.

C...”rablo

V

35‘ and

at luaucshlcotto

�#
.W
IGRPI‘I‘IL

”ﬁll“a; 0: 53!
an.

Mon to

3H!

3'! £63

21! £32

6501!? 8131136 0785

W

.

‘0
.35...“

M

81.

ha

73

36

6

30*”

61

30

6

ho-M

so

to

o

50 o

36

o

o

tan-29

11:

�.17In thin nonpartgon of this. vquatary payhhtntria hocpt‘alc
we have obs-trad significant tu$ar1act1tutzoanl diff-roast. or
puﬁtcu:a tn ‘hc social vurxabznt or want. a: oduaa$1on tad .00131'

.1305, But not .50: a: itaﬁribuﬁinu o: calitoruta r anal. sacral;
Ind ta ouch a! ﬁho irnuIn-n$ variation ~~ duration at haupl‘oltunitaa, noloo‘ton at invaalsl§a and dia‘rtbutaona a: (taunt...
uni dischargu Isuzunttnnt. in. oxpoctn‘ion ﬁhat the institutton
carving «99¢! G1.il pattnuts vault but. the long-at durattou o:
otur: I uschu! pvoporttan a: payuholourotao Gianna... and nor:
ooupluu diagnosﬁﬁc nah-nuts; lunar preporttoa a! patients requiring
organs. turn. or thavnpwa and peasant ditchuruu 1:31:30 use. each
contarlnd. 81-41331!) tho tuctttution serving lav-r clan- putioata
lvtnoad Ibortar purtoda at hocpttnllnutita, 10w proportaaua at
pay-honaurotio cinema-us. and bot‘ar 41:03.13. uvnllaﬁaonl. In
addition, tho diatrihitt-II at r 30.1. scorn. anon; tho that.
hn0p1%aln tollaund tic arising: atllaidc it‘d: in that low accruuurc lost uhnrtn%¢rtnt1u at tho upper :1... group, and high score:
at the lava! 0130-.
1951
mam.
n:
mu»by ropltoaﬁaon 3% Islamic; $ﬂ 1959. a: null no tntvn—tua‘ttuttonal
‘

a. “mg a

«m:- m

am

analysts 5‘ tbs oﬁh'r ﬁn. holpttalo. '0 VII. intuucooutul. It.
‘33. tuttod to anhlcv: a‘a‘tn‘ionl Itgnittonacu. in part huaunuo
at variomy or no‘hodologtcal prohluun. bnﬁ th- trcudu of tho
laﬁa I?! 01-11:: to the ortxtaal study.

.

�.18.
wall- theee etedlee have egeln eupheeleed the rele et

eeeiel tedbre

1n

peyehletrle tees-eat,

we

neat.
have been

lepreeeed by eke letheeelezleel preble-e e: etedleepereee

laeeltetlene. theee leetltelleee

were eeleeted

tee their

edeeetlenel leederehlp end eke expeetetlea thee the recorded

vertehlee would be eleerly defined. our dirtteelelee 1a

errlvtec et eoapereble dete ere invertent euee to the preblee
o: the eeeventlenel eee e: eeeperettve eeetletloe. eepeelelly
treqeene
in the evelietlel e: peyehleerie thereplee. ihe
eee e: dleeherze

retinal, alecueeele eleeeee or length or

heepltelleetlen ee craterle in therapeutic eveluetleue er
ldeatltleetlen
the
e: eeepereblle populetloae ere enhaece

te exceeelve error enleee

eke

tee stainletrettve peteerne.

lnetlteeleee ere eleerly eetehed
The

peredexleel neenre e: e

fellere te eeeeent for tneeltelleeel idleeyaereelee
be eeea 1: e

llterel :nterpretetlee e: the

1e

to

observation or sale

etedy. fhe Reﬁnance! neepllel bee the leet highly trelued

�.19.
par-onuol conducting trontuant thick to applied fur iudtvtda
Optimal port-dd

utlly Outta-a.

ti. 10:33 propnrticn

at tinny in population. with

diagnaaud 1: an unfavorahlo prognostic

grasp (nahtnophron1n1

.

-

and

rut. tn. proportion of ruportod

(ivornblc traatlont rouulta 1. tin recruit.

It

lintll lanlth

10.3%

cantor, 1a contra-t, that.

th-rnpiltn apply trout-nuts tor

its

atlluahunuttu

an administruttvaly

t'utnod

lilatod

potted, to a populntlou with a hithcr pruportton diagnouud
an tahtuophrunta. the propor$1ou or

Ihorco raﬁanaa

:-

than. dhnIrVn$£ann

tarornhlc

III-It: 41--

otgnatto-ntly grants!) 1‘ to yrobnhlo
do not garlogs

%hu%

the thirapoutlo efficacy

a! «a... tnltatuttann. but ludioutnn differ-aces

1n

oritnrtn

or ilprﬂvnncat.

this luck of clarity in

dilanos%1c Ichcuatn and 130.!-

pnrthtlity or pnyuhiatrac truinant 1:31.310: :10. load.
panic tn

tn. attc-ptcd

comparative stanzas 0: psychiatric

tbcrapioa. for tun-win. tho rlIh or roounﬁrntlurcn o:

�.26-

hioleslatl caloutlltl to contlrn obnorvatloaa and. 1: othor
laboratorlou In:

bu as such a

rotlcntlau o: dittoruaec. in

popnlttloau. payehlnlrlo orltarln,'g§g, an fallout.- 1: the

original hapothcuon. the widcaprhad
“cohltophr'uln' or ‘puyahououroslu'

II.
£0

at

Utah

turn. as

caplet. tho

ohnngoa

in payuhdbatonl or blclogluol tosGIrOI with mental 111:...

ha. 1.! to a totals. burdcnod by nasatSVI result: (lullnk).
coat Ijrkad ruouutly in lb. atatlletlng stadium at

taste: in anhinophruals.
physiological

~~

and tho lneonparnblllty

bohuvlornl corrolntlona Icon 1.

(runkuuulnln) and meantiou threshold

tutti.

Sven

I

It'll

at the
t3. Incholyl
turn I

1.111 ohnurvntloa to b. roportod from on. allnlo. in

v. is!-

II‘hOdl twillablo to doccrlba povulctluno adoquntol: lo
provido 1 00.34 ountlrun‘lon?

270: than. obocrvntiaal

at icllavu ao‘,

and concludn

tint lucrtnuoa attention list to

p.16 to the nothodlocloal problana of clnaaltylix substatby

'objoativo' criteria. rcthor thus ta. pro-oat lathe!-

uhlnh,uppo-r to ho so highly dcponloat an inatttutlonnl

�-g1.
:ad ohatrvur nttiiudul, and tho nociepoyuhoiegieul nspuctc or

it.

thorupintapnsiont intcraction.

studio: :13. highlight the situate of changing

!hnuu

populatidns on Iinilnr
mind:

than

italics.

lillnido lbnpitsl

rho peasant

that: rich! soaiopayuholocicai~troatlcat rclntioachipu

it.

1957. rufloo‘inc.

I.

btliovu, a constriction in tho

typo. ﬁt trout-out. and th- .30 runs. at tho patiuntu.

flora in; a nicnitiegnt rnduoiiou in the

inure... in
Icflocting

anon oduontionai iovdi

an 13010... in

noun

use, and as

o: its population,

it. nunbar of aJQIOlotnt and 33.33

aduli patients. baring in. in. yaw! purine, that. can 31.0
a untied voduoiion in tho

incruasc in
czalndnd
was

iii.

it.

nan

u:- o: couvuluivv ihar:py

chain. in the 1957 Itudy, wail.

tho aoliacnt lunatic truatloat or thin study.

at in. pvt-ant study,
and a

z:

at poyuhatropic 4213!. art; ihorupy In.

:- s irontlaat

‘OOOp‘QEQO

and

dittttcat

ii had both a crcntcr

it

it

the

stuff

psychological mooning than can.

vulaivu incrlpr. Ind hearing, parhapc a diff-punt mulbioachip

to attic! variablnn.

its availability at

an

ottoctivcihorupy

�9.2;.

(or viauruua tout tor sinusitiaation) nay liaidbo in.

intin-uco or uoeial «in-I vurinhlcu

lliiin‘ahnad Ina lodiich (bund
clans aad typo a: truttnayt
did for tho oehiuophroaiaa.
317.3

dial-cu, than

in n

rolatittly ottaoiivu,

n0

on

iruatnnut. Etna.

rulntion intros: loci-1

tar attentivt

'fhil

payohoni: but tho:

aﬁccontc that

trail-at mils“.

it,

which

inaxp-nnivu and tachaically

for a

i.

lilplo.

01.0: ditfnruueun nay ho Podtcld, but not niiuiaaﬁod‘.
2:11. that. inter-hospital dittoroncoo 8‘! he loak¢d

initial liliallc inirn-houpitai
‘

um. um peanuts.»

and

It. iatcrauiin DIOOOIIOI
and expectation! of tho

atndy. Xt_io our i-pr03Ii0I.

tron-out

mm “bun-hip.

1.9301: Invited iron

tint:

and

authoriticu

it.

.ttiiudoo

uiilil

0.83

institution.‘ thug. duration or patient tiny. Ginsburg.
rating, type or transient anniniotcrod ind diagnosis are In

�-52..

dutcrltuod an Inch by ‘30 attitude 6! the phyuiotnn and thy

hanpttal niltcn 1a which tho‘pcsinlt rind: hilonlt. a: In:

acuitollntion o: uyupttu or history which in In: pros¢nt.
snob ralntionshapa

ooaditlna

tiara

will he host lurkod in than. psychiatric

that. diagnostic critnrin at. lunn‘

39.01119. 5‘3‘,

tho obaaoQavu «9:53:13 aloostntod with 4300....

hats: arcs-10 inpuirI-nt arc ahacnt,

at

an an achisuphrcuin.

plynhancurolsn, and pcraouazt‘y and bohavior disordcrc.
Vain: conditacnn or anbtcnitr tbs obcurvor'l internal can.

(ntttwudal. alpoctttionl) hood-o
and

by

clansiticatton

hamlet,

(

tic ball. for pyrotptton

). this via:

31.1%: and

1.1!“!

1!:

was

clonrly douonu$rutcd

ﬂair

study of

vandal

in dingao¢1u within a £13315 institution. Th0: dbuurvod

that 1: pnttnuts rials-1: assign-d to ditturoaf lords inns
powulattonl d1! not 6111.: in sang

it Idlllltin, Inrttal

otntnn. vasecttla. as. or contain... stxusftoaa$ 41:211-300.
41¢ occur, hcvcvnr. 1- 13014030. of diagnoses anon;

tItIO

�5""?

mg “m ammuuun- in on an.
u that unman- mo notably at “he.“ in the mmu». I. an.“ they at largely "nuan- of tho “«Nu.

and

uts“: at the Ian-1:0".

�Sociopsychological Aspects of
Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary HoSpitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.
and
Max

From

M.D.

the Department of EXperimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
N.Y.

L.I.,
Aided, in part,
Mental
U.S.

‘Glen Oaks,

Fink,

Health,
Mental Health Board.

by grant MY-2092 of the National Institute of
Public Health Service; and the Nassau County

cosperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts Mental Health
Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital is gratefully
The

acknowledged.
NOYI

*

Present Address: Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore HOSpital,
NOYO

67,

�Recent community studies have demonstrated

relationship
between social factors and psychiatric treatment. In their study
of the New Haven psychiatric patient population, Hollingshead and
Redlich reported significant relationships between an individual's
position in the social class structure and the prevalence of treated

illness, types

a

of diagnosed disorders and kinds and duration of

psychiatric treatment administered (3). The influence of patient
economic status upon the availability of treating personnel, however,
was not excluded in these studies. To test the role of social
factors in the treatment of hospitalized patients independent of
patient's finances and availability of treatments, a survey was
undertaken at Hillside Hospital in 1957. In this hospital, a
variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy and
organic therapies are available to all patients regardless of their

ability to pay.
In the Hillside studies (h,S)

it

that patients
hospitalized for the shortest period were the oldest, had the least
education and were most likely to have been foreign born. The older,
less educated patients were predominantly treated by convulsive
therapy and received the more favorable discharge ratings. Younger,
native born and more educated patients were hospitalized the longest,
treated primarily by psychotherapy and generally received the poorer
discharge ratings. The clinical factors were also related to a
measure of stereotypy, the California F Scale (1,6). Higher F
scores, i.e., greater stereotypy, were often found in patients
was observed

�-2diagnosed as involutional psychosis

who

were

referred for somatic

therapy, hospitalized for a shorter period, and more often were
rated as much improved or recovered.
Another hypothesis developed at this time was that differences
in various aspects of psychiatric treatment among hospitals should
show the same relationship to social factors as noted within Hillside
Hospital. To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the
procedures of the 195? Hillside study in three institutions -Hillside Hospital, the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital of Topeka
and the Massachusetts Mental Health Center of Boston. These institutions were selected with the expectation that they served patients
of different social classes. It was anticipated that in these
hospitals there would be a similarity in attitude towards treatment
and education. Each is a teaching hospital with a full time supervisory staff and active research departments. They emphasize
psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy but provide other treatments such as somatic therapies and active programs of milieu therapy.
Each stresses short-term treatment of voluntary patients and does
not provide custodial care.
The specific aims of this study were to determine the population
characteristics of the three institutions with respect to social
class, age, education and F score: and to relate these characteristics
to the treatment variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and discharge evaluation among the institutions.

�-3METHOD

these
in
residence
in
adult
patients
census of all voluntary,
and
Menninger
While
1959.
institutions was undertaken in January,
of
number
small
a
only,
Hillside Hospitals had voluntary patients
(MMHC)
assigned
were
Center
Health
Mental
those at the Massachusetts
chronic
a
of
members
Or
were
by the courts for psychiatric evaluation
a
for
specific
transferred
group
schizophrenic state hospital
from
the
study
excluded
These
were
research project.
patients
A

the

patient
because of their non-voluntary status.
the
months
later
F
Eighteen
California scale on the census day.
social
the
determine
to
examined
were
records of discharged patients
and psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure of social class,
Each

was given

and
education
of
score
the Hollingshead 2-factor index - weighted
173
of
consisted
The
study population
occupation - was used (2).
95
Massachusetts
the
and
at
100
Menninger
at
patients at Hillside,
a

Mental Health Center.

social
the
of
of
the
relations
examination
included
study
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as
The

between

institutions.

These comparisons were

difficult

however,

These
below.
discussed
differences
because of various methodological
and
comparisons,
marked
the
most
in
intrahospital
difficulties were
will
emphasis
variables
of
the
in
analyses
psychiatric
accordingly,
be placed on the differences between institutions with citation of
to
missing
led
also
These
difficulties
trends.
intrainstitutiOnal
information for some data, which is reflected in the varying
population sample sizes in the tables.

�RESULTS

A.

Inter-hosEital Comparisons

l.

Methodological Problems

institution, the

reporting studies
ignored
and
either
granted
for
taken
is
of
the
hospital
structure
institution
a
strange
studying
in
or mentioned briefly. However,
the
of
made
aware
is
one
data
comparable
and attempting to gather
these
selected
we
While
institutions.
between
differences
many
pro—
treatment
and
research
teaching,
in
comparable
as
institutions
wh
ways
in
structurally
unlike
were
they
found
that
we
grams,
in
noted
were
problems
Sp‘cific
the
of
study.
influenced the data
the
and
classes
diagnostic
of
treatment,
of
type
the designation
outcome.
treatment
of
evaluation
desigfor
The
criteria
8) Designation of 212s of Treatment:
the
among
differed
"psychotherapy"
received
a
nating that patient
When

from a home

difficult.
classification
in
uniformity
institutions, making
treatment
as
designated
was
At Menninger Heepital psychotherapy
for
a
psychiatrist
staff
by
basis
a
on
prescription
administered
the
psychiatric
with
Sessions
a
fee.
which the¢patient was charged
care.
patient
administrative
of
routine
considered
part
were
resident
treatment
as
defined
was
At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy
did
Staff
psychiatrists
resident.
sessions with the psychiatric
to
supervising
activities
their
not treat patients, but restricted
charged.
were
fees
No
additional
the resident physicians.

�-5At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy was

designated as a function of many disciplines -- psychiatric residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students.
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident in charge of each case.
b) Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles made
comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed the
multiple evaluative data scheme recommended by the American PsychiaMMHC
and
both
while
followed unitary
Association
Hillside
tric
systems. Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed
in Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable
to that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortion.

c) Discharge Ratings of Improvement:

Ratings of improvement at

the three hospitals varied in format and detail.
rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with

discharge
separate evalua-

The

a

tion for social, characterological and syndrome changes. Hillside
Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global ratings
making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor of the
Menninger system (Table II). For this study-tho Meaninger syndrome

�rating

was c

Sociopsychological Variables
age,
of
social
class,
variables
the
of
The distribution
institutions
three
the
among
F
Scale
score
and
California
education
2.

is presented in Table III.

M

social
the
in
difference
a) Social Class:
Hospital
Menninger
At
institutions.
three
the
of
class composition
Hospital,
Hillside
at
class;
upper
predominantly
was
the population
There was a marked

predominantly
Center,
Health
Mental
Massachusetts
and
at
middle class;
lower class.

b) Age:

There were no differences in age

institutional populations.

distribution in the

attaineducational
in
differed
0) Education: The populations
Menninger
at
education
of
more
years
having
with
patients
ment,
hl
While
per
Center.
Health
Mental
Massachusetts
than
at
Hospital
32
only
school,
high
MMHC
completed
not
had
Cent of the patients at
not
Menninger
graduate.
did
cent
at
23
and
per
Hillside
at
cent
per
of
distribution
the
in
differences
F
Score: Significant
d)
cent
per
Fifty-one
observed.
F
were
Scale
California
the
scores on

�-7cent
and
eight
per
only
below
30,
scores

of Menninger patients had
associated
F
being
scores
with scores of 50 or above -- the higher
thirtyHillside
at
In
contrast,
with higher degrees of stereotypy.
MMHC
while
at
30
below
F
had
scores
one per cent of the patients
F

30.
below
were
cent
only twenty per
the
of
class
social
the
in
differences
Thus, the anticipated
These
differScale.
educational attainment and performance
of
relation
the
concerning
the
hypothesis
testing
permit
ences
insti—
the
among
variables
treatment
the
to
factors
sociopsychological
on

the

F

tutions.
3.

Variables
Treatment
Psychiatric
Among
Treatment:
of
a) Selection

institutions, significant-

therapy
somatic
received
Hospital
Menninger
at
fewer
patients
ly
IV.
Table
shown
in
MMHC
(68%)
as
than at Hillside (6h%) or
differed
The
institutions
three
b) Duration of Hospitalization:
IV).
(Table
of
stay
markedly with respect to patient's length
longest,
hospitalized
were
Menninger Hospital patients
cent
31
to
compared
per
months
or
more,
twelve
for
remaining
patients
the
of
those
at
5
cent
of the Hillside patients and only per
Hillside
the
of
modal
The
stay
Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
the
of
two-thirds
while
months
was between seven and eleven
(h3%)

group

of
months
hospitalization.
six
within
MMHC patients were discharged
were
most
patients
each
In
hospital,
c) Discharge Evaluation:
At
IV).
(Table
“improved“
evaluated at the time of discharge as

�-3(19%)
of
patients
percentage
a
higher
Menninger Hospital, however,
called
was
patient
a
single
and
only
were rated as "unimproved"
"recovered"
of
The
percentage
highest
"recovered" or "much improved".
of
lowest
proportion
and
the
(28%)
"much
ratings
improved"
or
Health
Mental
Massachusetts
the
"unimproved" (10%) were found at

Center.

groupdiagnostic
three
analysis
d) Diagnosis: For statistical
and
psychodisorders,
affective
ings were made: schizophrenia,
The
diagnostic
IV).
(Table
disorders
neurosis and personality
Hillside
for
similar
were
these
groups
within
of
patients
proportions
schizophrenia
as
diagnosed
were
and MMHC in that slightly over half
disorder.
affective
or
psychoneurosis
as
one-quarter
and approximately
and
personality
psychoneurosis
Hospital
In contrast, at Menninger
the
of
population.
cent
than
per
fifty
disorder accounted for more

B.

Intra-Hospital Comparisons

Problems
Methodological
l.
by
limited
were
comparisons
The intra—hospital statistical
lack
the
was
Most
prominent
problems.
methodological
of
a variety
of
subdivision
the
for
criteria
cut-off
statistical
of meaningful
within
the
of
population
due to the homogeneity

populations, in part

analyses
the
In
statistical
size.
each institution and to the sample
had
which
obtained
were
cells
several
within a single institution

�-9-

either none or fewer than five cases, thus not permitting a satisfactory intrahospital test of the hypothesis.
2. Intra-Hospital Comparison
With this methodological limitation some trends similar to
that found in the earlier study were observed, although few were of
statistical significance. With regard to selection of treatment,
for example, age and F score were found related at Menninger Hospital
(older and higher F score patients more frequently receiving somatic
therapy), and F score alone at Hillside.
Length of hospitalization and chronological age were related at
both the Menninger and Hillside Hospitals - the younger patients
remaining for the longest period. While such relationships were
trend
two
a
in
these
was noted at the
significant
hospitals, similar
MMHC (Table V) where no
patients over ho, but lb% of patients under
the age of

20 remained

longer than

a

year.

-—-_-------

�-10..
DISCUSSION
we
hospitals
psychiatric
of
voluntary
three
In this comparison
of
differences
patients
interinstitutional
have observed significant
but
and
social
of
education
class,
of
in the social variables
years
of
each
and
F
in
Scale
scores;
not age: in distribution of California

hospitalization, selection

of

the treatment variables
treatments and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluatimﬁh
The expectation that the institution serving upper class patient!
would have the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of
psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata,10W6r
proportion of patients receiving organic forms of therapy, aM'poorest discharge ratings were each confirmed. Similarly, the ﬂﬁtitution
serving lower class patients evinced shorter periods of howitaliza—
disand
betwr
low
of
diagnoses,
psychoneurotic
proportions
tion,
charge evaluations.
It is our impression that these differences in psycuatric
treatment are more related to differences in staff attitﬂes than to
differences in population samples. The contrasts betweeninstituthccomplexity.
tions in duration of hospitalization are great, as are
of diagnostic formulations, discharge evaluations, definiﬁons of
details
and amount of recorded data These
and
the
psychotherapy,
stylistic differences cannot be dismissed as merely idiosywratic
since they follow a pattern related to social differences mnsistent
with previous findings.
—-

duration of

�-11-

treatment variable relationships appear to
be interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff as by the constellation of
Such population and

history which a patient may present. Such relationships
will be most marked in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, 343., where the objective criteria
symptoms or

defining diseases of known organic impairment are absent, as in
schizophrenia, psychoneurosis and personality and behavior disorders.
Under conditions of perceptual or situational ambiguity the observer's
attitudes and expectations become the basis for perception and classi-

fication. This

clearly demonstrated by Pasamanick, Dinitz
and Lefton (7} in their study of variations in diagnosis within a
single institution. They observed that patients randomly assigned
to different wards did not differ in type of admission, marital
status, education, age or residence. Significant differences did
view was

occur, however, in diagnoses among the three wards and among three
administrators on one ward. As it is highly unlikely that these

differences were inherent in the population, we believe they are
reflections
of the attitudes of the examiners.
largely
It is clear that many of the present psychiatric concepts of
diagnosis or clinical evaluation have relatively little meaning when
transferred from one institution to another. If these concepts are

taken

literally

the results become paradoxical. For example,
Menninger Hospital has the most highly trained personnel conducting

treatment, keeps its patients for the longest time and has fewest

�-12-

patients diagnosed as schizophrenia.

And

yet, despite these resources

At
treatment
results.
the
poorest
and favorable factors, it reports
MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a therapist,
which keeps patients for the shortest periods, and which has a higher
the
reported
classed
asschizophrenia,
of
the
population
proportion

treatment results are the best.
the
does
relative
not
reflect
study
this
that
probable
is
It
Our
no
furnishes
data
of
the
institutions.
therapeutic efficacy
the
which
provides
hospital
for
determining
independent criteria
better care; nor for assessing the comparability of the population
the
based
on
evaluations
the
Since
are
of
the
in
degree
illness.
institution‘s own ratings, we believe that the differences reflect
variations in the criteria used for evaluation of improvement rather
than any intrinsic psychiatric characteristics.
In our initial Hillside study (5) it Was postulated that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons of different

social background. It was suggested that the higher the person's
has
This
employed.
the
complex
the
criteria
more
social background
Manninger‘s
using
with
the
confirmed
study,
in
been literally
present
two
other
of
the
the
global rating
a tripartite rating compared to
which
our
on
Even
syndrome
the
rating
considering
institutions.
contention
our
is
were
based,
it
analysis
comparative statistical
in
improvement
to
we
assess
lower
apt
class
are
that for
persons
work,
resume
to
capacity
the
symptom
patient's
relief or
relation to
while for upper class persons the criteria stress such complex

�-13-

intangibles as "developing insight", or "working through one's problems."

investigations have again demonstrated the role of
social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been considerably
impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational leader—
ship and the expectation that the recorded variables would be clearly
defined. But the differences in institutional style making it diffi—
cult to obtain comparable data are important cues to the problem of
the conventional use of comparative statistics, especially in the
evaluation of psychiatric therapies. The use of discharge ratings,
diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria
in therapeutic evaluations or the identification of comparable
populations are subject to considerable error unless the institutions
are clearly matched for social class patterns in patient population
and for staff attitudes and style. These difficulties may also extend
to the failures of scientists to confirm observations made in other
laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may be as much a reflection
of differences in populations and psychiatric criteria as to errors in
the original hypotheses. The wideSpread use of such terms as "schizoWhile these

phrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore the changes in psychological
or biological features with mental illness has led to a science
burdened by negative results. Even were a valid observation to be

laboratory, we do not have methods available to
describe populations adequately to provide a sound confirmation.

reported from one

�~1h-

Increased attention

classifying subjects

must be paid to the methodological problems of

criteria rather than the present
and
on
institutional
dependent
highly

by "objective"

methods which appear to be so
of
the
and
aspects
the
sociopsychological
observer attitudes

pist-patient interaction.

thera-

�-15..

SUMMARY

and

CONCLUSION

hospitals,
variables.
treatment
to
related
were
characteristics
population
F
and
education
score,
social
by
defined
age,
class,
were
Populations
and were related to type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,
diagnosis and discharge evaluation.
in
observed
were
differences
2. Significant interinstitutional
and
education
of
characteristics of patient social class, years
F
of
California
scores, but not age.
distribution
3. The variations in treatment characteristics among instituthe
in
predicted
different
be
found
to
significantly
tions were
direction.
a
follow
pattern
practices
in
psychiatric
h. These variations
and
are
institutions
among
differences
class
with
social
consistent
not regarded as being idiosyncratic.
of
make
comparisons
S. The differences in institutional style
between
results
and
treatment
diagnoses, duration of hospitalization,
need
more
objective
for
and
the
and
tenuous,
institutions difficult
emphasized.
is
of
populations
of
classification
criteria
1.

In three psychotherapantic-oriented teaching

�REFERENCES

l.

Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,
&amp;
New
York, Harper
Brotherg
R.N.: The Authoritarian Personality,

1950.
2.

Hollingshead, A.B.:

Two-Factor Index of Social Position, mimeo-

graphed publication.
3.

Mental
and
Class
Social
F.C.:
Redlich,
&amp; Sons, Inc.,
New
John
Wiley
York,
Community Study,

Hollingshead, A.B. and

Illness:

A

1958.

h.

R.L., Pollack,
Selection of Therapy in
M.

Kahn,

Social Factors in the
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside

and Fink, M.:
a

1957.
216-228,
g:
2.,
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental HOSpital:
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis,

Ho

5.

Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,
6.

l:

565-57h, 1959.

(CaliM.:
M.
Attitude
Social
and
Fink,
Pollack,
R.L.,
&amp;
Ment.
Nerv.
F
Dis.,
J.
and
Convulsive
Therapy,
Scale)
fornia

Kahn,

130: 187-192, 1960.
7.

OrientaM.:
and
Psychiatric
S.
Lefton,
Pasamanick, B., Dinitz,
Mental
a
in
and
Treatment
to
Diagnosis
tion and Its Relation

Heapital,

Amer.

J. Psychiat.,

116: 127-132, 1959.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Impr oved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly
WW-

Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

~———-————-—-———

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

III

Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Interhosgital

Menninger

Hospital

'

Hillside
Hospital

t
I

Massachusetts
Mental Health

!

i

t

t

Social

Class

EIII

%

17

3h

13

i
g

§

IV
v

1

E

t

28

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
gMenninger Hillside Massachusetts

Hospital Mental Health

{Hospital

Psychotherapy
Somatic

of
Treatment

Type

68

Other

8

1

.

as”ii.ii.ii_wmm.mi“iiiiiiiiii.i,__
Duration of

Hospitalization

i:QﬁiéimﬁifAL_R$;991MW_WWWW“a.

_-._~

_-_rmi...._i__.mwt

7-11 months
1

months

“—W.W
-

came-u «rr

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

Much

61

Improved

10

'Unimproved
I
..

,

m

Discharge
Diagnosis

..—W_-»lnw

w-‘W

a

.

df=h§ B&lt;.OOl.~W___
y3é29.3;
.....

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis

_

“p

M
1?

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

x2=23-83 df‘h? P&lt;-001

29

*__,m_.__".

�TABLE V

Duration of Hosgitalization

BX

Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

i»
mm

Below 20

Menninger

Hillside

81
73

61

3O

30

20

2422219.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

‘Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

AlcoholiSm

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�.0".

m
an.»
"mm
”turn
M
m
«trauma

in

a

Want a mu “am“.

m.

to

m:

Imitation

mums It“ ”'01:“!
M vacuum m «an.» mun. ”human
to
87
Nil
“mam"
it.
”no: u
pmuul. «Wu!
03
and
”I.
«um.
”mun- ti. mama" um: 53 by
m “Multan” at mm «- mm: It!“ t ”mm
V111
in
mu
”amt.
autumn»
h
It“
mm
m
than panama-u man: “an “uncut: ”turn um
to.“ ”am... m3", than an aunt“. cum-u «nun
or
um
has.
hum-at
that. u u
ﬁlm
or“.
and
a“
ammo-u.
mu»
m1“:
as
stadium
yum-pun 3: citation!
damn. an.
and
autumn“:
an
”um.- «yuan-n “cm
man»
a» tub for put-pun at elm-usual». Mt now an

mm“

nun-1: 4mm»: by
may “My of

munch, an»

and

um m u

31331.
a
mm:
«was:
nub
mum
“tin. not when“ an ”that! "m1: yuan-d u
01’
did
in
I!!!“
{taunt
at mm m: Quintin, m1“:
hum, man, In mm. suntan» «um»...
um um, bum. in “an.“
th- an. may «.4

in

oz»

m
u “9&amp;3“le
m‘thMMumui-d.
likely an. m aﬂm m “burnt a. 53W“...
in

�7C:

1/4,,

:

WW—
001.23]!”L”

g/
J
I:

’1

1,

5

6
7

/

.
i

.

My
I
i

"

.1

16'

1

1.!
1,

u
hi

101

o1

o

o

O.

o

()1

2

.101

1._

ﬂ

16

I ll

91

I"

1

1

°

'

“-3.

Rejec’t'

“1

ram

13

0

~

1

o

7

11

3

°

°

9

11

O1

1

ll]

o

57

-

70
7

8

001.23/3

35

&gt;

li

$7,

2312
Col.

1

‘1

IJ"

|

1

7/01.}

TALLY SHEEP

601.26/1 ‘7
,..,2

Deckf

-

D11

1

0

1

1

‘

0

.

/

9 4

.

75"

0011.29/8,9. {Mama

1%‘5‘5
I!
I

2

391

3

5

1h

0

o

Reject

O

5‘3

20111.11

X
11601.26/1

//

2

3

_

—

0.

Asa

.0

as:

1

111:

1

1

1

35‘

115

a

-

r

16
-

_

o

1

W—‘i—
01.1
Re

I

.9.—
1.

9‘

11

.3-

" M-w—«eﬁm
0
H

ect

1mm.

01

77

1

55

“_~_
53

f

�Dock:

I
,

“BALL!

Qilvcéév

31‘

comes/1

.

,

2

a?”

sum
sol-23k

,Gol.23/1

”

_

001-23/3

17

3

O

l

20

6

.

O

,

O

mutt»

‘00“

6

3

o

3

3

O

33

3

o

Reject
ICE“.

7

O

3--

o

�f

x

7“

,/;.!,/,

ﬂ

_

TALLY SHEEP

g/

001.2611 ‘7

57‘7“.”—

'

001,237.! 7‘1"" 1"
a

!

'i

,

/’

,

16

h ’* J

5

u

ﬂ

7

,.

.

”J--.

.,

x

.

.

o.

V-

o

.

o

2

~_

-

V

0

.

7.1.07

,

0

_-.

J

‘1‘

36

7

,

0

a

“I,

74.,47445
Co1.23/3
‘

7

,.

Q-

.

V

I

5

7

35"“!
7,001.23/2'

1...,_ 27 .

J

ﬁYlI ‘,

2

" bro"

Decks"

I

16

,

i

t.

..

.

.

-

57

.

.

0

0

,

-

13.
O

I

[4'
7

7
II

8
9.

7-07

ll

l

V

0

I.

iii

Owﬁl"
Reject H
warm.

”

“I":
aﬁa’
..

‘

,

,

.

I

V.

O

0.

II.

3

0

O

~

A

-

D

_

..

~ -

,

.

O

,

,

.

-

H

4
’9.

{IV/J '11.: farm/1:22.—
,

,

,

,

.16.

,

9

69.19.2311...

-

.

2

.39.-.

3

S

- -h-

.0

o

Reject

MAL
X

5‘3

//

2

not“

-

.3

-

.0

V

J.»

V.

5

.

.35‘

-

0

8'

7
‘

C?

.o

.

m____9__
0
f

_.

-

Reﬂect
-

__

.

.

43

,a

.0

_._V

.,

3

,

O

A

-601026/1

-

limo),

001.29/8,9.

Duh“

-

,,

55

.9—
.V

9‘ -

..
,3-

«wag—m...
53

/

�-3Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage (19%) of

patients
called

rated as "unimproved" and only a single patient was
"recovered" or "much improved". The highest percentage of "recovered"
or "much improved" ratings (28%) and the lowest proportion of
"unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health

were

Center.
d) Diagnosis:

For

statistical analysis three diagnostic

groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective disorders, and psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic
proportions of patients within these groups were similar for Hillside

in that slightly over half were diagnosed as schizophrenia
and approximately one-quarter as psychoneurosis or affective disorder.
In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and personality
disorder accounted for more than fifty per cent of the population.
and

MMHC

-‘---------’
Table
B.

Intra-Hospital Comparisons

l.

Methodological Problems
The

a

IV

intra-hospital statistical comparisons

variety of methodological problems.

of meaningful

statistical

cut—off

were

limited by

Most prominent was the lack

criteria for the subdivision

of

populations, in part due to the homogeneity of the population within
each institution and to the sample size. In the statistical analyses
within a single institution several cells were obtained which had

�Page 5.
COMMENTS BY

PSYCHIATRISTS

Most of the unfavorable

(1)
(2)
more

insufficient
"

criticism can

number of
"
"

be divided

into

two

complaints:

sessions per patient paid for by Project

patients

point, many apparently feel the Project should advertise itself
to its eligible subscribers, reminding them of the availability of coverage.

0n the second

Favorable criticism was in general directed at expressing approval of the
idea of testing psychiatric insurance. There were in addition a surprising number
of complimentary remarks about the planning or administration of the Project.

SUMMARY

typical participating psychiatrist is a man between 35 and 50, practicing
in Manhattan. He treats patients in the hospital as well as in his private office,
and he also does some clinic work. He has his "Boards" in psychiatry. His usual
office fee is $20 or $25.
His primary orientation in his practice is analytical and psychological. This
does not preclude his prescribing drugs or shock therapy.
The

interest in the Project is demonstrated by the fact of his participation.
If he has some adverse criticism, it is apt to be directed at the number of sessions allowed, which he regards as insufficient, or at the small number of patients
who have sought care, which he regards as a reflection of an inadequate educational
program. In short, his criticism is generated by his tendency to view the Project
as a social rather than an insurance experiment. He feels the Project, Operating
in an area where the supply of private psychiatric time apparently exceeds the
demand, is in a unique position to promote more psychiatry for more people, which
is what he really wants - insurance or no.
His

APA-NAMH-GHI RESEARCH PROJECT

August 30, 1960

�MWQQIPWZMMMWMS.

mmuummmumuaumm
umm-mmmyutnwmuum

mmmummmammw

«mummy-"um.

mmumtmmmuwm
mmnm.mumn
nun-1 mm m "WW nu»
M
m

mnﬂMmMWmuumu-m

ml;

Wax.

m-

1:

m», W‘s:

”.mtunmwmmtm.mm

Mnmw‘um.

mam.

uanwmmum.nm

��~19.

tut Oil. innﬁltution urn vniulruhla ‘u individual dittorunaai
among

uxaainera.)
uwdﬂﬂﬂh‘b an“ “it

Tabla

ﬁttings at inﬁrOth
neat variad in tornat uad antltl.
MIR

#3:

triptrtit¢

Yb: diaahtrmc

with a toynrtta cvtlnntion

aburnctaralugi¢nl and buhnvtoral changnt.

it wan dattianlt

tar

rating at
toc&amp;31,

3R and name had

cltbnl ratings in

which

tribution at

taator a: th‘ ﬂdngiaaar ﬁrst.» (tabla II).

Glen

ﬁn

sauna: the

awnw

In? than atndy tbs ntnuingar Iyndroun rnﬁang was nuad for par»
paamt

a: uauptrinun.
fable
.U.-”Q””Wﬁ&amp;u

2. ageia a anal» {at} virinblas
3)

ﬂow

n1 Elana:

that:

was

t

mnrkoé

airturanco in thu

�~16»

cahisaphrtnta) raeqivaa dtluhirnt rgtiuam at unimprﬁvud
lawn

titan than puttuai: ricosvtn:

Iﬁ ﬂurn‘icn

ox

payihnthnrupy ulﬁuc.

h3upitn11:ut£on. putiantu rtaaivinc uamnatn

ihhruyr warn hacpttalitod tar 1011:: partndi

ﬁhnn

that.

rtontvinc othtr ﬁhirapiau‘
canatdcrubiu alts-rw

Catt. at».

ﬁhtﬁ‘hOQwﬁﬂﬁ

the thrnu inasitutlunu with r¢nvact

in putsuut’u Ina‘th u! Uta: (Tibia VI). urn pattnaia
houyltulinud tonguut. with éﬁﬁ

tuttvt

unathn

aw

aura, casparnd

pniaautn and «n1: 5 pi! aunt

tiny at an.

a: pattoutl

t;

ramuiuing (or

3: par can‘ at th¢ an

at ihiiﬁ at Inna. 2k: unﬁt!

an group an: autumn»

Ii?in

whit. twanthirdl of thc vane pattcntn

'18 ninth!

wuru

and GllVIh

ninth:

worn «inahavcud within

I! httpttﬂliﬁitﬁlnw

&amp;i K?! :nd an

lli

«at tho inuial‘r:otor utus elatily

vtlntta ‘0 luacth or haunt‘nltuatiol
rtuuiainc tar sh. toauaut purine;

It

..

ﬁa‘iouiu
yuingar

ovary use lcvut,

�I.
Winn

ttruaiurc at thu hmnpt‘nl
isnuvud

a...
is ﬂak.» It! uranﬁtd.

rcpar‘tu; itudtin Iran a

ii

nautxuaua

in¢titutiau

1h» autumn

brlitxv. ﬁnntvnr,

and I3QOHﬁﬂiﬁi

and: aunrt a:

ﬁnd

inntitutaun.
“ad

tam

titan!

3n studying a atwtnun

ta cutuar nanpnrahia data an.

an

nun: dirzurananu butwaﬁn instituhtaaa.

a! an. gutpxtnl argumiustzan

twanmnn «no

a: sh:

naihudoiiuin prdhlqua ﬁrtuoiana trnaiucntﬁ tar nuanpln,
bath

tit

auaa and urn

mat. At suns tun

at

hiVO day

an

«at:

it:

hacpital,

and 1a ‘hc nttar~¢uru

Iu.nauh a ti‘ﬁlﬁﬁ. ht as; tau! Iran in diﬂﬂhlrsi

sh: Fattunt {run

8%.

hllﬂhﬂl ﬁt an chatter unﬁt, Running

£hat to «111 with; be ramrauathiu
wharcat

unlit, ﬂﬁill

ttu.i£nc phyciatmu a‘n «at. far I yutxdat

an innpattcut, an 933

n11»&amp;a.

haugﬁ‘al

at an. dtﬂahnrca

dun‘nr r01&amp;t10n;&amp;19.

manna

tar hi; putaont‘n,nnr¢;

turuaunstan_¢£ shat pn‘iuntn

�dc»
cu
hon,
a'mu
wanted
an
my
mm.
min»
pun-sonata
on ohm“ u «a.

�£03"

£in
2:?

artootod the colltction and organisttton 0: ‘ho dutn.\ﬁﬁQﬁgﬁ~
Spacitic problcnn were uotnd 1n dociguntiano a: typo or

1

L}!

7p”;

011/”

'rﬂt

“’

Wm Mt

qﬂ’

U

9/

ﬂ:;;pg{§‘
W

54?”

Vlﬂ”

//

‘

\
Q

”uncut, (lunatic tom
antenna

and

«autumn: train.“

a) Dootgnntion or 322. o: rrcttntut: rho criterig tor
dalignntin; that n patioat rocutvad 'puyohathtrtpy' dartorod
Ilbﬁﬂ tho instituttoal, ﬁshing unttornity in claalttienttun

difficult.

At HIE payohothorupy can designated as

ilturod

trc;;noat

ndm1n~

procertpttan btllu by a otntt paychiutrict,
for which tun pationt wan chargcd t I... Stadium. wi‘h
in. puychtatrie rolid¢at wort Ionatdorod part of routtuo
Idninistrntivu patina: cure.
xx
it paythothorapy val defined at transient nautical
with thu psychiatric recidont. Stat: paychintrista did not
trutt paticnta, but rtatriétcd thotr no£1v1ttul to auporvtstac
tht ruaidcat physicianl.
At the lane psychathornpy was donixnttod u. 1 function
0! many disciplinol .. pljchlltrie runtdontl, pnyoholoututo.
loclnl nurture, nurses and :ndtc;1 studonta. Furnnl record:
or Inch caution. var. not routincly includnd 1n the pt‘tcnt'c
rcoord and to ‘lccrtuin which pationtc rcccivcd psychotherapy,
the resident 1n «Egret or ouch ctno van intervicwed.
b) an noun Individual Institution}. Guano-tn
Itylou Illa and. saupnriaona difficult. At urn dilohurco
on a

�Wmuummﬁmwmmummm.
wmmmmmummm.nuﬂ$d
Mmrwhﬂwmgwm.mwnmmt
ummmmmmmswmwmamwm
watchmen.

mwmammm’m'm

Wammmuwm.
: nmmm,mmm
a)

'

m

mWﬁWﬂmﬂWu”W’M-ﬂ).
mmtuWﬂmvtnmp-mmmm
’W‘wmmﬂ“. ‘mwma*m'
&gt;

M

mmw‘m(ﬂ)mme-ww*
(M)mmummmmum.
‘

’

a)

mammummm.mm

«Mammary WWW“
mummmmwmmwmu

�H.

v.

vw&lt;_~——va‘

&lt;vwvwv

ﬂw—w—v__ﬁ,

_.

mum

mmewWa-ww

,‘
mumwmarmmmm.
MMWmmmmmu-nmum

mmmmmmhmm
mwummmmxtmwmmh"
m

Mum,wuwmwmw~.

mummwumwwhn

“mammary“. mwmamm‘
y‘auquuwnv’wu‘ummwnm
muwmvmmmmmmmm
(nJNMummwn-uunmm ”mu
mmuuWMwW,ubmm

�.5.

pm»

amu-

mm“... mamas mun: “was“ and

nttivo yrucrtnt a: asliam thirnpy. Inch ntronsut tutti»

tits

tr‘atmuut a: mutuntary'p;taontu, 400i nut privtda auto

twain! aura «an iduda ‘0 ﬁrdw

staliar tea

1%:

pntiiat4pavu1$tian tram

arouwu.

ﬁn: primary r‘acan Iv? nﬁluatiux thy inntatatxtnc.
haumvur,

In:

1» Sb.

«spautntian ﬁhut hair vuuxa nurvu p‘ttoaaa

at ﬁiztarina loaiai GIIIIIG (an. 5;) «at that aattivuuaau

tut:

ﬁsmanaxau

1a

ﬂthlé ha rﬁtioaiaﬂ in ﬂat ﬁraainant vattdbinu.

2h: upauixia purpaua a! ths‘ mind: in; te doﬁtruinu‘popamaa

m3:
m
mutwm
um»
an autumn ”hm m»

it

Ulﬁlﬂl mind», «an, aduauiiun and

thaag pniiaas charaatnrxatauu

ﬁt

it

r

ﬁt:

accru. ﬁnd to rulu‘u

zr*u®auut Virtublun

at

a: «ﬁtment, amiss.” a: mp-zuuumm, Manna: “a"

¢&amp;uuhnrss-nvn!u:stan.

�W1
01“.

m

1.
a.

~

31!
51

,

E

J.

17

t
am

20

h.

3.

SI:

13

38

29

5

38

3”

15$

5?

so

53

:1

23

33

413

I)!

32‘

515

18-915

53

51

M

16 0

23

1?

10

10—29

51$

M9

”S

M

In.

50

38

5&amp;1“?

a

18

ha

195

£21!

fan

i

'

5.

of
“ICON.“

80

;

.&gt;

u-

5

M3!

E
ﬂ

m”

he

4,

~

'

:'*13I:§
‘

«a
9".”‘
1“

31-3

9

”‘03::

at"

.1

it'We”

it”$001

“it" 90.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2904">
                <text>Social aspects of psychiatric treatment in three hospitals: methodological problems. VA Cooperative Studies in Psychiatry, 6:202-6.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2905">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2906">
                <text>mfp-02-01-004-59-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2907">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2908">
                <text>Pollack, Max; Siegel, Nathaniel; Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2909">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2910">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2911">
                <text>9 items. 1: Photocopy of publication with Q &amp; A. 2: [preprint]. 3: Draft. 4: The Identification of Patient Populations: Comparability of Subjects in Evaluating Therapies Among Institutions by Max Fink, M.D. 5: The American Psychoanalytic Association Summary and FInal Report of Central Fact-Gathering Committee. 6: Correspondence. 7: Handwritten notes. 8: Social Class. Diagnosis, and treatment In Three Psychiatric Hospitals. 9: Research, drafts, and letters.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2912">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2913">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74493">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81054">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87615">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94176">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="292" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6557">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/9a3312b18cdf6e7ffc1390135fa8f24f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7ebf0740040bf69f9525e1f11a533ee3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107162">
                    <text>20

Soci0psychological A3pects
of Psychiatric Treatment
A Report of Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals
ROBERT L. KAHN, PhD, NEW YORK; MAX FINK, MD, ST. LOUIS;
AND NATHANIEL SIEGEL, PhD, BETHESDA, MD

IN THEIR STUDIES of the New Haven

treated primarily by psychotherapy, and repsychiatric patient population, Hollingshead ceived poorer discharge ratings. These
and Redlich reported signiﬁcant relation— clinical factors were also related to a measscale.""5
California
F
the
of
in
the
individual’s
stereotypy,
ure
position
ships between an
social—class structure and the incidence of
Higher F scores, ie, greater stereotypy, were
treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders, often found in patients diagnosed as inand kinds and duration of psychiatric treat— volutional psychosis who were referred for
ment administered.1 The inﬂuence of the convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
economic status of the patient on the avail- periods, and were more often rated as much
recovered.
improved
or
of
however,
was
personnel,
treating
ability
It was suggested that differences in psy—
not excluded.
should
chiatric
hospitals
treatment
in
the
social
factors
of
among
Studies of the role
social
factors
of
inﬂuence
in—
similar
reﬂect
a
of
hospitalized patients
treatment
Hos—
Hillside
within
noted
for
patients
dependent of their ﬁnancial status and the as
decided
it
to
this
To
was
test
suggestion
pital.
undertaken
of
treatments were
availability
1957
Hillside
the
of
the
procedures
1957.
employ
this
In
in
hospital,
at Hillside Hospital
Hosinstitutions—Hillside
in
three
instudy
a variety of treatment modes, including
dividual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, pital, the C. F. Menninger Memorial Hosand convulsive therapies were available to all pital, Topeka, Kan, and the Massachusetts
inThese
Boston.
Health
Mental
Center,
patients regardless of their ability to pay.
In our surveys 2'3 we observed that patients stitutions were selected with the expectation
hospitalized for the shortest periods were that diverse treatment modalities were
older, had less education, and were more equally available to populations of different
often of foreign birth. These older, less- social classes. Each provided short—term
educated patients were predominantly treated treatment of voluntary patients and did not
by convulsive therapy and received more provide custodial care. Each is a residency
favorable clinical discharge ratings. In con- training center with a full—time supervisory
trast, younger, native—born, more—educated staff and active research units, emphasizing
patients were hospitalized for longer periods, psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy.
This study was designed to determine the
Submitted for publication June 21, 1965.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
in—
three
the
of
characteristics
population
Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, NY 1959-1962. Currently
at the Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago,
social
with
class,
to
stitutions
age,
respect
the
of
at
the
Psychiatry
Department
Chicago (Dr. Kahn);
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry, University of Missouri
and F score; and to relate these
education,
School of Medicine, St. Louis (Dr. Fink); and the National
characteristics to treatment variables of type
Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr. Siegel).
Reprint requests to 5400 Arsenal St, St. Louis, Mo 63139
of
duration
of
hospitalization,
treatment,
(Dr. Fink).
'

Arch Gen Psychial—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�EPIDEMIOLOGY—DUNHAM
Small City,” in Epidemiology of Mental Disorder,
B. Pasamanick (ed), \Vashington, DC.: American
Association for the Advancement of Science, 1959,
publication No. 60.
46. Hollingshead, AB, and Redlich, F.: Social
Class and Mental Illness ew York: John Wiley
&amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
47. Morris, ].N.:
ealth and Social Class, Laneet 12303—305 (F
1959.
48. Dunham,
Dis—
“Anomie
and
Mental
..
order,” in Anom and Deviant Behavior, M. B.
Clinard (ed.), Ne
k: The Free Press of
Glencoe, a division of the
acmillan Co., 1964.
49. Buck, C.; Wanklin, M.; and Hobbs, G.E.:
Symptom Analysis of Ru l—Urban Differences in
First Admission Rates, ] erv Ment Dis 122 280-82,

].A., and Kohn, M.L.: Social Isolation and Schizophrenia, Amer Soc Rev 20:265—
58. Clausen,

273 (June) 1955.
59. Stein, L.: Social Class Gradient in Schizo-

phrenia, Brit J Prev Soc Med 11:181-195 (Oct)

1957.
60. Carstairs, G.M., and Brown, G.\V.: A Census

.

(July) 1955.

M.B.: Al native Hypothesis for the
Explanation of Some f Faris and Dunham’s Re—
sults, Amer J Soc 47 48-52 (July) 1941.
51. Schroeder, C.
: Mental Disorders in Cities,
Amer Soc 47 :40-47 (
1942.
52. @degaard, (3.: E igration and Insanity:
Study of Mental Diseas Among Norwegian Born
Population in Minnes , Aeta Psychiat Neural,
50. Owen,

suppl 4, 1932.
53. @degaard,
Incidence of Psychoses
0.31m
in Various Occupations,
Soc Psychiat, vol 2,
No. 2 (Autumn) 1956.
54. Ekblad, M.; Psychiat c and Sociologic
‘

19

,

of Psychiatric Cases in Two Contrasting Communities, J Ment 5 '
72—81 (Jan) 1956.
61. Dunha r
.W.: Community and Schizo—
phrenia :
Epidemiological Analysis, Detroit:
Wayne Sta University Press, 1965.
63. Leig

lot: Comm
Psychiatry,

,

lisher, 1960.
64. Leigh
ger, New Y.
65. LClgh
the Epidemi
demiology
bank Memori
b

,

.H.: “A Proposal for Research in
y of Psychiatric Disorders,” in Epi—
ental Disorder, New York: Mil‘

o

Fund, 1950, pp 128-135.
66. Krame M.; “Discussion of H. W. Dunham’s article”. 'n Causes of Mental Disorders: A
Review of
miologieal Knowledge, 1959,
New York: Milban
emorial Fund, pp 271—273,
1961.
67. Miles, H.C., et

A Cumulative Survey of
All Psychiatric Expe nce in Monroe County, New
York: Summary of ata for the First Year (1960),
Psychiat Quart 3| ‘ 58-487 (July) 1964.
68. Dohrenw , B., and Dohrenwend, B.: The
Problem of Valio
in Field Studies of Psychological Disorder, ] Abn
Psyehol 70 :52-59, 1965.
69. Benedict, P.R., nd Jacks, I.: Mental Illness
in Primitive Societie Psychiatry 17 :379—390 (Nov)
.

.

’

E.: Mental
Ment Hyg (April) 1935.
55. \Vinston,

M.; Compa t e Study of Disease
Incidence in Admissions to ase Psychiatric Hospi—
tal in Middle East, Men
ei 922118—127 (Jan)
56. Simms,

1946.
57. JaCo,

E.G.: The Social Isolation Hypothesis
and Schizophrenia, Amer Soe Re-zv 19:567-577
(Oct) 1954.

1954.

70. Hollowell,

Philadelphia
1955.

:

.A.: Culture and Experience,
niversity of Pennsylvania Press,

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

diagnosis, and discharge evaluation among
the institutions.

Method
A census of all voluntary, adult patients in residence in the institutions was undertaken in January

While Menninger and Hillside Hospitals had
voluntary patients only, a small number of those at
the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC)
were assigned by the courts for psychiatric evalua—
tion or were members of a chronic schizophrenic
state hospital group transferred for a speciﬁc research project. These patients were excluded from
the study because of their nonvoluntary status.
The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census day.
Eighteen months later the records of discharged
patients were examined to determine the social and
psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure of
social class, the Hollingshead two-factor index—a
weighted score of education and occupation—was
used.“’6 The study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger, and 95 at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
The study included examination of the relations of
the social to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between institutions. These
comparisons were difﬁcult, however, because of vari—
1959.

ous methodological differences discussed below.
These difﬁculties were most marked in the intrahos—
pital comparisons and accordingly, in the analyses
of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on

the differences between institutions with citation of
intrainstitutional trends. These difﬁculties also led
to missing information for some data, reﬂected in
the tables by the varying population sample sizes.

Results
I. Methodological Problems—When

re—

porting studies from one institution, the
structure of the hospital is taken for granted
and either ignored or mentioned brieﬂy. In
TABLE

1.—Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses
Depressive reaction, narcissistic
personality
Anxiety reaction, narcissistic
personality
Narcissistic personality
Narcissistic personality, alcoholism, chronic infantile
personality
Passive aggressive personality,
alcoholism
Infantile personality, schizophrenic reaction, schizoaiicctive

type

General Classiﬁcation
Psychoneurosis
Psychoneurosis

Personality trait disturbance
Sociopathic personality
disturbance
Sociopathic personality

disturbance

Schizophrenic psychosis

21

gathering comparable data from multiple in—
stitutions, however, the differences between
institutions are accentuated. While these in—
stitutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research, and treatment programs,
they were functionally unlike in ways which
inﬂuenced the data of the study. Speciﬁc
differences were prominent in the designa—
tion of type of treatment, diagnostic classiﬁcations, and the evaluation of treatment
outcome.

Designation of Type of Treatment:
The criteria for designating that a patient
,
received “psychotherapy’ differed among
the institutions, making comparisons (lif—
1.

ﬁcult.

At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy
was designated as treatment administered on
a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist
for which the patient was charged a fee.
Sessions with a psychiatric resident physi—
cian were considered part of routine ad—
ministrative patient care.
At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was
deﬁned as treatment sessions with a psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities
to supervising resident physicians. No additional fees were charged.
At the Massachusetts Mental Health
Center psychotherapy was designated as the
activity of many disciplines—psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers,
nurses, and medical students. Formal
records of such sessions were not routinely
included in the patient’s record and to
ascertain which patients received psycho—
therapy it was necessary for members of the
study team to interview the resident physi—
cian responsible for each case.
2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional di—
agnostic styles made comparisons difﬁcult.
At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended
by the American Psychiatric Association,
while both Hillside and MMHC followed
different unitary systems. Several examples
of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table 1, with our suggested conversions into
categories comparable to that of the other
two institutions. These conversions provide
a source of distortion.

Arch Gen Psychz'al—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

22

Discharge Ratings of Improvement:
Ratings of improvement at the three hos—
pitals varied in format and detail. The discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was
tripartite with a separate evaluation for
social, characterological, and syndrome
changes. Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difﬁcult to assess the contribution of each factor of the Menninger
system (Table 2). For this study the
Menninger syndrome rating was compared
to the global ratings of the other institutions.
II. Interhospital Comparisons—1. Sociopsychological Variables: The distribution of
the variables of social class, age, education,
and California F scale score among the three
institutions is presented in Table 3.
A. Social Class. The anticipated differ—
ence in social class composition of the three
institutions was observed. At Menninger
Hospital the population was predominantly
upper class; at Hillside Hospital, middle
class; and at Massachusetts Mental Health
Center, predominantly lower class.
B. Age. There were no differences in age
distribution in the institutional populations.
C. Education. The populations also differed in educational attainment, with patients
having more years of education at Men—
ninger Hospital than at Massachusetts
Mental Health Center. While 41% of the
patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32% at Hillside and 23% at
Menninger did not graduate.
D. F Score. Differences in the distribution of scores on the California F scale were
also observed. Fifty-one percent of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and
only 8% with scores of 50 or above—the
higher F scores being associated with higher
degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside 31% of the patients had F scores below
30 while at MMHC only 20% were be-

2.—Comparative Ratings of Clinical
Condition at Time of Hospital Discharge

TABLE

3.

low 30.

Menninger Hospital

Thus, differences in social class,
tional attainment, and performance on the F
scale were observed. These differences permit a test of the hypotheses relating socio—
psychological factors to the treatment
variables among these institutions.
2. Psychiatric Treatment Variables: A.

MM HC

Improved

Recovered
Much improved

Unimproved

Improved

Social adjustment

Character structure

Recovered

Markedly
improved
Moderately
improved
Slightly improved
Unimproved

Unimproved

Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome
Complete remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Selection of Treatment. Among the institu—
tions, signiﬁcantly fewer patients at
Menninger Hospital (43%) received somatic

therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC
(68%) (Table 4).
B. Duration of Hospitalization. The three
institutions differed with regard to patient’s
length of stay (Table 4). Patients at Men—
ninger Hospital were hospitalized longest,
with 65% of the patients remaining for 12
months or more, compared to 31% of the
Hillside patients and only 5% at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The
modal stay of the Hillside group was beComparison: for
'Sociopsychological Variables

TABLE 3.——Interhospital
'

Hillside
Hospital

Menninger
Hospital

N

87
31 %

I

II
III

Social class
l

17

13
28
28

O

5

20-39

40+

x2=

N

&lt;12

12-15

16+

121.5,

df =

3.9,

dr=

4,

100
23 %
54
23

x2 = 9.7, df = 4,

[

F score

{
I

N

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

x2

51

P

%

41
8

= 39.2, (if =

&lt;0.001.
173
19 %
58
23

95
15 %
52
33

173
32 %
51
17

91
41

P: NS

92

10-29
30-49
50-70

L

P

8,

100
19 %
59
22

&lt;20

education

28

V

=

72
3%

2O

1

x2

M M HC

51

IV

N
Age

133
7%

34
34

L

Years of

educa—

Hillside
Hospital

4,

P

%

49
10

&lt;0.05
163
33 %
50
17

&lt;0.001

76
20 %
38
42

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL
TABLE

4.—Inicrhospital Diﬁ‘ercnccs in Treatment
Variables
Menninger Hillside
Hospital Hospital MMIIC
100

Ty pe of
treatment

Psychotherapy
[

Duration of
hospitalization

Somatic
Other

21%
43
36

x2=82.,8 df=4, P &lt;0.001
NMo

&lt;7

Mo
&gt;11 M0
7- 11

100
22 %
13
65

x3=90.,6 df=4,

P

RecoveNred,1 %
evaluation

much1m-

proved
Improved
Unimproved

x2=29.3, df=

N

Discharge
diagnosis

80
19

4,

89
24 %
68
8

173
27 %
42
31

67 %
27

172
23 %

88
28 %

5

5

P

62
15

61

171
52
22

S5
54

10

&lt;0001

95
43 %
5

Schizophrenia
Affective
psychosis
Psychoneurosis 52
&amp; personality disorder
xa = 23.8, df = 4, P &lt;0.001

%

%

17

26

29

tween 7 and 11 months while two thirds
of the MMHC patients were discharged
within six months of hospitalization.
C. Discharge Evaluation. In each hospital,
most patients were evaluated at the time of
discharge as “improved” (Table 4). At
Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage (19%) of patients were rated as
“unimproved” and only a single patient was
scored “recovered” or “much improved.”
The highest percentage of “recovered” or
“much improved” ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of “unimproved” (10%)
were found at the Massachusetts Mental
Health Center.
D. Diagnosis. For statistical analysis
three diagnostic groupings were made:
TABLE

5.—Duration of Hospitalization, by Age

Percentage of Age Group Staying Over One Year
Age

Below 20
20-29
30—39

40-49

50+

Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

81
73
61
30
36

42

14
6
6
0
0

36
30
20
0

schizophrenia, affective disorders, and psy—
choneurosis and personality disorders (Table
4). The diagnostic proportions of patients
within these groups were similar for Hill—
side and MMHC, as slightly more than half
were diagnosed as schizophrenia and one
quarter as psychoneurosis or affective dis—
order. In contrast, at Menninger Hospital
psychoneurosis and personality disorder ac—
counted for more than 50% of the popu—
lation.

III. Intrahospital Comparisons—The lack

&lt;0.001

99

Discharge

173
36 %
64
—

23

of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each
institution, and the limited sample size
(several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than ﬁve cases) precluded signiﬁcant
intrahospital comparisons. However, the
trends appeared similar to those found in the
earlier study. Age and F score were found
related to the selection of treatment at Men—
ninger Hospital (older and higher F score
patients more frequently receiving somatic
therapy), and F score alone at Hillside.
Length of hospitalization and chronological
age were related at both the Menninger and
Hillside Hospitals—the younger patients re—
maining for the longest periods. While such
relationships were signiﬁcant in these two
hospitals, a similar trend was noted at the
MMHC (Table 5) where no patients over
40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20
remained longer than a year.

Comment
The patients of three voluntary psychiatric
hospitals exhibited signiﬁcant interinstitutional differences in social class and years
of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the
treatment variables—duration of hospital—
ization, selection of treatments, and dis—
tributions of diagnoses and discharge
evaluations.7 Expectations based on our
earlier intra-Hillside Hospital study were
conﬁrmed. The institution serving upperclass patients did have the longest duration
of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower proportion of
patients receiving somatic forms of therapy,
and the poorest discharge ratings among the

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�24

SOCIOPS‘YCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

three institutions. Similarly, the institution

serving lower—class patients did have the
shorter periods of hospitalization, lower
proportions of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and
the better discharge evaluations.
It is our impression that these differences
in psychiatric treatment are related more to
differences in staff attitudes and social class
variables than psychiatric differences in
populations. The contrasts between in—
stitutions in duration of hospitalization are
great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, deﬁni—
tions of psychotherapy, and the details and
amount of recorded data. While these
stylistic differences may be dismissed as
idiosyncratic, they follow a pattern related
to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater de—
pendence on social class variables than
ordinarily acknowledged.
Such population and treatment variable
relationships are interactive processes, de—
termined both by the attitude of the physician and the administrative staff and by the
constellation of symptoms or history which
patients present. Such relationships are
marked most in those psychiatric conditions
where diagnostic criteria are least speciﬁc, ie,
where objective criteria deﬁning diseases of
known etiology are absent, as in schizo—
phrenia, psychoneurosis, personality and be—
havior disorders. Under these conditions of
perceptual and situational ambiguity, the ob—
server’s attitudes and expectations become
signiﬁcant aspects of his perceptions, classi—
ﬁcations, and decisions. A similar situation
was clearly documented by Pasamanick
et al 7 in their study of variations in
diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at
random to different wards (lid not differ in
type of admission, marital status, education,
age, or residence. Signiﬁcant differences did
occur, however, in the incidence of various
diagnostic classiﬁcations among the three
wards and among three administrators on
one ward. As no differences in the popula—
tions were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reﬂect the
attitudes of the examiners.

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis
and clinical evaluation have little meaning
when transferred from one institution to another. Literal adherence to these concepts
produces paradoxical results. For example,
Menninger Hospital with more highly
trained personnel conducting treatment,
keeps its patients for the longest time, has
the fewest patients diagnosed as schizo—
phrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treat—
ment results. At MMHC, in contrast, which
is most inclusive in deﬁning a therapist,
keeps patients for the shortest periods, and
has a higher proportion of the population
classed as schizophrenia, reports the best
treatment results.
In the absence of independent criteria for
the quality of care or the assessment of com—
parability of populations for degree of ill—
ness among the institutions, these ﬁndings
do not reﬂect the relative therapeutic
efﬁcacy of the institutions. Since the evalua—
tions are based on the institution’s own
ratings, we believe that the differences reﬂect
variations in the criteria used for evaluation
of improvement rather than intrinsic psy—
chiatric characteristics.
In our initial Hillside study3 it was
postulated that different criteria of improve—
ment were utilized for persons of different
social background. It was suggested that the
higher the person’s social background the
more complex the criteria employed. This
has been literally conﬁrmed in the present
study, with the staff of Menninger Hospital
using a tripartite rating compared to the
global rating of the other two institutions.
Even considering the syndrome rating on
which our comparative statistical analyses
were based, it is our contention that for
lower—class persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom relief or
the patient’s capacity to resume work, while
for upper—class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as “de—
veloping insight,” or “working through one’s
problems.”
While these investigations have again
demonstrated the role of social factors in
psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly
impressed by the methodological problems of
studies across institutions. These institutions

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol

14,

Jan 1966

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

were selected for their educational leader—
ship and the expectation that the recorded
variables would be clearly deﬁned. But dif—
ferences in institutional style made it difﬁ—
cult to obtain comparable data. This
experience is a cue to the problems of the
conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric
therapies. The use of discharge ratings, di—
agnostic classiﬁcations, or length of hos—
pitalization as criteria in therapeutic
evaluations or the identiﬁcation of comparable populations are subject to extensive
error unless the institutions are clearly
matched for staff attitudes and style as well
as social class patterns in patient popula—
tions. These difﬁculties also extend to the
failures of scientists to conﬁrm clinical or
laboratory observations made in other labo—
ratories, for the lack of conﬁrmation may
reflect differences in populations and psy—
chiatric criteria as much as errors in the
original hypotheses. The use of the terms
“schizophrenia” or “psychoneurosis” to explore changes in psychological and biological
features of mental illness has led to a science
burdened by negative results. Even were a
valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods
to describe psychiatric populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the
hypothesis. Increased attention must be paid
to the classiﬁcation of subjects by “objective” criteria rather than our present
methods, so highly dependent on institu—
tional and observer attitudes and the socio—
psychological aspects of the therapist—patient
interaction.

25

Summary
Population

characteristics, deﬁned by
social class, age, education, and F score; were
related to treatment variables in three
voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment vari—
ables included type of treatment, duration
of hospitalization, diagnosis, and discharge
evaluation. Interinstitutional differences
were observed in patient social class, years
of education, and distribution of California
F scores, but not age.
The variations in treatment characteristics
among institutions were signiﬁcantly differ—
ent in the predicted direction. The institution
serving upper-class patients did have the
longest duration of stay, a higher proportion
of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and more com—
plex diagnostic schemata, a lower proportion
of patients receiving somatic forms of
therapy, and the poorest discharge ratings
among the three institutions. Similarly, the
institution serving lower-class patients did
have the shorter periods of hospitalization,
lower proportions of psychoneurotic diag—
noses, and the better discharge evaluations.
These variations in psychiatric practices
followed a pattern consistent with the social
class differences among the institutions and
are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
Such differences in institutional style make
comparisons of diagnoses, duration of hos—
pitalization, and treatment results between
institutions difﬁcult and tenuous, and the
need for more objective criteria for the
classiﬁcation of psychiatric populations is
emphasized.
Aided, in part, by grants MY-2092 and MY-2715, of the
National Institute of Mental Health, US Public Health
Service and the Nassau County Mental Health Board. Dr.
Max Pollack aided in gathering material for this study.

REFERENCES
Hollingshead, AB, and Redlich, F.C.: Social
C lass and Mental Illness: A Community Study, New
York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
2. Kahn, R.L.; Pollack, M.; and Fink, M.; Social
Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital, J Hillside Hosp 6:216—228, 1957.
3. Kahn, R.L.; Pollack, M.; and Fink, M.; Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitali—
zation, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis, Arch Gen
Psychiat 1:565—574, 1959.
1.

al: The Authoritarian
sonality, New York: Harper &amp; Brothers, 1950.
4. Adorno, T.W., et

Per—

Kahn, R.L.; Pollack, M.; and Fink, M.; Social
Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive Ther—
5.

apy,

J Nerv Ment Dis

130 2187-192, 1960.

N.H., et al: Social Class, Diagnosis and
Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals, Soc
Problems 10 :191-196, 1962.
7. Pasamanick, B.; Dinitz, S.; and Lefton, M.;
Psychiatric Orientation and Its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental Hospital, Amer J
Psychiat 116:127-132, 1959.
6. Siegel,

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�26

Families of Children Wit
nia
hi
hood
SchizoPhr
Early
Sc ected Demographic Informajion
L IS HENDRICKSON LOWE, MA, INDIANAPOLIS

PREVIOUS STUDIjS regarding

the

etiological importance of l‘family background
in childhood schizophr ia have produced
Kanner4
i
ressions.
and
diverse ﬁndings
has stated that autistic hildren are usually
found to have intellige , sophisticated pareducational
attaine
high
have
who
3a
ents
level. In his populatio 10f autistic patients,
grad—
school
high
the
we
of
parents
94%
and
49%
fathers
of
while
74%
uates,
of the mothers had co 'pleted college. In
another publication,3 he ‘emarked on a low
incidence of divorce :1 ng these families.
Bender,1 on the other h d, has noted that
'ong the parents
no such trends exist
of schizophrenic childre seen at Bellevue,
"

t

"

wide variety of backgrou
It has also been rep ed that a fairly
in
is
a
s
common
to
of
ratio
boys
high
these
that
and
ion,
schizophrenic pop
children are freq ﬂy the ﬁrstborn in their
male-fe—
the
lists
nder2
sibling group.
1
in a group of 142
male ratio as
7
of
under
chil
age.
en
years
schizophrenic
autistic
27
of
ulation
with
a
Phillips,6
is
which
boys,
that
noted
were
children,
also
He
6:1.
ratio
male—female
0
early
a
autistic
of
ition
ordina
data
on
presents
children. In the general opulation, the ex—
is
44.12%.6
children
ﬁrstborn
of
rate
pected
In a group of 635 disturbed (but nonautistic) children, Phillips found that
27
the
of
while
ﬁrstborn,
76.38% were
autistic children, 81.5% were ﬁrstborn.
that
to
data
these
suggest
Phillips interprets
autistic children differ from the normal
population in matters of sexual ratio and
ordinal position as do lesser disturbed chil:1
of
the
suggestion
out
dren. He points

continuum, with more vere childhood dis—
turbances appearing cw comitantly with a
higher ratio of boys 'l girls, and with a
‘l
stborn children. It
higher proportion of
should be noted that ny data on ordinal
position can be undistood better when
viewed in conjunctio with maternal age
at the birth of the chi
these various re—
Discrepancies amo
ports of data may be due to disparities in
om which samples
patient populations
were drawn. Bender nd Kanner, however,
drew their patient ample from different
population groups ,' ith respect to socio‘anner’s probably came
economic status.
largely from peopl in higher socioeconomic
groups in a unive ity community while
Bender had a wide population to draw
from in New York ci . Since this poten—
tial error is compounc d by the relatively
low incidence of c'dhood schizophrenia
in the general

.

The p pose of the present paper is
to make .available pertinent information
collected etween 1955 and 1963 in the Chil—
dren’s S :VICC of LaRue D. Carter Me—
morial Ho' ital, Indianapolis. The data on
children is compared with that
schizophre
obtained on y-\turbed children given diag—
childhood schizophrenia.
noses other
Since LaRue
Hospital is the only
nit for disturbed
residential treatmen
youngsters in the stat of Indiana, the patient population is probably representative
of all geographic areas of the state as well
as a variety of socioeconomic backgrounds.

t

Ca

Method

Subjects.—Included in the study were the children
whose preadmission diagnosis was one of emotional
disturbance, whether or not the child was admitted
Arch Gen Psychiai—Vol 14, Jan 1966

Submitted for publication March 18, 1965.
From the Indiana University Medical Center. .
Reprint requests to 64 Mercury Ct, West Springﬁeld,
Mass 01089.

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks, L. I. New York, 1959— 1962.

cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts MEntal Health Center and the C. F. Menninger Memorial
Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
The

Aided, in part, by grants My—2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

**

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�In their studies of the New Haven psychiatric patient population, Hollingshead and Redlich have reported significant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
hand the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excluded,

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to payu In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birth, These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratingsa In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingso
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)c Higher F scores, i.e,, greater stereo—
typy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recovered,
In the survey reported here, it was suggested that dif—
ferencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospital, To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the pro—
cedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -‘ Hillside
Hospital, the C. F° Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Bostono These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
equally available, yet served patients of different social classes°
Each provided short-term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care, Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psycho—
analytically—oriented psychotherapy,
This study was designed to determine the population character—
istics of the three institutions with respect to social class, age,
education and F score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and

discharge evaluation

among

the institutions,

�..2.~

METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside HOSpitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo—
phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
statuso The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2—factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutionso These comparisons were difficult however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intrathospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trendso These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
sizeso
The

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital may be taken for granted and either ignored or mentioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institutions, however, the many differences between institutions are accen—
tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific differences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome,
When

1. Designation of Type of Treatment: The
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy"
the institutions, making comparisons difficult.

criteria for

differed

among

At Menninger

Hospital psychotherapy was designated as
treatment administered on a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res~
ident physicianso No additional fees were chargedo
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy

designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students,
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psycho—
therapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident responsible for each case.

was

2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger HOSpital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric
Association, while both Hillside and MMHC followed different unitary
systemso Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono

�Table I

Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of im~
provement at the three hospitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep—
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)a For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other
30

institutionsw

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
1. Sociopsychological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observedo At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—'
cational attainment, with patients having mOre years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Manninger
did not graduateo
c) Education:

The

Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty—one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per~
cent with scores of 50 or above —- the higher F scores being associated with higher degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside
thirty—one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 300
d)

F

Thus, differences in social class, educational attain—
ment and performance on the F Scale were observed. These diff—
erences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables
2.

among

these institutions.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables

a) Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received

somatic therapy than at Hillside

(64%)

or

MMHC

Hospitalization:

(68%)

(Table IV),

three insti~
tutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)9
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per-cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two-thirds of the
MMHC patients were discharged within six months of
hospitalization°
b) Duration of

The

c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV), At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved" and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"e The highest
percentage of "recovered" or "much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centerm

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diag—
disorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diag—
nostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one—quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty per-cent of the
population°

Table IV

C.

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital comparisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillsidec Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periods“
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a yeare
The

Table

—-—\

V

�-7DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter-institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment var—
iables
duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7),
The

——

Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmed, The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.

It is

our impression that these differences in psy—
chiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populationso The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data, While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow

pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged,
a

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, gig}, where objective criteria de—
fining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disorderso Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his per—
ceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residence. Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications among the
three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the
examiners,

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one institution to another, Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results.
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment resultso
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutions°
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi—

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social background, It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria employedo This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
In our

"developing insight," or "working through one's problems.”
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been great—
ly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across in—
stitutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapies. The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hos~
pitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populations.
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other labor—
atories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the orig—
inal hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis'l to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective'' criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist—patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in—
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluationw Inter—institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distribution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted direction. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psycho—
neurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionsc
\Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the institutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
These

differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric populations is emphasizedo
Such

�REFERENCES

l.

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.

Sanford,

Brothers,

R. N. The
New

Authoritarian Personality°

York, 1950, 990 pp.

J.

and
Harper and

2. Hollingshead, A. B. and Redlich, F. C. Social Class and
Mental Illness: A Community Study. John Wiley and Sons,
Inc., New York, 1958, 442 pp.
.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216—228.

Kahn, R.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization,
G
Ps h'
Diagnosis.
1959,
.,
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

Sociopsychologic
Voluntary Mental
Discharge Ratings and

is 565-574.

Fink, M. Social Attitude (Cal—
Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. .leﬁﬂah_lkﬂﬂﬁ_Dlﬁ,,
M. and

1960, lﬁﬂ: 187-192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orien—
tation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. Ameri_la_£sxchiat., 1959, 116: 127-132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesiggation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality
Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality
Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete_Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

Interhosgital

Comgarisons for Sociogsxchological Variables
MEnninger

Hospital
N

I

Social

Class

III

Hillside

Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

IIIIIKEEIIIIIIHIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHEIIIIIIII
31%

7%

II

51

20

III

17

34
.

.

IV

1

34

V

O

5

X

2

=

121.5; df=8: p&lt;.OOl

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHNIEIIIIIIIIIIIHHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJBHIIIIIIII
19/
Ag e

20- 39

IIIINIIIIIlllllﬂﬂddﬂllllIIIIIIIHHEIIIIIIIIIIIEHIIIIIIIII
Years of

Educatio

&lt; 12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
jMenninger
N

Treatment

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

.m-m-mHospital

Type of

Hillside

Psychotherapy

Hospital

Somatic

Other

=82 8
Duration
of
,

Hospitallzatlon

7

df= 4

.

.001

months

7-11 months
~11 months

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
Unimproved
X

=

Schizophrenia

29.3' df=4' .&lt;.001

'

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder
X

=

52%

54%

22

17

26

29

23.8' df=4' -&lt;.001

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Ass

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30—39

61

30

40-49

30

20

50+

36

MMHC

14

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization

By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Menninger

Agg

Below 20

Hillside

81

20-29

73

30-39

61

30

ho-h9

30

20

50

+

MMHg

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
Menninger Hillside Massachusetts

.m---Hospital

N

Psychotherapy
Somatic

of
Treatment

Type

WW

Other

l

Duration of

Hospitalization

Hospital Mental Health
Center

9

21%

36%

2b%

h3

6h

68

36

--

8

»

.

_

.

_..W.xi:82-8:.§_£:-hz P&lt;-001
mud-Mm...“ w...»

W
7-11 months

x2=90.6; df=h; p&lt;.OOl

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

f

‘&gt;

.

M=H

Discharge
Diagnosis

.

.. .

A

_

Much

Improved

61

Unimproved

10

,WWWWWr

.

x3=29.3; df=L-

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

&lt;.OOl

~~_”__M

17

26

29

WmamWNW-w‘mm
mmﬂmw

—-_.——_...__.... . ~...

�Hillside

Menninger

Hospital

i

Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health

Years of
Education

'

F

Score

lBO-h9
‘

1

b1

l

50

i

38

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved

Sindrome
Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�1.

W
um.
mam.
W.
W
W
9.11.,

“at“.
.
1959.
I
law
“mu-m. 4...:
1.1.:

a.
3.

I.
5.

1.

Mun.

am.

m

W
W
man at mu:

tutu“.

mama-u.
tum-«Ina. 5.]. an nun». no.
M rm. m- we

Wm:
‘ M. In... ‘”.o
m.

3.1...

rum.

I. m m. 1.: mu:

mm

1::

I“ Maintains.
m.
Mm“ Ct WWW hail-“u “ I 7.1““ In“!
lupin): PM“... u wanna“... hum um
and Emu,
A!
195’:
“’05“;
u
Km. mt... nxm. I. «a an. 1.: um: “um.
(ﬁnal-m 3 m1.) and mum W,
1,60.
“I'd”.
m:
and
8.
I...
mm...
I...
mm.
PM».
thuﬂ'tt
Mutant. m 1“ “um n W” m mun.
1-

an.

11.1...

ram.

I.

and

H

6.

I...

m"

. mm: mm».

1959.

-..1L,.}x.;....h..

W

W

.132-

m-m.

�I. I. ‘M

mm

mmto

may. Wan-I ml "um
Mahal‘ mm. mum at. W if ”all
nun. m. mama-aim, rump-um“
at
in. “but. man a noun-mun. mu
nd unit"- «than.
h lama-um magnum“: Wm“ an
a:
:new mu m. "an
mm
smut“a: man all dun-mun a! mum ! ”an. m.
lupin!”

at «I.

mmmuwmmumm
manua- m I“
“Wham “threat
ti. New mutt-I.
no” mm a urn-mm. ”an... “no:
mm on” «mm m
”non mm
manual-n all an at
n has; manna-nu.
3.

to In

1:

b.

with

a

an

S.

«no mo mt»
“nun, a minus-nun. nu ma.»
Amman man“ um “mm. at m

Wu,

m
I» m
of

mu!“
and

no

W
“ﬁlm a mum:
abs-nun «ital-u 0:

In“... I: ”huts“.

«may.

at

m‘

�’1‘!-

banana“... a «awn :- WWI «mum

mu
“mu m

a-

«was
m
may»
to
“I.“ it. mutton at. «m1:
n:mm
mm
a ”no“ mung.
mm
mm
«I :0:- na“ uum am an» M0 mm»... a»
.1
to
atomlulu-I
m
u
an
mm
”WI.
of
Human".
a.

m
“mama.“ mun... tummuww
mwuumarmuuuwmum»
“on
mun-tn. «was. u u m u a. mm:
MﬂWM-ulﬂmmu'MW
W.
mm' “Wan” mu“ a. W h
tun-u
(ukunow“:
uﬁ
m1
Won
and

at

«a

at

mun-wwwuﬁuﬂmn.
In
runs-w
and
Ina-um.
m
an
mm“;m
m

to

n

to
I».
n u m mm mun mm». min“..Mutant: h an“. a uni mum. Mun“
u’
b.
an“
«mum
u“ u m Wins“: ”on”
than
w
'nunun'
uxwu
«Mun
nun
Mama;

“mung-M autumn»...th
and

.- taut-um}. «I aim «um

WW

o!

my

manual.-

m ﬁwﬂi-nttut 13mm.

�man-mum.» man

:mmw What

in than

m um mm.
a“
1..

was, "um". nu

It: rm.

m
W!»
M‘mp an “Oil.
“a

or

of

"tum mum

um.
mm.

um.

am.

Wam;

'0’.

in!"
0:
I24”!
an»
a: Inga!“ 1.3..“an. mu
«any man mu

mum. Wu

mus-m
a. “and.
an in him

m
mmmumomnummmmuum

wwumuu

mamwmmea.
mm: MM“.
01
um»:
Imam.
'0:th
um
Wt
‘7;
'0’.
'0'.
mm.
1/0""

��unmumm.
mmrm
nit-a ma
lunar I m. in!" «an!»
ma
nth,
:- ”unto annual Wthan: ”man“ an m
(1.6}.

no

Mm“ m mun thorn”. “mulls“ In! a 0mm

pm.mmnmmmummndumn
and.

mm

that
at
tun
not!”
«an»
an
“h
mm“
cam 1a mam «rant: n! ”’0th tan-taut nanny

hmwammmmumuummm
in arm unu- uu-u. mum...
ma um nun-um
to

~mum«cumin-nuns».non-mm“amounting“.
9.!
the
“Ian
ca.
”and...
9.10.:th
..
ma
mm

mummmwmmuommmn
loam Nth an“! mm. Mn “tutu“!!!

M
«ant an“:
with

mof

01'

tin

mutton that that «no! ”that.

nuns“. It In

“than“

tint

1-

than

in
in
n
«mum-u:
an“
“that. W!
mum
tunianat a“ much In!) 1. a man mam. nth a

than

W
WWW-what“
mammmuMum-Wmuan
nu tun
«pin-ha
M

W

“at: and not!»

rm:

«Input-natahat
nay-haw

mm

mm Wit "It“ “roam
”In“!
a: voluntary nun-tn m «an ant ”and. «than: «an.
‘1’

mom-anarmauu-mmumm

�as-

mum mm»... «I m manual: I!“
in
and
I
mm
m
mo“
In.
was
mm
m.
to it. “but man»
a ”I.“ in:
of
o:
mo
a
What. mm mama“. W:
um may” ”all.“ can a. “guano”.
or

man

�.5...

l my 0! .11 ”mm. “‘1‘ ”mu 1. mm
115!1.
than
a
mnum In
m.
3m.
and
ad
mun! mm man. «law “no“. only.
mommwu mm In!“
cum (age) can mwm by m
In 3mm.
at 1 was. «MW “a“
walnut: n m
hand. an, wan-tutu ta- 3 most“
want.
it.» ”in“: an mam In: th It“: Mann 0: am
I
“minim “aka. I.» mum m an: a»

mm

.wmumn
m.

m

m
W
“Gamma-m. mhsmmmummmu

«M'nm-mumuwmmmm
at
at
as
max
in
aw.
mum. mm

m
m Inn-am
1m «mm
man I“ mun m W a. ““7
“I. mm“:
u m.
W
m ”WM“ In“!
mm.
m
m
u

tutu“!

cu...

-

or 173

Old ’5

at

tau-«u

«r

a

(U).

“a!“

no at

«on It
pm!»

"hum
man
rum to a. mum: mm“ can. out sauna”
I. all u Wm uuuuuna. than
an
o:
”mu
«am
mm
mm.
In.“ «sauna ban. no” mum-3m. an no» In“:

a

and: “an“

m,

ﬂu

“WM W».

or the

W
mm

a“ when.

1.-

of

m

«mnupwummwcwnma
it. mm m autum- vﬂi nun- a: kins»
«mm m.

�matmartin am

m

I'm a:
gunman.
«to: he gram at out”

tn "mm m man! u
in “am“ a ”nu.
“and a mum! mm.
Mutation m “MI-pun M um auroral. «a m a

m.

imam
«nu-um
m «mum.
am
an
on
than
in
manual»
it “uh-mu “mm
and
m; mm ”aunt ”mm. a sum “it my
1|
cum-mu:
um um Manual “0 his
an an"
.8 an

and.

awn

«mom. Wan-numoumumm”
or
an
dug-nut
«an.
I“
In.
train“,
a
m
cm
“an a hat-o»
a)

m.

74.4-.2,‘

;

4%.:

s

n. ham.

:0:-

muuuu
”am my!“ 'MQMMW“ mam.
in» muu‘m. has... many a amnmauu

m
caucus.

that a

W
”M
WWWWnammuwnnw
magma m» ”as” m .mm
loan“!

A.

m “in.“ u

in.
tout-u a» m pmmwu mu.” m manna M
of "him :mamun an.» an.
n lama mun:
m 4mm a
Who“ was“ um: in
taunt. In“
n:-

an

mm
mm.

a

�ol-

M!
mm.”
mum
«nuts... .0 moi-mm il- muuu pmmm. I. m«an m m “a“.
u no human“: mm in!“
W‘ mm.

at: not

but

m
Wm
manna»
mau..
m

on
n
o:
mitt-u
«01mm
m
Mo ration“. mmxuuu. ”cal mm... an" m
m1“: sad-nu. m1 m6. at not Ion-tau an at

mm a “I

nun m Wu“
um num "mm 3»me n m mm for
annual:

mumt’a

1..

mamummuumumruum.um
at out: out.

Wc
a“ mum

W103

W“.
Inuit-(u lupin}.

Imam). manna-1

I»)

Wu

rm
m

upland

m

“(ﬂu-1‘3. M.
”1:131. minus"

«a nun

mun

Ir an “aim Moll-m.
mu
nut-m «a me 2.11“ mm mm. toms;
at
0» mm a mm I.
m1” tun-u. tuto
an a» stunt“ mural-um 1m umu01’
um the
m savanna... hm unman- pn-

nu n

m
am.

"mat u

e!

tho

m.

man

mm.

mm
In». I

that man-u

wt“

in

no.“ and «mu.

�I'.

W«an. Wow“).

an anti". nuns at
with, a monk manua- In

”Inn! as am“

W.
WI”.
W
mxmummmnmmuumu
hmmmmhmuaamtumdmm
m

unnu- Iuﬂial «4

mm
"In: In

(mm 11).

mm.

W

m.

m an CW a. luau-an
k m .10“). um: at tho um 1”“..-

a. “swung at w- mmlu “ mu! gun.

than“: «a «mum I Bah can nun the “no
“inﬂuen- u "an“ 1. mu :11.

:30.

mm
”It In

Mmlwuﬂmcum
|)WI
mu: .m- nun-tun a: Nu
mun-um.
n
m
Ian-nut m papa-«u m pun-nutty mar

W
Ila" ”In“.
at

lupin}, ”“1. cm"

”mm m
“am

In!“ cow,
t) m: M. an I.
h m manna-1 mutant».

losl'ill

«A at

Wt-

nun.
an m «unsung-

�olol.nntanun1
In
par-lasaaui
attrirll
it.
a‘ﬁatulani. Itiﬁ»ytﬁlliﬁﬂ hivtI¢:I000.ruurI It oiuanﬁton at

I)

luggaggggp

Gum.
In!»
mm
W...“
mac n m «at at m with.“ u m m at “Input“
an
5113!“:
a:
)3
«at
put
0‘1:
M
hut am.
n
wm
m In mu.

lupin:
an
n
Mm

W

6) Iggggggp

Iaullrtlaut astrlrunuun

an an. diatribmtion

«twuthIMhmmm.
It'll-lanaur
It
it!
rmmmmmuammaum.
ﬂu
“in“.
”an“
m
MM
mi,

you

an.‘

only night

in
in!

MW
an!

patﬁuutu but 1 ashram 8.1.! 30.
‘hn hints!
«out with IOIIOO at so
ii-vu

I count: bdlcﬂ 30
but!“ 30.

of

w:-

no.

that. u‘plﬂlo an},

m. m madam

m

at Qt! pcyulaﬂiunn ant. abuarvua.

twang, per «03$ ulna

n “a mu: cm:

an ”an: an

Italttluaui

31:!Ivuncou is oduatﬁiaaux u‘ﬁailncat «at pivﬂhuumnn¢ on thI 3.310. than. Qitrbvunnon puMIxt tuiﬁtua tbs hrvoﬁhtoiu
cunnnrltuu tun rnlaﬁSUI a: Quatapquhalcciaul ttutnrn ‘0 ch.
my

mm mm m mum“.

ussnltzounttr tuna! antiantl at ﬂhlllltlr Insulin: (hJi) ran
outwit nuuntlu Chutupy ﬁnal at 8:11:11; (6&amp;5) at aunt (683)
Q: etc"! in lbhlc It.

�..

m
to
rm. ”an":

«tum mun

W

usu-

(m1. 1?).
loans. at“ ‘5‘

III

manual:

m
”an“ m. minus-d

,,

.,

-,

a my

loath).
a! ”that! Stand.“ for “it" an“. It
to 31 9.: mt at the must“ manta n4

m. mod
Wiwmwmummmuuxmtmza
Guam. mmxuwctuuuxnxummm

mummmnmwaumwum
at
In
Myst-awn“;
mm
am:
«maul
m

mm

out baptist. an
(mu
mm.“ In a. “no at dun-W a
1"). M
a mm
ﬂuvial.
(:9!) d ”that: um and in “WW“ «I! only i
«11.06
pus-at
at “m Wand".
m
“an
It. “about moat-co I!
I! ”am mm”
um... (:65) an a. mu‘
a:
(m)
with! lat“ mm.
M. to“ at w:
.,

m

W

a)

‘

.,

In

_.

W,

“W"
mm.

”W“
"W“

mac. ”W“
In 11qu W3. mu W“:

W“
W:

“may nu “is: “human. “taut. mu”,

m min-mun m pmmuw mam (an. 1').
m “mu: grower-“u: it ”an" am. a».
um “all.” for 8111:!“ mm ms in m: Elm“; m but

W

mm“!
amt“:
«um
a .mmmu u “that" mums.

in" dunno! an

um

We,
haunt: haunt ”samurai: n‘ mutant?
2::

.1:

may:

�«to.
naiuunaal

(it any. than titur par oaa‘ at in. population.
Stilt I?

“m.W
I!» intrtnhocyttil otQinttual Qau’arincul wart
Ianatod'by a itrtaiv it uaﬁhnn¢a¢¢i¢01 grdblaun. lint uran-

an§~oat
c.¢ﬁmlttp:1
urttnriu
It:
lbw it. lubd1v1::aa of ﬁlpﬂll‘l‘ll; in pav‘ It. in tho hulacnno~
1‘7 of 5h. puyuiatznn viihin aleh.1alttia§lon and to It. nuan
pl. tins. x. ‘33 ntntiutical aanlynau watts; I ain't. sultan
tn‘ita auv¢ru1 0411: VI?! dhiuintn ﬂittt had uaﬁlnr you. at
thin: than :17; cut... that an&amp; yovnlttaug a catsnsuoinnr

iaost

030 tank

tltrltnnpttal
I.

tan%

It nailing!!!

.3 tin iyrvtIOita.

with that nuthnailautaal ltnstuitou nan. trundItntlur ﬁn thni than! in it: IDVIIUI tinny III. Iluurvui. Il‘hanch in! auto ot’ntitaatlcal signittauaan. 81th raunrl so
loluc‘aun at tvnainnnt. sq: umwnpln, in. an: 1 near. uurc
(bald rel-todlb Xinntnair 33:919.! (axdqr 3" light! 3 salt.

puttunts nova trigulutlr'ruoaﬁvlns Ollﬁ.&amp;ﬂ thartlr). Out I
score Ilia. at nxxxuaac.
hcucth at hooy1¢n11anaon nil oircnclacaaal can I!!!
rtlnﬁcﬁ It tutu chm Quanta!!! can Illlnlln InlpIQ|1n - tit

�W

ﬁttl

m
mm
1m.»
a.
mm.
mm
«a nuts-Inn" m nW£ in an. m lupin}...
mum“

can!“ Mismatmm (Mb 1) Mn»

tau-nu
ruched

m

Ito,

1m

5“ 15! 9‘ ”Man

m
W

than a

m.

mu t

m

the

m

or so

�.12»
aggﬁuaaggg

an man

In
Inn-yuan In

or

Watt-to
alum
m

in. mm «um-mt Manama-u:
6311mm 0: gaunt. u m min. an»)... 3: run
and
nanna‘aan
$001.1 Ullﬂl, iii It. can: in tilirtbu‘inu
it
or alum-u: r lulu can” and in ml: or m “in.“
virlnblou .. Iﬁrn‘lnl of hnI’tIIISuD‘AOI, unlocttul ﬁt
and
was.» inviting“ 0: «mu m tum".

it. qnpto$ctlau ﬁltﬁ tit tliﬁtllttOI alvvtlt
01m ”tuna mu in. th- an”! «man at am.
a mau- pm“... a!
and
tum-u an m:yln
«but... in» pm.- at ”an“ mu»
«a: pm!» Mum“ "um
in arm (an qt
«I. out min-d. Inﬂow. m mus-um amt-u
Ovulunitill.

w
mu.

W“.

W.

lint! 01.3! yatlsﬁli ovtatii Ihutﬁan parluiu at halptﬁultaliacl,
1n
3: paw-mu mm”, and mm m.

pm
cm” mmnm.

umum
M
mun
at. Will-M m mum in
It :- «r

m

mm

«Ilium

«um m t. «(tum mutt»
1n

in

min-

um:
an
win.
1.:

must“ to”... muuum 1: «am at human»
um aunt. u at. tho min“: of magma: rmuum,
mmu Quinn-u. «Imam or punt-than”. m m

«an.

and

Mt

a:

m“

«a. M. “van“.

�~13-

nkumMm'mlrrmo-um «mutumu
a» man.

mawdmmtmme-v«qu
up“ a mu cum "mun
«nun»
Mn

a-

unummmmuummuumnm.
«umummvmmtummm”mumsthe
M
nut Many
m
W1. mu. Mm mu:
m
”an“
pm!
mm,
mun
M
W

tummﬁmmmtmﬁmuauwu
than
m

“law.

in. «mu
mmm rum»
M
m pom» What man. u m,
mm.
x...
3..
in
u
mi;
who“.
ma
Mun-t.
mm»
mm
ﬁlo
which
“I!
ma It”. ”um“
IWQ mm. m
in

m

and

ummummuuuumuunmm.
ill mm mm» mu“. m m it".

usumumsuucwmmmtm
It
on
nun»
”tram «ﬂow 9. manna.

«a

MI»
III
u
“out.“ mm mm. mu
mm
pm:
a. ham m: m m «scum m We
Oh.
at
a!
u»
may
u
“an
um.
man
a.
m mu I. is. mumn'l m "um,
I. um an m Mm Mat mutton :- tho

W

W

m

�«15.

W
W
«Mm-Quantum. nmmmmm
x. my mum. mxnm'
at
Mal-at

mm

vacuum
u
m
a»
an
«sum
at
m
(5)

hwmm'tWMWMWu-num
«that ”I". Ml In has nun-m mm a a.
mum cw. rub WW «m t mm“ mm
mumcmxnmummmmumm.
MMMummnuuuMu-rmun
nun-nu: mu m mu, It to II! mun“.- an

mmomomumu$hmmwu
”but: u m "not a: m mum's my a m
mn.mummammmmmwumm
unqu- muo- u 'mm mt“. n ‘mm
at" wanna".

w
mu
“mun“ In“ «mu-m
«nu-comm.» “Mina mm.
“MI: W
WI.
manual.
«1m
M
m
m mthat“). m
“no

haw

by

m

the

win-hm

not}... at

mumm-

W:
mwmmmuunmumm. mm

for tho”

‘8.

maﬁa“

that

to
Mﬂm‘t
it
a
aw
“not” ”ﬂaw “in.
Muwuum‘wmumnama
a: mum). In a mu" than“... may
nomad“.
tummuuucmmmm.
Mu Hum, am“. nm-mum a mu at
‘

�WW
m
We W

Aspects of

in

mom

L. Kuhn.

Biol)...

Mn:

Volmmy Hospitals

Pollack, Ph.D.

Nlﬂ'micl 81.301, Bub.“

ski
Max

Fink, 11.13.”.

�WMmdanwlmth-mﬂmsmumtudat
th- Dcpu'tnnt of
Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,

61m Oaks,

L.I.,

Wm

N.Y., 1959-82.

MWofﬁuauffsofﬁummmm
thathOuTtwmmc.F.MminwaHo-pimismtem1y

mm.

Aidld, in part, by grant: Hit-2092 md bit-2715, of the Nttimal
Institute cf Hontal Hulth, v.3. Mlle Health Sonics; and the
Nassau Oumty Minn]. Halt!) Bond.
*
**

m

*ﬂ

HIP

-

12/15/81!

Adm”:
:

:

mamm, Winn Hospital

chmnw,
Division of

National Institute of

Wadi,

Md.

NELLY.

Natal Halth,

of Fwd-Aim at the mam
Institute of Paydxiatry of the School cf
Unimity of Nissan-1, mo
Main,
Amend Strut, St. Louis 39, Ho.
Department

�Inthirsmdiosofﬁuwﬁmmtﬂcpatimtpopuhﬁm.

Wmmmmmmadmiﬂmtmmbumuxm

maw'smummmmmmmmmmosmam

unamtypucfdimoddbmwmmmofpoydduuic
ﬁninﬂmdﬂ'nmicatmofﬂn
mimtmﬂnnvdlabmtyofmwdngml,m,mmtmd.

WWQ).

mummhotmutmmmmrormiunm

Mind-Wefpaﬁmt'sﬂnmcesmdthcmihbﬂityofmmu

mama
WW.1m1udim MdMIpaydmmy,Wﬂm~apymomwldw
Hillsidn I-Ioapitalinlgm.

Inﬂaiahospital,avu~htyof

Minmmﬂabhtompatimtanmmsofﬂnirabmwmm.

Inﬁmeamys(¥,5)mobmdﬁutpaﬂmhmpitniudfmﬂuumt

mmmom,mmmimmmmoﬂmoffmimmm.
Mam.mmdmnmmmmlymamdbymﬂdw
Wadmimdmfavmhcmﬁmﬁsmm. mm,

m,miwmmmmmmmmitmmdfwlm

m.mm1ywpymmmmmwmm.
Mammalfwmmmommodmamofmmtypy.“

W
W,
famdinpudmﬁdagmudasinwlutimﬂwyahmia,wlmmmfmfw
California

I"

Beale

(1,8).

WPW.

1.3.,

wen often

Wiwmmy.hoap1miudfwmmm.mdmmmm
Wummmdormmmd.

Inthinmy,itwmamutadﬂntd1ffmsinpoydmmamat‘

WmmpiWMduﬂmtminfhmofmlfwmunm
fwﬂnpuﬁmtswitmnmmmothapim. Tomtmhsugguﬁmitm

�qummpmmmmmsvmmmmmummm
35.118160

tbspim,mc.P.WW1IbapitalinTcpoknmdﬁn

Wmmnwmmminamm.

mmmmumd

ﬂmﬁnmumMﬁWWpatimofdiffmtmnmmd

mamawrmdmdbitammwmmmmmmim.

Mwamm-mmdwlmmmdm,mddom

W

Whamwmmmwithafullﬁm
staff and native mm units. may miss

midnmtodhlm.

”Wr-

mmimtimﬁmwiﬂtmpmtomlclus,ago,emdmmdang

anmmcmmsﬂammmtmmofwofmt,
Wofmiunntim,dimismddismmmmmgminstimtims.

'

�WI)
Ammofmwlmwy,adultpatiminmidaminthoimtimHospitals
timmmdertdminJm,1959. WMwdeimido

hadmlmmmimmly,amnnmofmnmmmmmm
mammtm)mmimdwmmmmimicmlmﬁmor
mmmofamemzoﬁmicsmhmpimmmfaxmrwa

mmmmmtmmmm

moiﬂememmjwt.
ofﬂnirmvulmtmnm. mealifminl’amlemoomedfwam

patimtmﬂuwmday.

WmmhmﬁnMddi-WMMW

mamﬁusminlmdpsydﬂnudcfwmdﬂnm.

Forum

amma,mmW2~£WW-ammofmm
mW~mW(2;8).mmmhdmmimdof173Mmm

www.menmmrmdasnmmmmmmmomm.

WWW
mmummummmmmmuuummm.
ofﬁnmhﬁamofﬂumhlmm

m
diffmsdismmdbelw.
madam m

diffiwlt

My.

These

became of

Mass musical

difﬂmltleswmmtmdinmim~

Inspimmmm,mdmowdingly,inmm1yauofmkmovumbm

mm

diffmnm batman institution with citation of
M. diffimdtiualsoladmmiuinginfmtim

ambush will be placed on the

mm.

fermdcta,whiehismmmedinﬁnmingpopuatimmlesm1nﬁu
tables.

�1.

mmmm
Hmmpwtingmfmmimtituﬂm,ﬂnsmwtmofﬂn

mapitalwhowmfwgrmudmdthwimmdormﬁmdbﬁeny.

The

mammmﬁhmmmmmmmmn
Whileﬂmeinstitutimswmummas
mmmuplemum.

Whintawhing,mmdnmdmmpmm,ﬂmmhmﬁmuny
mmainwmmddainﬂmoedﬁndntaofmnudy. Spocificpmblm

mpmnhmtinﬁnduiyuﬁmoftypeofmm,dmticcludfmﬂaw,mmm1mt1mo£mmtmrtm.

of” “W:
mm
apnﬁmtmivad”poy&amp;wﬂumy"diffmdmgtmmmm,mkingm
mowimdafcrduigutingthxt

0.)

punbilitydiffimlt.

Atmprwmmmmdumum

Wmapmmmmnbyamffmhmfmmm

patlmtwmdmmdafu. Sesamwiﬁlﬁnpoyddxmamimtmom~

dmmdmmmismdmpatimtm.

Wt
suffpaymiattimdidmtmtptﬂm,but

At 111mm. Hoapitnl

psyduﬁmupy was Mimd as

apaydﬂatricmim.
madam: ﬂair activities to swish; midst“: physicians.

WWW.
the
At

sessions with
Ho

additimal

WWW: Natal than}! center W133; was animated

uﬂnhmtimofmydiaciplkns~psydﬁaﬂicmsidmts,poydmlogim,

mm.nmesmdmdionlatm. Pmlmmofswhmsm

�WW=

Rndmofimmtatm
mmﬁulsvuiodinfm’cmddotaﬂ. nudismmingatmmm
«valuation
for
social,
with
a
Wmlogial
bipartite
lupin]. m
"pm.
'31

W.
8!!th
W
hndglobalntilm-ddngitdiffiwlttoumsﬁuem‘udbuﬁmofeach
factorofﬁul‘hminscrsyamﬂablcn). rammmmhmm
111118163

83d

Mental Health Center

Hospital

mmmwmmgmmormmmumm.
Table

LEW
The

II

distribution of the variables of social class, ago, education

�mdcmmmhFSodesma-mgﬁnthmeimtimtimsinmmd

in'rathII.

TABIEIII

a)

menu:

hmticipawdiffminsomlclus

miﬁmofﬁuﬂmimﬁmtimmobm.

Athmingorﬂoopital

ﬁnpopulaﬂmmmﬂywrohu;atiﬂnsmghpim,middle

Maguﬂatmﬁmmmulmm 0mm,pmdominmtlylanr
class.

b)”; Mmmdiffmsinagedistrimiminﬁn

MWWW.
'm-popuhtiaualmdiffusdinadtmtmlattaim

mm:
munithpatimtshnvingmmofmtimatmhwmspim
mummmmummmm.

Whilehlpcramtofm

Mubatmwmtmhmwmol,mly32permtat
Hillsidsmdzspermtatmmdidmtmm.

mm:
CalifomiaFSulammoobsmod.

Wiminﬂndistrimﬂmofmmm
Fifty-unwantofl‘hminm

patimhndrsmbolwaa,mdmlyuia1tpcrmntwithmof
SOwabM«ﬂnh1§nvPsmboinguWwaiﬂxhigmdcm

013W.
”WMPWWMMummlymmmtm-e
Incontmt,atﬂillsiduﬂﬂrty~mpormtofﬁn

1301:1330.

���WW

ambit“

paint:
of
variablu
ﬂat
nodal
in
durum:
Win-m: 1111:.me
yomofdmtimmdaoahlclus,hutmtm;indhtrlhrﬂmot
ot than wlmmy

The

hospitals

CaliforniaFSedasmgmminMofﬂquhsw
osmium of hospitalizatim, «mm of Wits and 613W
ameddiMavaluatimsc?)mmﬁmthatﬁumsﬂtutimsmﬂzgwclaaspatientsmuldmmlmgmdtmim

«We

diagrmcs mdmemplex
of stay, ahignrpmwrtim
forms
somatic
of
waiving
patimts
schemata,
pmportim
War
diagnostic
each omfirmd. Similarly,
and pmst die-m ratings
of
the institutim serving lwer class patients wimed shame» perm of

W,

m

hospitalization,
Wartime
evaluatims.
low

diam

of

W,
We

and

better

Itiamimpmanimthattﬁusediffmsinpsydﬁmmt-

mt an

related to differences in staff attitudes than to
in populations. mu contrasts batman institutions in

more

611’st

Workmapitannﬂmmmt,mmmmludtyofdhgmﬁc

(Ii-m
mamuIdmtofnmd-dm. mmmticdiffm
WMWumlyidWmﬂosMﬁuyfonwapattm
Minions.

evaluation, daﬂnitimc of psyemthumw,

antosanialdﬂfmnm mhmwiﬁam‘vmfhdim.

and

�inﬁmcpsymiaudamitmmdmﬁawituhmm
specific, 1.0., when objoctiw

mm

defining

W

of Imam

,psydxmemismdpuvamnty

dmdmlmbmtyﬂum's
the M18

attitudesmdupectatiombm

This
classificatim.
md
pumpkin:
form:

321qu

wwmmbymmdc,mnitzmdkfm(7)inmnudy

«mmwmmammumm. MW

mmmhassigmdtodiﬂmmdidmtdﬁfwinw
Simiﬂamt
m.odmudm.agcormisdmcm
ofmum,mita1

diffmmdidm,mm,inﬂuimimofmdimu

m1..bhm1ngnrﬂoopitalmmmsthighlytmimdpmmlom-

WW,Witspntimtafwmlmgutdmwhufmt
mﬁmtndimoudauclﬁmmia.

Myanitmpormmw

�Wt
mamm,mmpsmmtwmmm,
malts.

Mm,inm,

uhieh

ismtimlusivcin

“MGQMCWWMW‘WWMMOGWW,
minim Wutic efficacy
ofﬂnimtitutims. Wedonothamindepmdmtcrimiaform
Thu” findings do not mﬂnct

than

quﬂityofam,mﬂummto£mpmb111tyofpopulatimam

motinmamﬂnimﬂmim.

Simeﬁnavaluatimm

Wmﬂninﬂitutim'smminga,mboummmdiffemm

mﬂaethﬂaﬁmmﬁmmmmwfwcmmofimmt
mm

than my intrinsic maxim-10

In our

initial

mm.
it

3111316: study (5)

was

postulated that

diffmt

«mm
mm 1W1: m
Itmmsmmtﬁnhimmmm'ssocial
utilized for poms of

of

W.
WWmmhxmwimwlmd.

social

Thishashm

nun-llyomﬁmdinmmmtamdy,withm'am1ma

'Wmummdmmngﬁngotmmmmw
tints. Mmidcmmoymmﬁngmmdxmmdw
“WWW“,itiswmtmdonﬂutfwlm
Mmmmapttommwmmhﬁmtom
unofwﬁupaﬂmt'smpmitytommm,whihfmwm
palms 6!. criteria
mama-'3 or

Wis.

mm mm

such

ain't

will): intmgiblos

mm."

as "developing

�mummmdmmmmmmmdmemuo:

Wifwmmpaymmicw,mmhmmﬂyw

bymmﬁmdologimlpmblmofatwiumsimtimﬁms.

Thane

imﬁtndmmumfwﬁnbcmﬁamlumpmdﬂn

Wmmmdmbmmdmmmwmd.
obtain

mm
Mammuammﬁnpmblmofﬂumdaulm

65.1ch

data.

But

in

style

made

it difficult to

mmblc

ofmantiwstaﬁatim,apocidlyinﬁuommimofmmimie

Mics. Mmofdismmﬁm,dimﬁcﬂudﬂaﬁmsor

Mdmitmuﬁmumminmmmwﬁu
to extensive
of

warm
imtitutims
mien

countable popuhﬂms

the

m

clan-1y

m swim

mm

m

for staff attitudn cad

styhumllusocialclasspaminpatimtpomlaﬁom. cholicve

mmfmmmommﬁufaﬂmofmimﬁsummﬂm

mbmmrmdmmimmmmmmmw

sdmbmduudbymmiwmulu. Manudobmatimtobo
Whamlnbomtmy,ttnmﬁmdsmmtavaﬂablctodaym

mmmmmmmmrwmmmm.

�-13-

Inam‘asod

attunticn must ho paid to tho althodblogiaal prcblumn of

classifying

mjom

mlthads, so highly dnpgndant an

m

criteria
institutional

by ”objcativa"

than the present

and obonrvur

attitudul

mmmmmmmammm-pmmm.

�Wmmnsxm
1.

Inﬁmowydmmic-mmmmgmﬁtnn,

WWmmammmmmtm-hbm.

Populatimsmdcﬂmdbyaomlelus,m,adumtimmfsm.

mmmhmmtypoofumt,dmﬁmofhmpitmadm.

Wwﬂmmmﬂm.
2.
3191131121“:

inurhwﬁtutianl

diffm m

obscured in

Wﬂmofpatimtsoahlelus,ymofodmutimm

diuudbuﬁmofcuifwml‘m,butmtago.

mmmmmwummmum
timmfmmbouigﬂﬁmﬂydiﬁmtinmpmdicmd
3.

dim.
It.

mmmmymammmnmnm

mumtwithmmclusdﬂfmwmgimﬂmdmsmdm

thuidiosynmtie.
5.

matrmmmmmmummmof

W,mumof)mpimnmim,mdmammultnbam

mmwﬁmdtmmm,mmmdfmmobjwdw
«imamimdmofmmﬁmsismim.

�REFERENCES

1.

Adorno, T.w., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,
&amp;
New
Brothers
York, Harper
R.N.: The Authoritarian Personality,

1950.

Two-Factor Index of Social Position,

Hollingshead, A.B.:

mimeo—

graphed publication.
Mental
and
Class
Social
F.C.:
Redlich,
&amp;
New
John
Sons, Inc.,
Wiley
York,
Community Study,

Hollingshead, A.B. and

Illness:

A

1958.

R.L., Pollack,
Selection of Therapy in
M.

Kahn,

Social Factors in the
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside

and Fink, M.:
a

1957.
216-228,
g:
§g_p.,
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis,

Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,

l:

565—57h, 1959-

(CaliM.
M.:
Attitude
Social
and
Fink,
Pollack,
R.L.,
&amp;
Ment.
Nerv.
F
Dis.,
J.
and
Convulsive
Therapy,
fornia Scale)

Kahn,

122: 187-192, 1960.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz,

Psychiatric OrientaTreatment in a Mental

S. and Lefton, M.:

tion and Its Relation to Diagnosis and
1959.
127-132,
Amer.
J. Psychiat., llé:
Hospital,
Siegel, N.H., Kahn, R.L., Pollack,
and Treatment in Three

M.

and Pink, M.:

Social Class, Diagnosis

Psychiatric Hospitals, Social Problems, 10:

191—196, 1982.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

~W‘_

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Improved

Unimproved

Unimproved
Syndrome
.._.W

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Markedly Improved

W-

�III

TABLE

InterhosEital

Comparisons for SocioEsychological Variables

Hillside

Menninger

;

Hospital

Hospital

Education

17

’

(92)

N

3

Score

1

i

’

F

Massachusetts
Mental Health

;

10-29

1

3o-h9

W7

51%

i

’41

g

(163)
33%

50

10

g

i

76
20%

1

'1

38

}

50-70

8
1

i

17

g

M

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
Massachusetts
lHillside
iMenninger
Mental

Health
Center

IHospital ‘Hospital

‘Psychotherapy

of
Treatment

Type

Somatic

h3

Other

Duration of

Hospitalization

36

’

7-11 months
1

months

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

Much

Improved

61

’
.

'Unimproved

10

%

I

9

.

-

_

mw.,,__,‘&lt;2=29-3s df=1v

ﬁanQwawiwﬂj
I

Discharge
Diagnosis

tr-‘a-m-th-A
_

...-A.Wn‘.m

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

.W---

85
Sh%

1?
26

29

”-

-.- —-”“—

w-

�TABLE V

Duration of HosEitalization

By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

h2

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

3O

hO-h9

3O

20

50+

M9

�‘— ‘7

-w vuwlr-u'rﬂmmm

—-u--

“Tm—“vii

W
Hm:

W.

21, man

911.13.

Hill-M- Wu}.
P. 0. Dan: 33
man Odes. the You:

W81
,
mm. mm
mmmlht:
MWWIMBWMbyaWo-n
I
whammmm'mmmmmmrmunm.
Midwinbutlmzldlﬂuewrymm
IMMMM
Mtﬁzhfwwblmw . Wumﬂulntdmﬁmfm
Wh.metMtoajml,ImﬂAlihto$smm-d
Hm,I
mmmmwmuwmmm.
singlubmmtittoamofﬁujwmmmwm
to .
81

FILE.

‘

‘

mm,mmmqumummxwmt
mwmumwtm-mmdtmjmw.
WWW.

ma:

�ﬂv

psychiatric treatment,
haMﬂm

and
research

December 2h, l96h

Dr.

Max

Fink

Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
Shoo Arsenal St.
St. Louis, Missouri
Dear Max:

(E)

/
(:&gt;

let,

the
have
reread
I
In reply to your letter
to
and
objections
my
original
paper on sociological aspects
the
skirts
I
feel
no
altered.
it
in
way
this paper are
whole problem of diagnosis which Nat in a previous paperwhich
and
than
social
class,
has shown to be more ;important
True,
variable.
be
crucial
a
VA
showed
to
I in the
paper
disturbed
more
severely
younger
same
institution
within the
of
time
period
a
and
longer
for
kept
patients are treated
and all this is relative to the philosophy of the
the
in
not
reported
at
all
is
This
viewpoint
institution.
paper.
form.
in
present
its
of
in
publishing
favor
not
it
I am
Should you have some specific need for seeing it published,
removed.
was
name
my
providing
no
objection
I would have
collaborate
to
want
should
you
authormanship,
of
Speaking
variables
and
psychological
EEG
and
psychiatric
on the
findings
I would have no objection.
My best wishes to you, Martha and the kids for a Joyous
New Year.
have
him
I
and
Turan
to
tell
Please give my regards
ordered a copy of his book.
Sincerely yours,
of the

10m»;

MP:gp

Pollack, Ph.D.
Senior Research Associate

Max

�m

21, 196‘!

mmmrmtmmmgm-ormw;md
fdﬂuMdmmm-Jmlofwmommﬁa
Mﬂlhdmlafhyuhhm. mﬁwmhﬁn
”magma-mum. hmmhmyw.

and:

Enema-mu
cc:

Pollack Ph.D.
Nathmial siegel, Ph.D.
Max

�MONTEFHMHCHUSPVRHJAND MEDHLMACENTER
111

EAST 210TH STREET. BRONX, NEW YORK 10467. TELEPHONE: 212/TU 1-1000

January 19, 1965

Fink,
Director

max

M.D.

Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
suoo Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
Dear Max:

I think the paper is fine, and would
touch it as little as possible. Your choice of
Journal is excellent. For my part, go ahead

and submit

it.

The only change concerns

the

here - "Mbntefiore Respital and
Mbdical Center" and the revised address as

revised

name

shown on

this letter.

It

to see you and I
pleased that you are doing well.
was good

am

Best regards to Martha.

Sincerely,

RLK:FB

Rdbert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Head, Section on Psyology
Division of Psychiatry

�DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION. AND WELFARE
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
BETHESDA. MD. 20014

December 31, 1964

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
AREA CODE aoI
TEL: ass—mo

In reply refer to:

M-TMR-SS
AIRMAIL

Dr. Max Fink, Director
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
5400 Arsenal

Street

St. Louis, Missouri 63139
Dear Max:

I was pleasantly surprised to see the paper on "Sociosociological Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals" again. I was
really delighted that you resurrected it and have taken responsibility
of submitting it to one of the journals that you listed. I have no
real preference for one of various journals that you mentioned. I would
think it would be most unlikely to be published in Psychiatry, but I
am sure you share this opinion since you listed it last in your order.

In all honesty, in rereading the manuscript, I found it to be much better
than I remember it. Most of my comments are of a stylistic nature. Here,
however, I would bow to you as the collator of the document to use the
style that you prefer. My own penciled comments are, however, on the
paper.

V/

I think the main contribution that this paper has to make, and should
make, has to do with the methodological problems that are involved in
doing cross-hospital studies or in doing hospital studies within the
same institution over a period of time. As you indicate in the paper,
on page 4, that when one reports studies from one institution, the
structure of the hospital is either taken for granted or ignored. Cer—
tainly, we should be elaborating on this in great detail, and the
methodological aspects of doing a study, such as the one we have done,
Should occupy a major area of the report in its own right. For this
reason, I am not sure I would report methodological problems as we have
done on page 4. I think that it should either occupy a place of its own
in the discussion or might indeed exchange status with "AH Interhospital
Comparisons on page 4, and become the "A" category, or interchange and
make Interhospital Comparisons the "#1" category. Most of the things
that we want to say are in the paper but, as I have indicated, I am a

�2.

little

unhappy about interweaving our "findings" with the "methodological

not being our intent in the original investigation
in
the
also,
report.
more
I,
important
the
I
being
think
...and, yet,
would
I
of
the
author
be
try to
should
senior
paper.
believe that you
own
in
and
autonomy
right
its
give
problems
it
methodological
the
spotlight
Section."
"Discussion
Section"
the
in
"Results
or
done
in
be
the
whether this

difficulties"...the latter

Cole
in
Jonathan
with
be
will
visiting
Please let us
the
evening
want
on
spending
us
to
plan
I
certainly
Washington again.
schedule
I
will
on
advance
notice
this
have
we
a
and
if
little
together,
know when you

my

time accordingly.

My

best to you

and your

family for a most happy 1965.

Sincerely,
Nathaniel H. Siegel, Ph. D.
Acting Chief, Social Sciences Section
Training and Manpower Resources Branch
National Institute of Mental Health
Enclosure

�M

L.

W.
liﬂunhﬂ.&amp;hﬂn1,Ith"

Kin. $.11...

MI!

nu!

Nu

m.

21.0.“

31.9.

�-n

mmw

—

vvr-nwr w)v-x&lt;v-'r

v

-,

—

1‘... er—‘u‘

-~

‘

m-vm.~—~v---ww—WVW-"— av uwvwx ':vtwv-‘uwvwav&lt;&lt; -... . &gt;rv—zwv-Inl“ . wt. u-vww-wmw—m—m‘ vv'vi'ﬁ‘mrr w 4w.—’wn’.~w—V'WWV

MIMmm-Mhmumwa
mwdwmm.mmm.
3.3..

mm.
m.
mummmc.r.mmwnwmhmmuy
m,mm.wmm~mmm~m.dmm
Mahatma). mmua. muss-mm; mun

mwammme-m
Lain.

mmmwam.
mmuumm.munmmm
Cmm: wmsmnwzm.
mm".
a:
mm mm mm mm.
W.
I“
3.2.

aWﬁdeW
memmammua:
mmwaw.m
mm.st.muis.m.
0‘

m.

Md.»

ray-12mm

�-

.

.

.

v.

v.,.‘,'.‘.- «r

«

:Vw’v mew—m—x— wwtr-rm'w-‘Mw—.nn-nwwvwwwmmw-v-v ... .. we» ~v .... *IJ- ‘v-r'
,

1:-

««..‘«.———»W.-.m»—7w....yu. nr__.4.;- “M...

——~m41‘7-~

-...—

n. Vr .. .

nmuwumwmmmmm
”1(1er

Wmmmwmmmm
mammawmmmwamwmmpmﬂnam
WW“). “W“ﬁwmﬂ”,

mam/1m [Yd/W
“'3"

MW!WMMNW%:W°¥IW.M 5 dz]
Wm
mam-rm.
Wren-(1.5).
.0.,WW.
ﬁr7sf‘“-“
‘

�.-—

wru- vv- "v... «- WMIwn—w

&gt;06." :u—

‘mkm:“"mvﬂw-w5-—rmw~r~vvb w,

wn-‘W-‘wnw-qm --. rtmmmnﬂ-FII .:- ;w~w-w——»,w-——W w...“ “-— v.W»—w——.~v— "ﬂ.Av—-HV»W‘WW‘W'WW"W—WI

“a“

Wummmdmmvmmmmmmm
mmm,mc.r.mmmummmmmmm
Wammmmmm. mmmmumm

WWW
WWW

ummmmmwmamwmm
WMMM
M M’Mmﬂ
'

[’2‘be (if #9»;

0/15th

aha/Me

.

whammmamnmm
wmmmmmmu.

mud-Wm.

mwmwwmmnmmmm.
MMWWmWMWWd
mmmmtmwmmmwnm.m.mumurm;

mm.

�,,,

—.»

,

.W—w ----~v-—-r-'

»*»-"—

"v

M

'-

wm;wmvmxv'"#w—

‘m-F-mu '«

"Hum—W.

«va-rn-w “.m—w—‘wvmmwm
»

.

\mer-r -m
a:

..

m

Amdmmmnammmmmmmmtm-

m~mmm,mm. WWMWWW

mmmw.nwmdmummw
MﬁWWmWWhMMWMw
denWWnn-Wmmwm:
WWW.
mmmmmwmm
«Mam-mm. mwmrmmmmm
Wanting-mushy.

mammmmmmmamm. MIW

www.mmummmmm-ammmdm
“Wummtﬁsymmmﬂmmhtddlnm
«www.mnmmmssnmmmmmm.
mmmmmmmmmorm'mmmm

”mmwummmmuwummm.

MWthm.m9£mW
MMMMMmWinm-m
mama-am.

www.mmmmy.hmmmammm

Mummmmmmmmmmama

mwum’mmmm
WWW
www.mummmjmvnﬂénmmmm

“a.

-

�. WV

‘ — ,- w-wmu. “kn-"n“,

A-

ham-w.”- VWWW—wmuwwum—mm

W
W
1-

mmmnmmimﬁmim.mmdﬁn

mimwhmfwmmdﬁwiwdwmdmm.
mmmmmmmmmmmn
mmmﬁmmum. mummmmmu

an

mumm.mmwmm.mmmly
mummmmwwmwmm. Wham

mmmmmmmorwammwmum»
ﬂm.mmmmﬁwm.
mmmmmmm

WWW
IWMMWMNWWMW,MM
met.
umwmmmmmum
«0

Wmummwuwwmmm
”twang-anus. mmummpmmammmm
Wmdmmwmm.
-Aemm1ammpwmymwmuummmmm

MW“MMM.M
nan-mm
mwmvmuwwmmmm.
cumin-aim.
Minimum.

'mmwmmmmmmmw
ummammmuwcmm.mmm.
mm.mmmm. mmamm
’

�,

n-

.m..

WV..—

Ww~

-

mw-«WWWWIWwv—mm wwmmw—mm

“Ir-V."

I. ‘“

mmmwmmmm'amwmwm
mmmwttmmmmummm
mW'mm’WwMW.
b.)

M:
wmmmmwmmm
MWWMWWMMWWV.

difﬁcult.

mmwmmmmmmm

mmmmmmmmnzwmmwmm
Moan-

mmmwmwmmmmm.

Wand’mm.

'1'th I

mmmmminmmm. mmmmmnmmm
WmmmuumasmmmumMammg'mm
Mammmmwumtmmm
“WW.

mmmmttmtmmmmmmdw
imamwwmmn).-MMsmmWW
mummmmmwmmmuw.
TIMI!

2.

mmmmmmmdmm.m,mam

�V v. .,_VW._..,_~_..,...._.V._

mwm wry“

r—‘um'wrp—

.

wwwnvmmm

NWFMWWmMMWhW
mum-m.
mm

mwmmwm
W:
.mmaunmmmmmw. mmmm

TITVZWL“

a)

@Wmmnywm;ummmw.m
:prj’ cam.
Mg'unwmmmm,mmxym

$0319”)

”ﬁg?
3":
3’1

if:4314,4'ZWMW

'0’
‘

.,_-

‘

Mmmmmmmmm
initiation-1
bug:

W.
pmmmmwmmm
,

m.’umwmmmamummmm
magma-macar-

mummmmm.
mwm.wmmmmm,cmynwmn

am
mm: Whﬁndmwmmm

unma- m 2: went

mad: mm.

mama-«aw
W‘rmmmm.

mmrmmm,mmymwmuimmd
sou-mu

mmrmmmammm
mm.ﬁmmmmdﬂn

aim
murmmmmmammmme
him”.

{

�.‘r “pm... 9

W mr—

mmmﬂwmmm‘

~wz.

.

‘-...-

WWWW-

mm‘mm

._

.

m,mwmm1nmm.mm
Wmmmmrswsmm.

W
W

”mus

WMtnmdwm-Wmmd

wrmumwmmm
mm.
s«

0

’

mm “W: mmm.nmmmuy

mmuumwmwmmmmw
mnm&lt;m3wmcammm.

mmmmm

m
«wwmmmww.ummotmm
w

wumnmuummmummm.

mmmwmwm.muuwmum

mmmwsmmnmwmmm
mmmdmmmammmmm
0mm.

mmmm—mwwmmmw
ummmuwm.
A,

Inmmlymmtum

mummwmuﬁwmm.
mm
mﬂmmugo
.

M:

WWm
“mawmmlyucMoMmAm‘
(19» of

'W‘wmw. mmmﬁw
memu-ummmmmu
(M)~mmnmywwmmm.

W”

MWWMW
Wm”: mm.MuW,mp-m
6)

mg:

mmmuuummm. mWW

mamummmm-mmmmmm,

m.—

�__

.

.

w~vwmvwﬁﬁn

mmwmwmmmmmammamm

www.m'w.

mammarwxmmmmmmmmm
WWW
mummmwmm.
mmmmmmgmm.mmmammm
Wmmctmw.
mmwmum,mmawmmmm

—-

I'm

.V-

lath-mm. mmrsmmmmmmumm

w.

.ﬂww‘

«mummmﬁmwmmmrmm

.

mmmmmwnmrmmnm.

demmammammnmm
Wum.mu~mmmummm

mmmpmuwmtmm
quh..-h1mtrmdm'mdd§nmmbhﬂwtmm
m-mw,mmammwmammw
mummiod.

'

Mam.

WV

��...

ww—nw—va—&gt;vwmmmm www.mmww- m“ mv—m—w—u—‘mwnwﬂ.

.—

“.mwmw

._‘ u...

_~wm.,

”minimum-mummy”

an.wmwﬂnndmbdﬂnm
mmmumwbymmmmmamw
mmmmmmmwmmmm

”.mmwwmmmmum

Mum.th.W1-NWW
mumuuﬁumdmmmm
“WW
dmwtymm'ummmmmm
mmmmmmmm‘mum. mammal-s

MWWW1&amp;.MHMWU)M‘MM
dWMWdMnIWMMm. MW

”MWWmmmddmﬁﬂu-inw
Want
www.mmm.m.mwm.

www.m.mmmmormm
mmmmmmmmmmm.
ithmIMymtﬂm-cﬂmmminmmnﬁm,m
A:

Wmmmmmdmmm.
MWWJWl-wdmm
”HWWMWMmmmmW.for
ummmmmummmmnmm.
uni-.WwﬂlhﬂﬂnMMYWw-RMW

www.mmmmmmuummm

WW.W{MM:“WWW

�Wan-alts.

nm,mm,Mhmmn-mm

mam.mmmmmmm.
«mmammngMu-mm.
mmwmammm.
mmmmmam‘nwm
arm-imam. mammm-Mdmmm

mutyofm.mmmtdmutyofmnmfw
manmmmmm. mmmm
mm'mmmmismm.mmmmmam

“mummmwrwmmdw
mummmmmwm.
ammwmmmc;),1tmwwm«m
mmawmmmmwmmmn
mum? Itmwm,wmmmmm
nmllymﬁminmmmﬂy,wiuaW‘sMn

Mummmmwmotmmmmdm
um.

“MMWWmMMWw
mummw.1tummmtmm

“mummwwwmmmm
«wamm'umtymmm;mmwm

mﬁnwﬁmﬂMMWWluuﬁ-«W
W“.w"mkimﬂmm'u mm.“

��“Vi—p.-.— «......,.“ym.—

“n WW... 7,“.u Irv-"ﬁrm“b'tw www.m-m

a».

.umw w», -..m--m.-.\mu~ urn—7”." w, m 7..” n- »~ .:.r~—nremw.n

Wme-mmmmmma
mmwmwmmmmmm

mum-.mmwmmmmwmmim

mmwmdmmmm.

�N"

a

man-wwmwrw

Wv-'ﬂ‘9""¥’:ﬂ1ﬂ'1w"v"’w

7)

‘

v.

w;1mmw‘n:-glm

v
,-.v.-

:.
v-y.

mun-rme

_,.

~

a.

n;'WK:=Vm4—_wr_nw-ytw;wtuv7~n.&gt;l.-.

war,

=W:

WW

EMWWW‘RR.
WWWWMWW.
1.

memmm.m.mmmrm.
MMNWWWMW.WMWWM.

WWWWWWQ
Wamwm.mdmm
WMWFM.MM*.
2.

MWMWWmmMm
ammfmbhcimmmrmmmd
3.

am.

mmmmmammmam
Wﬁmmmmﬂmmmﬁmmdm
Ii.

MWuwa-mw.

mammmmwmmummw
m.mawunuum.newmum
mmmtum.mmmmmwmdw
B.

wwwmmamnw

�REFERENCES

1.

and
D.J.
Sanford,
Levinson,
Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E.,
&amp;
New
Brothers
York, Harper
R.N.: The Authoritarian Personality,
'

1950.
2.

Hollingshead, A.B.:

Two-Factor Index of Social Position,

mimeo—

graphed publication.
3.

Hollingshead, A.B. and

Illness:

A

Community

Redlich, F.C.: Social Class and Mental
&amp;
New
John
Sons, Inc.,
Wiley
York,
Study,

1958.

h.

R.L., Pollack,
Selection of Therapy in
M.

Kahn,

Social Factors in the
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside

and Fink, M.:
a

Hos2., g: 216-228, 1957.
S.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
and
Diagnosis,
Ratings
Discharge
of
Duration
HOSpitalization,

Kahn,

Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,
6.

l:

565—57h, 1959-

(CaliAttitude
Social
R.L., Pollack,
&amp;
Ment.
Nerv.
F
J.
Dis.,
and
Convulsive
Therapy,
Scale)
fornia
M.

Kahn,

and Fink, M.:

129: 187—192, 1960.
7.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz,

tion
Hospital,
and

8.

and
to
Diagnosis
Relation
Its
Amer.

J. Psychiat., 116: 127-132, l9S9.

Siegel, N.H., Kahn, R.L., Pollack,
and Treatment

Psychiatric OrientaTreatment in a Mental

S. and Lefton, M.:

M.

and Pink, M.:

Social Class, Diagnosis

in Three Psychiatric Hospitals, Social Problems, 10: 191-196,

1962

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered
A

Markedly Improved

Much Improved

Improved

A

!

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Unimproved

Moderately Improved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

Interhosgital

Comgarisons for Sociopsychological Variables

i

I

Social

Class

Years of
Education

III

Menninger

Hospital

Hillside
Hospital

:
I

Massachusetts
Mental Health

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
gMenninger Hillside Massachusetts

Hospital Mental Health

iHospital

Center

'

of
Treatment

‘Psychotherapy

Type

68

Somatic

8

Other
1

.

_ﬂ,

__

Duration of

Hospitali—

zation

7-11 months
1

months

Improved

.--a-—u.~...w

Much

Improved

61

Unimproved

lO

a,”

Discharge
Diagnosis

,

months

Recovered,

Discharge
Evaluation

~__imiu_i_.,i_.__.::-

.

”13:29-33
W

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

df=h~

5,1001
I

‘

”WWW”
85

22

1?

26

29

!

I

S2

1

�TABLE V

Duration of HosEitalization

BX

Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

£52
Below 20

Menninger

Hillsidg

81

he

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

ho-h9

30

20

3422219.

�'

&gt;

%&gt;

This study was done when the authors were associated at
the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hespital,
Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y., 1959-62.
Pal/sue aux!

KIRIM“
cooperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts
Health Center
the
is
The

acknowledged.

and

C.P, Menninger Memorial Hospital

Mental

gratefully

Aided, in part, by grants MY—2092 and MEI—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

** Present Address: Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore Hespitalaw*
’
'
{hxxﬁrtﬁF-itﬁfr
IO‘NAZI
g“ QM? 1.14:
0M yNL
nan
:
National Institute of Mental Health,

'M,

-ﬂﬂqmam pn--~~r~Ognv m.

Bethesda,

Md.

Department of Psychiatry

at the Missouri

Institute of Psychiatry ef-the-SChool of

Medicine, University ot’ Missouri, suoo
Arsenal Street, St. Louis) an, Ma, 6399'"!
,4

:9,

�In their studies of the

psychiatric patient population,
Hollingshead and Redlidh have reported significant relationships between an'
individual's position in the social class structure and the
of treated
New Haven

illness, types of diagnosed disorders
administered.(;%.
treatment

patient
.

The

and kinds and duration

W

of psychiatric

influence of the economic status of the

the availability of treating personnel, however, was not excluded.
Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of hospitalized

on

#‘Fﬁ‘

.

'

IﬂL

srﬂwu‘

patients independent of pateent‘s finances and the availability of treatments
were undertaken at Hillside Hespital in 1957. In this hospital, a variety of
treatment modes, including individual psydhotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive
therapies were available to

.

.

.

.

all patients regardless of their ability to

pay.

(Eglgé
In these surveys
we observed

that patients hospitalized for the shortest
periods were older, had less education and were more often of foreign birth.
These older, less educated patients were predominantly treated by convulsive
therapy and received more favorable clinical discharge ratings.

In contrast,

younger, native born and more educated patients were hospitalized for longer

periods, treated primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratings.
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy, the
'

California

F

’15’

Scale (1333. Higher

F

scores,

i.e.,

greater stereotypy, were often

in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis, who were referred for
convulsive therapy, hospitalized fOr shorter periods, and more often were
rated as much improved or‘recovered.
hen,
(gram)
e'
In thzs surveyglit was suggested that differences in psychiatric treat—
ment among hospitals should reflect the influence of social factors as noted
f0und

fbr the patients within Hillside HOspital.

To

test this suggestion

it was

�decided to employ the procedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions

Hillside Hospital, the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hespital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston. These institutions were selected
mm» Ww-Mans.:qum-W nag-MW

:

with the expectation that they served patients of different social classes.and-

provide custodial care. Each

supervisory

staff

and

is a residency training center with a full

active researCh units)

time

emphasiqgugsychoanalytically—
They

oriented psychotherqua
This study was designed to determine the population characteristics of

the three institutions with respect to social class, age, education and

score;

F

to relate these characteristics to treatment variables of type of treatment,
duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and discharge evaluation among the in—
and

stitutions.
M'MWW,.,L..««Ila-mm?”

W/

“”‘MW‘WWW ”‘W

“’

m "' “

t4"

"M"

‘ﬂwwmwww

”‘

W

“m

«a

,

N,

WWW‘W,MM

——

�/
A

METHOD

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in

residence in the institu—

in January, 1959. While Manninger and Hillside Hospitals
had voluntary patients only, a small number of those at the MassaChusetts Mental
Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the courts for psydhiatric evaluation or
tions

was undertaken

of a chronic schizophrenic state hospital group transferred for a
from
because
excluded
the
These
study
were
researdh
patients
project.
specific
of their non—voluntary status. The California F scale was scored for each

were members

patient

on

the census day.

Eighteen months

examined
were
of
records
the
disdharged
patients
later

to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure
of social class, the Hollingihead 2—factor index a.weighted score of education
used(g;ii;.The
and occupation was
study population consisted of 173 patients
—

—

at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
social
of
the
to the
The study included examination.of the relations
psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between institutions.
These comparisons were difficult however, because of various methodological
differences discussed below. These difficulties were most marked in the intra—
hcspital comparisons, and accordingly, in the analyses of psydhiatric variables
emphasis will be placed on the differences between institutions with citation of
at Hillside,

100

at

Manninger and 95

intrainstitutional trends. These difficulties also led to missing infbrmation
1&amp;6/34 6, #2,
for some data, whidh is reflected in th varying population sample sizeslénrthe
4ﬁﬁﬂxeu

�RESULTS

I
Methodological Problems

A‘

When

reporting studies from one institution, the structure of the

hospital maybe taken forgranted and either ignored or mentioned briefly.

'W 1,,

e

comparable
gathering

gr;
m, _ M ”1111111....”
institutions
While
were selected as
these
data from.multiple institutions,
.

in teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific-problemscygf4LAt-Lk*
comparable

were prominent

tions,

in the designation of type of treatment, diagnostic classifica-

and the evaluation of treatment outcome.

criteria for designating that
differed among the institutions, making come

Designation of Eype of Treatment:

1)

a patient received ”psychotherapy"

[Sous

parehti=ay

The

difficult.

At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy was designated as treatment

administered on a prescription basis by a

patient

was Charged

a fee.

staff psychiatrist for

whidh the

Sessions with the psychiatric resident were

con—

sidered part of routine administrative patient care.
'At Hillside Hospital psydhotherapy was defined as treatment sessions with

Staff psychiatrists did not treat patients, but
No
additional
resident
physicians.
restricted their activities to supervising
a psydhiatric resident.

fees were charged.
At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy was designated

aucha‘
functiggrof

psydhiatric residents, psydhologists,
social workers, nurses and medical students. Formal records of such sessions

as the

many

disciplines

-—

�which
ascertain
and
record
to
in
the
included
patient's
were not routinely
team
members
the
of
study
for
was
received
necessary
psydhotherapy it
patients

to interview the resident responsible for eadh case.
made
comparisons
diagnostic
styles
Individual
institutional
Diagnosis:
evaluative
the
multiple
employed
diagnoses
At
Menninger
Hospital
difficult.

10

dlil

the American Psydhiatric Association)while both
followed different unitary systems. Several examples of

scheme recommended by

Hillside and

MMHC

conversions
with
Table
suggested
in
our
I,
diagnoses from.Menninger are listed
con—
These
two
institutions.
other
of
the
that
into categories comparable to

versions provide a source of distortion.

at the
detail.
The discharge rating at Menninger
and
format
varied
in
three hospitals
Hospital was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological
53)

e Rat'

Disc

s of

rovement:

Ratings of improvement

Hillside Hespital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center
had global ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each
factor of the Menninger system (Table II). For this study the Menninger syndrome
and syndrome Changes.

rating

3. jﬁﬂv

was compared

to the global ratings of the other institutions.

"A, .16 (’30

waft/mm

Co

I. Sociopsychological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age, education

�and California F Scale score among the

three institutions is presented

in Table III.

a)

Social Class:

The

institutions

composition of the three

the population

anticipated difference in social class
was observed.

was predominantly upper

At Menninger Hospital

class; at Hillside Hospital, middle

Massachusetts
Mental Health Center, predominantly lower
class; and at

class.
There were no differences

b) ége;

in age distribution in the

institutional populations.
c) Education:

The

populations also differed in educational attain-

ment, with patients having more years of education

at

than at MassaChusetts Mental Health Center. While

Ml

patients at

per cent of the
had not completed high school, only 32 per cent at

MMHC

Hillside and

23

per cent at Menninger did not graduate.

d) F Score:

Califbrnia

F

patients had
50

or above

below 30.

Differences in the distribution of scores on the

Scale were also observed. Fifty—one per cent of Menninger
F
—-

of stereotypy.

patients had

Menninger Hospital

F

scores below 30, and only eight per cent with scores of

the higher

F

scores being associated with higher degrees

In contrast, at Hillside thirty—one per cent of the

scores below

30

while at

MMHC

only twenty per cent were

�Thus, thl=a=pa===d.differences in social

attainment and performance on the
#40;

F

class, educational

Scale were observed.
RELA'H u a.

These

differences permit a test ofkhypotheses oamannrnngdﬂxrirﬁeﬁﬁxwrtn?
sociopsychological factors to the treatment variables among these

institutions.
12.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables
a) Selection of Treatment: Amongﬁinstitutions, significantly

at Menninger Hospital (”3%) received somatic therapy
than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV).
fewer patients
b)

DUration of H05pitalization:

The

three institutions

differed with regard to patient’s length of stay (Table IV). Patients

at

Menninger Hospital were

hospitalized longest, with

65%

of patients

remaining for twelve months or more, compared to 31 per cent of the

Hillside patients and only

per cent at the MassaChusetts Mental Health
Center. The modal stay of the Hillside group was between seven and
eleven months while two-thirds of the MMHC patients were disdharged
5

within six months of hospitalization.
c)

Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most patients were

evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved" (Table IV). At
Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage (19%) of
were

rated as "unimproved" and only a single patient

"recovered" or "much improved".

or

"much

The

was

patients
scored

highest percentage of "recovered"

inproved" ratings (28%) and the lowest proportion of

"unimproved" (10%) were found

d)

Diagnosis:

groupings were made:

at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center.

For

statistical analysis three diagnostic

schizophrenia, affective disorders, and psycho-

neurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic propore

tions of patients within these groups were similar for Hillside and

MMHC,

�as slightly more than

half

were diagnosed as schizophrenia and one-

In contrast , at Menninger

quarter as psychoneurosis or affective disorder.

Hospital psychoneurosis and personality disorder accounted for more than

fifty per cent of the population.

6.

Intra—Hospital Comarisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of populations,
1......an
size
and
1::
the
sample
each
within
institution
homogeneity
their
dgghb
A
$31“ Lou-T
precluded adequate intra—hospital comparisons . everal groupings were
The

WW
Jr”)
W

obtained which had fewer than five cases)
.

.

.

.

94

z

5/

the trends appeared similar to those found

in the earlier study.

Age and F

score were found related to the selection

of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher
more

and
somatic
therapy),
receiving
frequently

F

P

score patients

score alone at Hillside.

both
the
related
at
and
were
chronological
of
age
hospitalization
length

Hillside Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for
the longest periods, While such relationships were significant in these
MMHC
V)
where no
(Table
noted
the
was
at
trend
similar
two hospitals, a

Menninger and

patients over

40 ,

but 1% of patients under the age of

than a year.
————_———_——

20

remained longer

�DISCUSSION

Q

,

M

daM
SOClal variables—95

1:11:
differences
in
Significant interinstitutional
of
distribution
in
not
but
age;
years of

education/W97

;

F

?

{”1238

MN

3

WI
}

kw

of
eva‘aaeed
periods
shorter
lower
class
patients
the institution serving
Eta
and
ﬁeportions
diagnoses
of
low
psychoneurotic
“better
,
hospitalization,
discharge evaluations. \
ment are

ﬁuw

$7,

memm‘

;

(M

I

and
complex
more
diagnoses
of
psychoneurotic
of stay, a higher proportion
a
forms
somatic
receiving
of
patients
diagnostic schemataalower proportion
“in
Similarly,
yere-eaeh-eonﬂmed.
ratings
and
discharge
of therapy,
poorest

r“

“3

{2/

MW
W
,

”ﬂ
033°”

“5:

f
Wtuw W

—variables
treatment
the
each
of
and
F
in
California Scale scores;
duration of hospitalization, selection ff treatments and distributions
“MM:
Maﬁa—5’
in—
e
of diagnoses and discharge evaluations.
..._v,.__~__~_.'/l\——".~W-v
J!
A
.
.
.
.
duration
the
longest
class
patients
stitution serVing upper
'

f""\

9’

«mean

related Ato

differences in staff attitudes

than—to—

“errences

in populations . 'Ihe contrasts between institutions in
duration of hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
and
of
evaluations
psychotherapy,
formulations , discharge
, definitions
lﬂese
differences
recorded
data.
amount
and
stylistic
of
details
the

W

wwﬁ‘sﬁssed as slinky idiosyncratic1am they follow a pattern
M,
W
related to social

{W
WW; meabmx/Wm
ﬁg “W434.
differences] consistent7with

.

�-10-

Such population and treatment

variable relationships are

Cf the physician
attitude
the
both
determined
by
interactive processes ,

and the administrative

staff

and by the
Such

constellation of

symptoms

or

relationships are marked most

history which patients present.
least
are
criteria
where
diaglostic
conditions
those
in
psychiatric
known
of
diseases
defining
criteria
where
objective
i.e.
specific,
,

ﬂ

personality
schizophrenia,
in
psychoneurosis/
etiology are absent, as
AAA-0L
of
conditions
perceptual a:
Under
these
disorders.
and behavior
and
expectations
attitudes
observer's
the
situational ambiguity)
Ak444~0u4,

become 5
I4

v

"uuﬁ situation was
Eris
his perception
classification)
6
.
. .
.
study
their
and
(1)
lefton
in
Dmitz
Pasamanick,
clearly emanated-by
observed
They
institution.
within
a single
of variations in diagnosis
in
did
differ
wards
not
type
different
to
assigned“
that patients

g4en¢bh ' o

dew

S ’and'

~qu

réaedéup

_

M

’1

Significant
residence.
education,
or
age
marital
status,
of admission,
diagnostﬁé
Cewif‘UI-Lﬂvarious
of
incidence
differences did occur, however, in the
among

the three wards and
m
'

believe theﬁ reflect the

among

differences

attitu

W

ward.
one
on
administrators
three

As

(“E

in the populations/ we

es 0 the examiners.

”atclinical evaluation

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis par”

another.
to
institution
have little
For
results
.
roduces
paradoxical
literal adherance to these concepts
meaning when

example, Menninger

transferred from

one

M
mhighly trained personnel
Hospital has—themes;

con—

3%

has
“fewest
the
for
longest
patients
its
keeps
time/and
ducting treatment,
the
poorest
Ad
reports
yI.’
yet,
as
diaglosed
schizophrenia,
patients

I

i
I

�-11-

treatment results.

,ﬁt'MMHC,

in contrast,

whiCh

is

most inclusive

in

defining a therapist, which keeps patients for the shortest periods,
and whéeh-has a higher-proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,

OV’

quality of carefnnop the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions)‘ Since the evaluations are
based on the institution's own ratings, we believe that the differences

reflect variations in the criteria used for evaluation of
rather than.§gy intrinsic psychiatric Characteristics.
In our

criteria of

initial Hillside

it was

postulated that different

utiliZed fer persons of different social
suggested that the higher the person's social

improvement were

It

baCkground.

study (‘)

improvement

was

the more complex the

cr1ter1a.enm3i?:§é*£lgis has‘::§&amp;;1
background
literally confirmed in the present study, WithAMenninger‘EluSIng a

to the global rating of the other two institu—
considering the syndrome rating on whidh our comparative

tripartite rating
tions.

Even

statistical

compared

analyses were based,

it is

our contention that fOr lower

class persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper class
persons the

criteria

emphasize sudh complex intangibles as "developing

insight", or "working through one's problems."

�-12_

demonstrated
the role of
While these investigations have again

social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed
by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These
selected for their educational leadership and the
expectation that the recorded variables would be clearly defined. But
differences in institutional style made it difficult to obtain comparable

institutions

were

data. This experience is a cue to the problems of the conventional use

of comparative statistics, especially in the evaluation of psychiatric

therapies.

The use

of disdharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or

length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the
identification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and

style as well as social class patterns in patient populations.

ﬁkrteﬁéeve———

difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
clinical or laboratory observations made in other laboratories,
lack of confirmation may reflect differences in populations and
criteria as much as errors in the original hypotheses. The use

confirm

’Ehese

for the
psychiatric
of the

terns "schizophrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore changes in psydhological
and biological features of mental illness has led to-;:;1mnanadrthgr
6;Z;é
science burdened by negative results.
a valid observation to be

“40W
reported from one laboratory{ the methods armhamﬁaaﬁeélable—teéay to
Judy.”

«(no—c..-

(adeduately)describe psychiatric populations for an=adiqnuta==nnfinm==éan.
//*~—~.“www.m“imm.
“WM.,.,.--M—«~~WW"
c

M

4;,Aaanéigzgedai7

.

:

54; fggﬁ"JR;¢”;'
2%;7*"/;?

E

�~13.

fzar
Increased attention must be paid to thenaathedniogéoairprebiemSuei—-V4-’
3

w,
a
by "objective" criteria rather than the present
methods, so highly dependent on institutional and observer attitudes
and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist-patient interaction.

$nn“
g
cla881fyiag sub ects
‘

.

o

a

9

a

�-1u-

WW
SUMMARY

and

“Wu-I

2

@1

MW

VoLu u'!

three

CONCLUSION

MWHw.» m...»

(A

a.

teaching hospitals,
W,~.mm~__1_ ""“"Wm.m...“
mmwv— vm l.»/
ﬁopulation characteristicsjig-ererelated to treatment variables

W

,.. .

.,

wwmm

MN

defined by social class, age, education and F score ,
W
type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,

TfZM
(W
Washed-#0

W

diagnosis and discharge evaluation.

Z

interinstitutional

:da—
differences were observed in

patient social class , years of education and
California
F scores , but not age.
distribution of

@

variations in treatment characteristics among institutions were found—$0.435; significantly different in the predicted

‘2,

The

direction.

'%

6

“Q

variations in psychiatric practices follow a pattern
among’f‘institutions
withgocial
and are
consistent
class differences
These

not regarded as idiosyncratic.

6g

‘Eae

differences in institutional style

make comparisons

of

between
and
treatment
duration
results
of
diagnoses,
hospitalization,
institutions difficult and tenuous , and the need for more objective

criteria

4w 4C1

ff

classification

(

0

ne‘kﬁ‘m‘v)

emphasized.
is
pppulations
A

�REFERENCES

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik,

Authoritarian Personalitz.

The

990 pp.

3.

Communit238tudz.

J.

and Sanford, R. N.
Harper and Brothers, New York, 1950,
D.

Class and Montal Illness:
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, T933, KHZ pp.

Hollingshead, A. B. and
A

E., Levinson,

delich, F. 0. Social

L., Pollack, H. and Fink, M. Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Montal Hospital. J. Hillside Hos ., 1957, Q; 216Kahn, R.

228.

h. Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Pink, M. Sociopsychologic Aspects of
Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Montal Hospital: Duration of Hospi-

talization,

;:

565-5714.

Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis. Arch. Gen Ps

hiat.,

1959,

S. Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, H. Social Attitude (California F
Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J. Nerv. Mont. Dis., 1960, 1;_: 187—192.

Pasananick, 3., Dinitz, s. and Lofton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and
its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental Hospital. Amer. J.
P

hiat.,

1959, gig: 127-132.

7. Siogel, N. H., Kuhn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, H. Social Class,
Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals. Social Problems,
1962, 19: 191-196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

-WM_W_

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

InterhosEital

III

Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Menninger

Hospital

I

Hillside
Hospital

1

Massachusetts
Mental Health

s

2

§

a

3

1
1

Social

Class

III

E

17

3b

‘

z

g

i

g

1

i

i

3

i

l

!

z
~,

Years of
Education

llZ—lS

;

%

i
a

3
I

F

Score

5h

'13

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
;Menninger [Hillside Massachusetts

{Hospital [Hospital Mental Health

of
Treatment

Type

'Psychotherapy
Somatic

68

Other

8

I

Duration of

7-11 months

Hospitali—

W

zation

months

WWW..-”—

mmm
-w
-

1

*-

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

Much

Improved

61

Unimproved

10

.

i

Discharge
Diagnosis

.

,

I

mewmm

001
-.......’32_.L.__.......B&lt;
_....

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

(95)

(171)

I

(85

5h%

17

�TABLE V

Duration of HosEitalization

BX

Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

l»
mm

Below 20

Menninger

Hillsidg

81

he

73

36

61

30

3O

20

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks,

L.I.

New

York, 195941962.

cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial
"
Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
The

‘

Aided, in part, by grants My—2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

*9':

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�In

their studies of the

psychiatric patient pop—
ulation, Hollingshead and Redlich have reported significant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excluded,
New

Haven

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to pay“ In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birthc These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratings. In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratings,
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i.e,, greater stereotypy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recovered.
In the survey reported here, it was suggested that dif—
ferencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospital, To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the pro—
cedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -— Hillside
Hospital, the C. Fo Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston» These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
equally available, yet served patients of different social classesc
Each provided short-term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care, Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapyo

istics

This study was designed to determine the population characterof the three institutions with respect to social class, age,

score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutions”
education and

F

�-2“
METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside Hospitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo—

phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
statusc The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2—factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center»
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutionso These comparisons were difficult however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intra—hospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trends" These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in.the tables by the varying population sample
The

sizes,

ﬂ...

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital may be taken for granted and either ignored or men—
tioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institu~
tions, however, the many differences between institutions are accentuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study, Specific differences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome;
When

*—

1. Designation of Type of Treatment: The
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy"
the institutions, making comparisons difficult,
At Menninger

criteria for

differed

among

Hospital psychotherapy

was designated as
basis by a staff psychia—

treatment administered on a prescription
trist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident“ Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicians, No additional fees were charged,
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy
was designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students,
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psycho~
was necessary for members of the study team to interview
therapy

it

the resident responsible for each case.

2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric

Association, while both Hillside and

followed different unitary
systemsa Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono
MMHC

�Table I

3. Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of imr
provement at the three hospitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep—
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II). For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other

institutions.

Table

B.

Inter-hospital

II

Comparison

1. Sociopsychological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

in.

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observed. At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—'
cational attainment, with patients having more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduatec
c) Education:

The

Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty-one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per—
cent with scores of 50 or above -— the higher F scores being assoc—
iated with higher degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside
thirty—one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 300
d)

F

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainment and performance on the F Scale were observed, These differences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables
2a

among

these institutions.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables

Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received
somatic therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV).
a)

three institutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)Q
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
b) Duration of

Hospitalization:

The

group was between seven and eleven months while two—thirds of the
MMHC
patients were discharged within six months of hospitalization.
c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV)o At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved” and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"e The highest
percentage of "recovered" or "much improved” ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved” (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diagdisorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV)w The diag—
nostic preportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one-quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty per—cent of the
populationo

Table IV

C.

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital com—
parisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillsideo
Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periods,
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year.
The

Table

V

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications among the
three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the
examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one insti—
tution to anothere Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results,
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment resultso
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutionso
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi—

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social backgroundo It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—
ployed° This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
In our

"developing insight," or "working through one's problems.”
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapiese The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationso
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the orig—
inal hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist-patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables included type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation, Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distribution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutions,
~Simi1arly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the institutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
Such differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric popula—
tions is emphasized°
These

�REFERENCES

E., Levinson, D. J. and
Authoritarian Personality. Harper and

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel—Brunswik,

Sanford,

Brothers,

R. N. The
New

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

York, 1950, 990 pp.
A. B. and

Illness:

A

Redlich, F.

C.

Community Study°
New York, 1958, 442 pp.

Social Class and

John Wiley and Sons,

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.

Kahn, R.

J. Hillside Hosp.,
.

1957, 6: 216-228.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and
G
Ps
Diagnosis. A
a ., 1959, A; 565—574.
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

Social Attitude (CalScale) and Convulsive Therapy. ligjﬁuabhlkuug_jn§,,
M.

and Fink, M.

1960, 13Q5 187—192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
1959, 116: 127—132.
Hospital.

Whig”

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality
Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

III

InterhosEital Comgarisons for Sociogsxchological Variables
Menninger

Hospital
I

Class

"I“

Hospital

7%

II

20

III

34

IV

34

V

5

x2 = 121.5; df=8:

I

Massachusetts
Mental Health

lllllﬂaiﬂllllllIlllﬂﬂﬂﬂﬂlllll

N

Social

Hillside

_

p:(.001

“M“-0__-____—_‘-.i-____.__..1-____—___
19%

20- 39

Years of

Educatio

&lt;12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

39.2; df=4g p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
§Menninger
N

T

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

mum-.mHospital

Type of

Hillside

Psychotherapy

Hospital

36%

re atment Somatic
Other

=82 8 df=4
100

N

Duration
of

Hospital—

ization

7

months

7-11 months

.

~11 months

Recovered,

Much

.001
173

95

22%

27%

67%

13

42

27

65

31

5

90. 6 df= 4

X2=

.

.001-

Improved

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
Unimproved
X

=

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder
X

=

2903' df=4.

U&lt;n001

52%

54%

22

17

26

29

23.8' df=4° .&lt;.001

�Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

40—49

3O

20

50+

36

MMHC

14

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks, L. I. New York, 1959— 1962.

Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C. F. Menninger Memorial
Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
The co.operation of Dr. Max

Aided, in part, by grants My—2092 and MY-2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
.Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

**

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�In their studies of the New Haven psychiatric patient pop—
ulation, Hollingshead and Redlich have reported significant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excludeda

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hosPitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including in—
dividual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to pay, In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birtho These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratingso In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingsm
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i;gf, greater stereotypy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recoveredu
In the survey reported here, it was suggested that differencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospital» To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the procedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -- Hillside
Hospital, the C. F, Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Bostono These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
equally available, yet served patients of different social classeso
Each provided short-term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care. Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapya

istics

This study was designed to determine the population characterof the three institutions with respect to social class, age,

score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutionsa
education and

F

�METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside HOSpitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo-

phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non-voluntary
status. The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2—factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center,
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutions, These comparisons were difficult however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intra—hospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trendso These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
The

sizes,

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital may be taken for granted and either ignored or men—
tioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institutions, however, the many differences between institutions are accen—
tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific dif—
ferences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome,
When

1, Designation of Type of Treatment: The
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy"
the institutions, making comparisons difficult.
At Menninger

criteria for

differed

among

Hospital psychotherapy

was designated as
basis by a staff psychia—

treatment administered on a prescription
trist for which the patient was charged a fee, Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident, Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicianso No additional fees were chargedu
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy

designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical studentso
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident responsible for each case.

was

2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric

Association, while both Hillside and

followed different unitary
systemso Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono
MMHC

�‘1

Table I

Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of imw
provement at the three hosPitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)o For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other
39

institutions.

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
1. Sociopszchological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observedo At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental

Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—'
cational attainment, with patients having more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduate,
c) Education:

The

Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty-one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per—
the higher F scores being assoc—
cent with scores of 50 or above
iated with higher degrees of stereotypya In contrast, at Hillside
thirty-one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 30,
d) F Score:

——

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainﬁ
ment and performance on the F Scale were observed. These diff—

erences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychological factors to the treatment variables among these institutionse
2. Psychiatric Treatment Variables

Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received
somatic therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV)c
a)

three institutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)O
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center, The modal stay of the Hillside
b) Duration of

Hospitalization:

The

group was between seven and eleven months while two—thirds of the
MMHC
patients were discharged within six months of hospitalization.
c) Discharge Evaluation:

PA

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV). At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved" and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved", The highest
percentage of "recovered" or ”much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diagdisorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one-quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disorder, In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty per-cent of the
populationo

Table IV

C.

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital comparisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillside. Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periodso
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year.
The

Table

V

�-7DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter'institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment variables -- duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7)¢
The

,r‘

Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmedo The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psycho—
neurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutions”
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.

It is

our impression that these differences in psychiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populations° The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data, While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow

pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged,
a

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, 3223, where objective criteria defining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disorders, Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution,
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residenceo Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications

among

the

three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the

examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one insti—
tution to another, Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical results, For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results,
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment results,
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutions,
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi—

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social background, It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—
ployed, This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
In our

compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statis—
tical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
"developing insight," or "working through one's problems."

While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�f’.

leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapies, The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the identification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationso
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other labor—
atories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the original hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological fea—
tures of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the socio—
psychological aspects of the therapist—patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in"
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation, Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distribution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psycho—
neurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
»Similar1y, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the Shorter periods cf hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the
stitutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
These

in—

differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric popula—
tions is emphasizedo
Such

�REFERENCES

E., Levinson, D. J. and
Authoritarian Personality. Harper and

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel—Brunswik,

Sanford, R. N. The
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

.

A. B. and

Illness:

Redlich, F.

C.

John Wiley and Sons,

Community Study.
New York, 1958, 442 pp.
A

Social Class and

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216-228.

Kahn, R.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental
HOSpital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and
G
PS h
565—574.
15
Diagnosis.
1959,
.,
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

M.

and Fink,

M.

Social Attitude (Ca1-

Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. .lLJkﬂubnlkﬂug_DLi-,

1960, 139; 187-192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orien—
tation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. Am£I4_Ja_2£¥£hiaL., 1959, 116: 127—132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, 195 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesiggation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality
Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

III

InterhosRital Comparisons for Sociogsychological Variables
Menninger

Hospital
N

I

Social

Class

‘“

Hillside
Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

IllllﬂliillllllllIIIIIIIHEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZIIIIIIIII
31%

7%

II

51

20

III

17

34

IV

1

34

V

0

5

x2 = 121.5; df=8: p&lt;(.001

“M

1IIIIiIiﬂiiIIinjﬂﬁniiiiiﬂiiiiﬂiijﬁiiiiiIIIIIIIMIBIIIIIIIII
19/

20- 39

=

Years of

Educatio

3. 9; df= 4; p=n. s.

&lt; 12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

9.7; df=4; p&lt;.05

IIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEﬂIIIIIIII
F

Score

x2 =

33%

20%

50

38

17

42

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�W

TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
{Menninger

Hospital

N

Type of

Treatment

Psychotherapy
Somatic

Other

Duration
0t

Hillside
Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

21%

36%

24%

43

64

68

36

-—

8

7-11 months

Hospitallzatlon ~ll months

Recovered,

Much

Improved

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
nimproved
X

=

Schizophrenia

2903. df=4.'&lt;0001

52%

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis

22

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder

26
X

=

23.8. df=4. .&lt;0001

54%

17

29

�Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Ass

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

40-49

30

20

50+

36

MMHC

14

�Herch 12. 1965
Dr. Hetheniel Siegel. Ph.n.

lecionel Institute of Hentel Beelth
Bethesde. Ketylend

Deer nets:

I have sooepted ell your recommendations end heve redone this report.
Enclosed ere e for copies which, while they still may hsve e typographiosl error, ere in e for: which ooold he sent to s publisher. I have
taken the liberty of running this off on Colitho pletos. so the: if it
is not published, we may still have some copies for our friends.
Unless I hes: from you or receive s stop order. I will send e copy
of this to the Archives of Geoersl Psychiatry.
My best regards.
Sincerely yours.
Me: Pink. H.D.

H131-

Professor of Psychiecry

�Hutch 12. 1965

Dr. Robsrt L. Kuhn, Ph.D.

Division of Psychiatry
antstiora Hospital and Medical Cents:

Ill

Esau 210th 8tssst
Riv York, ﬂaw York 10667

Dear Bdb:

Following all tha recommendations in our last discussion, I have
accepted the full responsibility for this draft. Recognizing the snotionsl problems involvsd. I hsvn deleted
nsas. In this drsft. I
have sssuusd tbs senior authorship insofar as you seen to be ralactsnt
to do anything with the doeumsnt. It you would lihs, I will has. the
first psgs radon. sad hsvs this subnictsd to tbs Archivss of Gsuarsl
Psychiscry. with you ss senior author.

st's

It I

tsctory.
My

do not has: from you.
and submit
ss
is

it

it

I will assume that this drstc is satisto Dr. Grinksr.

best rsgsrds.
Sincerely yours,

Iink, H.D.
frofsssor of Psychistry

Ms:

31:3:

�MONTEFIORE'HOSPPTAL.AND MEDICAL UHETHR
111

EAST 210TH STREET. BRONX. NEW YORK 10467. TELEPHONE: 212/TU 1-1000

March 15, 1965

Fink, M.D.
Professor of Psychiatry
Department of Psychiatry
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
University of Missouri
5h00 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri

Max

Dear Max:
Thank you for sending me the draft of the "Three Hospitals" paper.
I can understand your deleting Max's name since he never seemed able
accept this organization of the material. I would appreciate
however, if my name were restored as senior author when the paper
is submitted for publication. I do not, in fact, feel "reluctant"

it,

to handle it, and if you wish, I am quite prepared to arrange for
publication. I have no objections, however, if you wish to submit
it to Dr. Grinker first with myself as the senior author.

I notice

from your

letterhead that you are

now

a professor at the

university of Missouri. I hope this change will be beneficial to
your professional interests. You certainly have my best wishes.
Regards

to Martha.
Sincerely,

34;,

Hebert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Head, Section of Psychology
Division of Psychiatry
RLK:DCS

to

�April 1,

1965

Robert L. Kain, Ph. D.

Division of Paydmiatzy
Hmtefiom Hospital and Hndical Cantor
111 East 210th Strut
Bronx,

Haw

York

10%?

DurBob:

Mummftisenclmod.andithasgmctonn

Wrinthisfom
Idohopohaceeptait,becauseit
is me of tho
intcmsting nm-bioloﬁeal studies in

m
participated.
MWMWMW.mImﬁndmlf
inapooitimsimilartomatmichlheldinmsa.

whidx we have

Waterman burdms

The

are minimal and palate exclusively to

mymstudiu. Immhawadaiewdawdmofindepondmca
fwmamhwithamatdulofauﬂmvityoverpatimtn.
staff.md£acilitius. WMIcm-mhemﬂxingofthis
Ihaveafew excellent oomrkcm,but
mlytimwill
tell.
have

none

the stimulation and imginatim that you exhibited.

Max
14?: fun

Fink,

PLD.

Professor of Pug/wintry

�DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION. AND WELFARE
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
BETHESDA. MD. 20014
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
AREA
aoI
TEL: ass—mo

coo:

March 17

2

1965

In reply refer to:

M-TMR-SS
AIRMAIL

Dr. Max Fink
Professor of Psychiatry
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry

‘

University of Missouri
5400 Arsenal

Street

St. Louis, Missouri 63139

Dear Max:

for the colitho copies of the "Sociopsychological"
It looks fine and I hope that it will be accepted by

Thank you

paper.
the Archives of General Psychiatry.

I have been in touch with some of our training grantees in
Missouri, making the Missouri Institute of Psychiatry more
visible to them as a research source. I hope that some
cooperative endeavor may result in the not too distant future.

Please keep in touch, and give

my

best regards to Martha.

Sincerely,
Nathaniel H. Siegel, Ph. D.
Acting Chief, Social Sciences Section
Training and Manpower Resources Branch
National Institute of Mental Health

�April 1.

1985

Mamie). a. 31.91, PM).

Acting Chief, Social 801m Sectian
Training and Hammer Ramon Bunch
National Institute of bats). Health
Dapu'mmt of Health, Edtmtim. md Welfm
Bethesda, Maryland

Dar Nat:
After- scnﬁng copies of the aociopsychological paper to
Bob, he indicated apnfomce forbeing the scalar auﬂm.

Implmodtocxooodtohiswish,mdmcloeediaaoopy
ofﬁte “pm wiﬂatmmvisod fact sheets. Ampysimmrto

this has

gone

to the Amhim.

811ml}; yaks,
Max

HP-zjn

Pink,

1-1.1).

Manor of. Psychiatry

�March 30. 1965

lobbins,
stis
Msdicsi Dirscror
Hillside Hospital
Dr.

P. O.

Box 38

Glsn Oaks,

Haw

K. D.

York

Dost Lev:
During ths

wists: usstings

discussed this study and

esrion.

we

Bob Xshn,

I
for publi-

Nst Sisgcl and

ssrssd to prepsrs

it

linsl drsft is enclosed for

your infornstian. Vs hsvs
tsksn rhs liberty of sabnirring this to Dr. Grinksr for his
A

consideration for publication in tbs
copy

I!

to

Agghgve .

it

sdvissbls. I would be plesssd to ssnd
you dssl
snyons you sugzsst st tbs Heaninxsr Foundation.
Sincsrsly yours.

link, H. D.
Protsssor of Psychiatry

Ms:

ﬁrst,

s

�Hatch 30. 1965

Dr. Jack Ewslt, H. D.
Prefessor of Psychistry
Massachusetts Hunts! Esslth Cantor
72~76 Yenwood Rosd

Boston, Hassschnsstts
Dear Dr. Ewslt:

s conpsrsttve study was undertsksn with
the Massachusetts Mental Baslth Conner as s coopsrstins institution. A finsl copy of tbs ropes: of thst study is sneloscd.
we have tsceLvsd psruisston to publish this inforustion from
Sons years ago,

Dr. Grssnblstt.

WW-

I an writing to tell

for consideration

I

would bu

by tho

you

tbs: us hsvs submittsd this drst:

plssssd to hsvs your con-sacs.

Sinesrsly yours.

Ms:

rink, u.

D.

Profsssor of Psychiatry

lltkp

�March 30, 1965

as. Roy R. Grinkar, Sr.
lbpartnent of Psychiatry
Michael Reese Hospital
micago, Illinois 60616
Dear Dr. Grizﬂcer:

I

the opportmity to enclose two copies of a
report "Socioysychological Aspects of Psychiatric Tmatmnt
in Emma Voluntary Hospitals" for your consideration for
publicatim in the Archives.
am tall-dug

We report mmmts a study mdertaken some years
ago by my associates and myself at the Hillside Hospital.
We have decided to submit 'ti'xis for
publicatim, in View of
the continued interest in the social aspects of diamonis
and manhunt.

Sincerely yours,
Max Pixﬂc, M. I).

Professor of Psychiatry

3‘?

�Harvard Medical School
Department of Psychiatry

Boston
Fenwood
Road,
021 I 5
74

l
l

l

Massachusetts Mental Health Center

[plllllllllllllllllll3M“; ljlllllllllll!!llﬂlH

.
ugﬁﬁrﬂiﬁ
a:

g

2:”

l

(Boston Psychopathic Hospital)

ill

Department of Mental Health

W”

”H"

u:
‘

Flak-.215

.-:::.!'1|

"

x2.mumuillméw

JACK

R. EWALT, M.D.

3mm PROFESSOR or PSYCHIATRY
SUPERINTENDENT

April

5, 1965.

Dr. Max Fink

Professor of Psychiatry
Mi ssouri Institute of Psychiatry
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
Dear Max:
Thank you for the copy of your study of the Hillside
Menninger's MMHC. I found it very interesting and, considering the
differences particularly between this place and Menninger's, I am impressed with the way you could tease out comparable elements. I would
hope some energetic person would about ten years after the first study
do a repeat on the same three institutions, using as near as possible the
same criteria to see what directions or shifts if any had taken place
be
would
directional changes
that
there
I
them.
strongly
suspect
among
in all three but the differences you found would probably persist.
Si

ely

�w. -.

m.

.V

1n: vv “

quI’V—nw

W", waw w':——'-1.17W . VF... s ”pamn— w...“ -mrmwmwv 4w-uw1-w‘rr ,_....v , .
—

Jun. 3,

up. lbbart

1..

New

. .4,

,

.«.—-~w "w ‘v.'rr .. «q many

1965

Rain

Division of Psychiatry
Hawaiian Win). and
1.11 East 210th 3m“:

M York,

”ﬁn—“W.

hated.

Cantor

York 16%?

DaanublndNat:

Hm:

Firm,

1!. 1).

Professor of Paydﬁatry

many
an:

HAW Sign. Hm}.
Mimi Imam of m1 Knuth

m,

mm

a“

m:«mv-:~,&lt;muvw; vn‘w‘u‘w‘rv

v

V

..

,...

�PROCESSING OF

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
Each accepted manuscript is processed
in the Chicago Editorial Offices of the
Archives of General Psychiatry bringing
together all elements of the printed pages
of the final published article.
You will receive a reproduction of the

typescript, edited according to the official
AMA Style Book, for final review and approval. There will be no galley proof.

is accepted with the
understanding that it may be necessary to
make minor revisions, or to request changes
in illustration or text.
Your manuscript

The Editors

�SAMPLE

DETACH

SAMPLE

AUTHOR(S) (AND ONE ADDRESS): R. K. Merchant and .I. P. Utz

1200 Blank Street, Chicago, Illinois 60610

TITLE: Familial Sarcoidosis
(Name of) JOURNAL: Archives of Internal Medicine

Sarcoidosis was observed in a mother and her daughter. The criteria for this diagnosis
included (1) a compatible clinical picture, (2) granulomatous inflammation with little
or no necrosis and the absence of demonstrable microorganisms to specially stained
sections of biopsy material, (3) negative cultures, particularly'for acid-fast bacteria
and fungi, of appropriate body fluids, exudates, and surgically excised granulomatous
tissue, and (4) apositive Kveim test. These cases of sarcoidosis, together with 73
others involving more than one member of each 32 families, suggest the possibility
that a complex hereditary trait is operative in the pathogenesis of Sarcoidosis.

�w

DETACH

.

INVITATION...TO PREPARE AN ABSTRACT OF YOUR COMMUNICATION WHICH
WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR PUBLICATION .IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN
MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.

Suggestions:

.7.

1. Type name(s) of author(s) (also address of one of the authors),

title of article

and name of journal in which the original article appears.
2. Type

abstract on attached card and mail promptly:

a) Indicate purpose, extent, kind of study, materials and methods used.

chiefly to new data—the high points—informational, not descriptive;
criteria,
technics,
diagnostic
new
new
new
new
statistics,
apparatus,
e.g.,
new evidence, new preventive measures, a new theory,new treatment.Do
not use abbreviations.

b) Refer

3. The

abstract should not exceed 200 words.

NOTE: Accepted abstracts will be printed concurrently with publication} of the original

article.

PLEASE TYPE

THIS IS THE ONLY REQUEST

PLEASE RUSH

�DETACH
PREPARE AN ABSTRACT OF YOUR COMMUNICATION WHICH
I LL BE CONSIDERED FOR
IiIVITATION...TO
PUBLICATION IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN
EDICAL ASSOCIATION.

Suggestions:
1. Type name(s) of author(s) (also address of one of the authors),

title of article

and name of journal in which the original article appears.
2. Type

abstract on attached card and mail promptly:

a) Indicate purpose, extent, kind of study, materials and methods used.
b) Refer

chiefly to new data—the high points—informational, not descriptive;
e.g., new statistics,new apparatus, new technics, new diagnostic criteria,
new evidence, new preventive measures, a new theory,new treatment.Do
not use abbreviations.

3. The

abstract should not exceed 200 words.

NOTE: Accepted

article.

PLEASE TYPE

abstracts will be printed concurrently with publication} of the original
THIS IS THE ONLY REQUEST

PLEASE RUSH

�SAMPLE

DETACH

SAMPLE

——————————-———————‘_

AUTHOR(S) (AND ONE ADDRESS): R. K. Merchant and J. P. Utz
1200 Blank Street, Chicago, Illinois 60610

V.

TITLE: Familial Sarcoidosis
(Name of) JOURNAL: Archives of Internal Medicine

Sarcoidosis was observed in a mother and her daughter. The criteria for this diagnosis
included (1) a compatible clinical picture, (2) granulomatous inflammation with little
or no necrosis and the absence of demonstrable microorganisms to specially stained
sections of biopsy material, (3) negative cultures, particularly'for acid-fast bacteria
and fungi, of appropriate body ﬂuids, exudates, and surgically excised granulomatous
tissue, and (4) apositive Kveim test. These cases of sarcoidosis, together with 73
others involving more than one member of each 32 families, suggest the possibility
that a complex hereditary trait is operative in the pathogenesis of Sarcoidosis.

�*Kahn, R.L., Fink,
,

dd
d
THOR
s
*‘blijvisioé 3f(?3yc?1'i%€ryf°ﬁgntefiore
“

M.

and Siegel, N.

10467)
Hospital,
St.,
TFFLE:Sociopsychological Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in Three
JOIHHWAL: Archives of General Psychiatry
Voluntary HOSpitals.
Population characteristics, defined 5y social class, age, education
and F score, were related to treatment variables in three voluntary
teaching hospitals, Hillside Hospital (N.Y.), C.F. Menninger Memorial
111 E 210

NY

Hospital (Topeka), and Massachusetts Mental Health Center (Boston).
Treatment variables included type of treatment, duration of hospitalizaThe
and
evaluation.
institutions differed in
discharge
diagnosis
tion,
of education and distribution of California
class,
years
patient social
1
but not age.
EF scores,
had
the
The
class
longest
g
patients
serving
institution
upper
p
psychoneurotic diagnoses &gt;
quration of stay, a higher proportion of lower
of
patientg
Idand
a
schemata,
complex
proportion
more
diagnostic
(I)
the
dischar
e
of
fo
oorest
an
somatic
ther
rati
receivi
Eamong tﬁé three instfgﬁtions. €¥§i1ariy, thg institution sgrving “gs
m
of
had
the
shorter
hospitalization,
periods
class
patients
glower
m
lower proportions of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better
discharge evaluations.
Psychiatric treatment and management practices differ among
institutions according to the prevailing social class characteristics
of their populations.

�F‘
.

“‘
““
&lt;4,

FIRST CLASS

Permit No.

1876

CHICAGO 10, ILL.

VIA AIRMAIL

MAIL
REPLY
BUSINESS
No Postage Necessary if Mailed in the U.S.
Postage

.

W111

be paid by—
.

American Medical Association
535 North Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60610, U.S.A.
Z. Danilevicius, MD

_

—
'—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

_

~

�ARCHIVES OF
GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
EDITORIAL BOARD
ROY R. GRINKER SR., M.D., Chief Editor

American M€dical ASSOCiation
June

Institute for Psychosomatic

andPsychiatticReseatch

29th Street and Ellis Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60616
EATON W. BENNETT, M.D., San Antonio
EUGENE L. BLIss, M.D., Salt Lake City
GEORGE E. GARDNER, M.D., Boston
EDWARD O. HARPER, M.D., Cleveland
M. RALPH KAUFMAN, M.D., New York
HAROLD I. LIEF, M.D., New Orleans
FREDERICK C. REDLICH, M.D., New Haven, Conn.
MORTON F. REISER, M.D., New York
DAVID MCK. RIOCH, M.D., Washington, D.C.
JURGEN RUESCH, M.D., San Francisco

3 , 1965

Fink, M.D.
University Of Missouri

Max

Medicine
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri

JOHN H. TALBOTT, M.D., Director
DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

SChOOl Of

GILBERT S. COOPER, Managing Editor
T. F. RICH, Assistant Managing Editor

63139

'

re: Manuscript

Number 3836

Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three
Voluntary Hospitals by KAHN, Fink,
and Siegel
Dear Doctor Fink:

I am very pleased to inform you that your paper has been
accopted by the Editorial Board for publication in the ARCHIVES
OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRE,

Yours very
ROY

truly,

R. GRINKER, 311., NJ).

Chief Editor
iknczbr

�’

ARCHIVES OF
GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
EDITORIAL BOARD
ROY R. GRINKER SR., M.D., Chief Editor

American Medical ASSOCiation

Institute to: Psychosomatic

andPsychiatticReseatch

29th Street and Ellis Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60616
EUGENE L. BLISS, M.D., Salt Lake City
GEORGE E. GARDNER, M.D., Boston
EDWARD O. HARPER, M.D., Cleveland
M. RALPH KAUFMAN, M.D., New York
HAROLD 1. LEE, M.D., New Orleans
FREDERICK C. REDLICH, M.D., New Haven, Conn.
MORTON F. REISER, M.D., New York
DAVID MCK. RIOCH, M.D., Washington, D.C.
JURGEN RUESCH, M.D., San Francisco

June 149 1965

Max

Fink,

M.D .

JOHN H. TALBOTT, M.D., Director
DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

Department Of PSYChiatry

Executive Managing Editor
GILBERT S. COOPER, Managing Editor
T. F. RICH, Asszstant Managmg Edttor

ROBERT W. MAYO,

Missouri Institute Of Psychiatry
University Of Mi ssouri
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139

re: Manuscript

SOciopsychological Aspects of
Psychiatric Treatment in Three
Voluntary Hospitals by KAHN, Fink,
and Siegel

Dear Doctor Fink:

I

Number 3326

very pleased to inform you that your paper has been
accepted by the Editorial Board for publication in the ARCHIVES
am

OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY.

Yours very
ROY

truly,

R. GRINKER,SR., M.D.

Chief Editor
RRG3br

P.S.

We

will,

Of

spaced throughout.

Course, need three cepies of the manscript, doubled

�re: Manuscript Number 3836

Sociopsychological Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatment in
Three Voluntary Hospitals by
KAHN,

Dear Author:

et

a1

Your paper has been received and is being considered by the
Editorial Board. A decision will be given to you as soon as possible.
Yours very truly,
ROY R. GRINKER, Sr.,

MD.

Chief Editor
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

�IS

ROYR. GRINKER, Sr., M

5

c)

Pan

‘

_HIS

29th STREET AND ELLIS AVENU CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, 60616

SIDE OF CARD

FOR ADDRESS

Fink, M.D.
University of Missouri
Dept. of Psychiatry at
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139

Max

�June 15, 1965

Dr. Roy R. Grinkcr, Sr. , Chief Editor-

Archivna of General Psychiatry
Institute for Paymomtic and Psychiatric Paaeamh
29th Strut and Ellis Avenue
Chicago. Illinois 60616
Dnar Dr. Grinkcr:

Enclosed am thme copies of thc

mmcxipt entitled

"Sociopsycl'nlogical Mpocts of Psychiatric '15:!th in
That. Voluntary Mitch," as mmtcd in ymr recent
letter. I am also enclosing the Mical abstract card.
I have pmvimuly
cm to Dr. Dmilevicim, as he had
rcqunstcd this about ten days ago.

mt

man: you very

much

for your interest.
Sincamly yours,
Pink, H.D.
Professor of Psychiatry

Max

Hrzkp

encloms

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�w.

.-..w‘ww.."“mmmmn—pw

MWCALWSOP

WCWWWWWW
mm

L

m.

31.9... ”I! My

Katmai.“ Sing-1.

Rub)“

“ODD...

�Wt
Oaks,

Thisutudyunduuwmmnutmmassocimdatthe
Hillside Hospital. Glen
of
L.I.

Expodmul Pawmutry,

New

Yak. 1959452.

MWmdﬂuataﬂsofﬂn
meimofIr.
CJ‘.
«ad
1:):
Manta).
Henningnr
Cantor
hath
Mutant“
mm
l-bmitnl in gratefully

W.

Aidcd, in part. by grams M24092 and HY~2715. of the National
Hulth, 0.8. Public malt}: Serving; and tho
Instituu of
mun Bond.
Rum County

mm

m1

O

Pun-mt Adams”

East 210th
York 1mm.

“

I’m-mt Adan":

W
SM.

mvidm of Psychiatry, Hmmfim
111
0mm, New
Howitd and

Wt
ram

New York.

of Psychiatry at the
Instituu o: Psyehhuy,
Missouri
School
of
of
Mmity

sum m1 Strut.
Win...
8t. Inuit, Missouri 63139.

no

HIP 2/1/65

Present Adda-u;

Nutimal Institutc of brutal Knuth,

Wadi. mma.

�.

V.—

,___‘V

... auvn-m. rm. .whwwvr... _w..

.vaw.‘w 3w.-- - .-.—u--r.. .'&gt;rlm' 'v' r q— “n... v-A‘Hnwwvwv‘V-vvv' )w-p—w' vrwumwrl—‘"W':"'V"V""-*‘VL'I'W-lw-v ‘.'._.,.._wv

mmmdﬂuﬂummmcmmpop-

ulntim.

8011111351356 and

hdlich

Imported significant

relation-

Mphmnmhmm'spmldminmsodalchssnmmtm
mmmddmceofmatndillmas,typesof¢iagmoddism

mmmmotmudammtmmmm.
mainflumceoftmmcstmofﬁumientmthe
availabilityofmating pummel.

m,mmtmm¢

Stmiasofﬁnmbofaodalfwminthomxmnof
of their fixmial status and tho
hospitalized paints

Wt
m

mast-tam at Huma- Hospital in
availability of mutant:
1957. In this hospital, anxiety of manhunt modes, incluling
individual payabaﬁnmpy,
were

WW

thompiu
available to all patients regardless of melt” ability to pay.
and convulsive

hmamys (mummizhat patimts hospitdiudforﬂn

Wm‘iodsmmoldar.hadlmedtmimmdmmoftm

011mm. Mom,mmwmimmpm
inmtlymmdbyomvulsiwﬁnmpymdmoeiwdmfavumbh

WWW.
mum
W
Myhypaydaathu‘pyujdmiwdpoomdim

mm

mm.mr.miv¢m.

mhoopitlliud for Impurioda, tmtad
ratings.

Thuclmimlfwmwnmmmamof‘sumtypy,
mmmnmrSa-hu.s).mwrm.w Mrstomn

mmmofmmmdinmlmtadimduinvolutiaalpmis
WWWMMWDMN thrupyﬂtocpitaliud‘fom amt-

m,mmmmmumwwm.

�_-..‘._ i

It as

,.

m." ....

7.." ‘r».:-

—

-~~--

um»

7.“ ,

suggested that differences in paydxiatr-io treatnmxt

afloat a similar influence of social factors

along hospitals should

as noted for patimts within Hillside Hospital. To

ewtion it was

decided to

wloy the

Hillside study in three institutions

cm. lhmin'ger
Mental Health

mm

enter in

-

test this

procedures of the 195?

Hilleide Hospital, the
Hospital in Topeka and the Maoeadmoetta
Boston.

Those

with the expectation that diverse

available to population of

institutions

were selected

tnataent modalities

diffemt social classes.

were equally
Each provided

ohm—ten treatment of voluntary patients and did not provide
custodial care. Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory

staff

and active

march mite,

mixing

peydnomalytioallycoriented psychotherapy.
'Ihia study wm designed to detemine thepopulatim character-

ietioe of the three inetitutim with respect to social class. age,
echoatim and 1' some; lid to relate these dmmcteriatios to
treatment variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,
diamoeia and discharge evaluation

mg

the inetitutiom.

tvwrw— w

v

�w

J"-

-A.».—.

v

...v. m-uwwa. ... ,ur» In.‘,._(...._,..n .,.‘,.“___,‘

.-

warm—Mr...“

.

.VN....

.v-

, ‘ ,7...” .... ....

NM”, x..." ‘rwm'.tq'(1.'rm'“&gt;1ﬂr-r.ny\w ”rm—"w.“ﬁvn v..._

mu
Ammofmwlmtuy.am1tpaﬁmtsinmimin

mum
adminidnﬂonpitalslndvolmtuypaﬁmsmly,amnnmr

WWquuminmeylaso.

ofthoocatﬂuWMthﬁmethﬂﬂQmm

mimdbyﬁnmtsprsymcovalmﬁmormm
dadmionwimmicnmmitummfmdfwn
specifiampmjwt. Mmﬂmﬂmmmfmﬂu
studybocmofthcirmwmuy

3m.

mmimeIMwasmndformImtimtmm
mundu.‘

memmofdismdmimﬁ

mummmmmmmwmmcrma
1110M.

PornmofsoddclumﬂnﬂoWZ-fwtw

im-aWMsdemmmmim-mmd
of
Hillside,
at
patients
(3.“,7).
mist-d
M
MORWWDSKWWWWMmCmtw.
mmmmmﬂmofﬁnnmofﬂusml
The

W

173

mmmdmcmiabluwiﬂdnmmnimﬂmumnm
batman institutions. mu. maxim mm difficult. lunar,

MmeofvuMBquiffWWbem.

W
www.mmwymoepaymcvamm
diffimltiu were

most mined

These

in the intm-hospital

will be placid on the diffomw batman imtitutiau with citatim
difficulties also no to
o: mwmmmm

m
m.
mummfomdmfwm‘dau,mfhmdintbeubmbythé
'

vmpawmimsaploaigs.

‘

pvt—u u

�A.

WMCAL mums

M Rpm

ofthehoapitalis

r

studies from an. instituticn, tho

stmctm

fwmtedmdeimrimdorm~

tel-am

timed bﬂaﬂy. In suturing amenable data from nultiplc
institutimo, hmwr, the durum between institutions are
«mutated. R111- thele institutims were sol-cred as mental:

invading,

mom

and

Mt m.

unlﬂm in ways which inflummd the data

they

a! the

m

8m.

fmctimdly
Specific

Mt,
mutant «Item.

differences were manhunt in the deeimtim of type of

(lunatic mutants.

and

th- evaluation of

m
Raw
designating that a pationt miwd
of

1.

the

institutim,

making

01'

Mutant:

The

”1:”de

cum-rim difficult.

oxitcria for
diffemd mg

hazing-r Hospital psychoﬂmpy was duimatod as mutant
basis by a staff psychiatrist for
Want-d on a
At

Mum

mmpaﬁmtwudmmdafui Wwithapsyddmic
ruidunt physicim wen midst“ part a! rmtino mutmiw
paint an.

arm a

Hillsid- ibopitn payMampy was
mutant
main»! with a psychiatric mid-at. Staff poydmictrim did not
A1:

matplthnta,

mmmactivitiutowpoming

midmtphysicim.

Nomitimdfmwemmd.

W
mm
MW 3
At

tht

th- mtivity

Hum: Gutter pnyehothcrupy was

ofmy disciplines

--~-

We

�“am

&lt;

-v

u w“ -w “KN..." .... ,.. v... -.

.7

r,r.,,..-....r...m~

rm.“

\w‘wur-m

7.. ,

.mvmwvrwmw—w ”v, w... H r.

v.

-_.'wm.-_..r.,.“,...m_,,‘,,.._w_..,. ,,._r_~‘l.,,_.
w

mm,pydnlosisu.sochlm,nms
wwwwdzmsimmnmtmﬂmlyimmainm

mdmdioal students.

mt'smmmmmmummmm

Witmmmfwmofﬂuammminm
unmidmtplmidmmpmnibh farewells...

W:
Wm:
2.

and.

Indivichal imtitutimal

difficult.

At

diamtic styles

cums
WWtal

Whmlﬂphuvmmiwsmmdbytmmdw
and
music:we row
mum
diffmtuﬁmaym. Scwnlmwofdimm

W.
W

Wmmudinhbul,wmhmmsumutodmmm

thWmMﬂﬁWmhﬂmﬁm.

Mmmmamﬂmm.
3-

m
WW=WMW

mummmitmmwinrmmmm. m
WWatWpritnmtdpar-dtewitham
«31min: Max:111,

W011

and

syndm

W.

mmmimmmmmmmmmmam
difficult to assess the ammunim of cad:
it

tutor
ofﬁnlhminearsymﬂ'nblan). Pwﬁﬁss‘mdyﬂnmmw
rating

making

smmmmmmmmotwm
intimation.

m
A...

7w..

�,

.,__n..-. 7‘..-‘._._.‘._..-..W‘..v...‘ w...—,.,-v.,mx-,~_..V“-.."w.u

"Wm.”w r9.w‘_v

. .r,_..-——w.w

”w. ._»,.,.r,,

—

._.__ .m‘...-..v..‘~,.\"

»......—-....—-v—

"m..- w

w ——.~..

".V...», v...“ -

mmmmumoruummamum,m.m

mmmrmmmmmmuumm
in
III.

W

Table

I)

W
mattinmﬁaipuaddﬂfnmin
mm"

mommmmormmmmmw.

”Wm-pimﬁupwﬂaﬂmmpmuywm;

«mumm.mm;mnmmmmm

www.muymam.
b)

msnmmmdifminmdimibutim

ammumwmmm.

Wammmaﬂu‘dhm
_mmm.mmmummmamdm
«WWmmummmmnmmmm.
mulmmammummmmmw
3M.uuya2parmtdtmmidcmd23permtatﬂlmimr
c)

didmtm.

d)

Wswfminmdlstﬁbutimat

mmﬁnmifthSed-mmmd.

Fifty-em

mmtdmmmrmhlwm.mmy

oimtmmwimmofSOwabw-wmhlmfm
hum

InWt.

�,

”.7

.

v

Nv‘,—'

~

v

,

v... v.

‘v"

—.~,~.~..-m ”11"!“ “we

,-.. ~.&lt;..,

.._ ~--r“~..,—a,&lt;.»~mprv-.

—.

~~pw~mmmw-w~mn

m.” a...

j."

-r..-‘...,.1~.v»

nymI-rznu

at Hillside thirty-me per cent of the patients had 1" scores
30 while at WHO only twenty per mt mm belcw 30.
mus, differences in social

perfume: an the

below

clan, edumtional attaimxt

P Scale were observed.

and

These diffexemee permit

test of the hypotheses relating sociopsydsological factors to the
mam-at variables mg these institution.
2. gleam-1c Than-ant Variables
a

n) Selectim of

rm

uimifimtly

W:

Manna

the institutions,

patimts at Naming” Hmpitel 043*.) received
sciatic therapy than at Hillside (6%) or 11116 (68$) (Table IV).
1:)
V

Wm

at Hoegiteliznticn:

‘lhe

three insti—

tutims differed with mm: to patient's length of my (m1. IV).
Pedant: it Hlminw Mini was hospitalized lamest, with
65‘ cf patients mining far twelve month: or
mated to

m.

alparwrtofﬂnﬂillnidepatientsMmlySpercmtatthe

Pin-mm

Hentnl thalth Center. 'Ihe mdal stay of the Hillside

mmbetweeneemmdelmmﬁu while tm-thirds ofthe

WC patients were
a)

W
Evalutim:

diam
Diem

within six

In and!

petients were evaluated at the time of
(Table IV) . At
(191!)

thinger Hoapitel.

of patients wen rated

patimt

was

a

of hoapitelizatim.

mini, mot

dimmer-3e no

"iuprmd"

however, a higher percentage

“miwmved” and only a single

scared ”uncured" or “max iwmved." The

percentage of ”mounted" an "mm harmed" rating

him

(2810 and

the

�_

_

v.

“v

~_.v_..‘._.......p.r

"anv “:wu—"mw-nr

-17.": WNWV. ”.wuwwn mm My .-.._‘ n-wwn-y—wy ..~—r

7—

—-,__.y vwri'ai.W"YV-wwmrnw.

Mmportimofwumwd”(mt)wmfamdnmmuo

mwmmm.
W3
minimum:

W,

d)

nostic

For

satiation analysis
uffccdw

Mmmiamdpomuuntymnﬂabh

than:

diag—

diam,

IV). Trading-

Mamdmmmmmmm
mmmm.usum1ymmmenaiW
"Wmmrwmmhwdfwdw
centrist. at
paydmmia
WW1“).

disorder. In

and

memmdfwmﬂmﬁftypwmdm
W161.
c.

’

m

W.»
mmammmmmmmmmmf
”Alum

W.ﬁnﬂrhmpmiﬂwiﬂdnudaimﬁtuﬂm.mdm

mm m].- siu

(neural

mine

Maud:

had
was
(«or than than was) maimed significant intru-l’mpital mn-

pm.

Humor-.mmappomummtommmm

thou-lineman

MMmeMnWmm

ulwddefatWHo-piulwwwhiMF
accumumfmmuymaimwmm‘py).md
Pamalematlﬂlhide.

mamimmmm~

Wmmmnmnmmmmmmm
Wm~mwmmmfmetm.
mmmmmummtmmmmmm,

�asmmmndwamudummmbuwmmmmn

mummusotpmmmummmonomm
Mam.

W

m
DISCUSSIW

mmormmmymmnmcmm

mind significant inter-institutional cum in social
mwmofmum.mtmtm;indiatﬂbutimof

ammrsmammmmmormmmm

win~mmothosp1unudm.ahctimo£mmts

mammarmmamwmum
maul-mm“.
Hmpitnlatudy
WWmmmmr
(7).

marina-d. 'nuimtitutimmvingwmpatiom

mmmmmwmyummw
paydmdodimmdmmdiwﬂcm,a

�-rw .-,.

a...

h

-...

w

‘

purvm .. “.V

7—-..

w. tux—0.... V" - ,7". "7‘-.. -

"\‘w' . -. -h. -Vw—l m.—....‘——wn~.
V

.

m

.w._-—zu—«——~....'_~Wm,-

u...“

-10..

form
of
therapy.
mtic
mim
and the poorest discharge ratings mg the three institutims.
smmxy. the 1:31:in serving mg. class patients did have

Mr

proportion of patients

the shorter

pew

of

hoe:pi.t:eliaa1:i.tm,~

peydmmtic diamond, ad

lover proportions bf

the better discharge evaluations.

Itumiwmeimﬂmtmdﬂfeminpeydumc

W

durum

in staff ettitudes and
are related more to
lock]. alas variables than peydniatric differences in populetiom.

The

are

We
greet.

as

between

m the

mututime in dwetim 0f hapitaliutim
mucky of climatic foundations.

diam-rye evaluations. deﬂnitima of peydwthempy, and the

detail- md aunt of
differences

W

date. mm. these stylistic

idiosynmtic, they follow! a
social
related
to
diffemoes, aid ﬁnir'miemncy
mum
with emeoteticm laments e meter dependence on social class
may be

dismissed as

Wiedgad.
Sud! mulatim and metnnt variable

variables than outwardly

intemtive processes,
physicim and the

of

an

15th

determined both by

mum‘s

staff

relatimships are
the attitude of the

me! by

the

matellatim

or history which patients present. Such relationships
mined mat in than psychiatric conditions where diwtic

criteria are leeet specific,

a,an

fining diseases of Imam etiology

where objective

criteria de-

absent. as in schizophmie.

peyoimmuis, personality md beluvior

W.

Under these

�-

——-»~.—..

.

0 .

.... Twp...

-‘--

~vv-ul'~w

5" 1m -.——.rw~‘~_.r

“mp—m...“

"m”.

.

v~-_.v...‘.. ...

m

«um”www.m—mrwv.r.w-‘.,r-r.—,.m.~ Nut-aw..." I"-~nr~rl’-'

Irav’r VW'FV‘wW-Pf'lm‘"- ._

mmwpomwthainiguity.m¢oh«mr's

mmwmmmuwmumormm
classified“, «Md-claims.
osmium.

1:313:11»qu

chalydoamudbyl’umidc,mnitxmdhfm (6)1ntha1r
studyafmiatimiadimiuwithinasinghimtitutim.

'nuyobuzwdﬂutputiummimdatrmmdiffcmtm

admtdifhrintypoofmm,mitalm,e¢mim.
mermaid-non. Simiﬂcmtdiffcmasdidm,m,in

“demmicwvimﬁmmm
Mm

“wwwmmmmwm.
wtmmmmmmmmm.mumwm
wmmammotdimmmmmitmIofﬂn

W.
WWWofmmismdmniml

mmnnhmwmmfcmdmmimb
tutimmmﬂm. unmmmammaemm
mimic-insults. Farminlhmimmtdwiﬂxm

Wyudmdpcmlmmﬁngmmnknpcimpmmto

fwﬁnlamttiu,huﬂufmtpatiem$mdu

W.mm.mﬂupmatmtmulu.

Arm,inmt.miahismstimlmiwinduﬁninga

Wat.kmpaﬂmufwﬁndmtpoﬂw.Mhma

mmamWWme
Whhaatmammults.

�mmmotmmmmmmqmny
olmwﬂnmmtofmwutyofpopumamfw
dogmofilhmsmgmeimtimﬁms, these {Wand

We

«ﬂeet the mhtiva
efficacy of the institutions.
Simﬁncvalmﬁmsmbaudmtmmﬁmdm’sommﬁngs,

arm
Mfmmmofimmmmrﬁminmicpsyw-

we

mum that tho

rennet variaticm in the criteria

Mam“.
Inwinimlfiﬂhidoatudym)itmpoamhmthat

M
WWW.
mam criteria of

were

utilized {or

mom

of

Itwmsuggastedﬁmttmmmr

ﬂumm'asodubwmdﬁnmmlexﬂtheﬁaw
ployad.

with

mmmumlymmmmmtsm.

ﬂu cuff of ﬂaming-r ibupital min; a tripartite rating
Em

Wmmemmgdmmmmum.

mmmemmﬁngmmmmmmtiwamim
ﬁmnlmmbmd.itisourmumtmtorlmr

duapommwapttcumiwinnuumto

Wamfwﬁnpaﬁmt's mpmitytomm wrigmile

for uppor ulna panama the criteria aphasia: such mien intangiblmm”avnloping insight,"or"mﬂd.nng‘a pmbm."

mmmmmmmmmmmmu
ofwdnfminpaymem.mhmbemgruﬂy
mmwmmmmmormm_mumm.

�Midesmmwamedmﬂmllnad-nhip
mamamimmmmmwmmnucmuy
defined. But diffm in instituﬂmal style and: it diffimlt
toebtlincmpambhdata.

Mmdmisnmmmpmblm

Wiml
Wu
meofwdxinmcmm. memormm
of the

use of

statistics,

«Many in

W,mewmwlmnthm
umitwiainmmwalmmwmidmﬁﬂmimof

Whpopuladmmauhdecttomiwmmnum
institutions

m charly mm for staff attitudu md atyla

wmlluminmminpaﬁmrtwpumm.

Thu-o

difﬁmltiwalaouﬂndtoﬂnfdlmdscimﬂahmomﬂm

mmwmymmmmmMuMm-m.

mmmammmwmmmu.
mmmdﬁmmmuMqummm

hypotm. ﬂamofthcm”adﬁaophmnia"or”paydw-

W18” to explore chm in paydnologial and biological

futuresofmtdﬂlmnhulodmascimww

Manama oboewatimtobanpoma
Mmmwzoday,mmmthmmmtom

negatiw

malts.

paydkalc munitions

Manly fwamfm tut of the

be
must
paid, to the elusiﬁcutim
Imam
Music.
mum

m,
wmymmmmmmmmnﬂmm
of aubjwts by "abjectiw" criteria tamer than our present

the oodnpoydxologiml aspects of ﬁn unmist-padom:

Wm.

�v. ....,

A.

n.

‘v ....._.—ur————‘.v—.

muw ‘ «m Two—u..— -..—.—v. .r. vvn&lt;~&gt;ww~wmﬂ‘rmew~——uir—I .—~ .

am

WMWW

Was,
Mmmdrsm,mm1mammamntvaﬂablaoin

dufimd by social class, age,

Fopuluﬂm

on. ”may tanning hospitals.
typo of

mm.

W

variablas incluad

dmutim of hmpitulimtim, diagnosis md
diuduma evaluation. Imimtitmimal diffaranous mm
in mint nodal class, yum of
and distri-

m

mam

Monofculifmiufums,butmtsga.

Wins

Thu

tions

m

in

W

Gamma“ mg institu-

uimifioumly diffamt in the pmdictad dimctim.
The imtitutim sawing
class patients did have the longest
Minn of stay, a higher pmportim of paydxmam'otic diagnoses
and

W

m min:

diagnostic

am,

W,

a lower proportion of

diam

and the poorest
too-Mag mastic fans of
ratings can; tho
imtttutim. Similu‘ly, the

m

patina

imitutim

ummmmmdidmmmrpemcr

houpitulisutim, 1m proportion of psydxmamdc diagnoses,
and the
discharg- evaluations.

Wvariation
on
ma
mm
m
muss

with

W
mm

not

and

Such

dim, Wm
hum

institutimo

objwmdam is

in psychiatric practices followed u pattern
class &lt;11!qu mg thu momma.

as idiosyncratic.

in institutions! style make madam of
of houpitalizatim and treatment mats

{:1th

ma tea-nuts,

and the mad

for

m

«item m:- the classification: of psymiati'ic populu~

mind.

�REFERENCES

and
D.
J.
T.
Levinson,
Frenkel-Brunswik,
W.,
E.,
Adorno,
and
The
N.
R.
Harper
Authoritarian
Personality.
Sanford,
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

Hollingshead,
Mental

Inc.,

A. B. and

Illness:

Redlich, F.

C.

Community Study.
New York, 1958, 442 pp.
A

Social Class and

John Wiley and Sons,

M.
M.
and
Social Factors in
Fink,
Pollack,
L.,
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.

Kahn, R.

J. Hillside Hosp.,

1957, 6: 216—228.

M.
M.
and
Sociopsychologic
Fink,
Pollack,
L.,
Mental
in
Treatments
a
Voluntary
of
Psychiatric
Aspects
and
Ratings
of
Discharge
Duration
Hospitalization,
Hospital:
Diagnosis. Argh, Gen Psyghia§., 1959, A; 565-574.

Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

M.

and Fink, M.

Social Attitude

(Ca1—

Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J4_Nexy&amp;_mgntg_ﬂls,,

1960, 1395 187—192.

.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
116:
127-132.
1959,
Ameza_J‘_£a¥£hiat.,
Hospital.

7. Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191-196.

�TABLE

I

Redesiggation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality
Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved

______.____——————-———

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission

Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Unimproved

�TABLE

Interhosgital

Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Hillside

Menninger

Hospital

Hospital

N

Class

WM”

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

IllllﬂiilllllllIIIIEEEEHIIIIIIIIIIIIﬂﬂZﬂIIIIIIII

I

Social

III

31%

7%

3%

II

51

20

28

III

17

34

13

H

IV

1

34

28

V

0

5

28

”'1‘"
"

x2 = 121.5; df=8: p&lt;{.001

,,_-_1_A_s-__1.______
19%

20— 39

=3. 9;

Years of

Educatio

&lt;12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

--—--—-—
x2 =

F

Score

df= 4; p=n. s.

=

9.7; df=4; p&lt;.05
§3z

20%

50

38

17

42

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Variables
Treatment
in
Differences
InterhOSpital
EMBnninger

Hospital

Treatment

Psychotherapy

21%

36%

24%

Somatic

43

64

68

Other

36

-—

8

x2

Duration
.

0?
HOSpltal—

lzat1°n

Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

IlﬁﬂﬂﬂﬂllllIIIlﬂEﬂIIIIIIIIZIIIIIII

N

Type of

Hillside

=

82.8- df=4

-m**
7

months

7-11 months

'

.11 months

22%

27%

67%

13

42

27

65

31

5

Discharge Improved
Evaluation

nimproved

X

=

29.3' df=4' -&lt;.001

85

54%

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis

17

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder

29
X

=

23.8' df=4‘ -&lt;.001

�Duration of HOSpitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30—39

61

3O

40—49

3O

20

50+

36

MMHC

l4

�AMA SPECIALTY JOURNALS

'

'
lC

'

Am 6 r1 C a n M e d al A S S O C l at] O n
535 NORTH DEARBORN STREET

-

'

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60610

wa—

AREA CODE 312

527-1500

910-221-0300

November

2 , 19 65

Archives of Dermatology
.
um 0
an i:Chialldr:n
Sinse;ses
Archives Of
Envir nrnent al Heal I h
.°
Archives °f
General Psychiatry

Archives of
internal Medicine
Archives of Neurology
Archives of Ophthalmology
Arc ives o ‘0‘ o l a ‘V n g o ‘ o 3’
"_
Arcthes of Pathology
A'c h'was ° f S“ '3 eW

JOHN H. TALEOTT, MD, DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

ROBERT W. MAYO, EXECUTIVE MANAGING EDITOR
NORMAN

D. RICHEY,

MANAGING EDITOR

Fink , MD
Department of Psychiatry
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
University of Missouri
5400 Arsenal St.
St. Louis, Mo. 63139

Max

Dear Doctor Fink:

edited copy of your manuscript entitled, ”SociopsychoA
Treatment:
of
Aspects
Report of
Psychiatric
logical
Treatments in Three voluntary Hospitals,” is enclosed for
your final checking and approval. Also enclosed is a layout that shows placement of title, copy, and illustrations.
Please indicate any necessary changes in a covering letter
rather than on the edited typescript. we will be responsible for checking your material against proofs.

An

manuscript has been edited according to present AMA
style. For example, most abbreviations appear without
periods.

The

are currently striving for brevity in article titles. If
the modified title of your paper is not satisfactory, please \/
supply another that will fit into two lines of no more than
40 characters and Spaces each.

we

L
,ZU

Chi,
for reprint purposes, the one

Is address at end of article,
you will be using on a relatively long-termlaasis?

1

Specialty Journals publish acknowledgments only to personsbﬁ1p
P
have
aided
in
that
a
a
study
or organizations
major way, as,
for example, by supplying drugs or funds, making statistical
analyses, or doing pathological studies.

AMA

references have been renumbered to conform to our rule
requiring numerically consecutive citation.

Your

�Fink,
St. Louis,

Max

MD

-2-

Mo.

11/2/65

According to our calculations,the paper will occupy 6 printed
pages. Please note that any new material you may wish to
submit at this time will be acceptable only if it can be
compensated for by deletion of an equal amount of copy now

included.

have retyped the references so that an accurate copy estimate could be made. Although we have reread the typescript, we request that you also check for any errors of
omissions that may have slipped through.

we

correction and return of your typescript will help us
get it into print as fast as possible. Please return it,
along with the layout, in the enclosed self-addressed envelope no later than November 9. For your convenience we
are also enclosing a reprint order form with the correct
number of pages indicated.
Prompt

Yours very

amh

,

udith

M.

truly,

Kiolbassa

�.

"luau—“new .-

,

.

H-

MW.

-1

~

»~v

-

we. w

re

,-_....‘--—-~~w—~- «V...

WP

v,“

mm“- "WWW.

w.

1“.

-

-..

.. .

5. 1965

Judith H. Kiolbesse
Mariam Medical Association
535 North Deerbom Street
Chicago,

Illinois

60610

Dear ﬂies Kiolbesse:

Myouwrymdafcrymmletterofﬂovemrz. I
shelltrytomreechitenineeqmnoe.
The article title is satisfactory, elthcugh I think the
"A

Mt

sub-heed should reed
in Three Voluntary
Report of
Hospitals.“ 'me word "treetlsents" end "treetsent" are probably

interminable, but in this inetmoe, I think the singular

{on is preferable.

However, both eve acceptable.

While the address at the end of the erticle is one that
will be used for e lmg~tem basis, I would prefer that you
and that is the Depertnmt of
change this for Dr.
Psychiatry. University of axioego. Chicago, Illinois.

m.

edmouledgmt included the name of Dr. Max Pollack.
In ell the studies done at Hillside, Dr. Pollack was e coper'tioipmt. In this study he was one of the three people
she visited eech of the institutions. Hmever, in writing
this report, there were some disagreements as to the omclusims,
mdheelectednottobeeoo—euthoroftheetudy. Hy
essccietes and I. wild, however, like to indicate his
assistance, and for this meson, I think a statusent, "me
cooperation of Dr. Mex Polleok is gratefully edmwledged"
“me

would be

appropriate.

met.

numbered refermces are
I m assuming
thet the Jamel limits the timer of authors to three, and
The

metthieisthereesmmythatintwooftheoitetions
the co~euthore are omitted. If this is not e gmerel rule,

perhaps in this instance the oo—wthcrs could be

listed.

page la, in addition to the notation regarding the coopemtim
of Dr. Pollack, would you please damage the address of Dr. Kern
from Hontifiore Hospitel to: Department of Psychiatry, University
of Omicego, Chicago, Illinois.
On

.uw

vs.— ‘ =. 2.. .: “may.“

.

.,..

�Miss Kiolbassa

-2-

Also, the dates 1959-1952 , which follow the statement donoeming
the origin of the study, are immutable by themelvee. In our
original report, we used the sentence, "his study was dorm when
the authors were associated at the Department of Experimental
Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital. 19594962." If 30m full sentence

ofﬂuiekindionottobeinoluded,thmlwmldouggestthat
the dates 1959-1982 be omitted.

I

have read the

text carefully,

and

find two small corrections

midxlhavemked. mm2,naarﬁmbotton, theoomotimo
putaolashlinethmwﬁthemwerS, mdthiemaybemolmto
1’
the printer.

It

should read "the California

Scale. 03,5)

page 10, mfemoe 7 should be number 6, and
mmked this copy.
cm

I

have so

is a table. and them is a symbol which I do not
mderatmd. In the first oolm."omplete remission"is aplit
with a synbol mien to me would indicate that the word “mission”
should be under "ooeplete." If that is so, this may be molear.
I do not know how this will be not, but ”oanplete minim,"
"amicedly homo," "mdemtely normed” are each word pairs
that should not be split. If this is too long for the oolmn,
than I hope you will indicate féthat "markedly mmved” fit
Page 19

together by appropriate spacing.

Tﬁis is the first time that I have had the opportunity to
edit a mmxmoz-ipt in this fashion, and I must say that I found

it quite helpful.
opportunity toworkwithyou, andI
Myouforthe
look forward to the final results.
Sincerely yours .

Pink, NJ).
Professor of Psychiatry

Max
HP :

in

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�~

This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks, L.I. New York, 19591-1962.

cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial
"
is
acknowledged.
Hospital
gratefully
The

.

‘

Aided, in part, by grants My-2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

**

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine,-University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�In their studies of the New Haven psychiatric patient pop—
ulation, Hollingshead and Redlich hast reported significant relation—
ships between an individual's position in the social class structure
.and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excluded.

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to paye In anr
thsae surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birtho These older, less educated patients were predominantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratings, In contrast, younger, native born/aim?
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingsa
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i.eo, greater stereotypy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosisf
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recoveredo
in-ehe-survey—rEpUTtEd-hETE)[it was suggested that dif—
"’4”“’A“'
ferencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for iht patients within Hillside
Hospitala To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the pro—
cedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -¢ Hillside
HosPital, the C. Fo Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston, These institutions were
selected with the Fr:ec£3£ipn that hing-had diverse treatment modalities h’&amp;Y‘
available,;d££:eoi¥ed-paeients
of different social classeso
equally
Each provided short—term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care, Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapyo
This study was designed to determine the population characteristics of the three institutions with respect to social class, age,
education and F score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutions,

�_2_
METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside HOSpitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo-

phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
status? The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2-factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutionso These comparisons were difficult/however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intraehospital comparisons/.and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra-institutional
trendso These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which—ie-reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
The

sizes,

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

repgfting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital guanine taken for granted and either ignored or mentioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institu~
tions, however, the.mnny;differences between institutions are accen—
tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific differences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcomeo
When

l. Designation of Type of Treatment: The criteria for
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy" differed among
the institutions, making comparisons difficult,
At Menninger

Hospital psychotherapy

was designated as
basis by a staff psychia-

treatment administered on a prescription
trist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the ‘2
psychiatric residentﬁyere considered part of routine administrative
patient care.
fkysa4.¢

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident, Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicianso No additional fees were chargedo
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy
was designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students,
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychowas necessary for members of the study team to interview
therapy

it

the residentgresponsible for each case.
fkjsKJAu

Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric
Association, while both Hillside and MMHC followed different unitary
systems, Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono
2°

Diagnosis:

�Table I

Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of improvement at the three hosPitals varied in format and detaily The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep—
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)o For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other
30

institutionsa

Table

Q

M’s

_———"’

Inter-hos ital
&lt;:; B.ﬁ~~,»n--__
"M..-

{§_‘

10

The

Com

II

arisonSN

Sociopsychological Variables

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observed, At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
/AE Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—”
cational attainment, with patients having more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduateo
0) Education:

The

Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fiftynone per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per—
cent with scores of 50 or above -- the higher F scores being associated with higher degrees of stereotypy, In contrast, at Hillside
thirty-one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 30.
d)

F

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainment and performance on the F Scale were observed, These diff—
erences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables

\“"2.

among

these institutions.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables

a) Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received

somatic therapy than at Hillside
b) Duration of

(64%)

or

MMHC

Hospitalization:

(68%)

(Table IV),

three insti—
tutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)o
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two-thirds of the
MMHC patients were discharged within six months of
hospitalization.
The

c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV), At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved" and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"o The highest
percentage of "recovered" or ”much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centerm

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diagdisorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one—quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty perncent of the
populationo
zx

Table IV

‘“

CLJLRS

."”

C: Intra—Hos

s-‘wa.

~~

r“

e~

ital

Com

arisons

‘h53

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital com—
parisons, However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillside. Length of hospitalization and chronological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periodst
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year,
The

Table

V

�DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter-institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment var—
iables -- duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7)“
swudy
Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospitauﬁﬁ;;:’
confirmed. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.
The

It is

our impression that these differences in psychiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populationso The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data. While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow
a pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged,

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, Egg}, where objective criteria defining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disordersq Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residence. Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications

among

the

three wards and among three administrators on one ward“ As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the

examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one institution to another, Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results.
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment results,
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutionso
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi-

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social backgroundc It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—
ployedo This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
In our

"developing insight," or "working through one's problems."
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined, But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapieso The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hos—
pitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationso
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the orig—
inal hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the socio—
psychological aspects of the therapist-patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in—
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation, Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distri—
bution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionse
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the Shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the in—
stitutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
Such differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric populations is emphasizedo
These

�REFERENCES

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel—Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.

Sanford, R. N. The Authoritarian Personality.
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

Illness:

New

Redlich, F.
Community Study.

A. B. and
A

C.

J.

and
Harper and

Social Class and

John Wiley and Sons,

York, 1958, 442 pp.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216-228.

Kahn, R.

.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization,
Diagnosis. Arch, Gen Psychia;., 1959,
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

M.

and Fink,

M.

Sociopsychologic
Voluntary Mental
Discharge Ratings and
1; 565—574.

Social Attitude (Cal-

Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. 14_lkuahhlkuxLL_Disu,

1960, llQ: 187—192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orien—
tation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. AmeIa_J4_E£¥£hiaL., 1959, 116: 127-132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, 1Q; 191-196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality
Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile.Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

III

InterhosEital Comparisons for Sociopsxchological Variables
Menninger

Hospital
I

Class

31%

7777 7 7

7%

II

51

20

III

17

34

IV

1

V

O

34

.

5

l|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x2

77

Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health

IIIIIﬂBiﬂIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIII

N

Social

Hillside

7 7N7 777—777
7

=

121.5; df=8: p’{.001

7m__-—

-77777777—77

20 39

Years of

Educatio

&lt;12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
iMenninger

Hospital

Treatment

Psychotherapy

36%

21%

Somatic

Other

um—
=82 8'

N

Duration
0?

Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

IIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIKIIIDIIIHIIIIIIJJIIIIII

N

Type of

Hillside

7

months

7—11

months

Hospitallzat1°n .11 months

df= 4

.

.001

Z

'

A

70

13

42

27

65

31

5

52%

54%

22

17

26

29

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
Unimproved

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder
X

=

23.8' df=4' -&lt;.001

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20—29

73

36

30-39

61

3O

40—49

3O

20

50+

36

MMHC

l4

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

‘Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�:0".

mm»... can“ b. awn-u a mi: “tum-Ma
in
a
M an“ ”MI "in“ am:
tm‘nt It“ ”mm
van-mm
pap-nun
”humbly!
m trams
m
um
to
but!
up»: u “mun" pram-I. «Wu!
h
by
no
“at:
m
pints“:
m
“um. a
n
manna"
u. wanna» .1 Wm at hum: mu 1 ”tint
up mm“. In! mumm- Irin h nut mm in

m

than

Mm

m.

pmmuu

I!"
”not“
Mt
“am“:
Mm

hut with, $1334, than “I “scan" uﬁnu «ﬂung
«In». or knu- uum Mum-mt an that. a n

W“
mchm“ ”than”2le
at

numb”,

nnﬂnn.
“than” an

and

«mutton o:

a“
nun»’M“”
a:

citation!

«yuan-n tum
v3.01:
2»
a» mu
pmmuu «a «mausuun. In.
an
ﬂatly Imam“ hr tun-much, an“: and um (7) u

that it“: of «than: as “was: um: a am. in“.
huh. 3.; than“ it“. ”mm mum}! animal! to
551’:an
an m mm in m. t: await», mm:
sum, man, an 0:
awn-mt «um-«m

m

mm.

m
m
mthmulnhhiutmummd. u “unawaI“ am, bum,
11:01:

«In “no

in

“and“

it.

and. as!

“St-rm mu tub-rut 1: m ywmﬂn.

�SociopsydholOgical Aspects of

Psydhiatrie Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

;R0berrt L,

.lﬁahn,

1311313332!

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

‘—
NEIIIIiiiiIIiE§E¥§

�-7-

’4‘,

DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter—institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment variables -— duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations {7},
The

Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmeda The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionsc
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.

It is

our impression that these differences in psychiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populationso The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded datae While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow

pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged.
a

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, i;gf, where objective criteria de—
fining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disorderso Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residence. Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2914">
                <text>Sociopsychological aspects of psychiatric treatment in three voluntary hospitals. A.M.A. Arch Gen Psychiat. 14:20-5.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2915">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2916">
                <text>mfp-02-01-004-59b-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2917">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2918">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Siegel, Nathaniel</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2919">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2920">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2921">
                <text>Reprint, [preprint], drafts, letters, review board postcard, </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2922">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2923">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74494">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81055">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87616">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94177">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
